HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 07 23 Public Hearings 505 Moss Park Mixed Use Area Conditional Use
COMMISSION AGENDA
Informational
Consent
ITEM505
Public Hearings
X
Regular
July 23, 2012KSRS
Regular MeetingCity ManagerDepartment
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests the City
Commission hold a public hearing to consider the request of Atlantic Housing Partners for a
Conditional Use for the Moss Park Apartments mixed-use area, located on the north side of
State Road 434, east of the intersection of Moss Road and State Road 434 to allow multi-
family residential in the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district. The subject
property is a portion of the former Saratoga Condominium project.
SYNOPSIS:
This request was originally heard by the City Commission at their June 25, 2012 meeting.
No final decision was rendered on this item by the City Commission. Section 20-33(c) of
the Code of Ordinances requires the City Commission to make a final decision when a
Pursuant to Section 20-33(c),
Conditional Use application is presented for consideration.
staff is bringing this item back before the City Commission for a final decision.
When considering a Conditional Use approval, Section 20-27 states: “the City Commission
may impose reasonable conditions on any approved rezoning, variance, conditional use,
waiver or administrative appeal to the extent deemed necessary and relevant to ensure
compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable provisions of the city code and
comprehensive plan. All formal decisions shall be based on competent substantial evidence
and the applicable criteria set forth in this chapter. The city commission may adopt, by
resolution, quasi-judicial rules and procedures to implement this division.”
Additionally, Section 20-28 (a) states: “all applicants shall be afforded minimal due process
as required by law, including the right to receive notice, be heard, present evidence, cross-
examine witnesses, and be represented by a duly authorized representative.”
Public Hearings 505 PAGE 1 OF 9 - July 23, 2012
Staff and the applicant have worked together since the original public hearing on May 29,
2012 to ensure the site will be designed with the proper amount of on-site parking to
accommodate both the apartments and commercial uses that are proposed for this project.
Staff has incorporated these changes into the site plan that accompanies the Conditional Use
request.
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use to permit multi-family
(apartment) units in the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district. Per Section 20-
234 (5) of the Code of Ordinances, multi-family uses are permitted in the C-1
(Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district by Conditional Use only. The subject property
is a 1.25 acre portion of the former Saratoga Condominium project, which is now being re-
developed into the Moss Park Apartment complex. This portion of the site is proposed as a
mixed-use development, with a combination of retail uses and multi-family units, vertically
integrated with two stories of apartments (15 units) over a ground floor of commercial
storefronts. This is the first vertical mixed-use building that is proposed outside of the Town
Center. Given that the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use to allow for the
construction of a vertical mixed use building which is encouraged in the Comprehensive
Plan, several uses that are permitted by right in the C-1 zoning district may be incompatible
with a development of this type. A list of permitted uses in the C-1 zoning district has been
provided as an attachment to this report. Any restriction on uses would be required to be
memorialized in a Development Agreement that is in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney.
CONSIDERATIONS:
FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATION
FLU: Commercial
Zoning: C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial)
APPLICABLE LAW &, PUBLIC POLICY
1. City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Element – Goals, Objectives, and Policies
Objective 1.4: Discourage Urban Sprawl and Encourage Redevelopment.
The
City will limit the proliferation of urban sprawl and encourage redevelopment and
revitalization of blighted areas.
Policy 1.4.5:
S.R. 434 Overlay. Implement the S.R. 434 overlay corridor design
standards to encourage infill development that is appropriate for the character of the
neighborhoods adjacent to this corridor. Allow a vertical mix of uses to promote a
live-work environment.
Policy 1.6.5:
On Site Traffic Flow. Require development to provide safe and
convenient on site motorized and nonmotorized traffic flow, adequate pedestrian
facilities and connections, and sufficient parking for both motorized and
nonmotorized vehicles.
b. Commercial Future Land Use – Data, Inventory, and Analysis
The City is pursuing redevelopment opportunities and encouraging economic
growth. As a result of this effort, the City will allow a vertical mix of uses within the
S.R. 434 Overlay District to promote a live-work environment.
