Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2026 06 08 Public Hearing 403 - Oviedo City Church Overflow Parking - Site and Final Eng Plan and DA
PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM 403 CITY COMMISSION AGENDA | JUNE 8, 2026 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Oviedo City Church Overflow Parking – Site and Final Engineering Plan and Development Agreement SUMMARY The development site consists of one lot, approximately 0.82 acres, located northwest of the intersection of Ethan Hammock Court and State Road 434, within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Winter Springs. It sits adjacent to Ladybird Academy (which is located to the west of the subject property) and is separated from the Ladybird Academy parcel by a small right-of-way. The property directly adjacent to the subject property (to the north and east) is undeveloped and common area of the Southern Oaks Community Association (HOA), subject to a conservation easement. The applicant is proposing to construct a small parking lot with thirty-four (34) pervious parking spaces and an impervious driveway connecting the parking lot to the Ladybird Academy parcel to utilize the academy’s entrance to W State Road 434 (by means of an access easement). FUNDING SOURCE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the Site/Final Engineering Plan and Development Agreement, subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of the Development Agreement. 2. All grass areas on the Off-Site Parking Property shall use Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass shall be permitted. No grass types with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. 3. The Off-Site Parking Property shall be utilized for parking, recreation, and associated facilities/improvements only. No principal structure shall be erected on the Off-Site Parking Property without prior approval of the City of Winter Springs and a modification of this Agreement and the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans. 4. The Off-Site Parking Project shall be used on an intermittent basis for occasional non-daily use. Should the parking lot be used on a continuous or daily basis, a 1651 modification to this Agreement and the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans will be required as sodded parking spaces will not be permitted. 5. The surface of the Off-Site Parking Project’s parking stalls shall be sodded. 6. All lighting on the Off-Site Parking Property shall be arranged so as to reflect light away from adjoining properties. 7. No advertising signs may be erected on the Off-Site Parking Property. 8. Effective screening of the Off-Site Parking Property’s parking area shall be maintained on all sides, including the frontage. Both a fence (or wall) and a hedge of at least 5 feet shall be maintained in good condition on the Off-Site Parking Property so long as such Property continues to be utilized as a parking lot. 9. The Off-Site Parking Property shall not be utilized for paid short-term or long- term parking. 10. The Off-Site Parking Property shall remain under common ownership with the Principal Church Property. To the extent common ownership is not maintained, the Off-Site Parking Property shall not be used for stand-alone, off-site parking. 1652 Oviedo City Church Parking John Rabon, JD, MPA Senior Planner City Commission 1653 Background COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Property Address: West of 300 W State Road 434 (± 0.82 acres) October 29, 2025: Site Plan Application (FEDP-2024-0020) April 20,2026: Development Agreement Application (DVAG- 2026-0015) April 1, 2026: Community Workshop April 23, 2026: Public Notice Letters & Signage May 7, 2026: Planning & Zoning Board Public Hearing June 8, 2026: City Commission Public Hearing June 8, 2026 AGENDA ITEM 403 City Commission Ov i e d o C i t y C h u r c h P a r k i n g FE D P -20 2 5 -00 2 0 1654 Background COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicant: Oviedo City Church •Proposal is to establish a overflow parking and an activity field. •Property is zoned C-1, Neighborhood Commercial. •Applicant has submitted a Final Engineering/Site Plan application and a Development Agreement application. June 8, 2026 AGENDA ITEM 403 City Commission Ov i e d o C i t y C h u r c h P a r k i n g FE D P -20 2 5 -00 2 0 1655 Site Plan AGENDA ITEM 400 Planning & Zoning Board June 8, 2026 AGENDA ITEM 403 City Commission Ov i e d o C i t y C h u r c h P a r k i n g FE D P -20 2 5 -00 2 0 1656 Proposed Conditions COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Board recommend approval of the Final Engineering/Site Plan and Development Agreement with the following conditions: 1.Execution of the Development Agreement. 2.All grass areas on the Off-Site Parking Property shall use Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass shall be permitted. No grass types with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. 3.The Off-Site Parking Property shall be utilized for parking, recreation, and associated facilities/improvements only. No principal structure shall be erected on the Off-Site Parking Property without prior approval of the City of Winter Springs and a modification of this Agreement and the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans. 4.The Off-Site Parking Project shall be used on an intermittent basis for occasional non-daily use. Should the parking lot be used on a continuous or daily basis, a modification to this Agreement and the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans will be required as sodded parking spaces will not be permitted. 5.The surface of the Off-Site Parking Project’s parking stalls shall be sodded. AGENDA ITEM 403 City Commission June 8, 2026 Ov i e d o C i t y C h u r c h P a r k i n g FE D P -20 2 5 -00 2 0 1657 Proposed Conditions COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Board recommend approval of the Final Engineering/Site Plan and Development Agreement with the following conditions: All lighting on the Off-Site Parking Property shall be arranged so as to reflect light away from adjoining properties. 6.All lighting on the Off-Site Parking Property shall be arranged so as to reflect light away from adjoining properties. 7.No advertising signs may be erected on the Off-Site Parking Property. 8.Effective screening of the Off-Site Parking Property’s parking area shall be maintained on all sides, including the frontage. Both a fence (or wall) and a hedge of at least 5 feet shall be maintained in good condition on the Off -Site Parking Property so long as such Property continues to be utilized as a parking lot. 9.The Off-Site Parking Property shall not be utilized for paid short-term or long- term parking. 10.The Off-Site Parking Property shall remain under common ownership with the Principal Church Property. To the extent common ownership is not maintained, the Off-Site Parking Property shall not be used for stand-alone, off-site parking. AGENDA ITEM 403 City Commission June 8, 2026 Ov i e d o C i t y C h u r c h P a r k i n g FE D P -20 2 5 -00 2 0 1658 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTJune 8, 2026 AGENDA ITEM 403 City Commission ANY QUESTIONS? Ov i e d o C i t y C h u r c h P a r k i n g FE D P -20 2 5 -00 2 0 1659 TITLE Oviedo City Church Overflow Parking – Site and Final Engineering Plan and Development Agreement SUMMARY The Community Development Department requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing to consider approval of a Site/Final Engineering Plan for the construction of a parking lot and playfield adjacent to the Oviedo City Church and Ladybug Academy located northwest of the intersection of Ethan Hammock Court and State Road 434 in Winter Springs, Florida. General Information Applicant Ronald S. Thomas Property Owner(s) Oviedo Community Church Inc. Location 300 W State Road 434 Tract Size ±0.82 Acres Parcel ID Number 25-20-31-5BA-0000-019A Zoning Designation C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) FLUM Designation Commercial Adjacent Land Use North: Vacant (undeveloped) East: Vacant (undeveloped) South: State Road 434 West: Commercial Height Not applicable Setbacks Front: 25’ min. Rear: 15’ min. Side: 15’ min. Development Standards Lot Coverage 75% Off-street parking and loading regulations Development Permits Not applicable Development Agreement Pending Code Enforcement Not applicable City Liens Not applicable PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ITEM CITY COMMISSION MONDAY, JUNE 8, 2026 REGULAR MEETING 1660 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M |M O N D A Y , J U N E 8 , 2 0 2 6 | P A G E 2 OF 9 Background Data: The development site consists of one lot, approximately 0.82 acres, located northwest of the intersection of Ethan Hammock Court and State Road 434, within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Winter Springs. It sits adjacent to Ladybird Academy (which is located to the west of the subject property) and is separated from the Ladybird Academy parcel by a small right-of-way. The property directly adjacent to the subject property (to the north and east) is undeveloped and common area of the Southern Oaks Community Association (HOA), subject to a conservation easement. The applicant is proposing to construct a small parking lot with thirty-four (34) pervious parking spaces and an impervious driveway connecting the parking lot to the Ladybird Academy parcel to utilize the academy’s entrance to W State Road 434 (by means of an access easement). Public Notices: The Community Workshop was held on April 6, 2026. Notices were mailed to all property owners and homeowners associations within 500 feet on March 13, 2026. Analysis of Final Engineering Plans (Sec. 20-33.1) Criteria: The criteria for Final Engineering Plans are provided and analyzed below: (a) Site and final engineering plans and the subdivision of land shall also be subject to the technical requirements set forth in Chapter 9 of the City Code. It is the intent of this section to apply to applications for site and final engineering plans and to any subdivision of land requiring a plat, if applicable, and does not include review and approval of a lot split application. Please see the discussion below regarding technical requirements of Chapter 9. The Final Engineering Plans have been reviewed by the City’s contract engineer, who concluded that the Plans satisfy the technical requirements. provided the conditions of approval set forth below are met. (b) Except in situations involving one (1) single-family home, the Planning and Zoning Board shall be required to review all site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land applications and make a written recommendation to the city commission. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the board's recommendation and show the board has considered the applicable criteria set forth in this section. (c) Upon receipt of the planning and zoning board's recommendation, the city commission shall make a final decision on the application. If the city commission determines that the planning and zoning board has not made a recommendation on an application within a reasonable period, the city commission may, at its 1661 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M |M O N D A Y , J U N E 8 , 2 0 2 6 | P A G E 3 OF 9 discretion, consider an application without the planning and zoning board's recommendation. Except in situations involving one (1) single-family home, all site and final engineering plan and subdivision recommendations and final decisions shall be based on whether the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land comply with all the technical requirements set forth in chapter 9 of the City Code and the following criteria to the extent applicable: (1) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land, including its proposed density, height, scale and intensity, hours of operation, building and lighting design, setbacks, buffers, noise, refuse, odor, particulates, smoke, fumes and other emissions, parking and traffic - generating characteristics, number of persons anticipated using, residing or working under the plan, and other off-site impacts, is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. Analysis: Subject to the Conditions of Approval, Staff finds that the proposed Development is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses and will not adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity. The site lighting features four (4) poles with the lights angled down to prevent a light nuisance to other properties and adding to the site safety for members of the public. Additionally, the surrounding parcel on the north, east, and west sides of the lot is undeveloped and heavily wooded, providing ample buffer between the parking lot and the adjacent commercial use as well as nearby neighborhood uses. (2) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed density, scale and intensity of the site and final engineering plan requested. The site shall be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, safe and convenient automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian mobility at the site, and other similar site plan improvements needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of the proposed use. Analysis: Staff finds that the Applicant has demonstrated that the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be adequate to accommodate the proposed use and intensity of the site and final engineering plan requested. As referenced in the previous analysis, the lot is surrounded by existing vegetation on three sides, necessitating only additional screening on Oviedo Rd/W State Road 434. No structures are being constructed as part of this site plan. 1662 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M |M O N D A Y , J U N E 8 , 2 0 2 6 | P A G E 4 OF 9 (3) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values. Analysis: Staff finds that the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will not have an adverse impact on the local economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property values. (4) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. Analysis: Staff finds that the proposed site and final engineering plan will not have an adverse impact on the natural environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. The project is located outside of the special flood hazard area. (5) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. Analysis: The proposed site and final engineering plan will have no impact on historical resources. No additional scenic or cultural resources. Including scenic views or vistas, will be impacted by this site and final engineering plan. (6) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on public services, including water, sewer, stormwater and surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Analysis: City Staff have reviewed this project from a planning and engineering perspective. Staff did not find any adverse impact on any of the public services listed above. Access to water and sewer is not necessary for this development. (7) Whether the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land, and related traffic report and plan provided by the applicant, details safe and efficient means of ingress and egress into and out of the neighborhood and adequately addresses the impact of projected traffic on the immediate neighborhood, traffic circulation pattern for the neighborhood, and traffic flow through immediate intersections and arterials. Analysis: A traffic study was not required for this project. A parking study was provided that shows forty-four (44) spaces being added on the lot to serve as additional parking for Oviedo City Church. 1663 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M |M O N D A Y , J U N E 8 , 2 0 2 6 | P A G E 5 OF 9 (8) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land will have an adverse impact on housing and social conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood quality. Analysis: As a commercial project, the proposed site and final engineering plan will not have an adverse impact on the variety of housing unit types and prices. As for neighborhood quality, the proposed site and final engineering plan development will not have an adverse impact on neighborhood quality. (9) Whether the proposed site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land avoids significant adverse odor, emission, noise, glare, and vibration impacts on adjacent and surrounding lands regarding refuse collection, service delivery, parking and loading, signs, lighting, and other site elements. Analysis: Staff finds that proposed site and final engineering plan avoids significant adverse odor, emissions, noise, glare and vibration impacts on adjacent and surrounding lands regarding refuse collection, service delivery, parking and loading, signs, lighting, and other site elements. (10) Whether the applicant has provided an acceptable security plan for the proposed establishment to be located on the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land that addresses the safety and security needs of the establishment and its users and employees and minimizes impacts on the neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: A security plan was not required for this development. As referenced above, the parking lot includes four (4) light poles that will provide ample lighting and additional security for churchgoers and others utilizing the lot during evening hours. (11) Whether the applicant has provided on the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land an acceptable plan for the mass delivery of merchandise for new large footprint buildings (greater than twenty thousand (20,000) square feet) including the hours of operation for delivery trucks to come into and exit the property and surrounding neighborhood, if applicable. Analysis: Not applicable. The project does not involve a large footprint building. (12) Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the site and final engineering plan and subdivision of land have been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent adverse impacts addressed in the criteria stated herein or to adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. Analysis: Staff finds that the site and final engineering plans have been designed to incorporate mitigative techniques and plans needed to prevent the adverse impacts mentioned in the criteria on adjacent and surrounding uses and properties. 1664 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M |M O N D A Y , J U N E 8 , 2 0 2 6 | P A G E 6 OF 9 (13) If the proposed conditional use is a residential use, whether the elementary, middle and high schools (K—12) that will be initially assigned to the residential project by the school district at the time the city commission considers final approval of the conditional use have both sufficient capacity, are in close proximity to the project so as to make each of the assigned schools accessible and convenient (e.g., walking distance, travel time, private and public transportation, and quality of route environment) to the majority of the school population that will be drawn from the project, and promote and support the integration of future residents of the project into the existing city of Winter Springs community in a sustainable manner. Analysis: Not applicable. This is not a residential development. (14) Whether the applicant has agreed to execute a binding development agreement required by city to incorporate the terms and conditions of approval deemed necessary by the city commission including, but not limited to, any mitigative techniques and plans required by City Code. Analysis: The applicant has a proposed development agreement that has been included with this report, see Exhibit “12”. Water and Sewer: Not applicable as the development does not require water and sewer access. Stormwater: The applicant has submitted a Stormwater Report depicting how the stormwater management capacity for proposed runoff from the project is to be handled. Staff have reviewed and approved the information necessary from this development. Please see Exhibit “8“. Transportation: Not applicable for this project as a traffic study was not required. Parking: Staff finds that the development provides adequate overflow parking to meet the needs of Oviedo City Church. Further, this project is subject to Section 9-278 of the City Code which sets forth regulations for off-street parking. Staff finds that the proposed development meets the requirements of City Code Section 9-278(9)(b)2., which sets forth conditions of approval for off-site standalone parking lots with no associated principal structure which are to be used on an occasional, non-daily basis, similar to the development proposed on the subject property. The instant project proposes to construct sodded parking spaces, which is consistent with the requirement that off-site standalone occasional-use parking lots may be hard-surfaced, graveled, or sodded. Additionally, per Section 9-278(9)(b)2., all driveway aprons must be concrete, which is the case for the proposed project. Proper drainage is also required per Section 9- 278, which has been provided for the proposed project in the form of a wet pond 1665 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M |M O N D A Y , J U N E 8 , 2 0 2 6 | P A G E 7 OF 9 with a retaining wall, 10 foot berm, outfall control structure, and wetland buffer. Per the City Code, all standalone parking lots shall be illuminated with lighting arranged so as to reflect light away from adjoining properties, which shall be accomplished on the subject property according to the photometric plans provided for this project. Aesthetic Review: An Aesthetic Review was not applicable for this project as no buildings are part of the site plan. Reports: The Final Engineering submittal is required to include the following reports or updates of previously prepared reports for the same property. Reports March 31, 2020 Environmental Report (Ex. “3“) May 20, 2022 Geotechnical Report (Ex. “7”) October, 2025 Stormwater Report (Ex. “8”) July, 2025 Parking Study (Ex. “6”) Procedural History: Not Required Non-Binding Presentation to City Commission (Aesthetics) April 6, 2026 Community Meeting May 7, 2026 Planning & Zoning Board | Recommendation on Final Engineering and Development Agreement June 8, 2026 City Commission | Hearing on Final Engineering, and Development Plan and Development Agreement Applicable Law, Public Policy, and Events: Florida Statutes 163.2511-163.3246: Growth Policy; County and Municipal Planning; Land Development Regulation (Provides that land development regulations for municipal planning be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan). Home Rule Powers Code of Ordinances City of Winter Springs. Section 20-1. Definitions. Code of Ordinances City of Winter Springs. Section 9-278. General Provisions for Off-Street Parking. 1666 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M |M O N D A Y , J U N E 8 , 2 0 2 6 | P A G E 8 OF 9 Fiscal Impact: A Fiscal Impact Report was not required for this project. Development Agreement: The Applicant is currently working with the City Attorney on the Development Agreement for the project. The Development Agreement shall be executed prior to any work on the project covered within this document. The proposed Development Agreement is enclosed as Exhibit ”12” hereto. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the Site/Final Engineering Plan and Development Agreement, subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of the Development Agreement. 2. All grass areas on the Off-Site Parking Property shall use Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass shall be permitted. No grass types with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. 3. The Off-Site Parking Property shall be utilized for parking, recreation, and associated facilities/improvements only. No principal structure shall be erected on the Off-Site Parking Property without prior approval of the City of Winter Springs and a modification of this Agreement and the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans. 4. The Off-Site Parking Project shall be used on an intermittent basis for occasional non-daily use. Should the parking lot be used on a continuous or daily basis, a modification to this Agreement and the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans will be required as sodded parking spaces will not be permitted. 5. The surface of the Off-Site Parking Project’s parking stalls shall be sodded. 6. All lighting on the Off-Site Parking Property shall be arranged so as to reflect light away from adjoining properties. 7. No advertising signs may be erected on the Off-Site Parking Property. 8. Effective screening of the Off-Site Parking Property’s parking area shall be maintained on all sides, including the frontage. Both a fence (or wall) and a hedge of at least 5 feet shall be maintained in good condition on the Off-Site Parking Property so long as such Property continues to be utilized as a parking lot. 1667 P U B L I C H E A R I N G S A G E N D A I T E M |M O N D A Y , J U N E 8 , 2 0 2 6 | P A G E 9 OF 9 9. The Off-Site Parking Property shall not be utilized for paid short-term or long-term parking. 