HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 08 10 Regular 603 Presentation For Quarter Ending June 2010Date: August 10, 2010
The following Report was provided to the Board of
Trustees during Regular Agenda Item "602" by Jack
L. Evatt, II, The Bogdahn Group on August 17,
2010.
I
LI
Winter Springs
General Employees
General Plan and Trust
2nd Quarter 2010
--A
THE
BOGDAHN
GROUP
W W W, $ Q G D A H N {; R O U R C O M simplifying your investment raid fiduciary decisions
2nd Quarter 2010 Market Environment
THF
BOGDAHN
GROUP
The Market Environment
Major Market Index Performance
Period Ended: June 30th 2010
Portfolio Attribution
(Reference pages 16, 17, and 18 of the Bogdahn Group June 2010 Report)
■ The Plan results were impacted by the sharp, broad based market declines experienced during the month of June. With no shortage of negative events to consider
including uncertainty over financial reform, sticky unemployment, and the burgeoning Federal deficit, the thematic return of " flight to quality" dominated the investment
environment. Results for the quarter were negative (- 6.34 %), declining marginally less than the policy benchmark (- 6.63 %), retracing all but (0.91%) of the previously earned
fiscal year to date gains. Year over year results for periods ended June have the Plan earning (12.37 %) net of manager fees. Attribution shows positive active management
elements continue to impact results on the margin. Overall equity performance, well down on an absolute basis, exceeded policy for the quarter (- 10.12% vs. - 11.32 %),
fiscal year to date (1.13% vs. - 0.51 %), and year over year (17.06% vs. 15.02 %). Positive contributions came from both the domestic and international equity effort.
Fixed income management trailed slightly for the quarter, but remains well ahead of benchmarks and peer comparisons fiscal year -to -date. Overall program results compared
to peers slipped over the period , placing the Plan in the (70th), (61St ), and (56th ) percentiles for the quarter, fiscal year to date, and year over year.
■ The most notable active manager contributions came from RBC where performance continues to exceeded already outsized benchmark returns impressively. Results for
the quarter (A 2.31% vs. - 13.75 %), and fiscal year to date ( -6.45% vs. - 11.00 %). While a (64th) percentile showing for the quarter, the manager ranks in the top (36th)
percentile fiscal year -to -date and (4th) percentile year over year.
■ Dalton Greiner continues to show strong results preserving capital well during the quarter ( -8.39% vs. - 11.09 %), and delivering strong fiscal year -to -date results (4.19%
vs. - 0.86 %).
■ Plan allocation remains on target policy with monthly investment of net cash contributions; there are no deviations from policy allocation of consequence.
What helped?
• Preservation oriented performance from Dalton Greiner, and RBC provided a modest offset to both domestic and international equity market declines.
• Real Estate was the strongest performing asset in the allocation; the return for American Realty for the quarter was 3.25 %.
What hurt?
• There were no allocation or manager specific issues hurting performance, rather the general, sharp decline in equities had the most profound affect on Plan results.
■ Recommendations:
- Proceed policy benchmark amendments to include NPI -ODCE at the plan level, and manager level.
- Proceed with Real Estate allocation targets (10% from 5 %) upon completion of Intercontinental engagement agreement and subsequent capital call.
MIL
BDGDAHN
GROUP
The Market Environment
Major Market Index Performance
Period Ended: June 30, 2010
Quarter Performance
■ Even the most optimistic market participants had no shortage
of negative events to consider during the second quarter.
Domestically, investors had to assess the potential impact of
financial reform, stubbornly slow employment growth and a
burgeoning Federal deficit. Globally, investors had to consider
the potential contagion of sovereign credit issues in Europe,
questionable global growth and evolving Chinese currency
policy. If this collection of macro issues wasn't enough to give
you pause, there was (and still is) oil spilling into the Gulf of
Mexico. One individual pulling -back in the face of such
challenges is certainly understandable, but if we collectively
pause to wait and see "what may happen ", the unfortunate
result will likely be deflation. While maintaining a long -term
strategy in such an uncertain environment can be difficult, we
are confident in the market's ability to persevere over the long-
term.
■ Domestic and international equity benchmarks suffered their
largest pullback in more than a year during the 2nd quarter.
While it is always tempting to fault a single issue as the cause
of negative performance, it is more likely a combination of
cascading events that resulted in a general reassessment of
market risk tolerance after more than a year of consistent
gains. In contrast to equity markets, fixed income benchmarks
posted impressive quarterly performance as a "flight to quality"
drove investors to U.S. Treasury securities, which resulted in
lower yields and higher prices.
■ Despite the 2 nd quarter's negative equity performance, one -
year results were solid for each of the equity and fixed income
benchmarks on the chart. Emerging markets and domestic
small and mid cap issues posted the year's most outsized
equity gains. Not to be outdone, the Barclays Aggregate Bond
index return of 9.5% was also impressive.
Source: Barclays Capital, MSCI Capital Markets, Russell Investments
MSCI ACWxUS
MSCI EAFE
MSCI Emerg Mkts
S &P 500
Russell 3000
Russell 1000
Russell MidCap
Russell 2000
- 12.3%
-13.7% I x
-11.4% .
11.3%
11.4%
-9.9%
-9.9%
Barclays US Agg
Barclays US Govt
Barclays MBS
Barclays Corp IG
3 -Month T -Bill
MSCI ACWxUS
MSCI EAFE
MSCI Emerg Mkts
S &P 500
Russell 3000
Russell 1000
Russell MidCap
Russell 2000
Barclays US Agg
Barclays US Govt
Barclays MBS
Barclays Corp IG
3 -Month T -Bill
0.0%
-20.0% -15.0% -10.0% -5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0%
One Year Performance
10.9%
6.4
235%
14.4%
15.7%
15.2%
25.1
21.5
9.5%
�.5
7.5
15.9
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
�-� THE
3 BOGDAHN
GROUP
The Market Environment
Domestic Equity Style Index Performance
Period Ended: June 30, 2010
■ Value managed to outpace growth on a relative basis for the
quarter at each capitalization level with the exception of small
cap stocks (Russell 2000). The chart illustrates that the 2nd
quarter's style -based performance bands were much more
narrow than those realized over the last several quarters. In
fact, the narrow 140 basis point differential between small cap
value and growth returns represented the quarter's widest
style -based range. This quarter's narrower performance span
was not surprising given the widespread losses realized by
the most heavily- weighted economic sectors of the various
capitalization -based style benchmarks.
■ The range of style -based benchmark performance is much
broader over the one -year period and favors value over
growth across the capitalization spectrum. The value -based
benchmarks' outperformance over the one -year period was
largely driven by the strong financial sector performance
during the 3rd quarter of 2009 and the 1St quarter of 2010.
While the one -year results are certainly impressive in an
absolute sense, the inclusion of the 2nd quarter's negative
performance coupled with the "roll -off' of the 2nd quarter of
2009's strong performance (Russell 1000: +16.5 %) resulted in
a significant downshift in the reported one -year performance
from last quarter.
Source: Russell Investments
MidCap Value
Quarter Performance
-9.6%
3000 Value
-11.1
30001ndex
-11.3%
3000 Growth
-11.6%
1000 Value
-11.1%
10001ndex
-11.4% F
1000 Growth
-11.7% -
MidCap Value
-9.6%
MidCapindex
-8.9%
MidCap Growth
-10.2% ,
2000 Value
-10.6%
20001ndex
-8.91
2000 Growth
- 9.2%
-15.0% -10.0% -5.0% 0.0% 5.0%
One Year Performance
3000 Value 17.6%
3000 1 ndex 15.7%
3000 Growth 13.9%
1000 Value 16.9%
1000 1 ndex 15.2%
1000 Growth 13.6%
MidCap Value 28.9%
MidCap Index 25.1%
MidCap Growth 21.3%
2000 Value 25.1%
2000 I ndex 21.5%
2000 Growth 18.0%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%
THE
4 BOGDAHN
GROUP
The Market Environment
GICS Sector Performance & (Quarter -End Sector Weight)
Period Ended: June 30, 2010
■QTR
O 1 -Year
• Large cap stock performance was negative across the various
Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sectors for the Energy (10. 3%)
quarter. There were few places for portfolios to shift or hide Materials (3.8 %)
with seven of the ten sectors of the Russell 1000 index down
more than 10% for the quarter. In a reversal of last quarter's Industrials (10.9%)
sector results, telecommunication services ( -5.0 %) and utilities Consumer Disc (10.7%)
( -3.8 %) sectors were the strongest relative performing sectors Consumer Staples (10.3%)
of the benchmark during the 2nd quarter. Such weak results
on a broad sector level means that individual issue selections Health Care (12.2%)
and uninvested cash positions will likely play a dominate roll in Financials (16.7%)
individual investment manager results. Info Technology (18.4%)
• For the trailing one -year period, each of the ten GICS sectors Telecom Services (2.9%)
in the Russell 1000 index posted positive performance. In Utilities (3.8%)
contrast to the quarterly results, seven of the ten sectors of
the Russell 1000 returned in excess of 10% for the period.
■QTR
• Small cap stock performance was also negative across each O1 -Year
of the GICS sectors for the 2nd quarter. Even though the
quarter's sector losses in the Russell 2000 were generally Energy (5.4%)
more mild than those realized in the large cap index, it was Materials (4.8 %)
still a very difficult quarter for small cap stocks. While issue Industrials (15.4 %)
selections and cash positions will be paramount in attributing
the quarter's individual manager results, sector positioning to Consumer Disc (13.8%)
industrials (- 7.7 %), consumer staples ( -6.4 %) and utilities Consumer Staples (3.3%)
( -3.2 %) will also likely play a role. Health Care (13.8%)
• Despite the 2nd quarter's small cap selloff, the one -year results Financials (21.4%)
for the Russell 2000 index GICS sectors are impressive. Each Info Technology (17.9%)
sector of the Russell 2000 was positive over the period and
Telecom Services (1.0 %)
six of ten sectors returned in excess of 20 %.
