HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 06 14 Regular 500
CITY COMMISSION
AGENDA
ITEM 500
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing
Regular X
~~lZ \,{.-
M~ 2004
'Meeting
MGR. rti/L//DEPT ~
Authorization
REQUEST: The Community Development Department requests the City Commission
remove from the table and hear a request for a variance by Virginia Stem from Section 20-103
of the City Code of Ordinances, to encroach as much as 10 feet into the 20 foot rear building
setback. The variance is contingent upon vacation of a portion of a private drainage easement
along the rear of the property (separate action, not by the City Commission).
PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to consider a request by Ms. Stem for a
variance from the requirements of Section 20 - 103 ofthe City Code of Ordinances to allow her
to add on to the rear of the house, to provide living space for her recently enlarged family
(enlarged by marriage from 3 to 7 family members). The site is 1406 Winding Stream Court
(Lot 9 of Bentley Club at Bentley Green, depicted in Plat Book 44, Pages 35-37 of the Public
Records of Seminole County, Florida). The rear of the site abuts the 1 ih fairway of the
Tuscawilla Golf Course,
APPLICABLE CODE:
Sec. 20-82. Duties and powers; general.
Sec. 20-103. Restrictions upon lands, buildings and structures.
CHRONOLOGY:
April 22, 2004 - Variance application was received by City.
May 6, 2004 - BOA votes 2 to 2 on variance request.
May 24, 2004 - City Commission "tabled" the variance request
June 14,2004
Regular Item 500
Page 2
CONSIDERATIONS:
The site abuts the 1 ih fairway of the Tuscawilla golf course (setbacks are provided only in the
homeowner documents, not provided on the Bentley Club at Bentley Green final subdivision
plat and staff cannot find other references to setbacks for the subdivision). The original
homeowner documents stated that other lots abutting the golf course or any country club
property, other than the 17th fairway, were bound by a 40 foot rear building setback.
Supplemental documents (please see attached), recorded in the public records of Seminole
County on June 15, 1991, allow a 20 foot rear building setback on any lots abutting the golf
course or country club property. Lots not abutting the golf course or other country club
property have a typical 15 foot rear setback, although provisions have been made for lots
abutting Howell Creek or other water bodies. The attached plot plan depicts the existing house
and addition as they relate to the property boundaries and 20 foot rear yard setback.
A 15 foot wide privately held drainage easement extends across the rear ofthe lot (centerline
depicted on the attached plot plan). City staff has no objection to vacation of a portion of the
easement to accommodate the variance request, subject to conditions (please see attached April
5, 2004, memo from Stormwater Manager Zynka Perez). Obviously, the party to which the
easement is dedicated (the homeowners' association) must agree to the vacation. The applicant
is obtaining a legal description of the pertinent portion of the drainage easement and must
formally apply (including, but not limited to, permission from the homeowners' association
and paying the $300 fee), in order for the City Commission to hear and act upon the vacation
request. Special provisions must be incorporated into the design and construction of the
portion of the foundation proposed to extend near the existing drainage pipe, to ensure
compliance with the "angle of repose" provisions of the Florida Building Code (Chapter 18
Foundations and Retaining Walls, Section 1803.1.3).
The applicant requests the variance to accommodate her newly increased family size. She and
her family have done research to deternline the feasibility of various alternatives, including, but
not limited to, moving to another existing single family residence, building a new single family
residence, and adding a second story. They have chosen this alternative and have been "doing
their homework" to try to demonstrate that they meet the variance criteria, although they
realize that it is difficult to obtain a variance and possibly even more difficult to obtain a
variance subject to vacating a portion of an easement.
The City Attorney has reviewed the variance request as it relates to the applicable regulations.
He will advise the City Commission of his findings.
FINDINGS:
1) The applicant did receive a letter from the Tuscawilla Country Club, stating
that it had no objection to the proposed encroachment.
2) A variance requires compliance with all six (6) criteria outlined in Code
Section 20-82 (staff does not believe that the request meets any of the 6
criteria):
a) that special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar
to the land, structures or buildings involved and which are not
June 14, 2004
Regular Item 500
Page 3
applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same
zoning district;
Staff does not believe there are any special conditions and
circumstances.
b) that special conditions and circumstances do not result from the
actions of the applicant;
Staff believes that the applicants created their own situation, although
this certainly appears to be an honorable one, and that no special
conditions and/or circumstances exist.
c) that granting the variance requested will not confer on the
applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to
other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district;
Staff believes that granting the variance would confer special
privileges upon the applicants.
d) that literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would
deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other
properties in the same zoning district under the terms of this
chapter and would work unnecessary hardship on the applicant;
Staff believes that a literal interpretation of the provisions of this
chapter do not deny the applicants of any rights and does not work
any hardship - much less an unnecessary hardship.
e) that the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make
possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure.;
and
Staffbelieves that there is already reasonable use of the land, building
or structure - an existing occupied single family residence, consistent
with the lot that was engineered for this type of and size home.
t) that the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general
intent and purpose of this chapter, will not be injurious to the
neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Staff believes that to grant the variance would be inconsistent with
the intent and purpose of and undermine the code.
3) Staff does not find that the request meets the 6 variance criteria set forth in
Chapter 20 of the City Code of Ordinances (the request must meet all 6
criteria).
June 14,2004
Regular Item 500
Page 4
BOA ACTION: At its regularly scheduled meeting of May 6, 2004, the Board of Adjustment
voted 2 to 2 on a motion to approve the variance request. The Board members noted that the
applicant had done a very thorough job of preparing for and presenting the case.
RECOMMENDATION:
The BOA (by its tie vote) and staff recommend that the City Commission deny the variance
request. If the City Commission were to approve or consent to the variance, such approval or
consent should be contingent upon the 3 items set forth in the City Attorney's June 4, 2004,
letter: (1) the Bentley Green Architectural Review Board approval, pursuant to Article VII,
Section 4, Variances, of the Bentley Green Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions, (2) the
vacation of the affected portion of the private drainage easement (this would be a separate
action - although any action affecting the easement should receive City approval to ensure
there would be no adverse impact on the public health or safety), and (3) compliance with all
applicable land and building regulations, including, but not limited to, Chapter 18, Foundations
and Retaining Walls, Section 1803.1.3, of the Florida Building Code.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Location Map & Plot plan
B - Photocopy from final subdivision plat
C - Variance application
D - Applicants' supporting documentation
E - Zynka Perez's April 5, 2004, memo
F - BOA minutes
CITY COMMISSION ACTION:
{
T'
I
I
Continu d Pg 2624
A I ij-x"
. I _.1:
I :,:
, __J.--_....:J.:.._ I I
".t I I ............1---. I
"'. I 'FL 0 --... .
I ", I I 1 __,'
- - - -' -',,;- +- - - - _ R/DA.':"p" -
I . I I 1-......, I C
I ".1 I f ~__I
I ',I I I ,___
I .~. . I . I' I .