10. The Off-Site Parking Property shall remain under common ownership with the Principal Church Property. To the extent common ownership is not maintained, the Off-Site Parking Property shall not be used for stand-alone, off-site parking. Attachments: Exhibit “1” – Oviedo City Church Overflow Parking Final Engineering and Development Plan Exhibit “2“ – Oviedo City Church Overflow Parking Landscape Plan Exhibit “3” – Environmental Report Exhibit “4” – Tree Survey Exhibit “5” – Tree Assessment Exhibit “6” – Parking Study Exhibit “7” – Geotechnical Report Exhibit “8” – Stormwater Report Exhibit “9” – Property Survey and Legal Description Exhibit “10” – Community Workshop Flyer Exhibit “11” – Community Workshop Sign-In Sheet Exhibit “12” – Development Agreement Exhibit “13” – Cross-Access Easement Agreement Exhibit “14” - Application for Final Engineering and Development Plan Exhibit “15” – Development Agreement Application 1668 PARCEL ID: 25-20-31-5BA-0000-019A SEPTEMBER 2025 VICINITY MAP PROJECT TEAM: OWNER / DEVELOPER: OVIEDO COMMUNITY CHURCH, INC. 1205 CITY VIEW CENTER, SUITE 1005 OVIEDO, FL 32765 ATTN. PETER KATAUSKAS PHONE: (407) 542-3375 MYCELLRST@GMAIL.COM CIVIL ENGINEER:LARRY POLINER, P.E 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32701 TELEPHONE: (407) 452-8633 GEOTECHNICAL:INTERTEK PSI PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES,INC 1748 33RD STREET, ORLANDO, FL 32839 PHONE: (407) 304-5560 ATTN. MAX S. MCGAHAN, P.E. MAX. MCGAHAN@INTERTEK.COM LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N 300 W. S.R. 434, OVIEDO, FLORIDA 32765 [LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF WINTER SPRINGS, FL] (SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21S, RANGE 31W, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FL) AERIAL MAP N SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION OVIEDO CITY CHURCH PARKING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LOCATION 10 REV.DESCRIPTIONDATE 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC Laurence Poliner #56974 RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC OVIEDO CITY CHURCH COVER SHEET THIS ITEM HAS BEEN ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY LAURENCE POLINER, P.E., ON THE DATE DELINEATED USING A DIGITAL SIGNATURE. PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPY. La u r e n c e M P o l i n e r Di g i t a l l y s i g n e d b y La u r e n c e M P o l i n e r Da t e : 2 0 2 5 . 1 0 . 3 0 16 : 5 6 : 3 8 - 0 4 ' 0 0 ' 16 6 9 GENERAL NOTES GE N E R A L N O T E S DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. N/A C-1.0 Laure nce M Polin er Digitally signed by Laurence M Poliner Date: 2025.10.30 16:56:52 -04'00' 1670 N 89°50'14" E 236.88'(C) N 89°52'46" E 237.22'(M) 24.7 22 . 3 22. 1 24.6 24.8 24.8 22.1 22.1 24.2 2 0 . 8 20.6 Storm Control Structure Top Elev: 24.73' Baffle Top Elev: 24.79' Weir Top Elev: 23.62' 15" Reinforced Concrete Pipe SW Invert: 20.78' NE Invert: 19.95' West State Road 434 (Variable Width Right-of-Way) (AKA: State Road 419) 11 WET POND TOP EL. 24.0' NWL = 21.0' BOTTOM EL.= 15.0' 99 WETLAND LINE WETLAND BUFFER PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L 9 6 PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 21 22 23 24 10' BERM 23 22 NWL 21 20 19 15 10' BERM PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 10 ' B E R M 10 ' B E R M R 1 5 . 0 0 ' 10 ' (T Y P . ) 5' N 0 0 ° 2 1 ' 2 1 " W 30 1 . 4 5 ' S 0 0 ° 3 4 ' 0 2 " E 28 6 . 0 0 ' N 89° 26' 17" W 123.57' 5 ' 5' EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK Of f s i t e w e t l a n d l i n e Gras s P a r k i n g Of f s i t e w e t l a n d l i n e N 55° 0 4 ' 6 9 " W 59.18 ' N 16° 54' 31" W 66.11' NORTHERLY R/W, S.R.434 R3. 0 0 ' G r a s s P a r k i n g Gras s P a r k i n g G r a s s P a r k i n g NOT INCLUDED PID: 04-21-31-300-015A-0000 DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. SITE PLAN SI T E P L A N C-2.01"=20' PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP.) FENCE (TYP.) PROPOSED 5' WIDE SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE ROUTE PID: 25-20-31-5BA-0000-019A ADDRESS: CIRCA 300 W. S.R. 434, OVIEDO, FLORIDA 32765 AREA: 35,280 SQ. FEET / 0.81 ACRES END RETAINING WALL END RETAINING WALL ASPHALT DRIVE FENCE (TYP.) OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURE 4' HIGH OPAQUE FENCE ALONG WALL 0.5' FROM FACE OF WALL 4' HIGH OPAQUE FENCE ALONG WALL 0.5' FROM FACE OF WALL 4' HIGH OPAQUE FENCE ALONG WALL 0.5' FROM FACE OF WALL Laure nce M Polin er Digitally signed by Laurence M Poliner Date: 2026.01.22 08:00:07 -05'00' 1671 West State Road 434 (Variable Width Right-of-Way) (AKA: State Road 419) N 0 0 ° 0 2 ' 0 2 " W 3 0 0 . 9 6 ' ( C ) N 0 0 ° 0 2 ' 5 5 " W 3 0 0 . 9 9 ' ( M ) One Story Concrete Block Building #300 FFE = 25.88' Vi n y l F e n c e Owner: Barrington Estates Homeowners Parcel ID#04-21-31-506-0J00-0000 Tract "J" (Landscape/Wall) 80.5'46.0' 3. 0 ' 4.0' 75 . 2 ' 75 . 2 ' 80.5' 14 0 . 0 ' 14 0 . 0 ' 27.5'3. 7 ' 75.0' 27.5'3. 7 ' 130.6' One Story Metal Frame Building #300 FFE = 26.62' PPPP PP PP ER ER TRCREB Ow n e r : B a r r i n g t o n E s t a t e s H o m e o w n e r s Pa r c e l I D # 0 4 - 2 1 - 3 1 - 5 0 6 - 0 J 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 Tr a c t " J " ( L a n d s c a p e / W a l l ) Vi n y l F e n c e 8.8' 11.0' PP OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OHE OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OH E OHE OHE OHE PP N 89°50'14" E 425.00'(C) N 89°49'06" E 424.74'(M)PP OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE N 89°50'14" E 236.88'(C) N 89°52'46" E 237.22'(M) S 0 0 ° 0 2 ' 0 1 " E 2 9 9 . 5 1 ' ( C ) S 0 0 ° 0 5 ' 5 6 " W 2 9 9 . 6 8 ' ( M ) 5. 8 ' 5. 4 ' Septic Tank Septic Tank Septic Tank COCOCOCOCOPP OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE Owner: Jambar Real Est LLC Parcel ID# 04-21-31-300-015A-0000 Ti t l e C o m m i t m e n t I t e m # 1 0 10 ' D i s t r i b u t i o n E a s e m e n t OR B 3 5 9 5 , P a g e 9 8 0 Right of Way Per Plat of Oviedo Road (Plat Book 6, Pages 74 & 75) Right of Way Per FDOT Maintenance Map (Section 77070, Pages 15-19, Dated 03/16/1989) Additional Right of Way (Per Official Record Book 2766, Page 979) S 89°32'38" W(M) 289.24'(D)(M)S 89°51'01" W(M) 135.77'(D)(M) CL CL 15 ' S i d e S e t b a c k 25' Front Setback 15' Rear Setback 15 ' S i d e S e t b a c k Approximate Drain Field Location FOC FOC FOC FOC FOC FOC FOC FOC FOC FOC FOC FOCFOCFOCFOCFOCFOCFOCFOCFOC FOC FOC FOC FOC UNK UNK UNK UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K WPB W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s CO UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK UN K UN K UN K UNK UNK UNK UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K UN K U N K UN K UN K UNK UNK UNK UNK UNK E E E E E E E E EE E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E T T T T T F O C Crepe Myrtle (5)(4"-8") Crepe Myrtle (3)(6"-8") Oak (1)(14") Oak (1)(20") Oak (1)(24") Oak (2)(16"-18") Oak (1)(12") Oak (1)(18") Oak (1)(6") Oak (1)(22") Oak (2)(6"-8") Oak (2)(20"-30") Oak (1)(10") Oak (1)(32") Oak (1)(10") Oak (1)(48") Oak (1)(48")Oak (1)(24") Oak (1)(22") Oak (1)(26") Oak (1)(24") Oak (1)(24") Oak (1)(14") Bay (1)(8") Oak (1)(18") Trees Small Oaks 24 . 2 22.4 22.6 22.4 22 . 3 25 . 0 24 . 9 2 2 . 2 2 2 . 5 21 . 8 21.6 25 . 2 25.3 21.6 21.7 24.3 21 . 5 21 . 8 21.8 21.3 24 . 8 24.9 22 . 6 22.4 24.9 24.8 22 . 6 22.524.9 24.8 25 . 0 25 . 6 22 . 9 22.8 22.5 25.5 25.3 25 . 1 25.9 25.6 25.3 24.8 24.7 22.3 22. 1 24 . 6 24.8 24.8 22 . 1 22 . 1 24 . 2 20.8 20.6 24 . 9 22.2 22.422.3 22.2 24.924.8 21.7 22 . 022.1 22.1 24.9 25.1 25 . 1 22.6 22.3 22 . 4 22.8 24.6 24.7 24 . 2 23.9 23 . 7 23. 9 23 . 1 23.5 23.3 24. 1 24 . 3 24.3 24 . 2 25.225.1 24.8 24 . 824.724.8 25.2 24.9 25.0 24.8 24.8 24 . 8 25.1 25.1 25. 0 25.4 25.1 25.2 25.2 25.2 24.6 23.8 23.5 23.2 23.2 23 . 3 23.323 . 4 23.223.3 23.123.123 . 1 23.0 22 . 9 23.4 23 . 3 23.3 23 . 3 23 . 4 23 . 2 23 . 6 23.8 24 . 0 23 . 5 23 . 3 23.1 22.9 23 . 0 23 . 1 22.923.0 23.1 23.3 24.0 24.8 25.0 25.1 24.2 24.4 24.7 25.0 2 5 . 0 25.0 25.3 24.4 25 . 0 24 . 2 24 . 2 24 . 5 2 4 . 0 23.9 25 . 0 25.6 25.6 26.0 24.2 6 24 . 7 0 25.2 325.2 5 24 . 9 5 24.7 1 24.2 8 24.7 24.8 25.1 24 . 7 24.9 25.5 25 . 2 25 . 1 24.9 24 . 224 . 4 25 . 4 25.3 26.0 25.8 25.9 25.9 25 . 925.9 26 . 025 . 9 26.126.125.4 25 . 425.8 25 . 9 25.2 2 25 . 2 5 25.5 0 25.9 8 25.7 25.5 26 . 1 25.425.7 25.9 26 . 4 27 . 7 27.827.8 27 . 4 25 . 4 25.8 26 . 4 25.6 25.2 25 . 9 1 25.9 4 25.9 7 25.9 6 25.8 9 25.8 2 25.79 25.78 25.65 25 . 5 0 25 . 5 6 25.6 1 2 5 . 3 7 25.2 8 25. 0 5 25 . 0 2 25.0 6 24.2 8 24.3 1 24 . 4 2 24.4 3 24.4 0 2 4 . 2 5 24.2 7 2 4 . 2 8 24.2 1 24.3 5 24 . 5 3 24 . 8 6 25 . 1 3 25 . 6 2 2 5 . 5 4 25. 6 6 25.14 25.10 25. 0 9 25.3 6 25. 4 6 25.6 8 25.9 2 25.9 0 25.76 25.68 25 . 5 8 25.5 1 25.49 25.54 25.2 6 25 . 2 2 25 . 2 5 25 . 5 5 25.4 5 2 5 . 3 2 2 5 . 3 3 25.2 6 24.9 8 24.4 024 . 4 024.4 4 24.7 6 24 . 6 4 24.4 9 24.5 2 24 . 5 0 24. 5 2 24.9 9 25.7 1 25.1 3 25.2 25 . 6 25.9 26 . 126.6 24 . 7 5 24.7 2 25.7 5 26.60 25.8 2 25. 8 2 26.63 25.8 8 25 . 4 25.8 5 2 6 . 0 1 25.9 5 25 . 8 9 25.4 25.8 4 26.66 2 5 . 9 0 2 5 . 9 1 26.62 25.9 0 25. 5 25.6 3 25.59 25.6 25 . 8 7 26.61 25.8 7 25.8 1 26 . 5 8 25.8 4 25. 6 25.52 25.5 8 25.2 4 25 . 3 6 25.8 4 25.69 25.7 2 26.1 6 26. 0 9 25 . 7 7 26.6 2 25.99 25.96 25. 9 9 26 . 0 4 26.62 25 . 8 8 25 . 7 25. 9 2 26 . 0 6 25 . 9 8 25 . 9 6 25.7 25.9 3 26.60 26.62 25.7 6 25 . 4 26.0 2 26.0 6 26.0 5 26.05 25.6 26.1 1 26.2 2 26 . 1 4 26.0 8 25 . 8 25.9 7 26.73 2 5 . 9 1 25.76 25.6 3 25 . 9 4 2 6 . 0 0 25.8 3 25.8 7 25. 9 2 25.9 26 . 0 25 . 7 25.7 2 4 . 7 24.8 23.622 . 823.423.1 23 . 0 23 . 2 23 . 123.0 22 . 3 24 . 6 24 . 1 23.8 23 . 6 23 . 8 23 . 1 23.4 25. 5 25.6 Storm Control Structure Top Elev: 24.73' Baffle Top Elev: 24.79' Weir Top Elev: 23.62' 15" Reinforced Concrete Pipe SW Invert: 20.78' NE Invert: 19.95' 24 25 2 4 24 2 3 25 24 24 25 25.6 23.5 25.524.5 23.5 25 25 18G 8G 4H 10G5 2 24 25 24.5 Oak (1)(24") 25.5 25.6 STOP ST O P 24.5 0 25.4 0 24.9 0 26 . 0 0 25 . 5 0 25 . 8 0 25 . 3 0 25 . 8 0 25 . 3 0 26. 0 0 25. 5 0 25.50 25.00 25.65 25.15 25.7 5 25.2 5 25 . 6 5 25 . 1 5 25. 0 0 25 . 3 0 24 . 8 0 25.8 8 25 . 7 5 25 . 2 5 25 . 6 0 25 . 1 0 2 4 . 5 0 25.8 8 2 5 . 8 8 2 5 . 8 8 2 5 . 8 8 24.5 0 2 5 . 0 0 24.5 0 2 4 . 5 0 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 25. 3 0 25.2 0 25.5 0 25.0 0 24.9 0 25 . 7 0 25 . 2 0 25 . 1 0 24 . 6 0 2 5 . 2 0 2 5 . 3 0 25.2 0 25.1 0 25.2 0 25.7 0 25.2 0 2 5 . 1 0 2 5 . 1 0 2 5 . 1 0 24.7 0 24.7 0 25.5 0 25. 2 0 24. 7 0 25.8 0 25.3 0 24. 7 0 24.7 0 25.1 0 23.50 FABRICATIONUSF FM s s s s s s Sa n Fi r e WM Fi r e FD C Bibb 25.8 8 25.8 8 PotablePotable San San West State Road 434 1H 4G 1G 10G 5 23. 5 0 nn nn 25.1 5 25.5 5 25.0 5 25.3 5 24.8 5 2 5 . 8 5 25.35 25.1 0 24.6 0 2 5 . 3 0 24.8 5 2 5 . 1 0 2 4 . 7 5 24.7 5 2 5 . 0 0 2 5 . 0 0 25. 5 0 24.9 0 2 5 . 0 5 25.55 24.75 25. 2 5 25. 3 6 25. 3 6 25. 7 1 25.6 26.1 25. 9 26. 0 (Variable Width Right-of-Way) (AKA: State Road 419) 11 WET POND TOP EL. 24.0' NWL = 21.0' BOTTOM EL.= 15.0' 99 WETLAND LINE WETLAND BUFFER PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L 9 6 PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 21 22 23 24 10' BERM 23 22 NWL 21 20 19 15 10' BERM PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 10 ' B E R M 10 ' B E R M 5' EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK Of f s i t e w e t l a n d l i n e Grass Parking Of f s i t e w e t l a n d l i n e NORTHERLY R/W, S.R.434 Grass Parking Grass Parking NOT INCLUDED PID: 04-21-31-300-015A-0000 DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. OVERALL SITE PLAN OV E R A L L S I T E P L A N C-2.11"=20' ACCESSIBLE ROUTE Laurence M Poliner Digitally signed by Laurence M Poliner Date: 2026.01.22 08:01:17 -05'00' 1672 N 89°50'14" E 236.88'(C) N 89°52'46" E 237.22'(M) 24 . 7 22.3 22. 1 24.6 24.8 24.8 22.1 22.1 24.2 2 0 . 8 20.6 Storm Control Structure Top Elev: 24.73' Baffle Top Elev: 24.79' Weir Top Elev: 23.62' 15" Reinforced Concrete Pipe SW Invert: 20.78' NE Invert: 19.95' West State Road 434 (Variable Width Right-of-Way) (AKA: State Road 419) WET POND TOP EL. 24.0' NWL = 21.0' BOTTOM EL.= 15.0' WETLAND LINE WETLAND BUFFER PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 21 22 23 24 10' BERM 23 22 NWL 21 20 19 15 10' BERM PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 10 ' B E R M 10 ' B E R M Match existing grade at all property line MES. INV. EL. 20.50 15 L.F. of 3" PVC @ 1.6% Offsite wetland line (referance existing Specific Purpose Survey prepared by Grusenmeyer Scott and Associates) 632 L.F. of retaining wall with FDOT handrail per Std. Plans 515-070 (see details on sheet C5) Top EL. approximately 24.50, bottom varies from 19.0 to 21.0, median wall height approximately 3.5 ft in height (design and permitting by others) Grass parking / playfield to be sodded (refer to Landscape Plans for details) OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURE. PER DETAIL THIS SHEET. Pavement (see details sheet) OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURE, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET. 25.20 2.0% 23.91± MATCH EX. GRADE 24.08± MATCH EX. GRADE 24.25± MATCH EX. GRADE 2 . 0 % 24.5223.91 23.91 24.64 2. 0 % 24.41 24.61 2.0% 25.31 25.18 24.90 24.90 24.51 24.20 24.442.0% 23.58 1. 0 % 1. 0 % 24.60 23.77 23.26± MATCH EX. GRADE 23.23 22.69 23.24± MATCH EX. GRADE 22.24 1. 0 % 24.50 2.0%2.0% 1. 0 % 24.50 24.20 22.78± MATCH EX. GRADE 22.50± MATCH EX. GRADE BEGIN RETAINING WALL TW 25.00 BW 22.50 END RETAINING WALL TW 21.00 BW 21.00 22.84± MATCH EX. GRADE BEGIN RETAINING WALL TW 25.00 BW 22.84 23.32 23.32 23.05± MATCH EX. GRADE 22.05 23.44 22.84 END RETAINING WALL TW 21.50 BW 21.50 RETAINING WALL TW 25.00 BW 19.00 1. 0 % 1. 0 % 2.0% 23 L.F. of 15" ADS HP @ 1.6% ST-1 FDOT TYPE C INLET TOP EL. 22.50 INV. EL. 18.00 EL 21.0 INV. 17.74 SWALE C-3.0 1"=20' DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN GR A D I N G A N D D R A I N A G E P L A N XXX.XX XXX.XX XXX.XX XXX.XX XXX.XX NOTES 1.ELEVATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON THE NAVD-88 DATUM (REFERENCE SURVEY PREPARED BY GRUSENMEYER - SCOTT AND ASSOC., INC., SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY/SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION/TOPOGRAPHY FOR/CERTIFIED TO RON THOMAS, ORDER #22-3651) 2.FLOOD ZONE (EXISTING FIRM): X, PER FIRM MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 12117C0180F, EFFECTIVE 9/28/07. PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF PVMT. ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION, TOP OF SIDEWALK OR BUILDING ENTRY ELEVATION PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATION EXISTING GRADE TO BE MATCHED (CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM ELEVATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) DRAINAGE INLET PROPOSED FLOW DIRECTION INDICATOR EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION Laure nce M Poline r Digitally signed by Laurence M Poliner Date: 2026.01.22 08:25:41 -05'00' 1673 C-4.0 1"=6' DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN GR A D I N G A N D D R A I N A G E P L A N 4" THICK CONCRETE WEIR OR APPROVED EQUAL 5' BERM DRY RETENTION SIDE RUBBLE RIP RAP X X X X SEE DETAIL FOR END CAP TREATMENT X X HDPE PIPE. SEE PLANS Laure nce M Polin er Digitally signed by Laurence M Poliner Date: 2026.01.22 08:24:54 -05'00' 1674 1 HANDICAP STRIPING 2 HANDICAP SIGN 3 PAVEMENT MARKINGS 4 STOP SIGN 5 CONCRETE FLUME 6 HANDICAP RAMP NTS 7 CONCRETE APRON 8 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 9 WHEEL STOP 10 BOLLARD 11 MONOLITHIC CURB AND SIDEWALK 12 6" VERTICAL CURB 13 DRIVEWAY CORNER RAMP 16 TYPE "F" CURB & GUTTER 17 DETECTABLE WARNING GENERAL DETAILS GE N E R A L D E T A I L S DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. N/A C-5.0 Laure nce M Polin er Digitally signed by Laurence M Poliner Date: 2025.10.3 0 16:58:24 -04'00' 1675 N 89°50'14" E 236.88'(C) N 89°52'46" E 237.22'(M) 24 . 7 22 . 3 22. 1 24 . 6 24.8 24.8 22.122.1 24 . 2 20.8 20 . 6 Storm Control Structure Top Elev: 24.73' Baffle Top Elev: 24.79' Weir Top Elev: 23.62' 15" Reinforced Concrete Pipe SW Invert: 20.78' NE Invert: 19.95' West State Road 434 (Variable Width Right-of-Way) (AKA: State Road 419) WET POND TOP EL. 24.0' NWL = 21.0' BOTTOM EL.= 15.0' WETLAND LINE WETLAND BUFFER PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 21 22 23 24 10' BERM 23 22 NWL 21 20 19 15 10' BERM PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 10 ' B E R M 10 ' B E R M DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) SILT FENCE (TYP.) SILT FENCE (TYP.) LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY SILT FENCE ER O S I O N C O N T R O L P L A N EROSION CONTROL PLAN CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS WITH IMPROVED APRON PER SHEET C7.0 PID: 25-20-31-5BA-0000-019A ADDRESS: CIRCA 300 W. S.R. 434, OVIEDO, FLORIDA 32765 AREA: 35,280 SQ. FEET / 0.81 ACRES NOT INCLUDED PID: 04-21-31-300-015A-0000 1"=20' C-6.0 Laure nce M Poline r Digitally signed by Laurence M Poliner Date: 2026.01.22 08:02:40 -05'00' 1676 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS AND RETENTION SYSTEM. PLACEMENT OF ANY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. DRY PERIODS AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT BY THE SITE 3. TRAPPING DEVICES SHALL BE PERIODICALLY INSPECTED DURING URE(S) MUST BE COMPLETE AND OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO THE BE CONSTRUCTED FIRST. THE POND(S) AND OUTFALL STRUCT- WITH ANY ENVIRONMENTAL BERM(S)/REAR YARD SWALE(S) SHALL 2. THE PROPOSED RETENTION AND/OR DETENTION POND(S) ALONG EXCAVATION TRAPS, BERMS, STAKED SYNTHETIC HAY BALES, OR 1. THE TRAPPING OF ERODED PARTICLES WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE DIVERSION OF RUN-OFF TO SEDIMENT BASINS, THE SOILS AND PREVENT EROSION. FUNCTION OF SEDIMENT TRAPPING. RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE STORMWATER COLLECTION OF COMPLETION IS ISSUED. AFTER THAT, THE OWNER WILL BE 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE UNTIL THE CERTIFICATE MOISTURE IS ATTAINED AND NO SURFACE RUN-OFF IS CREATED. APPLICATION RATE AND MANNER SHALL BE SUCH THAT SOIL EXPOSED SOIL IN ORDER TO PREVENT WIND EROSION. THE SITE A WATER SOURCE CAPABLE OF APPLYING WATER TO DRY 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE ON THE CONSTRUCTION TIVE COVER HAS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO STABILIZE 4. TRAPPING DEVICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL A VEGETA- DETERMINED TO BE INCAPABLE OF PERFORMING INTENDED CONTRACTOR. TRAPPING DEVICES SHALL BE REPLACED IF E. RESPONSIBILITY D. SOIL MOISTURE C. SEDIMENT TRAPPING FLOATING SILT CURTAINS. VEGETATION IS BECOMING ESTABLISHED. AREAS, OR THE STAKING OR SHINGLING OF SOD WHILE EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND FURROWING, OR BERMS TO REDUCE RUN-OFF VELOCITIES. 1. LONG AND/OR STEEP SLOPES WILL REQUIRE CONTOUR BENCHING USE OF FIBROUS MATTING, NETTING OF SEEDED AND MULCHED NEWLY GRADED CHANNELS OR STEEP SLOPES WILL REQUIRE THE SOD, SEED AND MULCH, CROWVETCH, LESPEDEZA OR CREEPER. TECTED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT COVER, SUCH AS 2. EXPOSED AREAS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY GRADED AND PRO- POSSIBLE AREA OF LAND FOR THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE TIME. 1. CLEARING SHALL BE LIMITED SO AS TO EXPOSE THE SMALLEST CONTRACTS SHALL USE THE FOLLOWING MEASURES TO ACCOMPLISH THIS EROSION OF SOILS DUE TO THE ACTION OF THE WATER AND WIND. THE ALL SUB-CONTRACTORS SHALL EXERCISE MEASURES TO PREVENT THE DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION THE SITE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND B. RUN-OFF CONTROL A. SURFACE PROTECTION OBJECTIVE: AND THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, AND NPDES CRITERIA. 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY/COUNTY 4. STABILIZE SITE AS AREAS ARE BROUGHT TO FINISHED GRADE. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DILIGENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND STRUCTURES. AND OTHER MEASURES AS SHOWN ON PLANS, CLEARING ONLY AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL THESE DEVICES. 2. INSTALL SILT FENCE, INLET PROTECTION, SEDIMENT TRAPS, DIVERSION DITCHES, TREE PROTECTION, 1. SET UP ON-SITE PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH CITY/COUNTY & ENGINEER . CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE CONTACT CYCORP ENGINEERING IF ADDITIONAL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED DUE TO SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. SYNTHETIC HAY BALE PLAN VIEW * ER O S I O N C O N T R O L D E T A I L S DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. N/A C-7.0 Laure nce M Polin er Digitally signed by Laurence M Poliner Date: 2025.10.30 16:59:01 -04'00' 1677 West State Road 434 (Variable Width Right-of-Way) (AKA: State Road 419) WET POND TOP EL. 24.0' NWL = 21.0' BOTTOM EL.= 15.0' WETLAND LINE WETLAND BUFFER PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 21 22 23 24 5' BERM24 23 22 NWL 21 20 19 15 DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN PH O T O M E T R I C P L A N P-11"=20' PROPOSED 5' WIDE SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE ROUTE END RETAINING WALL ASPHALT DRIVE FENCE (TYP.) 1678 DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. PHOTOMETRIC DETAILS PH O T O M E T R I C D E T A I L S P-21"=20' Lauren ce M Poliner Digitally signed by Laurence M Poliner Date: 2026.01.21 12:14:07 -05'00' 1679 24 . 7 22 . 3 22. 1 24 . 6 24.8 24.8 22 . 1 22 . 1 24 . 2 2 0 . 8 20 . 6 West State Road 434 WET POND TOP EL. 24.0' NWL = 21.0' BOTTOM EL.= 12.0' WETLAND LINE WETLAND BUFFER PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 21 22 23 24 5' BERM24 23 22 NWL 21 20 19 N 0 0 ° 2 1 ' 2 1 " W 30 1 . 4 5 ' S 0 0 ° 3 4 ' 0 2 " E 28 6 . 0 0 ' N 89° 26' 17" W 123.57' Offsite Wetland Line Grass Parking Of f s i t e w e t l a n d l i n e N 55° 0 4 ' 6 9 " W 59.18' N 16° 54' 31" W 66.11' NORTHERLY R/W, S.R.434 West State Road 434 (Variable Width Right-of-Way) (AKA: State Road 419) 1 MG 1 MG 1 MG 39 VS 2 LI 5 LI 39 VS 1. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated with a permanent automatic irrigation system providing 100% coverage. 2. An automatic moister sensor/shutoff shall be part of the system. 3. All tree, shrub, and groundcover material proposed for this site is medium to low water use. Micro or drip irrigation will be installed in these beds. 4. The entire irrigation system shall be designed to utilize water efficient methods in accordance with and conform to Chapter 37, Sec. 601-613 of the LDC,including the use of re-use water where available. IRRIGATION NOTE: LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. All plant material shall be Florida Grade No. 1 or better as specified in "Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants", "Parts 1 and 2, by Division of Plant Industry, Florida", Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and shall conform to current American Association of Nurserymen 'Standards for Nursery Stock', latest edition. 2. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for verification of quantities the plant list. in the event of a conflict between quantities on the plant list and the plans, the plans shall control and the discrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the landscape architect prior to bid. Any deviation from these plans must be approved by the Landscape Architect or owner's representative. 3. Contractor is responsible for compliance with all applicable building codes, ordinances and local regulations. The contractor shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits to perform the work. 4. The landscape contractor is responsible for inspection of existing conditions and promptly reporting all discrepancies and improper conditions (wetness, muck, debris, ect) to the Landscape Architect prior to bidding. Contractor is responsible for soil analysis prior to installation of plantings, and is responsible for all soil amendments to conform to specifications. 5. All tree material shall be container grown unless otherwise specified. 6. The landscape contractor shall aquaint himself with all civil drawings as they relate to paving, site grading, and all utilities, (including water, sewer and electrical supply) to preclude any misunderstanding and ensure trouble free installation. The exact location of all existing structures, underground utilities, existing underground sprinklers and pipe may not be indicated on drawings. The contractor shall conduct his work in a manner to prevent interruption or damage to existing systems which must remain operational. The contractor shall protect utility services which must remain operational and shall be responsible for there replacement if damaged by him. 7. Mulch shall be organic and shall not be placed on top of the root ball or placed against the trunk. Mulch shall be applied a minimum of 12" to 18" from the trunk of any sized tree. Materials such as rock and shells that do not biodegrade, are not deemed acceptable. Failure to install mulch (and type of mulch) as provided in the specification above may result in a failed inspection. See http://hort.ifas.ufl.edu/woody/over-mulching.html for more information. 8. Refer to specifications for complete requirements. 9. In the event of a conflict between quantities on the plant list and the plans, the plan shall take precedent. LARGE TREE DETAIL Scale: N.T.S. 2 PROTECT TREE WITH 1/2" DIA. BLACK RUBBER HOSE ABOVE FIRST MAIN LIMBS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS ASSURE PERCOLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL FINISHED GRADE NOTE: ABOVE GALV. TURNBUCKLE 4'-0" ABOVE GROUND, TYP. BUILDERS SAND WATER, 6" TYP. MULCH, 3" MIN., 1" OVER ROOTBALL TYP. 6" CLEAN COURSE PREPARE PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED SOIL BERM TO HOLD #10 GUAGE WIRE WHITE PLASTIC FLAG HT. PLASTIC FLAG 3" BELOW SURFACE W/ 2"14"13" STAKES BURIED L-1.0 (WIRE LOCATION) PLAN 120° 120° 120° PLAN PREPARE PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED WATER, 6" MIN. SOIL BERM TO HOLD MULCH, 3" MIN., 1" OVER ROOTBALL TYP. SHRUB DETAIL ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE: Scale: N.T.S. 1 L-1.0 DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Landscape Architect of Record Christopher M. Kennedy #6666855 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Christopher M. Kennedy, PLA, on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. L - 1 NOT INCLUDED PID: 0921305BM0A000090 PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP.)SILT FENCE (TYP.) LA N D S C A P E P L A N LANDSCAPE PLAN 1"=20' 1680 24 . 7 22 . 3 22. 1 24 . 6 24.8 24.8 22 . 1 22 . 1 24 . 2 2 0 . 8 20 . 6 West State Road 434 WET POND TOP EL. 24.0' NWL = 21.0' BOTTOM EL.