HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 12 13 Informational 105 Official Results From The November 2, 2010 City Of Winter Springs General Municipal Election COMMISSION AGENDA
Informational X
Consent
ITEM 105 Public Hearings
Regular
g P
December 13, 2010 Authorization
Regular Meeting
REQUEST:
The City Clerk wishes to inform the City Commission of the Official results from the
November 2, 2010 City of Winter Springs General Municipal Election.
SYNOPSIS:
On November 2, 2010, the City of Winter Springs' held a General Municipal Election
and this Agenda Item is to inform the City Commission of the results of the November 2,
2010 Municipal Election. As the City Commission knows, at the end of the City's
Qualifying period which ran from Noon on Monday, August 23, 2010 until Noon on
Friday, August 27, 2010, three individuals were Elected Unopposed for the Seats of
Mayor, and Commissioner — District Two, and Commissioner — District Four. The City
of Winter Springs also had nine (9) Referendum questions on the November 2, 2010; and
the results of those Referendum questions are noted in this Agenda Item. Previously, in
November 2010, an Agenda Item went to the City Commission with the Unofficial
Results. The Supervisor of Elections for Seminole County has now Certified the results
from the November 2, 2010 Election and those results are being provided to the City
Commission in this Agenda Item.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
CITY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - DECEMBER 13, 2010
INFORMATIONAL AGENDA ITEM "105'
PAGE 2 OF 2
CONSIDERATIONS:
The Qualifying Period for the November 2, 2010 City of Winter Springs' General
Municipal Election began at Noon on Monday, August 23, 2010 and ran until Noon on
Friday, August 27, 2010.
The following individuals were Elected Unopposed for a four (4) year Term of Office:
Mayor: Mr. Charles Lacey
Commissioner — District Two: Mr. Rick Brown
Commissioner — District Four: Mr. Cade Resnick
Attached to this Agenda Item under Attachment "A" are the "Official Results" from the
November 2, 2010 Election.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no Fiscal Impact to be considered with the approval of this Agenda Item.
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
This Agenda Item has been forwarded to the Mayor and City Commission; City
Manager; City Attorney /Staff; placed in Press Packets; placed in the City Hall (Lobby)
City Commission Meeting binder; and is available on the City's Website, LaserFiche,
and the City's Server. Additionally, information related to this Agenda Item has been
sent to media/press representatives who have requested Agendas /Agenda Item
information, all Homeowner's Associations on file with the City, all individuals who
have requested Agendas /Agenda Item information, Department Directors; and also
posted outside City Hall; posted inside City Hall with additional copies available for the
general public; and posted at five (5) different locations around the City.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Clerk respectfully requests the City Commission review and accept the
information provided in this Agenda Item.
ATTACHMENTS:
A: November 2, 2010 "Official Results" from the Seminole County Supervisor of
Elections
B. Informational Agenda Item "102" from the November 15, 2010 City Commission
Regular Meeting
ATTACHMENT
«A„
Election Summary Report Date:11 /12/10
Time:17:23:52
General Election 2010 Page:1 of 4
Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races
Official Results
Registered Voters 266124 - Cards Cast 134723 50.62%
US SENATE CFO
Total 1 Total
Total Votes 133975 Total Votes 128513
Marco Rubio REP 76550 57.14% [ Jeff Atwater REP 81508 63.42%
Kendrick B. Meek DEM 26449 19.74% Loranne Ausley DEM 42916 33.39%
Alexander A. Snitker LBT 733 0.55%1 Ken Mazzie NPA 1684 1.31%
Bernie DeCastro CPF 93 0.07%1 Tom Stearns NPA 2405 1.87% I
Sue Askeland NPA 335 0.25%
Bruce Ray Riggs NPA 81 0.06% COMM AGRICULTURE
Bobbie Bean NPA 113 0.08% I Total
Rick Tyler NPA 148 0.11°/01 Total Votes 128886
Charlie Crist NPA 29231 21.82%1 Adam H. Putnam REP 79199 61.45%
Lewis J. Armstrong NPA 91 0 . 07 %1 Scott Maddox DEM 43461 33.72%
Write -in Votes 151 0.11%1 Ira Chester TEA 3947 3.06 %.
Thad Hamilton NPA 2279 1.77%
US REP DIST 3 -
Total I ST SENATE DIST 20 !!
