HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014 11 17 Public Hearing 500 Pollack Shores Apartments, Preliminary Site Plan COMMISSION AGENDA
Informational
Consent
ITEM 500 Public Hearin s X
g
Regular
November 17, 2014 KS RS
Special Meeting City Manager Department
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department — Planning Division requests the City
Commission continue to a date certain of December 8, 2014 a Preliminary Site Plan (PSP)
for a 338 unit apartment complex located on the northeast corner of the intersection of State
Road 434 and Michael Blake Boulevard.
SYNOPSIS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Site Plan (PSP) for a thirteen building
apartment complex that will be developed into a total of 338 units. The subject property is
13.9 acres in size and is located in the TS zone (Urban Center Zone) of the Town Center.
CONSIDERATIONS:
APPLICANT AND PROPERTY INFORMATION:
. Applicant name and address and authorized representative: CS Capital Management,
Inc./ Whitaker Capital, LLC. 3525 Piedmont Road, 7 Piedmont Center, Suite 300,
Atlanta, GA 30305. Brian Love, authorized representative
. Pro�ert� owner's name(sl: Winter Springs Holdings, LLC.
. Property addresses: No address issued
. Pro�erty Parcel ID number: 26-20-30-SAR-OA00-0070
. Current FLUM Desi�nations: Town Center
Public Hearings 500 PAGE 1 OF 6- November 17,2014
. Current Zonin�Desi�nations: Town Center TS (Urban Center Zone)
• Previously Approved Development permits such as conditional use, waiver, or
variance (if any): None
. Develo�ment Agreements (if an�: No known Development Agreements
. Pendin� Code Enforcement Actions (if any): No known pending Code Enforcement
actions
. City Liens (if any): No known liens
APPLICABLE LAW. PUBLIC POLICY. AND EVENTS
Home Rule Powers
Florida Statutes
City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan -Future Land Use Element
GOAL 2: Town Center. The City seeks to create a Town Center based upon traditional
design standards for development that will become the identifying focus of the City's
downtown and contribute to an increased and diversified tax base for the City. The primary
purpose of the Town Center shall be to create an economically successful, vibrant, aesthetic,
compact, multimodal, diverse, mixed use (including horizontal and vertical integration of
uses) neo-traditional urban environment, designed on a pedestrian scale and with a
pedestrian orientation. The Town Center is to be a place where people can reside in a mix of
single and multiple family dwellings, work, gather to shop, relax, recreate, be entertained,
attend community events, and enjoy the natural beauty of lands located in the Town Center.
The Town Center should be created through public and private investment and
development.
Policy 2.2.4: Mixed Uses. Permit a variety of mixed uses consistent, compatible, and in
harmony with the Town Center Goal and the Town Center District Code, including single
family residential, multiple family residential, commercial retail and services, public
services and buildings, parks, and schools, through the enactment of creative and flexible
land development regulations. (Ord. 2012-OS)
Policy 2.2.6: Residential Density. Support the desired commercial activity and urban
character desired for the Town Center by encouraging high density residential development
consistent with the Town Center Goal and Town Center District Code and encourage a
minimum average residential density of seven (7) units per acre, unless the type of unit
would warrant a lesser density while still meeting the intent of the Town Center District
Code. (Ord. 2012-OS)
Policy 2.2.8: Intensity. Encourage higher intensity development in the Town Center subj ect
to the Town Center District Code. (Ord. 2012-OS)
Policy 2.3.3: Fiscal Impacts of Development. Ensure that City policies, regulations, and
decision making processes not only consider Town Center design planning impacts, but also
consider whether proposed new development will have a positive and acceptable economic
and fiscal impact on the City. In furtherance of this policy, the City Commission shall
require (unless otherwise exempted by land development regulation), as a condition of
considering the approval or denial of a development proj ect, that developers provide a
Public Hearings 500 PAGE 2 OF 6- November 17,2014
written economic and fiscal impact report, prepared by a duly qualified expert, that details
the associated economic and fiscal impacts of any proposed new development project on the
City and the School District. Although the City recognizes that some projects will have a
regional economic and fiscal impact as well, said report shall predominantly address the
economic and fiscal impacts on the Town Center and the City of Winter Springs as its own
economic system. The economic impact analysis portion of the report shall address the
impacts of the proposed project on jobs, economic output, and wages. The fiscal impact
analysis portion shall pertain to the net fiscal impact of the project over a period of years
which is the sum of those revenues (such as ad valorem taxes, public service taxes, sales
taxes, and charges for service) directly received by the City minus the sum of expenditures
incurred by the City (such as general government expenses, law enforcement, roads, and
parks and recreation). (Ord. 2012-OS)
Policy 2.3.4: Compatibility and Optimization of Tax Base. For purpose of determining
whether a project has a positive and acceptable economic and fiscal impact on the City
pursuant to Policy 2.3.3, the developer shall be required to demonstrate through its written
economic and fiscal impact report that the project is in compliance with the following
obj ective criteria:
(1) The proposed project and associated land use is not only a permitted use within the
applicable zoning transect, but is also compatible under existing conditions (existing,
permitted, or master-planned development) at the proposed location with other adj acent or
nearby land uses within the Town Center and any established surrounding neighborhoods.