= 12.0' WETLAND LINE WETLAND BUFFER PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 21 22 23 24 5' BERM24 23 22 NWL 21 20 19 N 0 0 ° 2 1 ' 2 1 " W 30 1 . 4 5 ' S 0 0 ° 3 4 ' 0 2 " E 28 6 . 0 0 ' N 89° 26' 17" W 123.57' Offsite Wetland Line Grass Parking Of f s i t e w e t l a n d l i n e N 55° 0 4 ' 6 9 " W 59.18' N 16° 54' 31" W 66.11' NORTHERLY R/W, S.R.434 West State Road 434 (Variable Width Right-of-Way) (AKA: State Road 419) DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Landscape Architect of Record Christopher M. Kennedy #6666855 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Christopher M. Kennedy, PLA, on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. T - 1 NOT INCLUDED PID: 0921305BM0A000090 PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP.)SILT FENCE (TYP.) TR E E P R O T E C T I O N P L A N TREE PROTECTION PLAN 1"=20'TP L2 DESIRABLE TREES TO BE REMOVED (122 REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED)UNDESIRABLE TREES TO BE REMOVEDDESIRABLE TREES TO REMAIN (56 REPLACEMENT TREE CREDITS) 4" - 8" TREES ONE (1) REPLACEMENT TREE REQUIRED PER TREE 9"-11" TREES TWO (2) REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PER TREE 12"-15" TREES THREE (3) REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PER TREE 16"-23" TREES FOUR (4) REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PER TREE 24" OR GREATER NON-SPECIMEN TREES SIX (6) REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PER TREE 24" OR GREATER SPECIMEN TREES SIX (6) REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PER TREE 4" - 8" TREES ONE (1) REPLACEMENT TREE CREDIT 9" - 11" TREES TWO (2) REPLACEMENT TREES CREDIT 12" - 15" TREES THREE (3) REPLACEMENT TREES CREDIT 13 TREES @ ONE (1) REPLACEMENT TREE REQUIRED PER TREE = 13 REQUIRED TREES 13 TREES @ TWO (2) REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PER TREE = 26 REQUIRED TREES 21 TREES @ THREE (3) REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PER TREE = 63 REQUIRED TREES 2 TREES @ FOUR (4) REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PER TREE = 8 REQUIRED TREES 1 TREE @ SIX (6) REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PER TREE = 6 REQUIRED TREES 1 TREE @ SIX (6) REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PER TREE = 6 REQUIRED TREES 4 TREES @ ONE (1) REPLACEMENT TREE CREDIT PER TREE = 4 TREE CREDITS 5 TREES @ TWO (2) REPLACEMENT TREE CREDIT PER TREE = 10 TREE CREDITS 14 TREES @ THREE (3) REPLACEMENT TREE CREDIT PER TREE = 42 TREE CREDITS 122 REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED 55 REPLACEMENT TREE CREDITS FOR EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 3 MAGNOLIA CANOPY TREES PROPOSED AT 4" CAL. @ 3:1 CREDIT = 9 CREDITS 7 CRAPE MYRTLE UNDERSTORY TREES PROPOSED @ 1:1 CREDIT = 7 CREDITS 16 TOTAL CREDITS PROPOSED AT 4" CALIPER 66 REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED - 16 PROPOSED CREDITS = 50 ADDITIONAL TREE CREDITS REQUIRED SIZE REPLACEMENT QTY PROTECTED CREDIT DIFFERENCE 4"-8"13 4 9 6"-11"26 10 16 12"-15"63 42 21 16"-23"8 0 8 24"12 0 12 TOTAL 122 56 66 1681 1682 1683 Orlando: Main Office 3025 East South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Vero Beach Office 4445 NA1A Suite 221 Vero Beach, FL 32963 Jacksonville Office 1157 Beach Boulevard Jacksonville Beach, FL 32250 Tampa Office 6011 Benjamin Road Suite 101 B Tampa, FL 33634 Key West Office 1107 Key Plaza Suite 259 Key West, FL 33040 Aquatic & Land Management Operations 3825 Rouse Road Orlando, FL 32817 407.894.5969 877.894.5969 407.894.5970 fax Bio-Tech Consulting Inc. Environmental and Permitting Services Orlando Vero Beach Jacksonville Tampa info@bio-techconsulting.com www.bio-techconsulting.com KeyWest March 31, 2020 Jessa Anderson Project Finance & Development 7575 Dr. Phillips Boulevard; Suite 265 Orlando, Florida 32819 Proj: Sand Loch Parcel; Seminole County, Florida Parcel ID No: 25-20-31-5BA-0000-019A Section 25, Township 20 South, Range 31 East (BTC File #917-04) Re: Environmental Assessment Report Dear Ms. Anderson: During March of 2020, Bio-Tech Consulting, Inc. (BTC) conducted an environmental assessment of the approximately 0.72-acre Sand Loch Property. This property is located along the north side of W. State Road 434, just west of De Leon Street; within Section 25, Township 20 South, Range 31 East in Seminole County, Florida (Figures 1, 2 & 3). This environmental assessment included the following elements: • Review of soil types mapped within the site boundaries; • Evaluation of land use types/vegetative communities present; • Field review for occurrence of protected flora and fauna; • Delineation of on-site wetland communities; and, • Environmental constraints. SOILS According to the Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), two (2) soil types exist within the subject property (Figure 4). These soil types include the following: 1684 Jessa Anderson; PF&D Sand Loch Property; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #917-04) Environmental Assessment Report Page 2 of 9 • Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10) • Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20) The following presents a brief description of each of the soil types mapped for the subject site: Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10) are nearly level, very poorly drained soils found in swamps and depressions. Typically, the surface layer of Basinger soil consists of very dark gray mucky fine sand about 6 inches thick. Typically, the surface layer of Samsula soil is muck about 30 inches thick. Typically, the surface layer of Hontoon soil consists of dark reddish brown muck about 18 inches thick. During most years, the undrained areas of the soils in this map unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more. The permeability of this soil unit is rapid. Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20) are nearly level, poorly drained soils found on broad plains on the flatwoods. Typically, the surface layer of Myakka soil consists of black fine sand about 5 inches thick. Typically, the surface layer of EauGallie soil consists of dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. During most years the seasonal high table for this soil type is within 12 inches of the surface for 1 to 4 months. The permeability of Myakka soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum and moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil. The permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or moderately rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil and moderately slow in the loamy part of the subsoil. The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists (FAESS) considers Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10) as a hydric soil type. Furthermore, the FAESS considers inclusions present in Myakka and Eaugallie fine sands (#20) as hydric. This information can be found in the Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Third Edition (March, 2000). It should be stated, however, that evidence of these soils were not observed across the majority of the site. LAND USE TYPES/VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES The Sand Loch Property currently supports one (1) land use type/vegetative community. This land use type/vegetative community was identified utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCFCS, FDOT, January 2004) (Figure 5). The on- site upland land use type/vegetative community is classified as Disturbed Lands (740). There is no on-site wetland/surface water land use type/vegetative community within the boundaries of the subject property. The following provides a brief description of the on-site land use type/vegetative community: 1685 Jessa Anderson; PF&D Sand Loch Property; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #917-04) Environmental Assessment Report Page 3 of 9 Uplands: 740 Disturbed Lands The entirety of the subject property consists of historically cleared lands that have ecologically succeeded to their current condition. As such, the property would best be characterized as Disturbed Lands (740), per the FLUCFCS. Dominant vegetation across the property consists of a scattered canopy of Chinaberry (Melia azaderach), hackberry (Celtis laevigata), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), Carolina cherrylaurel (Prunus caroliniana), and camphor; with a sub-canopy of like-species; and, a dense understory of musky mint (Hyptis alata), lantana (Lantana camara), America beautyberry (Callicarpa Americana), pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), arrow-leaf (Syngonium podophyllum), wandering jew (Tradescantia zebrina), muscadine vine (Vitis rotundifolia), air potato (Dioscorea bulbifera), greenbriar (Smilax spp.), caesarweed (Urena lobata), Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense), tuberous sword fern (Nephrolepis cordifolia) and scattered elephant ear (Colocasia spp). PROTECTED SPECIES Utilizing methodologies outlined in the Florida’s Fragile Wildlife (Wood, 2001); Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Mammals (Wilson, et al., 1996); and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s (FFWCC) Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (April 2008 - revised May 2017), an assessment for “listed” floral and faunal species occurring within the subject site boundaries was conducted on March 31 2020. The survey covered the subject site’s developable area, included both direct observations and indirect evidence, such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and vocalizations that indicated the presence of species observed. The assessment focused on species that are “listed” by the FFWCC’s Official Lists - Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (December 2018) that have the potential to occur in Seminole County (Table 1). No plant species listed by either The Florida Department of Agriculture (FDA) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was identified on the project site during the assessment conducted. The following is a list of those wildlife species identified during the evaluation of the site: Reptiles and Amphibians brown anole (Norops sagrei) eastern racer (Coluber constrictor) green anole (Anolis carolinensis) oak toad (Anaxyrus quercicus) 1686 Jessa Anderson; PF&D Sand Loch Property; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #917-04) Environmental Assessment Report Page 4 of 9 Birds American Crow (Corvus caurinus) Black Vulture (Coragyps atratus) Carolina Wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus) Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus) Mammals eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) northern raccoon (Procyon lotor) Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) None of the above wildlife species was identified in the FFWCC’s Official Lists - Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (December 2018). The following provides a brief description of wildlife species as they relate to the development of the site. Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi) Federally Listed as “Threatened” by USFWS The indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) is a federally listed threatened species. The basis for this listing was a result of dramatic population declines caused by over-collecting for the domestic and international pet trade as well as mortalities caused by rattlesnake collectors who gassed gopher tortoise burrows to collect snakes. Since its listing, habitat loss and fragmentation by residential and commercial expansion have become much more significant threats to the eastern indigo snake. This species is widely distributed throughout central and south Florida and primarily occurs in sandhills habitat in northern Florida and southern Georgia. No evidence of indigo snakes was observed within the subject site during the wildlife survey conducted by BTC. However, the site does not contain gopher tortoise burrows nor does it contain suitable habitat to support this species. Thus, based upon the USFWS’s August 2013 Consultation Key for the Eastern Indigo Snake, the site is located within Seminole County and will result in the removal of less than 25 acres of eastern indigo snake habitat, a key determination would result in a finding of “may affect, but not likely to adversely affect.” Based on the required permit conditions that would allow the above finding, it is not likely that a survey specific to indigo snakes would be required. However, if required, the survey can be accomplished from October 1st thru April 30 for a minimum of five (5) surveys with 2 days of 1687 Jessa Anderson; PF&D Sand Loch Property; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #917-04) Environmental Assessment Report Page 5 of 9 optimal weather (overnight low temperature above 60º F). At a minimum, the Corps permit (if applicable) will be conditioned for the use of the USFWS’s “Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake.” It will also be conditioned “such that all gopher tortoise burrows, active or inactive, will be excavated prior to site manipulation in the vicinity of the burrow. If an eastern indigo snake is encountered, the snake must be allowed to vacate the area prior to additional site manipulation in the vicinity.” Any permit will also be conditioned “such that holes, cavities, and snake refugia other than gopher tortoise burrows will be inspected each morning before planned site manipulation of a particular area, and, if occupied by an eastern indigo snake, no work will commence until the snake has vacated the vicinity of proposed work.” As long as the above mentioned “Standard Protection Measures” are adhered to, the development activities associated with the subject site would result in a key determination of “may affect, but not likely to adversely affect” (NLAA) the eastern indigo snake. It should also be noted that Indigo snake mitigation may be purchased in lieu of conducting the indigo snake survey. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) In August of 2007, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) removed the Bald Eagle from the list of federally endangered and threatened species. Additionally, the Bald Eagle was removed from FFWCC’s imperiled species list in April of 2008. Although the Bald Eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and FFWCC’s Bald Eagle rule (Florida Administrative Code 68A-16.002 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leuchocephalus). In May of 2007, the USFWS issued the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. In April of 2008, the FFWCC adopted a new Bald Eagle Management Plan that was written to closely follow the federal guidelines. In November of 2017, the FFWCC issued “A Species Action Plan for the Bald Eagle” in response to the sunset of the 2008 Bald Eagle Management Plan. Under the USFWS’s management plans, buffer zones are recommended based on the nature and magnitude of the project or activity. The recommended protective buffer zone is 660 feet or less from the nest tree, depending on what activities or structures are already near the nest. As provided within the above referenced Species Action Plan, the USFWS is the regulating body responsible for issuing permits for Bald Eagles. In 2017, the need to obtain a State permit (FFWCC) for the take of Bald Eagles or their nests in Florida was eliminated following revisions to Rule 68A-16.002, F.A.C. A USFWS Bald Eagle “Non-Purposeful Take Permit” is not needed for any activity occurring outside of the 660-foot buffer zone. No activities are permitted within 330 feet of a nest without a USFWS permit. 1688 Jessa Anderson; PF&D Sand Loch Property; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #917-04) Environmental Assessment Report Page 6 of 9 In addition to the on-site evaluation for “listed” species, BTC conducted a review for any Audubon EagleWatch and FFWCC recorded Bald Eagle nests on or within the vicinity of the project site. This review revealed that there are no Bald Eagle nests through the 2018-2019 nesting season, within 660-feet of the Sand Loch Property. Thus, no developmental constraints are expected with respect to Bald Eagle nests. Wood Stork (Mycteria Americana) Federally Listed as “Endangered” by USFWS It should also be noted that the subject site is shown to be located within a Wood Stork Nesting Colony Core Foraging Area (see Figure 7). The Wood Stork (Mycteria Americana) is listed as “Endangered” by both the FFWCC and the USFWS. Wood storks are large, long-legged wading birds, about 45 inches tall, with a wingspan of 60 to 65 inches. Their plumage is white except for black primaries and secondaries and a short black tail. The head and neck are largely unfeathered and dark gray in color. The bill is black, thick at the base, and slightly decurved. Wood Storks are birds of freshwater and estuarine wetlands, primarily nesting in cypress or mangrove swamps. They feed in freshwater marshes, narrow tidal creeks, or flooded tidal pools as well as roadside ditches. Particularly attractive feeding sites are depressions in marshes or swamps where fish become concentrated during periods of falling water levels. Based on our review of available databases, there is no record of a Wood Stork rookery on the project site or within close proximity. The USFWS and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers require that any impacts to on-site ditches and/or wetlands, which would eliminate a portion of the wood stork foraging habitat, be either mitigated through the purchase of mitigation credits or recreated elsewhere on-site so that there would be no net loss of wood stork foraging habitat. Thus, no further action will be required prior to site development related to Wood Storks unless wetland/surface water impacts are anticipated. USFWS CONSULTATION AREAS The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has established “consultation areas” for certain listed species. Generally, these consultation areas only become an issue if USFWS consultation is required, which is usually associated with permitting through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The reader should be aware that species presence and need for additional review are often determined to be unnecessary early in the permit review process due to lack of appropriate habitat or other conditions. However, the USFWS makes the final determination. Consultation areas are typically very regional in size, often spanning multiple counties where the species in question is known to exist. Consultation areas by themselves do not indicate the presence of a listed species. They only indicate an area where there is a potential for a listed 1689 Jessa Anderson; PF&D Sand Loch Property; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #917-04) Environmental Assessment Report Page 7 of 9 species to occur and that additional review might be necessary to confirm or rule-out the presence of the species. The additional review typically includes the application of species- specific criteria to rule-out or confirm the presence of the species in question. Such criteria might consist of a simple review for critical habitat types. In other cases, the review might include the need for species-specific surveys using established methodologies that have been approved by the USFWS. The following paragraphs include a list of the USFWS Consultation Areas associated with the subject site. Also included, is a brief description of the respective species habitat and potential for additional review: Everglade Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis) Federally Listed as “Endangered” by USFWS The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Everglade Snail Kite. Currently the Everglade Snail Kite is listed as “Endangered” by the USFWS. Everglade Snail Kites are similar in size to Red-shouldered Hawks. All Everglade Snail Kites have deep red eyes and a white rump patch. Males are slate gray, and females and juveniles vary in amounts of white, light brown, and dark brown, but the females always have white on their chin. Everglade Snail Kites vocalize mainly during courtship and nesting. They may occur in nearly all of the wetlands of central and southern Florida. They regularly occur in lake shallows along the shores and islands of many major lakes, including Lakes Okeechobee, Kissimmee, Tohopekaliga (Toho) and East Toho. They also regularly occur in the expansive marshes of southern Florida such as Water Conservation Areas 1, 2, and 3, Everglades National Park, the upper St. John’s River marshes and Grassy Waters Preserve. No Everglade Snail Kites were observed within the site during the wildlife survey conducted by BTC. As no suitable habitat exists within the limits of the site, it is not anticipated that a formal survey would be required by the USFWS or another agency to determine if any Everglade Snail Kites utilize any portions of the site. Florida Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) Federally Listed as “Threatened” by USFWS Currently the Florida Scrub-Jay is listed as threatened by the USFWS. Florida Scrub Jays are largely restricted to scattered, often small and isolated patches of sand pine scrub, xeric oak, scrubby flatwoods, and scrubby coastal stands in peninsular Florida (Woolfenden 1978a, Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). They avoid wetlands and forests, including canopied sand pine stands. Optimal Scrub-Jay habitat is dominated by shrubby scrub, live oaks, myrtle oaks, or scrub oaks from 1 to 3 m (3 to 10 ft.) tall, covering 50% to 90 % of the area; bare ground or sparse 1690 Jessa Anderson; PF&D Sand Loch Property; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #917-04) Environmental Assessment Report Page 8 of 9 vegetation less than 15 cm (6 in) tall covering 10% to 50% of the area; and scattered trees with no more than 20% canopy cover (Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). No Florida Scrub-Jays were observed on the project site during the cursory survey conducted by BTC. As no suitable habitat exists within the limits of the site, it is not anticipated that a formal survey would be required by the USFWS or another agency to determine if any Florida Scrub- Jays utilize any portions of the site. Audubon’s Crested Caracara (Polyborus plancus audubonii) Federally Listed as “Threatened” The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Areas for the species, Audubon’s Crested Caracara (Polyborus planeus audubonii). Currently the Crested Caracars is listed as “Threatened” by the USFWS due primarily to habitat loss. The Audubon’s Crested Caracara is a large species of raptor that can reach a body length of 19.7-25.2 inches (50-64 centimeters). The Audubon’s Crested Caracara has a dark brown-black belly, wings, back, and crown; and a white lower belly, head, and throat. They also have a bluish-gray to light bluish dark yellow to white bill, red cere (facial skin), and a white tail with dark crossbars. The Audubon’s Crested Caracara is a resident of the prairies and range lands of south-central Florida. The Crested Caracara commonly occurs in dry or wet prairie areas with scattered cabbage plams, lightly wooded areas with saw palmetto, scrub oaks and cypress. The Caracara also uses improved or semi-improved pasture with seasonal wetlands. This species is most abundant in a six-county area north and west of Lake Okeechobee (DeSoto, Glades, Hendry, Highlands, Okeechobee and Osceola counties). Crested Caracaras construct new nests each nesting season, often in the same tree as the previous year. Although the subject site falls within the USFWS Audubon’s Crested Caracara consultation area, no Crested Caracaras were observed and little suitable habitat for this species exists within the project boundaries. As such, it is not anticipated that any further action should be required pertaining to the Crested Caracara. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS Permitting through the City of Winter Springs and the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) would be required to develop the site. As there are no wetland/surface waters within the limits of the site that would be jurisdictioanl to the US Army Corp of Engineers (USACE), permitting through the Corps will not be required. The site resides in the Lake Jesup Drainage Basin. 1691 Jessa Anderson; PF&D Sand Loch Property; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #917-04) Environmental Assessment Report Page 9 of 9 St. Johns River Water Management District An Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) will be required through the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) for the construction of a stormwater management system in association with the proposed development. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) As the ERP is no longer a joint application between the SJRWMD and the USACOE, the Corps will not be notified/copied upon submittal of the ERP application to the District. As there are no proposed wetland/surface water impacts in association with the Sand Loch Property, notification to this effect will be submitted to the Corps in order to obtain a “No Permit Required” letter. The environmental limitations described in this document are based on observations and technical information available on the date of the on-site evaluation. This report is for general planning purposes only. The limits of any on-site wetlands/surface waters can only be determined and verified through field delineation and/or on-site review by the pertinent regulatory agencies. The wildlife surveys conducted within the subject property boundaries do not preclude the potential for any listed species, as noted on Table 1 (attached), currently or in the future. