Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026 05 14 Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Agenda Packet.pdfBOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING AGENDA THURSDAY, MAY 14, 2026 - 5:30 PM CITY HALL - COMMISSION CHAMBERS 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Invocation Pledge of Allegiance Agenda Changes AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS INFORMATIONAL AGENDA PUBLIC INPUT Anyone who wishes to speak during Public Input on any Agenda Item or subject matter will need to fill out a “Public Input” form. Individuals will limit their comments to three (3) minutes, and representatives of groups or homeowners' associations shall limit their comments to five (5) minutes, unless otherwise determined by the City Commission. CONSENT AGENDA 300. Approval of the Minutes: Thursday, April 9, 2026 Board of Trustees Regular Meeting 2026 04 09 Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Minutes.pdf PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA Pursuant to F.S. § 286.0115, if the mayor or any city commissioner receives and/or sends ex parte communications regarding any application filed with the city, the mayor or any city commissioner must publicly disclose such communications before or during the hearing at which a vote is taken on the quasi-judicial matter, so that persons who have opinions contrary to those expressed in the ex parte communications are given a reasonable opportunity to refute or respond to the communications. REGULAR AGENDA 500. Quarterly Investment Return Report and Asset Allocation Analysis from Mariner 2026-03-31 Winter Springs General (Quarterly Report).pdf 2026.05.07 Winter Springs Asset Allocation Analysis.pdf 501. GRS Actuarial Valuation Report of the Defined Benefit Plan - October 1 2025 October 1 2025 Actuarial Valuation with CL.pdf 502. Updated Actuarial Projection Study as of October 1, 2025 Actuarial Projection Study 10-1-2025 Report w CL.pdf REPORTS PUBLIC INPUT Anyone who wishes to speak during Public Input on any Agenda Item or subject matter will need to fill out a “Public Input” form. Individuals will limit their comments to three (3) minutes, and representatives of groups or homeowners' associations shall limit their comments to five (5) minutes, unless otherwise determined by the City Commission. 2 ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC NOTICE This is a Public Meeting, and the public is invited to attend and this Agenda is subject to change. Please be advised that one (1) or more Members of any of the City's Advisory Boards and Committees may be in attendance at this Meeting, and may participate in discussions. Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact the City of Winter Springs at (407) 327-1800 "at least 48 hours prior to meeting, a written request by a physically handicapped person to attend the meeting, directed to the chairperson or director of such board, commission, agency, or authority" - per Section 286.26 Florida Statutes. "If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he or she may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based" - per Section 286.0105 Florida Statutes. 3 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 300 BOARD OF TRUSTEES AGENDA | MAY 14, 2026 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Approval of the Minutes: Thursday, April 9, 2026 Board of Trustees Regular Meeting SUMMARY FUNDING SOURCE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board review and approve the Thursday, April 9, 2026 Board of Trustees Regular Meeting minutes as presented. 4 BOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 9, 2026 Rescheduled from February 12, 2026 CITY HALL – COMMISSION CHAMBERS CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA CALL TO ORDER City Clerk Christian Gowan called the Regular Meeting of Thursday, April 9, 2026, of the Board of Trustees to order at 5:30 pm in the Commission Chambers (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708). Roll Call: Chairperson Marco Santoro, present Vice-Chairperson Arif Fareed, present Board Member Michael Blake, present Board Member Brandon Fair, present Board Member Karl Furno, present City Clerk Christian Gowan, present Also present: Mr. Dave West, Senior Consultant, Mariner, 531 West Morse Blvd., Suite 200, Winter Park, Florida Mr. Jack Evatt, Director of Institutional Advisory Services, Mariner Mr. Kevin Sweet, City Manager Ms. Holly Queen, Director, Finance Department Mr. Brian Dunigan, Director, Operations Department REGULAR AGENDA - PART I 500. Election for Chairperson of the Board of Trustees for Calendar Year 2026 BOARD MEMBER BLAKE NOMINATED BOARD MEMBER MARCO SANTORO TO SERVE AS THE CHAIR FOR 2026. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER FAIR. NO OTHER NOMINATIONS WERE MADE AND THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0). 501. Election for Vice-Chairperson of the Board of Trustees for Calendar Year 2026 BOARD MEMBER BLAKE NOMINATED BOARD MEMBER ARIF FAREED TO SERVE AS THE VICE- CHAIRPERSON FOR 2026. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER FAIR. NO OTHER NOMINATIONS WERE MADE AND THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0). AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS 100. Not Used 5 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES BOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING – APRIL 9, 2026 PAGE 2 OF 2 INFORMATIONAL AGENDA 200. Not Used PUBLIC INPUT Chairperson Santoro opened Public Input. No one addressed the Board. Chairperson Santoro closed Public Input. CONSENT AGENDA 300) Approval of the Thursday, August 19, 2025 Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Minutes No discussion. 301) Approval of the Thursday, November 20, 2025 Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Minutes Brief discussion followed where it was noted that the November 20, 2025 document did not constitute official minutes as no quorum was present at that meeting. The Board acknowledged this distinction for the record, and the City Clerk indicated the document would remain filed under minutes for administrative purposes. MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 19, 2025 REGULAR MEETING AND THE NOVEMBER 20, 2025 MEETING NOTES. MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER BLAKE. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER FAIR. VOTE: BLAKE (AYE); FAIR (AYE); FURNO (AYE); FAREED (AYE); SANTORO (AYE) MOTION CARRIED: 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA 400. Not Used REGULAR AGENDA – PART II 502) Quarterly Investment Return Report from Mariner Jack Evatt and David West of Mariner presented the quarterly investment report for the period ending December 31, 2025. David West noted that he is in the process of transitioning out of the firm after 40 years, and that Jack Evatt would lead client services going forward. Mr. Evatt reviewed the Q4 2025 economic environment and noted generally strong conditions supported by Federal Reserve rate cuts and broader equity market performance, alongside emerging inflationary pressures and uncertainty in future rate direction. He reported that the fund returned 2.34% for the quarter, in line with its benchmark and outperforming most peer plans, with continued strong long-term results. Mr. Evatt noted that investment performance across asset classes met expectations overall, with strength in fixed income, while the Board continues to exit its private real estate holdings, including one near full liquidation and another that experienced a modest loss due to a forced property sale. Discussion followed on concerns about the office sector, the timing of real estate redemptions, and the 6 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES BOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING – APRIL 9, 2026 PAGE 3 OF 2 historical role of real estate in the portfolio. The Board also recognized that its current real estate allocation target is outdated and may warrant a broader asset allocation review given the plan’s improved funded status and reduced need for risk. MOTION TO DIRECT THE INVESTMENT CONSULTANTS TO CONDUCT AN ASSET ALLOCATION STUDY AND PRESENT FINDINGS AT THE NEXT MEETING. MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER BLAKE. SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR FAREED. VOTE: BLAKE (AYE); FAIR (AYE); FURNO (AYE); FAREED (AYE); SANTORO (AYE) MOTION CARRIED: 5-0 Discussion followed on the City’s contribution levels and City Manager Kevin Sweet confirmed planned contributions above the actuarial minimum for FY 2026 and FY 2027 and noted broader fiscal pressures. The Board emphasized the importance of planning for scenarios involving reduced contributions. Mr. Evatt provided a brief update on the Crescent private debt funds and noted both were largely wound down, have performed strongly since inception, and present no current concerns. The Board also recognized David West on the occasion of his final meeting and thanked him for his longstanding service and contributions to the fund’s success. REPORTS City Manager Kevin Sweet addressed the Board to provide an update on ongoing efforts to improve the competitiveness of the defined benefit plan for sworn officers and other eligible employees. He outlined a two-phase approach undertaken in response to recruitment and retention challenges in the police department, the first phase having addressed compensation and the second focused on retirement benefit provisions. City Manager Sweet noted five proposed benefit scenarios were being studied, including: (1) increasing the maximum benefit accrual cap; (2) increasing pensionable overtime hours from 150 to 300; (3) establishing normal retirement eligibility upon 30 years of service regardless of age; (4) creating a Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP); and (5) adding an automatic 2% annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) commencing three years after retirement. City Manager Sweet noted that three hybrid scenarios combining elements of the above had also been requested and further noted that the actuarial consultant, GRS, was expected to deliver an updated 30-year projection — based on October 1, 2025 actual data — on May 8, 2026, in advance of the Board's next meeting on May 13, 2026. Brief discussion followed on the role of the Board as an advisory body. PUBLIC INPUT Chairperson Santoro opened Public Input. No one addressed the Board. Chairperson Santoro closed Public Input. ADJOURNMENT Chairperson Santoro adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. 7 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES BOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING – APRIL 9, 2026 PAGE 4 OF 2 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: ___________________________________ CHRISTIAN D. GOWAN, MPA, CMC CITY CLERK NOTE: These Minutes were approved at the May 14, 2026 Board of Trustees Regular Meeting. 8 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 500 BOARD OF TRUSTEES AGENDA | MAY 14, 2026 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Quarterly Investment Return Report and Asset Allocation Analysis from Mariner SUMMARY FUNDING SOURCE RECOMMENDATION Mariner requests the Board accept the Quarterly Investment Report for the period ending March 31, 2026 9 <CBDoc TenantId="2" EntityTypeId="3100" EntityId=”190" DocumentTypeId="1" EffectiveDate="03/31/2026" Interval="3" Description="Quarterly Report" /> Winter Springs General Employees General Plan and Trust Asset Allocation Analysis May 2026 10 Asset Allocation Analysis 1 11 Overview of the Asset Allocation Process 2 12 Asset Allocations and Investment Policies Developing an investment strategy is based on a number of different decisions: Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ What is the target return of the Plan? What asset classes should be considered for potential investment? What strategic (long-term) weights should be assigned to each asset class? What are the appropriate allocation ranges (+/-)around the strategic weight of each asset class? What are the most appropriate managers/vehicles to implement and retain for each asset class? While manager and investment vehicle selection is an important part of implementing and maintaining an investment strategy, majority of a portfolio’s variability over time is determined by the selection of asset classes and strategic (long-term) weights. 3 13 Limitation of Asset Allocation Models Limitations of Asset Allocation Models: Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ The model output is based on the capital market assumptions; accurately predicting the expected return, standard deviation, and correlation coefficients for each asset class is very difficult. Many asset classes have historically exhibited non-normal return distributions (fat-tails and/or skewness); models generally assume normal distributions. Correlation coefficients change over time and may potentially overestimate the diversification benefits of combining asset classes (particularly during periods of market stress). Alternative asset classes introduce risk factors that are not captured in their standard deviation. The return, risk, and correlation forecasts utilized in this report were developed by Mariner Capital Market Assumptions (CMA). These projections are based on its expectations over the next 10 to 15 years. Source: Client Data, Study Assumptions and Mariner Capital Market Assumptions (CMAs). CMAs represent forward-looking estimates based on Mariner’s internal modeling and assumptions. Projections and other information shown are strictly hypothetical in nature, do not represent the performance of any actual portfolio or strategy, do not reflect actual investment results achieved by clients, and are not guarantees of future results. Actual outcomes may differ materially from those illustrated, and results are highly dependent on the assumptions used. Assumptions are subject to change without notice. Please see additional important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 4 14 Capital Market Assumptions & Opportunities Expected Returns and Standard Deviations Source: Client Data, Study Assumptions and Mariner Capital Market Assumptions (CMAs). CMAs represent forward-looking estimates based on Mariner’s internal modeling and assumptions. Projections and other information shown are strictly hypothetical in nature, do not represent the performance of any actual portfolio or strategy, do not reflect actual investment results achieved by clients, and are not guarantees of future results. Actual outcomes may differ materially from those illustrated, and results are highly dependent on the assumptions used. Assumptions are subject to change without notice. Please see additional important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 5 15 Asset Class Correlations Asset Class Correlation Matrix 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.65 0.82 1.00 0.34 0.44 0.43 1.00 0.36 0.14 0.23 0.84 1.00 0.19 0.68 0.53 0.46 0.17 1.00 0.23 0.56 0.42 0.76 0.57 0.72 1.00 0.31 0.33 0.33 0.76 0.70 0.31 0.62 1.00 0.21 0.22 0.20 0.78 0.72 0.26 0.59 0.91 1.00 0.15 0.22 0.19 0.74 0.64 0.31 0.59 0.87 0.95 1.00 0.19 0.41 0.35 0.77 0.62 0.50 0.72 0.79 0.78 0.73 1.00 0.18 0.38 0.32 0.78 0.64 0.62 0.76 0.75 0.76 0.75 0.84 1.00 0.28 0.37 0.34 0.81 0.71 0.38 0.68 0.96 0.89 0.85 0.91 0.83 1.00 0.05 0.13 0.10 0.21 0.21 -0.02 0.09 0.20 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.19 1.00 -0.25 0.03 -0.16 0.29 0.30 -0.03 0.20 0.35 0.33 0.31 0.21 0.23 0.31 0.64 1.00 0.20 0.50 0.39 0.67 0.56 0.44 0.60 0.67 0.69 0.70 0.64 0.61 0.67 0.29 0.29 1.00 0.23 0.15 0.17 0.69 0.66 0.20 0.53 0.77 0.75 0.72 0.69 0.70 0.77 0.36 0.57 0.51 1.00 0.20 0.45 0.37 0.74 0.59 0.56 0.70 0.72 0.74 0.70 0.78 0.68 0.76 0.21 0.32 0.83 0.60 1.00 0.26 0.21 0.22 0.81 0.77 0.30 0.65 0.82 0.87 0.84 0.80 0.79 0.86 0.13 0.31 0.54 0.77 0.64 1.00 0.46 0.13 0.21 0.68 0.76 0.11 0.51 0.65 0.64 0.56 0.52 0.51 0.62 0.22 0.49 0.46 0.75 0.58 0.64 1.00 0.08 -0.21 -0.13 0.25 0.47 0.05 0.18 0.24 0.31 0.23 0.27 0.35 0.26 0.24 0.32 0.14 0.32 0.27 0.40 0.43 1.00 Asset Class 1 U.S. Cash 2 U.S. Aggregate Bonds 3 U.S. Short Duration Government/Credit 4 U.S. High Yield Bonds 5 U.S. Leveraged Loans 6 World ex-U.S. Government Bonds 7 Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt 8 U.S. Large Cap 9 U.S. Mid Cap 10 U.S. Small Cap 11 EAFE Equity 12 Emerging Markets Equity 13 Global Equity 14 U.S. Core Real Estate 15 U.S. Value-Added Real Estate 16 U.S. REITs 17 Private Equity 18 Global Core Infrastructure 19 Diversified Hedge Funds 20 Direct Lending 21 Commodities 1.00 to 0.75 0.75 to 0.50 0.50 to 0.25 0.25 to 0.00 0.00 to -0.25 -0.25 to -0.50 -0.50 to -0.75 -0.75 to -1.00 Source: Client Data, Study Assumptions and Mariner Capital Market Assumptions (CMAs). CMAs represent forward-looking estimates based on Mariner’s internal modeling and assumptions. Projections and other information shown are strictly hypothetical in nature, do not represent the performance of any actual portfolio or strategy, do not reflect actual investment results achieved by clients, and are not guarantees of future results. Actual outcomes may differ materially from those illustrated, and results are highly dependent on the assumptions used. Assumptions are subject to change without notice. Please see additional important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 6 16 Change in Historic 10-15 Year Forecasts JPMorgan capital market assumptions are presented for comparative purposes only, based on Mariner’s prior use of the third-party assumption set, and do not represent Mariner’s current assumptions or views. Differences in assumptions may materially affect projected outcomes. Source: JPMorgan Capital Market Assumptions 2024 – 2025 and Mariner Capital Market Assumptions 2026 (CMAs). CMAs represent forward-looking estimates based on Mariner’s internal modeling and assumptions. Projections and other information shown are strictly hypothetical in nature, do not represent the performance of any actual portfolio or strategy, do not reflect actual investment results achieved by clients, and are not guarantees of future results. Actual outcomes may differ materially from those illustrated, and results are highly dependent on the assumptions used. Assumptions are subject to change without notice. Please see additional important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 7 17 Annualized as of 12/31/2024 Asset Class Historical Performance vs. Forecast Historical Trailing Returns 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years U.S. Cash U.S. Aggregate Bonds U.S. Short Duration Gov/Credit U.S. High Yield Bonds U.S. Leveraged Loans World ex-U.S. Government Bonds Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt U.S. Large Cap U.S. Mid Cap U.S. Small Cap EAFE Equity Emerging Markets Equity Global Equity U.S. Core Real Estate U.S. Value-Added Real Estate U.S. REITs Private Equity Global Core Infrastructure Diversified Hedge Funds Direct Lending Commodities 3.98 -2.41 1.69 2.92 7.00 -7.91 -0.90 8.41 3.79 1.24 1.65 -1.92 0.82 -3.14 4.91 -4.49 4.25 7.06 2.80 6.84 4.05 2.49 -0.33 1.58 4.21 5.86 -4.81 -0.84 14.28 9.92 7.40 4.73 1.70 4.10 1.99 10.36 2.78 15.80 5.28 4.93 5.73 6.77 1.75 1.35 1.63 5.17 5.15 -1.53 1.83 12.87 9.63 7.82 5.20 3.64 4.80 4.95 13.49 5.58 15.28 5.92 3.65 5.13 1.28 1.19 2.37 1.55 6.44 5.29 -0.74 2.92 13.79 12.09 10.33 5.24 3.01 4.68 7.52 16.22 9.14 15.88 6.91 3.58 5.36 -1.04 Long Term Std. Dev. 15 Years 0.51 4.90 4.40 14.86 1.31 7.16 16.74 17.57 15.49 5.82 17.12 10.03 4.26 4.79 14.44 14.89 15.70 19.82 8.17 9.45 8.03 10-15 Year Forecasts Arithmetic Mean Standard Deviation 3.45 2.00 4.30 5.50 3.40 4.75 6.25 15.00 7.05 10.00 3.00 8.00 5.95 12.00 8.20 17.00 8.90 19.00 9.20 20.00 9.70 21.00 12.15 30.00 8.80 17.60 8.00 16.15 11.50 20.00 7.60 18.50 10.90 25.20 7.60 16.25 7.20 13.00 8.20 11.50 7.35 25.00 Historical Trailing Returns 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years Current 3.37 7.75 7.85 8.86 1 Year Forecast Return Standard Deviation 7.53 13.14 The Value-Added Real Estate historic performance is measured by the NCREIF ODCE + 200 bps. Asset class allocations proxied for the current mix where historic data was not availiable. FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY 8 18 Model Asset Allocation Broad Asset Class Allocation (%) Current Policy Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3 Mix 4 Mix 5 U.S. Cash U.S. Aggregate Bonds U.S. High Yield Bonds U.S. Leveraged Loans World ex-U.S. Government Bonds Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt U.S. Large Cap U.S. Mid Cap U.S. Small Cap EAFE Equity Emerging Markets Equity U.S. Core Real Estate Direct Lending 1.47 21.90 0.92 0.00 2.77 0.92 39.76 11.28 2.69 10.65 4.57 2.76 0.31 0.00 17.50 1.50 0.00 4.50 1.50 37.00 10.50 2.50 10.50 4.50 10.00 0.00 0.00 27.50 1.50 0.00 4.50 1.50 37.00 10.50 2.50 10.50 4.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.50 1.50 0.00 4.50 1.50 41.63 11.81 2.81 13.13 5.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.50 1.50 0.00 4.50 1.50 33.30 9.45 2.25 10.50 4.50 5.00 5.00 0.00 20.00 1.00 5.00 3.00 1.00 33.30 9.45 2.25 10.50 4.50 5.00 5.00 2.50 27.50 0.50 5.00 1.50 0.50 29.14 8.27 1.97 9.18 3.94 5.00 5.00 Single Year Expectations (%) Current Policy Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3 Mix 4 Mix 5 Arithmetic Mean Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio 7.53 13.14 0.57 7.63 12.81 0.60 7.26 12.68 0.57 7.75 14.26 0.54 7.44 12.26 0.61 7.58 12.40 0.61 7.21 11.11 0.65 Source: Morningstar, expected returns are based on the Monte Carlo output. See appendix for any relevant constraints and a list of proxies. 9 19 Efficient Frontier and Mix Statistics Efficient Frontier & Asset Mixes Risk: Standard Deviation 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 Efficient Frontier Current Policy Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3 Mix 4 Mix 5Arithmetic MeanAsset Mix Statistics Current Policy Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3 Mix 4 Mix 5 Arithmetic Mean Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio 7.53 13.14 0.57 7.63 12.81 0.60 7.26 12.68 0.57 7.75 14.26 0.54 7.44 12.26 0.61 7.58 12.40 0.61 7.21 11.11 0.65 Source: Morningstar 10 20 Return, Risk & Probability Forecasts Current Asset Mix Broad Asset Class Allocation (%) Current U.S. Cash U.S. Aggregate Bonds U.S. High Yield Bonds World ex-U.S. Government Bonds Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt U.S. Large Cap U.S. Mid Cap U.S. Small Cap EAFE Equity Emerging Markets Equity U.S. Core Real Estate Direct Lending 1.47 21.90 0.92 2.77 0.92 39.76 11.28 2.69 10.65 4.57 2.76 0.31 Single Year Expectations (%) Current Arithmetic Mean Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio 7.53 13.14 0.57 Return Percentiles Current Compound Return (%)1 5 10 15-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Current Wealth (USD)1 5 10 150.7 1.01.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Percentile 95th 50th 5th Current 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 1.31 1.07 0.87 2.16 1.38 0.91 3.67 1.92 1.03 5.95 2.67 1.26 Return Percentiles Percentile 95th 50th 5th Current 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 30.83 7.04 -13.48 16.67 6.68 -1.84 13.90 6.76 0.28 12.63 6.76 1.57 Source: Morningstar Return Percentiles & Forecasted Growth of $1 depict Geometric Returns. 11 21 Return, Risk & Probability Forecasts Policy Asset Mix Broad Asset Class Allocation (%) Policy U.S. Aggregate Bonds U.S. High Yield Bonds World ex-U.S. Government Bonds Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt U.S. Large Cap U.S. Mid Cap U.S. Small Cap EAFE Equity Emerging Markets Equity U.S. Core Real Estate 17.50 1.50 4.50 1.50 37.00 10.50 2.50 10.50 4.50 10.00 Single Year Expectations (%) Policy Arithmetic Mean Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio 7.63 12.81 0.60 Return Percentiles Policy Compound Return (%)1 5 10 15-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Policy Wealth (USD)1 5 10 150.7 1.01.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Percentile 95th 50th 5th Policy 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 1.31 1.07 0.88 2.14 1.39 0.93 3.68 1.94 1.05 5.88 2.71 1.30 Return Percentiles Percentile 95th 50th 5th Policy 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 30.90 7.07 -12.46 16.42 6.78 -1.52 13.90 6.83 0.49 12.53 6.87 1.78 Source: Morningstar Return Percentiles & Forecasted Growth of $1 depict Geometric Returns. 12 22 Return, Risk & Probability Forecasts Asset Mix 1 Broad Asset Class Allocation (%) Mix 1 U.S. Aggregate Bonds U.S. High Yield Bonds World ex-U.S. Government Bonds Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt U.S. Large Cap U.S. Mid Cap U.S. Small Cap EAFE Equity Emerging Markets Equity 27.50 1.50 4.50 1.50 37.00 10.50 2.50 10.50 4.50 Single Year Expectations (%) Mix 1 Arithmetic Mean Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio 7.26 12.68 0.57 Return Percentiles Mix 1 Compound Return (%)1 5 10 15-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Mix 1 Wealth (USD)1 5 10 150.7 1.01.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Percentile 95th 50th 5th Mix 1 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 1.30 1.07 0.87 2.11 1.37 0.92 3.52 1.88 1.03 5.63 2.59 1.24 Return Percentiles Percentile 95th 50th 5th Mix 1 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 30.26 6.80 -12.66 16.10 6.52 -1.75 13.40 6.53 0.32 12.21 6.56 1.45 Source: Morningstar Return Percentiles & Forecasted Growth of $1 depict Geometric Returns. 13 23 Return, Risk & Probability Forecasts Asset Mix 2 Broad Asset Class Allocation (%) Mix 2 U.S. Aggregate Bonds U.S. High Yield Bonds World ex-U.S. Government Bonds Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt U.S. Large Cap U.S. Mid Cap U.S. Small Cap EAFE Equity Emerging Markets Equity 17.50 1.50 4.50 1.50 41.63 11.81 2.81 13.13 5.63 Single Year Expectations (%) Mix 2 Arithmetic Mean Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio 7.75 14.26 0.54 Return Percentiles Mix 2 Compound Return (%)1 5 10 15-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Mix 2 Wealth (USD)1 5 10 150.7 1.01.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Percentile 95th 50th 5th Mix 2 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 1.34 1.07 0.85 2.24 1.39 0.88 3.89 1.94 0.98 6.46 2.71 1.20 Return Percentiles Percentile 95th 50th 5th Mix 2 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 33.71 6.97 -14.96 17.50 6.82 -2.52 14.56 6.83 -0.21 13.24 6.87 1.24 Source: Morningstar Return Percentiles & Forecasted Growth of $1 depict Geometric Returns. 14 24 Return, Risk & Probability Forecasts Asset Mix 3 Broad Asset Class Allocation (%) Mix 3 U.S. Aggregate Bonds U.S. High Yield Bonds World ex-U.S. Government Bonds Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt U.S. Large Cap U.S. Mid Cap U.S. Small Cap EAFE Equity Emerging Markets Equity U.S. Core Real Estate Direct Lending 22.50 1.50 4.50 1.50 33.30 9.45 2.25 10.50 4.50 5.00 5.00 Single Year Expectations (%) Mix 3 Arithmetic Mean Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio 7.44 12.26 0.61 Return Percentiles Mix 3 Compound Return (%)1 5 10 15-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Mix 3 Wealth (USD)1 5 10 150.7 1.01.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Percentile 95th 50th 5th Mix 3 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 1.29 1.07 0.88 2.10 1.38 0.94 3.53 1.92 1.07 5.64 2.67 1.34 Return Percentiles Percentile 95th 50th 5th Mix 3 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 29.38 7.07 -11.93 15.98 6.73 -1.29 13.45 6.73 0.67 12.22 6.76 1.95 Source: Morningstar Return Percentiles & Forecasted Growth of $1 depict Geometric Returns. 