The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002 04 08 Regular F Homeless Shelter in the Winter Springs Industrial Park Reimbursement . COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM F CONSENT INFORMA TIONAL PUBLIC HEARING REGULAR X 4/8/2002 Meeting MGR. fJ---.. IDEPT Authorization . REQUEST: Commissioner Robert Miller asks the City Commission to determine if Mayor Paul Partyka should (1) be censured for deliberately misleading the City Commission regarding his participation in the planning of the Homeless Center in the City's Industrial Park in 2001, and (2) be ordered to reimburse the City for an invoice associated with his participation in that planning. PURPOSE: This agenda item is a formal request by Commissioner Robert Miller that the City Commission consider censuring Mayor Paul Partyka and ordering him to reimburse the City for an invoice, both in connection with his participation in the 2001 planning for the construction of a Homeless Shelter in the Winter Springs Industrial Park. CONSIDERATIONS: 1. During an approximate one-year period between 2000 and 2001, several statements and actions attributed to Mayor Paul Partyka indicated he was more closely involved in the promotion of a Homeless Shelter within the City's Industrial Park than he previously disclosed. 2. Mayor Partyka failed to fully disclose his close relationship with the project, and through questionable dealings, realized substantial financial gains. 3. Whether legal or not, his failure to reveal his full involvement created an appearance of impropriety and possible conflicts of interest, such that the City Commission should address this issue in an appropriate fashion. RECOMMENDATION: . Commissioner Robert Miller asks the City Commission to determine if Mayor Paul Partyka should be censured, and ordered to reimburse the City for an invoice submitted in connection with the Homeless Shelter and authorized by him. FUNDING: None required at this time. . City Commission Regular Agenda Item "F" April 8, 2002 ATTACHMENTS: Letter, dated February 25, 2002, from Commissioner Robert Miller to the City Commission, with Universal Engineering Sciences Geotechnical Exploration report of May 23, 2000. COMMISSION ACTION: . . . . . Robert S. Miller District One. City of Winter Springs February 25, 2002 SUBJECT: Censure of Mayor Partkya for lying to this Commission regarding his part in the planned homeless Center in Winter Springs. TO: City Commission. I am asking that this issue be placed on the Commission agenda for Monday, April, 8, 2002, as a "Regular Agenda item," in order to determine if Mayor Partyka should be censured for deliberately misleading this Commission regarding his participation in the planning of the Homeless Center to be built in the City's Industrial Park last year. A second question is whether the Mayor should be ordered to reimburse the City for an invoice associated with his participation in the above transaction. At the City Commission meeting of July 23, 2001, an agreement was discussed with operators of the Homeless Center of Orange County, not to pursue a new Homeless Center facility in Winter Springs. Included in documentation provided by the Homeless Center to the City in support of the settlement, was an invoice for $ I ,465.00, from Universal Engineering Sciences (UES) of Orlando. The invoice is dated May 23, 2000, is addressed to Mr. Paul Partyka as Development Director. It requests payment for work completed at the new Homeless Center site in Winter Springs. Text in the letter states, "The scope of our investigation was planned in conjunction with and authorized by you." The letter continues... "This report contains the results of our investigations, and engineering interpretation of these with respect to the project characteristics described to us, and recommendations for the groundwater control, foundation design, and site preparation." Public records now available to the City reflect the following: I. In early May 2000, as the sitting Mayor of Winter Springs, Mayor Partyka and the chief fund raiser for the Homeless Center at Saint Stephens Church, met privately with Winter Springs city staff, to encourage them to arrange for sewer and water to be provided to the Homeless Center site in Winter Springs. Mayor Partyka arranged for this subject to be placed on the City Commission agenda of May 22, 2000. 2, At the May 22, 2000 City meeting, Mayor Partyka again spoke eloquently about the need to provide sewer and water to the proposed Homeless Center site in the Winter Springs Industrial Park. He repeatedly insisted that the city needed to provide this service to the Industrial Park so as to protect the environment, save Lake Jessup, avoid ground water pollution, and to stop the . . . spread of septic tanks. When asked an hour later by Commissioner McLeod, if Mayor Partyka had any interests in the property, the Mayor repeatedly reassured the Commission that he was only a Realtor for the transaction, and therefore only represented the seller, who obviously no longer had any interest in the property. On several occasions when the Homeless Center was discussed, the Mayor again assured this Commission that he was only the Realtor for the land transaction. 3. At a Commission meeting in early 2001 (a year later), Mayor Partyka, under more questioning about his role in the Homeless Center transaction, admitted to the CitY Commission that he was in fact the Broker for the transaction and represented the Homeless Center from the very beginning. Nothing was said at this time by the Mayor about work that he had authorized for the Homeless Center's construction, nor the substantial commission which he had received from funds raised for the project, from churches in the area. Citizens of Winter Springs are deeply distressed by the Mayor's repeatedly misleading of this Commission about his role in the transaction, which constitutes deception to this Commission, conflict of interest, as well as serious ethical questions regarding acceptable standards of conduct. Robert S. Miller, Commissioner Commissioner, District 1. City of Winter Springs. Encl.: Universal Engineering Sciences invoice of May 23, 2000 CC: Mayor Partyka City Manager City Attorney Sent By: BROWN,WARD,SALZMAH&WEISS,P.A.; 407 425 9596; F eb. 1 1 .02 10: 44AM; Page 2 a6~??~?~~1__ E13~~.2__ 4679777822 ...,""",-..L'"",,'O.... MlICAIONE GROl.f' n::....L I n ~ u:.1~ 1l:.J'( PAGE aa I"" AbC. tl::f May 23, 2000 ~'" . ()....-.do . (lahoe'<llll -fMloI\",<" .~~ .el~ . O~N o.-:r.. . w.... Nm Doaoa> .~ . Or:4lAo .l'lI~ . o.oe 'Y . w UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES eonou....~ 101: a...,,\~ 0'09'M~~' Thtardd ~ (o""'ronr""""'" ~ - C"",\rVC~"" MAl'orl.lo Tlfllllll Re<llvast, Real Estale Advisors :l700 Lucien Way. Suito 350 MaItland, Florida 32751 Attention: Mr. Paul P ~ Partyka Development Director Reference: GEKltochnlcal ExplorotJon 7.B +/- Aae 31te Old Sanford! Oviedo Roo<1 Serninolo County, Florida Project No. 19290-0' 6-01 Re port No. 116.402 Dear Mr. Partyka: . Unive~al Engineering Saences has; completed the geotechnical exploralion for toe referenced sUe in Seminole County, Florida. The SCOptl of our Investigation wa.5 planned In conjunction with and authorized by, you. This report contains the results of our Investigations, an engineering InterprelatJon of thesa with respect to the project characteristics described to us, and recommendalions (or the groundwater control, found<'ltlon desIgn, and site preporol/on. We apprec;3te the opportunity 10 have \lJo~ed with you on this project and look forwanj to a continued a$socfadon. Ple8se do nol hasilale 10 conlact us If you should have any qU8EtJom:. or if we may further assist you as your plan~ proceod. lIy submitted, AL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. eln. P. E. a P. E. No: 51399 or Project Manser I{)~' 'f /L- viP"" Br 09 H. Woloshln. P.E. P.E. No. 38734 Manager - GeolechnlC3/.....E:nginc ering KH/8W:sl cc: CHonl (4) . 353.2 Maggio Blvd, . Orlando, 1="1 32811 . (407) 423-0604 . F3X (d07) 423-3106 ~~Q-, l-?nn~ '~I:..1q ,'IGO .1:>C: ClC:QC, Q.'l'/ P (:l::> . . . OG/27i2~01 'a3:42 4079777822 t-1ACA lONE GROUP nt:..L1I_ I H ~ AI'<l::. Ll:.N' t:.k PAGE l::lb PAGE 85 ~_, ~~'LUUU L~.LU ~~/~LOOL~ UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES GEOTECHNICAl EXPl.ORAT10N 7.8 .,- ACR.E SITE OLD SANFORDJOVlEOO ROAD SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORJDA PROJECT NO. 1a:ZElO~1B-01 REPORT NO. 116402 Prop_rod For: Reafvost, Real Estate AdvIsors 2200 Ludan Way. SuIte 350 Maitland. Aorfda 32751 Prepllrlld By: U"ivon;al EnglnlClring Sciences 3.53.2 Maggie Boulevard Or1<mdo, Florida 32811 (407) 423-0504 Moy 2.3, 2000 Consultants in: Geo~ Enginect\ng . Em1ronrnental &:io~ . C<:rr.nrvcWn Mlllori..:Jt& TE/"'IDng' Thror;hOd I~ OlliClLS 10: OMndo . Gainocvillo . Alvi6T11 e.",dl . At:dled<Jo . Dlly1Qt'\/) 8eod1 . F\.ntIl Gon:J,.., . SI. ..wgustinc . JActsonviIle . Oc.a/a . Tampa 136/27/2801 ,83:42 4079777822 __I _~, ____ ~~.~_ ~V'~LVUL~ fvlACAIONE GROUF' nr:.14L I M l,;Ul-::1::. U:..N I ti PAGE 137 PAGE 86 . Project No. 19290-016-01 Report No. 116402 '.0 INTRQD!"!CJION 1.1 GENERAL In this report. we present the results of the subsurface investigations of the site for the proposed 7.8 +j-<3cra site In Seminole County. Florida. We have divided this report into the following secllons: . SCOPE OF SERVICES - Defines what we dId . FINDINGS -Describes what we encountered . RECOMMENDATIONS - Describes ....mat we encourage you to do . LIMITATIONS - Describes the restrlcllons Inherent in this report . SUMMARY - Reviews the material In this report . . APPENDICES - Presents support materials rerarencsd in thIs report. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION . We understand that you propose to construct a 2-story main structure With 2 adjacent structures on this site. We were provided Vlith a site plan prepared by Lochrane Engineering, on May 15, 2000. We used this plan in preparing our investigation. The geotechnical study induded herein ;s limited to structure area and does not include any pavement or drainage areas. Our recommendations are based upon the above considerations. If any of this information is incorrect or if you anticipate any changes, inform Universal Engineering Sciences so that we may review our recommendations. The site is located In SemInole County, Florida. A general location map of the project area appears in Appendix A: Site Location Map. 2.2 PURPOSE The purposes of this investigation wers: . to investigate the general subsurface condition,S at the site; . to interpret and review the subsurface conditions with respect to the proposed construction: and · to provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for foundation design. and site preparation. . Page 1 of 8 Pages w . . . 136/27/20,01 ,83: 42, 4079777822 rvlACA lONE GROUF nCHLln ~~c LtNlc~ P'!:'GE 08 PAGE 07 ~V'''''LOO.LU''' Project No. Report No. 1929o-D16-01 1 15402 This report presents an evaluation of site conditions on the basis of traditional ~eole~hnical procedures for site characterization. The recovered samples were not examined, eIther. v'su~"y or analytically, for chemical composition or environmental hazards. Universal Engineering Sciences would be pleased to perform Ihese services, if you desIre. . Our investigation was confined to the zone of soil likely to be stressed by the proposed . construclion. Our work did not address the potenlial for surface expre.ssion of deep geological conditions, such as sinkhole development related to karst activity. This evaluarlon requIres a more extensive range of field services than performed in this study. We will be pleased to conduct an Investigation to evaluate lhe probable effect of the regional geology upon the proposed constructIon.. if you desire. 2.3 FIELD INVESTIGATION The subsurface a:>nditions In the structure area ware investigated with five (5) borings advanced to depths of 25 feet while performing the Standard Penetration Test. The locations of the boring were not surveyed and should be considered approximate. Our drilling crew located the boring locations upon estimated distances and relationships to obvious landmarks. We performed the Standard Penetration Test In each of the borings according 10 the procedures of ASTM 0-1586. with continuous sampling performed above a depth of 10 feet, to detect slight variations in the soli profile at shallow depths. The basic procedure for the Standard Penetration T e:)t is as (ollows: a standard split-barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler 1-foot, after liGatIng 6 inches, Is designated the penetration resIstance, or N-value; this value is an inde:r. to soil strength and consistency. Jar samples of the soils encountered will be held in our laboratory for your Inspection for 60 days and then discarded, unless we are notified otherwise. 2.4 LABORATORY JNVESTIGATION The soil samples recovered (rom the soil lest borings were-returned 10 our laboratory and then visually examIned and the field descriptions reviewed. We selected representative soil samples (or laboratory testing consistIng of five (5) wash No, 200 sieve analysis, and five (5) moisture content detelTTlinations, We performed these tests 10 aid In classifying the soils and 10 help to evaluate the general engineering charaderistics or the sile salls. See Appendix B: Boring Logs and Description of Testing Procedures. for further dala and explanations, Page 2 of 8 Pages w . . . 06/27/2801 '03: 42 4079777822 _......,...uv.c.u--. MACA lONE GROUP nCHLln ~c ~CNICH PAGE 09 I~AGl:. I:ll:l Project No. 19290-016-01 Report No. 116402 3.0 ERElIMINARY FINDINGS 3.1 SURFACE CONOITIONS A Universal Englne'ering Sciences engIneer performed a visual site Inspection of the subject property to gain a "hands-on" familiarity with the project area. From the site specific topographic information provided. and (rom our site explorations. it is apparent that the sIte is generally flat. VegetatIon on the site consisted primarily of underbrush and trees. We examined U.S.G.S. topographic quadra~gle maps and the USDA Soil ConservCltJon Service (SCS) Soil Surveyor SemInole County for relevant InformatIon about the site. The SCS Soil Survey indIcates the'soils on the site o:mslst of Myakke and Eau Gallle Fine Sands (20). ThIs class of soils Is generally flat and poorly drained Bands. 3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ' The boring locations and detailed subsurface CQndllfons are illuslrated in Appendix B: Boring Location Plan and Boring Logs. The classIfications and descriptions shown on the logs are generally based upon visual characterizations of the rSCDvered soil samples and a limited number of laboratory tests. Also, see Appendix, B: Soils Classification Chart, for further explanation of the symbols and placement of data on the Boring Logs. In general, the borings performed at the site revealed a somevvnat unlfonn soli profile. The borings revealed a sequence fine sands grading from clean sand (SP) to sillY and clayey sand (SM, SC) to the explored depth of 25 feet. The blow counts "N" values measured in the borings ranged from 5 to 21 blows per foot. This is indicative of loose to medium dense conditions. At the time of our investigation (May 2000), we encountered groundwater at depths ranging from 4 to 5.3 feet below grade at the boring locations after the groundwater had stabilized. Page 3 of 8 Pages w . . . 86/27/2001 ,83: 42. 4079777822 ___ __.____. ~~.