Total Votes 6056 Total :
Michael "Mike" Yost REP 1943 32.08% Total Votes 9991
Corrine Brown DEM 3951 65.24% Alan Hays REP 6779 67.85%
Terry Martin -Back NPA 162 2.68 %' Eunice Garbutt DEM 3212 32.15% 1
US REP DIST 7 : ST SENATE DIST 24
Total Total
Total Votes 60259
Total Votes 16639
John L. Mica REP 42536 70.59% i Thad Altman REP 11747 70.60% I
Heather Beaven DEM 17723 29.41% { Steve Edmonds NPA 4892 29.40%1
US REP DIST 24 1 ST REP DIST 25 e
Total Total E '
Total Votes 65406 ` Total Votes 7903
Sandra "Sandy" Adams REP 40323 61.65 %; f
Larry Metz REP 4975 62.95%
Suzanne Kosmas DEM 24925 38.11% Frank Layne Wood DEM 2928 37.05%
Write -in Votes 158 0.24%
• ST REP DIST 33
GOVERNOR 1.T GOV Total
Total Total Votes 39441
Total Votes 132621 Jason Brodeur REP 23845 60.46 %,
Rick Scott REP 68351 51.54% Leo Cruz DEM 14140 35.85%1
Alex Sink DEM 59412 44.80 %' Franklin Perez LBT 1456 3.69%1
Peter Allen IDP 2891 2.18% ' - T_ Michael E. Arth NPA 506 0.38% ST REP DIST 34 1
Farid Khavari NPA 184 0.14 E •
C
•
. C. Reed NPA 297 0.22%1
Total
Daniel Imperato NPA 286 0.22% [ Total Votes 41179
Write-in Votes 694 0.52% Chris Dorworth REP 21603 52.46%
-- Steve Barnes DEM 16958 41.18%
• John DeVries TEA 2618 6.36%1
ATTY GEN
Total CTY COMM DIST 2
Total Votes 130684
Pam Bondi REP 78507 60.07% Total
Dan Gelber DEM 48547 37.15% Total Votes 101022
Jim Lewis NPA 3630 2.78% John Horan REP 96359 95.38%
- Write -in Votes 4663 4.62%
Election Summary Report Date:11 /12/10
General Election 2010 Time:17:23:52
Page:2 of 4
Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races
Official Results
Registered Voters 266124 - Cards Cast 134723 50.62%
CTY COMM DIST 4 i JUDGE TORPY !
Total ! Total I
Total Votes 99806 Total Votes 105502 j
Carlton Henley REP 94937 95.12% !, YES 70341 66.67%
Write -in Votes _ 4869 4.88% NO 35161 33.33 %'
JUSTICE CANADY • CIRCUIT JUDGE GRP 3
Total Total 1
Total Votes 109760 Total Votes 103953
YES 76339 69.55% I Oscar Hotusing 33886 32.60%
NO 33421 30.45% Jessica Recksiedler 70067 67.40% E
•
JUSTICE LABARGA ! COUNTY COURT JUDGE
Total Total
Total Votes 109664 ! Total Votes 106563
YES 64928 59.21%1 Debra L. Krause 51795 48.61%
NO 44736 40.79% ! Fred Schott 54768 51.39%
JUSTICE PERRY I SCHOOL BD DIST. 5 I
Total Total
Total Votes 110488 I Total Votes 112382 [
YES 69046 62.49%1 Tina Calderone 62403 55.53%
NO 41442 37.51 %': Becky Erwin 49979 44.47%
JUSTICE POLSTON OVIEDO COUNCIL GRP IV
Total ! Total
Total Votes 108419 Total Votes 10119 !
YES 73541 67.83% i Cindy Drago 2497 24.68%
NO 34878 32.17% ! Darrell Lopez 1058 10.46%1
Bob Pollack 606 5.99%
JUDGE COHEN ! Matthew C. Schwartz 832 8.22%
Total Paul Sladek 2483 24.54%
Total Votes 107267 Judith Dolores Smith 982 9.70%1
YES 71203 66.38% _ Rob Thrift 1661 16.41 %!
