HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 06 11 Public Hearing 500 Moss Park Mixed Use Postponement
COMMISSION AGENDA
Informational
Consent
ITEM500
Public Hearings
X
Regular
June 11, 2012KSRS
Regular MeetingCity ManagerDepartment
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department requests the City Commission postpone
consideration of the Moss Park Mixed-Use Area Conditional Use to a date certain and to
preserve advertising in order that staff can continue to work with the applicant on certain on-
site and shared parking issues and bring a complete package before the City Commission
for consideration.
SYNOPSIS:
The purpose of this agenda item is to request that the City Commission postpone their
consideration of the Moss Park Mixed Use Conditional Use to a date certain to allow
additional work to be done on the parking requirements for the proposed project.
At the May 29, 2012 City Commission meeting, the City Commission voted to postpone
this item to a date certain (June 11, 2012 meeting) in order to give staff and the applicant
additional time to provide a proper amount of on-site parking that would accommodate
both the apartments and commercial uses that are proposed for this project. Following the
City Commission meeting, staff met with the applicant to resolve these concerns and
incorporate them into the Conditional Use request. At the meeting with the applicant, it was
Staff
determined additional time was needed to resolve the issues related to on-site parking.
is requesting a postponement of this item to the June 25, 2012 City Commission
meeting.
Public Hearings 500 PAGE 1 OF 5 - June 11, 2012
CONSIDERATIONS:
FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATION
FLU: Commercial
Zoning: C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial)
APPLICABLE LAW &, PUBLIC POLICY
City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan
City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 20, Section 20-33. Conditional Uses
City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 20, Section 20-234 (5). Conditional Uses C-1
(Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district
DISCUSSION:
On April 24, 2006, the City Commission approved a Final Engineering Plan for Saratoga
Condominiums that was proposed for construction on a portion of the subject property.
Subsequently site construction commenced, with the site ultimately becoming abandoned
as a result of market conditions. The Saratoga project is now being redeveloped into an
apartment complex that is located adjacent to the north of the subject property. The 1.25
acre frontage along SR 434 was not included in the re-developed portion of the site. As a
result, the applicant has proposed a mixed-use center that combines retail and multi-
family residential on the subject property. Per Section 20-234(5), multi-family uses are
permitted in the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district by Conditional Use only.
:
CHRONOLOGY
April 12, 2004 - Conditional Use permit approved to allow multi-family residential
within the C-1 zoning district.
September 20, 2004 - Conditional Use Permit 6-month extension granted by the City
Commission.
March 20, 2006 - Request for a 6-month extension to the approved Conditional Use
permit filed by the Applicant.
April 24, 2006 – Final Engineering Plan approved for Saratoga Condominiums.
May 2006 – Site construction commenced.
2007 – 2012 – Site abandoned.
April 2012 – Application submitted for Conditional Use to permit multi-family
residential in the C-1 zoning district.
May 2, 2012 – Planning & Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of the
proposed Conditional Use.
FINDINGS: Pursuant to Section 20-33(d) of the City Code, “all conditional use
recommendations and final decisions shall be based on the following criteria to the extent
applicable:
(1) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the conditional use, including its proposed
scale and intensity, traffic-generated characteristics, and off-site impacts, is compatible and
harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not adversely impact land use activities in the
immediate vicinity.”
Public Hearings 500 PAGE 2 OF 5 - June 11, 2012
The scale of the development is expected to be similar in scale with the approved multi-
family use to the north of the subject property. This use will allow a modest number of
multi-family units, which will have a minimal impact on existing traffic patterns. As a result
of the site improvements already being in place, the addition of multi-family units on the
subject property is not anticipated to create adverse offsite impacts. Staff opinion is that the
vertical integration of residential and commercial represents a positive addition to the area
that could be developed as another strip shopping center.
(2) “Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site, the proposed
access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to
accommodate the proposed scale and intensity of the conditional use requested. The site
shall be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening, buffers,
landscaping, open space, off-street parking, and similar site plan improvements needed to
mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed use.”
The subject property had a previously approved site plan, and site improvements were
completed. This provided access, circulation, and design elements that are adequate for the
proposed use. In addition, the owner has indicated they are receptive to a joint parking
agreement with the property to the north, which will provide residents of this development
access to Moss Road. Final parking quantities will be resolved as part of the final
engineering efforts.
