The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2011 03 09 Regular 602 Recommendation of Requested Revisions to Existing Capital Improvements Program for FY 2010/11 thru FY 2015/16 Planning & Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Special Meeting March 9, 2011 The attached "ADD -ON" Agenda Item "602" was provided to the Board Members for informational purposes only relating to the Bicycle And Pedestrian Advisory Committee recommendations and discussed at the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Special Meeting on March 9, 2011. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD / LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ITEM 602 March 9, 2011 Meeting Consent Information Public Hearin Regular X REQUEST: The Community Development Department —Planning Division requests that the Local Planning Agency review and make a recommendation regarding the requested Revisions to the existing Capital Improvements Program for FY 2010/11 thru FY 2015/16. SYNOPSIS: All major capital project requests are to be submitted for review and recommendation by the Local Planning Agency. Staff will be in attendance to answer questions. CONSIDERATIONS: APPLICABLE LAW, PUBLIC POLICY, AND EVENTS Section 2(b), Article VIII, of the State Constitution. Municipal Home Rule Powers Act Section 166 041, Florida Statutes. Procedures for adoption of ordinances and resolutions Winter Springs Charter, Article IV. Governing Body. Winter Springs Charter, Article VII. Financial Procedure. City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan FINDINGS The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) furthers the City's legitimate government purpose of meeting the demands for new and properly maintained infrastructure and facilities in a fiscally responsible manner and in furtherance of section 166.021, Florida Statutes. The CIP is the vehicle that links capital expenditures with adopted public policy. The CIP neither appropriates funds nor authorizes projects; it is a planning document. The CIP integrates planning for significant capital or operating projects with financial planning into a multi -year schedule of projects. It is used as an alternative to considering individual projects one -at -a -time without reference to overall community priorities or fiscal capacity. The CIP is the primary tool for implementing City Commission initiatives and reflects the various master plans that serve as a blueprint for future capital investment. The proposed CIP also serves as the companion to the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan, which outlines capital improvements that are required to maintain adopted levels of service and keep pace with community growth. Each capital improvement is described, listed by year it is to be purchased or commenced, the amount to March 9, 2011 Planning & Zoning Board/ Local Planning Agency Regular Agenda Item 602 be spent per year, and the method of financing. The list is prioritized over the 5 -year period and is reviewed and updated annually. The adoption of the CIP does not commit the City to expenditures or appropriations beyond the first year (which will be included in the forthcoming Adopted FY2009 budget). What is Included? • Projects that cost more than $50,000, and • Projects identified in the Comprehensive Plan that are necessary to meet Levels of Service (LOS) [elimination of existing deficiencies]; • Projects which increase the capacity or efficiency of existing infrastructure; • Projects which replace failing infrastructure [the repair and replacement of existing public facilities]; and /or • Projects which enhance facilities and infrastructure [the provision for new public facilities]. Items may include: • New and expanded facilities; • Rehabilitation or replacement of existing facilities; • Major pieces of equipment; • Cost of professional studies related to the improvement; and /or • Acquisition of land related to a community facility. Priorities of Capital Improvements The biggest priority for the capital program is ensuring that facilities currently meet adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards and that they will continue to do so in the future as growth occurs or other conditions change. Adopted LOS are from the existing Comprehensive Plan and do not reflect the changes included in the EAR -Based Amendments transmitted to the State, as these will not be adopted until the fall. The adopted LOS standards are as follows: TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES The City shall use Quality/Level of Service (Q/LOS) for monitoring purposes in order to identify where multimodal improvements are needed, for guiding capital improvements facility /operations planning to achieve and maintain mobility, to reduce greenhouse gases, and to assist in determining a fair share that a development should contribute to the achievement of these mobility strategies. Roadway Q /LOS The following minimum Roadway Q/LOS standards are applicable to all TCEA Zones for monitoring intersection capacity based on annual average daily trips (AADT) and peak hour maximum service volumes: • Limited Access Highways D • Arterials E • Collectors D • Local Roads D Transit /LOS Coordinate with METROPLAN ORLANDO and LYNX to assist the County in maintaining the County's minimum Q/LOS standard for transit applicable to the citywide TCEA, to link urban centers and neighborhoods to nearby LYNX stops and subsequently to commuter March 9, 2011 Planning & Zoning Board/ Local Planning Agency Regular Agenda Item 602 rail. Work toward a long range vision of implementing higher capacity transit modes, such as bus rapid transit (BRT) along Seminole Way (SR 417) and between Zones A & B: Fixed Route Public Transit Initial 2030 Link 103 Altamonte Station Link 434 Crosstown Seminole Way BRT PickUnLine (PUD Transit Tuskawilla/Red Bug Lake Rd 15 -min. headway (2013) No Change 60 -min. headway (2010) 30 -min. headway N/A 15 -min. headway Initial N/A 2030 60 -min headway(2 hr adv) Pedestrian Q /LOS The pedestrian QLLOS shall be the presence of pedestrian paths /sidewalks on both sides of roadways in areas of new development or within' /4 mile of existing schools, parks, or transit fixed service routes and shall be considered a QLOS standard of "B ". The QLLOS is not a standard that is intended to be achieved on an annual basis, but rather as an objective to be achieved by 2030. Bicycle OILOS The bicycle QLLOS shall be the presence of designated bike lanes, bike routes, and /or multi -use paths or trails, which run the length of the City in an east -west, north -south grid pattern at 1 -1/2 mile intervals. The provision of this citywide network shall be considered a QLOS standard of "B ". The QLOS is not a standard that is intended to be achieved on an annual basis, but rather as an objective to be achieved by 2030. SANITARY SEWER 100 gallons per person per day. POTABLE WATER 115 gallons (minimum) per person per day. SOLID WASTE 3.7 pounds per person per day. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (DRAINAGE) Water Quanti ty - Peak post - development runoff rate shall not exceed peak pre - development runoff rate for the 25 -year, 24 -hour storm event. Each development shall accommodate its proportion of basin runoff rate above the downstream systems actual capacity. Water Quality - Stormwater treatment system which meets the requirements of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) and which is site - specific or serve sub -areas of the City. Roadway construction - All public roadways within a development shall be designed and constructed to standards which do not allow any amount of water above the roadway centerline during the following storm events for the following roadway types: o Local Roadway — 25 -year, 24 -hour design storm event (8.6 inches of rainfall). o Collector Roadway — 25 -year, 24 -hour design storm event (8.6 inches of rainfall). o Arterial Roadway — 100 -year, 24 -hour design storm event (10.6 inches of rainfall). PARKS AND RECREATION Parks 8 acres (total public park and recreation land acreage, including open space) per 1,000 residents. The City may utilize State and county park lands and trails that are located within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. This standard includes both passive and active recreation lands. March 9, 2011 Planning & Zoning Board/ Local Planning Agency Regular Agenda Item 602 City Owned Open Space 4 acres per 1, 000 residents. Open space is defined as "undeveloped lands suitable for passive recreation or conservation ". SCHOOL CAPACITY- as established by the Seminole County School Board- 100% of the aggregate permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each school type within each Concurrency Service Area, except for high schools which are established at 110% of the aggregate permanent FISH capacity for 2008 -2012 in order to financially achieve the desired LOS. The following thresholds shall be used to target initiation and budgeting