(2) The market demand for the proposed project is at least minimally feasible based on
current market data including, but not limited to, data set forth in any economic
development study conducted by the City.
(3) Provided said project is first deemed compatible from a land use perspective under
criteria (1) and market demand is deemed minimally feasible under criteria (2), the
proposed project optimally increases and diversifies the City's tax base and economic well-
being. With respect to the phrase "optimally increases," the proposed project's economic
and fiscal impact shall be required to be the best result obtainable for the City under current
economic and land use conditions. In furtherance of determining consistency with this
provision, the developer's written economic and fiscal impact report shall analyze and
compare the proposed proj ect to either the City's preferred proj ect or proj ects for the subj ect
location as may be expressly set forth in the City's Town Center Master Plan or economic
development study conducted pursuant to Policy 2.3.2, or if the plan or study does not so
expressly provide, to a reasonable array of other potential alternative compatible projects
authorized in the applicable zoning transect for the subj ect proj ect location. Furthermore,
the term "diversifies" means the extent that the proposed project reduces the City's reliance
upon a residential tax base to fund the City's fiscal budget. Additionally, if the proposed
proj ect is a commercial proj ect, the extent that the proposed proj ect also provides different
and needed services and jobs to the Town Center and the City.
(4) Such other criteria set forth in the City's land development regulations. (Ord. 2012-OS)
Policy 2.3.7: Quality of Life. Strive to improve the quality of life of Winter Springs'
residents by encouraging an increased number and variety of thriving commercial
businesses that are supported and complimented by high-end residential projects located in
the Town Center.
City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan -Housing Element
Policy 1.1.15: Support the desired commercial activity and urban character desired for the
Town Center by encouraging high density residential development subj ect to the Town
Public Hearings 500 PAGE 3 OF 6- November 17,2014
Center District Code. (Cross Reference: Future Land Use Element, Policy 2.2.6); (Ord.
2012-OS)
Winter Springs Town Center District Code
DISCUS SION:
The PSP proposes a thirteen building apartment complex that will be developed into a
total of 338 units on 13.9 acres in the TS zone (Urban Center Zone) of the Town Center.
Multifamily uses such as apartments are a permitted use in the TS zone of the Town
Center.
Vehicular access to the site will be via State Road 434, Michael Blake Boulevard, two
proposed "Town Center Streets", and an Edge Drive that runs along the northern boundary
of the property. The property will be divided into four blocks, with the block located on
the southwest corner of the site being reserved for future commercial development.
Vehicular access will be permitted into each block, with parking areas either being located
behind apartment buildings or screened from view with garden walls so they are not
visible from the surrounding rights-of-way. On-street parking will be provided on both
Town Center Streets, the Edge Drive, and the portion of Michael Blake Boulevard that is
adjacent to block "A". A roundabout will be constructed at the proposed intersection of
Michael Blake Boulevard and the Town Center Street (Tree Swallow Drive) that is
proposed to run in an east/west direction across the property. The roundabout at this
location was previously approved by the City Commission as part of the Michael Blake
Boulevard project; however; construction of the roundabout was deferred until
development of the surrounding land. On the west side of the roundabout, a stub-out will
be provided to allow the extension of Tree Swallow Drive to the existing intersection at
Tuskawilla Road, consistent with the Town Center Master Transportation plan.
A wet detention pond is proposed on the east side of the Cross Seminole Trail pedestrian
bridge that will serve the development. This wet detention pond was previously designed
and permitted as a master wet detention pond to serve the Town Center Phase II proj ect.
The pond is sized to handle stormwater runoff from the entire undeveloped portion of the
Town Center Phase II property.
