HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 03 08 Regular 502
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM
502
CONSENT
INFORMATIONAL
PUBLIC HEARING
REGULAR X
March 8, 2004
Meeting
MGR. /#-/DEPT 1ft/'
Authorization
REQUEST:
The Community Development Department recommends approval of the proposed
architectural renderings for a building on Lot 7 at the Tuskawilla Office Park (TOP),
subject to the Dover Kohl & Partners comments.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this agenda item is to consider and approve the proposed architectural
renderings for a building on Lot 7, subject to the Dover Kohl & Partners comments. A
typical building elevation was approved with the final engineering plans for the TOP.
Any deviation from that design requires City Commission approval.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
Sec. 20-321. Administration.
Sec. 20-327. Architectural Guidelines.
CHRONOLOGY:
February 11, 2002 - City Commission approves final engineering/site plan and
development agreement for the TOP (including typical
architectural renderings for one and two story buildings).
April 14, 2003 - City Commission approved architectural renderings for buildings 1
and 6 at the TOP.
July 28, 2003 - City Commission approved architectural renderings for building 11
at the TOP.
March 8, 2004
Regular Item 502
Page 2
FINDINGS:
1. Staff believes the proposed rendering is more aesthetically appealing that the
typical renderings approved on the final engineering plans.
2. The City Commission approved similar renderings at its April 14, 2003 and July
28,2003, meetings, subject to Dover Kohl and Partners' comments.
3. James Dougherty, of Dover Kohl and Partners, the City's Town Center
consultant, has reviewed the architectural renderings and although finding them
generally consistent with the Town Center Code's, provided comments for minor
modifications.
ST AFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed renderings, subject to Dover Kohl & Partners
comments.
Staff would process the building permit applications and the applicant could commence
vertical construction (once the plans are approved and the wall and other related site
improvement requirements are completed), but the applicant would be fully responsible to
diligendy pursue the plan modifications and implement and complete d1em by the time the
certificate of occupancy is requested.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Approved architectural renderings
B. Proposed architectural renderings
C. Dover Kohl & Partners correspondence
COMMISSION ACTION:
S:\dept - Community Development\Planning\2004\Commission\030804 _Regular _ 502 TOP
#7_ Architectural_ Renderings. doc
,
. ..
.
ATTACHMENT A
II
SINGLE- . STORY.
TYPICAL BUILDING, FRONT
ELEVATIONS ,& BUJtDlNC$lCNAGE'
(NTS) . ',." . .
TWO STORY
.': ';,~':::~~'.;.'. ... -":~,';
~ ~;.-:: .J~ ",'
,,,,
~
:Jl ~
l.~i
~g
.;n~
~8~
~,~
. 0
~;i
.."
. '.
~:itc
;:~.
U" COWPACl(I)SU8~Aoc (10.~,T-l!lO) .
II" v.II. 'ttur.NT Ool!i COORS[, 98X WIN. ~P"'CT\ON
1-1/2: TYF'[ 5," olSJ>t1AL.T,$I$lfl,CCCWRSE:
SOT . 12"W 'cONe.' RIEIB;H CURe. \Iltf[R[ NO SIOC~olLK
. , . I' .
S . 11" SlA8: SlJtl-eolSC CtNT[ft(O
U~R R1B~J~;'I~Bp".l
ttri;ro.'
.\.., . '.
.... . .. ',.,',
6"HIQi~_'II'Au.
+ "lOHaS.'PRdPDlTT.llt€
[ROW TlJSI(ol'MlU, Rtl"TQ
...... (NO (;6 DEtOI1lOl\l
~.,
!
~
~
~
~
PAvrM:C~~ ~~i05~OA;ICTll1N
JAMES C" BRANCH. P,E.
Ctl'lSULTING aVll ENGINEER
21JO E. HYDE DRIVE
DELJQNA. fL 32738
PHONE &: FAX'-(-J86) 574-2830
e-moU: jlmbronchOmplnet.net
TUSKAWILLA.. OFFICE". PARK
WlNTER- SPRINGS. -SEllINOLE"" COUNTY. FLORIDA
~ . , '
.DEVEcOPER: .
TUSKAWlI:.L'A'..OFFlCE:'PARK. LtC
800 W,.S.R; 426.: SUITE E
OVIEDO; i=1.' 32"765 '
PHON[ (40i) 971;'2.004:'.,.X. (4<17) 971-1005
. ,')f;;~ ': :'i~' ;, ,: . .;.;,: ,':~ : '
-.' -.- '. .