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (407) 894-5969. Thank you. Regards, Stephen Butler Project Manager John Miklos President Attachments 1692 Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NR Can, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Project #: 917-04Produced By: SEBDate: 3/31/2020 Sand Loch PropertySeminole C ounty, FloridaFigure 1Location Map 2,7 00 Feet² Legend Sand Loch Property World S treet Map 1693 Project #: 917-04Produced By: SEBDate: 3/31/2020 Sand Loch PropertySeminole C ounty, FloridaFigure 22017 A erial Photog rap h 50 Feet² Legend Sand Loch Property 1694 Project #: 917-04Produced By: SEBDate: 3/31/2020 Sand Loch PropertySeminole C ounty, FloridaFigure 3USGS Topog rahic Map 450 Feet² Legend Sand Loch Property 1695 20 10 Project #: 917-04Produced By: SEBDate: 3/31/2020 Sand Loch PropertySeminole C ounty, FloridaFigure 4USDA/NRCS Soils Map 60 Feet² Legend Sand Loch Property musym, muname 10 ; Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional 20 ; Myakka and EauGallie fine sands 1696 740 Project #: 917-04Produced By: SEBDate: 3/31/2020 Sand Loch PropertySeminole C ounty, FloridaFigure 1FLUCFCS Map 50 Feet² Legend Sand Loch Property FLU C FCS 1697 Project #: 917-04Produced By: SEBDate: 3/31/2020 Sand Loch PropertySeminole C ounty, FloridaFigure 6Wildlife Sur vey 50 Feet² Legend Sand Loch Property 1698 SE091 SE045 SE031 SE092 SE018 Project #: 917-04Produced By: SEBDate: 3/31/2020 Sand Loch PropertySeminole C ounty, FloridaFigure 7Wildlife Proximity Map 1,6 00 Feet² Legend Sand Loch Property [b Eagl ew atch Permanent ID [b Eagl ew atch Temporary ID Buffers_330ft Buffers_660ft [b Eagl e Nests 2016 330 ft_Eagle_Nest_Buffer 660 ft_Eagle_Nest_Buffer Wood S tork Nesting Colony Core Foraging Areas 1699 SCRUB-JAY CONSULTATION AREACARACARA CONSULTATION AREA SNAIL KITE CONSULTATION AREA Project #: 917-04Produced By: SEBDate: 3/31/2020 Sand Loch PropertySeminole C ounty, FloridaFigure 8USFWS C onsultation A reas 110 Feet² Legend Sand Loch Property Consultati on Areas_USFWS2 1700 Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status State Status FISH Pteronotropis welaka bluenose shiner N ST REPTILES Alligator mississippiensis American alligator SAT FT(S/A) Drymarchon corais couperi Eastern indigo snake LT FT Gopherus polyphemus gopher tortoise C ST Lampropeltis extenuata short-tailed snake N ST Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus Florida pine snake N SSC BIRDS Aphelocoma coerulescens Florida scrub-jay LT FT Egretta caerulea little blue heron N ST Egretta tricolor tricolored heron N ST Falco sparverius paulus southeastern American kestrel N ST Grus canadensis pratensis Florida sandhill crane N ST Haliaeetus leucocephalus bald eagle N ** Mycteria americana wood stork LT FT Pandion haliaetus osprey N SCC* MAMMALS Puma concolor coryi Florida Panther LE FE Sciurus niger shermani Sherman's fox squirrel N SSC Trichechus manatus West Indian manatee LE FE PLANTS Carex chapmanii Chapman's Sedge N T Centrosema arenicola Sand Butterfly Pea N E Cucurbita okeechobeensis Okeechobee Gourd LE E Dennstaedtia bipinnata hay scented fern N E Illicium parviflorum star anise N E Lechea cernua nodding pinweed N T Nolina atopocarpa Florida Beargrass N T Ophioglossum palmatum Hand Fern N E Pecluma plumula Plume Polypody N E Pteroglossaspis ecristata Giant Orchid N T Pycnanthemum floridanum Florida Mountain-mint N T Salix floridana Florida willow N E FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS Table 1: Potentially Occuring Listed Wildlife and Plant Species in Seminole County, Florida N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing as Endangered or Threatened. LE-Endangered: species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. LT-Threatened: species likely to become Endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. SAT-Endangered due to similarity of appearance to a species which is federally listed such that enforcement personnel have difficulty in attempting to differentiate between the listed and unlisted species. C-Candidate species for which federal listing agencies have sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to support proposing to list the species as Endangered or Threatened. XN-Non-essential experimental population. 1701 STATE LEGAL STATUS - ANIMALS STATE LEGAL STATUS - PLANTS FXN- Federal listed as an experimental population in Florida E-Endangered: species of plants native to Florida that are in imminent danger of extinction within the state, the survival of which is unlikely if the causes of a decline in the number of plants continue; includes all species determined to be endangered or threatened pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act. T-Threatened: species native to the state that are in rapid decline in the number of plants within the state, but which have not so decreased in number as to cause them to be Endangered. N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. **State protected by F.A.C.68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918)and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) FT(S/A)- Federal Threatened due to similarity of appearance ST- State population listed as Threatened by the FFWCC. Defined as a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is acutely vulnerable to environmental alteration, declining in number at a rapid rate, or whose range or habitat is decreasing in area at a rapid rate and as a consequence is destined or very likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future. SSC-Listed as Species of Special Concern by the FFWCC. Defined as a population which warrants special protection, recognition, or consideration because it has an inherent significant vulnerability to habitat modification, environmental alteration, human disturbance, or substantial human exploitation which, in the foreseeable future, may result in its becoming a threatened species. (SSC* for Pandion haliaetus (Osprey) indicates that this status applies in Monroe county only.) FE- Listed as Endangered Species at the Federal level by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service FT- Listed as Threatened Species at the Federal level by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1702 Digitally signed by Thomas X Grusenmeyer DN: c=US, o=Unaffiliated, ou=A01410C0000016C8B48A0D100 00088C, cn=Thomas X Grusenmeyer Date: 2022.06.23 16:36:45 -04'00' Adobe Acrobat Reader version: 2022.001.20117 1703 October 7, 2022 Ron Thomas Oviedo City Church – Vacant Lot Dear Ron, Thank you for the opportunity to provide a tree assessment for the Oviedo City Church – Vacant Lot located in Winter Springs, FL. Assignment: Produce a Consulting Arborist Report with health assessment, species identification and size for trees and Palms located on the vacant lot parcel on SR 434 in Winter Springs, Florida. • The health assessment ratings will be categorized using the following description below: Excellent – Specimen tree good health Good – Tree that meets available points for good structure, viable canopy and without decay. Moderate – Tree that doesn’t meet either good structure, viable canopy or has internal decay present. Poor – Tree that meets multiple stress items and should be considered for removal, this also includes all Invasive Species– Removal Only The majority of the lot trees and palms appear to be volunteer trees. They consist of Sabal Palms. Red Maple, Chinaberry, Sweet Bay, Hackberry, Golden Rain and (1) Laurel Oak. The trees were in very poor health and had significant structural damage. 1704 Vacant Lot Canopy Listed below are examples of defects and lot characteristics that negatively impacted the overall health assessment rating for the trees and palms on the lot. 1) Heavy vines in the canopy 2) Decay in primary branches 3) Decay areas in trunk and at base, 4) Leaning trunk structures due to encroachment, 5) Poor structure 6) Pencil Necking in Palm 7) Damage fronds and branches from the recent Hurricane Ian 8) Invasive species and volunteer trees Examples of heavy vines throughout the parcel Examples of broken canopies and pencil necking in palms Trees are dynamic, living organisms which change over time. The observations made herein will reflect the opinion of the Arborist at the time of inspection and do not guarantee the condition of the trees anytime in the future. Trees or parts can fail at any time; these failures cannot always be predicted. Inspections of these trees will be based on a ground level visual observation only, I did not perform sound testing, advanced Arboricultural 1705 testing or gather any forensic samples for further examination. The assessment does not take into consideration any information unknown, not visible or detectable at the time of the inspection. Again Ron, thank you for the opportunity to submit this tree assessment. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, Mary Mary L. Edwards Registered Consulting Arborist RCA #451 ISA Certified Arborist FL-0116 ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor 321-303-4714 mary@maryedwardsarborist.com 1706 OVIEDO CITY CHURCH Tree #DBH T001 OA 30'-35' T002 OA 15'-20' T003 OA 20'-25' T004 OA 30'-35' T005 OA 35'-40' T006 OA 15'-20' T007 18" T008 7" T009 OA 15'-18' T010 17" T011 OA 40'+ T012 5" T013 OA 40' T014 OA 40' T015 15" T016 OA 30' T017 12" T018 8" T019 7" T020 OA 30' T021 OA 20'-25' T022 OA 20'-25' T023 OA 20'-25' T024 5" T025 OA 10'-12' T026 OA 15'-20' T027 OA 15'-20' T028 7" T029 OA 8'-10' T030 OA 15'-20' T031 OA 12'-18' T032 OA 15'-20' Celtis occidentalis - Hackberry Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Poor - weak species, volunteer tree, poor structure Good - vines, full canopy Poor - crown damaged from storm Fair - heavy vines Fair - heavy vines Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Celtis occidentalis - Hackberry Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Melia azedarachi - Chinaberry Celtis occidentalis - Hackberry Prunus caroliniana - Cherry Laurel Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Celtis occidentalis - Hackberry Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Celtis occidentalis - Hackberry Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Koelreuteria paniculata - Golden Rain Melia azedarachi - Chinaberry Sabal palmetto Good - full canopy Good full canopy Poor - weak species, volunteer tree, poor structure, heavily forested Fair - small crown stunted crown Good - some vines, full crown Fair - heavy vines, forested, slightly one-sided canopy Fair - some broken fronds, heavy vines Invasive species Poor - weak species, volunteer tree , deadwood, vines Poor - completely uprooted at base, heavy vines Good - vines, full canopy Good - full canopy Fair - slight lean Poor - weak species, broken top, 50% of tree in decline Poor - heavy vines, slight lean Poor - heavy vines, slight lean Poor - weak species, volunteer tree heavy vines, broken top Fair - vines, slight lean, broken crown Fair - vines, small crown during storms Fair - vines into canopy Poor - heavy vines, major deadwood, decay Poor - Invasive species Good - vines, full crown Species Tree Special Characteristics Sabal palmetto Good , full crown Fair - covered in vines Poor - broken fronds in crown Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Poor - broken top, 50% of tree in declineAcer rubrum - Red Maple 1707 OVIEDO CITY CHURCH Tree #DBH T033 OA 15'-18' T034 OA 12'-15' T035 OA 40'- 45' T036 OA 15'-20' T037 OA 15'-20' T038 OA 15'-20' T039 OA 15'-20' T040 OA 40'-45' T041 14"/14" T042 OA 35'-40' T043 10" T044 11" t045 OA 35'-40' T046 OA35'-40' T047 9" T048 11" T049 OA 35"-40" T050 OA 25'-30' T051 7" T052 10" T053 12" T054 OA15'-20' T055 OA 15'-20' T056 OA 10'-12' T057 OA 20'-25' T058 52" T059 9" T060 OA 30'-35' T061 OA 13'-14' T062 OA 20'-25' T063 18" T064 OA 25'-30' Magnolia virginiana -Bay Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Celtis occidentalis - Hackberry Sabal palmetto Celtis occidentalis - Hackberry Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Quercus laurifolia - Laurel Oak Liquidambar styraciflua - Sweetgum Celtis occidentalis - Hackberry Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Celtis occidentalis - Hackberry Liquidambar styraciflua - Sweetgum Melia azedarachi - Chinaberry Sabal palmetto Melia azedarachi - Chinaberry Melia azedarachi - Chinaberry Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Fair - Encroached canopy Poor - weak species, volunteer tree, heavy vines, broken top Good - heavy vines on trunk, nice crown Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Sabal palmetto Fair - only vines, encroachment Fair - only vines, encroachment, slight lean Poor - Broken top, advanced decay no lateral branching, advanced decay in trunk Poor - broken canopy with significant lean, poor form Fair - vines, slight lean in canopy Fair - young palm, top encroached Fair - vines Poor - vines, significant lean, broken top Poor - balanced canopy, volunteer tree, vines Poor - weak species, broken top, significant lean, deadwood Fair - vines, thin canopy Fair - slight lean, encroachment Poor - Invasive species Poor - heavily encroached, leaning deformed canopy Poor - dead palm Fair - upright canopy, one-sided Poor - weak species, significant lean, poor structure, vines Poor - severe pencil necking of trunk, poor condition Fair - heavily encroached, vines Fair - heavily encroached, vines Poor - pencil necking at top, poor condition, missing trunk tissue Invasive species Poor - significant lean, resting on chinaberry, uprooted Poor - Invasive species Fair - heavy vines, leaning crownSabal palmetto Fair - heavy vines, leaning crown Poor - cavity 4' up trunk, pencil necking Fair - heavily encroached, vines Fair - heavily encroached, vines Species Tree Special Characteristics 1708 OVIEDO CITY CHURCH Tree #DBH T065 11" T066 12" T067 OA 15'-20' T068 OA 25'-30' T069 OA 25'-30' T070 OA 15'-20' T071 15" T072 OA 20'-25' T073 24" T074 11" T075 OA 12'-15' T076 OA 30'-35' T077 OA 10'-12' T078 OA 20'-25' T079 6" T080 9" T081 OA 25'-30' T082 7" Melia azedarachi - Chinaberry Poor - Invasive species Melia azedarachi - Chinaberry Poor - Invasive species Sabal palmetto Good - penciling necking upper trunk Liquidambar styraciflua - Sweetgum Poor - thin canopy, heavy vines Liquidambar styraciflua - Sweetgum Fair - thin canopy Sabal palmetto Good - heavy vines Sabal palmetto Fair - heavy vines up trunk to 20', pencil necking Sabal palmetto Good - heavy vines Sabal palmetto Good - light vines Sabal palmetto Poor - heavily encroached, leaning deformed canopy Sabal palmetto Poor - heavily encroached, leaning deformed canopy Celtis occidentalis - Hackberry Dead tree Sabal palmetto Poor - heavily encroached, vines Celtis occidentalis - Hackberry Poor- weak species, volunteer tree, heavy vines throughout Species Tree Special Characteristics Liquidambar styraciflua - Sweetgum Fair - young tree, balanced structure, not a good stand alone tree Liquidambar styraciflua - Sweetgum Poor - tip dieback, broken branches, canopy damage Sabal palmetto Poor - heavily encroached, leaning deformed canopy Sabal palmetto Poor - heavily encroached, leaning deformed canopy 1709 N 89°50'14" E 236.88'(C) N 89°52'46" E 237.22'(M) 24. 7 22. 3 22 . 1 24. 6 24.8 24. 8 22. 1 22. 1 24. 2 2 0 . 8 20. 6 Storm Control Structure Top Elev: 24.73' Baffle Top Elev: 24.79' Weir Top Elev: 23.62' 15" Reinforced Concrete Pipe SW Invert: 20.78' NE Invert: 19.95' West State Road 434 (Variable Width Right-of-Way) (AKA: State Road 419) 11 WET POND TOP EL. 24.0' NWL = 21.0' BOTTOM EL.= 15.0' 99 WETLAND LINE WETLAND BUFFER PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L 9 6 PO N D R E T A I N I N G W A L L POND RETAINING WALL 21 22 23 245' BERM24 23 22 NWL 21 20 19 15 R 1 5 . 0 0 ' 10 ' (T Y P . ) 5' N 0 0 ° 2 1 ' 2 1 " W 30 1 . 4 5 ' S 0 0 ° 3 4 ' 0 2 " E 28 6 . 0 0 ' N 89° 26' 17" W 123.57' 5' 5' EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK Of f s i t e w e t l a n d l i n e Gras s P a r k i n g Of f s i t e w e t l a n d l i n e N 55° 0 4 ' 6 9 " W 59.18 ' N 16° 54' 31" W 66.11' NORTHERLY R/W, S.R.434 R3. 0 0 ' G r a s s P a r k i n g Gras s P a r k i n g G r a s s P a r k i n g NOT INCLUDED PID: 04-21-31-300-015A-0000 DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. SITE PLAN SI T E P L A N C-2.0 1"=20' PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP.) FENCE (TYP.) PROPOSED 5' WIDE SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE ROUTE PID: 25-20-31-5BA-0000-019A ADDRESS: CIRCA 300 W. S.R. 434, OVIEDO, FLORIDA 32765 AREA: 35,280 SQ. FEET / 0.81 ACRES END RETAINING WALL END RETAINING WALL ASPHALT DRIVE FENCE (TYP.) OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURE 4' HIGH OPAQUE FENCE ALONG WALL 0.5' FROM FACE OF WALL 4' HIGH OPAQUE FENCE ALONG WALL 0.5' FROM FACE OF WALL 4' HIGH OPAQUE FENCE ALONG WALL 0.5' FROM FACE OF WALL 1710 Project Number: 07572702 May 20, 2022 Engineering Certificate of Authorization 3684 www.intertek.com/building Professional Service Industries, Inc. 1748 33rd Street, Orlando, FL 32839 Phone: (407) 304-5560 Pastor Brian Katauskas Fax: (407) 304-5561 Oviedo City Church 1205 City View Center, Ste. 1005 Oviedo, FL 32765 c/o Ron Thomas RE: Report Addendum Geotechnical Engineering Services Parcel 1 - Oviedo City Church Proposed Unpaved Parking Area & Stormwater Pond Oviedo, Seminole County, Florida Dear Mr. Katauskas: In response to the request of Mr. Ron Thomas for additional information related to the proposed site improvements, Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI), an Intertek company, has prepared this addendum to provide more detailed information related to groundwater levels at the site. The specific information requested is the elevation of the estimated normal seasonal high groundwater table within the project site. The site addressed herein is Parcel 1 located between the Beacon Street right of way and the Tract E Conservation Easement of Southern Oaks Phase 3. PSI was recently provided with topographic survey data for the site. The topographic survey data includes spot ground surface elevations, along with wetland line flag locations adjacent to the eastern and northern site boundaries. Based on a review of the provided survey information and the groundwater information obtained during PSI’s field exploration, we estimate that the normal seasonal high groundwater table at the site will occur at an elevation on the order of +21 feet NAVD in the northern limits of the site and +23 feet NAVD in the southern limits of the site. It should be noted that groundwater levels could exceed the noted elevations in response to heavy or prolonged rain events such as tropical weather events (i.e. hurricanes, tropical storms, etc.) that produce above normal rainfall. If you have any additional questions related to our services on this project, or if we may be of further service, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Malcolm A. Thompson, P.E. Robert A. Trompke, P.E. Project Engineer Florida Geotechnical Practice Leader Florida License No. 55456 07572702 Report Addendum (Oviedo City Church Parking Stormwater Improvements) cc - Mr. Ron Thomas 1711 Oviedo City Church Stormwater Management Report City of Winter Springs October 2025 RCE Consultants, LLC has prepared this report under the direct supervision of the undersigned with technical assistance rendered by other professional team members. This report contains the results of our analysis of the project Stormwater System and an engineering interpretation of the results. The results, with the aid of the guidelines of the St. Johns River Water Management District and the City of Winter Springs Land Development Code were used in the design of the detention pond and conveyance systems. Laurence Poliner #56974 Date Digitally signed by Thomas X Grusenmeyer DN: c=US, o=Unaffiliated, ou=A01410C0000016C8B48A0D100 00088C, cn=Thomas X Grusenmeyer Date: 2022.06.23 16:36:45 -04'00' Adobe Acrobat Reader version: 2022.001.20117 1712 Page 1 of 4 OVIEDO CITY CHURCH STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT OCTOBER 2025 1.0 DESIGN CRITERIA Design Storm Event The site has been designed to attenuate the 25 year/24 hour (8.6”), and the Mean Annual (4.5”) storm events. 1.1 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS Development of Computer Model A detailed hydrologic/hydraulic engineering analysis was performed for the existing and recommended drainage conveyance systems within the study area. This analysis utilized a computer program entitled Advanced Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing (adICPR, Version 3.1, SP 6), developed by Streamline Technologies, Inc., to simulate/predict stormwater runoff and the hydraulic responses of the conveyance system during the design storm event. The ICPR program consists of two (2) modules, the hydrologic element which computes the runoff hydrographs and the hydraulic portion which flood routes the hydrographs through various drainage conveyance systems in order to predict the peak flood stages and/or hydraulic gradeline (HGL) elevations based on tailwater conditions, friction and head (minor) losses. The ICPR input data required for this drainage investigation includes the following: Hydrograph Module • Drainage Area (acres) • Weighted Runoff Curve Number (CN) • Time of Concentration (minutes) • Peak Rate Factor (K) • Rainfall Distribution • Rainfall Duration (hrs) • Rainfall Depth (inches) • Tailwater (time-stage) 1713 OVIDEO CITY CHURCH STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Hydraulics Module • Stage (ft, NAVD) / Storage (acres) Relationships • Stage (ft, NAVD) / Time (hrs) Relationships (i.e., tailwater conditions) • Pipe Length (feet) and Invert Elevations (feet, NAVD) • Pipe Dimensions (inch x inch) • Entrance, Exit and/or minor loss coefficients ("k") • Manning’s Roughness Coefficient ("n") The Peak Rate Factor (k) is used to represent the effect of watershed storage on hydrograph shape. High Peak Rate values represent little to no storage characterized by steep slopes and low Peak Rate values represent watersheds with significant ponding effects due to very little to no slope and areas with significant storage (refer to Table 1) Although the Peak Rate Factor is site specific depending on the previously mentioned factor along with soil characteristics and landscape, a Peak Rate Factor of 323 shall be incorporated throughout this analysis. The following table illustrates in greater detail, the various Peak Rate Factors that are available. RECOMMENDED K’ FOR VARIED SITE CONDITIONS SITE CONDITIONS K’ Represents watersheds with very mild slopes, recommended by SCS for watersheds with average slope of 0.5% or less. Significant surface storage throughout the watershed. 256-284 Intermediate peak rate factor representing watersheds with moderate surface storage in some locations due to depressional areas, mild slopes and/or lack of existing drainage features. 323-384 Standard peak rate factor developed for watersheds with little or no storage. Represents watersheds with moderate to steep slopes and/or significant drainage works 484 1714 OVIDEO CITY CHURCH STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT 1.4 MODELING PARAMETERS Curve Numbers Various curve numbers were assigned to areas based upon existing land use conditions and soil types. These were based on the delineated values within the Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release 55, Second Edition (June 1986). These values were then used to compute a weighted runoff curve number, depending on the breakdown of land use and soils for each drainage basin contributing runoff to the existing drainage system. Refer to Section 3.1 and Section 4.1 of this report for calculations associated with the detailed basin parameters. Time of Concentration Time of concentration for each basin evaluated was determined using the SCS procedures described in Chapter 3 of Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release 55, Second Edition (June 1986), Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Time of concentration is separated into travel time components. Travel time is defined as the time for runoff to travel from the hydraulically most distant point of a watershed to a point where there is a change in flow regime (i.e., overland flow to shallow concentrated flow). Time of concentration is the summation of all the travel times for consecutive components of a drainage system. Time of concentration is generally separated into three distinct components; (1) overland flow; (2) shallow concentrated flow; and (3) open channel, gutter or culvert flow. Each component consists of a travel time (Tt) that is summed up for consecutive components to compute time of concentration (Tc). Most time of concentration calculations indicated a time of less than 10 minutes, therefore 10 minutes was utilized for all basins unless otherwise noted. 1.5 HYDRAULIC MODELING Drainage System Connectivity As mentioned previously, adICR was used to simulate the drainage response of the existing and proposed conveyance systems. These models required a spatial network consisting of nodes and reaches to define the drainage system connectivity. Nodes (e.g., upstream and downstream elements of culverts and ditches, inlets, manholes, and tailwater) are used to identify specific locations along a drainage system for which peak flood stages or Hydraulic Gradeline (HGL) elevations are to be computed. Reaches consist of various conveyance systems (e.g., cross culverts, storm sewer pipes, ditches, etc.) that connect nodes. TABLE 1 1715 OVIEDO CITY CHURCH STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM POND STAGES TOP OF POND EL. 24.00 Condition Mean Annual Peak Stage (ft-NGVD) 25-Year/6 Hour Storm Event Peak Stage (ft-NGVD) 25-Year/24-Hour Storm Event Peak Stage (ft-NGVD) Pond 1 21.78 22.73 22.91 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM POND FLOWS Condition Mean Annual Peak Discharge (cfs) 25-Year/24-Hour Storm Event Peak Discharge (cfs) 100-Year/24-Hour Storm Event Peak Discharge (cfs) Pre-Condition 0.86 2.39 3.08 Post-Condition 0.15 1.23 3.08 1716 N 89°50'14" E 236.88'(C) N 89°52'46" E 237.22'(M) 24 . 7 22.3 22. 1 24 . 6 24.8 24.8 22.122.1 24.2 2 0 . 