HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015 08 10 Regular 601 Magnolia Park Cost ReductionsCOMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM 601
Informational
Consent
Public Hearings
Regular
X
August 10, 2015 KS KL
Regular Meeting City Manager Department
REQUEST:
Public Works Department Requesting the City Commission Review and Consider the
Proposed Cost Saving Alternatives for the Magnolia Park Amphitheater Project.
SYNOPSIS:
The agenda item is needed for the City Commission to consider potential cost saving
measures to reduce the estimated construction costs below the budget for the Magnolia Park
Amphitheater project.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The City Commission directed staff at the March 23, 2015 Commission meeting to bring
back potential cost saving alternatives for the Commission to consider. Staff engaged the
architect of record for the project, Bill Starmer of Starmer Design Group, to evaluate any
and all opportunities to reduce the estimated construction costs for the project. The
resulting Magnolia Park Amphitheater Potential Cost Savings letter report is included as
Attachment No. 1.
The estimated cost for the amphitheater project was $1,112,975 when the design was
completed in 2010. The estimate was updated in January of 2015 with the anticipation
that the project was potentially moving forward in 2015. The January 2015 estimated
construction costs were $1,463,874. When the $106,000 land acquisition costs are added in,
the total project cost estimate is $1.57M which is about $350,000 over the $1,219,000
budgeted. Copies of the January 2015 estimates are included as Attachment No. 2.
A detailed breakdown of the 15 cost savings opportunities totaling over $400,000 have been
Regular 601 PAGE 1 OF 2 - August 10, 2015
identified and are included in the letter report. Mr. Starmer will be covering each of these
savings opportunities to determine which the Commission would like to implement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no cost to this agenda item. The project fund (1999 Construction Capital Project
fund) is projected to have $1.2M available for land acquisition ($106K) and construction.
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission,
City Manager, City Attorney /Staff, and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and
the City's Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the
respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals
noted above, and which is also available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's
Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have
requested Agendas /Agenda Item information, Homeowner's Associations/Representatives
on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This
information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional
copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the
City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff
is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested
individuals.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Commission review the cost reduction alternatives provided and
direct staff to bring back a design proposal from Starmer Design Group to modify the
Magnolia Park Amphitheater Construction Drawings and Specifications incorporating the
selected cost reduction alternatives.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Starmer Design Group Cost Savings Report and Estimate (3 pages)
2. January 2015 Cost Estimate (1 pages)
3. Engineering plans and Renderings (4 pages)
Regular 601 PAGE 2 OF 2 - August 10, 2015
901 Belle Avenue St 1 100
WinterSprings, Florida
32708
407 977 1080
AA0002984
bstarmer@starmerdg. com
Attachment No. 1
design group
Planning and Architecture LLC AA0002984
12 Jun 15
Kipton Lockcuff P.E.
Director of Utilities and Public Works
City of Winter Springs
1126 East SR 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
Re: Magnolia Park - Amphitheatre
Cost Savings Report
Please accept this report as our written opinion of construction value for the above
referenced project and our opinion of cost saving value based on the results of our
recent staff meeting.
History
Starmer Design Group completed the design of the amphitheatre in June of 2010 at a
projected construction cost of $ 1,112,974 but the project was placed on hold due to a
land swap negotiation with the State of Florida for a minor piece of land in the rails to
trails right of way.
In January of 2015 we were asked to look at the project and update the probable
construction value based on current construction costs and we submitted a revised
projected construction cost of $ 1,463,874.
In early April of this year we met with City staff to explore numerous cost saving ideas to
bring the overall project cost down so that staff could prepare a recommendation to
City Council should they choose to proceed with the project.
This report represents our professional opinion of construction value for several cost
saving options.
Methodology
sdg reviewed several options and this report is a detailed summary of the tasks taken to
evaluate potential cost savings:
1. Work session with staff to understand current goals and objectives for the
amphitheatre
2. Review of existing drawings and specifications
3. Discussions with all design staff including civil, structural, mechanical, and electrical
engineers as well as landscape architect to review costs and current code
requirements
4. Contact with several key material suppliers and vendors to verify current pricing
trends
5. A second meeting with staff on 1 Jun 15 to arrive at a consensus of opinion on best
cost saving options.
