HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014 04 22 Regular 600 WS-1 ; .5p , Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
r io ios ►
lo
Case number: 12-0027758
Address: 1125 Ermine Ave.
Applicant: Johann Von Eisenberg
Sec. 2-61.5 (Reduction of Lien Request)
Non- Compliance Hearing Date:
November 20, 2012
Inspector - Christi Flannigan
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1.
11011,101 ►
• This violation was first presented to the Code Board at the
November 20, 2012 hearing. It was found in violation.
• The Order of the Board stated that the violations were to be
corrected by December 20, 2012.
• The Code Enforcement Board found the property in non-
compliance on February 26, 2013 .
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1.
ria�ios ►
• The owner of record at that time was Michelle and John
Weiss. The owner of record at this time is John Weiss.
• The violations were: City Ord. 13-2 (Junk and Debris),
City Ord. 6-217 (Pool Enclosure), IPMC 304 7 (Roof &
Drainage) and IPMC 304.2 (Protective Treatment)
• The junk and debris has been removed from the property.
The pool enclosure has been corrected by repairing the
fence. The gutters have been removed, the protective
treatment has been corrected in a temporary manner-
"patch painted".
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
ria�ios ►
• Sec. 2-61 .5 of City Ordinance covers the application
process for satisfaction or release of code enforcement liens.
• The ordinance indicates that a reduction may be requested
to the Community Development. There is an application
process that was to be met by the respondent prior to this
hearing.
• (5) At the hearing before the code enforcement board, the
board shall review and consider the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, provide the violator with an
opportunity to address the board regarding the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, and to take the testimony of
other interested parties, including but not limited to city staff.
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
1101111611 ►
• (6) Upon review of the application and any testimony
presented, the code enforcement board shall recommend to
the city commission approval, approval with conditions, or
denial of the application for satisfaction or release of lien.
• The code enforcement board, in determining its
recommendation, shall consider the following factors:
a. The gravity of the violation;
b. The time in which it took the violator to come into
compliance;
c. The accrued amount of the code enforcement fine
or lien;
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
110101 ►
d. Any previous or subsequent code violations;
e. Any financial hardship;
(7) Any other mitigating circumstance which may warrant the
reduction or satisfaction of the penalty or fine;
(8) After a recommendation has been rendered by the code
enforcement board, the Community Development Director
shall place the application for satisfaction or release of lien
upon the agenda of the next regularly scheduled city
commission meeting. The City Commission may take action
solely based upon the sworn application and recommendation
of the code enforcement board, and information provided by
the violator in regard to the application for satisfaction or
release of lien.
r;o.5f2 snr,,, � Code Enforcement Division
iila POlICE
v --,k y
Ili:,
is -4.' r1• 49?
Aid• " r.' .
• f.. • K1• _f $ �e
yy
08012 1
•••••••■.••..1W1,./.01111.AMMIN. ...-...Mill.komM•Yrillin=MMAIIIIMIIELI Alliliallik
Junk in the back yard- has been corrected
PHOTO FROM ORIGINAL HEARING
i;,.5,, snr ,, � Code Enforcement Division•• .....-
POlICE
�} .a_ 0 '1
'y 14GI9s '
R Y y �
„ . -==--2,.".. 1,- . -----— - 1`.------- illAtilli-1.:- -
�. ~ - -- __ 4 ti`s
y
1I ... 1r .I I ',f AFL• i`oi\ - - - - -
f
. IN i' ll'Ik. - - 1:7 . i ,,,.., __,..,. .....--- _
r MN
1 • ■
1I
As of 2-22-13- IPMC 304.7 Roof and Drainage
has been corrected
PHOTO FROM NON-COMPLIANCE HEARING
; .5 ,�,,,, � Code Enforcement Division
. poLieE
- �' ,s -v v 1IOGI9s v
? _•
1'`' ■,~
44411. 1 r
'r i!1
+ �• _ .
4•1 - _ I
-�.p •
c,.
... • 37.•-••7`.."....`wr%.tt
•
-� - F - -
♦ a f t
As of 2-22-13- junk in the driveway and overgrown, rotten
wood on corner of house has been corrected PHOTO
FROM NON-COMPLIANCE HEARING
1; .512 snr,,, c Code Enforcement Division
is%POU€F
A, .
1 1 1 ,
ice. 71.^' .1,,14 ' ',4f -�� , �~ '►` {
ilit, v la lik,
tic.
,ialibita. I
i j
iiiiii.1
i
iir, l
As of 2-22-13- Fence falling (only pool enclosure), protective
treatment on side of house- has been corrected
PHOTO FROM NON-COMPLIANCE HEARING
; . c, Code Enforcement Division
POlICE
11011,101
7441
I 11
-. , 2
As of 4-15-14- the exterior walls
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
lea 8'
POlICE
:„„. ,,2,.....V114G1S ,V , °`
T . -A I - , . e irk 4-~
a x
,y.� [r: F•
4 T 1 ' `
• ik.„,444S t '7.- ,
li
.„ - --, iikt, .1',., , ,.. .,
, :., .
_ .„
., .,, , _
1
_____ .
1......10---e:---= . - - , ...,..__ ___
_...,.._ ,,
,A.,,,,,... ., • _T . . ,, • 7,c, . - - -:
i ■ 1 ! \-I.
, 1-� '•'
As of 4-15-14- the door has a hole and some problems with the
protective treatment.
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
iila POlICE
er 4
v -..." ,..,
•
eAJ, y./ tY G'" L .f„ } l ire
•L■
...., - -
11je ' •
ti_ AM's F
r
-
a: ` :g . i.---!-_ yam 441,--I
As of 4-15-14- there is a hole in the door.
; .5 nr?,yk Code Enforcement Division
poLitEE
v , ,..,
,,,,
11011,101
4,41'
J
'- - / ? ,
J , ! %,..
j
l•f` , X f �
04 . '1 . 21 1 t
As of 4-15-14- the side of the yard gate is locked.
s%.5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
ria�ios ►
The amount of the lien is approximately $ 172,992.42 as of
April 14, 2014.
The recommendation is that the lien not be reduced any lower
than a total due of $ 1 ,296.30.
This amount is for the cost of Code Enforcement personnel's
time, mailing fees, a past due administrative amount of
$ 115.74, a grass cutting lien for $76.71 .