~V ~V(~LUVLU~ /vIACAIONE GROUF' ncH~ln ~~c ~CNIC~ PAGE 10 .....Al:>t:. tl':l Project No. Report No. 19290-016-01 116402 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 GENERAL The following recommendations are made based upon a review of the attached soil lest data, our understanding of the proposed construction, snd experience with similar projects and subsurface conditions. If the srructuralloadings. building locations, or grading plans change from those discussed previously, we request the opportunity to review and possibly amend our recommendations with respect 10 those changes. Additionally, if subsurface conditions are encountered during construction which were not encountered In the borings. report those condItIons Immediately to us for observatIon and recommendations. In this section of the report. we present our detailed recommendations for groundwater control, building foundations. site preparation and construction related services. 01.2 GROUNDWATER CONTROL The groundwater table will fluctuate seasonally depending upon local rainfall. The rainy season In Central FlorIda is normally between June and September. Based upon our review of U.S.G.S. data, Orange County Soils Survey. and regIonal hydrogeology, our best estimate for the seasonal high groundwater levels are shown on the boring log, sheets adjacent to theIr corresponding depths. The existing and estimated seasonal high Water levels at each boring location appear In Appendix B: Boring Logs. It should t>e noted that the estimated seasonal high water levels do not provide any assurance that groundwater levels will not exceed these estlmated levels during any given year in the future. Should the impediments to surface water drainage be present,or should rainfall intensity and duration. or total rainfall quantities. exceed the normally anticipated rainfall quantities, groundwater levels might once again exceed our seasonal high estimates. We recommend positive drainage be established and maintained on the site during construdlon. We further recommend permanent measures be constructed to maintain positive drainage from the site throughout the life of the project. We recommend alt foundation designs Incorporate the seasonal high groundwater conditions. 4.3 BUILDING FOUNDATIONS Provided the soils are compacted in accordance with the site preparation recommendations oullined in the Site Preparation Section (4.1) of the report. we recommend that the proposed structures be supported on convenllonal, shallow spread foundations or 8 thickened edge monolithic slob. The (ollowing parameters m3y be used (or prelimInary foundation design, Page 4 of 8 Pages w 86/27i2001 03:42 4079777822 --,.~,__v_ 4~.~V 'u,'~oo~u. tvlACA lONE GROUP nl:.J-\L I n ~utc.t:. LeN I t..K t-'A~e 11 PAGE 1 El . Prcject No. Report No. 19290-016-01 116402 4.3.1 B~rinQ Pressure The maximum allowable net soil bearing pressure to be used for prelimInary shallow foundation design should not exceed 2500 pounds per square foot (psf). Net bearing pressure is defined as the soil bearing pressure at the base of the foundation In excess of the natural overburden pressure. The foundations should be desIgned based upori the maximum load that could be imposed by all loading conditions. 4.3.2 Foundation Size The minimum widths recommended for any Isolated column footing and conlinuous wall footing are 24 inches and 18 inches. respectIvely. Even though the maximum allowable sol boaring pressure may not be achieved, these width recommendation should control the sIze of the foundatlons. 4.3.3 BearlnQ Depth The foundatIons should bear at a depth of at least 18 inches below the exterior final grades. We recommend stormwater and surface water be diverted away from the buildIng exterfor. both during and after constructIon to reduce the possIbility of erosIon beneath the exterior footings. . 4.3.4 Beating Moteri~1 The foundations may bear on either the compacted suitable natural soils or compacted structural fill. The bearing level soils. after compaction should have compactIon to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density of the bearIng soils a9 determined by ASTM D~ 1557 (Modified Proctor), to the depth described subsequenUy in the Site Preparation Section (4.7) of the report. In addition to c~mpaction the bearing soils must exhibil5tability and be free of "pumping" conditions. 4.3.5 S{/tt1ement Estimates Post-construction settlement of lhe structure will be InnuenceCl by several Jnterrelated factors, such as (1) subsunace stratification and strength/compressibility characteristics of the bearing solis to a depth of approximately twIce the width of Ihe (ooling; (2) footing size. bearing level, applied IOeds. and resulting bearing pressures beneath the foundation; (3) site preparation and earthwork construction techniques used by the contractor,.and (4) external fadors. including but nOllimited to vibration from offslle sources and groundwater fluctuations beyond those normally anticipated for the n3lurally-occurring site and soli conditions which are present. Our settlement estimales (or the structure are based upon the use or successful adherence to the site preparation 'recommendations presented later in this report, Any deviation from these recommendations could result in an increase In the estimated post-construction settlement of lhe slrvcture, Ou~ to the sandy nature of the surficial solis following the compaction opera lions, we expect . a s'gnlfi=nl portion of settlemenl 10 be elastic in nalu'e and accu, ,elatively Quick/y. DnW Page 5 of 8 Pages B6/27/2081 .83:44 4879777822 _~#.~, 'u~v ~~.LU ~U'~LOOL~ rvl~C~ lONE GROUF r"t:.AL I H L:Q~t:. L:~NTa t-'Alit:. 1'L p~ 11 . Project No. RepOrl No. 19290-016-01 11 6402 Due 10 the sandy nature of the surildal soils folloVling the compaction operations, we expect a signifiC8nt porlion of settlement to be elastic In nature and occur relatJvely quicxly, on application of the loads,' during and immediately following, construction. Using the recommended maximum bearing pressure, the assumed maximum structural loads, and the field and laboratory test data which we have correlated into the strength and compressibility characteristics of the subsurface soils, we estimate the total, post-construcllon settlements of the structure to be 1.lnch or less. Differential settlement result from differences in applied bearing pressures and the variations In the compressibility characteristics of the subsurface soils. F'or the building pads prepared ' as recommended, we anticipate the differential settlement of less than Y.r-inch. 4.4 SITE PREPARATION We recommend only good practice, site preparallon procedures. These procedures Indude: stripping the site of vegetation, proof-rolling and compacting the subgrade, end flIllng to grade VYilh engineered filL AddItional site preparation measures may. be requIred once the final geotechnical exploration is performed If differing site conditions are encountered. . A detailed synopsis of the anticipated site preparation work Is as follows: 1. If required, perform remedial dB'N8tering pnor to any earthwork operations. 2, Strip the pro'posed construction IimJts of ~II muck, grass, roots, topsoil, construction debris, and other deleterious materials within and' 0 feet beyond the perimeter of the proposed bulldlng. Expect clearing and grubbing to depths of 12 Inches_ Deeper clearing and grubbing depths may be encountered In heavily vegetated areas where major toot systems and surficial organic soils are encountered. 3, Proof-roll the subgrade with a heavily loaded, rubber-Ured vehicle under the observation of a UnIversal Engineering Sciences geotechnical engineer or his representative. Proof- ro[ling will help locate any zones of especially loose or sofi soils not encountered in the soil test borings. Then undercut, or olherNlse treat chese zones as recommended by the engineer. 4. Compact the subgrade from the surface by a medium weight vibratory rol!er (a 10-ton roller, (or example) unril you obtain a minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM 0-1557), ro a depth of 3 feet be/ow exlstlng ground sU~3ce In the building limits. 5. Test the subgrade (or compaction at 8 frequency of not less than one test per 2,500 square feef per foot or deplh Improvemenlln the building area. Page 6 of 8 Pages sa . ~""''''LV,,",LV-' 1.1ACA lONE GROUP nc.H'- I n ~r<c:. u:J'l1 cr<: .....Al:il::. 1.:1 t"'Al.:Je 1 ~ 86/27/2081 ,83:42 407977782~ . Projed No. Report No. 19290-016-01 116402 6. Place fill material. as required. The fill should consist of -c1ean,- fine sand with less than 5 percent soil fines. You may use fill materials with soil fines between 5 and 10 percent, but strict moisture control may be required. Place fill in uniform 10- to 12-lnch loose lifts and compact each 11ft to a minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. 7. Perform compliance tests within the fill at a frequency of not less than one test per 2,500 square teel per lift in the buildIng areas, or at a minimum of two lest locations, whichever is greater. 8. Test all footing cuts for compaction to a depth of 3 feet. Additionally. we recommend that you test one out of every, four column footings, and one test per every 200 lineal feet of wall footing_ 4.5 CONSTRUCTION RELATED SERVICES . We recommend the owner retain Univef$al Engineering Sciences to perform the flnal geotechnical evaluation and the construction materials tests and observations on this project The geotechnIcal engineering design does not end with the advertisement of the constructIon documents. The design is an on~gorng process throughout construction. Because of our familiarity with the site conditions and the intent of the engineering design, we are most qualified to address problems that mlghr'arise during construction In a timely and cost-effective manner. . Page 7 of 8 Pages w 06/27/:001 8~:42, 4879777822 VO'~JILUUU ~l.LU ~U/4LOOLV~ /.lACA lONE GROUP Hr:.UL I H LA~t:. Ll:N II::)< t-'Al:it. III PAGE 13 . Project No. Report No. 19290-016-01 116402 5.0 LIMITATIONS DUring the eany stages of most construction projeds, geotechnical Issues not addressed in this report may anse. Because of the naturallfmltations inherent in working with the subsurface, it is not possible for a geotechnical engineer to predict and address all possible problems_ An Association of Engineering Firms Practicing In the Geosciences (ASFE) publication. "Important In(ormatlon Abour Your Geotechnical Engineering Report" appears in AppendIx C, and will help explain the nature of geotechnical Issues. . Page 8 of 8 Pages' " w . -......, .,LVVL(J..... fvlACA lONE GROUP - nc:.HL I n \..I4r<:c \.,;CN I c.r. PAGE 15 t-'Abl;. 1 q 06/27/2801 03:42 4079777822 . AP-PENDIX A . . 06!27/?881 03:42 4079777822 v....u &. -''' LU\,JU L.. ~ LoU ...tJ '....LOOLCJ'.. IvlACAIONE GROUP nc;":L I M I;UKt. U:.N I t.t< PAGE 1E, PAGE 15 . . . :1 'J " " ~ o ~ :2000 f , SCURC[: USGS QUACRANGl~ MAP 1980, SCAl[ (n.) r;g 7.8 ACRE SITE OLD SANFORD-OVIEDO ROAD SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA SITE LOCATION MAP 5/22/00 UNIVERSAL !" >>'CIN((1I1NC :C'(~CE~ O~AW~ ~y: R,K,5, SOLe: AS SHOWN 06/27/2881 03:42 4879777822 . uO,~~ILOUU L~.~V ~a'4~OOL~q IvIACA lONE GROUP HtALIH C~ ~I~~ PAGE 17 PAGE 16 . APPENDIX ,8 . . 06/27/2001 03:42 4079777822 VV. A~' LVVV L~.LV ~U"~UUL~~ MACAIONE GROUP , ncl-<\... I n '-'Hr<l:. l.l:.I'i I cr< . .-----..-------- toot -- -- ~B-4 1'9"""1 .-.. ~v. Z"-O" -- -'- ~s ~~ J- = ~B-3 . l10 l>~(' .~ r-~~~ - -4lC:; - - :Jl - "LJ( c. Cj'" K..A.. c;...,... ~ lll.. -- --=.=--=----- <L ,,"o..y-: lORING LOC.::. nON BORINGS PERFORMED 5/17/00 . 'rHIS ORAYlING Rf:PROOUCEO, PROM PLAN PRO\J1DED 8'1" C.IErH. PAGE 18 ,1-ll:Jt:. tll .~ ~ ~ r cj z , g I c Iii fl ....... '. 0 t"V - , . ./'::n >0 :, :>'1 "- " . J < tj ~ ~I~ .~ --< :c ~ ," c.C1.....~ CJ)- cr. LU Z I- D::' <( a.. )-. U) g! ;? w a:: N ~ :~~ ~ vi ~ . ~ j'I; x . (i "'J ~ ~ ., " ". : .. ~ '" C> ~' ~ 5/:; ~ l~ ... ~ ~ t ~I'" - Q; e ~ 0 <::: cr g 0 Z 0:: :5 0 0 UJ -l a. ~ > LL Z o " 0 en .?: ill ~ z i= I <( c:r o ::J U U cr 0 0 <( CJ U -1 co a:: UJ C) ,.... o -l Z l1.. 0 0:: ~ i 0 en w C) o CJ) -1 0 .. m UNIVERSAL ("co. COI.-' ~IOtCO P~( "0/3 __ / J VV'.~'LUUU L~.~O ~O'~~COL~q fvlACA lONE GROUP ~ALIH CARE CENTER PAGE 19 PAGE B2 06/27/2001 83:42 4879777822 . \----_d - .-.-- ..... . ---- ---- _'__._..._ __ _~.__ _0 _.' _----.- _--0" ..0 1.4 ~--_. .----------- - 0 __ _._.- -....-.. ~8-5 PQ~."':-""r. '.r.t..r...-y; :.., .:.-c::>- tl. \ c., ~-tS\-- ----- . 'r ."" -..' --. ' -- --- -- -- -.-- --, ---.- . :., .. "'.- -- -- CORE aU/lOlHG - -. . _ 0 B-1 08-2 . " \---.--.. . - .. .- J~ \:==U- ~- 3'E-=-- or r~~( ,4.- ~ .....Ci . ..( ~. -- - pia. _ ~i 71. I ,:. ~:.::-: OLD S^NFORD-OVlEDO tt LEGEN, . o ~o I j APPROX. 5C,A.LE (n,) -0 STANDARD PENETRJ\TIOt--: 1 . .' J 1 -. 86/27/2001 03:47 4079777822 .. MACAIONE GROUP I A.J"""\- I n L.~c:. \..A:.1"If I t.. t-'Al:ik:. l::J'L PAGE 63 .93 Jl"JIIIloJeC"r He.! 'D2Q1()...o, e...o 1 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERJNG SCIENCES BORING LOG "'IIO'OI\T NO.: 1 ,~:z PAGE: 8-~.1 M'OJCCT: &HEET: 1 of 1 /UlNaE; 30E 7.4 ACJlE elT! OlD 5AJ'I~D RQ.A[}.OVlliDO ROAD SEMWOUl. COUNTY, "1.0/UOA CUlHT: /lu.1~T "AJlTNEJtS. !He. l~TlON: SEE IlOfl~ LOCATlON PLAN "f",,"R~: DUTH ,FT./ A 1lL0WS ~ PeI\.II' I.. 1H00e,..eNT E N IBlOWSJ W.T. P'1'.1 o , 3-4-5 9 9--8-9 17 .2 5-9-1 2 21 ...l:.. --5::2';:1"'- --.soo_oo I 2-3-2 5 10 34-4 8 '''''----'-''-. ....-.-....... . ___.____...._._n_._......._...._.__..........._..__....._.._...._....... ......._..u.... .h...._........_ _.____, __._. ..__...._. ....'.f....__ 15 ...._~::;J,~..__, ,._...~'oo., -........-.....-.---...-.............-.-............__. ...... .....0..0....... ... .__.... .... ........ 0" ,_. .._ __ .......... ....._ _., 'r M !l o L DESCRIPTION 1l0RING OE:lICi",A TION, B-1 s~C"tIO/'f: ~ TO......,.,S..'...: 20$ 0.8. J:LfV^nON ('t!: 0" TE ST "-"TeD: 5/171tX) WATER TACl.f en': ~." DATE FINISHl!o: 6117/00 DATE Ofl READING: 8/17/00 DRlllEO 8V1 U.f.S. - ON..AHI EST. w.S. W. T. IrU: 2.6 rrPE 0' SAIool,PlING: ASTl.4 0-1514 .200 .", ArTUUI€IIC) LIMrT!I QI'lQ. COft'T . f 'AI Gray finn SANO /SPJ - modlwn don.... blown - &ght brow.. JC IFT.J DAYI Me '''' LL PI loo~. gr.Y-<Jroon c ayoy tIne SAND ISCI - 100.. -----..........--.....-..-..-.........------.-..............--. ................... .......-.......- ____A ..__....._ ._....___.__ ___ 23 20 27 11 .. . to Loc:". gray.brown Jilty roll AND: with clir( rsMI ;zo 3.).3 6 _........ . 0" . . .- -...........................--......................................... _... 0.. .... .......... .......... ....... ..............._ ........... ".. ". 2S 3.3-4 7 30 '. l0050 gr:ry-i/roon clayoy line SAND I CI ......,?,;?..... ,.. .P....... ..J..~.... ._~.._ . ...............-. . . ........... ....._... ...u..... ..................._ ................._............_ .................... . ................. ................. "'_"'Uhu._ ._........ ........... .........._._.__ ........._ e- . . B6/27/2elen 'el'3: 47' 4el79777822 MACA lONE GROUP nc.HL r n \.At(1:. L.l:.N Tli PAGE \1:.:1 PAGE Elq m UNJVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES BORING lOG ~ROJl!cr ..0.: tg~DO-o.lI-O' m;PQRT~.1 1l!l.402 PAO E: 11-2.2 p/lOJf;CT: 1.1 ACJlE SIT!; OLO s.ANI'OftD "O",O.QvleOO AOAD SI!MINOLE COUNT"/', FlORIDA ~LVElJT P"'RTNE~. If<. efe: llolUNt'J lOC4 T10N r\.AN IIOIlI/OG OESKlNATlON: B-2 :U,CTlOfll: J_ TOWNSHIP: 205 SHIiH: 1 of 1 AA.NOf: 301 CUCHT; loeA. 001'4: aSJloiUUIlKS: G.:5. Ell!V...nON rto: DATE 3TA"TI!O: ~1I7JOQ, WAn;II T....SL& lIt): '.3 OA T!i FINlllHEO; !!" OItlO DA Tl! Of' "fACiNG: :1111'00 O/UUED BY' U .1I.Jl. . OAl,..l.