The applicant is proposing exterior amenities such as a swimming pool, and a plaza
adjacent to the clubhouse building that is located at the northeast corner of the
roundabout. Additional amenities will be provided within the clubhouse. In addition,
pedestrian access points leading into blocks "A", "B", and "C" will be provided from each
street. Preliminary architectural elevations have been submitted that propose a muted, but
varied color scheme that is consistent with the surrounding architecture exhibited in the
Town Center. The elevations propose three-story buildings that are reflective of the urban
nature and architectural styles mandated in the Town Center District Code. The applicant
will be required to obtain final approval of the architectural elevations from the City
Commission through the Aesthetic Review process.
The main frontages of the buildings will be oriented toward SR 434, the Town Center
Streets, the Edge Drive, and Michael Blake Boulevard. The buildings will be setback
consistent with the setbacks that are required in the TS (Urban Center Zone) of the Town
Center, which range between zero and eight feet along front property lines. This setback
range is reflective of historic downtown layouts throughout the United States.
Public Hearings 500 PAGE 4 OF 6- November 17,2014
This project will help to further create the urban sense of place that has materialized along
State Road 434 with the completion of previously approved projects such as Jesup's
Reserve, and will help foster the transformation of this portion of State Road 434 into the
urban boulevard and constrained roadway section that was envisioned in the Town Center
master plan.
A traffic impact study was submitted by the applicant during the review process and after
several rounds of review, the traffic study is recommended for approval by Staf£ The
proj ect will require construction (by the developer) of a right-turn deceleration lane on SR
434 westbound at Michael Blake Boulevard. The signalization of the S.R. 434 /Michael
Blake Boulevard intersection is approved by FDOT and will be constructed by the City
using transportation impact fees when warranted by the traffic volume in accordance with
FDOT standards. It is not likely that the additional traffic from the proposed apartment
proj ect alone will generate enough traffic to meet the minimum requirements for
signalization. The apartment proj ect will require the developer to extend the right and left
turn storage lanes on the Michael Blake Boulevard southbound approaches to S.R. 434.
On August 21, 2014, a community meeting was held in the City Commission chambers with
the developer of the proposed apartment complex. Representatives of the developer
presented conceptual design plans and solicited input and answered questions from the
general public in regards to this project and how the proposed development fits into the
City's overall vision for the Town Center.
The PSP satisfies all applicable requirements of the Town Center District Code. The
applicant will be required to obtain City Commission approval of Final Engineering Plans
prior to construction of the project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Development of the property will provide an increase in taxable value to the City, and will
provide additional population in the Town Center which will increase the Town Center's
demographic base and strengthen the support for business and future commercial
development within the Town Center. Per Policy 2.3.3 of the Future Land Use Element of
the Comprehensive Plan, a detailed fiscal impact analysis will be provided as part of the
December 8, 2014 City Commission agenda item. Staff is currently running this project
through the City's Fiscal Impact Model.
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission,
City Manager, City Attorney/Staff, and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and
the City's Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the
respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals
noted above, and which is also available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's
Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have
requested Agendas/Agenda Item information, Homeowner's Associations/Representatives
on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This
information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional
copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the
City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff
Public Hearings 500 PAGE 5 OF 6- November 17,2014
is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested
individuals.
A community meeting was held with representatives of the applicant and the developer on
August 21, 2014 to solicit input and answer questions in regards to this project.
Additionally, the property has been posted with a large yellow sign noting the date and time
of the public hearings. An additional meeting with concerned residents is scheduled for
November 14, 2014.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department — Planning Division requests the City
Commission postpone, to a date certain of December 8, 2014, to permit the applicant to host
a second workshop with concerned citizens to solicit input on design of the proj ect and to
permit the applicant a sufficient amount of time to make design changes to the Preliminary
Site Plan (PSP) that are based on the outcome of the workshop.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Preliminary Site Plan
B. Preliminary Architectural Elevations
C. Minutes -November 5, 2014 Planning & Zoning Board meeting
Public Hearings 500 PAGE 6 OF 6- November 17,2014
� �a��3�� .�o=s� aNO�a��3a .���,.
wos��s e�oz �sz Vo — ,P�e�<zeo �,d�3a No,�d zsM �N3wdo,� ��3�N� a�o��em�� o
�vo�ama 0�.3 �VO,„o„, df1021`J31V1S31V321S3210HS�I�VIIOd ����
.a.d ,d o�a siNaw�vooddvisaadaasi�ea n�gUS ao.�..a .°� NV�d . ' ��. .