NO 36064 33.62%1
SANFORD MAYOR
JUDGE GRIFFIN Total
Total Total Votes 10879
Total Votes 107694 Linda Kuhn 4831 44.41%1
YES 72646 67.46% _ Jeff Triplett 6048 55.59%
j
NO 35048 32.54% I
SANFORD CITY COMM. DIST. 1
JUDGE JACOBUS 1 Total
Total Total Votes 2990
Total Votes 106525 Hank Dieckhaus 1321 44.18%
YES 70552 66.23% - Mark McCarty 1669 55.82%
NO 35973 33.77%
CONST AMENDMENT 1
JUDGE MONACO Total
Total Total Votes 123263
Total Votes 106207 ! YES 64322 52.18%
YES 70132 66.03% I NO 58941 47.82%
NO 36075 33.97%
Election Summary Report Date:11/12/10
General Election 2010 Time: 4
Page :3 o of f 4
Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races
Official Results
Registered Voters 266124 - Cards Cast 134723 50.62%
CONST AMENDMENT 2 OVIEDO CHARTER 3
Total Total
Total Votes 126521 I Total Votes 10084
YES 103056 81.45 %': YES 7765 77.00% I
NO 23465 18.55% I NO 2319 23.00% j
•
CONST AMENDMENT 4 OVIEDO CHARTER 4
Total Total
Total Votes 126968 € Total Votes 10466 I
YES 41556 32.73% YES 7999 76.43% I
NO 85412 67.27% NO 2467 23.57%
CONST AMENDMENT 5 OVIEDO CHARTER 5 •
Total Total
Total Votes 125296 Total Votes 10045
YES 76598 61.13% { YES 4213 41.94 %'
NO 48698 38.87% I NO 5832 58.06 %'
CONST AMENDMENT 6 SANFORD CHARTER 1
Total Total
Total Votes 124586 Total Votes 10502
YES 76805 61.65% ` YES 3439 32.75%
NO 47781 38.35% I NO 7063 67.25%
CONST AMENDMENT 8 j SANFORD CHARTER 2 R
Total Total j
Total Votes 126956 I Total Votes 9964
YES 71918 56.65% YES ! 6221 62.43%
NO 55038 43.35% I NO 3743 37.57%1
-
BUDGET REFERENDUM i SANFORD CHARTER 3
Total Total
Total Votes 123820 Total Votes 10026
YES 89239 72.07% I YES 6617 66.00%
NO 34581 27.93% E NO 3409 34.00% f
•
SCHOOL BOARD REFERENDUM WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 1
Total Total
Total Votes 127846 Total Votes 10696
YES 62952 49.24% I YES 5277 49.34% f
NO 64894 50.76% NO 5419 50.66% [
•
OVIEDO CHARTER 1 • WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 2
Total Total
Total Votes 10163 I Total Votes 10910
YES 7620 74.98% YES 8876 81.36%
NO 2543 25.02% ! NO 2034 18.64%
OVIEDO CHARTER 2 • WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 3
Total Total
Total Votes 10083 Total Votes 10867 f
YES 5607 55.61% YES 5993 55.15%!
NO 4476 44.39% i NO 4874 44.85% I
Election Summary Report Date:11 /12/10
General Election 2010 Time:4
Page:e:4 o off 4
Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races
Official Results
Registered Voters 266124 - Cards Cast 134723 50.62%
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 4
Total
Total Votes 10790
YES 7229 67.00%
NO 3561 33.00%
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 5
Total
Total Votes 10969
YES 4313 39.32%
NO 6656 60.68%
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 6
Total
Total Votes 10852
YES 8119 74.82%
NO 2733 25.18%
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 7
Total
Total Votes 10752
YES 7257 67.49%
NO 3495 32.51%
—
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 8
Total
Total Votes 10481
YES 6200 59.15%
NO 4281 40.85 %''
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 9
Total
Total Votes 11240
YES 5931 52.77% I
NO 5309 47.23%
ATTACHMENT
"B"
•
COMMISSION AGENDA
Informational X
ITEM 102 Consent •
Public Hearings
Regular
November 15. 2010
(RESCHEDULED FROM NOVEMBER 8, 2010) Mgr. / pt.
Regular Meeting Authorization
REQUEST:
The City Clerk wishes to inform the City Commission of the results of the
November 2, 2010 City of Winter Springs General Municipal Election.
SYNOPSIS:
On November 2, 2010, the City of Winter Springs' held a General Municipal Election
and this Agenda Item is to inform the City Commission of the results of the November 2,
2010 Municipal Election. As the City Commission knows, at the end of the City's
Qualifying period which ran from Noon on Monday, August 23, 2010 until Noon on
Friday, August 27, 2010, three individuals were Elected Unopposed for the Seats of
Mayor, and Commissioner — District Two, and Commissioner — District Four. The City
of Winter Springs also had nine (9) Referendum questions on the November 2, 2010; and
the results of those Referendum questions are noted in this Agenda Item.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The Qualifying Period for the November 2, 2010 City of Winter Springs' General
Municipal Election began at Noon on Monday, August 23, 2010 and ran until Noon on
Friday, August 27, 2010.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
CITY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 15, 2010
(RESCHEDULED FROM NOVEMBER 8, 2010)
INFORMATIONAL AGENDA ITEM "102"
PAGE 2 OF 2
The following individuals were Elected Unopposed for a four (4) year Term of Office:
Mayor: Mr. Charles Lacey
Commissioner — District Two: Mr. Rick Brown
Commissioner — District Four: Mr. Cade Resnick
Attached to this Agenda Item under Attachment "A" are the (currently "Unofficial " *)
results from the November 2, 2010 City of Winter Springs' General Municipal Election
for the nine (9) Referendum questions.
