HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005 09 12 Public Hearing Item 408
CITY COMMISSION
ITEM 408
Consent
Information
Public Hearin
Re ular
x
September 12,2005
Meeting
MGR. IDEPT
Authorization
REQUEST: The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests the City
Commission hold a Public Hearing for Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 2005-11, a
Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (referenced as LS-CP A-05-06) which
amends the Transportation Element and the Future Land Use Element.
PURPOSE: The City of Winter Springs is initiating the request for a Large Scale
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to incorporate into the Winter Springs Comprehensive
Plan the recently adopted update to the transportation study known as "Supplement 3" and to
revise text and remove inconsistencies relating to the Town Center transportation network
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY
s. 163.3174, Florida Statutes. Local planning agency
s. 163.3184, Florida Statutes. Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment.
s. 163.3187. Florida Statutes. Amendment of adopted comprehensive plan.
ss. 166.041(3)(c)2.b.. Florida Statutes. (required advertising)
Rule 9J-11.011. Florida Administrative Code
Winter Sprin2s Charter Section 4.15 Ordinances in General
Winter Sprin2s Article III. Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Section 15-30. Authority, purpose and intent;
Section 15-36. Review criteria;
Section 15-37. Local Planning Agency Review and Recommendation
CHRONOLOGY:
Feb. 2005- Supplement No.3, Update to the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study
Feb. 7,2005- Commission Workshop on funding of transportation projects in the City.
Mar. 14, 2004-City Commission adopted Ordinance 2005-10 amending the current Impact Fee
Ordinance in Chapter 9, Article VIII, based on escalating road construction costs
and the costs of additional collector roads and growth related projects.
@)
Mar. 24, 2005- Public Noticing in Orlando Sentinel ofLPA Public Hearing
September 12, 2005
Public Hearing Item 408
Apr. 5, 2005- LP A heard the request and made recommendation of approval of Ord. 2005-11.
Apr. 14,2005- Public Noticing in the Orlando Sentinel of the City Commission Transmittal
Hearing
July 18, 2005- ORC Report Received
Sept. L 2005- Public Noticing in the Orlando Sentinel of the City Commission 2nd
Reading/Adoption of Ordinance 2005-11
CONSIDERATIONS:
The City of Winter Springs is the Applicant seeking the Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments
to the Future Land Use Element and the Transportation Element. These Amendments
incorporate into the Comprehensive Plan the recently adopted update to the transportation study
known as "Supplement No.3, February 2005" and include revisions to the existing text,
removing inconsistencies relating to the Town Center transportation network. No new policies
were added. Although City Code Section 15-33. states that updates to the Comprehensive plan
are not considered amendments, this submittal includes some revisions beyond the update.
Text was revised and inconsistencies relating to the implementation of the Town Center
transportation network were removed.
The City's Transportation Study was completed in 1997. The 1997 Study identified some potential
deficiencies in the transportation infrastructure of the City of Winter Spring's local system for the
projected 2010 traffic loadings. These potential deficiencies were corrected by projects performed
by FDOT and Seminole County. No major deficiencies were identified for 2010 for the roadways
controlled by the City of Winter Springs. In subsequent updates (Supplement No.1, December 1999
and Supplement No.2, February 2001), the Traffic Study was updated by traffic counts and changes
in projects.
Supplement No.3, February 2005 updated the 1997 Study and Supplements No.1, December
1999 and No. 2, February 2001 to acknowledge roadway improvements completed by FDOT,
Seminole County and the City of Winter Springs. No changes were made to the land use or
existing uses. New computer modeling was not performed nor were counts made on City
roadways. Proposed development of vacant areas with known and projected projects was
included. The data was presented to allow for a comparison of where the City was in 1996 and
where the City is today. Roadway capacities were updated based on FDOT 2002 Level of
Service Handbook (the latest edition on this reference/manual).
The roadway collector system identified in Supplement No.1, December 1999, was expanded to
serve more of the City. Additional roads falling into the collector road status are the result of the
proposed Town Center street network. A recent traffic model completed by Walter Kulash of
Glatting Jackson, demonstrates that the Town Center collector road network will increase the
performance ofS.R. 434. All ofthe collector roads included in Supplement 3 have been added to the
proposed Transportation Element Amendment. Supplement 3 verifies that the projections of the
1997 Study were reasonably accurate and that the City's concurrency efforts are effective. Based on
available information, the City network is operating within normal parameters and within established
goals/capacities. Existing and future roadway project needs were updated and are included in the
revised tables.
September 12, 2005
Public Hearing Item 408
Map II-6 has been revised to illustrate US 17-92 (from Orange County to Shepard Road) as
deficient, reflecting the comments from FDOT in the aRC Report. Although, SR 434 (from US
17 -92 to Edgemon Avenue) was also indicated by FDOT as deficient 2004 traffic counts from
Seminole County indicate that it has a LOS of"D". In reviewing the data, it was discovered that
the FDOT count was located west of Timberlane, whereas the Seminole County count was
located east of Timberlane. Map II-6 has been amended to show the segment from US 17-92 to
Timberlane as deficient to reflect the FDOT data. The segment from Timberlane to Edgemon
has been left at a LOS "D".
FIND INGS:
(1) The proposed amendment will have a favorable effect on the economy of the City;
(2) The proposed amendment will not diminish the level of service (LOS) of public facilities;
(3) There will not be an unfavorable impact on the environment or the natural or historical
resources of the city or the region as a result of the proposed amendment;
(4) The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the State
Comprehensive Plan set forth in chapter 187, Florida Statutes. Consistency with the East Central
Florida Regional Policy Plan, adopted by Rule 29F-19.001, Florida Administrative Code is no
longer required as this rule was repealed;
(S) The proposed amendment will promote the cost/effective use of public facilities and will not
unduly burden public facilities;
(6) The proposed amendment is compatible with the land use;
(7) The proposed amendment will not cause the comprehensive plan to be internally
inconsistent, but rather, addresses current internal inconsistencies in the plan.
(8) The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety, welfare,
economic order, or aesthetics of the city or region; and
(9) The request is consistent with Florida Statute Chapter 163, Part II and Rule 9J-S, Florida
Administrative Code.
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY RECOMMENDATION:
The Local Planning Agency recommends that the City Commission hold a transmittal Public
Hearing and recommends that the City Commission adopt Ordinance 200S-11, a Large Scale
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (referenced as LS-CP A-OS-06) based on the Findings
enumerated above.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Commission hold a transmittal Public Hearing related to
Ordinance 2005-11, a Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (referenced as LS-
CP A-OS-06) based on the Findings enumerated above.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
September 19, 200S- Submittal to DCA for Compliance Review (within 10 days of adoption)
ATTACHMENTS:
A. FL. Dept of Community Affairs, Objections, Review and Comments (aRC) Report
B. Minutes from P&Z/LPA Meeting of April S, 2005
September 12, 2005
Public Hearing Item 408
C. Public Noticing in Orlando Sentinel
D. Ordinance 2005-11
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
September 12, 2005
Public Hearing Item 408
ATTACHMENT A
FL. Dept of Community Affairs, Objections, Review and Comments (ORC) Report
. I "
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home"
JEB BUSH
Governor
THADDEUS L. COHEN, AlA
Secrela ry
July 15,2005
~~
;:~J- 1f (\~
0\0-<, /' ~~
%J't-;. d' d ~
<:l.t'? ~4' 0
..:Il'-<> v
%'?~1<
~...QIl'
The Honorable, John F. Bush
Mayor, City of Winter Springs
1126 State Road 434,
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Dear Mayor Bush:
The Department of Community Affairs has completed its review of the proposed
Comprehensive Plan Amendment for City of Winter Springs (DCA 05-2), which was received
May 18,2005. Based on Chapter 163, Florida Statues, we have prepared the attached report that
outlines our findings concerning the amendments. it is especially pertinent that the City address
the objections set forth in our review so that the identified issues can be successfully resolved
prior to adoption. We have also included a copy of the local, regional and state agency comments
for your consideration. Within the next 60 days, the City should act by choosing to adopt, adopt
with changes or not to adopt the proposed amendments. For your assistance, our report outlines
procedures for final adoption and transmittal.
The City of Winter Springs proposed Amendment 05-2 consisted of one Future Land Use
(FLUM) amendment and several text amendments. The FLUM amendment (LS-CP A-05-05)
will re-designate approximately 10.95 acres from County Office and Commercial to City Town
Center. The text amendment (LS-CP A-05-06) and (LS-CP A-05-07) involve changes to the
Future Land Use, Transportation, and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements.
The Department has identified concerns with the proposed amendment package. The
proposed FLUM amendment is not supported by an adequate infrastructure analysis
demonstrating that the adopted level of service on affected public facilities is not impacted by
this development. The Department looks forward to further discussions with the City to
determine whether a more appropriate intensity standard for the Town Center land use category
can be identified and incorporated into the comprehensive plan.
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399.2100
Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncorn 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781
Internet address: htto:llwww.dca.state.fl.us
CRITICAl. STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE
2796 Overseas Hi~hwa/' Suite 212
.......-..,....... 1:1 '):'):nc:r..,?"),?7
COMMUNITY P~NING
2555 Shurrard Oak Boulevard
T.IIAhAssee. FL 3239!l-2100
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee. Fl3239!l-2100
HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2555 Shurrard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee. FL 3239!l-2100
The Honorable William D. Arthur, Mayor
July 15, 2005
Page Two
The Department looks forward to working with the City of Winter Springs to address the
objections. We will be available to assist in any way we can. If you or your staff have any
questions or if we may be of further assistance as you formulate your response to this Report,
please contact me at (850) 922- 1818 orTowanda Anthony at (850) 922-1782.
Sincerely,
J
es D. Stansbury,
egional Planning Administrator
JS/ta
Enclosures: Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report
Review Agency Comments
cc: Jeff Jones, Acting Executive Director, East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
Eloise M. Sahlstrom, Senior Planner, 1126 State Road 434, Winter Springs, FL 32708
I
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS
FOR
City of Winter Springs
AMENDMENT 05-2
July 15, 2005
Division of Conununity Planning
Office of Comprehensive Planning
This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J-l1.01O, F.A.C.
TRANS MITT AL PROCEDURES
The process for adoption oflocal comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in s.
163.3184, Florida Statutes, and Rule 91 -11.011, Florida Administrative Code.
Within ten working days ofthe date of adoption, the City must submit the following to
the Department:
Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendment;
A copy of the adoption ordinance;
A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed;
A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the
ordinance; and
A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's
Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report.
The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a
compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent.
In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the amendment, and
pursuant to Rule 91-11.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted amendment directly
to the Acting Executive Director of the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council.
Please be advised that the Florida legislature amended Section 163.3184(8)(b), F.S.,
requiring the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the
Department's Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local
government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide
this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by the law to furnish to the
Department the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information. This list is to be
submitted at the time of transmittal of the adopted plan amendment (a sample Information Sheet
is attached for your use).
INTRODUCTION
The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the Department's
review of City of Winter Spring's proposed amendment to their comprehensive plan (DCA
number 05-2) pursuant to Chapter 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.).
The objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J-5, Florida
Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. Each objection includes a
recommendation of one approach that might be taken to address the cited objection. Other
approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objections may have
initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. Ifthere is a difference between
the Department's objection and the extemal agency advisory objection or comment, the
Department's objection would take precedence.
Each of these objections must be addressed by the local government and corrected when the
amendment is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections, which are not addressed, may
result in a determination that the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have
raised an objection regarding missing data and analysis items, which the local govemment
considers not applicable to its amendment. If that is the case, a statement justifying its non-
applicability pursuant to Rule 9J-5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will
make a determination on the non-applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is
sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed.
The comments, which follow the objections and recommendations section, are advisory in
nature. Comments will not form bases of a determination of non-compliance. They are included
to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning
planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar,
organization, mapping, and reader comprehension.
Appended to the back of the Department's report are the comment letters from the other state
review agencies and other agencies, organizations and individuals. These comments are
advisory to the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they
appear under the "Obj ections" heading in this report.
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS
FOR
CITY of Winter Springs
AMENDMENT 05-2
I. OBJECTIONS
The City of Winter Springs is amending five parcels of land containing approximately 10.65
acres from Seminole County Office (6.0 ac @ 0.35 FAR) and Commercial (4.6 ac @ 0.35 FAR)
to City of Winter Springs Town Center (6.0 FAR) due to annexation. Staff has identified
potential objections to the FLUM amendment. The objections relate to insufficient infrastructure
data and analysis. The analysis is not based on the maximum 6.0 FAR allowed for the proposed
land use.
A. The Department raises the following objections to FLUM amendment LS-CP A-OS-
05.
TRANSPORTATION
1.0biection: The proposed amendment has not demonstrated that the necessary transportation
facilities are available or planned to be constructed concurrent with the development.
The proposed amendment has not demonstrated consistency with the transportation provisions
(goals, objectives, and policies) of the following: Future Land Use Element (Objective 1.3),
(Policy 1.3.1) and (Policy 1.3.2); Transportation Element (Objective 1.9) and Capital
Improvements Element (Policy 3.1). The proposed amendment is not consistent with the
requirements of:
Sections 163.3177(2),163.3177(3), 163.3177(6)(a), 163.3177(6)(b), 163.3177(JO)(h), F.s.
Rules 9J-5.005(5), 9J-5.006(2)(a), 9J-5.006(3)(c)3., 9J-5.016{3)(b)1., 3., 4., and 5., and 9J-
5.016(3)(c), 9J-5.016(4), 9J-5.019(4)(b)2., 3., and 5., 9J-5.019(4)(c), and 9J-5.019(5), F.A.C.
Recommendation: Provide data and analysis demonstrating the necessary improvements to
address the transpo~ation impacts of the proposed development and demonstrate the necessary
roadway improvements needed are in the appropriate short range or long range capital
improvements'plan, depending on when needed and based on the maximum density/intensity
allowed for the proposed land use. If the facilities are needed in the first five years then they
should be included in the appropriate financially feasible five-year capital improvement plan.
Any roadway improvements within the City should also be reflected on the Traffic Circulation
Map. Base the analysis on the amount of development proposed in the future land use map
amendment. If the City intends to rely on developer-funded improvements for the necessary
transportation facilities to support the proposed land use amendment, then the executed
development agreement must be submitted along with the amendment. Regardless of the entity
responsible for the transportation facility, the future land use map should be coordinated and
based upon existing or the planned availability of supporting transportation facilities. Revise the
amendment as necessary to be consistent with and supported by the data and analysis.
PUBLIC FACILITIES
2. Obiection: The proposect amendment is not supported by data and analysis to demonstrate
that public facilities, including potable water facilities and sanitary sewer services, are available
or will be available at the adopted level of service standards, to serve the potential maximum
development allowed for the proposed land use. The proposed FLUM amendment is not
supported by an adequate public facilities analysis addressing the following: (1) the amount of
potable water and sanitary sewer generated by the max-imum development potential allowed by
the FLUM amendment; (2) the available uncommitted capacity of potable water and sanitary
sewer facilities that would serve the amendment site; (3) the impact of the demand for potable
water and sanitary sewer on the projected operating level of service and available capacity of
these facilities for the five year and long term planning timeframe; (4) the need for potable water
and sanitary sewer facilities improvements (scope, timing, and cost of improvements) to
maintain the adopted level of service standards for the facilities; (4) coordination of the needed
facilities improvements with the plans with the Infrastructure and Capital Improvement
Elements, including implementation through the five year schedule of capital improvements.
The proposed amendment has not demonstrated consistency with the public facilities provisions
(goals, objectives, and policies) of the following: Future Land Use Element (Objective 1.3),
Policy 1.3.1 and Policy 1.3.2), Infrastructure (Objective IV-A-1) and (Policy IV-B-2.l), and
Capital Improvements Element (Objective 1.1). The proposed amendment is not consistent with
the requirements of:
Sections l63.3l77(2and 3, l63.3l77(6)(a), l63.3l77(6)(c), and l63.3l77(JO)(h). F.s.
Rules 9J-5.005(2 and 5), 9J-5.006(2)(a) and 9J-5.006 (3)(b) 9 and 10, 9J-5.006(3)(c)3.. 9J-
5.011(J)(f) and 9J-5.011 (2)(b) and (c), 9J-5.0l6(3)(b)1., 9J-5.0l6(3)(b)3., 4., and 5., 9J-
5.0l6(3)(c). and 9J-5.0l6(4)(a), F.A.C.
Recommendation: Provide data and analysis, demonstrating the availability of potable water
and sanitary sewer facilities to serve the site affected by the proposed amendment. The data and
analysis should demonstrate how the facilities are coordinated with the proposed development as
it occurs within the planning horizon ofthe comprehensive plan. The amendment should also
demonstrate that adequate public facilities are planned for in the comprehensive plan to
accommodate the level of development projected within the next five-year period and the next
ten-year period. The amendment should address the public facility improvements (scope, timing,
and cost) needed to maintain the adopted level of service standards for public facilities. The
analysis should be based on the maximum development potential allowed by the proposed land
use. Revise 'the amendment as necessary to be consistentwith and supported by the data and
analysis.
II. COMMENTS
1. Comment: The Department of Transportation noted that additional roadway segments were at
a deficient LOS and should be identified in the transportation element update. Currently
segments of US 17-92 and SR 419 are identified on Map II-6 as having a deficient. The map
should be revised to show US 17-92 and SR 434 as experiencing a deficient LOS.
2. Comment: The Department has coordinated with City Planning Staff in regards to the
currently adopted Floor Area Ration (FAR) of 6.0 for the land use proposed for the site. We
have discussed alternatives for addressing the Department's concerns with the intensity of the
proposed land use category. The Department pointed out that the City may want to assess
whether suchan intense land use is in keeping with your vision for the character of the
community. On a I-acre lot a 6.0 FAR would allow up to 261,360 gross square feet of non-
residential development. This would allow the intensity of a large mall to be located on a four
acre parcel. This does not include any infrastructure (stormwater), open space, or parking
requirements. It would be difficult for any community to plan for such an intensity considering
the infrastructure needs and in some cases demonstrating the suitability and compatibility of such
an intense land use.
The City should reassess the need for such an intense land use. An FAR of 1.5 is still a
high intensity for the land use category but may still achieve the City's vision for this area. An
intensity standard closer to what the City wants to achieve in this land use category will allow for
better coordination of infrastructure and overall planning. We look forward to further
discussions with the City to resolve the Department's concerns with the proposed intensity for
the site.
=\\
---- -"
..., .....'
Florida Department of Transportation
JEB BlISH
GOVERNOR
Planning & Public Transportation
133 South Semoran Boulevard
Orlanao, FL 32807-3230
June 16, 2005
Mr. Ray Eubanks, Community Program Administrator
Department of Community Affairs, State of Florida
Plan Review & DR! Processing Section
2555 Shumard Oaks Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
SUBJECT:
LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
DCA#:
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
WINTER SPRINGS
05-2
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
& Ts
&/tl/ OS
JOSE ABREU
SECRETARY
The Department of Transportation has completed its review of the above proposed
comprehensive plan amendments as requested in your memorandum dated, May 19,2005..
We appreciate the opportunity to participate in this review process and we offer our comments
with this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at 407-482-7856 (Suncom: 335-
7856) or e-mail meatbettv.mckee@dot.state.f1.us.
Sincerely,
~ htc~
Betty McKee
Systems Planner
BMcK
attachment
cc: Don Fisher, Seminole County
Rob Magee, FDOT
Bob Romig, FOOT
Eloise Sahlstrom, Winter Springs
James Stansbury, DCA
Tony Walter, Seminole County
File: J: IGrow1h ManagementlComprehensive PlanslCommentsandCoverLetterslSeminole ColWinlerS en ogso> 2CoverLetter061605. doc
Florida Department of Transportation
Intennodal Systems Development
Technical Applications Section
Page 1 of 2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW COMMENTS
Local Government:
Winter Springs (Seminole County)
DCA Amendment #:
05-2
Date of DCA's Request Memo:
May 19, 2005
Review Comments Deadline:
June 17, 2005
Today's Date:
June 16 2005
ELEMENT:
Future Land Use Element: FLUM Amendments
RULE REFERENCE:
9J-5.006 Future Land Use Element
9J-5.019 Transportation Element
9J-11.006 Submittal Requirements
9J-11.007 Data and Analysis Requirements
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
LS-CPA-05-05: 10.65 acres; current future land use: County Office (6.05 acres @ 0.35 FAR) and County
Commercial (4.6 acres @ 0.35 FAR); proposed future land use: City Town Center (6.0 FAR with
structured parking, 36 units! acre); affected state roads: SR 15-600 (US 17-92), SR 417, SR 419, SR 426,
SR 434 and SR 436
REVIEW COMMENTSI RECOMMENDATIONS:
92,238 square feet of office uses and 70,132 square feet of commercial uses could be developed under
the current future land use designations, which translate to 4,027 average daily trips (ITE 710 and 820).
2,783,484 square feet of commercial uses could be developed under the proposed future land use
designation, which translates to 119,523 average daily trips (ITE 820). The difference between the
scenarios represents a potential increase of 115.496 average daily trips.
land Use Square feet AveraQe Daily Trips
Current Desiqnations County Office 92 238 . 1,016
County Commercial 70 132 3,011
Subtotal 4,027
Proposed Desiqnation City Town Center 2.783,484 119,523
Subtotal 119,523
Net Trips 115 496
The request is not supported by appropriate data and analysis. As shown on FOOT's 2004 LOS_ALL
spreadsheet, several affected segmetlts of SR 15-600 (US 17-92), SR 419, SR 426, SR 434 and SR 436
are currently over capacity. These segments, as well as one segment of SR 417, an FIHS!SIS facility,
are expected to remain so by 2014. A traffic impact analysis that assumes the maximum development
scenario possible under the proposed future land use designation and addresses impacts to all state
roads in the vicinity should be submitted to support the request or a new policy could be added to the
Comp Plan limiting development in this area to a .26 FAR.