I I ". I I I
I I I , I
I 'I', I I
I I ,
, ,
G
SEE DETAIl:.
I. PAGE 2632A,'
I
I
I
,
,
:) I
,
,
.F I
I
r-----
,
I
- - 4
- I
J7(); .,
- _' I
i'f'l
~
\0
N
bO
~
'0
.j
l3
u
'>
. .. -
1/
.!
,
,
,
O?
c
B
5
,
,
\
,
,
,
\
,
\
Co~tinued Pg 2641
6 7
A
NOTES:
MuniCipal Address Map Book
PRINTED: REVISED:
Oct 2003 1 : 2 :
City of Winter.Springs, FL
o . 200 400
......~I\ = 350 feet I
3 :
~:Pe 2632
Developed By: SOIltMaStem SlIT\Ieyfng & Mapplnl Coip.
NEW
PROPOSED
ADDITION
~. '\' \
'~
~
t;?-
('~
"
{'~
~
C'v....
~
.p
~17,
'"111l
~"l
~....
1
"
'-,
"
..............
"
'-,
",
",
",
'-, '
......... .!' '-"-'
'~()I' "" '
- c. "
~~ k ''''~
x....~~r
.........
'" oS: -"--,
9'~
6-
9'(;.
4-
s
'. ../.
... ...r'.
Attachment C
'BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
1126 EAST S~ATE ROAD ~~4
WIN T E R ' S P R I N G S, FL. 3 2 7 0 8".;. 2.7 9 9
(407)327-1800
". ~"
FOR:
SPECIAL EXCEPTION
VARIANCE
'CONDITIONAL USF;
ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION
1. AP PL I CANT: A ,'-.1 / A .:5 +.('1:. tJ .:.' . PHQNE 'f.(J1- :J 0;(0 - '1 iJO-b
ADDRESS: l'ifJlo UJ,',J,.lc',,/ 0 ::;i~eltM. e~u,e t, C!J/Jlfd SpRi"fJs, Fe
2 RE UES~ -e " tJ .Q c) "c' I 3d."Itf'i{
.)<.
3. ATTACH A COpy OF THE PARCEL SURVEY.
4. ATTACH AN 11 x 17 MAP SHOWING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND
SURROUNDING PARCELS.
5. ATTACH LEGAL'DESCRIPTION.
6. TAXPARCEL ~DENTIFICATION NUMBER:' {)1-pl ~ ~/-6/t/-(){Y]O-oo9D
7. LOCATION 'OF
. ~reets): .
~r; '. -+<v'
'-
8. PRESENT ZONING;
5;L70~
B"y Signing below JOHNS.ORKIS 01-00
'. t . PH. 4W-359-5782
may en er. up.on n 951 WEDGEWOODDR.
;;; ~; ;;: ~:;~; ;:{~'1~1;~';J:~11~~<i;'i ..
owner) . .
FUTURE LAND uSE: L;,w ^ErvJJ)ed_.d,-I.-~~
. Q. .
1033
L . , .
'PERSONS ARE ADVIS,ED THAT, IF'THEY OECIPE TO APPEAL ANY.. DECISIONS
HADE AT T~ESE HEEfINcis/HEARINGS, THEY WItL ,NEED A.RECORb OF THE
PROCEEDINGS AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE, THEY WILL NEED TO INSURE THAT A
VERBATIM"RECORD OF THE PR6C~EDINGS IS MADE,"AT'THEIR 'COST, WHICH I
I NCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND '.EV IDENCE UPON WH ICH THE APPEAL I S TO BE. ,I. ",.
BASED, PER S.ECTION 286.0105. FLORIDA S'T'~rNI""J;'.~
. ATTACHMENT D
Stern Variance Request Application Questions Responses
City of Winter Springs
4/21/2004
Page 1 of3
To Mr. John Baker
City of Winter Springs
Please accept these as responses to the 7 questions outlined on the Board of Adjustment
Application for a variance.
1. The special conditions and circumstances which exist that are peculiar to the land
involved are as follows:
a. The land backs up to four distinctly different areas that are peculiar to this
piece of property.
i. The property adjoins the waterfront of Bentley Green Lake.
11. The property adjoins the back of the Tuscawilla Country Club,
green #17.
111. The property adjoins a wooded area that is part of the Tuscawilla Country
Club, which includes Howell Creek and cannot be built on.
IV. The property adjoins Howell Creek another type of waterfront.
b. The property is shaped in such a manner, that the view out the back of the
lot provides no visibility to the neighboring houses on either side.
c. These circumstances individually have specific value by themselves. After
combining these characteristics, our research shows that they are not
applicable to any other pieces of property available for sale in the zoning
district. .
d. The property lies in the back of the Winding Stream Court, a Cul-de-sac,
which contains five houses, and has little to no traffic.
2. The special conditions outlined in question #1 are the result of the Bentley Green
Subdivision planned development and natural or manmade conditions that were
present before the applicant owned said property. These conditions are why the
applicant originally was attracted to the property and now are the overwhelming
conditions that make the case relevant for approval this request. Such conditions
are not available currently and for the foreseeable future in the zoning district.
Therefore, none of the special conditions may be the result of, or resulting from
any actions of the applicant.
3. The granting of the variance requested does not confer any special privilege upon
the applicant, which is denied by this chapter to other lands, buildings, or
structures in the same zoning district. This process allows for the opportunity to
confer the same privileges upon others within the zoning district.
Stern Variance Request Application Questions Responses
City of Winter Springs
4/21/2004
Page 2 of3
4. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter will work unnecessary
hardship on the applicant. The applicant is increasing her family from three to
seven and the current house will not allow appropriate living space to
accommodate the size of the new family. The cost to try to replace the peculiar
circumstances outlined in question # I, and to build a completely new house of the
proposed size and scope would be cost prohibitive, even if such vacant property
were to be identified and furthermore available in the zoning district. The
applicant has prepared a current market study dated 2/29/2004 of the zoning
district and updated on 4/19/2004 which was prepared by a licensed Real Estate
Agent from Coldwell Banker. The market study shows that there are no existing
vacant lots or land with the same peculiar circumstances outlined in Question 1,
available in the zoning district. The market study also shows that there are no
existing houses situated on such a piece of property with the same peculiar
circumstances outlined in Question 1, within the zoning district. Thus there are no
alternatives, at this time or in the foreseeable future, to replace this property at a
reasonably similar financial situation. The denial of this request will cause
additional hardship on the homeowners as well. Both families have resided in the
City of Winter Springs for as many as twelve years. We have each chosen the
Winter Springs area for its peaceful, family valued, community environment at
separate times. The city has proven to be everything and more that we both
individually expected. Now that we are bringing our families together we do not
want to disrupt the lifestyle that we so cherish here in the City of Winter Springs.