}j I ~ST. W~""".T. IN: 3.0 TYP$ OF SAM"UN(J: ASTa. Dol:!" DEm1 II"T J .A Bl.OWS ~ pEJ\ il- l> l "'C1IE~T ~ Y M 8 o L LL P1 A rl'IUIBl:/lG lIMITS N (Ill..OWSI W.T. FT.' Ie 1FT.) a4n .200 ("', 0110. CCflrT . "" Me 1"-' DE~CIIln10N o M.dlum dense gr..y.OI'tIwn tin. SAND I 5 19 4.4-7 t 1 Jl... fl..7-IO 17 . J,Q9.tIU1T~Gl~Ld.)'::q.On....Ji. . Q..lS.CL__, .....-...--- -..- 3-3-4 7 -\}I'ay , 25 ].3-4 7 - g"y-ero~n 10 , 5-~ __.~_..... .._,..._ ..........-......---.......-..-.........._........._...._.._...04...........'.n'._.._,'. ............._.. ...-......10.... ..___.. ........... .._n_....n_. "._'_"_._ 1& 4.15-5 10 ......_._... u_......... .....-..-..-. .............-.. ......-... -...-.-. ....-....-.-.. ..-........... .--..... r... : _...._............_._....._n._..................._._.............."._'_...n__..._'_' . . . . .' 20 4-.4.5 9 ..n....' .' '; ...._....._..... .................................._..............._.............._......... ..........-..-. ................. ........... .......... ....... n._.._ ._..........._ ... . '. 25 ,3-4~ e FI/T7l'!l.oy.g.nn u y LAY {ell 30 .... .......-....-..-. ...-.......... ........ ........- -........-.............-............. ......-.............................................-.. ................ . . . 86/27/2001 '83:47 4079777822 MACA lONE GROUP nc.1-ll.. I n Ult<c. L1:.N"i t-'Abt:. ljq PA~ ElS m UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES BORING LOG PI\O.1liCT 'NO.: Il1'lIO.41LOI REpOR'r /'f0.: "640Z PAGf: 8o:t.:I 7./1 ACRE SITf OLD SANFORD ROAD-OVIEOO ROAO S6r.o1NO\.f C:OUHTV. A.OA'OA Cl. I ENT: ~e...LvG:n PAIITNl:RS. INC. PROJECT, DOA'IoICO OeS'GNA nON: B-3 S€CTIOI.I: JA rOWNSHIP; 20S SHEET: 1 of 1 AAN<:lE: :JOE C.S_ liLEVAno,. tN': OAT& STAATI;OI " 17/00 WATl;R TJ-8U Iftl: ..6 0.4 TE FIHIeHl!~ 5/1~IOO OATE OF Al!AOtNO: 111171'0(} OAII.UOC llY: \J.I.1l. - OAUu eST. w"'3..w:r. 'hi: 2.:1 'l'r'P'f Of' SAMl'uN<): A$n4 O-1UG tOCATlON: aSE eo..1NO LOCATION J"UIN /I l!,....,..,cs: OEPTH 1FT-1 A lII.OWS ~ ~II /I- L IHCAi:MENT I: ." M e o l. LL PI A liEIIOfRG LIMITS N 181.0w~1i w. T. 'T.) II; IFTJ OAYl ~.zoo O'lQ. COHT. u,. Me I'lloJ OESCRlPTlOH '%1 o Modil.lm de""" INJhr b,oWn tine SAND 5 7.8.9 17 7-7-8 15 ..2.., 20 4.4.4. e . . .,...... ......-........-......-......-.................--......... .....-...,..... ....._..-.._~. ..........- ---"-" ................. .-..........- 5-:3-3 6 Loo.. g'rr1I'.'" &lightly c/ryay fJn. SAND t5C' ~ ---:1:~~.__.. .__.S...~.. ...-.... Loose O'-Y day.y fin. SANe ISc;/ - ModJur.l den,.. O'lIY"brown ......-.-. .--- -..-- ---. 20 20 -4.~6 12 10 ._.2:8-~___. .___,~_~.._. ..--........... ..-..-............-._.................u...._......._....._......_..... ......_......... _.__.__.._ ........... ........_..... .._._._.....~_ ._____.. -Ioos.. 15 5-5-5 10 ..............-......- ........ ....._..n................................ ...._................ ..... . ....._.......... .n............ ........... ..__....... .. .............. .._...._.._ '. Mcaium oerlJe 9'.y-",run silty tin" AND [SMI 2S 8-7'1 S 22 BORING TERMINATEO AT 1.5.0 FT. . ....n.......... ............... 30 ............ ........ .....-.... ... ...........-...... ................................... ..- ................. ................. .......... . . .~ 136/27/200103:41 4137977782:;' MACA lONE GROUP , .____.., ~ \...C.J....,~ PAGE 05 PAGE: El6 sa UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES' BORING LOG PRO~ No.1 '1>21>0.01"'0' AEPOflT NO.: "4~2 p....OE, &-2... PFlOJfCT: SHEET; 1 of 1 AA.NOI!: :JO<< 7. a ACRE 'In; 0t.D SA"FOAO llCAO-()\lIEDO ItOAO S~Lf COUNTY, FlOIUOA Cltt:Kl': ~VEST ""'A-rnEAS. INC. t.OCA'tlON: SEE 1I0llINQ lOCATIClN PlAN III0.l....AltS: o t: I'Tli II"T ..I I; M 8l0W:S N r' />€A1l- 1!lI.OY'3l,W.T. L lNCJl9ooCl!PIT J'T,' l! ~ M 8 o l OeSCRI?110~ o . Loou brown 11n.. SAND ISPj r-: ,.~ .x 6 JL ., Loou gr.", alhv flrI. SAHO; wnn 11IOT' ISMI 3-4.:;1 7 ~'. . '. 15' - X -:--~';r::J"'- ~-'<l-' .-..' lDo.. gr.y d-rrt tltlll SAND: with lOOll :- W rsPl X 2.3.2 5 9~ - ~ ~7'- - X :).2.3 5 ~. ~ ~,', , 0 - ~ ._..,B..g..... _._.~.... -- ~. ........--.-.:..-..-.....-..--..........,................................._......... .............,.. ................. '.......... ........_ .........._..... .~ :;:.;/. ~/ I.~ Il/:c 3-2-3 Loose tan "'ty tine SAIIIO ISM! OQRIHO ct61GNA nON: 84- SEcnOtf: JA TowNSHIP; 20S G.9. ELEVATlON ,h,: OATli ST....RTEo' 5117/00 wA.rfR TAaLE InI: 4.0 OA TE FlNISHE!), '"7rOQ OA Tf 0- 1\b1l.01HO: 5117/00 ORILLeo BV; U.E.5. - o~ En: W.S,W.T. lru: 2.0 TYPE OF 8AMP'l.J)jc:J, ASn.t 0- J 0&.8 -2CO 1%1 ATTEJlBEAQ UMITS OIlZ2 . COHT, l~, II; (FTJ DAY) Me I'" Ll ~I ._,f.-?,..,.. ......~~..__ ---.., ......_._ --.0__- _____ :- X 4.4-4 B '.' '. 15- - ---..--. ,-...-......, .~.._- ..' .....-....--....-...........-. ..-....................,-...-......,..,.......,........ - ~ X 6.5.5 10 20 - - ....,....--........, ..........-.. -........ " .' ,..,-...........,...._...........,.............,...............,-,............ ..'....,...'..... ............ .... '..,.. '....,.', ,'...._.., .......... ',....'.......... _..:,:_.__ r-- -~ 5-8-11 19 25 - '- ..........'.....,.-... ,.. ... .......,. - medium <tenSll BOAING TERMINATED AT 25,0 FT. :30 - '..' ....,..........---... ........ ..'..' .......... ......... ......'........... ...'......,..........._..,................................. ..,........,'.... ...... ..,'...... ............... ..,.......' ,.......... ....,....'...., ................ . . . 136/27/2801 e3:47 407'3777822 MACA lONE GROUP nc..>-<'- I n ..."'Kt:. L.CNTl t-'A<=il:.. l:lb PAGE ,1:17 m UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES BORING LOG I'I\OJECT NO.: U;roo.o,l1-O, '- A6POffT NO.: 1111.&02 PAce: 8-7.5 7,11 ACIIE SITE 0\.0 SANFORO ROAo-OVIf:OO ~OAO SEMINOLI COUHTY. A.O..'DA CUENT: IlEAl\tf:sr ,.....I'ln.EIIS. INC. 80"'I'IG a.SIGNATlON: B-5 SeCTlON: 3A TOWNSHlJ>: JOS S~EH: 1 of 1 RJIo.U(JE: 30E ,""OJl!CT: LOCA1l0N: see eo~INQ LOCA lION /'VlN I'G4AFlJICS: 0... a..eVAnON 'ltl: DIo re 5T Al'TED: 5/17/OQ WATeR TA8LI: In): 4.0 CATE FlfoI'SHED: ~ t71O() DAn OF REAO'NC: 6/, "00 OIULLED r:N': lJ.e.lS. - o~ EST. W.S.W,T. IF'll: 2.0 'N PI; OF 8AIoAI"UN(): ASTM ~1~ OEPTM 1FT.' I': Ilt.Ows ~ PEA ... l IJoIClEMENT E II PI ~ M It o l A rTIiJOI)EJ!C Ll1w1/TS N IBLOWS! W. T. FT.I Ie IFTJ D.A. ,., . too I"" CUlQ. ec>>n: I'JoJ /JlC ,,,, oe9CIlJPTION 0 . Medium dlln.lllt brow" line SAND IS PI - -X ,jZ. ., 8.7-8 15 - . X . M..alvm d~u 10 100" gnry-bf'own DItty 11". 4-7.9 115 ..x.. " S,AHD rsMJ 5 - X "-"e:::r:"--- .....'0...... ,.-..'" .' - ~ _ ~ 2-:1-5 8 @; ~ '.'.0 " ~ 10- X _..~~~__n .._.,~.~...., . ~' -,-......,.......,..,................__,..,............m_.'._...._........._.._,..._. .............,.. .._...._,_.. ___. .___.... ~ 0; /Z Loolle 10 lTl.dlum d.rt.. gray-Crown ~I..,..y line SAND tOCJ ..--...--.-- .-..,...........- -..-- ..........- --.--11I _ 0- X 3-4...4. 6 15 - - h._.....__..."... ....,....' loou gray'brown Iilt'y len. SANO (:>"11 ,- : .0 .- .n.... .......................-.................-......-.....---_........._..._.__...... ................. ..._......._.~_. .__..__ ......,... ...__......-., 0.____ " r- X 4.5.5 10 20 - - ,.........-.........., ,........ .. ....... -,.. .......................-...-..............-.................................. ................ ..... ......... ........__ ._...._.. .. '0 '_.._ _..____. r- -IX 3-5.7 2S -~ '..~......,......,..' 12 .. 1 I I I,.. ..,....,..........,....,"...........".....,....,..,......"......,.........,....................................................,...........-......".....- BOAING TERMINAHD AT 25.0 FT. ...H............ ......... ...... ..._..._. ....._.._ .n.............. ._~.__.__ 30-1,.. .......'" ..,..... ,...... ,." no 1 0G/27/2a0103:47 4079777822 . ITJ, UNIVERSAL ~ ENGINEERING SCIENCES SYMBOLS ~ ~ ~ r:J. I~ WOoIgtte """'ng ~ Irl.. ~uu-.d ., on- SlIroI,dwd Spc>an Q-. 'oot waR W.lqM of OrUl Rod.. Jhlr,.WDlI B~lby Tub. Undl.UJrtled SAmple, lhed p~ c.:.. ~ry ~ Aoalt Cot..OrllDng Op.-cllCl/'\l 5,,"pl. Tall.,.. allhl. t..-I Sampl. Not T.h" a1 tN. t..r..l o,Ang. I" Soli 3hSls Fr.. O/T:X.lnd W ___ L..... 5..uClrld HIgh Oround W.III, L....... . RELATIVE DENSITY (sand-slit) Vary LOOQQ - les~ Than 4 8/0W$/R. loose - 4 - 10 BIOWll/Ft. Modlum . 10 to ~o Blows/Fl Denllo - ::30 to so Blov.r.sfFt. Vary Oen~g - Mora ThZln SO BI0W3/Fr. CONSISTENCY (clay) Vruy Soft - UlSS Than ,2 Blo'o'ts:/Fl Son ~ 2 to 4 BloWS/FL MedIum - 4 to 8 BloW3/FI. Slit( - e to 15 Blows/Ft. Very Sti11 - 1S to :30 8Ia......~t. Hard. More Than 30 Blo...-.r&lFr. .1 /vIACA lONE GROUP nt:.J.>L I H ~ CENT! t-'At:ie tlt f'AGE ~B 1 KEY TO BORING LOGS J UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM QI'fOI.H . y u-.cx..a n-..cA4 w.LU D ~ ~l()In 'j~ ~j aw ....-- ~ ---.&Id 1 ~. - or... "'- i f ~ op ~0Dhf .r_ g........ _ "'_._ a' _. IllS. ""1'0 "'- ~Ij ~i" c1M a;,n., g,.".... ~.......,..s.....bl~.. Ii i l oc 0.,..,. u_ ~._.,. ~ .. j !i ~ "'"'-vru*' _ _ g-..., .....,;., r~ IIdII f1I I'ID a.r- I~j. :;; "-'r ~ __ _ "....,. I jl~ .....11IIoo w"" _ j j I j~f ..... ".". .-.. -"'--' ac 0..,..,. ---. ._~ ...0.0...;,. ""- .............,..........,.,/Ina_.-* J! llo.#. . 'IIy eo ....,.,., ... .-.. ! dll C\- 'nar;.......,.,.. .. _l01I _ iJIr ;><...........~ ...,.. """" ~ ~u ~ , "IIy ........ ..... ...,. Ii # CI.. . Ot,:-r'o ..... ~ ~ ..., ~ .. 1?0o ~ aJl o.o.l """11-- oJIIlo. ............. 01 c..cotTl ~.,.. . W"'dl 01 ..n.. .... ~ ri . It>> II iJ' c.. 1....".- d.ro "" I>Q" pI..ocr,. ,., ~ i ! ci.1'" ow Or~ 5iyo ~ '"""......... ",," .,f......"., "'ll""1 0.-.""'" - I"T P. M. """"-CI. .-nJ ::Hw' t'tON1 0f'Q.....: .0"_ ,. a-......... _~.."... ~ rn--,!_ PLASTICJ1Y CHART t j 2 2 o 111 II:;>Q :l() 4Q l'iO M 70 b:J CJ() .00 "0 UC>U"oO uw rr IUJ ''T''V If"'''' ,." n,,,O 1 \, B6/27/2e01 '03:41 4079777822 MACAIONE GROUP , L.-I'""1II.- f n l....~c.. l,..C..N I " t'Al:lt:. tll:l PI',GE El ~ .~ . Project No. Report No. 19290-016-01 116402 D~SCRIPTION OF LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES MOISTURE CONTENT DETERMINATION ASTM 0-2216 Moisture content is the ratio of the weight of water to rhe dry weight of 5011. Moisture content Is measured by drying a sample at 105 degrees Celsius. The moIsture content is expressed as a percent of the oven dried soil mass., WASH 200 TEST The Wash 200 test Is performed by passing a representative soil6ample over a No. 200 sieve and rinsing with water. The percentage of the soli graIns passing this sieve Is then calculated. . . 8-4 e6/211~~~1' ~~:q'l 1Il:l/':l1 I Itl:':. --. '.__OJ_",-' MI-\U-\.1UNe \:lKUur' Nt:.I-\L IH t:ARE CENl ~< "",...1.:11:. t:l"=' PAGE 16 . A'PPENDIX C . . .' . . e6/27/28~1 'ej:47 4079777822 MACA lONE GROUP t-'Al:i!:. HI PAGE 11 . '-- . .. ....."" "L.. \",oCJ,. c. Geotochnical Enginoering Report " , TnafolIowinpinformallonis, rLluilfedtohef oumana e olJrrisks., ":".:.;':::',:',:::'::, Geotechnical $eno/ca:5 Are Porformed for Speciflc Purpose::!, Persons, and ProJocts GoolDChnical 8/1Qlneors Iltl\lcl1Jro Ihelr acrvlcoo to mo.,. the Ilpecillc needll of tt'lelr cJlonbs. A geotachnlC!ll englnecring lJtuCy CDndudad to.;; d'.;1! or.glnser ~~ root f'.J:tl1l i."i6 roe&:. of 8 c:oostnJr;tJon c:onlrac.lX:>r or ENGn a~ civil engineer. Becaulle oodl goo<<achnlc91 englnaGrfng study /II un/que; uad'l 900tecMlcal ena1nocrlng report 13 uniquely prepared tor tM client NO ona e-:u:apt you snould rely on your gool9C11nlcal engineering roport wf,lhout n~t c:.onRdlng wlth the gtK>technlcal engineer who prepared It. And no onet-nOt 8Von you-llhould apply the report for any purpo,se or prole a lUCep<< the one originally CDntemplated. A Gootechnlcal EngIneering Report Is Based on A Unique Set of Project Specific Factors Geolechnlc:aJ engineers consIder a number or unl(lue project speclnc faclors whon e~lablhlhrng the 3COpe of :J lItuay. TypIcal factons Include: ltte dlent's go91~. obJecU"o8, and riok management preferences; the general naturo of the struC(urs InVIJlved. 11:1 3lZ6, and conflguraUon: tho Iocatlon or IMI) structurOJ on the site; and olher p~nned or e:dstlng slle ,imp~V1lmenb. such as; dCC8~ ro~d5, p;;,rXJng laf3, and underground umHles. Unless the geotechnIcal anglneer who condvclld the study specifically Ind/calM otherwise. do not rely On a gooteehnical e~ineerlng report thaI was: not prepared fur )<lU. nol preparod for your project not prepared fur the specific site explored. or completed'befora imporUlnt project chanoes were made, Typical changes thllt can erode tho ,,,/laOllity of an o>:isting gootechnlcal engineering report include those that affect: tho function of tho proDOsed struduro 3.5 when It's changed Irom a parking garaQe to an OmCD building. or from Il IIgtlllnduslriel plont to a retngoralod warohouso. oh:rvallon, configuration, loc;:ation, oncnlalfoo, 01 'f'o/Ulgnt 'ot the propolled a01Jdura, ' compoalUon of the deCllgn team. or project own8f"6hlp , As a Q&nl!l(3l rulo, always Inform your g80tsd1n1cal eng\not,r of pro}od cJumgoa-evBn mlOQr onOCHJrtd roqu"t1l an 8&a811sment 0( tholr Impact. Geotechnical engineers caMot QCCept TOSporuJJbJUty or Jlahnlty for problema that o<<:ur becauco Olefr I13porl.s do nol consider dolltllopmenls of when !hay went not Informed. Subsurface Condltlons Can Change A gaotechnlcal <mglneorlng report 1:1 based On ronditlonll that oxlsted al the time tho study W1l9 perfonnod. Do not roly on a 090l9chnlcal engIneering' report whose adequacy INIY hllVO boon al'tected by the pa.s.&3ge of Ume: by man-maClo 6V!lnt3, 9uch llB conlltr..,.uon on or adjacent to the 1I1ta: or by naturar BVOnt3 sucn :IS flood. earthquakes. or gro~tarfluctuQtklM. AJwar-s contnct the geotechnical englneor before apPlyIng !tie repott. to det9fTTllne I( It lis sun reliable. A mfnor amount of addlJ10naJ tesUng or analysis could prevent major Droblams. Most Gootochnlcal Findings Are Professional Opinions SHe exploration ldenlil'led eubllurlaoo c:.ondllJon3 0"", aJ Ihostt ,poInts ...../'18(8 lIubstmc.e tests .:Jre CDndUded or MlJTl~ 8ro takon. Geotechnical onglneers r~la- f'..,1d and laboratory da1.l:l and then apply their profolUlional Judgement to renCklr 8Il opw,k:n gbout subsLJrface condltlons throughout the aite. Ad\JaI 5ubautfece condiUons may dil'fer-somel1mos slgnlflc.anlly-from thollo Indicated In your report. Retaining tho geofecl'\nicat onglnoer who dtIVElloped your report ro provide cono!nJC1Jon - oblServaUon i6 tho rnolrt effective method of man:dglng !tio risk.s aS5oc1owd with unanticlp:Hed conditions. . . . e6i27/26~1 03:47 4079777822 A Report's Rocommondatlons Aro Not FIno" 00 not over rely on the conslructlon rocommend.llions lndudod in your report. n-.o~o rocommondaUon", are not fin,,/. because gooltlctlnlca' englnaen; dovolop thom princlpaJJy from ludgcmeol :and opinion. Goolechnlc.al onglnoons r::gn flngllzo molr rncommandatlons only by Ob:lOrvlng octu~1 ~ubaurl1aco conditioN rovo9lod during c:ona11UctJon. The geotech"lall 6f1Qlnoor who dlJV910pod your report cannot allllUIT\8 responllillility or lIobnJry for Iho roport'lI ~mmondDUons If thgl engineer Coe.ll not perform constrUction obsorvndon. A GeotechnIcal Eng~noerfn9 Repon 'S Subject to MIsInterpretation Othord~lgn learn momOo(3' rnblnt9rprolaUon o! goo Locholc:.al eng;neetino report.5 hB~ resullttd In C03Uy problernll.' LOWDr thai risk by having your GOOlechnic.::l1 enginoer confer 'M1h approprl8tQ member:s 01 !he.dorslgn team after :submllllng lhe mport. Abo, retain your goorochnlca' ong1nctor !D rOVlow pGrtlnenl elements 01 rho design teem'a plans and spodllc.zltions.. Conlr9ctor.s c::ao obo mIlllmurpret a geotechnical englneerlng ",port. Roduce Ulat rilIk by haYing )'QUI' gaotechnJa1l engIneer partfdpaf9 In prutlld and ~~n oonfemnc.M. ~nd by providing canalnJd10n obaeNaUon. Do Not Redraw tho Englno9f'.s Logs GeoIBCt1nlc:3l englnel!lfS proparD flnal bortng and !Dating loglr ba3ttd upon !helr Intorpretatioo of field 'logs and ISboratoty data. To prlJVent erro~ Dr ornl3:lion:l, the Iogs.lnduded In a geot(3chnic:a! onol/'leering report should never be rodrn'/lln (or IncJUsJon In arcttitecflJral or other dealgn dre.....lngfJ. Only photngrapl'lic or electronic reproductlon III acceptable. but rvocognlz.. Ihat separating logs from tha r&port con lIlQvDte risk. GIve Contractors a Complete Report nnd Guidance Som/) O\NnOf'S :md design protell.3ionalSl mlstakonly believe they can make contracto~ liable for l.Inantldpllted subsurface c:ondlUons by limil'fng w/'lat they provide forbid prepargtJon, To help prevent C0311y problems, give conlrnctc;~ Ih., complete geotocl1nical enslneerlng report. but pr8fSC8 !t wl~ a clearly written Jolter of tr.InsmltbI. In !h.at lett6(". advJ3e Q)ntnlctons that 1110 ropon was not prepared 10( purposes at bid de~lopment and ttuJt the report':! ac:;curacy !., limIted; ASFE MACA lONE GROUP t-'Abt. 11 PAGE;: 12 ...