HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 11 19 Public Hearing 504 Ordinance 2012-21, Weaver Large Scale
COMMISSION AGENDA
Informational
Consent
ITEM504
Public Hearings
X
Regular
November 19, 2012KSRS
Special MeetingCity ManagerDepartment
REQUEST:
At the request of the applicant, the Community Development Department – Planning
Division requests that City Commission postpone first reading of Ordinance 2012-21, a
Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment, Expedited State Review (ESR 13-1), which
proposes to change the Future Land Use Map designation from “Rural Residential”
and “Conservation Overlay” to “Low Density Residential” and “Conservation Overlay” for
approximately 19.1 acres, located on the north side of State Road 434, west of the
intersection of DeLeon Street and Cress Run), to the December 10, 2012 Regular City
Commission meeting.
SYNOPSIS:
The City of Winter Springs Community Development Department has received an
application for a Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment, Expedited State Review
(ESR 13-1), which if approved, would change the Future Land Use Map designation for an
approximate 19.1 acre parcel located on the north side of State Road 434, west of the
intersection of DeLeon Street and Cress Run from “Rural Residential” and “Conservation
Overlay” to “Low Density Residential” and “Conservation Overlay”. The applicant has
indicated that the subject property is a major portion of the development of a single-family
residential subdivision that is proposed to be developed partially in the City of Winter
Springs, and partially in the City of Oviedo. At the request of the applicant, the Community
Development Department – Planning Division requests that City Commission
postpone first reading of Ordinance 2012-21to the December 10, 2012 Regular City
Commission meeting.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY
Public Hearings 504 PAGE 1 OF 10 - November 19, 2012
Florida Statute 163.3174 (4): The Local Planning Agency shall have the general
responsibility for the conduct of the comprehensive planning program. Specifically, the
Local Planning Agency shall:
(a) Be the agency responsible for the preparation of the comprehensive plan or plan
amendment and shall make recommendations to the governing body regarding the adoption
or amendment of such plan…
(b) Monitor and oversee the effectiveness and status of the comprehensive plan and
recommend to the governing body such changes in the comprehensive plan as may from
time to time be required…
Florida Statute 163.3187 Amendment of adopted comprehensive plan;
Florida Statute 166.041 Procedures for adoption of ordinances and resolutions;
Winter Springs Charter Section 4.15 Ordinances in General;
Winter Springs Article III. Comprehensive Plan Amendments;
Section 15-30. Authority, purpose and intent;
Section 15-35. Review Procedure;
Section 15-36. Review criteria;
Section 15-37. Local Planning Agency Review and Recommendation:
Prior to the City Commission's consideration of the application, the Local Planning Agency
shall consider the application(s) at a Public Hearing, along with the staff review board's
recommendation, and recommend that the City Commission approve, approve with
modifications (text only), or deny the application for transmittal to the Department of
Economic Opportunity. At a minimum, the Local Planning Agency shall consider the same
factors considered by the staff review board. The LPA shall hold at least one (1) public
hearing prior to making its recommendation to the City Commission.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Applicant – Dwight Saathoff: American Land Investments of Central Florida, LLC.
Location – north side of State Road 434, west of the intersection of DeLeon Street and
Cress Run.
Site Information – The approximate 19.1 acre parcel currently has a “Rural Residential”,
and “Conservation Overlay” future land use designation. The applicant has petitioned the
City to change the future land use designation of the parcel to “Low Density Residential”,
and “Conservation Overlay” in order to develop a single-family residential subdivision on
the property.
PARCEL
Property Address: No existing address
Property Owner: Donald E. Weaver, as Trustee of the Donald E.
Weaver Revocable Trust dated June 29, 1984
Public Hearings 504 PAGE 2 OF 10 - November 19, 2012
Applicant Address: 5535 Osprey Isle Lane, Orlando, FL 32819
Property Appraiser Parcel I.D.: 03-21-31-300-0090-0000
Property Acreage: Approximately 19.1 acres
Property Legal Description: LEG SEC 03 TWP 21S RGE 31E W 1/2 OF
SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4
Existing Zoning: City of Winter Springs R-C1 (Single-family
dwelling district)
Current Future Land Use: Rural Residential, Conservation Overlay
Proposed Future Land Use: Low Density Residential, Conservation
Overlay
Existing Land Uses –The property is currently undeveloped. Portions of the property are
currently being utilized for the growing and harvesting of palm trees. According to the
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, a shed was utilized for the storage of fertilizers on
the property. The western portion of the property contains a 100-foot by 100-foot parcel
where a cellular tower is located. Within the cellular tower parcel, there is an emergency
generator with an aboveground diesel fuel storage tank. Additionally, there is a
Conservation Overlay over the southwestern portion of the property. Per the City’s
Comprehensive Plan, the Conservation Overlay is “not intended to prevent development,
but rather identify sensitive areas that need to be reviewed carefully during the review
process to determine whether development should be permitted or if some form of
mitigation may be necessary.”
Adjacent existing land uses, zoning and future land use designations include the following:
Existing Land Uses Zoning Future Land Use
Subject Property Undeveloped with a palm tree City of Winter City of Winter
growing and harvesting Springs R-C1 Springs “Rural Residential”
operation, cellular tower(Single-family and “Conservation Overlay”
dwelling district)
North City of Winter Springs Solary City of Winter City of Winter
Canal stormwater treatment Springs R-C1 Springs “Public/Semi-public”
facility (Single-family
dwelling district)
South Undeveloped City of Winter City of Winter
Springs C-1 Springs “Commercial”, “Cons
(Neighborhood ervation” and “Conservation
Commercial) Overlay”
East Warehouse/storage facility, City of Winter City of Winter
vacant two-story single-family Springs R-C1 Springs “Rural Residential”,
home(Single-family Seminole County Rural 3
dwelling district),
Seminole County A-
3 (Agriculture)
West Single-family residential City of Winter City of Winter
Public Hearings 504 PAGE 3 OF 10 - November 19, 2012
subdivision (Barrington Springs C-1 Springs “Commercial”, “Low
Estates), commercial use (Neighborhood Density Residential”
consisting of a daycare centerCommercial), R-1A (Barrington Estates: density
(One family of 1.88 dwelling units per
dwelling district) acre).
Development Trends – This parcel is undeveloped and has been utilized for the growing and
harvesting of palm trees. The parcel to the north is owned by the City of Winter Springs and
is the site of the Solary Canal stormwater treatment facility. The parcel to the south consists
primarily of undeveloped lands characterized by wooded areas, and is the subject of a
proposed Small-Scale future land use amendment being considered under Ordinance 2012-
19. The parcels to the east consist of a vacant two-story single-family residence that is
located in Seminole County, and a warehouse/storage facility that is located within the City
of Winter Springs. The property immediately to the west is located within the City of
Winter Springs and consists of a single-family residential subdivision known as Barrington
Estates, which has approximately 110 lots. Barrington Estates was developed at a density of
1.88 dwelling units per acre. Based on a Conceptual Plan submitted by the applicant as a
point of discussion, the subject property is proposed to be developed at a density of 2.14
dwelling units per acre (41 lots proposed / 19.1 acres = 2.14 dwelling units per acre).
Beyond the adjacent parcels, the surrounding area has trended toward low density single-
family development. The subject property has a current future land use designation
of “Rural Residential” and “Conservation Overlay”.
Proposed Future Land Use Classification – The proposed change in the future land use
designation to “Low Density Residential” and “Conservation Overlay” will permit up to a
maximum of 3.5 units per gross acre on the developable portions of the property. The
current designation of “Rural Residential” and “Conservation Overlay” permits a maximum
of 1 (one) dwelling unit per acre on the developable portions of the property. Based on a
conceptual plan that the applicant presented to staff as a point of discussion, a majority of
the property will be developed as single-family residences that will be part of an overall
residential subdivision that will be developed in both the City of Winter Springs and the
City of Oviedo. The applicant has indicated the entire project will be developed with the
same density as the subject parcel. The southwestern portion of the site where the existing
conservation overlay designation is located will remain in preservation. The remainder of
the development will be located on adjacent parcels, one of which is located in the City of
Winter Springs, and the remaining parcels are located in the City of Oviedo. According to
the application received by the City, no wetland impacts are anticipated. If during the design
phase any such impacts are unavoidable, the applicant will be required to mitigate said
impacts in accordance with all applicable laws. Development of this property as single-
family residences, and retaining the remaining conservation overlay designation appears to
be the highest and best use of the property.
Letters/Phone Calls In Favor Or Opposition – To date, the City has not received any letters
or phone calls in favor or opposition.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS:
The following summarizes the data and issues which staff analyzed in reviewing this
application:
Public Hearings 504 PAGE 4 OF 10 - November 19, 2012
Justification for Future Land Use Designation
- The requested future land use map
designation is “Low Density Residential” and “Conservation Overlay” from “Rural
Residential” and “Conservation Overlay”.
The applicant has applied for the future land use amendment in order to develop the subject
property as part of a single-family residential subdivision that is proposed for development
in both the City of Winter Springs and the City of Oviedo. The proposed use and density is
compatible with the surrounding area, as it generally characterized by low density
residential development patterns.
Public Facilities:
ROADS/TRAFFIC CIRCULATION:
The portion of State Road 434 that the property is closest to contains two lanes and has
access to the State Road 417/Greeneway beltway, which is approximately one (1) mile to
the west of the subject property. A conceptual plan that was presented to staff for discussion
purposes shows an internal road will be developed on the property. This road is proposed
for development in both the City of Winter Springs and the City of Oviedo. Lots on the
subject property are proposed to have frontage on this street. This street is proposed to
service the entire development which the subject property is proposed to be part of.
Availability of Access:
A Conceptual Plan that was provided by the applicant as a point of discussion shows the
parcel being interconnected to an adjacent parcel which is proposed at this point to have
access to DeLeon Street, a Seminole County local road. Access to the State Road
417/Greeneway is approximately one (1) mile to the west. As previously mentioned, these
lots will have frontage on an internal street which is proposed to be developed in the City of
Oviedo and the City of Winter Springs.
Function Classification:
State Road 434 is a principal arterial that runs north from Edgewater Drive near Orlando to
Altamonte Springs, then east to Oviedo, and then south to East Colonial Drive. Within this
portion of the City of Winter Springs, State Road 434 is a two-lane roadway. According to
the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the level of service (LOS) on this portion of State Road 434
is ‘F’. According to the traffic study that was submitted by the applicant, under the
current “Rural Residential” future land use designation, the property could be developed
with a maximum of 19 residential units (1.0 dwelling units per acre x number of acres). The
proposed change to “Low Density Residential” would permit up to 3.5 dwelling units per
acre on the property. This future land use designation allows up to a maximum of 67 units
on the property (3.5 dwelling units per acre x 19.1 acres =). Based on a Conceptual Plan
submitted by the applicant as a point of discussion, the subject property is proposed to be
developed at a density of 2.14 dwelling units per acre (41 lots proposed / 19.1 acres = 2.14
dwelling units per acre).
If the subject parcel itself was the only property proposed for development, there would be
an increase in the total amount of trips on the adjacent roadways. According to the
conclusion provided in the traffic study, development of the subject property and the
adjacent parcels as a single-family residential subdivision will result in a net decrease of
3,852 new daily trips and 357 new P.M. peak hour trips on State Road 434.
