HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 11 10 Public Hearings 400 Second Reading - Ordinance 2003-38 Public Building Impact Fund
J
111003 _ COMM ]ublic _ Hearing_ 400 ]ublic _ Building_Impact]ees
Page 1 of2
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM 400
Consent
Information
Public Hearing X
Regular
November 10. 2003
Meeting
MGR. ~Dept.
REQUEST:
City Manager requesting the City Commission to approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2003-
38 establishing a Public Building Impact Fee.
PURPOSE:
This agenda item is needed to implement a Public Building Impact Fee to help fund public
buildings.
CONSIDERATIONS:
On March 10, 2003 the City Commission approved a contract with Land Design
Innovations (L.D.I.) to prepare an impact fee to help fund public building utilized for the
conduct of General Administrative and Information System Services (Attachment "C").
L.D.I. completed their report which was presented to the City Commission for First
Reading on October 27,2003.
On October 27, 2003 the Commission had a First Reading of Ordinance 2003-38 and
decided to change the segmented non-residential schedule of impact fees as shown on
Agenda Item Exhibit "I", to an average non-residential impact fee as shown on Agenda
Item Exhibit "3", providing for a $100 per unit residential Public Buildings Impact Fee,
and an averaged $231.35 per 1,000 square feet non-residential Public Buildings Impact
Fee.
FUNDING:
As shown on Exhibit "2" of this agenda item the unadjusted methodology would produce an
estimated $4,701,699 in impact revenue, far more than is needed.
As shown on the adjusted rate schedule Exhibit "3" of this agenda item the adjusted impact fee
schedule is expected to generate approximately $2,924,019 to fund the expansion of City Hall
111003 _ COMM ]ublic _ Hearing_ 400 ]ublic _ Building_Impact]ees
Page 2 of2
As shown on the adjusted rate schedule Exhibit "3" of this agenda item the adjusted impact fee
schedule is expected to generate approximately $2,924,019 to fund the expansion of City Hall
through build-out and the administrative facilities of the new Public Works Facility and other
unforeseen projects.
Expansion of City Hall
Public Works Center
Other
Total
$1,650,000
600,000
674.019
$2,924,019
RECOMMENDA TIONS:
It is recommended that the Commission (1); review the proposed impact fee study and
recommendations as amended, (2); approve the Second Reading of Ordinance 2003-38
implementing the adjusted rate schedule as shown in Exhibit "3", providing for a $100 per unit
residential Public Buildings Impact Fee and a $321.35 per 1000 square feet non-residential impact
fee.
IMPLEMENT A TION:
October 26,2003 Commission approval of Ordinance 2003-38 First Reading.
November 10,2003 Commission approval of Ordinance 2003-38 Second Reading.
November II, 2003 Implementation of new impact fee rules.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit "1" - Detailed Adjusted Public Building Impact Fee.
Exhibit "2" - Detailed unadjusted Rate Schedule.
Exhibit "3" Detailed Adjusted Rate Schedule.
Attachment "A" - Proposed Ordinance 2003-38. (as amended from First Reading)
Attachment "B"- L.D.I. Impact Fee Study Report. (as amended from First
Reading)
Attachment "c" - March 10,2003 Agenda Item "J".
Attachment "D" - Summary of Current Impact Fees.
COMMISSION ACTION:
.
.
.
Exhibit /I t 11
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DETAILED ADJUSTED PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
SCHEDULE
Land Use Unit Functional Net Cost/ Net % Adjusted
Pop.lUnit Func. Pop. Cost/Unit Reduction Rate
Residential Dwelling 1.34 $120.00 $160.80 37.81% $100.00
Specialty Retail 1000 sf 1.49 $120.00 $178.80 37.81% $111.20
Convenience 1000 sf 12.25 $120.00 $1,470.00 37.81 % $914.19
Store/ Gas/Service
Shopping Center 1000 sf 3.15 $120.00 $378.00 37.81% $235.08
Industrial 1000 sf 1.16 $120.00 $139.20 37.81% $86.57
Warehouse 1000 sf 0.74 $120.00 $88.80 37.81 % $55.22
Automotive Sales 1000 sf 1.92 $120.00 $230.40 37.81% $143.29
General Office 1000 sf 1.80 $120.00 $216.00 37.81% $134.33
Medical Office 1000 sf 3.49 $120.00 $418.80 37.81 % $260.45
Financial Institution 1000 sf 2.95 $120.00 $354.00 37.81% $220.15
Golf Courses Holes 2.40 $120.00 $288.00 37.81% $179.11
Restaurant 1000 sf 4.77 $120.00 $572.40 37.81% $355.98
Fast Food Restaurant 1000 sf 3.41 $120.00 $409.20 37.81% $254.48
HoteVMotel Room 0.77 $120.00 $92.40 37.81% $57.46
}
.
.
.
Exhibit "2"
2003 DEVELOPABLE LANDS - UNADJUSTED RATE SCHEDULE
:~:~::::I::~:::::::::::::::J::::rr:~~II:::~:::~::f:::ftr:::::~::::::::~:~::~~r~:::~:::::::::::::::~mw.eAaf:::Fe(;\tlMQQNl$W:~1llVQWAl:J;atlQal$.g$.}::~::~:::::~:(~::~~~~~:~~rr:::?:r::::~:;::::~:::~::~:~~~~~~:~f:::::r:::~~::::r/?:t~~:::::~:::
-___.JIIII_
Residential Rural 0 DU/Acre 1.0 DU/Acre 15 $0.00 $2,412.00
Low Density Res. 1.1 DU/Acre 3.5 DU/Acre 179 $31,661.52 $100,741.20
Medium Density Res. 3.6 DU/Acre 9.0 DU/Acre 0 $0.00 $0.00
High Density Res. 9.1 DU/Acre 21.0 DU/Acre 0 $0.00 $0.00
Commerical (4) 0.25 FAR 0.5 FAR 129 $522,589.32 $1,045,178.64
Industrial (4) 0.25 FAR 0.5 FAR 87 $352,443.96 $704,887.92
Public/Semi-Public 0.25 FAR 0:5 FAR 0 $0.00 $0.00
Recreation/Open Space 0 FAR 0.25 FAR 0 $0.00 $0.00
Vacant N/A N/A 0 $0.00 $0.00
.. .#. ..i....Q~~:~:~:::\::.:\\/:.:\:.:::::-:::::.:.,: .: :::.:.::.......:...:.::...:::.:,::/".:;.::.::::::: ::::::.::::/4:....i:.::: ....... .... .: :t.. .... .,...::
:::::::::::::::::rr:::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::m;::::::::t::::::::::f::::UMg4Ql1:ti.qg:~MgQI:ti::i{J(~lmQ..::lttjp:::tl$.g$:::::::r:::::::::::::{r:r:::::r::::::::::::::::t::::::::::::::r::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::t:
. .. ... ... ... .......................... . ............,...................
. .......;........ '::;.:::..:..:::........:..... .;......:...::...:.:. ...y.:............;.......:...;... .:,,': ;';"':;':;:::';':::::':;:':::'::::';'::::::;:::::' ':::'::;::':::::;:;:;.;.;.;.v :...:.:.'..';.:.....;.....:...:.:.:.;.;.;.;.:" ..... ..........;.....:.;...:.;.:.;.;.;.:.;.:.;.:.:.:.;.:.:.;.:
___'11I"._
8 DU/Acre 0.8 FAR 85 $54,672.00 $550,946.88
12 DU/Acre 1.0 FAR 167 $241,682.40 $676,530.36
8 DU/Acre 0.8 FAR 179 $57,566.40 $1,740,343.97
:::;H::::::::::~::::n>T(H :::~:::~~'Tt~: 3~3;920~~1): ~t~6r; 2 ~. L~V:
P.B. Impact Fee:
No:~e~~:n~~:; 'III!IIIIIIIJI~!.~~;'II ~:~ ~,~OO sq-ft
Note: Non-residential rate is an average of rates for the various types of non-residential development as identified on pg. 9 of the
Winter Springs Public Buildings Imapct Fee Report dated August 2003 as prepared by Land Design Innovations, Inc.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Mixed Use:
50% ResidentiaV50% Commercial
2,500 sq. ft. average dwelling unit
Town Center:
75% ResidentiaV25% Commercial
2,000 sq. ft. average dwelling unit
Greenway:
25% ResidentiaV75% Commercial
1,700 sq. ft. average dwelling unit
1) Residential credits based on 2004 impact fees payment, average 2,500 sf house with a $175,000 value.
2) Non-residential Impact fees are an average for the individual land uses identified within the report.
3) Impact fee amounts take into consideration the appropriate credits due.
4) FLUM Acreage from the Comprehensive Plan
5) Impact fee amounts for variable land uses based upon median build out scenario.
