HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014 06 24 Regular 600 WS-1 ; .5p , Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
r io ios ►
lo
Case Number: 11-0025742
Address: 111 Elderwood St.
Applicant: Premium Title Services
Sec. 2-61.5 (Reduction of Lien Request)
Non- Compliance Hearing Date: November 15, 2011
Inspector — Christi Flannigan
.5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1.
110111101 ►
• This violation was first presented to the Code Board at the
July 19, 2011 hearing. It was found in violation.
• The Order of the Board stated that the violations were to be
corrected by August 9 2011 .
• The Code Enforcement Board found the property in non-
compliance on November 15, 2011 .
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
110111101 ►
• The owner of record at that time was Wesley Smith. The
owner of record at this time is Deutsche Bank Trust CO
TR.
• The violation was: City Ord. 6-195 (Fence in Disrepair)
• The fence has been replaced in the areas that had broken
slats and a broken gate.
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
ria�ios ►
• Sec. 2-61 .5 of City Ordinance covers the application
process for satisfaction or release of code enforcement liens.
The ordinance indicates that a reduction may be requested to
the Community Development Department. There is an
application process that was to be met by the respondent prior
to this hearing.
• (5) At the hearing before the Code Enforcement Board, the
Board shall review and consider the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, provide the violator with an
opportunity to address the board regarding the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, and to take the testimony of
other interested parties, including but not limited to city staff.
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
1101611
4,11 10
• (6) Upon review of the application and any testimony
presented, the Code Enforcement Board shall recommend to
the City Commission approval, approval with conditions, or
denial of the application for satisfaction or release of lien.
• The Code Enforcement Board, in determining its
recommendation, shall consider the following factors:
a. The gravity of the violation;
b The time in which it took the violator to come into
compliance;
c. The accrued amount of the code enforcement fine
or lien;
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
110101 ►
d. Any previous or subsequent code violations;
e. Any financial hardship;
(7) Any other mitigating circumstance which may warrant the
reduction or satisfaction of the penalty or fine;
(8) After a recommendation has been rendered by the Code
Enforcement Board, the Community Development Director
shall place the application for satisfaction or release of lien
upon the agenda of the next regularly scheduled City
Commission meeting. The City Commission may take action
solely based upon the sworn application and recommendation
of the code enforcement board, and information provided by
the violator in regard to the application for satisfaction or
release of lien.
- , „
i N. '` e., �� ;•
`'l7`)1Y re f• 1 +.. � t _ ....
-y�JF - {� 1' .
'` 0. f' .. - . .1:',1 , r 1.r'i f,•
tit
•
q :.r
f i liii " t ~ r y• -psi w,!!J ��1. �R
gl f ir
I , ,;..� Pr"'1
i ±
'g. rte' xrJ:
t f , ' ` Lam.K. • • 7 If t "Mt,.
au 1101411P
1
f. 4.
� : 3�
• 3i l
a. • I 1 ,
1
P, bM tf
Feral .' T -, r0 ,v !>
a•Y... _.V- 7 7K.
,.., . - `L,C ; rte . I. tF
. _ _ ,. ,T ;;z,- ..1 ,�,Y x• ` . i-{7 •�•. `
.-
11-9-11. Original photo from non-compliance hearing
i -ti
may,' _ r ')
t � 9 rit
• ' ' -arm.•
I
_..
i q 201 1
11-9-11 : Original photo from Non-compliance hearing
'41 1 'i� 1r IS
. PI .i I 6 i,
tr
•0
i
/lad r I;
it F 4.
•.1,
1
• 1i ;4. i
•
111 lit pili 1 ..
A rte. l . i5 it •* .k �., A,
k R.
1 y• !' •i.w.V ..:•••I.16, ..- ..1 . 0gLir t 1"
3 2014
6-13-14: The left side of the fence
ski � �.��, ( F
s
'f'. k
r ! . 'q 1' '"fir
'I .y •*. r '/ r "� "' cite
- ' 4: 1 filli - v
r i , At
•
•
n
•
a,�° a+'auw it .,a'a•a' a � a . lir
• •
..,
06 13 . 2014
6-13-14: The left side of the fence
• f .4..A
t ,
:Y�tir •
'.„..
h
' /r dr
r r '`a1 S "14.3 -
. '1;,.�� + �: ti's ! < +"•
i 4, tAlip.p.mvp 4 10 ' t 'r "v.. l'' I 4. ... • : 'sr.• OS tip. ,. ';4111!P't
I. .I. ".. !If:
\ . .
Lip ••.. •- • l• ! ' ' _ py
... "t" • , i '. 1 .,'i rig
�1 ! �y '
M1.
Misr
./!
`ri I
6-13-14: The right side of the fence
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1101611 ►
The amount of the lien is approximately $ 15,3 00.00.
The recommendation is that the lien not be reduced any lower
than a total due of $2,560.00. This accounts for staff costs,
costs incurred to file the liens and present cases, and a standard
10%o reduction of the total owed the City for a new owner who
is not going to reside in the home, per City policy.