Public Hearings 504 PAGE 5 OF 10 - November 19, 2012
POTABLE WATER:
City water lines are available in the general vicinity of the subject property. At the time of
development, the applicant will be required to extend water lines to the subject property.
WASTEWATER
City sewer service is available in the general vicinity of the subject property. At the time of
development, the applicant will be required to extend sewer service to the subject property.
RECLAIMED WATER:
Facilities serving the parcels: None currently.
ELECTRIC SERVICE:
Facilities serving the parcels: None currently. The City of Winter Springs is serviced by
Progress Energy for electric service. Progress Energy will provide service to this area, with
no interruption of service. A future land use change will not impact current electric rates.
SOLID WASTE:
Facilities serving the parcels: None currently. The City of Winter Springs currently has a
franchise agreement and is serviced by Waste Services of Florida, Inc., a private solid waste
contractor who will provide service to this area.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT:
Facilities serving the parcels: None currently. Upon development, the site will be required
to provide on-site stormwater management in accordance with all applicable St. John’s
River Water Management District (SJRWMD) criteria.
POLICE:
The City of Winter Springs is responsible for police protection. The station closest in
proximity to the subject property is located at 300 N. Moss Road. Response times are
averaged monthly.
FIRE:
Seminole County is responsible for fire protection. City Hall currently houses a fire station
with a response time of 5 to 8 minutes to this area.
NUISANCE POTENTIAL OF PROPOSED USE TO SURROUNDING LAND USES
:
The change in designation from “Rural Residential” and “Conservation Overlay” to “Low
Density Residential” and “Conservation Overlay” will not result in any nuisance potential
for the surrounding properties because proposed uses are compatible with the “Low Density
Residential” future land use designation, and the subject property is surrounded primarily
by residential uses designed in low density land use patterns.
NATURAL RESOURCES COMPATIBILITY:
The subject property includes a conservation overlay on the southwestern portion of the site.
Because there is a conservation overlay on a portion of the property, an environmental
impact study has been submitted to determine exact boundaries of conservation areas. This
study will be part of the transmittal package to the Florida Department of Economic
Opportunity (DEO) and all associated review agencies.
Public Hearings 504 PAGE 6 OF 10 - November 19, 2012
SOILS
The parcel consists of Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon Soils, Depressional, and Basinger
and Delray fine sands. Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon Soils, Depressional soils are nearly
level, very poorly drained that are found in swamps and depressions. According to the
Environmental Impact Study that was submitted: “the surface layer of Basinger soil consists
of very dark gray mucky fine sand about six (6) inches thick. Samsula surface layer is muck
that is about 30-inches thick. The surface layer of Hontoon soil consists of dark reddish
brown much about 18-inches thick. During most years, the undrained areas of the soils in
this map unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more. The permeability of this soil unit is
rapid.”
“Basinger and Delray sands are nearly level, poorly drained soils found in sloughs and
poorly defined drainageways. The surface layer of Basinger soil consists of very dark gray
fine sand about five (5) inches thick. The surface of Delray soil consists of black fine sand
about 12-inches thick. During most years the seasonal high table for this soil type is within
12-inches of the surface for 6 months or more. The permeability of Basinger soil is rapid.
The permeability of Delray soil is rapid in the upper part and moderate in the lower part.”
FLOOD PRONE AREAS
According to the Seminole County Property Appraiser’s records, the property is within
flood zone “X”. Based on this, no areas of the property appear to be flood prone. It has been
observed in the past that areas of the subject property are prone to ponding and therefore the
southwestern portion of the property is shown on the Conceptual Plan that was presented by
the applicant as a conservation area.
HISTORIC RESOURCES
No known historical resources are known to be located on the subject property.
WILDLIFE
The conservation overlay area noted on the City’s future land use map indicates the site
may potentially contain protected wildlife habitat areas, in addition to hydric soils/wetlands
and special vegetative communities. The environmental report that was submitted with the
future land use amendment application indicates the existence of gopher tortoises on the
property and the existence of four (4) bald eagle nests within one (1) mile of the subject
property, well outside the required 660-foot no development buffer that is required around
bald eagle nests. The Environmental Impact Study states the gopher tortoises will be re-
located off-site to a Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC)
approved recipient site.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Future Land Use Element
The Conceptual Plan that was presented by the applicant as a point of discussion proposes a
density of 2.14 dwelling units per acre on the subject property. Per the Comprehensive Plan,
the Low Density Residential future land use category permits up to a maximum of 3.5
dwelling units per acre. This residential category is characterized by detached single-family
homes on one-quarter acre lots. This land use category is intended to be applied as a
transitional land use where higher density residential land uses would conflict with existing
Public Hearings 504 PAGE 7 OF 10 - November 19, 2012
adjacent neighborhoods.
The surrounding area is generally characterized by low density residential uses. The single-
family development to the west known as Barrington Estates was constructed at a density of
1.88 dwelling units per acre. The proposed future land use amendment is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
The Conservation Overlay is not intended to prevent development, but rather identify
sensitive areas that need to be reviewed carefully during the review process to determine
whether development should be permitted or if some form of mitigation may be necessary.
There will be no future land use change to the portion of the property that has this
designation. Therefore, the proposed future land use amendment is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed future land use amendment is consistent with the following policies from the
Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan:
1.
Policy 1.1.8 – requires an Environmental Impact Study to be submitted which
identifies the extent of all conservation areas and protected species on-site, and the
impacts of development when a portion of a site is illustrated in the Comprehensive
Plan as having a Conservation Overlay. The applicant submitted and Environmental
Impact Assessment with the application. Additionally, results of the Environmental
Impact Study will be further analyzed by staff during the development review process.
2.
Policy 1.12.11 - requires areas determined to need protection through the
Environmental Impact Study process to be placed into a permanent conservation
easement prior to final development order approval.
3.
Policy 1.3.1 - requires all development proposals to determine their specific impacts
on current Level of Service (LOS) and mobility standards.
4.
Policy 1.3.4 - requires the City to support proposed future land use map amendments
with data and analysis demonstrating that adequate water supplies and associated
public facilities will be available to meet the projected growth demands.
5.
Policy 1.6.4 - Encourages land uses that generate high traffic counts to locate adjacent
to arterial roads and mass transit systems.
6.
Policy 1.7.1 - requires the City to consider existing and proposed land uses in
adjacent jurisdictions when reviewing proposed land use amendments.
Transportation Element
The proposed future land use amendment is consistent with the following policies from the
Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan:
1.
Policy 1.1.7 and Policy 1.11.5 – requires a Transportation Impact Analysis for all new
development generating more than 300 total annual average daily trips.
Public Hearings 504 PAGE 8 OF 10 - November 19, 2012
Conservation Element
The proposed future land use amendment is consistent with the following policies from the
Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan:
1.
Policy 1.4.1 – requires the protection of the natural functions of wetlands through the
Conservation Overlay on the Future Land Use Map and the Conservation land use
category, as defined in the Future Land Use Element.
2.
Policy 1.4.6 – requires the incorporation of existing isolated wetlands into
development projects as appropriate, provided the wetlands remain undisturbed and
their natural functions are not impaired.
FINDINGS:
1.The request is consistent with all applicable goals, objectives and policies of
the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan.
2.The request is in conformance with the purpose and intent of the City Code
and with all applicable requirements.
3.Considering the type and location of uses involved and the general character
of the area, the change of the FLUM designation will not result in any
incompatible land uses, including such factors as height, bulk, scale, intensity,
traffic, noise, drainage, dust, lighting, appearance, and other factors deemed
important.
4.The request is consistent with Florida Statute Chapter 163, Part II, of the
Florida Statutes.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed Large-Scale future land use amendment which re-designates the property
from “Rural Residential” and “Conservation Overlay” to “Low Density Residential”
and “Conservation Overlay” allows the subject property to be developed into a single-
family residential subdivision. Development of the subject property is anticipated to provide
an increase to the City’s taxable value.
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission,
City Manager, City Attorney/Staff, and is available on the City’s Website, LaserFiche, and
the City’s Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the
respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals
noted above, and which is also available on the City’s Website, LaserFiche, and the City’s
Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have
requested Agendas/Agenda Item information, Homeowner’s Associations/Representatives
on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This
information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional
copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the
City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff
Public Hearings 504 PAGE 9 OF 10 - November 19, 2012
is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested
individuals.
In accordance with state statute, this item was advertised in the Orlando Sentinel on October 28,
2012. Additionally, the applicant has met with the Barrington Estates homeowners association
and the president of the Black Hammock Association.
RECOMMENDATION:
At the request of the applicant, the Community Development Department – Planning
Division requests that City Commission postpone first reading of Ordinance 2012-21, a
Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment, Expedited State Review (ESR 13-1), which
proposes to change the Future Land Use Map designation from “Rural Residential”
and “Conservation Overlay” to “Low Density Residential” and “Conservation Overlay” for
approximately 19.1 acres, located on the north side of State Road 434, west of the
intersection of DeLeon Street and Cress Run), to the December 10, 2012 Regular City
Commission meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
A.
Ordinance 2012-21
B.
Traffic Study
C.
Environmental Assessment
D.
Conceptual Plan
E.
Advertisement, Orlando Sentinel – October 28, 2012
F.
Minutes, November 7, 2012 Planning & Zoning Board meeting
Public Hearings 504 PAGE 10 OF 10 - November 19, 2012
Attachment "A"
ORDINANCE NO. 2012-21
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY,
FLORIDA,RELATING TO COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING;
PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO
THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP BY DESIGNATING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF
WINTER SPRINGS GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS ONE (1)
PARCEL OF LAND, CONTAINING 19.1 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS, AND LOCATED GENERALLY NORTH OF STATE
ROAD 434 AND WEST OF DELEON STREET, MORE
PARTICULARLY DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT"A,"ATTACHED
HERETO, FROM "RURAL RESIDENTIAL" AND
"CONSERVATION OVERLAY" TO "LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL" AND "CONSERVATION OVERLAY";
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; INCORPORATION
INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;SEVERABILITY,AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PLAN
AMENDMENT.
WHEREAS,sections 163.3161 et.seq.,Florida Statutes,establish the Community Planning
Act; and
WHEREAS,sections 163.3184 and 163.3187,Florida Statutes,establish the process for the
amendment of comprehensive plans,pursuant to which the City of Winter Springs has established
procedures for amending the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed
public hearing on November 7,2012 in accordance with the procedures established in Chapter 163,
Part II, Florida Statutes, on the proposed comprehensive plan amendment; and
WHEREAS,the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed public
hearing on the proposed amendment set forth hereunder and considered findings and advice of staff,
citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and oral comments and supporting data and
analysis, and after complete deliberation, hereby approves and adopts the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment set forth hereunder; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs hereby finds that this
Ordinance is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter
Springs.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No.2012-21
Page 1 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS,AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated
herein by this reference.
Section 2. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted in compliance with, and pursuant to,
the Community Planning Act, formerly known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning
and Land Development Regulations Act.