FOOT Contact: Betty McKee, Systems Planner Reviewed by: Ellen Bertoni, AICP
FOOT Genesis Group
Telephone: 407-482-7856 (Suncom: 335-7856) 904-730-9360
Fax: 407-275-4188 904-730-7165
E-mail: betty.mckee@dot.state.fl.usebertoni@qenesisqroup.com
F ite: J:\Grow1h Managemenl\Comprehensive Plans\CommentsandCoverLetterslSeminole Co\WinlerSprinos05-2Comments061505.doc
Florida Department of Transportation
Intennodal Systems Development
Technical Applications Section
Page 2 of2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW COMMENTS
Local Government:
VVinter Springs (Seminole County)
DCA Amendment #;
05-2
Date of DCA's Request Memo:
May 19, 2005
Review Comments Deadline:
June 17. 2005
June 16 2005
Today's Date:
ELEMENT:
RULE REFERENCE:
Transportation Element: Text Amendment
9J-5.019 Transportation Element
9J-11.006 Submittal Requirements
9J-11.007 Data and Analysis Requirements
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
LS-CPA-05-06: The purpose of the text amendment is to incorporate the recently adopted update to the
Transportation Study (known as "Supplement 3"), and to revise and delete text regarding inconsistencies
related to the Town Center transportation network.
REVIEW COMMENTSI RECOMMENDATIONS:
Map 11-6 shows only two road segments as deficient: US 17-92 (from SR 419 to Shepard Road) and SR
419 (from US 17 -92 to SR 434). The map should be revised to include US 17-92 (from Orange County to
Shepard Road) and SR 434 (from US 17-92 to Edgemon Avenue); these segments are also deficient per
FOOTs 2004 LOS~LL spreadsheet.
FOOT Contact: Betty McKee, Systems Planner Reviewed by: Ellen Bertoni, AICP
FOOT Genesis Group
Telephone: 407-482-7856 (Suncom: 335-7856) 904-730-9360
Fax: 407-275-4188 904-730-7165
E-mail: belty.mckee@dot.slale.l1. us ebertoni@qenesisqroupcom
File: J:IGrowlh Management\Comprehonsive PlanslCommentsandCoverLetlerslSemi nole ColW1nterSprtngs05-2Comments061605.doc
East Central Florida
REGIONAL
PLANNING
COU NCIL
Chairman
Welton G. Cadwell
Commissioner
Lake County
Vice Chairman
Jon B. Rawlson
Governor's
Appointee
Orange County
Secretary/Treasure
r
Michael S. Slake
Commissioner
Tri-County L€~~ue
of Cities
\'linter Spri,.}s
Executive Director
Sandra S. Glenn
S<!/Til/g
BrevClrd. Lak<'.
OrClngt'. Osceola.
S<'/IIil1o/<, and "ol/lIia
COllI/ties.
6 31 N. l'ij11\on; ".::>ad
Suite 100
f.J;;it1and, Flcripa
32751
Ph:m9
407.623.1(0/5
Fax 40,,623.1084
Suncom 334-11)75
Suncom Fa:,
334.1084
Website:
'.~",'f"~~. ecfrpc. :rg
T
a V0q~{
I
o
MEMORANDUM
Ts
0!s/u::,
TO:
O. Ray Eubanks, FOCA, Community Program Administrator
James Stansbury, FOCA
FROM:
Jeffrey A. Jones
DATE:
Thursday, June 02, 2005
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review
LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
Winter Springs
LS-CPA-05-05; LS-CPA-05-06; LS-CPA-05-
07.
05.2
LOCAL AMENDMENT #:
DCA AMENDMENT #:
Council staff has completed a technical review of the above referenced
comprehensive plan amendment. The review was conduqed in accordance
with the provisions of the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council's
current contract with the Florida Department of Community Affairs for Plan
and Plan Amendment Reviews.
We have not identifiep any significant and adverse effects on regional
resources or facilities, nor have any extra-jurisdictional impacts been
identified that would adversely effect the ability of neighboring jurisdictions
to implement their comprehensive plans.
The East Central Florida Regional Planning Council is available to assist in the
resolution of any issues that should arise in the course of your review. If you
should have any questions, please contact me at Sun Com 334-1075 x327.
Thank you.
cc:
Local Government Contact: Eloise Sahlstrom, Senior Planner
File
".." ,~'r.J-
'\1. If,jn\'IC.~.' ~je, f
....~\. . ..... ~
,,'(.,.., x:-':. .~-.
~". \'"):.. . .
...~.. ~ ,:<'.1 !!\
is- .. ~ ;:: :
~ ,.~. I,
.'.l . .............. I
~ FLORI;!:"!
Department of
Environmental Protection
o Ts
~(7(<J~
-~
Jeb Bush
Governor
Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000
Colleen '11. Castille
Secretary
June 9,2005
Mr. Ray Eubanks
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Plan Review and DR! Processing Team
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
RE: Winter Springs 05-2, Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
On behalf of the Department of Environmental Protection, the Office ofIntergovemmen-
tal Programs has reviewed the proposed comprehensive plan amendment in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. As required by law, the scope of our comments and
recommendations is limited to the environmental suitability of the proposed changes in light of
the Department's regulatory and proprietary responsibilities. Based on our review of the pro-
posed amendment, the Department has found no provision that requires comment, recommenda-
tion or objection under the laws that form the basis of the Department's jurisdiction and author-
ity. If the amendment pertains to changes in the future land use map or supporting text, please be
advised that at such time as specific lands are proposed for development, the Department will
review the proposal to ensure compliance with environmental rules and regulations in effect at
the time such action is proposed.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. IfI may be of further
assistance, please call me at (850) 245-2172.
Sincerely,
.%(f{
Suzanne Ray
Office of Intergovenunental Programs
/ser
':.\/,,;',.: !)i"/JI...\'/fl.lI: L~'\\ !',/",.J..',....~.,."
-l
St. JohnsJtiv~er .
::::~':~, ~:~':~;'~:~A~'~~'~~~~~; ~ 15
4049 Reid Street · P.O. Box 1429 · Palatka. Fl 32178-1429 · (386) 329-45GO
On the Internet at www.sjrwmd.com
~(:rG{QS
June 17,2005
D. Ray Eubanks, Administrator
Plan Review and Processing
Florida Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee. FL 32399-2100
Subject: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment
DCA Amendment # Winter Springs 05-2
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
St. Johns River Water Management District (District) planning staff have reviewed the above-
referenced proposed comprehensive plan amendment. The proposed amendment consists of one
change to the City of Winter Springs' future land use map and text changes to the Future Land
Use, Conservation. and Transportation elements of the comprehensive plan. The District staff
review focuses on water supply availability and related water resource issues in an effort to link
land use planning and water supply planning. District staff have no comments because no
substantial water supply availability or related water resource issues were identified.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments. If you have any questions. please contact
District Policy Analyst Peter Brown at (386) 329-431l/Suncom 860-431 I or
pbrolV/l@!Jjnvmd.com.
Sincerely,
~ lAM/1A SL
Linda Burnette, Director
Office oT Communications and Governmental Affairs
LB/PB
cc: Eloise Sahlstrorn, City of Winter Springs
Jeff Jones. ECFRPC
Lindy McDowell. FDEP
Nancy Christman. SJRWMD
Jeff Cole. SJRWMD
Peter Brown, SJRWMD
GOVERNING BOARD
Ome!rJ.f.5D Lcng. r.F.!..fl.\I':'""
,,-!"~:"'l<:..
DilViG G Grat' am ~'.:f ~"""'.j,:..,
R Oay A:b~i~hl. :\t:r.r::fj.-:,....
Dw;s Q-:l:rs!r,:ef. T?E:....:;.:f=.~:l
.~(K ':<'r,', f
c::..:}.
,!>!:'.';l;"'!'.L;
W Leenard Weed
F'r:ftl,)~ID'~;..t :E';.cr:
Jcrn G Sow!nSk,
~::~;"_~~'I-J('
'~'T::;lJm Ke(~
".J.:L;,'-;,.C:lt. ~t';'-.>
A.r.n T r,\,:.: 'e
5..::..1-;: _'.
Susan N HJghES
?,:'.~: ~ '.'~.~;:~
September 12, 2005
Public Hearing Item 408
ATTACHMENT B
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 5, 2005
(RESCHEDULED FROM APRIL 7, 2005)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
402. Community Development Department - Planning Division
Requests The Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Hold A Public Hearing
For Ordinance 2005-11, A Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (Referenced
As LS-CPA-05-06) Which Amends The Transportation Element And The Future Land Use
Element.
Ms. Sahlstrom presented this Agenda Item.
Discussion ensued on the Transportation Element.
Ms. Sahlstrom said, "Our Code of Ordinances actually allows us to put updates in the Comp Plan
without sending it to the State." Ms, Sahlstrom added, "However, it does allow us to take both
of them forward and then to help tweak the other policies and language to support the City's
position and to support what the Comp Plan is already addressing in other elements."
Discussion ensued on public transportation.
Board Member Tom Brown said, "What I'd like for you to tell the people who are putting this
together for us - I'd like to have Roman Numeral 11-15 put at the bottom of the page so it will be
consistent throughout the whole Comp Plan." Board Member Brown added, "This is the first
issue, I'd like to see on every page a little block somewhere with the 'Sub' and 'Revision
Number' ."
Discussion.
Ms. Sahlstrom said, "I'll look at that and see how it might be accomplished." Board Member
Brown said, "I'll be glad to help you with that if! can,"
Chairman Poe stated, "Page 11-18, 'E-D-G-E-M-O-N' as opposed to 'A-N', Belle Avenue 'B-E-
L-L-E' as opposed to 'B-E-L-L' [AVENUE]."
Ms. Sahlstrom distributed to the Board Members some changes to the "Text".
Chairman Poe opened the "Public Input" portion of this Agenda Item.
September 12,2005
Public Hearing Item 408
ATTACHMENT B
None.
Chairman Poe closed the "Public Input" portion of this Agenda Item.
Discussion.
Mr. Kip Lockcuff, P.E., Public Works/Utility Director answered various questions from the
Board Members.
Board Member Linda Tillis said, "On Table 11-4 starting on Page Roman Numeral 11-21 - there-
any 'Headings' on the secondary pages of that Table." Ms. Sahlstrom said, "When this was
provided from the Consultant, when he printed it, it automatically put the header on there. When
I inserted it from the PDF, it did not. Just so you know, I am reviewing this Table to verify its
accuracy which I have not been able to do prior to this. It will be updated and as I am updating
it, it will be updated before it goes to the State and I am happy to provide you - a copy of the
update. It actually has taken a lot more time than I anticipated and - I will make sure the header
is correct."
Regarding the Resolutions of the maps, Ms. Sahlstrom stated, "We wanted to get the Data out
there and send it to State. But, as we are able to update the quality of the graphics in here, we
will be able to do that without taking it as an Amendment.
Board Member Tillis said, "The other 'Item' I had was on Page 11-40 for 'Map 11-6', I believe
the title should read 'Year 2004 Deficiencies [and LOS]'." Ms. Sahlstrom said, "Yes, I believe
you are correct."
Board Member Brown asked, "If we recommend this to the City Commission, is that the final
recommendation for the Comp Plan for this?" Ms. Sahlstrom said, "It will go to the City
Commission for a transmittal Public Hearing and then if they move it forward it will be
transmitted to the State, the DCA [Department of Community Affairs] will have a period of time
to review it, they will send back their ORC [Objections, Response and Comments] Report, their
objections, response and comments. And then, if they have objections, then we would bring our
response back to you to also respond to. If they don't have objections, then we'll just move to
the final adoption hearing and that's what we did with the last cycle."
Discussion.
Vice Chairperson Karr said, "I just had a problem with Page 11-13 under the first Paragraph
under 'b', 'Allow the option of exempting certain developments from the transportation
concurrency requirements'." Vice Chairperson Karr added, "That is the highest - accident area
the intersection ofTuskawilla [Road] and [State Road] 434, that exempting them from
concurrency requirements would cause a higher incident of accidents along that area." Ms.
Sahlstrom said, "Currently, we don't have an area that's an exemption area." Ms. Sahlstrom
-l
September 12,2005
Public Hearing Item 408
ATTACHMENT B
added, "But the State would allow us to create that at some point in time if we wanted to. I
understand it's a little bit ofa process to go through to do so."
"I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING
[BOARD]/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY THAT WE RECOMMEND ADOPTION TO
THE CITY COMMISSION RELATIVE TO ORDINANCE 2005-11 IT'S THE LARGE
SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REFERRED AS LS-CP A-05-06
BASED ON THE FINDINGS ENUMERATED ABOVE AND ANY INPUT FROM THE
BOARD THIS EVENING AS YOU HAD PROBABLY MARKED UP ANY
CORRECTIONS OR ADDITIONS." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN.
SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRPERSON KARR. DISCUSSION.
VOTE:
CHAIRMAN POE: AYE
VICE CHAIRPERSON KARR: AYE
BOARD MEMBER BROWN : AYE
BOARD MEMBER TILLIS: AYE
BOARD MEMBER VOSKA: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
Board Member Brown said, "I would recommend very highly to the Board that you hold on to
your old page and the new page as we proceed with this."
Board Member Brown stated, "I would also recommend Mr. Chairman [Poe] that you think
about a possible Workshop after they [City Commission] go through it or maybe when they do
review it - when are they going to review this, do you have a date?" Ms. Sahlstrom said, "It will
go to the Commission on April 25th [2005] I believe."
September 12, 2005
Public Hearing Item 408
ATTACHMENT C
Public Noticing in Orlando Sentinel
THURSDAY. SEPTIMbt:l1: f, ~
l
NOTICE OF CHANGES TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AND ZONING MAP
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
~
!
NO'IKlllS HEIUl8Y ClIVl!N 11lAt TltE crry COMI\llo'lS.ION Ol'
TltE crry OI'Wl'I'I'I!:R,5I'lUNGS PIlOPOSES to~,
ORDINANCltNO. _11
OF W!N'!'I:(k SI'IllN'05. SllIdlNOU! COUllTY. ~. IUJtATINO to l'DMPRE.
00MPRllllllN1ilVl! !'LAN TEXT
$!VII !'LAN IUll.ll-
SUINOS; CUllll'YlNO POIJCIES
INO _ UtA1iSMlTIAL Ol' TIlIl Pl.A.N to TltE OOPARTMIlN'l' Ol' COMMUNITY Al'l'''Ul$;I'IlOVIDINO_
lUlI'IW. Of I'IUOlllN'CONSI$'l1lNT 0lU:lINANCllS,4.Nl) RESOLUTIONS; SIiVllltAllJtlTY, "Nt) "N fl'fIlCTlVIi
OATIl
llIlDlNANQ NO.__11
A.N OIlDINi\NClI Of TltE crry Of WJ!'o,"t13lt Sl'lUNos. SliMDiOUl~. fUllUIlA. II.IiLATIJIiO 1'0 COMI'IU!.
II_VI ~ SIITTINO POII.tH ANn !\lXlt'I"lililO'; A LAIlOIl SCAI.H !'LAN 'l'EXl
=='C~^~~ I'IA~
IN'I1INT WITH ~p m WhTl..AND Uft.ANll'll!:Jl'l'Bll!l; I'II.OVIDlNO 1()ll.1'lL\NSMITTAL 01' TltE 1'I.A.'11'O
ml!. Pl'J>ARTMIlN'l' OF COMMUNITY AFPAW: Fll.CNILlINO fOil '1ll!I'I!AL OF 1'IU0Il !/It'\)NSISTE...., OlIDl.
NANCES AND llllSOlAITIOr;S; SBVliRAU1UTY: ....'1) AN EFFl!C1Wll DA1"L
I'>>lJ)lKANC!:l NO. _:10
AN Oll.tJIN'ANCl! PI' 1m crry <nVl\llSS.ION 0l'111ll crry 01' W'lImJI! SFII.lNOS. I~ AOOl'1/NG 1\
SIoWl. 5CAl..B fW"l ~DML'"T IlY CllkN<lb"O TltE FVi'lJlIlll,4.Nl) use MAP lll'lllIONAlION Of TIlIl
RIlAL !'!lOI'IiJlTY U::lI'Sl'IT1Jm'G II FAlIClIll -rorALlN'O Ul ACEE$ llOlU: OIl IlE$S '\''10 LOC:Al1ill AT &:10
STAtll ROAD .\4. IN ..1N1'F.ll SFII.lNOS. I'UliUISA. ,4.Nl) MOlIJi I'AI<lK'1.1.A!ll.1 DllI'lCTIJID J\I{D UiOAUY
lll'lllCIlUlOO ON lllQII,1Ili ~ Cl:ll.lhn''S<iIlL'UAN IlSOO1llr ,4.Nl)
"('\)!>'SERVATION" 1'1) CIAL'" AND CONSllRVAtrol'l ()'IIl1:RLAY'" (ON
11 lOSE AWl,cn01 AREAS); 1Il11.llPl'.AL Of Fll.1011. INCONSISTli."T OIlDINA.'iCES.AND II.ES-
ll/.LTlONS, SEVllltAlllUTY.lNCOII.Ii'O TIlE COIo\I'lUlIllk...S1VE !'IAN. ANO AN IiFfECrlVli 1"'1"L
1s:..MAl"A'lc,,_.
Map 'A'
wuna
SPRmGS
OltDIWASlCK NO. :lOIl!>-:!
A." OiWINANCll Ol' 111E crry COMMISSION Of TIlE crry Of WJ!'o,TlSII. SI'IlINGS, Fl fill.IDA. CRANdlSO THE
201>11'0 MAl' lll'lll.IONATION Offill! MAL !1lOl"IlKl"'t CO'<srrl'Ul1Nll Ar....CEL TOWJNO 'U ACllES
MOlUl 0II.1lE$S ,4.Nl) LOCATED AT Ul STATE IIlJ.'.l} .04 IN WL"TlSII. SI'IU.'<OS. fUllUIlA. AHDloIORll PAiI."J"tC.
lJ[.A!ll.Y DIil'IClTD AND Ul(;AIklY lll'lllC1UlIOO ON IlXlI1lHT "'" An~ """'IITo. !'II.OiIiI _OLE
COUNT)' 'A.)" 10 CITY 01' W:lI'11!R SPRINGS "'C.t N1!lllflIlOIl.llOOD ~-: l'ltO'\<TOlN'O "lit TIlE
lUiPI:!AL ()l' rRIOII. INCONSIS1"L'\T ol!OINANCES AND IUJ.\OI.UJlONS. SE\"e!lAIl'JtITY. AND AN ~1'1,CIlVE
DATE. (Su 11.'.1' 'A' 1",_)
I'lillUC ImAIlINGS
rt1lllil.CONll1l..lV..l'llN'G .. AOOMlON
WILL lIEIfI!t.tl ON
MQNDA.y,I!IIPI'EI\IlIIl,I1,_AT l';Je P.st.
Oil SOON 'lTIIFJtEArrD: IN THE ~N CHA._S
!.lICATED AT THE W1N11!Jl!ll'lUNGS CITY IlAU
1l:l6 EAST stAn: IWA1H3o!
WlN11!Jl SI'IUNGll, FLOIUUA
T'bc ~ ~a mil)>' be ohm_ hy ~. p&tti<ll bet~ al.In, ~." p,m.. MuDY tfmAl,h rfiiMl~ 4111P:
Clry',Cwl'.(l<<io<.k-..J..It16lLSII414. ~Sf'rillP. _, ""'100.. ml.._.il,ull (olG7) m,UIXIIll7,
"""- _ <Ii,"""._ -..,._ I.,....,., polO in "">" ~ 11_ ~', .....w """'I,lbc Employ" Alola.em
~ C__.41 _In _ 01'.......... ..'olG7I12?ISOO,I:l14. TIttsc """ ""blI< -IIV, lDIcmIixI
~.......""" IPIbty _.......,... ...-. v.l lie "-d """ ~ "'... P"'r-'~, If y"" doc"'" to
'I'l""I....,~...__bylbcCl<y~_,-''''..t-_......-....
YOOIllUJ _. _iJllbe ~ ....tc._~, l"'" __ "'__, __lIIlbtpt<>-
.......... a ..... "f'O'l IlIIU<:k ... """"" .. "-'i
September 12,2005
Public Hearing Item 408
ATTACHMENT D
ORDINANCE NO. 2005-11
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF \\lINTER SPRINGS.
SEMINOLE COVNTY. FLORIDA, RELATING TO
CO:\IPREHENSIVE PLANNING; SETTING FORTH AND
ADOPTING A LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TEXT AMENDJ\fENT, REFERENCED AS LG-CPA-05-06,
WHICII SHALL "BlEND '1'HE ('OJ\IPREHENSI\'E PLAN
REI,EVANT TO TIlE TRANSPOI~TATION ELEIVlENT ANn
THE FUTlJRE LAND USE ELEMENT: INCORI)ORA TING
THE FEBRUARY 2005 SlJPI'LEJ\'lENT (NO.3) TO THE
CITY'S TRANSPORTATION STUDY WHICH EXPANDS THE
EXISTING ROADWAY COLLECTOR SYSTEM AND
ACKNOWLEDGES ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
COMPLETED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTJ\IENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, SEMINOLE COUNTY, AND THE CITY
OF WINTER SPRINGS; CLARIFYING POLICIES
REGARDING THE TOWN CENTER TRANSPOI~TA TION
NETWORK; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL OF THE
PLAN TO THE nEPARTMENTOFCOJ\IMUNITY AFFAIRS;
PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT
ORDINANCES AND RESOLlJTIONS: SEVERABILITY: AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
\VHEREAS, section 163,316 I cT. seq., Florida Statutes, established the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act: and
WHEREAS, section 163.3167, Florida Statutes, requires each municipality in the State of
Florida to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan as scheduled by the Florida Department of
Cornmunity Affairs; and
WHEREAS, the Cityof\VinterSprings Transportation Study, originallycomplctedin 1997,
is period ieall y reviewed and updated after cons idering updated traffic counts and changes in roadway
projects; and
WHEREAS, the February 2005 Supplement (No.3) to the City's Transportation Study
expands the ex isting roadway collector system and acknowledges road\vay improvements completed
by the Florida Department of Transportation, Seminole County, and the City of Winter Springs; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the City's Comprehensive Plan
should be updated to ref1ect the latest transportation study; and
City of Winter Spring~
Ordinance No. 2005-11
Puge I of 4
September 12, 2005
Public Hearing Item 408
\VHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed
public hearing, in accordance \vith the procedures in chapter 163, Florida Statutes, on the proposed
Comprehensive Plan alllendments and considered findings and advice of stan citizens, and all
interested parties submitting written and oral comments and has recommended adoption to the City
CommiSSIon: and
\\'HEREAS, the adoption of this Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment, is consistent with
the Goals. Objectives and Policies of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan: and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted by this Ordinance cOlnply vvith
the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development
Regulation Act and the amendments arc in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfilre
of the citizens of Winter Springs, Florida.