of construction and /or purchase of capital facilities to meet projected future needs based on adopted LOS standards: • SANITARY SEWER- 75 % of available capacity is being utilized. • POTABLE WATER 75 % of available capacity is being utilized. • PARKS AND RECREATION Park lands when 95 % of available land area is utilized or when 90 % of the population exists in areas in need of new park acreage. Ranking of Proposed Capital Improvements The following criteria were used by each Department Head in evaluating and ranking their list of capital improvement projects: ■ [8 pts.] Does the project eliminate (or assist in the elimination of) proven or obvious dangers to public or employee health or safety? [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC] [CIE, p. 1.1.3]; or ■ [6 pts.] Does the proj ect raise a service or facility to an adopted Level of Service by eliminating (or assist in the elimination of) existing capacity deficits? [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC] [CIE, p. 1.1.3]; or ■ [4 pts.] Does the project maintain adopted Level of Service standards in already developed areas by increasing the efficiency of existing facilities or infrastructure? [CIE, p. 1.1.3] Will the project accommodate redevelopment Level of Service demands? [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC]; or ■ [2 pts.] Does the project represent a logical extension of facilities to accommodate projected growth and new development demands by providing comparable Level of Service in developing areas? [CIE, p. 1.1.3] [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC]. In addition, add two pts. for each, as applicable: ■ [2 pts.] Is the project financially feasible (meaning, does the project have committed funding? [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC] [CIE, p. 1.1.3]; and ■ [2 pts.] Is the project coordinated with major projects of other agencies? Does the project accommodate plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction? [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC] [CIE, p. 1.1.3]; and ■ [2 pts.] Does the project specifically implement one or more policies of the Comprehensive Plan pertaining to concurrency requirements? [CIE, p. 1.1.3]. March 9, 2011 Planning & Zoning Board/ Local Planning Agency Regular Agenda Item 602 FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time; The City is applying for grants to fund these projects. COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: The City Commission adopted FY 2011 -2016 Capital Improvements Program by Resolution 2010- 52 on September 27, 2011. The Additions to the Capital Improvement Program was Adopted by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) at a special meeting held on February 16, 2011. Although this item was not included in the posted P &Z Agenda, it was previously posted as part of the BPAC Agenda in City Hall and on the City's Website. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the P &Z/Local Planning Agency make a recommendation to the City Manager and City Commission related to the Revised Capital Improvements Program for FY 2010/11 thru FY 2015/16. ATTACHMENTS: A. Revised Capital Improvements Program, FY 2010/11 thru FY 2015/16 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY DEPARTMENT FY 2010/11 to FY 2015/16 LOS Funding Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 TOTALS Operating Account Number Project Name Category Source Description / Justification Location Rank 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013114 2014/15 2015/16 (Years 1 -6) Budget Impact Comprehensive Plan Reference 2010/2011 Department: PARKS & RECREATION TOTAL $ 1,530,550 I $ 200,000 I $ 400,0001 $ 5,000,000 I $ I $ I $ 7,130,550 I $ 20,500 Page 1 of 7 Outdoor amphitheatre furthers the network of public green spaces that form the framework for the Town Center and promotes & expands trail ROS 1.1.1, ROS 1.1.9 Parks & CF -305 & system; Improves recreational Winter ROS 1.1.10; FLUE 1.3.3; 305 - 65000 -70008 Magnolia Park opportunities consistent with the Springs 10 $ 1,180,550 $ $ ' ' ........... $!' ' $', $ ! ' ' $ 1,180,550 TBD Recreation 1CTX recreational needs of residents; Is a Town Center FLUE 2.1.5; FLUE 2.2.3; catalyst for private development in the CIE 1.2.1(f); CIE 1. 