Executive Summary
Original opinion of construction value Jun 2010 $ 1,112,974 (page 3)
Updated opinion of construction value Jan 2015 $ 1,463,874 (page 4)
Revised opinion of construction value based on
selected cost saving options $ 996,349 (page 5)
Recommendation
In our opinion the City could Move forward with the project and keep the construction
costs below $ 1,000,000 with the savings identified herein.
As you know we are in a volatile construction market and if the City chooses to move
forward we recommend that we add a deductive bid alternate using a standing seam
roof in lieu of the translucent panel should costs come in higher than expected.
We trust this report will be well received and we look forward to helping you make this
project a great success.
Regards
Wm E Starmer AIA NCARB
President
City of Winter Springs Magnolia Park Amphitheatre
Opinion of Construction Value 2015 Update with june 2015 cost saving revisions
Line
Description
unit
quantity
unit cost
subtotal
totals
savings description
savings amount
new totals
1
Site
2
clear grub rough grade
ac
0.8
10000
$ 8,000
3
entry gates
ea
2
5500
$ 11,000
omit entry gates
$ 11,000
4
drainage
allowance
1
25000
$ 25,000
5
water service
allowance
1
7500
$ 7,500
6
sewer service
allowance
1
220001
$ 22,000
7
electrical service
allowance
1
15000
$ 15,000
8
site lighting
ea
8
5000
$ 40,000
reduce site lighting 50%
$ 20,000
9
landscaping
allowance
1
120000
$ 120,000
reduce landscape 50 %
$ 60,000
10
irrigation
allowance
1
11000
$ 11,000
reduce irrigation 50%
$ 5,500
11
signage
allowance
1
5,000
$ 5,000
reduce sign age
$ 2,000
12
subtotal
$ 264,500
$ 98,500
$ 166,000
13
Seating / Hardscape
14
paver walkway
sf
5000
14
$ 70,000
reduce square footage
$ 17,248
15
conc ribbon curb
cy
68
350
$ 23,800
reduce lineal footage
$ 5,712
16
conc seating slab
cy
34
320
$ 10,880
17
seats
ea
240
185
$ 44,400
use portable seating
$ 37,200
18
subtotal
$ 149,080
$ 60,160
$ 88,920
19
Building
20
conc foundation
cy
52
280
$ 14,560
omit one ramp
$ 10,000
21
conc slab
cy
40
320
$ 12,800
22
conc tie beam
cy
22
320
$ 7,040
23
conc filled cel
cy
18
320
$ 5,760
24
cmu
sf
6400
12
$ 76,800
25
brick
sf
5300
12
$ 63,600
26
stucco
sf
2500
3
$ 7,500
27
aluminum roof structure
sf
2680
64
$ 171,520
simplify
$ 80,000
28
aluminum trellis
sf
1216
45
$ 54,720
reduce by 50%
$ 27,000
29
aluminum railings
If
250
115
$ 28,750
reduce by 50 %
$ 14,000
30
metal roof framing
sf
490
20
$ 9,800
31
misc metal connections
allowance
1
4000
$ 4,000
32
membrane roofing
sf
490
22
$ 10,780
33
doors and hardware
ea
6
1200
$ 7,200
34
translucent roof
Is
2680
56
$ 150,080
simplify
$ 30,000
35
painting
allowance
1
15000
$ 15,000
36
ceramic wall tile
sf
1560
12
$ 18,720
37
ceramic floor tile
sf
520
12
$ 6,240
38
plumbing
ea
2500
13
$ 32,500
39
toilet accessories
ea
18
150
$ 2,700
40
mechanical
sf
2200
5
$ 11,000
411
electrical
sf
2200
22
$ 48,400
42
sound system
allowance
1
85000
$ 85,000
omit sound system
$ 80,000
43
theatrical lighting
allowance
11
280001
$ 28,000
reduce lighting
$ 20,000
44
subtotal
$ 872,470
$ 261,000
$ 611,470
45
Base Bid Total Construction
Costs
$ 1,286,050
$ 866,390
46
Fees and Permits 10%
$ 128,605
$ 86,639
47
Contingency 8%
$ 96,454
reduce to 5%
5%
$ 43,320
481
Base Bid Project Costs