10/24/2003
Exhibit "3"
2003 DEVELOPABLE LANDS - ADJUSTED RATE SCHEDULE
,::'::r{:::::::;::::::::::::m:::::':::::::::::::::::::::::I::::::M'::':':::':I:::::::::::::::::::::::I::::m::qMe.~lu:lfJ.i.J$:@.<<<<(($:H::~Q;Mr.Jj:::~tflJ.!nU$.i~::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::::::':::::::::::':::::::::,::::,::::':::,:'::::'::::::::f:::::::::::::::::::i:::::::::::::::::::I::::
--_1___.1_
Residential Rural 0 DU/Acre 1.0 DU/Acre 15 $0.00 $1,500.00
Low Density Res. 1.1 DU/Acre 3.5 DU/Acre 179 $19,690.00 $62,650.00
Medium Density Res. 3.6 DU/Acre 9.0 DU/Acre 0 $0.00 $0.00
High Density Res. 9.1 DU/Acre 21.0 DU/Acre 0 $0.00 $0.00
Commerical (4) 0.25 FAR 0.5 FAR 129 $325,002.79 $650,005.59
Industrial (4) 0.25 FAR 0.5 FAR 87 $219,187.93 $438,375.86
Public/Semi-Public 0.25 FAR 0.5 FAR 0 $0.00 $0.00
Recreation/Open Space 0 FAR 0.25 FAR 0 $0.00 $0.00
Vacant N/A N/A 0 $0.00 $0.00
$fjtJfT:iJ,tiil~:):::i:::i' U\: /\i i:U:::: ::::::r::::::,::, Hi::::: /H: :t::::::: :it:::::.::::::: :t:, ..... ..... :.: 41:0:::::' :,: ':\H $563;fl.~lli72::::.:'.' u:: ::$1m:~~;~~:~ i4...::::: (:
:::t::::::m:::::'t:::::::::::::::r:::::::II::::::::r:::::::rmJ:::::::r::rrmmIr::'lMBAP:11:lrl4;::4Mgf.l.~[<<::fiNK4.RiA$.m;':;(i.il:fit.q::iY=$Ii$:rIrr:rJr:::"::::fi:::\f":r:':::':'::r:::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::::'::::::.:::,:::::
_1"''1_IiI_I_
Mixed Use 8 DU/Acre 0.8 FAR 85 $34,000.00 $342,638.60
Town Center 12 DU/Acre 1.0 FAR 167 $150,300.00 $420,740.05
Greeneway Interchange 8 DU/Acre 0.8 FAR 179 $35,800.00 $1,082,334.88
~ii.b.8n~~#.@):\H:\:::/H::nH':((' t::::4~1in:':: n{:::$2~I):jtQll.9Q:.'n. :t(::..tjIl4~Vl1~,~4: .....
P.B. Impact Fee:
NO:~:~~:n~~~; 11111111:illll~~~~~:1 ~:~ ~,~oo sq-ft
(37.81 % reduction from unadjusted rate of $16.80)
(37.81 % reduction from unadjusted rate of $372.00)
Note: Non-residential rate is an average of rates for the various types of non-residential development as identified on pg. 9 of the
Winter Springs Public Buildings Imapct Fee Report dated August 2003 as prepared by Land Design Innovations, Inc.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Mixed Use:
50% ResidentiaV50% Commercial
2,500 sq. ft. average dwelling unit
Town Center:
75% ResidentiaV25% Commercial
2,000 sq. ft. average dwelling unit
Greenway:
25% ResidentiaV75% Commercial
1,700 sq. ft. average dwelling unit
1) Residential credits based on 2004 impact fees payment, average 2,500 sf house with a $175,000 value.
2) Non-residential Impact fees are an average for the individual land uses identified within the report.
3) Impact fee amounts take into consideration the appropriate credits due.
4) FLUM Acreage from the Comprehensive Plan
.pact fee amounts for variable land uses based upon median build out scenario.
ATTACHMENT "A"
L.D.I. Impact Fee Study Report
As Amended From First Reading
City of Winter Springs
Public Buildings Impact Fee Analysis Report
August 2003
Prepared For:
City of Winter Springs
Community Development Department
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799
Prepared By:
Land Design Innovations, Inc.
140 North Orlando Avenue, Suite 295
Winter Park, Florida 32789
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A INTRODUCfI ON ............................................................................................................. 3
B. ME THODOLc:x;.y ...... ... ........................................................... I' ....................................... 3
1. Benefit Dis 't:ri.c t. ................................. ............. ................................................................ 3
2. Service Unit.................................................................................................................... 3
a. Residential Functional Population ....................................... ... ................................... .................4
b. Non-Residential Functional Population .................................................................................... 4
(1) Source - Seminole County Property Appraisers Database, 2000. .............................................................6
3. Level of Service ....................... .............................................. .... ... .... .... .......................... 6
4. Cost per Service Unit .....................................................................................................7
5. Revenue Credits ... ................................... ...................................... ............... ... ... ..... ... .... 7
6. Maximum Public Building Impact Fee Schedule......................................................... 9
c. .APPE NDIX ........................... ............................................................ ................ ................. 11
1. August 22,2000 - COREGIS Statement of Values....................................................... 11
2. Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey - Table 7.16: Average Vehicle
Occupancy by Trip Purpose ........................................................................................ 12
3. 2000 US <::ensus Bureau Population Data ................................................................... 13
4. Seminole County Property Appraiser's - City of Winter Springs Commercial Building
Sq uare- F oobges ............................. .................. ........................................................... 14
1
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Residential Functional Population ....................... .............................. ............. ................................ 4
Table 2: Non-Residential Functional Population ........................................................................................ 5
Table 3: Gty of Wmter Springs Total Functional Population - 2000.......................................................6
Table 4: Gty of Wmter Springs Public Building Data ................................................................................ 7
Table 5: Building O:lst per Functional Population ...................................................................................... 7
Table 6: Public Building Debt Service Oedit............................................................................................... 8
Table 7: Public Building Net Cost Per Service Unit....................................................................................9
Table 8: Maximum Public Building Impact Fee Schedule.......................................................................... 9
11
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
A INTRODUCTION
Impact fees are used by municipal governments to recover those capital expenses necessary to
maintain adopted levels of service associated V1ith new growth. These identifiable capital costs are
assigned directly to those residents or service users responsible for the additional cost to help offset
capital funding deficiencies and to ensure equity amongst all users, existing and new.
The Gty of Wmter Springs provides a number of public buildings that are used to provide civic
services to the city businesses and residents that are not addressed in other impact fee charges levied
by the Gty. For the prupose of the public building impact fees, public buildings are defined as all
buildings owned and operated by the Gty, which are not addressed in separate impact fees. The
Gty of Wmter Springs public buildings, as listed in Section B(3) of this report, provide a variety of
services to the public. As the Gty continues to expand and develop, the need for public buildings
will also increase. The Public Building Impact Fee is designed to ensure that new development pays
its fair and proportionate amount of the expenditures for expanding these capital facilities.
The determination of a public building impact fee amount involves the establishment of facility
standards and current deficiencies, inventory and assessment of existing facilities, apportioning of
costs to new developments, determination of appropriate credits, and the incorporation of time-
price differentials. These elements are defined in the following report for the calculation of a Public
Building Impact Fee.
B. METHODOLOGY
Currently, the Gty of Wmter Springs does not assess a Public Buildings Impact Fee. As such, a
methodology for the calculation of this impact fee must be determined. The following report
calculates a public building impact fee based upon a standards driven methodology. A standards
driven methodology is an impact fee determination based upon the historical capital investment
made to support a determined level of service and projections of need based upon theoretical future
capital costs. The following details the determination of the various parameters used in calculating
the Public Building Impact Fee.
1. Benefit District
Public buildings V1ithin the Gty of Wmter Springs provide a V1ide variety of services to the
public, which are Gtywide in nature. As such, the entire Gty is considered as a single benefit
district for the purposes of this report.
2. Service Unit
The Gty of Wmter Springs public building impact fee level of service is expressed in terms
of functional population. This approach is based upon the assumption that the demand
placed upon these facilities is generally proportional to the presence of people utilizing these
facilities. It represents the number of "full-time equivalent" people present at the site of a
land use. Calculations of the functional population are presented in latter sections of this
report.
3
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
a. Residential Functional Population
Residential functional population is based upon a 16-hour day. A 24-hour day is not
utilized as the services provided by public service buildings are not provided during
night time hours. Of the 16-hour day, it is assumed one-half of that time is spent at
home while the other half is spent at "away from home" activities where there is
potential for utilizing the services provided by public buildings. Therefore, the
residential functional population is calculated by dividing the population by one- half.
The 2000 census population numbers were used as it was the best available data and
because the public building replacement values identified in Section B(3) were
determined in year 2000.
Table 1: Residential Functional Population
2000 Census
Population
Housing
Units (1)
Persons per
Unit
Occupancy
Factor
Functional
Population per
Unit
31,666
(1) Housing units is representative of occupied units not total units.
11,774
2.69
0.50
1.34
b. Non- Residential Functional Population
The calculation of the non-residential functional population also utilizes a 16-hour
day. The methodology used to calculate the non- residential functional population is
based upon national trip generation data as calculated by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (I1E). The non-residential functional population per 1,000
square- feet is determined by dividing the total number of hours spent by employees
and visitors at a particular land use. Employees are assumed to spend 8- hours at their
work place while visitors are assumed to spend 20 minutes to one hour per visit
depending upon the type of land use. The formula for calculating non- residential
functional population is provided below.