Utilities(3.2 %)
Source: Thompson Financial
Russell 1000
-12.6
3.5
-15.2
16.5%
-12.2
-11.0%
29.3
-8.5
13.3
-11.4%
= L ,
-13.3
17.5%
-12.2
16.3%
-5.0
5.8%
-3.8
6.3
-30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0%
Ru sse112000
-13.8
21.9
-13.1
38.1
-7.7
19.6
-13.6
34.0
-6.4
21.3
-10.3
13.2
-9.5
21.2
-8.7
21.0%
13.7
-30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0%
THE
5 BOGDAHN
GROUP
The Market Environment
Top 10 Index Weights & Performance for the 2nd Quarter
Period Ended June 30, 2010
Russell ,,,
Exxon Mobil Corp
Symbol
XOM
Sector
2.77% - 14.2% Energy
Apple Inc
AAPL
2.00%
7.1%
Information Technology
Microsoft Corp
MSFT
1.90%
- 21.0%
Information Technology
General Electric Co
GE
1.61%
-20.3%
Industrials
Procter & Gamble Co
PG
1.59%
-4.5%
Consumer Staples
Johnson & Johnson
JNJ
1.51%
-8.6%
Health Care
International Business
IBM
1.49%
-3.2%
Information Technology
Bank Of America Corpor
BAC
1.47%
-19.4%
Financials
Jpmorgan Chase & Co
JPM
1.45%
-18.1%
Financials
Wells Fargo & Co New
Russell 1 000
WFC 1.38%
E•
-17.6%
Financials
0.23%
Stocks
0.02%
-9.1%
119.6%
Netflix Inc
NFLX
0.04%
47.3%
Consumer Discretionary
Mariner Energy Inc
ME
0.02%
43.5%
Energy
Abraxis Bioscience Inc
ABII
0.00%
43.4%
Health Care
Gig Partners Inc
GLG
0.01%
42.7%
Financials
Sybase Inc
SY
0.04%
38.7%
Information Technology
Akamai Technologies In
AKAM
0.06%
29.2%
Information Technology
Valeant Pharmaceutical
VRX
0.03%
21.9%
Health Care
Sandisk Corp
SNDK
0.08%
21.5%
Information Technology
Newmont Mining Corp
NEM
0.23%
21.4%
Materials
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Bottom
R ussell rrr
Anadarko Pete Corp
CMG
10
Symbol
APC
0.04%
Performing
Weight
0.25%
21.4%
Stocks
Return
-50.3%
Consumer Discretionary
Sector 'now
Energy
Office Depot Inc
ODP
0.02%
- 49.4%
Consumer Discretionary
Ak Stl Hldg Corp
AKS
0.02%
-47.7%
Materials
Massey Energy Corp
MEE
0.03%
- 47.6%
Energy
Cobalt Intl Energy Inc
CIE
0.01%
-45.2%
Energy
Seahawk Drilling Inc
HAWK
0.00%
- 42.9%
Energy
Nvidia Corp
NVDA
0.07%
-41.3%
Information Technology
Sears Hldgs Corp
SHLD
0.04%
-40.4%
Consumer Discretionary
Waddell & Reed Finl In
WDR
0.02%
- 39.3%
Financials
United States Stl Corp
X
0.07%
-39.3%
Materials
Source: Thompson Financial
Russell 2000 MR&O W 111111116
Human Genome Sciences
.• 10 Weighted
HGSI
Stocks
0.46%
-6.4%
Health Care
Ual Corp
UAUA
0.32%
-1.8%
Industrials
Tupperware Brands Corp
TUP
0.26%
-0.6%
Consumer Discretionary
Skyworks Solutions Inc
SWKS
0.26%
-4.7%
Information Technology
Ares Cap Corp
ARCC
0.25%
-3.5%
Financials
Domtar Corp
UFS
0.25%
1 -6.3%
Materials
E Trade Financial Corp
ETFC
0.24%
-9.4%
Financials
Polycom Inc
PLCM
0.24%
-2.4%
Information Technology
Solera Holdings Inc
SLH
0.24%
-3.5%
Information Technology
Developers Diversified
Russell rrr L
Neurocrine Biosciences
DDR
•• 10 Performing
NBIX
0.23%
Stocks
0.02%
-9.1%
119.6%
Financials
M
sector
Health Care
Akorn Inc
AKRX
0.01%
94.1%
Health Care
Cirrus Logic Inc
CRUS
0.08%
88.4%
Information Technology
Us Gold Corporation
UXG
0.03%
85.6%
Materials
Idenix Pharmaceuticals
IDIX
0.01%
77.3%
Health Care
Trimas Corp
TRS
0.01%
1 74.3%
Industrials
Astronics Corp
ATRO
0.01%
66.8%
Industrials
Cpi Corp
CPY
0.01%
63.3%
Consumer Discretionary
Southwest Bancorp Inc
OKSB
0.02%
60.7%
Financials
Power One Inc New
Bottom
Russell rrr
Intermune Inc
PWER
r
Symbol
ITMN
0.05%
Performing
Weight
0.10%
60.0%
Stocks
Return
-79.0%
Information Technology
dm
Sector
Health Care
First Bancorp P R
FBP
0.01%
-78.0%
Financials
Affymax Inc
AFFY
0.04%
- 74.5%
Health Care
Yrc Worldwide Inc
YRCW
0.04%
-66.9%
Industrials
Oxigene Inc
OXGN
0.00%
- 66.3%
Health Care
Pacific Cap Bancorp Ne
PCBC
0.01%
- 65.7%
Financials
South Finl Group Inc
TSFG
0.01%
- 63.1%
Financials
Discovery Laboratories
DSCO
0.01%
-59.7%
Health Care
Fuelcell Energy Inc
FCEL
0.02%
- 58.2%
Industrials
Old Second Bancorp Inc
OSBC
0.00%
-57.5%
Financials
THE
`✓ BQGDAHN
GRQUP
The Market Environment
International and Regional Market Index Performance (# Countries)
Period Ended June 30, 2010
■ Much like the domestic indices, international markets also
suffered during the quarter due to concerns over global credit
and sustainable growth. The "flight" to the safety of the U.S.
Dollar (USD) that typically occurs during periods of global
unrest is clearly evident in the USD versus local currency
international index results. Relative to the USD, 39 of the 44
countries that make up the MSCI- ACWxUS index saw their
currencies depreciate by an average of -6.0 %. In contrast,
Japan was one of the five ACWxUS countries that managed
to gain relative to the USD during the quarter with an
appreciation of +4.8 %.
■ Weak performance in developed markets (- 13.8 %) was
spread broadly across the 22 countries in the MSCI -EAFE
index. In fact, Singapore's USD return of +0.0% was the only
positive country in the index. In contrast to Singapore, it
should certainly come as no surprise that Greece was the
worst performing country in the index with a return of -40.4%
for the quarter. The emerging markets index return of -8.3%
for the quarter was down less than developed markets for the
quarter due to stronger relative results in the emerging Asian
countries as well as some sporadic positive individual country
results. Over the last year, the emerging market index shows
a performance advantage of more than 3x the developing
market index return.
■ It is interesting to note that MSCI reclassified Israel as a
developed market country as part of its semi - annual index
review in May. While Israel's 0.9% weight in the MSCI -EAFE
index at the end of the quarter may not seem significant, it is
the first country in the developed index that does not fall into
the classic definition of (E)urope, (A)ustralasia or (F)ar (E)ast.
■ QTR (USD)
oQTR(Local)
AC World x US (44)
WORLD x US (23)
EAFE (22)
Europe(16)
Pacific (5)
Emerging Mkt (21)
EM Europe (5)
EM Asia (8)
EM Latin Amer (5)
■ 1 -Year (USD)
01 -Year (Local)
AC World x US (44)
WORLD x US (23)
EAFE (22)
Europe(16)
Pacific (5)
Emerging Mkt (21)
EM Europe (5)
EM Asia (8)
EM Latin Amer (5)
Quarter Performance
-12.3
-9.3
-13.4
-10.4
-13.8
-10.9
-14.8
-9.5%
-11.6
-13.0
-8.3%
-15.3
-9.0%
-2.7%
-11.9
-10.3
-20.0% -15.0% -10.0% -5.0% 0.0% 5.0%
One -Year Performance
10.9% 1
12.4%
7.5
10.3%
6.4
o
10.4%
o
6.3
17.3%
o
6.6
-0.8
23.5
20.1
z7.o%
30.5
230%
19.9%
25.7
1 .3
-5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%
THE
Source: MSC/ Capital Markets
7 BOGDAHN
GROUP
The Market Environment
U.S. Dollar International Index Attribution & Country Detail
Period Ended June 30, 2010
Source: MSC/ Capital Markets, & Franklin/Templeton
Japan
:rTiorriTORYMno
16.0%
-10.1%
Energy
7.1%
-22.5%
-9.2%
Materials
10.1%
-18.1%
13.4%
Industrials
12.3%
- 10.9%
13.9%
Consumer Discretionary
10.3%
-10.1%
10.4%
Consumer Staples
10.6%
-7.3%
19.4%
Health Care
9.0%
-9.6%
10.8%
Financials
24.4%
- 16.9%
0.8%
Information Technology
5.2%
- 14.7%
6.3%
Telecommunication Services
5.6%
-9.3%
4.4%
Utilities
Total
5.5%
• • • ,
-12.5%
-4.0%
Source: MSC/ Capital Markets, & Franklin/Templeton
Japan
4T,orriTORYMno
16.0%
-10.1%
0.9%
10.3%
16.7%
0.3%
11.8%
- 15.2%
19.9%
ls
10.5%
-10.5%
14.9%
7ia
r Discretionary
8.9%
-8.6%
15.2%
r Staples
9.1 %
- 6.3%
22.3%
are
6.4%
-9.4%
12.0%
s
25.3%
- 14.7%
7.2%
on Technology
6.9%
- 13.3%
14.6%
Telecommunication Services
6.1%
-7.0%
7.7%
Utilities
Total
4.8%
• • • ,
-11.0%
-0.5%
-9.2%
Netherlands
2.6%
1.8%
Source: MSC/ Capital Markets, & Franklin/Templeton
Japan
23.3%
16.0%
-10.1%
0.9%
United Kingdom
21.0%
14.5%
-13.8%
8.6%
France
9.8%
6.7%
- 18.3%
1.7%
Australia
8.1%
5.6%
-19.0%
18.1%
Switzerland
8.0%
5.5%
- 11.3%
18.0%
Germany
7.8%
5.4%
-12.1%
7.8%
Spain
3.5%
2.4%
-20.4%
-12.6%
Sweden
2.9%
2.0%
-6.6%
30.8%
Italy
2.8%
2.0%
-21.0%
-9.2%
Netherlands
2.6%
1.8%
-13.0%
17.4%
Hong Kong
2.6%
1.8%
-5.8%
14.3%
Singapore
1.7%
1.2%
0.0%
29.4%
Finland
1.0%
0.7%
- 25.9%
-9.4%
Denmark
1.0%
0.7%
-5.4%
19.4%
Belgium
0.9%
0.7%
- 12.3%
13.6%
Israel
0.9%
0.6%
- 18.4%
13.2%
Norway
0.7%
0.5%
-17.5%
12.3%
Austria
0.3%
0.2%
- 21.9%
-10.0%
Ireland
0.3%
0.2%
-19.8%
-7.0%
Greece
0.3%
0.2%
-40.4%
-46.7%
Portugal
0.3%
0.2%
- 16.7%
-9.8%
New Zealand
0.1%
••
0.1%
-10.5%
8.6%
Canada
Total D-
7.9%
10.3%
18.6%
China
4.4%
4.5%
11.1%
Brazil
3.6%
- 15.2%
22.1%
Korea
3.2%
-7.6%
32.3%
Taiwan
2.5%
-9.3%
16.1%
India
1.9%
-2.2%
32.0%
South Africa
1.7%
-9.5%
18.4%
Russia
1.5%
- 15.4%
26.9%
Mexico
1.0%
-9.0%
31.7%
Malaysia
0.7%
0.2%
33.9%
Indonesia
0.6%
4.4%
66.9%
Turkey
0.4%
-4.0%
44.3%
Chile
0.4%
2.9%
25.8%
Thailand
0.4%
-1.7%
35.1%
Poland
0.3%
- 21.6%
24.0%
Colombia
0.2%
3.6%
53.6%
Peru
0.1%
4.2%
52.2%
Egypt
0.1%
- 13.4%
11.4%
Philippines
0.1%
3.1%
37.2%
Hungary
0.1%
-30.2%
15.5%
Czech Republic
0.1%
-13.0%
-0.6%
Morocco
Total Emerging Countries
Total ACWIxUS Countries
0.0%
23.2%
••
-4.1%
-8.3%
-11.1%
23.5%
THE
BOGDAHN
GROUP
The Market Environment
Domestic Credit Sector & Broad Market Maturity Performance
Period Ended: June 30, 2010
Quarter Performance
■ The equity market unrest that occurred during the quarter was
largely a benefit to fixed income indices. Foreign sovereign
credit worries and the looming possibility of a "double -dip"
recession overshadowed the corporate spread compression
that dominated fixed income results for most of the last year.