8 20.6 Storm Control Structure Top Elev: 24.73' Baffle Top Elev: 24.79' Weir Top Elev: 23.62' 15" Reinforced Concrete Pipe SW Invert: 20.78' NE Invert: 19.95' West State Road 434 (Variable Width Right-of-Way) (AKA: State Road 419) WETLAND LINE WETLAND BUFFER C-3.0 1"=20' DRAWN:SK CHECKED: - RCE CONSULTANTS, LLC 617 ARVERN DRIVE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL. 32701 PHONE NO. 407-452-8633 LARRY@RCECONSULTANTS.NET SHEET: SCALE: PROJECT #: BY : RE V I S I O N / I S S U E D A T E : DA T E : NO : OV I E D O C I T Y C H U R C H OV I E D O , F L O R I D A Engineer of Record Laurence Poliner #56974 · This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Laurence Poliner, P.E., on the date delineated using a digital signature. · Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the signature must be verified on any electronic copy. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN GR A D I N G A N D D R A I N A G E P L A N Drainage Basin Direction of Flow Drainage Basin Limits Drainage Node 1717 PRE-CONDITION CURVE NUMBER CALCULATIONS Project:OVIEDO CHURCH PARKING ADDITION By:LMP Basin Name: Basin 1 Checked:DM Cover Description CN Product Hydrologic (Cover type, treatment, and hydrologic Table Pervious Area Impervious Area Total Area of Group condition; percent impervious)#B-7 (acres)(acres)(acres)CN X Area D 10 (Basinger, Samsula, Hantoon), 20 (Myakka & EauGallie 79 0.71 0.00 0.71 56 Woods Fair Totals =0.71 56.09 Composite CN =79 Impervious area CN = 98 FLOW TYPE SHEET FLOW 1. Surface Description Undeveloped 2. Manning's Roughness Coefficient 0.400 3. Flow Length 280 (ft.) 4. 2-Year, 24-hour Rainfall 4.50 (in.) 5. Calculated Land Slope 0.015 (ft./ft.) 5a. Land Elevation of Flow Path (Upper End)25.7 (ft. NGVD) 5b. Land Elevation of Flow Path (Lower End)21.6 (ft. NGVD) 6. Computed Travel Time 0.78 (hr.)46.75 (min.) Time of Concentration 1718 Pre Input Data ========================================================================================== ==== Basins ============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: Basin1 Node: Taiil Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: Uh323 Peaking Factor: 323.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 47.00 Area(ac): 1.000 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 79.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ========================================================================================== ==== Nodes =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: Tail Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 22.200 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 22.200 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 22.200 12.00 22.200 24.00 22.200 ========================================================================================== ==== Hydrology Simulations =============================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 100 Year Pre Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\100 Yr Pre.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Scsiii Rainfall Amount(in): 10.50 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 5.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 25 Year Pre Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\25 Year Pre.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Scsiii Rainfall Amount(in): 8.60 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 5.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: MA Pre Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\Mean Annual Pre.R32 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 1 of 3 1719 Pre Input Data Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Scsiii Rainfall Amount(in): 4.30 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 5.00 ========================================================================================== ==== Routing Simulations ================================================================= ========================================================================================== Name: 100 Year Hydrology Sim: 100 Year Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\100 Year Pre.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 150.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 999.000 15.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 25 Year Post Hydrology Sim: 25 Year Post Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\25 Year Pre.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 150.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 999.000 15.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: MA Hydrology Sim: MA Post Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\Mean Annual Pre.I32 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 2 of 3 1720 Pre Basin Data Basin Name: Basin1 Group Name: BASE Simulation: 100 Year Pre Node Name: Taiil Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh323 Peaking Fator: 323.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 6.27 Comp Time Inc (min): 5.00 Rainfall File: Scsiii Rainfall Amount (in): 10.500 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 47.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 1.000 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.001 Curve Number: 79.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.58 Flow Max (cfs): 3.08 Runoff Volume (in): 7.873 Runoff Volume (ft3): 28579 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Basin Name: Basin1 Group Name: BASE Simulation: 25 Year Pre Node Name: Taiil Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh323 Peaking Fator: 323.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 6.27 Comp Time Inc (min): 5.00 Rainfall File: Scsiii Rainfall Amount (in): 8.600 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 47.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 1.000 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.001 Curve Number: 79.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.58 Flow Max (cfs): 2.39 Runoff Volume (in): 6.071 Runoff Volume (ft3): 22039 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Basin Name: Basin1 Group Name: BASE Simulation: MA Pre Node Name: Taiil Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh323 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 1 of 2 1721 Pre Basin Data Peaking Fator: 323.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 6.27 Comp Time Inc (min): 5.00 Rainfall File: Scsiii Rainfall Amount (in): 4.300 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 47.00 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 1.000 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.001 Curve Number: 79.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.58 Flow Max (cfs): 0.86 Runoff Volume (in): 2.211 Runoff Volume (ft3): 8024 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 2 of 2 1722 Pre Input Data Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 150.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 999.000 15.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 3 of 3 1723 Oviedo Church Post Condition Basin Name: Post Condition Basin 1 Cover Description Impervius Pervious Product Hydrologic (Cover type, treatment, and hydrologic CN CN of Group condition; percent impervious)(acres)(acres)(acres)CN X Area D Developed Area 98 79 0.10 0.61 0.71 58 Totals =0.10 0.61 0.71 57.99 Composite CN =82 Pond Elevation Area Area Volume Cumulative Volume Cumulative Volume (ft-NGVD)(ft2)(ac)(ft3)(ft3)(ac-ft)Notes 15 5199 0.12 0 0 0.00 17 5656 0.13 10855 10855 0.25 21 6551 0.15 24414 35269 0.81 Pool El. 22 7617 0.17 7084 7084 0.16 23 8098 0.19 7858 14942 0.34 24 8642 0.20 8370 16228 0.37 Permanent Pool Calculations Site Impervious area 0.10 ac Site Pervious area 0.61 ac Total Area 0.71 ac Runoff Coefficient "C"Impervious Runoff Coefficient 0.95 Pervious Runoff Coefficient 0.25 Composite Runoff Coefficient 0.35 Vp = A x c x P (rainfall) x Rt(Residence Time)/Ws (Wet season)Rt* = 21 days *(14 plus additional 50% for no littoral zone)Ws = 153 days P = 32 inches Therefore volume required 0.09 ac-ft Volume Provided 0.81 ac-ft Mean Depth (must be between 2 and 8 feet) Volume of pond / Area at control elevation 5.38 Water quality will be based on the entire site : 2.5" over the impervious 0.02 ac-ft or 1" over the entire site 0.06 ac-ft Impervious Area Pervious Area Total Area 1724 Post Basin Data ========================================================================================== ==== Basins ============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: Basin1 Node: Pond Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Unit Hydrograph: Uh323 Peaking Factor: 323.0 Rainfall File: Storm Duration(hrs): 0.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 0.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 1.000 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 82.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ========================================================================================== ==== Nodes =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: Pond Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 21.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 24.000 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 21.000 0.1500 24.000 0.2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Tail Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.300 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 19.300 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 19.300 12.00 19.300 24.00 19.300 ========================================================================================== ==== Cross Sections ====================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: x-section Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 24.000 0.240000 6.000 22.500 0.240000 8.000 22.500 0.240000 14.000 24.000 0.240000 ========================================================================================== ==== Pipes =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 1 of 4 1725 Post Basin Data Name: Drawdown From Node: Pond Length(ft): 20.00 Group: BASE To Node: Tail Count: 1 Friction Equation: Automatic UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Most Restrictive Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 3.00 3.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.00 Rise(in): 3.00 3.00 Exit Loss Coef: 1.00 Invert(ft): 21.000 20.900 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.012000 0.012000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ========================================================================================== ==== Weirs =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: Overflow From Node: Pond Group: BASE To Node: Tail Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Irregular XSec: X-section Invert(ft): 22.500 Control Elevation(ft): 22.500 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 9999.00 TABLE Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.200 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 ========================================================================================== ==== Hydrology Simulations =============================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: 100 Year Post Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\100 Yr Post.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Scsiii Rainfall Amount(in): 10.50 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 5.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 25 Year Post Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\25 Year Post.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 2 of 4 1726 Post Basin Data Rainfall File: Scsiii Rainfall Amount(in): 8.60 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 5.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: MA Post Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\Mean Annual Post.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Scsiii Rainfall Amount(in): 4.30 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 5.00 ========================================================================================== ==== Routing Simulations ================================================================= ========================================================================================== Name: 100 Year Hydrology Sim: 100 Year Post Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\100 Year Pre.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 150.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 999.000 15.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 25 Year Post Hydrology Sim: 25 Year Post Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\25 Year Pre.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 150.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 999.000 15.000 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 3 of 4 1727 Post Basin Data Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: MA Hydrology Sim: MA Post Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\Mean Annual Pre.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 150.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 999.000 15.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 4 of 4 1728 Recovery Data ========================================================================================== ==== Nodes =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: Pond Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 22.500 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 24.000 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 21.000 0.1500 24.000 0.2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Tail Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 19.300 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 19.300 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 19.300 12.00 19.300 24.00 19.300 ========================================================================================== ==== Cross Sections ====================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: x-section Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N --------------- --------------- --------------- 0.000 24.000 0.240000 8.000 22.000 0.240000 13.000 22.000 0.240000 21.000 24.000 0.240000 ========================================================================================== ==== Pipes =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: Drawdown From Node: Pond Length(ft): 20.00 Group: BASE To Node: Tail Count: 1 Friction Equation: Automatic UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Most Restrictive Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 3.00 3.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.00 Rise(in): 3.00 3.00 Exit Loss Coef: 1.00 Invert(ft): 21.000 20.900 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.012000 0.012000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 1 of 2 1729 Post Basin Data Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Max Name Simulation Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Outflow ft ft ft ft2 cfs cfs Pond 100 Year 22.91 24.00 0.0050 7924 6.14 3.08 Pond 25 Year Post 22.73 24.00 0.0050 7793 4.86 1.23 Pond MA 21.78 24.00 0.0050 7099 1.95 0.15 Tail 100 Year 19.30 19.30 0.0000 0 3.08 0.00 Tail 25 Year Post 19.30 19.30 0.0000 0 1.23 0.00 Tail MA 19.30 19.30 0.0000 0 0.15 0.00 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 1 of 1 1730 Recovery Data Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ========================================================================================== ==== Weirs =============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: Overflow From Node: Pond Group: BASE To Node: Tail Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Irregular XSec: X-section Invert(ft): 22.500 Control Elevation(ft): 22.500 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 9999.00 TABLE Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.200 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 ========================================================================================== ==== Routing Simulations ================================================================= ========================================================================================== Name: Recovery Hydrology Sim: Filename: C:\Users\User\Dropbox\Wild Design Services\Oviedo City Church\Calculations\Primary Drainage\Recovery.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 150.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 999.000 15.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 2 of 2 1731 Recovery Data Simulation Node Group Time Stage Warning Surface Total Total Total Total Stage Area Inflow Outflow Vol In Vol Out hrs ft ft ft2 cfs cfs af af Recovery Pond BASE 0.00 22.50 24.00 7623 0.00 0.22 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 0.26 22.47 24.00 7603 0.00 0.22 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 0.50 22.45 24.00 7585 0.00 0.22 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 0.77 22.42 24.00 7565 0.00 0.22 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 1.02 22.39 24.00 7547 0.00 0.21 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 1.27 22.37 24.00 7528 0.00 0.21 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 1.52 22.34 24.00 7510 0.00 0.21 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 1.77 22.32 24.00 7491 0.00 0.21 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 2.02 22.29 24.00 7473 0.00 0.21 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 2.27 22.27 24.00 7455 0.00 0.20 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 2.52 22.24 24.00 7438 0.00 0.20 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 2.77 22.22 24.00 7420 0.00 0.20 0.0 0.0 Recovery Pond BASE 3.02 22.20 24.00 7403 0.00 0.20 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 3.27 22.17 24.00 7385 0.00 0.20 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 3.52 22.15 24.00 7368 0.00 0.19 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 3.77 22.12 24.00 7351 0.00 0.19 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 4.02 22.10 24.00 7334 0.00 0.19 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 4.27 22.08 24.00 7317 0.00 0.19 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 4.52 22.06 24.00 7301 0.00 0.18 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 4.77 22.03 24.00 7285 0.00 0.18 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 5.02 22.01 24.00 7268 0.00 0.18 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 5.27 21.99 24.00 7252 0.00 0.18 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 5.52 21.97 24.00 7237 0.00 0.17 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 5.77 21.95 24.00 7221 0.00 0.17 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 6.02 21.92 24.00 7205 0.00 0.17 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 6.27 21.90 24.00 7190 0.00 0.17 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 6.52 21.88 24.00 7175 0.00 0.17 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 6.77 21.86 24.00 7160 0.00 0.16 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 7.02 21.84 24.00 7145 0.00 0.16 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 7.27 21.82 24.00 7131 0.00 0.16 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 7.52 21.80 24.00 7116 0.00 0.16 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 7.77 21.78 24.00 7102 0.00 0.15 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 8.02 21.76 24.00 7088 0.00 0.15 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 8.27 21.74 24.00 7075 0.00 0.15 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 8.52 21.73 24.00 7061 0.00 0.15 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 8.77 21.71 24.00 7048 0.00 0.14 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 9.02 21.69 24.00 7034 0.00 0.14 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 9.27 21.67 24.00 7022 0.00 0.14 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 9.52 21.65 24.00 7009 0.00 0.14 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 9.77 21.64 24.00 6996 0.00 0.13 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 10.02 21.62 24.00 6984 0.00 0.13 0.0 0.1 Recovery Pond BASE 10.27 21.60 24.00 6972 0.00 0.13 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 10.52 21.59 24.00 6960 0.00 0.12 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 10.77 21.57 24.00 6949 0.00 0.12 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 11.02 21.55 24.00 6937 0.00 0.12 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 11.27 21.54 24.00 6926 0.00 0.12 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 11.52 21.52 24.00 6915 0.00 0.11 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 11.77 21.51 24.00 6905 0.00 0.11 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 12.02 21.50 24.00 6894 0.00 0.11 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 12.27 21.48 24.00 6884 0.00 0.11 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 12.52 21.47 24.00 6874 0.00 0.10 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 12.77 21.45 24.00 6865 0.00 0.10 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 13.02 21.44 24.00 6855 0.00 0.10 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 13.27 21.43 24.00 6846 0.00 0.10 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 13.52 21.42 24.00 6837 0.00 0.09 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 13.77 21.40 24.00 6828 0.00 0.09 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 14.02 21.39 24.00 6820 0.00 0.09 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 14.27 21.38 24.00 6811 0.00 0.09 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 14.52 21.37 24.00 6803 0.00 0.08 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 14.77 21.36 24.00 6795 0.00 0.08 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 15.02 21.35 24.00 6787 0.00 0.08 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 15.27 21.34 24.00 6780 0.00 0.08 0.0 0.2 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 1 of 10 1732 Recovery Data Simulation Node Group Time Stage Warning Surface Total Total Total Total Stage Area Inflow Outflow Vol In Vol Out hrs ft ft ft2 cfs cfs af af Recovery Pond BASE 15.52 21.33 24.00 6773 0.00 0.07 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 15.77 21.32 24.00 6766 0.00 0.07 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 16.02 21.31 24.00 6759 0.00 0.07 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 16.27 21.30 24.00 6752 0.00 0.07 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 16.52 21.29 24.00 6745 0.00 0.07 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 16.77 21.28 24.00 6739 0.00 0.07 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 17.02 21.27 24.00 6733 0.00 0.06 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 17.27 21.26 24.00 6727 0.00 0.06 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 17.52 21.26 24.00 6721 0.00 0.06 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 17.77 21.25 24.00 6715 0.00 0.06 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 18.02 21.24 24.00 6710 0.00 0.06 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 18.27 21.23 24.00 6704 0.00 0.06 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 18.52 21.22 24.00 6699 0.00 0.06 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 18.77 21.22 24.00 6694 0.00 0.05 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 19.02 21.21 24.00 6689 0.00 0.05 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 19.27 21.20 24.00 6684 0.00 0.05 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 19.52 21.20 24.00 6679 0.00 0.05 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 19.77 21.19 24.00 6675 0.00 0.05 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 20.02 21.18 24.00 6670 0.00 0.04 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 20.27 21.18 24.00 6666 0.00 0.04 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 20.52 21.17 24.00 6662 0.00 0.04 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 20.77 21.17 24.00 6658 0.00 0.04 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 21.02 21.16 24.00 6655 0.00 0.04 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 21.27 21.16 24.00 6651 0.00 0.03 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 21.52 21.15 24.00 6648 0.00 0.03 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 21.77 21.15 24.00 6645 0.00 0.03 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 22.02 21.14 24.00 6642 0.00 0.03 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 22.27 21.14 24.00 6639 0.00 0.03 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 22.52 21.14 24.00 6636 0.00 0.03 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 22.77 21.13 24.00 6633 0.00 0.03 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 23.02 21.13 24.00 6631 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 23.27 21.13 24.00 6628 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 23.52 21.12 24.00 6626 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 23.77 21.12 24.00 6624 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 24.02 21.12 24.00 6622 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 24.27 21.11 24.00 6620 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 24.52 21.11 24.00 6618 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 24.77 21.11 24.00 6616 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 25.02 21.11 24.00 6614 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 25.27 21.10 24.00 6612 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 25.52 21.10 24.00 6611 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 25.77 21.10 24.00 6609 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 26.02 21.10 24.00 6608 0.00 0.02 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 26.27 21.10 24.00 6606 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 26.52 21.09 24.00 6605 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 26.77 21.09 24.00 6603 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 27.02 21.09 24.00 6602 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 27.27 21.09 24.00 6601 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 27.52 21.09 24.00 6600 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 27.77 21.09 24.00 6598 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 28.02 21.08 24.00 6597 