15 25 Return, Risk & Probability Forecasts Asset Mix 4 Broad Asset Class Allocation (%) Mix 4 U.S. Aggregate Bonds U.S. High Yield Bonds U.S. Leveraged Loans World ex-U.S. Government Bonds Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt U.S. Large Cap U.S. Mid Cap U.S. Small Cap EAFE Equity Emerging Markets Equity U.S. Core Real Estate Direct Lending 20.00 1.00 5.00 3.00 1.00 33.30 9.45 2.25 10.50 4.50 5.00 5.00 Single Year Expectations (%) Mix 4 Arithmetic Mean Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio 7.58 12.40 0.61 Return Percentiles Mix 4 Compound Return (%)1 5 10 15-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Mix 4 Wealth (USD)1 5 10 150.7 1.01.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Percentile 95th 50th 5th Mix 4 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 1.30 1.07 0.88 2.11 1.39 0.94 3.59 1.94 1.08 5.79 2.70 1.35 Return Percentiles Percentile 95th 50th 5th Mix 4 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 29.89 7.10 -12.23 16.14 6.79 -1.26 13.65 6.85 0.76 12.42 6.86 2.02 Source: Morningstar Return Percentiles & Forecasted Growth of $1 depict Geometric Returns. 16 26 Return, Risk & Probability Forecasts Asset Mix 5 Broad Asset Class Allocation (%) Mix 5 U.S. Cash U.S. Aggregate Bonds U.S. High Yield Bonds U.S. Leveraged Loans World ex-U.S. Government Bonds Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt U.S. Large Cap U.S. Mid Cap U.S. Small Cap EAFE Equity Emerging Markets Equity U.S. Core Real Estate Direct Lending 2.50 27.50 0.50 5.00 1.50 0.50 29.14 8.27 1.97 9.18 3.94 5.00 5.00 Single Year Expectations (%) Mix 5 Arithmetic Mean Standard Deviation Sharpe Ratio 7.21 11.11 0.65 Return Percentiles Mix 5 Compound Return (%)1 5 10 15-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Mix 5 Wealth (USD)1 5 10 150.7 1.01.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 Year 95th 50th 5th Forecasted Growth of $1 Percentile 95th 50th 5th Mix 5 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 1.27 1.07 0.90 2.00 1.37 0.97 3.30 1.90 1.11 5.22 2.62 1.40 Return Percentiles Percentile 95th 50th 5th Mix 5 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 27.18 6.84 -10.28 14.91 6.57 -0.63 12.67 6.62 1.07 11.65 6.63 2.25 Source: Morningstar Return Percentiles & Forecasted Growth of $1 depict Geometric Returns. 17 27 Appendix 18 28 Proxies and Constraints Proxies: Proxies are used for GTAA and MLP allocations. The proxies are constructed to mirror the properties of these asset classes as well as reflect the overall risk and return behavior. Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ GTAA: U.S. Large Cap - 21%, EAFE Equity - 20%, Emerging Markets Equity - 9%, U.S. Aggregate Bonds - 50% MLP: U.S. Small Cap - 50%, Commodities - 50% US Equity: U.S. Large Cap - 74%, U.S. Mid Cap - 21%, U.S. Small Cap - 5% International Equity: EAFE Equity - 70%, Emerging Markets Equity - 30% Global Equity: U.S. Large Cap - 45%, U.S. Mid Cap - 13%, U.S. Small Cap - 3%, EAFE Equity - 27%, Emerging Markets Equity - 12% Global Bonds: U.S. High Yield Bonds - 20%, World ex-US Gov't Bonds - 60%, Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt - 20% SMID: U.S. Mid Cap - 81%, U.S. Small Cap - 19% Constraints: A minimum and/or maximum allocation constraint can be applied on a group or an individual asset class level. Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ U.S. Cash, U.S. Aggregate Bonds, U.S. Short Duration Gov/Credit Bond ≤ 80% U.S. Leveraged Loans ≤ 15%; U.S. High Yield Bonds, World ex-US Gov't Bonds Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ≤ 10% U.S. Large Cap ≤ 75%; U.S. Mid Cap ≤ 50%; U.S. Small Cap ≤ 30% EAFE Equity, Emerging Markets Equity ≤ 25%; Global Equity ≤ 30% U.S. Core Real Estate, U.S. Value-Added Real Estate ≤ 10% Private Equity, Global Core Infrastructure, Diversified Hedge Fund, Direct Lending, Commodities ≤ 10% 19 29 Introduction to Asset Allocation Modeling Mean/variance optimization using forecast capital market assumptions: Asset Allocation model inputs include: Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Expected Return:The arithmetic average expected return (mean) of each asset class Expected Risk:The variability (standard deviation) of each asset class around its mean return Correlation:The degree of co-movement (correlation coefficient) of each asset class relative to other asset classes Understanding asset allocation model limitations: Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Output is based on forecasts (guesses) of each capital market assumption. Accurately predicting the expected return, expected risk (standard deviation), and correlation coefficients for each asset class is not a science, it’s an economic methodology that varies by organization and forecast timeframe. Assumes asset class returns are normally distributed (bell-shape curve). However, many asset classes exhibit non-normal (kurtosis - fat-tails and/or skewness) return distributions. Assumes correlations between asset class pairs are static. However, since correlation coefficients can and do change over time, diversification and/or stability benefits of combining different asset classes may be overstated. Even historically stable correlation relationships may break down during periods of market stress. Alternative asset classes introduce a variety of important risk factors that are not captured in their standard deviation measures. Despite its shortcomings, asset allocation modeling provides a foundational framework for making sound portfolio decisions. 20 30 Arithmetic vs. Geometric Returns Arithmetic vs. Geometric Returns Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Arithmetic Returns:The simple average of annual returns Geometric Returns: The average of annual returns compounded over multiple periods The larger the volatility, the greater the dispersion is between an arithmetic and geometric return FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY 21 31 A Closer Look at Investment Risk Large Cap Equity Average Expected Return of 8.20% with a Standard Deviation of 17.00% Variability of return around its arithmetic average Risk = Variability Around Mean = Standard Deviation Source: Client Data, Study Assumptions and Mariner Capital Market Assumptions (CMAs). CMAs represent forward-looking estimates based on Mariner’s internal modeling and assumptions. Projections and other information shown are strictly hypothetical in nature, do not represent the performance of any actual portfolio or strategy, do not reflect actual investment results achieved by clients, and are not guarantees of future results. Actual outcomes may differ materially from those illustrated, and results are highly dependent on the assumptions used. Assumptions are subject to change without notice. Please see additional important disclosures at the end of this presentation. 22 32 Understanding How Correlation Fits into the Process A statistical measure of co-movement withing a range between +1 and -1. It is important to remember that correlations are not consistant through time. Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ +1 = Perfect positive correlation. Assets move in tandem in the same direction. 0 = No correlation. Assets move independently of one another - essentially no distinguishable pattern, more random. -1 = Perfect negative correlation. Assets move in opposite directions - one goes up, the other goes down and vice versa. Where the magic happens: How asset class pairs move relative to one another Understanding Correlations 23 33 Other Investment Risks Beyond Variability - Other Risks Are Always Present Business:Underlying operational volatility/uncertainty Call:Debt security called prior to maturity Credit:Bond Issuer defaults on interest/principal payment Currency/Exchange Rate:Change in price of one currency against another Fiduciary:Potential non-arm's length transactions Headline:Manager makes the headlines or negative press Inflationary:Value of a security is eroded by inflation Interest Rate:Bonds decline in value when rates rise Investment Manager:Changes in investment style or management team Leverage:Amplifies losses Liquidity:Lock-up terms or gates during market stress Social/Political/Legislative:Investment landscape changes Systemic/Market:Correlations go to "1" (like 2008) Valuation:Some assets are difficult to price 24 34 Glossary of Terms Allocation Ranges:the range a specific asset class’ allocation must fall between. Arithmetic Mean:the average of annual returns. Asset Allocation:the process of determining how investment fund should be distributed among asset classes to optimize the balance between risk and reward based on investment needs. Asset Classes:a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and behave similarly in the marketplace. Examples include equities, fixed income, cash equivalent or money market instruments, and alternatives. Capital Market Assumptions:expected returns, standard deviations, and correlation estimates that represent the long-term risk/return forecasts for various asset classes. Correlation:statistical measurement of the relationship between two variables. Possible correlations range from +1 to -1. A zero correlation indicates that there is no relationship between the variables. A correlation of -1 indicates a perfect negative correlation and +1 indicates a perfect positive correlation. Diversification:the process of owning different investments that tend to perform well at different times in order to reduce the effects of volatility in a portfolio, and also increase the potential for increasing returns. Efficient Frontier:a representation of potential portfolios that offer the highest expected return for a specific level of risk (standard deviation). Expected Return:the arithmetic average (mean) of each asset class. Geometric Mean:the average of annual returns compounded over multiple periods. Kurtosis:indicates the peakedness of a distribution. For normal distribution, Kurtosis is 3. Monte Carlo Simulation:a model used to predict the probability of different outcomes and used to understand the impact of risk and uncertainty in prediction and forecasting models. Optimized Portfolio:a portfolio that lies along the efficient frontier and is determined by target risk/return objectives. The underlying exposures are dependent on forecasted asset class expectations. Risk Tolerance:the degree of uncertainty that an investor can handle in regard to a negative change in the value of the portfolio. Skewness:reflects the degree of asymmetry of a distribution. If the distribution has a longer left tail, the function has negative skewness. Otherwise, it has positive skewness. A normal distribution is symmetric with skewness 0. Sharpe Ratio:In this report, a reward-to-variability ratio and a measure of the return per unit of risk in an investment asset or a trading strategy. This is based on methodology used by Morningstar, whose software was used to create these charts. This definition differs from the ratio that Dr. William Sharpe created in that the risk-free rate has not been deducted in Morningstar’s calculations. Standard Deviation:A measure of the dispersion of a set of data from its mean. Calculated by the square-root of the variance. Target Return:the specific return the investor is modeling to reach, usually sent in place by the actuary. Time Horizon:the total length of time that an investor expects to hold a security or a portfolio before it is liquidated. Volatility:the amount and frequency an investment fluctates in value. 25 35 Disclosures IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION This document has been created by Mariner Institutional (“Mariner") solely for use by the named client recipient ("Client”) and not for distribution to the public. It is the proprietary confidential work product of Mariner and is strictly confidential. It should not be disclosed, distributed or reproduced in whole or in part or used for any other purpose. Mariner uses the material contained in this document to make observations and recommendations to the client, however the allocations listed may not be suitable for all investors and there is no guarantee that the asset allocation provided will be successful. Neither the information in this document nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a recommendation to buy or sell any specific security. Moreover, the material provided is valid as of the date indicated on the cover and not as of any future date, and will not be updated or otherwise revised to reflect information that subsequently becomes available, or circumstances existing or changes occurring after such date. Any return data presented is provided solely for historical and informational purposes. The results shown represent past performance and do not represent expected future performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. We do not provide any representation or guarantee that your goals will be achieved. Unless otherwise indicated, returns stated are net of fees, which may include: investment management fees, taxes and other expenses. There may be instances where certain returns are shown gross of fees (i.e., before the aforementioned fees are deducted) and would be noted as such. It is important to note that any accounts being used as a “proxy” are strictly for illustrative purposes. An investor should not expect the same results from the actual strategy or strategies under consideration. When client-specific performance is shown, Mariner uses time-weighted calculations, which are founded on standards recommended by the CFA Institute. In these cases, the performance-related data shown are based on information that is received from custodians. As a result, this provides Mariner with a reasonable basis that the investment information presented is free from material misstatement. CAPITAL MARKET ASSUMPTIONS, MODELING, AND FORECASTS This study uses assumptions from proprietary, internally developed capital market assumptions created by Mariner (the “CMAs”). The CMAs represent forward-looking estimates of expected asset class returns, volatility, correlations, inflation, and other economic variables over specified time horizons. These assumptions are based on quantitative models, historical data, and professional judgment. This analysis does not constitute a guarantee of investment performance or future outcomes. It is intended as a strategic planning tool to support decision-making and should be evaluated in conjunction with other information and professional advice. Recipients are encouraged to review the assumptions and consider alternative scenarios as appropriate. The CMAs are strictly hypothetical in nature. They do not reflect the performance of any actual client portfolios and do not guarantee or accurately predict future market behavior or asset class returns. Actual investment results and economic conditions will differ, potentially materially, from those reflected in the assumptions. Results illustrated in this Study may differ materially from actual outcomes. Forecasts, projections, probability analyses, and scenario results presented herein are derived from the CMAs and other modeling inputs and are intended solely to illustrate potential long-term investment outcomes, risk exposures, and other considerations under specified assumptions. Such outputs are inherently uncertain, are not forecasts of actual results, and are highly sensitive to changes in assumptions, inputs, and economic conditions. Small variations in underlying parameters may produce materially different outcomes. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including market volatility, interest rate movements, inflation variability, policy changes, demographic experience, and structural economic shifts. Model results may also be affected by data quality, simulation methodology, rebalancing assumptions, and programming limitations. SOURCING Third-party information is based on sources and data believed to be reliable, but their accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. This document may contain data provided by Morningstar. All rights reserved. Use of this content requires expert knowledge. It is to be used by specialist institutions only. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied, adapted or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information, except where such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by law in your jurisdiction. Past financial performance is not a guarantee of future results. Mariner Institutional is an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Mariner is the marketing name for the financial services businesses of Mariner Wealth Advisors, LLC and its subsidiaries. Investment advisory services are provided through the brands Mariner Wealth, Mariner Independent, Mariner Institutional, Mariner Ultra, and Mariner Workplace, each of which is a business name of the registered investment advisory entities of Mariner. For additional information about each of the registered investment advisory entities of Mariner, including fees and services, please contact Mariner or refer to each entity’s Form ADV Part 2A, which is available on the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website (www.adviserinfo.sec.gov). Registration of an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. 26 36 37 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 501 BOARD OF TRUSTEES AGENDA | MAY 14, 2026 REGULAR MEETING TITLE GRS Actuarial Valuation Report of the Defined Benefit Plan - October 1 2025 SUMMARY GRS will be presenting the October 1, 2025 Actuarial Valuation for the City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan. The purpose of this report is to indicate appropriate contribution levels, comment on the actuarial stability of the Plan and to satisfy State requirements. FUNDING SOURCE RECOMMENDATION 38 May 4, 2026 Ms. Kimberly Aviles Senior HR Generalist City of Winter Springs 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 Re: City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan October 1, 2025 Actuarial Valuation Dear Kim: As requested, we are pleased to enclose eleven (11) copies of the October 1, 2025 Actuarial Valuation Report for the City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan. We appreciate the opportunity to partner with you on this important project and look forward to presenting the key financial results of our Report at the May 14th Board Meeting. Upon Board approval of the Actuarial Valuation Report, we will upload an electronic copy of the Actuarial Valuation Report along with the required disclosure information to the State portal as required by the State. If you should have any questions concerning the above, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Shelly L. Jones, A.S.A. Consultant and Actuary Enclosures 39 City Of Winter Springs Retirement Plan ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2025 This Valuation Determines the Annual Contribution for the Plan Year October 1, 2026 through September 30, 2027 to be Paid in Plan Year October 1, 2026 to September 30, 2027 May 4, 2026 40 41 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Transmittal Letter 1 Executive Summary 4 Risks Associated with Measuring the Accrued Liability and Actuarially Determined Contribution 7 Low-Default-Risk Obligation Measure 10 I. Summary of Retirement Plan Costs ....................................................................... 11 II. Comparison of Cost Data of Current and Prior Valuations .................................... 13 III. Characteristics of Participants in Actuarial Valuation ............................................ 14 IV. Statement of Assets .............................................................................................. 15 V. Reconciliation of Plan Assets ................................................................................. 16 VI. Actuarial Gain / (Loss) ........................................................................................... 18 VII. Amortization of Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability .......................................... 19 VIII. Accounting Disclosure Exhibit ............................................................................... 20 IX. Outline of Principal Provisions of the Retirement Plan .......................................... 29 X. Actuarial Assumptions and Actuarial Cost Methods Used ..................................... 32 XI. Distribution of Plan Participants by Attained Age Groups and Service Groups ...... 38 XII. Statistics for Participants Entitled to Deferred Benefits and Participants Receiving Benefits ................................................................................................ 42 XIII. Reconciliation of Employee Data ........................................................................... 43 XIV. Projected Retirement Benefits .............................................................................. 44 XV. Recent Plan Experience ......................................................................................... 45 XVI. Schedule of Funded Progress ................................................................................ 47 XVII. State Required Exhibit ........................................................................................... 51 XVIII. Glossary ................................................................................................................. 55 42 May 4, 2026 City Council City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan c/o Ms. Kimberly Aviles Senior HR Generalist 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 Dear Council Members: We are pleased to present our October 1, 2025 Actuarial Valuation for the City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan (Plan). The purpose of this report is to indicate appropriate contribution levels, comment on the actuarial stability of the Plan and to satisfy State requirements. The City has retained Gabriel, Roeder, Smith and Company (GRS) to prepare an annual actuarial valuation under Section 3.02 of the Plan. This report consists of this cover letter, executive summary, risk assessment and Low-Default-Risk Obligation Measure followed by detailed Tables I through XVI, the State Required Exhibit on Table XVII and Glossary on Table XVIII. The Tables contain basic Plan cost figures plus significant details on the benefits, liabilities and experience of the Plan. We suggest you thoroughly review the report at your convenience and contact us with any questions that may arise. The findings in this report are based on data or asset information through September 30, 2025. The valuation was based upon information furnished by the City concerning Plan benefit, plan provision and active members, terminated members, retirees and beneficiaries. We received financial information concerning Plan assets as of September 30, 2025 from the City. We do not audit the Member census data and asset information that is provided to us; however, we perform certain reasonableness checks. The City is responsible for the accuracy of the data. In our opinion the benefits provided for under the current Plan will be sufficiently funded through the payment of the amount as indicated in this and future Actuarial Valuation reports. This valuation assumed the continuing ability of the plan sponsor to make the contributions necessary to fund this plan. A determination regarding whether or not the plan sponsor is actually able to do so is outside our scope of expertise and was not performed. We will continue to update you on the future payment requirements for the Plan through our actuarial reports. These reports will also continue to monitor the future experience of the Plan. We have assessed that the contribution rate calculated under the current funding policy is a reasonable Actuarially Determined Employer Contribution (ADEC) and it is consistent with the plan accumulating adequate assets to make benefit payments when due. 43 Council Members May 4, 2026 Page Two The actuarial assumptions used in this Actuarial Valuation are as adopted by the Plan. The economic and demographic actuarial assumptions are based upon the results of an Experience Study for the period October 1, 2016 – September 30, 2022. The mortality assumptions are as prescribed by statute. Each assumption represents an estimate of future Plan experience. All actuarial assumptions used in this report are reasonable for the purposes of this valuation. The combined effect of the assumptions is expected to have no significant bias (i.e. not significantly optimistic or pessimistic). All actuarial assumptions and methods used in the valuation follow the guidance in the applicable Actuarial Standards of Practice. If all actuarial assumptions are met and if all future minimum required contributions are paid, Plan assets will be sufficient to pay all Plan benefits, future contributions are expected to remain relatively stable or decrease as a percent of payroll and the funded status is expected to improve. Plan minimum required contributions are determined in compliance with the requirements of the Florida Protection of Public Employee Retirement Benefits Act with normal cost determined as a level percent of covered payroll and a level dollar amortization payment using an initial closed amortization period of 25 years for newly created bases effective October 1, 2023. The Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) may not be appropriate for assessing the sufficiency of Plan assets to meet the estimated cost of settling benefit obligations but may be appropriate for assessing the need for or the amount of future contributions. The UAAL would be different if it reflected the market value of assets rather than the smoothed value of assets. The GASB Net Pension Liability and Plan Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of Total Pension Liability may not be appropriate for assessing the sufficiency of Plan assets to meet the estimated cost of settling benefit obligations but may be appropriate for assessing the need for or the amount of future contributions. The Funded Ratio shown in Table II and Table XVI is for informational purposes and may not be appropriate for assessing the sufficiency of Plan assets to meet the estimated cost of settling benefit obligations but may be appropriate for assessing the need for or the amount of future contributions. This report should not be relied on for any purpose other than the purpose described in the primary communication. Determinations of the financial results associated with the benefits described in this report in a manner other than the intended purpose may produce significantly different results. This report was prepared using ProVal’s valuation model, a software product of Winklevoss Technologies. We are relying on the ProVal model. We performed tests of the ProVal model with this assignment and made a reasonable attempt to understand the developer’s intended purpose of, general operation of, major sensitivities and dependencies within, and key strengths and limitations of the ProVal model. In our professional judgment, the ProVal valuation model has the capability to 44 Council Members May 4, 2026 Page Three provide results that are consistent with the purposes of the valuation and has no material limitations or known weaknesses. This report has been prepared by actuaries who have substantial experience valuing public employee retirement plans. To the best of our knowledge the information contained in this report is accurate and fairly presents the actuarial position of the Plan as of the valuation date. All calculations have been made in conformity with generally accepted actuarial principles and practices, with the Actuarial Standards of Practice issued by the Actuarial Standards Board and with applicable statutes. This report was prepared at the request of the City and is intended for use by the City and those designated or approved by the City. This report may be provided to parties other than the City only in its entirety and only with the permission of the City. GRS is not responsible for unauthorized use of this report. The signing actuaries are independent of the Plan sponsor. The undersigned are Members of the American Academy of Actuaries and meet the qualification standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinions contained in this report. We are available to respond to any questions with regards to matters covered in this report. Sincerely, Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Shelly L. Jones, A.S.A., E.A. Consultant and Actuary Jennifer M. Borregard, E.A. Consultant and Actuary 45 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Retirement Plan Costs Our Actuarial Valuation develops the required minimum Plan payment for the Plan Year October 1, 2026 – September 30, 2027 under the Florida Protection of Public Employee Retirement Benefits Act. The minimum payment consists of payment of annual normal costs including amortization of the components of the unfunded actuarial accrued liability over various periods as prescribed by law. The minimum payment is $1,070,408 (24.7%). The figure in parentheses is the Plan cost expressed as a percentage of projected covered annual payroll for fiscal year October 1, 2026 – September 30, 2027 ($4,333,635). This total cost is to be met by member and City contributions. We anticipate member contributions will be $216,682 (5.0% of projected covered payroll for fiscal year ending September 30, 2027). The resulting minimum required City contribution is $853,726 (19.7%). We recommend the City continue to contribute not less than the dollar amount of minimum required contribution due to the closing of the Plan to future general employees. Changes in Actuarial Assumptions, Methods and Plan Provisions The Plan provisions were updated to reflect the plan restatement to comply with the current operation of the Plan. These changes did not affect the funding calculations. The remaining Plan provisions are unchanged from our October 1, 2024 Actuarial Valuation. The Plan provisions are outlined on Table IX. The mortality assumption is updated to use the mortality assumption used by the Florida Retirement System (FRS) as required under F.S., Chapter 2015-157 based upon the July 1, 2025 FRS Actuarial Valuation. The disability rates are updated based upon the July 1, 2025 FRS Actuarial Valuation. The remaining actuarial assumptions and methods are unchanged from our October 1, 2024 Actuarial Valuation. The actuarial assumptions and methods are outlined on Table X. Comparison of October 1, 2024 and October 1, 2025 Valuation Results Table II of our report provides information of a comparative nature. The left columns of the Table indicate the costs as calculated for October 1, 2024. The center columns indicate the costs as calculated for October 1, 2025, prior to the update in actuarial assumptions. The right columns indicate the costs as calculated for October 1, 2025, after the update in actuarial assumptions. Comparing the left and center columns of Table II shows the effect of Plan experience during the year. The number of active participants decreased by approximately 12% while covered payroll increased by approximately 2%. Total Plan membership decreased by approximately 2%. Total normal cost, unfunded actuarial accrued liability and net City minimum funding requirement all decreased both as a dollar amount and as a percentage of covered payroll. 