NO\V, THEREFORE, TIlE CITY CO:Vl\IISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS, HEREB" ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. Redtals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and arc fully
incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted in compliance with, and pursuant
to, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act,
sections 163.3184 and 163.3187. FIOlida Statutes.
Section 3. PUl'pose and Intent. It is hereby declared to be thcpurpose and intent of this
Ordinance to clarify, expand, correct. update, modify and otherwise further the provisions of the City
of Winter Springs' Comprehensive Plan.
S('ction 4. Adoption of Amendments to Compreh('nsive Plan. The City of
Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Element, is hereby amended as reflected in
Exhibit "A", attached hereto and funy incorporated herein by this reference. The City of ~linter
Springs Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Element, is hereby amended as reflected in Exhibit
"13"', attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. (Underlined twe indicates
additions and -m-lk:eottt type indicates deletions, while asterisks (***) indicate a deletion of text from
the Comprehensive Plan. It is intended that the text denoted by the asterisks shall remain unchanged
from the language existing prior to adoption ofthis Ordinance).
Section 5. Repe~lI of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior
inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts ofordinanees and
resolu tions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the connict.
City of W inter Springs
Ordinance No. 2005-11
Page 2 of 4
September 12,2005
Public Hearing Item 408
Section 6. Severahility. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or
provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competcnt jurisdiction, vvhether for substantive. proceduraL or any other reason, sueh portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 7. Incorporation into Compreh{'nsive Plan. Upon the eJJcctive date of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this ordinance, said Amendments shall be
incorporated into the City of \Vinter Springs C'omprehensive Plan and any section or paragraph
number or letter and any heading may be changed or moditled as necessary to effectuate the
foregoing.
Section 8. Eff{~ctive Date and Legal Status ofthe Plan Amcndmcnts. The effective
date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this Ordinance shall be the date a lInal
order is issued by the Florida Department ofCOInmunity Affairs, or the Administration Commission
lInding the Amendments in compliance with section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. No development
orders, development permits, or land use dependent on these Amendments may be issued or
commeneed before the amendments become effective. Ifa tinal order of non eo mplia nee is issued
by the Adrninistration Commission, the Amendments may nevertheless be made efTective by
adoption of a resolution affirming its eflcctive status. After and from the effective date of these
Amendments, the Comprehensive Plan Amendments set forth herein shall amend the City of Winter
Springs Comprehensive Plan and become a pmi of that plan and the Amendments shall have the
legal status of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as amended.
ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs. Florida, in a regular
meeting assembled on the day of 2005.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLO\VSI
City of W inter Springs
Ordinancc No. 2005-11
Page 3 of 4
September 12, 2005
Public Hearing Item 408
.John F. Bush. l\layor
ATTEST
Andrea Lorenzo-Lmlces, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORl\) A-"iD
SUFF)CIE-"iCY FOR THE CITY OF
\V)-"iTER SPRI-"iGS O-"iL Y:
Anthony A. Garganese. City Attorney
First Reading:
Second
Effective Date:
elly ur \Vinter Springs
Ordinance No,2005-J I
Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT A
City of Winter Springs
Comprehensive Plan
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
October 2001
Amended January 2005
APRIL 2005
PrepQrotl EST"; Prepared Bv:
City of Winter Springs
Community Development Department
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799
And
CPH Engineers, Inc.
1104 East Robinson Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
Revised From Text Prepared By:
Land Design Innovations, Inc.
140 North Orlando Avenue, Suite 295
Winter Park, Florida 32789
And
Conklin, Porter and Holmes - Engineers, Inc.
1104 East Robinson Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTROD U CTI ON.............................................................................................................. 1
B. INVENT 0 RY ..................................................................................................................... 1
1. Road System.........................................................................................~......................... 2
a. Jurisdiction and Maintenance Responsibility............................................................................. 2
b. Functional Classification ................................. ....... ....... ........ ....... ..... ... ...... ....................... ....... ....3
c. Cons trained Facilities.................................................................................................................... 3
d. Accident Locations........................................................................................................................ 4
e. Signalized Intersections .......... ........... .... ....... ........ .................. ........... ....... ............ ................... ..... 4
f. Evacuation Routes ........................................................................................................................ 4
2. Public Transit System.................................................................................................... 4
3. Parking System .............................................................................................................. 5
4. Bicycle System ............................................................................................................... 5
5. Pedestrian System.......................................................................................................... 5
6. Intermodal Facilities...................................................................................................... 5
C. TRANSPORT A TI ON ANAL YSI S ..................................................................................... 6
1. Socio- Economic Growth Trends................................................................................... 6
2. Roadway Current Performance...................................................................................... 7
3. Future Roadway Performance....................................................................................... 8
4. Model Development and V alidation.............................................................................. 9
a. OUATS Model Set........................................................................................................................ 9
b. Trip Generation ............ ....... ....... ....... ................... ..... ......... ... ..... ............. ..................... .............. ...9
c. Trip Distribution ........................................................................................................................... 9
d. Model Split/Auto Occupancy ..................................................................................................... 9
II-i
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
e. Traffic Assignment.................................................................................................................... .. 10
f. Trip Generation Modifications.................................................................................................. 10
g. Use of OUATS 11 Trip Purpose Models ................................................................................10
5. Public Transit Performance......................................................................................... 10
6. Other Transportation Systems..................................................................................... .11
7. Future Transportation Plan......................................................................................... .11
a. Future Transportation Map .......................................................................................................12
b. Transportation Concurrency Management Areas and Concurrency Exemption Areas ...13
c. Future Public Transit Plan .........................................................................................................13
d. The Future Pedestrian Plan........................................................................................................13
e. The Future Bicycle Plan .............................................................................................................13
f. TSM/TDM Strategies .................................................................................................................14
D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ........................................................................43
II -u
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
LIST OF TABLES
Table II- 1: Year 200W Roadway Link Levels of Service........................................................ .................15
Table II- 2: Accident Locations with Greater than 5 Accidents, 2004 May 2000 to May 2001..........18
Table II - 3: Public Transit Characteristics..... ............ ........ .... ............ ... ... ............... ... ............ ................ ......19
Table II- 4: -1996 2005 Existing and Projected Development by Traffic Zone ....................................20
Table II - 5: Statewide Minimum Level of Service Standards for the State Highway System..............25
Table II- 6: +9%f2001 Average Annual Daily Traffic Count Results....................................................26
Table II- 7: Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas...................27
Table II- 8: Projected Year 2010 Roadway Link Levels of Service with 2010 Network......................28
Table II- 9: Programmed and Planned Highway System Improvements...............................................31
Table II- 10: Year 2010 Road Needs (Developer and Other Funding)..................................................32
Table II- 11: State and County Road Projects Adjacent to or within Winter Springs..........................32
Table II- 12: Year 2010 Road Needs (City Funding) ................................................................................34
LIST OF MAPS
Map II- 1: Existing Roadway Classification, Jurisdiction and Number of Lanes .................................35
Map II- 2: Signalized Intersections and Accident Locations....................................................................36
Map II- 3: Public Transit System and Major Traffic Generators/ Attractors ........................................37
Map II- 4: Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities ..................................................................................38
Map II- 5: 2004 Traffic Analysis Zones ......................................................................................................39
Map II- 6: 2004 Existing Year 2000 Deficiencies and LOS .....................................................................40
Map II- 7: Year 2010 Needed Improvements Plan ...................................................................................41
Map II- 8: Year 2010 Transportation Plan..................................................................................................42
II-iii
_n_~
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
CHAPTER II
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
A. INTRODUCTION
The City of Winter Springs is located within an urbanized portion of a Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) - Metroplan Orlando. Therefore, the City is required by the State to adopt a
Transportation Element, as opposed to a Traffic Circulation Element, and to coordinate the element
with the long-range transportation plan of the MPO.
The purpose of the Transportation Element is to plan for a multi-modal transportation system that
emphasizes accessibility by placing emphasis on public transportation systems; encourages the
development of compact, pedestrian-oriented urban areas; promotes energy efficient development
patterns; and protects air quality. The City hired Conklin, Porter and IIolmcs Engineers, Ine. in
1997 to update the traffic study submitted as part of the Comprehensive Plan in 1982 2001. The
traffic study was again updated in 1999 and 2001. Land Design Inno'v-atiom, Inc. (LDI) was hircd
by the City to put together the Tramportation Element, \vmch incorporates the traffic portion
prepared by CPH, and also the pedestrian, bicycle, mass tram it and other components of a truc
multi modal system.
An essential base for planning a transportation system is the Future Land Use Element. The Future
Land Use Map will determine where new or improved transportation facilities may be needed. The
Transportation Element will assess the condition and capacity of the existing transportation
facilities, project future needs, set Levels of Service (LOS) standards for roads and determine future
system improvements. Roadway level of service standards will be established to ensure that
adequate facility capacity for future development is concurrently sufficient with the issuance of
development orders and development permits. These standards will be established for each
roadway link consistent with the facility type, and current Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT) LOS guidelines.
The transportation planning process in Seminole County is a joint effort among various federal,
state, regional, county and municipal agencies working together with the MPO. This agency ensures
that highways, public transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and other transportation facilities are coordinated
and planned consistent with planned development in the urbanized area.
MetroPlan Orlando prepares the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study (OUATS) Year 2020
Transportation Plan Update, a 20-year multi-modal plan for guiding transportation improvements in
the Orlando urban area (Orange, Osceola and Seminole Counties). The plan is based on regional
needs identified through the process of forecasting future travel demand, evaluating system
alternatives, and selecting those options which best meet the mobility needs of the region. The plan
recommends road, highway, beltway, rail, and transit system improvements to be implemented by
2020. The plan represents the best combination of financial resources and improvements to meet
the goals and objectives of the study.
B. INVENTORY
An efficient transportation system should provide access to various land uses through alternative
transportation modes. The overview of the existing multi-modal transportation system within the
II-1
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
City of Winter Springs provides the basis for analyzing existing transportation deficiencies and needs
within the City.
This section will identify existing roadway and transit facilities, availability of public parking facilities,
airport and rail line systems, availability of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and other ancillary
services and programs.
1. Road System
This section describes the major roadway facilities within the City and their relative function
to the City's circulation system. The main roads in and around the City are the Greeneway,
S.R. 434, S.R. 419, U.S. 17-92, Red Bug Lake Road, and Tuskawilla Road. Located in south-
central Seminole County in a suburban residential setting, the City's major roadways provide
access to neighboring towns for Winter Springs residents and employees and facilitate the
flow of traffic. All the major roads in the City are listed on Table II- 1 and displayed on Map
II- 1. The following is a description of the major roadways in the City of Winter Springs.
· Central Florida Greeneway (S.R. 417): The Greeneway is a north-south Principal
Arterial located along the eastern boundary of the City, which provides access to
Sanford to the north and Orange County to the south. In Seminole County, it is
currently a four-lane divided facility that serves traffic coming into and out of the
County.
· U.S. 17-92- North-south principal arterial located along the west boundary of the
City. It connects with Sanford to the north and Orange County to the south. The
route passes through Orlando, Winter Park, Maitland, Casselberry, Longwood,
Winter Springs, Lake Mary and Sanford. It is currently a six-lane undivided facility
within the City of Winter Springs, and four lanes north of Shepard Road.
. S.R. 434: A principal arterial that runs from Edgewater Drive near Orlando to
Altamonte Springs, then east to Oviedo, and then south to East Colonial Drive. S.R.
434 within the City of Winter Springs is a four-lane facility.
. S.R. 419: A minor arterial that runs from S.R. 434 in Winter Springs to U.S. 17-92
near Lake Mary. Within the City of Winter Springs, it is a two-lane undivided facility.
· Tuskawilla Road: A County minor arterial that runs from S.R. 434 in Winter
Springs to S.R. 426 near the Orange County line. This road is currently being
widened to a four-lane facility.
a. Jurisdiction and Maintenance Responsibility
Map II- 1 show the jurisdictional responsibility of each roadway in the City of Winter
Springs. The map ",;as prepared in 1997 by CPI I and docs not reflcet the recent
<\1.dening of u.s. 17 92 to six lanC3 south of Shepard Road.
There are four state arterials, S.R. 417, U.S. 17-92, S.R. 434 and S.R. 419; and one
County arterial, Tuskawilla Road. There are two County collectors (East Lake Drive
II-2
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
and a portion of Shepard Road), and ninctccn (19) twenty-nine (29) City collectors
included in the classification.
b. Functional Classification
Table II- 1 and Map II- 1 show the functional classification of major roads in the
City of Winter Springs. The functional classification of public roads in this element
is based on FDOT criteria, which considers quantitative and qualitative factors such
as jurisdiction, land access, route length, and trip lengths. A road hierarchy is used to
identify relative importance of roads within the system, provide guidance for level of
service and design standards, aid in establishing improvement priorities, identify
maintenance responsibility, and assist in determining funding and financing policies.
The hierarchy used in this element includes:
(1) Limited Access Facilities: Designed to provide regional mobiliry via
uninterrupted flow at high travel speeds for regional trips. Access spacing is
generallY on the order of one mile or more, and average travel speeds are above 40
miles per hour. There is no direct land access, and urban freewqys are multi-lane,
divided facilities. Lane access is alwqys via ramps to mqjor arterials or frontage
roads. S. R 417, Central F/onda Greenewqy, which is part of the Florida
Intrastate Highwqy System (FIHS), is the onlY limited access faciliry within the
Ciry of Winter Spn'ngs.
(2j Arterials: Provide regional mobiliry via both uninterrupted flow and interrupted
flow segments. Arterials provide mobiliry around and through urban and
communiry cores, and accommodate relativelY long trip lengths as opposed to
providing access to ar!Jacent properties. Arterials are sometimes further classified
for peiformance as Class I, II, and III based on the number of signals per mile,
access controls, geometric cross sections, and speed limits. .L1rtCliall'oads n:i:hin
t,00 Ciry iPldudi: S.P-.. 131, U.S. 17 92, S.P-.. 119, and Tu,;,tan:i/fa Road.
(3) Collectors: Provide for movement between local streets and the arterial network.
Collectors serve residential, commercial and industrial areas.
(4) Local Roads: Provide direct access to abutting properties. Local roads
accommodate trciffic originating in or traveling to properties within a neighborhood,
commercial or industrial development. Local roads are not considered part of the
mqjor thoroughfare !)1st em.
c. Constrained Facilities
Section 339.155, Florida Statutes, makes governmental police powers available to
preserve and protect property necessary for transportation corridors and
recommends that needed right-of-way be acquired as far in advance of construction
as possible. FDOT requests that local governments identify constrained roadways in
their comprehensive plans to ensure maintenance of the operating conditions, so
that significant degradation in the level of service does not occur. A constrained
II-3
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
roadway is one in which adding two or more through lanes to meet current or future
needs is not possible due to physical, environmental or policy barriers.
The City and the County have not identified any constrained roads within the City
limits.
d. Accident Locations
Accident analysis is critical because it provides a tool for City and state officials to
recommend appropriate safety measures. Accident frequency along with roadway
performance can be used to prioritize future roadway needs. Table II- 2 shows
accident data for the period berNeen May 2000 and May 2001 2004, compiled by the
Winter Springs Police Department. It shows those road segments with 5 accidents
or more during that year. The road segment with the largest number of accidents
was S.R. 434 at S.R. 119 Tuskawilla Road with H 21-accidents.
e. Signalized Intersections
The location of signalized intersections is shown on Map II- 2. Most of the
intersections in the City use stop signs rather than traffic signals. Traffic lights are
located mainly along S.R. 434.
f. Evacuation Routes
The City of Winter Springs adopted the Peace Time Emergency Plan in 1997. The
plan outlines responsibilities for all departments in the City in the case of a man-
made or natural disaster of local scale. For large-scale disasters, the City follows the
County's Comprehensive Emergency Plan. This plan does not identify evacuation
routes, as Seminole County is a "receiving area", but lists the shelters available.
There are currently 2 shelter;, in Winter Springs (Winter Springs High School and
Highlands Elementary School). All schools in Winter Springs can serve as shelter
sites.
2. Public Transit System
The fixed route bus transit system in Seminole County is operated by LYNX, which serves
three counties.
There is currently one bus transit route serving the City of Winter Springs, Route #39, and
one route that goes to the Oviedo Marketplace area (Route #47). Route 39 runs along U.S.
17 -92 from Fern Park to Sanford. There are no covered bus stops in the City. Map II - 3
shows the bus transit route, major transit generators and attractors, and transit service area
(estimated at 1/4 mile distance from transit route). Table II- 3 shows the public transit
characteristics and ridership figures for fiscal years 1995/96 to 2000/01.
The major transit generators/ attractors in and around the City of Winter Springs include the
U.S. 17-92 commercial corridor, the Oviedo Marketplace commercial area, schools and
public offices. In the future, the Town Center and Greenway Interchange mixed-use areas
will also become major traffic attractors.
II-4
---~
-- I
I
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
3. Parking System
At this time, the City of Winter Springs does not have or need any significant public parking
facilities.
4. Bicycle System
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Office of Greenways and Trails
owns, and has sub-leased to Seminole County, the Cross Seminole Trail, a portion of which
is located in Winter Springs. The Seminole County Parks and Recreation Department is in
charge of maintaining the trail. An Interlocal Agreement exists between the City of Winter
Springs and Seminole County regarding use and maintenance of the Cross Seminole Trail.
The City of Winter Springs Parks and Recreation Department assisted with the design of the
restroom facility located at the Black Hammock trailhead, located within the jurisdictional
limits of the City, and is responsible for the maintenance and cleaning of the restroom
facility.
The trail currently runs from Gardenia Avenue in Winter Springs to the intersection of State
Road 434 and State Road 426 in downtown Oviedo, but will eventually run from Spring
Hammock Preserve in Winter Springs to Howell Branch Road at the Orange County Line
and will connect 5 parks: Central Winds Park, Sweetwater Creek Park, Torcaso Park, Lawton
House Park, and Spring Hammock. The trail will also connect sff seven schools: Layer
Elementary, Winter Springs High School, Indian Trails Middle School, Keeth Elementary,
Trinity Preparatory School, Oviedo High School, and Lawton Elementary. When complete,
the Cross Seminole Trail will be 14 miles long, and will eventually connect to the Seminole
Wekiva Trail, creating a 30-mile continuous trail through Altamonte Springs, Longwood,
Lake Mary, Winter Springs, and Oviedo; and with the Cady Way Trail and the Orange
County Trail System.
Funding for the Cross Seminole Trail has been given priority status by Metroplan Orlando.
However, the funds will not be available until 2007 for this project. The Seminole County
Greenways and Trails Office is currently exploring the possibility of using funds from the
"Completing the Trails Connection" referendum to advance this project to be reimbursed in
2007. Map II- 4 shows the existing and future bike lanes and bike paths/sidewalks, as
presented in the plan. The City docs not have a local bicycle plan.
5. Pedestrian System
The City docs not keep is currently working on an inventory of pedestrian facilities, cxccpt
as part of the Cross Seminole Trail master plan (see abo'o'"e). Sidewalks are found along most
roads. The majority of the City's residential neighborhoods currently have sidewalk facilities.
6. Intermodal Facilities
Intermodal facilities are those transportation elements that accommodate and interconnect
different modes of transportation and serve interstate, intrastate and international movement
of people and goods. Some facilities considered intermodal include ports, airports, bus
stations and train terminals. The Intermodal Surface Efficiency Act (ISTEA) legislation
encourages the provision of efficient access to these intermodal facilities.
II-S
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
There are no public airports within the City limits. The closest public airport is the Orlando-
Sanford Airport in Sanford.
The County is serviced by Greyhound Transportation Services with a bus terminal in
Sanford.
The City of Winter Springs has only one active rail line within the City limits. It is operated
by CSX and runs along S.R. 419 and terminates at just east of Wade Street, within the Winter
Springs Industrial Park. It is used for freight trains only.
The City of Winter Springs is located along the south shore of Lake] esup. The lake is
currently used for recreational boating and fishing. It is not used for transportations
purposes.
c. TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS
Transportation can have a major role shaping the spatial and functional organization of a
community. It can determine the size, scale, status and identity of a community. However, there are
other contributing factors that need to be considered, such as the personal, social, physical,
environmental, economic and cultural attributes of the community. This section will analyze
existing conditions of the transportation system to provide a comprehensive assessment of the
various transportation facilities and services, and their relationship with existing land uses.
This section will also address growth trends, travel patterns, and interactions between land use and
transportation, including the compatibility between future land uses and transportation systems.
Winter Springs is an integral part of the Orlando Urban Area. Additionally, the City is one of the
larger municipalities within Seminole County and is located between two principal arterials, S.R. 434
and Red Bug Lake Road. As such, transportation planning for Winter Springs requires close
cooperation with other planning efforts within the Orlando region and Seminole County. For this
reason, the transportation planning methodology used to develop the transportation plan must
necessarily be compatible with transportation methodologies in adjacent jurisdictions. In order to
accomplish this requirement, extensive use of data sources and planning models from the Orlando
Urban Area Transportation Study (OUA TS) and the Seminole County Transportation Management
Program (TMP) were used in the development of the Winter Springs Transportation Plan.
Existing deficiencies on city, county and state systems were defined and Capital Improvement
Programs identified to resolve these transportation deficiencies. Forecasts of anticipated land
use/ socio-economic activities for 2010 were made and the validated transportation models applied
against them. This allowed the definition of future capacity deficiencies so that funding sources can
be developed to correct these deficiencies.
1. Socio-Economic Growth Trends
The 2000 U. S. Census reported a City population of 31,666, and a total of 12,306 dwelling
units. Dwelling unit estimates prepared by CPH show that the City had 12,769 dwelling
units by October 1999 (including existing and permitted), and expects to add approximately
1,985 dwelling units in the next ten years, for a total of 14,754 units by 2010. Population
projections prepared by LDI in 2000. for the City indicate that the City population will grow
to approximately 37,606 residents by the year 2010, and the Shimberg Center for Affordable
II-6
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Housing estimates a need for additional 4,170 dwelling units in the City, for a total of 16,476
units.
Table II- 4 shows the socio-economic data by TAZ included in the transportation study
prepared by CPH. There are differences in numbers with the City estimates due to the fact
that the CPH study was done prior to the preparation of updated population projections.
The MPO T AZ data also includes projections of employment.