Nan. RESidential F unaional Pcp./1. 000 sf is calaJatffl by the fdlouirrgfarmula:
(Employee Hours/1,000 sf + Visit Hours/1,000 sf) / 16 Hours/Day
Based upon the definitions below:
Employee Hours/1.000 sf = employees/1,000 sf x 8 hours/day
Visitor Hours/l.OOO sf = visitors/1,000 sf x hours/visit
Visitors/l.OOO sf = weekday ADT/l,OOO sf x Average Vehicle Occupancy-
employees/l,OOO sf
Weekday ADT/1.000 sf = one-way average daily trips
4
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
Table 2: Non-Residential Functional Population
Land Use Unit Trip Ave. Vehicle Emp. per Visitors Hours per Functional Population
Rate (1) Occupancy (2) Unit (3) per Unit (4) Visitor (5) per Unit (6)
Specialty Retail 1000 sf 20.34 1.71 1.96 32.82 0.25 1.49
Convenience Store/Gas/Service 1000 sf 422.8 1.71 1.96 721.03 0.25 12.25
Shopping Center 1000 sf 21.46 1.71 1.96 34.74 1.00 3.15
Industrial 1000 sf 3.49 1.16 2.08 1.97 1.00 1.16
Warehouse 1000 sf 2.48 1.16 1.27 1.61 1.00 0.74
Automotive Sales 1000 sf 18.75 1.71 1.96 30.10 0.50 1.92
General Office 1000 sf 5.51 1.42 3.32 4.50 0.50 1.80
Medical Office 1000 sf 18.07 1.52 4.05 23.42 1.00 3.49
Financial Institution 1000 sf 78.24 1.64 1.96 215.52 0.25 2.95
Golf Courses Hole 17.87 1.47 1.74 24.53 1.00 2.40
Restaurant 1000 sf 44.98 1.84 1.96 117.95 0.75 4.77
High Turn Over Restaurant 1000 sf 65.17 1.84 1.96 454.47 0.33 3.41
HoteVMotel Room 4.12 1.78 0.71 6.62 1.00 0.77
(1) Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, one-way average daily trips per 1,000 square-feet.
(2) US Department of Transportation, 1990 National Personal Transportation Survey.
(3) Employees per 1,000 sq-ft from ITE manual (ADT per 1,000 sf divided by ADT per employee-retail rate from National Association of Office and Industrial Parks)
(4) Calculated from formula.
(5) Hours per visitor assumed based upon land use type.
(6) Calculated from formula.
5
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
The total functional population for the Gty of Wmter Springs is based upon the existing
land use and functional population multipliers as previously calculated in this section. The
base year for the calculation of the Gty's functional population is 2000.
Table 3: City of Winter Springs Total Functional Population - 2000
Land Use Unit 2000 Functional Functional
Units (1) Pop.lUnit Population
Residential Dwelling 11,774 1.34 15,777
Specialty Retail 1000 sf 104.282 1.49 155
Convenience Store/Gas/Service 1000 sf 39.832 12.25 488
Shopping Center 1000 sf 72.440 3.15 228
Industrial 1000 sf 207.348 1.16 241
Warehouse 1000 sf 48.650 0.74 36
Automotive Sales 1000 sf 47.274 1.92 91
General Office 1000 sf 212.568 1.80 383
Medical Office 1000 sf 0 3.49 0
Financial Institution 1000 sf 5.130 2.95 15
Golf Courses Holes 36 2.40 86
Restaurant 1000 sf 1.989 4.77 10
High TurnOver Restaurant 1000 sf 3.358 3.41 12
HoteVMotel Room 0 0.77 0
Total 17,522
(1) Source - Seminole County Property Appraisers Database, 2000.
3. Level of Service
The Gty of Wmter Springs does not have an adopted level of service standard for public
buildings. Therefore, this report will establish a level of service standard based upon the
existing level of service currently being provided for public buildings by the Gty based upon
the population. Table 4 identifies the total Gty of Wmter Springs existing square-footage of
public buildings and the total replacement value of those buildings. According to the data
provided in Tables 1 and 4, the Gty has 28,030 square-feet of public buildings and a 2000
population of 31,666. Therefore, the existing level of service provided by the City is
0.89 sq-ft per capita.
6
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
Table 4: City of Winter Springs Public Building Data
Building Description Building Area (sf) Replacement Cost (I)
Public Works Garage 1,975 $150,000
Public Works/Utility Office 925 $69,458
Public Works Storage 2,430 $15,956
Gty Hall Municipal Complex 22,700 $2,734,889
Total 28,030 $2,970,303
(1) Building replacement costs taken from Aug. 22, 2000 - OJREGIS "Statement of Values" provided by the Oty of
Wmter Springs.
4. Cost per Service Unit
The public buildings owned and operated by the Gty of Wmter Springs provide a variety of
services to the businesses and residents of the Gty. As indicated in Table 4, the existing
public buildings have a total building area of 28,030 square-feet and a year-2000 replacement
value of $2,970,303. These buildings service the Gty's functional population as described in
Section 2 of this report. Dividing the replacement costs by the functional population being
served results in a cost of $169.20 per service unit to maintain the existing level of service.
Table 5: Building Cost per Functional Population
Public Building Replacement Cost $2,970,303
Functional Population, 2000 17,522
Cost per Functional Population $169.52
Source: Land Design Innovations, Inc.
5. Revenue Credits
The premise of impact fees is to ensure that new development pays for the capital
expenditures necessary to build the public facilities needed to service new development. This
protects existing development from shouldering the burden of providing additional public
services required to service new development while continuing to maintain the quality and
services currently being provided for future generations. Likewise, new development is not
responsible for paying the cost for capital expenditures required to service existing
development. Therefore, an analysis of the means by which existing capital improvements
were financed is necessary to determine if credits are due to new development to offset
future payments in the form of taxes, special assessments, user fees, etc. In the calculation of
the Public Building Impact Fee, it was asswned that general fund resources would not be
used in financing future capital expenditures for public buildings and that all capital costs
associated with public buildings would be funded through the assessment of the public
building impact fee.
According to the Gty of Wmter Springs finance department, Wmter Springs Gty Hall is the
only public building that was funded through a bond and not currently paid in full. The
7
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
original cost of City Hall was $1,672,331 which was 100% financed by the 1984
Improvements Revenue Bond. This bond has since been refunded several times, ultimately
with the $7,998,969.75 Series 1999 Bond. At the time of the issuance of the Series 1999
Bond, the City Hall debt service was approximated at $1,466,989 or 18.34% of the total
Series 1999 Bond. The calculation of the City Hall debt service percentage of the overall
Series 1999 Bond is provided within the spreadsheet found in the Appendix section of this
report. The following table details the remaining payments towards the retirement of this
bond, the amount devoted to retiring the City Hall debt and the corresponding payment per
functional population.
Table 6: Public Building Debt Service Credit
Fiscal Year Total Debt City Hall Functional Payment/ Func.
Service (18.34% ) Po ulation (1) Po .
2004 573,815.00 105,237.67 18,632 $5.65
2005 580,762.50 106,511.84 18,911 $5.63
2006 591,182.50 108,422.87 19,365 $5.60
2007 369,797.50 369,797.50 19,830 $3.42
2008 142,377.50 142,377.50 20,306 $1.29
2009 159,792.50 159,792.50 20,793 $1.41
2010 176,192.50 176,192.50 21,292 $1.52
2011 191,537.50 191,537.50 21,739 $1.62
2012 205,672.50 205,672.50 22,195 $1.70
2013 213,787.50 213,787.50 22,662 $1.73
2014 230,912.50 230,912.50 23,138 $1.83
2015 241,725.00 241,725.00 23,623 $1.88
2016 246,487.50 246,487.50 24,120 $1.87
2017 260,462.50 260,462.50 24,626 $1.94
2018 263,125.00 263,125.00 25,143 $1.92
2019 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 25,671 $9.11
2020 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 26,210 $8.92
2021 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 26,761 $8.74
2022 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 27,323 $8.56
2023 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 27,896 $8.38
2024 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 28,482 $8.21
2025 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 29,080 $8.04
2026 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 29,691 $7.88
2027 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 30,314 $7.71
2028 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 30,951 $7.55
2029 1,275,000.00 1,275,000.00 31,601 $7.40
Total $18,472,630.00 $3,387,880.34 $129.50
Net Present Value (2) $49.52
(1) Functional Population projections based upon the followmg annual growth rates taken from the Gty of Wmter Spnngs
Comprehensive Plan: 2000-2005 @ 1.5%; 2006-2010@ 2.4%; 2011-2029@ 2.1%.
(2) Net present value is based upon an assumed interest rate of 7%.
8
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUilDINGS IMPACT FEE
Table 7: Public Building Net Cost Per Service Unit
O>st Per Fnnctional Population $169.52
Oedit Per Fnnctional Population $49.52
Net Cost Per Functional Population $UO.OO
Source: Land Design Innovations, Inc.
6. Maximum Public Building Impact Fee Schedule
Table 8 identifies the maximum Public Building Impact Fee that may be adopted by the Gty
of Wmter Springs. TIlls fee is determined by multiplying the net cost per fnnctional
population by the fnnctional population per unit for the individual land uses. In addition,
Table 8 takes into acconnt the Public Building Impact Fee reduction that the Gty of Wmter
Springs would like to apply. The resultant adjusted Public Building Impact Fee rate is shown
in the right-most column of Table 8.