-....._.1. ~"- \..oC.J"trc:." encourage thorn to COnfor wll1l the aeotodlnical engIneer WTlo propurod tho ruport (a mOOo9( fee may bo ro.qulrod) nndlor condlJd eaaltlonal ll,llK1y (0 ob131n Ulo 5PCcJ(JC typBs of , In(ormatlon thay nolJd or profe~. A prlJbld conferef"IQJ C3I1 atao be volL/able. 8n 5Ur& contr9clOrn MV9 JUf'flclanl tlme 10 perfocm addItional atudy. Only !hen might you bo In B po1SltJon to gr"o conlTBctol"3!ho bolrlln(ormat/on gVlIlIable fa }'Qu. while toqulrlng them to at lea4t llhan, 50,"& at the flnandal n,sporllSlblllt1C1l1 otommlng from unantfdpstud =ndlllomil. Rand 'Roeponalblllty Provlolono Cloe;oly Some cllenl8, dos-lgn profc4<Slonals, and contracto~ do not rocognJ2ll that geotechnlcaf onglneoring 15 tar lalla o~ lt1an alher onglnoonng diaclpl1ros. This lack 0( underst3ndlng has croBlad unrealistic expectations that' have led to dl&:.lppolntmMls. clnims. dOd ,dispul.es_ To help rodlJC8 such rlSk3, gootacllnlcal eng1f1eor:s commonly Inc1vda a v<lrioly o! el;)llmalory prolli&lons In theIr reports. Somotlmes labeled i1mllatlona,- ~ny of lt1(nO provlsi<ms IndIcate where goolechnlcal onginao(s rosponsJbllllJea bel:Jln and end, to help othenl I'QCOQn12e thslr own mspons1bllllSua and rtakll. Raad !heClO proviaJons dOllofy. ~k QUostlons. Your gftOlechnlcal enoll'loer ahoul4 respond fully and fnJnkty. OeoenvJronmental Concerns Aro Hot Covered Tho equIpment, lad'InJquos. and pQf'8ooool ua&d ~ perform Q gooenvlronmental sludy differ algnlncanUy from lhoa<<, UlS8d to porlonn II geoloq,nlcal study, For that reOl50n, g geote<:hnlcal (wglnnerlng report does not ulSually relate any gooonVJronment21 findIng.!, conclusIons, or llK:l:l/TlmendoUolla; 0.11" llbout Itle IIkollhood of oncountorlng underorotmd atorage ranl(3 or ragulatod contBmlnan~. Unanllclpatad environrnent.al problem3 kavo led to l'lUm6roU3 proJecl fllllvrea. If you hava not yer OO"tBlned your own geoenvlronmantallnfonnaCon. ~k your geotechnical COl1BullBnt fOr risk management gUldlln<:o. Do not' rely on an envfronmental report propared for som~na else, Roly .on Your Geotechnical EngIneer for AddltJonal Assistance Membof'llhip InASFE OxpoSll15 gBotachni~J engineers to a wide ;array of rhsk manllgomenl ttlctlnlque.s !hal can b9 of genuirnl benefil for everyone Involved .....nh OJ coostrtJctlo" ~roi8a.. Conterwlth your ASFE-membor geotochnical engineertor more in foml a tlo n. PROFESSIONAl FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 COle!).."l'" Road Suite G10e SUver sPring, MD 20910 Tolophone: 301-565--2733 F'aClllmJIe: 301-589-2017 emall: rnfocm~3r{/.Qn:!W"M..f.a.re.Qrn ~~t '99ft frt ~ ~ ~I.U ASC, 1TWru:t .....u'l... .,....,.......an to 00 10. ~I-c.Utwl Q1( fNl o~ oy .lny ~ ~l.4.oI!l~ I_ "'lV~&ty pror.o.;lIJ'd. p........ 011"'_ ..............glrl ~. ~ I^ -tlOf. or..., pat'\, ~IO'" ~ty ~rw. .MJ""'y tw ~ r>Ny......tn ~ _rcYIlt" ~ of ,.t..SFE or frnr ~ tA~.... (.II ~'(""'-o\ IIGE:R0698J,5M 86/27/2001 03:47 4079777822 MACAIONE GROUP '~I" ~c. \...C.I""~ PAGE 12 PAGE 13 . ProJ ect No. 19290-016-Q1 Report No, 116402 CONSTRArNT$ AND RESTRICTIONS WARRANTY UnIversal Engineering Sciences has prepared this report for our client for hIs exduslve use, in accordance wfth generally accepted soli and foundation engineering practices, and makes no other wammly either expressed or implied as to the professional advice provided in the report. UNANTICIPATED SOIL CONDITIONS The analysis and recommendallons submitted In this report are basad upon the data obtained from soli borings performed at the locations IndIcated on t.~e Boring Locstlon Plan. ThIs raport d~ not reflect any variations which may occur between these boring~. The nature and extent of variatIons between borings may not baco'me known until excavation begins. If variations appear, we may have to fe-evaluate our recommendations after perfonning on-site observations and noting the characteristics of any variations. CHANGED CONDITIONS . We recommend that the spedflcations for the project require that the contractor imme<1iately notify Universal Engineering Sdences, as well as the owner, when subsurface conditions Clre encountered that are different from those present In this report. No claIm by the contractor for any candlUons differing from those anticipated in the plans, spedncatlons, and those found In this report, should be allowed unless the contractor norifies the owner and Universal Engineering Sciences of such changed conditions, Further, we recommend that all foundation work and site Improvements be observed by a representaUve of Universal Engineering Sciences to monitor field condIrlons and changes, to verTfy design assumptions and ro evaluate and recommend any appropriate modIfications to rhls report MISINTERPRETATION OF SOIL ENGINEERING REPORT Universal Engineering Sdences Is responsible for the conclusIons and opinions contained within this report based upon the data relating only ro the specIfic project and location discussed herein. If the condusions or recommendations based upon the data presented Bre madeby others, those Conclusions or recommendations are not the responsibility of Universal EngIneering ScIences. . C - 2.1 El6/ 271 2 ElEl'l iB': 47 4079777822 MACAIONE GROUP , -=-""- I n ....HKC L.:.!::.N I t:.. PAGE 13 PAGE 14 . Project No. 1929o-D16-01 Report No. 116402 CHANGED STRUCTURE OR LOCATION This report was prepared in order to aid In the evaluation of thIs project and to assist the architect or engineer In the design of this project. If any changes in the design or location of the structure a5 outlined in this report are planned, or if any structures ere included or added that are not discussed in the report, the oondusioDS and recommendations contained In this report shall not be consIdered valid unless Ihe changes are reviewed and the conclu810n~ modltled or approved by Uniyersal Engineering Sdences. ' USE OF REPORT BY BIDDERS Bidders who art! examinIng the report poor to submIssIon of a bid ora cautioned that this report was prepared as an aid to the'deslgners ot the project and It may affect a~uar construction op.,,-atJons. Bidders are urged to make their own soli borings, test pits, test caIssons or other Irwestlgatfons to determine those conditions that, may affect construction operations. UnIversal Engineering Sciences cannot be responsrble for any interpretations made from this report or the attached , boring logs with regard to their ad~uacy in reflecting subsurface conditIons whIch will affect construction operatIons. . STRATA CHANGES Stfdta ch:anges are Indicated by a deflnlt9 Una on the boring logs Which accompany thIs report. However, the actual change In the ground may be more gradual. Where changes occur between soil samples, the location of the change must necessarily be estimated using aU available information and may not be shown at the exact depth. OBSERVAT10NS DURJNG DRILLlNG Attempls are made to detect andlorldentlfy occurrences.durlng drilling and sampling, such as: wafer Jevel, boulders. zones of losl circulation. re/atlve ease or resistance to drllUng progress, unusual sample recovery, variarion of driving resistance, obstructions. etc.: however, lack of mention does not predude their presence. . C - 2.2 86/27/2001 .e3:47 4079777822 MACAIUNt. l;iI-<UUr- . _____~, I' '--"1f"tC 1....C..'t I. r-I4\:1c:.. .1.4 PAGE 15 .. . . Project No. Roport No. 19290-01&01 115402 , WATER LEVELS Warer level readIngs have been made in the drill holes during drilling and they Indicate normally occurrIng conditions. Water levels may not have been stabilized at the last reading. This data has been reviewed and interpretations made In rhls report. However, It must tle noted that fluctuations in the level of the groundwater may occur due to variations In rainfall. temperature. t1des. and other factors not evident at the time measurements Were made and rep~rted. SInce the probability of such variations Is' antIcipated. design drsYr1ngs and spedflcatlons sfloufd accommodate such possIbilities and construction planning should be based upon such assumptions of varfaUons. LOCATION OF BURIED OBJECTS All users of thIs report are cautioned that there was no requIrement for Universal EngIneering Sdencas to attempt to loeste any man-made burled objects during the course of thIs exploration and that no attempt wa!! mada by UnIversal EngIneering Sclences to locate any sud1 buried objects. Universal EngJooerfng Sdences cannot be responsIble tor any burled man-made objects, whIch are SUbsequently encountered dunng constructIon that are not discussed wfthin the text of thIs report. TIME This repon renects the sol/ conditions at the time of investigation. If the report is not used In a reasonable amount of rime. significant changes to the site may occtJr and addItIonal reviews may be required. C - 2.3 ......'" .r." ,....... ".""0' . . . 06/29/01 07:28 '0'4074234410 !fll 0021006 UNIVERSAL ENGRG i ~ o I 2000 I APPROXIMA TE SCALE, FEt:T :3 BASE MAP: "CASSELBERRY. FLA." USGS OUADRANGLE ~AP. PHOTOREVlSED 1980 m PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 7.8 ACRE SITE, 350 OLD SANFORD-OVIEDO ROAD WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA U.S.G.S. SITE LOCATION MAP UNIVERSAL ("CINEERINC SCIENCES DRAWN BY: G,8. -, DATE: 1/24/01 I CHECKED BY: A4c:::::- I DA TE: / /~ 7;{'~i SCALE: AS SHOWN I PROJECT NO: 11347 -001-01 I REPORT NO: I':;; \ 4~> I PAGE NO: A-I . . . ,- 06/29/01 'eN ()7 42:14 41(i 07:29 UNIVERSAL ENGRG _lg] OO}f006, /" UNDEvELOPED LAND r---- ---- UND('.oUOPED LAND I I I UND('.oUcYED lAND SUBJECT PROPERTY I I TAYLOR /.lADE SYSTEMS (aOA T PRODUCTS) I I I . , II ~ DUI.IPED nRES PAINT CANISTERS ~:: @ II UNPAvED R?DAO , I 1______ \ \ DUUPED DEBRIS ~\~\ II II ____ - II r ~ ~s~~;;;;;;:- _ _ ' I ~CDO RO~ -~ - ---- THE CRO'/f.:S COUN~UNG CENTER ~ DUMPED SOIL AND CONCRETE RuaeL~ UNUI.;ITED WELDING VACANT (FORI.;ER a.AS5lC FENCE CO,) JJST C::NCREIT &: MASONRY o I <D '" o o z AUTO SALES & SER\i1CE .) m PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 7.8 ACRE SITE, 350 OLD SANFORD-OVIEDO ROAD WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA SITE PLAN UNIVERSAL ENGIN((RING SCIENCES SCAl(: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: DATE: 1/24/01 G,S, . . , .r. c :I . 06/29/01 -07:29 ,.... ''5'40742J4410 .... .-. UNIVERSAL ENGRG ~ O~4/006 ) '" d> 0- i. \ ~)2 ..~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ --.J . \ t 0 60 ! I SCALe: (n.) ,lUlfS =; '.~,~ AR~ ,APPRO", ',S2~: -'C,) ~.c:.,._.......~'" .,). --\ \\ ~ 06/29/01 ~ 0,7,:.3,0 . L . THtS IS /fOr ... SWfYt:y . .- '0'407423'1410.,..." ' UN 1 VEHSt\ L ENGRG ..___ 81/18/2801 22:14 407428628.1 . MAY-17-~ 10:41 I..or I !.JI/:lIIWIl ~~.~ ... &A.A. r GO'd rOO'ON O~:TT 00.5<: fiC'w HE:~L TH Ct'-RE CENTER L~ EI'{]I~I~ 40? B96 9167 PROPFRTY SKEI CH FOR INFORMATION ONLY , . I , :!r/ J / .. I ( I 00 ) . AN;:"URO @005/006 PAGE 03 P.~ ,.. . K)Q' Hl:JJ,I,/NOf.n LOr 4 " 75a Ae r:._ ~ -a.'1 ~ - -4.5~ (A~) ~:J4 )."...,..,,, ~ -J....,. (~.~) I. THIS IS IV(')r J O<XJN!JJ.Kr CIf ~APIfICN.. SUlrYlr. I. Tf/I$ (:( '" SJffl'(;11 t.'::'PfCTlMJ MN"Y-Itr.A1IY ..,.,,~ 'N~r,,A}([) r Oft" we.... l' to,.,. .J.." r IfVl./'tO.'ItI 01 r -"U:.' J . l~~r9lVlCV[:131 A9010NHJ31*Ql~~3~21rj " 06/29/01 07:30 '0'4074234410 Ell / t 8/2El21l 22: 14 4El74286284 . M4y- 17-00 07'1~ UNIVERSAL ENGRG !ilJ 006/006 H::t\L TH C.aRE CENTF:R PAGE: El2 P.04 407-:J0!5g oag~ '. M,A,P OF B..OUl::/OARY SURltFy LO~ J, CNrZ1.lINCE,R f'~,IW3 AOOiT'lON NO. :; ancJ Url W..t ~a.OO !Nt 01 Lor 4. .,,/0 l4'ut ~Q. 00 lul b.ing ,"eo-..1 PUPMdkulor to tJr. /Wft I~. 01 LO r~ rtJcord.~ ,;., Plot tJooJt ~. Po g Pvb/k RKOI"da of SHnlttol. Covnt Flcrldr1. - ltOJf, -~--~ . ~~.::.. - \ I ~ i :l- i I~ I I I I I \ I I , , I \1 \ 'i I. 1" :i ," [ ~ I J i I I I I I 110.0' ~ ... , ,,", ..~ ,.c. \..~ I I I I \ Ii \i I ~ ~, !V 3' , I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I 1 I I vI"~ 7.7~ At:. ~7.~ L'. . ! ~ -t 'Q -----! )OQ.W ~r>> ~ ... -- · !lIC='1'(JI\~ 'rap.mru '~ ~ I __ oe.... ~ LJ. .' .T .~:'\' . 9.....,..._"-Ul -- -.4 ____ 'Ll'7'. '::r. ~1:14 'lJ":: ~~ " H../~ ~ .&.a - r'JC -,. ~-::...- -n~;loC ""~~........ ~ 'l':.'J, 1t- =. -- --.- . tl['d ~OO'ON <:<;::rr 00.5';: tif?W c:ar9Zvc!.Otn: 131 A9010NHJ31.al~~39Z1r3 I I \" M (GJu MACAIONE Group Inc April 8, 2002 City of Winter Springs, FL 1126 East SR 434 ~ - - ~-Winter-Sp-rings7-FL'32708- - ...-,- - Attn: Commissioners Re: Mayor Paul Partyka I am writing this letter in response to the recent article in the Orlando Sentinel whereby members of the city's commission alleged participation by Mayor Partyla's as Director of Development for the recently proposed Respite Center by Health Care Center for the Homeless. We were the Program Manager for the Respite Center from its initial inception and we were responsible for the management and coordination of all aspects of the planning, engineering and permit acquisition for the project. Mayor Partyka was never involved in any portion of the development planning or permit acquisition for the project and he was not the Development Manager. I do not know where this erroneous information was obtained but I do know it is not factual. Very truly yours, omenic Macaione President phone: 407-977-7821 fax: 407.977,7822 1505 Eagle Nest Circle Winter Springs, Fl32708 email: mgi@macaionegroup.cam .