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 28.27 21.08 24.00 6596 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 28.52 21.08 24.00 6595 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 28.77 21.08 24.00 6594 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 29.02 21.08 24.00 6593 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 29.27 21.08 24.00 6592 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 29.52 21.08 24.00 6591 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 29.77 21.07 24.00 6590 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 30.02 21.07 24.00 6589 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 30.27 21.07 24.00 6588 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 30.52 21.07 24.00 6588 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 30.77 21.07 24.00 6587 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 2 of 10 1733 Recovery Data Simulation Node Group Time Stage Warning Surface Total Total Total Total Stage Area Inflow Outflow Vol In Vol Out hrs ft ft ft2 cfs cfs af af Recovery Pond BASE 31.02 21.07 24.00 6586 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 31.27 21.07 24.00 6585 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 31.52 21.07 24.00 6584 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 31.77 21.07 24.00 6584 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 32.02 21.06 24.00 6583 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 32.27 21.06 24.00 6582 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 32.52 21.06 24.00 6582 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 32.77 21.06 24.00 6581 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 33.02 21.06 24.00 6580 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 33.27 21.06 24.00 6580 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 33.52 21.06 24.00 6579 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 33.77 21.06 24.00 6579 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 34.02 21.06 24.00 6578 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 34.27 21.06 24.00 6577 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 34.52 21.06 24.00 6577 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 34.77 21.06 24.00 6576 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 35.02 21.05 24.00 6576 0.00 0.01 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 35.27 21.05 24.00 6575 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 35.52 21.05 24.00 6575 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 35.77 21.05 24.00 6574 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 36.02 21.05 24.00 6574 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 36.27 21.05 24.00 6573 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 36.52 21.05 24.00 6573 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 36.77 21.05 24.00 6573 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 37.02 21.05 24.00 6572 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 37.27 21.05 24.00 6572 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 37.52 21.05 24.00 6571 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 37.77 21.05 24.00 6571 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 38.02 21.05 24.00 6570 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 38.27 21.05 24.00 6570 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 38.52 21.05 24.00 6570 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 38.77 21.05 24.00 6569 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 39.02 21.05 24.00 6569 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 39.27 21.05 24.00 6569 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 39.52 21.04 24.00 6568 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 39.77 21.04 24.00 6568 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 40.02 21.04 24.00 6568 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 40.27 21.04 24.00 6567 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 40.52 21.04 24.00 6567 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 40.77 21.04 24.00 6567 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 41.02 21.04 24.00 6566 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 41.27 21.04 24.00 6566 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 41.52 21.04 24.00 6566 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 41.77 21.04 24.00 6565 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 42.02 21.04 24.00 6565 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 42.27 21.04 24.00 6565 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 42.52 21.04 24.00 6565 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 42.77 21.04 24.00 6564 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 43.02 21.04 24.00 6564 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 43.27 21.04 24.00 6564 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 43.52 21.04 24.00 6564 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 43.77 21.04 24.00 6563 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 44.02 21.04 24.00 6563 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 44.27 21.04 24.00 6563 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 44.52 21.04 24.00 6563 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 44.77 21.04 24.00 6562 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 45.02 21.04 24.00 6562 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 45.27 21.04 24.00 6562 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 45.52 21.04 24.00 6562 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 45.77 21.04 24.00 6561 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 46.02 21.04 24.00 6561 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 46.27 21.03 24.00 6561 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 3 of 10 1734 Recovery Data Simulation Node Group Time Stage Warning Surface Total Total Total Total Stage Area Inflow Outflow Vol In Vol Out hrs ft ft ft2 cfs cfs af af Recovery Pond BASE 46.52 21.03 24.00 6561 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 46.77 21.03 24.00 6560 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 47.02 21.03 24.00 6560 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 47.27 21.03 24.00 6560 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 47.52 21.03 24.00 6560 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 47.77 21.03 24.00 6560 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 48.02 21.03 24.00 6559 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 48.27 21.03 24.00 6559 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 48.52 21.03 24.00 6559 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 48.77 21.03 24.00 6559 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 49.02 21.03 24.00 6559 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 49.27 21.03 24.00 6559 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 49.52 21.03 24.00 6558 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 49.77 21.03 24.00 6558 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 50.02 21.03 24.00 6558 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 50.27 21.03 24.00 6558 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 50.52 21.03 24.00 6558 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 50.77 21.03 24.00 6558 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 51.02 21.03 24.00 6557 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 51.27 21.03 24.00 6557 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 51.52 21.03 24.00 6557 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 51.77 21.03 24.00 6557 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 52.02 21.03 24.00 6557 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 52.27 21.03 24.00 6557 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 52.52 21.03 24.00 6556 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 52.77 21.03 24.00 6556 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 53.02 21.03 24.00 6556 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 53.27 21.03 24.00 6556 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 53.52 21.03 24.00 6556 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 53.77 21.03 24.00 6556 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 54.02 21.03 24.00 6556 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 54.27 21.03 24.00 6555 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 54.52 21.03 24.00 6555 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 54.77 21.03 24.00 6555 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 55.02 21.03 24.00 6555 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 55.27 21.03 24.00 6555 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 55.52 21.03 24.00 6555 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 55.77 21.03 24.00 6555 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 56.02 21.03 24.00 6554 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 56.27 21.03 24.00 6554 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 56.52 21.03 24.00 6554 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 56.77 21.03 24.00 6554 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 57.02 21.03 24.00 6554 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 57.27 21.03 24.00 6554 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 57.52 21.03 24.00 6554 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 57.77 21.03 24.00 6554 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 58.02 21.02 24.00 6554 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 58.27 21.02 24.00 6553 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 58.52 21.02 24.00 6553 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 58.77 21.02 24.00 6553 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 59.02 21.02 24.00 6553 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 59.27 21.02 24.00 6553 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 59.52 21.02 24.00 6553 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 59.77 21.02 24.00 6553 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 60.02 21.02 24.00 6553 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 60.27 21.02 24.00 6553 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 60.52 21.02 24.00 6552 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 60.77 21.02 24.00 6552 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 61.02 21.02 24.00 6552 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 61.27 21.02 24.00 6552 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 61.52 21.02 24.00 6552 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 61.77 21.02 24.00 6552 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 4 of 10 1735 Recovery Data Simulation Node Group Time Stage Warning Surface Total Total Total Total Stage Area Inflow Outflow Vol In Vol Out hrs ft ft ft2 cfs cfs af af Recovery Pond BASE 62.02 21.02 24.00 6552 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 62.27 21.02 24.00 6552 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 62.52 21.02 24.00 6552 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 62.77 21.02 24.00 6552 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 63.02 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 63.27 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 63.52 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 63.77 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 64.02 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 64.27 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 64.52 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 64.77 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 65.02 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 65.27 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 65.52 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 65.77 21.02 24.00 6551 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 66.02 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 66.27 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 66.52 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 66.77 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 67.02 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 67.27 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 67.52 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 67.77 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 68.02 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 68.27 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 68.52 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 68.77 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 69.02 21.02 24.00 6550 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 69.27 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 69.52 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 69.77 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 70.02 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 70.27 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 70.52 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 70.77 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 71.02 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 71.27 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 71.52 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 71.77 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 72.02 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 72.27 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 72.52 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 72.77 21.02 24.00 6549 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 73.02 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 73.27 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 73.52 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 73.77 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 74.02 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 74.27 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 74.52 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 74.77 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 75.02 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 75.27 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 75.52 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 75.77 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 76.02 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 76.27 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 76.52 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 76.77 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 77.02 21.02 24.00 6548 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 77.27 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 5 of 10 1736 Recovery Data Simulation Node Group Time Stage Warning Surface Total Total Total Total Stage Area Inflow Outflow Vol In Vol Out hrs ft ft ft2 cfs cfs af af Recovery Pond BASE 77.52 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 77.77 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 78.02 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 78.27 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 78.52 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 78.77 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 79.02 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 79.27 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 79.52 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 79.77 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 80.02 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 80.27 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 80.52 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 80.77 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 81.02 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 81.27 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 81.52 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 81.77 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 82.02 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 82.27 21.02 24.00 6547 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 82.52 21.02 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 82.77 21.02 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 83.02 21.02 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 83.27 21.02 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 83.52 21.02 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 83.77 21.02 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 84.02 21.02 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 84.27 21.02 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 84.52 21.02 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 84.77 21.02 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 85.02 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 85.27 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 85.52 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 85.77 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 86.02 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 86.27 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 86.52 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 86.77 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 87.02 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 87.27 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 87.52 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 87.77 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 88.02 21.01 24.00 6546 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 88.27 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 88.52 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 88.77 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 89.02 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 89.27 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 89.52 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 89.77 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 90.02 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 90.27 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 90.52 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 90.77 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 91.02 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 91.27 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 91.52 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 91.77 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 92.02 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 92.27 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 92.52 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 92.77 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 6 of 10 1737 Recovery Data Simulation Node Group Time Stage Warning Surface Total Total Total Total Stage Area Inflow Outflow Vol In Vol Out hrs ft ft ft2 cfs cfs af af Recovery Pond BASE 93.02 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 93.27 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 93.52 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 93.77 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 94.02 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 94.27 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 94.52 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 94.77 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 95.02 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 95.27 21.01 24.00 6545 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 95.52 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 95.77 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 96.02 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 96.27 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 96.52 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 96.77 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 97.02 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 97.27 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 97.52 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 97.77 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 98.02 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 98.27 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 98.52 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 98.77 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 99.02 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 99.27 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 99.52 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 99.77 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 100.02 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 100.27 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 100.52 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 100.77 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 101.02 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 101.27 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 101.52 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 101.77 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 102.02 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 102.27 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 102.52 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 102.77 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 103.02 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 103.27 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 103.52 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 103.77 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 104.02 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 104.27 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 104.52 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 104.77 21.01 24.00 6544 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 105.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 105.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 105.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 105.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 106.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 106.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 106.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 106.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 107.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 107.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 107.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 107.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 108.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 108.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 7 of 10 1738 Recovery Data Simulation Node Group Time Stage Warning Surface Total Total Total Total Stage Area Inflow Outflow Vol In Vol Out hrs ft ft ft2 cfs cfs af af Recovery Pond BASE 108.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 108.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 109.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 109.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 109.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 109.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 110.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 110.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 110.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 110.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 111.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 111.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 111.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 111.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 112.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 112.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 112.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 112.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 113.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 113.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 113.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 113.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 114.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 114.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 114.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 114.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 115.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 115.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 115.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 115.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 116.02 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 116.27 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 116.52 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 116.77 21.01 24.00 6543 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 117.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 117.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 117.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 117.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 118.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 118.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 118.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 118.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 119.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 119.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 119.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 119.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 120.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 120.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 120.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 120.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 121.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 121.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 121.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 121.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 122.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 122.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 122.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 122.