46 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 5 Comparing the center and right columns of Table II shows the effect of the update of the actuarial assumptions. Total normal cost, unfunded actuarial accrued liability and net City minimum funding requirement all increased both as a dollar amount and as a percentage of projected pensionable payroll. The Plan assets exceed the value of vested accrued benefits this year, resulting in a Vested Benefit Security Ratio (VBSR) of 108.0% (110.3% before the update in actuarial assumptions) which is an increase from 104.6% as of the October 1, 2024 Actuarial Valuation. The VBSR is measured on a market value of assets basis. Plan Experience The Plan experienced an actuarial gain in the amount of $2,276,390 this year. This indicates actual overall Plan experience was more favorable than expected. Table XV (salary, turnover and investment yield) provides figures on recent Plan experience. Salary experience indicates actual salary increases averaged approximately 6.1% for General and Forensic Employees and 17.6% for Police Officers for Plan Year ended September 30, 2025 when compared to the assumed salary increase of 5.1% and 4.8%, respectively. Salary increases were generally an offsetting source of actuarial loss for General and Forensic Employees and for Police Officers. The three, five and ten-year average annual salary increases are 11.8%, 10.4% and 7.9% for General and Forensic Employees, respectively – 12.8%, 11.1% and 7.9% for Police Officers, respectively. Employee turnover this year was 310% of the assumed turnover for General and Forensic Employees and 160% of the assumed turnover for Police Officers. Employee turnover was generally a source of actuarial gain for General and Forensic Employees and for Police Officers. The three, five and ten-year average annual turnover is 140%, 160% and 200%, respectively for General and Forensic Employees - 160%, 150% and 200%, respectively for Police Officers. The smoothed value investment return of 11.11% was above the investment return assumption of 6.75%. Smoothed value investment return was an additional source of actuarial gain during the year. The three, five and ten-year average annual smoothed value investment returns are 8.53%, 8.75% and 9.0%, respectively. The one, three, five and ten-year average annual market value returns are 11.44%, 15.23%, 10.89% and 10.0%, respectively. Funded Ratio The smoothed value funded ratio is 92.8% as of October 1, 2025 (94.8% before the update in actuarial assumptions) compared to 90.8% as of October 1, 2024. The smoothed value funded ratio is equal to the actuarial value of assets divided by the actuarial accrued liability. If the market value of assets had been used instead, the funded ratio would have been 102.0% as of October 1, 2025 (104.2% before the update in actuarial assumptions) and 99.1% as of October 1, 2024. 47 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 6 Conclusion and Recommendations The Market Value of Assets is more than the Actuarial Value of Assets by $7,596,985 as of the valuation date. This difference will be gradually recognized in the absence of future gains/losses. In turn, the actuarially determined contribution rate will decrease. The remainder of this report includes detailed actuarial valuation results, information relating to the pension fund, financial accounting information, miscellaneous employee data and a summary of plan provisions and actuarial assumptions and methods. 48 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 7 RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH MEASURING THE ACCRUED LIABILITY AND ACTUARIALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTION The determination of the accrued liability and the actuarially determined contribution requires the use of assumptions regarding future economic and demographic experience. Risk measures, as illustrated in this report, are intended to aid in the understanding of the effects of future experience differing from the assumptions used in the course of the actuarial valuation. Risk measures may also help with illustrating the potential volatility in the accrued liability and the actuarially determined contribution that result from the differences between actual experience and the actuarial assumptions. Future actuarial measurements may differ significantly from the current measurements presented in this report due to such factors as the following: Plan experience differing from that anticipated by the economic or demographic assumptions; changes in economic or demographic assumptions due to changing conditions; increases or decreases expected as part of the natural operation of the methodology used for these measurements (such as the end of an amortization period, or additional cost or contribution requirements based on the Plan’s funded status); and changes in Plan provisions or applicable law. The scope of an actuarial valuation does not include an analysis of the potential range of such future measurements. Examples of risk that may reasonably be anticipated to significantly affect the Plan’s future financial condition include: 1. Investment risk – actual investment returns may differ from expected returns; 2. Asset / Liability mismatch – changes in asset values may not match changes in liabilities, thereby altering the gap between the accrued liability and assets and consequently altering the funded status and the actuarially determined contribution requirements; 3. Contribution risk – actual contributions may differ from expected future contributions. For example, actual contributions may not be made in accordance with the Plan’s funding policy or material changes may occur in the anticipated number of covered employees, covered payroll or other relevant contribution base; 4. Salary and Payroll risk – actual salaries and total payroll may differ from expected, resulting in actual future accrued liability and the actuarially determined contributions differing from expected; 5. Longevity risk – members may live longer or shorter than expected and receive pensions for a period of time other than assumed; 6. Other demographic risks – members may terminate, retire or become disabled at times or with benefits other than assumed resulting in actual future accrued liability and the actuarially determined contributions differing from expected. The effects of certain trends in experience can generally be anticipated. For example if the investment return since the most recent actuarial valuation is less (or more) than the assumed rate, the actuarially determined contribution can be expected to increase (or decrease). Likewise if 49 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 8 longevity is improving (or worsening), increases (or decreases) in the actuarially determined contribution can be anticipated. The actuarially determined contribution rate shown on page four of the report may be considered as a minimum contribution rate that complies with the Plan’s funding policy. The timely receipt of the actuarially determined contributions is critical to support the financial health of the Plan. Users of this report should be aware that contributions made at the actuarially determined rate do not necessarily guarantee benefit security. Plan Maturity Measures Risks facing a pension plan evolve over time. A young plan with virtually no investments and paying few benefits may experience little investment risk. An older plan with a large number of members in pay status and a significant trust fund may be much more exposed to investment risk. Generally accepted plan maturity measures include the following: 2024 2025 Ratio of market value of assets to payroll 19.15 19.96 Ratio of actuarial accrued liability to payroll 19.33 19.57 Ratio of actives to retirees and beneficiaries 0.34 0.29 Ratio of net cash flow to market value of assets -4.2% -4.5% Duration of the actuarial accrued liability 11.36 11.41 Ratio of Market Value of Assets to Payroll The relationship between assets and payroll is a useful indicator of the potential volatility of the actuarially determined contribution. For example, if the market value of assets is 2.0 times the payroll, a return on assets 5% different than assumed would equal 10% of payroll. A higher (lower) or increasing (decreasing) level of this maturity measure generally indicates higher (lower) or increasing (decreasing) volatility in the actuarially determined contribution as a percentage of payroll. Ratio of Actuarial Accrued Liability to Payroll The relationship between actuarial accrued liability and payroll is a useful indicator of the potential volatility of the actuarially determined contributions for a fully funded plan. A funding policy targeting a funded ratio of 100% is expected to result in the ratio of assets to payroll and the ratio of liability to payroll converging over time. The ratio of actuarial accrued liability to payroll may also be used as a measure of sensitivity of the liability itself. For example, if the actuarial accrued liability is 2.5 times payroll, a change in actuarial accrued liability 2% other than assumed would equal 5% of payroll. A higher (lower) or increasing (decreasing) level of this maturity measure generally indicates a higher (lower) or increasing (decreasing) volatility in actuarial accrued liability (and also the actuarially determined contribution) as a percentage of payroll. 50 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 9 Ratio of Actives to Retirees and Beneficiaries A young plan with many active members and few retirees will have a high ratio of active to retirees. A mature open plan may have close to the same number of actives to retirees resulting in a ratio near 1.0. A super-mature or closed plan may have significantly more retirees than actives resulting in a ratio below 1.0. Ratio of Net Cash Flow to Market Value of Assets A positive net cash flow means contributions exceed benefits and expenses. A negative cash flow means existing funds are being used to make payments. A certain amount of negative net cash flow is generally expected to occur when benefits are prefunded through a qualified trust. Large negative net cash flows as a percent of assets may indicate a super-mature plan or a need for additional contributions. Duration of Actuarial Accrued Liability The duration of the actuarial accrued liability may be used to approximate the sensitivity to a 1% change in the assumed rate of return. For example, a duration of 10 indicates the actuarial accrued liability would increase approximately 10% if the assumed rate of return were lowered 1%. Additional Risk Assessment Additional risk assessment is outside the scope of the annual actuarial valuation. Additional assessment may include scenario tests, sensitivity tests, stochastic modeling, stress tests and a comparison of the present value of accrued benefits at low-risk discount rates with the actuarial accrued liability. 51 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 10 LOW-DEFAULT-RISK OBLIGATION MEASURE Actuarial Standards of Practice No. 4 (ASOP No. 4) was revised and reissued in December 2021 by the Actuarial Standards Board (ASB). It includes a new calculation called a low-default-risk obligation measure (LDROM) to be prepared and issued annually for defined benefit pension plans. The transmittal memorandum for ASOP No. 4 includes the following explanation: “The ASB believes that the calculation and disclosure of this measure provides appropriate, useful information for the intended user regarding the funded status of a pension plan. The calculation and disclosure of this additional measure is not intended to suggest that this is the “right” liability measure for a pension plan. However, the ASB does believe that this additional disclosure provides a more complete assessment of a plan’s funded status and provides additional information regarding the security of benefits that members have earned as of the measurement date.” The following information has been prepared in compliance with this new requirement. Unless otherwise noted, the measurement date, actuarial cost methods, and assumptions used are the same as for the funding valuation covered in this actuarial valuation report. A. Low-default-risk Obligation Measure of benefits earned as of the measurement date: $101,593,500 B. Discount rate used to calculate the LDROM: 4.90% based on Bond Buyer “20-Bond GO Index” as of September 25, 2025 * C. Other significant assumptions that differ from those used for the funding valuation: None D. Actuarial cost method used to calculate the LDROM: Entry Age Normal E. Valuation procedures to value any significant plan provisions that are difficult to measure using traditional valuation procedures, and that differ from the procedures used in the funding valuation: None F. Commentary to help the intended user understand the significance of the LDROM with respect to the funded status of the plan, plan contributions, and the security of participant benefits: The LDROM is a market-based measurement of the pension obligation. It estimates the amount the plan would need to invest in low default risk securities. This measure may not be appropriate for assessing the need for or amount of future contributions. This measure may not be appropriate for assessing the sufficiency of plan assets to cover the estimated cost of settling the plan’s benefit obligation. The difference between the two measures (Valuation and LDROM) is one illustration of the savings the sponsor anticipates by taking on the risk in a diversified portfolio. * The “20-Bond GO Index” is based on 20 general obligation municipal bonds maturing in 20 years with mixed quality. In describing this index, the Bond Buyer website notes that the bonds’ average credit quality is roughly equivalent to Moody’s Investors Service’s Aa2 rating and Standard &Poor’s Corp.’s AA. 52 Table I Cost % of Cost % of Data Payroll Data Payroll A. Participant Data Summary (Table III) 1. Active Employees 50 N/A 50 N/A  2. Terminated Vested 151 N/A 151 N/A  3. Receiving Benefits 174 N/A 174 N/A  4. Total Annual Payroll of Active Employees 4,222,158$          100.0% 4,222,158$          100.0%    ‐ Police Officers and Forensic Professionals 3,715,893$          88.0% 3,715,893$          88.0%    ‐ General Employees 506,265$             12.0% 506,265$             12.0% B. Total Normal Costs 1. Age Retirement Benefits 281,991$             6.7% 284,554$             6.7% 2. Termination Benefits 151,048                3.6% 156,744                3.7% 3. Death Benefits 5,523                    0.1% 4,073                    0.1% 4. Disability Benefits 3,170                    0.1% 8,786                    0.2% 5. Estimated Expenses 50,286                  1.2% 50,286                  1.2% 6. Total Annual Normal Costs 492,018$             11.7% 504,443$             11.9% C. Total Actuarial Accrued Liability 1.Age Retirement and Termination Benefits Active Employees 12,130,462$        287.3% 12,377,022$        293.1% 2. Death Benefits Active Employees 142,297                3.4% 107,821                2.6% 3. Disability Benefits Active Employees 81,535                  1.9% 212,350                5.0% 4. Retired or Terminated Vested Participants Receiving Benefits 54,717,124          1296.0% 55,657,340          1318.2% 5. Terminated Vested Participants Entitled to Future Benefits 10,437,090          247.2% 10,824,551          256.4% 6. Deceased Participants Whose Beneficiaries are Receiving Benefits (includes DROs) 2,568,120            60.8% 2,639,090            62.5% 7. Disabled Participants Receiving Benefits 566,765                13.4% 577,223                13.7% 8. Miscellaneous Liability (Refunds in Process) 240,239                5.7% 240,239                5.7% 9. Total Actuarial Accrued Liability 80,883,632$        1915.7% 82,635,636$        1957.2% D. Assets (Table V) 1. Smoothed Value of Assets 76,674,502$        1816.0% 76,674,502$        1816.0% 2. Market Value of Assets 84,271,487$        1995.9% 84,271,487$        1995.9% E. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (C.9. ‐ D.1.) 4,209,130$          99.7% 5,961,134$          141.2% Current Assumptions Summary of Retirement Plan Costs as of October 1, 2025 Prior Assumptions City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    1153 Table I (Cont'd) Cost % of Cost % of Data Payroll Data Payroll F. Minimum Required Contribution 1. Total Normal Cost (including expenses) 492,018$              11.7% 504,443$              11.9% 2. Amortization of Unfunded Liability 363,232                8.6% 500,909                11.9% 3. Interest Adjustment 33,407                  0.8% 39,583                  0.9% 4. Total Payment 888,657$              21.0% 1,044,935$          24.7% G. Expected Payroll of Active Employees for FYE 2027 ($3,715,893 x 1.030 + $506,265 x 1.000) 4,333,635$          102.6% 4,333,635$          102.6% H. Contribution Sources (percent of expected 2027 payroll) 1. City 693,381$              16.0% 853,726$              19.7% 2. Member 216,682                5.0% 216,682                5.0% 3. Total Required Contribution 910,063$              21.0% 1,070,408$          24.7% I. Actuarial Gain / (Loss) 2,276,390$          53.9% 2,276,390$          53.9% J. Actuarial Present Value of Vested Accrued Benefits 1. Retired, Terminated Vested, Beneficiaries and Disabled Receiving Benefits 57,852,009$        1370.2% 58,873,653$        1394.4% 2. Terminated Vested Participants Entitled to Future Benefits and Miscellaneous 10,677,329          252.9% 11,064,790          262.1% 3. Active Participants Entitled to Future Benefits 7,875,541             186.5% 8,102,585             191.9% 4. Total Actuarial Present Value of Vested Accrued Benefits 76,404,879$        1809.6% 78,041,028$        1848.4% K. Unfunded Actuarial Present Value of Vested Accrued Benefits (J.4. ‐ D.2., not less than zero) 0$                          0.0% 0$                          0.0% L. Vested Benefit Security Ratio (D.2. ÷ J.4.) 110.3% N/A 108.0% N/A  Summary of Retirement Plan Costs as of October 1, 2025 Current AssumptionsPrior Assumptions City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    1254 Table IICost % of Cost % of Cost % of Data Compensation Data Compensation Data CompensationA. Participants1. Active Employees 57 N/A 50 N/A 50 N/A 2. Terminated Vested 156 N/A 151 N/A 151 N/A 3. Receiving Benefits 169 N/A 174 N/A 174 N/A 4. Total Annual Payroll of Active Employees 4,123,889$              100.0% 4,222,158$              100.0% 4,222,158$              100.0%B. Total Normal Costs 509,646$                 12.4% 492,018$                 11.7% 504,443$                 11.9%C. Actuarial Accrued Liability 79,713,104$            1933.0% 80,883,632$            1915.7% 82,635,636$            1957.2%D. Present Value of Future Benefits 82,714,656$            2005.7% 83,929,886$            1987.8% 85,757,239$            2031.1%E. Smoothed Value of Assets 72,379,517$            1755.1% 76,674,502$            1816.0% 76,674,502$            1816.0%F. Market Value of Assets 78,991,435$            1915.5% 84,271,487$            1995.9% 84,271,487$            1995.9%G. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability(C. ‐ E.) 7,333,587$              177.8% 4,209,130$              99.7% 5,961,134$              141.2%H. City Minimum Funding Payment 973,223$                 23.0%1693,381$                 16.0%2853,726$                 19.7%2I. Ratios‐Vested Benefit Security Ratio 104.6% N/A 110.3% N/A 108.0% N/A‐Funded Ratio (Market Basis) (F. / C.) 99.1% N/A 104.2% N/A 102.0% N/A‐Funded Ratio (Smoothed Basis) (E. / C.) 90.8% N/A 94.8% N/A 92.8% N/A1Percent of projected 2025 ‐ 2026 covered payroll ($4,231,403)2Percent of projected 2026 ‐ 2027 covered payroll ($4,333,635)October 1, 2025Prior AssumptionsComparison of Cost Data of October 1, 2024 and October 1, 2025 ValuationsCurrent AssumptionsOctober 1, 2024 October 1, 2025City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    1355 Table III A. Active Plan Participants Summary 1. Active participants fully vested 22 2. Active participants partially vested 0 3. Active participants non‐vested 28 4. Total active participants 50 5. Annual rate of pay of active participants 4,222,158$            B. Retired and Terminated Vested Participant Summary 1. Retired or terminated vested participants receiving benefits 155 2. Terminated vested participants entitled to future benefits 151 3. Deceased participants whose beneficiaries are receiving benefits (includes DROs) 18 4. Disabled participants receiving benefits 1 C. Projected Annual Retirement Benefits 1. Retired or terminated vested receiving benefits 4,951,497$            2. Terminated vested entitled to future benefits 1,445,031$            3. Beneficiaries of deceased participants (includes DROs) 282,359$                4. Disabled participants 43,699$                  Actuarial Valuation as of October 1, 2025 Characteristics of Participants in City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    1456 Table IV Assets Market Value A. Cash and Cash Equivalents 2,800,707$                B. General Investments 1. Common Stock 56,179,419$              2. Bonds 21,926,269                3. Real Estate 2,979,775                  4. Other 268,009                      C. Receivables 1. Accrued Interest 0$                                2. Employee Contribution Receivable 0                                  3. City Contributions Receivable 157,473                      4. Accounts Receivable 0 D. Payables 1. Accounts Payable 40,165$                      2. Due to Broker 0                                  E. Plan Assets (A + B + C ‐ D) 84,271,487$              Statement of Assets as of October 1, 2025 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    1557 Table V A. Market Value of Assets as of October 1, 2024 78,991,435$          B. Receipts During Period 1. Contributions a. Member 215,945$                   b. City 1,607,042                 c. Total 1,822,987$               2. Investment Income a. Interest and dividends 952,429$                   b. Realized gains (losses) 7,355,651                 c. Unrealized gains (losses) 822,443                     d. Investment expenses (299,328)                   e. Net investment income 8,831,195$               3. Total receipts during period 10,654,182$          C. Disbursements During Period 1. Pension payments and contribution refunds 5,323,844$               2. Administrative expenses 50,286                       3. Total disbursements during period 5,374,130$            D. Market Value of Assets as of September 30, 2025 84,271,487$          Reconciliation of Plan Assets City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    1658 Table V(Cont'd)202420252026202720282029A. Preliminary total smoothed value from prior year 68,848,494$     72,379,517$     76,674,502$     B. Market value beginning of year 66,367,829       78,991,435       84,271,487       C. Market value end of year 78,991,435       84,271,487       D. Non‐investment net cash flow (2,797,873)        (3,551,143)        E. Investment return1. Total market value return: C. ‐ B. ‐ D. 15,421,479       8,831,195         2. Amount for immediate recognition (6.75%) 4,385,400         5,212,071         3. Amount for phased‐in recognition: E.1. ‐ E.2. 11,036,079       3,619,124         F. Phased‐in recognition of investment return:1. Current year 2,207,216         723,825             2. First prior year 479,959             2,207,216         723,825             3. Second prior year (2,879,880)        479,959             2,207,216         723,825           4. Third prior year 2,102,937         (2,879,880)        479,959             2,207,216        723,825           5. Fourth prior year 33,264               2,102,937         (2,879,879)        479,959           2,207,215        723,824           6. Total phased‐in recognition of investment return 1,943,496         2,634,057         531,121             3,411,000        2,931,040        723,824           G. Total smoothed value end of year1. Preliminary total smoothed value end of year 72,379,517       76,674,502       A. + D. + E.2. + F.6.2. Upper corridor limit: 120% of C. 94,789,722       101,125,784     3. Lower corridor limit: 80% of C. 63,193,148       67,417,190       4. Total smoothed value end of year: G.1., not more than G.2., nor less than G.3. 