The resulting "flight to quality" drove rates lower across the
Treasury yield curve. This general rate decline enhanced the
performance of long -dated and high - quality bond issues. The
market's changing risk aversion was evident in the high yield
index ( <BBB) return of -0.1%. This performance marked the
first quarter in more than a year that high yield was not the
best performing segment of the fixed income market.
■ Despite questions surrounding the sustainability of the global
economic recovery that dominated the quarter's results, the
one -year performance of the various bond market indices still
shows the effects of sizable credit compression in corporate
issues. The Government bond index, which did not benefit
from the credit compression in corporate bonds, posted a
respectable +6.5% over the last year.
Source: Merrill Lynch Index System
aaa
AA
A
BBB
<BBB
Govt
Mort
1 -3yr G /M /C
1 -5yr G /M /C
1 -10yr G /M /C
10 +yrG /M /C
aaa
AA
A
BBB
<BBB
Govt
Mort
1 -3yr G /M /C
1 -5yr G /M /C
1 -10yr G /M /C
10 +yrG /M /C
4.8
3.1
3.7
2.8
-0.1
4.3
2.9
G /M /C =Broad Market (Government + Mortgage + Corporate)
1s%
2.1
2.9
8.5%
-2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0%
One Year Performance
11.1
12.1
15.4%
19.6%
27.5%
6.5'
7.6%
5.3%
s.a %
8.1
16.7
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
THE
9 BOGDAHN
GROUP
The Market Environment
Market Rate & Yield Curve Comparison
Period Ended: June 30, 2010
■ While the quarter began with economists and market
participants speculating on the timing of the Fed reversing its
stance on short -term interest rates and assessing the potential
of higher inflation, it certainly didn't end that way. As the
quarter progressed, the market's movements became more
and more dominated by sovereign credit concerns in Europe
as well as weaker than expected domestic economic
readings. These market events are easily visualized in the
trailing market rates chart where domestic inflation
expectations receded (10yr TIPs), credit spreads widened
(BAA /10yr Spread) and investors fled to the quality of
Treasuries that drove yields lower (10yr Treasury).
■ After trading in a relatively narrow range for much of the last
year, the yield curve showed a marked reduction in rates
across the maturity spectrum during the quarter. The
benchmark 10 -Year Treasury bond closed the quarter with a
yield of 2.98 %, which was down 87 basis points from the
3.84% yield on 3/31/10. The lower curve reflects the market's
concern that the global economy may not continue to recover
without ongoing coordinated Government support.
5.00
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
Source: Mortgage -X. com , US Department of Treasury & St. Louis Fed 10
1 -Year Trailing Market Rates
Fed Funds Rate —TED Spread —3 -Month Libor
BAA/10yr Spread — 10yrTreasury 10yrTIPs
0.00 J—
Jun-09
Sep -09 Dec -09 Mar -10 Jun -10
Treasury Yield Curve
X6/30/2009 — 12/31/2009 0 3/31/2010 X6130/2010
1 mo 3mo 6mo 1 yr 2yr 3yr 5yr 7yr
10yr 20yr 30yr
THE
BOGDAHN
GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
June 30, 2010
March 31, 2010 : S19,273,042
June 30, 2010 : S18,301,384
Segments
Market Value
Allocation
Segments
Market Value
Allocation
(S)
(%)
(S)
(%)
■ Domestic Equity
9,589,583
49.8
■ Domestic Equity
8,608,272
47.0
❑ International Equity
2,910,875
15.1
❑ International Equity
2,580,041
14.1
❑ Fixed Income
5,761,294
29.9
❑ Fixed Income
5,985,504
32.7
■ Real Estate
595,761
3.1
■ Real Estate
607,888
3.3
■ Cash Equivalent
415,529
2.2
■ Cash Equivalent
519,679
2.8
THE
11
BOGDAHN
` GRoup
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
June 30, 2010
March 31, 2010 : S19,273,042
■ Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co
■ Lateef Asset Mgmt.Equity
■ Galliard Core Fixed Income
■ RBC Global (Voyageur)
■ Galliard TIPS
❑ American Core Realty Fund
❑ Receipt & Disbursement
■ Galliard Cash
June 30, 2010 : S18,301,384
Market Value
Allocation
Market Value
Allocation
(S)
( %)
(S)
( %)
4,968,701
25.8
■ Galliard Core Fixed Income
5,072,689
27.7
4,887,399
25.4
■ Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co.
4,589,911
25.1
4,865,111
25.2
■ Lateef Asset Mgmt.Equity
4,342,057
23.7
2,910,875
15.1
■ RBC Global (Voyageur)
2,580,041
14.1
916,171
4.8
■ Galliard TIPS
946,372
5.2
595,761
3.1
❑ American Core Realty Fund
607,888
3.3
88,424
0.5
❑ Receipt & Disbursement
141,924
0.8
40,600
0.2
■ Galliard Cash
20,502
0.1
THE
12
BOGDAHN
` GRoup
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Asset Allocation vs. Target Allocation
As of June 30, 2010
June 3u, Lulu
Domestic Large Cap Value Equity
Domestic Broad Cap Growth Equity
Foreign Equity
Broad Market Fixed Income
TIPS
Real Estate
Receipt & Disbursement
Galliard Cash
0.1 ° o
-1.3%
-0.9%
2.7%
0.2%
-1.7%
0.8%
-10.0% -8.0% -4.0% 0.0% 4.0% 8.0% 10.0%
Allocation Differences
June 30, 2010
13
THE
BOGDAHN
t GROUP
Market Value
Allocation
Target
Domestic Large Cap Value Equity
4,589,911
25.1
25.0
Domestic Broad Cap Growth Equity
4,342,057
23.7
25.0
Foreign Equity
2,580,041
14.1
15.0
Broad Market Fixed Income
5,072,689
27.7
25.0
TIPS
946,372
5.2
5.0
Real Estate
607,888
3.3
5.0
Receipt & Disbursement
141,924
0.8
-
Galliard Cash
20,502
0.1
-
Total Fund
18,301,384
100.0
100.0
13
THE
BOGDAHN
t GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Asset Allocation History
As of June 30, 2010
Asset Allocation History by Portfolio
Total Domestic Equity
Snow Capital Mgmt. Equity
Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co
Lateef Asset Mgmt.Equity
Total International Equity
RBC Global (Voyageur)
Total Fixed Income
Galliard Core Fixed Income
Galliard TIPS
American Core Realty Fund
Receipt & Disbursement
Galliard Cash
Total Fund Portfolio
Asset Allocation History by Segment
lnn n
0
C.
O
U
O
8,931,968 48.80
4,589,911 25.08
4,342,057 23.73
2,580,041 14.10
2,580,041 14.10
6,019,062 32.89
5,072,689 27.72
946,372 5.17
607,888
3.32
141,924
0.78
20,502
0.11
18,301,384
100.00
9,856,099 51.14
4,968,701 25.78
4,887,399 25.36
2,910,875 15.10
2,910,875 15.10
5,781,283 30.00
4,865,111 25.24
916,171 4.75
595,761
3.09
88,424
0.46
40,600
0.21
19,273,042
100.00
8,825,671 48.31
3,971,638 21.74
4,854,033 26.57
2,431,014 13.31
2,431,014 13.31
6,265,208 34.29
5,123,295 28.04
1,141,913 6.25
605,618 3.31
141,982 0.78
18,269,494 100.00
8,076,514 46.61
3,596,107 20.75
4,480,407 25.86
2,318,143 13.38
2,318,143 13.38
6,205,557 35.81
5,089,040 29.37
1,116,517 6.44
639,006
3.69
88,380
0.51
17,327,600
100.00
6,767,374 44.28
2,985,975 19.54
3,781,399 24.74
1,762,078 11.53
1,762,078 11.53
5,893,704 38.56
4,813,261 31.49
1,080,442 7.07
714,964
4.68
146,556
0.96
15,284,676
100.00
9/07 12/07 3/08 6/08 9/08 12/08 3/09 6/09 9/09 12/09 3/10 6/10
Domestic Equity International Equity Fixed Income Real Estate Cash Equivalent THE
14
�� BOGDAHN
` GRoup
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Financial Reconciliation Quarter to Date
1 Quarter Ending June 30, 2010
Total Domestic Equity
9,856,099
100,000 - -
- 21,111
-1,210
32,292
- 1,034,103
8,931,968
Lateef Asset Mgmt.Equity
4,887,399
50,000 - -
- 12,219
-591
14,517
- 597,049
4,342,057
Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co.