$ 1,511,109
1 $ 996,349
Attachment No. 2
City of Winter Springs Magnolia Park Amphitheatre
Opinion of Construction Value 2015 Update 16- Jan -15
Line
Description
unit
quantity
unit cost
subtotal
1
Site
2
clear grub rough grade
ac
0.8
10000
$ 8,000
3
entry gates
ea
2
5500
$ 11,000
4
drainage
allowance
1
25000
$ 25,000
5
water service
allowance
1
7500
$ 7,500
6
sewer service
allowance
1
22000
$ 22,000
7
electrical service
allowance
1
15000
$ 15,000
8
site lighting
ea
8
5000
$ 40,000
9landscaping
allowance
1
120000
$ 120,000
10
irrigation
allowance
1
11000
$ 11,000
11
signage
allowance
1
5,000
$ 5,000
12
subtotal
$ 264,500
13
Seating / Hardscape
14
paver walkway
sf
5000
14
$ 70,000
15
conc ribbon curb
cy
68
350
$ 23,800
16
conc seating slab
cy
34
320
$ 10,880
17
seats
ea
240
185
$ 44,400
18
subtotal
$ 149,080
19
Building
20
conc foundation
cy
52
280
$ 14,560
21
conc slab
cy
40
320
$ 12,800
22
conc tie beam
cy
22
320
$ 7,040
23
conc filled cel
cy
18
320
$ 5,760
24
cmu
sf
6400
12
$ 76,800
25
brick
sf
5300
12
$ 63,600
26
stucco
sf
2500
3
$ 7,500
27
aluminum roof sturcture
sf
2680
60
$ 160,800
28
aluminum trellis
sf
1216
45
$ 54,720
29
aluminum railings
If
250
115
$ 28,750
30
metal roof framing
sf
490
20
$ 9,800
31
misc metal connections
allowance
1
4000
$ 4,000
32
roofing
sf
490
22
$ 10,780
33
doors and hardware
ea
6
1200
$ 7,200
34
translucent roof
Is
2680
45
$ 120,600
35
painting
allowance
1
15000
$ 15,000
36
ceramic wall tile
sf
1560
12
$ 18,720
37
ceramic floor tile
sf
520
12
$ 6,240
38
plumbing
ea
2500
13
$ 32,500
39
toilet accessories
ea
18
150
$ 2,700
40
mechanical
sf
2200
5
$ 11,000
41
electrical
sf
2200
22
$ 48,400
42
sound system
allowance
1
85000
$ 85,000
43
theatrical lighting
allowance
1
28000
$ 28,000
44
subtotal
$ 832,270
45
Base Bid Total Construction Costs
$ 1,245,850
46
Fees and Permits 10%
$ 124,585
47
Contingency 8%
$ 93,439
48
Base Bid Project Costs
$ 1,463,874
PROPERTY NAME:
MAGNOLIA PARK AMPHITHEATER
434 SR W
MINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
O'AtFR NAME:
CITY OF YANTER SPRINGS
PARCEL D:
26- 20- 30- 5AR- OAGO -006C
TAI DM INICT,
W1- MINTER SPRINGS
CONC. RIBBON
CURB MP.) -
DOSING BUILDING STORK
N/A
PROPOSED BUILDING STORY:
1 -STORY
PROPDDIY
T -C TOM CENTER DISTRICT
nib
T -C TOMN CENTER DISTRICT
TOTAL STE AREk'
27,930.60 SF (0.6412 AC)
W
F.A.R. [FLOOR AREA RATNA
1,169.48 SF/ 27,930.60 SF (0.6412 AC) = 0.04
CONSTRUCTION IYPE-
TYPE AB
MAI6MAAN BUILDING HEIGHT:
55 0'
SOTS TYPE:
MAP UNIT MAP UNIT NAME S OF SLOPE
SYMEKX
29 St. Johns and
Ea0.1is fine sands -
1 � j
5, (,
) 1
) ca_
1
SGT .P^ (�
183775) \
\
�1
DES
7
IK 1
NORTH
T -C TOMN CENTER DISTRICT
EAST
T -C TOMN CENTER DISTRICT
SOUTH
T -C TOMN CENTER DISTRICT
VEST
T -C TOM CENTER DISTRICT
SURROUNDING ZONING:
GEOGRAPHIC CODE
LOCATION
.Q
NORTH
T -C TOWN CENTER DISTRICT
EAST
T -C TOWN CENTER DISTRICT
SOUTH
T -C TOWN CENTER DISTRICT
VEST
- TUSCAYALLA ROAD
POINT OF BEGINNING
PARCEL I —
_ BE�NCHM_A_RK
ate' [c. wpb (team)
TUSKAWILLA ROAD
F— 1:-Y aeavne+ Ary ,'
(az _
SITE DATA g AC % OF PARCEL
OEM
PERVIOUS 27,930.60 0.64 100.00
PROPOSED
IMPERVIOUS 3,797,37 0.32 49.40
PERVIUS 14,13323 0.32 50.60
TOTAL 97E AREA 27,930.60 064 100.00
J
PAVER CURB U".) ✓"`�
WALKS
PAVER
z
PAYER
$AVRR PAVER
WALES
W ft„Y
ih'ALRWAY wr:
❑ t�'_'.