1.3 Town Center; Accomodates growth through additional active recerational area [LOS]. Permanent dog park expansion Central Winds consistent with recreational needs of CWP ROS 1.1.1; ROS 1.1.10; 7270 65000 Park Expansion Parks & GRT /GNF residents; Utilizes grant funding; Expansion 8 $ $ $, $ $ $ $ 20,500 ROS 1.4; ROS 1.4.1; ROS 1.5; - -70013 Improvements Recreation Accomodates growth through $ FLUE1.3.3; FLUE 2.1.5; FLUE 2.2.3; (Dog Park) additional active recreational area near SR 434 CIE 1.1.3; CIE 1.2.1(f) [LOS]. Trotwood Park Two new tennis courts with fencing Trotwood ROS 1.4; ROS 1.4.1; not yet established N/A PIMF consistant with recreational needs of $ 50,000 $t $ $, $ $ 50,000 Tennis Courts residents. park ROS 1.5; FLUE 1.3.3 Central Winds Heavy duty commercial shade Central ROS 1.3.6; ROS 1.4; not yet established N/A PIMF structures over all 8 sets of bleachers $ 100,000 '$ $ - $, $' $ = ' ' $ 100,000 Park at CWP ballfields Winds Park ROS 1.4.1 Outdoor Fitness N/A PIMF Outdoor Senior Fitness Wellness TBD $ 75000 $ $ $', $ $ 75,000 $ ROS 1.3.6; ROS 1.4; not yet established Course System Course. , $ - - ROS 1.4.1; ROS 1.5 not yet established Civic Center N/A PIMF Aesthetic Renovation Sunshine $ 125,000 $ - $ - $' - $ $ - $ 125,000 $ Renovation Park Senior Fitness N/A GIRT Convert Civic Center to Senior Fitness Sunshine $ $ 200,000 $', $ $ $ 200,000 $ ROS 1.3.6; ROS 1.4; not yet established Center Center. Park $ - ROS 1.4.1; ROS 1.5 Neighborhood parks & Torcaso Park expansion consistent Torcaso ROS1.4; ROS 1.4.1; FLUE 1.3.3; 7230 -53180 Community GIRT with recreational needs of residents; 6 $ - $ $ 400,000 $, $' $ 400,000 $ ' Center Recreation Utilizes grant funding. park HE 2.2.11; CIE 1.1.3 Civic or Event BND, GIRT Civic Center expansion not yet established N/A consistent with recreational needs of Town Center 6 $ $ $ $ 5,000,000 $ -, $ $ 5,000,000 $ -, ROS 1.4; ROS 1.4.1 Center &PIMF residents; Utilizes grant funding. TOTAL $ 1,530,550 I $ 200,000 I $ 400,0001 $ 5,000,000 I $ I $ I $ 7,130,550 I $ 20,500 Page 1 of 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY DEPARTMENT FY 2010/11 to FY 2015/16 Page 2 of 7 LOS Funding Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 TOTALS Operating Account Number Project Name Description / Justification Location Rank Budget Impact Comprehensive Plan Reference Category Source 2010111 2011112 2012113 2013114 2014/15 2015116 (Years 1 -6) 2010/2011 Department: PUBLIC WORKS City Hall BND, Expands existing facility to 312 - 65000 -30061 N/A PBIF, & accommodate demands due to City Town Center 4 $ $ $; - $ -, $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ -, CIE 1.1.3 Expansion RSV growth. Major maintenance; Refurbishes 104 - 65000 -30075 Resurfacing- N/A LGTX existing streets so that transportation City Wide 6 $ 300.000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,550,000 $ ::', : : *:: MTE 1 network is maintained. Services future demand and addresses future deficiency of SR 434 FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.3; 115- 65000 -30055 Michael Blake Transptn 1CTX by expanding interconnecting collector Town Center 4 $ 700,000 $ 750,000 $ $! $ $ $ 1,450,000 $ FLUE 2.1.4; MTE 1; MTE 1.2; Blvd.(Spine Road) road network in Town Center to MTE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 reduce demand on SR 434. Safety improvement; Improves City Sidewalks- 1CTX & collector streets with the addition of Northern Wy FLUE 1.3.1; MTE 1; MTE 1.2; 115 - 65000 -30130 N/A sidewalks to increase safety of /Shetland 6 $ 100,000 . $ $ $ $ $ $ 100,000 $ Shetland /Northern GIRT pedestrians in cooperation with Av Sidewalk MTE 1.3; MTE 1.5.3; CIE 1.1.3 Seminole County. Safety & mobility improvement; Between SR FLUE 1.4.6; FLUE 1.6.6; FLUE Sidewalks- North Addition of sidewalks will increase 419 & SR 6.1.1; MTE 1.5.1; MTE 1.6.7; MTE not yet established Village Walk- Transptn GIRT safety of pedestrians in an area with 434 and 10 $ 300.000 $ 300,000 Phase I easy access to parks, transit, school & Sheoah & 1.13.6; HE 2.2.1; ROS 1.5.1; ICE retail commercial. Sherry Av. 1.3.5; CIE 1.1.3 Safety & mobility improvement; Town Center FLUE 1.4.6; FLUE 1.6.6; FLUE Sidewalks - Winter Addition of sidewalks will increase at Winter 5.1.2; FLUE 5.2.6; FLUE 6.1.1: MTE not yet established Springs High Transptn FDOT safety for students and improve Springs High 10 $ 288,000 $ 288,000 1.5.1; MTE 1.5.3; MTE 1.6.7; MTE School network connection of high school to School and 1.13.6; PSFE 1.7.2; PSFE 1.7.3; ICE transit and the trail. City Hall 1.3.5; CIE 1.1.3 Safety & mobility improvement; Between SR Sidewalks- North Addition of sidewalks will increase 419 & SR FLUE 1.4.6; FLUE 1.6.6; MTE 1.5.1; not yet established