Table 8: Maximum Public Building Impact Fee Schedule
Land Use Unit Functional Net Cost/ Net % Adjusted
Pop.lUnit Func. Pop. Cost/Unit Reduction Rate
Residential Dwelling 1.34 $120.00 $160.80 37.81% $100.00
Specialty Retail 1000 sf 1.49 $120.00 $178.80 37.81% $111.20
Convenience 1000 sf 12.25 $120.00 $1,470.00 37.81% $914.19
Store/ Gas/Service
Shopping Center 1000 sf 3.15 $120.00 $378.00 37.81% $235.08
Industrial 1000 sf 1.16 $120.00 $139.20 37.81% $86.57
Warehouse 1000 sf 0.74 $120.00 $88.80 37.81% $55.22
Automotive Sales 1000 sf 1.92 $120.00 $230.40 37.81% $143.29
General Office 1000 sf 1.80 $120.00 $216.00 37.81% $134.33
Medical Office 1000 sf 3.49 $120.00 $418.80 37.81% $260.45
Financial Institution 1000 sf 2.95 $120.00 $354.00 37.81% $220.15
Golf Courses Holes 2.40 $120.00 $288.00 37.81% $179.11
Restaurant 1000 sf 4.77 $120.00 $572.40 37.81 % $355.98
Fast Food Restaurant 1000 sf 3.41 $120.00 $409.20 37.81 % $254.48
HoteVMotel Room 0.77 $120.00 $92.40 37.81% $57.46
Based upon its desire to have a simplified and easily nnderstandable and implemented Public
Building Impact Fee, the Gty has chosen to adopt a single adjusted rate public building impact fee
9
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
for residential and non-residential land uses. The residential Public Building Impact Fee is
$100.00 per dwelling unit as identified above while the non-residential Public Building Impact
Fee is $231.35 per 1,000 square-feet. The non-residential Public Building Impact Fee of $231.35
per 1,000 square-feet represents an average impact fee for all non-residential uses.
10
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
C. APPENDIX
1. August 22,2000 - COREGIS Statement of Values
ll-A
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
.
c.
APPENDIX
1.
August 22,2000 - COREGIS Statement of Values
.
":,., .,..' .... . :..:.... c'" .,'., .'..'}.:.: :>:.'. .. .' Tl
.,:: "." i' . {," '1(>' ..".,>:~T'..:,).;,.j .X.... .'. .... ...i';
'::r ..,': f.: ).:c. .. ,.':; ..,.: , ...:..,.., .... :..;
, - "..; ..' ":;(.' /: '.,' ,. . .....: ':
.., ..:' " ....... ':'..'" .", .:.:"". '.,....." ......:C':,.
: V. .,. :'.,.
. , " ,I :,><:; ..... ",::,/"
!; '.. ' " , ,:: i.:," '., .+;;:;..::..1< ..;,jI
;"<:\; ': . i: I:.::"> .....t...:/......
.,"':,s'> C' ".'<;":' ........
'. .:! ; ; (. ; I'; i" .::\X..:i .' ~.
;!.. ;.> . x:( - - ., '." ., .I'>'.,:,>::>:.} .<{<
11<:::"; ~'~f. ,: ,,'. .... .. .. . >, > '.2>'., "d'
,..'\~~J..' -~ .... . --" ~. --.... . I ,.-- / ,.......::U....;/'; '>:'.;:;;:!f~+:r::~'i'.!;::
1'.::':'\':', -.i,M~I~lfil~lill~l~ :; ~ ~ Y ,. I ~1~~~I~lml~~M4~ltJ'..' - - . - - - 'i" ;:c,.
.....1 ..' d:~m~~~:I~~ ~j~~I~I~13~I~j~JlJ1 ,_" " :'.;;:,: .. ... '. "', '. "".
,::',i . ... ." ';.' : '",:. .:. :;:I,
.'< .. .)!" _ _ _ _ ~ ... _.. ~ ~ -' ~ - , ; - - .; 4 ",:>>.;. {~ :~[
.:.. it ..' ,; ~" _' i" ': - - ' ::.::;:..:, ......:,:{,
~:};!Bm\.. ". Wi" :.:.~/" c(,~:.,~
';&'-;'JJI~',~".~~~: " ii~"~,-,_.,,-_...;.:):ur'<,,; /.)....};!?;t,~
Il>~ >:, 'II! : __. ,!' HH .--. :., I~,.:.:.,h.'\:' i
l;1 ..~.," li lI~IIJ I~' ., '--~ _~:..." i ;[,<"';:,... ,;(.. }1"" r..
I ' ~ .;. ~ . . g. ~ - -. i I .. .... j', 0;
Il ~:': .:. ,. > . > > ..... .'~':';: ,.;:;', ..;;.;'4:: j
[ , '.:J. -;R ~ t 'H'~"~ ~ '^!h!U:HJiX 'I'T ; ......,:<> ,"L
i.::+: '\j ). ,j , ;::: ;u~' :;~lr:';:,' :::!'lllf;ie,.:r., ,j;~
~~t/,~.: ' . ~ i · - . , , . -, - . - '.' <. '.. .... "'" · ,i.',';
...".;...... . '.' '.i;
j-:;~~-;::-;: ;.' -. \ - ... ... - --... .. i~'" ' .J:! ;!~ :::,:::
j ,.i.,,,: -," ..... ] ~ t ~ ~ it ~ r ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !! ...... w, :r;.... ~ ,.."j : ->
:'i;.J: r ' j ,/::';t..,
:~'c~ 1;11.:;:!;1'11I: I ;'U j >/. . "- t ". ..,:,.>l>':;'
!~~4" t'. i~ .", ~~, -~; :. -1\ --. ... - ., "H' :, ....'. ..... ....,..(:
'~.:H, 1.. . . h.... .
~,. 1:' fl r "ft .... , .'. . .
i~ ~ -~I:! i' ~ ~ ' ,,> , '.. ,f:
i,~ ~I:ty:r--' ;, .,.."..... ........"".. Ii '. ". Jiltfjtjl ..
.. .. ",l~, ,.-. ','" '. .... .. .. ... .. _ _, ".... _ ~h.hi rv~ :,!l'lh... ,.
....:!.Ui:.!;[,i
.' ,..... 'W'.
,'.
.
"<. ........
!.~: :.....,..
.
Il-B
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
2. Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey - Table 7.16: Average Vehicle
Occupancy by Trip Purpose
~2 -A
.
.
.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
2.
Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey - Table 7.16: Average Vehicle
Occupancy by Trip PUlpose
; t,
., ,
. r. ~>-J<- _' ..~ .,:~} -:.~.,'" ~
,
....;'.';-"..','.,-.-r.-.
~:,'. ~t~_~r"'.4 1.... ~~, "f' . '. ", flhlto:('.)"'l'", ":'I"''''''''~~/''-\.''':i.J ~'<~'J"~.~;';'-~-'
.J- 1
'A';~t:~~e,':'. ",Y,", '~'{,.~{'e,;,:',0fc;..p~n~~'~; t~:~~ R\~ir;p6 se." "
;~Pel"9"'nMj:'lil," pel" Veh,lCle lVfq..) . "
I, 9,.7'7 J 983. end 19~m NPTS,', I
J "... _.~, "." .' ,,' ,
;.'
'. '"
, ,A!tsSJ
: .'Trip PUrpose,
. ". ,,"',
. .,Avirage,,' P~r~~nl;Qf
:1g~9pc~libf: . .,;VMT : '
" "Pei't~nt~ijf;'
"":..' '':VMl':'''. .,
. Jveiag~.;" ' :~~.Per~lil\~:;;'; ,
OtC~lf~Ocy:,,;;<, : vMf.' , , .
',. - . .-. ,._:....' .." t. ",:. . /':, , ,:'. "",~" .' . "<, , ,>< ...'.('..... <""". "~', ,,":-"'-.".,' .-::~. ~, ,,": _,.-:"
tEARNIf.IrtttJ~~:d1<ij':::::[r1}."';"jr<''''' ~~!jlJlj:1$1;:''''3.;ti'~[llr;];Il~'jjf:I~~~t;3~~r~,ic .:r:'t~';'3",:;~";'n>';.1.;~~:-6-' ,: ~11:;'li~:fili'ii:'i3'~~1m~ii
. .i'T~;O;I~o~M~:~,r~""" ~:: '''''.~~''~~}~].6~'<C'' '.-e1:" !;a1~/~"'.' '~11.29~t:' ':~~:'~ 36.tF~:~~~.;h:1'4~1"'~~~'~'3;i'.~
::W6r~:Re!~!ea' , I' 139 .:1~6 l5J :, Ail qi42 ,3.0:
,- .". .
,<....'.:~\...:--,....::........;(,_..:."'\'~:".. " -"::~"~~-I~ "_."",,, J':L" ,;'.:: ";:<,;. ::. ~.; .~~..;:/~:...~.:~. ~; ~'.' '_~', "v...:~,},' "..,...;::-"......;,,:;,,-:. '.'~ . . <. - ,:-..,:,1'";.;,:....'... '.,;.,..,,- ,'" ''''r''~ '. "~"~~;"T;'
, ':fAMllmfRS0NAtITilOsrNQ~;iIT:l; :J:!:~'2'0"2:c'>~""'!iliifi.l:"aril)j~lh~"1f.i1l0,'y;'M~~!W,'L!J;~gQY21~r'ii.'ii::f]r '!fJ,;~7L8'it""..'liL~2~8l'f""".
\'-_'><,'''' "....'..."..'_>c..r;..~'-.. H',,___ _ _-:,.lIt;.:~., .)....,_"......;_:'~:'._,::+_,~ili.. ;lIM,'_.'_::-'~.:il ......:'.,,:..1<1<. ,-{ ;'_8~'~:,,,___\"...':,'"
:Shop'jJiI1S' ... "fi06. ,. 1M n~ :' , "3.,~;. . .l7c1 M;5, .
