HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 02 26 Regular 602 WS-1 ; .5 snr ,, Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v riOD!
Case #11-0026800
601 Marlin Rd.
Federal National Mortgage Association
Sec. 2-61.5 Reduction of Lien Request
Non- Compliance Hearing Date:
February 26, 2013
Inspector - Jim Flannigan
; .5 snr ,, Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
ria�ios ►
• This violation was first presented to the Code Board at the
October 18, 2011 hearing. It was found in violation.
• The Order of the Board stated that the violations were to be
corrected by November 1 , 2011 .
• The Code Enforcement Board found the property in non-
compliance on December 20, 2011 .
• The owner of record at that time was William Riggin. The
owner is now Federal National Mtg
; .5 snr ,, Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1.
11011,101 ►
• The Affidavit of Compliance was issued on April 1 , 2012.
• Seminole County Public Records shows that Federal
National Mortgage applied for Certificate of Title
November 2012 according to the Seminole County
Property Appraiser website.
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1101611
• Sec. 2-61 .5 Of City Ordinance covering the application
for satisfaction or release of code enforcement lien .
• The ordinance indicates that a reduction may be requested
to the Community Development Director
• There is an application process that was to be met by the
respondent prior to this hearing.
• (5) At the hearing before the code enforcement board, the
board shall review and consider the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, provide the violator with an
opportunity to address the board regarding the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, and to take the testimony of
other interested parties, including but not limited to city staff.
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1101611 ►
• (6) Upon review of the application and any testimony
presented, the code enforcement board shall recommend to
the city commission approval, approval with conditions, or
denial of the application for satisfaction or release of lien.
• The code enforcement board, in determining its
recommendation, shall consider the following factors:
a. The gravity of the violation;
b. The time in which it took the violator to come into
compliance;
c. The accrued amount of the code enforcement fine
or lien;
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
HOWL V
d. Any previous or subsequent code violations;
e. Any financial hardship;
• (7) Any other mitigating circumstance which may warrant
the reduction or satisfaction of the penalty or fine;
• (8) After a recommendation has been rendered by the code
enforcement board, the community development director
shall place the application for satisfaction or release of lien
upon the agenda of the next regularly scheduled city
commission meeting. The City Commission may take action
solely based upon the sworn application and recommendation
of the code enforcement board, and information provided by
the violator in regard to the application for satisfaction or
release of lien.
; .5 .p.,, s Code Enforcement Division
POU€F
v "rill .kof
110101 L' 7+r
f
1{ o f Y,, 1A.■ ft-.4 4 5
A. a
��� 't 1:
.AiI.
jor
a
4 4114 A I 1
'2/18/2011
Photo from the Non-Compliance Hearing in December 20, 2011
; .5 ,�.,,, � Code Enforcement Division
iiv-
POlICE
er .4 __...„„„ .4
i.,, -....,1 ,..,
== y —ue _ ' r r
alp
ill 1 4 t:0, ;
1
, ,.... \ , _. 1
. i : 1 2
� �p .vim p f . - � .-
. T ;S
,, 4
Photo from the Non-Compliance Hearing in December 20, 2011
; .5 po , c, Code Enforcement Division
x t
v r 1419s
fi #'
k
• J7 . fir ad7g< i P•
_E f•ta $
a fri) SS
, ,
`
—
r" 4.
n9 08 . 2013 fA ' 0
Current photo of pool covering
__; .5,, sn,, , � Code Enforcement Division-G
41 -POlICE
y ` . ,
. ., i* ` v-" : 'a M c" i •4 ` j '• $ '°5j • b f 4-4* a4 M s, Y `y
a t i WK j } .'. � ' mow• 1 • R 140 rill VI k, A ,..: Tr . , , ;,-,1 ■ // ry y/ }..IOW
\ •• T � .. j*ss
•
a ?, a ��- j Via„, - J �"".
1
.1 ' V r� �'.,fya� J y.'
. t'
y. .'.. .'". .rte
01
` ski ' ,� :,
A
44416„ivessir
Current Photo shows fence repaired
;,.5p snr,,, , Code Enforcement Division
POlICE
,,,, ,..:., ,
1 110D1611 e 7 : _ i_ .
H ' 2 .e !•4 4 et
, • , .
, ..,... . _ ...„. „,„„; . .
1 i diri$ f IlLs. . 4
6. �• J +" - • _ •, t 'i'4. ...•
■ r
4141111011%. I.- ; t:'
•
g. : ' . • ,
. 11
JP
- 02 . 08 . 2013 04 : 06
r IL
Current photo front yard
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
11011,101 ►
The amount of the lien is approximately $38,206.82 as of
February 20, 2013 .
Community Development Division is recommending that the
lien not be reduced any further than $706.82 which covers costs
incurred by the City. This based on the problem was corrected
prior to Federal National taking possession of the property