The Seminole County Supervisor of Elections expects to provide Certified Results at a
later date, and those Certified results will be forwarded to the City Commission, most
likely via email.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no Fiscal Impact to be considered with the approval of this Agenda Item.
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
This Agenda Item has been distributed to the Mayor and City Commission; City
Manager; City Attorney; Department Directors; placed in Press Packets; placed in the
Lobby binder; and will be available on the City's Website, LaserFiche, and the City's
Server.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Clerk respectfully requests the City Commission review and accept the
information provided in this Agenda Item.
ATTACHMENTS:
A: November 2, 2010 "Unofficial" Results from the Seminole County Supervisor of
Elections
B. City of Winter Springs' Special Newsletter on the Ballot questions
ATTACHMENT
«A„
Election Summary Report Date:l l /02/10
General Election 2010 Tim e:22:38:07 of Page:1 of 4
Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races
Unofficial Results
Registered Voters 266124 - Cards Cast 134644 50.59%
US SENATE I CFO
Total Total
Total Votes 133890 Total Votes 128442
Marco Rubio REP 76517 57.15% Jeff Atwater REP 81475 63.43%
Kendrick B. Meek DEM 26422 19.73% Loranne Ausley DEM 42885 33.39%
Alexander A. Snitker LBT 732 0.55% Ken Mazzie NPA 1681 1.31%
Bernie DeCastro CPF 93 0.07% Tom Stearns NPA 2401 1.87%
Sue Askeland NPA 335 0.25%
Bruce Ray Riggs NPA 81 0.06% COMM AGRICULTURE
Bobbie Bean NPA 113 0.08% Total
Rick Tyler NPA 148 0.11% Total Votes 128815
Charlie Crist NPA 29208 21.81% Adam H. Putnam REP 79168 61.46%
Lewis J. Armstrong NPA 90 0.07% Scott Maddox DEM 43427 33.71%
Write -in Votes 151 0.11% Ira Chester TEA 3945 3.06%
Thad Hamilton NPA 2275 1.77%
US REP DIST 3 - _
Total ST SENATE DIST 20
Total Votes 6042 Total
Michael "Mike" Yost REP 1942 32.14% Total Votes 9983
Corrine Brown DEM 3940 65.21% Alan Hays REP 6772 67.84% -
Terry Martin -Back NPA 160 2.65% Eunice Garbutt DEM 3211 32.16%
US REP DIST 7 - ST SENATE DIST 24
Total Total
Total Votes 60227 Total Votes 16631
John L. Mica REP 42517 70.59% Thad Altman REP 11742 70.60%
Heather Beaven DEM 17710 29.41% Steve Edmonds NPA 4889 29.40%
US REP DIST 24 - ST REP DIST 25
Total Total
Total Votes 65369 Total Votes 7896
Sandra "Sandy" Adams REP 40302 61.65% Larry Metz REP 4970 62.94%
Suzanne Kosmas DEM 24909 38.11% Frank Layne Wood DEM 2926 37.06%
Write -in Votes 158 0.24%
GOVERNOR LT GOV ST REP DIST 33
Total
Total Total Votes 39414
Total Votes 132548 - Jason Brodeur REP 23834 60.47%
Rick Scott REP 68320 51.54% Leo Cruz DEM 14127 35.84%
Alex Sink DEM 59376 44.80% Franklin Perez LBT 1453 3.69%
Peter Allen EDP 2887 2.18%
Michael E. Arth NPA 506 0.38% ST REP DIST 34
Farid Khavari NPA 183 0.14% Total
C. C. Reed NPA 296 0.22% Total Votes 41165
Daniellmperato NPA 286 0.22% °
Write -in Votes 694 0.52% Chris Dorworth REP 21596 52.46 /o
- . -_ _- - -,_ - _ _,, „ ,. Steve Barnes DEM 16951 41.18%
John DeVries TEA 2618 6.36%
ATTY GEN z
Total CTY COMM DIST 2
Total Votes 130614
Pam Bondi REP 78474 60.08% Total
Dan Gelber DEM 48515 37.14% Total Votes 100975