John's children are new in the area and have settled in very nicely. They have
suffered through instability for the past four years and are now becoming well
established in the schools and the community. A move at this point from a
neighborhood, schools, and community activities that they love would create a
hardship that is un-necessary and unfair. Virginia's children have lived in the
same house on this property for the past 12 years. They are well established in the
fine schools and many community activities. This includes being able to walk to
the Tuscawilla Country Club, which both families currently enjoy being members
and living in there present locations. We want to continue to raise our family, now
together, in a safe, secure, yet open and outdoor community, which allows for
traditional family values and wholesomeness, We have that here; we have looked
for it in the surrounding areas and have come to the conclusion that we cannot
even come close financially or culturally to replacing what we have here in the
City of Winter Springs. This hardship would be unfair and be in direct conflict
with the goals and objectives of the City of Winter Springs. The City works very
hard and spends allot of tax dollars to attract citizens and have them establish
residency and develop the same type of feelings and enjoyment from the
community that we have outlined in this document. To not approve this variance
and force a situation that would cause us, as very satisfied citizens, to have to
leave the community would in direct contradiction to the stated objectives of the
City of Winter Springs, itself.
5. The variance requested is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land and the building to accommodate the seven members of
.' "
Stem Variance Request Application Questions Responses
City of Winter Springs
4/21/2004
Page 3 of3
the family. Ms. Stern was willing to consider a 2-story addition that would not
encroach on the setback. The Bentley Homeowners Association, Inc Architectural
Review Board felt that this option was inconsistent with the original elevations of
the existing structure and would not be in harmony and the general intent of the
neighborhood. The Bentley Homeowners Association, Inc Architectural Review
Board felt this could be injurious to the neighborhood. Thus, it is the opinion and
recommendation of The Bentley Homeowners Association, Inc Architectural
Review Board that the variance be granted and the proposed addition be
approved, which would certainly be harmonious and enhance the general intent of
the neighborhood. The Tuscawilla Country Club was not in favor of the 2-story
proposal. The proposed single story addition is much more favorable and this was
part of the reasoning in their approval of the setback variance request. The 2-story
proposal also did not provide for rooms and layout that were consistent with the
proportion and design to the existing house and it was felt by the designers that it
would cause financial hardship in the future should the owners want to sell the
property.
6. The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent of the
purpose of this chapter, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or other wise
detrimental to the public welfare. The granting of the variance will allow for
modifications projected to increase the value of the existing property and dwelling
from $360,450 to $554,850. The architectural rendering's show that the elevations
and modifications will be in harmony with the general intent of the purpose of this
chapter and have been approved by the The Bentley Homeowners Association,
Inc., Architectural Review Board in writing as represented by the approval letter
attached to this application. Letters are also included from owners of The
Tuscawilla Country Club, and each of the adjoining property owners within 150
feet of all property lines adjacent to the property stating they have "no going
concern" as it relates the City of Winter Springs granting the requested variance.
7. The request is consistent with the objectives and policies of the comprehensive
plan. The objectives and policies of the plan are to provide a harmonious
neighborhood that attracts and retains respectable citizens to the community. The
proposed addition to this house certainly improves the neighborhoods ability to do
so. The upgrading of the existing house is projected to increase the property value
by a significant amount as well as those of the overall neighborhood.
. .
IRIDlcl
Golf Group, Inc.
March 26, 2004
City of Winter Springs Commission
City of winter Springs
1126 East S.R. 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Re: Lot 9 Bentley Club at Bentley Green, Platt Book 44, Pages 35-37
Dear Commissioners:
Tuscawilla Country Club has been asked by Virginia Stem, the owner of 1406
Winding Stream Court, to consent to the construction of an addition to her home that
would fall ten (10) feet from the golf course property. The setback requirements pursuant
to the attached Supplemental Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
dated 8/29/90 (Section 23) require a twenty (20) foot setback from the golf course.
The owners of the subject property have submitted for review the attached plans
which I have marked as "Exhibit A". After review of these plans, the ownership of
Tuscawilla Country Club does not object to the addition and its encroachment into the
twenty-foot setback, solely as it is depicted in Exhibit A. Any alterations or
modifications to the plans depicted on Exhibit A would require additional review by
Tuscawilla Country Club.
Our consent is solely on behalf of Tuscawilla Country Club and not on behalf of
any other party, such as any homeowner's association. If you have any questions please
feel free to contact me at 732-656-8900.
Sincerely,
?/~~-
Matthew D. Galvin
Executive Vice President
Winter Springs Golf, LLC
dba Tuscawilla Country Club
Encl.: Exhibit A, Building Plans
Supplemental Declaration CC&R
REceIVED
APR 2 7 2004
CITY OF WINTER ~PR1NGS i
Currant PlanOlng ._.J
375 Forsgate Drive Monroe Township, NJ 08831 (732) 656-8900 FAX: (732) 656-8902 www.rdcgolfgroup,com
!
I
I I
I
. . II .
~ C1 k;~,\-.A '. '.
. . . ~fr'i'1
~
~
.!!!!!!9.!1l!!l
fAll nrvl1l111
~
~
11I:11 nrvATIlII
i
S
I~
I
I
: ~
'I ~
'j ~ ~
t ::.:: Q;
I~g
! ~
i
.
.
I
i
i
I
I
.;~ ~
:~ ~ lll.
. >4 ...... ;t!1
I.......... l.;l;!:
. ~ -. I~
I... ~ ~
ti - j;:
t~= I~
i ~ (/J 1!!S1
. I~~ Glc!
. '. I~r;; if
~ ;~~ III
. CI) !j
I zm
! ~i
--I! ]
~
~
~
I
II.
I
! .
I
!
I
.~.
.~.
.LJ
1OIllI.Q1VATIIJI
b;~:\,~',' .
./tA ".
'..) r (.
'-, .. I -. .
\l '). to GA ':lr s. R., 4-;4-
~,~~p.. SPR't-JG..~) FL"3~"
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF
COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
~4-
~~f,'
,THIS SUPPLEMENTAL 'DECLARATION OFqOVENANTS, CONDITIONS ~
RE~TRICTIONS, ,made this 2.2711:i day, of AUGilsf 1990 ,'by },..WALTER;
_'TEMl',LE, 'JR~ ~ "TROS,TEE , ("TeInple") and BENTLEY GREEN JOINT ,VE~
,1,'- a Florida general ,partnership ("Bentley")., rq
" r)
,P
w r T N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, Temple recorded that certain Bentley Green Declara~
,~ion of CovenAnts, Conditions and Restrictions dated May 22, 1989
in Official Records Book 2071, Page 38Dof the Public Records of'
Seminole County, Florida (the "Declaration"): and
~REAS, Temple assigned to Bentley certain rights as '
Declarant to the Declaration i~ that certain Warranty Deed,
recorded inOfficial Records Book 2072, Page 129 'of the Public
Records of Seminole County, 'Florida; and
WHEREAS, the Declaration provides that Additional Properties
can 'be brought wi thin the scheme of the Declaration, by the
Declarant: and
WHEREAS, Temple owns certain real property (the "Bentley
, Club Property"), more particularly described, on Exhibit itA"
',attached hereto, which Temple and, Bentley desire to bring wi thiI)
the scheme of the Declaration. "
NOW, THEREFORE, Bentley '(as Declarant)
themselves and "their successors and assigns,
and state as falrows:
and ,Temple, for.