Section 3. Purpose and Intent. It is hereby declared to be the purpose and intent of this
Ordinance to clarify,expand,correct,update,modify and otherwise further the provisions of the City
of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan.
Section 4. Adoption of Amendment to the Future Land Use Map. The City of Winter
Springs Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Map, is hereby amended by designating the real
property depicted on Exhibit"A"from"Rural Residential"to"Low Density Residential." Exhibit
"A" is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 5. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior
inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission,or parts of prior ordinances
and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict.
Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or
provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction,whether for substantive,procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
Section 8. Incorporation into Comprehensive Plan. Upon the effective date of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment adopted by this Ordinance,said Amendment shall be incorporated
into the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and any section or paragraph number or letter
and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing.
Section 9. Effective Date and Legal Status of the Plan Amendment. The effective
date of the comprehensive plan amendment shall not become effective until 31 days after the state
land planning agency notifies the City that the plan amendment package transmitted by the City is
complete, except, however, if the plan amendment is timely challenged, this Ordinance shall not
become effective until the date a final order is issued by the state land planning agency, or the date
that the Administration Commission enters a final order determining the adopted plan amendment
is in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land use dependent on this
amendment may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. After and from the
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No.2012-21
Page 2 of 3
effective date of this amendment,the comprehensive plan amendment set forth herein shall amend
the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and become a part of that plan and the amendment
shall have the legal status of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as amended.
ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular
meeting assembled on the day of , 2012.
Charles Lacey, Mayor
ATTEST:
Andrea Lorenzo-Luaces, City Clerk
Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for
the City of Winter Springs only:
Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No.2012-21
Page 3 of 3
Exhibit "A"
Legal Description:
The West 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 3, Township 21 South, Range 31 East,
lying and situate in Seminole County, Florida.
+ e
0 r e
o ,
Q
e = Subject property
- Ly / BLACK HAMMOCK -
SARRINSTON ESTATES- a �y -
S es Fai - �e -
�e
c1I- -
ROMA AVE Lt Ig 44E5 2-= ° v 4. WIIII - -
e a..: e e a_.. a 0 I - - - -- - - - -
. 0
rE:�r LAsa - SR 434 - --- - M00000
Attachment "B"
D
TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Winter Springs Parcels @ SR 434 and DeLeon Street
Introduction
This trip generation analysis was conducted for use in conjunction with an application for
comprehensive plan amendment for a property in Winter Springs, Florida. The property
consists of 28.88 acres in three parcels as follows:
• Toledo Parcel - 8.29 acres
Tax Parcel Number: 25-20-31-5BA-0000-0190
• Weaver Parcel - 19.10 acres
Tax Parcel Number: 03-21-31-300-0090-0000
• Florida Avenue R/W - 1.49 acres
50-foot Right-of-Way located between Toledo and Weaver Parcels
Figure 1 depicts the location of these parcels north of SR 434 to the west of DeLeon Street in
Winter Springs, Florida. The Toledo Parcel has a current future land use designation of
commercial (4.90 acres) and conservation (3.39 acres). The Weaver Parcel has a current
future land use designation of rural residential. The Florida Avenue Right-of-Way, now vacant,
will be vacated so that it can be developed in conjunction with the Toledo and Weaver Parcels.
American Land Investments of Central Florida, LLC, the Applicant, is proposing to change the
future land use designation (or classification) of these parcels to low density residential.
TPD No. 4407
October 3, 2012
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc.
535 Versailles Drive,Maitland, Florida 32751 •Phone(407)628-9955•Fax(407)628-8850•www.tpdtraffic.com
- h '
as_
■
,
r -71111ktiii•rhi -- . -• : , ...4723%1IFMIlr° Ia. .•
rrr r .i.i .r:j ,
41.rilifillt
•
it . do : 1
• • F .._„
• 1 P• i.. 4. �L
. ._. _.•1- _ - i.� . • i
f 5I •1 17 r IJ F ■• 4r •4
Iii y
" * Weaver r~�Yi' . } _ . r
1---.1.7 . 03-21-31-3000-0090-0000
• i1 . 6 jiL' .--
• L 1
1 •
" ,
r. ■ •
•1 ' , - .L r •■
V
,
J. L �r • • -
s ..
■ _ - - `� •I'FJ Florida Ave RIW 1 - — "• • * ; r Toledo . 'Naha
' �1. - -
r '6' ' 25-20-31-5BA-0000-0190 F
I
r
Y ..•I. r _ .--' 434) - _ 0.
ILIF.,7 .
,� r• a
ti ■ I r •
- r - Ilkdoltilr4r.: ..1 is.."... . 1l
, x
97 3 .i J•
Cal• .— — +•74 •1. -J.
.a. lir j11116:41 Ilk 1
it'sr 'Ir. •1 .
CD
r . ' a " 5
c r, Weaver-Toledo Sites Site Location
Project Ng 4407
Figure 1 NT5
Land Use Intensity Analysis
Under the current land use classification, the parcels under consideration have the following
maximum allowable uses:
• Toledo parcel — Its Commercial land use allows development up to an FAR of 0.50. This
would result in 106,722 square feet of retail commercial development (4.90 acres x
43,560 SF x 0.5 = 106,722 SF). Its conservation land use will not be developed.
• Weaver Parcel — Its Rural Residential classification allows development up to 1 DU/
gross acre. This would result in 19 residential units (19.10 x 1 DU/acre)
• Florida Avenue Right-of-Way— Reserved for road construction, no development.
Under the proposed future land use classification, the entire property of 28.88 acres will be Low
Density Residential with up to 3.5 DU/gross acre. This would result in the construction of 101
residential units (28.88 x 3.5 DU/acre = 101.08).
Trip Generation Analysis
The trip generation of the uses identified in the current and proposed future land use
classifications was calculated with the use of trip generation data from the ITE Trip Generation
Report' and ITE Trip Generation Handbook2. This calculation is summarized in Table 1 and trip
generation worksheets included in the Appendix.
TABLE 1
Trip Generation Summary, Comprehensive Plan Amendment
ITE Trip Generation Rate % New Trip Generation
Land Use Code Size Daily PM Pk Hr Trips Daily PM Pk Hr
Current FLUM
Toledo Parcel-Commercial 820 106.722 KSF 66.38 6.23 66% 4,675 439
Weaver Parcel—Residential 210 19 DU 11.88 1.24 100% 226 24
Subtotal 4,901 463
Proposed FLUM
All Parcels-Residential 210 101 DU 10.39 1.05 100% 1,049 106
Difference in New Net Trips -3,852 -357
KSF=Thousand Square Feet, DU—Dwelling Unit
i Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Report, 8"'Edition,2008
2 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Handbook,2nd Edition,2004,
As shown in the table, the most intense development under the current future land use
designation has a much higher trip generation than the most intense development under the
proposed future land use designation. The proposed amendment to the future land use
classification would result in a decrease of 3,852 new daily trips and 357 new P.M. peak hour
trips under the most intense development scenarios.
Conclusions
The Applicant is proposing to amend the future land use of 28.88 acres in the City of Winter
Springs from commercial and conservation, rural residential, and road right-of-way to Low
Density Residential (LDR). As documented herein the proposed future land use amendment
would result in a net decrease of 3,852 new daily trips and 357 new P.M. peak hour trips. This
would result in reduced traffic impacts in the area especially for the area's major roadway, SR
434 which is a two-lane principal arterial in this area. The Orlando Area Transportation Study
(OUATS) Cost Feasible Plan includes this roadway segment as a four-lane divided facility.
APPENDIX
Trip Generation Worksheets
Summary of Trip Generation Calculation
For 106.722 Th.Sq.Ft. GLA of Shopping Center
October 03, 2012
Average Standard Adjustment Driveway
Rate Deviation Factor Volume
Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 66.38 0.00 1.00 7084
7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0. 91 0.00 1.00 98
7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.58 0.00 1.00 62
7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 1.50 0.00 1.00 160
4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 3.05 0.00 1.00 326
4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 3.18 0.00 1.00 339
4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 6.23 0.00 1.00 665
Saturday 2-Way Volume 90.20 0.00 1.00 9626
Saturday Peak Hour Enter 4.36 0.00 1.00 465
Saturday Peak Hour Exit 4.02 0.00 1.00 429
Saturday Peak Hour Total 8.38 0.00 1.00 894
Note: A zero indicates no data available.
The above rates were calculated from these equations:
24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = . 65LN(X) + 5.83, R^2 = 0.78
7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) = .59LN(X) + 2.32
R^2 = 0.52 , 0. 61 Enter, 0.39 Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) = . 67LN(X) + 3.37
R^2 = 0.81 , 0.49 Enter, 0.51 Exit
AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: 0
R^2 = 0 , 0 Enter, 0 Exit
PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: 0
R^2 = 0 , 0 Enter, 0 Exit
Sat. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = . 63LN(X) + 6.23, R^2 = 0.82
Sat. Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = . 65LN(X) + 3.76
R^2 = 0.83 , 0.52 Enter, 0.48 Exit
Sun. 2-Way Volume: T = 15. 63(X) + 4214.46, R^2 = 0.52
Sun. Pk Hr. Total: 0
R^2 = 0 , 0 Enter, 0 Exit
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
Summary of Trip Generation Calculation
For 106.722 Th.Sq.Ft. GLA of Shopping Center
October 03, 2012
Average Standard Adjustment Driveway
Rate Deviation Factor Volume
Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 66.38 0.00 1.00 7084
7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0. 91 0.00 1.00 98
7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.58 0.00 1.00 62
7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 1.50 0.00 1.00 160
4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 3.05 0.00 1.00 326
4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 3.18 0.00 1.00 339
4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 6.23 0.00 1.00 665
Saturday 2-Way Volume 90.20 0.00 1.00 9626
Saturday Peak Hour Enter 4.36 0.00 1.00 465
Saturday Peak Hour Exit 4.02 0.00 1.00 429
Saturday Peak Hour Total 8.38 0.00 1.00 894
Note: A zero indicates no data available.
The above rates were calculated from these equations:
24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = . 65LN(X) + 5.83, R^2 = 0.78
7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) = .59LN(X) + 2.32
R^2 = 0.52 , 0. 61 Enter, 0.39 Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) = . 67LN(X) + 3.37
R^2 = 0.81 , 0.49 Enter, 0.51 Exit
AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: 0
R^2 = 0 , 0 Enter, 0 Exit
PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: 0
R^2 = 0 , 0 Enter, 0 Exit
Sat. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = . 63LN(X) + 6.23, R^2 = 0.82
Sat. Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = . 65LN(X) + 3.76
R^2 = 0.83 , 0.52 Enter, 0.48 Exit
Sun. 2-Way Volume: T = 15. 63(X) + 4214.46, R^2 = 0.52
Sun. Pk Hr. Total: 0
R^2 = 0 , 0 Enter, 0 Exit
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
Summary of Trip Generation Calculation
For 19 Dwelling Units of Single Family Detached Housing
October 03, 2012
Average Standard Adjustment Driveway
Rate Deviation Factor Volume
Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 11.88 0.00 1.00 226
7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0.30 0.00 1.00 6
7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0. 91 0.00 1.00 17
7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 1.21 0.00 1.00 23
4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 0.78 0.00 1.00 15
4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 0.46 0.00 1.00 9
4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 1.24 0.00 1.00 24
Saturday 2-Way Volume 11.50 0.00 1.00 219
Saturday Peak Hour Enter 0.74 0.00 1.00 14
Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0. 65 0.00 1.00 12
Saturday Peak Hour Total 1.39 0.00 1.00 26
Note: A zero indicates no data available.