~ Response to Commissioner Miller's Slanderous Accusation What I am about to do, I don't like doing but I must do to clear up the reputation of this city's Mayor and to repudiate the baseless comments of Commissioner Miller. In all my years in political office, people have not liked some of my opinions but have not questioned my intent or my integrity. Commissioner Miller has embarrassed the city and embarrassed his office of City Commissioner by damaging, distorting and falsely accusing the Mayor on information that, if investigated, confirmed or read properly would have eliminated any controversy. Mr. Miller is an intelligent person who knows what he is doing. His mean spirited personal attack on the mayor is uncalled for. He willfully and with out regard to the facts, slandered the mayor as a liar and defamed the mayor with his incorrect accusations... even after the mayor has warned that people would be held accountable for what they say. In the audience, I have my client Marie Chowanski who was the former owner of the parcel in question. Domenic Macaione and Scott Griffith, the General Contractor and Pr.oject Manager for the Healthcare Center, Michael Beaudine, Attorney with Gronek & Latham, and a letter from the Senior Project Manager at Universal Engineering Services. The court stenographer is here at my instructions. Now let's get to the facts. First of all my name is spelled P-A-R-T- Y-K-A, not the misspelling that Commissioner Miller had on his Feb. 25, 2002 letter. That alone may be an indication of what we can expect. Second and most important, I represented only one person throughout this transaction which included; contract offer agreement.. ,due diligence,. .c1ose. And that person is Marie Chowanski, the former owner. I have stated this repeatedly. Legally, my fiduciary responsibility is to my client. And that is what I did. I did not and have never stated, as Commissioner Miller has stated, that I represented the center during this transaction. The center was represented by their own counsel, Greg Chares, throughout this transaction. I did state, as asked by some Commissioners, that Realvest Partners (and I as their agent) was the only broker involved but I was not the transactional broker as has been stated by Commissioner Miller. By the way, sole brokering is not unusual. In fact, in 2001 of 23 real estate transactions that I was involved, Realvest Partners (and I as their agent) was the sole broker in 14 of those transactions (almost 6] %). '-; It is not against the law to be a sole broker if all principals are comfortable and understand that fact. Furthermore my job as an agent representing my client is to expedite all processes so that the sale can be closed. In fact, recently I received the 200 I Hallmark Circle of Achievement Award from the Central Florida Commercial Real Estate Society for my successes. This award was only given to 16 real estate professionals in all of central Florida. Our finn had four. We will not tolerate any defamation to our reputation Thirdly, as part of the due diligence process, the center went through a pre-application meeting with the various departments in our city. I attended some of the meetings so that no one was surprised that I was involved with the sale, I was present as the agent protecting the interests of my client. The simple fact was... .the city staff gave zoning approval, water and sewer capacity approval and preliminary site ok. This is part of the normal process that is involved with any project coming into the city. This is what the city has put in place to review development projects. In reference to point one on Commissioner Miller's letter, there was no private meeting with staff but a presentation that was given to the City Manager to explain the project. Some of the issues included whether to put a septic system in or a sewer system. Mr. McLemore then suggested that the center could apply for block grant money from the county because it may qualify but that the commission needed to endorse. In addition to the typical benefits of sewer the lines would come in earlier since the city had long term plans to put sewer lines in the Industrial Park. He then gave instructions to Mr. Carrington to put it on the next agenda and Mr. Carrington happened to put it under my seat. I would like to take credit for this idea but it was not mine, but the city manager's. Which, by the way, is still a good idea. Let me reinterate, I did not arrange to place it on the agenda but Mr. McLemore did. What is irksome and frust;'ating ...I had already explained this previously to the commission and for it to come up again only shows that Commissioner Miller is purposely slandering my name by misstating the facts hoping I would not respond. Well I am responding. Now let's clear up point three in the letter. There seems to be something that I cannot prevent. When Commissioner Miller reads a document, I assume he understands what it says. When I joined Realvest Partners at stated in the Orlando Business Journal "Deal of the Week" article that "at Realvest, he (Paul Partyka) will be primarily responsible for new business development, linking property owners with Realvest clients, investors, participants, partners and principals." Some people have called me the Development Director or Director of Development. As it relates to the Universal Engineering report, it was addressed to Realvest, Real Estate Advisors Attention: Mr. Paul P. Partyka, Development Director. ..my responsibility for Realvest at the time. Now why did Universal send it to me? Very simple, the center's engineer, Bob Lochrane of Lochrane Engineering, recommended the firm to conduct a soils study as part of a engineering study on the site. The center authorized me to call them and give instructions 2 "'" to start the job but the payment for their services would be billed to the buyer. Agents do these kind of actions to facilitate the due diligence process. Incidentally, as part of the sales contract there is a clause that stated.. .if this transaction does not close the Buyer was required to release to Seller all reports and other work generated as a result of the inspections. That is why 1 got copies of reports to show my seller. Finally, in point three Commissioner Miller suggests that I made a substantial commission which I had received from funds raised for the project. How ridiculous. First of all the % commission Realvest Partners received were substantially less than is typical for the sale of vacant property. This was negotiated when the listing agreement was signed by the owner and was in effect regardless of who bought the property. Is Commissioner Miller suggesting that Real Estate agents not be paid? Secondly, the property owner paid the commission from their funds to Realvest Partners and, then, I receive my share from that. This is the normal transaction process with any associate in any real estate office. Now for Commissioner Miller to say otherwise, which he did, is wrong, slanderous and defaming to my company and me. The sale of this parcel was not based on whatl said or didn't say but on sound investigations and getting proper preliminary approvals from the city. The Healthcare Center closed based on their research and comfort level. After the sale, my real estate agent responsibilities were over. I did not and have never participated as a Project Director. That job was done by Domenic Macaione and his staff. I am a Real Estate Broker. I act as an agent for buyers or sellers. I cannot discriminate against any potential buyer of property that I represent. Sometimes those transactions are in Winter Springs. And that's great. This latest accusation by Commissioner Miller does a disservice to his office, to his residents that he represents and to the City in general. His slanderous and defamatory comments based on misstatements, wrong information and lack of confirmation is appalling to say the least, and criminally liable to say the most. I will not be bullied and intimidated by him. It is time for Mr. Miller or anyone else, for that matter, to be held responsible for disparaging comments that are made. Justice and fairness demand it and I will not stand for anything else. I immediately request that Commissioner Miller apologize to me, to his constituents and to the city for his behavior on this issue. Paul P. Partyka Mayor 3 . I Orlv>do B.nml Joulnll BANKING [i'l<..<'.,.'-..-','."" 11... ~:-?:~: ,,- --;~. : ~ ", \.:' "I Ii:,\ '; . "J' y ::. , . . . ).-~' :., . . .":. -~*J J.: ' /. Joe Regner Tom Abelmann Winter Park,based BankFirst has post' :1 record sLx'month earnings through lme 30 of $436.326, Total assets are 102.688,434, Joseph E, "Joe" Regner Jr,. ,ankFirst's president, attributes the rowth to "a su"Ong penoJ111ance from all usiness units," including SBA. commer' ial business fmance. residential and the .ur offices in Winter Park, Eustis, Winter ;arden and Clermont. Tom Abelmann, he bank's executive vice presidenVchief inancial officer and cashier cautions bout overconfidence but acknowledges sLx months in a row above budget cer, aiuly sounds a lot like a trend," PUBLIC RELATIONS Frank Gammon. senior vice presi. Icnllgeneral manager of Clermont. WHERE ARE THEY NOW? 'If BLOWING ROCK, N,C, - Grover Cleveland Bryan - a name syn. onymous with commercial real es- I tate growth and development in grealer Orlando for 40 years. Bryan retired as president of Grover Bryan Inc. in 1985, selling the brokerage business he estab, lished in 1963 to his three sons, Robert. Paul and David. Grover Bryan Inc, mergeawith The Galbreath Co, of Pittsburgh in 1994, which in turn was ac, quired by LaSalle Partners of Chicago in 1997, Jones Lang Wootton of London then merged with laSalle to form Jones Lang La.SalIe in 1998, Today, Grover Bryan spends six months of the year at his summer home in Blowing Rock. N,C" play, ing golf and "taking it easy." He shoots "in the low 90s and high 80s:' Bryan. who turned 80 on May 30, says he misses being "out of the loop" of active real es, tate and only advises sons Robert and Paul. Robert Bryan both laSalle executives, when asked to do so, "I let them do their thing and they let me do mine:' says Bryan, "We have always been a close-knii fam, By so I get to hear some of their activi, ties from time to time," He notes residential real estate values in Blowing Rock have been escalating at an annual rate of 20 to 30 percent, as numerous young fam, Hies discover the once all-retirees North Carolina hideaway 600 miles from downtown Orlando, . Paul Bry... Business Digest J,~ll-19, 1999 based Banyan Homes, has selected CrossQue of Clermont to manage Banyan's advertising. marketing and public relations eITorts, The budget wasn't disclosed, David Konstan, president of Uniroof Internationallnc, of Altamonte Springs. has hired Winter Park,based Patterson-Bach Communications Inc. to launch a new communications program, The budget wasn't disclosed, Rodger ChieITalo, project manager at Kissimmee Bay Country Club in Osceo- la County, has re, tained JHJ Commu, nicatlons to handle public relations, JHJ will coordinate the PR program with Vergason Sojourn- er & McWaters Ad, vertising, The bud, get wasn't disclosed. Aerial Communications Inc. has con- tracted with Bisbee and Co. Inc, of Or, lando to provide public relations ser, vices for its Orlando regional business omce, The budget wasn't disclosed, Stratcomm Media LId.. a publicly traded Winter Park,based financial publisher and marketing firm, has re, tained Lambert. Edwards & Associates lnc, of Grand Rapids, Mich" as its pub, lie and investor relations counsel. BIRTHDAYS lI"'" ,...."..,....,.."... . . '''~:.' ,',. 1 , 'L":" J. Michael Pertree Paul Hagerty Ted Edwar,jj J. Michael Pertree, presidenVfounder, Pertree Constructors Inc" Allamonte Springs; 46, on July 25, Earl K. Wood. Orange County tax collector; 83, on July 25, Paul J. Hagerty, Seminole County Schools superintendent; 60, on July 25, Ted B. Edwards, District 5 Orange County commissioner; 44, on July 26, CONSTRUCTION IJ"'" . ..~. ,..' , ..' ~:. Shawn Biederman Orlando,based T&G Constructors. specialists in till, wall projects, has posted first.half con, tract awards of$15 million, The 100,per, son firm has been averaging $25 mil, lion in contract vol. ume almost since Rick Gonzalez and Dave Grabosky founded the general contracting busi. ness in 1987, New faces include: Shawn Biederman, site operations man- FAST SELLER 'If WINTER PARK - Almost immedi, ately after breaking ground, this four. bedroom, five,bath, 4,200,square.foot home at t563 Lakehurst Ave, in Win, ter Park, was sold for $801,000, Richard and Elizabeth Dvorack moved into the two,story, traditional Southern, style resi, dence June 15, "Traditional. themed styling is back 'in' these days:' notes Robert J, Vega, presidenVfounder of 10.year,old. Winter Park, based RJV Robert Vega Homes Inc. "Ten years ago when 1 built my rU"St spec Ira' ditional home in Windermere. I couldn't get people interested, Today I'm ttu1ling away business-I'm so busy." Vega, a graduate architect himself from Louisiana State University, feels Dave Aurelio Bryan Alderman ager; Mellita Price, controller; and Shalene Estes, assistant estimator. Newly promoted project managers are: David Cote. Dave Aurelio and Bryan Alderman, DEAL OF THE WEEK 'If MAITLAND - When George D, Livingston Jr, ushers a guest into his Maitland office to meet "the mayor," he isn'tjoking. Livingston has recruited Paul P. Partyka as his newest commercial rea! estate associ, ate at lll-year-old Realvesl Part- ners Inc. Partyka George Uvlngston has been the mayor of Winter Springs since 1996, At Rea!vest. he will be primarily re- sponsible for new business develop- the traditional style's "homey charac, ter" is what is selling his products so quickly, "Traditional styling has more feeling to it. not like the typical West Palm Beach designs," The speculatively built home was completed from Southern Liuing mag, azine's special house plans collection. Winter Park Design of Maitland was the architect. As a member of the magazine's Custom Builder Network, RJV Homes undertakes at least one spec construction venture each year. The Lakehurst Avenue residence features a 16-by,20,foot kitchen with a large work island that opens to the family room, The formallibmry room has Ooor.la.ceiling book shelves. RJV Homes sold 16 custom homes valued at $7,5 million in 1998, up from 1997 volume of $2 million, Vega builds in the $500,000 to $1.5 million range, His primary markets are Winter Park, Maitland. Lake Conway and the Tuscawilla area of Winter Springs, TELEVISION United Television Inc. has completed its purchase ofWRBW,TV, UPN 65 Or, Iando from Rainbow Broadcasting Ltd, for an undisclosed price. Seth Winter, for, mer general sales manager ofWWOR,TV in Secaucus, N,Y., has been named vice presidenVGM of\ITV of Orlando Inc, DEATHS Dr. Jule Deans of Maitland; retired optometrist; 95, on July 5, Rebecca Sheldon Whitemarsh Herbert of Allamonte Springs; found, Ing partner of Lakeridge Winery in Clermont; 74, on June 16, Send iriformation to: Orlando Business Journal,Alten/ion: Alex Finkelstein, 315 E. Robinson SL, Suite 250, Orfnndo, Fla, 32801, D~ to the uolume o[submissions, please be speci[u: in submitting items, ment, linking property owners with Realvest clients. investors, partici- pants, partners and principals, "Paul has an ex, cellent sense for the needs of the commercial real estate develop- mentlndustry and is well,known to many landowners throughout Cen. PIP Ita tra! F1orida," says au arty Livingston, whose family is a pio- neer landowner itself. Partyka has a zo.year sales and mar, keting background. including stints with Proctor & Gamble and other na, tiona! retailers, ~ Ma Sot 01 Sori. real firm Inte: kno\ Mat Micl age t TI: valu state new ket i try," Kin TP Carl chat coml com I horn stat, $10,( filed Th sche mem Air' OF (NM for tl lion. a or 13 oper; in 19 seeo: cent eoue Act for OF tiona it ha, tribe: dom Toys Spac addi. Gr( la,^ JA ploy. pose< and 1 lion. sonv curro ees,l f:;- Th than worf 1993, inth' Nig ver OF winl agr", JJS film . . . . ,./,:'''''''/ !;~ ~( 11,~~~ ' _ ,. "_.n, ___________'__. ,_,_ _______.f.l.mU,IA!!narh ^ \\'~I!lls____'u_____, ,._., ,,___,__. :\.~:::~";":: '~:!:':':':"'!~~~:'::.1.'::~ ':.I::::'.:'.~! _..1:.- _~..___.........____ .-..----.....--.-.---- .' ) ~ ;'>.';,,~ It'~ ,"r. / ! !" ,.1 , . l ' i :,' I ~. I , .J {'>: ,',' /' (" ,"'F; J(' Il,f .~ , .f':.f J;:. .'~ ..:", ,.i.. tf.. ~. f . ,f 1\oh Barkett Cushman & \Vakclicld I\lez Birdie Commercial Net Lease Realty, I n(. Jeffrey Bloom An'ida Re;llty Sen'ices Christi Da\'is NAI Realvest Partners, Ine. Richard Davis, Jr. Rebman Pmperties Margery Johnson Cushman & Wakefield Jason K1.iser Trammell Crow Company Tom Kelley, II NAI Realvest Partners, lnc, Stephen LaFreniere Quest Company -[ Platinwll SPOI1S~~ .----.... ..