do h(!reby declare
~
~ 1.' Additional Propertv., The Bentley Club Property is
n0 hereby brought within the scheme of the Declaration, as provided
, in Article I I, Section 2 of the, Declaration. Thi s Supplemental
~ Declaration is made for the purpose of'annexing the BeJ)tley Club
:I rr~ Property, as Addi tional Prope~ty! to the scheme of. the Declara~
~ __tion and extending' the jur1sd1ction 'of the Association (as
, .~def1ned in the'Declaration) to the Bentley Club Property.
tV ~ ' ,
"'- ~', ,,' ,
C1 2. Setbacks.' Article IX, Section 23 of, the Declaration is
,-',' .;' hereby deleted, as, ,to the Bentley Club PropertY' onlY, and
..k replaced w~~ the ,follc;>wing: '
~5? i: .seCtiOn23... Setbacks. In addi tion to any setback require-
=te _' ments of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, any building
- .-'5J : "!'" structure located on any Unit sball not be located any
Q\ - nearer than a minimum of fifteen (15) feet from the front or '
-:.. ~~ rear proper.ty, lines, a ,minimum of three (3). feet on side lot
~ lines providing all buildinqstructures are no nearer than a
) minimum .of ten (10) feet from any,bUilding structure on .any
I"-J
""
u,
~
--
.,., -,
:
-
0')
t
r
c
r
,--, r
f';') ~
C
, '.' C
-'J -
:-
-
r
.
-
t, ._
W
,Co-
.po.-
-
-
'oJ'
~
c::?
C)'
c.c
i
. ,
I
'I
i
I
i,
.'4
,'t
.. .
r .
side adjoining Unit, one hundred (100) feet from the
centerline of Howell Creek, twenty !20) feet from any qo~f
course or country' club proper~y, arid.. twenty (20)' feet from
any retention or de~ent~on porrd~ or the existing golf course
pond;. The ARB may. however, in its reasonable ,discretion.
.requiresetbacksas to any Unit' up to twehty(20) feet from
the.: fr. ontor 'rear prop'etty , lines, up t~ seven. an? ' ~ne-halb.
'(7..5) ,feet on.side. l<?t l~nes. anc;i with the prov~s.~on tha~
:a11. building', structures are no near~r than up to fifteelE
' (15) feet from' any building. structure; on any side adj oiniri~
Unit. . ~
. (:)
3. House Square' E'ootaqe. As to the ., Addi tional Property~
only. each residential dwelling built upon any Unit shall have at
least .one thousand nine hundred ( I, 900) square feet of inaoor
floor area.. exclusive' of porches. garages and~any
tinairconditioned or unheated space< '
N
N
CJ1'
-..,
-
-
-
-.,
4. Unit Landscaping. As to.the "Additional Property" only.
Article X of the Declaration shall not be applicable., Each Unit
.owner in the Bentley Cl,Ub Property shall be fully responsi'ble for
maintaining any and all landscaping upon his Unit. Such land-
scaping shalJ comply with the requirements of Article IX. Section
2 of the Declaration. Failure to so maintain shall entitle the
Association to enter upon any such Unit to perform any such
maintenance. as provided in Article VIII. Section I, and to
assess the cost of such to the Unit Owner as provided, in that
. Article VI I I. All assessments for. maintenance of, landscaping
, within the Property originally encumbered by the Declaration and
known as Bentley Green Unit I shall be the sole responsibility of
the'Unit owners' within said Bentley Green Unit I. consistent. with
Article VI. Section 9 of the Declaration. '
5. Assessments. The initial' annual. assessment referenced
in Ar:ticleVI, Section 5 of the Declarati,on shall be Three
Hundred Doll.ars '($300.00) per Unit in the Bentley Club Property.
6; Declarant. 'Temple and Bentley,do acknowledge and agree
that, notwithstanding the assignment to Bentley of certain rights
as Declarant in that certain Warranty Deed recorded in Official
Records Book 2072. Page 129 pf. the Public Records of Se~inole'
County; Florida. that Temple, did also reserve to himself" and
Bentley does hereby' assign to Temple. co-existent rights as
.Declarant'under the Declaration. including but without limitation
as to all lots owned by Te,mple ,in the Additional Property.
,7. 'Limi tati'ons~' Except as expressly provided above. 'all 9f'
the terms, covenan,ta. conditions and restrictions of the Declara-
tion shall be fully applicable to the Bentley Club Property~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Temple and Bentley have caused these
,
i.. ~
-2-
< ,
. .
,. ~
presents to' be executed as of the day and. year first above
written.
Signed. sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
/}. ....
w,'. ~f.,' . 1:.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF t'~t:.:-.'~k-
)
)SS:
)
n
o -
,.,
'(A .,..
~ ~
.=. ...
z
C).
r-
A.WALTER TEMPLE,
..., -
,...
,
BENTLEY GREEN JOINT VENTURE I, a
Florida general partnership.
By: SUNVEST REAL ESTATE, INC., a
Florida corporatio
Manaqiriq JointVe
c:
5y:G .LJ
. A. Walter
pres.ident
(Corpora te .Seal) ,
.\ ..,... ."'"
The foregoing instrument was acknOWledged before me...'this ....
day of 2.u..j . " 1990 by A. W.alter Temple, Jr.. ,Trustee.~'" .....:..'....'.:.~,
I " ./. ~.. . .
~ LId' :. T (~ ,/ . . ,.' r.. '1.... . '.
'... c ~ . : ,..,; '. ''','. ...
- .".:..~ ; . " ~ ~ -.;-.......:.",:.... _., . ~ :
liPTARY PuBLIC ' :~. '0., ..:
. , \ .... -. ~ J. 0 ',f .....
My Commission Expires:',. ,;'., ,.'
, '. "
~." ; .. ........,,,,' ,.~
'f I, _ .. .' ,,,\'
tlOTA~Y I'UBL.IC STATE Of' FLORIDA "'.,..",.,,'
MY r.Ot~lSSI0N ~XP. MA~ 17. 1~94
BONDED TKRU G!1-:t1W. INS. UHD..
.;;t'l
-J.-
STATE OF FLORIDA ) .
)5S:
COUNTY OF J~;J~~ )
.' 't11e, foregoing' . i~strument was acknowledged before . me this
~'f Z/_ day 'of O.t."?" , 1990, by A. Walter' Temple, Jr., as Pres{~..'
dent. of Sunvest ~ea.l' Estate. rnc.. a Florida .cox:por~tion,Man~g"':
inq Joint ,Venturer on behalf of., <BENTLEY GREEN, JOINT VENTURE I, a
Florida general partnership.