The above rates were calculated from these equations:
24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = . 92LN(X) + 2.71, R^2 = 0. 96
7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: T = .7 (X) + 9.74
R^2 = 0.89 , 0.25 Enter, 0.75 Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) = . 9LN(X) + .51
R^2 = 0. 91 , 0. 63 Enter, 0.37 Exit
AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: T = .7 (X) + 12.37
R^2 = 0.89 , 0.26 Enter, 0.74 Exit
PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = .88LN(X) + . 62
R^2 = 0. 91 , 0. 64 Enter, 0.36 Exit
Sat. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = . 95LN(X) + 2.59, R^2 = 0. 92
Sat. Pk Hr. Total: T = .89(X) + 9.56
R^2 = 0. 91 , 0.53 Enter, 0.47 Exit
Sun. 2-Way Volume: T = 8.84 (X) + -13.31, R^2 = 0. 94
Sun. Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = . 91LN(X) + .35
R^2 = 0.87 , 0.53 Enter, 0.47 Exit
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
Summary of Trip Generation Calculation
For 101 Dwelling Units of Single Family Detached Housing
October 03, 2012
Average Standard Adjustment Driveway
Rate Deviation Factor Volume
Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 10.39 0.00 1.00 1049
7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0.20 0.00 1.00 20
7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0. 60 0.00 1.00 60
7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 0.80 0.00 1.00 80
4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 0. 66 0.00 1.00 67
4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 0.39 0.00 1.00 39
4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 1.05 0.00 1.00 106
Saturday 2-Way Volume 10.58 0.00 1.00 1069
Saturday Peak Hour Enter 0.52 0.00 1.00 53
Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0.46 0.00 1.00 47
Saturday Peak Hour Total 0. 98 0.00 1.00 99
Note: A zero indicates no data available.
The above rates were calculated from these equations:
24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = . 92LN(X) + 2.71, R^2 = 0. 96
7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: T = .7 (X) + 9.74
R^2 = 0.89 , 0.25 Enter, 0.75 Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) = . 9LN(X) + .51
R^2 = 0. 91 , 0. 63 Enter, 0.37 Exit
AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: T = .7 (X) + 12.37
R^2 = 0.89 , 0.26 Enter, 0.74 Exit
PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = .88LN(X) + . 62
R^2 = 0. 91 , 0. 64 Enter, 0.36 Exit
Sat. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = . 95LN(X) + 2.59, R^2 = 0. 92
Sat. Pk Hr. Total: T = .89(X) + 9.56
R^2 = 0. 91 , 0.53 Enter, 0.47 Exit
Sun. 2-Way Volume: T = 8.84 (X) + -13.31, R^2 = 0. 94
Sun. Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = . 91LN(X) + .35
R^2 = 0.87 , 0.53 Enter, 0.47 Exit
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
I
1( Attachment "C"
Boo-Tech Consulting Inc. info @btc-inc.com
www.btc-inc.com
Environmental and Permitting Services
July 11, 2012
Robert Zlatkiss
Lexfor Capital
3911 Orange Lake Drive
Orlando, Florida 32817
Proj: SR 434 & Deleon Street Project Site; Seminole County,Florida
Section 03, Township 21 South,Range 31 East
(BTC File #672-01.05)
Re: Preliminary Environmental Assessment
Dear Mr. Zlatkiss:
During May and June of 2012, Bio-Tech Consulting, Inc. (BTC) conducted a
Orlando Office
2002E Robinson St preliminary environmental assessment of the SR 434 & Deleon Street Project
Orlando FL 32803 Site. This approximately 53.46-acre site fronts on both the north and south
Vero Beach Office sides of SR 434 and the west side of Deleon Street; approximately three-
1111 Indian River Blvd quarters of a mile west of the Eastern Beltway (SR 417); within Section 03,
Suite 201
Vero Beach FL 32960 Township 21 South, Range 31 East; Seminole County, Florida (Figures 1, 2
& 3). This preliminary environmental assessment included the following
Jacksonville Office
2036 Forbes St elements:
Jacksonville FL 32204
Tampa Office 0 • review of soil types mapped within the site boundaries;
333 Falkenburg Rd N • evaluation of land use types/vegetative communities present;
Suite A • wildlife surve and
Tampa FL 33619 Y> >
• field review for occurrence of protected species of flora and fauna.
Key West Office
1101 Key Plaza
Suite 259 SOILS
Key West FL 33040
Aquatic&Land According to the Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida, prepared by the
Management operations
3825 Rouse Rd U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation
Orlando FL 32811 Service (NRCS), five (5) soil types occur within the subject property
Native Plant Nursery boundaries (Figure 4). These soils include the following:
BCC Farms
8580 Bunkhouse Rd
Orlando FL 32832
401.894.5969
811.894.5969
401.894.5910 fax Key West Vero Beach Orlando Jacksonville Tampa
Robert Zlatkiss;Lexfor Capital
SR 434&Deleon Street Project Site-Seminole County,Florida(BTC File#672-01.05)
Preliminary Environmental Assessment
Page 2 of 9
• Basinger and Delray fine sands (#9)
• Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10)
• Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional (#11)
• Canova and Terra Ceia mucks (#12)
• Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20)
The following presents a brief description of the soil types mapped for the subject property:
Basinger and Delray fine sands (#9) are nearly level, poorly drained soils and very poorly
drained soils found in sloughs and poorly defined drainageways. Typically the surface layer of
Basinger soil consists of very dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. Typically the surface
layer of Delray soil consists of black fine sand about 12 inches thick. During most years the
seasonal high table for this soil type is within 12 inches of the surface for 6 months or more. The
permeability of Basinger soil is rapid. The permeability of Delray soil is rapid in the upper part
and moderate in the lower part.
Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10) are nearly level, very poorly drained
soils found in swamps and depressions. Typically the surface layer of Basinger soil consists of
very dark gray mucky fine sand about 6 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Samsula soil
is muck about 30 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Hontoon soil consists of dark
reddish brown muck about 18 inches thick. During most years, the undrained areas of the soils
in this map unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more. The permeability of this soil unit is rapid.
Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional (#11) are nearly level,very poorly drained soils
found in depressions. Typically the surface layer of Basinger soil consists of black mucky fine
sand about 5 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Smyrna soil consists of black fine sand
about 2 inches thick. During most years undrained areas of this soil unit are ponded for 6 to 9
months. The permeability of Basinger soil is rapid. The permeability of Smyrna soil is rapid in
the surface and subsurface, moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil, and rapid in the
substratum.
Canova and Terra Ceia mucks (#12) are nearly level and very poorly drained soils found in
depressions and freshwater marshes. Typically, Canova soil has a surface layer of black muck
about 10 inches thick. Typically, Terra Ceia soil has a surface layer of black muck about 7
inches thick. In most years, undrained areas of the soils in this map unit are ponded for 6 to 9
months or more. The permeability is rapid in the upper part of Canova soil and is moderate or
moderately rapid in the lower part. The permeability of Terra Ceia soil is rapid, but internal
drainage is impeded by the shallow water table.
Bio-Tech Consulting Inc.
Environmental and Permitting Services
Robert Zlatkiss;Lexfor Capital
SR 434&Deleon Street Project Site-Seminole County,Florida(BTC File#672-01.05)
Preliminary Environmental Assessment
Page 3 of 9
Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20) are nearly level, poorly drained soils found on broad
plains on the flatwoods. Typically the surface layer of Myakka soil consists of black fine sand
about 5 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of EauGallie soil consists of dark gray fine sand
about 5 inches thick. During most years the seasonal high table for this soil type is within 12
inches of the surface for 1 to 4 months. The permeability of Myakka soil is rapid in the surface
and subsurface layers and in the substratum and moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil.
The permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or
moderately rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil and moderately slow in the loamy part of the
subsoil.
The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists (FAESS) considers Basinger and
Delray fine sands (#9), Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10), Basinger and
Smyrna fine sands, depressional (#11), and Canova and Terra Ceia mucks (#12) as hydric soil
types. Furthermore, the FAESS considers inclusions present in Myakka and Eaugallie fine sands
(#20) as hydric. This information can be found in the Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Third
Edition (March, 2000). It should be stated, however, that evidence of these soils were not
observed across the majority of the site.
LAND USE TYPES/VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES
The SR 434 & Deleon Street Project Site currently supports seven (7) land use types/vegetative
communities within it's boundaries. These land use types were identified utilizing the Florida
Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCFCS, FDOT, January 1999)
(Figure 5). The uplands within the subject property consist of Residential, Low Density (111),
Tree Nursery (241), and Temperate Hardwood (425), Disturbed Lands (740), and
Communication Facilities (822). The wetland/surface water types consist of Streams &
Waterways (510) and Wetland Forested Mixed (630). The following provides a brief description
of the land use types/vegetative communities identified on the site:
Uplands:
111 Residential,Low Density
Two (2) portions of the subject property's upland community may best be classified as
Residential, Low Density (111), per the FLUCFCS. The larger of these communities is located
within that portion of the property south of SR 434 and the second, smaller community is located
along the property's eastern boundary, off of Deleon Street. Both of these areas contain
residential dwellings and assorted secondary buildings, sheds, pole barns, etc. Vegetation
observed within the residential lots includes species such as live oak(Quercus virginiana), laurel
oak (Quercus laurifolia), southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), and cabbage palm (Sabal
Bio-Tech Consulting Inc.
Environmental and Permitting Services
Robert Zlatkiss;Lexfor Capital
SR 434&Deleon Street Project Site-Seminole County,Florida(BTC File#672-01.05)
Preliminary Environmental Assessment
Page 4 of 9
palmetto) throughout the canopy and sub-canopy; with understory species consisting of
bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), and numerous ornamental
species.
241 Tree Nursery
Within the northern portion of the overall property exists a community that may best be
classified as Tree Nursery (241), per the FLUCFCS. More specifically, this nursery contains a
variety of in-ground palms such as Washingtonia palm (Washingtonia robusta) and queen palm
(Syagrus romanzofftana); with species such as ragweed (Ambrosia artemisifolia), dogfennel
(Eupatorium capillifolium), bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), caesarweed (Urena lobata),
blackberry (Rubus spp), Spanish needles (Bidens alba), Cuban jute (Sida rhombefolia), and
Cupid's shaving brush (Emilia sonchifolia) existing between the rows of planted palms.
425 Temperate Hardwood
The largest and most expansive of the subject property's upland communities may best be
classified as Temperate Hardwood (425), per the FLUCFCS. This community is located along
the eastern and western boundaries of that portion of land located south of SR 434 and also
within the southeastern and west-central portions of the property located to the north of SR 434.