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 123.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 123.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 123.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 123.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 8 of 10 1739 Recovery Data Simulation Node Group Time Stage Warning Surface Total Total Total Total Stage Area Inflow Outflow Vol In Vol Out hrs ft ft ft2 cfs cfs af af Recovery Pond BASE 124.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 124.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 124.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 124.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 125.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 125.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 125.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 125.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 126.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 126.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 126.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 126.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 127.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 127.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 127.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 127.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 128.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 128.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 128.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 128.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 129.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 129.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 129.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 129.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 130.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 130.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 130.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 130.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 131.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 131.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 131.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 131.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 132.02 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 132.27 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 132.52 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 132.77 21.01 24.00 6542 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 133.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 133.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 133.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 133.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 134.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 134.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 134.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 134.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 135.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 135.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 135.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 135.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 136.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 136.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 136.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 136.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 137.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 137.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 137.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 137.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 138.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 138.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 138.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 138.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 139.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 139.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 9 of 10 1740 Recovery Data Simulation Node Group Time Stage Warning Surface Total Total Total Total Stage Area Inflow Outflow Vol In Vol Out hrs ft ft ft2 cfs cfs af af Recovery Pond BASE 139.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 139.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 140.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 140.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 140.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 140.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 141.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 141.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 141.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 141.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 142.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 142.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 142.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 142.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 143.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 143.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 143.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 143.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 144.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 144.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 144.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 144.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 145.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 145.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 145.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 145.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 146.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 146.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 146.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 146.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 147.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 147.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 147.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 147.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 148.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 148.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 148.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 148.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 149.02 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 149.27 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 149.52 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 149.77 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Recovery Pond BASE 150.01 21.01 24.00 6541 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.Page 10 of 10 1741 United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Seminole County, FloridaNatural Resources Conservation Service October 9, 20251742 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 31 7 3 7 0 0 31 7 3 7 1 0 31 7 3 7 2 0 31 7 3 7 3 0 31 7 3 7 4 0 31 7 3 7 5 0 31 7 3 7 6 0 31 7 3 7 7 0 31 7 3 7 8 0 31 7 3 7 9 0 31 7 3 8 0 0 31 7 3 8 1 0 31 7 3 8 2 0 31 7 3 8 3 0 31 7 3 8 4 0 31 7 3 7 0 0 31 7 3 7 1 0 31 7 3 7 2 0 31 7 3 7 3 0 31 7 3 7 4 0 31 7 3 7 5 0 31 7 3 7 6 0 31 7 3 7 7 0 31 7 3 7 8 0 31 7 3 7 9 0 31 7 3 8 0 0 31 7 3 8 1 0 31 7 3 8 2 0 31 7 3 8 3 0 31 7 3 8 4 0 479190 479200 479210 479220 479230 479240 479250 479260 479270 479280 479290 479190 479200 479210 479220 479230 479240 479250 479260 479270 479280 479290 28° 41' 29'' N 81 ° 1 2 ' 4 7 ' ' W 28° 41' 29'' N 81 ° 1 2 ' 4 3 ' ' W 28° 41' 25'' N 81 ° 1 2 ' 4 7 ' ' W 28° 41' 25'' N 81 ° 1 2 ' 4 3 ' ' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 03060 120 180 Feet 01020 40 60 Meters Map Scale: 1:706 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 1743 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Seminole County, Florida Survey Area Data: Version 24, Aug 28, 2025 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 1, 2023—Sep 1, 2023 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 1744 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 10 Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional 1.2 50.5% 20 Myakka and EauGallie fine sands 1.2 49.5% Totals for Area of Interest 2.4 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, Custom Soil Resource Report 11 1745 onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 12 1746 Seminole County, Florida 10—Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 1lmpt Elevation: 0 to 150 feet Mean annual precipitation: 46 to 54 inches Mean annual air temperature: 68 to 75 degrees F Frost-free period: 332 to 362 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Basinger and similar soils:58 percent Samsula and similar soils:15 percent Hontoon and similar soils:15 percent Minor components:12 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Basinger Setting Landform:Depressions on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Parent material:Sandy marine deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: mucky fine sand Eg - 6 to 18 inches: fine sand Bh/Eg - 18 to 35 inches: fine sand Cg - 35 to 80 inches: fine sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Very poorly drained Runoff class: Negligible Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 0 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:Frequent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum:4.0 Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D Ecological site: R155XY070FL - Sandy Freshwater Isolated Marshes and Swamps Custom Soil Resource Report 13 1747 Forage suitability group: Sandy soils on stream terraces, flood plains, or in depressions (G155XB145FL) Other vegetative classification: Freshwater Marshes and Ponds (R155XY010FL), Sandy soils on stream terraces, flood plains, or in depressions (G155XB145FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Description of Samsula Setting Landform:Depressions on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Parent material:Herbaceous organic material over sandy marine deposits Typical profile Oa - 0 to 30 inches: muck Cg - 30 to 80 inches: fine sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Very poorly drained Runoff class: Negligible Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 0 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:Frequent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum:4.0 Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D Ecological site: R155XY100FL - Organic Freshwater Isolated Marshes and Swamps Forage suitability group: Organic soils in depressions and on flood plains (G155XB645FL) Other vegetative classification: Freshwater Marshes and Ponds (R155XY010FL), Organic soils in depressions and on flood plains (G155XB645FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Description of Hontoon Setting Landform:Depressions on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Parent material:Herbaceous organic material Typical profile Oa - 0 to 80 inches: muck Custom Soil Resource Report 14 1748 Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Very poorly drained Runoff class: Negligible Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 0 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:Frequent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum:4.0 Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very high (about 23.9 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D Ecological site: R155XY100FL - Organic Freshwater Isolated Marshes and Swamps Forage suitability group: Organic soils in depressions and on flood plains (G155XB645FL) Other vegetative classification: Freshwater Marshes and Ponds (R155XY010FL), Organic soils in depressions and on flood plains (G155XB645FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Minor Components Felda Percent of map unit:3 percent Landform:Depressions on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Ecological site:R155XY080FL - Sandy over Loamy Freshwater Isolated Marshes and Swamps Other vegetative classification:Freshwater Marshes and Ponds (R155XY010FL), Sandy over loamy soils on stream terraces, flood plains, or in depressions (G155XB245FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Eaugallie Percent of map unit:3 percent Landform:Flats on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf Down-slope shape:Convex Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:F155XY120FL - Sandy Flatwoods and Hammocks Other vegetative classification:South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL), Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141FL) Hydric soil rating: No Smyrna Percent of map unit:2 percent Landform:Depressions on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip Custom Soil Resource Report 15 1749 Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Concave Ecological site:R155XY070FL - Sandy Freshwater Isolated Marshes and Swamps Other vegetative classification:Freshwater Marshes and Ponds (R155XY010FL), Sandy soils on stream terraces, flood plains, or in depressions (G155XB145FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Myakka Percent of map unit:2 percent Landform:Flats on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf Down-slope shape:Convex Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:F155XY120FL - Sandy Flatwoods and Hammocks Other vegetative classification:South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL), Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141FL) Hydric soil rating: No St. johns Percent of map unit:2 percent Landform:Flats on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf Down-slope shape:Convex Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:F155XY120FL - Sandy Flatwoods and Hammocks Other vegetative classification:South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL), Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141FL) Hydric soil rating: No 20—Myakka and EauGallie fine sands Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 1lmq4 Elevation: 0 to 130 feet Mean annual precipitation: 46 to 54 inches Mean annual air temperature: 68 to 75 degrees F Frost-free period: 332 to 362 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Myakka and similar soils:58 percent Eaugallie and similar soils:32 percent Minor components:10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Custom Soil Resource Report 16 1750 Description of Myakka Setting Landform:Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf Down-slope shape:Convex Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Sandy marine deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 5 inches: fine sand E - 5 to 28 inches: fine sand Bh - 28 to 45 inches: fine sand C - 45 to 80 inches: fine sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Poorly drained Runoff class: High Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 6 to 18 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum:4.0 Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.9 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D Ecological site: F155XY120FL - Sandy Flatwoods and Hammocks Forage suitability group: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141FL) Other vegetative classification: South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL), Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141FL) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Eaugallie Setting Landform:Flatwoods on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf Down-slope shape:Convex Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Sandy and loamy marine deposits Typical profile A - 0 to 5 inches: fine sand E - 5 to 18 inches: fine sand Bh - 18 to 30 inches: fine sand E' - 30 to 41 inches: fine sand Btg - 41 to 60 inches: sandy clay loam Cg - 60 to 80 inches: loamy sand Custom Soil Resource Report 17 1751 Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Poorly drained Runoff class: High Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately low to high (0.06 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 6 to 18 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum:4.0 Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D Ecological site: F155XY120FL - Sandy Flatwoods and Hammocks Forage suitability group: Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141FL) Other vegetative classification: South Florida Flatwoods (R155XY003FL), Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141FL) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Pompano, flooded Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Flood plains on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R155XY030FL - Sandy Freshwater Floodplain Marshes and Swamps Other vegetative classification:Slough (R155XY011FL), Sandy soils on stream terraces, flood plains, or in depressions (G155XB145FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Basinger Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Drainageways on marine terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Dip Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Concave Ecological site:F155XY120FL - Sandy Flatwoods and Hammocks Other vegetative classification:Sandy soils on flats of mesic or hydric lowlands (G155XB141FL), Slough (R155XY011FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Custom Soil Resource Report 18 1752 Digitally signed by Thomas X Grusenmeyer DN: c=US, o=Unaffiliated, ou=A01410C0000016C8B48A0D100 00088C, cn=Thomas X Grusenmeyer Date: 2022.06.23 16:36:45 -04'00' Adobe Acrobat Reader version: 2022.001.20117 1753 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP Date: April 6, 2026 @ 6:00 P.M. Location: Oviedo City Church 300 W. State Road 434, Oviedo, FL 32765 Community Workshop to consider Final Engineering Site Plans in order to construct an additional parking lot of 44 spaces and a recreation field for Oviedo City Church within the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial District on the subject site. Project: Oviedo City Church Additional Parking Lot Location: Adjacent to 282 W State Road 434 Parcel ID: 25-20-31-5BA-0000-019A Acreage: ± 0.82-acre project Zoning: C-1 Neighborhood Commercial Future Land Use: Commercial Applicant/Presenter: Ron Thomas, Oviedo City Church and Larry Poliner, RCE Consultants, LLC 1754 17 5 5 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 1 of 15 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY AND SHOULD BE RETURNED TO: Anthony A. Garganese City Attorney of Winter Springs Garganese, Weiss, D'Agresta & Salzman, P.A. 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, FL 32802 (407) 425-9566 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Oviedo City Church Standalone Parking Lot THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT (“Agreement”) is made and executed this ___ day of _____________, 2026, by and between the CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, a Florida municipal corporation located at 1126 E. State Road 434, Winer Springs, Florida 32708 (“City”), and OVIEDO COMMUNITY CHURCH INC, a Florida not for profit corporation with a principal address at 300 W. State Road 434, Oviedo, Florida 32765 (“Developer”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of approximately 2.81 acres, more or less, of real property located northwest of the intersection of Ethan Hammock Court and State Road 434 in Winter Springs, Florida, with a Tax Parcel Identification Number of 04-21-31-300-0150-0000, zoned C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial), as more particularly described herein (the “Principal Church Property”); and WHEREAS, Developer is also the owner of 0.82 acres, more or less, of real property located northwest of the intersection of Ethan Hammock Court and State Road 434 in Winter Springs, Florida, with a Tax Parcel Identification Number of 25-20-31-5BA-0000-019A, zoned C- 1 (Neighborhood Commercial), as more particularly described herein (the “Off-Site Parking Property); and WHEREAS, Developer has applied for Final Engineering/Site Plan Approval in order to construct an off-site, standalone parking lot with no principal structure on the Off-Site Parking Property, to be used occasionally as overflow parking for the Oviedo City Church located on the FOR RECORDING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY 1756 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 2 of 15 Principal Church Property, and to construct other associated improvements on the Off-Site Parking Property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 20, Zoning, Article II, Division 1, Section 20-29.1 of the Winter Springs City Code (“City Code”), a community workshop for the Project was held on April 06, 2026; and WHEREAS, Section 20-29(c) of the City Code requires that all site plans shall be binding on the use of the subject property and, further, that as a condition of approval by the City Commission, all development projects requiring a community workshop pursuant to Section 20- 29.1 of the City Code shall be required to be memorialized in a binding development agreement; and WHEREAS, additionally, due to the nature of this project as a standalone off-site parking lot, the conditions of approval provided in City Code Section 9-278, General Provisions for Off- Street Parking, are also applicable to this project, and the Developer must comply with the applicable provisions of Section 9-278; and WHEREAS, this Development Agreement shall be recorded against the Off-Site Parking Property so that the terms and conditions of approval related to the Project shall run with the land; and WHEREAS, the Off-Site Parking Property was previously subject to that certain Development Agreement dated September 28, 2020, recorded in the Official Records of Seminole County, Book 9768, Page 996, which was included as a condition of the rezoning of the Off-Site Parking Property to C-1 in 2020, and contained a binding Land Use Plan with a 5,000 square foot commercial building and parking lot; and WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to terminate the prior Development Agreement as provided herein; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1.0 Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. 2.0 Authority. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act, Chapter 166, Florida Statutes. 3.0 The Property. The real property subject to this Agreement bears a Tax Parcel Identification Number of 25-20-31-5BA-0000-019A and is legally described in Exhibit “A,” which is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference (the “Off-Site Parking Property”). 1757 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 3 of 15 4.0 Project Description and Requirements. Developer shall, at its sole expense, design, permit, and construct an off-site standalone parking lot with asphalt drives, 44 sodded parking spaces, wet pond, and no principal structure, which shall be used occasionally as overflow parking for the Oviedo City Church, and associated improvements on the Property. (Hereinafter the project description and requirements are referred to as the “Off-Site Parking Project”). The Developer shall construct the Off-Site Parking Project in a manner consistent with the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans that are on file with the City with the following file numbers, and consistent with the requirements contained in this Agreement: File No.: FEDP-2025-0020 File No.: DVAG-2026-0016 For convenience, a copy of the Site Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit “B,” and is fully incorporated herein by this reference. Exhibit “B” is provided for reference purposes only. The official and controlling copy of the Final Engineering/Site Plan is maintained in File No. FEDP-2025-0020, which shall govern in all respects, including the resolution of any inconsistencies or conflicts with Exhibit “B.” The official copy should be reviewed for the complete and authoritative specifications, requirements, and other content of the Final Engineering/Site Plan. 4.1 Specific Conditions of Approval. Specific conditions of approval for the above-referenced Site/Final Engineering Plans include the following, which are also addressed in the Staff Report for the Final Engineering/Site Plans: 1. All grass areas on the Off-Site Parking Property shall use Bahia grass. No St. Augustine grass shall be permitted. No grass types with low drought tolerance shall be permitted. 2. The Off-Site Parking Property shall be utilized for parking, recreation, and associated facilities/improvements only. No principal structure shall be erected on the Off-Site Parking Property without prior approval of the City of Winter Springs and a modification of this Agreement and the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans. 3. The Off-Site Parking Project shall be used on an intermittent basis for occasional non-daily use. Should the parking lot be used on a continuous or daily basis, a modification to this Agreement and the approved Final Engineering/Site Plans will be required as sodded parking spaces will not be permitted. 4. The surface of the Off-Site Parking Project’s parking stalls shall be sodded. Commented [AU1]: Please confirm file number and insert other files as may be necessary. Commented [AU2]: Additional conditions added in order to ensure continued compliance with s. 9-278. 1758 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 4 of 15 5. All lighting on the Off-Site Parking Property shall be arranged so as to reflect light away from adjoining properties. 6. No advertising signs may be erected on the Off-Site Parking Property. 7. Effective screening of the Off-Site Parking Property’s parking area shall be maintained on all sides, including the frontage. Both a fence (or wall) and a hedge of at least 5 feet shall be maintained in good condition on the Off-Site Parking Property so long as such Property continues to be utilized as a parking lot. 8. The Off-Site Parking Property shall not be utilized for paid short-term or long- term parking. 