R:831jD4024.
06/21/90
,
/"' / . If. -;.'/: :,.."., '
. 6/"'-L.-z.~.... .,~""~~t.-'::"l__
NO~RY PUBLIC . . I
My Commission Expires:."
. ,.
. , ; ia .'.
. . .J .-
t' -1:'
tlQ..IlHrU3LIC ST."TE OF FlORI v" , '.
fA': . CC:tll SS I eN E~P, il~ Y .. 11 ~ 19~4
r~!ltJI~m illlW GtritP.~L iN,). UNO., .'
, ,
, '
. Exhibit "A"
, .
AdditionalPro~erty
From 0lC Northeast C"Oiiier or WrNTER"SPRtN051JNtT"3;-as recorded in"
. Plat Book "7, Pages 89 and 90, Public Records of Seminole County.. .
'. . Florida: run N,870S 1 'OO"E along ,an Easterly ~lttension o( lhe North line
of Said WINTER'SPRINGS UNIT.3, .1' dasW1CC of 395;67 fect to iI pQint on .'
, the East easemenlline of a Florida' Power and Light Easement .recorded' in '.' ,
Official Reeord Book 183, Page 130, Public Records of Scminolc County. .
Florida: run. thence N 31045'52" W along said East easement IifItC for a
distance of 3674.63 feet; thence run E:1st 1.426.66 feet to the Pobit of
BcgiMing, said point bc.ing on the centerline of HoweUCtcck; run thence
Northerly along s:lid centerline of Howell Creek the following courses: run
N 14031'15" E (or a distance of 103.24 feet; thence run N 40031'18" E
for a distance of 53.38 .feet; thence run N 06008'17" EJor a disL,ncc of
107.86 feet; thence run N 64020'lr E for a distance of 107.70 feet;
thence run N 13025'05" W (or a 'distance of 160.26 feet; Ilhence run
N 21036'48" W for a 'distance of 84.60 feet: thence run N 24028'06" E
for a disUUlCC of 51.90 feet; thence run N.06002'13'' E fOIr a distance of
79.15 feet; thence run S 42023'31" E for a distance of 73.29 (eet; lhcncc
run N 18047'34;' E for a distance of 21.66 feet; thence leaving aforesaid
centerline of Howell Creck run S 69018'41" E for a distlll1ce of 383.72
feet; thence run S 87037'08" E for a distance of 484.86 (eet to I point on
. the Westerly Right-of-Way line ofGrecnbriar Lane (60' RJW). said point
being on a non-tangent'curve concave Eas,Lerly having alildius of 626.89 .
feet; thence from a ~ngent bearing of 5 22030'36" W. ~ Southerly .
along the arc of said curve and said Westerly Right-o(~Way line for a . . .
disUlllCC of 239.42 feet through a centri1l angle of 21052'56" to the point of'
tangency: thence run 5 00037'40" W along said Westerly Right-c)f-Way
line (or a disWlce of 346.49 feet; thence leaving said Westerly Right-Of-
Way line run the following courscsalong thc No~JY line of BEN11..EY
GREEN UNIT I, recorded in Plat Book 41, Pages 42 through 45 olthe .
PubJjc Records of Seminole County.FJorida; thence run N 86032'15" W
fora distance of 20.96 feel; lhence run S 76~18'42" W for a 'distance of
134.15 Jeet: thence run S 82017'31" W (or a distance of 113j3 feet:
thence run S 41015'17" E for a distance of 136.01 feet; thence run
S 19045'5 I" E for. il distance of 134.39 feet;' thence run S 82031'35" W
(or a ;ffstallce of 117.s 1 feet; thence run N 73037'28" W for a distance of
47.4. feel to a point on a non-tangent curve 'concavc Southwesterly h.'Iving
a rildius of 274.86 feet and a chord bearing of S IOOS3'40"E; thence
leaving SOlid Northerly line, run Southerly along the are of said curve and
, the Westerly Right-of-Way line of Bentley Green Circle (40' R/W) lhrough
a central angle of 15038'03" for a distance of 75.00. feet; thence nm
N 88001'34".W along the North tiocof Lot 2S of said BENTLEY
GREEN UNIT I for a distance of 119.93 feet; th~ce run N 34039'39- W
along t~ Easierl)' line of Tract "C" of ~id 'BENTLEY OREEN UNIT I
. (or a distance: of 25.90. feet; thence run S 74OU'OS" W along the
Northerly line ()f said Tract "C" for a disUUlce of 102.32 feet; thence run .
N 15031 '52" W (Of'il distance o( 294.99 feet; thence run N' 40004'32" W
for a distance of 122.77 feet; thence run S 74034'26" W for a distance of
140.90 feel; thence run N 54026'46" W for a distance of 216,ZO feet to the
Point of Beginning.
Conlaining 15.996 :lcres more or less.
. ,
. to-..)
'~ I"',J
m CJ1'
3:
:r. ~
0
r-
m
, n
I ?
'. .....
r
(.t:)
. .
"
MORTGAGEE'S CONSENT TO DECLARATION
BENTLEY CLUB
KNOW'ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
. , .~
That Fir~tate Financial a .Sa-vihgs Bank."hereinafter refetr'e~
to as ""Mortgage'e", the owner and .holder' of' a. Mortgage dated:2
: 5~~ ..J.~ 1 \ q,i'l::\. , granted by A. Walter Temple. Jr..~ Trustee. ~
recorded in Official Records Book~. Page J..")"'~ of the Public~
Records of Seminole County, Florida. and' enCumbering the lands;:!
described on. .the Plat 'of . Bentley I. Club acco:ding to the plat.
thereof as recorded in Plat 'Book~, Page~~of the Public
Records of Seminole C9unty, Flo~iqa, does hereby consent to the
foregoing Supplemental Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions dated~U~~r ~ . 1990, and Mortgagee agrees. that in
the event of 'fo.reclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure or other
proceeding relating . to enforcement of Mortgagee' s rights under
the aforementioned Mort<;Jage and 1;11e Note .secured thereby, the
terms of the Supplemental Declaration and the Bentley Green
Declaration of Covenants', Coridi tions and Restrictions . as
amended. referenced therein. shall remain in fullforc'e and effect
as if the. same had' been entered into and recorded prior to .the
recording of"the above-described Mortgage. . '.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Mortgagee' has caused these presents .to
be executed by its' corporate officer hereunto duly authorized as
of the ~ day of ~~ u.:r'\~. 1990. .
. ~ . ..
~
......,
C.J'1'
~.
-
~
:)
.' . ..II"',,;;,~, -
. ~'~;>.'
FIRSTATE FINANCIAL .4 SWlriCjs'" ~\.