:..t::~:~~~';,}':'::L~l~~.,{~', :
PNIdo(l.SlCal \',.,'
.~;~.,~..
N
t
-
$'su_.. .
~_ll
ACcr.i:i' .~~~ ~~PfllUA,.REA
......""1..11__..~
''''''
SCALE: 1"' - 30'
...-
o :lO
60
,
../
.!
i
i
I
i
I
i
:1
_ ~a~r ~
~ ~ ~f5' i:
g M ..:;Jl~.. ~
~! !~a~: g
...01 ~- ~~~ ....
'"
I
I
d
U
...... ...
. SiTE. .
DII;:1ENS!ON
. PLAN
SHE:ET'60F 9
~"y.."
.o..c P....VE .
,:"-.<.-r_
~_...""1C_
-.-....-
~OUNTA.BLE. CURB (mOT
TYPE' ,,6, INDEX 300)
(NTS)
SCA.U:l-..2tl'
.SEPTEt.lSER..., 2001.
""_"'I.O-..arr
_0$ -...--. 00..
---.....
DOR/'IER 'WINDOWS TO BE _
~= r,y p~~~. .
~
~
Z
~
~ ,.~~~~~
~ a.
=~~~
""IdNALl5iO-OC~
I2"OC,l'!tLO
t
in
u
-<
~
~
-<
II
II
II
I>>"
~
'ON 1 I
""lJ II
:c-.."'l:rW
II
I.;.
,..,
II
1\
~
....
. ".': : ". ~. .;". :.-'
":':.JI--~~" .....
<iijl~ ~"
.:........-.
.......;.
KEYSTONE \
II
III
II
/: C; ~
,...
'-0
28 YR. ARCHTECTURAL ROOF
, r' SHINGLES. INSTALLATION IS.
I r16" ROUND \oIIMJOW FASTENING SPECS By MANU-
ENTRY TRUSS TO BEAR BLRCKEl-ED OUT BY FACTURER. SHALL COMPLY
AT 9"-'" (ATOP COLUMNS . WlNOO\oI MANU'. . WITH FBC-ZOOl
TrI~N
:T17'/4':>:::,::~~"<{
'i Affm""::':' "-
~Ji~~~~%~~
II
,II
II
/I
~~
~~y.
.m'll
. ..
'.' LI
~~:1;:~~::;':i" "',STU:~'~~;c~.,:,,'i" '..<.. ..b 0:
~''''''''~~'''':. .'~~ ~,,~::..
". of( ~~. .'( Z ..,)::
::-.
I
~
1 ~ I ~I~
t:j
....... ......
:..:'. ...,:~.
i=~1i \~
., .... ..' ,.~
"-:.. ,< "," :::'". .....:...:::
"' .. '.. ..............
~STYROFOAM APPLIQUE ~
WINOOW BASE .
"Y' STOP AROUND '
ALL EXTERIOR DOORS
.../
/'
/
COACH LIGHT PER
CUSTOIMER SPECIFICATIONS
1111'11
rI I \I II 1
11I111I
11
I 1\
II
,-
-0
':~::"!:'I"': / _I....... :?!.'\;.111":"('~" ~"I<":'~"::"';;\':;:
T .:....]1 ,.....
Lit: I~';b~, IY;i
~ :~'.~!::.. ..' ~.~Jc&;:~::.;..::..::.:::'.:::.Ai::t;t.;
STYROFOAM
\oIINOOW
CAPITAL
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
12
7ls
NJ
RA !SEO 2"
001'
7/ff' TEXT. CEMENT D
METAL LATH ON
7/16" D.SE.
KEYSTONE Of
g"
6"
7"
~
'f'
1'-10"
DOVER, KOHL &: PARTNERS
lOW 11 P III 11 n i II g
Memorandum
To: John Baker
City of Winter Springs
Cc: Victor Dover
From: James Dougherty
Date: 02 March, 2004
Subject: Comments regarding the Tuskawilla Office Park elevation
The building looks more like residential than office because of the dominant roof. This is not
necessarily a problem, but the building would benefit from more presence.
The detailing of the buildings appears to be fairly consistent with the other buildings in the
Tuskawilla Office Park.
The building looks very 'slab on grade'. The building would have more presence with a
raised finish floor. The look of a raised finish floor could be accomplished, while maintaining
accessability by increasing the height of the first story and placing a water table at the height
a raised finish floor would be.
The elevation appears to show a row of shingles along the top of the horizontal piece of the
central pediment. This is an unusual detail. It would be better not to use shingles there.
\