Jim Lewis NPA 3625 2.78% John Horan REP 96314 95.38%
-- -- -__ s - .. Write -in Votes 4661 4.62% -
Election Summary Report Date:11/02110
General Election 2010 Time:22:38:07
Page:2 of 4
Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races
Unofficial Results
Registered Voters 266124 - Cards Cast 134644 50.59%
CTY COMM DIST 4 JUDGE TORPY
Total Total
Total Votes 99757 Total Votes 1054.46
Carlton Henley REP 94891 95.12% YES 70304 66.67%
Write -in Votes 4866 4.88% NO 35142 3333%
JUSTICE CANADY CIRCUIT JUDGE GRP 3
Total - Total
Total Votes 109704 Total Votes 103903
YES 76302 69.55% Oscar Hotusing 33866 32.59%
NO 33402 30.45% Jessica Recksiedler 70037 67.41%
JUSTICE LABARGA - COUNTY COURT JUDGE
Total Total
Total Votes 109607 Total Votes 106511
YES 64892 59.20% Debra L. Krause 51776 48.61%
NO 44715 40.80% Fred Schott 54735 51.39%
JUSTICE PERRY SCHOOL BD DIST. 5
Total Total
Total Votes 110431 Total Votes 112324
YES 69009 62.49% Tina Calderone 62370 55.53% I
NO 41422 37.51% Becky Erwin 49954 44.47%
JUSTICE POLSTON OVIEDO COUNCIL GRP IV
Total Total
Total Votes 108362 Total Votes 10111
YES 73504 67.83% Cindy Drago 2497 24.70%
NO 34858 32.17% Darrell Lopez 1055 10.43%
Bob Pollack 606 5.99%
JUDGE COHEN Matthew C. Schwartz 832 8.23%
Total Paul Sladek 2483 24.56%
Total Votes 107208 Judith Dolores Smith 978 9.67%
YES 71162 66.38% , Rob Thrift 1660 16.42%
NO 36046 33.62%
abagb -a. SANFORD MAYOR
JUDGE GRIFFIN Total
Total Total Votes 10859
Total Votes 107637 Linda Kuhn 4829 44.47%
YES 72608 67.46% Jeff Triplett 6030 55.53%
l
NO 35029 32.54%
SANFORD CITY COMM. DIST. 1
JUDGE JACOBUS Total
Total Total Votes 2988
Total Votes 106468 Hank Dieckhaus 1319 44.14%
YES 70514 66.23% Mark McCue' 1669 55.86%
NO 35954 33.77% -'
CONST AMENDMENT 1
JUDGE MONACO Total
Total Total Votes 123200
Total Votes 106150 YES 64293 52.19% :
YES 70098 66.04% NO 58907 47.81%
NO 36052 33.96%
Election Summary Report Date:11/02/10
General Election 2010 Time Page:3 o04
of 4
Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races
Unofficial Results
Registered Voters 266124 - Cards Cast 134644 50.59%
CONST AMENDMENT 2 OVIEDO CHARTER 3
Total Total
Total Votes 126455 Total Votes 10079
YES 103002 81.45% YES 7762 77.01%
NO 23453 18.55% NO 2317 22.99%
CONST AMENDMENT 4 OVIEDO CHARTER 4
Total Total
Total Votes 126906 Total Votes 10459
YES 41536 32.73% YES 7994 76.43%
NO 85370 67.27% NO 2465 23.57%
CONST AMENDMENT 5 OVIEDO CHARTER 5
Total Total
Total Votes 125235 Total Votes 10039
YES 76562 61.13% YES 4210 41.94%
NO 48673 38.87% NO 5829 58.06%
CONST AMENDMENT 6 SANFORD CHARTER 1
Total t Total `
Total Votes 124523 Total Votes 10487
YES 76768 61.65% : YES 3433 32.74% _
NO 47755 38.35% - NO 7054 67.26%
CONST AMENDMENT 8 SANFORD CHARTER 2
Total Total
Total Votes 126891 Total Votes 9949
YES 71885 56.65% YES 6210 62.42%
NO 55006 43.35% NO 3739 37.58%
BUDGET REFERENDUM
Total Votes
SANFORD CHARTER 3
Total Total
123757 Total Votes 10013
YES 89198 72.08% YES 6608 65.99%
NO 34559 27.92% NO 3405 34.01%
SCHOOL BOARD REFERENDUM WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 1
Total Total
Total Votes 127782 Total Votes 10693
YES 62920 49.24% YES 5277 49.35%
NO 64862 50.76% NO 5416 50.65%
. -.