4,968,701
50,000 - -
-8,892
-619
17,775
- 437,054
4,589,911
Total International Equity
2,910,875
36,576 - -
-6,576
-514
26,699
- 387,019
2,580,041
RBC Global (Voyageur)
2,910,875
36,576 - -
-6,576
-514
26,699
- 387,019
2,580,041
Total Fixed Income
5,781,283
88,300 - -
-
-113
3,681
145,911
6,019,062
Galliard Core Fixed Income
4,865,111
78,300 - -
-
-
129,278
5,072,689
Galliard TIPS
916,171
10,000 - -
-
-113
3,681
16,633
946,372
American Core Realty Fund
595,761
- - -5,667
-1,585
-
5,667
13,712
607,888
Receipt & Disbursement
88,424
- 208,120 511,241 - 238,170
-
- 11,454
2
-
141,924
Galliard Cash
40,600
- 16,756 - -
-3,343
1
-
20,502
Total Fund Portfolio
19,273,042
- 511,241 - 243,836
- 32,615
- 13,290
68,341
- 1,261,500
18,301,384
15
THE
` J BOGDAHN
GRoup
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Financial Reconciliation Fiscal Year to Date
October 1, 2009 To June 30, 2010
Total Domestic Equity
8,076,514
857,700 -
- 58,635
-3,269
96,571
- 36,913
8,931,968
Lateef Asset Mgmt.Equity
4,480,407
- 24,200 -
- 35,553
-1,696
39,893
- 116,795
4,342,057
Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co.
3,596,107
881,900 -
- 23,082
-1,573
56,678
79,882
4,589,911
Total International Equity
2,318,143
461,525 - -
- 17,325
-
52,772
- 233,659
2,580,041
RBC Global (Voyageur)
2,318,143
461,525 - -
- 17,325
-1,415
52,772
- 233,659
2,580,041
Total Fixed Income
6,205,557
- 551,087 - -
-8,127
-1,166
13,512
360,373
6,019,062
Galliard Core Fixed Income
5,089,040
- 326,787 - -
-7,243
-843
-
318,523
5,072,689
Galliard TIPS
1,116,517
- 224,300 - -
-884
-322
13,512
41,850
946,372
American Core Realty Fund
639,006
-9,035 - -5,667
-4,762
-
19,304
- 30,959
607,888
Receipt & Disbursement
88,380
- 783,163 1,508,123 - 648,363
-
- 23,061
8
-
141,924
Galliard Cash
-
24,061 - -
-3,343
-217
-
-
20,502
Total Fund Portfolio
17,327,600
- 1,508,123 - 654,030
- 92,192
- 29,127
182,167
58,842
18,301,384
M
THE
`✓ BOGDAHN
GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Comparative Performance Trailing Returns
As of June 30, 2010
otal Fund (Net)
-6.34
(70)
0.91
(64)
12.37
(57)
-4.85
(84)
-0.13
(87)
1.08
(94)
2.39
N/A
11/01/2000
otal Fund Policy
-6.63
(78)
0.04
(91)
10.59
(86)
-3.35
(52)
0.91
(62)
2.19
(64)
1.70
N/A
ifference
0.29
0.87
1.78
-1.50
-1.04
-1.11
0.69
ll Public Plans -Total Fund Median
-5.81
1.18
12.76
-3.32
1.25
2.68
N/A
otal Fund (New Mgrs) (Net)
-6.31
(70)
0.97
(61)
12.44
(56)
N/A
N/A
N/A
-5.92
N/A
10/01/2007
otal Fund Policy
-6.63
(78)
0.04
(91)
10.59
(86)
-3.35
(52)
0.91
(62)
2.19
(64)
-4.46
N/A
ifference
0.32
0.93
1.85
N/A
N/A
N/A
-1.46
ll Public Plans -Total Fund Median
-5.81
1.18
12.76
-3.32
1.25
2.68
N/A
otal Fund (Gross)
-6.15
(64)
1.45
(44)
13.15
(40)
-4.22
(71)
0.53
(71)
1.75
(77)
3.09
N/A
11/01/2000
otal Fund Policy
-6.63
(78)
0.04
(91)
10.59
(86)
-3.35
(52)
0.91
(62)
2.19
(64)
1.70
N/A
ifference
0.48
1.41
2.56
-0.87
-0.38
-0.44
1.39
ll Public Plans -Total Fund Median
-5.81
1.18
12.76
-3.32
1.25
2.68
N/A
otal Fund (New Mgrs) (Gross)
-6.15
(64)
1.47
(44)
13.17
(40)
N/A
N/A
N/A
-5.36
N/A
10/01/2007
otal Fund Policy
-6.63
(78)
0.04
(91)
10.59
(86)
-3.35
(52)
0.91
(62)
2.19
(64)
-4.46
N/A
ifference
0.48
1.43
2.58
N/A
N/A
N/A
-0.90
ll Public Plans -Total Fund Median
-5.81
1.18
12.76
-3.32
1.25
2.68
N/A
Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. Returns are expressed as percentages. 10/1/2007 inception date represents the date new managers were THE
hired. Total Fund Policy represents new policy beginning 10/1/2009. Old policy geometrically linked to new policy. See benchmark history for details. I(� Bo G DAHN
17 `
GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Comparative Performance Trailing Returns
As of June 30, 2010
Equity
Equity Policy
otal Domestic Equity
otal Domestic Equity Policy
ifference
S Core/LC Equity (SA +CF) Median
otal International Equity
1SCI EAFE Index
ifference
Al Active Value Equity (SA +CF) Median
otal Fixed Income
otal Fixed Policy
-10.62
-0.66
-11.84
-2.95
1.22
2.29
12.19
-10.12
(14)
1.13
(10)
-11.32
(41)
-0.51
(32)
1.20
1.64
-11.42
-1.02
-12.31
(62)
-6.45
(36)
-13.75
(85)
-11.00
(78)
1.44
-1.68
4.55
0.06
-11.91
1.17
-8.18
11/01/2000
2.57
(29)
6.34
(61)
2.92
(62)
5.34
(68)
-0.35
(83)
1.00
2.04
17.29
-9.26
-2.41
-0.03
1.38
01/01/2001
12.19
-10.40
-3.47
-0.69
-0.45
5.10
1.14
1.06
0.66
1.83
17.06
(11)
-8.00
(30)
-1.68
(34)
0.06
(46)
1.17
(24)
11/01/2000
15.02
(29)
9.66
(61)
-2.89
(62)
-0.69
(68)
-1.45
(83)
2.04
1.66
1.21
0.75
2.62
13.80
-9.21
-2.61
-0.10
-0.45
18.81
(4)
-14.23
(85)
-5.03
(85)
0.80
(83)
2.21
(97)
11/01/2000
6.37
(72)
-12.94
(73)
-4.22
(76)
1.35
(80)
1.73
(100)
12.44
-1.29
-0.81
-0.55
0.48
8.79
-10.71
-2.29
2.89
5.97
11.42
6.85
6.49
4.93
6.08
11/01/2000
8.72
7.34
7.07
5.45
6.25
2.70
-0.49
-0.58
-0.52
-0.17
Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. Returns are expressed as percentages. 10/1/2007 inception date represents the date new managers were THE
hired. Total Fund Policy represents new policy beginning 10/1/2009. Old policy geometrically linked to new policy. See benchmark history for details. I(� Bo G DAHN
18 `
GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Comparative Performance Trailing Returns
As of June 30, 2010
alton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co.
-8.39
(14)
4.19
(8)
21.13
(25)
N/A
N/A
N/A
24.85
(18)
05/01/2009
ussell 3000 Value Index
-11.09
(65)
-0.86
(73)
17.57
(53)
-12.13
(84)
-4.75
(88)
-1.56
(88)
19.89
(57)
ifference
2.70
5.05
3.56
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.96
S All Cap Value Equity (SA +CF) Median
-10.41
0.14
17.91
-8.91
-1.47
0.78
20.68
ateef Asset Mgmt.Equity
-11.88
(57)
-1.77
(60)
13.30
(43)
N/A
N/A
N/A
-6.22
(11)
10/01/2007
ussell 1000 Growth Index
-11.75
(53)
-0.31
(37)
13.62
(40)
-6.91
(48)
-1.01
(42)
0.38
(52)
-8.89
(42)
ifference
-0.13
-1.46
-0.32
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.67
S Growth/LC Equity (SA +CF) Median
-11.64
-0.92
12.65
-7.02
-1.42
0.48
-9.30
BC Global (Voyageur)
-12.31
(62)
-6.45
(36)
18.81
(4)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10/01/2007
[SCI EAFE Index
-13.75
(85)
-11.00
(78)
6.37
(72)
-12.94
(73)
-4.22
(76)
1.35
(80)
-14.72
(77)
ifference
1.44
4.55
12.44
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
itl Active Value Equity (SA +CF) Median
-11.91
-8.18
8.79
-10.71
-2.29
2.89
-11.90
alliard Core Fixed Income
2.63
(67)
6.52
(17)
12.08
(16)
N/A
N/A
N/A
6.00
(91)
10/01/2007
arclays Capital Intermediate Aggregate
2.92
(48)
5.34
(52)
8.72
(63)
7.34
(64)
7.00
(63)
5.57
(69)
6.97
(64)
ifference
-0.29
1.18
3.36
N/A
N/A
N/A
-0.97
S Int Fixed Income (SA +CF) Median
2.90
5.36
9.33
7.68
7.24
5.82
7.28
alliard TIPS
2.21
(93)
5.29
(93)
8.29
(94)
N/A
N/A
N/A
6.18
(93)
10/01/2007
arclays Capital U.S. TIPS
3.82
(56)
6.25
(72)
9.52
(67)
7.62
(70)
6.72
(71)
4.99
(85)
6.60
(70)
ifference
-1.61
-0.96
-1.23
N/A
N/A
N/A
-0.42
S TIPS (SA +CF) Median
3.87
6.44
9.92
7.97
7.01
5.28
6.98
merican Core Realty Fund
3.25
N/A
-1.77
N/A
-11.22
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-12.39
N/A
10/01/2007
CREIF Property Index
3.31
N/A
1.90
N/A
-1.48
N/A
-4.70
N/A
0.37
N/A
3.79
N/A
-6.32
N/A
ifference
-0.06
-3.67
-9.74
N/A
N/A
N/A
-6.07
S Private RE -Open End (SA +CF) Median
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. Returns are expressed as percentages. 10/1/2007 inception date represents the date new managers were THE
hired. Total Fund Policy represents new policy beginning 10/1/2009. Old policy geometrically linked to new policy. See benchmark history for details. /(� Bo G DAHN
19 `
GRoup
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Comparative Performance Fiscal Year Returns
As of June 30, 2010
al Fund (Net)
0.91 (64)
0.73 (59)
-16.82 (91)
13.03 (76)
7.89 (67)
11.07 (67)
12.18 (36)
a1 Fund Policy
0.04 (91)
0.33 (63)
-12.11 (29)
11.97 (90)
9.55 (32)
10.76 (70)
11.65 (46)
erence
0.87