~-- --"- Bc\'erly McBryde Maitland Re:llty Company Paul Part}'ka NAI Realvest l'arUlers, Inc. Scott Renick Crosslll:ln & Company Paul Reynolds Trammell Crow Company Julia Sosa Quest Compan)' Mark Sneed Casto Southeast Realty, lne. Paul Str:lubinger NAI Re:llve.~t Partners, Inc. Jeffrey Tanner Arvida Re.11ty Services Vincent Wolle Duke Prol'crtic.~ Business Journal -I,_.,~?~~p~~~~r~~" ---------. -'.:. -\ I ~ Gt71R WllmfmUJfl&tll~W ~ Magic nnanclal Scn'ices ~ IU!W.I.UW " i "'11 CNL ".,.,I//I'....Ill'l.,.J,'f'..I1't1.ClII/l. " ' I II Washing~on Mutual -r_~iIver ~?;),I,l~~.J';;-J Brown, Wanl, Salzman & Weiss, 1'.1\. Libert)' National Bank L.11ll1ll & Com pan)' Beer Sk~nsb r11lerl~chen COllllllerdal Mortgage First C\l'itall'rol'ert}' CllSluu'lIl & Wakefield Zilllmerman, Shnffield Kiser & Sutcliffe, P.^, ,,-'" .- })..' :' -~#- ~.:' .....'t, !:' croiE<; ,'~ David Pierce, CCI M, CPM, LCAM ,2002 President For Mcmbcrship Information Contact: Shirley Knapp 407.513-7269 Recognized as the Central Florida Commercial Real Estate Society's 2001 Firm of the Year 'k " ~~~ h: ~: ~ ~" -/.. iJr Cole Whltak~r, ~~< . .<'t..~:t? . l::'f" Ttw/\pa~ment Gjp!-'p g,f' A ~rnan *~'efi~r~Omrtl~,:~ ~. t- ~ a i!-t; .' ~...~. ill;'" ' ~.~ ~l~: Hal Warren h~,. "~". . Tile Apartment Group A'CUshm<tn 8. Wa~.ef~rd Compa"y ~~~~. Michael Davi~ Cushman P. Wa~.' " I\f~"'"'7~~.h:''':~'''Jr::: . ;-1....'\... . "~l. . .,~,. ," .~j; e, ':;" 1:}':'.. s~~anRu~~.~~;IJ CuJhman'&rw~k~~7d': ' , ..r,:ff,{: Other Rmj?,!(!1lts: ~.. ...,,~ ' , . Top FhiErln Invesbnent Sales l #2 Cole Whitakerrrhe ApartmentGroup Top Five in OffJ I', it' /' #3 Hal Warren/The Apartment Q,roup ,.;~#4 .Stephen Cougl' #4 Jay Ballardrrhe Apartment Group #5 Richard Solik Top Five in Industrial Sales Top Five in Ret #1 Michael Davis #3 Scott Cori.Jin #2 Susan Ruby Ci rc/e oj /1 chievclIlclll Robert Barkelt . Margery .Johnson Stephen Coughli.n Cushman & Wakefield .I ...:,' ..;";~4~'(ifJ,~;.j~i.;':'";-f(;;l~~F"~I%~~/~""'J;,i', ~, ' ~~'..~. -f..:.~.7t.~"..;r~~~~~~~~,~: \ ~~.~~~~~~1"'~\ik~: t.~ .:.~Xt""!~~~,.". M~rch 21 ,. Office Speci~hy Group Rreakf~st, no ch~rge, member benefit, 8:00 - 9:00 A.1\1. . University Club, 150 E, Ccnt1'31 Blvd. Marl'll 21 . General Meillhership Social, Wall Street (',antin~ 5:00 ' 8:00 r.M, $10 per person r---~".'" ?"~ ., "",", :-T,,:; ..': ',' .,";-,~""'.'" ,'J~ "'.'"d_~,.I:!":,llj.l', "c!I.-.I;W,Ul;.i;]l.L"J;.l;.lUCUAclUil ;' .. :1,)4;" ;'ii. ""(!'J,tll~ltfJi1;J.Y~Jli;lijJ,J~"Ulj!.iJl!~i, i "'~:1~":;~'~" '~'Jii".i;,t'):0,~!.~!,l!!:,~j,!,1l:J,!lJqr~)l.j:Y;, ,', ''''~'"''<'''''..l'l " :' 'iJj~'~~;;""':' .: . }"~'.1~~'~~~~;~~~ ,'..ll..~t 'I ~slri~~:t::. ~ GENCO BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. Full service commercial construction management & general contracting firm specializing in retail, multifamily, and commercial construction. · Conceptual planning · Design Support · Construction to Post Construction . Competitive Pricing · Cost Effective Control . Advanced Scheduling Methods 407 -376-2766 Office · 407-852-1301 fax 333 S, Orange Ave" Suite 229, Orlando, FL 32806 . www.gcncobuildin9systems.com Date: 040802 This (copy of) document was shown by Deputy Mayor Gennell during discussion of Regular Agenda Item "P". REALVEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE ADVISORS :;:CCJRFAC' 7 INTt1~NA7"lOo"oU\L FOR SALE 7.8 +/- ACRES CHOW ANSKI INDUSTRIAL VACANT SITE 350 OLD SANFORD OVIEDO RD. UJTNT~,U SPRINGS FLORIDA I ' CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS $280,000 COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES J'.);~' ~:J>- PAUL P. PARTYKA MAYOR 1126 EAST S.R. 434 CITY HALL: (407) 327-1800 WINTER,SPRINGS, FL 32708 FAX: (407) 327-4753 RES: (407) 365-9233 BUS: (407) 875-9989 e-mail: MAYRPAUL@MAGICNET.NET .~,. -,' ~ t, t ~. '. ". .. ~., ;,'.... '1 '... ~I, .' " . ~f/-:l,.I..r'/:-!\J.~';:~;' , ',y" '\..~; r ~'If~"l'~r~- \...I'l~''>.: :4'.~f'.,f ..~ l.~!'.,-(:~J~-:~d.:~,~;' J~1 /". ~ .:.~. " /?.f I/'\.J':, ...~.f.~'~"rM, ~ . . ;-I"~ ".:.'.! -,. j;r;,. ",1, ',' .:.. .f- ~. J .;' t :'l t :...? : "'. ? ',~ ;!:~ Paul P. Partyka REALVEST PARTNERS, INC. (a, 2200 Lucien Way I Suite 350 I Maitland. FL 32751-7019 (407) 875-9989/ Fax (407) 875-3137/ Email: mayrpaul@magicnel.ncl 'll~;th;' FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT PAUL P. PARTYKA 407,875.9989 M 407.341.0805 REALVEST PARTNERS, INC. 2200 Lucien Way, Suite 350 Maitland, Florida 32751-7019 Tel 407.875.9989 Fax 407.875.3137 www.realvest.com _=_.'- _......,.~__,__~;"":c....o1'"'''',..l.. ._o!IId.~_..~"-", ..... . ~ - --,- _0:: 0 OO~ ~~ ~ oo~ t;1U~ ~~ ~ 8~<> ~~~ ~ _c'ii .- E - ~ ~~~ ::-! ~..~ -~! .- ~ ~ i!iil - ~ ~ ~~ I o.C' ~ .....~. ~ ~.fl _......!i . ~~~.o" ~I \0.-.; 'a f5~c3 ~go ~oQ: ~Vll: ~-- ....~ ~ ~~f ~'- u ~~U~ .-- . -- . 1'"'0 . - ,.. . . ~~ . 00= . J "j r- REAL VEST,.\) COMMEHCIAL REAL ESTATE ADVISOHS ~"'l) j,::;7 ;;= CDRFAC d-" INrt:'UVATlC1NAl - For Sale - CRO'" ANSKI INDUSTRIAL VACANT SITE $280,000 7.8 +/- ACRES 350 OLD SANFORD OVIEDO ROAD WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708 \:~ ~ 01 '9~~m ,\ I!I , II !.Il 1:11' '. ,"Ii IIVI - 1 i' (I; ""11, II '1,1 I'll . I;" ,le"l II . "'", "1' i I' Ii'" .10" '!I'III Ill'" 'II ~ Iii ;;llllll:ll ~ !!!!i!.!!!!1!,~!!!!I)!i '. i .r~ ~"H J.~ ~Ut!i:E2..fdllf~.lU -:.::: \. ... .. ~~ Part of the Winter Springs Industrial Park, adjacent to The Grove Counseling Center Approximately 4 acres uplands, rest can be used as passive green space or some retention Septic and well, can be connected easily to Winter Springs water Easy access to major highways (Rt. 17-92, Rt. 434, Rt. 436, Rt. 419, Greeneway) For Further Information Contact: Paul P. Partyka 407.875.9989 M 407.341.0805 \ No IVarra/lty or represe/lflltio/l, express or implied, is lIll/de as 10 Ihe l/ccuracy or 1111: infimnillion con wined herein, allil SlIlIle is ,wl}/nirred suhjecr to ermrs, omissions, change lif price, re/ltal or otller cO/lditio/ls, IVithdraw(JIlVitIIllIR'tttj(t"iffs't'PAlit'ft4tt\~~ :T!<ft'~l, ill//II/Jed I))' IJ/lrl'ri/lc:il'"ls, 2200 Lucien Way, Suite 350 Maitland, Florida 32751-7019 Tel 4()7,X75.9989 Fax 407.875.3137 \V\Vw.realvest.com 9S9.9\'(C.tlol) '0 ~ --- ~ -, 505'30'65'; ..~I~~ ~ ~o~'~_ - -- r ... ,..: :I.'" ~3 ~E '8 ~ '8 ~ ~ 7 J ;; ...., \,.100' .. ~ol ) 9(1(l.17'CPJo)t) N015.3S'55'"W - -'> C-2 zoning (INDUSTRIAL), City of Winter Springs Excellent site for manufacturing, warehouse, outside storage Excellent value for the land, only $.82 SF ($36,000 per acre) REALVEST ,A\) COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE ADVISORS (~t;) ......-_. ~::CaRFAC" .:-" IlYrt!Ql\lAnONAI.. Executive Sunlnlary Property Name: Chowanski Industrial Site - Winter Springs Location: 350 Old Sanford Oviedo Rd., Winter Springs 32708 On the north side of Rt. 419, two-tenths of mile west of the intersection of Rt. 434 and 419. The entrance is through Wade St. into the industrial park, then left on the original and historic Old Sanford-Oviedo Rd. The site is on the north side. Access: Off of Rt. 419, I minute from Rt. 434, 3 minutes from Rt. 17-92, 5 minutes from the Winter Springs exit of the Greeneway. Site Characteristics: 7.75 +/- acres GREAT VALUE! - Slightly irregular shape, 959' on the east, 374'on the north, 969' on the west and 371' on the south, The site is pristine with the northern side adjacent to the green belt. The topography gradually descends as you go toward the northern and western edges. The 100- and 500-year flood plain zones do not encroach on the property. - There is some wetlands. Potential buyer needs to survey. Initial estimate has it about 4 acres of usable uplands land. Actual yield may be higher. There is potential for mitigation. - Land Use Plan / Zoning: The property is zoned C-2. This is the most intense commercial zoning in Winter Springs, This zoning is suited for heavy manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, outside storage. The is the west portion of the industrial park. Adjacent to the property on the east is the Grove Counseling Center. - Police / Fire- Well / Septic (can be hooked up easily to Winter Springs water) City of Winter Springs Utilities: Water / Sewer- '-' Price: $280,000 - REALVEST PARTNERS, INc. 2200 Lucien Way, Suite 350 Maitland, Florida 32751-7019 Tel 407.875.9989 Fax 407.875.3137 www.realvesr.com I LEOeO ~~ eo..-...... LOCAlDI METRO-ORLANDO AREA MAP ~ ~ PARTNERS I ~ ~~-:. NCU.OH:l N'EM ~ L.N:E. 0lW<<lE. 0lICe0t.A I'OUC. llBoe<<lLE NV YOUJ8IA CXllHTES @. Copyright 1997 Ivey, Harris & Walls, Inc. - - -- - ,...... r:= I~ ~ - l\!!O ~ \- ,- -. :'","' .' .. ,f::1\:~r~~;r:>!~~~7iJ'~:;;' .' -~. , \: . :: ~. " " '..: looking west into the property looking east MAl-' UI- tJUUNUAK Y SUKVt y LOT J, ENTZMINGER FARMS ADDITION NO. 2 and the West 50.00 feet of LOT 4, said West 50.00 feet being measured perpendicular to the West line of LOT4 recorded in Plot Book 5, Page 9 Public Records of Seminole County. Florida, z o en c.i 01 ol (Jl ~ 'l- \,0'- <0 C> ~ ... ~ NOTE: Trees ere blazed with yellow point along the: north line of .unnamed street- at 100' + /- Inlervals . .fJv ~ ~ r- 5' .. ~ r- o ... '" ) Ul o en c.i 01 ol C1\ , t"l \ \ \ \ \ \~ \~ \~ \ : \ ;: I~ <D IV" ~I "'. "3\ \ , \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ , \ \ I \ \ \ \ I ~ ~TER I: JOHNSON. P,5.U. .ProftualOlld Surwp OIId Mapper. 41/ OEBARY A 10E eNTERPRISE. FlORIDA J272S Ph (#J7) 668-1650 Fox (407) 668-IJ98 (-"All. PCJ5G1JIMOLCOtol 1...-..1 ,\1 l'~ I'C 7,750 Ac. 337,588 S.F, <0 C1\ <0 <0 ... be( O\~ ~e(f' \. 60 \,0 300.00' n ~ b \ \ \ 350,00' \ I , \ 50.0 H \'i -=-i !. O/J) SAJ.q, OR/) - a (60' R/lv) l'Ien'o R'OA./) '"NOT YAUD IlTHOUT M SlCNAlVA( AHa 0RIClHAl.. RN!D) SEAL. fE A flQRI)A UCOfsm ~ NC> wAF"f'Or k,.."..-LW PI In the north boundary line 01 ENTlI.tINGER F ^RI.tS A001T10N NO. 2 NOTES I. BEARINGS SHO~ HEREC>>I ARE BASED OH niE NORTH LJH( OF' LOT J BEARlHC BONG S75'47'n~ 2. lLGAl DESCRIPTION PROYlOED BY THE OJEHT. PROPERT\ES SHe" H(R((>>l 'MSRE NOT A8SlRA.Cl!D BY THIS SUR~ (CIA ANY ~1S CIA OR OTHER RECORDED D/0lW1lRAHCCS. J. ACCORDING TO THE iliA TlONAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE WAP, PAHo.. NO. 12117C 01,>> Eo DATED AAm. 17, 1005. THIS PROPERlY UES DC ZONE ...... AREAS DElUtWlNED TO 8( OUTgo( THE ESTAa.JSHED 500-'I'O.R n.ooo PlAlN. LEGEND PO - fIlA T BOOK PC - PAC( Pl - PACPERTY UHE fM) - fOUND (Pl- PlAT (u - utASlMlED (e) _ CAlCULATED II - liON ROO P - IRON PIp( IRC - IRON ROO 6: CAP PC - IRON FYE 6: CAP [SAlT - EASEWEHT OHW _ CM:RHEAD v.cRE ~c - CONCRETE AC _ AIR CCI<<)lT1QN(.q ca - CONCRETE BI.OCK QI - COHCRElt WQNUll.l(HT NaD - HAl. . DISK PSW - PROf'ESSlONAl SUR'f'E'I"OR 6; t.l4PP(R lB - UctHSED BUSlHESS ~ _ - lOOCO POVoEll POlL 6 - ctNTRAl AHa.E R - 'VJ,XUS L - UNCTH j! '" o z CRAPHIC SCAlE 'l' i ( .l'IIln't ......._ A. PRo.ECT DATA DATE: lloVU/oo : '"-100' DRA Y1N: PGJ REW:'t\IJ): PGJ FU.E: IJANIEJ.S REV: REV: SHEET: 1 Of" , 1HIS SURVEY IlEETS 1HE 1oIINlIoIUll TEOiNICAl STNlDARDS SET fOR1H BY lHE FLaI1llA BOARD Of" lNIO SUR'of:I'llRS, PURSUNlT TO SECTION 472.027 flORlOA STATlJES. j~:i(f PROfESSIONAl .. lIAPPOl _ RogIo_ No. 51113 I'f)Z -/~ -00 DAn: C(R1lf1ED TO: IIA1lIE OiOWNlSlO PEQPl.(S fIRST BNlK UNI\'ERSAl nTlL COW'NlY "'f' .~~::~,;:::: '(i~r I~W '.t ' "~"', : ---,- ,~ ~, -..-. _...~.u~ .u, ____ ' VUL''.; "t.\';v"vS\Jr=::2E!!!I!.:'~~t,;U~TT,flURI\)l\' _ un , , C:oA.JrA..'f.JtN& 3"3 ~ Stll. S' ~.H.: I, rS0.40ff'l.. "r.A tH, (e (II , ' ~' ',;;' n.. .. . - -,-. _. ...___ _ ~ .f"!J.lO~...L- -.' ..,..~-~ 75......7.Z~"E 374,~~'-.:!\~~ UJ.;;;AM ;;rnUr(N(lrO~N)lI, ,'. ..,"" , "j, :~ ~:?I.O'" (,.. . )) -' -~~.Ol\" ~ ,,<:1'1 "II!,J,~" .':"'i: \............. 3 Z 1 (\(., ( o~ 11 r) ""- \ ../.::--- ~ \' N~ !J'I/IJ~ ::>$ . N"?iH.rll ~{ 7 -\"tJL'''- .01 Yfrr~l(. 'i;'~ , bT L~ 1~ \ t \'. '~~~~,!1~N~~~f. \ "i:.. 1 \ :.... :;:";[::\"I"~'~/':' "~{~~, '- 8 - ' '.. '},r"','<l ...,...'; ." '.'.'];. ," ----- \-':~ ' ,.;..I:~~::I:J :tr.-.;;.~~~ \. ~ :" -::-i.:~~r. I:;'~I," ...~,.t~;~: r ~ ,.' "t,'.~:~'( i?'r :;' ;;,'r~' \ 1, \ ~. 'i ,;t. ~;j.: ,L1. ~ , . "",,'1';'III~;"';' '.',..ii"~l \. .~::;i~:.~~ ';,~';'''''"lh;j '. '" ',.,'1'" ~\", "'''~l~'' \' ,,',. ~'{~;\~V~ ;"';~Wh . ~"r"~':.;r.,,,:.t,',. t,. , .'A, ;~>r~'': ,\' .' '::'l'~'ffol!' \", .:;~. ~~11:~ :'.' ~:,~;~\i .' . ~,:\ ~~!:~:'" "':;'~; "! "" . \i~~I\'A~}:',:' -'.;"; ,: ,It ' .' . \~"'-I " ;,' "...,,',..\" \.. .,~li~ ...:......r... 'f ..~;:,'~'~ , :''',' '" 'j~:i': :':;~i{{~;~: - '.' ,...~~' . Iii,:., ;~"\;t.:t.t . 'l" ~; ~.~~' ~. . 1,- '- ,.,:1'."1... '.~,' .'.I~ :k . :. ...~.....: ~.. ,";'1. ::~''''''~'' -...... . :" :~.. _ '" (..1 ~. r~!!' _ ~ ':i. "'~' ". ,~~jj:l;'t.Y>,:"rx;::"'.J J,~.': <\ '-0.0 .' ~.~, ~' v.])'.1';;',' , . '? '-: \ ' ,."lJ'I~ ! . ~.,,!!:, ...' ".;.:.'.~, I . ~ / ..-I". '. 4 'r.......'~.. "'; 3 __ ~ ' ...:4'j", -> .,-.r~4""f' 'j;" \ . ':i!ii;~lf ~ .':":{f::.IJ. .M(i- ..... !\?t':'I~ '~.~;~7-i;;;'::I'~ ~ .'_ ..:./?-:....... . /' \ . .tj;. ~j;;'i'.;i,M i!:~f, ~./' "". '.l..Wft.f .~,! ::,!;:;;~!1'~~. l} / \ : . ::,;,~~~m I '~I-"'?I~;L :.~, o ,.'..(".I..t- l'rl"ll''' t;; /s__ ~ ," '~., - ",;r..,,;~~\\~,;' ': ii, . ~ ~ . - . ' -,~ : ;',i}~~'~' ';'. .'~,i\ ,., '-- ______ . ~ ' \ '. ' ' . :,!(1~I~: Si ~ <$i..!. ~'it . ': / :;.~.' '. ~ '" !'ii',.: N, ' ' ---- .1 . _/6 ~ '.' -,,;.,. \j~ 'I" "'~li - -;"Ck~I41~.f' ~-- \ ~ \'~'1~~' f, f.. ~;.::',,~ ' ~, -:------. . ~. . , /7---\ '..-: ~,9'iV'r" ~ ':'..;;;, J". 'Ji,~' ............... ~ ~. 1...........'-_".,1,...~ f. , --- 1- ---' .--:'" . ..',': ,'"..,... ,'i'.'."'.,' !\ ~ 1 - . /R~ ~ ~ ' ',;'::(',',~1,., ~t: ..;, l' ____ I. ~/V A7 ,. '. ..",i"i,'.....", ::, (,;.: ~, .-.r'F \~. .' " ',... ... ~ ' '. {, ,____ ~.-,.. -19 ~ ~ ."...:::(~;'.'\.... /. ( '0.' ~-- '. ~ ...:[f~;~~;. ;~: . . ,. ~ I ,.:~t~~,)M'i. l~~J;:', ' '.. ~ ~ .I..."...~')t.~,.." ~'..?~ :.,~"~':~',.,.~. .,.~ z' e. .~~, \ '<:.:!'i::i,'~Y;' ~~~::, '," .. \._......"\ ,..:-.L '.. . ",' ~ ';;I:~':(~:i>'S ~':~:" ::i,i; __23/ ___ " r:?'-\i',~'!,;' ,'1\~ ~" ,::,i! , ,/' \ .. '('" ~"" ,<. e4-- ---- \.. ~.")~rt.~:; :1' ' ::~{ '.1\ I. ~25 ~ -r () ....., \) "l :".'.. ~ '~ ~ ----;?~t.: - 1.. , '~1 ~,,:t~ x'f .. '. Z7~ -\ ", ~ ~"~' :5,':' \~ ,:~I ~Z8 - - ~' ";:~;,~:.~~:~:~!i;~ .. \ \.) _ __ z 9- ~ :';~o\ff \) ;111 .. .~' .~ 1- 0'" .3 0 ---' _ _ ('i;t':~:.!! ~ :~"'{:f'f . ~ 1o'~ ' ''\i~.{l. .d" ": to. \ )t " ''\1''.t!...~T;.,';. :-~ U'il.' . .....~ ", :', :" ,,: ~ \',~~ \ '. \\~;,. " ~ ~ ,(~ r+~~~' \ ' ~ ~.J\.J ~"'/l:',.....~'1 /. . t ~ '4'."...J\, ,o.c,'l'(ri[_JJ ~ ,I' I~ I"':': --- , /. I"' --to I.t '. ,.,., I~# , CL ~.,..,.. d ..-:-:- ~ '.... "to ~ ~ 01' -.1 ~ ~ r:::;, - 1 C:' ,"'\ . ~v = r: ,~ \ 1-. ~ ~ '- ~ 'l>.. '-oJ "1":'""""-.- r::, ~ E, ~ 1?J "1::."'; ~... ,.., ;) c>r I (:. \" f \0) , o (,. /). \. /{V I ~ ~'''''iiI\. c. .. 'O~ IW 1F 10 ' 11 HADYlJl , 12 F ~WOOO DR 13 ~ II I II~' I ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 11. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ., 411 " ~ _I. . ~ ~~ ~ I . 15 ElCAMINI ~ 18ELCAMINIl !r@j! 17ELPASOHJ :::r:, F t.o~ P r1AP 18 COSTA CI~R @, 19 COLUMBU }J'IR i 20 LA SALMA'LN ;' 21 ' 22 PONCE oELEil N CIR ~ ==, _~): '. },:j:l::: ~ c::r\Q Ct ~~~ -[JID>-~ ;::\ H 'LW';""",.. 1 - " ~~ ~ ~ ' "":.:~,::.'^, :~li~ "'. :{:::? ~ EID3l::I--~ 0-" ~ ~ .. -r ffi ~ ~~"'...:~ \,1 ~m\l\l-J/~rIJ0/1 ~J"/ ; -yJlil~ .J\~ :AF:::" fil 1" 11. lnTm:1 n ~.::l ...{ ~ \'... ""~'" ~ ~'~ ",::V: I...LI,- '\ I~ ~ ~ . f':ll ~ ,sO~O' ~ R1~ / ~) C L 'OR ~~A II 1:\ ~C-n ~{t.::WEF:r:~;1rs/ ..... ~ \ ~ ~ ~~-n\-~ ~~~'f$ ii ~ S~ H _t g~~K~ '~::'t@?~~ ~1 ~ \IT ill;:: t ~ a, _ ~ ~ (1j f.O: '- - '-1 r- ~ I ,<t!A:@).. ~":, .;:: ~ t I tfJ'1Ji ~?11 /1~7iff;' '- I- '-11 ~ ~~ ...~.::,~~",:..,..",,~lt J:=-, I ~.! '..J. "'l;t:l:::rl ~'- l' ,,:~:::::,::t:'::~:::::::::::: l\:: -rm \ I :- ~ I ,.. r.r/~ r !:-J roo . i- ~ 1 - r;;::":'w '...".... ", ': ~ ' ~ ~ f[J%J~~/ f.::J~.'O: ~\ ~ ~ vV L-- ~ /~ ::t~:!