Dominant vegetative species consist of live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus
laurifolia), southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), pignut hickory (Carya glabra), cabbage
palm (Sabal palmetto), camphor (Camphora cinnamomum), hackberry (Celtis occidentalis),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), American elm (Ulmus Americana), Chinaberry (Melia
azedarach) and scattered citrus (Citrus spp); with an understory of dwarf palmetto (Sabal
minor), saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), beautyberry (Callicarpa Americana), muscadine vine
(Vitis rotundifolia), greenbriar (Smilax spp), blackberry (Rubus spp), swordfern (Polystichum
munitum), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), and poison-ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
Within the southwestern portion of this community, a large amount of switch cane (Arundinaria
gigantean) exists throughout the understory. It should also be noted that within the southeastern
portion of the property, north of SR 434 and west of Deleon Street, the majority of the
groundcover has been cleared. Within this portion of the property a large amount of Guinea grass
(Panicum maximum) exists.
740 Disturbed Lands
A small portion of the subject property's upland communities may best be classified as
Disturbed Lands (740), per the FLUCFCS. This community is located within the southwest
corner of that portion of land located north of SR 434 and has been historically cleared.
Vegetative species observed consist of a scattered canopy of cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto),
Chinaberry (Melia azedarach), and laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia); with a groundcover of
Bio-Tech Consulting Inc.
Environmental and Permitting Services
Robert Zlatkiss;Lexfor Capital
SR 434&Deleon Street Project Site-Seminole County,Florida(BTC File#672-01.05)
Preliminary Environmental Assessment
Page 5 of 9
Guinea grass (Panicum maximum), lantana (Lantana camarera), cogongrass (Imperata
cylindrica), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisifolia), Cuban jute
(Sida rhombifolia), blackberry (Rubus spp), Spanish needles (Bidens alba), and caesarweed
(Urena lobata).
822 Communication Facilities
The final of the subject property's upland communities may best be classified as Communication
Facilities (822), per the FLUCFCS. This community is directly associated with a cell phone
tower that is located centrally along the subject property's western boundary.
Wetlands/Surface Waters:
510 Streams & Waterways
A number of ditch systems extend through the subject property that may best be classified as
Streams & Waterways (510), per the FLUCFCS. Although most of the ditch systems associated
with the property are considered argicultural ditches located within the Tree Nursery (241), there
is a large ditch system that runs north-to-south through the entire propety. This ditch system
bisects the property's large, forested wetland within its western portion and extends north into
the nursery, eventually outfalling into District lands. Additionally, a number of upland cut ditch
systems extend through the eastern portion of the property and convey surface water to the
roadside ditch along Deloen Street. Lastly, one upland cut ditch exists within the southern
portion of the property that is associated with the old SR 434 right-of-way. This ditch, identified
as Surface Water 2 (SW-2), is now isolated and no longer conveys drainage off-site. All ditches
are to be located via survey and depicted as top-of-bank.
630 Wetland Forested Mixed
All of the subject property's wetland communities may best be classified as Wetland Forested
Mixed(630),per the FLUCFCS. A total of four(4) wetland systems exist within the limits of the
overall property. Vegetation observed within these systems consists of laurel oak (Quercus
laurifolia), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), red maple (Ater
rubrum), loblolly bay (Gordonia lasianthus), hackberry (Celtis occidentalis), American elm
(Ulmus americana), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and water oak (Quercus nigra)
throughout the canopy; with understory species such as elderberry (Sambucus cannadensis),
swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), southern shield
fern (Thelpteris kunthii), blackberry (Rubus spp), wild taro (Colocasia esculenta), poison-ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans), air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera), and creeping oxeye (Wedelia
trilobata).
Bio-Tech Consulting Inc.
Environmental and Permitting Services
Robert Zlatkiss;Lexfor Capital
SR 434&Deleon Street Project Site-Seminole County,Florida(BTC File#672-01.05)
Preliminary Environmental Assessment
Page 6 of 9
All wetlands within the limits of the subject property have been field delineated using pink"Bio-
Tech Consulting" flagging tape.
Additionally, it should be stated that an informal jurisdictional review was conducted by St.
Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) staff on July 2, 2012. After a few
modifications/adjustments, the limits of the wetlands as delineated by BTC were approved.
PROTECTED SPECIES
Utilizing methodologies outlined in the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's
(FFWCC) Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (revised June 2011) an assessment for "listed"
floral and faunal species occurring within the subject property boundaries was conducted. This
survey covered approximately 100% of the subject property. Particular attention was given to
those listed species which have the potential to occur in Seminole County (see attached Table 1).
The review included direct observations, as well as evidence of a particular species' presence
such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and birdcalls. No plant species listed by either The
Florida Department of Agriculture (FDA) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was
identified on the site during the assessment conducted. However, one (1) species was identified
that is listed as "commercially exploited" by the Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (FDACS). The harvesting of this species, cinnamon fern (Osumunda
cinnamomea) for commercial gain is not allowed. However, the listing of this species poses no
restrictions towards the development of the subject property. The following is a list of those
wildlife species identified during the evaluation of the property:
Reptiles and Amphibians
black racer (Coluber constrictor)
brown anole (Anolis sagrei)
fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus)
gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus)
green anole (Anolis caroliniana)
Birds
Black Vulture (Coragyps atratus)
Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata)
Common Grackle (Quiscalus quiscula)
Carolina Wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus)
Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura)
Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis)
Bio-Tech Consulting Inc.
Environmental and Permitting Services
Robert Zlatkiss;Lexfor Capital
SR 434&Deleon Street Project Site-Seminole County,Florida(BTC File#672-01.05)
Preliminary Environmental Assessment
Page 7 of 9
Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos)
Mammals
eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis)
nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus)
raccoon (Procyon lotor)
marsh rabbit(Sylvilagus palustris)
Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana)
One (1) of the above identified species is listed in the FFWCC's Official Lists - Florida's
Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (October, 2011). This
species is the gopher tortoise. The gopher tortoise is currently "listed" as "Threatened". The
following provides a brief description of this species as it relates to development of the property.
Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus)
State Listed as "Threatened"
Currently the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) is classified as a "Category 2 Candidate
Species" by USFWS, and as of September 2007 is now classified as "Threatened" by FFWCC,
and as "Threatened" by FCREPA. The basis of the "Threatened" classification by the FFWCC
for the gopher tortoise is due to habitat loss and destruction of burrows. Gopher tortoises are
commonly found in areas with well-drained soils associated with the pine flatwoods, pastures
and abandoned orange groves. Several other protected species known to occur in Seminole
County have a possibility of occurring in this area, as they are gopher tortoise commensal
species. These species include the eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), Florida
mouse (Podomys floridanus) and the gopher frog (Rana capito). However, none of these species
were observed during the survey conducted. A number of tortoise burrows was observed
through-out the subject property.
The subject property was surveyed for the existence of gopher tortoises through the use of
pedestrian transects (Figure 6). The survey covered approximately 100% of the suitable habitat
present within the subject property boundaries. Four (4) active/inactive gopher tortoise burrows
were observed and recorded using GPS technology. Based on four (4) potentially occupied
burrows, it is estimated that approximately three (3)may be occupied by a tortoise. This number
is based on the factored occupation rate of 0.614 (Auffenburg-Franz). Therefore, for the purpose
of estimating costs associated with the subject project, as many as three (3) gopher tortoises are
estimated to occupy these burrows.
The FFWCC provides three (3) options for developers that have gopher tortoises on their
property. These options include: 1) avoidance (i.e., 25-foot buffer around burrow), 2)
Bio-Tech Consulting Inc.
Environmental and Permitting Services
Robert Zlatkiss;Lexfor Capital
SR 434&Deleon Street Project Site-Seminole County,Florida(BTC File#672-01.05)
Preliminary Environmental Assessment
Page 8 of 9
preservation of habitat, and 3) off-site relocation. As such, resolution of the gopher tortoise issue
will need to be permitted through FFWCC prior to any construction activities.
Based on the tortoise population that exists within the site and the expected development plan for
the property (residential/commercial), there is only one potential option for resolving the gopher
tortoise issue. This option is off-site relocation and would require that any tortosie within 25 feet
of proposed construction activities be relocated off-site to an approved recipient site. For the
four (4) gopher tortoise burrows, the estimated cost of off-site relocation is approximately
$6,325.00 for the subject site; depending on the available recipient site at the time of permitting
and the actual number of tortoises relocated. This cost includes a formal 100% gopher tortoise
survey, permitting, excavation with a qualified biologist/FFWCC "authorized agent", and the
recipient site fees.
If relocation efforts cannot be completed within 90 days of a formal gopher tortoise survey,
FFWCC requires an additional survey to be conducted. The fee for this additional survey is not
included in the above cost estimate.
Independent to the costs associated with gopher tortoise relocations (i.e., recipient site fees,
excavation, silt fencing, transportation costs, etc.), FFWCC will be assessing a $200.00 fee for
the first five (5) gopher tortoises and $300.00 per tortoise fee for all remaining on-site tortoises.
Based on the estimated tortoise, the subject development site would be required to pay a one
time fee of $200.00, paid to FFWCC prior to obtaining any permit (i.e., off-site relocation
permits). This FFWCC mitigation fee requirement began after April 2009.
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
USFWS Listed as "Threatened"
In addition to the on-site review for "listed" species, BTC conducted a review of the FFWCC's
recorded Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nest sites on or in the vicinity of the subject
property. This review revealed four (4) Bald Eagle nests, through the 2011-2012 nesting season,
within one (1.0) mile of the subject site. These nests, Nest SE-004, Nest SE-018, Nest SE-031,
and Nest SE-045, are all located greater than 660' from any portion of the subject property. As
such, no restrictions towards the development of the site will apply.
Wood Stork(Mycteria Americana)
FFWCC& USFWS Listed as "Endangered"
It should also be noted that, as indicated on the attached exhibit (Figure 6), the subject parcel is
shown to be located within a Wood Stork Nesting Colony Core Foraging Area. The Wood stork
(Mycteria Americana) is listed as "Endangered" by both the FFWCC and the USFWS. Wood
storks are large, long-legged wading birds, about 45 inches tall, with a wingspan of 60 to 65
Bio-Tech Consulting Inc.
Environmental and Permitting Services
Robert Zlatkiss;Lexfor Capital
SR 434&Deleon Street Project Site-Seminole County,Florida(BTC File#672-01.05)
Preliminary Environmental Assessment
Page 9 of 9
inches. Their plumage is white except for black primaries and secondaries and a short black tail.
The head and neck are largely unfeathered and dark gray in color. The bill is black, thick at the
base, and slightly decurved. Wood storks are birds of freshwater and estuarine wetlands,
primarily nesting in cypress or mangrove swamps. They feed in freshwater marshes, narrow tidal
creeks, or flooded tidal pools as well as roadside ditches. Particularly attractive feeding sites are
depressions in marshes or swamps where fish become concentrated during periods of falling
water levels.
Based on our review of available databases, there is no record of a Wood Stork rookery on the
project site or within close proximity. Furthermore, as there is limited foraging habitat located
within or adjacent to the subject parcel, it is unlikely that any restrictions towards the
development of the property will be applied by either the FFWCC or the USFWS.