. j JMe~icillfP~r\lal .2J4. :1illH;g ..t~5. .1,$~ ; ,r~-:
:;Other,t~6 ~~';O 1:82; , . :'15,5tM ;20;0
j" -, ,., .,.
J '- ,_."".). ;;-' -: #. "," - .,.:'.),..._:~..,:.-",:, "O!' ;;.: ;,. ;:;,.....'.....M._.. ~'- .: ".0': - :~"'i' ~.~:..<~.~." :"~,', - , .. " "-~t .....;;:..('- '-'~1:"'f'." "Ut: .~~. .: ~._.....~.~ '.. .~ -~~:"'->~'~'i;4' ,..... 7'-"::;.~
. Wt,IIIII\~n/l'llJ(O'\^,I. D,crlrllGltiflS . (".'~';:""'~~'9~';~'I'"", ':~5"2;ntl~" ~ ,~""t;\o'\!m,...!,.1'i!r~)'4'ITh",~""'4~'tF",'firl'(.'ffl':'~!~,~:1!/f'"~ ,:'I>!""."
, ~,:.v\ ,\ij;~uv!\ _. n:tll,.,..~. _ .U.U :( t ; h-i,j. <:'u<b, :i~~I...~',.....l'-.AA.' - ~ -ljlf.< -.: - ~......,~.i\:JQ.;~~;:~/;.!,,~~~,..tt,.jJJ1:"'1~...'fW.I:i" - - - dt:OP:J:')'lii.M;t~_;i~"'.!IL~';t~.. ..
.". 1. .' ....., . ." " .". ,_ . . _,'" ., ,
.: f,'SO.Ci'a1\1>:~llId'REATi0N' '^i;;;fii0O;i~~~ \'7'il!,. 2f'Ii''''''~!'i~1~;f;~~~'J!g9~1l~~~~;.'';~2J:11~:'1~.~~~~(';''Jo'd@'f'~pi\lli\MJ,~2Til;ro'!ij!t""~'i'f,.:t679'k:tl~
; IJ... ~ U';iLL-{( "~~",_'_~'~ .'. Q~.....:..=<;j:l;:._.,..-I~ ~.J~,.;I"_ta.~ .,.l'?1lI il5O.:Iit.J.,j~~!t:Ji!l~..~.._il!I!~~~~W~;t" ~~.:~~~'4ll!~.,.,...~~..)l~~.. "._......IQjl""""''I:
. ': 'Vi$liiiigJri~n.~>: ," .2~g5 ..;lZ{" 2,l)1'J 1:~.Q < .' . tB:~ 1,1'.6
;P!~~r~PfiYi:ng: .. J;l9 ' '. Q,~ ' ?,34l,i' ' 'j;~~ Q;J
':v.acatiol).'. .~,~ai lO:~ '2:52 .2:1. 2.~8 ,.. ;1.5
Pih.~,L ' '2.59,. ... ,'.13'.12.15 1,313 " 2.~8~13.l .
. ~ '
. - -.' - - - -. - - -' , . ~ ..,'
; ~qirri~N,X~W~l;'.Il~~ f:~~t'f~~J~1t!~J~~r~im~mj~?:,q0r~~t~~J,:~;';1~-a~~(~;i:~~b1'm~~.
~ " ,
. Uii'J'~~hi~Oill:E.S;~~:,'ij:iji'il'~;m;~~ '~f![~1~'6~~~,~t'''flluli7''tr;1~{..;i~'~"'~~'''tt:7'"'f::p1f;!SlmO"f;iii~:::::.;rqirn7"::101':i:';';ir'~r;f; ";"r.~!0'ii\'f01~"
1i~~~,!J;\l.OO. .~~..-..-.-",.,.,Ia!>'~~ Jg!t~~~~~:~ ... ,~...,~~ .~lfti.'.:~o.;l';~!i:!l"SI),~,,:.~!~Mi~t!~~~. 1>.::-,..;~~;;;n~~;,l~~,:,,,..-7':~~~~";' . ~,..!:-l.:{':'Jc~~#<~~,~~~:_~--,g'~~~!~$'~;".~.!:-ir.::"'~
i. ..' I
.-
'--.,
.. ~:
,. .':!
J ~
'='.
I F.~,Ir1orl11a!llin cihicbm~aHn~.1983.'anpj990NPTS si!~y:d~~,J~~,eCuQf14Qr C!Wpl~r 1:
. .'t'"
12-B
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUilDINGS IMPACT FEE
3. 2000 US Census Bureau Population Data
13 -A
.
.
.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
3.
2000 US Census Bureau Population Data
Quick i~1:)f~s
.-,~.."... ....""""~.
. ''''';Amerr'. .. :j;jCtl;...'....~. ..f ,c;c,..., .. .'
. . ,......~(\.,.....,,~"!l~< .,.
,N1idri+Seai'Ch,j.Feedbiickl. FAGls'IGld!l8li,y I Help.
:€l3V~PL R~ce, HiSpaniC or Latino~ arnl:Age: ,2'000' ..,. . . , .. '.
'1;5.a~:~ei: .Ge6Sti5: ~!OoO' Reaisfrictin6 .9ata' lPuflllc 'l:aw '94-1;711 Summa[y File
GEl9arapl:1rc A,~ea:; W.ii'itilf' $ptri1g~~~I~.. FIQr!~a' .
~2TE!~r!~fo~~Cin on:ooiiffde .,
ftlw:/IfSCltlnller'.,,;i\1iu . ,
~ .."' .. . n ,,~, _,.
feciioil, riCiiia'arilpllnjj iiitCir, and iI~lihl!lbr\$, .$88
. . ;JfuQi;:,. _,,' ; _,
Alr.saes
;18 velifs.anil over
Sublect
.:Numbe ,,,"Mcen... ., ,_ Numbll :. A~er'cEiri
.'. i!. .....;; # ~ .~.
~,.~ .::...~:
'RACE",:
.~ :!,
. ....~,.,...; .._. .w...u:.... ..'. ,... ';.'
.., .:3:r~66 .~;AOM ',;;,.":.,. ..;:23 ~O .:.100'0
...__....._. ~,.._.._ .._ .31;Q3 M_. :98, _.. .:"::22 7.61 " :.98':6.
)28"1)9 _ ,)881 .1". ,,207,6 r, ,89.9 '
, .,. :1'45';.:: ,.-O~, ._ ,. _ '982 . . .d_ 4.2,
._., .._ ~ ,"" t.O:2 :43,. _ 0.21
.1> ;,.. '3.,9 ,45 ' ^ ..'2-.0!
1" ,..., .. .,'.:0. '.. . ";12 -'......0:1
. .. .. .799 ':I.t. .. .. . d" , $0 lb2
..;829 '2: "', .- ,^.:!il5 .'--;11iE
.Tof.ar.D~plilatl(jh
Giieiilcer
. While ,
'.. BlsCl\COf'AfticaifAlheriOifn:" ...
M'lerlc,m,lndiao\s/:ill:AlasklfNative; ..
.. A'slan. .. .".. -
, :,.. Niitive'Hswallaii,sr'id 01MriPacifio lstandlit:'
'SQrilll.'otJierra.i>>. ..,.. .. _.. "
''Tw6''qi niore raoos" ~." ... ,. ".-
, ".~
-.... .,.:., .'
lot ....
..HlseANIC~OR, c:.o.T1NO'.ANO RAce"..
~~:;~TOfaHD6Dtilatio)f.~..:~-~_.~::':'. :"".~,;.,- :;":: ...' -"....;
ffiStianrii'(ir.'l:ati,io"(Qfiln'i'raceE:;. .
;Nof f1fSp;itjicf6tLiitioo.':, - - .
Ohe:race
Whim.
Blackiot'Afrlaan,Ni'ieffeai1 ... __ "
'. .:Amenciin lndial'ien(f.'Alasks Nstive~ ,.
'.. ".Alilan......:.." ,...., .... ..:_
.Nativ.eil'lawailai\ Md Other RiI'ClI!CJlilarider'. '. .
.Sbinaoothar'race ,
. TW6or.mOieraces.
~-,.'>'..;
':.31'686:.:,.(00.0 '., ',2~'106 ,. ..100,0
3'330.. :'10,5.. , .,:.......2.227h., ... .,o:llt6
. :28;3311 89':;. _..... .;20.87.$ ". ,\10:4
.' .!7'949 ., __,;;88:3 .. .' . ..,),20'1l7,7 '" .,.89J~
.251851 ... :8,1\6 . .... 19;208 ~ . . .83A
;1:3Jl.3 ..:.:,;;4'. ~ .,.., ~\l33 :4.~
,.il .."';0) ".., ....' .,,38 ,:0;2
.. :60l: I " .... .~1.9 " ' ,.,.. .,:,.4.46 ".., :;.1.~'I,
_*13., ,,_:;(O;OL;,. l:.:._:;.tj-~,.. ./0:
:. Jl. :., ,'0:2".. " . :,:': ~;;3 .,' ;.0.'
'.>38,:;.',;1:2 ",..'~202 q" _!O,~
-{;.. ", ,~- ~ ......
--
(X):Nbi applicable . . .. .