vaiaoi�'s�Niadsa3iNinn 1N3Wd0�3n34
d� .dow� zeocea�n v � b£b'21'S/'0/�l8 3�IVl8l3VH�IW - ��� � U
�-..�:�o;•o...aa:v:,�:oa'�; �vn1d3�NO� t�o�.b���
.•eOf��a'�833NION3�� sNinnv •����• �-
�m� aaaao�aa�� siNawiavdv-uaaiNa�nvv�oissNiadsaaiNV�n
O
W
n O � �
� a � — _
Q �„ W �V � _ �
o — y �
� a z ��
� w �
M _ .,.. � w,' _ _
�
� J
�, � � �� , . : z � o
w
z� '� F
m � m ��
N 'FO -. : �� r� z I-
w
N � '� � / "'°_' �
tt - - -
0 ` ti ��w ��� �1
i
J �
W o
� . O� _
\
6 � G�
� �\ \ �
�. \. \\. �. \
PEDESTRIAN TRAIL � � �� �
1y _ — �.. ___� ^ , � \
a � ° ' ----- _ _ � �\\� � �
� � ��� -- m -- _ _ �v����� �
� 3 n \ \ \\\�
� \
a' � � BG I �.\� .\
� o #4 ��OZ�
-0� a� o o #7 ' ° o
� ..... .
— \ \
°w F\ _ SG : I \\\� � \
rn� , ° I �\\.\� �
a � w ,bZ� 17 � .
p � 17 Q��0 17 � � \ � . �
\ \ \ �
H \ \
� o .0 \.\�\\ .\ .
\ N � \ \ \
�\o .. .._ �\\ \ \ \
\ #8 $^ I \ \
�` i
, , � -
J
�� � f #9 !
r ,
I _ _ �
i � �� �- , - � o 0 oTOWN CENTER STREET� � I
L_ �' � -- ----- � _ a �
_ � � � _
., #�o e _ wo
�� w�� _ �wo
i �� � o °��
� ,. � �oa
� ° ° m
^ o I I � � #11 � Da � � �� I a� _
'li J � � o ac o a o o � °'
� m � � o wi
W � o ai
Y I H I I
¢ � z o I
W �
III m � U ° I
� I Z I
_ � O i I
U I H I II✓
— oa - ���o � I I .
i �
i ,os ! ' � :
i ,
� � i '
o n
N � i
�
0 0 0 o s
�
i ^ �
' � � I °�' �
� i � `�
i �` ' � � � �
� �
� , $� `
0 0 0
� , I � \ ,
� . �
i ,oz° T T.
�i �� i I
i � �
� i� � I \� �\
— — r�� ,90� 50� I \ \ \
� — — — ` �
� �� �
_ <
, ' \`._'___"_'_'__'.__'_'__'_____".__'_____'__'.__'_"
.,.°.434
�- a - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
����"��j.r.,•� �
�� . �
:�����'_°_ '�L
����---_�i�---� �,
� _ z..- � -- �. -�
�.. - --►��*_-�-�� �;
�w `
r.. -.� � ��,�.
�, -�-- ��-- '---- E � ��
_ L���—�� �" ��.- �.
�.�, � -.I��� r
� � ��i; �"�"-� ,I
_ Li� �,��_ —t.i i,= > -�.
r... — ,
i
� � ,� � —I
M �� _ --- ���.. _._ I- l
W " _ � �' T
_ - _ �.� l`� �..,,:�
` . , --, __
� �:� � �
�n, f� � °
�✓ — '____ _- --___ ��
� -- _— _._...._— �..
� J �
U �
,
r� _ „ , .-„ �,.----.;-��
� -- - --- - ---���.
� - �
�yf_, ai�� �,T�7• : .. - �;
ti r �.
��-���— � .
�- � ,- ;;�=�j �
�� � � �-
Y����' �� � -- �� =•-
�� - � ____ �- ::,
4. '-
� � 1�+� �� _-`__ I__ ` .
� I _
r�--- ---�� �'— —
� �T1
�������
�-- -�- , - y: �
'1 '� ._�- � ' � i ',. :'�.
r-�r���� 31 . �
-►
=��� i_ � �
, .� �}
_ ' ._�_ �:` %,
.:,, ... � �.•
� , , ! -_�-*. -
f
� � - ���"`:
-----� r- --_��
- � �� �
� ��
� , . . }.