Bank " . ...,., ~ t.... .
.BY.~~~{ ~;5 .~j
Ti~;e: . ....~ ')~7.f
. ! .. . .,\~"
..'
(Seal)
:'...f..
'Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
STATE OF FLORIDA
.cOUNTY OF ~ .
I IiER$SY CERTIFY that on . this d~y, befor'e me. an officer
. .duly .' authori'Z. ed in the. State and .~c . n1:~Y. f~es . dtotake
acknowledgments" personally. appe!l~~d. .,~_ _ ,well
known to me to' be' the. ~ (/..-<.1"' . _ of, the
savings bank. . named as.' Mortgagee '. herein, and that
acimowle~ged executing the same in the presence of two
subscribing.~~tnesses freely and voluntarily under authority duly
vested in. ~ by said savings bank and that the seal affixed
thereto is the true seal ot said savings bank.
,
, . ,.
"
last
WITNESS my hand ~d official seal in the County and State
aforesaid this 3/4 day. of a7"~1990..";.",,
~. .... /t.' ./:/....~~:....:: ", .' .
"' ,'/?--=.~/:I1-.: ..... -oJ :"-~ ".
'.,.M ,,~~:: '_.' ,':. ..-.:0
N MY PUBLIC ': 4. ': 0 ; .'.;0 ':" ~
" "~:. (;1 -.. -- "'::::".: (:: ..
MyCornrnission Expii~;"~-J?~':,~//
~'. ~ \ .\,\' 7 .
.."'f...... . ...... \,".
R:831/D4025
1'-0)
U) I"".,)
m c.n
3:
s: -..,
C)
r-
m
n
p
..., -
r-
. ~
,
',.
, .
.'
DEVELOPER'S CONSEtr.r AND APPROVAL TO DECLARATION
(BENTLEY CLUB)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT .WINTER . SPRINGS' DEVELoPMENT JO~NT VENTURE ~ a: ,'Florida
ge~ercd . partnership ~'hereiriafter referred' 'to a~. "Developer, ,. the
assignee of' the De"leloper under'. that. certain Declaration be.
Covenants and Restrictions (the "Original Declaration") date~"
June '30, 1987, . recorded in Official Records Book 1864, Page 0803~
of the 'Public Records of Seminole County, Florida. an~
encumbering the lands described on the plat 'Of Bentley. Green Uni~
I ~ according to the plat thereof as. recorded in Plat Book 41F
Paqes 42 to 45, of the Public Records of Seminole County~ --
Florida, does hereby consent to . and approve the foregoing
Supplemental. Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions dated AUiLl,:>r '1. 9-- . 1990, as required by Section 15
of the Original Dec,laration.
~.
N
c.n
.....,
r-.J.
'"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Developer has caused these presents
be e~ecuted by itsr-corporate officer hereunto duly authorized
of the .dl1!i!'day of "-.c!/).T 1990. .
Signed. seaied and Jlive . d . . .' .
in the presence of: WINTER SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT
JOINT VENTURE
to
as
-~!
\ j'
u iL/ .. .'1~( )
. '~!f-:. }jl/l ':3~
. !. .
i :
i .
By:
,."........" '.r.
. ..,". f '
.'
. ," \ .. ......
Gulfstream Housing .~o:rp';"tZ .....
a Delaware corpora1;to~~-;r -..J ,.'
.. :--() ~
managing general Pf:t~~J?~: Cb .
!....(/)l'> ..
..... ... ..c.. _ ...
~ . ,..,., .'
, ".:. ~'.'
. ~#.........' .
v
By:
Name: Glenn Marv!
Title: Vice Presiaent
(Corporate Seal)
bND
By:
. ..By:
-
'.
,.
By:
Name:
Title:
~
". t. ~'! J"
Secre tll1.'Y' It...."
"
~
"
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF Ot/l/J~
~
<n~
~c.n
I.. HEREBY CERTIFY that on. tAis day, before me, . an. office:- --.,
duly authorized in. the sta:te' and. Count'y'. aforesaid to.' tah.' -
acknowtedgments, personally appeared Glenn Marvin, well known.@:_.
.'me to be the Vice President of Gulfstream Housing Corp.,' tli4it
. manaqing qeneral . partner of the Developer named herein t. and ths:E C"...)
he acknowledqed exec;:utinq the - same. in ,~the presence of tWo c....,
subscribinqwitnesses freely and voluntarily under authority duly
vested in him by said corporation arid that the seal affixed'
thereto is. the true corporate seal of said corporation.
/,1'
. . /1 t" ' \. h
-, /1,:. L.:- <'L,..e. .....><~i..k::::.
. . Ifl........
I \,. . I,
/ \' .' .. J I"
. /,\'\\ ..... 1~ ~
. '..' ~ .........
My ~.~ issio xpires: /S......:)// ....~
NOTA PUSL' . .' : -.: :' . ? ':
"ty C:Mls' ,C;~TATE OP F10ll/DA AT I.AI;,jl~ : ~J (', *':)
60NO~ 1 ./ON I:.:OmEs JUN! ~,.1994 : W ~ "~',.. ~ C.
Hr.:u AS.'frOH AOEiIC:l iNc:. ~ -:.. . /
STATE OF,-1J~ ,. \.-r~. :"o,~~;..'
- ". "./.l:~""I'='<"'~
(J~ "'.. ,.,17 .-#, ", ,..... .
COUNTY OF~' ,;:'~ft.... ::~~'\'.~
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer
.duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid, to take
acknowled9ments~ personally appeared Louis E. Voqt, well known to
me. to be the Vice President of Home Capital Corporation,qeneral
P!lrtner of the Developer named herein. . and that he acknowledqed
executing the same in the presence of two subscribinq witnesses
freely and voluntarily under.authority duly vested in him by said'
corporation and that the. seal affixed.thereto is the true
corporatese~l of said corporation.
V'
. and State
WITNESS my hand. and official
last aforesaid thi s ,f?rib'day of', ../
----
.-(
,-
last
WITNESS my hand and Offici'::1jl
aforesaid this .~ day of ~
in the County and State
, 19S\1.'
My
0/"11'
Commi sion Expires:'-' ",'. 1.lf fl . """"
........, .,
NOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF F'LORtP,v" ~ i "~... :\"
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: MAY "'lI99~ ..
8.0NOaD 1'HRU NOTARY PU81.1C UIllO&.~.IT~ ., <.,) . _
. . ,:.~t () ,,'. ";"_~
. , '. , ,,. .. . ...
~ ~ ~~ , ~. . j .':
l \,. ~\~" :'/~./
~"r ..,.....l" "...~ ,.
"", ........ ,
~"". ~ r r~ t
.,.
R:831jD4026
,
- .
. ',' ""
.'
."
'f"\
STATE OF 'FLORIDA
. COUNTY OF~ : .