4.2 Restrictive Covenant. Pursuant to Section 9-278 of the City Code, when a stand-alone, off-site parking lot with no principal structure is utilized to satisfy minimum parking standards under the Code for another building or structure, both properties shall be required to be under common ownership. Accordingly, the Developer covenants and agrees that the Off-Site Parking Property shall remain under common ownership with the Principal Church Property. To the extent common ownership is not maintained, the Off-Site Parking Property may not continue to be used for the purpose of off-site, stand-alone parking. The Developer hereby acknowledges and agrees that the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs has imposed certain conditions upon its approval of the Off- Site Parking Project, and that the Developer has voluntarily entered into this Development Agreement and Restrictive Covenant to memorialize the conditions of approval as covenants running with the land. The City of Winter Springs shall have the right to enforce the provisions of this Development Agreement and Restrictive Covenant in the event the Developer, or any assignee or successor in interest of the Developer, fails to adequately maintain the restrictive covenants as set forth herein to the satisfaction of the City. Further, in accordance with Section 9-278 of the City Code, this Restrictive Covenant may be enforced by any lawful means, including but not limited to, bringing charges before the City’s code enforcement board or special magistrate and seeking injunctive and equitable relief. The Developer understands and acknowledges that such enforcement may include charges for violations of this covenant and/or the City’s Land Development Ordinances, if the Principal Church Property no longer meets minimum parking requirements because of the termination of the off-site parking use on the Off-Site Parking Property as a result of a conveyance of the Off-Site Parking Property. 4.3 Termination of Development Agreement. The City and Developer agree that that certain Development Agreement dated September 28, 2020, recorded in 1759 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 5 of 15 the Official Records of Seminole County, Book 9768, Page 996, is terminated and shall be of no further effect on the Off-Site Parking Property. 4.4 Permitted Uses. The Developer agrees that the Off-Site Parking Property is situated between commercial development to the west, currently a child care facility, and single-family development and wetlands to the east and south. As a consequence, the City Commission herein re-imposes certain use restrictions greater than those otherwise specified in the C-1 zoning district, consistent with the prior Development Agreement entered into upon rezoning of the Off-Site Parking Property to C-1, to ensure any negative impacts of the commercial development are minimized and to ensure the future development is compatible with the surrounding uses, which shall apply to the extent that the Off-Site Parking Property is ever conveyed and common ownership with the Principal Church Property is not maintained or the use of a stand-alone parking lot ever ceases. The following uses shall be permitted on the Off-Site Parking Property in the event common ownership is not maintained or the use approved herein as a stand-alone parking lot ever ceases: 1. Animal hospitals and veterinary clinics (with no outside kennels) 2. Art supplies and picture framing shops 3. Artists’ (such as painters, sculptures, and craft makers) studios 4. Cleaners, Alterations, Tailoring and Shoe Repair 5. Confectionary and ice cream stores (including outside dining) 6. Dance and music studios 7. Health and exercise clubs and athletic training facilities 8. Interior decorating and draperies 9. Office a. Advertising Agencies b. Attorney c. Bookkeeper d. Dental e. Insurance f. Medical g. Professional and Business h. Title Companies i. Travel Agency 10. Pet shops and grooming 11. Photographic studios 12. Limited retail uses as follows: a. Art supplies and picture framing shops b. Bakery c. Bicycle d. Bookstore e. Hardware f. Health Food 1760 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 6 of 15 g. Florist h. Office and Stationary Supplies 13. Swimming pool sales, service and supplies The Developer acknowledges and agrees that no other uses shall be permitted on the Off-Site Parking Property in the event common ownership is not maintained or the standalone parking lot use ceases, including, but not limited to, retail sales of alcohol or retail sales, manufacturing, or compounding of any products derived from the hemp plant or cannabis plant, including CBD (cannabidiol). 5.0 Future Permitting. The Developer shall be required to substantially complete the Off-Site Parking Project within two (2) years of the Effective Date of this Agreement. 6.0 Representations of the Parties. The City and Developer hereby each represent and warrant to the other that they have the power and authority to execute, deliver and perform the terms and provisions of this Agreement and have taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement. This Agreement will, when duly executed and delivered by the City and Developer, constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable against the parties hereto. Upon recording of this Agreement in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, the Agreement shall be a binding obligation upon the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Developer represents that it has voluntarily and willfully executed this Agreement for purposes of binding himself and the Property to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. 7.0 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall automatically be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the City and Developer and their respective successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement similarly shall be binding upon the Property and shall run with title to the same upon being duly recorded against the Property by the City. 8.0 Applicable Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The venue for any action arising out of this Agreement shall be in Seminole County, Florida, for state actions or the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, for federal actions. 9.0 Amendments. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended except by written agreement duly executed by both parties hereto (or their successors or assigns) and approved by the City Commission. 10.0 Entire Agreement; Exhibits. This Agreement and all attached exhibits hereto supersede any other agreement, oral or written, regarding the Property and contain the entire agreement between the City and Developer as to the subject matter hereof. The Exhibits attached hereto and referenced herein are hereby fully incorporated herein by this reference. 1761 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 7 of 15 11.0 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable to any extent by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall not affect in any respect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement. 12.0 Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon approval by the City Commission and execution of this Agreement by both parties hereto. 13.0 Recordation. Upon full execution by the Parties, this Agreement shall be recorded in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida by the City. The Developer shall be responsible for all recording fees associated with this Agreement. 14.0 Relationship of the Parties. The relationship of the parties to this Agreement is contractual and Developer is an independent contractor and not an agent of the City. Nothing herein shall be deemed to create a joint venture or principal-agent relationship between the parties, and neither party is authorized to, nor shall either party act toward third persons or the public in any manner, which would indicate any such relationship with the other. 15.0 Sovereign Immunity. The City intends to avail itself of sovereign immunity and other applicable limitations on City liability whenever deemed applicable by the City. Therefore, notwithstanding any other provision set forth in this Agreement, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of the City’s right to sovereign immunity under section 768.28, Florida Statutes, or other limitations imposed on the City’s potential liability under state or federal law. As such, the City shall not be liable under this Agreement for punitive damages or interest for the period before judgment. Further, the City shall not be liable for any claim or judgment, or portion thereof, to any one person for more than two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00), or any claim or judgment, or portion thereof, which, when totaled with all other claims or judgments paid by the State or its agencies and subdivisions arising out of the same incident or occurrence, exceeds the sum of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00). 16.0 City's Police Power. Developer agrees and acknowledges that the City hereby reserves all police powers granted to the City by law. In no way shall this Agreement be construed as the City bargaining away or surrendering its police powers. 17.0 Interpretation. The parties hereby agree and acknowledge that they have both participated equally in the drafting of this Agreement and no party shall be favored or disfavored regarding the interpretation to this Agreement in the event of a dispute between the parties. 18.0 Third-Party Rights. This Agreement is not a third-party beneficiary contract and shall not in any way whatsoever create any rights on behalf of any third party. 19.0 Specific Performance. Strict compliance shall be required with each and every provision of this Agreement. The parties agree that failure to perform the obligations provided by this Agreement shall result in irreparable damage and that specific performance of these obligations may be obtained by a suit in equity. 1762 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 8 of 15 20.0 Attorney's Fees. In connection with any arbitration or litigation arising out of this Agreement, each party shall be responsible for their own attorney’s fees and costs. 21.0 Development Permits. Nothing herein shall limit the City's authority to grant or deny any development permit applications or requests subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement in accordance with the criteria of the City Code and the requirements of this Agreement. The failure of this Agreement to address any particular City, County, State and/or Federal permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve Developer or the City of the necessity of complying with the law governing said permitting requirement, condition, term or restriction. Without imposing any limitation on the City’s police powers, the City reserves the right to withhold, suspend or terminate any and all certificates of occupancy for any building, trailer, structure or unit if Developer is in breach of any term and condition of this Agreement. 22.0 Default. Failure by either party to perform each and every one of its obligations hereunder shall constitute a default, entitling the non-defaulting party to pursue whatever remedies are available to it under Florida law or equity including, without limitation, termination of this Agreement, an action for specific performance, and/or injunctive relief. Prior to any party filing any action as a result of a default under this Agreement, the non-defaulting party shall first provide the defaulting party with written notice of said default. Upon receipt of said notice, the defaulting party shall be provided a thirty (30) day opportunity in which to cure the default to the reasonable satisfaction of the non-defaulting party prior to filing said action. 23.0 Termination. The City shall have the unconditional right, but not obligation, to terminate this Agreement, without notice or penalty, if Developer fails to substantially complete the Project in accordance with the timelines established in Section 5.0. The Developer may apply to the City Commission for an extension of this Agreement, which may be granted upon good cause shown. In addition, the City shall have the right, but not obligation, to terminate the Agreement if Developer permanently abandons construction of the Project, provided, however, the City shall first deliver written notice and an opportunity to cure to the defaulting party as set forth in Section 22.0 above. If the City terminates this Agreement, the City shall record a notice of termination against the Property in the public records of Seminole County, Florida. 25.0 Force Majeure. The parties agree that in the event that the failure by either party to accomplish any action required hereunder within a specified time period constitutes a default under the terms of this Agreement and, if any such failure is due to acts of God, acts of government authority (other than the City’s own reasonable acts), acts of public enemy or war, riots, civil disturbances, power failure, shortages of labor or materials, injunction or other court proceedings beyond the control of such party, or severe adverse weather conditions (“Force Majeure Event”), then, notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, that failure shall not constitute a default under this Agreement and any time period proscribed hereunder shall be extended by the amount of time that such party was unable to perform solely due to the Force Majeure Event. The extended time period shall be agreed to in writing by the parties and said agreement shall not be unreasonably withheld by either party. The City Manager shall have the authority to grant an extended time period. An extension of any time period for reasons of a Force Majeure Event shall be requested solely as provided in this Section. Developer hereby waives and 1763 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 9 of 15 relinquishes the right to notify the City of the intent to exercise the tolling and extension of any period related to the Project, including time periods under this Agreement, development orders, and building permits, available under Section 252.363, Florida Statutes, as the result of a declaration of a state of emergency issued by the Governor for a natural emergency. 26. Notice. Whenever either party desires to give notice to the other, notice shall be sent by hand delivery or certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be sent to: For the City: Kevin Sweet, City Manager City of Winter Springs 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 With additional notice to: Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney Garganese, Weiss, D’Agresta & Salzman, P.A. 111 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 2000 Orlando, FL 32802 For the Developer: Doug Hill, President Oviedo Community Church Inc. 300 W. State Road 434 Oviedo, Florida 32765 With additional notice to: Daniel M. Lacich, Registered Agent 1010 Magee Creek Court North Oviedo, Florida 32765 Either party may freely modify their respective contact person and address contained in this Paragraph by providing written notice of the modification to the other party. Any Notice given as provided herein shall be deemed received as follows: if delivered by personal service, on the date so delivered; and if mailed, on the third business day after mailing. 27.0 Assignment. Prior to completing the construction of the Project and reaching final build-out of the Project, Developer shall not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City. Such assignment shall also require the written approval of the City by amendment to this Agreement, which shall not require a public hearing and shall not be unreasonably withheld. However, Developer shall be entitled to assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to a parent, subsidiary, or affiliated entity in which Developer or its members 1764 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 10 of 15 are members or interest holders without City consent, provided that the City is given notice of such assignment in accordance with Section 26.0 herein. Any assignment authorized by this subparagraph shall require the assignee to be a formal signatory to this Agreement and fully assume all of Developer’s obligations, commitments, representations, and warranties under this Agreement. In any assignment, the rights and obligations contained herein shall be binding on successors in interest to the Property, and the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and any respective successors and assigns. 28.0 Trafficking. As a condition of this contract, the Developer shall attest under penalty of perjury, that the Developer does not use coercion for labor or services as defined in Section 787.06(2), Florida Statutes. Attestations shall be documented using a Human Trafficking Affidavit as provided by the City. [Signatures to Follow] 1765 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 11 of 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto attached their hands and seals on the dates set forth below. Signed, sealed and delivered in the Presence of the following witnesses: CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ______________________________ Signature of Witness _____________________________________________ ______________________________ Kevin McCann, Mayor Printed Name of Witness Date: ________________ ______________________________ Address of Witness ______________________________ Signature of Witness ______________________________ Printed Name of Witness ______________________________ Address of Witness ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY ____________________________ ______________________________ Christian Gowan, City Clerk Anthony A. Garganese, City Attorney CITY SEAL: 1766 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 12 of 15 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF SEMINOLE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2026, by Kevin McCann, the Mayor of the City of Winter Springs, a Florida municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation, who is personally known to me or produced ___________________ _______________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: ________________ 1767 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 13 of 15 OVIEDO COMMUNITY CHURCH INC. ______________________________ Signature of Witness _____________________________________________ ______________________________ Print: _________________________ Printed Name of Witness Title: ______________________________________ Date: ________________ ______________________________ Address of Witness ______________________________ Signature of Witness ______________________________ Printed Name of Witness ______________________________ Address of Witness STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of (___) physical presence or (___) online notarization, this ______ day of ___________, 2026, by____________________, the __________________of Oviedo Community Church Inc., a Florida not for profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation, who is personally known to me or produced _________________________________ as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) (Notary Public Signature) (Print Name) Notary Public, State of Commission No.: My Commission Expires: ____________________ 1768 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 14 of 15 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property 1769 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT City of Winter Springs and Oviedo City Church Inc. Page 15 of 15 EXHIBIT B OVERALL SITE PLAN 1770 1771 1772 1773 17 7 4 17 7 5 17 7 6 17 7 7 17 7 8 17 7 9 17 8 0 Incorporated 1959 IN GOD WE TRUS The Community Development Director reserves the right to determine whether this application is complete and accurate. An incomplete application will not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. The application shall be viewed per all applicable City Codes amd the City Comprehensive Plan. Applications shall be reviewed for sufficiency (completeness) within thirty (30) calendar days per FL Statue 166.033. Once the application is deemed sufficient, the applicant shall move forward with the Community Workshop, required per Chapter 20-Zoning Sec.20-29.1. All applicants shall be afforded minimal due process as required by law, including the right to receive notice, be heard, present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be represented by a duly authorized representative. Applicants are further advised that a Development Agreement is quasi-judicial in nature. APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGES and AGREES, by signing below, that he or she: REQUIRED INEORMATION Applicant(s): Email: RINGS. Shall be required to qualify expert witnesses, as appropriate. May be sworn-in as a witness in order to provide testimony to the City Commission; Shall be subject to cross-examination by party intervenors (if requested); and Applicants are encouraged to familiarize themselves with Chapter 2 -Administration Sec. 2-30 of the Winter Springs City Code relating to Quasi-Judicial Rules and Procedures of the City Commission. All Development Agreement recommendations shall be based from the required information/documentation provided, the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan (to the extent applicable). Applicant Signature: Mailing address: The City Commission (CC) shall render all final decisions regarding Development Agreements and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved Development Agreement to the extent deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable provisions of the Winter Springs Code of Ordinances and the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Phone Number: Email: Property Owner(s): Mailing Address: 01/2024 Phone Number: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice @winterspringsfl.org CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS Rert o S. THonas Application -Development Agreement 407-20-1801 PETa GEIGER 450/ 5ToNE HeDGE DR. ORLAJDOh 32817 PE TE C ovIEDO4G CH4ECH 407-3I2 -68 BB Therefore, Date: ef2as Page 1 of4 1781 F Incorporated INTERS T959 Property Address: Parcel ID(s): GoD WE TRUST Parcel Size: Project Name: Plan. RINGS A general description of the relief sought under this division. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice.@winterspringsfl.org Application– Development Agreement A brief explanation, with applicable supporting competent substantial evidence and documents, as to why the application satisfies the relevant criteria set forth in the City Zoning Code and City Comprehensive 01/2024 List all witnesses that the applicant intends to present to the City Commission to provide testimony: Describe with specificity any evidence which the applicant intends to present to the City Commission, including oral factual testimony, maps, photographs, records or reports and/or expert testimony: Attach all documentary evidence which the applicant intends to present to the city commission to the back of this application. The Applicant has a continuing duty to update the list of witnesses, description of evidence, and documentary evidence throughout the application process. Additional witnesses or evidence will not be admitted at the city commission hearing if not submitted at least seven (7) days prior to such bearing Page 2 of 4 None No relief or variances are requested. The site plans meet all codes. Appoved site plans. 300 W SR 434, Ovideo, Fl 32765 25-20-31-5BA-0000-019A 0.81 acres Oviedo City Church Parking Improvements 1782 .CITY o HINTER Incorporated 1959 IN GOD WE TRUST REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION 01/2024 A complete Application and Fee CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice.@winterspringsfl.org Application -Development Agreement An Electronic copy of the most recent survey of the subject property. An Electronic copy of the Legal Description of the subject property. Documentation and Data supporting the request. Page 3 of 4 1783 CITY WINTERSA Incorporated T959 IN GOD WETRUST SoNI Applicant Name (Print): CITY LIMITED RIGHT OF ENTRY: By submitting this Application you hereby grant temporary right of entry for City Officials to enter upon the subject property for purposes of evaluating this Application and posting on the subject property. Applicant Signature: Business Name: APPLICANT'S AUTHORIZATION: I desire to make Application for a Development Agreement for the aforementioncd project and have read and agree to the terms contained herein. In addition, if the Applicant is a corporate entity, the undersigned hereby represents and warrants that he/she is authorized to act on behalf of, and bind, the corporate entity. Address: STATE OF [boa _COUNTY OF_Semhioole FL DivES Lceose Notary Public Signature: My Commission expires: Roa 5. THonas The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20_day of Hpnál who is personally known to me as identification and who did/did not take an oath. Date: Property Owner's Name (Print): Property Owner Signature: 01/2024 STATE OF Flotida COUNTY OF_enok COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 customerservice @winterspringsf.org Notary Public Signature: My Commission expires: Application -Development Agreement Parcel ID: CITY OOF WINTER SPRINGS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_ 20 day of Date: Date: 4/29/2024 Apal 20,202Le Note: The Property Owner shall sign and have their signature notarized below if the Applicant is not the owner of the subject property. who is personally known to 2030 as identification and who did/did not take an oath. dpal 20, 2ale SUJEIRY NATIONS Notary Publlc -State of Florida Commission # HH 779246 My Comm, Expires Mar 16, 2030 Date who has eal): ALLSON HARRISON who Notary Public -State of Florida Commission # HH 720233 My Comm. Expires Oct 28, 2029 (seal): 20_2La by produced has Page 4 of4 202, by produced 1784