Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2013 02 26 Regular 603 WS-1
; .5 ,. , Code Enforcement Division POLICE v r io ios ► Case #11-0026940 744 Sherwood Dr. Federal National Mortgage/SunTrust Sec. 2-61.5 Reduction of Lien Non- Compliance Hearing Date: January 17, 2012 Inspector - C. Flannigan ; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division POLICE v ria�ios ► • This violation was first presented to the Code Board at the November 15, 2011 hearing; it was found in violation. • The Order of the Board stated that the violations were to be corrected by November 30, 2011 or $ 100.00/day fine Imposed. • The Code Enforcement Board found the property in non- compliance on January 17, 2012. • The owner of record at that time was Manuel Sarnes. The owner of record on February 25, 2013 is Suntrust Mtg. s Code Enforcement Division POLICE trr ria�ios ► • The Affidavit of Compliance was issued on November 16, 2012. • Seminole County Public Records shows that Federal National Mortgage/SunTrust applied for Certificate of Title June 2012 according to the Seminole County Property Appraiser website. ; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division POLICE 1101611 • Sec. 2-61 .5 Of City Ordinance covering the application for satisfaction or release of code enforcement lien . • The ordinance indicates that a reduction may be requested to the Community Development Director • There is an application process that was to be met by the respondent prior to this hearing. • (5) At the hearing before the code enforcement board, the board shall review and consider the application for satisfaction or release of lien, provide the violator with an opportunity to address the board regarding the application for satisfaction or release of lien, and to take the testimony of other interested parties, including but not limited to city staff. ; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division POLICE 1101611 ► • (6) Upon review of the application and any testimony presented, the code enforcement board shall recommend to the city commission approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the application for satisfaction or release of lien. • The code enforcement board, in determining its recommendation, shall consider the following factors: a. The gravity of the violation; b. The time in which it took the violator to come into compliance; c. The accrued amount of the code enforcement fine or lien; ; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division POLICE HOWL V d. Any previous or subsequent code violations; e. Any financial hardship; • (7) Any other mitigating circumstance which may warrant the reduction or satisfaction of the penalty or fine; • (8) After a recommendation has been rendered by the code enforcement board, the community development director shall place the application for satisfaction or release of lien upon the agenda of the next regularly scheduled city commission meeting. The City Commission may take action solely based upon the sworn application and recommendation of the code enforcement board, and information provided by the violator in regard to the application for satisfaction or release of lien. At po , � Code Enforcement Division•iilis- po L.1 tE.E . ,.'..,-,-,..4 s-'Ji,%, ._.-rq a A, A: yam14GI' d 4 •,, :k gd Fi } .r A II i ,, A 7 l'Ino,', /A sz , t1/4, ,r ;) n ,, gut•, Ill r — �c,5 w Sig•+ "IpM © 1 w�r+ ,1 V,\Fb i µ '-, t� NO014,, JL ■ ■ , Jigiek •Ao' is EP l ' 1 ts1 Photo from the Non-Compliance Hearing in January 2012 ; . c Code Enforcement Division 410s. POlICE er 11011,101 rr BANK OWED 4'1 FOR SUE1 11 . 16 . 2 Current photo where the tree trimmings were laying ; .5 ,� , Code Enforcement Division Ap POLIES v 110111101 4,11 Nrgd fi''''r i Loom . .� 2012 02 : 14 Current photo where there were no house numbers ; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division. POLICE v 1101111611 ► The amount of the lien is approximately $35 965.52 as of February 20, 2012. Community Development Division and staff is recommending that the lien not be reduced any further than $ 1065.52 which covers costs incurred by the City. This based on the quickness of the response once ownership was transferred after the lien was put into place.