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me; an
officer duly authorized in the State and Country,aforesaid
to take acknowledgments, personally appeared Joy DeCaro,
well known to me, 'to be the Assistant Secre,tary of Home
Capital Corporation, general partner of the Developer named
herein, and that she acknowledged executing the same in the
presence of two subscribing witnesses freely and voluntarily
under authority duly vested in him by said corporation and
that the seal affixed thereto is the true corporate seal of
said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and o~icial seal
State last aforesaid this , ~day, of
1990.
~
(I) "N
", CJ1
3:
% .......,
(:)
r
I'TI
n
,p -
....., -
r-
.
~
.;::-
i~country .
and
"
My
.. ,
,: ,,-9
PUB C :' ,~",,~
. ~ . .'.
. . "" r
l' · , t'
Commis ion 1.lre~O"UI"'''''''''" ~.. "
.." ~J.1t "
NOTARYPUBLlC.STA F ~~A:e'.-"'.' "";.
MY COMMISSION EX : aA'( ~. 1 ' ...s- ~
BONDED THRU NOTARY' aUQ'UMfl'WR U .. ''''. ~
- ... .., -
.. : .)-. k"4 , ...... ~ (': ~
;:1: ' · ~ :'-':
~~\o, ~ :' ~
~ "I. ...<<: ~ .. ~ ~
'."" ^ ..' CO) ~
~.. ~ ~
'.. S' 1\"' - ",..-
'" ,"\,
, 1t"III,''''''''
...
,
",
'. I
..!:" .:-
,.
!. I
ACKNOWLEDGEMElIT OF RECEIPT OF DOCUHENTS
BUYER. :
LOT: . Bentley Green
the undersigned hereby co~curs and agrees that they have received a
complete set of Bentley Green Homeowners Association Documents
this day of . 19_
It is understood that in case of recision of this contrac"t. these
documents must be returned prior .to seller returning deposit monies.
BUYER
BUYER.
BUYER.
,
~,-y I
!"
I
: I
I
!
~1
l::::l I
~ c.., !
~ ~I
CI)~!
.. .......
== ~ ~
.... ~ ~
~ l
!'> ~.
~t::!
<'> ~.
~l_
~I
~
I
II
~1
~I
t;:il
." '.
,01-.I:nt.JS
I"" -PI
111 --
pc .. 0
-$-
00
+
1
I
,Ol-.t
NVld 3lIS
...
~
""" ~
"+~ "'-<,
'7,. ~
0'
.(
do,) \,
..; ~:r...~ ~...
, 4'"" <>
~ ,-':0
~ "'b.~~~ ~
~" \r;" D~
V'
\.~')
'L?'\
~ ?,;fls r--
.~,L ~(;.~
f'o',p\.S
1\
"
I.
..,
'''''...... -
- .-\-
'"
- NOWOOV
mSOdOHd
M3N
i-I
- i
J,,-
"
.. .~,
:r---
, ""'-
~
~
~ ~.
~
--& \
-C\
.:..
~..
><..
~
,"
\Seminole County Property Appraiser Get Information by Parcel Number
. .
PARCEL DETAIL
'f,.
Scn~fn(ik .,t€"MI!:1h'
M~trC.t't v ~+pn.1j.4-~t' r
&J-~'}(f:J,: .
I rli t I{.. ~i~f~';: :--,~.
~~:"Hdi II ~I I' I. :-l1'7:1
.:i n '7 -Id'~'- : f,~h,
Page 1 of1
2004 WORKING VALUE SUMMARY
GENERAL
Parcelld' 07-21-31-514-0000- Tax District. W1-WINTER
. 0090 . . SPRINGS
OWner. STERN VIRGINIA K Exemptions: oo-HOMESTEAD.
Address: 1406 WINDING STREAM CT
CitY,State,ZipCode:WlNTER SPRINGS FL 32708
. Property Address: 1406 WINDING STREAM CT WINTER SPRINGS 32708
Subdivision Name: BENTLEY CLUB AT BENTLEY GREEN
Dor. Q1-SINGLE FAMILY
Value Method:
NU~ber of Buildings:
Depreciated Bldg Value:
Depreciated EXFT Value:
Land Value (Market):
Land Value. Ag:
Just/Market Value:
Assessed Value (SOH):
Exempt Value:
Taxable Value:
SALES
Deed Date Book Page Amount Vacllmp
QUIT CLAIM DEED 04/1996 03195 0729 $98,500 Improved
FINAL JUDGEMENT 05/1996 03058 1233 . $100 Improved
WARRANTY DEED 03/1992 02403 0686 $69,900 Vacant
WARRANTY DEED 03/1992 02403 0685 $65,200 Vacant
Find Comparable Sales within this Subdivision
Market
1
$244,527
$10,389
$53,000
$0
$307,916
$235,273
$25,000
$210,273
2003 VALUE SUMMARY
Tax Value(without SOH): $5,031
2003 Tax Bill Amount: $3,899 .
Savings Due To SOH: $1,132"
2003 Taxable Value: $205,886
DOES NOT INCLUDE NON.AD VALOREM
ASSESSMENTS
LAND
. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLAT
LEG LOT 9 BENTLEY CLUB AT BENTLEY GREEN
PEl 44 PGS 35 THRU 37
Land Assess Method Frontage Depth Land Units Unit Price Land Value'
LOT 0 0 1,000 53,000.00 $53,000
BUILDING INFORMATION
Bid Num Bid Type Year Bit Fixtures Gross SF Heated SF Ext Wall Bid Value Est. Cost New
1 SINGLE FAMILY 1992 11 3,560 2,624 CB/STUCCO FINISH $244,527 $256,049
Appendage I Sqft SCREEN PORCH FINISHED /322
Appendage I Sqft OPEN PORCH FINISHED /42. .
Appendage I Sqft GARAGE FINISHED /572
EXTRA FEATURE
Description Year Bit Units EXFTValue Est..Cost New
FIREPLACE 1992 1 $1,400 $2,000
POOL GUNITE 1992 450 $~,300 $9,000
COOL DECK PATIO 1992 .810. $1,985 $2,835
WATER FEATURE .1992 1 $700 $1,000
.IRON FENCE. 1992 1 $4 $5 .
NOTE: Assessed values. shown are NO T cerbfied values and.therefore are subject to change before being finah'zed for ad valorem tax
urposes.
..... If au recentl rchased a homesteaded tax will be based on Just/Market value.
~
ATTACHMENT E
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-1800
April 5, 2004
To:
John Baker, Senior Planner
Dennis Franklin, Building Official
Thru:
Kip Lockcuff, P.E., Pl;tblic Works I Utility Director
Subject:
Proposed Addition at Mrs. Virginia Stern's Property at 1406 Winding
Stream Court or Lot 29 at Bentley Cove at Bentlev Green
The City staff held a meeting to discuss the proposed addition at the 1406
'Winding Stream Ct. The proposed addition would extend beyond the rear building
setback and encroach into the 15 feet drainage easement at the rear of the property which
is also adjacent to the Tuscawilla Golf Course. The 15 feet drainage easement is to the
benefit of the homeowners association of Bentley Cove at Bentley Green. Present in the
meeting were the City's Kip Lockcuff, John Baker, David Alamina, Zynka Perez and
John Orkis, the property owner's representative.