72,379,517       76,674,502       H. Difference between total market value and total smoothed value 6,611,918         7,596,985         I. Smoothed value rate of return 9.38% 11.11%J. Market value rate of return 23.74% 11.44%Development of Smoothed Value of Assets as of September 30City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    1759 Table VI A. Derivation of Actuarial Gain / (Loss) 1. City net normal cost previous valuation 298,076$                 2. Unfunded actuarial accrued liability previous valuation 7,333,587                3. City contributions previous year 1,607,042                4. Interest on: (a) City net normal cost 20,120$                   (b) Unfunded actuarial accrued liability 495,017                   (c) City contributions 54,238                     (d) Net total: (a) + (b) ‐ (c) 460,899$                 5. Increase / (decrease) in unfunded actuarial accrued liability due to assumption changes 1,752,004$             6. Expected unfunded actuarial accrued liability current year: (1. + 2. ‐ 3. + 4. + 5.) 8,237,524$             7. Actual unfunded actuarial accrued liability current year 5,961,134                8. Actuarial gain / (loss): (6. ‐ 7.) 2,276,390$             B. Approximate Portion of Gain / (Loss) due to Investments 1. Smoothed value of assets previous year 72,379,517$           2. Contributions during period 1,822,987                3. Benefits and administrative expenses during period 5,374,130                4. Expected appreciation for period 4,765,767                5. Expected smoothed value of assets current year:  (1. + 2. ‐ 3. + 4.) 73,594,141$           6. Actual smoothed value of assets current year 76,674,502$           7. Approximate investment gain / (loss) due to investments: (6. ‐ 5.) 3,080,361$             C. Approximate Portion of Gain / (Loss) due to Liabilities:  A.8. ‐ B.7.(803,971)$               Actuarial Gain / (Loss) for Plan Year Ended September 30, 2025 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    1860 Table VII A. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability Unfunded Amortization Date Liability Payment October 1, 2025 5,961,134$            500,909$             October 1, 2026 5,828,790$            500,909$             October 1, 2027 5,687,513$            500,909$             October 1, 2028 5,536,700$            500,909$             October 1, 2029 5,375,707$            500,909$             … … October 1, 2052 0$                           0$                         B. Covered Payroll History Covered Annual Date Payroll Increase October 1, 2025 4,222,158$            2.4%       October 1, 2024 4,123,889$            3.5%       October 1, 2023 3,986,205$            (2.8%)       October 1, 2022 4,102,020$            0.5%       October 1, 2021 4,081,949$            (3.6%)       October 1, 2020 4,236,443$            (2.1%)       October 1, 2019 4,325,321$            (14.2%)       October 1, 2018 5,042,067$            (8.9%)       October 1, 2017 5,537,207$            (6.4%)       October 1, 2016 5,916,189$            (13.9%)       October 1, 2015 6,868,214$            N/A Ten‐Year Average Annual Increase (4.7%)       Amortization of Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    1961 Table VIII Prior Current Assumptions Assumptions 10/01/2024 10/01/2025 10/01/2025 I. Number of Plan Members a. Retirees and beneficiaries receiving benefits 169 174 174 b. Terminated plan members entitled to but not yet receiving benefits 156 151 151 c. Active plan members 57 50 50 d. Total 382 375 375 II.Financial Accounting Standards Board Allocation as of October 1, 2025 A. Statement of Accumulated Plan Benefits 1. Actuarial present value of accumulated vested plan benefits a. Participants currently receiving benefits 57,919,625$           57,852,009$      58,873,653$            b. Other participants 17,614,238             18,552,870        19,167,375              c. Total 75,533,863$           76,404,879$      78,041,028$            2. Actuarial present value of accumulated  non‐vested plan benefits 187,340$                 229,505$            236,451$                  3. Total actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits 75,721,203$           76,634,384$      78,277,479$            B. Statement of Change in Accumulated Plan Benefits 1. Actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits as of October 1, 2024 75,721,203$            2. Increase (decrease) during year attributable to: a. Plan amendment 0$                              b. Change in actuarial assumptions 1,643,095 c. Benefits paid including refunds (5,323,844)               d. Other, including benefits accumulated, increase for interest due to decrease in the discount period 6,237,025                 e. Net increase 2,556,276$              3. Actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits      as of October 1, 2025 78,277,479$            C. Significant Matters Affecting Calculations 1. Assumed rate of return used in determining actuarial present values 6.75% 2. Change in Plan provisions None affecting calculations 3. Change in actuarial assumptions See Table X, Item N. Accounting Disclosure Exhibit City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    2062 Table VIII(Cont'd)III. Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios (GASB No. 67 & No. 68)ProjectedMeasurement date 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 9/30/2022 9/30/2023 9/30/2024 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 *A. Total Pension Liability (TPL)Service Cost 808,281$            697,459$            502,667$            472,736$            401,950$            390,407$            370,884$            405,604$            447,227$            442,554$            454,157$            Interest 4,059,813           4,229,901           4,452,760           4,693,091           4,736,276           4,858,742           4,948,720           5,034,091           5,124,101           5,230,827           5,421,925           Benefit Changes 0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          Difference Between Actual and Expected Experience 275,994              (592,087)             124,345              1,281,355           569,125              661,000              258,774              1,300,852           721,817              1,171,158           820,991              Assumption Changes 0                          526,115              2,531,601           0                          479,182              691,291              0                          2,978,730           2,668,890           0                          1,752,004           Benefit Payments, including Refunds of Member Contributions (2,450,972)         (2,679,408)         (2,935,206)         (3,276,412)         (3,821,626)         (4,119,650)         (4,425,331)         (4,760,493)         (4,989,518)         (5,323,844)         (5,529,945)         Net Change in Total Pension Liability 2,693,116$        2,181,980$        4,676,167$        3,170,770$        2,364,907$        2,481,790$        1,153,047$        4,958,784$        3,972,517$        1,520,695$        2,919,132$        Total Pension Liability (TPL) ‐ (beginning of year) 50,888,868        53,581,984        55,763,964        60,440,131        63,610,901        65,975,808        68,457,598        69,610,645        74,569,429        78,541,946        80,062,641        Total Pension Liability (TPL) ‐ (end of year) 53,581,984$      55,763,964$      60,440,131$      63,610,901$      65,975,808$      68,457,598$      69,610,645$      74,569,429$      78,541,946$      80,062,641$      82,981,773$      B. Plan Fiduciary Net PositionContributions ‐ City 2,586,936$        2,605,753$        2,635,968$        2,924,706$        3,213,927$        3,052,914$        2,734,292$        2,492,912$        1,994,135$        1,607,042$        973,223$            Contributions ‐ Member 479,257              342,209              460,745              265,688              217,975              208,098              215,136              206,423              264,602              215,945              211,108              Net Investment Income 4,077,452           5,851,493           5,243,193           1,437,224           4,254,000           14,813,524        (9,095,110)         6,664,779           15,421,479        8,831,195           5,539,964           Benefit Payments, including Refunds of Member Contributions (2,450,972)         (2,679,408)         (2,935,206)         (3,276,412)         (3,821,626)         (4,119,650)         (4,425,331)         (4,760,493)         (4,989,518)         (5,323,844)         (5,529,945)         Administrative Expenses (28,208)               (55,697)               (64,770)               (69,023)               (32,984)               (46,494)               (71,691)               (34,871)               (67,092)               (50,286)               (50,286)               Other 0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          (11,598)               0                          0                          0                          Net Change in Plan Fiduciary Net Position 4,664,465$        6,064,350$        5,339,930$        1,282,183$        3,831,292$        13,908,392$      (10,642,704)$     4,557,152$        12,623,606$      5,280,052$        1,144,064           Plan Fiduciary Net Position ‐ (beginning of year) 37,362,769        42,027,234        48,091,584        53,431,514        54,713,697        58,544,989        72,453,381        61,810,677        66,367,829        78,991,435        84,271,487        Plan Fiduciary Net Position ‐ (end of year) 42,027,234$      48,091,584$      53,431,514$      54,713,697$      58,544,989$      72,453,381$      61,810,677$      66,367,829$      78,991,435$      84,271,487$      85,415,551$      C. Net Pension Liability (NPL) ‐ (end of year): (A) ‐ (B) 11,554,750$      7,672,380$        7,008,617$        8,897,204$        7,430,819$        (3,995,783)$       7,799,968$        8,201,600$        (449,489)$          (4,208,846)$       (2,433,778)$       D. Plan Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of TPL: (B) / (A)78.44 % 86.24 % 88.40 % 86.01 % 88.74 % 105.84 % 88.79 % 89.00 % 100.57 % 105.26 % 102.93 %E. Covered Employee Payroll **6,671,503$        5,846,435$        5,342,971$        4,800,755$        4,334,163$        4,335,802$        4,346,257$        4,279,689$        4,327,083$        4,276,869$        4,222,158$        F. NPL as a Percentage of Covered Employee Payroll: (C) / (E) 173.20 % 131.23 % 131.17 % 185.33 % 171.45 % (92.16)% 179.46 % 191.64 % (10.39)% (98.41)% (57.64)%G. Notes to Schedule:Valuation Date 10/1/2015 10/1/2016 10/1/2017 10/1/2018 10/1/2019 10/1/2020 10/1/2021 10/1/2022 10/1/2023 10/1/2024 10/1/2025Reporting Date (GASB No. 68) 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 9/30/2022 9/30/2023 9/30/2024 9/30/2025 9/30/2026Update procedures were used to roll forward the TPL to the measurement date.See Table VIII, Item V. for a history of benefit changes and assumption changes.  For measurement date September 30, 2026 ‐ No benefit changes, mortallity and disability assumptions updated.* Projected ‐ actual amounts will be available after fiscal year end.** Reported payroll on which contributions to the Plan are based as provided under GASB No. 82.Accounting Disclosure ExhibitCity of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    2163 Table VIII (Cont'd) IV. Schedule of Employer Contributions (GASB No. 67 & No. 68) Actuarially Contribution Actual Contribution Fiscal Year Determined Actual Deficiency / Covered as a % of End 9/30 Contribution Contribution (Excess)Payroll 1 Covered Payroll 2016 2,067,445$           2,586,936$           (519,491)$              6,671,503$           38.78% 2017 1,831,495              2,605,753              (774,258)                5,846,435              44.57% 2018 1,613,548              2,635,968              (1,022,420)            5,342,971              49.34% 2019 1,484,498              2,924,706              (1,440,208)            4,800,755              60.92% 2020 1,389,125              3,213,927              (1,824,802)            4,334,163              74.15% 2021 1,251,632              3,052,914              (1,801,282)            4,335,802              70.41% 2022 1,055,047              2,734,292              (1,679,245)            4,346,257              62.91% 2023 669,772                 2,492,912              (1,823,140)            4,279,689              58.25% 2024 846,797                 1,994,135              (1,147,338)            4,327,083              46.08% 2025 1,090,776              1,607,042              (516,266)                4,276,869              37.58%   2026 2 973,223                 973,223                 0                              4,222,158              23.05% 1 2 Projected ‐ actual amounts will be available after fiscal year end Accounting Disclosure Exhibit Reported payroll on which contributions to the Plan are based as provided under GASB No. 82 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    2264 Table VIII (Cont'd) V. Notes to Schedule of Contributions (GASB No. 67 & No. 68) Valuation Date: Methods and Assumptions Used to Determine Contribution Rates for Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2026: Actuarial Cost Method Amortization Method Amortization Period Asset Valuation Method Inflation Salary Increases Investment Rate of Return 6.75% Retirement Age Mortality Accounting Disclosure Exhibit Actuarially determined contributions are calculated as of October 1st ‐two years prior the fiscal year end in which contributions are reported. Entry Age Normal Level dollar, closed For disabled General Employee participants, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Disabled Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, both set forward 3 years, without projected mortality improvements. 5‐year smoothed market 2.75% 3.75% ‐ 7.00% Experience‐based table of rates that are specific to the type of eligibility condition For healthy General Employee participants during employment, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Below Median Employee Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, set back 1 year for male, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP‐2018. For healthy Firefighter, Police Officer and Forensic Professional participants during employment, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted Safety Employee Female Mortality Table and Safety Below Median Employee Male Mortality Table, both set forward 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP‐2018. For healthy General Employee participants post employment, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Below Median Healthy Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, set back 1 year for male, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP‐2018. For healthy Firefighter, Police Officer and Forensic Professional participants post employment, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted Safety Healthy Retiree Female Mortality Table and Safety Below Median Healthy Retiree Male Mortality Table, both set forward 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP‐2018. For disabled Firefighter, Police Officer and Forensic Professional participants, 80% PUB‐ 2010 Headcount Weighted General Disabled Retiree Mortality Table / 20% PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted Safety Disabled Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, without projected mortality improvements. 25 years City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    2365 Table VIII (Cont'd) V. Notes to Schedule of Contributions (GASB No. 67 & No. 68) (cont'd) Other Information: Benefit Changes Assumption Changes VI. Discount Rate (GASB No. 67 & No. 68) VII. Sensitivity of the NPL to the Discount Rate Assumption (GASB No. 67 & No. 68) Current 1% Decrease Discount Rate 1% Increase Discount Rate 5.75% 6.75% 7.75% NPL 4,740,789$          (4,208,846)$         (11,697,695)$        Current 1% Decrease Discount Rate 1% Increase Discount Rate 5.75% 6.75% 7.75% NPL 6,885,323$          (2,433,778)$         (10,228,884)$        * Projected ‐ actual amounts will be available after fiscal year end Accounting Disclosure Exhibit A discount rate of 6.75% was used to measure the TPL effective with measurement date September 30, 2024. This discount rate was based on the expected rate of return on Plan investments of 6.75%. The projection of cash flows used to determine this discount rate assumed member contributions will be made at the current member contribution rate and City contributions will be made at rates equal to the difference between actuarially determined contribution rates and the member contribution rate. Based upon these assumptions, the Plan's fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future expected benefit payments of current Plan members. Therefore, the long‐term expected rate of return on Plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the TPL. Measurement date: September 30, 2026 * Measurement date: September 30, 2025 2023: Investment return, salary increase factors, retirement rates and withdrawal rates updated. 2022: Investment return updated. 2020: Investment return and mortality rates for disableds updated. 2019: Investment return, mortality rates and disability rates updated. 2017: Investment return, salary increase, withdrawal and retirement rates updated.  2016: Mortality rates updated. None. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    2466 Table VIII (Cont'd) VIII. Pension Expense for Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2025 (861,484)$             Deferred Outflows  of Resources   Deferred Inflows  of Resources  0$                            0$                         Changes of assumptions or other inputs 0                              0                            0                              7,601,948            Total 0$                            7,601,948$          Year Ending 30‐Sep Amount 2026 (533,603)$                2027 (3,413,481)               2028 (2,931,040)               2029 (723,824)                  2030 0                               Thereafter 0                               Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to  Pensions ‐ Reporting Date (GASB No. 68) Summary of Outstanding Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources as of September 30, 2025 Differences between actual and expected experience on  liabilities Net difference between projected and actual earnings on  pension Plan investments Summary of Deferred Outflows and Inflows of Resources that to Be Recognized in Pension Expense in  Future Years.  Accounting Disclosure Exhibit City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    2567 Table VIII(Cont'd)The following information is not required to be disclosed but is provided for informational purposes.IX.Components of Pension Expense (GASB No. 68)ProjectedMeasurement Date 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 9/30/2022 9/30/2023 9/30/2024 9/30/2025 9/30/2026 *Service Cost 808,281$        697,459$        502,667$        472,736$        401,950$        390,407$        370,884$        405,604$        447,227$        442,554$        454,157$        Interest on Total Pension Liability 4,059,813       4,229,901       4,452,760       4,693,091       4,736,276       4,858,742       4,948,720       5,034,091       5,124,101       5,230,827       5,421,925       Current‐Period Benefit Changes 0                      0                      0                      0                      0                      0                      0                      0                      0                      0                      0                      (479,257)         (342,209)         (460,745)         (265,688)         (217,975)         (208,098)         (215,136)         (206,423)         (264,602)         (215,945)         (211,108)         Projected Earnings on Plan Investments (3,012,502)      (3,370,693)      (3,730,846)      (4,134,934)      (4,087,676)      (4,298,839)      (5,304,289)      (4,252,575)      (4,385,400)      (5,212,071)      (5,539,964)      Administrative Expenses 28,208            55,697            64,770            69,023            32,984            46,494            71,691            34,871            67,092            50,286            50,286            Other Changes in Plan Fiduciary Net Position 0                      0                      0                      0                      0                      0                      0                      11,598            0                      0                      0                      (78,759)           (99,375)           1,158,437       1,917,785       1,460,935       1,182,929       762,752          2,771,779       4,687,304       1,479,404       2,572,995       123,208          (372,952)         (675,422)         120,322          (505,342)         (2,395,289)      980,749          800,779          (1,945,978)      (2,636,539)      (533,603)         Total Pension Expense 1,448,992$     797,828$        1,311,621$     2,872,335$     1,821,152$     (423,654)$       1,615,371$     4,599,724$     3,729,744$     (861,484)$       2,214,688$     * Projected ‐ actual amounts will be available after measurement dateContributions ‐ MemberRecognition of Beginning Deferred Outflows / (Inflows) due to LiabilitiesRecognition of Beginning Deferred Outflows / (Inflows) due to AssetsAccounting Disclosure ExhibitCity of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    2668 Table VIII (Cont'd) The following information is not required to be disclosed but is provided for informational purposes. X.Recognition of Deferred Outflows and (Inflows) due to Liabilities ‐ Measurement Date (GASB No. 68) Recognition of Deferred Outflows due to Differences Between Actual and Expected Experience on Liabilities Established Initial Balance Initial  Recognition  Period Remaining  Recognition  Period as of  9/30/2025 Recognition  Amount for  2024 / 2025 Balance as of  9/30/2025 2023 / 2024 721,817$            1.1 0.0 65,620$              0$                                   2024 / 2025 1,171,158$        1.0 0.0 1,171,158$        0$                                   TOTAL 1,236,778$        0$                                   Recognition of Deferred (Inflows) due to Differences Between Actual and Expected Experience on Liabilities Established Initial Balance Initial  Recognition  Period Remaining  Recognition  Period as of  9/30/2025 Recognition  Amount for  2024 / 2025 Balance as of  9/30/2025 2023 / 2024 0$                        1.1 0.0 0$                        0$                                   2024 / 2025 0$                        1.0 0.0 0$                        0$                                   TOTAL 0$                        0$                                   Recognition of Deferred Outflows due to Changes of Assumptions or Other Inputs Established Initial Balance Initial  Recognition  Period Remaining  Recognition  Period as of  9/30/2025 Recognition  Amount for  2024 / 2025 Balance as of  9/30/2025 2023 / 2024 2,668,890$        1.1 0.0 242,626$           0$                                   2024 / 2025 0$                        1.0 0.0 0$                        0$                                   TOTAL 242,626$           0$                                   Accounting Disclosure Exhibit City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    2769 Table VIII (Cont'd) The following information is not required to be disclosed but is provided for informational purposes. X.Recognition of Deferred Outflows and (Inflows) due to Liabilities ‐ Measurement Date (GASB No. 68) (cont'd) Recognition of Deferred (Inflows) due to Changes of Assumptions or Other Inputs Established Initial Balance Initial  Recognition  Period Remaining  Recognition  Period as of  9/30/2025 Recognition  Amount for  2024 / 2025 Balance as of  9/30/2025 2023 / 2024 0$                       1.1 0.0 0$                      0$                                2024 / 2025 0$                       1.0 0.0 0$                      0$                                TOTAL 0$                      0$                                XI.Recognition of Deferred Outflows and (Inflows) due to Assets ‐ Measurement Date (GASB No. 68) Established Initial Balance Initial  Recognition  Period Remaining  Recognition  Period as of  9/30/2025 Recognition  Amount for  2024 / 2025 Balance as of  9/30/2025 2020 / 2021 (10,514,685)$    5 0 (2,102,937)$     0$                                2021 / 2022 14,399,399$     5 1 2,879,880$      2,879,879$                2022 / 2023 (2,412,204)$      5 2 (482,441)$        (964,881)$                  2023 / 2024 (11,036,079)$    5 3 (2,207,216)$     (6,621,647)$               2024 / 2025 (3,619,124)$      5 4 (723,825)$        (2,895,299)$               TOTAL (2,636,539)$     (7,601,948)$               Recognition of Deferred Outflows / (Inflows) due to Difference Between Projected and Actual Earnings on  Pension Plan Investments Accounting Disclosure Exhibit City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    2870 Table IX A. Effective Date B. Eligibility Requirements C. Accrual Service D. Compensation E. Final Average Compensation F. Normal Retirement 1. Eligibility: (a) Attainment of age 65; or (b) Completion of 30 years of service and determined to be disabled under the City's long term disability insurance policy. Years of Accrual Service are any Plan Years during which an Employee completes at least 1,000 hours of service, including years of service completed prior to participation in the Plan. Average earnings during the best five (5) consecutive Plan Years out of the last ten (10) Plan Years preceding termination or retirement, but not less than the three (3) highest consecutive compensation periods during employment with the City as of September 30, 2011. Outline of Principal Provisions of the Retirement Plan Plan adopted as a Money Purchase Floor Offset plan on October 1, 1997. Plan amended and restated as a Defined Benefit Plan effective October 1, 2000. Plan most recently amended by Resolution 2025‐12 adopted August 25, 2025. General Employees hired prior to October 1, 2011, Police Officers and Forensic Professionals working 32 or more hours per week are eligible to join the Plan, unless they have elected to opt out of participation and enroll in a defined contribution plan established by the City. Effective December 1, 2017, eligibility is the first day of the month following completion of 30 days of service. Electing transferring Firefighters as of October 2, 2008 under the Agreement with the County.  Wages, salaries and other amounts received (whether or not paid in cash) for personal services actually rendered in the course of employment. Effective October 10, 2011 Compensation shall exclude commissions, bonuses, overtime pay in excess of one hundred fifty (150) hours per Plan year and payments for accrued leave in excess of the dollar amount of an Employee's accrued leave balance on July 1, 2011. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    2971 Table IX (Cont'd) 2. Benefit: G. Early Retirement 1. Eligibility: (a) Attainment of age 55 and completion of 15 years of service; or (b) 2. Benefit: H. Late Retirement 1. Eligibility: Continued employment beyond age 65. 