Public Hearings 505 PAGE 2 OF 9 - July 23, 2012
Housing Element – Goals, Objectives, and Policies
Policy 1.1.10:
Amend the City’s land development regulations to include criteria
allowing multi-family housing in commercially zoned areas contingent on the
developer preserving greenspace either onsite or elsewhere in the City.
Objective 1.3: Very-Low, Low and Moderate-Income Households.
The City shall
encourage and attempt to assist the private sector in the provision of safe, clean and
affordable housing for special needs populations of the City, including the very low,
low and moderate-income households.
Policy 1.3.9:
Encourage developers to address the need for workforce housing
where appropriate, by including workforce housing units in their developments.
Additionally, encourage developers of single family detached units, where
appropriate, to include residential units with accessory dwelling units (such as
garage apartments). (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element, Policy 2.2.7)
Objective 2.4: Infill
. The City shall promote infill development by supporting
alternative development standards consistent with the existing zoning standards,
where necessary and feasible.
Policy 2.4.1:
Work to identify acceptable locations, priorities, and implementation
strategies for potential infill development and redevelopment. Opportunities for
residential, commercial, and mixed use shall be identified and categorized. The City
will encourage mixed use and higher density and intensity development in priority
infill development and redevelopment areas identified through these efforts. (Cross
Reference: See Future Land Use Element, Policy 1.4.8)
2. City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 20, Section 20-27. City Commission; authority.
3. City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 20, Section 20-28 (a). Due Process, Special Notice
Requirements
4. City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 20, Section 20-33. Conditional Uses
5. City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 20, Section 20-36. Expiration of Conditional Use,
Variance, and Waiver approvals.
6. City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 20, Section 20-234 (5). Conditional Uses C-1
(Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district.
7. City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 20, Article VI – State Road 434 Corridor Vision
Plan. Division 3 - General Design Standards for Redevelopment Area.
DISCUSSION:
On April 24, 2006, the City Commission approved a Final Engineering Plan for Saratoga
Condominiums that was proposed for construction on a portion of the subject property.
Subsequently site construction commenced, with the site ultimately becoming abandoned
as a result of market conditions. The Saratoga project is now being redeveloped into an
apartment complex that is located adjacent to the north of the subject property. The 1.25
acre frontage along SR 434 was not included in the re-developed portion of the site. As a
result, the applicant has proposed a mixed-use center that combines retail and multi-
family residential on the subject property. Per Section 20-234(5), multi-family uses are
permitted in the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district by Conditional Use only.
:
CHRONOLOGY
April 12, 2004 - Conditional Use permit approved to allow multi-family residential
within the C-1 zoning district.
September 20, 2004 - Conditional Use Permit 6-month extension granted by the City
Public Hearings 505 PAGE 3 OF 9 - July 23, 2012
Commission.
March 20, 2006 - Request for a 6-month extension to the approved Conditional Use
permit filed by the Applicant.
April 24, 2006 – Final Engineering Plan approved for Saratoga Condominiums.
May 2006 – Site construction commenced.
2007 – 2012 – Site abandoned.
April 2012 – Application submitted for Conditional Use to permit multi-family
residential in the C-1 zoning district.
May 2, 2012 – Planning & Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of the
proposed Conditional Use.
May 29, 2012 – City Commission voted to continue this item to the June 11, 2012
meeting to allow staff and the applicant to demonstrate concerns related to on-site
parking have been resolved.
June 11, 2012 – City Commission voted to continue this item to the June 25, 2012
meeting to allow staff and the applicant to demonstrate concerns related to on-site
parking have been resolved.
June 25, 2012 – City Commission takes no action on the Conditional Use request.