S
I
f STABILIZED FIRE
CONCRETE
RAM➢
.Q
STAGE
F.F 3675
E) ❑
�w's5i
CONCRETE
4 ACCESS ROAD
PAVER-
�"`' --- _ - IYIG OR.-
'.r""r'
WAIL
GRAPHIC SCALE
t mmw wn )R r,
=t=p Klima
y Weeks
_11.11
t'21SCl. C.L 11
E- -- iARK
-- — - ✓
RE (EZ7 !"
iIII
if
j1 t` TUSPAWILLA ROAD
1 ;Faa ea a>ti r_r r ua4
i
-- R �W
9 f
\ STABD.IZEDFIRE
\ ACCESS ROAD /
a.
CN'.1
�-�, r
F- w
j' ®ao awwmsn.r,uno
soww
amaz
C3.1
100% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 0710112009
t 1_4
SET ID�
L93778'
BENCHMARK
REQ
LA
LEGEND
POINT OF BEGINNING SET ma
PARCEL I
LWn50FC%WM=0N
Klima
�EH KEYNOTES Weeks
�C
MR
,..Weeks
TUSKAWILLA ROAD
O.—Y —) NOT TANCENT
WNW
— I A
- ---------------
7 Ma
LIJ
T 0.0 It 0
IV
wea
< W
n �_ Lr-
-A, L_J
IAGE V. LLI E-3
180 <
TUSKAWILIA ROAD d 3k -
<2w
Z
2 < CD
DOT
aq
C
14 -711�._�
.1m
C5.1
100% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 0710112009 -
-----------
L
r
f EA
GRAPHIC SCALE
WEIR SECTIONS
Krs
LEGEND
POINT OF BEGINNING SET ma
PARCEL I
LWn50FC%WM=0N
Klima
�EH KEYNOTES Weeks
�C
MR
,..Weeks
TUSKAWILLA ROAD
O.—Y —) NOT TANCENT
WNW
— I A
- ---------------
7 Ma
LIJ
T 0.0 It 0
IV
wea
< W
n �_ Lr-
-A, L_J
IAGE V. LLI E-3
180 <
TUSKAWILIA ROAD d 3k -
<2w
Z
2 < CD
DOT
aq
C
14 -711�._�
.1m
C5.1
100% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 0710112009 -
Ana �n.arta
LL
U,
< L
m M'-' L L
0 9 a
C�
z
C) CL a
LL
R1.0
E
2 FIRSTFLOOR PLAN
A ACHE 1b-�1ff A
v
FAMILY ® T[c
G1RE0 PO-H
/ �
BEMs ttPJ
1® EItT SIGN
- - --
CIL-
P
CUSi. 0
PLAN - FIRST FLOOR
%7�LIFE SAFETY
0
E
TIP, , RE EM Nw s r+ECessED cAewE, -
FRONDE D BT LF C M ONTRACTOR
DRESSING DRESSING
I
PRIMARY EGRE%
I �
-
V
-- --
)4_.x COMMON PATH CF TRAVEL LIMITS
n��R«ft OISrM1cE a 4aa' -m'
STAGE
0
E
2 FIRSTFLOOR PLAN
A ACHE 1b-�1ff A
v
No.; I.A. SEE SHEET OF
FOR EMERGENCY LIGHTING
LEGEND
G1RE0 PO-H
/ �
BEMs ttPJ
1® EItT SIGN
5VE
ZttP.OF
�
IREW 9 rtYPI
PcLTCA
E NAZI HER I CABINET - PRPADED BT
® FI'--1
PLAN - FIRST FLOOR
%7�LIFE SAFETY
E
TIP, , RE EM Nw s r+ECessED cAewE, -
FRONDE D BT LF C M ONTRACTOR
A AC.YE llFIff
PRIMARY EGRE%
)4_.x COMMON PATH CF TRAVEL LIMITS
E
2 FIRSTFLOOR PLAN
A ACHE 1b-�1ff A
v
I. REFER TO SHEET A0.0 FOR ALL
GENERAL NOTES, 51'MBOLb e
WALL TYPES
2, REFER TO SHEET A51 FOR DOOR
SCHEDULES AND SHEET A81 FOR
DETAILS,
3, ALL DIMENEION5 ARE MASONRY
TO MASONRY FACE OF STUD TO
FACE OF STUD,
4. ALL LONG SHALL HAVE COMP,
STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI AT 28
DAY5
5. ALLOWABLE SOIL BRA. RRE55URE
SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE 2000
RSF.