Village Walk- Transptn FDOT safety of pedestrians in an area with 434 and 9 $ 295.000 $ 295,000 MTE 1.6.7; MTE 1.13.6; HE 2.2.1; Phase II easy access to parks, transit, school & Sheoah & ROS 1.5.1; ICE 1.3.5; CIE 1.1.3 retail commercial. Sherry Av. Safety & mobility improvement; FLUE 1.6.6; FLUE 5.1.2; FLUE not yet established Sidewalks- Town Transptn DTM Addition of sidewalks will increase Town Center 10 $ 288,000 $ 288,000 5.2.6; FLUE 6.1.1; MTE 1.5.1; MTE Center safety and improve connection 1.5.3; MTE 1.6.7; PSFE 1.7.2; CIE between uses. 1.1.3 Paving of this multi -use trail will Between FLUE 1.6.6: FLUE 6.1.1: MTE 1.5.1; not yet established Multi Use Trail Transptn 1CTX or provide a safe, alternative east -west Winding 10 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 MTE 1.5.3: MTE 1.5.10: ROS 1.2.7; Connector DTM route to SR 434 for bicycles and Hollow & CIE 1.1.3 pedestrians. Alton Rd Addition of this multi -use trail will Between FLUE 1.6.6; FLUE 6.1.1; MTE 1.5.1; not yet established Power Line Multi Transptn GIRT or provide connectivity and a safe, Belle and Tuskawilla 10 $ 500.000 $ 500,000 MTE 1.5.3; MTE 1.5.10; ROS 1.2; Use Trail DTM alternative east -west route to SR 434 along FP &L ROS 1.2.2; ROS 1.2.4; ROS 1.2.6; for bicycles and pedestrians. ROS 1.2.7; CIE 1.1.3 Easement From Addition of multi -use trail connector Highlands FLUE 1.6.6; FLUE 6.1.1; MTE 1.5.1; not yet established Highlands Trail Transptn GIRT will increase connectivity and increase PUD north to 9 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 MTE 1.5.3; MTE 1.5.10; ROS 1.2; Connector use of the Cross Seminole Trail as a Cross ROS 1.22 ROS 1.2.5; ROS 1.2.7; mobilty option. Seminole CIE 1.1.3 Trail Safety improvements; Furthers safe 115 -65000 -30134 Wade Street /419 Transptn STM transportation network to ensure SR 419 10 $ $ $ - $! $ $ $ $ FLUE 1.3.1; MTE 1; MTE 1.2; Improvements adequate movement of people and MTE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 goods. Page 2 of 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY DEPARTMENT FY 2010111 to FY 2015116 TOTAL $ 2,500,000 1 $ 1,000,000 1 $ 1,550,000 1 $ 550,000 1 $ 986,000 1 $ 5,245,000 1 $ 11,831,000 1 $ ( 1 Page 3 of 7 LOS Funding Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 TOTALS Operating Account Number Project Name Description/ Justification Location Rank Budget Impact Comprehensive Plan Reference Category Source 2010/11 2011112 2012/13 2013114 2014/15 2015116 (Years 1 -6) 2010/2011 Department: PUBLIC WORKS, Continued Doran Drive (Blumberg to high school) FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.3; MTE 1; 115 - 65000 -30121 Doran Drive Transptn 1CTX Refurbishes collector road so that Town Center 6 $ 200.000 $ $ - $! - $ $ _ $ 200,000 $ ? existing LOS is maintained. MTE 1.2; MTE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 Dirt road paving provides supporting 115 - 65000 -30134 R Transptn 1CTX infrastructure to enhance existing Ranchlands 6 $ 1,200.000 $ $ ; ;!... ; $!; ; $ $ ; + ' " $ 1,200,000 $ (10,000) FLUE 1.3.1; MTE 1; MTE 1.2; Paving Paving housng stock. ... ....... MTE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3; HE 1.1.9 Residential Road Rebuilds existing neighborhood FLUE 1.3.1; MTE 1; MTE 1.2; 115 - 65000 -30132 Transptn 1CTX streets so that transportation network Various 6 $ $ $ - $ $ $ - $ $ Reconstruction is maintained. MTE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 Major maintenance- Refurbishes MT FLUE 1.3.1; MTE 1; ; MT E 1.2; not yet established North Moss Road Transptn 1CTX collector road so that existing LOS is Moss Road 6 $ $ $ 1,300,000 $ $, $ $ 1,300,000 $ maintained. MTE 1.3; CIE 115 - 65000 -30xxx Sherry Ave Decel Transptn FDOT Helps ensure adequate movement of SR 419 & 6 1$ $ $ $ $' $ $ $ FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.3; Lane people and goods. Sherry Ave MTE 1.2; MTE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 140 65000 Hayes Road Transptn STM Helps ensure adequate movement of SR 434 & 6 $ $ $ $ $ $ FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.3; MTE 1.2; - -30085 Decel Lane people and goods. Hayes Road TE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 140 - 65000 -30112 Vistawilla Drive Transptn STM Helps ensure adequate movement of SR 434 & 6 - $ $ $ FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.3; Decel Lane people and goods. Vistawilla MTE 1.2; MTE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 not yet established Tuscora Drive Transptn