0.40
- 4.71
1.06
- 1.66
0.31
0.53
Public Plans -Total Fund Median
1.18
1.34
-13.67
14.48
8.74
12.54
11.19
al Fund (New Mgrs) (Net)
0.97 (61)
0.68 (59)
-16.82 (91)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
A Fund Policy
0.04 (91)
0.33 (63)
-12.11 (29)
11.97 (90)
9.55 (32)
10.76 (70)
11.65 (46)
erence
0.93
0.35
- 4.71
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Public Plans -Total Fund Median
1.18
1.34
-13.67
14.48
8.74
12.54
11.19
al Fund (Gross)
1.45 (44)
1.44 (49)
-16.46 (89)
13.92 (60)
8.62 (52)
11.82 (61)
13.05 (23)
A Fund Policy
0.04 (91)
0.33 (63)
-12.11 (29)
11.97 (90)
9.55 (32)
10.76 (70)
11.65 (46)
erence
1.41
1.11
-4.35
1.95
-0.93
1.06
1.40
Public Plans -Total Fund Median
1.18
1.34
-13.67
14.48
8.74
12.54
11.19
otal Fund (New Mgrs) (Gross)
1.47 (44)
1.39 (50)
-16.46 (89)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
otal Fund Policy
0.04 (91)
0.33 (63)
-12.11 (29)
11.97 (90)
9.55 (32)
10.76 (70)
11.65 (46)
ifference
1.43
1.06
-4.35
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ll Public Plans -Total Fund Median
1.18
1.34
-13.67
14.48
8.74
12.54
11.19
Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. Returns are expressed as percentages. 10/1/2007 inception date represents the date new managers were THE
hired. Total Fund Policy represents new policy beginning 10/1/2009. Old policy geometrically linked to new policy. See benchmark history for details. I( B4GDAHN
20 ` GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Comparative Performance Fiscal Year Returns
As of June 30, 2010
otal Equity
-0.66
-1.09
-25.61
18.52
10.83
15.40
17.60
otal Equity Policy
-2.95
-6.91
-21.98
16.44
12.51
14.30
15.14
ifference
2.29
5.82
-3.63
2.08
-1.68
1.10
2.46
otal Domestic Equity
1.13
(10)
-4.29
(28)
-21.66
(56)
17.58
(36)
9.29
(75)
13.77
(59)
16.77
(20)
otal Domestic Equity Policy
-0.51
(32)
-6.91
(60)
-21.98
(65)
16.44
(58)
10.79
(52)
12.25
(80)
13.87
(59)
ifference
1.64
2.62
0.32
1.14
-1.50
1.52
2.90
S Core/Large Cap Equity (SA +CF) Median
-1.02
-6.47
-21.14
16.64
10.82
14.34
14.20
otal International Equity
-6.45
(36)
11.87
(21)
-39.55
(100)
23.63
(59)
19.84
(68)
26.83
(55)
22.94
(76)
iSCI EAFE Index
-11.00
(78)
3.80
(58)
-30.13
(75)
25.38
(45)
19.65
(71)
26.32
(63)
22.52
(77)
ifference
4.55
8.07
-9.42
-1.75
0.19
0.51
0.42
iternational Active Value Equity (SA +CF) Median
-8.18
4.82
-27.04
24.45
20.96
27.09
25.40
otal Fixed Income
6.34
10.53
0.64
4.96
3.27
2.81
2.68
otal Fixed Policy
5.34
9.69
4.16
5.33
3.55
2.80
3.68
ifference
1.00
0.84
-3.52
-0.37
-0.28
0.01
-1.00
Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. Returns are expressed as percentages. 10/1/2007 inception date represents the date new managers were THE
hired. Total Fund Policy represents new policy beginning 10/1/2009. Old policy geometrically linked to new policy. See benchmark history for details. I(� Bo G DAHN
21 `
GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Comparative Performance Fiscal Year Returns
As of June 30, 2010
ton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co.
sell 3000 Value Index
erence
All Cap Value Equity (SA +CF) Median
eef Asset Mgmt.Equity
sell 1000 Growth Index
erence
Growth/Large Cap Equity (SA +CF) Median
C Global (Voyageur)
Cl EAFE Index
erence
rnational Active Value Equity (SA +CF) Median
Iiard Core Fixed Income
clays Capital Intermediate Aggregate
erence
Intermediate Fixed Income (SA +CF) Median
Iiard TIPS
clays Capital U.S. TIPS
erence
TIPS (SA +CF) Median
erican Core Realty Fund
REIF Property Index
erence
Private Real Estate -Open End (SA +CF) Median
4.19
(8)
N/A
N/A
-0.86
(73)
-10.79
(93)
-22.70
(68)
5.05
N/A
N/A
0.14
-3.08
-20.17
-1.77
(60)
0.53
(19)
-15.13
(14)
-0.31
(37)
-1.85
(35)
-20.88
(52)
-1.46
2.38
5.75
-0.92
-3.20
-20.59
-6.45
(36)
11.87
(21)
N/A
-11.00
(78)
3.80
(58)
-30.13
(75)
4.55
8.07
N/A
-8.18
4.82
-27.04
6.52
(17)
12.08
(39)
-1.68
(95)
5.34
(52)
9.69
(80)
4.16
(34)
1.18
2.39
-5.84
5.36
11.43
3.22
5.29
(93)
3.97
(88)
7.72
(17)
6.25
(72)
5.67
(68)
6.20
(60)
-0.96
-1.70
1.52
6.44
6.18
6.35
-1.77
N/A
-32.42
(37)
4.72
(39)
1.90
N/A
-22.09
(9)
5.27
(28)
-3.67
-10.33
-0.55
N/A
-33.44
3.47
N/A
13.73 (71)
N/A
16.37
N/A
19.35 (55)
N/A
19.88
N/A
25.38 (45)
N/A
24.45
N/A
5.33 (66)
N/A
5.46
N/A
4.97 (60)
N/A
5.02
N/A
17.31 (67)
N/A
18.34
N/A
14.55 (12)
N/A
10.40
N/A
6.04 (58)
N/A
6.79
N/A
19.65 (71)
N/A
20.96
N/A
3.84 (58)
N/A
3.90
N/A
1.91 (76)
N/A
2.08
N/A
17.62 (53)
N/A
17.92
N/A
16.78 (60)
N/A
20.02
N/A
11.60 (70)
N/A
14.04
N/A
26.32 (63)
N/A
27.09
N/A
2.23 (41)
N/A
2.09
N/A
5.32 (52)
N/A
5.36
N/A
19.19 (67)
N/A
19.86
N/A
20.89 (57)
N/A
21.13
N/A
7.51 (74)
N/A
10.06
N/A
22.52 (77)
N/A
25.40
N/A
3.39 (27)
N/A
2.87
N/A
7.52 (38)
N/A
7.50
N/A
12.41 (52)
N/A
12.50
Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. Returns are expressed as percentages. 10/1/2007 inception date represents the date new managers were * THE
hired. Total Fund Policy represents new policy beginning 10/1/2009. Old policy geometrically linked to new policy. See benchmark history for details. /( BoGDAHN
22 `
GRoup
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Total Fund (Net)
June 30, 2010
Financial Reconciliatio
Market Value
Market Value
Net
Capital
As of
Contributions
Distributions
Fees
Expenses
Income
As of
3/31/2010
Transfers
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
Total Fund (Net)
19,273
-
511
-244
-33
-13
68
-1,261
18,301
Financial Reconciliation
Oct11'
009 To June
30, 20 10
Market Value
Market Value
Net
Capital
As of
Contributions
Distributions
Fees
Expenses
Income
As of
9/30/2009
Transfers
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
Total Fund (Net)
17,328
1,508
-654
-92
-29
182
59
18,301
Peer Group
Public
Plans-To Plans-Total Fund
Cummulative
Perfo
;n nn
10.00
e
a
L
0.00
a
-10.00
-2000
$145.0
$130.0
125.1
122.4
$115.0
$100.0
1 Oct -2009 1 2 3 4 5 $85.0
Quarter To Year Years Years Years Years
Jun -2010
■ Total Fund (Net) -6.34 (70) 0.91 (64) 12.37 (57) -2.56 (53) -4.85 (84) -0.13 (87) 1.08 (94)
• Total Fund Policy -6.63 (78) 0.04 (91) 10.59 (86) -2.39 (50) -3.35 (52) 0.91 (62) 2.19 (64) $70.0
12/00 12/02 12/04 12/06 12/08 6/10
Median -5.81 1.18 12.76 -2.43 -3.32 1.25 2.68 -Total Fund (Net) -Total Fund Policy
C omparative Perfo
1 1 1 1 1 1
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
Ending Ending Ending Ending Ending Ending
Mar -2010 Dec -2009 Sep -2009 Jun -2009 Mar -2009 Dec -2008
Total Fund (Net) 4.32 (22) 3.28 (63) 11.36 (52) 11.59 (34) -4.27 (24) -15.33 (85)
Total Fund Policy 3.63 (66) 3.40 (52) 10.55 (68) 10.13 (58) -6.14 (58) -12.19 (42)
All Public Plans -Total Fund Median 3.84 3.42 11.45 10.61 -5.80 -12.83
THE
23
�J BOGDAHN
GR OVP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Total Fund (Net)
June 30, 2010
3 0.0
Over
0.00
10.00 15.00
20.00
25.00
0.00 5.00
10.00
Performance
25.00
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
20.0
c 25.00
Return Standard Deviation
a
•
■ Total Fund (Net)
-4.85
10.0
so.00
■ Total Fund (Net)
1.08
•
• • •
•
• Total Fund Policy
-3.35
•
• Total Fund Policy
2.19
•
•
z 0.0
a
- Median
•
13.82
•
=
w -10.0
L 75.00
• •
Up
■
Under a
■
Tracking
c
Performance 100.00
Sharpe
Downside
F -20.0
Error
9'05
9/06 9/07
9/08
IR
9/09 6/10
-20.0 -10.0 0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
Capture
Capture
Total
Period 5 -25 25- Median
Total Fund (Net)
Median -75
75 -95
Total Fund Policy( %)
-1.01
-0.42
Count Count
1.11
Count
Count
0 00
■ Total Fund (Net)
100.00
0 (0 %) 4 (20 %)
N/A
5 (25 %)
11 (55 %)
f Over Performance f Under Performance -A-Sep-2005
Jun -2010 • Total Fund Policv
0 (0 %) 10 (50 %)
Down
9 (45 %)
1 (5 %)
10.00
5.00
0.00
a
-5.00
a
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
= 2.00
0.00
a
0
2.00
0.00
5.00
10.00 15.00
20.00
25.00
0.00 5.00
10.00
15.00 20.00
25.00
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
Return Standard Deviation
Return