2. Benefit: (a) (b) I. Disability Retirement 1. Eligibility: 2. Benefit: Accrued benefit calculated as for Normal Retirement based upon service and pay at Disability Retirement Date. Greater of (a) and (b): Accrued benefit calculated as for Normal Retirement based upon service and pay at Late Retirement Date. Actuarially increased benefit as of Late Retirement Date. Completion of 30 years of service and determined to be disabled under the City's long term disability insurance policy. Completion of 25 years of service. Benefit accrued to date of early retirement, actuarially reduced for each year early retirement benefit commencement precedes age 55. A participant as of September 30, 2011 who attains age 55 and completes 10 or more years of service but less than 15 years of service may receive the accrued benefit as of September 30, 2011 payable without actuarial reduction plus the accrued benefit earned after September 30, 2011 payable with actuarial reduction from normal retirement date. Outline of Principal Provisions of the Retirement Plan For Firefighters, Police Officers and Forensic Professionals, 3.00% times Final Average Compensation multiplied by Accrual Service, up to a maximum of 30 years. For General Employees, 3.00% times Accrual Service earned through September 30, 2011 times Final Average Compensation plus 2.50% times Accrual Service earned after September 30, 2011 times Final Average Compensation, up to a maximum of 30 years of Accrual Service.  City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    3072 Table IX (Cont'd) J. Death Benefit K. Participant Contributions L. Vested Benefit Upon Termination Years of Service Vested Percentage Less Than 70% 7 or More 100% M. Normal Form of Payment of Retirement Income Other Options N. Changes Since Previous Valuation Eligibility Requirements was: General Employees hired prior to October 1, 2011, Police Officers and Forensic Professionals working 30 or more hours per week are eligible to join the Plan on the first day of the month following completion of six (6) months of service. Electing transferring Firefighters as of October 2, 2008 under the Agreement with the County.  Outline of Principal Provisions of the Retirement Plan 100% vested in required participant contributions. Participant contributions made after October 1, 2000 are included in the deferred vested benefit payable at normal or early retirement date.   Upon termination of service prior to normal or early retirement date a participant shall be entitled to a benefit payable at normal or early retirement date calculated as for normal retirement. Based upon pay and service at date of termination multiplied by a percentage from the following table. Five percent (5%) of compensation. Monthly benefit payable for life. Actuarially equivalent joint and survivor at 50%, 75%, 100%; or ten (10) years certain and life. Beneficiary entitled to a monthly benefit supported by the present value of the non‐forfeitable accrued benefit at the time of the participant's death. If death occurs after actual retirement, the beneficiary receives whatever is payable under the form of benefit option elected. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    3173 Table X A. Mortality Firefighter, Police Officer and Forensic Professional participants: Sample Ages (2025) Men Women Men Women 55 32.17 35.46 29.74 32.66 60 27.16 30.40 24.88 27.74 62 25.19 28.39 23.01 25.84 Sample Ages (2045) Men Women Men Women 55 33.51 36.60 31.44 34.26 60 28.45 31.51 26.50 29.28 62 26.46 29.49 24.58 27.34 General Employee participants: Future Life Expectancy (Years) Future Life Pre‐retirement Expectancy (Years) Expectancy (Years) For healthy participants post employment and survivors of participants, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Healthy Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, set back 1 year for males, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP‐2021. For healthy participants during employment, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Employee Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, set back 1 year for males, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP ‐2021. For healthy participants post employment, PUB‐2010 Benefits Weighted Safety Healthy Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, males set forward 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP ‐2021. For healthy participants during employment, PUB‐2010 Benefits Weighted Safety Employee Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, males set forward 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP ‐2021. Used in the Valuation Actuarial Assumptions and Actuarial Cost Methods Post‐retirement Expectancy (Years) Future Life Post‐retirement For disabled participants, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Disabled Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, females set forward 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP ‐2021. Future Life For survivors of participants, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Healthy Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, males set back 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP ‐2021. Pre‐retirement City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    3274 Table X (Cont'd) A. Mortality (cont'd) Sample Ages (2025) Male Female Male Female 55 33.52 35.36 30.32 32.96 60 28.62 30.34 25.79 28.21 62 26.69 28.36 24.02 26.33 Sample Ages (2045) Male Female Male Female 55 34.83 36.51 32.12 34.50 60 29.87 31.45 27.46 29.66 62 27.92 29.45 25.63 27.74 B. Investment Return C. Allowances for Expenses or Contingencies D. Salary Increase Factors General Age Employees Under 30 7.00% 30 ‐ 39 7.00% 40 ‐ 49 4.75% 50 ‐ 54 4.75% 55 & older 4.00% 3.75% 3.75% Police Officers Forensic 6.25% 4.75% 4.75% Professionals and Actuarial Assumptions and Actuarial Cost Methods Used in the Valuation Expectancy (Years) Future Life Post‐retirement Expectancy (Years) Future Life Pre‐retirement Prior year's actual administrative expenses are included in normal cost. Current salary is assumed to increase at a rate based on the table below per year until retirement ‐includes assumed wage inflation of 3.0%.   For disabled participants, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Disabled Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, both set forward 4 years, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP ‐2021. Expectancy (Years) Future Life Pre‐retirement Expectancy (Years) Future Life Post‐retirement 6.75%, compounded annually, net of investment expenses ‐ includes assumed inflation of 2.75%. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    3375 Table X (Cont'd) E. Employee Withdrawal Rates Service Male Female Male Female Less than 5 years 15.0% 10.0%20.0% 15.0% 5 ‐ 9 years 15.0% 10.0%10.0% 15.0% 10 ‐ 14 years 15.0% 10.0%5.0% 4.0% 15+ years 7.5% 10.0% 5.0%4.0% F. Disability Rates 1. General All Other Age Employees Employees < 40 0.001%0.025% 45 0.001% 0.025% 50 0.002% 0.250% 55 0.006% 0.450% 60 0.006% 0.450% 65 0.001% 0.450% 2. General All Other Age Employees Employees 20 0.00% 0.01% 25 0.00% 0.01% 30 0.01% 0.03% 35 0.01% 0.03% 40 0.02% 0.03% 45 0.04% 0.04% 50 0.08% 0.07% 55 0.13% 0.07% 60 0.19% 0.07% 65 0.03% 0.07% Non‐duty disability rates for General Employees, Forensic Professionals and Police Officers were used in accordance with the following illustrative example. The disability assumptions are the disability assumptions used in the July 1, 2025 FRS Actuarial Valuation. Actuarial Assumptions and Actuarial Cost Methods Used in the Valuation Line‐of‐duty disability rates for General Employees, Forensic Professionals and Police Officers were used in accordance with the following illustrative example. General  Employees Forensic Professionals and Police Officers Withdrawal rates were used in accordance with the following illustrative example. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    3476 Table X (Cont'd) G. Assumed Retirement Age Retirement rates were used in accordance with the following tables. 1.For Forensic Professionals and Police Officers: Age 0 ‐ 9 10 ‐ 14 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 or more Under 55 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.0% 35.0% 55 0.0% 5.0% 12.5% 12.5% 70.0% 90.0% 56 ‐ 64 0.0% 2.5% 12.5% 40.0% 7.5% 10.0% 65 and above 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2.For General Employees: Age 0 ‐ 14 15 ‐ 24 25  or more Under 55 0% 0% 10% 55 ‐ 64 4% 20% 25% 65 ‐ 66 65% 80% 100% 67 and above 100% 100% 100% H. Assumed Rate of Increase in Covered Payroll to Contribution Year I. Marital Assumptions 1. 2. J. Interest on Future Participant Contributions 3.75%, compounded annually. K. Asset Valuation Method The method used for determining the smoothed value of assets phases in the deviation between the expected and actual return on assets at the rate of 20% per year. The smoothed value of assets will be further adjusted to the extent necessary to fall within the corridor whose lower limit is 80% of the fair market value of Plan assets and whose upper limit is 120% of the fair market value of Plan assets ‐adjusted for equation of balance October 1, 2010. 100% of active members are assumed to be married. Females are assumed to be three (3) years younger than their male spouses. Years of Service Actuarial Assumptions and Actuarial Cost Methods Used in the Valuation Years of Service 3.0% per annum for Forensic Professionals and Police Officers and 0.0% for General Employees. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    3577 Table X (Cont'd) L. Cost Method M. Disclosure of Assumptions N. Changes Since Previous Valuation 1. Mortality assumption was: Firefighter, Police Officer and Forensic Professional participants: For healthy participants during employment, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted Safety Employee Female Mortality Table and Safety Below Median Employee Male Mortality Table, both set forward 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP‐2018. For healthy participants post employment, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted Safety Healthy Retiree Female Mortality Table and Safety Below Median Healthy Retiree Male Mortality Table, both set forward 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP‐ 2018. For disabled participants, 80% PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Disabled Retiree Mortality Table / 20% PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted Safety Disabled Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, without projected mortality improvements. Under this method, the actuarial present value of vested accrued benefits is an amount calculated to be the sum of the present values of each individual's vested accrued or earned benefit under the Plan as of the valuation date.  Each individual's calculation is based on pay and service as of the valuation date. The investment return, salary increases, withdrawal and retirement rates were updated based on the most recent experience study performed for the six years ending September 30, 2022. The mortality rates are based upon the July 1, 2025 FRS Actuarial Valuation, as required under F.S., Chapter 2015‐157. Actuarial Assumptions and Actuarial Cost Methods Used in the Valuation Normal Retirement, Termination, Disability, and Death Benefits: Entry Age Normal Cost  Vested Normal Retirement, Termination, Disability, and Death Benefits: Unit Credit Cost  Under this method the normal cost for each active employee is the amount which is calculated to be a level percentage of pay that would be required annually from his entry age to his assumed retirement age to fund his estimated benefits, assuming the Plan had always been in effect. The normal cost for the Plan is the sum of such amounts for all employees. The actuarial accrued liability as of any valuation date for each active employee or inactive employee who is eligible to receive benefits under the Plan is the excess of the actuarial present value of estimated future benefits over the actuarial present value of current and future normal costs. The unfunded actuarial accrued liability as of any valuation date is the excess of the actuarial accrued liability over the assets of the Plan.  City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    3678 Table X (Cont'd) Actuarial Assumptions and Actuarial Cost Methods Used in the Valuation N. Changes Since Previous Valuation (cont'd) General Employee participants: 2. Disability rates were: General All Other Age Employees Employees < 40 0.001%0.005% 45 0.001% 0.050% 50 0.002% 0.050% 55 0.005% 0.090% 60 0.006% 0.090% 65 0.001% 0.090% General All Other Age Employees Employees 20 0.00% 0.02% 25 0.01% 0.02% 30 0.01% 0.04% 35 0.01% 0.04% 40 0.02% 0.04% 45 0.04% 0.04% 50 0.08% 0.07% 55 0.16% 0.07% 60 0.21% 0.07% 65 0.04% 0.07% Line‐of‐duty disability rates for General Employees, Forensic Professionals and Police Officers were used in accordance with the following illustrative example. Non‐duty disability rates for General Employees, Forensic Professionals and Police Officers were used in accordance with the following illustrative example. For healthy participants during employment, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Below Median Employee Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, set back 1 year for male, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP‐2018. For healthy participants post employment, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Below Median Healthy Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, set back 1 year for male, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP‐2018. For disabled participants, PUB‐2010 Headcount Weighted General Disabled Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, both set forward 3 years, without projected mortality improvements. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    3779 Table XI(Cont'd)AttainedAge Group0 ‐ 45 ‐ 910 ‐ 1415 ‐ 1920 ‐ 2425 ‐ 29 30 & OverTotalUnder 25‐‐‐‐‐‐‐025 ‐ 29‐‐‐‐‐‐‐030 ‐ 34‐‐‐‐‐‐‐035 ‐ 39‐‐1‐‐‐‐140 ‐ 44‐‐‐‐‐‐‐045 ‐ 49‐‐‐‐32‐550 ‐ 54‐‐‐‐‐‐‐055 ‐ 59‐‐‐‐‐‐‐060 ‐ 64‐‐‐‐‐‐‐065 & Over‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0TOTAL 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 610/01/2024 10/01/2025Average Attained Age 48.14 years 46.20 yearsAverage Hire Age 27.71 years 23.70 yearsAverage Pay 77,157$        84,378$     Percent Female 14.3% 0.0%‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐COMPLETED YEARS OF SERVICE‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Distribution by Attained Age Groupsand Service Groups as of October 1, 2025General EmployeesCity of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    3880 Table XI(Cont'd)AttainedAge Group0 ‐ 45 ‐ 910 ‐ 1415 ‐ 1920 ‐ 2425 ‐ 29 30 & OverTotalUnder 25 4‐‐ ‐‐‐‐425 ‐ 29 5 1‐‐‐‐‐630 ‐ 34 5 4‐‐‐‐‐935 ‐ 39 3 1‐1‐‐‐540 ‐ 44 4 1‐‐11‐745 ‐ 49 1 1‐121‐650 ‐ 54 1‐‐ ‐‐22555 ‐ 59‐‐‐‐‐‐‐060 ‐ 64‐‐1‐‐‐‐165 & Over‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0TOTAL 23 8 1 2 3 4 2 4310/01/2024 10/01/2025Average Attained Age 36.97 years 38.34 yearsAverage Hire Age 29.51 years 29.57 yearsAverage Pay 72,376$        85,158$     Percent Female 22.9% 20.9%and Service Groups as of October 1, 2025‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐COMPLETED YEARS OF SERVICE‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Distribution by Attained Age GroupsPolice OfficersCity of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    3981 Table XI(Cont'd)AttainedAge Group0 ‐ 45 ‐ 910 ‐ 1415 ‐ 1920 ‐ 2425 ‐ 29 30 & OverTotalUnder 25‐‐‐‐‐‐‐025 ‐ 29 1‐‐ ‐‐‐‐130 ‐ 34‐‐‐‐‐‐‐035 ‐ 39‐‐‐‐‐‐‐040 ‐ 44‐‐‐‐‐‐‐045 ‐ 49‐‐‐‐‐‐‐050 ‐ 54‐‐‐‐‐‐‐055 ‐ 59‐‐‐‐‐‐‐060 ‐ 64‐‐‐‐‐‐‐065 & Over‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0TOTAL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 110/01/2024 10/01/2025Average Attained Age 50.02 years 29.27 yearsAverage Hire Age 47.02 years 28.27 yearsAverage Pay 54,874$        54,080$     Percent Female 100.0% 100.0%‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐COMPLETED YEARS OF SERVICE‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Distribution by Attained Age Groupsand Service Groups as of October 1, 2025Forensic ProfessionalsCity of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    4082 Table XI(Cont'd)AttainedAge Group0 ‐ 45 ‐ 910 ‐ 1415 ‐ 1920 ‐ 2425 ‐ 29 30 & OverTotalUnder 25 4‐‐ ‐‐‐‐425 ‐ 29 6 1‐‐‐‐‐730 ‐ 34 5 4‐‐‐‐‐935 ‐ 39 3 1 1 1‐‐‐640 ‐ 44 4 1‐‐11‐745 ‐ 49 1 1‐153‐1150 ‐ 54 1‐‐ ‐‐22555 ‐ 59‐‐‐‐‐‐‐060 ‐ 64‐‐1‐‐‐‐165 & Over‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0TOTAL 24 8 2 2 6 6 2 5010/01/2024 10/01/2025Average Attained Age 38.80 years 39.10 yearsAverage Hire Age 29.90 years 28.84 yearsAverage Pay 72,349$        84,443$     Percent Female 24.6% 20.0%and Service Groups as of October 1, 2025‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐COMPLETED YEARS OF SERVICE‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Distribution by Attained Age GroupsAll MembersCity of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    4183 Table XII A. Entitled to Deferred Benefits Current Age Total Average Group Count Annual Benefit Annual Benefit Less than 40 9 87,213$                        9,690$                      40 ‐ 44 19 226,654                        11,929                      45 ‐ 49 30 353,719                        11,791                      50 ‐ 54 42 513,215                        12,219                      55 ‐ 59 16 89,086                          5,568                         60 ‐ 64 21 124,188                        5,914                         65 ‐ 69 6 26,946                          4,491                         70 ‐ 74 3 12,970                          4,323                         75 & Over 5 11,040                          2,208                         TOTAL 151 1,445,031$                  9,570$                      B. Receiving Benefits Current Age Total Average Group Count Annual Benefit Annual Benefit Less than 50 0 ‐$                                    ‐$                               50 ‐ 54 5 131,656                        26,331                      55 ‐ 59 26 928,546                        35,713                      60 ‐ 64 34 1,239,341                     36,451                      65 ‐ 69 45 1,586,649                     35,259                      70 ‐ 74 26 635,262                        24,433                      75 ‐ 79 23 461,026                        20,045                      80 ‐ 84 10 216,018                        21,602                      85 & Over 5 79,057                          15,811                      TOTAL 174 5,277,555$                  30,331$                    Statistics for Participants Entitled to Deferred Benefits and Participants Receiving Benefits City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    4284 Table XIII A. Active Participants 1. Active participants previous year 57 2. Retired during year (1) 3. Died during year 0 4. Disabled during year 0 5. Terminated non‐vested during year (11) 6. Terminated vested during year (1) 7. New active participants 5 8. Out on military leave 0 9. Rehired during year 1 10. Transferred to DC Plan 0 11. Active participants current year 50 B. Participants Receiving Benefits 1. Participants receiving benefits previous year 169 2. New retired participants 1 3. New DRO recipient 0 4. New terminated vested receiving benefits 5 5. New beneficiaries receiving benefits 1 6. Died or ceased payment during year (2) 7. Retired or terminated vested receiving benefits current year 174 C. Terminated Vested Participants Entitled to Future Benefits 1. Terminated vested entitled previous year 156 2. Died during year 0 3. Commenced receiving benefits during year (5) 4. New terminated vested 1 5. Terminated vested refunded employee contributions 0 6. Rehired (1) 7. Terminated vested entitled current year 151 Reconciliation of Employee Data City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    4385 Table XIV Projected Total Fiscal Year Ending Annual Payout 2026 5,529,945$                  2027 5,713,497$                  2028 5,860,891$                  2029 6,046,739$                  2030 6,080,085$                  2031 6,139,336$                  2032 6,244,304$                  2033 6,386,433$                  2034 6,397,844$                  2035 6,420,159$                  Projected Retirement Benefits The above projected payout of Plan benefits during the next ten years is based on assumptions involving all decrements. Actual payouts may differ from the above estimates depending upon the death, salary and retirement experience of the Plan. However, since the projected payment is recomputed each valuation date, there is an automatic correction to the extent that actual experience varies from expected experience. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    4486 Table XVYear Benefits Administrative Employee City / County SmoothedEndingPaid 2Expenses ContributionsContributions 3Value09/30/2025 5,323,844$            50,286$              215,945$           1,607,042$        76,674,502$         09/30/2024 4,989,518              67,092                264,602 1,994,135 72,379,517            09/30/2023 4,760,493              34,871                206,423 2,492,912 68,848,494            09/30/2022 4,425,331              71,691                215,136 2,734,292 67,494,398            09/30/2021 4,119,650              46,494                208,098 3,052,914 64,718,452            09/30/2020 3,821,626              32,984                217,975 3,213,927 58,929,456            09/30/2019 3,276,412              69,023                265,688 2,924,706 54,759,146            09/30/2018 2,935,206              64,770                460,745 2,635,968 50,899,575            09/30/2017 2,679,408              55,697                342,209 2,605,753 46,396,570            09/30/2016 2,450,972              28,208                479,257 2,586,936 42,001,072            09/30/2015 2,202,769              11,937                358,106 2,392,948 37,570,287            09/30/2014 1,974,208              159,424              369,500 2,527,508 33,841,977            09/30/2013 1,732,845              177,541              396,374 2,258,798 29,908,683            09/30/2012 1,606,752              309,874              418,635 1,824,431 26,852,721            09/30/2011 1,165,350              196,423              287,090 2,616,924 25,932,292            09/30/2010 886,521                 178,530              284,866 2,311,058 23,887,446            09/30/2009 617,274                 116,982              306,420 1,781,197 20,788,655            09/30/2008 384,482                 70,423                365,288 1,663,951 18,746,975            09/30/2007 233,953                 123,197              N/A 1,843,147 15,526,572            09/30/2006 171,697                 84,340                N/A 1,505,020 11,951,383            1  Information prior to September 30, 2008 as reported by prior actuary.2  Includes refunds.3  Values prior to September 30, 2008 include Employee Contributions.Summary of Transaction Information 1City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    4587 Table XV(Cont'd)General & Forensic Police & FireValuationNet Market Net Smoothed Assumed RateDate Actual Assumed Actual Assumed Value Yield Value Yield of Return10/01/2025 6.1% 5.1% 17.6% 4.8% 3.1 1.6 11.44% 11.11% 6.75%10/01/2024 22.5% 5.1% 14.5% 4.9% 0.0 1.6 23.74% 9.38% 6.75%10/01/2023 7.4% 3.2% 6.6% 3.6% 2.5 1.6 10.95% 5.19% 7.00%10/01/2022 11.9% 3.0% 14.1% 3.7% 0.0 2.0 (12.69%) 6.76% 7.40%10/01/2021 4.9% 3.1% 3.4% 3.5% 6.9 0.8 25.50% 11.45% 7.40%10/01/2020 7.8% 3.1% 4.1% 3.4% 2.6 1.2 7.81% 8.42% 7.50%10/01/2019 8.5% 3.2% 4.5% 3.3% 3.9 0.9 2.69% 7.90% 7.75%10/01/2018 4.7% 3.1% 5.9% 3.2% 2.6 2.0 10.89% 9.49% 7.75%10/01/2017 3.9% 4.0% 4.0% 4.6% 1.7 6.6 13.9% 9.9% 8.0%10/01/2016 2.4% 4.2% 5.6% 4.8% 1.8 5.5 10.8% 10.2% 8.0%Last 3 Years 11.8% 4.5% 12.8% 4.4% 1.4 1.6 15.23% 8.53% 6.83%Last 5 Years 10.4% 3.9% 11.1% 4.1% 1.6 1.5 10.89% 8.75% 7.06%Last 10 Years 7.9% 3.7% 7.9% 4.0% 2.0 2.0 10.0% 9.0% 7.4%% Increase / (Decrease)Police & Fireto ExpectedRatio of ActualTerminationGeneral & ForensicRecent Compensation, Termination and Investment Return ExperienceInvestment ReturnCompensationCity of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    4688 Table XVI Actuarial Actuarial Accrued Unfunded Actuarial Value of Assets Liability (EAN) AAL Funded Assumed Valuation (AVA) (AAL) (UAAL) Ratio Rate of Date (a)(b)(a) ‐ (b)(a/b)Return 10/01/2011 25,932$               41,567$               (15,635)$             62.4% 8.00% 10/01/2012 26,853$               43,759$               (16,907)$             61.4% 8.00% 10/01/2013 29,909$               45,927$               (16,018)$             65.1% 8.00% 10/01/2014 1 33,842$               48,398$               (14,556)$             69.9% 8.00% 10/01/2014 2 33,842$               48,406$               (14,564)$             69.9% 8.00% 10/01/2015 37,570$               51,165$               (13,595)$             73.4% 8.00% 10/01/2016 1 42,001$               52,990$               (10,989)$             79.3% 8.00% 10/01/2016 2 42,001$               53,516$               (11,515)$             78.5% 8.00% 10/01/2017 1 46,397$               55,888$               (9,492)$               83.0% 8.00% 10/01/2017 2 46,397$               58,420$               (12,023)$             79.4% 7.75% 10/01/2018 50,900$               61,721$               (10,822)$             82.5% 7.75% 10/01/2019 1 54,759$               64,180$               (9,421)$               85.3% 7.75% 10/01/2019 2 54,759$               64,659$               (9,900)$               84.7% 7.50% 10/01/2020 1 58,929$               66,637$               (7,707)$               88.4% 7.50% 10/01/2020 2 58,929$               67,328$               (8,399)$               87.5% 7.40% 10/01/2021 64,718$               68,716$               (3,998)$               94.2% 7.40% 10/01/2022 1 67,494$               70,911$               (3,417)$               95.2% 7.40% 10/01/2022 2 67,494$               73,890$               (6,396)$               91.3% 7.00% 10/01/2023 1 68,848$               75,291$               (6,443)$               91.4% 7.00% 10/01/2023 2 68,848$               77,960$               (9,112)$               88.3% 6.75% 10/01/2024 72,380$               79,713$               (7,334)$               90.8% 6.75% 10/01/2025 1 76,675$               80,884$               (4,209)$               94.8% 6.75% 10/01/2025 2 76,675$               82,636$               (5,961)$               92.8% 6.75% 1 Prior to assumption or benefit changes 2 Reflecting assumption updates Schedule of Funded Progress Actuarial Value of Assets Basis (Dollar Amount in Thousands) City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    4789 Table XVI(Cont'd)10/1/2014 – remained at 69.9% despite change in disability rates10/1/2016 – decreased from 79.3% to 78.5% primarily due to change in mortality assumption10/1/2017 – decreased from 83.0% to 79.4% primarily due to reduction in investment return assumption from 8.00% to 7.75% and experience study results10/1/2019 – decreased from 85.3% to 84.7% primarily due to reduction in investment return assumption from 7.75% to 7.50% and change in mortality and disability rates10/1/2020 – decreased from 88.4% to 87.5% primarily due to reduction in investment return assumption from 7.50% to 7.40% and change in mortality10/1/2022 – decreased from 95.2% to 91.3% primarily due to reduction in investment return assumption from 7.40% to 7.00%10/1/2023 – decreased from 91.4% to 88.3% primarily due to reduction in investment return assumption from 7.00% to 6.75% and experience study results10/1/2025 – decreased from 94.8% to 92.8% primarily due to change in mortality assumptions and disability rates62.4%61.4%65.1%69.9%69.9%73.4%79.3%78.5%83.0%79.4%82.5%85.3%84.7%88.4%87.5%94.2%95.2%91.3%91.4%88.3%90.8%94.8%92.8%60.0%64.0%68.0%72.0%76.0%80.0%84.0%88.0%92.0%96.0%100.0%Funded RatioValuation DateHistory of Funded Ratio(Actuarial Value of Assets / Actuarial Accrued Liability)X‐preliminary ratio   O‐final ratioCity of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    4890 Table XVI (Cont'd) Market Actuarial Accrued Unfunded Actuarial Value of Assets Liability (EAN) AAL Funded Assumed Valuation (MVA) (AAL) (UAAL) Ratio Rate of Date (a)(b)(a) ‐ (b)(a/b)Return 10/01/2011 22,336$               41,567$               (19,231)$             53.7% 8.00% 