The environmental limitations described in this document are based on observations and
technical information available on the date of the on-site evaluation. This report is for general
planning purposes only. The limits of any on-site wetlands/surface waters can only be
determined and verified through field delineation and/or on-site review by the pertinent
regulatory agencies. The wildlife surveys conducted within the subject property boundaries do
not preclude the potential for any listed species, as noted on Table 1 (attached), currently or in
the future. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact our office at(407) 894-5969. Thank you.
Regards,
Stephen Butler
Project Manager
John Miklos
President
attachments
Bio-Tech Consulting Inc.
Environmental and Permitting Services
•
t'� r r
w
Sanford
Er
} '.:Lae.Jes .. i•
r t r t 1 t r
} r�� f • f.. r� 1
tip' ...3.,...' h �' _
• r �
• 1k
11 - — .� -------..—
. i F 1 1
II I
-- I -
' , 1 II1
--� — .. -.. ill:
F.,.. ,..... . r. ilr,, , . .• .
. ! . ,
___,
c40.1341,yr do . _ rmor.,___ iip irik, 1 .... „.. . 1
_ j
•-neva '
Winterings -"" ,
r- I
itc , ip .444,'y{`y� - Bro Roum �a e --I I—lera EV r, r -.
too. . !..1. i 1 milli' r'-
hirr I La g:La e � 11 pi.
NM A
kr..:v1.1 ..... irriati . he ..i.
ivied• y i
$1‘111111 1
ti 1 �4 . 47g
rIl -- 1 I.II
_.J I F r.
m_, -ed Bug Lake avi .,. A --•----
II _ m '�
Legend ' % j--Bac ke"
1 p an .,-1
I!
/�� SR 434 &Deleon Street Parcels •4 IF_ .ma, 1 o
6,000
#� SR 434 & Deleon Street Property I I Feet
610-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida Project #: 672-01
Environmental and Permitting Services
2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 Figure 1 Produced By: SEB
Ph: bio-echco s Fax: 407-894-5970 Location Map Date:7/2/2012
wwwbio-techconsulting.com
1 r : ,- '"` . Legend•
'If • • �' f ; 9 _ { ' P SR 434 & Deleon Street Parcels• L: ,�■ � 4»00_,
k • 1{ r T,'
1
r ' I n . • " ` _ ,
n
I Mille•Iiit:r.- Ill .. A
, •..
-ia-10- 1 lir-
. _ ..0 1
art' ' v■, • •n' '�Y� a-'' L •.. '• }" -
F
.r
_ I • .m_ .. - : : r &!..' + �# '*�'ti •
5 . •
• •',.p , - . ' i a •L• • • • • ..11 171. .:.1*.4%...•. : Arii
. •X I •• -1t9It pirt9-;. ...,r,‘'...-V.:. .• • ill' joix-• r7M 72e1:ya-Ati •• • . .. .4....1.:,;5 wt.. • ... • .%:.•:,. : ...1.• ...; ...."...11.• ....•- F.
- g.i.2111. • . -- .— • •ve .• c.f..tF. ..1 : ', • • - I. '
1 + ' �- -• T .. ��.1 ?#.V�.- ..441.: _Nf�ri��:s... ■ r1 4'•L•r• ' 1-•
' • : 1 •
• . 4 .7:•14 III:.•irily•-• il'IF' - - • 1 P•.• ••4 i: .. !
-
- ..42. odir-1-7.1k: ..• .• 4 + • le...•11- ——— _
...- , a • _ ilri"I.i.•
Vr '11 .1 ' '
�' • �•n ' y a -, .L4.. '•• •ti' I •S.. I • }Ac'll
•'N16 I:VfNe
.• '1 •• :. .41---:.0401, y .1...•••-" •":r ' 1 p.7, • •1 - #•' • ti t .
1 .1 ,..1 a r - f -
�• .. ❑ .. »• »» .�� - tip,
f ��_ +i ■ - k �TtiO•
ilk."' - g• W.A.11. yid. . '': ... .-rt' .5, 01-041•Li: -• S' r. ... .,1111; ..1 r r• V •,.._iv_
L C .1111.11s.!.....Ar
. •" '' • r ' IL , •l'. • ., •iiiKX 7 mon
-..: • ...* .: • - .E.......i.... , . , .
{ _ ri
: . -' ''x • . . d Erc . . 1..0, . _❑❑t❑ .e. . ❑rx � � •'J4� ' M
% ._ O.'.- • . i L •:.- orm.„-
450
# . SR 434 & Deleon Street Property I I Feet
Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida Project #: 672-01
Environmental and Permitting Services
2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 Figure 2 Produced By: SEB
Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 2009 Aerial Photograph Date:7/2/2012
www.bio-techconsulting.com
mar -Ilia- �a�` _- ' i F �� 'i i•
6 , � ,BUT.. -d litil
I JI ry -- ' �� --
- - % I
4 tr-
0
r_ - 4 i, ±I•
itir-
..LUI- II .:211 ...do az ...1...._ ___ . .-
AI II _
IV=-- rte_ ' _.. 1a .t I. _ --- -
_• .��. .1J _ F •' ; i lair
'' - 4 „�- '" �,' f j. i�■ "F - +fir
—Alt' •'' _. CC GoOCCC •
s'i.r' . u = _ .-
_01..- J. - - 'I :I .. IIIIIII\
-''' .1-..1' r I' -Li - \
.-
U -1-rp___
-� 4 �' CCCCCICI
-,..........
■ 1..) 23 ;, `
.. __ ■
i •�n __ . . ■ 'I■
. .
■
..
. 1.
. ..> .._.4...;:dv.
. (..■ F L'' mi r ■ ' ]]] �■]]] a ; + I F
■. . 1�.
■
c-77 it-
i ■ o
•
fir _ - - ,
•
c_ CC■■CCCCCCCCCCCC■ )p, .. 9,._■ !, -.- p 7.-
.-z I el
b, r
r
li......: _sir. i „ .. ri
'4:::-.%-- -"-'9---•LI/r7--..-•-•-".-1 . i
Legend 1 �ti�■ �� ,
iii ''''.\\ 21 ,.,...
ir--. •
..1C...,......\
.I V -\\ .
•
1 ip 1 . ...,,- 1, ..„ ..,_-
..,r . :...:.. ... ::•.• I • (
CCCq I r
-]:::_l SR 434 & Deleon Street Parcels 1- , ■
1,200
#� SR 434 & Deleon Street Property I I Feet
Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida Project #: 672-01
Environmental and Permitting Services
2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 Figure 3 Produced By: SEB
Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 USGS Topographic Map Date:7/2/2012
wwwbio-techconsulting.com
� � ` � "-'• - •• ; Legend
ti- ' y •- ' 1a C. -S ETS-�Io CF :i-- -.--•∎ pEEoofl
• 'u •` r 2 ....-,"•'I. �� 4»oor SR 434 & Deleon Street Parcels
1 _ ; . ' f,':fir- '� Soil Symbol, Soil Name•
■ d' }' • • +r „ 9, BASINGER AND DELRAY FINE SANDS
'' ' ' - • + '.� ;. .ti .. . • . `-' '•• 10, BASINGER, SAMSULA,AND HONTOON SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL•'� '••' 'r •• '. - 11, BASINGER AND SMYRNA FINE SANDS, DEPRESSIONAL•
- .' u ` . i •- 12, CANOVAANDTERRACEIAMUCKS
20, MYAKKAAND EAUGALLIE FINE SANDS
r_, ,,.. , . ... 7 - —! 1=i:1•1" 11•••.-•..••• '.1 .• cmr . • - -• ' AI . - ••"•• l• III f •.:•-••
ti.. fi "l 3 - 'art'f ' _ . .; . 'K` .1or r. ` A''
• . rte°•.' ''� :: ate'.:: _ _-. �• • ' �} •- r � �'.. �.•i + ���~ - ❑L=tip —� -+ - , ' ',s• ri i•WI 0 { '.. '�__—• a-.� .-ii�1- ��-.. -i ' •i 1 •• -. ....:1.•fit+ ,I. +
■ i, * ,�• + •fir f ;I.;-•. :• ,,,,, 1 $..': .. ••••••1. • •:•• ..7..:•i•1:I'M.:- •Or I. ..
' , : : 'it s' • .. ._e -_t::.:e_• ■ "n∎ r-'.. � I y } t '.' — ` r:s,_,_•• ' 1 i ,•
■ :tom a� ; .e i
f='
.* ■• � ' II•:: f•k _
ti �� _ ■
- '
' ■ .. • 3 •' ti, F x y �� 1 kJ r .■. ire..2. —■!i+*+•
,� h � .1,01t.',..:.0 ' . '• d'ke• • .{ . '. . f - . I11 "•r� �. �.. + fir -
:
�, • - c�•
44114.
•• i v , :.•" P11244437 . :' :1/2c li•1 .{ ° 7 --- - ' ' 2 : . _ . . 1•.. • •ti ,20 ••.. � . • rr _•�:T • ..Lir d•�' pa,, .. i�• • '�, 1 *••11: • •
'' 1 •' A �- �� .. __ _ r .-- • • k
ai i _,. . ... . . ....!!‘..,,p- ::_s.. . . . Mill.•. •
--.•:.ill . .• .• :7.•.N;;.,..1. - • liL -
450
# . SR 434 & Deleon Street Property I I Feet
1 Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida Project #: 672-01
Environmental and Permitting Services
2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 �FTigure 4 Produced By. SE'B
Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970
USDS/NRCS Soils Map Date:7/2/2012
www bio-te chcon salting.con
s, { F Y Legend
`F r �'", - ="; ?� — - ��� 'r�` +,;:� - L fl SR 434&Deleon Street Parcels•
�� – ' 'x,. •4�_ yy •: ;' Residential, Low Density(111)
-�-} '''€-I': I - :� = ' r•. 's `� i '.1 { • Tree Nursery(241)
r_ , L. •;� ��� —•.Fr" i x Temperate Hardwoods(425)
�r• - � =� Streams&Waterways(510)
ti
{ �r.'k 5105'1r0 mc5,1'O�' - -� Wetland Forested Mixed (630)
` 1 _ , . PI �I Disturbed Lands(740)
•
r I !-- +I'':1 • Communication Facilities(822)
r � ��. _I.
_ 1 : 82'2. --._ -- ,�• y,� ,
r ,= . 510r •A. 1 :
. . 0,.._ __6,I ■ _ -- it ,542;911,1E i ` _
I s Y i i ' t ;%•
- 5110 l - - _ -- .x.
.+ y ,I.