Standard Deviation
■ Total Fund (Net)
-4.85
14.93
■ Total Fund (Net)
1.08
12.30
• Total Fund Policy
-3.35
13.20
• Total Fund Policy
2.19
10.96
- Median
-3.32
13.82
- Median
2.68
11.60
Historical
Up
Down
Tracking
Sharpe
Downside
Error
Market
Market
Alpha
IR
Ratio
Beta
Risk
Capture
Capture
Total Fund (Net)
3 03
107.96
116.70
-1.01
-0.42
-0.35
1.11
11.31
Total Frmd Policv
0 00
100.00
100.00
0.00
N/A
-0.30
1.00
9.72
Historical
Up
Down
Tracking
Sharpe
Downside
Error
Market
Market
Alpha
IR
Ratio
Beta
Risk
Capture
Capture
Total Fund (Net)
2.50
104.15
117.86
-1.22
-0.37
-0.07
1.10
8.78
Total Fund Policy
0.00
100.00
100.00
0.00
N/A
0.01
1.00
7.54
24
THE
BOGDAHN
GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Total Domestic Equity
June 30, 2010
Financial Reconciliation
$80.0
Market Value
1
Oct -2009
1
2
Market Value
4
5
Net
Capital
Quarter
To
As of
Contributions Distributions
Fees
Expenses
Income
As of
3/31/2010
Transfers
Jun -2010
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
Total Domestic Equity
9,856
100
-21
-1
32
-1,034
8,932
Financial Reconciliation
Oct1 1'
I June 30, 20 10
-8.00 (30)
-1.68 (34)
0.06 (46)
• Total Domestic Equity Policy
-11.32 (41)
-0.51 (32)
15.02 (29)
-7.88 (47)
-9.66 (61)
-2.89 (62)
Market Value
$60.0
Market Value
Net
Capital
12/02 12/04
12/06 12/08 6/10
As of
Contributions Distributions
Fees
Expenses
Income
-9.21
As of
-0.10
9/30/2009
Transfers
-Total Domestic Equity Policy
Comparative Performance
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
Total Domestic Equity
8,077
858
-59
-3
97
-37
8,932
Peer Group
Core/Large
Cap Equity (SA+CF)
1
Cumulative
Performance
1
1
1
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Ending
;n nn
F
a
L
0.00
a
-10.00
-2000
$140.0
$120.0
113.0
$100.0
v 93.8
$80.0
1
Oct -2009
1
2
3
4
5
Quarter
To
Year
Years
Years
Years
Years
Jun -2010
■ Total Domestic Equity
-10.12 (14)
1.13 (10)
17.06 (11)
-3.95 (9)
-8.00 (30)
-1.68 (34)
0.06 (46)
• Total Domestic Equity Policy
-11.32 (41)
-0.51 (32)
15.02 (29)
-7.88 (47)
-9.66 (61)
-2.89 (62)
-0.69 (68)
$60.0
12/00
12/02 12/04
12/06 12/08 6/10
Median
-11.42
-1.02
13.80
-7.99
-9.21
-2.61
-0.10
-Total
Domestic Equity
-Total Domestic Equity Policy
Comparative Performance
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Mar -2010
Dec -2009
Sep -2009
Jun -2009
Mar -2009 Dec -2008
Total Domestic Equity
5.72 (32)
6.43 (27)
15.75 (33)
17.93 (15)
-7.99
(24) -23.80 (86)
Total Domestic Equity Policy
5.94 (24)
5.90 (54)
15.61 (38)
15.93 (42)
-11.01
(69) -21.94 (60)
US Core/Large Cap Equity (SA +CF)
Median
5.40
6.01
15.28
15.56
-10.43
-21.68
THE
25
BOGDAHN
` GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Total Domestic Equity
June 30, 2010
3 0.0
Over
20.00
0.00
40.00
5.00 10.00
Performance
20.00 25.00
30.00
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
18.0
R
a
25.00
Deviation %)
■ ■
6.0
Return
Standard Deviation
5
50.00
■ ■
W -6.0
-
p;,
L
75.00
■
= .
• • •
� -18.0
o Under
a
18.32
• Total Domestic Equity Policy
G Performance
21.89
100.00
• Total Domestic Equity Policy
3 -30.0
18.07
9/05 9/06 9/07
9/08 9/09 6/10
0
F -30.0 -18.0 -6.0 6.0 18.0 30.0
- Median
Total Period 5 -25 25- Median
Median -75 75 -95
Total Domestic EquityPolicy( %)
Hist
Count Count
Count Count
■ Total Domestic Equity
20 0 (0%) 8 (40 %)
6 (30 %) 6 (30 %)
f Under Performance f Over Performance f Sep -2005 Jun -2010
• Total Domestic Equity
Polic,
0 (0%) 0 (0%)
15 (75 %) 5 (25 %)
5.00
0.00
10.00
-5.00
_ -10.00
L
-15.00
a
-20.00
5.00
0.00
a
L
� -5.00
a
10.00
0.00 10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
5.00 10.00
15.00
20.00 25.00
30.00
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
Risk (Standard
Deviation %)
Return
Standard Deviation
Return
Standard Deviation
■ Total Domestic Equity
-8.00
22.50
■ Total Domestic Equity
0.06
18.32
• Total Domestic Equity Policy
-9.66
21.89
• Total Domestic Equity Policy
-0.69
18.07
- Median
-9.21
21.64
- Median
-0.10
18.00
Hist
Up
Down
Tracking
Sharpe
Downside
Error
Market
Market
Alpha
IR
Ratio
Beta
Risk
Capture
Capture
Total Domestic Equity 5 58
102.76
96.08
2.01
0.35
-0.35
1.00
17.07
Total Domestic Equity Policy 0 00
100.00
100.00
0.00
N/A
-0.46
1.00
16.92
Hist
Up
Down
Tracking
Sharpe
Downside
Error
Market
Market
Alpha
IR
Ratio
Beta
Risk
Capture
Capture
Total Domestic Equity 43.94
134.52
95.92
8.64
0.20
0.14
0.93
24.17
Total Domestic Equity Policy 0.00
100.00
100.00
0.00
N/A
-0.11
1.00
13.24
o
THE
BOGDAHN
GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Lateef Asset Mgmt.Equity
June 30, 2010
Financial Reconciliation 1 Q uarter
Market Value Net Capital Market Value
As of Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees Expenses Income Apprec.// Deprec. As of
3/31/2010 6/30/2010
Lateef Asset Mgmt.Equity
4,887
50 -12
-1 15
-597
4,342
Financial Reconciliation
Oct ober
009 To June 30, 20 10
Quarter
To
Year
Years Years
Years
Years
Market Value
Net
Capital
Market Value
As of
Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees
Expenses Income
Apprec.// Deprec.
As of
■ Lateef Asset Mgmt.Equity
9/30/2009
-1.77 (60)
13.30 (43)
-0.87 (3) N/A
6/30/2010
Lateef Asset Mgmt.Equity
4,480
-4 -36
-2 40
-117
4,342
Peer Group
13.62 (40)
Growth/Large Cap Equity (SA+CF)
Cumulative Perfo
0.38 (52)
$50.0
$1100
6/08 3/09 12/09 6/10
I ledian
;n nn
20.00
10.00
e
a
L
0.00
a
-10.00
-2000
$100.0
$90.0
83.8
$80.0
$77.4
$70.0
1
Oct -2009
1
2 3
4
5
$60.0
Quarter
To
Year
Years Years
Years
Years
Jun -2010
■ Lateef Asset Mgmt.Equity
-11.88 (57)
-1.77 (60)
13.30 (43)
-0.87 (3) N/A
N/A
N/A
• Russell 1000 Growth Index
-11.75 (53)
-0.31 (37)
13.62 (40)
-7.38 (39) -6.91 (48)
-1.01 (42)
0.38 (52)
$50.0
9/07
6/08 3/09 12/09 6/10
I ledian
-11.64
-0.92
12.65
-8.17 -7.02
-1.42
0.48
- LateefAsset Mgmt .Equity - Russell 1000 Growth Index
C omparative Perfo
1
1
1
1
1 1
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter Quarter
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending Ending
Mar -2010
Dec -2009
Sep -2009
Jun -2009
Mar -2009 Dec -2008
LateefAsset Mgmt.Equity
5.33
(32)
5.83 (77)
15.34 (25)
14.76 (53)
-5.85 (66) -19.33 (10)
Russell 1000 Growth Index
4.65
(51)
7.94 (29)
13.97 (53)
16.32 (34)
-4.12 (44) -22.79 (55)
US Growth/Large Cap Equity (SA
+CF) Median
4.67
7.03
14.03
15.01
-4.67 -22.56
27
THE
�J BOGDAHN
GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co.
June 30, 2010
Financial Reconciliatio
1 Oct -2009
1
2
Market Value
4
5
Market Value
Net
Capital
Year
As of
Contributions Distributions Fees
Expenses Income
As of
3/31/2010
Transfers
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co. 4,969
50 -9
-1 18 -437
4,590
Financial Reconciliation Oct1 1' I
June 30, 20 10
■ Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co.
-8.39 (14) 4.19 (8)
21.13 (25)
N/A
N/A
Market Value
N/A
$100.0
Market Value
• Russell 3000 Value Index
Net
Capital
-8.47 (74)
As of
Contributions Distributions Fees
Expenses Income
As of
9/30/2009
Transfers
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co. 3,596 882 -23 -2 57 80 4,590
Peer Group Analysis - US All Cap Value Equity (SA +CF) Cumulative Performance
L
0.00
a
-15.00
-3000
$130.0
$120.0
$110.0
1 Oct -2009
1
2
3
4
5
Quarter To
Year
Years
Years
Years
Years
Jun -2010
■ Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co.
-8.39 (14) 4.19 (8)
21.13 (25)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$100.0
• Russell 3000 Value Index
-11.09 (65) -0.86 (73)
17.57 (53)
-8.47 (74)
-12.13 (84)
-4.75 (88)
-1.56 (88)
6/09 9/09 12/09 3/10 6/10
- Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co.
Median
-10.41 0.14
17.91
-5.41
-8.91
-1.47
0.78
- Russell 3000 Value Index
C omparative Perfo
1
1
1
1
1 1
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter Quarter
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending Ending
Mar -2010
Dec -2009
Sep -2009
Jun -2009
Mar -2009 Dec -2008
Dalton, Greiner, Hartman, Maher & Co.