5. CONTRACTOR 5HALL PROVIDE
SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERED
SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL ALUMINUM
FRAMING, CONNECTIONS AND
FASTENERS,
1, ALL HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAIL5 SHALL BE
DESIGNED TO MEET ALL CDOE LOADIW
REQUIREMENTS
8, ALL TRELLI5 FRAMING 54ALL BE PAINTED
BLACK BAKED ENAMEL,
E ALL ALA RpRAIL5h1ANpRAIL55HALL BE
PAINTED BLACK BAKED ENAMEL AS WELL,
10. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS BOOK FOR MORE
DETAILED IN IIa1ATION.
- do fC�aPro pp. alrp
OCCUPANCY
e (HC
TN
e01)
ME-
03 (lyp� IIB Gmup AS�
!able saa (lvae lle�GrouPlA�61 "I - � !� '
clo 6. Nns I:ler.ys�_m =xto =T.
PLUMBING
—I —1
- I Ifa ilk ✓) -
3 DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN A� ROOF PLAN A�
•iA e¢ue:lw�v Y �iA erv�eT�ff V
BID DOCUMENTS 05/20/2010
/
G1RE0 PO-H
/ �
BEMs ttPJ
5VE
ZttP.OF
�
IREW 9 rtYPI
PcLTCA
J/
tt STF - Pl O
e� 11PLFCRGL'v.
/
C G BEPM INLL CIR =LEI
I. REFER TO SHEET A0.0 FOR ALL
GENERAL NOTES, 51'MBOLb e
WALL TYPES
2, REFER TO SHEET A51 FOR DOOR
SCHEDULES AND SHEET A81 FOR
DETAILS,
3, ALL DIMENEION5 ARE MASONRY
TO MASONRY FACE OF STUD TO
FACE OF STUD,
4. ALL LONG SHALL HAVE COMP,
STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI AT 28
DAY5
5. ALLOWABLE SOIL BRA. RRE55URE
SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE 2000
RSF.
5. CONTRACTOR 5HALL PROVIDE
SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERED
SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL ALUMINUM
FRAMING, CONNECTIONS AND
FASTENERS,
1, ALL HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAIL5 SHALL BE
DESIGNED TO MEET ALL CDOE LOADIW
REQUIREMENTS
8, ALL TRELLI5 FRAMING 54ALL BE PAINTED
BLACK BAKED ENAMEL,
E ALL ALA RpRAIL5h1ANpRAIL55HALL BE
PAINTED BLACK BAKED ENAMEL AS WELL,
10. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS BOOK FOR MORE
DETAILED IN IIa1ATION.
- do fC�aPro pp. alrp
OCCUPANCY
e (HC
TN
e01)
ME-
03 (lyp� IIB Gmup AS�
!able saa (lvae lle�GrouPlA�61 "I - � !� '
clo 6. Nns I:ler.ys�_m =xto =T.
PLUMBING
—I —1
- I Ifa ilk ✓) -
3 DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN A� ROOF PLAN A�
•iA e¢ue:lw�v Y �iA erv�eT�ff V
BID DOCUMENTS 05/20/2010