FINDINGS: Pursuant to Section 20-33(d) of the City Code, “all conditional use
recommendations and final decisions shall be based on the following criteria to the extent
applicable:
(1) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the conditional use, including its proposed
scale and intensity, traffic-generated characteristics, and off-site impacts, is compatible and
harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not adversely impact land use activities in the
immediate vicinity.”
The scale of the development is expected to be similar in scale with the approved multi-
family use to the north of the subject property and is appropriate in scale and intensity
with the surrounding commercial developments. This use will allow a modest number
of multi-family units, which will have a minimal impact on existing traffic patterns. As
a result of the site improvements already in place, the addition of multi-family units on
the subject property is not anticipated to create adverse offsite impacts. Staff opinion
is that the vertical integration of residential and commercial uses represents a positive
addition to the area that could (currently) be developed as another strip shopping
center.
(2) “Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site, the proposed
access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to
accommodate the proposed scale and intensity of the conditional use requested.
The site shall be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening,
buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, and similar site plan improvements
needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed use.”
The subject property had a previously approved site plan, and site improvements were
completed. This plan provided access, circulation, and design elements that are
adequate for the proposed use. In addition, the owner has indicated they are receptive
Public Hearings 505 PAGE 4 OF 9 - July 23, 2012
to a joint parking agreement with the property to the north, which will provide
residents of this development access to Moss Road. Please note that joint parking is
not required for this site to meet and, in some cases, exceed the City’s parking
requirement.
As a result of Staff working with the applicant between City Commission meetings, a
total of sixty-three (63) parking spaces will be provided on-site. This amount of on-site
parking exceeds Code requirements. If necessary, two of these spaces could be
removed to allow cross-access to the property to the east in the future. (Cross-access
between neighboring parcels is a requirement, when feasible, of the State Road 434
Redevelopment Area, in which this property is located).
For general business and retail commercial uses, Section 9-277 of the City’s Code of
Ordinances requires one (1) parking space for each three hundred (300) square feet of
floor space in the building exclusive of storage space. For 6,000 square feet of
commercial space this would equate to eighteen (18) parking spaces that are required
per the City’s Code.
Since the May 29, 2012 City Commission meeting, Staff and the applicant have
worked to provide a total of thirty-three (33) parking spaces, or a ratio of five and one-
half (5.5) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area for the commercial
component of this project. This equates to fifteen (15) more parking spaces than what
is required per the City’s Code for general business and retail commercial uses.
For the multi-family residential use, a total of thirty (30) parking spaces will be
provided on-site. This is the amount of on-site parking that is required in accordance
with Section 20-234 of the City’s Code of Ordinances. Per Section 20-234 (5) of the
City’s Code of Ordinances, multi-family residential uses that will be developed in a C-
1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district with a Conditional Use approval are
required to provide at least two (2) parking spaces for each unit within an enclosed
garage. The applicant has applied for a waiver to the enclosed garage requirement
since the intent of this provision of the Code is to provide enclosed parking for
townhome uses, not apartment uses. At the July 11, 2012 Planning & Zoning Board
meeting, the applicant’s waiver request was unanimously approved. If the Conditional
Use request is approved, the waiver will be considered in a separate agenda item (506)
by the City Commission at the July 23, 2012 meeting. Staff recommends support of
this waiver request since this provision of the Code is intended to require enclosed
parking for townhome uses, not apartment uses that are proposed as one component
of a mixed-use building. The vertical mixed-use buildings that have been constructed
in the Town Center do not provide parking for the residents in an enclosed garage.
Implementation of the Conditional Use as outlined in this agenda item is dependant
upon approval of the waiver of the 2-car garage (Agenda Item 506 on the July 23, 2012
City Commission meeting).