TIF Helps ensure adequate movement of SR 434 & 6 $ $ $, $ 160,000 $ $ 160,000 $ FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.3; Decel Lane people and goods. Tuscora MTE 1.2; MTE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 SR 434& not yet established Winding Hollow Transptn TIF Helps ensure adequate movement of Winding 6 $ $ $ $' $ 250,000 $ 250,000 FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.3; Decel Lane people and goods. Hollow MTE 1.2; MTE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 Orange Av FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.3; 115 - 65000 -30121 Orange Avenue Transptn TIF Improves road function and to CWP (SR 6 $ - $ $ - $, $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ FLUE 2.1.4; MTE 1; MTE 1.2; Loop beautification. 434) -Town . MTE 1.2.4; MTE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 Ctr TOTAL $ 2,500,000 1 $ 1,000,000 1 $ 1,550,000 1 $ 550,000 1 $ 986,000 1 $ 5,245,000 1 $ 11,831,000 1 $ ( 1 Page 3 of 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY DEPARTMENT FY 2010111 to FY 2015116 175,000 $ LOS Funding $ 20,000 Ranking Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Account Number Project Name Category Source Description/ Justification Location Score 2010/11 2011112 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015116 Department: UTILITY -Potable Water $ SR 46 Alternative Potable - Study of surface water supply as a 213,143 $ - $ 80,000 $ 3600 -62100 75,000 $ UEF means of reducing demand on potable City Wide 6 $ 35,000 $ $ 75,000 $ 100,000 $ $ Water Supply Water water Electrical ... . 3600- 65000 -30028 Improvements to N/A UEF Major maintenance. WTP #2 6 $; ; $ $ , , , ; ;!, , -; ; $:, , ; ; ; $' WTP #2 WTP #1 Storage not yet established Tank 1 N/A UEF Major maintenance. WTP #1 6 $ $ 70,000 $', $,' $ Resurfacing not yet established WTP #2 Storage N/A UEF Major maintenance. WTP #2 6 $ $ $ 60,000 $' $' $ j Tank Tank Resurfacing not yet established WTP #3 Storage N/A UEF Major maintenance. WTP #3 6 $ 70,000 $ $ $' $' $ Tank Resurfacing New Variable 3600 -62100 Frequency N/A UEF Control upgrades. WTP #1 6 Controls WTP #1 SR 434 Spine Rd SR 434 to not yet established to Tuscora Dr. N/A UEF Water system looping. Spine 4 $ - $ $ 200,000 $I ........ $ -d $ Water Line Rd /Tuscora SR 434 Tuscora SR 434/ not yet established Dr. to Vistawilla N/A UEF Water system looping. Spine Rd to 4 $ $ $ $, $ 200,000 Dr. Water Line SR 417 Spine Rd 3640- 65000 -30053 (Michael Blake N/A UCF Water system looping. Town Center 4 $ $ 213,143 . $ - $, $ $ Blvd) Water Line not yet established Chlorine Conv. N/A BND Water quality upgrades. WTP #1 4 $ 80,000 ' $ - $I $', $ WTP# 1 not yet established Monitor Wells N/A UEF Groundwater monitoring required by Various 4 $ 75,000 $ $ $', $ CUP TOTAL $ 180,000 $ 363,143 $ 335,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ TOTALS Operating (Years 1 -6) Budget Impact Comprehensive Plan Reference 2009/2010 FLUE 1.3.1; IE 2.3; IE 2.3.2; IE 5.1.7; CE 1.2.8 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; HE 1.3.10; CIE 1.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; HE 1.3.10; CIE 1.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; HE 1.3.10; CIE 1.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; HE 1.3.10; CIE 1.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; HE 1.3.10; CIE 1.1 Account Number Project Name LOS Funding Description/ Justification Location Ranking Year 1 Category Source Score 2010111 Department: UTILITY - Administration Utility /Public Old Sanford - 311- 65000 -30037 Works Facility N/A CF -311 Consolidates management. 4 $ 861,943 $ Admnstrn Bldg Oviedo Rd TOTAL $ 861,943 $ Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 2011112 I 012/13 I 2013114 I 2014/15 I 2015/16 TOTALS Operating (Years 1 -6) Budget Impact Comprehensive Plan Reference 2010/2011 - $ 175,000 $ $ 861,943 $ 20,000 - $ 70,000 $ - $ 60,000 $ $ 70,000 $ - $ $ 3,000 $ 200,000 $ $ 200,000 $ - $ 213,143 $ - $ 80,000 $ $ 75,000 $ $ 1,178,143 $ 3,000 FLUE 1.3.1; IE 2.3; IE 2.3.2; IE 5.1.7; CE 1.2.8 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; HE 1.3.10; CIE 1.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; HE 1.3.10; CIE 1.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; HE 1.3.10; CIE 1.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; HE 1.3.10; CIE 1.1 IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; HE 1.3.10; CIE 1.1 Account Number Project Name LOS Funding Description/ Justification Location Ranking Year 1 Category Source Score 2010111 Department: UTILITY - Administration Utility /Public Old Sanford - 311- 65000 -30037 Works Facility N/A CF -311 Consolidates management. 