\:: :W;r:::,::::: :fi:;:~:!;:;::':"',..~',::.,,::,.::~:::.:. \ \ \ I~: ~ U / J ElJf[J: \ "C ~.~ ~ : C/l,\ .L- - rmTl:@ ~ Il:aMk::,:MUI~;g~~ 07 &>-:\""'< ~ \1 \'\:>Y : ~~ ,- ---C\~ ~ if d ~':'::,':~:::::'f*!!~:~'t. "<...L I\;~'~ ~'" ill \\ ~'34 wrr- ~~c:; "0 : 1-11 TI \ I u.J....\~.I. I I III I~ ~ 'f.:I/j'N r::\:::~',;:i:lll~fJ:;i:i::!li:!I!fli::il'" " n-o ~ , ~ ~R q., 000 ,\ I -, 1 1 -u ::.Y ~";:" ,::~:~.:::=.:,:~ U:,.:,:,,:~:~:~::::::::~:t: .1.11 IJ'- '. U r I 1 ~ '~o88 89.Pr ::Ii. ~fu 1 II \ Ll.2d \ \ \ \ \ill -~' co . l'''% tI.- ~~-c >- '-1.",0 . "'-W;: %3l) 0 I rr1' [tJo ~~ ~ .,i I'S: 1 I~ I \ \ L-W-)- \~ ~ "':':, ~ =:- ~ ::::::;;;:::~:,~::::::::::~:::.~ r?'.:<:::<, I \: ~ ';:,?" ,,~~,.,t "IYe I Nell 0 1600 Lr '~j I I ~...t:" .,..- _ ~ ~ r- I-- ~ \:V:::ii::::~:::~ - '::'::: r- ~ I~' /"N lMH - iiIl' ./""'!> Vx.-T L K 'Iif:;" *' '''''* I \.I 't ~ - 'T5 /' m \ t 0 ~ ;':II"";n~>lr ~[';:"~~"a~~ -\<21~{L~C:j ~ "';t~ \::~ ffirn\~O~~O , "~. ~~~~_~~PW- ~ ~ ::::::=1\:;;":':: ~~\ T t-:ll: \11 >- ::: ~ \ "l.lNI " '<" ~("~ll-~ : ~ ~1~f:. ll" ~\~'\Tl\ 1= -\ Ii. >- I- t: ,.._..........,. '" ,,'..<, ~1!"""': ~\ I I I I I '1 ~ \-': ;::::: ~'(' .x '*- ,'1-/\: 1--\ t:. I- I- _ " I , I I ~ _ ' \ L- :: ~ '(.. ''::t>:, \ \ I \ : \--II- ~ I- -~ - - - \ ~:::.iI[!~1 ~B~ili'li.:!: ~~~i'i1 ::igj~fi, I!II';: i~; r~~~j1~ iBBlc I ';! :~i~'! ~: ~li !~ii '!~~" I ' ; I'; mo:I' I :llXll: ::IOICII !i:, :I : DOl l[lIJI:: 100lC 11'1 :A I. :~ :~: ~~: :~, : :~ :W1l: ~ ~Or:! i ,; ,lI!l!i:! ,~~:! '::8~::i 81 ; BBi :mIIE, :BBl l ,i!! !~;~ ~ ~ ~~i : ~: !I 1 ! \:;tnr:" 'II 'ml:' 'jl~" JOeLI ,:1';'1 l iclJDE . I:::~d~;; ,hOOI~ f :i:~lf f l::tll::f~' ,~ :~, ~~: ,~~ I :: ~O[I ~ p:01: III ' ,;; l [II: I ::IOlrlll. [II I: m:H l[lIJIC:, 100lC i I 1:::11 1:111:1:1 :~ :~: :~: :~ :~ :~: ~8EIJ ~ 8E i '; 'lmm j: : :l8EII~ '~:181~1 ill;; 8'1 : ~ B8~ 1~~1~'11; ,:881~ I ibd,~li 13113 ~li i i~Hii ii i ~~~ !~I~i 00[10 c;; r: ' lOC,:: :lI:I[II: I ::IOlrll IIII:~, ]111 : D[]r I 1~~~1!1 b ~ I II:::!lJl':11 1:111:1 :ll I ,~:,,~I /~ :~ ,~: [][][I[] '\ ~II: I ~I::' :l[][II: I ::I[]ICII ,. l:.I : Dm [t rlDOI:11 \1:111:1 :ll ., :~: ,:~~ ~~ : ~, ~ Ii;; 011 : D[]lr I I ,; IIDOI::II I:l [][I[] ~,: II :'. :l[][II:II::Olrlll 'II!I;; ~llll :D[]lrJ Ir:n~I~1 I [][]Ir I IID[]I::II 11:1IIJ':ll :l l:t~1 i~::~: ~~ ~ ~I: i\'" [I[][] ...:; '1;'1 :lO[II:1 ::I[]lrlll ::u :D[]'r lfilt7m: I []Olt I 111:1011:'1 11~IJ':ll :l[]I:l~HJ'~:::: ~~ ~ ~~: ~~~8 ~! \i:~~8 I~::I' '~I[]~lii,) !!B!~!ii ii~~i!: ~B8:~ ~~;ii~: ~B!!i iiB8!i~:i ii iiB,~jl ,!118i~lli;ii~li 1 ~ 'i'~ \!~i ~ ,,[] ,,, . I: I. .1 ,,-tl1E~1 II 011 :~il,~D[]S!~' ~31;J~b:, .n ~OOI: t tl I 1.11 '. Ill, r1I~ -lr I I II , I ':":l 1:1: I': ::Olrnl ' I, L ~!ii:l~t 1[ I m:f1:II:'1 II~I ::ll \: I.H:' rlll:: r . 'I ,\. II.; I I \ I:':; I: I: I: I :: IJlrlll ' ,I J ,2NCE:11 II liDO I:.! II I I ::rl 'I I: l~[ ,,\t l I l : ~ I II' : I !l'I:It' ::'l" ...~ ,: : :l = I: I: I :: olr~j I I, ~ : ~ ..t.', I g![ I ' . 1I I I ~lL . ..[ltl 'l t<r[\'~u.lo:all!: ';': 't ::: ~ ~ l ;; ="I"I"fiitlTI ,I :'I'~ .. I Ol[r ~..~L ....r::i~ 0...,1\ ,,')i.,!--j "" ~~~ _ t\::..::.~; J;' \l~ '~JI::jl-- :_!" , l I Bl! ~ \ @@ ~~~~~--'~i~i~~b!'T ii --.~~\... '-- Ol[ I n=rr~\.I. ~~~ : . \ ~ (i~". \~~l--~ WE.j'&..ArJ()~) III LITl\~ 0 WlTIILI0TTT\\r itl 1 :----..PJl/~ci~, ""AP 1[\ [] \ \1~ ~ ::::::::-- II f ,~ ~~: b C / n r-~:-h tlJf$fIjElJ ~ : / ~R 1\1),4 l-: - flJ& fl3El:;. fiJEi3 ~ qV' ' ,,: , \ / - ..,..,.,. [j iI'".IOOO 000 8> :f$f$ ~vg;fB ~ e: ~ ~ ' .' _ ~ _ - rr --ID \ . ~ 8888 81~88800~[ ~ < 'f$ ,h~ ~f- t:1-It!fJ-~ K~~ ", \ '-1 .~ '\.l\\\ill\:- I ~ ~ [l[l[l[] 00000 rY( Bi~' ~~ ;- ~ - r ..-/ ~~",,"""''' ~ ~ ~.E, ~. ~888 8 -~S~uE~ ~:, ~ ~ \ .~4)' ~:~ ~t8i~ L\ III ~ [][]~ ~iflfl3ffJ/ fJ~'Y,~ ~'c L\- ; ~ ~ 11_ ~ ~..... , I" ~ ~ [][][] ~fl3~A,( ~~~~:V~S8~~~ \r-"lm\lH-gL\~[] ~m8~0[] ~"""''4 ~ ~'~IB8 -~B~ I.I~ '~I ,~ ill / v 0 ~ '-J..L I- :1- I) a ill \~, o~ \ mc\ 6'\'\ \ \ llllL ~ VJjN ~ '~~I 00 ~ tr ~ ~Rgrt' l \ \ \ JJJ\ \ \\}Tm _ II [][]di5 -TI - ,-"'r\ L1ifit 8B~B~e? ~ ,rrl \ \ \ \ \ \\J.J l\ ~ ~-'::r-Hj J ~~t!l~8 ,: I, ;::00 u B r1"f11- [jL ,;:< ~ /-l: \ m -\ \ \ \ \ \ \ l_L t::.1 ~ W ~ ~ 0 "LLj] IQJO UO /'i1nTOnl . ~\ ....~-t \ \ \ \ \ I \~~ -I~:}=-~; O[ ~ U A"jl[ rani 0 ,\UQO n " [(l wE:::' v~ T\ \ ~ lk1 t::==i~: I-- \\-' ~ [] ~ [][ \\,D 0 ~ LJl 0 ~ -L.. J""T-r h.... IJj ~::j ," \..- [] ~~ ~r .J II 0 ~ ~ ~-h, ~:I'l/..~ ~ [7/ '-..... [][] ~i~crJl 0 ~1 ~ ~d~ ~m. ~~ . 00 ~ ~ ffi~~l ~J~~~~ml_~I_ .. . 00.. OO~ ",0 ~ ~~ !l ~~ I~ ~ 1~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ : ~~ ~~ I ~~ l~ '1- ~! I - \ffi z C) ~ 1 I I Chapter 30 I ZONING REGULATIONS PArer 51 YP-l FLOOD-PRONE CLASSIFI~ION I Sec. 30'.961 purposes and inte~t. It is the purpose of this Part to promote the public health, safety and general welfare and to minimize public and private .losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed to: (a) restrict uses which are dangerous to health, safety and property due to water or erosion hazards, or which result in damaging increases in erosion or in flood heights or velocities; I I (b) require that uses vulnerable to floods, including facilities which serve such uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction; I (c) control the alteration of natural floodplains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers which are involved in the accommodation of flood waters; I (d) control filling, grading, dredging and other development which may increase erosion or flood damage; and (e) regulate the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert flood waters or which may increase flood hazards to other lands. (5 19, ord. No. 88-10, 9-13-88; 5 5.781, LDC, through Supp 16). I I Sec. 30.962 Reserved. . Sec. 30.963 FloOd-prone area zone classification created~ I In addition to, and supplemental to, all Seminole county Zoning Require- ments heretofore or hereafter established by designated zoning categories and classifications, there is hereby created a zoning classification to be known as the "Flood-Prone Area Zone Classification" (FP-l) in which all property situated in a Flood-Prone Area, as defined in Chapter 2, shall be classified. No structure or land located within said classification shall be located, extended, converted, improved or structurally altered without full compliance with the provision of this Part and all other applicable regulations. . . (5 20, Ord. No. 87-1, 2-10-87; 5 19, Ord. No. 88-10, 9-13-88; 5 5.783, LDe, through Supp 16). Sec. 30.964 General standards. . In all flood-prone areas the following general provisions are required: (a) New construction and substantial improvements shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure; . Supplement No. 17 30-501 . . . \ - -- ZONING REGULATIONS -- (c) No structure shall be constructed or placed and no land filling or grade level changes shall be permitted within said classification unless the resulting filling or change will not inhibit the flow of flood waters or drainage waters or cause erosion. All filling within said classification is limited to the minimum area necessary for a building site. In the event the necessary filling area for a building site is greater than ten percent (10\) of the total area within said classification, on-site compensating storage shall be provided. In riverine situations, notification of alteration or relocation of a watercourse will be in accordance with approved County procedures. (d) No structure shall be constructed or placed and no land filling or grade level changes shall be permitted,within said classification unless the resulting filling or change will not increase flooding of or drainage of lands above or below the property and the modification to an affected watercourse can be maintained. ~ (e) Residential. Construction. New construction or substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated no lower than one (1) foot above the base flood elevation. Should solid foundation perimeter walls be used to elevate a structure, openings sufficient to facilitate the unimpeded movements of ,flood waters shall be provided. (f) Non-Residential Construction. New construction or substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or non-residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated no lower than one (1) foot above the level of the base flood elevation. (g) Non-residential Agricultural Structures. Non-residentialagricultur- al structures may be flood-proofed in lieu of being elevated provided that: (1) All areas of the structure below the required elevation are water tight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water, and use structural components having the capability, of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effect of buoyancy. A registered professional engineer or architect shall certify that the standards of this subsection are satisfied. such certification shall be as provided in 30.970(a)(3); or (2) All electrical, plumbing and utility improvements, including but not 1~ited to, circuit breakers, conductors, conduit or other devices that carry but do not utilize electricity; panel boards; power outlets; receptacles; service conductors; switchboards; and switches, are above the base flood elevation. (h) Elevated Buildings. New construction or substantial improvements of elevated buildings that include fully enclosed areas formed by foundation and other exterior walls below the base flood elevation shall be designed to preclude finished living space below the base flood elevation and designed to allow for the entry and exit of floodwaters to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls. supplement No. 17 30-503 3 ZONING REGULATIONS (a) No encroachments, including fill material or structures, shall be located within a distance of the stream bank equal to five (5) times the width of the stream at the top of bank or twenty (20) feet each side from top of bank, whichever is greater, unless certification by a registered professional engineer is provided demonstrating that such encroachments shall not result in any increase in flood levels during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. (b) New construction or substantial improvements of structures shall be elevated or flood-proofed to elevations established in accordance with this Part. (S 19, Ord. No. 88-10, 9-13-88; S 5.786, LDC, through Supp 16). Sec. 30.967 Additional factors to be considered in evaluating structure proposals in flood-prone areas. No location of a structure in flood-prone areas, shall be approved by the COunty Engineer and/or th~ Board of County Commissioners unless all relevant factors specified in other Sections of this Chapter and, to the extent appli- cable, the following general criteria and guidelines have been considered. (a) The danger to life and property due t,o increased erosion, flood heights or velocities caused by encroachment; (b) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others; (c) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary conditions; (d) damage; The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood (e) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community; (f) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront loc~tion; (g) The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding or erosion damage for the proposed use and under the ownership of the applicant; (h) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; (i) The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan, Wetlands OVerlay Zoning Distance Regulations and Flood-Plain Management Program for the area; (j) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. (k) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment' transport of flood waters expected at the site; and Supplement No. 17 30-505 s . ZONING REGULATIONS (4) Certificate from a registered professional engineer that compensating storage has been provided, if required; II (5) Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development; and, I (b) Construction stage. Upon completion of the lowest floor and/or necessary flood-protection measures by whatever construction means, it shall be the duty of the permit holder to submit to the Building Division a certification of the actual location and elevation of the lowest floor and the actual lowest flood protected elevation (if applicable), as built, in relation to National Geodetic Vertical Datum. The certification of the lowest floor elevation shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a registered land surveyor or registered engineer and certified by same. When flood-proofing is utilized for a particular building, said certification shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a registered engineer or architect and certified by same. Any work done prior to submissiqn of the certifications and prior to verification by the County Engineer, or his designee, shall be at the permit holder's risk. (c) The Building Division shall retain and preserve a copy of all required certificates after review and verification by the County Engineer or hIs designee. I I I I (S 20, Ord. No. 81-59, 9-1-81; S 21, Ord. No. 87-1, 2-10-87; S 19, Ord. No. 8B- 10, 9-13-88; S 5.790, LDC, through Supp 16). I Sec. 30.971 Duties and responsibilities of the county engineer. The County Engineer, or his designee, shall be responsible for determini'lg whether the requirements of this Part have been complied with. Duties of the County Engineer, or his designee, shall include, but not be limited, to the following: I (a) Review all development permits to assure that the permit requirements of this Part have been satisfied. (b) Advise 'permit holder that additional Federal or State of Florida permits may be required, and if specific Federal or State permit requirements are known, require the copies of such permits be provided and maintained on file with the development permit. I I (c) Notify adjacent communities, the Department of Community Affairs of the State of Florida and the St. Johns River Water Management District prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. I I (d) portion of diminished. Assure that maintenance is provided within the altered or relocated said watercourse so that the flood-carrying capacity is not I (e) Review and verify the actual location and elevation of the lowest floor of all structures covered under this Part. Supplement No. 17 30-507 '"+ ZONING REGULATIONS Sec. 30.975 Warning and diaclaimer of liability. The degree of flood protection required by "FP-l Flood-Prone Classifica- tion" is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on scientific and engineering considerations. Larger floods can and will occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes. These provisions do not imply that land outside the areas of special flood hazard or uses permitted within such areas will be free from flooding or flood damages. These provisions shall not create liability on the part of Seminole County or by any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on these provisions or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. (S 21, Ord. No. 81-59, 9-1-81; S 19, Ord. No. 88-10, 9-13-88; S 5.795, LOC, through Supp 16). Sees. 30.976 - 30.980 Reserved. Supplement No. 17 , 30-509 [The next page is 30-521J 5 \'\ \ " Seminate County Chapter 30 ZONING REGULATIONS PART 52 W-1 WETLANDS OVERLAY ZONING CLASSIFICATION Sec. 30.981 Creation. In addition to, and supplemental to, all Seminole county Zoning require- ments heretofore and hereafter established by designated zoning categories