This project is in the City’s State Road 434 Redevelopment Overlay Area. In the
Redevelopment Area, developments are subject to guidelines that may be specific only
to this portion of the City. One such guideline is noted in Section 20-483 (d) of the
City’s Code of Ordinances. This provision allows a development to provide up to
twenty-five (25) percent of the parking spaces at nine (9) feet wide by twenty (20) feet
in length to accommodate compact cars. As previously mentioned, a total of sixty-three
Public Hearings 505 PAGE 5 OF 9 - July 23, 2012
(63) on-site parking spaces will be provided. A total of fifteen (15) compact parking
spaces will be provided on-site, or twenty-four (24%) percent of the total parking
spaces are provided as part of the 63 on-site parking spaces.
The applicant has mentioned to staff that one of the potential uses in a portion of the
commercial space is a daycare center.
A daycare center is a permitted use in the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning
district. The City does not have a Code required parking ratio for daycare centers.
Previously approved daycare centers such as Ladybird Academy and Park Manor
Academy have provided parking amounts that were based on ratios from neighboring
jurisdictions. Ladybird Academy provided two (2) parking spaces per 1,000 square
feet of floor area plus adequate space for the loading and unloading of children. Park
Manor Academy provided one (1) parking space per employee plus adequate space for
the loading and unloading of children.
If a daycare center is proposed within a portion of the commercial part of the building,
staff will be looking for similar parking ratios and will work with the applicant to
ensure adequate space for the loading and unloading of children will be provided
when the daycare center is under review. In the event a daycare center is provided as a
use, a portion of the on-site parking that is proposed on the east side of the building
will be required to be removed per Florida law in order to provide adequate open
space for children. Florida law requires a minimum of a four (4) foot high fence
around the play area. The play area is required to be a minimum of forty-five (45)
square feet in area per child, excluding children who are under one (1) year of age.
Compact parking spaces measure one hundred eighty (180) square feet in area,
regular parking spaces measures two hundred (200) square feet in area. The play area
shall be provided for one-half (1/2) the licensed indoor capacity.
Staff has calculated a total of three (3) parking spaces would need to be removed per
Florida law to permit adequate space for the play area in the event a day-care center is
one of the uses in the commercial portion of the building. The removal of these spaces
will not jeopardize the provision of a sufficient amount of on-site parking for
commercial uses and the apartments in the event a daycare center is proposed in this
mixed-use center.
(3) “Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the local economy, including
governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values.”
Approval of this Conditional Use will allow the property to be developed in a
manner that is desirable, versus a strip commercial center. The proposed development
will add to the taxable value of the City more substantially that a one story strip
center. Successful completion of the mixed-use development on the subject property is
anticipated to provide employment opportunities for the area. Development of the site,
which is currently a partially completed development, is anticipated to have a positive
impact on surrounding property values.
(4) “Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the natural environment,
including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and
desirable vegetation, and flood hazards.”
Public Hearings 505 PAGE 6 OF 9 - July 23, 2012
Staff believes that the proposed conditional use will not have an adverse impact on the
natural environment as the immediate vicinity is approaching build-out and is not in
a “natural” state. The subject property has also been partially developed.
(5) “Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural
resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic
resources.”
No known cultural or historic resources are known to be on this site. The site will be
developed in accordance with the State Road 434 Redevelopment Area guidelines.
(6) “Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on public services, including
water, sewer, surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public
transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities.”
Adequate facilities are in place to support the proposed use, in conjunction with the
approved site plan.
(7) “Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on housing and social
conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality.”
Construction of a mixed-use commercial/residential development on the subject
property will provide additional housing opportunities for the community. Quality
development of the partially developed site should enhance the property values of the
surrounding neighborhood.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The approval of a Conditional Use for Moss Park Apartments is anticipated to create a
positive fiscal impact which will allow the development of the mixed-use center with the
multi-family residential component. Development of the mixed-use center is anticipated to
create jobs and add taxable value to the City.
