HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 07 23 Regular 601 WS-1 ; .5 snr ,, Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
ria�ios ►
4,1b. lag
Case #12-0027671
Address: 245 E. Tradewinds Rd.
Sidney & Jules Testerman
Sec. 2-61.5 Reduction of Lien Request
Non- Compliance Hearing Date;
September 18, 2012
Inspector Christi Flannigan
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1.
11011,101 ►
• This violation was first presented to the Code Board at the
July 17, 2012 hearing. It was found in violation.
• The Order of the Board stated that the violations were to be
corrected by August 10, 2012.
• The Code Enforcement Board found the property in non-
compliance on September 18, 2012.
• The owner of record at that time was Sidney & Julie
Testerman, The owner of record at this time is Michelle
Barry.
; .5P , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
ria�ios ►
• Affidavit of Compliance was issued May 9, 2013 for
partial violations, for junk & debris, stagnant pool, and
accessory buildings.
• A second affidavit of compliance was issued on June 11 ,
2013 for the remaining violations.
; .5P , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
ria�ios ►
• Sec. 2-61 .5 Of City Ordinance covering the application
for satisfaction or release of code enforcement liens.
• The ordinance indicates that a reduction may be requested
to the Community Development Director
• There is an application process that was to be met by the
respondent prior to this hearing.
• (5) At the hearing before the code enforcement board, the
board shall review and consider the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, provide the violator with an
opportunity to address the board regarding the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, and to take the testimony of
other interested parties, including but not limited to city staff.
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
11011,101 ►
• (6) Upon review of the application and any testimony
presented, the code enforcement board shall recommend to
the city commission approval, approval with conditions, or
denial of the application for satisfaction or release of lien.
• The code enforcement board, in determining its
recommendation, shall consider the following factors:
a. The gravity of the violation;
b. The time in which it took the violator to come into
compliance;
c. The accrued amount of the code enforcement fine
or lien;
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v 1101Ds
d. Any previous or subsequent code violations;
e. Any financial hardship;
• (7) Any other mitigating circumstance which may warrant
the reduction or satisfaction of the penalty or fine;
• (8) After a recommendation has been rendered by the code
enforcement board, the community development director
shall place the application for satisfaction or release of lien
upon the agenda of the next regularly scheduled city
commission meeting. The City Commission may take action
solely based upon the sworn application and recommendation
of the code enforcement board, and information provided by
the violator in regard to the application for satisfaction or
release of lien.
; 1 5 po,, c Code Enforcement Division
POlICE
,. . . .,
ir,.. .:1.4, r‘ . A Nt . . . .
,,. . ,
ria�ios ► , ' ,
•
-- :A
. + 7•..1 /0. ry
' r
1 `�� �ti
lir I S.!.. .• .'.. 7., '
yyi err` ' tyl
7C fi ��s j � .`a \ . .rte-
ti
I :--I-
wYi11Z•..YAL12 .X hi, '4:. .4i dL.a.951..i,kL1'1iJ Z'i,a:.i..S;l:,,r.a`i Fz.: Yi.i. :4;11;Ai' P,$.ill:.. . ..
Photo from the Non-Compliance Hearing in September 18, 2012
isli_s-.if Code Enforcement Division
POlICE
v it.,-
-.-,k ► • f
'y 1101111611 Ir 4 Y ! • .• 'rya .. ''!..7 f ;,•4.11 Nr g„
..-■.-5•<-..-.. 44411. r , ...., .1 r . .•ejr,4 r •
+ �� �
•".R • fig. M Y .
-V i �,y • C' . f., _ 10-it f :•., .r
.
...VI •ti r. A ' •
sir., 1 �%,
.,,,,x, ..hr ,.. ,
rx / i ._ //r . - 14 4" ...
//IC' ' //' / ///':',;.-;'' 1.2_ '' 1-;
/1///)(4 , I V/V)/-iic / , , , _ /:104 ./1:,] ! r.....