and classifications, there is hereby created an overlay zoning classification known as the "Wetlands Overlay Zoning Classification" (W-l) in which all property containing a wetland of one half (~) acre in size or larger, any wetlands with a direct hydrologic connection to a one half (~) acre or larger wetland, and their adjacent areas shall be classified. (S 22, Ord. No. 87-1, 2-10-87; S 5.821, LOC, through Supp 16; Part XVI, S 1, Ord. No. 92-5, 3-30-92). Sec. 30.982 Pu~se. The purpose of this'Part is to protect the wetland functions 'of water quality enhancement, water quality management, climatic stability, wildlife and human'use by: ' (a) Minimizing the disruption of wetland functions by requiring a wetlands approval for development activities proposed within wetlands and their adjacent areas; (b) Considering the impact of development activities on wetlands functions ~hrough the County land development regulation process; (c) Regulating development activities according to'wetland significance with the degree of protection afforded a wetland being in direct relationship to the significance of a wetland; (d) Using performance standards as the basis for minimizing the impact of development activities on wetland functions; (e) Providing for the multiple use of wetlands for compatible development activities which do not d~srupt wetland functions; and (f) Providing for development flexibility through the availability of mitigation/compensation measures where more beneficial environmental results can be achieved. (S 22, Ord. No. 87-1, 2-10-87; S 5.822, LOC, through Supp 16). Sec. 30.983 Reserved. Sec. 30.984 Wetlands approval required. Prior to the commencement of any development activity, wetlands approvals shall be issued in the form of performance standards to be complied with as part of development order or development permit approval. It shall be unlawful for any person to undertake a development activity within a wetland or adjacent area Supplement No. 17 30-521 ~ LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE or to develop, change, modify or alter wetlands or adjacent areas except in accordance with the provisions of this Part. (S 22, Ord. No. 87-1, 2-10-87; S 5.824, LDC, through Supp 16). Sec. 30.985 Applicatio~ procedures and submittal requirements. (a) wetlands approval concurrent with Development Order and Development Permit Applications. (1) Applications for Land Use Amendments, Rezonings, Special Exceptions, Variances and Developments of Regional Impact. Concurrent with the review of these 'applications, the Development Review Division shall consider the impacts of the proposed use on wetland functions, the ability of the parcel to support the proposed use without disrupting wetland functi,ons and the ability to meet performance standards. Co~ceptual approval may be provided by the Development Review Division concurrent with the approval of Development of Regional Impact. The conceptual approval shall be binding as long as the related development order is valid and shall indicate the following: (A) wetland areas to be preserved, altered, or, areas to be enhanced through the creation of wetlands; (B) development activities within wetlands and the adjacent area which are permitted subject to compliance with performanc~ standards; and (C) conditions for the use of wetlands for surface water management and recreation. (2) Applications for PUDs, Plats, Site Plans, Borrow Pit, Arbor, and Dredge and Fill Permits: Concurrent with the review and approval of the following Development Orders and Permits applications, the Development Review Division shall issue a wetlands approval for development activities that are compatible or compatible subject to compliance with performance standards: Planned Unit Developments Subdivision Final Plats Site Plans Borrow Pit Permit Arbor Permit Dredge and Fill Permit Supplement No. 17 30-522 - , . . . II cL ZONING REGULATIONS (3) Applications for Building Permits: Concurrent with the review and approval of a Building Permit, the Current Pla~ning Division will review the application, and based upon best available information, determine if the provisions of this Part apply. A wetlands approval will be required for all Building Permits within a wetland or an adjacent area. Building sites located within an approved plat or' site plan for which a wetlands approval has been issued shall not require a separate wetlands approval but shall comply with the conditions set forth in the previously issued approval. (5 22, Ord. No. 87-1, 2-10-87; 5 20, Ord. No. 88-10, 9-13-88; S 5.825, LDC, through Supp 16). Sec. 30.986 Conditions of a wetlands approval. ) (a) Development Activity Compatibility. Prior to the issuance of a wetlands approval the Development Review Division shall determine in accordance with the Planning Guidelines for Natural Resources that the proposed development activity is: Compatible, therefore a wetlands approval is to be issued and compliance with performance standards as set forth in the approval are encouraged; or / Compatible subject to compliance with the performance stan- dards set forth in the wetlands approval; or Incompatible, therefore a wetlands approval may not be issued by the Development Review Division. (b) Compliance with Performance standards. Concurrent with the issuance of a wetlands approval, the Development Review Division shall provide the applicant with a list of performance standards. For the purpose of this Part, the Development Review Division shall use the performance standards found in the Planning Guidelines for Natural Resources. alternative Department. maintaining For the purpose of maintaining effective performance standards, and innovative techniques are encouraged if approved by the Performance standards are to be monitored for effectiveness in wetland functions and periodically updated. (c) Mitigation/Compensation. :-- Where site conditions preclude the use of performance standards and where opportunities exist to enhance wetland or environmental benefits, the Oevelopment Review Division may recommend mitigation/compensation on a site opecific basis. .y.,.... " . ~ Supplement No. 17 30-523 ...- I ~ "~ I I - LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (d) Effective Period of Approval. (1) The wetlands approval shall be valid as long as the related Development Order is effective. (2) A wetlands approval may be reasonably extended by the Board of County Commissioners in order to permit the applicant to receive State agency permits related to an approved Development Order; (S 22, Ord. No. 87-1, 2-10-87; S 5.826, LDC, through Supp 16). Sec. 30.987 Factors to be considered in identifying wetland types, significance, and development activity compatibility. (a) Verification of Wetland Type: Upon receipt of the required Development Permit Application submittals, final verification of wetland type shall be made by the Department. The Department shall classify wetlands into one or more of the following categories for the purpose of determining development activity compatibility and performance standards: Deep Marsh Mixed Hardwood Swamp Cypress Wetlands .' Bayhead Hydric Hammock Shallow Marsh Wet Prairie (b) Verification of Wetland and Adjacent Area Boundaries: 1,- Verification of wetland, boundaries shall be based on existing hydrology, soils, and vegetative characteristics and the procedures and information as defined in the Planning Guidelines for Natural Resources. (c) Verification of Wetland Significance: For purposes of determining wetland significance, the Development Review Division shall use the following wetland significance criteria: Size (the geographic size of the wetland) Connectedness (the extent of hydrologic connection to a major wetland or aquatic system). Supplement No. 17 30-524 ... I I LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Seminole County Wetlands Maps I I Additional sources of information as determined by the Depart- ment. (f) Bonding Requirements: -, As a condition for granting any wetlands approval related to a development activity 'in a wetland' or adjacent area, as defined in this Part, the Board of County Commissioners may require the posting of a surety bond, escrow, or other means of financial guarantee that the applicant correct any deleterious effects on wetlands or adjacent areas as 'a result of non-compliance with the conditions ofa wetlands approval. No bonding requirement shall preclude the County from pursuing,' another means of enforcement. (S 22, Ord. No. 87-1, 2-10-87; S 5.827, LDC, through Supp 16). Sec. 30.988 Inspections and enforcement. 1- Development activities in wetlands or the adjacent area, shall be carried out with strict adherence to the conditions of approval in the Development Order and/or wetlands approval. A final inspection shall be made by the Development Review Division and a'determination made'as to the adequacy of the development in meeting these conditions. (S22, Ord. No. 87-1,' 2-10-87; S 5.828, LDC, through Supp 16). ' Sec. 30.989 Denial;' suspension, 'or revocation of approval. r The Development Review Division may, at its own discretion; refuse to issue or renew, suspend, or revoke any wetlands approval on the following grounds: (a) Material misstatement in the application for approval. (b) Willful disregard or violation of any of the provisions of this Part. (c) Willful disregard or violation of any condition or conditions imposed upon any approval granted. ' (d) Negligence on the part of the applicant, his contractor or subcontractor in the performance of any development activities permitted in or adjacent to wetlands. (e) Any other grounds which shall, in the sound discretion of the Board and/or Development Review Division, constitute a threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens and inhabitants of the County. , ' ,- If the approval is revoked, the applicant shall return any wetlands altered under the permit to its original conditions prior to such activity. _ (S 22, Ord. No. 87-1, 2-10-87; S 5.829,LDC, through Supp 16). . Supplement No. 17 30-526 ..... I I ZONING REGULATIONS Sec. 30.990 Appeals. .. Where any person shall be aggrieved by a decision of the Development Review Division made pursuant hereto, said aggrieved person, may within fifteen (15) days from the date of the disputed decision, appeal said decision to the Board of County Commissioners by filing a notice of appeal with the Development Review Division. Review by the Board of County Commissioners shall be de novo. (5 22, Ord.No. 87-1, 2-10-87; S 5.830, LDC, through Supp 16). Sec. 30.991 Exemptions. (a) Subdivision plats and site plans, or phases or portions thereof, approved subsequent to June 24, 1980 and prior to the effective date of this Part are exempted from the provisions of this Part. J -~, (b) For the purpose of this section, approved subdivision plats are those plats that have received preliminary plat approval by the Board of County Commissioners. (c) For the purpose of this section, approved site plans are those plans that have been authorized, by the Current Planning Division, to proceed with site permit and building permit approvals. (S 22, Ord. No. 87-1, 2-10-87; S 5.831,'LDC, through supp 16). Sees. 30.992 - 30.1000 Reserved. /" Supplement No. 17 30-527 [The next page is 30-541) - = MET R 0 seA N PRO PER T Y PRO FILE = Semino~e (FL) ******************************************~.********************************************* * * * ===================== * * OWNERSHIP INFORMATION * * --------------------- --------------------- * * * * Parcel Number Building Number Owner CoOwner Site Address Mail Address Phone :34 20 30 5AW 0000 0030 S:34 T:20S R:30E * * * * :Chowanski Marie 0 * * * * :*No Site Address* Winter Springs :625 Marni Dr Winter Springs Fl 32708 :Owner: Tenant: * * * * * * * * * * SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * * -------------------------- -------------------------- * * * * Transferred Document # Sale Price Deed Type % Owned :06/09/1999 :3665-1879 :$50,000 :Warranty :100 Loan Amount Lender Loan Type Interest Rate Vesting Type :$40,000 :Isss : Private : Fixed * * * * ------------------------------ ------------------------------ * * * * * * * * * * * * * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION ------------------------------ ------------------------------ * Land Structure Other Total CurrTotal :$78,788 Exempt Amount Exempt Type % Improved Tax District 1998 Taxes * * * * * * :$78,788 :$78,788 :W1 :$1,515.16 * * * * * * * * * * * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * -------------------- -------------------- * * * Census MLS Grid Bldg Use Land Use Plat Sub/Plat Sub Number Legal :Tract: :Be11 Block: * * * * * :40 Vacant, Industrial :5 Book Page :9 :Entzminger Farms Add No 2 : SAW :LOT 3 & W 50 FT OF LOT 4 ENTZMINGER :FARMS ADD NO 2 PB 5 PG 9 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Profile-Page 1 of 3 * **************************************************************************************** The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. =METROSCAN PROPERTY Semino~e (FL) PROFILE= **************************************************************************************** * Parcel:34 20 30 SAW 0000 0030 Bldg No: * * * * * * * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * * ------------------------ ------------------------ * * * * * * Bathrooms * Fixtures .. CntlHeatAC .. FloorCover .. Flr System .. Wall Matl .. WallHeight .. Roof Shape * Roof Matl .. Elec Svc Year Built Totl Base SF: Heated SF Total SF Stories Foundation Frame Type Deck Patio Interior Lot Acres Lot SqFt LotFrntFt Lot Dimen Garage Garage SF Pool Pool SF Spa :7.80 :339,768 * .. * * * * * * * .. Area Description Area SF Extra Feature XFeature SF * * * .. .. * * 1 * 2 * 3 .. 4 .. 5 .. 6 * 7 * 8 1 2 3 4 5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * .. * * * * * * Profile-Page 2 of 3 * **************************************************************************************** II,A:;' ~!\:. I'!" 'it.. :C\i:Y~', P'~!i.i'~i' - ~ ~!~1ll.." "'I <\1. ~. >I. \. ~ It ,',," "f.I,. t / ~.". The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. Transfer History Property ID: 34 20 30 SAW 0000 0030 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Buyer Chowanski Marie D Price S50,000 CoOwner Xfered 06/09/1999 Title Doc n 3665-1879 Lender Isss Deed Warranty Loan Private Vest LoanS $40,000 %Owned 100 Rate Fixed S/SqFt 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Buyer CoOwner Title Lender Loan Loan$ Rate Korman Gerald Trustee Price Xfered Doc # Deed Vest %Owned $/SqFt S90,000 03/01/1984 1532-1679 100 0.00 t1 - - .. . - I I I The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. Seminole County Property Appraiser Database Information Page I of2 /0'::,' ~~~, \\l9'1j~ s~, ~/ ~~~:i''' SEMINOLE COUNTY APPRAISAL DATA Assessed values shown are NOT certified values and therefore are subject to change before being finalized for ad valorem tax purposes. - I Parcel Id 1/34-20-30-5A W-0000-0030 Tax DistrictIIWI-WINTER SPRINGS I I Owner "CHOW ANSKI MARIE D Dor 1140- V AC INDUSTRIAL I GENER I Address liP 0 BOX 196565 City,State,ZipCode IWINTER SPRINGS FL Exemptions - 32719 I Property Address I - - I V ALUE SUMMARY I I Value Method II Market I I Number of Buildings 1[3 I Depreciated B1dg Value I~ I Depreciated EXFT Value 1L3 I Land Value (Market) II $78,788 I I Land Value Ag I~ I JustlMarket Value " $78,788 I I Assessed Value (SOH) II $78,788 I I Exempt Value 1L3 I Taxable Value II $78,788 I r - ht...Ishow yarcels?SEC=34&TWN=20&RNG=30&SUB=5aw&BLOCK =0000&LOT=003 02/24/2000