HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 10 28 Other, Documents presented by Mr. Cannell durinng Public Input Date: October 28, 2013
These documents were shown and/or referenced
by Mr. Mike Cannell during "Public Input" at
the October 28, 2013 City Commission Regular
Meeting.
4.
* .
S.■ (:)SC4#LC' ' t
5 4-
. •., I n or 1/
i
. , ..
..„
7
405,
43 4,
....
It
744 ,
ft.,
-41.4k.
411144411146"160411Systfto ,,,,,
•,-
- ,
4440040.00040.".4.
111111111**116 mismumm,osiwismio
. 01640%,0,06.
Ortook .
vs,
O 4 e
���
•
. •• i, r R '1R may.�J � ` ' + ! 4�y .. -* ta�ly`}� ` j` * a Mme" # 1 f ` mil' -_ 41: ' 411, '%
x.�� � mot ',�' -' � ,'•..k,
a 4,4-. ""�
. ;;
.. 'ix '7* ill'
Y" Y
t
}5 r ,
0
t1j}
e {i 3d
y 4: - 7
4
ilk
i
RIGHT TURN
ONLY AT MERGE
o r
Ni)
1
BEGIN
RIGHT
TURN
LANE
no right turn
COMMENT QUESTIONS
(Tuscawilla Intersction)
Monday October 18,2013
1. What is the Problem Statement
2. What are the Alternatives proposed to Date, including the TSM Alternative
3. What are the Environmental Impacts (or is this a FONSI,which would be questionable)
4. Where is the Project in terms of the Federal timeline and budget
5. What is the design year and projection LOS for the areas impacted by the removal of the road
(merge).
POSSIBLE SOLUTION
6. Remove Blockage to Signs
7. Place better Signage (Electronic Flashing set far enough back to be seen clearly in advance).
Currently,the sign location is so closed (and blocked),that a Driver would not know he/she
passed the merge until they were right at the "point of no return" (See Pictures)
CONCEPT DESIGN PROBLEMS ENVISIONED
8. Locking in cars(at the added parallel spots) causing congestion and safety concerns:
a) getting out of their spots and trying to get into the traffic lane at the very END of the
intersection
b) Imagine turning right(from w/b 434 and trying to parallel park on the East Side—and
the resultant safety concerns of those following such an individual)
c) Believe that a car must signal so far back from an intersection when turning—this would
design may not allow such)
d) Though parallel parking spots, about 3—4 four spots are added on each side,they are
likely of little to no value and likely to add to more incidents (accidents and congestion).
e) Imaging the potential (jaywalking) when attempting to access the opposite side of the
street.
9. The design seems to guarantees more back-up southbound as the "relief" merge will no longer
bet there and allow the right turning cars to exit the que---events that would likely lead to
many complaints now that there are many more dwellings and especially during school peak
times.
10. How much construction down time is this going to take- is there a construction mitigation plan
for the businesses-do they know how this will impact people from staying away from their
place of business? How would this be communicated to the businesses and when (before or
after a decision)
11. Is there going to be a new route will for individuals to take (rumor has it) or are they expected to
use the one by the memorial?
12. Why are there surveyors out now, before this has been approved (or why else would you have
sent the email to go over our concerns). How much money has been spent on this and other
activities to date).
13. Would like to have access to the Environmental documents—when would that be.
14. The speed control Island seems to be problematic—i.e. the width of the road is already tight
with parallel parking. And,the road is slow to begin with. By putting such an obstacle up (like
the circle fountain by the road further North is a headache as it is so tight to make a turn.
In this instance,you have also a barrier by which those with parallel parking will back up to.
al
1 Jt.
rm.. ...
„, ^stk.-
' 4
k • '•U moo.... ,,r; '''
4.. .0°‘ ' '' a.• • iti<” ,
' •••■ir-' '
....-
.P•
s■.-...
`I• 1 "Oh , .
• , . '
...." . •,
.
A A•,• k '
.4
V
, -
. .
,
..
--I ..--,
, 4...
,....„ ..,,, , _. . .. .,„ .... , „ ,.. . , ..4%.1
S
19- .,.
...,
( C lit4
.) -----
s 7
. 1 '
A. 1111111111111111111111HH
I
. , .
4 . ...7
,I.
Go .-.._-)gle earth feet, 100
meters 30 A
Speed , _�.
' Co�tro� ,�� `j' Attachment 1
- pr
stand ����,� wo-La ominarY Co
n e Concept pion
Tat t.--\
ntersecti Modified Expand on ed plaza ;�,,._
(Valet P i ► Good Design
Parkin le r Access g
f°r g NE for
Special � , De�elo LO
a � �i pmern nger Left
Events i ,.- ' Site
Storage
_ . , 00 age
R
At
em0Va � � Add . .
ble / I. ►Mona
g°11 , , . 1 ands / 1114 t , on-Stye
Unlit g � j ;�, t et
Y °x (r ;0 I, Parki ntou tr, oil� i � ng
Untouched .: .ti.. �'
Good S • = •j Larger
Rod
u •/
Sight �u
�� s
ua�0�UE1.
jn + �� to- a.� .
.R
�. � � � Left T
�� u
h rn D
Shaved — o
ed N e - g ' ' , a ,t• Not
°S , i _ ' overlap
p
Median ,� %.%, �a _
ter d!us "`,,, Raised
� , ,A ed
'` Cr
°ss walk
Heading South on o
Tuscawilla Towards y
Right Turn (Merge)
Tree Blocking View l k
- 17134011111a..
on Approach r
r
tr. • r
r ` 4.
11 * 1 •.
�, n`' }+i,, ray t� IV
�. * V:
t�
-4
.A
r
1. 4 '
Illustrates The Sign is Right at the Point where the
Turn is required—making it too late to respond
i