,i ) ,//:,-, ,,L-,•-, ke," • .._ •-
, „., ,. . , ,,,,
, , 7,,, i.
/ , , „ ,,... , ... .. . "fir � .. .. 1
:
"/T "iT V f LJ
/,/r /f / �-
rr .
A: / . ' ',":Photo from the Non-Compliance Hearing in September 18, 2012
4% *CP' SP , a Code Enforcement Division
POlICE
it.„....
...44,
.4,, -...." ,.., ..
,..may ! k3 ' R 'f. ?T
f �, 't A-0L <fy �15.0-,+ i .� .1"s L " *41 S #N`��" 4471 ^1
5
E s t ry 'H t"d a 'a`r Y r' .1 t. . '.,t5•
w-' ° 4,-d-,ti ij,:11ray110,7
Y r 'oy0 4 -� '•' `r F w° ` . f4 "li 5 1i •� .."11.1..; 7� ; : k 1`C!
Y' wf Gil °.s 4.-
_ Aft„ .414'_. R;. yy9 r. .;1,..4,!,-1,011 �+" 3 ff'
S•
•
•
J y:
From the Non-compliance Hearing on Sept. 18, 2012
Code Enforcement Division
4.1114D101 ti�f� - - _ 'fir ms �! - T 'ri 1 f i •.. iR "
ct .w l 1. j ,.era
` l 4
i W hS3 It r 1y4
Part of one of the garage from Tradewinds Rd.
9-18-12 Hearing
; .5Pints Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v -*NIL :t4141
11011,101 ►
\\ \\\ ,�\\
z
Draining of pool on 7-19-12, The pool Code
Enforcement drained from Non-compliance hearing
; . p , s Code Enforcement Division
poLitEE
110D1611 ►
rr
-
N14 ti
The covering of the pool that Code Enforcement paid to have
done.
14%f12 snr ,, � Code Enforcement Division
v r 14G19s y
S._ V°
yyy
4
Y •
SPEED ' -_°"-
LIMIT -
/p " 1-
1 fi
■
4I.
From the corner of Tradewinds Rd. and Sunrise
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
iila POlICE r
., .:, , .0 , :„.. ,i'
V 5
4a
/... --------.-_-•,---7,---==_;.-.=-_- -E" - - - — -
•
•
A*, . -. AWN! Mill
a .." -...
. '
1
/ ,i� .-4."''',,,,:.,',"r k /1/Y \ iA A
: / / ,' °.'/I- {!; t p, �, �' _�
/ ;t‘/ / t ' � i 1 Yb �' "` h,',
- '3TR
� / " / ./ � ,
- f
Side of house, from Sunrise 7-16-13
; .5 .p.,,,, � Code Enforcement Division
P01_ICE ,:
1 110D101 fit! - '_, ',k. _s , 4 ,% R ' ytit A� ; �e `S■T.� 4a.. C` p 1 ` y Y, 'y
_ H
!fit 1 ¢ 's. ;,00' ' fti T f. - a y
- fY {i fis /'
t
•-',�t'.yr, •�•k. ' t,.,� -E+k5 T'''' `�-v
44, � WASTE PRO 407 77J Ow
, y„
r v.
t
4?
q..l ... �
07 16 . 20 i L
Current photo 7-16-13 Photo of where the Red accessory
building was located
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
The amount of the lien is approximately $84, 142. 12 as of July
16, 2013 . This includes the Code Board lien from the hearing
on July 17, 2012 for $82,250.00 and a filing fee of $ 18.50.
A lien for the draining and covering of the pool for $ 143 8.23 on
September 7, 2012.
Grass cutting liens for $310 on July 17, 2012, and $ 125.39 on
October 10, 201'2.
Administration time, City representative time $ 1 ,810.90
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
1101111611 ►
Code Enforcement is recommending that if the Board orders a
reduction that the reduction is no less than $3740.02, this
includes administrative time, grass liens, and pool draining lien,
and the recording fees (times 3 for three liens that are filed).