� .._ \ _ _ � .�, '-�
� - .. d ' �'
� � . � .�
•3'4�'
� ��— � ��{ �a�
�� �`.. ._ _ �� ,+�,; �,, y ..�
.... `; �� --- � .,�;�
. = r�. .�;� � li
, �"_"„� __� ..� ti
��o�
�,
�� �°' �, , '°
i y, � 7
i n
� �.,�,v` � .. � ��t: . --
Attachment " C "
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 5,2014
PAGE 2 OF 12
CONSENT AGENDA
CONSENT
300. Office Of The City Clerk
The Office Of The City Clerk Requests That The Planning And Zoning Board/Local
Planning Agency Review And Approve The Wednesday, October 1, 2014 Planning
And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting Minutes.
"I MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE LAST
MEETING." MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRPERSON CASMAN. SECONDED BY
BOARD MEMBER WALKER. DISCUSSION.
VOTE:
BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE
BOARD MEMBER MILLER: AYE
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE
CHAIRPERSON HENDERSON: AYE
VICE-CHAIRPERSON CASMAN: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
400. REPORTS
No Reports were given.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA
PUBLIC HEARINGS
500. Community Development Department—Planning Division
The Community Development Department — Planning Division Requests The
Planning And Zoning Board Consider A Preliminary Site Plan (PSP) For A 338
Unit Apartment Complex Located On The Northeast Corner Of The Intersection Of
State Road 434 And Michael Blake Boulevard.
Mr. Bobby Howell, AICP, Planner, Community Development Department introduced the
Agenda Item and mentioned different aspects of the project, noting the developer's
willingness to work with City Staff and that the Preliminary Site Plan is in line with the
Town Center District Code.
Referring to the Community Meeting held on August 21, 2014 between City Staff,
residents and the Developer, Board Member Suzanne Walker asked "What were some of
the changes that were made based upon community input at that time?"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 5,2014
PAGE 3 OF 12
Mr. Howell explained that the trash compactor had been moved as requested and noted
that the Developer was present this evening and available to answer further questions.
Mr. Brian Love, representing Whitaker Capital, LLC.: summarized some of the issues
and their changes, including the proximity to the pedestrian trail, creating a buffer, more
green space, and the trash compactor was moved.
Vice-Chairperson Howard Casman asked if there were any other issues brought up during
the Community Meeting.
Responding, Mr. Love said, "I think there is a myriad of issues and questions and
comments and I'll say we did our best to address as much as we could." Regarding the
orientation of the apartment complex, Mr. Love continued, "Through discussions with the
City, really, the vision of the Town Center puts us into this layout." Mr. Love also
emphasized that they would like this to be a "discussion not a dictation" between all
parties involved.
Mr. Randy Stevenson, ASLA, AICP, Director, Community Development Department
briefly spoke on Staff's desire not to pursue further apartment complexes but to see more
commercial development in and around the Winter Springs Town Center.
Brief discussion.
Chairperson Henderson opened "Public Input".
Ms. Colleen Murphy, 684 Fanning Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: spoke on behalf of the
Winter Springs Village Homeowner's Association, acknowledged the City's need to
grow its tax base and the desire for an economically viable Town Center, mentioned the
closeness in proximity of the complex to Winter Springs Village, loss of sense of
community, potential increase in crime, traffic and noise pollution, declining home
values, future implications, and preferable alternative plans.
Mr. Eric Beach, SIS Buckhorn Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: spoke briefly about when
he moved to Winter Springs and spoke on issues related to residents that are not vested in
the community.
Mr. Amarildo Monsalve, 604 Treehouse Street, Winter Springs, Florida: commented
briefly about transient populations normally associated with rental units and its
potentially negative impact on surrounding neighborhoods.
Mr. Todd A. Stewart, 103 St. .Iohns Landing Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: remarked
about his concerns with traffic, a decline in home values, and the Cross Seminole Trail.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING—NOVEMBER 5,2014
PAGE 4 OF 12
Mr. Howard "Jim" Thomson, 931 Ginnie Way, Winter Springs, Florida: mentioned
potential traffic jams at some locations and was concerned that the new Commissioner
recently Elected would not have enough time to fully assess the situation before a Vote
takes place by the City Commission.
Chairperson Henderson responded, "Yes, he will be" and emphasized that this is only a
Preliminary Site Plan.
