HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 07 23 Regular 600 WS-1 ; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v riODIDi
Case #11-0026183
Address: 443 Alderwood Ct.
Applicant: Robert Carneal
Sec. 2-61.5 Reduction of Lien Request
Non- Compliance Hearing Date;
December 18, 2011
Inspector — Christi Flannigan
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1.
ria�ios ►
• This violation was first presented to the Code Board at the
October 18, 2011 hearing. It was found in violation.
• The Order of the Board stated that the violations were to be
corrected by November 1 , 2011 .
• The Code Enforcement Board found the property in non-
compliance on December 11 , 2011 .
• The owner of record at that time was Laura Fancis and
GMAC. The owner of record at this time is Robert
Carneal.
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
HOWL
• Sec. 2-61 .5 Of City Ordinance covering the application
for satisfaction or release of code enforcement liens.
• The ordinance indicates that a reduction may be requested
to the Community Development Director
• There is an application process that was to be met by the
respondent prior to this hearing.
• (5) At the hearing before the code enforcement board, the
board shall review and consider the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, provide the violator with an
opportunity to address the board regarding the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, and to take the testimony of
other interested parties, including but not limited to city staff.
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
1101111611 ►
• (6) Upon review of the application and any testimony
presented, the code enforcement board shall recommend to
the city commission approval, approval with conditions, or
denial of the application for satisfaction or release of lien.
• The code enforcement board, in determining its
recommendation, shall consider the following factors:
a. The gravity of the violation;
b. The time in which it took the violator to come into
compliance;
c. The accrued amount of the code enforcement fine
or lien;
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v 1101Ds
d. Any previous or subsequent code violations;
e. Any financial hardship;
• (7) Any other mitigating circumstance which may warrant
the reduction or satisfaction of the penalty or fine;
• (8) After a recommendation has been rendered by the code
enforcement board, the community development director
shall place the application for satisfaction or release of lien
upon the agenda of the next regularly scheduled city
commission meeting. The City Commission may take action
solely based upon the sworn application and recommendation
of the code enforcement board, and information provided by
the violator in regard to the application for satisfaction or
release of lien.
;, ;# ,}„. , Code Enforcement Division
POLICE . . .,„,..4. ,.,.,tt ,
. .
v r iairi s ► • .�
•
1 1 t
7 -q'.∎ r”: l y- ° .: 0040
• 411
;I,"■•1
'r.
II -
I
1 - 11 ..1 II
.1. !i •
.F..* r At. i' .h(-7741 T}J, r
• • ar'.i 7,'F .r . *444004.t` 4., #, , , . *s,l'‘_• , { •
I`• !•`
t.
it ,;,
a .,
0 y, r s! - 4 1 ,,, t \i`.. 1; r' Kt■ 1 i f ! —1!'''''''''{ 'I 4 1 '''''-'1 Yk ! y` 1"' \ r �•1 I .,',4 ; , , i1`; . 4 1+ , f 1 .tkf ` l,V 1,1�) 11 Y. i. 4 `5 1 1 - , 1'1.
', 1 4 i y r
F y / ° .. t 4 k, t " \h.1', \`',`,:)', { /i 1 y t,', I\ . r t•.`�+ ,\
,J , , y ��' � , � \ I` \ y � .} �
Current photo of fence
sn „,, Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
ria�ios ►
lag
The amount of the lien is approximately $86,518.50 as of July
16, 2013 .
The recommendation is that the lien not be reduced any further
than $ 1 ,034.80.