(3) “Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the local economy, including
governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values.”
Approval of this Conditional Use will allow the property to be developed in a manner which
is desirable, versus a strip commercial center. The proposed development will add to the
taxable value of the City more substantially that a one story strip center. Successful
completion of the mixed-use development on the subject property is anticipated to provide
employment opportunities for the area. Development of the site, which is currently an
abandoned partially completed development is anticipated to have a positive impact on
surrounding property values.
(4) “Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the natural environment,
including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and
desirable vegetation, and flood hazards.”
Staff believes that the proposed conditional use will not have an adverse impact on the
natural environment as the immediate vicinity is approaching build-out and is not in
a “natural” state.
(5) “Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural
resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic
resources.”
No known cultural or historic resources are known to be on this site. The site will be
developed in accordance with the State Road 434 Redevelopment Area guidelines.
Public Hearings 500 PAGE 3 OF 5 - June 11, 2012
(6) “Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on public services, including
water, sewer, surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public
transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities.”
Adequate facilities are in place to support the proposed use, in conjunction with the
approved site plan.
(7) “Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on housing and social
conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality.”
Construction of a mixed-use commercial/residential development on the subject property
will provide additional housing opportunities for the community. Quality development of
the abandoned site will enhance the property values of the surrounding neighborhood.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no immediate fiscal impact to the City as a result of postponing consideration
of the Moss Park Mixed-Use Area Conditional Use. The fiscal impact of the project, if
approved, is projected as follows:
The approval of a Conditional Use for Moss Park Apartments is anticipated to create a
positive fiscal impact which will allow the development of the mixed-use center with the
multi-family residential component. Development of the mixed-use center is anticipated to
create jobs and add taxable value to the City.
Apartments (15 units)
Income approach: $601,330 assessed tax value
$601,330/1000 = 601.33
601.33(2.5600) = $1,539.40
$1,477.82 tax revenue
$1,539.40 (less the 4% statutory discount) =
Taxes paid on vacant land now (data obtained from Seminole County Property Appraiser)
$100 assessed value for entire parcel
$100 assessed tax value
100/1000 = 0.1
$0.256 tax revenue
0.1 x 2.5600 = 0.256
Total Potential Tax Revenue: $1,478.08
(1477.82 + 0.256 = 1478.08)
Retail (6,000 square feet)
Units (6,000 square feet) assessed at $90/square foot: $540,000.00 assessed tax value
(6,000 x 90 = 540,000)
$540,000/1000 = 540.00
540(2.5600) = $1382.40
$1327.10 tax revenue
$1,382.40 (less the 4% statutory discount) =
Public Hearings 500 PAGE 4 OF 5 - June 11, 2012
Taxes paid on vacant land now (data obtained from Seminole County Property Appraiser)
$100 assessed value for entire parcel
$100 assessed tax value
100/1000 = 0.1
$0.256 tax revenue
0.1 x 2.5600 = 0.256
Total Potential Tax Revenue: $1,327.36
(1327.10 + 0.256 = 1327.36)
Total taxable value for entire site: $2,805.44 total
(1478.08 + 1327.36 = 2805.44)
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
This Agenda Item has been electronically forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission,
City Manager, City Attorney/Staff, and is available on the City’s Website, LaserFiche, and
the City’s Server. Additionally, portions of this Agenda Item are typed verbatim on the
respective Meeting Agenda which has also been electronically forwarded to the individuals
noted above, and which is also available on the City’s Website, LaserFiche, and the City’s
Server; has been sent to applicable City Staff, Media/Press Representatives who have
requested Agendas/Agenda Item information, Homeowner’s Associations/Representatives
on file with the City, and all individuals who have requested such information. This
information has also been posted outside City Hall, posted inside City Hall with additional
copies available for the General Public, and posted at five (5) different locations around the
City. Furthermore, this information is also available to any individual requestors. City Staff
is always willing to discuss this Agenda Item or any Agenda Item with any interested
individuals.
A yellow sign noting the date and time of the public hearing has been erected on the
property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests the City Commission postpone this item to a date certain (June 25, 2012) and
preserve advertising in order to give staff and the applicant additional time to provide a
proper amount of on-site parking that would accommodate both the apartments and
commercial uses that are proposed for this project
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Public Hearings 500 PAGE 5 OF 5 - June 11, 2012