10/01/2012 27,040$               43,759$               (16,720)$             61.8% 8.00% 10/01/2013 32,173$               45,927$               (13,754)$             70.1% 8.00% 10/01/2014 1 36,821$               48,398$               (11,577)$             76.1% 8.00% 10/01/2014 2 36,821$               48,406$               (11,585)$             76.1% 8.00% 10/01/2015 37,363$               51,165$               (13,802)$             73.0% 8.00% 10/01/2016 1 42,027$               52,990$               (10,963)$             79.3% 8.00% 10/01/2016 2 42,027$               53,516$               (11,489)$             78.5% 8.00% 10/01/2017 1 48,092$               55,888$               (7,797)$               86.0% 8.00% 10/01/2017 2 48,092$               58,420$               (10,328)$             82.3% 7.75% 10/01/2018 53,432$               61,721$               (8,290)$               86.6% 7.75% 10/01/2019 1 54,714$               64,180$               (9,466)$               85.3% 7.75% 10/01/2019 2 54,714$               64,659$               (9,946)$               84.6% 7.50% 10/01/2020 1 58,545$               66,637$               (8,092)$               87.9% 7.50% 10/01/2020 2 58,545$               67,328$               (8,783)$               87.0% 7.40% 10/01/2021 72,453$               68,716$               3,737$                 105.4% 7.40% 10/01/2022 1 61,811$               70,911$               (9,101)$               87.2% 7.40% 10/01/2022 2 61,811$               73,890$               (12,080)$             83.7% 7.00% 10/01/2023 1 66,368$               75,291$               (8,923)$               88.1% 7.00% 10/01/2023 2 66,368$               77,960$               (11,592)$             85.1% 6.75% 10/01/2024 78,991$               79,713$               (722)$                   99.1% 6.75% 10/01/2025 1 84,271$               80,884$               3,388$                 104.2% 6.75% 10/01/2025 2 84,271$               82,636$               1,636$                 102.0% 6.75% 1 Prior to assumption or benefit changes 2 Reflecting assumption updates Schedule of Funded Progress Market Value of Assets Basis (Dollar Amount in Thousands) City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    4991 Table XVI(Cont'd)10/1/2014 – remained at 76.1% despite change in disability rates10/1/2016 – decreased from 79.3% to 78.5% primarily due to change in mortality assumption10/1/2017 – decreased from 86.0% to 82.3% primarily due to reduction in investment return assumption from 8.00% to 7.75% and experience study results10/1/2019 – decreased from 85.3% to 84.6% primarily due to reduction in investment return assumption from 7.75% to 7.50% and change in mortality and disability rates10/1/2020 – decreased from 87.9% to 87.0% primarily due to reduction in investment return assumption from 7.50% to 7.40% and change in mortality10/1/2022 – decreased from 87.2% to 83.7% primarily due to reduction in investment return assumption from 7.40% to 7.00%10/1/2023 – decreased from 88.1% to 85.1% primarily due to reduction in investment return assumption from 7.00% to 6.75% and experience study results10/1/2025 – decreased from 104.2% to 102.0% primarily due to change in mortality assumptions and disability rates53.7%61.8%70.1%76.1%76.1%73.0%79.3%78.5%86.0%82.3%86.6%85.3%84.6%87.9%87.0%105.4%87.2%83.7%88.1%85.1%99.1%104.2%102.0%50.0%54.0%58.0%62.0%66.0%70.0%74.0%78.0%82.0%86.0%90.0%94.0%98.0%102.0%106.0%110.0%Funded RatioValuation DateHistory of Funded Ratio(Market Value of Assets / Actuarial Accrued Liability)X‐preliminary ratio   O‐final ratioCity of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    5092 Table XVII Prior Current Assumptions Assumptions 10/01/2024 10/01/2025 10/01/2025 A. Participant Data 1. Active participants 57 50 50 2. Retired participants and beneficiaries receiving benefits 168 173 173 3. Disabled participants receiving benefits 1 1 1 4. Terminated vested participants 156 151 151 5. Annual payroll of active participants 4,123,889$           4,222,158$           4,222,158$            6. Annual benefits payable to those currently receiving benefits 5,210,306$           5,277,555$           5,277,555$            B. Value of Assets 1. Smoothed Value 72,379,517$         76,674,502$         76,674,502$          2. Market Value 78,991,435$         84,271,487$         84,271,487$          C. Liabilities 1. Actuarial present value of future expected benefit payments for active members a. Retirement benefits 11,862,987$         13,337,173$         13,561,615$          b. Vesting benefits 1,708,381             1,778,966             1,846,831              c. Death benefits 160,631                180,505                135,946                 d. Disability benefits 94,303                   103,904                274,404                 e. Total 13,826,302$         15,400,548$         15,818,796$          2. Actuarial present value of future expected benefit payments for terminated vested members 10,728,752$         10,437,090$         10,824,551$          3. Actuarial present value of future expected benefit payments for members currently receiving benefits a. Service retired 54,795,283$         54,717,124$         55,657,340$          b. Disability retired 571,450                566,765                577,223                 c. Beneficiaries 2,552,892             2,568,120             2,639,090              d. Miscellaneous (Refunds in Process) 239,977                240,239                240,239                 e. Total 58,159,602$         58,092,248$         59,113,892$          State Required Exhibit Actuarial Valuation as of October 1, 2025 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    5193 Table XVII (Cont'd) Prior Current Assumptions Assumptions 10/01/2024 10/01/2025 10/01/2025 4. Total actuarial present value of future expected benefit payments 82,714,656$         83,929,886$         85,757,239$          5. Actuarial accrued liabilities 79,713,104$         80,883,632$         82,635,636$          6. Unfunded actuarial accrued liabilities 7,333,587$           4,209,130$           5,961,134$            D. Statement of Accumulated Plan Benefits 1. Actuarial present value of accumulated vested benefits a. Participants currently receiving benefits 57,919,625$         57,852,009$         58,873,653$          b. Other participants 17,614,238           18,552,870           19,167,375            c. Total 75,533,863$         76,404,879$         78,041,028$          2. Actuarial present value of accumulated non‐ vested plan benefits 187,340                229,505                236,451                 3. Total actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits 75,721,203$         76,634,384$         78,277,479$          E. Pension Cost 1. Total normal cost 509,646$              492,018$              504,443$               2. Payment required to amortize unfunded liability 602,171                363,232                500,909                 3. Interest adjustment 44,007                   33,407                   39,583                    4. Total required contribution 1,155,824$           888,657$              1,044,935$            5. Item 4 as a percentage of payroll 28.0% 21.0% 24.7% 6. Estimated employee contributions 211,570$              216,682$              216,682$               7. Item 6 as a percentage of projected payroll 5.0% 1 5.0%2 5.0%2 8. Net amount payable by City 973,223$              693,381$              853,726$               9. Item 8 as a percentage of projected payroll 23.0% 1 16.0%2 19.7%2 1 Percent of projected 2025 ‐ 2026 covered payroll ($4,231,403) 2 Percent of projected 2026 ‐ 2027 covered payroll ($4,333,635) Actuarial Valuation as of October 1, 2025 State Required Exhibit City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    5294 Table XVII (Cont'd) Prior Current Assumptions Assumptions 10/01/2024 10/01/2025 10/01/2025 F. Past Contributions 1. Total contribution required (previous valuation) 1,306,721$           1,184,793$           1,184,793$            2. Actual contributions made: a. Members 215,945$              N/A N/A b. City 1,607,042             N/A N/A c. Total 1,822,987$           N/A N/A G. Disclosure of Following Items: 1. Actuarial present value of future salaries ‐ attained age 28,467,332$         29,207,987$         29,123,739$          2. Actuarial present value of future employee contributions ‐ attained age 1,423,367$           1,460,399$           1,456,187$            3. Actuarial present value of future contributions from other sources N/A N/A N/A  4. Amount of active members' accumulated contributions 1,357,919$           1,484,936$           1,484,936$            5. Actuarial present value of future salaries and future benefits at entry age N/A N/A N/A  6. Actuarial present value of future employee contributions at entry age N/A N/A N/A  State Required Exhibit Actuarial Valuation as of October 1, 2025 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    5395 Table XVII (Cont'd) Current Remaining Unfunded Amortization Funding Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liabilities Liabilities Payment Period 10/01/2000 Initial 9,269$ 2,104$ 5 years 10/01/2002 Assumption Change (412) (71) 7 years 10/01/2003 Plan Amendment 3,820 593 8 years 10/01/2004 Plan Amendment 7,816 1,112 9 years 10/01/2005 Plan Amendment 20,618 2,718 10 years 10/01/2006 Plan Amendment 28,934 3,570 11 years 10/01/2007 Plan Amendment 34,981 4,071 12 years 10/01/2008 Plan Amendment and Assumption Change 180,901 19,990 13 years 10/01/2008 Method Change 404,340 44,680 13 years 10/01/2009 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)195,229 20,599 14 years 10/01/2010 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)(40,103) (4,060) 15 years 10/01/2010 Plan Amendment (232,495) (23,536) 15 years 10/01/2011 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)278,797 27,190 16 years 10/01/2012 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)102,062 9,624 17 years 10/01/2013 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)(85,437) (7,813) 18 years 10/01/2014 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)(96,963) (8,624) 19 years 10/01/2014 Assumption Change 908 81 19 years 10/01/2015 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)(41,213) (3,574) 20 years 10/01/2016 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)(208,020) (17,624) 21 years 10/01/2016 Assumption Change 72,103 6,109 21 years 10/01/2017 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)(109,429) (9,076) 22 years 10/01/2017 Assumption Change 396,516 32,888 22 years 10/01/2018 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)54,163 4,406 23 years 10/01/2019 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)105,061 8,394 24 years 10/01/2019 Assumption Change 102,577 8,195 24 years 10/01/2020 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)33,664 2,645 25 years 10/01/2020 Assumption Change 185,549 14,581 25 years 10/01/2021 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)(726,900) (56,258) 26 years 10/01/2022 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)1,032,201 78,771 27 years 10/01/2022 Assumption Change 1,777,540 135,651 27 years 10/01/2023 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)1,475,021 119,976 23 years 10/01/2023 Assumption Change 2,084,956 169,587 23 years 10/01/2024 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)(560,534) (44,782) 24 years 10/01/2025 Actuarial Loss / (Gain)(2,276,390) (178,885)                25 years 10/01/2025 Assumption Change 1,752,004 137,677 25 years TOTAL 5,961,134$ 500,909$                Shelly L. Jones, A.S.A., E.A.Jennifer M. Borregard, E.A. Enrollment Number: 26‐08646 Enrollment Number: 26‐07624 Dated:          May 4, 2026 State Required Exhibit This Actuarial Valuation and/or cost determination was prepared and completed by us or under our direct supervision, and we acknowledge responsibility for the results. To the best of our knowledge, the results are complete and accurate, and in our opinion, the techniques and assumptions used are reasonable and meet the requirements and intent of Part VII, Chapter 112, Florida Statutes. There is no benefit or expense to be provided by the Plan and/or paid from the Plan's assets for which liabilities or current costs have not been established or other wise provided for in the valuation. All known events or trends which may require material increase in Plan costs or required contribution rates have been taken into account in the valuation. Amortization balances are written down in proportion to amortization payments. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    5496 Table XVIII Glossary Actuarial Accrued Liability. The difference between the Actuarial Present Value of Future Benefits, and the Actuarial Present Value of Future Normal Costs.   Actuarial Assumptions.Assumptions about future plan experience that affect costs or liabilities, such as: mortality, withdrawal, disablement, and retirement; future increases in salary; future rates of investment earnings; future investment and administrative expenses; characteristics of members not specified in the data, such as marital status; characteristics of future members; future elections made by members and other items. Actuarial Cost Method. A procedure for allocating the Actuarial Present Value of Future Benefits between the Actuarial Present Value of Future Normal Costs and the Actuarial Accrued Liability. Actuarial Equivalent. Of equal Actuarial Present Value, determined as of a given date and based on a given set of Actuarial Assumptions. Actuarial Present Value of Future Benefits. The Actuarial Present Value of amounts which are expected to be paid at various future times to active members, retired members, beneficiaries receiving benefits and inactive, non‐retired members entitled to either a refund or a future retirement benefit. Expressed another way, it is the value that would have to be invested on the valuation date so that the amount invested plus investment earnings would provide sufficient assets to pay all projected benefits and expenses when due. Actuarial Valuation. The determination, as of a valuation date, of the Normal Cost, Actuarial Accrued Liability, Actuarial Value of Assets, and related Actuarial Present Values for a plan. An Actuarial Valuation for a governmental retirement system typically also includes calculations of items needed for compliance with GASB No. 67. Actuarial Value of Assets. The value of the assets as of a given date, used by the actuary for valuation purposes. This may be the market or fair value of plan assets or a smoothed value in order to reduce the year‐to‐year volatility of calculated results, such as the funded ratio and the actuarially required contribution. Amortization Method. A method for determining the Amortization Payment. The most common methods used are level dollar and level percentage of payroll. Under the Level Dollar method, the Amortization Payment is one of a stream of payments, all equal, whose Actuarial Present Value is equal to the UAAL. Under the Level Percentage of Pay method, the Amortization Payment is one of a stream of increasing payments, whose Actuarial Present Value is equal to the UAAL. Under the Level Percentage of Pay method, the stream of payments increases at the rate at which total covered payroll of all active members is assumed to increase. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    5597 Table XVIII (Cont'd) Glossary Amortization Payment. That portion of the plan contribution which is designed to pay interest on and to amortize the Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability. Amortization Period.  The period used in calculating the Amortization Payment. Annual Required Contribution . The employer’s periodic required contributions, expressed as a dollar amount or a percentage of covered plan compensation. The annual required contribution consists of the Employer Normal Cost and Amortization Payment plus interest adjustment. Closed Amortization Period.A specific number of years that is reduced by one each year, and declines to zero with the passage of time. For example if the amortization period is initially set at 25 years, it is 24 years at the end of one year, 23 years at the end of two years, etc.  Employer Normal Cost.The portion of the Normal Cost to be paid by the employer. This is equal to the Normal Cost less expected member contributions. Equivalent Single Amortization Period.For plans that do not establish separate amortization bases (separate components of the UAAL), this is the same as the Amortization Period. For plans that do establish separate amortization bases, this is the period over which the UAAL would be amortized if all amortization bases were combined upon the current UAAL payment. Experience Gain/Loss.A measure of the difference between actual experience and that expected based upon a set of Actuarial Assumptions, during the period between two actuarial valuations. To the extent that actual experience differs from that assumed, Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liabilities emerge which may be larger or smaller than projected. Gains are due to favorable experience, e.g., the assets earn more than projected, salaries do not increase as fast as assumed, members retire later than assumed, etc. Favorable experience means actual results produce actuarial liabilities not as large as projected by the actuarial assumptions. Losses are the result of unfavorable experience, i.e., actual results that produce Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liabilities which are larger than projected. Funded Ratio.  The ratio of the Actuarial Value of Assets to the Actuarial Accrued Liability. GASB.  Governmental Accounting Standards Board. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    5698 Table XVIII (Cont'd) Glossary GASB No. 67 and GASB No. 68. These are the governmental accounting standards that set the accounting rules for public retirement plans and the employers that sponsor or contribute to them. Statement No. 67 sets the accounting rules for the plans themselves, while Statement No. 68 sets the accounting rules for the employers that sponsor or contribute to public retirement plans. Normal Cost.  The annual cost assigned, under the Actuarial Cost Method, to the current plan year. Open Amortization Period.An open amortization period is one which is used to determine the Amortization Payment but which does not change over time. In other words, if the initial period is set as 25 years, the same 25‐year period is used in determining the Amortization Period each year. In theory, if an Open Amortization Period is used to amortize the Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability, the UAAL will never completely disappear, but will become smaller each year, either as a dollar amount or in relation to covered payroll. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability. The difference between the Actuarial Accrued Liability and Actuarial Value of Assets.   Valuation Date.The date as of which the Actuarial Present Value of Future Benefits are determined. The benefits expected to be paid in the future are discounted to this date. Vested Benefit Security Ratio.The ratio of the Market Value of Assets to the Actuarial Present Value of Vested Accrued Benefits. City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan    5799 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 502 BOARD OF TRUSTEES AGENDA | MAY 14, 2026 REGULAR MEETING TITLE Updated Actuarial Projection Study as of October 1, 2025 SUMMARY As discussed at the April 9th meeting by the City Manager, attached is the updated actuarial projection study as of October 1, 2025. FUNDING SOURCE RECOMMENDATION 100 May 4, 2026 Mr. Brian Dunigan Director of Administrative Services and Operations City of Winter Springs 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 Re: City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan Updated Actuarial Projection Study Dear Brian: As requested, we are pleased to enclose updated thirty (30) year projections illustrating the financial impact of proposed changes to the benefit provisions of the City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan (Plan). This updates the Study valuation date from October 1, 2024 to October 1, 2025. If you should have any question concerning the above or if we may be of further assistance with this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Shelly L. Jones, A.S.A. Consultant and Actuary Enclosure 101 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan Updated Actuarial Projection Study as of October 1, 2025 Prepared: May 4, 2026 102 103 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1 II. Projection Results .......................................................................................................... 6 III.Outline of Principal Provisions of the Retirement Plan ................................................ 22 IV. Actuarial Assumptions and Cost Methods ................................................................... 25 V. Glossary ....................................................................................................................... 31 104 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As requested, we have completed updated thirty (30) year projections illustrating the financial impact of proposed changes to the benefit provisions of the City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan (Plan). This reflects an updated valuation date from October 1, 2024 to October 1, 2025. Background – Currently the Plan provides: a maximum of 30 years of Accrual Service compensation includes up to one hundred fifty (150) hours of overtime pay in a plan year for hourly employees normal retirement eligibility upon attainment of age sixty-five (65) no Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP) no automatic cost of living adjustments (COLA) Proposed Changes – We understand the City wishes to determine the effect on future City contributions of the following proposed changes: Scenario 1 – Increase the maximum accrued benefit from 30 years of Accrual Service to 99% of Average Final Compensation Scenario 2 – Increase maximum hours of pensionable overtime from 150 to 300 hours per plan year for hourly employees Scenario 3 – Add a normal retirement eligibility provision of completion of thirty (30) years of service, regardless of age, without benefit reduction Scenario 4 – Create a DROP with a maximum participation period of three (3) years, a fixed annual interest credit of 4% and participation upon eligibility for normal retirement or unreduced early retirement (attainment of age 55 and completion of 15 years of service) Scenario 5 – Add an automatic annual COLA of 2.0% commencing three (3) years after benefit commencement for future retirees who retire under early or normal retirement eligibility Scenario 6 – Combine Scenario 1, 2 and 3 Scenario 7 – Combine Scenario 1, 2, 3 and 4 Scenario 8 – Combine Scenario 1, 2, 3 and 5 Results – The following table shows the projected cumulative and average annual minimum required net City cost over the next one (1), five (5), ten (10) and thirty (30) years for the baseline (current Plan) and for the proposed benefit changes described above. We have also shown the present value of the thirty (30) year net City cost for the current Plan and proposed Plan as of October 1, 2025 based on the current assumed investment return of 6.75%. 105 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 2 PV * of 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 30 Year 5 Year 10 Year 30 Year 30 Year Baseline - Current Plan $ Net City Cost $854 $4,416 $9,182 $28,603 $883 $918 $953 $12,013 Scenario 1 - Increase maximum accrued benefit to 99% of FAC $ Net City Cost $897 $4,621 $9,580 $29,615 $924 $958 $987 $12,488 $ Change from Baseline $43 $205 $398 $1,012 $41 $40 $34 $475 Scenario 2 - Increase maximum pensionable overtime to 300hr per year $ Net City Cost $865 $4,481 $9,333 $29,123 $896 $933 $971 $12,219 $ Change from Baseline $12 $65 $151 $520 $13 $15 $17 $206 Scenario 3 - Implement a normal retirement eligibility of 30&out $ Net City Cost $984 $5,038 $10,387 $31,658 $1,008 $1,039 $1,055 $13,455 $ Change from Baseline $130 $622 $1,205 $3,055 $124 $121 $102 $1,442 Scenario 4 - Implement DROP $ Net City Cost $871 $4,506 $9,364 $29,074 $901 $936 $969 $12,228 $ Change from Baseline $17 $90 $182 $471 $18 $18 $16 $215 Scenario 5 - Add an annual COLA of 2% $ Net City Cost $1,109 $5,713 $11,832 $36,486 $1,143 $1,183 $1,216 $15,429 $ Change from Baseline $256 $1,297 $2,650 $7,882 $259 $265 $263 $3,417 Scenario 6 - Combine Scenarios 1, 2 and 3 $ Net City Cost $1,011 $5,184 $10,695 $32,653 $1,037 $1,070 $1,088 $13,872 $ Change from Baseline $157 $768 $1,513 $4,050 $154 $151 $135 $1,859 Scenario 7 - Combine Scenarios 1, 2, 3 and 4 $ Net City Cost $1,038 $5,319 $10,961 $33,342 $1,064 $1,096 $1,111 $14,191 $ Change from Baseline $184 $903 $1,779 $4,739 $181 $178 $158 $2,178 Scenario 8 - Combine Scenarios 1, 2, 3 and 5 $ Net City Cost $1,303 $6,660 $13,691 $41,485 $1,332 $1,369 $1,383 $17,722 $ Change from Baseline $449 $2,244 $4,509 $12,882 $449 $451 $429 $5,709 * Present Value is determined using the Plan's investment return assumption of 6.75% Net City Cost ($ thousands) Average AnnualCumulative Actuarial Assumptions and Methods, Plan Provisions, Financial Data and Member Census Data – Plan provisions employed for the purposes of our Actuarial Projection Study are the same Plan provision utilized in the October 1, 2025 Actuarial Valuation with the exception of the proposed changes described above. The actuarial assumptions and methods, financial data and member census data employed for purposes of our Actuarial Projection Study are the same actuarial assumptions and methods, financial data and member census data utilized for the October 1, 2025 Actuarial Valuation unless otherwise specified herein. • For Scenario 2, 6, 7 and 8, pensionable compensation has been increased by overtime hours worked (up to 300 hours) for fiscal years ended 2023, 2024 and 2025 as reported by the City. 106 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 3 •For Scenario 3, 6, 7 and 8, the retirement rates have been updated as follows: For General Employees Current Retirement Rates Proposed Retirement Rates Years of Service Years of Service Age 0 - 14 15 - 24 25 or more 0 - 14 15 - 24 25 - 29 30 31 or more Under 55 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% 10% 90% 35% 55 – 64 4% 20% 25% 4% 20% 25% 90% 50% 65 – 66 65% 80% 100% 65% 80% 100% 100% 100% 67 and above 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% For Forensic Professionals and Police Officers Current Retirement Rates Years of Service Age 0 – 9 10 – 14 15 – 19 20 – 24 25 – 29 30 or more Under 55 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.0% 35.0% 55 0.0% 5.0% 12.5% 12.5% 70.0% 90.0% 56 – 64 0.0% 2.5% 12.5% 40.0% 7.5% 10.0% 65 and above 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Proposed Retirement Rates Years of Service Age 0 – 9 10 – 14 15 – 19 20 – 24 25 – 29 30 31 or more Under 55 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.0% 50.0% 35.0% 55 0.0% 5.0% 12.5% 12.5% 70.0% 90.0% 90.0% 56 – 64 0.0% 2.5% 12.5% 40.0% 7.5% 90.0% 25.0% 65 and above 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% In addition, the following projection assumptions have been included: •The administrative expenses are assumed to be 1.19% of expected payroll for each future year (the same level as of October 1, 2025) •Future Forensic Professionals and Police Officers are assumed to be hired each year at a rate sufficient to maintain a constant active Forensic Professional / Police Officer headcount – stationary population. New Forensic Professionals / Police Officers are assumed to have the same average demographic characteristics (age, gender, salary – adjusted each year for inflation) as those Forensic Professionals / Police Officers hired over the past five (5) years. Projections are deterministic - throughout the projection period Plan experience is expected to match the assumptions (asset value reported as of October 1, 2025). Other Considerations – Under Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement Number 68, we understand the full cost of benefit changes must be recognized immediately in the Pension Expense (for accounting, not funding). 