OVIEDO CHARTER 1 WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 2
Total Total
Total Votes 10157 Total Votes 10907
YES 7617 74.99% YES 8875 81.3
NO 2540 25.01% NO 2032 18.63%
OVIEDO CHARTER 2 WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 3
Total Total
Total Votes 10078 Total Votes 10864
YES 5606 55.63% YES 5992 55.15%
NO 4472 44.37% NO 4872 44.85%
•
Election Summary Report Date:11/02/10
Time:22:38:07
General Election 2010 Page:4 of 4
Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races
Unofficial Results
Registered Voters 266124 - Cards Cast 134644 50.59%
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 4
Total
Total Votes 10787
YES 7227 67.00%
NO 3560 33.00%
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 5
Total
Total Votes 10966
YES 4313 39.3 %%
NO 6653 60.67%
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 6
Total
Total Votes 10849
YES 8118 74.83%
NO 2731 25.17%
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 7
Total
Total Votes 10749
YES 7255 67.49%
NO 3494 32.51%
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 8
Total
Total Votes 10478
YES 6198 59.15%
NO 4280 40.85%
WINTER SPRINGS QUESTION 9
Total
Total Votes 11237
YES 5930 52.77%
NO 5307 47.23%
ATTACHMENT
«B„
W i
eiP; INSIDER . INSIDER
Special Ballot Edition
Orr _ , -
nie „ , , a ,. - :. i .
This year, the City Commission appointed a Charter
Review Committee consisting of eleven (11) Winter
Springs' voters whose purpose was to conduct a compre- ;
hensive review of the current City Charter to determine it.
if updates were needed. The Committee held various
public meetings where the public was invited to partici- ( * * - �..
pate. Upon conclusion of the meetings, the Committee` „
filed a written report with the City Commission recom- r
mending a number of revisions to the City Charter. The * '
City Commission considered the Committee's report and` = 1 -
adopted Ordinance 2010 -19 which approved holding
a referendum election to present most of the revisions `
recommended by the Committee to the voters of Winter
Springs for consideration, with some changes.
In addition, this year the City Commission has been studying various options to expand eco-
nomic development within the City. One option available is for the voters of Winter Springs to
authorize the City Commission to grant property tax exemptions to certain State qualified new
businesses and expansions of existing businesses within the City. As such, the City Commission
adopted Ordinance 2009 -05 which approved a referendum election on the issue of whether or
not the City Commission should be given this authority.
Below are the referendum questions that the City Commission wants its citizens to consider at
the November 2, 2010 general election. Because each referendum ballot is limited to only 75
words and a short title, each question is accompanied by an additional factual summary (which
will not appear on the ballot) explaining the meaning of the referendum question.
More information, including the actual proposed text changes to the City Charter, can be found
in Ordinances 2009 -05 and 2010 -19. A copy of the ordinances can be viewed on the City's
website at www.winterspringsfl.org or at City Hall.
I l
1
PROPOSED CITY requirements set forth in Section 2 -87 of the City Code into
CHARTER AMENDMENTS the City Charter so that any future amendments could only
be made with the approval of the Winter Springs voters.
The provisions of Section 2 -87 that will be incorporated into
ARTICLE II, SECTION 2.03 the Charter are: (1) a one year City residency requirement
AR
A OF PROPERTY prior to candidates qualifying to run for election as Mayor
or City Commissioner; (2) a six month district residency re-
Question. Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, governs quirement prior to candidates qualifying to run for election
the annexation of land into the territorial limits of the in a particular City Commission District; and (3) require -
City. Should the City Charter be amended to delete ments that all candidates for Mayor and City Commission
specific city charter requirements for annexations so at the time of qualifying meet other requirements such as
the charter reads, "The City Commission of Winter ing a petition signed by fifteen registered Winter Springs'
Springs, Florida, may annex land to the territorial lim- voters, being a registered and qualified voter of Winter
its of the municipality in accordance with the proce- Springs, filing other documents required by state law, and
dures set forth in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes as it paying required qualifying fees and election assessments.
now exists or as it may be renumbered or amended ?" filing YES ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4.01(a), AND 4.03.
GOVERNING BODY
NO ELECTION AND TERMS
Additional Factual Summary. When the City annexes Question. The City Charter currently provides that
real property into the territorial limits of the City, the City the terms of the mayor and commissioners upon
is required to follow the exclusive procedures and criteria election shall begin on the first Monday after the first
set forth in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes. Although the day of December of each year an election is held.
current City Charter references Chapter 171, the Charter Should the City Charter be amended to provide that
also contains text regarding the City's annexation powers such terms of office upon election shall begin at the
which partially mentions the Chapter 171 criteria for annex- next s ssio led regular or special meeting of the city
ing land. If approved, the proposed Charter amendment commission .
will remove the partially mentioned criteria from the Charter YES
and only reference that annexations will be in accordance
with Chapter 171, Florida Statutes as it now exists or as it NO
may be renumbered or amended.