Mr. Greg Roth, 782 Gainer Way, Winter Springs, Florida: acknowledged the
Developer's right to build, offered an alternative location for the apartment complex and
spoke about access roads.
Mr. Brian Buholtz, 106 Trace Point, Winter Springs, Florida: spoke about visibility
issues, the Town Center District Code, lack of signage, and exceeding capacities for
surrounding schools.
Mr. Mike Cannell, 221 Torcaso Court, Winter Springs, Florida: asked for clarification on
the exact location of the development, remarked about previous highly productive
collaborations with the City and suggested that a workshop would be beneficial in
helping to solve the current issues.
Ms. Gina Shafer, 434 Buckhorn Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: spoke about traffic
issues outside of housing developments and schools.
Mr. David Bowen, President, St. .Iohns Landing Community Association, 105 St. .Iohns
Landing Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: discussed Winter Springs' limitations, the
unlikelihood of commercial growth, small job market, potential traffic issues, parking
issues, long-term apartment maintenance, and suggested townhomes instead of
apartments.
Chairperson Henderson closed "Public Input".
Next, Chairperson Henderson asked the City Engineer comment about a possible traffic
light on Michael Blake Boulevard and the extension of Orange Avenue.
Mr. Brian Fields, P.E., City Engineer, Public Works Department referenced the
Transportation Master Plan that distributes traffic in the Town Center and its future
implementation as it is warranted.
Tape 1/Side B
Continuing Mr. Fields mentioned Orange Avenue and its status and noted, "We are
currently in design for Orange Avenue to extend Orange Avenue as a permanent real road
through Central Winds Park— it is targeted and scheduled for construction next calendar
year." Mr. Fields commented further on traffic and streets.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 5,2014
PAGE 5 OF 12
Discussion followed on the capacity of vehicles that the Transportation Master Plan can
accommodate to which Mr. Fields remarked, "This network of streets—this was designed
in concept to be modified as developments come in around it."
Board Member Walker asked if there would be lane widening on State Road 434. Mr.
Fields stated, "On State Road 434? No." Mr. Fields emphasized that six (6) lanes is not
envisioned for State Road 434 and added, "We would like to see lower speeds, more
access, so residents and businesses — people slow down and stop and in our downtown
area. Discussion followed on the timeline of these projects.
Vice-Chairperson Howard Casman also suggested a workshop to aid in solving the
issues. Mr. Love answered, "Sure, we're happy to do it." Mr. Love spoke on the added
benefit of community input, and the site orientation being a concern to some. Brief
discussion followed about the number of apartments in the Winter Springs area.
Furthermore, Vice-Chairperson Casman asked, "You would be willing to sit down with
these people again, in a workshop type atmosphere? Maybe invite people over from St.
Johns Landing and other communities in the area that have worked through this to help
them understand what you are doing and how it will affect them." Mr. Love replied,
"Sure—like I said we've done it before, we'll do it again."
Comments continued on the neighboring property and apartments versus townhomes.
Speaking to Mr. Fields, Board Member Walker voiced her apprehension about potential
traffic issues and asked for further information.
Mr. Fields commented on traffic generation in commercial and residential areas and
stated, "We feel like the network and Master Plan that we have, has anticipated high
density development in the Town Center at this location. We don't know what mixture of
Uses it'll be, but we have a complete network of streets and intersections that is ready to
be developed. There are funding sources, including Developer funded improvements to
accommodate that traffic."
Board Member Walker praised City Staff"Who do a wonderful job and are very diligent
and have a lot of integrity in their work" and asked if there was an opportunity to change
the orientation of the development in an attempt to try and appease nearby residents.
Mr. Stevenson discussed community involvement in the Town Center Master Plan and
the City's attempts to build a demographic within the Town Center, and pointed out,
"One of reasons that we have it oriented the way you see it here, is that we are still trying
to protect some commercial or Mixed-Use area." Mr. Stevenson clarified why the
development could not be located on Tuskawilla Road and mentioned the City's efforts
to keep natural/green spaces, reduce visibility issues, and implement directional/way
finding signage.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 5,2014
PAGE 6 OF 12
Board Member Bart Phillips commented on limiting the quantity of apartment complexes
to create a thriving supply and demand factor. Mr. Stevenson agreed and mentioned the
desire for more Mixed-Use and retail spaces.
Much discussion followed.