2. Roadway Current Performance
The 1985 Growth Management Act established two important responsibilities for local
governments. The first was to set level of service (LOS) standards for public facilities within
the jurisdiction as part of the comprehensive plan. The second was to ensure that the public
facilities and services proposed in the Capital Improvements Element of the local
comprehensive plan were available concurrent with the development. The Department of
Community Affairs (DCA) requires that adopted level of service standards be achievable and
financially feasible. The standards set a minimum service level that the City must maintain
for each of the public facilities, including roadways.
The roadway LOS concept is defined in the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)
Quality /Level of Service Standards Handbook (2002) 1998 Lc, cl of Service I Iandbook as a
qualitative assessment of the road user's perception of the quality of flow, and is measured
by a scale of driver satisfaction. The scale ranges from "A" to "F", with "A" generally
representing the most favorable driving conditions and "F" representing the least favorable.
FDOT adopted statewide minimum level of service standards for the State highway system.
The minimum level of service standards are used for planning applications, including the
review of local government plans. The generalized maximum volume tables provided by
FDOT are guidelines recommended for broad planning applications. They are to be used as
a general guide to determine highway level of service and through-lane requirements.
For the purpose of LOS maintenance, the County has been divided into Traffic Analysis
Zones (TAZs), twenty-ttffie of which are in Winter Springs. TAZs are small, internally
homogeneous aggregations of the entire urban area. They range from a City block to areas
encompassing several square miles. Demographic data, such as population, housing,
employment and traffic, is maintained at the TAZ level to measure existing roadway LOS.
Map II- 5 shows the TAZs within the City of Winter Springs.
Minimum level of service standards recommended for the state system are shown on Table
II - 5. Table II - 6 shows the average annual daily traffic count results for the period 1996
2001. The standardized descriptions of service levels used in transportation planning are as
follows:
.
LOS A - A condition of road performance where traffic density is very low, with
little or no restrictions in maneuverability. Drivers can maintain their desired speed
with little or no delay.
LOS B - A condition of road performance where traffic density is low and vehicles
travel with operating speeds somewhat restricted by other vehicles. Drivers still have
reasonable freedom to select their speeds.
.
II-7
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
LOS C - A performance condition where operating speeds are determined by other
vehicles, permitting a stable traffic flow. Drivers might have limitations to maneuver
and to increase speeds.
LOS D - A condition of road performance where traffic density is high but tolerable.
Fluctuations in traffic volumes may cause reductions in operating speeds. Drivers
have little freedom to maneuver. In some instances, traffic flows approach unstable
conditions.
LOS E - Represents traffic operation near the roadway capacity or maximum service
volume. Vehicles flow at unstable conditions. Stop-and-go situations may happen.
In freeways or limited access roads, speeds are near thirty (30) miles per hour and
traffic density is high.
LOS F - This condition usually results from long lines of vehicles backing up
because the traffic volume exceeds the roadway capacity. The vehicles are forced to
operate at very low speeds. Stop-and-go situations are frequent and in extreme
cases, vehicles stop for long periods of time.
The +998 2002 FDOT Generalized Tables (see Table II- 7) were used by CPH to evaluate
roadway performance in the City of Winter Springs. A level-of-service analysis was
performed to determine existing deficiencies. The capacity analysis was based on the FDOT
Generalized Peak Hour Directional Maximum Service Volumes for different roadway types.
.
.
.
.
Table II- 1 and Map II- 6 show the WOO 2004 traffic conditions in the City of Winter
Springs. Current deficiencies were found on U.S. 17-92 from Shepard Road to S.R. 419, and
S.R. 419 from U.S. 17-92 to S.R. 434. The segment of U.S. 17-92 between Shepard Road
and Airport Boulevard is planned for widening to 6 lanes by 2010. The S.R. 419 segment
between Edgemon Avenue and Moss Road is programmed for turn lane improvements in
~ 2004-2005 (See Map II- 6 and Table II- 9).
3. Future Roadway Performance
The Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) was used for all of
the city's travel demand forecasting. Consistency with the MetroPlan model (OUA TS) data
and traffic zone structure was maintained through the process in forecasting the city's travel
demand. Table II- 8 shows the 2010 traffic conditions as projected. Most roads \\111 be
complying 'Vi,1.th the Ie, d of service standards noted above. Deficiencies will be found on
U.S. 17-92 north of Shepard Road (even after widening to 6 lanes), S.R. 434 from S.R. 419 to
the Greeneway, and S.R. 419 from U.S. 17-92 to Edgemon Avenue. ImprovTmcnts on these
roads are the responsibility of the State. The projection does not take into consideration the
additional collector roads added within the Town Center. which will help to alleviate the
projected deficiency. Improvements to U.S. 17-92. S.R. 419 and S.R. 434 are the
responsibility of the State.
The City of Winter Springs has limited financial resources to address all of the potential
traffic circulation system needs identified in its Transportation Element. Therefore,
intergovernmental coordination is critical. The MPO provided a list of committed roadway
projects and transportation studies impacting the City of Winter Springs. Table II - 9 shows
the applicable road projects contained in the MPO Transportation Improvements Program
II-8
-l
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
(TIP), as well road improvements planned by the MPO beyond the year 2005.
The traffic simulation process was accomplished as noted in the following section.
4. Model Development and Validation
To adequately forecast future traffic conditions in a rapidly urbanizing area such as the City
of Winter Springs, a set of transportation planning models must be developed and validated.
In the case of the City of Winter Springs, such models exist and these models have been
previously used to develop City, regional and county wide plans. These models are
contained in the model set documented for the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study.
In order to provide the more detailed analysis required for the City of Winter Springs, this
model set was modified. These modifications include the development of a more detailed
TAZ set (microzones), a more detailed highway network, and the use of
TRANSPLAN /FSUTMS model structure. These changes require the validation of the
model set used in this process even though this model set is derived from and closely
resembles the ~UA TS model set. This model set has been modified as detailed below.
a. OUATS Model Set
The transportation planning models used in the Orlando Urban Area Transportation
Study have evolved from a set of models developed in the mid-sixties and based
upon extensive home interviews conducted at that time. The model set is divided
into four general functions and modifications to each of these functions have
occurred over the last twenty-five years.
b. Trip Generation
The existing ~UA TS trip generation model is a cross-classification person trip
production model with attractions calculated using expressions derived from
regression analysis. This model currently uses 11 purposes including special
generator purposed for the major tourist attractions, the various universities and
colleges in the region, and the Orlando International Airport. The model requires
extensive data not generally available such as the forecast of the median income and
car ownership by zone for the calculation of home-based productions.
c. Trip Distribution
The ~UA TS trip distribution model utilizes each of the 11 purposes for which
productions and attractions are generated. Friction factors for each of these 11
purposes have been developed, although the special generator purposes generally
borrow friction factors from other purposes. There are not K-factors utilized in the
model.
d. Model Split/Auto Occupancy
The ~UA TS model set includes a multi-nominallogit expression for calculation of
splits of trips to the transit sector. Auto occupancy is calculated with simple rates by
II-9
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
purpose. The model split is system-sensitive in that it requires the coded description
of a transit system.
e. Traffic Assignment
The current OUATS traffic assignment procedure consists of a 4-iteration
equilibrium assignment with capacity restraint. This process is applied using network
descriptions in accordance with the 1979 version of the Urban Transportation
Planning System (UTPS) developed by the US Department of Transportation.
f. Trip Generation Modifications
In order to make use of the data available from Seminole County and to avoid the
necessity to forecast income and car ownership as required by the ~UA TS trip
generation model, modifications were made to this model. The trip generation
models used are based upon the ~UA TS models, but these models incorporate
simpler rate expressions instead of the more complex cross-classification models.
These models have successfully been used numerous times in the Orlando area
including Casselberry and for Seminole County projects. In addition to the
Transportation Plan and Impact Fee Study in Casselberry, the models were used to
forecast trip generation for the Lake Mary Boulevard Corridor Study and the Lake
Mary/I-4 interchange study for the Florida Department of Transportation. The
models forecast vehicle trips instead of person trips so they additionally do not
require a separate auto occupancy model. The input socio-economic data for the
Winter Springs traffic zones was approved by the City for 1996 and 2010. All other
zones used Seminole County or OUATS data (in Seminole County).
g. Use of OUATS 11 Trip Purpose Models
Since trip generation expressions were available for each of the ~UA TS non-special
generator purposes, it was decided to use the entire 11 purpose models available in
~UA TS. This required incorporating the special generator expressions available
from OUATS into the Winter Springs Model Set. This use of the full OUATS
model purposes additionally permitted use of the ~UA TS friction factors.
5. Public Transit Performance
Public transit improvements offer the potential to significantly increase the capacity of the
transportation network. One average size bus at capacity can carry as many passengers
(approximately 40 persons) as 10 or more private automobiles. Successful transit systems
emphasize the land use and travel demand relationship necessary to address congestion
problems. The most important factors in encouraging transit use are mixed land uses and an
urban form, which provides street connectivity and access to the pedestrian, transit and
bikeway systems.
Transit facilities and multi-modal terminals also are important for the success of the transit
system. These facilities allow for transfers among the various modes within the
transportation system.
II-10
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Public transit level of service criteria is based on the operational and service characteristics of
the transit system. Operational characteristics include the number of vehicles operated in
maximum service, the amount of service supplied, the average speed, and the number of
days the service is provided. Service characteristics include geographic location and service
area population. These characteristics are monitored by the local transit provider, but the
City could be monitoring levels of service for transit performance based on headway
standards. Headway is the time that separates vehicles moving in the same direction on the
same route or track. The emphasis should be on reducing headways to encourage public
transit ridership.
The LYNX transit route currendy serving Winter Springs does not cover all the major traffic
generators/ attractors identified on Map II- 3. In analyzing access to transit service, the City
considers one-quarter mile on either side of the route an adequate maximum distance that
people would be willing to walk to use transit.
6. Other Transportation Systems
The City's current transportation network is based primarily on a road network serving
vehicular traffic, with very litde attention given to other means of transportation. The City
needs to start establishing facilities that will encourage the use of alternative transportation
systems.
Parking is an essential component of the overall transportation system. The decision of a
commuter to drive alone or to use alternative transportation modes such as ride-sharing or
public transit depends to a large extent on the cost, accessibility and availability of parking.
As the City grows the need for these types of facilities will increase.
Birycling is a viable mobility alternative. Bicycle networks provide a commuting alternative as
well as a recreational asset. The City has made efforts to establish a bicycle system.
However, the adopted five-year plan was not achieved within that timeframe. The existing
bicycle plan will need to be updated to plan for the expansion of the current system.
According to the MPO 2020 plan, it is the policy of FDOT to consider adding bicycle
facilities to arterials, and wide curb lanes to collectors when the roads are improved within
urbanized areas.
Pedestrian mobility is gready influenced by the mix and proximity of land uses as well as the
availability of adequate sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities. Adequate land uses and
appropriate urban design would encourage walking for short trips and for accessing transit
facilities and services. The City Code currendy requires developers to provide sidewalks in
new subdivisions.
7. Future Transportation Plan
This section provides recommendations for creating a safe, convenient, and energy efficient
multi-modal transportation system, coordinated with future land uses, plans and programs of
the Seminole County MPO and FDOT.
Since World War II, roadways have been designed primarily for automobiles. Very litde
attention has been given to accommodating other modes of transportation such as bicycles,
II-ii
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
pedestrians, and transit. The goal of this Transportation Element is to look at roads as
multi-modal interconnected transportation corridors, and design them accordingly.
Intergovernmental coordination is essential for the most cost-effective provision of
transportation system improvements. Clearly, the City of Winter Springs does not possess
the resources nor is it fiscally responsible for the entire transportation system within the City.
Seminole County and FDOT have financial responsibility for county roads and state
highway system roads, respectively. Therefore, it is necessary for the City to review the
transportation improvement plans and programs prepared by the County and FDOT. In
this way, the effort and dollars expended by the City to improve its traffic circulation system
may be complemented and perhaps enhanced by the activities of the County and FDOT.
One area of coordination should include the preservation and protection of rights-of-way
for identified future roadway improvements and construction. With the escalating value of
land and costs entailed in right-of-way acquisition it is essential that the City protect roadway
corridors in advance from building encroachment. Increased right-of-way costs reduce the
funds available for actual construction. The City needs to utilize such techniques as setback
requirements, zoning restrictions, right-of-way protection regulations and official
transportation maps to preserve and protect existing and future rights-of-way. Other
measures are discussed in the policy section.
a. Future Transportation Map
The purpose of a Transportation Map is to graphically depict the location of all
proposed collector and arterial roadways and any limited access facilities, airports, rail
lines, and other related facilities. The main impro'.Tfflent that the City \vill need to
coordinate \vith Seminole County i3 the ~1.dening of U.S. 17 92 and S.R. 431.
Map II- 8 presents the proposed Future Transportation Map for the City of Winter
Springs. This map shows the proposed roadway functional classification and
number of lanes for each roadway segment. Roadway capacity is based on the
functional classification and number of lanes. The level of service standard selected
for each roadway was based either on its present or forecasted performance. The
map shows the network as it is planned for the year 2010, with several roads at a
LOS D, which is an acceptable standard. Map II- 7 shows the needed
improvements. Table II- 10, Table II- 11, and Table II- 12 show the roadway
improvement needs by State, County, City or developer funding.
Future roadway design will need to incorporate bicycle, pedestrian and transit
features to achieve a true multi-modal system. In addition to incorporating roadway
design standards in the City Code, the City will start requiring that new
developments be interconnected to enhance the transportation network.
Development design must provide connectivity and access between adjacent
residential developments and nearby land uses. Traffic calming techniques can be
used to protect neighborhoods.
II-12
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
b. Transportation Concurrency Management Areas and Concurrency
Exemption Areas
Chapter 163, F.S., and 9]-5.0055(5), F.A.C., allow the option of exempting certain
developments from the transportation concurrency requirements if a project is
consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, if an area-wide
level of service standard is established and maintained for certain facilities and
transportation concurrency management areas are depicted on the future conditions
map.
Chapter 163, F. S., and 9J-5.0055(6), F.A.C., allow the option of exempting certain
developments from the transportation concurrency requirements if the project is
consistent with the comprehensive plan, promotes public transportation or is within
an area designated for infill development, redevelopment or downtown revitalization
area. The City of Winter Springs does not have any designated Transportation
Concurrency Management Areas or Transportation Concurrency Exemption Areas.
c. Future Public Transit Plan
A transportation system that offers multi-modal opportunities has the potential to
absorb a significantly higher number of person trips than a system that focuses solely
on accommodating vehicle trips. Improved transit service frequencies and new
routes offer a viable transportation alternative and promote transit use. The City will
need to coordinate with the MFO and LYNX for the expansion of routes when
deemed necessary due to the development of new traffic generators/ attractors such
as the Town Center and the Greeneway mixed use district. The City will continue to
support and participate in the transit system operated by LYNX. Furthermore, the
City will help achieve increased ridership by encouraging compact development,
requiring the provision of pedestrian connections, and requiring the provision of
transit facilities and amenities where necessary.
d. The Future Pedestrian Plan
The analysis of existing pedestrian conditions found that the City is well served by
sidewalks. However, in order to develop a pedestrian improvement/construction
program to address those areas lacking sidewalks, a citywide inventory of sidewalks,
crosswalks and other pedestrian facilities must be completed. By identifying missing
links in the pedestrian system, the inventory will allow prioritization of
improvements. Implementation of these improvements will provide pedestrian
connectivity to the overall transportation system.
e. The Future Bicycle Plan
The existing bicycle path system needs to be expanded to extend the bike paths
along to City parks and schools. The City bikeway system will need to continue
being expanded, filling gaps and providing new segments where deemed necessary.
II-13
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
f. TSM/TDM Strategies
Transportation System Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) are options for communities trying to add roadway capacity
without having to construct costly new facilities. The ultimate goal of the TDM
program is to influence people to shift to more efficient modes of transportation and
to travel during off-peak hours. TSM strategies, on the other hand, aim to affect the
actual supply of transportation services. The most effective policies integrate supply
and demand strategies to create a transportation network that promotes efficient
choices. The City of Winter Springs does not currently offer any of these programs.
However, they are options to consider in the future.
II-14
~
....
0
~
<l)
z
=
....
....
rJ)
....
~
~
..r::
....
.~
<l)
u
.E
<l)
rJ)
....
0
rJ)
-
<l)
:;.
<l)
....:l
~
=
J
~
~
"t:l
(/) (1
0 z 0
z <( ~
a::: -l "<t"1
a... ~
a... 0
(/) UJ 0
> N
a::: ....
UJ(/) (1
I-z <l)
ZUJ ><
~ITi .,.:.;
LLa::: I
.....
o a... .....
>-~ <l)
:0
1-0 (1
UU ~
I-
Z
UJ
~
UJ
-l
UJ
Z
o
I-
<(
I-
a:::
o
a...
(/)
Z
<(
a:::
I-
;*1 ~
~ ;... ;;; 0:<"', ~, t"l 1;0 N ~ '" ~ !::: ~ Q< r;;: I"- - '" ~ ;; ~
..; ~ S:! '" -< :;:; ~ :;:; ~ ~ ~ lri !::: ..: ",
;:x ::; '" I"- ,~ .. 00 Z I"- -t
~: ~f ~ z ..f ',c v-; v; ~ c, ",: Ir; ~ :!:. o:'"i '" ~- .f 1'".;-
~ ~ t:"~ - N
;..
;,;....
'J; ...,. ..:
.,. ~ a; Q i,.L,; U U U '" '" ... ... 0 Q 0 Q 0 V V U U U Z U U
c,
~ ~ < ~
~ ;5 00 :;; r-~ - 0 0.: t< 5: '2 -t ~<l ." .0: ?; '"
- ,. "" V': '", "" ,. ~, -t ~ N
;;... .- d - '5 C 6 '0 "" - - d 6 ',-' '- d d d 0 -=- d Z - d
;:!
'"
'"
~ r~ <'>- '" '" '" '" :5:: I"- " ;? '" ,-",I
or; vo ~ '" :;;: 1;'1 ~ 3 f; '" ~ c' ~l S: ~ tf' ..: N if,
~: '" :l', c- t- O; ~ lr~ ,'" -:'l ~ -t '" Z :;: l{'".)
~ ~ ;g ;t; ~~< c. 01:; ",: 00 !"'l - I=:i ,., 00 :! ~, -+ 'r- e; ~; t"-I
r"j '" - - ....j - ('1 1""1 -
;..
~
... M c V'" 1"'1
~ '" ", ~ 'X, g 00 ~ ~. 'Z' f8 -t R.
\:; :; ~ ~-fl 0::' cr, ~
::;: I"- 00 CJ'~ ~.
.- ..; 5!' 11"; ~ t - ....... a: .oS ~; - ...; 00 ". ~
Q >r. ('~ r".j N - ("', (,"1 N
-
;..
...
\: :: '" 8 ;3 :8 ::s 8 ~ 8 ,~ ,,,", ~ 8 ~ 8 X ~ S ;( 8
~; ~ ~ 1"'\ "" 8
~ ? .' t- 9 .. '" '" I"- ,- C-' (0"':. b ~.
.- ....-; ~ ~: ~; ~ v', :!:. :!:. :! .f ~: ~ IF> ;;'): ~ - S' - d S
~ V\ ", - !,"", ", - - -
-
...
.- "F; ~ <<: '" Ii!' <<: Ii!' <<: '"
~ "/, ..; ;;; ..; -' ..; ..; ..; ..; ..; 0 3 ..; ..; 3 3 c f:: 6 c 0 6
-1' ::; ;:$ ;::; ::; ;:$ .- ;:$ ::; t t; :1l ::; t; t;
~ '-'
.. ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ ::j '" ~ ~ '" <<: ~ ~ ::J "i ::j ~
~ i:= ~ ~ ~ r: r: ~ ~ ~ ;:j '"1
5 ..; ~ 5 ..;
~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '.? '" '" ':::. '-, 0 0
<( <. -< .0: <f, <f, <f, <f, u U .0: .0: <. ..: u u u u u u
- :r:
C :.;
7, '" -t -t -. .,. .. .. 1""<1 ,",'j " " -t -t .,. -t .,. r'~ i'"l C, r-J ...'1 c.
7- ....;;
w ~ W
~ ~ Ci
~ ~ ;... > Q .., 0 <:. vl >; 0
'"' ~ c< <f, .0: ..; " ~ 8 Q .."
;;> Z ~ "" i::ci ~,
> ..: ~ p:; 0 vl b '-
-< ~ c' ::< ffi :z; '"
,.. ;:!: ,'" ::: v ::; ;:t '" UJ ~ ;1 ;'!, ;:r: s:
- ~ ;2 Z g "i '" ~ 25 '"
" -t >-j -. iG "-l u.l "" ~ 0 j ~ .,. " ~ .,. -t
cr:: cr:: f:li 0:: vl IX ~ 8 cr:: ::r: ?;1 cr:: ~ ~ cr:: ~ '" '"
~ "'- IX tr: i: <f, :::c
tn t.n '" Ul vl <.:> !l-l tn it ~ ~ ::< F- r;/; Z tn <I> vl vi vl
E'" wJ 0 w Q
~ <'; > Q '" -, ~ (r <(
'< 1; ~ '-' 15: 0 0 0 0
; j ;d ..J ;;- '" '" '"
~'l :> <; z j ~ R ..; 0 (fJ 8 1"'-1 ~ d
0 , q -< ::< ~: 0 0 '" "-l '" ~ -<
';J. '" '< 0 :F. ~ in ;:J ~ '" <:>: :E :1.
- ~ t:: UJ ;,:; '" l.U ~, t::
-t .., ::;: '" /::; - W j :-. :-. .,. "'- '" -< 'T
15 '" t/ '" vl g: t:.Ii 8 ::;s 0 Q Z: C' '" ~ '" :z
t:iJ ~ :.s..: vl '" ;:;'j fi '" vl 0 ~ '"
vl r..r, ;::J "" U'i vl ::; ~ Vi it '" ~ f-< f/'j' :::. '" :E vi
:; <'; <; j <; ~ j Ci 0 0
~ d F ::J d '" '" ~
C-. r'l ~ ~ ~ ;?; :::: 0 .., c.