6.12 (57)
7.17 (3)
16.26 (68)
N/A
N/A N/A
Russell 3000 Value Index
7.05 (40)
4.17 (80)
18.59 (47)
16.81
(80) -17.00 (98) -22.41 (49)
US All Cap Value Equity (SA +CF) Median
6.42
5.07
18.23
18.28
-10.57 -22.53
THE
��
28
BOGDAHN
` GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Total International Equity
June 30, 2010
Financial Reconciliation
0.00
a
L
7
Market Value
a
-10.00
-20.00
Market Value
Net
Capital
As of
Contributions Distributions
Fees
Expenses
Income
As of
3/31/2010
Transfers
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
Total International Equity
2,911
37
-7
-1
27
-387
2,580
Financial Reconciliation
Oct11'
009 To June 30, 20 10
Market Value
Market Value
Net
Capital
As of
Contributions Distributions
Fees
Expenses
Income
As of
9/30/2009
Transfers
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
Total International Equity
2,318
462
-17
-1
_ _
-234
2,580
Peer Group
1
1
Performance
30.00
20.00
$150.0
$100.0
1 Oct -2009 1 2 3 4 5
Quarter To Year Years Years Years Years
Jun -2010
■ Total International Equity -12.31 (62) -6.45 (36) 18.81 (4) -10.98 (50) -14.23 (85) -5.03 (85) 0.80 (83)
• MSCI EAFE Index -13.75 (85) -11.00 (78) 6.37 (72) -14.30 (79) -12.94 (73) -4.22 (76) 1.35 (80) $50.0
12/00 12/02 12/04 12/06 12/08 6/10
D ledian -11.91 -8.18 8.79 -10.99 -10.71 -2.29 2.89 -Total International Equity -MSCI EAFE Index
Comparative Performance
1 1 1 1 1 1
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
Ending Ending Ending Ending Ending Ending
Mar -2010 Dec -2009 Sep -2009 Jun -2009 Mar -2009 Dec -2008
Total International Equity 5.07 (5) 1.54 (65) 27.00 (3) 31.73 (9) -9.63 (20) -26.00 (98)
MSCI EAFE Index 0.94 (66) 2.22 (51) 19.52 (46) 25.85 (30) -13.85 (61) -19.90 (57)
International Active Value Equity (SA +CF) Median 1.96 2.29 19.27 23.60 -13.01 -19.35
THE
29
BOGDAHN
` GROVP
10.00
0.00
a
L
7
a
-10.00
-20.00
-3000
$150.0
$100.0
1 Oct -2009 1 2 3 4 5
Quarter To Year Years Years Years Years
Jun -2010
■ Total International Equity -12.31 (62) -6.45 (36) 18.81 (4) -10.98 (50) -14.23 (85) -5.03 (85) 0.80 (83)
• MSCI EAFE Index -13.75 (85) -11.00 (78) 6.37 (72) -14.30 (79) -12.94 (73) -4.22 (76) 1.35 (80) $50.0
12/00 12/02 12/04 12/06 12/08 6/10
D ledian -11.91 -8.18 8.79 -10.99 -10.71 -2.29 2.89 -Total International Equity -MSCI EAFE Index
Comparative Performance
1 1 1 1 1 1
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
Ending Ending Ending Ending Ending Ending
Mar -2010 Dec -2009 Sep -2009 Jun -2009 Mar -2009 Dec -2008
Total International Equity 5.07 (5) 1.54 (65) 27.00 (3) 31.73 (9) -9.63 (20) -26.00 (98)
MSCI EAFE Index 0.94 (66) 2.22 (51) 19.52 (46) 25.85 (30) -13.85 (61) -19.90 (57)
International Active Value Equity (SA +CF) Median 1.96 2.29 19.27 23.60 -13.01 -19.35
THE
29
BOGDAHN
` GROVP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Total International Equity
June 30, 2010
DUM
30.0
F
� 10.0
Over
P erformancc
4 W
R -10.0
C
O
-30.0
a
-50.0
Under
Performance
30.0 50.0
Jun -2010
R
c -50.0 -30.0 -10.0 10.0
F
MSCI EAFE Index( %)
f Over P erformance f Under Perfonnance f Sep -2005
4.50
0.00
-4.50
-9.00
-13.50
a -18.00
-22.50
0.00
c 25.00
a
50.00
L
Qi
L 75.00
0
a
1 00.00
9/05 9/06
Total Period
■ Total International Equity 20
• MSCI EAFE Index 20
15.00
10.00
5.00
a
0.00
a
-5.00
10.00 15.00
20.00 25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
10.00 15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Risk (Standard Deviation %)
Risk (Standard
Deviation %)
Return
Standard Deviation
Return
Standard Deviation
■ Total International Equity
-14.23
33.81
■ Total International Equity
0.80
27.99
• MSCI EAFE Index
-12.94
27.50
• MSCI EAFE Index
1.35
23.34
- Median
-10.71
25.89
- Median
2.89
22.17
Hist
Up
Down
Tracking
Sharpe
Downside
Error
Market
Market
Alpha
IR
Ratio
Beta
Risk
Capture
Capture
Total International Equity 9 33
108.26
106.56
1.02
-0.02
-0.43
1.12
23.21
MSCI EAFE Index 0 00
100.00
100.00
0.00
N/A
-0.49
1.00
19.99
Hist
Up
Down
Tracking
Sharpe
Downside
Error
Market
Market
Alpha
IR
Ratio
Beta
Risk
Capture
Capture
Total International Equity 7.30
106.18
106.14
-0.14
0.03
0.04
1.10
18.10
MSCI EAFE Index 0.00
100.00
100.00
0.00
N/A
0.04
1.00
15.63
W
THE
BOGDAHN
GROUP
9/07 9/08 9/09 6/10
5 -25 25- Median Median -75 75 -95
Count Count Count Count
0 (0 %) 0 (0 %) 9 (45 %) 11 (55 %)
0 (0 %) 1 (5 %) 16 (80 %) 3 (15 %)
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
RBC Global (Voyageur)
June 30, 2010
Financial Reconciliation 1 Quarter
Market Value Net Capital Market Value
As of Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees Expenses Income Apprec./Deprec. As of
3/31/2010 6/30/2010
RBC Global (Voyageur)
2,911
37 -7
-1 27
-387
2,580
Financial Reconciliation
October
009 To June 30, 20 10
a
-10.00
Quarter
-20.00
Year
-3000
Years
Years
Years
Market Value
Market Value
Jun -2010
Net
Capital
As of
Contributions Distributions Fees
Expenses Income
-12.31 (62)
As of
18.81 (4)
9/30/2009
Transfers
N/A
ApprecJ Deprec.
6/30/2010
RBC Global (Voyageur)
2,318
462 -17
-1 _ _
-234
2,580
Peer Group
1
1
Performance
$0.0
$1,p0
6/08 3/09 12/09 6/10
Median
30.00
20.00
$100.0
$80.0-
$ 64.5
$60.0-
$40.0-
10.00
Oct -2009
1
2
0.00
a
L
5
0
a
-10.00
Quarter
-20.00
Year
-3000
$100.0
$80.0-
$ 64.5
$60.0-
$40.0-
1
Oct -2009
1
2
3
4
5
$20.0
Quarter
To
Year
Years
Years
Years
Years
Jun -2010
■ RBC Global (Voyageur)
-12.31 (62)
-6.45 (36)
18.81 (4)
-10.98 (50)
N/A
N/A
N/A
• MSCI EAFE Index
-13.75 (85)
-11.00 (78)
6.37 (72)
-14.30 (79) -12.94
(73)
-4.22 (76)
1.35 (80)
$0.0
9/07
6/08 3/09 12/09 6/10
Median
-11.91
-8.18
8.79
-10.99
-10.71
-2.29
2.89
-RBC Global
(Voyageur) - MSCIEAFEIndex
Comparative Performance
1
1
1
1
1 1
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter Quarter
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending Ending
Mar -2010
Dec -2009
Sep -2009
Jun -2009
Mar -2009 Dec -2008
RBC Global (Voyageur)
5.07 (5)
1.54
(65)
27.00
(3)
31.73 (9)
-9.63 (20) -26.00 (98)
MSCI EAFE Index
0.94 (66)
2.22
(51)
19.52
(46)
25.85 (30)
-13.85 (61) -19.90 (57)
International Active Value Equity
(SA +CF) Median
1.96
2.29
19.27
23.60
-13.01 -19.35
THE
31
BOGDAHN
` GROVP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Galliard Core Fixed Income
June 30, 2010
Financial Reconciliatio
10.50
F
$115.0
Market Value
$110.0
Market Value
a
Net
Capital
3.50
As of
Contributions Distributions Fees
Expenses Income
As of
3/31/2010
Transfers
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
Galliard Core Fixed Income 4,865
78
129
5,073
Financial Reconciliation Oct11'
009 To June 30, 20 10
To
Year
Years
Years
Years
Years
Market Value
Market Value
Net
Capital
As of
Contributions Distributions Fees
Expenses Income
As of
9/30/2009
Transfers
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
Galliard Core Fixed Income 5,089 -327 -7 -1 319 5,073
Peer Group Analysis - US Intermediate Fixed Income (SA +CF) Cumulative Performance
!0.4
$120.0
10.50
F
$115.0
a
L
$110.0
7.00
a
$105.0
3.50
000
!0.4
$120.0
$117.4
$115.0
$110.0
$100.0
$105.0
$100.0
1
Oct -2009
1
2
3
4
5
Quarter
To
Year
Years
Years
Years
Years
Jun -2010
■ Galliard Core Fixed Income
2.63 (67)
6.52 (17)
12.08 (16)
7.61 (60)
N/A
N/A
N/A
$95.0
1
1
• Barclays Capital Intermediate Aggregate
2.92 (48)
5.34 (52)
8.72 (63)
7.42 (68)
7.34 (64)
7.00 (63)
5.57 (69)
9/07
6/08
3/09 12/09 6/10
- Galliard
Core Fixed Income
Median
2.90
5.36
9.33
7.88
7.68
7.24
5.82
- Barclays Capital Intermediate Aggregate
C omparative Perfo
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Mar -2010
Dec -2009
Sep -2009
Jun -2009
Mar -2009 Dec -2008
Galliard Core Fixed Income
3.01 (4)
0.76 (37)
5.22 (19)
4.80 (17)
2.34
(4) -0.68 (90)
Barclays Capital Intermediate Aggregate
1.81 (57)
0.53 (56)
3.21 (69)
1.68 (75)
0.91
(38) 3.58 (59)
US Intermediate Fixed Income (SA +CF) Median
1.85
0.60
3.63
2.64
0.75
4.16
32
THE
�J BOGDAHN
GROUP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Galliard TIPS
June 30, 2010
Financial Reconciliation 1 Q uarter
Market Value Net Capital Market Value
As of Transfers Contributions Distributions Fees Expenses Income Apprec.// Deprec. As of
3/31/2010 6/30/2010
Galliard TIPS 916
10 -
4 17
946
Financial Reconciliation Oct ober
I June 30, 20 10
a
L
7
Quarter
x
5.00
Market Value
2.50
Market Value
Net
Capital
As of
Contributions Distributions Fees
Expenses Income
As of
9/30/2009
Transfers
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
Galliard TIPS 1,117
-224 -1
14 42
946
Peer Group
'
Perfo rmance
9.52 (67) 4.07 (75)
7.62 (70) 6.72 (71)
4.99 (85) $100.0
�1�00
$1192
15.00
12.50
$117.9
$115.0
$110.0
$105.0
10.00
Oct -2009
1 2
3 4
7.50
a
L
7
Quarter
x
5.00
Years Years
2.50
000
$117.9
$115.0
$110.0
$105.0
1
Oct -2009
1 2
3 4
5
Quarter
To
Year Years
Years Years
Years
Jun -2010
■ Galliard TIPS
2.21 (93)
5.29 (93)
8.29 (94) 3.10 (100)
N/A N/A
N/A
• Barclays Capital TIPS
3.82 (56)
6.25 (72)
9.52 (67) 4.07 (75)
7.62 (70) 6.72 (71)
4.99 (85) $100.0
9/07 6/08
3/09 12/09 6/10
Median
3.87
6.44
9.92 4.52
7.97 7.01
5.28
- Galliard TIPS - Barclays Capital TIPS
C omparative Perfo
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Mar -2010
Dec -2009
Sep -2009
Jun -2009
Mar -2009
Dec -2008
Galliard TIPS
0.68
(58)
2.32 (18)
2.85 (85)
0.48 (91)
4.15
(79) -3.40 (72)
Barclays Capital TIPS
0.56
(75)
1.76 (87)
3.08 (55)
0.66 (66)
5.52
(21) -3.48 (76)
US TIPS (SA +CF) Median
0.70
1.90
3.08
0.69
4.95
-2.59
33
THE
�J BOGDAHN
GR OVP
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
American Core Realty Fund
June 30, 2010
Financial Reconciliation I tl
Market Value
$70.0
$69.5
Market Value
1
Net
1
2
Capital
4
As of
Contributions Distributions
Fees
Expenses Income
As of
3/31/2010
Transfers
Years
Years
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
American Core Realty Fund 596
(
-2
6 14
608
Financial Reconciliation Oct11'
009 To June 30,
20 10
■ American Core Realty Fund
3.25 (N /A)
-1.77 (N /A) -11.22
(N /A)
Market Value
N/A
N/A
N/A
Market Value
Net
3.31 (N /A)
1.90 (N /A) -1.48
Capital
-10.98 (N /A)
As of
0.37 (N /A)
Contributions Distributions
Fees
Expenses Income
As of
9/30/2009
Transfers
Apprec.// Deprec.