Source: t/,S; CeIJ9U!s"Blire~~;.~lIsy~ '!!Q.OQRQd[shictlt1g()~~.(P.iJbJiol:a:N e~M 71) Slimin~rtFllai
MlI.~il~:S'PL;l. PI,.2.Pl3, erii1'P!:4; .
13-B
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
4. Seminole County Property Appraiser's - City of Winter Springs Commercial
Building Square-Footages
14 -A
.
....
.
.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC BUILDINGS IMPACT FEE
4.
Seminole County Property Appraiser's - City of Winter Springs Commercial
Building Square-Footages
. '. 1.00000 0
. 1.QOOOO R
......:' 1.00000 C
...1,o06bO C . .
.1.00000 R . ,.
'1:00000 C . .. C
: :.1.00000 .0 STRUCTUR; ,
. 1.00000 R :RSTRUCTUR.,.
.'1.00000 R .RESIDENIIA r, ..:..:':. ,
j1.00000R::.". HOU$El0FFI.' , .,
: 1.00()Op C.: . :.,MAS0NRXPL..:: '..,.
:..1.00000 C... . . 'COMM SALES' .... '.."...:
'.'. ':\21..00000:00000 Co'.. :.:: .' ',.COMM SA.tE~ ..,:' ... '11.:..9.:...:........., "'.<. .:. ~~~('<~/":'
: . OFFICE..""::: i. '11:,,,:'.,0 .', ::.:C. . :<: ...:. ... :: ::::":"...: ....:.:,.
;<. ::..Hm~I ::..:...~~~~JK~ . .... .::. .'.. :',~" .:.,.:'~;:,S H,. ,:\;::::: M~^,::?; '~~~'."\,:::;~'.:
: :;:.~)}:1.00000 G ,};:CC,STRUCTiUR. .... .,::,:11':" :> ."r .,:, 9 ......<...
'."',:: ;1.00000 C): ,V. ... C STRUCTUR':~: ,. y ",; .::. +L .0,:::/ ,,'., )~2"
",..,.. ,/100000 C' .... ',. 'GOMM SAtES:' ":,,,.d.., ...... .... ,.. .11.:' ,<. 0 ",.;..'.. 1o"n nnnnn.,.'i .;"
:'~$~~l-"J\~- C\i~bi'..W;iJ'trH~ sP,,\/>JG-~.:;t"~~~~lr.i~I~"'A~ - :'~. ::";o,i,. ",':..' ,.'. J'. ". .ii;..~:
,.:rO.TAL.....S.'Q.:.,;..F.T.,bYDO.R,f::..O.~:!'...:.~......." . ",......"...,.. ..:...:,."'.,.,.... i.;; ,;.;.;';'.:...:. >:;",".':/..:'. .,......:..'.,;. /', ;::
:. DOR,.....v....... sa. FT.. . D ," .'. '.,: .' .....:'.. . "" . :,,':,;... '.\>., ;".,..'.... }.
',.,.. ".,' .:...:.48 .:. .48650. . . ,Space: :' ", . ';'.., ','.. ", :'. ',' .....'.. .:'.: :,; :.
.'C.' '.""441" '213o.OP.k....PI.t. '.'" ..,. .ce'..,.,.: ..... ...::..;..: .'.. '.. '..'<.':'"
:.:.,.;'.,.:". : .... ',..ao,!(19.8n ,.,.!.. .."...,.... .. ,.' '.. .;:; ::.X...., . '.:'...,:" ..
',43,141o.Q Ll,lmberY.ard'. (("""> ":'." ." ......i'/ .....
41:, 171648 Light'Ma~ufll;clu~n~ " <', >,,<.;;; IH"i.
.,38 ....27798GolfGourse....;.... ;. .." .. .,. .i.. '" ....,,;:>,..:,::..:.:r.:L.o:. ..".
.28 .,; '.9172Mobiie,HomePa~ks ,.,?~l,'i:t:r:~ ';7>....IAi.. :..: ,)' ':1: > <..
27 47274 Auto Sales ';'. .':.. "'I ,,'~A..:: '.:.. ..}.,"::,I"'.". .,
'. 2617816 Seni~Ga.s/C9{1~er\iencElS!a.!i6hs' M'*" 'V..,~ : ':'c.' I:'
;.' ..,.... :25 .. . ;22016SelV!Ce.Shp....:::.., .. " ..' . >,1>:..: ':
".,. ,23 ,..:5130. Flnancjallnsutulfoii ',.. I, ri~~~(:~;'~i
i ,. 22 ,.,'. ... ..~,3.58 OrlveJn8esL :,; J' F,I>;f;f't ""..;:,.." :\.: ;:,:".
21 ,...!, ,,'.1989 Res Oa{eleilir. , . '. . ':'. . ..:.v .,'7~. i<:,,::F,
, '.,19<~'.121:041 Profe~slbni:iJ Buililiriglre;dIO~ty's,~alion5, <'>rF\t;-e..' .. ..;.... :..: .: ~:::' ):::
i, ';,.~J~::.:<..~,~~m~E~~!~t~g~~~::~~~;;~cJ~l~f.!;h~;r~~~d:_:~~'!.""~;i.>:.' ::".... ;/:.'
; .. ".~7T,12 ..:",. 13097 !Mlxe~Use'i:'.i:,'j.(":"F,;" :'1'::, '. '::: :>?CC,>lAi..1'1: ie, :.., ......: :,:' :'.,:'.... ..; .... ..
'~ ;:, '.:.' 11; .: .,~, 9.1185 Stores, RiliaiV:Pls(;dllntZ,Gonvenlen'bli'.,.' cs,occiJiC1Y,..::H. ::........:.;....: . .
'et >'.( ~..:.><, ...:;:
;;;.":U :iI.' ;ri):'j:i: L . ,,:i; ,;i>,,:,..:
"""". "il']'! :'~:H':<y' "l}":"'"' ,.:.:.... ".;':",;.:" '. ..'.
. \:..: 'it . . ,.,: '7,;:.,:; . i." ",;",.,::.;':t;;;k..: ':,""".,.
, ,.f' ..', .', . "...,,",. """"<."",..,,..,,' .,""'" . ,""..:'
','".'
.'.,,/.
14-B
ATTACHMENT "B"
Ordinance Number 2003-38
As Amended From First Reading
.
.
ORDINANCE NO. 2003-38
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI1Y COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF WINTER SPRINGS, FWRIDA, AMENDING THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES CHAPTER 9, ARTICLE VIIJ, IMPACT FEES, BY
ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC BUllJ)ING IMPACT FEE;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATION INTO
THE CODE, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, has previously found and
determined it to be in the best interest of the safety, health, and welfare of the citizens of the City ofWmter
Springs to establish police, fire and other impact fees to require new development to pay their equitable share
of public improvements that must be constructed to serve new growth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has commissioned an impact fee study and has retained Land
Design Innovations, Inc. (''illr') to complete the study and prepare a report on the feasibility of creating an
impact fee to assist the City in paying the costs incurred maintaining adequate administrative public buildings
which are required to service the needs of the public and the residential and commercial citizens of the City
ofWmter Springs; and
WHEREAS, LDI has issued to the City an impact fee report entitled, "City ofWmter Springs Public
Buildings Impact Fee Analysis Report," dated August 2003 ("Report"); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission hereby finds that the Report legally justifies the imposition of
public building impact fees pursuant to applicable law. See, e.g., Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond
Beach, 760 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2000); Contractors and Builders Association of Pinellas County v. City of
Dunedin, 329 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 1976); Wald v. Metropolitan Dade County, 338 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA
1976); Ho/lywood, Inc. v. BrowardCounty, 431 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that Section 163.3202(3), Florida Statutes, encourages the
use of innovative land development regulations which includes the adoption of "impact fees," and
WHEREAS, the City Commission also finds that the impact fees required by this Ordinance are
____ __Il~~~~!l}!t!g~!~!mp~g~_~~IYa.!1ril?!l1@l~19.n~w.dtW~}Qpme.nt;Jmd . . . _ _ _..
.
WHEREAS, the City Commission also recognizes that the Florida Legislature has mandated that
local government plan comprehensively for future growth and that this regulatory Ordinance is consistent
with that mandate. See, e.g., Ch. 163, Fla. Stat.; and
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 1 of 7
.
.
.
WHEREAS, new land development activity generates public facility and service demands within the
City and it is reasonable to require new development to pay a fair share of the cost of expanding new public
facilities and services attributable to new development; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is enacted pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act,
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the City ofWmter Springs Comprehensive Plan, and other applicable law
authorizing a municipality to set rates, fees, and charges for new development; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of
Wmter Springs to amend the City' s police, fire/rescue, and parks and recreation impact fees and procedures,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLWWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. Code Amendment, Chapter 9, Article vm, Division 3. The City ofWmter Springs
Code, Chapter 9, Article VIII, Division 3, is hereby amended as follows (underlined type indicates additions
and strikeout type indicates deletions, while asterisks (* * *) indicate a deletion from the Ordinance of text
existing in Chapter 9, Article VIII, Division 3. It is intended that the text in Chapter 9, Article VIII, Division
3 denoted by the asterisks and set forth in this Ordinance shall remain unchanged from the language existing
prior to adoption of this Ordinance):
ARTICLE vm. IMPACT FEES
* * *
DIVISION 3. POLICE, FIRE, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND PARKS AND
RECREATION
See. 9-391. Generally.