' q� � ' 1 I \ - y }1t' R.O.W. PARCEL
II J�1 ' ' „, -• Y• TO BE INCLUDED "
. 1 Fr'- ''"'' ..."1- . i , 1 _ - _-.C•1- j _-i' 1
` I� _ - ■•—'_I '1 { 1 ii.1 '' ' . • '. -4 .... .. VV.+ i .i- 5'1'0 '�_
' ' iq.... IF . +1;....;
y y c�
42'5....1 } 1 r 1 '! S�•
b}y Y I t•a'• F7j. •' • #•, li r } ter
ti-• T4
n '~•�'~' 11 r - +-� i __T �..C. :i'.�LF ' :6430• ,•r - T_ n ••_ ry'•Jar•...: • -I& 7 A etI,I,..540‘i.....:'.1.01,.-. 41.1;.-&•- • •i .• - • -
+} , 74 +
• �, 510 A. x. ;•
'41'• •: ' 1111 { m�
?�'�L - �F. .1. 5110=i .. '
f' r.. _ i I fIF '11-'• .tit
- '_ .• .if 1.11 , 'h y�'• k
I r. • �� •. Y
•ti �• ,'_- '_, }' 1 ` 4 ��_■' �IL
4y� 1r •' ' 'n ` E 'c-r 'iris a ri i L ' -i ••JyJ
450
# . SR 434 & Deleon Street Property I I Feet
1 Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. Seminole County, Florida Project #: 672-01
Environmental and Permitting Services
2002 E.Robinson St. Orlando,FL 32803 Figure 5 Produced By: SEB
Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 FLUCFCS Map Date:7/2/2012
www.bio-techconsulting.com
ti e4 _ n cs f - d� r n- es F r- .. .1.
}bra .{n L` { 0• 'z.' ',7k_ �.ka, *+ !' L a. ti : -: ?{ r�•a : ti ��ee-���� , C 1.--1,, -� Q- c .q�—tz i �- ti•, P" k'hy'{ : ,�.1 '7i�-1 — - . .•�
err.'� '-s t t 4, .'{ '-3k �.ka .' '.' t { _ '-Y - •a e-r �- P ez =2 Q- c tz 21 Y �� 1•• ,� r� r I-•• � �� r' • r c - �JL 1'r' • 1'� a -�= ''kk i r' ,•
yrG7��Y�' ,� .71c..._:.,..._...... '-s t {•-,R . y a...'{ *�Iti ti � 4f � � �' '•. Alt
'ti
..: 0_7' ,•: r . ... . ..' . E.I. rr � �_ i 7.710. } :Yi•LL 1 11F— 1''
i7 9'..•1!.-=•115 NI q.-•...leelY--.c:V..01i -A,: . - 9. ..-LiNly.T.,I,EL... . .
t•. 1,�y' , • � ;+_1 � 1 f . I , • i F r•
. • ._• _ _ 17; '� 4,y g• •., ` BFI '� ' .I •••
, .• - ...... 4..,,,,74:,:it.,,,, _ •. n. - .. '7.•..... 'Wei e N 'le r •:r. ^••l'Ir . ": .11 mg.. . Ain,r.pp- - ez - L- - . , .'•'• 'ti -•''' 20.04•76.t.434 ''-' •-
, y '
x ..•-• ; ; F 1�.. • - —••- c.a;. ._ate.; -•g itio....... -4--.• ,....-0-:... --•-. ..k.wer...A••hi ...,7•• I..•- Vd.:.. I. 1.••••.,y- F - • - • ''•.--....“ V 1....I. •-• ',1.4.2177.:••.....*-.''.. '.
•• -.01. .:•;., •15.• r 1,...i: .4=7.11:11-.re riF,•Jr..pri•S11.1_:•.‘:1-.. . ' V •' ...r••., 1-••.••K••.- .."._Li....,_ l' it'• • :'I. . A 1 . Ljz aft...P....i.1 4.4.11.1 .....P .5,...69'.
it : {, r; Si
kr r.
4L ,` SLR 1...' L Y.
U ?1 i #
, r •
r �' i F•. :,11'
1 •7 ..��r a 1• f y{ '.� •r 13.
t ' Y U' V�y� 'T r�•'• ' �,n{ . .•
PPP + + :lh : ` _ r
_,,, T ' y 4o- S i_ � , C• {: ti r r ti -- ••r ....yr. r i ' a a�• y'r ' • ?�: ' x .'r •.-i }'vt •• r {R -{ •' i. '.'Mil! _ - ...6••;.••
.3 } rr 1 '')y t.' T �' C 1: '-5 :.. 'y1'.r ti: r :'} ti 3 F _� rr{{44 5•''-C•• :;Al i3.0il- ! •I ' * �• .4 _7T i ' .y�.F 1• —� �- # }i * x
•
1 t- .-1 r k�- ` - J�
g `. •'�A V. ,'T. } :{•4• - . :.•1 1.• .'- -�-� • ,r`.� .!r. L'' 3 ± t gy p• •- .......7.._...:.;*� �•
_•
Legend ' :r• • ':
Table 1:
Potentially Occurring Listed Wildlife and Plant Species in
Seminole County, Florida
Scientific Name Common Name Federal State Occurrence
Status Status Status
_
FISH
Pteronotropis welaka I bluenose shiner I N I LS I C
AMPHIBIANS
Rana capito I gopher frog I N I LS I P
REPTILES
Alligator mississippiensis American alligator T(S/A) LS C
Drymarchon corais eastern indigo snake LT LT C
couperi
Gopherus polyphemus gopher tortoise N LS C
Pituophis melanoleucus Florida pine snake N LS C
mugitus
Stilosoma extenuatum short-tailed snake N LT P
BIRDS _ I I
Eudocimus albus white ibis N LS P
Falco sparverius paulus southeastern American N LT P
kestrel
Haliaeetus leucocephalus bald eagle LT LT C
Mycteria americana wood stork LE LE P
Aramus guarauna limpkin N LS P
Egretta caerulea little blue heron N LS C
Egretta thula snowy egret N LS C
Egretta tricolor tricolored heron N LS C
Falco peregrinus peregrine falcon LE LE P
Picoides borealis red-cockaded woodpecker LE LT C
Aphelocoma Florida scrub jay LT LT C
coerulescens
Grus canadensis Florida sandhill crane N LT C
pratensis
Pandion haliaetus os re N LS** C
MAMMALS
Podomys floridanus Florida mouse N LS C
Sciurus niger shermani Sherman's fox squirrel N LS C
Trichechus manatus manatee LE LE C
Ursus americanus Florida black bear C LT** C
floridanus
PLANTS
Dennstaedtia bipinnata hay scented fern N LE C
Lechea cernua nodding pinweed N LT C
Carex chapmanii Chapman's Sedge N LE C
Centrosema arenicola Sand Butterfly Pea N LE C
Cucurbita Okeechobee Gourd LE LE C
okeechobeensis
Ophioglossum palmatum Hand Fern N LE C
Illicium parviflorum star anise N LE C
Lechea cernua nodding pinweed N LT C
Salix floridana Florida willow N LE C _
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS
LE-Endangered: species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
LT-Threatened: species likely to become Endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of
its range.
E(S/A)-Endangered due to similarity of appearance to a species which is federally listed such that enforcement personnel
have difficulty in attempting to differentiate between the listed and unlisted species.
T(S/A)-Threatened due to similarity of appearance(see above).
PE-Proposed for listing as Endangered species.
PT-Proposed for listing as Threatened species.
C-Candidate species for which federal listing agencies have sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to
support proposing to list the species as Endangered or Threatened.
XN-Non-essential experimental population.
MC-Not currently listed,but of management concern to USFWS.
N-Not currently listed,nor currently being considered for listing as Endangered or Threatened.
STATE LEGAL STATUS-ANIMALS
LE-Endangered: species,subspecies,or isolated population so few or depleted in number or so restricted in range that it is
in imminent danger of extinction.
LT-Threatened: species,subspecies,or isolated population facing a very high risk of extinction in the future.
LS-Species of Special Concern is a species,subspecies,or isolated population which is facing a moderate risk of extinction
in the future.
PE-Proposed for listing as Endangered.
PT-Proposed for listing as Threatened.
PS-Proposed for listing as Species of Special Concern.
N-Not currently listed,nor currently being considered for listing.
STATE LEGAL STATUS-PLANTS
LE-Endangered: species of plants native to Florida that are in imminent danger of extinction within the state,the survival
of which is unlikely if the causes of a decline in the number of plants continue;includes all species determined to be
endangered or threatened pursuant to the U.S.Endangered Species Act.
LT-Threatened: species native to the state that are in rapid decline in the number of plants within the state,but which have
not so decreased in number as to cause them to be Endangered.
PE-Proposed for listing as Endangered.
PT-Proposed for listing as Threatened.
N-Not currently listed,nor currently being considered for listing.
COUNTY OCCURRENCE STATUS
Vertebrates and Invertebrates:
C=Confirmed
P=Potential
N=Nesting
Plants:
C=Confirmed
R=Reported
-- Attachment "D"
\_______71,--;--:::.
1
‘vrr ,' I "IR,. -wi
. .f v sown \f,(4..
0sk
v .�
w ®1 �'
5 ' 3 Mr ,ii, i
11 if 7,1 E rit
4 AM 17—v .,„,. _.\
_..1 .1
(l kg ` l_ 11
1.0 '; 4- ‘4 -1=11. .
d I ii, I NSvp-r-, '41.-1.----,_. _ ... . I
11 i,N • ' '''A --'11IIII •I '
1110
iil . 1 - / -----1-
i Li
1. . v
. 1)ji ,3I j 1 1 1 4 1/
:1 —
1'i x U,N� f i
A K '9.1 1(-1-7, .." ks 2‘' N
it .A 1`.
lirilValk
Aliumbi iwk.,,
, s'. F a,K R w U�,,� n��M SITE PLAN —
L 1'ieiamC.F.*.P.L\n23M5 E4tlp,dIc CIVIL DESIGN GROUP _
).,h\9.nlr 2012-03 Fdcnrrc: � �
BLACK HAMMOCK ESTATES 6969 0 fiK E.0m,,,.6�
Y Got r=tar o6vwoo.a.09w6
u�-'' AUGUST2012 Seminole County, Florida w„,,,(407)876-3996 Fa,(402)676-4279 4, 6n^^- 6,,M-
w
I .
c
a)
E
0
Co
Q
3 i d- �'� pi! r E z b '� o-
K,-= aF6 9 3 $ k
� _ �� �� =g t a y 1� �y ,�. � I z8 ' ty � l �T 79 Sod['�ib1ii G �'�n 8a 4 X4,11
33 g{ a { ki IR3 m i'r �S" p` °a y 'e# 11 4 61°. E �R V as 3 1 Fl�� Y I id $ l y a P i , i l y e9 4 P a,,1i "s9 d h11 i h 1 = 9 Sri j g 411 �S�d�'a �a � �-� ��d, Qs �'� E��€�;e.:§! $�.��� — ��° "#3 t Y�93'6 it E = f O k Il 9&k{1 tl9 9 o 1 n o- e 111,11 f
{ a gt lit. k �� !
s� a Via, a e � 10 1 �) � l g i sa �' '! r E�-pS a1 s ill $$ ei , Iii = is oIl II 7
+.Pd , �@ dx ���9# 1 ;� lei i - ] .xx
IqIdflIilliI1I1flI1IIJJIJi3 II o � i °k � � �ar i - iii }' : 1ij1i 'Jkiriqi 6 ; - ii'II . 1i `41, 1l;, {�l II l 114 iI ,^i k # 4i! I II �L;ij ; k 6pg °iI1Hft fl4j, . -. its Si. IF1 oo. � a ti g 0.11 i,i5 . e r' p ga i� = �{p
III s� - ] iti g= I-1 l .i II a is. rt x1 , I l .W!it_
$ � § ai[la 4n.9 � a 1,11 i i''g skit ti �' d js x 2 d. ! -. .iiii I 3 i
9 � i lt# his� sx � 7,- :s'! fillip 11f1 11 k r3 ill{d.. 'i 1y a-� ,lilH a 4/111.11i41 4 iiil i- . _41 ..,�, 1
€ I ill l2 ji y9 y`' If is i.i Sj] 1, • v i a
i 0 J! , . g .afl ill i' um/a hi-it,' lid 8 ',gEii 11s l°pia1"8 3 aSd
y e° S7 lf. 84 a i� s i. Alit . St• .4 qI ; a FF i5�L� y0 1 is � erT4 a&d l
i 1 } IP 9 X22 li$p n �i IId :/ it ill 112'4' a I".1 -I tge ilti l a gt131 1141 A°a xt d I I.WIA 1 LI 4 .