"I WOULD MAKE A RECOMMENDATION THAT THE PLANNING AND
ZONING BOARD FORWARD TO APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION
WHO WOULD TABLE THIS APPROVAL PENDING A WORKSHOP."
MOTION BY VICE-CHAIRPERSON CASMAN.
SENIOR ATTORNEY KOPP STATED, "DO YOU WANT TO MAKE IT SO
THAT A WORKSHOP IS HELD, WITH THE PUBLIC PRESENT..." VICE-
CHAIRPERSON CASMAN REMARKED, "...ABSOLUTELY..." SENIOR
ATTORNEY KOPP CONTINUED, "...WITH THE DEVELOPER, EITHER
PRIOR TO THE CITY COMMISSION OR THE CITY COMMISSION COULD
TABLE IT—THAT WAY IF THEY COULD..."
MR. STEVENSON ADDED, "...I THINK THE CITY COMMISSION, BECAUSE
OF THE ADVERTISING AND TO PRESERVE ADVERTISING AND MY
ADVERTISING DOLLARS, WOULD PROBABLY CONTINUE IT TO A DATE
CERTAIN, ALLOWING FOR TIME TO HAVE THE WORKSHOP PRIOR TO
THEM CONSIDERING THE CONCEPT PLAN."
CONCURRING, SENIOR ATTORNEY KOPP STATED, "YOU COULD DO
THAT OR YOU COULD TRY TO HAVE THE WORKSHOP PRIOR TO THE
MEETING AS WELL, EITHER WAY."
MR. STEVENSON MENTIONED, "IT'S ON THE SEVENTEENTH
(NOVEMBER 2014)."
VICE-CHAIRPERSON CASMAN NOTED, "ALL WE ARE LOOKING TO DO IS
PROTECT OUR NEIGHBORS AND IN THAT SENSE WE COULD
RECOMMEND IT TO BE FORWARDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE CITY
COMMISSION, BUT THEY SHOULD TABLE IT PENDING A WORKSHOP."
SENIOR ATTORNEY KOPP MENTIONED, "THEY CAN AND THEY COULD —
PERSERVE THEIR ADVERTISING COSTS BY CONTINUING TO A TIME
AND DATE CERTAIN..." VICE-CHAIRPERSON CASMAN SAID, "...THAT
WAY THESE PEOPLE ARE GUARANTEED A VOICE BEFORE ANY FINAL
DECISION IS MADE."
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 5,2014
PAGE 7 OF 12
ADDITIONALLY SENIOR ATTORNEY KOPP STATED, "THEY WOULD
HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING AT THE CITY COMMISSION ANYWAY, SO
THEY WOULD BE HEARD EITHER WAY, BUT YES."
SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER WALKER. DISCUSSION.
ASSISTANT TO THE CITY CLERK ANTONIA DELLA DONNA ASKED FOR
CLARIFICATION THAT "THE MOTION IS APPROVE THIS TO GO TO THE
CITY COMMISSION, THAT THEY'LL TABLE IT..." CHAIRPERSON
HENDERSON STATED, "...WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THEY
TABLE IT AND HOLD A WORKSHOP." IN ADDITION, MR. STEVENSON
ASKED, "COULD WE CHANGE THE WORD `TABLE' TO `CONTINUE TO
DATE CERTAIN'?"
CHAIRPERSON HENDERSON AGREED ANDVICE-CHAIRPERSON CASMAN
NODDED IN AGREEMENT. NO OBJECTIONS WERE VOICED.
VOTE:
VICE-CHAIRPERSON CASMAN: AYE
CHAIRPERSON HENDERSON: AYE
BOARD MEMBER MILLER: AYE
BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
Chairperson Henderson called a Recess at 7:00 p.m.
The Meeting reconvened at 7:OS p.m.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
501. Community Development Department—Planning Division
The Community Development Department — Planning Division Requests That The
Planning And Zoning Board Consider: 1) Final Engineering Plan, And 2) Aesthetic
Review For Dunkin Donuts, A 6,883 Square Foot Building With A 2,310 Square
Foot Dunkin Donuts Restaurant And Three Associated Retail Bays Located On The
Southeast Corner Of The Intersection Of State Road 434 And Stone Gable Circle.
Mr. Howell introduced the Agenda Item and gave a brief description of its origin,
Permitted Uses, and some recent aesthetic improvements.
In reference to the landscaping Board Member Walker commented about the
Developer's plans to add any type of greenery; and Mr. Howell referenced the Landscape
Plan and the variety of trees.