~ '" ~ ;! .,. ;:!: " ,";)'- ~ !;;l "" '" :;: ~ Cii '"
.- c: ~ ~ =t ;;2 ;;2 ;;2 :2 ;:2 ;2 <0' <f, Vi vl
"" " 'T "" "T j j c; 0 ::r: tn tn
~ vi vi '" "" '" '" '" '" '" y:: ~ tn 0 Vi 0 ~ ~ 0 '::l
~ i: ~ ~ ~ <(
:::. ;:J u) uJ tn vi '" vl vl w..i u.i f7 ", '" :;;.; ::E
V)
-
I
>-<
>-<
'E
'"
~
i:?,
'E
.c
g
c
2.
~
~~
::> c
";;U
> '/:
if:: ~
C "
~~
&
rl
X
~~6
~;:t .rs
~ E
~
,
...;
d
0
U
~
40<
0
!
Q)
Z
d
....
....
CIl
....
~
~
..c::
....
.~
Q)
u
.E
Q)
lfJ
'-
0
CIl
-
Q)
>
Q)
.....J
~
d
J
('l
(/) ~
()z ('l
z<( 0
- ---l ez:::
0:::: a...
a... -.:to
(/) W 0
0::::> 0
N
W (/) 40<
I-Z ('l
Zw Q)
~aJ ><
..:.;
LL 0:::: I
-
o a... -
>-~ Q)
-
1-0 ,.Q
('l
UU E--
I-
Z
W
~
W
---l
W
Z
o
I-
<(
I-
0::::
o
a...
(/)
Z
<(
0::::
I-
'" ~
=:: L. 00 ~ "" ;:; - ~ ~ 3 ~ ~, ~
~ <" "l ;;:
Ii'" .,. ~ r-. "; - -t, ,..j ~ "'~
~ - ,.-,j ,..,~ - .f c, I""': 0 ,-, r-;
...
~: ...
:"
-- Q u u () u u u Cl Cl Cl U U Cl u
d ~
-
~ 00 ;?} 0 ~'~ ,>"1 .=. l~ ~ fi: 2; t:; ~,
:::: ~I ,^, '" ~, 1-, ....t
~ a a 0 d ~ 0 0 d 0 d d d
-,
--
;..
~
-- ;; ':G ~ ~ ,..-., 5! c- 1', ~ e, on
de ~, "" ;::
0 ~ :z. - on
c-, .. <c'l -' ~ <l, -t
~i f"~ ('i .f - c- If: .' - ~, ",i
'"
'" --
~.
...
-'!': ~ '" 8 8 '" g Q .~ ~ ~ ~ '" 8 8
:;; ~ ; '~ ~, ~;
.:. (3l ';: d ,-1 ~ =: d
'Z r - - 'I
-
~ 1', '" '" '" '" ~ S!' '" '" '" '" S!' '"
g ,.J: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 {:::: ~
-- ... ... ...
U U U U U U U U U c..' til u
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -l
~ -l .J j j .J .J :J -l '"
:=: -l ~ 8 -l ~ ~ ~ ~
0 8 8 0 0
u u e:; u u
~
:i",
--
..; 1'1 N l""'l "I e. r"l "'j ("J c-, -t ('I N c.
-
';
'" Q '" Cl
Cl .J Cl :s: z 12 :S 12 '"
c' d 2, v; '" '" iil
f- a ~ ~ '" w WJ co WJ
~ ci '" ~ ~ r= 15 F e, ;1. ;J, '"
c. ;.- f- ;.- ;.- ... -t -t WJ
-- r- ~ u:l t; >, '" v, '" WJ '" ;.-
~ .J ::c 0:: tl:: ... 0 '" WJ 0 '" '" z c' '" '" '" '" '"
'" >- c. Vl <( ~ 0; z ~ ~ ,/, ~ " .J Z ~ V1 czj Vl ::r:
c. ~ Cl
'" ~ ~ j '"
It Cl 2 <( z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-- Vi. 8 Vl ;;;: d '"
;;: '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" t(l
~ - ;:;;
:... ~ ~ ~ ~ '" <( r= ~ ~ ".!:,
... Cl Cl C. ~ ~ ;.- ;.- ,. '" '" '"
'-' ;:- 0 ;:- '-' >- ~ i../') ci ~ f5 -0: -0: ~ '" z z 0
.J '" -l -l i=: r:; ~ i=: c;: '" ::r:
~ '" ... '" ~ '" Q '" z ?: z ~ z '" ... Vl
Cl
.... Si Cl -0:
-- r2 ~ r2 f2 ~ G 2 2 2 2 '" 0
'"
.,. 13 x V1 Vl Vl Vl 0 0
WJ I::! UJ tJJ ~ '" '" , '" '" '" :!::
""" ~ r:: ~ ~ i: i: c. ~ , WJ C. WJ C. W '-/1 ~
r r ;.- >- Cl ci Cl ~ ~ '" '"
;;: '" '" ~ '" ~ <( 9': -0: C 2:l a :i 2:: ~ '-' :J ::J >; 0 ,.
~ ~ ::r: ~ 8
z ~ z ~ z ~ Z ~ '" '" ~ '" ~ '" ~ '" ~ 05 Vl
\0
..-<
1
.......
.......
~
w.
~
Vi
'-
c
-@
'"
c
E
8-
.~
,~
7, .u
~d
> '"
sq ~
.::;j""'
,,-0
:'3'~ "'0
~ "P~.."
G: ci.~
~2:~
~r!
"
I;'
,
..;
t:
0
U
...::t:
'"'
0
z
Il)
Z
t:
.....
.....
CIl
.....
><
~
..c:
.....
.~
Il)
u
.E
Il)
(f)
.....
0
CIl
~
>
Il)
...:l
...::t:
t:
.....
...:l
(II
V) .g
<.9 z (II
z <( 0
0::: --l ~
0.... 0.... '<T
V) W 0
> 0
0::: N
WV) '"'
I-Z (II
Zw Il)
~
~a:i ,.:..;
LL 0::: I
-
00.... -
>-~ Il)
1-0 ::0
(II
UU ~
I-
Z
W
~
W
--l
W
Z
o
I-
<(
I-
0:::
o
0....
V)
Z
<(
0:::
I-
;i ~ ~
~ tz ~, '" ,'I .." ,.. ~, ~ ;:f, '" '" :;r;
.;, :! D r- r- oo ':0 .;.
.....~ '" q ""t: r- ~~ "'t ~ r<'": c-
Or, r-
! - - - '-, ..,,' r,j d - - - """
;.;...
q ""
~
""
;,.. Q v v v v V Q V <;." V (.,! (.,! (.,! (.,!
.,. ;;
=i ~
~
~
..... g 1"1 ~ - c. ,"" <" 0'. ,.., 8 :: ;i ~
Cl ~, '>1 ~,
::: c ::i d C c' d d ,'" ci ,0 d d d
;..
:3
.., " .." c't ,:;, 0'. - ~. ~ C' ;; ~, ',D 1/\ ~.
-r ;;t; "" c. r"- ~, -r
,.. ("J ~, n ~, n 0'. ('.A N '-"i -
~, 0' N r-~ - - or" ,.., ri ..; 'D - ('"~ -
'" ;0,..
'"
c,
... E
~ " "' f3 :=: f3 ~ '", g f3 " f3 g :;
- '-' ?:: e; ~ 15 6 :S
~ ~ S! d e S! ~ ~ "2' =: (":i
- - - -
; ~ G
-
... ~ "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ~ ""
..;f '"
~ C1 2 0 0 12 12 12 e
j F: .... .... .... ....
u u U u <;." u u u u U ..J ..J
~ '" '4 ~ ::J ~ ::J ::J '" :l ~
~ ....l ..J ....l ..: ..:
'V ..J :=! ..J Q 8 ..J ..J ..J :=! 8 i:i i:i
8 8 .....1 0 0
G v r) u u ij ..J ..J
~
7-
""
,
(',) c. ("'J i"l Cl ~..~ c. 0' c. I""J N ("'',j "
:::
"
':1
Q Q Q
C1 V uJ ..ct Q
~ ~ 2:; e, ..,. j
"" '" ~ "" "" d d
<r. '" Q ~ ""
G "" ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ::J Z :;;: ~ 0'. ,,,. ;;:j ;,..
<r. .." w ci z 0 <r. -r "'1" ;; <r. f:J
z z ~ :':i '" LU '" z 9 ~
<r. '" '" ::c ..- ~ <r. '" '" '" '"
'" cO '" ~. '" '" <r. Q '" cO tri vi [h :::,~ >=
j ~ ~ to
12 0
.,,-; WJ Z z d ~ "" ~ /';;
~ 0:: "" '"
j w ~ ~ ~. <r. 0::
0:: i:: ~ v. ..,.. .." ;:f, '" ;;....
bY ~ ~ ::.:> ~ "", '" ~
..... f- 2:; ~ >- ;.... 0:: ci ...: .." .." ~ Cl <(
V1 l5 <r. l5 <r. d t:: "'- ;.. Z "" "" Z; ~ ~
<'il "" ~ UJ ..J c;; ~
Q Z ~. Z ~. Z ~ 0:: '-' U'1 '" '" ~ ::: PO "
;,.. 9- "" '" f- Q ci ci
j <:; UJ >: ::J
..... ;S Q I.lJ <r. ..J
..- 0 ~ d 0:: 15 z z z z ~ 0 oo oo
0:: '" 0 0 0 ""
..- 0:: :<: z Z ~ :; ::s :; '" z <r. <r.
~ '" I.lJ -<: 15 u ~
v 2:; rrJ 0 t..U UJ W 0 ~
;;; '" .... ", i:!l uj 8 uj ~ uj is IJ.l :J
:a ~ z
:c F; "" 0:: '" ::1 ;.. ;;. ;;. ;;. >- G.l ~
w.. Q > Q " Q t/) <( UJ <( <( w <( :<: <( '"
u
Q Vl Jb!
~ ~ c
~ ~~,
co> ;/';
U.1VJ~
0:::0;;
<....l~
~Ji~
...J rl ;;r::;
s~~j
Ci ~ ~
~ t
Ft
~
("j
>--
'"
;<>;
o:!
'"
UJ
""
~
;;.1)
:;;:
~
U
f..:
tt
<(
0::
f-
;..
b
Ci
~
;:l;
C5
t',t
~
0::
UJ
f-
'"
:.';
"5-
....
Vi
j
iJ.l
;I:
....
:i!!i
cr;
r--
,.....
I
.....
.....
'? I
p
iT
u:;
-
C
'/;
6.
~
~
t;
fd
tt:
""
e:
>-
....
z
~
G
~
u
q
.....
M
q
'0
<l)
<l)
q
'M
q
W
::r::
p.,
u
<l)
u
'"'
;:l
o
(f)
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORT A TION ELEMENT
Table 11- 2: Accident Locations with Greater than 5 Accidents, 2004
INTERSECTION CRASHES % 01 INJURY 01 FATALITY
SR 434 @ TUSKAWILLA 34 8 6 0
SR 434 @ SR 419 25 6 1 0
SR 434 @ CONSOLIDATED 16 4 5 0
SR 434 @ TIMBERLANE TRAIL 15 4 4 0
SR 434 @ WINDING HOLLOW 14 4 5 0
TUSKAWILLA RD @ TROTWOOD 12 3 3 0
SR 434 @ MOSS 11 3 3 0
TUSKAWILLA RD @ WINTER SPRINGS 10 3 3 0
SR 419 @ MOSS 11 3 4 0
SR 434 @ SUNSHADOW 9 2 5 0
SR 434@ CENTRAL WINDS 9 2 2 0
SR 434 @ APACHE TR 8 2 3 0
SR 434 @ EDGEMON 8 2 3 0
SR 434 @ SHEOAH BLVD 8 2 3 0
SR 434 @ CORTEZ 7 2 4 0
SR 434 @ LANDS END 7 2 4 0
SR 434 @ SHERRY AVE 7 2 1 0
SR419@WADEST 7 2 2 0
SR 434 @ BELLE AVE 6 1 2 0
SR 434 @ VISTAWILLA 6 1 0 0
US 1792 @ SR 419 5 1 0 0
SR 434 @ HAYES RD 5 1 0 0
WINTER SPRINGS @ NORTHERN WAY 5 1 0 0
SR 434 @ FOUNTAINTREE 5 1 3 0
SR 434 @ TUSCORA 5 1 0 0
NOTE: THE CRASHES LISTED ABOVE WERE CRASHES THAT THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
RESPONDED TO IN 2004.
Source: Winter Springs Police Department, March 2005
II-iS
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Table 11- 3: Public Transit Characteristics
Route Service Area Days Frequency Hours
#
39 U.S. 17-92 (Orlando to Mon. to Sat. 30 min. 5:02 AM to 11:05 PM
Sanford) Sunday 60 min. 6:24 AM to 8:05 PM
47 Oviedo - UCF Mon. to Sat. 60 min. 5:00 AM to 9:54 PM
Source: LYNX Web site, July 2001
Ridership
Year Route 39 Route 47
FY 95/96 247,099 N/A
--.---.-.-----.-.-.---. -.------.-.--.
FY 96/97 282,333 N/A
---.--.--....---.------.... --
FY 97/98 309,326 N/A
---.-.---.--..--.-...--.--.--..--....--. ........--.--......----..-...-.....--............--......
FY 98/99 261,920 63,466
.--.--.---.--.--.----.....---. ~_._--~
FY 99/00* 213,777 59,032
.........................._mM....mm.mm......_.............. ,__....._....._.._._..___'....M.m.............__.......M.....
FY 00/01 (Oct.-June)* 164,437 43,109
..........-.........-.....-.-.-......-........--..--........ _...__.w......_.._._............._M..._M_....._............._
* Route 39 was split into two.
Source: LYNX. Land Design Innovations, Inc., August 2001
II-19
I-
Z
w
:2
w
---l
W
Z
o
I-
<(
I-
0:::
o
0....
(/)
Z
<(
0:::
I-
Q)
=
0
N
u
!+=l
.....
~
~
E-t
>>
..c
....
=
Q)
e
0..
0
-
Q)
>
Q)
0
"'C
Q)
....
u
Q)
'0'
~
~
"0
=
~
OJ:)
=
....
(/) ....
0 rn
Z ....
~
z <( W
0::: ---l ~
0.... 0....
(/) W
0::: > ~I
w (/)
I-z
Zw
~aJ "<t
LL 0::: I
-
00.... -
>-:2 Q)
-
1-0 ..c
~
UU E-t
j
~ el
f~J
1li
! ~
I ~
o
o
o
o
C)
r--
>-
l~oo"" S?
~;s~g~gs ....
g>
11i
j
~!
,i~
!"n
~~.~
ra. := :5
I~ :i
~..~
'E
.. ..
w;...'t:
.sF"
g>:::>
i}i
i
Jj ~ g
~ 8 ~'g
2. ~5-~3
15 ~ i;-: 0 ~ 1#1
(f)~~EE-g@
Q('J~ciL:ll(~(/)
;:r::t:~;::f"'..;:::
o
""
""
""
o
o
r--
o
...
'"
...
o
o -
f'.J
o U")
c,
8~i:2~j~~m63
.- Q1 ~ ~
~-g~gO~
:5 g UJ "5..x: c'~ ~ E
"'<.:11"~:>iJ)"8
1~~0~~~ r~!i.:
(;l-5rn~~dJ57liro
~uJj~i:()8~;e
(~ t'~ 0J r',j N N N ("J ('"-.J
r--f'-.t'-t'-r-r-r-r-r-
o
~~8~
-_?'1",
o
o
o
'"
.,.,
'"
o
o
r--
-
-0
co
'"
~ .-
c; \is
'" ~
~ CL
8 i1 '"
.,. ~]
'" UJ$;
" '5 "
i!! ~j
~
<3 uu
'"
r--
o
o
o
""
""
o
N
'"
o
o
o
""
o
N
I
-
-
o
o
~M.roc N~WN- -~~o("~~~~~
~t'-~N~r-r-~MW~~~~r-t'-wnoo~~
~i
'"-1 X X
.~ ~Li: ~
:., ('J o;"iv N
m ~ ~~~ -", ~ t'-
::::~; 2JL~ <Jl);!CQ;llt
C :'t;: C CL 0.. 0.. c 2: )5.QJ "e: ~
~C~~ 2E2~n~S0~~ ~
~~~8.~~&&~8Ij~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~I~UJ%~~~~3
~~gi~~~~~~~~~~~~g
~~~~~U0uromG00U~ro~
en
'>)
.,....
r--r--
("~NNt'JNNNNNNNNNNNNN
rooo~~~rooo~roro~ooooroOOroOO
V)
0z
Z<(
0:::---1
0....0....
V) w
0:::>
W V)
I-z
Zw
~aJ
LL 0:::
00....
>-~
t::0
UU
I
I
I-
Z
W
~
W
---I
W
Z
0
I-
<(
I-
0:::
0
0....
V)
Z
<( 0 <:> '"
0:::
l-
e, 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~S '"
0 <:> 8 0 ;g
0 0 17; g
~1 (') C>
(') ", '" " c.;) ...
C. N N M
<:> i:ii '" '" <:>
'"'
o
E5?;~
('1 oo::t '"
~
""
""
o
'-'0
00
CJ -
<:> <:> '" - ~
- N - - N '" ~...-..... - ""
........
N
I
.......
.......
... I~i", '" '"
- ~.,... "" - ~
M
W 0:) Ncolo:
:2 "'T r"'l ('"lla::
-tl5~~~~~ gj~lp~
M
('J IT; \II c.o
OJ~~~(f)
,,-,
4'~
<"
co
'"
M
<"
M <<l
)0( .~ 0\1\.:1 "-.l
ill cV'" ]",,,
(~ :~ ~~~
I'" "" "_N~",E,"_I~;j
miC 1~~W~~~~~~~~]~81.g
t0mi~I~~~~5~Bac ii~I~~
O!~0 ~. ';1111~~!~1~
8-~b ~immm8D~...i
!~~e ~E~~~~!!j~gg~i
~:>:>~:;( U'J'::Lif}I-i-I-I-l-$:C')<r:42t-.>
C
"t5
:;>
if>
~
a~ ~
~I'~ ~I= dlg 1'1;; ."~
'5 = "11 ?: (l) -5 .~ '" !.i "'
= 8 8 - - is lU '" ~ >= ,!: l'
~ ~ ~ i 1 ~ ~I~ ~ ~I~ ~ l~ ~
~-t:-~ E()O~>-ujU) (I) g EE
rn rf ~ &. ~~ ~ d5 ~:i?i ciS ~ ~ t~
.$;? 0 ~
,~ ~: 5
iJr "'
i~ If1 ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ .~
:;EC 1-('lj::J;"'"
lI! III ~ c"!<
~5:"ga;*'5i~~p
o:",,::J:H;E~w~
I'J 8 ".s:;iIg;n: R
.r.?~~&loiig;~]
r- Y.-i (j) j:- (')::;;
6
;;;
CD
Ed
c
'"
o
S ~
l' ~
" t-
~j3,~
~~~
:g~~
(/)~(I)W
~n~MIM MMMMMMMMMMMMM
rororo~l~ ro~ro~rooororo~oooororo
.:$.:$.:$d\;1;cil;1,
1...11 U') U"J If}
roccroaj
a3iSiBa3:i:::€:liiS::€:i::i:iB:i:::€
...:
d
o
U
.;,;
I
-
-
~
::c
1:'$
~
V)
(jz
Z<(
o:::--J
CLCL
V) W
0:::>
W V)
f-Z
Zw
~m
LL 0:::
OCL
>-~
f-O
UU
..;
;::
o
U
~
I
-
-
~
::c
CIS
f-t
G
I'--
~M~
'"
I'--
I'--
'='
co
'"
M
'='
O~~'N\"I:::
'='
'='
M ('\1
""
N
'=' '=' '=' <D '"
~ ~ I~ M '=' '=' ~ .-N"'lf
N
N
I
>-<
>-<
1'--0 N O'l
'=' Q Q ;!~ (<, ;::
(j1;:I;&l8
N I'--
:rv~
~~~ OU. ~:r8~~oro2o~n~~~~N~~N~a
_,_. ~ ~__~~_~~N~ ~M~_~_M~~-
;::.:..:rl.D:;
-.- ..;[
::::;
~
~~~~ ",S2
.8B~.8 '
~~2~~ -~ ~~ m
~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~* e
_~~_o rn~ u ~~ m
2~~R~ &~~ ~ ~g ~
~~r-~o.. ~~~2~E. ~& g
cc_c~ Itl~~c88~oO 0
~2~~._~~~~~2 ~~~ ~~
~~i~~~$!a~~~~~I~~ i~
~~~~~ciii~8~!00o~~
~~~~.~U~R~ ~?~~~Dw.
~~~~~!~rn~~~~m~?5a~~~
OOOO~IOO~~~~<~zz>~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~rowwwoo~rorooowroOOoorororooooo
CD
,"
'"
<t
N
.,.-(">j-(f") '<:t u.i ifJ
:5:5~~:5~lJl~
r;;v;t?1iiro$(!JiJ)
~:E~~?5:&<5~
~lfJ:J: ~"O~ ~
~~~~~~~~
OOOOi-OU'JP
~~~&5gs~gsgs
06
<t
~<DI'--
~jljljl
ifJ "" </J III
W m Q) <.ll
~~J::
U I.) (,,) U
c: c: c: c:
:!UUUl!