Prior to an application of a building permit for the proposed addition, the property
owner must vacate the drainage easement or a part thereof and obtain a variance from the
rear yard building setback.
There are additional recommendations as follows~
I. The proposed addition must not be built directly over the (embedded) pipe in the
drainage easement.
2. The property owner is recommended to provide a 'Hold Harmless Agreement' to
the homeowners' association.
3. If the proposed addition were allowed, it is the opinion of the building
department, that a special engineered plans for the foundation be part of the
permit. This special engineering should address and verify measures taken for the
soil bearing integrity of the foundation is maintained in the event excavation is
necessary to repair or replace the drainage infrastructure in the event of failure of
the drainage infrastructure. In short the building should be able to maintain
structural integrity if excavations needed or the angle repose ofthe footing is to be
violated.
Prepared by: .. a.e -
~~id'minac--.6; ,
Stormwater Manager I Senior Building Inspector
Cc:
Mr. John Orkis for Mrs. Virginia Stern
RECEIVED
APR 2 7 2004 .j
\
CITY OF \^I1NTER SPRINGS
Current Planning
ATTACHMENT F CITYOFWINTER~~~~~
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR MEETfNG - MAY 6, 2004
PAGE 3 OF 6
Chairman Waters asked Joan Brown [Deputy City Clerk] to check on availability to hold
a Special Meeting for Mr. and Mrs. Phillip Tucker. Discussion.
REGULAR
Community Development Department
B. Requests The Board Of Adjustment Hear A Request For A Variance By Virginia
Stern From Section 20-103. Of The City Code Of Ordinances, To Encroach As
Much As 10' (Ten Feet) Into The 20' (Twenty Foot) Rear Building Setback. The
Variance Is Contingent Upon The City Vacating A Portion Of A Private Drainage
Easement Along The Rear Of The Property (Separate Action By The City
Commission.)
Mr. Baker presented this Agenda Item.
Mr. Baker said, "We [Staff] have looked at this request according to the six (6) Variance
Criteria and of course you have to meet all six (6) of those [Variance] Criteria and we
[Staff] do not think they do,"
Discussion.
Board Member Diller confirmed, "Your conclusion is that they do not meet any of the six
(6) [Variance Criteria]. Is that correct?" Mr. Baker replied, "That is correct."
Ms. Virginia Stern, 1406 Winding Stream Court, Winter Springs, Florida: briefly
addressed the Board.
Mr. John Orkis, 951 Wedgewood Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: spoke on behalf of Ms.
Stem regarding the request for a Variance.
Tape l/Side B
Much discussion ensued.
Mr. Steve Cox, President of the Bentley Green Homeowners Association, 876 Bentley
Green Circle, Winter Springs, Florida: briefly addressed the Board.
Mr. Rudi Stockhammer, Chairman of the Architectural Review Board/First Vice
President/Treasurer of the Bentley Green Homeowners Association, 856 Bentley Green
Circle, Winter Springs, Florida: spoke in favor of the "Variance" Request. Mr.
Stockhammer stated, "The Architectural Review Board has looked at the plans and we
are fine with the plans as long as they build according to Code of Winter Springs and the
other Codes." Mr. Stockhammer added, "The Architectural Review Board has asked - all
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR MEETING - MAY 6, 2004
PAGE 4 OF 6
the neighbors are being asked whether they agree with it or do not agree." Mr.
Stockhammer indicated, "Everybody agreed."
Much discussion.
"I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE AND
PASS IT ON TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR THEIR FINAL APPROVAL."
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER FAIRCHILD. WITH DISCUSSION, BOARD
MEMBER FAIRCHILD WITHDREW HER MOTION.
"I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE RECOMMEND TO THE
CITY COMMISSION THAT THEY APPROVE - THE VARIANCE AS
REQUESTED." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER DILLER. SECONDED BY
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. DISCUSSION.
MR. BAKER SAID, "IF AT SOME POINT, IF THIS MOTION CARRIES,
COULD I GET EVERYBODY TO ELABORATE. I FEEL EACH ONE - OF
THESE POINTS IS COVERED." CHAIRMAN WATERS REMARKED, "THAT
IS A GOOD POINT. WE DO NEED TO RECOMMEND TO THE [CITY]
COMMISSION AS TO HOW THESE SIX (6) [VARIANCE CRITERIA] POINTS
ARE AFFECTED BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT OUR MOTION NEEDS TO BE
BASED ON."
FURTHER DISCUSSION ENSUED.
Tape 2/Side A
DISCUSSION.
BOARD MEMBER DILLER REITERATED HIS MOTION AND STATED, "THE
MOTION - WAS TO FORWARD IT WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR
APPROV AL."
CHAIRMAN WATERS ADDED, "SO EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS - IF YOU
ARE VOTING TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE - YOU WOULD VOTE YES, IF
YOU ARE VOTING NOT TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE, YOU WOULD
VOTE NO."
VOTE:
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN : AYE
CHAIRMAN WATERS: NAY
BOARD MEMBER FAIRCHILD: AYE
BOARD MEMBER DILLER: NAY
MOTION DID NOT CARRY.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR MEETING - MAY 6, 2004
PAGE50F6
Chairman Waters said, "It will go to the [City] Commission. You [Mr. Baker] will let the
applicant know what the date will be?" Mr. Baker said, "That will be the second Meeting
of this month."
IV. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Mr. Baker said, "We have a 'Conditional Use' for multi-family - condominiums -
fifteen (15) acres right next to Golf Terrace."
Board Member Fairchild asked Mr. Baker, "Do you want something in writing?" Mr.
Baker said, "I just need to have the reasoning behind a recommendation of approval,
because it is very difficult to say, well, the Board recommends approval and disagrees
with Staff for the following reasons if you do not know the following reasons."
With further discussion Chairman Waters suggested another Meeting with Mr. Anthony
A. Garganese, City Attorney, to discuss the six Variance Criteria. Chairman Waters
stated, "That might be something that we might want to consider - if you all want to, we
can ask to do that in the next couple of months - sit down and talk to him [Attorney
Garganese], ask him questions."
Board Member Howard Casman asked, "Is there anywhere I am going to find a further
explanation of these six (6) [Variance Criteria]?" Mr. Baker stated, "It is in the Code."
Discussion.
V. REPORTS
Mr. Baker pointed out that there will be a Board of Adjustment Special Meeting
scheduled before the next Regular Meeting.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
"I MOVE TO ADJOURN."
SECONDED. DISCUSSION.
MOTION WAS APPROVED.
MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER DILLER.
WITH CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD THE