Additional Factual Summary. The current City Charter
ARTICLE IV, SECTIONS 4.01(b) provides that upon election in November, the term of of-
GOVERNING BODY fice for a newly elected mayor or city commissioner
ELIGIBILITY FOR OFFICE does not begin until the first Monday after the first day of
December following the election. Thus, there is generally
•
Question. The City Charter currently references a a one month time period between when a newly elected
City Code section adopted by the City Commission mayor and city commissioner are elected and when they
which provides that candidates for city commission take office. During this one month time period, the then
and the mayor prior to the time for qualifying reside current mayor and city commissioners continue to serve in
in the City for one year and commissioners reside their respective capacities until the newly elected mayor or
in the designated commission district for six months. commissioner are officially swom into office. If approved,
That City Code section also establishes other quali- the proposed Charter amendment will require that newly-
' fying requirements. Should the qualifying require- elected city commissioners and the mayor take office at
ments set out in the City Code be set out in the City the next regular or special meeting of the city commission
Charter? after the election, and eliminate the one month time period
mentioned above.
2 YES
NO ARTICLE IV SECTIONS 4.05, 4.08
Additional Factual Summary. The current City Charter FILLING OF VACANCIES FOR CITY
provides that candidates for Mayor and the City Commission COMMISSIONERS AND THE MAYOR
must comply with Section 2-87 of the City Code, as may be
Question. Shall the City Charter be revised to re-
amended from time to time. Section 2-87 may be amended quire the remaining city commissioners to fill vacan-
by the City Commission, by ordinance, without approval of cies in any commission member seat or mayor's
the voters of Winter Springs. If approved, the proposed position by majority vote within the next two regular
Charter amendment will set forth the candidate qualifying meetings of the city commission to serve until the
1 1
next regular election, at which time the citizens will
vote to fill the vacancy for the remainder of the term, ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4.10
or a new four year term if the previous term was set COMPENSATION OF CITY CLERK
to expire.
Question. The City Charter does not currently spec -
YES ify who shall establish the compensation of the City
Clerk, who is appointed by the City Commission.
NO Shall the City Charter be amended to include a re-
quirement that the City Commission establish the
Additional Factual Summary. Under the current City compensation of the City Clerk.
Charter, the deputy mayor, who is appointed by the City
Commission, automatically becomes mayor if the mayor's YES
position becomes vacant. Additionally, the current City
Charter requires the City Commission to appoint, by major- NO
ity vote of the remaining commissioners, a qualified per-
son to fill a vacancy in a commissioner seat until the next Additional Factual Summary. Although the City Charter
regular election of the seat that was filled by appointment. requires that the city commission appoint a city clerk, the
If approved, the proposed Charter amendment will require current City Charter does not address who shall be respon- -
the city commission to appoint, by majority vote of the re- sible for establishing the compensation for the city clerk.
maining members, a qualified person to fill a vacancy in the Because the city clerk is appointed by the city commission,
position of city commissioner and the mayor. The deputy the past practice of the City has been for the city commis
mayor would no longer automatically become mayor in the sion to establish the compensation for the city clerk. If ap
event of a vacancy in the mayor position. The amendment proved, the proposed Charter amendment will incorporate
will also establish a maximum time period for filling such the City's past practice into the City Charter and require
vacancies. Vacancies will be required to be filled at either the city commission to establish the compensation for the
of the next two regular meetings of the city commission. : city clerk.
Also, rather than the city commission appointment always
being for the entire unexpired term of the vacant position,
any such appointment by the city commission will only be
until the next regular city election. At that regular election, ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4.15
a qualified person will either be elected by the citizens to fill EMERGENCY ORDINANCES
the unexpired term of the position that was vacated or for
a new four year term if the previous term was to expire at Question. The City Charter does not currently con -
the regular election. tain any provision specifically addressing the enact-
ment of emergency ordinances by the city commis-
sion. Shall the City Charter be amended to create a
new section that will provide that the city commission
ARTICLE IV, V, AND VI, may enact emergency ordinances in accordance
SECTIONS 4.10, 5.02 AND 6.02 with Florida law, and require that such emergency or-
REMOVAL OF CHARTER OFFICERS dinances be automatically repealed after sixty days
unless repealed sooner by the commission?