107 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 4 Risk Assessment – Risk assessment may include scenario tests, sensitivity, or stress tests, stochastic modeling and a comparison of the present value of benefits at low-risk discount rates. We are prepared to perform such assessment to aid in the decision making process. Please refer to the October 1, 2025 Actuarial Valuation Report dated May 4, 2026 for additional discussion regarding the risks associated with measuring the accrued liability and the minimum funding payment. This Actuarial Projection Study is intended to describe the financial effect of the proposed provision changes on the Plan from a neutral perspective and is not intended as a recommendation in favor of the changes nor in opposition to the changes. If all actuarial assumptions are met and if all future minimum required contributions are paid, Plan assets will be sufficient to pay all Plan benefits, future contributions are expected to remain relatively stable as a percent of payroll and the funded status is expected to improve. Plan minimum required contributions are determined in compliance with the requirements of the Florida Protection of Public Employee Retirement Benefits Act with normal cost determined as a level percent of covered payroll and with a level dollar amortization payment using a closed amortization period of 25 years. We have assessed that the contribution rate calculated under the current funding policy is a reasonable Actuarially Determined Employer Contribution (ADEC) and it is consistent with the plan accumulating adequate assets to make benefit payments when due. All actuarial assumptions used in this Actuarial Study are reasonable for the purposes of this study. The combined effect of the assumptions is expected to have no significant bias (i.e. not significantly optimistic or pessimistic). All actuarial assumptions and methods used in the study follow the guidance in the applicable Actuarial Standards of Practice. The Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) may not be appropriate for assessing the sufficiency of Plan assets to meet the estimated cost of settling benefit obligations but may be appropriate for assessing the need for or the amount of future contributions. The UAAL would be different if it reflected the market value of assets rather than the smoothed actuarial value of assets. These calculations are based upon assumptions regarding future events. However, the Plan’s long term costs will be determined by actual future events, which may differ materially from the assumptions made. These calculations are also based upon present and proposed Plan provisions that are outlined or referenced in this Actuarial Study. If you have reason to believe the assumptions used are unreasonable, the Plan provisions are incorrectly described or referenced, important Plan provisions relevant to this Actuarial Projection Study are not described or that conditions have changed since the calculations were made, you should contact the undersigned prior to relying on information in this Actuarial Projection Study. If you have reason to believe that the information provided in this Actuarial Projection Study is inaccurate, or is in any way incomplete, or if you need further information in order to make an informed decision on the subject matter of this report, please contact the undersigned prior to making such decision. Future actuarial measurements may differ significantly from the current measurements presented in this report due to such factors as the following: Plan experience differing from that anticipated by the economic 108 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 5 or demographic assumptions; changes in economic or demographic assumptions; increases or decreases expected as part of the natural operation of the methodology used for these measurements (such as the end of an amortization period or additional cost or contribution requirements based on the Plan’s funded status); and changes in Plan provisions or applicable law. Due to the limited scope of the actuary’s assignment, the actuary did not perform an analysis of the potential range of such future measurements. This report should not be relied on for any purpose other than the purpose described in the primary communication. Determinations of the financial results associated with the benefits described in this report in a manner other than the intended purpose may produce significantly different results. This Actuarial Study was prepared using ProVal’s valuation model, a software product of Winklevoss Technologies. We are relying on the ProVal model. We performed tests of the ProVal model with this assignment and made a reasonable attempt to understand the developer’s intended purpose of, general operation of, major sensitivities and dependencies within, and key strengths and limitations of the ProVal model. In our professional judgment, the ProVal valuation model has the capability to provide results that are consistent with the purposes of the valuation and has no material limitations or known weaknesses. This Actuarial Study has been prepared by actuaries who have substantial experience valuing public employee retirement systems. To the best of our knowledge the information contained in this report is accurate and fairly presents the actuarial position of the Plan as of the valuation date. All calculations have been made in conformity with generally accepted actuarial principles and practices, with the Actuarial Standards of Practice issued by the Actuarial Standards Board and with applicable statutes. This Actuarial Study was prepared at the request of the City and is intended for use by the City and those designated or approved by the City. This Actuarial Study may be provided to parties other than the City only in its entirety and only with the permission of the City. GRS is not responsible for unauthorized use of this Study. The signing actuaries are independent of the Plan sponsor. The undersigned are Members of the American Academy of Actuaries and meet the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinion contained herein. If you should have any question concerning the above or if we may be of further assistance with this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company Shelly L. Jones, A.S.A., E.A., M.A.A.A., F.C.A. Consultant and Actuary Jennifer M. Borregard, E.A., M.A.A.A., F.C.A. Consultant and Actuary 109 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 6 PROJECTION RESULTS Scenario 1 – Increase the maximum accrued benefit from 30 Years of Accrual Service to 99% of Final Average Compensation. The following Tables show projected covered payroll, comparison of projected City and Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) under the baseline forecast versus Scenario 1 – ($1,000s). Cumulative Increase / Increase / Increase / Fiscal Projected Projected (Decrease) in (Decrease) in (Decrease) in Year Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Net City Cost Net City Cost UAAL 2026 - 2027 4,334 854 19.7% 5,961 4,334 897 20.7% 6,366 43 43 405 2027 - 2028 4,396 875 19.9% 5,829 4,396 914 20.8% 6,227 40 83 398 2028 - 2029 4,467 876 19.6% 5,688 4,467 916 20.5% 6,079 40 123 391 2029 - 2030 4,524 900 19.9% 5,537 4,524 941 20.8% 5,920 41 164 383 2030 - 2031 4,559 912 20.0% 5,376 4,559 953 20.9% 5,751 41 205 375 2031 - 2032 4,652 926 19.9% 5,204 4,652 963 20.7% 5,571 37 242 367 2032 - 2033 4,747 940 19.8% 5,023 4,747 978 20.6% 5,380 38 280 358 2033 - 2034 4,843 954 19.7% 4,829 4,843 993 20.5% 5,177 39 319 348 2034 - 2035 4,903 966 19.7% 4,623 4,903 1,005 20.5% 4,960 39 358 337 2035 - 2036 5,027 980 19.5% 4,403 5,027 1,020 20.3% 4,729 40 398 326 2036 - 2037 5,152 989 19.2% 4,169 5,152 1,030 20.0% 4,483 41 439 314 2037 - 2038 5,273 1,007 19.1% 3,923 5,273 1,044 19.8% 4,224 37 476 301 2038 - 2039 5,398 1,020 18.9% 3,664 5,398 1,058 19.6% 3,951 38 514 288 2039 - 2040 5,550 960 17.3% 3,391 5,550 999 18.0% 3,664 39 553 273 2040 - 2041 5,701 958 16.8% 3,169 5,701 998 17.5% 3,427 40 593 258 2041 - 2042 5,868 1,009 17.2% 2,955 5,868 1,045 17.8% 3,196 35 628 241 2042 - 2043 6,039 997 16.5% 2,696 6,039 1,033 17.1% 2,920 36 664 224 2043 - 2044 6,210 1,006 16.2% 2,449 6,210 1,043 16.8% 2,654 37 702 205 2044 - 2045 6,375 1,033 16.2% 2,195 6,375 1,071 16.8% 2,380 38 740 185 2045 - 2046 6,567 1,064 16.2% 1,917 6,567 1,103 16.8% 2,080 39 779 163 2046 - 2047 6,747 1,086 16.1% 1,610 6,747 1,127 16.7% 1,750 40 820 140 2047 - 2048 6,946 1,118 16.1% 1,278 6,946 1,160 16.7% 1,394 42 861 116 2048 - 2049 7,140 1,114 15.6% 912 7,140 1,157 16.2% 1,002 43 904 90 2049 - 2050 7,351 823 11.2% 547 7,351 860 11.7% 608 37 941 62 2050 - 2051 7,568 870 11.5% 471 7,568 908 12.0% 502 38 979 32 2051 - 2052 7,759 916 11.8% 359 7,759 923 11.9% 359 8 987 0 2052 - 2053 7,996 1,000 12.5% 214 7,996 1,008 12.6% 214 8 995 0 2053 - 2054 8,229 798 9.7% 0 8,229 798 9.7% 0 0 995 0 2054 - 2055 8,480 814 9.6% 0 8,480 823 9.7% 0 8 1,003 0 2055 - 2056 8,739 839 9.6% 0 8,739 848 9.7% 0 9 1,012 0 5 Year Totals 22,280 4,416 19.8%22,280 4,621 20.7%205 10 Year Totals 46,452 9,182 19.8%46,452 9,580 20.6%398 30 Years Totals 181,540 28,603 15.8%181,540 29,615 16.3%1,012 Required Contribution Required Contribution Net City Net City Current Plan Scenario 1 - 99% of FAC 110 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 7 0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%Scenario 1 -Projected City Contributions as a % of Payroll Current Plan Scenario 1 - 99% of FAC111 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 8 Scenario 2 – Increase maximum number of pensionable overtime from 150 to 300 hours per Plan year for hourly employees. The following Tables show projected covered payroll, comparison of projected City and Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) under the baseline forecast versus Scenario 2 – ($1,000s). Cumulative Increase / Increase / Increase / Fiscal Projected Projected (Decrease) in (Decrease) in (Decrease) in Year Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Net City Cost Net City Cost UAAL 2026 - 2027 4,334 854 19.7% 5,961 4,416 865 19.6% 6,046 12 12 84 2027 - 2028 4,396 875 19.9% 5,829 4,481 887 19.8% 5,912 12 24 83 2028 - 2029 4,467 876 19.6% 5,688 4,554 888 19.5% 5,769 13 37 82 2029 - 2030 4,524 900 19.9% 5,537 4,615 914 19.8% 5,617 14 50 80 2030 - 2031 4,559 912 20.0% 5,376 4,656 926 19.9% 5,454 15 65 78 2031 - 2032 4,652 926 19.9% 5,204 4,754 941 19.8% 5,280 16 80 76 2032 - 2033 4,747 940 19.8% 5,023 4,854 956 19.7% 5,097 16 97 75 2033 - 2034 4,843 954 19.7% 4,829 4,955 971 19.6% 4,902 17 114 73 2034 - 2035 4,903 966 19.7% 4,623 5,022 984 19.6% 4,693 18 132 70 2035 - 2036 5,027 980 19.5% 4,403 5,150 999 19.4% 4,471 19 151 68 2036 - 2037 5,152 989 19.2% 4,169 5,279 1,008 19.1% 4,235 19 170 66 2037 - 2038 5,273 1,007 19.1% 3,923 5,407 1,022 18.9% 3,986 15 185 63 2038 - 2039 5,398 1,020 18.9% 3,664 5,537 1,035 18.7% 3,724 15 200 60 2039 - 2040 5,550 960 17.3% 3,391 5,694 979 17.2% 3,448 19 219 57 2040 - 2041 5,701 958 16.8% 3,169 5,850 977 16.7% 3,223 19 238 54 2041 - 2042 5,868 1,009 17.2% 2,955 6,023 1,024 17.0% 3,005 15 253 50 2042 - 2043 6,039 997 16.5% 2,696 6,200 1,017 16.4% 2,743 20 273 47 2043 - 2044 6,210 1,006 16.2% 2,449 6,376 1,020 16.0% 2,492 14 288 43 2044 - 2045 6,375 1,033 16.2% 2,195 6,547 1,048 16.0% 2,234 15 302 38 2045 - 2046 6,567 1,064 16.2% 1,917 6,745 1,086 16.1% 1,951 22 324 34 2046 - 2047 6,747 1,086 16.1% 1,610 6,926 1,108 16.0% 1,639 22 346 29 2047 - 2048 6,946 1,118 16.1% 1,278 7,130 1,141 16.0% 1,302 23 369 24 2048 - 2049 7,140 1,114 15.6% 912 7,327 1,136 15.5% 931 22 391 19 2049 - 2050 7,351 823 11.2% 547 7,543 845 11.2% 560 21 412 13 2050 - 2051 7,568 870 11.5% 471 7,764 893 11.5% 477 23 435 7 2051 - 2052 7,759 916 11.8% 359 7,955 931 11.7% 359 15 450 0 2052 - 2053 7,996 1,000 12.5% 214 8,198 1,017 12.4% 214 17 467 0 2053 - 2054 8,229 798 9.7% 0 8,437 810 9.6% 0 12 479 0 2054 - 2055 8,480 814 9.6% 0 8,693 835 9.6% 0 20 499 0 2055 - 2056 8,739 839 9.6% 0 8,958 860 9.6% 0 21 520 0 5 Year Totals 22,280 4,416 19.8%22,722 4,481 19.7%65 10 Year Totals 46,452 9,182 19.8%47,456 9,333 19.7%151 30 Years Totals 181,540 28,603 15.8%186,045 29,123 15.7%520 Current Plan Scenario 2 - 300Hrs Overtime Net City Net City Required Contribution Required Contribution 112 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 9 0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%Scenario 2 -Projected City Contributions as a % of Payroll Current Plan Scenario 2 - 300Hrs Overtime113 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 10 Scenario 3 – Add a normal retirement eligibility provision of completion of thirty years of service, regardless of age, without reduction. The following Tables show projected covered payroll, comparison of projected City and Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) under the baseline forecast versus Scenario 3 – ($1,000s). Cumulative Increase / Increase / Increase / Fiscal Projected Projected (Decrease) in (Decrease) in (Decrease) in Year Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Net City Cost Net City Cost UAAL 2026 - 2027 4,334 854 19.7% 5,961 4,334 984 22.7% 7,269 130 130 1,308 2027 - 2028 4,396 875 19.9% 5,829 4,379 998 22.8% 7,115 124 254 1,286 2028 - 2029 4,467 876 19.6% 5,688 4,451 1,001 22.5% 6,951 126 380 1,264 2029 - 2030 4,524 900 19.9% 5,537 4,465 1,023 22.9% 6,776 122 502 1,239 2030 - 2031 4,559 912 20.0% 5,376 4,506 1,032 22.9% 6,589 120 622 1,213 2031 - 2032 4,652 926 19.9% 5,204 4,570 1,047 22.9% 6,389 121 743 1,185 2032 - 2033 4,747 940 19.8% 5,023 4,609 1,055 22.9% 6,178 115 858 1,155 2033 - 2034 4,843 954 19.7% 4,829 4,687 1,069 22.8% 5,953 115 973 1,124 2034 - 2035 4,903 966 19.7% 4,623 4,740 1,081 22.8% 5,713 115 1,088 1,090 2035 - 2036 5,027 980 19.5% 4,403 4,879 1,098 22.5% 5,456 118 1,205 1,054 2036 - 2037 5,152 989 19.2% 4,169 4,994 1,104 22.1% 5,184 115 1,320 1,015 2037 - 2038 5,273 1,007 19.1% 3,923 5,139 1,120 21.8% 4,897 113 1,433 974 2038 - 2039 5,398 1,020 18.9% 3,664 5,292 1,133 21.4% 4,594 112 1,545 930 2039 - 2040 5,550 960 17.3% 3,391 5,463 1,082 19.8% 4,274 122 1,667 883 2040 - 2041 5,701 958 16.8% 3,169 5,644 1,078 19.1% 4,002 120 1,787 833 2041 - 2042 5,868 1,009 17.2% 2,955 5,814 1,128 19.4% 3,734 119 1,906 780 2042 - 2043 6,039 997 16.5% 2,696 5,999 1,116 18.6% 3,419 119 2,025 722 2043 - 2044 6,210 1,006 16.2% 2,449 6,141 1,124 18.3% 3,110 118 2,143 662 2044 - 2045 6,375 1,033 16.2% 2,195 6,336 1,153 18.2% 2,792 121 2,263 596 2045 - 2046 6,567 1,064 16.2% 1,917 6,542 1,184 18.1% 2,444 120 2,383 527 2046 - 2047 6,747 1,086 16.1% 1,610 6,731 1,205 17.9% 2,063 119 2,502 453 2047 - 2048 6,946 1,118 16.1% 1,278 6,934 1,241 17.9% 1,652 123 2,625 374 2048 - 2049 7,140 1,114 15.6% 912 7,127 1,240 17.4% 1,201 126 2,751 289 2049 - 2050 7,351 823 11.2% 547 7,333 939 12.8% 746 115 2,867 199 2050 - 2051 7,568 870 11.5% 471 7,549 996 13.2% 573 126 2,993 103 2051 - 2052 7,759 916 11.8% 359 7,737 928 12.0% 359 13 3,005 0 2052 - 2053 7,996 1,000 12.5% 214 7,978 1,013 12.7% 214 14 3,019 0 2053 - 2054 8,229 798 9.7% 0 8,211 805 9.8% 0 6 3,026 0 2054 - 2055 8,480 814 9.6% 0 8,458 829 9.8% 0 15 3,040 0 2055 - 2056 8,739 839 9.6% 0 8,708 853 9.8% 0 14 3,055 0 5 Year Totals 22,280 4,416 19.8%22,135 5,038 22.8%622 10 Year Totals 46,452 9,182 19.8%45,620 10,387 22.8%1,205 30 Years Totals 181,540 28,603 15.8%179,750 31,658 17.6%3,055 Current Plan Scenario 3 - NR 30&Out Net City Net City Required Contribution Required Contribution 114 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 11 0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%Scenario 3 -Projected City Contributions as a % of Payroll Current Plan Scenario 3 - NR 30&Out115 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 12 Scenario 4 – Create a Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP) with a maximum participation period of 3 years, a fixed annual interest credit of 4% and participation upon eligibility for normal retirement or unreduced early retirement (attainment of age 55 and completion of 15 years of service) The following Tables show projected covered payroll, comparison of projected City and Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) under the baseline forecast versus Scenario 4 – ($1,000s). Cumulative Increase / Increase / Increase / Fiscal Projected Projected (Decrease) in (Decrease) in (Decrease) in Year Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Net City Cost Net City Cost UAAL 2026 - 2027 4,334 854 19.7% 5,961 4,334 871 20.1% 6,110 17 17 149 2027 - 2028 4,396 875 19.9% 5,829 4,419 888 20.1% 5,975 13 31 146 2028 - 2029 4,467 876 19.6% 5,688 4,503 896 19.9% 5,831 21 51 144 2029 - 2030 4,524 900 19.9% 5,537 4,553 920 20.2% 5,678 19 71 141 2030 - 2031 4,559 912 20.0% 5,376 4,586 931 20.3% 5,514 19 90 138 2031 - 2032 4,652 926 19.9% 5,204 4,683 946 20.2% 5,339 20 110 135 2032 - 2033 4,747 940 19.8% 5,023 4,751 960 20.2% 5,154 20 130 132 2033 - 2034 4,843 954 19.7% 4,829 4,831 971 20.1% 4,957 17 147 128 2034 - 2035 4,903 966 19.7% 4,623 4,793 983 20.5% 4,747 17 164 124 2035 - 2036 5,027 980 19.5% 4,403 4,942 998 20.2% 4,523 18 182 120 2036 - 2037 5,152 989 19.2% 4,169 5,086 1,007 19.8% 4,285 18 200 116 2037 - 2038 5,273 1,007 19.1% 3,923 5,237 1,021 19.5% 4,034 14 213 111 2038 - 2039 5,398 1,020 18.9% 3,664 5,383 1,033 19.2% 3,769 13 227 106 2039 - 2040 5,550 960 17.3% 3,391 5,551 983 17.7% 3,492 22 249 101 2040 - 2041 5,701 958 16.8% 3,169 5,715 977 17.1% 3,264 19 269 95 2041 - 2042 5,868 1,009 17.2% 2,955 5,891 1,025 17.4% 3,043 16 284 89 2042 - 2043 6,039 997 16.5% 2,696 6,072 1,014 16.7% 2,778 18 302 82 2043 - 2044 6,210 1,006 16.2% 2,449 6,171 1,018 16.5% 2,524 12 314 75 2044 - 2045 6,375 1,033 16.2% 2,195 6,343 1,047 16.5% 2,263 14 328 68 2045 - 2046 6,567 1,064 16.2% 1,917 6,544 1,080 16.5% 1,977 16 344 60 2046 - 2047 6,747 1,086 16.1% 1,610 6,733 1,104 16.4% 1,661 18 362 52 2047 - 2048 6,946 1,118 16.1% 1,278 6,936 1,137 16.4% 1,321 19 381 43 2048 - 2049 7,140 1,114 15.6% 912 7,133 1,134 15.9% 945 20 401 33 2049 - 2050 7,351 823 11.2% 547 7,347 838 11.4% 569 14 416 23 2050 - 2051 7,568 870 11.5% 471 7,566 893 11.8% 482 22 438 12 2051 - 2052 7,759 916 11.8% 359 7,758 923 11.9% 359 8 446 0 2052 - 2053 7,996 1,000 12.5% 214 7,996 1,008 12.6% 214 8 454 0 2053 - 2054 8,229 798 9.7% 0 8,229 798 9.7% 0 0 454 0 2054 - 2055 8,480 814 9.6% 0 8,480 823 9.7% 0 8 462 0 2055 - 2056 8,739 839 9.6% 0 8,739 848 9.7% 0 9 471 0 5 Year Totals 22,280 4,416 19.8%22,395 4,506 20.1%90 10 Year Totals 46,452 9,182 19.8%46,395 9,364 20.2%182 30 Years Totals 181,540 28,603 15.8%181,304 29,074 16.0%471 Current Plan Scenario 4 - Implement DROP Net City Net City Required Contribution Required Contribution 116 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 13 0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%Scenario 4 -Projected City Contributions as a % of Payroll Current Plan Scenario 4 - Implement DROP117 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 14 Scenario 5 – Add an annual automatic cost of living adjustment (COLA) of 2.0% commencing three years after benefit commencement for future retirees who retire under early or normal retirement eligibility. The following Tables show projected covered payroll, comparison of projected City and Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) under the baseline forecast versus Scenario 5 – ($1,000s). Cumulative Increase / Increase / Increase / Fiscal Projected Projected (Decrease) in (Decrease) in (Decrease) in Year Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Net City Cost Net City Cost UAAL 2026 - 2027 4,334 854 19.7% 5,961 4,334 1,109 25.6% 8,272 256 256 2,310 2027 - 2028 4,396 875 19.9% 5,829 4,396 1,130 25.7% 8,101 255 511 2,273 2028 - 2029 4,467 876 19.6% 5,688 4,467 1,135 25.4% 7,920 259 770 2,232 2029 - 2030 4,524 900 19.9% 5,537 4,524 1,163 25.7% 7,726 262 1,032 2,189 2030 - 2031 4,559 912 20.0% 5,376 4,559 1,176 25.8% 7,519 264 1,297 2,143 2031 - 2032 4,652 926 19.9% 5,204 4,652 1,191 25.6% 7,298 265 1,562 2,094 2032 - 2033 4,747 940 19.8% 5,023 4,747 1,206 25.4% 7,064 266 1,828 2,041 2033 - 2034 4,843 954 19.7% 4,829 4,843 1,225 25.3% 6,814 271 2,099 1,985 2034 - 2035 4,903 966 19.7% 4,623 4,903 1,241 25.3% 6,548 275 2,373 1,925 2035 - 2036 5,027 980 19.5% 4,403 5,027 1,257 25.0% 6,264 276 2,650 1,862 2036 - 2037 5,152 989 19.2% 4,169 5,152 1,267 24.6% 5,963 278 2,928 1,793 2037 - 2038 5,273 1,007 19.1% 3,923 5,273 1,287 24.4% 5,643 279 3,207 1,721 2038 - 2039 5,398 1,020 18.9% 3,664 5,398 1,301 24.1% 5,307 281 3,488 1,643 2039 - 2040 5,550 960 17.3% 3,391 5,550 1,249 22.5% 4,951 289 3,777 1,560 2040 - 2041 5,701 958 16.8% 3,169 5,701 1,248 21.9% 4,641 291 4,068 1,472 2041 - 2042 5,868 1,009 17.2% 2,955 5,868 1,303 22.2% 4,332 293 4,361 1,377 2042 - 2043 6,039 997 16.5% 2,696 6,039 1,292 21.4% 3,972 296 4,657 1,276 2043 - 2044 6,210 1,006 16.2% 2,449 6,210 1,304 21.0% 3,618 298 4,955 1,169 2044 - 2045 6,375 1,033 16.2% 2,195 6,375 1,332 20.9% 3,249 300 5,255 1,054 2045 - 2046 6,567 1,064 16.2% 1,917 6,567 1,373 20.9% 2,848 309 5,563 931 2046 - 2047 6,747 1,086 16.1% 1,610 6,747 1,397 20.7% 2,410 310 5,874 800 2047 - 2048 6,946 1,118 16.1% 1,278 6,946 1,431 20.6% 1,938 313 6,186 660 2048 - 2049 7,140 1,114 15.6% 912 7,140 1,435 20.1% 1,423 321 6,507 511 2049 - 2050 7,351 823 11.2% 547 7,351 1,139 15.5% 898 316 6,824 352 2050 - 2051 7,568 870 11.5% 471 7,568 1,196 15.8% 652 325 7,149 182 2051 - 2052 7,759 916 11.8% 359 7,759 1,055 13.6% 359 140 7,289 0 2052 - 2053 7,996 1,000 12.5% 214 7,996 1,143 14.3% 214 144 7,433 0 2053 - 2054 8,229 798 9.7% 0 8,229 938 11.4% 0 140 7,572 0 2054 - 2055 8,480 814 9.6% 0 8,480 967 11.4% 0 153 7,725 0 2055 - 2056 8,739 839 9.6% 0 8,739 996 11.4% 0 157 7,882 0 5 Year Totals 22,280 4,416 19.8%22,280 5,713 25.6%1,297 10 Year Totals 46,452 9,182 19.8%46,452 11,832 25.5%2,650 30 Years Totals 181,540 28,603 15.8%181,540 36,486 20.1%7,882 Current Plan Scenario 5 - 2.0% Annual COLA Net City Net City Required Contribution Required Contribution 118 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 15 0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%Scenario 5 -Projected City Contributions as a % of Payroll Current Plan Scenario 5 - 2.0% Annual COLA119 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 16 Scenario 6 – Combine Scenarios 1, 2 and 3: Increase the maximum accrued benefit from 30 Years of Accrual Service to 99% of Final Average Compensation; Increase maximum number of pensionable overtime from 150 to 300 hours per Plan year for hourly employees; Add a normal retirement eligibility provision of completion of thirty years of service, regardless of age, without reduction. The following Tables show projected covered payroll, comparison of projected City and Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) under the baseline forecast versus Scenario 6 – ($1,000s). Cumulative Increase / Increase / Increase / Fiscal Projected Projected (Decrease) in (Decrease) in (Decrease) in Year Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Net City Cost Net City Cost UAAL 2026 - 2027 4,334 854 19.7% 5,961 4,416 1,011 22.9% 7,535 157 157 1,574 2027 - 2028 4,396 875 19.9% 5,829 4,463 1,027 23.0% 7,377 152 309 1,548 2028 - 2029 4,467 876 19.6% 5,688 4,539 1,030 22.7% 7,208 155 464 1,520 2029 - 2030 4,524 900 19.9% 5,537 4,557 1,053 23.1% 7,028 152 616 1,491 2030 - 2031 4,559 912 20.0% 5,376 4,603 1,063 23.1% 6,835 152 768 1,460 2031 - 2032 4,652 926 19.9% 5,204 4,673 1,075 23.0% 6,630 149 917 1,426 2032 - 2033 4,747 940 19.8% 5,023 4,716 1,089 23.1% 6,413 149 1,066 1,390 2033 - 2034 4,843 954 19.7% 4,829 4,800 1,104 23.0% 6,181 150 1,216 1,352 2034 - 2035 4,903 966 19.7% 4,623 4,859 1,113 22.9% 5,934 147 1,363 1,312 2035 - 2036 5,027 980 19.5% 4,403 5,003 1,131 22.6% 5,671 150 1,513 1,268 2036 - 2037 5,152 989 19.2% 4,169 5,122 1,137 22.2% 5,391 148 1,661 1,222 2037 - 2038 5,273 1,007 19.1% 3,923 5,273 1,155 21.9% 5,095 148 1,809 1,172 2038 - 2039 5,398 1,020 18.9% 3,664 5,432 1,168 21.5% 4,783 148 1,957 1,119 2039 - 2040 5,550 960 17.3% 3,391 5,608 1,116 19.9% 4,454 156 2,113 1,063 2040 - 2041 5,701 958 16.8% 3,169 5,794 1,118 19.3% 4,172 160 2,273 1,002 2041 - 2042 5,868 1,009 17.2% 2,955 5,971 1,164 19.5% 3,893 155 2,428 938 2042 - 2043 6,039 997 16.5% 2,696 6,162 1,158 18.8% 3,565 162 2,590 869 2043 - 2044 6,210 1,006 16.2% 2,449 6,309 1,167 18.5% 3,245 161 2,751 796 2044 - 2045 6,375 1,033 16.2% 2,195 6,510 1,191 18.3% 2,913 159 2,910 718 2045 - 2046 6,567 1,064 16.2% 1,917 6,720 1,223 18.2% 2,551 159 3,069 634 2046 - 2047 6,747 1,086 16.1% 1,610 6,910 1,244 18.0% 2,155 157 3,226 545 2047 - 2048 6,946 1,118 16.1% 1,278 7,118 1,281 18.0% 1,728 163 3,389 450 2048 - 2049 7,140 1,114 15.6% 912 7,315 1,280 17.5% 1,260 166 3,555 348 2049 - 2050 7,351 823 11.2% 547 7,524 986 13.1% 786 162 3,718 240 2050 - 2051 7,568 870 11.5% 471 7,744 1,038 13.4% 594 167 3,885 124 2051 - 2052 7,759 916 11.8% 359 7,931 952 12.0% 359 36 3,921 0 2052 - 2053 7,996 1,000 12.5% 214 8,179 1,031 12.6% 214 31 3,952 0 2053 - 2054 8,229 798 9.7% 0 8,417 825 9.8% 0 27 3,979 0 2054 - 2055 8,480 814 9.6% 0 8,669 850 9.8% 0 35 4,015 0 2055 - 2056 8,739 839 9.6% 0 8,925 875 9.8% 0 36 4,050 0 5 Year Totals 22,280 4,416 19.8%22,577 5,184 23.0%768 10 Year Totals 46,452 9,182 19.8%46,628 10,695 22.9%1,513 30 Years Totals 181,540 28,603 15.8%184,260 32,653 17.7%4,050 Current Plan Scenario 6 - Combine Sce 1, 2 and 3 Net City Net City Required Contribution Required Contribution 120 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 17 0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%Scenario 6 -Projected City Contributions as a % of Payroll Current Plan Scenario 6 - Combine Sce 1, 2 and 3121 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 18 Scenario 7 – Combine Scenarios 1, 2, 3 and 4: Increase the maximum accrued benefit from 30 Years of Accrual Service to 99% of Final Average Compensation; Increase maximum number of pensionable overtime from 150 to 300 hours per Plan year for hourly employees; Add a normal retirement eligibility provision of completion of thirty years of service, regardless of age, without reduction; Create a Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP) with a maximum participation period of 3 years. The following Tables show projected covered payroll, comparison of projected City and Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) under the baseline forecast versus Scenario 7 – ($1,000s). Cumulative Increase / Increase / Increase / Fiscal Projected Projected (Decrease) in (Decrease) in (Decrease) in Year Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Net City Cost Net City Cost UAAL 2026 - 2027 4,334 854 19.7% 5,961 4,416 1,038 23.5% 7,773 184 184 1,811 2027 - 2028 4,396 875 19.9% 5,829 4,463 1,053 23.6% 7,610 178 362 1,782 2028 - 2029 4,467 876 19.6% 5,688 4,539 1,057 23.3% 7,438 182 544 1,750 2029 - 2030 4,524 900 19.9% 5,537 4,557 1,080 23.7% 7,253 180 724 1,716 2030 - 2031 4,559 912 20.0% 5,376 4,603 1,091 23.7% 7,056 179 903 1,680 2031 - 2032 4,652 926 19.9% 5,204 4,673 1,103 23.6% 6,845 177 1,080 1,642 2032 - 2033 4,747 940 19.8% 5,023 4,716 1,113 23.6% 6,623 173 1,253 1,600 2033 - 2034 4,843 954 19.7% 4,829 4,800 1,128 23.5% 6,386 174 1,427 1,556 2034 - 2035 4,903 966 19.7% 4,623 4,859 1,142 23.5% 6,132 176 1,603 1,510 2035 - 2036 5,027 980 19.5% 4,403 5,003 1,156 23.1% 5,862 175 1,779 1,460 2036 - 2037 5,152 989 19.2% 4,169 5,122 1,163 22.7% 5,575 174 1,952 1,406 2037 - 2038 5,273 1,007 