00 0 0
~1~~
~"'C '"'C""C
000
~€€€
~~~~
en en ~.,..., O'J
cO 00 0.,;
N ~ U"l(Q..... "<T....-t 'I':t
u u u u u u u u
JSJSJSJSJ;J;r.% JS
~ 0 ~ ~ 0 w I/i~ ~ </J ~
lw",,,,.,,,,,,i:'-~ '" ~
u~~~~~~~~c ~ e~
~~~~~c~0ci ~ ~~E
~~~~~~~-~~ ~~~3ro
~~~~g~~~<~~~~~~E~
~~ffl~~~~~~ffi~gm~ Ea
OOOOOOO~~G~~O~~~~
~€~~€€~~m~$~€'~~$E
z~~~~~z~~~~~~~~~8
~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~g~:?,
I-
Z
W
~
W
---I
W
Z
0
I-
<(
I-
0,::
0
0-
C/)
Z
<( 0 C>
0,::
I-
0 '"
0 '"
~
;;$
'"
1----
.,,- .-,....-...-~
c<")
N
I
>-<
>-<
(,7;
"'t
:;j:
13 ~~ ~ ~ ~ (D
N
'"
...,
rt.~~ ;:Z;;:':~~~:'h3S~''J;g;;r;
~~~~~~
g
'"
~
I~
i5 Jj ,. ~
2~ t~ 1"'1 "'It L(1t,.,h<J:jd') 'Ri:ill
~c 0E ~
~E~~2Bg2gg ~~ ~ ~
~Juvvvvuuv c~ g Elli
~A ~~~~~~~~ &m ~ ~>
~o ~~a.mm$~~-NM_o~n I~~ gl~~
~~~uuuuuuuUcE'~~~ I~k Cl~~
~C~CCCCCCCC~~5~C,_ ._~ .~t~O
r;~U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t5 ~ '- ~.glci5 ~,~~ L~T~lc7S5;
1~1~~~~~~~~~B~~~I~IJ~~iJ~
roo (':) 0 0 q 0 00 0 0 Pi ~ ~ F; (" ;.::;>; ~ .' J;;; roW j;;; J~ "
$ZOZZZZzzzz i$~o$o~$$~
~,B
~"6i5
"" <tJiJi
~ 1h-E-5
j~~i~
'9~~(tI~
fiiC5666
.~~~~~
'"
@ "ili ~
~"" ~ 3 ~
og~ ~~(3E~
~Or-@ t5(/)~~
~ ] ~ :Q I~ ~ ~ 0 ~
.~ cr cr ~ ~ )c;: -3 ~ ]J
il;iI;~~1!~IDa..'E
~~'E~~~~[)d3
x x
" "
a
E E
g a a
o rJ'I ~
~ ~ ,~~
~~~!S~
B-Ei1~i5
~a&Li:&
C/)
(jz
Z<(
0,::---1
0-0-
C/) W
0,::>
wC/)
I-z
Zw
~iE
LL 0,::
00-
>-~
t:::0
UU
~.-.-__...-~ .-~-~---- .- --.-
mmm~mmmmmmmmmmmmmm~m~mm~m
~NNNN!NNNNNNNNNNNN
hmmmmi~~mmmmm~mm~~
M r'J N ("'-4<"'J
m01(10)()"l
....:
=
o
U
"<t
I
-
-
~
:c
~
f-;
I-
Z
W
~
W
---I
W
Z
0
I-
<(
I-
0:::
0
lL
V)
Z e
<(
0:::
l-
e
V)
(jZ
Z<(
0:::---1
lLlL
V) W
0:::>
W V)
I-Z
Zw
~iE
LL 0:::
OlL
>-~
1-0
UU
...
;::
o
U
.;;.
I
-
-
tI)
-
..0
<:IS
f-;
;:1;
e
lJi ~
e
~~1~~3:~
O~:;~~cO
N "q; "'":"
i4) r- ""1'
-'"
(";',
CL
1?
-Vi
]
~
~
"
E
-'
,3
if>
~ "8
~~ .r:
oO~I:ttJ as
000",,, ",0 2:
r-j"'7r---U~E C~ (lJ
C5g:5$oi; ('-.11:"101- c
g ;f; U 13 ] V; Q Q).5 5 ~. ~ ~ ~
<V ~ (f; ~ ~ J1 ro 3 ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ttJ~~~~~~o~~w~~~~ .~
C C C C C C ~ (Ii ~Il J::. c C C C fti (\I
~~E~~Effi~~ ~~~~~~O
;~~~~~I01~ ~~~~~!~
C0
,J"j
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0
e
'<>
~
"" ;:{
~
...
f-
...
'"
...
N 0 '"
"t;t (,'J co
<D
'"
.,
ri
di ...
'"
r::
'"
~
'"
- N
'T
-;:: N
I
;;; -
-
'-" <'i
~
r:: Lfl
0
<1> 0
<I>
d N
... '" ...
'"
.1 M
-
""
'"
""
'"
~ ~~~@~
....'"
(''./ ~
~ (O,t g~
"'
!Ii e
c 8
E o!lr.IJ
i ~ ~15 ~~
k <( 0~1~ ail~~ - ,,_
ill ~ ~ E ~L~ (3 <( ~ ~ .02 'fh
f)j ~ >1 c:- "Ig if> "' f- (j) :> ~
K; <1l (S 0 "010'"0 "0 X...c m (j;
~t--;;dJ~~Q.i~?e('Jj('lJ:-Q~
:Jl :0 :!' '5' !j fj1" I~I~ E :Jl ,g] ~
~8~Jj0I~fI~b58~
rD [,0 U;:;I~h ti) U^J L{) W.l If) I,{) l,,(J Ion LO
,.::/1 Ch O'llen cJ' 0; 01 en 0':> 0';> ,:)) Ch OJ
<II
(ij
-
o
I-
u
c
-
(j)
'-<
<l)
<l)
C
,..,
bJ)
C
~
::c
p.,
u
Q.i
u
l-<
=
o
rf)
~
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Table 11- 5: Statewide Minimum Level of Service Standards for the State Highway System
as Determined by ADT (total volume)
Transitioning Roadways Inside
Urbanized Urbanized Urbanized Parallel to Transportation Constrained
Areas, Urban Areas Areas Exclusive Concurrency and
Areas, or Under Over Transit Management Backlogged
Communities 500,000 500,000 Facilities Areas Roadways
INTRASTATE
Limited Access Highway (Freeway) C CCD) D(E) D(E) D(E) Maintain
Controlled Access Highways C C D E E Maintain
OTHER STATE ROADS
Two-Lane C D D E * Maintain
Multilanes C D D E * Maintain
*
Means the level of service standard will be set in a transportation mobility element that meets
the requirements of Rule 9J-5.0057.
N ate: Level of service standards inside of parentheses apply to general use lanes only when
exclusive through lanes exists.
SOURCE: FDOT f998 2002 Level of Service Handbook.
II-25
I-
Z
W
~
W
--l
W
Z
o
I-
<:(
l-
n:::
o
0....
(/)
Z
<:(
n:::
I-
rJl
.::
='
rJl
Q.I
Q;::
....
=
='
0
u
u
!+::
.....
(':l
...
r--
,.e.
.;
Q
-
(':l
='
=
~
Q.I
(/) ~
...
0z Q.I
Z<:( ~
- --l .,..;
n:::o.... 0
0.... 0
(/) W N
n:::> i
w (/)
I-z
Zw
~~ ~
LL n::: I
....
00.... ....
>-~ Q.I
-
1-0 ..0
(':l
UU r--
~ ><
~~~<
rn.a,:,~
~~~9
~<F-<~
~~..;~
~.,.~o
~~~<"
...t7!'-<r':
~ r.; 0 U
>~~~
""1:""1:""'....
~"'-l
~~a
......to
o d t'l
U
UfIJ~
K ""i"'.'
~~Zt::
.-( ':;l i:l.'
e:::~o9
;...u~
o
;...
....
r.
o
~
~
;..
""I:
~
~
<
,..,
"'"
::::
("j
~~~~~g~~~~~g~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~~~~=~~~~~;~~~
~~~~~oo~oo~oooooo~oooo~oo~oo~~~~~~~~~~oooo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~
dcicicidcidcidddcidddci66dddcicidci~ci~od~
~~~M~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
O\C'C'CI'."'.oo~'<t''''
_ - r'4N
~ N {;,1 ~1 ~,l ;:;4N r:i ~ N
~8~~~g~~~~~~~~N~~~8:ag ~~~~g:~~
N~~~~~n~~~~N~~8o~~OOM~ffl ~~N~~M-~
~NNMMM~~N~~~-N~MN~~~~=-_~-~~NN-
;....
<
;t:
Q
Cl >
~ s5
o:l l/J
""j \:I
...... AA.
Q_Zl/J
::-:;.<~~
~:(r-<~C
J:: f-d""!:'"' P:
~~~~~
d
> Cl
~ < Z
m . 0 0::
- - ~ ~ -
<1''1'~'~.t...t'''O\~~.t-
O~;;~<~:;;~~~~
8P4~~~~~:4g~~5
l/J Q1 U [/J A. vi U U <I) '/) <I) Z
;:.-. r ;;..
< < <
~c;::;. ::: i::'
<"-S""- j
~2~S~02
lllo::Lll.c,~ZO ~
...... Z :::: :i :r: j z ;" :1: :::: "T r :;t
!=~l-< l-<l-<o2t""r-""<""
52ab6~~Q55:~~
;Z;QZOZ~Off3ZZvi >
C'< Q\
.....
~l r~
\0
N
I
>H
>H
<;0 ,0 " (". I
->0> > >
~~>~ > >rr~ >~
>o:l..lc:l <: <<<0:: <:::l I
9 <~~~~N>~~>>~<9~ ~~
o ' < ," (;) ':l ' J ? ? ;;> I'" , . - ~ .- Q
~ < - ~w~o_~z~zzz~~c~<- z~
N~. ~.. 0 ~<I)o<l)~C;:......~~~<I)8o~ ~Q1
1'J'.. < < ~:l<:;'?rYO;:x:ro;.u';;>t.alllUl""~~~C;: Ul""
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~::I) .2: :E :;;: - FJ ~ lll.' z::r: :( 0::: :::: :1:. .;-'." < ~ r:/l .0 'It 0:::. =.'" ;;..
-_~<-<~~;;.,<<0 t""'1'-'-:.d: ot-t-!-~u-t.aL.Ll:;':: <I
~~~z~z~~~zz~o.zo~~~~.' -o~-o""~~~.~~~~~o'~.~
.....;. ;:r: , . ~ :.l <( , ' , . ...:.1 < < ,.., ;:". :;. p; ;;" c;:: ~ ,.J, , '" ';;> r-' M .;.; <; , .. ;> ...
_~~~M~<I)M_~~~;;>?r-'~Zt""'ZZZ.-t""'U--~Z.-~
0000
00 >>>>
" ... >>>-->->--r ~J....l.-J--4 .~/'
d ~-Ulr-9 ..l..l~~~< o:l~~~ ~ ~
~.._ ?>>~~cc.o::~~~~~.-~~~~~~ c~~
~ ::. 9 Cl < < '< ;L1.'. ~ << Cl. Cl ;z; '. z. z .:J (..J :; :; 0 <::: < Vi _J
OCl _<(ZZZ~. OCO':::I:2~L~..:.l ~~V;~2~8o~ ~
~_~9880~~C;:~?9;L1Ul;.uW>~~~~~9~~~~~~~
<<. ~.c,~~~o:::~. ~~:;t::::~~~~;.uUlt""'." zZ..l.~z2.<oG0
A.OIZlIZlUl""'WO~-~- 1-<.. r-l"'" f-..:.....- ~O"-O"":.:f..)~Ul
Lll Lll <I) <I) \:I Q \:I <: "'"" .:>- 0 0 b ;r; ~ c.: :::;; "'": Z Z Z Z ~ :n I., ,.... ':::l 1.1) 'il .)t Z
0::: ..... goo c c _' 0 <.... :.: ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ::;- :-.:::;;. ".. O:::.....l ~ ::; ::; G:l P:l
~~~~~~~~o=~ ~zzzz>~~~~~o~<~~~~~
l1')
o
o
N
t?
o:j
::l
...
.D
<I.)
~
u
-=:
>H
~
...
<I.)
<I.)
-=:
go
~
::c
p..
u
~
u
...
='
o
rn
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
l
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
UNINTERRUPTED ]1,OW IDGlI\y'AYS
Table 11- 7: Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas
FREe-WAYS
Level t> f Service
ABC D
2;000 7,(100 13,800
20,400 33,000 47,800
30.500 49,500 71,600
STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIAL.'>
Ciass 1(>0.0010 1.99 sigr",li,.e<l intersections per mile)
Level of SeT\''1ce
C D
13,800 16,40(J
34,700 35,700
52,100 53.500
66,100 67,SOO
Lanes Dhided
2 UndiYided
4 Divided
6 Divided
LJ.Ol'S Di'lided
2 Undivided
4 ])jvided
6 Divided
8 Divided
A
B
4,200
29,300
44,700
58,000
4,800
7,300
9,400
Class n (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile)
l..evel (}fS(:rYic~
C D
11,200 15,400
16,000 32,700
40,300 q^.o
53,300 63,800
Lanes Divided
2 Undivided
4 1),,;ded
6 Divided
8 Divided
A
B
1,900
4,100
6,500
8,500
Class ill (more than 4.5 signalized intcr.;ectlOns per mile and not
within primary city ceMral business district of an
urbanize<l area oyer 750,000)
Interchrmg e spacin g ~_ :2 mi.
apart
Level of Service
C
55,200
B5,300
115,300
145,500
175,500
Ii
74,600
115,300
156,000
196,400
237,]00
Lanes
4
6
8
10
12
B
D
67,100
i03,600
140.200
176,900
213,500
A
49,900
82,700
104,200
125,800
E
16,900
Interc-hal1ge spacing .;
2 m!. .pmt
Levol of Service
C
52,000
81,700
lll,400
141,200
170,900
E
76,500
120,200
163,900
207/.10
251,200
E
16,300
34,51)0
51,SOO
67,000
I..anc:s A
4 22,000
6 34,800
8 47,500
10 60,2()0
12 72,900
B
36,000
56,50()
77,000
97 ~500
llB,!(J()
D
67,2()0
105,800
144,300
182,600
221,IW
IlICYCLE MODE
(Note: Level of serv ice fur the bicycle moue in this table is based on TOadw.y
geometries at 40 ulph posted speed and Lra.ffi c eonditions) not number ofbicydisl~
using !he facility.) (M ultiply mc(()rizer1 vehicle volumes shown below by number
ofdirectional roadway lanes to determine two-"W'dY max:imum sen;ce volumes.)
Paved Shoulder!
Ll'vel of Service Bicycle Lane Level ofServiee
Lanes ,Dlvide.d A B C D E (nve.rage A B C D E
- Undivided 5,30() 12,600 15,500 O~49% 3,200 13,800 > 13,800
4 Divided 12/!OO 28,900 32,800 50-84 % 2,500 4,100 >4,W() ..,...
6 Divirlt~l .. 19,500 44,700 49,300 85.100% 3,100 7,Zoo >7,200 ..,..
8 Dividt'J .. .. 25,800 58,700 63,800
Class IV (more !han 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and "i thin
primary city ccntrnl bU3iness district bran urbanized area
oYer 750,(00)
Lanes DividctJ
2 Undivided
4 Divided
6 Divided
8 Divided
Leyel ot Sen; ce
BCD
5,200 13,700
12,300 30,300
19,100 45,800
25,900 59,900
A
..
Lanes Di,ided
2 Undivided
4 Diyid,A
6 Divided
NON-STATE ROADWAYS
Major City!(',Ouuty Roadways
L<.>veJ of Service
ABC
.. 9,100
2lAOO
33,400
D E Level of Smice
14,600 15,6tl() Si dc'WaIk Coverage A II C D E
'1100 32,900 0-84% >5 2.4 ::.3 2:;2
46,800 49,300 85-100% >6 >4 2.3 ~2 ::.1
Lanes Divided
2 Undivided
4 Divided
Other Signawed Roadways
(SIgnalized intmeet:on analysis)
LevelofSer.ice
A II C
4,800
] 1.1 00
Source: Honda Department ofTnmsportation 02122/02
SystOOlS Planning Office
60S SuwAlJllee Sire,,!, M S 19
TaJlallassee, FL 32399..0450
http://l\'wwl 1 .myflorid.a.cowpJanning!sys!ctuslsrw1os/defaul t.11 tm
E
12,600
25.200
E
15,()OO
31,700
47,600
62,200
PE.J)ESUUA:" MODE
(Note: level ofsenic. for the pedest..ian mode in this ruble is based tln roadway
goometries at 40 mph posted spted and traftic conditions, not number of pc'd""trian3
using the f.eility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes ,hO"'l1 below by number of
dircction:tI roadway lanes to determine two-'Wt1yma:xirnum service volumes.)
Le...-d of Service
C D
6,400
9,900
11,300 >11 ,300
SidC\\""alk Coverage
0-49%
50-84 %
85-100~~
A
B
E
15,500
19,000
...
...
2,200
BUS MODE (Sctieduled Fixed Roule)
. (lluses per bow)
(Note:BllYt'.S per hOUfSOO,",,^J) are ow)' {l)'f thrt pt'ltk hour in the ~$,Ic dlrf'd.h.ll1llfth~bjghertn.flkfk,'W.}
Lanes
2
2
Multi
Multi
ARTF:RIAJ.fNON-S'fATE ROADWAY AD./USTMENTS
DIVIDED!Ul'-.'D1VlDED
(.Iier corrcsponding volume by the iodicated percent)
Median left Turn! Lanes Adjustlncnt l'aclon
Divided Yes +5%
Undivided No .20%
Undivided Yee: -5%
Undivided No ~25%
ONE. WAY FAClLJTIES
Decr:eru;e e orrespoodlng two.directi octal volumes in thi, table by 40 % to
obtain the uivaIent one. direction.alvolume for one-wa fadl ities.
.C",u :;;hh doet flat G.."lngriMta ,.\;V1dMd.a1d tbouJd be \;slid anly fOr j;C::)etal pJ3rtning :lppricW..;M, Tb~ tornp1ller mtxid$ fr()1l\ whicll Uta Qbleu derived shooid be llnd: f<< more:s:petin'c plamitlg
l.fpliwlOR 'I1l6 tltJe and ddiv;llg ~rofmtt"Jrnodtls should not be used. tilt co1uidor or j:Jt~StiCtio:u dttiJttt. whe;e: mott rtfJned tduiqlW exist Value! ttAown are twfr<Way 3D%lIUlutnge daily Vtl~
(bM.::od 011 K~ tac.tom) for levllls of s...,(.~ ADd are fce -the fJ}tomOOile/tru::l( rode';\: unlC$$ $pecffinlly $~. ~cl of st\'f\"iCl! letter gn4e dHe:\holih: are probabIyoor CJ)mpu.wl~ :acre,s'\: modes and. ~vre,
cross modal ~mpMitmu: tbott!4 ~ IlUde '\lith. C1Ut1(m. F~!':TtlWnl. <<lrohhl.tng Ieveu Qt sarvii.;$ of ..fiffe!~l1t ~odt$ mro OM overaU roadway Jrvet of !l.ervi~ it DOt rt!iC()rn:,uncel11.1te tahl.~1 mplJt v2:llile
litbul:.t and :evd (If $criicc rntc:-'.... .iiPCM on the rollo-wiD, plJiC. CtJ"llL1rion:; are ba5<ld OQ rl:wUDe applid:ti,,1l.I of ti:le lllthMy t.'apacrty Marma4 Bicycle LOS Model" Poddlriaa LOS Medel &i:l.d Tnnsit
Capacity aud Quanty of Se:vk:.d Maoual. rrsp<<:tivdy for the autumobiWtmck, biGyc!e, pe&mlrim and bw; modes
,. .CMttO( be ach-ieved using ab~ illput value deUulu.
."*Not oip pliQible fQt that levd vi 'l:(Y~ lett;:.r gr~ fa ~mobile.i!rucl: mc~, '\'obmrs t;rwueJ ~_lC'l'cl 0{ $crvke J) btx:.O(Ue Fh~<- .lllte.":lt.'\:boo Oilp-ooitie1!u.vl: beed, f.e.a.:kod. rM bicycle ~J
~t:i<U! mod;,;$., the level ~f ,c:rvi;.c !cuag;ladll (iac.!udh:lg 1) " nol iIcl:Jcyahlc, h<<:!ll..l.$t tnerce ls M J:MXi;uum nhidc volume threshold USblj; uhlc lnp'Jt yal~ dcfau1~,
Source: Florida Department of Transportation, 2002; CPH Engineering, Inc.
85
II-27
I-
Z
W
~
W
---l
W
Z
o
I-
<(
I-
~
o
0....
(/)
Z
<(
~
I-
~
..
0
f
Q,)
z
0
...-l
0
N
..:::
.....
"~
Q,)
u
"E
Q,)
00
.....
0
<Ill
-
Q,)
:>
Q,)
...J
~
;::
J
>.
(IS
~
(IS
0
~
0
...-l
0
N
(/) ..
0z (IS
Q,)
Z<( ><
- ---l J
~o....
0....
(/) W
~>
W (/)
I-z
Zw
~aJ 00
LL ~ I
....
00.... ....
>-~ Q,)
-
1-0 ..c
(1
UU ~
-
Q,)
"t:l
o
~
;.-
.....;~ Q '"' '"' Q '"' '"' '"' kL. Q V V Q Q Q V U >.cJ Q
'5 ~:; Q u Q Q
~
;::
':,... 'CO ~, ,,, or, - - c- ,..., c: " '" "'T c: r'~. .~ "" ("~ :::: ...,. - 00
~ 0 <~ r- r" ...; ...; - ~ ,ci ':::; 00 - "'", r-.
c' - CI '::C - - ,:;:: ,::; ::c - -' ci Ci 0 "" C
~
~
-
~ - r. 8 8 ',", g g g 8 g c) ;;: 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 :;;;
r:"; :5 '0
(.1 (~ X: '~ '. or, e v, or, 1",.1 ~'l ~',l I> :;: ,~ ,',
-' .... :;! or r-4.1 ",: ~: - ,0 <5 - ~i ?, or ~~ ci ..=:-~ - re -t, ,,, ~,
::::: v -t ~, -t - '" f"", " - if5 'Ii r'~
~
,.., ~ E ';;'\ ;5 :;; :5 R ~ <;;~ c; ~ ;;: g 8 ~ e' el ,~
,~ '-' "+, ;r: '" '" ~ g ~ g
3 .... '" or, ~ '" t_ t" "f r- t- t-, '" r- 0 '"
.... .....; ;,:~ '(/ ~-' ~ v: ;.:: ~' 'c ~~ .r ,..,; v; vi or' or; ~ :)
Q ..,. or, f", '-, - '-, or, ~, ~, ~, ~, - - '~ ci ci
-
:...
:,..
