HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 11 20 Regular 601.1 WS-1 ; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
is%POLICE
ria�ios ►
Case Number 11-0026952
708 Lakeside Dr.
Federal National Mtg. Assn.
Seca 2-61 .5 Reduction of Lien
Non- Compliance Hearing Date:
January 18, 2012
Inspector C. Flannigan
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
HOWL
• This violation was first observed August 29, 2011 . There
are several containers of oil stored outside the garage.
There are holes in the exterior walls.
• The Order of the Board stated that the violations were to be
corrected by November 30, 2011 .
• The Code Enforcement Board found the property in non-
compliance on January 17, 2012.
• The owner of record at that time was Kenneth B. Disch,
Trustee.
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1.
HOWL
• Seminole County Public Records shows that J.P. Morgan
Chase (purchased Washington Mutual) and the Lis
Pendens paperwork was filed in Jan. 2009. The final
judgment was filed in March 2012.
• According to the Seminole County Property Appraiser' s
Office, Federal National Mtg. Assn. requested the title
transfer in August 2012; there was no exact date provided.
• There was a request to reinspect on September 20, 2012,
from HomePro Properties stating the violations were
corrected on September 9, 2012. An affidavit of
compliance was issued on September 21 , 2012.
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1101611
• Sec. 2-61 .5 Of City Ordinance covering the application
for satisfaction or release of code enforcement lien .
• The ordinance indicates that a reduction may be requested
to the Community Development Director
• There is an application process that was to be met by the
respondent prior to this hearing.
• (5) At the hearing before the code enforcement board, the
board shall review and consider the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, provide the violator with an
opportunity to address the board regarding the application for
satisfaction or release of lien, and to take the testimony of
other interested parties, including but not limited to city staff.
; .5 ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
1101611 ►
• (6) Upon review of the application and any testimony
presented, the code enforcement board shall recommend to
the city commission approval, approval with conditions, or
denial of the application for satisfaction or release of lien.
• The code enforcement board, in determining its
recommendation, shall consider the following factors:
a. The gravity of the violation;
b. The time in which it took the violator to come into
compliance;
c. The accrued amount of the code enforcement fine
or lien;
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
HOWL V
d. Any previous or subsequent code violations;
e. Any financial hardship;
• (7) Any other mitigating circumstance which may warrant
the reduction or satisfaction of the penalty or fine;
• (8) After a recommendation has been rendered by the code
enforcement board, the community development director
shall place the application for satisfaction or release of lien
upon the agenda of the next regularly scheduled city
commission meeting. The City Commission may take action
solely based upon the sworn application and recommendation
of the code enforcement board, and information provided by
the violator in regard to the application for satisfaction or
release of lien.
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLIO
rioii ►
4014,* Ow
, r,. wi '1N7 ' 0. , fki i .
Photo from Non-Compliance Hearing
4% .5t ,� , � Code Enforcement Division
POlICE
.4,4 ..
v
e.
ria�ios ►
i
i.
i 0 A . _.
-11,
,„,.7,,,. 1- / ,
��
w
b v .> 1 ,. i•
T.- a X '' i 3 41x s S �
Photo from Non-Compliance Hearing
iiP la i.,:itp Code Enforcement Division
�� .�,,,
i.,, r is os
F
.,j 1
3
Y r
Y`
Exterior wall photo from original hearing
; .5P , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
1101111611 ►
•
11 . 08 . 2011
Photo from Non-Compliance Hearing. Hole in the exterior wall
Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
ice
rr
\\117...
/�
h
_ to
{
'sal
10 . 25 2,12 23 : 4
Current Photo of the Exterior walls that were deteriorated
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLIO
1101111611 i
I
III; i
Current Photograph of the attic vent that was missing/broken
; .5P , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
1101111611 ►
ice
17 "012 23 : 41
Current photograph of the exterior wall that had a hole in it along
with the attic vent cover that was missing/broken
; ,� , Code Enforcement Division
POLIC-E
to-
11011,1611 ►
.000 svAii
� i �' _ yam' y, - `
In 2' ?n19
Current photo where the oil containers were sitting
; .5 ,� , s Code Enforcement Division
POLICE
v
11011,101 ►
The amount of the lien is $58,760.28 as of October 16, 2012.
Community Development Division and staff is recommending
that the lien not be reduced any further than $ 1 ,061 .92, which
covers costs incurred by the City. This based on the quickness
of the response once ownership was transferred after the lien
was put into place.