Apartments (15 units)
Income approach: $601,330 assessed tax value
$601,330/1000 = 601.33
601.33(2.5600) = $1,539.40
$1,477.82 tax revenue
$1,539.40 (less the 4% statutory discount) =
Taxes paid on vacant land now (data obtained from Seminole County Property Appraiser)
$100 assessed value for entire parcel
$100 assessed tax value
100/1000 = 0.1
$0.256 tax revenue
0.1 x 2.5600 = 0.256
Public Hearings 505 PAGE 7 OF 9 - July 23, 2012
Total Potential Tax Revenue: $1,478.08
(1477.82 + 0.256 = 1478.08)
Retail (6,000 square feet)
Units (6,000 square feet) assessed at $90/square foot: $540,000.00 assessed tax value
(6,000 x 90 = 540,000)
$540,000/1000 = 540.00
540(2.5600) = $1382.40
$1327.10 tax revenue
$1,382.40 (less the 4% statutory discount) =
Taxes paid on vacant land now (data obtained from Seminole County Property Appraiser)
$100 assessed value for entire parcel
$100 assessed tax value
100/1000 = 0.1
$0.256 tax revenue
0.1 x 2.5600 = 0.256
Total Potential Tax Revenue: $1,327.36
(1327.10 + 0.256 = 1327.36)
Total taxable value for entire site: $2,805.44 total
(1478.08 + 1327.36 = 2805.44)
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission,
City Manager, City Attorney/Staff, and is available on the City’s Website, LaserFiche, and
the City’s Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the
respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals
noted above, and which is also available on the City’s Website, LaserFiche, and the City’s
Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have
requested Agendas/Agenda Item information, Homeowner’s Associations/Representatives
on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This
information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional
copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the
City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff
is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested
individuals.
A yellow sign noting the date and time of the public hearing has been erected on the
property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on polices cited from the City’s Comprehensive Plan as well as the result of staff’s
efforts to work with the applicant to address design criteria, Staff and the Planning and
Zoning Board recommends the City Commission approve the Conditional Use application
to permit multi-family residential uses on the subject C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial)
zoned property pursuant to section 20-234 (5) of the City Code, subject to the following
binding conditions:
1.The multi-family use shall be incorporated into a mixed use project as follows:
A.There shall be a minimum of eight (8) and a maximum of fifteen (15) dwelling
Public Hearings 505 PAGE 8 OF 9 - July 23, 2012
units.
B.There shall be a minimum of 6,000 square feet of commercial retail space
located on the ground floor.
2.There shall be minimum on-site parking equivalent to two (2) spaces per dwelling
unit, and five (5) spaces per 1000 square feet of commercial space.
3.The City Commission approves the waiver request to Section 20-234(5) of the City
Code of Ordinances which requires multi-family residential that is permitted in the C-
1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district via a Conditional Use approval to
provide at least two (2) parking spaces for each unit within an enclosed garage. The
waiver will be considered under Item 506.
4.Prohibit the following approved uses in the C-1 zoning district on this property:
package stores, animal hospitals/veterinary clinics, cleaners (except for on-site
delivery/pick-up (cleaning required off-site)), pet shops with on-site animal sales,
tobacco shops with on-site consumption of products. These restrictions will be
memorialized in a Development Agreement that is in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney. Staff further requests that the City Commission authorize the City Manager
and City Attorney to finalize and execute said Development Agreement.
5.The Conditional Use shall be subject to expiration pursuant to section 20-36 of the
City Code which states that Conditional Use approvals “shall expire two (2) years
after the effective date of such approval by the City Commission, unless a building
permit based upon and incorporating the conditional use, variance, or waiver is issued
by the city within said time period.”
ATTACHMENTS:
A.
Conceptual Plan
B.
Revised Conceptual Plan/parking summary
C.
Preliminary Elevation
D.
Income approach worksheet
E.
Minutes, May 2, 2012 Planning & Zoning Board meeting
F.
Photographs from Staff visit to Northbrige at Millenia, June 28, 2012
G.
C-1 permitted uses
Public Hearings 505 PAGE 9 OF 9 - July 23, 2012