Jd 1 till a l��ia it 1i. s 111 11, 211 fill Ili 4111 • :1 I1101 la a�7 ifi�isl` ia:t ` $$ ilf1/1 "l t.$ di i'ii4il
W a s � $��,�� �� a.�a e 01114.441 § � ig st E i��+°i � }Yr�•i•.� 3 !F'� �^yI �� �7 i� '1� a� �a'�e�2
e i $ ffi ph 5i i° 7 ' 1 i 1.4 i S a 4s � x Ai a s ttif
i t � ,i} d�E' s� ,� yv�ip£ 3 � II �F �.. � I� 1 9 i �i' � � I�iy� p?gy4a�&p � �a � t x a A iJa �:A i C Sa� f I$S {d 4.3 b m = 33 =� i¢�t7 � g S �`" ! $^a 8, �. Hdg'j rill
Iuoyuoa Nfa omdnd u JO yioidxa ATM Aue Ill so Inpom or imp 13 Kecia lou orau1 rmA poympul of¢d pun omp op uo iou 1>u os opreu0 441 ui pen;Mt pro xp p4l aauoplaa onim puaa aB paple.o�d al RilWags- =141
OZ'6L-ZLOZ'PJ❑ :uopduosap mire ad�Sl,io1o0 Z4QZl8Z144 :a1 0 uo.1 .1c1nd
vi iiooaiaool :auova6ad/uollaas 'VOL x Z : zis
sOuuds is;u!MdO A;!3 :A5IpanPy :JaqunN uo!}-Jsu! pu��uas 0 UPpo
:aueN;ua!!o L^£L6Icb :JaqunN PV •t bid ai ar `
Attachment "F"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 7, 2012
CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Meeting of Tuesday, November 7, 2012 of the Planning And Zoning
Board/Local Planning Agency was called to Order at 5:30 p.m. by Chairman William H.
Poe in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State
Road 434,Winter Springs, Florida 32708).
Roll Call:
Chairman William H. Poe, present
Board Member Howard Casman, present
Board Member Bart Phillips,present
Board Member Suzanne Walker, present
Assistant City Attorney Kate Latorre,present
Assistant to the City Clerk Sean Beaudet,present
A moment of silence for the U.S. Troops abroad was followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance.
INFORMATIONAL AGENDA
INFORMATIONAL
100. Not Used
CONSENT AGENDA
CONSENT
200. Office of the City Clerk
Requesting Approval Of The September 11, 2012 Planning And Zoning
Board/Local Planning Agency Regular Meeting Minutes.
Chairman Poe stated "Chair will entertain a Motion to approve the Minutes as
circulated."
"I MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE THE MINUTES." MOTION BY BOARD
MEMBER CASMAN. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS.
DISCUSSION.
Attachment "F"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 07,2012
PAGE 2 OF 8
VOTE:
CHAIRMAN POE: AYE
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE
BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS
AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS
300. Not Used
400. REPORTS
No Reports were given.
PUBLIC INPUT
Chairman Poe opened "Public Input".
No one spoke.
Chairman Poe closed "Public Input".
PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA
PUBLIC HEARINGS
500. Community Development Department—Planning Division
Requests that the Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing to consider an
Expedited State Review, CPA-2012-02-ESR (Ordinance 2012-13), changing the
Future Land Use Map designation from "Mixed Use" and "Conservation Overlay"
to "GreeneWay Interchange District" and "Conservation Overlay" (on those
affected areas) for the forty (40) acres, more or less, located on East State Road 434,
immediately north of Creeks Run Way.
Mr. Randy Woodruff, AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department
presented the Agenda Item.
Discussion.
Attachment "F"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 07,2012
PAGE 3 OF 8
Chairman Poe opened "Public Input".
Individuals addressed the Board.
"Public Input"was closed.
Board Member Walker referenced the City Attorney Opinion and asked Assistant City
Attorney Kate Latorre "When will the Opinion be finalized?" Assistant City Attorney
Latorre responded that the City Attorney had just met with the property owner recently
and it may take a couple of weeks.
Further comments.
"MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO BRING IT BACK UNDER THE GID
(GREENEWAY INTERCHANGE DISTRICT)." MOTION BY CHAIRMAN POE.
SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. DISCUSSION.
VOTE
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: NAY
BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE
CHAIRMAN POE: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
501. Community Development Department—Planning Division
Requests the Planning and Zoning Board hold a Public Hearing to consider the
Aesthetic Review for the Moss Park Commercial/Apartments, located on the north
side of State Road 434, east of the intersection of Moss Road and State Road 434.
The mixed use project consists of 15 apartment units and 6,000 square feet of
retail/restaurant/office space.
Mr. Woodruff presented the Agenda Item and gave a brief summary of the history of the
project.
Discussion.
Chairman Poe opened "Public Input".
Brief comments.
Chairman Poe closed "Public Input".
Attachment "F"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 07,2012
PAGE 4 OF 8
"I RECOMMEND WE APPROVE ITEM `501' - RECOMMENDING THE
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD FORWARD RECOMMENDATIONS TO
APPROVE TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR THE AESTHETIC REVIEW
PACKAGE OF MOSS PARK COMMERCIAL APARTMENTS." MOTION BY
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS.
DISCUSSION.
VOTE
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE
BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE
CHAIRMAN POE: AYE
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
502. Community Development Department—Planning Division
Requests the Planning and Zoning Board hold a Public Hearing to consider the
Aesthetic Review for GrandVille at Town Center, a 244 unit, 4-story apartment
complex located adjacent to City Hall at the northwest corner of the intersection of
Doran Drive and State Road 434.
Mr. Bobby Howell, AICP, Planner, Community Development Department began the
discussion on this Agenda Item.
Discussion.
Chairman Poe opened "Public Input".
No one spoke.
Chairman Poe closed "Public Input".
"I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION." MOTION
BY BOARD MEMBER WALKER. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
CASMAN. DISCUSSION.
VOTE
BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE
CHAIRMAN POE: AYE
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
Attachment "F"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 07,2012
PAGE 5 OF 8
PUBLIC HEARINGS
503. Community Development Department—Planning Division
Requests that the Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing to consider
Ordinance 2012-21, a Large-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment, Expedited
State Review (ESR 13-1), which proposes to change the Future Land Use Map
designation from "Rural Residential" and "Conservation Overlay" to "Low Density
Residential" and "Conservation Overlay" for approximately 19.1 acres, located on
the north side of State Road 434,west of the intersection of DeLeon Street and Cress
Run.
Mr. Howell mentioned that Agenda Items `503', `504', `505', `506' relate to the same
project
Discussion.
Chairman Poe opened "Public Input".
Individuals addressed the Board.
"Public Input"was closed.
"I RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION."
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
WALKER. DISCUSSION.
VOTE
CHAIRMAN POE: AYE
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE
BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
504. Community Development Department—Planning Division
Requests that the Planning and Zoning Board hold a Public Hearing to consider
Ordinance 2012-22,which proposes to rezone a 19.1 acre parcel located on the north
side of State Road 434, west of the intersection of DeLeon Street and Cress Run
from R-C1 (Single-family dwelling district) to R-1A(One-family dwelling district).
Mr. Howell introduced this Agenda Item.
"I WILL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER `504'."
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER WALKER. SECONDED BY BOARD
MEMBER PHILLIPS. DISCUSSION.
Attachment "F"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 07,2012
PAGE 6 OF 8
VOTE
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE
BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE
CHAIRMAN POE: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
505. Community Development Department—Planning Division
Requests that the Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing to consider
Ordinance 2012-19, a Small-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment which
proposes to change the Future Land Use Map designation from "Commercial",
"Conservation" and "Conservation Overlay" to "Low Density Residential",
"Conservation" and "Conservation Overlay" for approximately 8.29 acres, located
on the north side of State Road 434, approximately 582 feet west of the intersection
of DeLeon Street and State Road 434.
Mr. Howell introduced this Agenda Item.
"I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION ON ITEM `505' FOR THE SMALL
SCALE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT CHANGE..." MOTION BY
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS. CHAIRMAN POE ASKED FLOR
CLARIFICATTION, "...TO APPROVE?" BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS
AGREED AND ADDED, "...TO APPROVE." SECONDED BY BOARD
MEMBER CASMAN. DISCUSSION.
VOTE
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE
BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE
CHAIRMAN POE: AYE
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
506. Community Development Department—Planning Division
Requests that the Planning and Zoning Board hold a Public Hearing to consider
Ordinance 2012-20,which proposes to rezone a 8.29 acre parcel located on the north
side of State Road 434, approximately 582 feet west of the intersection of DeLeon
Street and State Road 434 from C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) to R-1A (One-
family dwelling district).
"I WILL RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ITEM `506' AS PRESENTED BY
STAFF." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER POE. SECONDED BY BOARD
MEMBER PHILLIPS. DISCUSSION.
Attachment "F"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING-NOVEMBER 07,2012
PAGE 7 OF 8
VOTE
BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE
CHAIRMAN POE: AYE
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
REGULAR AGENDA
REGULAR
600. Community Development Department—Planning Division
Requests that the Planning and Zoning Board consider the Offices at Winding
Hollow Lot Split, located on the southwest corner of State Road 434 and Winding
Hollow Boulevard.
Mr. Woodruff presented this Agenda Item.
Discussion.
"I MAKE A MOTION WE REJECT STAFF'S REQUEST." MOTION BY
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN.
MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
"I MAKE A RECOMMENDATION THAT WE ACCEPT STAFF'S PROPOSAL
ON LOT SPLIT ON ITEM `600'." MOTION BY CHAIRMAN POE. SECONDED
BY BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS. DISCUSSION.
VOTE
CHAIRMAN POE: AYE
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: NAY
BOARD MEMBER PHILLIPS: AYE
BOARD MEMBER WALKER: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC INPUT
Chairman Poe opened "Public Input".
No one addressed the Board.
Chairman Poe closed "Public Input".
Attachment "F"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS,FLORIDA
DRAFT MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING—NOVEMBER 07,2012
PAGE 8 OF 8
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Poe adjourned the Regular Meeting a 6:58 p.m.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
ANDREA LORENZO-LUACES, MMC, CITY CLERK AND
SEAN BEAUDET
ASSISTANT TO THE CITY CLERK
APPROVED:
WILLIAM H. POE, CHAIRMAN
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
NOTE: These Minutes were Approved at the ,2012 Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency
Regular Meeting.