The city commission hereby establishes police, fire, public buildings and parks and recreation
impact fees under the requirements of this division. The City Commission finds that the Florida
Growth Management Act nuindates that local government plan comprehensively for future growth
and that this division is consistent with that mandate. In addition, Section 163.3202(3), Florida
Statutes, encourages the use of innovative land development regulations which includes the adoption
- -of"irilpaCt fees." -Fiirtlier, - new -"land - development actiVitY"'generates. pu6lic faCilit:y - arlCfseMce-.
demands within the City and it is reasonable to require new development to pay a fair share of the
cost of expanding new public facilities and services attributable to new development. This division is
enacted pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes,
the City ofWmter Springs Comprehensive Plan, and other applicable law authorizing a municipality
to set rates, fees, and charges for new development.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 2 of 7
.
See. 9-391.1. Levy and purpose.
For the purpose of helping to defray the cost of new or expanded police, fire, public building
and parks and recreation facilities and equipment attributable to new construction within the city
limits, impact fees are hereby levied on new construction within the city limits in accordance with the
provisions of section 9-391.5, payment offees, and other provisions of this division. This division is
intended to be consistent with the principles for 81l0cating a fair share of the cost of new public
filcilities to new users as established by the Florida Supreme Court. In support 0:( and as legal
justification for, the impact fees adopted under this division, the city commission hereby adopts by
reference the repo~ prepared by Land Design Innovations, Inc. entitled, "City ofWmter Springs
Impact Fee Analysis Report for Police, FirelRescue and Parks & Recreation," dated November 2002
and "CitY ofWmter Springs Public Buildings Impact Fee Analysis Report" dated August 2003.
See. 9-391.2. Dermitions.
Unless otherwise specified herein, the definitions, classifications and uses shall be as set forth
in the City ofWmter Springs Land Development Code.
* * *
.
(f) Public Buildings capital improvements: The land buildinf!s. facilities. vehicles and equipment
necessaty for the general administrative services division of the city to provide general administrative
services to the citizens ofWmter Springs.
(fg) Residential: Includes single-family dwellings, multifamily dwelling units, mobile homes,
accessory dwelling units, accessory residential structures.
. . .
See. 9-391.5. Payment of fees.
. . .
_______~)__ .._~~t_o~fee..?~h~ foilow~,~g. impact fees are hereby ~d?'p'~e~..__.....
* * *
.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 3 of 7
.
(5)
PuJ?lic Buildinm!:
Res}dential - $100.00 per unit.
Non-residential - $321.3? per 1000 square feet.
e}lee inc:ludes credit which ncw develqpmc:nt will incur to retire the 19R4 Imptovemen~ Reveu\;1.e
Bond (as refunded from time to time) which WIlS used to finance the cons;::;;;;don or ci~ T.1;ill. At
the time oC establisb.i.oz ~R Puhlic. B\l/Minlt ImpllCt Fee. this b<md was the onlv o\rt1lllln~ oond
which was ~ed tu fund pAS~ construction oE ylv Bdtni1listmlive service P\Ib& buildjn;
***
See. 9-391.7. Establishment of a trust fund.
(a) The impact fees collected by the city pursuant to this division shall be kept separate from
other revenue of the city and a capital expansion trust fund is hereby created for each impact
foo category created W1der this division as follows:
.
00 Public Buildings Capital Expansion T~st Fund.
..*
See. 9-391.8. Capital expansion plans.
nle city'~ police; fire and parks and recreation departmcn~. which is m to receive funds
collected pursuant to this impact fee division, shall pTepare and maintain a capital expansion
plan for their respective individual funds which shall be for a period of no less than on., (1)
year. Each department's plan shall be reviewed and approved by the city commission at least
. annually during the budget review process. The city mana~er or the city manager's designee
shall be ~sible for the capital eJq)ansion plan for the public buildings capi't;i exp;;Ton
toIst fldld.
... ... ...
.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003.38
Page 4 of 7
.
See. 9-391.10. Vested rights.
(a) A developer or successor in interest ofland which has received a building pennit may
petition the city commission for a vested rights determination which would exempt the
petitioner from the provisions of this division. Such petition shall be evaluated by the city
attorney and a recommendation thereon submitted to the city commission based upon the
following criteria:
(1) There exists a valid, unexpired government act authorizing a specific development for
which a detennination is sought;
(2) Expenditures or obligations made or incurred in reliance upon the authorizing act that
are reasonably equivalent to the fees required by this division;
(3) That it would be inequitable to deny the petitioner the opportunity to complete the
previously approved development under the conditions of approval by requiring the
developer to cOmply with the requirements of this division;
.
(4) Common law principles of equitable estoppel and vested rights set forth in case law.
(b) For the purpose of this section, the following factors shall be ~nsidered in determining
whether it would be inequitable to deny the petitioner the opportunity to complete the
previously approved development:
(1) Whether the injury suffered by the petitioner outweighs the public cost of allowing the
development to go forward without payment of the fee required by this division;
(2) With respect to the relevant impact fee. Wwhether the expense or obligations were
made or incurred subsequent to November 1, 2002, after which day the adoption of the
police. fire. and parks and recreation impact fees required by this division was pending, or
- . .. .- - - - August 1.2003. after which-day.the- adoption-of the. public building~ impacffee re<;tuired-by
this division was pending; and
(3) Whether the operation of this division would create an inordinate burden which would
prevent petitioner from making a reasonable return on his investment.
.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 5 of 7
.
( c) The city shall not permit the extension of a building permit beyond the initial time for
activation without the applicant complying with this division.
(d) If a previously approved development order or other binding agreement contained
conditions regarding impact fees required by this division and their designated uses, or
contributions to the capital asset inventory of the respective departme~, the developer or his
successor may request a modification of such prior approvals in order to bring the approval
conditions into consistency with the requirements of this division.
* * *
Section 3. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior
inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts of prior
ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the
conflict.
.
Section 4. Incorporation Into Code. This ordinance shall be incorporated into the Wmter
Springs City Code and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be
changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or
provision of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
adoption by the City Commission of the City ofWmter Springs, Florida, and pursuant to City
. Charter.
.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 6 of 7
.
ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City ofWmter Springs, Florida, in a regular
meeting assembled on the _ day of , 2003.
ATTEST:
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
ANDREA WREN'ZO-LUACES
City Oerk
JOHN F. BUSH
Mayor
Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for
the City of Winter Springs only:
.
ANTHONY A. GARGANESE
City Attorney
First Reading
Posted
Second Reading and Public Hearin2
C:lDocuments and Settings\Anthony\My Documents\Anthony\Work\Cllent MBtters\Wlnter Springs\lmpBct_Fee_Publlc_BuIldlng.wpd
.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 7 of 7
.
ATTACHMENT "C"
March 10, 2003
Commission Agenda Item "J"
.
.
.}
'.
'.
031003 Commission Meeting
Regular "r
General Office Facility Impact Fee Study
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM J
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing
Regular X
March 10, 2003
Meeting
rr--
Mgr. / Dept.
Authorization
REQUEST: City Manager requesting the Commission to authorize the City Manager to
enter into a contract with LDI, Inc. to prepare a General Office Facility and Information
Systems Equipment Impact Fee Ordinance and to authorize a supplemental appropriation
from General Fund reserves to pay for same in the amount of $5400.
PURPOSE: This Agenda Item is needed to make the Commission aware of the need for a
General Office Facility and Information Systems hnpact Fee, and to acquire funding and
authority to pursue the preparation of the impact fee.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The continued growth of the City and resulting growth in City office and storage needs requires
an expansion of City Hall to house Information Systems, Finance, records and storage, and other
general office space, and the need for expanded Information Systems equipment to service the
expanded facilities.
We anticipate that approximately two million dollars will be needed over the next ten years as
the City reaches build-out and our population grows from 32,000 to 45,000 residents or
approximately a Y3 increase in growth.
FUNDING: No additional appropriation required. I am authorizing the expenditure of $5,000
from the General Government Contingency Fund to fund the study.
!,.
/.
,
fe
031003 Commission Meeting .
Regular "f'
General Office Facility Impact Fee
Page 2 Of2
SRI has performed a space analysis plan that indicates a need for approximately 11,000 square
feet of additional space through build-out.
We have had a preliminary expansion plan for Phase I for approximately 3,000 square feet
proposed by SRI that will satisfy our needs over the next five years. The cost of this project is
estimated to be $750,000, including furnishings and equipment.
We could be collecting these impact fees within 90 days. We estimate that it would cost
approximately $150 - $200 for single family residences.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that the City Commission do the following:
1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with LDI, Inc., to prepare a
General Office Facility and Information Systems impact fee ordinance.
2. Authorize a supplemental appropriation in the amount of $5400 from General
Fund Reserves to fund the study.
ATTACHMENTS:
a) SRl Preliminary Design Graphics.
b) LDI Contract.
COMMISSION ACTION:
ATTACHMENT "D"
Summary of Current
Impact Fees
Attachment "D"
Summary of Current Impact Fees
Fees are noted in either pu (per unit), psf(per square foot) or gpd (gallon per day).