6/30/2010
American Core Realty Fund 639
-9
6
-5
19 -31
608
$1100
10 00
0.00
e
.. -10.00
a
L
7
a
-20.00
-3000
$100.0
$90.0
$80.0
$70.0
$69.5
1
Oct -2009
1
2
3
4
5
Quarter
To
Year
Years
Years
Years
Years
Jun -2010
■ American Core Realty Fund
3.25 (N /A)
-1.77 (N /A) -11.22
(N /A)
-18.65 (N /A)
N/A
N/A
N/A
• NCREIF Property Index
3.31 (N /A)
1.90 (N /A) -1.48
(N /A)
-10.98 (N /A)
-4.70 (N /A)
0.37 (N /A)
3.79 (N /A)
$60.0
9/07
6/08 3/09 12/09 6/10
Median
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
- American Core Realty Fund - NCREIF Property Index
C omparative Perfo
1
1
1
1
1 1
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter
Quarter Quarter
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending
Ending Ending
Mar -2010
Dec -2009
Sep -2009
Jun -2009
Mar -2009 Dec -2008
American Core Realty Fund
-0.67
(74)
-4.23
(63)
-9.62
(67)
-7.20 (46)
-12.86 (39) -7.53 (26)
NCREIF Property Index
0.76
(37)
-2.11
(18)
-3.32
(22)
-5.20 (18)
-7.33 (15) -8.29 (28)
US Private Real Estate -Open End (SA +CF) Median
0.40
-3.73
-7.30
-8.06
-14.81 -10.07
THE
�J
34
[ BOGDAHN
` GROUP
Total Fund
Effective Date: Jan -1976
S &P 500 Index
Barclays Capital Aggregate
MSCI EAFE
Effective Date: Oct -2003
S &P 500 Index
Barclays Capital Aggregate
MSCI EAFE
Effective Date: Sep -2006
S &P 500 Index
Barclays Capital Intermediate Aggregate
Effective Date: Oct -2009
Russell 3000 Index
Barclays Capital Intermediate Aggregate
MSCI EAFE
Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury: U.S. TIPS
NCREIF Property Index
Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust
Benchmark History
As of June 30, 2010
Total E
Effective Date: Jan -1970
65.00
S &P 500 Index 90.00
30.00
MSCI EAFE 10.00
5.00
Effective Date: Oct -2003
S &P 500 Index 85.00
60.00
MSCI EAFE 15.00
30.00
10.00
Effective Date: Sep -2006
S &P 500 Index 100.00
60.00
Effective Date: Oct -2009
40.00
Russell 3000 Index 77.00
MSCI EAFE 23.00
50.00
25.00
Total Domestic Equity Policy
15.00
5.00
Allocation
Effective Date: Jan -1926
5.00
S &P 500 Index 100.00
Effective Date: Oct -2009
Russell 3000 Index 100.00
Total Fixed
Effective Date: Nov -2000
Barclays Capital Aggregate
Effective Date: Sep -2006
Barclays Capital Intermediate Aggregate
35
100.00
100.00
THE
BOGDAHN
GROUP
City of Winter Springs General Employee Retirement System
Compliance Checklist as of June 30, 2010
1. The Total Plan return equaled or exceeded the 8% actuarial earnings assumption over the trailing three and five year periods. ✓
2. The Total Plan return equaled or exceeded the total plan benchmark over the trailing three and five year periods. ✓
3. The Total Plan return ranked within the top 40th percentile of its peer group over the trailing three and five year periods. ✓
Total equity returns meet or exceed the benchmark over the trailing three and five year periods. ✓
Total equity returns ranked within the top 40th percentile of its peer group over the trailing three and five year periods. ✓
The total equity allocation was less than 75% of the total plan assets at market. ✓
Total foreign equity was less than 25% of the total plan assets at market. ✓
1. Total fixed income returns meet or exceed the benchmark over the trailing three and five year periods. ✓
2. Total fixed income returns ranked within the top 40th percentile of its peer group over the trailing three and five year periods. ✓
3. All fixed income investments had a minimum rating of investment grade or higher. ✓
Manager Compliance: Lateef Dalton
1. Manager outperformed the index over the trailing three and five year periods. ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
2. Manager ranked within the top 40th percentile over trailing three and five year periods. ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
3. Less than four consecutive quarters of under performance relative to the benchmark. ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
4. Three and five -year down - market capture ratios less than the index. ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
0
City of Winter Springs General Employee Retirement System
Compliance Checklist as of March 31, 2010
1. Manager outperformed the index over the trailing three and five year periods. ✓
2. Manager ranked within the top 50th percentile over trailing three and five year periods. ✓
3. Less than four consecutive quarters of under performance relative to the benchmark. ✓
4. Three -year down - market capture ratio less than the index. ✓
37
Statistics Definitions
Statistics
Description
Return
-- Compounded rate of return for the period.
Standard Deviation
-- A statistical measure of the range of a portfolio's performance, the variability of a return around its average return over a
specified time period.
Sharpe Ratio
-- Represents the excess rate of return over the risk free return divided by the standard deviation of the excess return. The result is
the absolute rate of return per unit of risk. The higher the value, the better the product's historical risk- adjusted performance.
Alpha
-- A measure of the difference between a portfolio's actual returns and its expected performance, given its level of risk as measured
by beta. It is a measure of the portfolio's historical performance not explained by movements of the market, or a portfolio's
non - systematic return.
Beta
-- A measure of the sensitivity of a portfolio to the movements in the market. It is a measure of a portfolio's non - diversifiable or
systematic risk.
R- Squared
-- The percentage of a portfolio's performance explained by the behavior of the appropriate benchmark. High R- Square means a
higher correlation of the portfolio's performance to the appropriate benchmark.
Treynor Ratio
-- Similar to Sharpe ratio, but focuses on beta rather than excess risk (standard deviation). Represents the excess rate of return over
the risk free rate divided by the beta. The result is the absolute rate of return per unit of risk. The higher the value, the better the
product's historical risk- adjusted performance.
Downside Risk
-- A measure similar to standard deviation, but focuses only on the negative movements of the return series. It is calculated by
taking the standard deviation of the negative quarterly set of returns. The higher the factor, the riskier the product.
Tracking Error
-- A measure of the standard deviation of a portfolio's performance relative to the performance of an appropriate market
benchmark.
Information Ratio
-- Measured by dividing the active rate of return by the tracking error. The higher the Information Ratio, the more value -added
contribution by the manager.
Consistency
-- The percentage of quarters that a product achieved a rate of return higher than that of its benchmark. The higher the consistency
figure, the more value a manager has contributed to the product's performance.
Excess Return
-- Arithmetic difference between the managers return and the risk -free return over a specified time period.
Active Return
-- Arithmetic difference between the managers return and the benchmark return over a specified time period.
Excess Risk
-- A measure of the standard deviation of a portfolio's performance relative to the risk free return.
Market Capture -- The ratio of average portfolio return over the benchmark during periods of positive benchmark return. Higher values indicate
better product performance.
;vn Market Capture -- The ratio of average portfolio return over the benchmark during periods of negative benchmark return. Lower values indicate
better product performance.
Calculation based on monthly periodicity.
38
BOGDAHN
GROUP
39 THE
BOGDAHN
GROUP
40 BOGDAHN
.f GROUP
Z£6L'Ot'Z'998
ZOZ£S uisuoosi,k `aaxnumpW
0081 a1inS an'; uisuo:)sim 'a OSZ
aa�n�nnit�
I £ Ibt oii1O `aouopuodopul
00Z olinS `pnlg aaaZ )jVp 0019
SSS09 siou `ailinuaiiLlM
OOZ alms pro2d plaijuipA OZ£j7
o2Bal11a
118Z£ Ep!JOIJ `opurpo
009 alinS `p '20�d pulclOulA 106tj
opuL'ij0
su . .lap �e . npff purr guauc�sanuz �norf $u: ijduczs _
d noxI)
NHVCIDOq
JHJL