19.1% 3,923 5,273 1,181 22.4% 5,272 174 2,126 1,349 2038 - 2039 5,398 1,020 18.9% 3,664 5,432 1,195 22.0% 4,952 175 2,301 1,288 2039 - 2040 5,550 960 17.3% 3,391 5,608 1,144 20.4% 4,614 184 2,485 1,223 2040 - 2041 5,701 958 16.8% 3,169 5,794 1,141 19.7% 4,323 184 2,669 1,154 2041 - 2042 5,868 1,009 17.2% 2,955 5,971 1,188 19.9% 4,034 179 2,848 1,080 2042 - 2043 6,039 997 16.5% 2,696 6,162 1,183 19.2% 3,697 187 3,034 1,001 2043 - 2044 6,210 1,006 16.2% 2,449 6,309 1,192 18.9% 3,365 186 3,220 916 2044 - 2045 6,375 1,033 16.2% 2,195 6,510 1,217 18.7% 3,022 185 3,405 826 2045 - 2046 6,567 1,064 16.2% 1,917 6,720 1,250 18.6% 2,646 186 3,591 730 2046 - 2047 6,747 1,086 16.1% 1,610 6,910 1,271 18.4% 2,237 185 3,776 627 2047 - 2048 6,946 1,118 16.1% 1,278 7,118 1,310 18.4% 1,796 191 3,967 518 2048 - 2049 7,140 1,114 15.6% 912 7,315 1,302 17.8% 1,313 188 4,156 401 2049 - 2050 7,351 823 11.2% 547 7,524 1,008 13.4% 822 185 4,341 276 2050 - 2051 7,568 870 11.5% 471 7,744 1,061 13.7% 613 191 4,531 142 2051 - 2052 7,759 916 11.8% 359 7,931 960 12.1% 359 44 4,575 0 2052 - 2053 7,996 1,000 12.5% 214 8,179 1,039 12.7% 214 39 4,615 0 2053 - 2054 8,229 798 9.7% 0 8,417 833 9.9% 0 35 4,650 0 2054 - 2055 8,480 814 9.6% 0 8,669 858 9.9% 0 44 4,694 0 2055 - 2056 8,739 839 9.6% 0 8,925 884 9.9% 0 45 4,739 0 5 Year Totals 22,280 4,416 19.8%22,577 5,319 23.6%903 10 Year Totals 46,452 9,182 19.8%46,628 10,961 23.5%1,779 30 Years Totals 181,540 28,603 15.8%184,260 33,342 18.1%4,739 Current Plan Scenario 7 - Combine Sce 1, 2, 3 and 4 Net City Net City Required Contribution Required Contribution 122 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 19 0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%Scenario 7 -Projected City Contributions as a % of Payroll Current Plan Scenario 7 - Combine Sce 1, 2, 3 and 4123 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 20 Scenario 8 – Combine Scenarios 1, 2, 3 and 5: Increase the maximum accrued benefit from 30 Years of Accrual Service to 99% of Final Average Compensation; Increase maximum number of pensionable overtime from 150 to 300 hours per Plan year for hourly employees; Add a normal retirement eligibility provision of completion of thirty years of service, regardless of age, without reduction; Add an annual automatic cost of living adjustment (COLA) of 2.0% commencing three years after benefit commencement for future retirees who retire under early or normal retirement eligibility. The following Tables show projected covered payroll, comparison of projected City and Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) under the baseline forecast versus Scenario 8 – ($1,000s). Cumulative Increase / Increase / Increase / Fiscal Projected Projected (Decrease) in (Decrease) in (Decrease) in Year Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Payroll Amount % of Pay UAAL Net City Cost Net City Cost UAAL 2026 - 2027 4,334 854 19.7% 5,961 4,416 1,303 29.5% 10,213 449 449 4,252 2027 - 2028 4,396 875 19.9% 5,829 4,463 1,321 29.6% 10,011 446 895 4,182 2028 - 2029 4,467 876 19.6% 5,688 4,539 1,325 29.2% 9,795 450 1,345 4,108 2029 - 2030 4,524 900 19.9% 5,537 4,557 1,349 29.6% 9,565 449 1,793 4,028 2030 - 2031 4,559 912 20.0% 5,376 4,603 1,362 29.6% 9,319 451 2,244 3,943 2031 - 2032 4,652 926 19.9% 5,204 4,673 1,374 29.4% 9,057 448 2,692 3,853 2032 - 2033 4,747 940 19.8% 5,023 4,716 1,391 29.5% 8,779 451 3,144 3,756 2033 - 2034 4,843 954 19.7% 4,829 4,800 1,406 29.3% 8,482 452 3,596 3,653 2034 - 2035 4,903 966 19.7% 4,623 4,859 1,419 29.2% 8,166 453 4,049 3,543 2035 - 2036 5,027 980 19.5% 4,403 5,003 1,441 28.8% 7,828 461 4,509 3,426 2036 - 2037 5,152 989 19.2% 4,169 5,122 1,450 28.3% 7,469 461 4,970 3,300 2037 - 2038 5,273 1,007 19.1% 3,923 5,273 1,471 27.9% 7,089 464 5,434 3,166 2038 - 2039 5,398 1,020 18.9% 3,664 5,432 1,488 27.4% 6,687 468 5,902 3,023 2039 - 2040 5,550 960 17.3% 3,391 5,608 1,441 25.7% 6,262 481 6,383 2,871 2040 - 2041 5,701 958 16.8% 3,169 5,794 1,443 24.9% 5,877 485 6,868 2,708 2041 - 2042 5,868 1,009 17.2% 2,955 5,971 1,493 25.0% 5,489 483 7,352 2,534 2042 - 2043 6,039 997 16.5% 2,696 6,162 1,491 24.2% 5,045 495 7,846 2,349 2043 - 2044 6,210 1,006 16.2% 2,449 6,309 1,501 23.8% 4,599 495 8,342 2,150 2044 - 2045 6,375 1,033 16.2% 2,195 6,510 1,536 23.6% 4,134 504 8,845 1,939 2045 - 2046 6,567 1,064 16.2% 1,917 6,720 1,566 23.3% 3,630 502 9,347 1,713 2046 - 2047 6,747 1,086 16.1% 1,610 6,910 1,596 23.1% 3,082 510 9,857 1,472 2047 - 2048 6,946 1,118 16.1% 1,278 7,118 1,630 22.9% 2,493 512 10,369 1,215 2048 - 2049 7,140 1,114 15.6% 912 7,315 1,631 22.3% 1,852 517 10,886 940 2049 - 2050 7,351 823 11.2% 547 7,524 1,347 17.9% 1,194 524 11,410 647 2050 - 2051 7,568 870 11.5% 471 7,744 1,402 18.1% 805 531 11,941 334 2051 - 2052 7,759 916 11.8% 359 7,931 1,095 13.8% 359 179 12,120 0 2052 - 2053 7,996 1,000 12.5% 214 8,179 1,178 14.4% 214 178 12,298 0 2053 - 2054 8,229 798 9.7% 0 8,417 985 11.7% 0 187 12,485 0 2054 - 2055 8,480 814 9.6% 0 8,669 1,006 11.6% 0 191 12,676 0 2055 - 2056 8,739 839 9.6% 0 8,925 1,044 11.7% 0 205 12,882 0 5 Year Totals 22,280 4,416 19.8%22,577 6,660 29.5%2,244 10 Year Totals 46,452 9,182 19.8%46,628 13,691 29.4%4,509 30 Years Totals 181,540 28,603 15.8%184,260 41,485 22.5%12,882 Current Plan Scenario 8 - Combine of Sce 1, 2, 3 and 5 Net City Net City Required Contribution Required Contribution 124 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 21 0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%Scenario 8 -Projected City Contributions as a % of Payroll Current Plan Scenario 8 - Combine of Sce 1, 2, 3 and 5125 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 22 OUTLINE OF PRINCIPAL PROVISIONS OF THE RETIREMENT FUND PRIOR TO ANY PROPOSED CHANGES INCLUDED IN THIS STUDY A. Effective Date B. Eligibility Requirements C. Accrual Service D. Compensation E. Final Average Compensation F. Normal Retirement 1. Eligibility: (a) Attainment of age 65; or (b) Wages, salaries and other amounts received (whether or not paid in cash) for personal services actually rendered in the course of employment. Effective October 10, 2011 Compensation shall exclude commissions, bonuses, overtime pay in excess of one hundred fifty (150) hours per Plan year and payments for accrued leave in excess of the dollar amount of an Employee's accrued leave balance on July 1, 2011. Average earnings duringthe bestfive (5) consecutive PlanYears outof the last ten (10) PlanYears preceding termination or retirement, but not less than the three (3) highest consecutive compensation periods during employment with the City as of September 30, 2011. Completionof30yearsofservice anddeterminedtobe disabledunderthe City's longterm disability insurance policy. Plan adopted as a Money Purchase Floor Offset plan on October 1, 1997. Plan amended and restated as a Defined Benefit Plan effective October 1, 2000. Plan most recently amended by Resolution 2025-12 adopted August 25, 2025. General Employees hired prior to October 1, 2011, Police Officers and Forensic Professionals working 32or more hours per week are eligible to join the Plan, unless they have elected to opt outofparticipationandenrollinadefinedcontributionplanestablishedbytheCity. Effective December 1, 2017, eligibility is the first day of the month following completion of 30 days of service. Electing transferring Firefighters as of October 2, 2008 under the Agreement with the County. Years of Accrual Service are any Plan Years during which an Employee completes at least 1,000 hours of service, including years of service completed prior to participation in the Plan. 126 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 23 2. Benefit: G. Early Retirement 1. Eligibility: (a) Attainment of age 55 and completion of 15 years of service; or (b) 2. Benefit: H. Late Retirement 1. Eligibility: Continued employment beyond age 65. 2. Benefit: (a) (b) I. Disability Retirement 1. Eligibility: 2. Benefit: Accrued benefit calculated as forNormal Retirementbased uponservice andpay atDisability Retirement Date. Benefitaccruedtodate of early retirement, actuarially reducedfor eachyear early retirement benefit commencement precedes age 55. A participant as of September 30, 2011 who attains age 55andcompletes10ormore yearsof service but lessthan 15years ofservice mayreceive the accrued benefit as of September 30, 2011 payable without actuarial reduction plus the accrued benefit earned after September 30, 2011 payable with actuarial reduction from normal retirement date. Greater of (a) and (b): Accrued benefit calculated as for Normal Retirement based upon service and pay at Late Retirement Date. Actuarially increased benefit as of Late Retirement Date. Completion of 30 years of service and determined to be disabled under the City's long term disability insurance policy. Completion of 25 years of service. For Firefighters, Police Officers and Forensic Professionals, 3.00% times Final Average Compensation multiplied by Accrual Service, up to a maximum of 30 years. ForGeneral Employees,3.00%timesAccrual ServiceearnedthroughSeptember30, 2011times Final Average Compensation plus 2.50% times Accrual Service earned after September 30, 2011 times Final Average Compensation, up to a maximum of 30 years of Accrual Service. 127 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 24 J. Death Benefit K. Participant Contributions L. Vested Benefit Upon Termination Years of Service Vested Percentage Less Than 7 0% 7 or More 100% M. Normal Form of Payment of Retirement Income Other Options N. Changes Since Previous Valuation Eligibility Requirements was: Upon termination of service prior to normal or early retirement date a participant shall be entitled to a benefit payable at normal or early retirement date calculated as for normal retirement. Based upon pay and service at date of termination multiplied by a percentage from the following table. Monthly benefit payable for life. Actuarially equivalent joint and survivor at 50%, 75%, 100%; or ten (10) years certain and life. General Employees hired prior to October 1, 2011, Police Officers and Forensic Professionals working 30 or more hours per week are eligible to join the Plan on the first day of the month followingcompletion of six (6) months of service. Electingtransferring Firefightersas of October 2, 2008 under the Agreement with the County. Beneficiary entitled to a monthly benefit supported by the present value of the non-forfeitable accruedbenefitatthetimeoftheparticipant'sdeath. If deathoccurs afteractual retirement,the beneficiary receives whatever is payable under the form of benefit option elected. Five percent (5%) of compensation. 100% vested in required participant contributions. Participant contributions made afterOctober 1, 2000 are included in the deferred vested benefit payable at normal or early retirement date. 128 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 25 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODS PRIOR TO ANY PROPOSED CHANGES INCLUDED IN THIS STUDY A. Mortality Firefighter, Police Officer and Forensic Professional participants: Sample Ages (2025) Men Women Men Women 55 32.17 35.46 29.74 32.66 60 27.16 30.40 24.88 27.74 62 25.19 28.39 23.01 25.84 Sample Ages (2045) Men Women Men Women 55 33.51 36.60 31.44 34.26 60 28.45 31.51 26.50 29.28 62 26.46 29.49 24.58 27.34 General Employee participants: For survivors of participants, PUB-2010 Headcount Weighted General Healthy Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, males set back 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP-2021. For healthy participants during employment, PUB-2010 Headcount Weighted General Employee Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, set back 1 year for males, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP-2021. For healthy participants post employment and survivors of participants, PUB-2010 Headcount Weighted General Healthy Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, set back 1 year for males, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP-2021. Pre-retirement Post-retirement Future Life Future Life Expectancy (Years) Expectancy (Years) Expectancy (Years) Expectancy (Years) For healthy participants during employment, PUB-2010 Benefits Weighted Safety Employee Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, males set forward 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP-2021. For healthy participants post employment, PUB-2010 Benefits Weighted Safety Healthy Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, males set forward 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP-2021. For disabled participants, PUB-2010 Headcount Weighted General Disabled Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, females set forward 1year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP-2021. Pre-retirement Post-retirement Future Life Future Life 129 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 26 A. Mortality (cont'd) Sample Ages (2025) Male Female Male Female 55 33.52 35.36 30.32 32.96 60 28.62 30.34 25.79 28.21 62 26.69 28.36 24.02 26.33 Sample Ages (2045) Male Female Male Female 55 34.83 36.51 32.12 34.50 60 29.87 31.45 27.46 29.66 62 27.92 29.45 25.63 27.74 B. Investment Return C. Allowances for Expenses or Contingencies D. Salary Increase Factors General Age Employees Under 30 7.00% 30 - 39 7.00% 40 - 49 4.75% 50 - 54 4.75% 55 & older 4.00% 4.75% 3.75% 3.75% Current salary is assumed to increase at a rate based on the table below per year until retirement - includes assumed wage inflation of 3.0%. Forensic Professionals and Police Officers 6.25% 4.75% Prior year's actual administrative expenses are included in normal cost. Future Life Future Life Expectancy (Years)Expectancy (Years) Pre-retirement Post-retirement Future Life Future Life Expectancy (Years)Expectancy (Years) 6.75%, compounded annually, net of investment expenses - includes assumed inflation of 2.75%. Pre-retirement Post-retirement For disabled participants, PUB-2010 Headcount Weighted General Disabled Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, both set forward 4 years, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP-2021. 130 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 27 E. Employee Withdrawal Rates Service Male Female Male Female Less than 5 years 15.0% 10.0% 20.0% 15.0% 5 - 9 years 15.0% 10.0% 10.0% 15.0% 10 - 14 years 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 4.0% 15+ years 7.5% 10.0% 5.0% 4.0% F. Disability Rates 1. General All Other Age Employees Employees < 40 0.001% 0.025% 45 0.001% 0.025% 50 0.002% 0.250% 55 0.006% 0.450% 60 0.006% 0.450% 65 0.001% 0.450% 2. General All Other Age Employees Employees 20 0.00% 0.01% 25 0.00% 0.01% 30 0.01% 0.03% 35 0.01% 0.03% 40 0.02% 0.03% 45 0.04% 0.04% 50 0.08% 0.07% 55 0.13% 0.07% 60 0.19% 0.07% 65 0.03% 0.07% Employees and Police Officers Line-of-duty disability rates for General Employees, Forensic Professionals and Police Officers were used in accordance with the following illustrative example. Non-dutydisabilityratesforGeneralEmployees, ForensicProfessionals andPolice Officerswere used in accordance with the following illustrative example. The disability assumptions are the disability assumptions used in the July 1,2025 FRS Actuarial Valuation. General Forensic Professionals Withdrawal rates were used in accordance with the following illustrative example. 131 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 28 G. Assumed Retirement Age Retirement rates were used in accordance with the following tables. 1. For Forensic Professionals and Police Officers: Age 0 - 9 10 - 14 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 or more Under 55 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.0% 35.0% 55 0.0% 5.0% 12.5% 12.5% 70.0% 90.0% 56 - 64 0.0% 2.5% 12.5% 40.0% 7.5% 10.0% 65 and above 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 2. For General Employees: Age 0 - 14 15 - 24 25 or more Under 55 0% 0% 10% 55 - 64 4% 20% 25% 65 - 66 65% 80% 100% 67 and above 100% 100% 100% H. Assumed Rate of Increase in Covered Payroll to Contribution Year I. Marital Assumptions 1. 2. J. Interest on Future Participant Contributions 3.75%, compounded annually. K. Asset Valuation Method 3.0% per annum for Forensic Professionals and Police Officers and 0.0% for General Employees. 100% of active members are assumed to be married. Females are assumed to be three (3) years younger than their male spouses. The method used for determining the smoothed value of assets phases in the deviation between the expected and actual return on assets at the rate of 20% per year. The smoothed value of assets will be further adjusted to the extent necessary to fall within the corridor whose lower limit is 80% of the fair marketvalue ofPlanassetsandwhoseupperlimitis120%ofthe fairmarket valueof Planassets -adjusted for equation of balance October 1, 2010. Years of Service Years of Service 132 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 29 L. Cost Method M. Disclosure of Assumptions N. Changes Since Previous Valuation 1. Mortality assumption was: Firefighter, Police Officer and Forensic Professional participants: Under this method the normal costfor each active employee is the amount whichis calculated to be a level percentage of pay that would be requiredannually fromhis entry age to his assumedretirement age to fund his estimated benefits, assuming the Plan had always been in effect. The normal cost for the Plan is the sum of such amounts for all employees. The actuarial accrued liability as of any valuationdate foreachactive employee orinactive employee who iseligible to receive benefits under the Plan is the excess of the actuarial present value of estimated future benefits over the actuarial present value of current and future normal costs. The unfunded actuarial accrued liability as of any valuation date is the excess of the actuarial accrued liability over the assets of the Plan. Vested Normal Retirement, Termination, Disability, and Death Benefits: Unit Credit Under this method, the actuarial present value of vested accrued benefits is an amount calculated to be the sum of the present valuesof each individual's vestedaccrued orearned benefitunder the Plan as of the valuation date. Each individual's calculation is based on pay and service as of the valuation date. The investment return, salary increases, withdrawal and retirement rates were updated based on the most recent experience study performed for the six years ending September 30, 2022. The mortality rates are based upon the July 1, 2025 FRS Actuarial Valuation, as required under F.S., Chapter 2015-157. For healthy participants during employment, PUB-2010 Headcount Weighted Safety Employee Female Mortality Table and Safety Below MedianEmployee Male Mortality Table,both setforward 1 year, with fully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP-2018. For healthy participants post employment, PUB-2010 Headcount Weighted Safety Healthy Retiree Female Mortality Table and Safety Below Median Healthy Retiree Male Mortality Table, both set forward1year,withfullygenerationalmortality improvementsprojected toeach futuredecrement date with Scale MP-2018. For disabled participants, 80% PUB-2010 Headcount Weighted General Disabled Retiree Mortality Table / 20% PUB-2010 Headcount Weighted Safety Disabled Retiree Mortality Table, separate rates for males and females, without projected mortality improvements. Normal Retirement, Termination, Disability, and Death Benefits: Entry Age Normal Cost 133 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 30 N. Changes Since Previous Valuation (cont'd) General Employee participants: 2. Disability rates were: General All Other Age Employees Employee < 40 0.001% 0.005% 45 0.001% 0.050% 50 0.002% 0.050% 55 0.005% 0.090% 60 0.006% 0.090% 65 0.001% 0.090% General All Other Age Employees Employee 20 0.00% 0.02% 25 0.01% 0.02% 30 0.01% 0.04% 35 0.01% 0.04% 40 0.02% 0.04% 45 0.04% 0.04% 50 0.08% 0.07% 55 0.16% 0.07% 60 0.21% 0.07% 65 0.04% 0.07% Non-duty disability rates for General Employees, Forensic Professionals and Police Officers were used in accordance with the following illustrative example. Forhealthy participants duringemployment, PUB-2010Headcount Weighted General Below Median Employee MortalityTable,separate rates formales andfemales, setback 1year formale, withfully generational mortality improvements projected to each future decrement date with Scale MP-2018. For healthy participants post employment, PUB-2010 Headcount Weighted General Below Median HealthyRetireeMortalityTable,separateratesformalesandfemales,setback1yearfor male,with fullygenerational mortality improvementsprojected toeach futuredecrement date with Scale MP- 2018. For disabled participants, PUB-2010Headcount Weighted General DisabledRetiree MortalityTable, separate rates for males and females, both set forward 3 years, without projected mortality improvements. Line-of-dutydisabilityratesfor GeneralEmployees, ForensicProfessionals andPolice Officerswere used in accordance with the following illustrative example. 134 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 31 GLOSSARY Actuarial Accrued Liability The difference between the Actuarial Present Value of Future Benefits, and the Actuarial Present Value of Future Normal Costs. Actuarial Assumptions Assumptions about future Plan experience that affect costs or liabilities, such as: mortality, withdrawal, disablement, and retirement; future increases in salary; future rates of investment earnings; future investment and administrative expenses; characteristics of members not specified in the data, such as marital status; characteristics of future members; future elections made by members and other items. Actuarial Cost Method A procedure for allocating the Actuarial Present Value of Future Benefits between the Actuarial Present Value of Future Normal Costs and the Actuarial Accrued Liability. Actuarial Equivalent Of equal Actuarial Present Value, determined as of a given date and based on a given set of Actuarial Assumptions. Actuarial Present Value The amount of funds required to provide a payment or series of payments in the future. It is determined by discounting the future payments with an assumed interest rate and with the assumed probability each payment will be made. Actuarial Present Value of Future Benefits The Actuarial Present Value of amounts which are expected to be paid at various future times to active members, retired members, beneficiaries receiving benefits and inactive, non-retired members entitled to either a refund or a future retirement benefit. Expressed another way, it is the value that would have to be invested on the valuation date so that the amount invested plus investment earnings would provide sufficient assets to pay all projected benefits and expenses when due. Actuarial Valuation The determination, as of a valuation date, of the Normal Cost, Actuarial Accrued Liability, Actuarial Value of Assets, and related Actuarial Present Values for a plan. An Actuarial Valuation for a governmental retirement system typically also includes calculations of items needed for compliance with GASB No. 67. Actuarial Value of Assets The value of the assets as of a given date, used by the actuary for valuation purposes. This may be the market or fair value of plan assets or a smoothed value in order to reduce the year-to-year volatility of calculated results, such as the funded ratio and the actuarially required contribution. 135 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 32 Amortization Method A method for determining the Amortization Payment. The most common methods used are level dollar and level percentage of payroll. Under the Level Dollar method, the Amortization Payment is one of a stream of payments, all equal, whose Actuarial Present Value is equal to the UAAL. Under the Level Percentage of Pay method, the Amortization Payment is one of a stream of increasing payments, whose Actuarial Present Value is equal to the UAAL. Under the Level Percentage of Pay method, the stream of payments increases at the rate at which total covered payroll of all active members is assumed to increase. Amortization Payment That portion of the plan contribution which is designed to pay interest on and to amortize the Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability. Amortization Period The period used in calculating the Amortization Payment. Annual Required Contribution The employer’s periodic required contributions, expressed as a dollar amount or a percentage of covered plan compensation. The annual required contribution consists of the Employer Normal Cost and Amortization Payment plus interest adjustment. Closed Amortization Period A specific number of years that is reduced by one each year, and declines to zero with the passage of time. For example if the amortization period is initially set at 25 years, it is 24 years at the end of one year, 23 years at the end of two years, etc. Employer Normal Cost The portion of the Normal Cost to be paid by the employer. This is equal to the Normal Cost less expected member contributions. Equivalent Single Amortization Period For plans that do not establish separate amortization bases (separate components of the UAAL), this is the same as the Amortization Period. For plans that do establish separate amortization bases, this is the period over which the UAAL would be amortized if all amortization bases were combined upon the current UAAL payment. Experience Gain/Loss A measure of the difference between actual experience and that expected based upon a set of Actuarial Assumptions, during the period between two actuarial valuations. To the extent that actual experience differs from that assumed, Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liabilities emerge which may be larger or smaller than projected. Gains are due to favorable experience, e.g., the assets earn more than projected, salaries do not increase as fast as assumed, members retire later than assumed, etc. Favorable experience means actual results produce actuarial liabilities not as large as projected by the actuarial assumptions. Losses are the result of unfavorable experience, i.e., actual results that produce Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liabilities which are larger than projected. 136 City of Winter Springs Retirement Plan 33 Funded Ratio The ratio of the Actuarial Value of Assets to the Actuarial Accrued Liability. GASB Governmental Accounting Standards Board. GASB No. 67 and GASB No. 68 These are the governmental accounting standards that set the accounting rules for public retirement plans and the employers that sponsor or contribute to them. Statement No. 67 sets the accounting rules for the plans themselves, while Statement No. 68 sets the accounting rules for the employers that sponsor or contribute to public retirement plans. Normal Cost The annual cost assigned, under the Actuarial Cost Method, to the current Plan year. Open Amortization Period An open amortization period is one which is used to determine the Amortization Payment but which does not change over time. In other words, if the initial period is set as 25 years, the same 25-year period is used in determining the Amortization Period each year. In theory, if an Open Amortization Period is used to amortize the Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability, the UAAL will never completely disappear, but will become smaller each year, either as a dollar amount or in relation to covered payroll. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability The difference between the Actuarial Accrued Liability and Actuarial Value of Assets. Valuation Date The date as of which the Actuarial Present Value of Future Benefits are determined. The benefits expected to be paid in the future are discounted to this date. Vested Benefit Security Ratio The ratio of the Market Value of Assets to the Actuarial Present Value of Vested Accrued Benefits. 137