Question. The City Charter currently requires a su-
per- majority vote of at least four commission mem- YES
bers to remove the city clerk, city attomey and city
manager from office. Should the City Charter be NO
amended to require only a simple majority vote of at
least three commission members to remove the city Additional Factual Summary. Under Florida general
clerk, city attomey and city manager? law, the city commission is permitted to adopt emergency
ordinances by two-thirds vote without following the stan-
YES dard ordinance adoption procedures. Florida general law
does not establish a maximum duration for emergency or-
NO dinances to be in effect. The current City Charter does —
not address emergency ordinances. If approved, the pro -
Additional Factual Summary. The current City Charter posed Charter amendment will provide that the city com-
requires the City Commission to appoint and remove from mission may enact emergency ordinances in accordance
office the city manager, city clerk, and city attomey by a su- with Florida law. However, unlike Florida general law, the
per- majority vote of at least four (4) commission members. Charter amendment will require that such emergency or-
The proposed charter amendment, if approved, would al- dinances be automatically repealed after sixty (60) days
low the city commission to remove the city manager, city unless repealed sooner by the commission. In addition, al-
clerk, and city attomey by a simple majority vote of at least though emergency ordinances will only be effective for a
three (3) commission members. A super- majority vote of maximum of sixty days, the Charter amendment will also
at least four (4) city commissioner would still be required to : provide that the city commission can reenact an emergen-
appoint the city manager, city clerk, and city attomey. . cy ordinance if necessary.
TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS PROPOSED AD VALOREM
TO CITY CHARTER ABATEMENT AUTHORITY
Question. Shall the City Charter be amended to renum-
ber sections 4.12 and 12.01, amend penalty provisions to ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM
comply with law, clarify the city commission can adopt or- TAX EXEMPTION
dinances regulating public utility rates except as provided
by law, clarify the city commission can appoint a qualified Question. Shall the City Commission of the City of
acting city manager to act in the manager's absence or dis- Winter Springs be authorized to grant, pursuant to
ability, clarify the city attomey is not required to represent Section 3, Art VII of the State Constitution, property
the city in all legal proceedings, editing charter language to tax exemptions to new businesses and expansions
be gender - neutral? of existing businesses?
YES YES
NO NO
Additional Factual Summary. Several proposed Charter amend- Additional Factual Summary. Section 196.1995, Florida
ments are categorized as technical amendments. These Charter Statutes, provides that a city may call a referendum within
amendments were deemed technical in nature by the city com- its jurisdiction to determine whether the voters in that city
mission because they involve 'house cleaning' matters to either will authorize that city to grant economic development ad
address inconsistencies with State law, wordsmith text to clan- valorem tax exemptions in accordance with the require -
fy perceived ambiguities in the existing City Charter, renumber ments of State law. If approved by the voters of Winter
several sections of the City Charter, and make the text in the Springs, the city commission may exempt from ad valor -
City Charter gender neutral. If approved, the proposed Charter em taxation up to one hundred percent (100 %) of the as-
amendment will: (1) renumber sections 4.12 and 12.01 of the ex- sessed value of all improvements to real property made by
isting City Charter, (2) amend the penalty provisions under sec- or for the use of a qualified new business. Additionally, the
tion 4.11 involving city commission investigations to comply with city commission may also exempt up to one hundred per -
State law; (3) remove specific language referencing "telephone cent (100 %) of the assessed value of all added improve -
and telegraph companies and public utilities regulated by the ments to real property made to facilitate the expansion of
public service commission' from the Charter section requiring an a qualified existing business and of the net increase in all
ordinance to establish public utility rates in order to clarify that tangible personal property acquired to facilitate such ex-
the city commission can only adopt public utility rate ordinances if pansion of a qualified existing business, provided that the
permitted by law; (4) add the word 'qualified' under the acting city improvements to real property are made or the tangible
manager section of the City Charter in order to clarify that if city personal property is added or increased on or after the day
commission revokes the city manager's appointment of an act- the tax abatement ordinance is adopted. Exemptions must
ing city manager to serve during temporary absences or disability be approved by ordinance of the city commission and can
of the city manager, the city commission is required to appoint a not exceed 10 years with respect to any particular facil-
"qualified' officer of the city to serve as acting city manager until ity. Further, if approved, the authority to grant exemptions
the manager retums; (5) strike the word "all" from the city attor- under this referendum will expire 10 years after the date of
ney section of the City Charter in order to clarify, consistent with election (November 2, 2020) unless renewed for another
the Florida Bar Rules and practice, that the city attomey is not 10 year period by the voters of Winter Springs.
required by law to represent the city in "all" legal proceedings; and
(6) remove and reword any references to masculine or feminine
pronouns from the City Charter such as "his," "he," 'her,' or "she"
in order to make the text in the City Charter gender neutral.
� The City of Winter Springs PRSRT STD
_ 1126 East State Road 434 U.S. POSTAGE
Nliaffl Winter Springs, Florida 32708 PAID
visit us online at www.winters rin sfl.o M T N L
P 9 � PERMI T NO F 126