~ ,/, ~ ~ ox: ~ ~ ~ l>: l>:
,. 'f, ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J e 6 ..J ..J ..J ..J 0 0 6 0 6 c
.... ..,. .-.: :S < < <. :S <. .-.: .-.: :;: .-.: :S :S :S t; t; t:; t;
:;: - ;:2 " C2 C2 C2 ~ C2 C2 C2 "-i w ;:2 C2 " " " >.cJ W ~ w "-i w
--' '"'
~ ~ UJ UJ W ~ ~ w UJ w ~ :::J UJ w UJ w f;: ::l :::J ..J ::l -1
~ f- f- f- f- ~ f- f- f- f- ..J 8
l>: "" "" "" '" '" l>: ij 8 '" l>: l>: " '" 8 0 8 8 8
<. <. < .-.: < < <. < < <. < <t, < <t, u
'"' ~
L. ',0 '" -t "'T -t "'T "'T (".J r', ...,. "'T ',( -t "'T -t -t r.,,j r,
.., .... (',~ ~>l (-1 CJ
Z ,
;.-
~ < d V> 0
"" ~ W oe: d >- W 0
-' UJ 2:i ..J 0
,.., j 7, Gj :,;;.. 0 < d 2: a:l ::J ;;. 0 ~
-' UJ <<. ;j g: <
1- d > a:l ~ ~ e<: 0 ~ ~
?:; ?<: Q V> 8 0:> Z
W ~ <<. z ~ a:l oe: ~ >:) Z
0 0, "" 0' <<. i';:; '" ~ -;t, "" <<. ~ !::! ~ f: -;t, < ::; ;J, ~ i ;J,
...,. -t v; "'T ~ i!:, ~ W -t ~ ~ j -t 0 Ul -t ~ ...,.
oi " 0 oi V> '" V> '-' 0:: ~ V> '-' 2:i b oi >.cJ '-' oi oi
;::1 c.. <. 0 i=: < l>: ~ 0 :I: C;
vi VI ::l': vi f- V> Ul W vi Ul wj ~ I- vi </l UJ vi V> vi
0 d
~ Ii! wj 0 W ~ :J Q
~ ~ W Q 0
~ ci ~ j > 0 0:: ci 2: VI <Xl d ~
w < '" d ~ 2 0 :.> 0 C ~
oe: > 15 ..J ""
E d > z ~ ..J V> 8 <Xl <f ""
0 ~ (-J d ~ <<. CI C '" Q "" r"~ - 0 Ci < z
'.';i ", ~ '" '" 0::
r':' c>:: ~ <f Ci ~ ~ '" ~ ~ l:1 ~ ~ t:: ':i! ..: l>: :; ~
Co, Co, - tr, -t ~ i!:, - W W '" j >:) c.. V> <
M:! w V; oi '" g: ><' ~ :I: 0 Q !iG 0 ~ W V> z 8
:I: vi C :;;, vi .... L1J V; W <f ~ v;, :I: C g;
V; '" -' :;, vi f- ef' ::J UJ V'. ti: Ct: w W ~ :::;;i '" V'J ::l':
.
d d d cj d
;.- w CU " ~ 0:: ~ 0:: d "
.. <
> ::: j "'- j j j [2 ~ :3 0
.... :;;: '" ..J " 0
,- d d d d d "" Ct: < "'-
::: r-l r" 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ?; 0 0 ~ ,,", 0
--' 0 :i: -t -;!, ;::!: ;: 0 0 ~ UJ '" '" :I: .:;: ""
,~ :.;: ;J, :;:; ~ ~ <f <f <f :2 ~ <<: ~ d
- '" "'T "'T -t '" j j '" ~ '" ~ ~ V> V;
r/5 r./i V'J V; V; V> '" W S rj:;
eo: eo: eo: eo: .:.: .:.: .:.: i:: ~ ~ ~ ~ :I: 0
~ :::; U'i tfj V; vi ,/1 vi r/; I-l.i W v; Vi r;r. "" .t. ::;
00
N
I
>-<
>-<
~
u
.a
>-
S!::
:::J.
~~
.:.:::: \.)
~,=
~~ ~
x, ,",
ri V",
2 ~
..J
V)
0z
z<{
- ---l
oe:o..
0..
V) w
oe:>
w V)
I-z
Zw
~aJ
LL oe:
00..
>-2
!::::o
UU
I-
Z
w
2
w
---l
W
Z
o
I-
<{
I-
oe:
o
0..
V)
Z
<{
oe:
I-
...:
=:
o
U
00
I
-
-
v
:0
(\l
f-"
q
;;.,,:
.. u CI CI U U U c.;' c...:i c.;' c.;' 0 CI U uJ U CI U
~
:;: ...
0
'-' or, 0 ('-I '.J or, '^' 0" f"~ ~ 00 '.0 0 0':,
'" ~ '" \0 ", ", ~'j '" ~< ','-j 'X' or, "1" ~ or ~
;;, , 0 0 ,=:,: 0 c; 0 - - 0 - d - c; - 0 d 0
;.. ::?: ~ 'Z(
~ 8 :::; 8 :::; :3 '0 ',:;> ;:? :3 :3 8 8 <:> ~ :8
'" ~l ~
,~ .,.,f r': :~ -' if;
'-" f" ~ 'D V) '" r"l Jr., '" 0 ":
;::: '-' '.c ,rr-; ...-~ r.) t;r:~ ~~ !"-~ "'" 06 V~. or;' ..; - 0:' -
~ - -
~ ~
" 8 8 ~ 8 :,:;> 8 8 @ S a 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 g
0
, t"--. or, @ i:5 or, .....; or or,
-, ~: ~ ~ Ci d d ~ '2 ;:{ C1 ~ 0 (".1 Ci S
3 ~ - {",'" -
;..
... ':/'; "'" "'" "'" "'" "'" "'" "'" "'" ..: ..: "'" "'" "'" "'" "'" ..: ..:
g 'l: f2 0 ~ f2 0 f2 c 12 p C p c f2 f2 f2 t 12
""!t F-> F-> F-> .- .- b
u \.! \.! ~ ~ u f", \.! U v ~ \.! fn \.!
... 5
~ ~ ~ ~ w.J w.J w:: :J w:: w.J w.J w:: w:: w::
:;: -1 ,.J ,.J ,.J ;1 ,.J ~ ,.J ~ B
e: cj ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <:l
u u -' ,-' v c;
\.! U U U U U 1",;.1 '-' U U U U u
23 ~
"",,, Z "'t e, c, c, ~1 I"'~ ('1 1""1 ("1 el r'l r-l e, "'>4 "1' ('I r"l
Z j
~ Ul CI
CI C, >
~ ::J ~ w :J ,.J ;.. ;.. :J ;.. ;..
CI Cil '" < '" '" '"
tiJ ci '" >: " ~ ?; ~ ~
~ ~ '" t:<: t:<: CI
'" ~ 0 1::: i;;: 0 .s g: z ~ .s ~ ~ CI '"
<f Q
< Ul VJ Z t:<: ';/) '" ~ '"'
(fi ~ 0:: 0:: ~ 01 0:: ;..q gj lOP w.J ?;: '"
U1 0- ~ ~ Iii ~ :r: Iii :r: ~ 'D ~
>- ;;;: 0 :-<;f. ~ .- ~ q v,
.- -t
CI) V; F-> 25 ~ ~ t:; 0:: w.J ;:Q
0:: ci i:: ~ '" 0 '" 0 0 ci '-'
ti; v; ;;. ~ ~ V; " ~ Z z " z z ui :E Ul
0 0 0 Q c:i
:J 0:: :3 ~ '" Z ;.. Z ;.. ;..
0 ,.J 0:: "'" < ,.J < ~ LIi
~ F-> '" ci co co ;;- '" ~ j ~ '" ::; ~ ;;-
w:: j ~ < <( CI
ii! r;;; CI CI 0 '" z ::: ~ &i
~ ;2 d 8 Vi z QZ ;::! '" 0:: Z d
.- ~ "'" j '" ~ ~ t:!:l '" ~ ~ 0
.,. t/l ~ 0 ~ t:: z z :e '"
ff', <( ~ ~
-t F-> U F-> w.J ~ ~ w.J OJ Vi
ci V'l C '" F-> ,~ Z; t;J E:l 2'? Ul E:l tS tS 8 Ul
0:: '" :::;J ~ '" ;:) C
vi fj; F-> F-> ;;- F-> ~ ;:;:; " b F-> Z " z z w.J ",j!"
;.. ;.. ;.. >< 0 .
;.. ;.. r >; :J
;.. ..: '" '" '" .. < ..: CI CI
.,. . ~ ~ a: ~ :::: ~ ;:; 0:; '" (5 d
~ ~ ~ ;Z Z ;Z ;Z Z ;Z Z CI 2 2 2 it 2
C) 8 '" '"
::;: '" "'" "'" "'" '" '" '" '" rr </) Ul '" <( ..
r.rJ w.J w.J w.J w.J W w 0:: 0:: ~ 0:: 0::
"'" '" ~ t5 t5 t5 g: g: :r: E . . . ~ ~
;; w.J w.J 0 ~ 0 w.J
'/J tJ'J f- F-> c:i F-> Q F '" -0:
~ ~ '" "'" 0:: '" ~ ~ 0:: 2J >; z ~ ~ ~ Z; ~ i?, Z Z
C 0 0 0 C ~
:;; :;; Z Z Z Z Z 2l' Iii ~ ~ ~ ~ .:;; ..
Z Z co '" co ci:
0-
N
I
>-<
>-<
~
"il
?
if;
q.
jl
r'~ 2
~~
.9 g
V)
Oz
z<(
0:::--1
0....0....
V) W
0:::>
WV)
I-z
Zw
~aJ
LL 0:::
00....
>-2
!:::O
UU
I-
Z
w
2
w
--I
W
Z
o
I-
<(
I-
0:::
o
0....
V)
Z
<(
0:::
I-
...:
;::
o
U
;..
..- ...;
u ~, ~ Ci u u ,-, u u u u Ci u Ci
~
'-' u
;:: 2:
~
0 ~ '" :! ,,~ c' 'r; ::::( v, '"
'" - ::;:
("I lC' "" " '<T ;; (',J '"t 0< v,
c;; ;.. ~ '- r.,1 d 0 :;:; ,:;;; c; 0:> d a c:
'" ,;:)
;..:
;;;- ~ 8 8 c, g :3 ~ 8 g S ;;: :3
c' ~ :3 r:::'
,~ .. r"c 4: t- v, v, '"
5 '" ,~ ~ '" (".~ - ('--J "'i - <"'1 ,,; 1('; 0' ~ "':
".., :::: ~ -.(;.'
..
:.-
~ ..-t- ~ Q ~ ~ g 8 ~ Q S S 8 S 8
0 ~ ~
d 0: ~ cf ~ 0:> ~ ~ d ,-;:) d S ~ ~ ~
'"
- :~ .. - -
::: v
:.-
po:: .,.. :F, po:: po:: po:: po:: po:: po:: po:: po:: po:: po:: po::
g 6 ~F; g ~ ,.-, Z g g 0 g g 0 0
~ f:, f-< f-< f-<
V " r..; ,.J r..; U U V u &:J b:J b:J u U
\.l.I ,-, - ~ \.l.I W WJ \.l.I W W w
a :ii '4 <>: a ,.J ...; ...; a a a :j -i -4
is ~ eJ cS ~ 0 i5 ~
u u u u v u v u u
,- 3
<"'1 7' r~ 1"1 ("1 ('-~ r-~ ;:'-~ " <', ('^l ('I ""I
Z .. \""J
0 &I
>- ,..;
...; z :.- Ci
~ 0 '" w <>: Ci
Ci < Q ;;- ~ :s: <>: <>:
0 Q 0 g: <>: 0 C
'" f-< ~ c.:: ~ ~ 12 c.:: '"
a '--' .-,: I./i <>: 0
c.:: c.:: <>: w c.::
;J cr L ;J, -<T Z ~ ::;: 0<
:s ", r:: i=! <<1.
"<t W <<1. "<t "<t 0 ~ .::; 0.
oi ~ z oi oi 25 !E cr, z oi w
8 iB g; >-- 0 g; ::t
u5 u'i '" li: '" Ci Z '" cr
lJ:.l ci
0 i:: :.- r :.- 0 '" Ci Sil
~ c.:: .-,: <>: ~ po:: w ::>,
<>: ~ 0 ::: ~ ~ <>: ~ PJ Q3
0 0 0 ...; ;::; Q
c.:: c.:: <: ~ ~ Z Z ...; ...; ex: <: c.::
< r;: ;Z ,... ex: ex: ;; 0 0 ,.J Ci
- ~ 02 j ~ l:l PJ ::.:.:J 0 '"
,..e; ~ ::t .-,: Z ~ <t ."
.:;\ rfl f-< f-< f-< ~ '" 0 '" "<t
::;: V) t/'i ~ ~ Vi @ if> C5 UJ
8 c i1i z ;,::;J ;:; ::t Pi
'" :E z Z f-< '" I./i OJ vi
:.- Cl UJ ~ z tiJ >Ll >Ll ~
2:; ...; PJ
...-: <: Ci PJ -- ;> ;;- ;;- ~
0 0 Q 15 ~ '" <>: <l:
<'! E ~ < ::\ <:. ~ <l:
-< c.:: 0 ~ 0 Cl Z
v v ~ '" :z: :z: z z
ex: .. '" i1; c.:: C C C
g ~ '" j ~
r/i 'If', ~ '" 0 Z z :2 ~ a3
f:'.l UJ !E v is PJ C G 8
.- :.- C C/> UJ C/> ~ 8 8
.-,: <l: U1 ~ ;a '" >- ::t
::r: ::r: a ti: >- Q 0 en en u.J UJ L.W
00
I
....
....
II)
:c
~
E--
d
z
Z
UJ
9
:s:
f-<
0
z
2
<t
C/>
w
z
S
z
ex:
;:,
f-<
'"
e
8 0
ra <<")
f:ij I
>-<
'" >-<
l!j
co
UJ
;;-
iB
LI'1
..?;
UJ
t::
UJ
VI
~
vi
i:3 w
j
Z
j -t
Q
'" ..: trll
;a :I:
a :4 ,/;. 3
~ 0:: '-'
0 0 ~ 0
'" ~ N
!5 >
UJ VJ e--
z z -,
.... .:l ~
0 r../'j -.;:j :l
1:: UJ '"' ~ ...
tI .... ~ ..0
UJ ~
U1 0 Il)
;a a ri: ~ ~
r"1
g: ~ ('--~ ~ u
'" F X q
0 ::t ?"J ;z
Z a E ~ >-<
0 ;.:; ~ '1)"
F:: 0 ...J ...
0:: :I: Il)
2 f-< Il)
...;
..: q
<( ,..,
bf)
q
(,Ll
:r:
p...
u
~
u
...
;:l
0
if)
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Table 11- 9: Programmed and Planned Highway System Improvements
Roadway Segment 1m provement programmed1 Planned 3
S.R 434 US H-92 to SR 4']9 Traffic Control 2004/2006
Lake Drive Seminolia Boulevard to Add 2 Lanes 2002-2005
Tuskawilla Road
Red Bug Lake SR 436 to Eagle Circle Widen to 6 2000-2005
Rd Lanes
Serninola Blvd. US 17-92 to Lake Drive Widen to 6 20153
Lanes
U.S '17-92 Shepard Road to Lake Add 2 Lanes Design 2006/2007 20103
fvialY Boulevard ROW-2008-2009
SR 419 Moss Road Turn Lane 2004-2005
SR 419 SR 434 to US17 -92 Turn Lanes 2005/2006
Pavement
Overlay
SR 426 rv1itchel1 Hammock To Widen to 4 2006/2007
Pine Street Lanes
SR 426 Pine Street to SR 434 Widen to 4 20103
Lanes
1. Contained in construction program of FDOT or Seminole County.
2. Latest date based on need.
3. 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan.
II-31
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Table 11-10: Year 2010 Road Needs (Developer and Other Funding)
County*
1. Improve Lake Drive from fI..vo (2) lanes to four (4) lanes from Tuskawilla to Seminola.
(Under design) (Bids 2005)
State*
1. Improve U.S. 17-92 from Shepard to Lake Mary Boulevard from four (4) lanes to six (6)
lanes. (Under environmental revievv')
2. Improve SR 419 from SR 434 to U.S. 17-92 from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes.
Note: ThIs project is not funded or planned by the State.
NOTE: .It appears that the City should start lobbyIng for improvements to SR 419 as current
counts equal and/or exceed the existing roadway capacity.
*See also Table 15A for additIonal information.
Source: CPH Engineers, Inc., January 2005
Table 11- 11: State and County Road Projects Adjacent to or Within Winter Springs
II-32
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
State - District Five Funded Projects
1. SR 434 from US 17-92 to SR 419 - Improve the traffic control devices/system. (City and
State Joint Project)
2. SR 426 - Four-lane from Mitchell Hammock Road to Pine Street. (Design)
State - Metroplan Orlando 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan (Source: Table 5.2;
Summary Report, Technical Report No.5)
1. SR 426 from Pine Street to S.R. 434 - Widen to 4 lanes.
2. US 17-92 from Shepard Road to Lake Mary Boulevard - Widen to 6 lanes.
3. Aesthetic/traffic improvement project on SR 434 from U.S. 17-92 to SR 419. (Under
Construction)
4. Resurface U.S. 17-92 from Shepard Road to Airport Blvd. (Bjds 2006/2007) (Does not
add capacity.)
5. Skid hazard overlay of SR 419 from SR 434 to U.S. 17-92. (Bids 2005/2006) (Does not
add capacity.)
6. Grant ($100,000) to Winter Springs to pay for westbound left turn lane at Moss Road.
(Under construction) (May add only minor capacity.)
County. FY 2004/2005
1. Lake Drive from Seminola Boulevard to Tuskawilla Road - Reconstruct to 4 lanes.
County - Metroplan Orlando 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan (Source: Table 5.2;
Summary Report, Technical Report No.5)
1. Seminola Boulevard from US 17-92 to Lake Drive - Widen to 6 lanes.
County - Metroplan Orlando 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan Unfunded Critical
Needs (Source: Table 5-2; Summary Report, Technical Report No.5)
1. Red Bug Lake Road from SR 436 to Eagle Circle - Widen to 6 lanes.
Source: CPH Engineers, Inc., February 200+.}.
II-33
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Table 11-12: Year 2010 Road Needs (City Funding)
Phase I
1. Improve Panama Road from Moss Road to E.dgemon Avenue. (Completed)
2. Improve Hayes Road north of Bahama Road to existing paving on Hayes. (Completed)
3. Improve Moss Road from Panama Road north to existing paving on Moss Road.
(Completed)
4. Replace Hayes Road bridge. (Completed)
5. Replace Moss Road bridge. (Completed)
Phase II
1. Paving and drainage improvements to Bahama Road from Shore Road to Hayes
Road.
2. Paving and drainage improvements to Panama Road from Shore Road to Moss Road.
(Completed)
3. Paving and drainage improvements to Fisher Road from Panama Road to City Limits.
(Completed)
4. Add stacking lanes to Hayes Road at the SR. 434 intersection.. (Completed)
Phase III
1. Upgrade Moss Road from SR 434 to SR 419 from two lanes to four lanes.' (Not
Requ iredfDeleted)
2. Improve Tuskawilla Road north of SR 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue). (Completed)
3. Construct Town Center collector road to accommodate new development. Roads will
connect SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road for collection of traffic from this area. (Completed.
Roads include Tuskawilla Road. Doran Drive and Blumberg Blvd.)
Source: CPH Engineers, Inc., February 200+2.
II-34
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Map 11- 1: Existing Roadway Classification, Jurisdiction and Number of Lanes
>:
f-
Z
:::l
0
~
((
0
1- '"
f- U
Z llj ~.
lJJ
:;; -' E E "
z W 0 (( ci
(9 f- U 0 ~j
:; <{ (( z U f- '"
<: f- a :::l - Cl u.
'12 0 (( U.l a 0
0 .., cr:
<: u 0 -' I
ill -' :;; - f- a w >-
(/) <( (( u fJ) ::>
0 ct' - 0 ':'J (/) () ::> 0
_J HJ 0 fJl
n. w <{ f- Z ~
0 -' I a
f- ct' U 0 <{ z
(( (( w -' U z
n. <{ w -' U I.L ,.. '"
1- -' 0 Q
:g -' t:r -' 0 I
<{ <{ 0 <{ W t- I- -l<
'" n. U n. (( (/) '" 0:
N 0 Z a: 0 w 0 w 0
;;; <( co n. I- ?,
;; co 0 :if :;; 0 z
C) oc (( Z :::l :::l oc U1
'" ::E u
N n. :::l ::;: Z n. z
. :<:
0
0 t-
Z . @
W . iC
e:J .
w .
.J
___c- Z ~
n:
Cl 0
w 0:
'" LlJ
<( '"
-' :)
-'
w 0 ...
::>
co
0
LlJ
t:r
SLlPPLEvfENTAL NO. ,}
_ Lngi""",
$lIt1.'('yan<
-r. . l:lo~~enj[<<fhl~~fc~rdljtl!cb
_. l:nFINJllmirnt<tl~clelftH'l:;
Colti/l"ltcthm :\111 Mgmu,'ft
wu'u..('phl"lsin.~rr.'l ('Olff
Hr; t;;"i R~hil<.'"'' sr,erl, Or/,;O'#h n J::~!H
t'lnml';;tt7.42'.!14:!l f"ar:407i4SJ016
Scale: NONE
2004 EXISTING ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS
AND NUMBER OF LANES
4';)/liiftI
Date: 3-11-2005
FIGURE
2
Job No.. W04124
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
TRANSPORTATION STUDY - REVISED 2-2005
Page 9
II-35
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Map 11- 2: Signalized Intersections and Accident Locations
c.;.;j
~:
"0 c_ ~
h
c: ,-
en ',1)
::..
(/j
c:
0
- :
U :~'
Q)
!!: (.)
'1'.
a.> ,tJ;
-
c: . .....,
F'
"0 .2 "
t-
,-
Q) .... ,~
,-
N <r. ('\
0, . :. ~)
.:!: "
en ,.
c:: 0 0 ."
.... N
t:i'> ,~ " (:~\
US II: II: '1'
.:'}
c: c: <l>
C C -
N '+= '+= '-'
III III
. {",r) 5 u
c .p
1'''~
a. -1 -l r
.~ +- +-
<J: -l :: ::
w ~ q;
:E - :g
- w u
2 u W
I- et <l
. .
-i
LTi -~
(/j
c:
II-36
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Map 11- 3: Public Transit System and Major Traffic Generators/ Attractors
,.~. .
;; ..........'; (;itv of Winte" SIJrin<ss
\, ~/! .' ,...
,~, ',~i
,~t!. ',' '; " '
I..\i,ti!l~ ami lulm'(' Public
"ll'm; '''1101' f',llll<: lil',Wf,ilo;',
.~
L\
N
L
"I ",'.