4 $ 861,943 $ Admnstrn Bldg Oviedo Rd TOTAL $ 861,943 $ Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 2011112 I 012/13 I 2013114 I 2014/15 I 2015/16 TOTALS Operating (Years 1 -6) Budget Impact Comprehensive Plan Reference 2010/2011 - $ 861,943 $ 20,000 $ 861,943 $ 20,000 FLUE 1.3.3; CIE 1.1.3 Page 4 of 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY DEPARTMENT FY 2010111 to FY 2015116 TOTAL $ 3,763,334 1 $ 503,333 1 $ 1,025,000 1 $ 2,025,000 1 $ 2,030,000 1 $ 1,030,000 1 $ 10,376,667 1 $ 75,000 Page 5 of 7 LOS Funding Ranking Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 TOTALS Operating Account Number Project Name Category Source Description/ Justification Location Score 2010/11 2011112 2012/13 2013114 2014115 2015116 (Years 1 -6) Budget Impact Comprehensive Plan Reference 2010/2011 Department: UTILITY - Reclaimed Water Lake Jesup Water Study for reuse augmentation project- to augment and FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.3.10; 3640- 65000 -30043 Lake Jesup Water Potable UCF expand the use of reclaimed water for Lake Jesup 6 $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ IE 2.3; IE 2.3.2; IE 5.1.7; Study Water irrigation purposes, as a means of CE 1.2.8 reducing demands of growth on the Floridan Aquifer. Augments demand on the City's Shore of Reclaimed Water Potable Bank potable water system so that the City Lake FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.3.10; not yet established Augmnt Pump ill not exceed its 2013 CUP 6 $ 3,763,334 $ 503.333 $ $ $ 4,266,667 $ 75,000 IE 2.3; IE 2.3.2; IE 5.1.7; Station - Phase A Water financing allocation and allows the expansion of Jesup /Spray CE 1.2.8 the City's reclaimed water system. fields Expands reclaimed water system and Reclaimed Water Potable reduces demand on the City's potable FLUE 1 HE 1.3.1 not yet established Distribution - BND City Wide 6 $ $ $ 1,025,000 $ 1,025,000 $, $ $ 2,050,000 $ . IE 2.3; IE 2. 2.3.2; IE 5.1.7; Phase 1 Water water system so that the City will not CE 1.2.8 exceed its 2013 CUP allocation. Reclaimed Water Expands reclaimed water system and FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.3.10; not yet established Distribution - Potable BND reduces demand on the City's potable City Wide 6 $ $ $ $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ $ 2,000,000 $ IE 2.3; IE 2.3.2; IE 5.1.7; Water water system so that the City will not Phase 2 exceed its 2013 CUP allocation. CE 1.2.8 Reclaimed Water Expands reclaimed water system and FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.3.10; not yet established Distribution - Potable BND reduces demand on the City's potable City Wide 6 $ $ $ $; $ 1,030,000 $ 1,030,000 $ 2,060,000 $ IE 2.3; IE 2.3.2; IE 5.1.7; Water water system so that the City will not Phase 3 exceed its 2013 CUP allocation. CE 1.2.8 TOTAL $ 3,763,334 1 $ 503,333 1 $ 1,025,000 1 $ 2,025,000 1 $ 2,030,000 1 $ 1,030,000 1 $ 10,376,667 1 $ 75,000 Page 5 of 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY DEPARTMENT FY 2010111 to FY 2015116 LOS Funding Ranking Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 TOTALS Operating Account Number Project Name Category Source Description/ Justification Location Score 2010/11 2011112 2012/13 2013114 2014/15 2015116 (Years 1 -6) Budget Impact Comprehensive Plan Reference 2010/2011 Department: UTILITY -Sanitary Sewer Re lace Variable 3600 p Freqncy Contrls N/A UEF Major EWWTP 6 $ $ Year 3 $ $', $ $ $ FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12; IE 1.1.4; IE -65000 EVWVfP Category Source maintenance. Location Rank 2010111 2011/12 $ - - 2014/15 - (Years 1 -6) Budget Impact 1.4.3 West Force Main Sanitary Bolsters service to new growth; Lift Station 2010/2011 FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12; IE 1.1.4; IE 3600 - 65000 -30123 Rerouting / UEF 10 8 $ - $ - $ $ ' $ - $ - $ 10,000 Design Sewer Improves efficiency. Discharge corner 1.4.3 3640 East Force Main Rerouting/ Sanitary UEF Bolsters service to new growth; Tuskawilla 8 $ 204,567 $ $ $ $, $ $ 204,567 $ FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12; IE 1.1.4; IE -62100 Sewer Stormwater pond. Improves efficiency. - 3800 -65000 1.4.3 Stormwater Design Major maintenance enabling efficient Lombardy 6 $ $ $ - $i, $ $ $ $ FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12 Piping 3610- 65000 Sewer Line N/A R &R Annual City Wide 6 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,500,000 FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12; IE 1.1.4; IE -30030 Restoration reline of portions of system. ... 