Winter Sprin2s
Fire/Rescue
Police
Parks
Transportation
Potable Water
Sanitary Sewer
Subtotal
Seminole County
Schools
Library
Roads - Collector
Roads - Arterial
Residential
Non-Residential
$173.28 pu
$105.47 pu
$914.53 pu
$890.95 pu (single family)
$518
$2.199
$4,801.23
$0.326 psfless $105.47 credit
$0.164 psfless $176.08 credit
$0
Varies by Use
$1 .48 per gpd
$7.33 per gpd
Residential
Non-Residential
$1,384
$54
$480
$705
$0
$0
Varies by Use
Varies by Use
Single Family Total $7,424.23
ORDINANCE NO. 2003-38
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMl\1ISSION OF THE CITY
OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES CHAPTER 9, ARTICLE VIII, IMPACT FEES, BY
ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC BUILDING IMPACT FEE;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATION INTO
THE CODE, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, has previously found and
determined it to be in the best interest of the safety, health, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Winter
Springs to establish police, fire and other impact fees to require new development to pay their equitable
share of public improvements that must be constructed to serve new growth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has commissioned an impact fee study and has retained Land
Design Innovations, Inc. ("LDI") to complete the study and prepare a report on the feasibility of creating an
impact fee to assist the City in paying the costs incurred maintaining adequate administrative public
buildings which are required to service the needs ofthe public and the residential and commercial citizens
of the City of Winter Springs; and
WHEREAS, LDI has issued to the City an impact fee report entitled, "City of Winter Springs
Public Buildings Impact Fee Analysis Report," dated August 2003 (''Report''); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission hereby finds that the Report legally justifies the imposition of
public building impact fees pursuant to applicable law. See, e.g., Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond
Beach, 760 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2000); Contractors and Builders Association of Pinellas County v. City of
Dunedin, 329 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 1976); Wald v. Metropolitan Dade County, 338 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA
1976); Hollywood, Inc. v. Broward County, 431 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that Section 163.3 202(3), Florida Statutes, encourages the
use of innovative land development regulations which includes the adoption of "impact fees," and
WHEREAS, the City Commission also finds that the impact fees required by this Ordinance are
necessary to mitigate impacts reasonably attributable to new development; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission also recognizes that the Florida Legislature has mandated that
local government plan comprehensively for future growth and that this regulatory Ordinance is consistent
with that mandate. See, e.g., Ch. 163, Fla. Stat.; and
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 1 of 6
WHEREAS, new land development activity generates public facility and service demands within
the City and it is reasonable to require new development to pay a fair share of the cost of expanding new
public facilities and services attributable to new development; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is enacted pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act,
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, and other applicable law
authorizing a municipality to set rates, fees, and charges for new development; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of
Winter Springs to amend the City's police, fire/rescue, and parks and recreation impact fees and procedures.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. Code Amendment, Chapter 9, Article VIII, Division 3. The City of Winter Springs
Code, Chapter 9, Article VIII, Division 3, is hereby amended as follows (underlined type indicates additions
and strikcottt type indicates deletions, while asterisks (* * *) indicate a deletion from this Ordinance oftext
existing in Chapter 9, Article VIII, Division 3. It is intended that the text in Chapter 9, Article VIII,
Division 3 denoted by the asterisks and set forth in this Ordinance shall remain unchanged from the
language existing prior to adoption of this Ordinance):
ARTICLE VIII. IMPACT FEES
* * *
DMSION 3. POLICE, FIRE, PUBLIC BillLDINGS AND PARKS AND
RECREATION
Sec. 9-391. Generally.
The city commission hereby establishes police, fire, public buildings and parks and
recreation impact fees under the requirements of this division. The City Commission finds that the
Florida Growth Management Act mandates that local government plan comprehensively for future
growth and that this division is consistent with that mandate. In addition, Section 163.3202(3),
Florida Statutes, encourages the use of innovative land development regulations which includes the
adoption of "impact fees." Further, new land development activity generates public facility and
service demands within the City and it is reasonable to require new development to pay a fair share
of the cost of expanding new public facilities and services attributable to new development. This
division is enacted pursuant to the Florida Municipal Home Rule Powers Act, Chapter 163, Florida
Statutes, the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, and other applicable law authorizing a
municipality to set rates, fees, and charges for new development.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 2 of 6
Sec. 9-391.1. Levy and purpose.
For the purpose of helping to defray the cost of new or expanded police, fire, public
building and parks and recreation facilities and equipment attributable to new construction within
the city limits, impact fees are hereby levied on new construction within the city limits in
accordance with the provisions of section 9-391.5, payment of fees, and other provisions of this
division. This division is intended to be consistent with the principles for allocating a fair share of
the cost of new public facilities to new users as established by the Florida Supreme Court. In
support of, and as legal justification for, the impact fees adopted under this division, the city
commission hereby adopts by reference the report~ prepared by Land Design Innovations, Inc.
entitled, "City of Winter Springs Impact Fee Analysis Report for Police, Fire/Rescue and Parks &
Recreation," dated November 2002 and "City of Winter Springs Public Buildings Impact Fee
Analysis Report." dated August 2003.
Sec. 9-391.2. Definitions.
Unless otherwise specified herein, the definitions, classifications and uses shall be as set
forth in the City of Winter Springs Land Development Code.
* * *
ill Public Buildings capital improvements: The land. buildings. facilities. vehicles and
equipment necessary for the general administrative services division of the city to provide general
administrative services to the citizens of Winter Springs.
(fg) Residential: Includes single-family dwellings, multifamily dwelling units, mobile homes,
accessory dwelling units, accessory residential structures.
* * *
Sec. 9-391.5. Payment of fees.
* * *
(c) Amount of fee. The folIowing impact fees are hereby adopted:
* * *
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 3 of 6
(5) Public Buildings:
(i) Residential: $100.00 per dwelling unit.
(in Non-residential: $231.35 per 1000 square feet.
-Fee includes credit which new development will incur to retire the 1984 Imorovements Revenue
Bond (as refunded from time to time) which was used to [mance the construction of City Hall. At
the time of establishing this Public Building Imoact Fee, this bond was the only outstanding bond
which was used to fund past construction of City administrative service public buildings.
* * *
Sec. 9-391.7. Establishment of a trust fund.
(a) The impact fees collected by the city pursuant to this division shall be kept separate from
other revenue of the city and a capital expansion trust fund is hereby created for each impact fee
category created under this division as follows:
* * *
ill Public Buildings Capital Expansion Trust Fund.
* * *
Sec. 9-391.8. Capital expansion plans.
The city's police, fire and parks and recreation department~, which is are to receive funds
collected pursuant to this impact fee division, shall prepare and maintain a capital expansion plan
for their respective individual funds which shall be for a period of no less than one (1) year. Each
department's plan shall be reviewed and approved by the city commission at least annually during
the budget review process. The city manager or the city manager's designee shall be responsible for
the capital expansion plan for the public buildings capital expansion trust fund.
* * *
Sec. 9-391.10. Vested rights.
(a) A developer or successor in interest of land which has received a building pennit may
petition the city commission for a vested rights determination which would exempt the petitioner
from the provisions of this division. Such petition shall be evaluated by the city attorney and a
recommendation thereon submitted to the city commission based upon the following criteria:
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 4 of 6
(1) There exists a valid, unexpired government act authorizing a specific development
for which a determination is sought;
(2) Expenditures or obligations made or incurred in reliance upon the authorizing act
that are reasonably equivalent to the fees required by this division;
(3) That it would be inequitable to deny the petitioner the opportunity to complete the
previously approved development under the conditions of approval by requiring the
developer to comply with the requirements of this division;
(4) Common law principles of equitable estoppel and vested rights set forth in case law.
(b) For the purpose of this section, the following factors shall be considered in determining
whether it would be inequitable to deny the petitioner the opportunity to complete the previously
approved development:
(1) Whether the injury suffered by the petitioner outweighs the public cost of allowing
the development to go forward without payment of the fee required by this division;
(2) With respect to the relevant impact fee. Wwhether the expense or obligations were
made or incurred subsequent to November 1, 2002, after which day the adoption of the
police. fire. and parks and recreation impact fees required by this division was pending, or
August 1.2003. after which day the adoption of the public buildings impact fee required by
this division was pending; and
(3) Whether the operation of this division would create an inordinate burden which
would prevent petitioner from making a reasonable return on his investment.
(c) The city shall not permit the extension of a building permit beyond the initial time for
activation without the applicant complying with this division.
(d) If a previously approved development order or other binding agreement contained
conditions regarding impact fees required by this division and their designated uses, or
contributions to the capital asset inventory of the respective department~, the developer or his
successor may request a modification of such prior approvals in order to bring the approval
conditions into consistency with the requirements of this division.
* * *
Section 3. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent
ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts of prior ordinances and resolutions in
conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 5 of 6
Section 4. Incorporation Into Code. This Ordinance shall be incorporated into the Winter
Springs City Code and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed or
modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision
of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction,
whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct
and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
Ordinance.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption
by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, and pursuant to City Charter.
ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting
assembled on the 10thdayof November ,2003.
ATTEST:
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
LORENZO-LUACES
erk
J~~~
Mayor
Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for
the City of Winter Springs only:
a
iNTHONY A. GARGANESE
City Attorney
First Reading October 27, 2003
Posted October 28, 2003
Second Reading and Public Hearing November 10, 2003
F:\Docs\C1ty of Winter Springs\Ordinances\lmpact Fee\lmpacl_ Fee]ubUc_ Building.wpd
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2003-38
Page 6 of 6