The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2012 04 04 Public Hearings 501 Re-Approval of Aesthetic Review for Hayes Road PlazaPLANNING &ZONING BOARD ITEM 501 April 4, 2012 Meeting Consent Informational Public Hearing X Regular MGR. /DEPT REQUEST: The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests the Planning & Zoning Board /Local Planning Agency hold a public hearing for the re- approval of an Aesthetic Review for Hayes Road Plaza, located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Hayes Road and SR 434. SYNOPSIS: The applicant is requesting re- approval of an Aesthetic Review for Hayes Road Plaza, a 17,128 square foot single -story shopping center located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Hayes Road and SR 434. The Aesthetic Review was originally approved by the City Commission on March 24, 2008. Per Section 9 -604 of the City Code of Ordinances, the approval period of the Aesthetic Review is 18 months from the date the City Commission renders its approval at a public meeting. If a building permit is not obtained within the 18 month period, the City Commission's approval shall expire at the end of the period. No building permit has been issued for this property and the Aesthetic Review approval has since expired. The applicant has indicated that he has secured financing for the project and is ready to proceed. CONSIDERATIONS: FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATION FLU: Commercial Zoning: C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY Chapter 9, Article XII. Minimum Community Appearance and Aesthetic Review Standards. Section 9 -601. Approval prerequisite for permits. Section 9 -603. Procedure. AGENDA Section 9 -604. Duration of Approval. Section 9 -605. Submittal requirements. Chapter 20, Division 3. General Design Standards for Redevelopment Area. April 4, 2012 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 501 Page 2 of 5 DISCUSSION: On March 24, 2008, the City Commission approved an Aesthetic Review for Hayes Road Plaza. The 1.99 acre site is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Hayes Road and SR 434. Hayes Road Plaza is proposed as a 17,128 square foot single -story shopping center that includes a 24 -hour convenience store without gas pumps as one of the uses. Per Section 9 -604 of the City Code of Ordinances, the approval period of the Aesthetic Review is 18 months from the date the City Commission renders its approval at a public meeting. If a building permit is not obtained within the 18 month period, the City Commission's approval shall expire at the end of the period. No building permit has been issued for this property and the Aesthetic Review approval has since expired. In March 2012, the applicant submitted building plans for the shopping center that proposes the convenience store as one of the uses in the center. During the review of the building plans, it was determined that the Aesthetic Review approval expired. As a result of this situation, the applicant is requesting re- approval of the Aesthetic Review. CHRONOLOGY: • February 22, 2006 — Concept plan for a 20,100 square foot commercial center was submitted. • January 22, 2007 - Preliminary engineering /site plan approved by Commission. • March 7, 2007 - Aesthetic review package was submitted. • January 5, 2007 — Revised aesthetic review plans submitted to City. • March 29, 2007 — Final engineering /site plan and 2nd aesthetic review packages received. • November 14, 2007 — Final engineering /site plan approved by Commission, subject to conditions. • December 10, 2007 — Commission directed the applicant and City's consultant to modify building aesthetics • March 6, 2008 — Applicant, City's consultant, staff and City Manager address aesthetic review • March 24, 2008 - Aesthetic Review approved by the City Commission. • January 15, 2009 — Board of Adjustment voted 4 -1 to recommend approval of the Conditional Use. • January 26, 2009 - Conditional Use was approved by the City Commission. • September 24, 2009 — Aesthetic Review approval expired. • January 26, 2011 — Conditional Use approval expiredNovember 13, 2007 - Final Engineering /Site Plan approved by the City Commission. The submittal requirements for aesthetic review are set forth in Section 9 -605 and include the following: (a) a site plan; (b) elevations illustrating all sides of structures facing public streets or spaces; (c) illustrations of all walls, fences, and other accessory structures and the indication of height and their associated materials; (d) elevation of proposed exterior permanent signs or other constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; (e) illustrations of materials, texture, and colors to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs; and (f) other architectural and engineering data as may be required. The procedures for review and approval are set forth in Section 9 -603. April 4, 2012 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 501 Page 3 of 5 The City Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the application only after consideration of whether the following criteria have been satisfied: (1) The plans and specifications of the proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, textures, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and cultural character of the community. The proposed building is to be constructed of concrete block covered primarily with stucco. The building's varied roofline, water table, and expression line enhance its appearance as do quoins at the corners. The addition of the stone and brick veneer, in combination with the colonnade and alternating awnings and canopies are further embellishments. This style and color combination should be a welcome addition to this area. (2) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has been formally approved by the City within the surrounding area. The proposed project is in harmony with the existing developments in the surrounding area. The proposed elevations represent an upgrade to the older architecture exhibited within the surrounding area. Contextually, the proposed architecture represents an integrated part to the surrounding area that is composed of numerous architectural styles. (3) The plans for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance: (A) Front or side elevations, (B) Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement, (C) Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof line, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements. The proposed building is tastefully designed and does not appear excessively similar or dissimilar to other structures in the immediate area and represents a positive addition to the architecture located in the surrounding. (4) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community. The proposed project does enhance the character and overall aesthetics of the surrounding area. The proposed building has a contextually appropriate architectural style and includes design features and detailing that accentuate the building and enhances the established character of the existing structures in the area. April 4, 2012 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 501 Page 4 of 5 The local community is comprised of different architectural styles and, therefore, the proposed project represents a positive addition to this area. (5) The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of this Article, the Comprehensive Plan for Winter Springs, design criteria adopted by the city (e.g. Towne Center guidelines, SR 434 design specifications) and other applicable federal state or local laws. The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and other applicable design guidelines such as those detailed in the State Road 434 Redevelopment Area. The applicant has worked with staff to provide a building with several architectural enhancements in order to be consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan, State Road 434 Redevelopment Area architectural design guidelines, and the requirements for the Aesthetic Review process. The final architectural plans are being reviewed for compliance with all building code criteria. (6) The proposed project has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as concrete masonry units with stucco, marble, termite - resistant wood, wrought iron, brick, columns and piers, porches, arches, fountains, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive design detailing and promoting the character of the community. The project is attractive and will be an asset to the community, given the architectural enhancements already mentioned. The applicant worked with staff in providing distinctive design details to help add variation to the project such as awater -table that has been provided around the bottom perimeter of the building. FINDINGS: 1. The proposed building elevations are consistent with the Aesthetic Review guidelines prescribed in the City Code of Ordinances and the State Road 434 Redevelopment Area. 2. The building elevations include attention to detailing adding to the appearance and the quality of the development. 3. The proposed building utilizes colors and materials that complement the developments in the surrounding area. 4. The proposed development is located within the City of Winter Springs: it has a Commercial Future Land Use designation and is in the G1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district. COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: The Meeting Agenda and this Agenda Item have been forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board members and are available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's Server. The Agenda has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission; City Manager; and City Attorney /Staff. Additionally, the Meeting Agenda has been sent to media /press representatives, all Homeowner's Associations on file with the City, all individuals who have requested Agenda information, Department Directors; and also posted outside City Hall; posted inside City Hall with additional copies available for the general public. A yellow sign noting the date and time of the public hearing has been erected on the property. April 4, 2012 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 501 Page 5 of 5 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Commission for re- approval of the Aesthetic Review package for Hayes Road Plaza. ATTACHMENTS: A. Aesthetic Review package — approved March 24, 2008 Attachment "A" 200'-C' 74-8" 274'-8- CLOTH AWNING CLOTH AWNING CLOTH AWNING METAL CANOPY METAL CANOPY RECEIVED MAR 12 2008 434 RETAIL CITY OF WINTLR SPffiNGS Permittin & Licensin Winter Sprin Florida 0 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3W -, A I I a MM Ivan= 014 RECEIVED MAR 12 2008 434 RETAIL CITY OF WINTLR SPffiNGS Permittin & Licensin Winter Sprin Florida 0 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3W -, A I I Attachment "A" 200'-C' 74-8" 274'-8- CLOTH AWNING CLOTH AWNING CLOTH AWNING METAL CANOPY METAL CANOPY RECEIVED MAR 12 2008 434 RETAIL CITY OF WINTLR SPffiNGS Permittin & Licensin Winter Sprin Florida 0 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3W -, A I I a MM Ivan= 014 RECEIVED MAR 12 2008 434 RETAIL CITY OF WINTLR SPffiNGS Permittin & Licensin Winter Sprin Florida 0 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3W -, A I I CLOTH AWNING CLOTH AWNING CLOTH AWNING METAL CANOPY METAL CANOPY PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN MUM M., Winter Sprin Floirida 1p 50 lvmF�-Tr,=Ql0Ll Winter Sprin Floirida CLOTH AWNING CLOTH AWNING CLOTH AWNING METAL CANOPY METAL CANOPY PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN MUM M., Winter Sprin Floirida 1p 50 lvmF�-Tr,=Ql0Ll Winter Sprin Floirida 1--- 1 C METAL CANOPY -- - - ' PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN 01- I'* ,-,/' SCALF 3t-Ar = -G SW 6115 SW 7011 Totall Tan Natural Choice ( Trim ) ALI, V- MSTINSC . �#�Slrllyb SW 6115 SW 7011 Totall Tan Natural Choice ( Trim ) 4 Winter Sprin Florida 03 EAST ELEVATION ALI, V- 4 Winter Sprin Florida 03 EAST ELEVATION PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN 0 SCALE, 3W - V-W PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN A M., I_� its 6 434 Rm"ETAll. Winter Sprin Florida EAST ELEVATION I z --------------- � � T _ v ,� I �I 11 F1 i I I II i 7 It F1 If If R l j �I I I I1 @ ! s PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN v t - , - 3W = 1-W Materials: 434 RETAIL Winter Sprin Florida SOUTH ELEVATION 02,SCA1E3W=1'-T I V* I.T-MeTs' I re 11 -Z MW 6 M 434 RETAIL Winter Sprin Florida SOUTH ELEVATION 02,SCA1E3W=1'-T WEST DUMPSTER ELEVATION RT.HDU.MPSTER ELEVATION /x / NORTH 0 IVIL SITE PLAN & (51 * P. AWNING P. �CA N �OP �Y �P N ��S Winter Sprin Florida