3800 -65000 Quality Stormwater .$ 1.4.3 not yet established VVWRF Sand Sanitary UEF Increases capacity for new growth; WWRF 6 $ $ $ -:: $ 250,000 $:, $ = ::, $ 250,000 $ FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12; Filter Sewer Improves efficiency. Projects IE 1.1.4; IE 1.4.3 not yet established Backhoe N/A UEF Equipment Replacement City Wide 6 $ $ 80,000 $ = $!' - $', $ - $ 80,000 $ CIE 1.1.3 ................... . TOTAL ;. $ 454,567 $ 330,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 2,034,567 $ 10,000 ................... Page 6 of 7 LOS Funding Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 TOTALS Operating Account Number Project Name Category Source Description/ Justification Location Rank 2010111 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015116 (Years 1 -6) Budget Impact Comprehensive Plan Reference 2010/2011 Department: STORMWATER Solary Canal Northwest Regional SJRVVNID Partnership with Oviedo, Seminole corner FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12; IE 4.1.1; CIE not yet established Stormwater Stormwater GIRT County, & SJRVVTVID for regional DeLeon 6 $ 412,313 :$ $ - $, $; :: $ $ 412,313 1.2.3; CIE 1.5.3 Facility Stormwater pond. Street & 3800 -65000 Lombardy Canal Stormwater SUF Major maintenance enabling efficient Lombardy 6 $ $ $ - $i, $ $ $ $ FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12 Piping operation. Road area TMDL Water Mandate to meet State water quality ... 3800 -65000 Quality Stormwater SUF regulations; Improves surface water City Wide 6 $ 50,000 $ 75,000 : $ : $!; $;, ... $ - : $ 125,000 CIE 1.2.3; IE 4.1.1 Management quality. Projects not yet established WR Outfall N/A SUF Replace non - functioning WR's &weir Various 6 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ $ $ $ $ 100,000 $ FLUE 1.3.3; CIE 1.1.3 Replacement structures at various locations Stormwater Pipe 3800 - 65000 -30140 Relining / N/A SUF Major Maintenance City Wide 6 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 350,000 $ ' FLUE 1.3.3; CIE 1.1.3 Replacement TOTAL $ 612,313 $ 175,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 987,313 $ Page 6 of 7 TOTAL $ 545,000 1 $ - 1 $ - 1 $ - 1 $ - 1 $ - 1 $ 545,000 1 $ Funding Sources: LOS Funding 1CTX One Cent Sales Tax (Road Improvement Fund) - 115 PBIF Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 TOTALS Operating Private Contributions Account Number Project Name Category Source Description / Justification Location Rank 2010/11 2011112 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 (Years 1 -6) Budget Impact Comprehensive Plan Reference FDOT Florida Dept of Transportation SUF Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund GNF General Fund TIF Transportation Impact Fee Fund GIRT Grants & CDBG TLBD Assessment District (Tuscawilla Lighting & Beautifictn) LGTX Local Option Gas Tax (Transportation Improvement Fund) 2010/2011 Utility Construction Fund Department: POLICE UEF Utility Enterprise Fund OFD Assessment District (Oak Forest Wall) New Storage New 40x50 out building to be used for Police 2110 -62000 N/A GNF the secure storage of bulk property 6 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $, - $, $ $ 100,000 $ CIE 1.1.3 Building Department and evidence storage. ........ .....:... . TOTAL $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 100,000 $ Funding Sources: Funding Sources: 1CTX One Cent Sales Tax (Road Improvement Fund) - 115 PBIF Public Buildings Impact Fee Fund BND Bonds PIMF Park & Rec Impact Fee Fund CF -305 1999 Construction Capital Project Fund - 305 PRV Private Contributions CF -311 Construction Fund - 311 R &R Utility Renewal & Replacement Fund DEF Development Services Enterprise Fund RSV Reserves DTM Developer Transportation Mitigation SC Seminole County FIMF Fire Impact Fee Fund STM Stimulus Federal Funding FDOT Florida Dept of Transportation SUF Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund GNF General Fund TIF Transportation Impact Fee Fund GIRT Grants & CDBG TLBD Assessment District (Tuscawilla Lighting & Beautifictn) LGTX Local Option Gas Tax (Transportation Improvement Fund) UCF Utility Construction Fund MTF Medical Transportation Fund UEF Utility Enterprise Fund OFD Assessment District (Oak Forest Wall) Page 7 of 7