II-37
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Map 11- 4: Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities
j, t
'\~ Cily ui 'Willkr Springs
c~. -! <
t ~ ' jI~ it
1 fi ,,/' .~..../....,
... ' / /- I
,it ,.t, l~ / / ':
I ".... -//, !
~ '-'--~f-
/
"
';\
- \
t!::'~: f~-"- ·
,J -, - I
I ~ ' ~
I ':i1t I'
;;.l,~~ \ Q'
~
r,,';1-r,"" ,)J:::~,
\Llp n..I- l\hIHl~ ..mil I'n1Iw,,'d
BUI' It- 1.111111"."
-.-:
Mr.. '''I
L:",II
~"" ~.~ I.': '" AJ..
II-38
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTA liON ELEMENT
Map 11- 5: Traffic Analysis Zones
--
'!>.
m
~
~~
\
,...,.
f
l ~
~'\'1
!
'1
\
?
-
(/)0..
CJ<(
Z~
a:C)
~~
a:Z
WZ
1-<(
Z..J
-0..
Sa:
u..w
01-
~~
-~
o
j("
U ~ .
~/
b\
\
\.
\
rj
(
~
';
\
SUI' I' IL\1 E.\'T. \1.\ (), .J
r ~".J l_~
?
,
u.
--
u.
C
~
(;;';
I
.~
- ,.
t: 'f
~
I> ,
f'\
:t
iJ
L
~"
~!004 Tj</\FFiC Z()NE:S
4
CjTY OF VViNTER SPR!NGS
! H,~\I\ISt'("Ji< [/\1 lON ~'-':;l tJ()Y .. X{k-::V!~:)FL'J )..:;'f1:~)t'l
PU:'if,22
II-39
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Map 11- 8: Year 2010 Transportation Plan
City of Winter Springs
\
:t(\4
Si:Ttorltn~f 2U{) 1 " ~:1arch 2005
11.8: Yenr 2010 Transportation Plan
F\)\(C1 L\\iA:,
~1
N
o
, kAii
;,,:1,",-" ,~~
,l1li,.:..,1
allt
j )1
* " I ~ \ l f'."'
. .
i'l{/ {), ,,,,".4'\
II-42
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL 1:
To develop a safe, convenient, efficient and coordinated system of motorized and non-motorized
transportation facilities which ensures adequate movement of people and goods through and within
the City.
Objective 1.1: Level of Service. Throughout the planning period, the City shall enforce
the level of service standard on all arterial and collector roads.
Policy 1.1.1:
Policy 1.1.2:
Policy 1.1.3:
Policy 1.1.4:
Policy 1.1.5:
The minimum daily Level of Service (LOS) standard, to be adopted as
part of this element and plan, shall be as follows:
. Limited Access Roads C, or as otne1Vv1.Se as prescribed by FDOT
. Arterials
D
. Collectors
D
The LOS standards are based on peak hour trips ADT (average daily
trips). }, lower LOS may be acceptable immediately before and after
special C.Tents \Jy"here the impacts of such C,Tnts on the roadway system
arc infrequent.
The City shall coordinate with the MPO and LYNX to assist the County
in maintaining the County's adopted level of service standard for mass
transit - 1.03 revenue miles per capita per year based on the estimated
functional population within the transit service area.
Monitor the functioning of the arterial and collector road system by use
of the TRANPLAN/FSUTMS model updated by the City's traffic
consultant so that collector road improvements may be scheduled
according to valid priorities.
Require a traffic study for all new development generating more than 300
Daily Trips. Such study shall be conducted in accordance with written
procedures provided by the City.
Update and monitor transportation concurrency with formalized
procedures that ascertain the permittability of proposed developments
according to criteria established by an expert consultant.
The City shall annually monitor the LOS status of arterial and all state
roadways within the City including U.S. 17-92 and the Eastern Beltway,
by obtaining from the State and County their most recent traffic counts
II-43
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
at points along all roadways that would be affected by development in
the City.
Objective 1.2: Roadway Network To provide an attractive, safe, convenient, and efficient
arterial, collector and local roadway system that serves travel demands within and through the City,
through establishment of criteria to be enforced during site plan review, concurrency management
and access management by the statutory deadline.
Policy 1.2.1:
Policy 1.2.2:
Policy 1.2.3:
Policy 1.2.4:
Policy 1.2.5:
Policy 1.2.6:
Policy 1.2.7:
The arterial roadway system shall be designed through cooperation with
the FDOT and Seminole County to provide high-volume, multi-lane
facilities with access controls, a3 needed where appropriate, to preserve
the through traffic carrying capacity of the facility.
The City shall require joint use access, and cross access easements where
appropriate. to encourage interconnectivity between developments. ,
minimal driTvTTNay cut3, and aeCC33 prohibitiofi3 T,vherc.rer traffic pattcrfi3
and ph)3i:cal featurc3 make it p033iblc in the development appro val
proce33. Coordinate permitting w1.th the DOT }~cce33 Management
Program.
Provide residents alternative routes over collector roads.
The collector road system shall be funded by the standards-driven impact
fee created in 1990 by the City.
The collector road system shall be developed according to the master
conceptual plan and design standards derived under the auspices of the
City, to coordinate the construction of segments of the system by both
the public and the private sectors.
The conceptual plan does and shall continue to address, through periodic
review, these factors:
. Current and projected deficiencies of arterial roads under other
jurisdictions; and
. Existing deficiencies of City collector streets.
Land development regulations shall contain specific access management
alternative techniques to control access and preserve level of service.
These techniques include but are not limited to the following:
. Limit access to roads by controlling the number and location of site
access driveways and other intef3eeting road3;
II -44
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Policy 1.2.8:
Policy 1.2.9:
Policy 1.2.10:
Policy 1.2.11:
Policy 1.2.12:
Policy 1.2.13:
Policy 1.2.14:
. Cross-access elements of adjacent properties where feasible; and
. Use of frontage or back-lot parallel access roads where feasible.
All major roadways shall be designed as complete transportation
corridors, incorporating bicycle, pedestrian and transit features to achieve
a true multi-modal system.
Projected traffic circulation system demand will be met and the LOS
standards cited above will be maintained through the year 2010 by
undertaking the projects listed in this element.
The City will cooperate and extensively coordinate with the State, the
County and the MPO to ensure that their improvements are
implemented by the dates indicated, and as the need develops. Proposed
developments within the City will be monitored to determine if roadway
infrastructure will be adequate to service projected demand, and
development approvals will be dependent upon these criteria.
Create intersections of the new City collector roads with arterials where
they will coordinate with the functioning of arterials.
Design and engineer the collector road system to minimize traffic impact
on arterial roads.
Permit no individual residential driveways onto collector or arterial roads.
Individual driveways shall be located on local roads or alleys. wfiieh
channel trips to the collector and arterial system.
The City in cooperation with FDOT shall establish strategies to
discourage local traffic from using the Central Florida Greeneway.
Objective 1.3: Roadway Connectivity. The City shall, through configuration of the
citywide collector road system, create the interaction and cohesiveness that have been lacking among
the residential neighborhoods of Winter Springs, but do so in a manner that enhances and preserves
the quality of life within each community.
Policy 1.3.1:
Policy 1.3.2:
The City shall establish design cross-sections for collector and local roads
in the City Code that accommodate narrower rights-of-way and roadway
widths within developments that meet the definition of traditional
neighborhood development.
The City shall require that roadways be dedicated to the public when
there is a compelling public interest for the roadways to connect with
existing public roadways.
lI-4S
~---~
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Policy 1.3.3:
Policy 1.3.4:
Policy 1.3.5:
Policy 1.3.6:
Policy 1.3.7:
Policy 1.3.8:
Policy 1.3.9:
Policy 1.3.10:
In order to promote connectivity, the City shall amend its land
development regulations to include provisions to encourage new
subdivisions to "stub-out" to adjoining undeveloped lands, and to
connect to existing roadways that are "stubbed-out" at their boundaries.
The City shall establish access management standards in the City Code to
ensure appropriate access to the City's transportation system. Standards
may include the requirement of joint -use driveways and/or cross access
easements to access sites.
The City shall preserve the movement function of the major
thoroughfare system by requiring development of parallel roads or cross
access easements to connect developments as they are permitted along
major roads.
The City shall review through the Development Review Committee
process all proposed development for consistency with future
transportation projects listed in this element, and for the implementation
of the County's Bicycle Master Plan.
When designing extensions of existing collector roads to their logical
arterial connection south of the City (the Lake Drive/Seminola
Boulevard major collector that is planned for improvement by the
county), choose rights-of-way that minimize intrusion and cut-through
high-speed traffic, so that improved circulation is not at the expense of
peaceful habitation.
Plan for the completion of the one-ended collector roads in existing
developments on a neighborhood-by-neighborhood basis so that input
from the residents is acquired.
Eliminate landlocked parcels by providing for rights-of-way to reach
these properties.
Emphasize improved access for emergency vehicles to secluded areas.
Objective 1.4: Rights-oE-way. The City shall coordinate with the County and the State to
protect existing rights-of-way, and to prioritize and acquire future right-of-way in accordance with
the future traffic circulation plan.
Policy 1.4.1:
Policy 1.4.2:
The City shall adopt the Future Transportation Plan Map to ensure the
protection of future rights-of-way.
The City shall not vacate rights-of-way that are necessary to maintain an
efficient and adequate transportation system.
II -46
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Policy 1.4.3:
Policy 1.4.4:
Policy 1.4.5:
Policy 1.4.6:
Policy 1.4.7:
Policy 1.4.8:
Policy 1.4.9:
Policy 1.4.10:
Policy 1.4.11:
Policy 1.4.12:
The City's land development regulations shall require the provision of
adequate setbacks and dedications necessary to implement the
Transportation Plan.
The City shall continue requltlng dedication of needed rights-of-way
from new development, through subdivision regulations and applicable
local ordinances.
The City shall amend the setback requirements, zoning restrictions and
right-of-way protection requirements, if necessary, to make the
regulations consistent with this element.
The City shall ensure adequate rights-of-way protection for intersections,
interchanges and future park-and-ride sites in order to retain flexibility
for future growth and expansion.
The City shall ensure that the development of the Town Center provides
the necessary right-of-way for the proposed Town Center Boulevard.
The City shall continue to maintain minimum rights-of-way requirements
in the City Code for new roadways.
The City shall pursue grant opportunities for median landscaping and
road beautification.
The City, in its land development regulations shall require the dedication
of all needed rights-of-way and necessary roadway improvements for all
new development, and adopt provisions to protect dedication of roads to
the City.
The City shall acquire right-of-ways for future transportation needs as
funds become available.
The City shall designate U.S. Highway 17/92 as a mass transit corridor.
Objective 1.5: Multi-Modal System. The City shall promote alternative modes of
transportation to provide a safe and efficient multi-modal system.
Policy 1.5.1:
Winter Springs shall continue to adopt revisions to the land development
regulations to include guidelines and criteria consistent with nationally
recognized standards and tailored to local conditions which provide for
safe and convenient on-site traffic flow, adequate pedestrian ways and
sidewalks, as well as sufficient on-site parking for both motorized and
non-motorized vehicles.
II-47
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Policy 1.5.2:
Policy 1.5.3:
Policy 1.5.4:
Policy 1.5.5:
Policy 1.5.6:
Policy 1.5.7:
Policy 1.5.8:
By 2002, t The City shall develop standards in the City Code for access to
public transit, bicycle and pedestrian systems. Such standards shall apply
to new developments, substantial improvements of existing
developments, and to road improvements.
The City shall ensure the provision and maintenance of bicycle and
pedestrian walkways to supplement collector roads between residential
areas and parks, schools, and other major attractors. Specific provisions
for the establishment and maintenance of bicycle pedestrian walkways
shall include, but not necessarily be limited to the following:
· The City shall review all proposed development for its
accommodation of bicycle and pedestrian traffic needs;
· The land development regulations shall continue to require all new
developments to provide bicycle parking space; and
· Sidewalks or other pedestrian ways shall be provided where feasible
and appropriate along all roadways.
The City shall develop standards for maximum number of parking spaces
to encourage walking, bicycling, ridesharing, transit use, and shared
parking,.
The City shall review the City Code to address provision of bus stops,
bike parking and circulation, pedestrian walkways, and handicap
accessible facilities within new developments and existing developments
undergoing substantial improvements. Site plan reviews will ensure that
intermodal transfers are efficiendy implemented.
The City shall review the City Code to address safe and convenient on-
site traffic flow, which includes motorized and non-motorized circulation
and parking.
The City shall encourage increased land use densities and mixed uses,
consistent with the Future Land Use Element to enhance the feasibility
of transit and promote alternative transportation modes.
The City shall amend the City Code to require that new development be
compatible with and further the achievement of the Transportation
Element. Requirements for compatibility may include but are not limited
to:
· Orienting pedestrian access to transit centers and existing and
planned routes;
II -48
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Policy 1.5.9:
Policy 1.5.10:
Policy 1.5.11:
Policy 1.5.12:
Policy 1.5.13:
Policy 1.5.14:
Policy 1.5.15:
Policy 1.5.16:
.
Locating parking to the side or behind the development to provide
pedestrian accessibility of building entrances and walkways to the
street, rather than separating the building from the street by parking;
and
.
Providing clearly delineated routes through parking lots to safely
accommodate pedestrian and bicycle circulation.
The City shall include landscaping and streetscaping as roadway design
components in order to enhance the function of the road for all users.
A Pedestrian Circulation Master Plan shall be prepared, adopted and
implemented by ~ the City. Priority will be given to those walkways
for which heavy recreational usage is projected, as well as those along
roadways between residential areas and schools, which can be
implemented concurrently with other roadway improvements.
The City's roadway system management will require implementation and
construction of an adequate and safe pedestrian circulation system.
The City shall amend the City Code to require that sidewalks be
constructed concurrently with new development, by the developer.
Additional sidewalks will be constructed in existing developed areas when
requested and funded by the abutting property owners.
The City Code shall be amended to require that new residential
developments with densities of one or more dwelling units per acre
provide sidewalks on both sides of every street.
Except in the Town Center, where bikes are allowed to use travel lanes,
bike paths shall be established on one side of every arterial and collector
street with sidewalks established on the opposite side of all arterial
streets. The City shall coordinate with the MPO, the County and the
State to expand the current bicycle system. (Ord. 2004-43; 01-24-05)
Whenever possible, intersections shall be made pedestrian-friendly by
limiting the crossing width to 48 feet; use of adequate lighting; adequate
timing for traffic signals; and the provision of facilities for the
handicapped. The City shall coordinate with FDOT and the County to
implement this policy.
Continue to work with other jurisdictions to convert the former railroad
into a corridor for alternative modes of travel within the City - walking
trails, bicycle paths, equestrian and recreation.
II-49
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Policy 1.5.17:
By January 2001, The City shall establish a monitoring system \\1.ll bc
cstablishcd to measure the achievement of the City's multi-modal
transportation goals.
Objective 1.6: Public Transit. The City shall work with LYNX to provide a safe and
efficient public transit system, based on existing and proposed major trip generators and attractors,
land uses.
Policy 1.6.1:
Policy 1.6.2:
Policy 1.6.3:
Policy 1.6.4:
Policy 1.6.5:
Policy 1.6.6:
The City shall encourage land uses and site developments that promote
public transit within designated public transportation corridors, with
priority given to those projects that will bring the greatest increase in
transit ridership.
Residential development greater than 200 units or commercial
developments over 50,000 square feet shall incorporate space for bus
stops. Transit ridership to and from such developments shall be
encouraged and further improved by including elements, such as:
. Transit stops meeting ADA requirements;
. Parking lots and intersections designed with minimum corner turning
radii for buses;
. Clearly delineated walkways from the building to the transit stop; and
. Commercial and multi-family buildings and transit stops placed closer
to the street.
The City shall ensure that all roads serviced by public transit routes
function at a level of service sufficient to support the bus service.
The City shall notify LYNX of any proposed traffic generators/ attractors
submitted to the City for review.
The City shall work with LYNX to improve existing bus stops, and to
design new ones to include benches, signage, lights, and protection from
the elements. Bus stops shall also be convenient for the handicapped.
The City shall coordinate with LYNX the accommodations of the special
needs of the transportation disadvantaged.
Objective 1.7: Land Use Coordination. Throughout the planning period, the City shall
coordinate the transportation system needs with land use designations, and ensure that existing and
proposed population densities, housing and employment patterns, and land uses are consistent with
the transportation modes and services proposed for these areas.
II-50
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Policy 1.7.1:
Policy 1.7.2:
Policy 1.7.3:
Policy 1.7.4:
The City shall establish standards that promote the location of affordable
housing in close proximity to employment opportunities and transit
servIces.
The City shall continue to adopt and enforce regulations and standards
that require that the design and function of the roadway be adequate for
the type, size, and location of the land uses they serve.
Land uses that generate high traffic counts shall kencouraged to locate
adjacent to arterial roads and mass transit corridors.
By 2003, tIhe City shall update the traffic study portion of this
Transportation Element periodically to reflect the most current
population projections, which are higher than the TAZ data used for the
current traffic study.
Objective 1.8: Environment. Conserve the natural environment and augment open space
in the City as functions of road development.
Policy 1.8.1:
Policy 1.8.2:
Policy 1.8.3:
Policy 1.8.4:
Where valid options are available, choose rights-of-way for the City
collector system distant enough from natural drainage features and
upland habitats to coexist with these natural areas.
The incursion of a roadway through these natural areas shall be allowed if
it benefits the public need, such as for access by emergency vehicles or
transporting school children, outweighing other concerns.
Include in all new road plans adequate right-of-way for potential
landscaping and provide for maintenance, in the annual budget of the
City.
Designate scenic guidelines to preserve as much as possible of existing
vegetation and canopy.
Objective 1.9: Intergovernmental Coordination. Traffic circulation planning will be
coordinated with the MPO, FDOT, Seminole County, ECFRPC, neighboring jurisdictions and other
transportation related agencies.
Policy 1.9.1:
Policy 1.9.2:
The City shall keep appraised of the schedules for improvements and
ongoing policies of all jurisdictions whose transportation responsibilities
within the City limits affect the quality of life and the levels of service on
which Winter Springs citizens depend.
The Community Development and Public Works Departments shall
review subsequent versions of the FDOT Five-Year Transportation Plan,
in order to update or modify this element, as necessary.
II-51
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Policy 1.9.3:
Policy 1.9.4:
Policy 1.9.5:
Policy 1.9.6:
Policy 1.9.7:
The Community Development and Public Works Departments shall
review updates to the Transportation Element of the Seminole County
Comprehensive Plan, in order to update or modify this element, as
necessary.
The City shall promote a comprehensive transportation planning process
that coordinates state, regional, and local transportation plans.
The City will support the State and the County on the establishment of
alternative transportation systems, including high speed and commuter
rail line systems connecting Seminole County with other areas in Florida.
The City shall continue to monitor the construction schedules of
Department of Transportation regarding improvement of SR 434
through the City so that the level of service is not degraded below the
state's criteria for a principal arterial link. In applying the lenience to
permit three years in advance of funded improvements, be selective so
that development permitted to proceed prior to actual construction of
the higher capacity road will include only those projects which further
progress toward other goals.
The City shall coordinate development of all property in the City adjacent
to Tuskawilla Road with County requirements for laneage and
intersection improvements to lessen development impact until the road is
improved.
Objective 1.10: Traffic Management Systems. By 2005, tThe City shall evaluate the need
and feasibility of implementing traffic management systems.
Policy 1.10.1:
Policy 1.10.2:
The City shall support and where possible, partiClpate in the MPO's
Congestion Management System (CMS) and FDOT's Mobility
Management Plan (MMP).
If needed, the City shall consider adopting and/or promoting
Transportation System Management (TSM) or Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) strategies to enhance traffic capacity, movement
and safety.
Objective 1.11: Concurrency Management System. The City shall maintain a Concurrency
Management System to ensures that transportation facilities and services needed to support
development and redevelopment are available concurrent with the impacts of such development.
Policy 1.11.1:
The City shall continue requiring that adequate transportation facilities to
maintain the City's level of service standards be available to meet the
traffic demands of all new development prior to the issuance of a final
II-52
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
development order, in accordance with the Concurrency Management
Provisions set forth in the Capital Improvements Element of this Plan.
Policy 1.11.2:
The City shall amend the City Code to require that all new developments
anticipated to generate citftef 300 or more trips during the peak hour, or
morc than 1,500 daily trips, be required to submit a Transportation
Impact Study.
Policy 1.11.3:
New developments, regardless of size, shall provide operational
improvements to the City' transportation system to mitigate their impacts
on the system, to ensure smooth traffic flow, and to aid in the
elimination of hazards. Improvements may include, but are not limited
to: providing added connectivity, the addition of turn lanes, deceleration
lanes, signage, signals and pavement markings. and contributions to the
City's multi-modal system.
II-53
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
***
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
***
C. LAND USE ANALYSIS
***
2. Analysis of Public Facilities Mfecting Development
***
e. Transportation
Current deficiencies were found on U.S. 17-92 from Shepard Road to
S.R.419, and S.R. 419 from U.S. 17-92 to S.R. 434. The segment of U.S. 17-
92 between Shepard Road and Airport Boulevard is planned for widening to
6 lanes by 2010. The S.R. 419 segment between Edgemon Avenue and Moss
Road is programmed for turn land improvements in ~ 2004-2005.
By 2010, most roads ",111 be complying '",<ith the level of service standards
noted above. Ddeficiencies will be found on U.S. 17-92 north of Shepard
Road (even after widening to 6 lanes), S.R. 434 from S.R. 419 to the
Greeneway, and S.R. 419 from U.S. 17-92 to Edgemon Avenue. The
projection does not take into consideration the additional collector roads
added within the Town Center. which will help to alleviate the projected
deficiency. Improvements on thcsc roads to U.S. 17-92. S.R. 419 and S.R.
434 are the responsibility of the State.
***
D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
***
Objective 1.6: Transportation/Land Use Compatibility. The City will ensure
that population densities, housing types, employment patterns, and land uses are consistent
with the City's transportation network.
Policy 1.6.1: Curb-cuts and points of access to the traffic circulation system from
individual parcels shall be minimized.
***
Policy 1.6.4: The City shall prohibit proposed land use amendments which are
anticipated to reduce the LOS of service for transportation facilities
below the standard, unless the development contributes to the City's
multi-modal system and addresses the deficiencies caused by the
project. Such contribution shall be approved by the City
Commission.