The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005 05 23 Public Hearing Item 403 EXEMPTION, Development Greenspointe Subdivision CITY COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM 403 CONSENT INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING X REGULAR May 23, 2005 Meeting Jff r MGR. IDEPT 1',-1 Authorization REQUEST: The Community Development Department recommends the City Commission hear the request for a waiver from the building setback requirements of Section 6-86 of the City Code of Ordinances, by way of Subsection 20-354 (d) (7), to allow a builder to construct 8 homes, consistent with the existing development in the Greenspointe subdivision, within the Highlands PUD . PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to consider a waiver request by Julian Demorra from the requirements of section 6-86 of the City Code of Ordinances to allow a builder to complete 8 lots of the Greenspointe subdivision, within The Highlands PUD, consistent with the existing principal building setbacks in that subdivision. The waiver request affects lots 1, 8, 13,67, 72, 82, 101, and 102, none of which has a dwelling on it. APPLICABLE CODE: Sec. 6-86. Minimum setback requirements within PUD zoning districts. Sec. 2-354. Site Development Standards [for PUDs]. CHRONOLOGY: July 12,2004 - City Commission adopts Ordinance No. 2004-31, establishing minimum building setbacks within PUDs. March 16,2005 - City receives application package from Julian Demorra. April 7, 2005 - BOA recommends the waiver be approved. April 18, 2005 - P&Z recommends the waiver be approved. May 9,2005 - City Commission deferred a decision on the item to May 23,2005 May 23, 2005 Public Hearing Item 403 Page 2 FINDINGS: 1) The Greenspointe subdivision plat was recorded December 15, 1983, with 116 lots on 23.179 acres. 2) The applicant states that the proposed waiver request would make the homes on these 8 un-built lots consistent with the setbacks on a majority of the built lots in that subdivision. He states that the setback provisions of Subsection 6-86 would force him to build in a manner that would be inconsistent and incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood, as the new houses would not align with the existing residences. 3) The applicant states that each of the 8 new houses would have at least a 3 foot minimum side yard setback, a minimum 10 foot front and rear setback, except that lot 102 is proposed with a 5 foot front yard setback (about 13 feet from the curb) on one side and approximately 2.43 feet on the south side (for about 5 feet near the rear of the house). 4) There are no building setbacks depicted on the Greenspointe final subdivision plat, recorded in Plat Book 29, Pages 24-26, December 15, 1983. 5) The Greenspointe Homeowners' Association hierarchy has investigated the locations of various homes on the lots and has stated that it believes the applicant's request is consistent with the existing development within Greenspointe - and therefore supports the applicant's request. 6) The applicant has provided a list of signatures of persons purported to live near lots 101 and 102 who state their support for the waiver request. 7) Residents voiced concern about drainage at both the BOA and P&Z meetings; past Highlands HOA President Helga Schwarz voiced concern that the request had not been presented to the Highlands HOA; and one e-mail was received from Andrew Koberlein (643 Nighthawk Circle), stating that he opposes ".. . any changes that do not promote a minimum clearance of 10 feet between structures..." 8) Records of 11 homes built within the last 15 years have been examined for the existing building setbacks. The results are provided in the attachment "J". Single family residential building plans must be kept by the local government for 15 years, after which they are destroyed. 9) The waiver request must conform to all six of the waiver criteria set forth in Section 20-34 of the City's Code of Ordinances. 10) Staff believes that given the size of the lots, the existing development with no specified primary building setbacks, and only 8 remaining vacant lots, that the primary building setbacks set forth in Section 6-86 of the City Code for zero lot line development within a planned unit development would create an illogical, impractical, and/or patently unreasonable result. 11) Staff believes that the proposed development plan supported by staff(10' front and rear setbacks, 3' side setbacks, except for as little as 2.43' for about 5' on the south side of Lot 102) is in substantial compliance with Chapter 20 of the City Code and with the Comprehensive Plan. 12) Staff believes that the proposed development plan supported by staff will significantly enhance the real property. 13) Staff believes that the proposed development plan supported by staff serves the public health, safety, and welfare. May 23,2005 Public Hearing Item 403 Page 3 14) 16) Staff believes that the proposed development plan supported by staffwill not diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood. Staff believes that the proposed development plan supported by staff is the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the application of Section 6-86 by way of Subsection 20-354 (d) (7). Staff believes that the proposed development plan supported by staff is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, as evidenced by the support of the Greeenspointe Homeowners' Association. 15) BOA RECOMMENDATION: At its regularly scheduled meeting of April 7, 2005, the Board of Adjustment voted to recommend the waiver be approved to allow 10 foot front and rear building setbacks and 3 foot side building setbacks, with as little as 2.43 feet for an approximately 5 foot long section toward the rear of the south side of the house to be built on lot 102. P& Z RECOMMENDATION: At a special April 18, 2005, Planning and Zoning Board meeting, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended the waiver be approved to allow 10 foot front and rear building setbacks and 3 foot side building setbacks, with as little as 2.43 feet for an approximately 5 foot long section toward the rear of the south side of the house to be built on lot 102. RECOMMENDATION: The BOA, P&Z, and staff recommend approval of the waiver to allow a 10 foot front and rear yard building setback, a 3 foot side building setback on each side of the building, with as little as 2.43 feet for an approximately 5 foot long portion of the south side (toward the rear of the house) for lot 102. The waiver request applies to lots 1, 8, 13, 67, 72, 82, 101, and 102. ATTACHMENTS: A - Location Map B - Application C - Construction plans for Hawks Landing (now Greenspointe) D - Other correspondence E - Proposed Plot Plan for lot 102 F - Section 6-86 & Subsection 20-354 (d) (7) G - Waiver criteria H - Draft BOA Minutes I - P &Z Minutes J - Greenspointe Setbacks Table CITY COMMISSION ACTION: G " ' c a) A~ 7 _ Municipal ~ddresS Map Book ~: ~eo: oct 2003 1 ,_ - z ,- City of Winter Springs, FL -= -~ ~ t~:- 240! Dove\OpedBr- SOl&~S~" ~ 0 1 2 NOTES: = 1/ <vi ""rJ,.. "~ ~"~ ,. = ,. ,. . , , , , "', ", ..--w-~--">"-'~"---'~-"'-'-'-"-- -- --- GREEENSPOINTE- 2002 AERIAL ~ N >"f' ~I ~ ~r(,) 'Ii" T'- ATTACHMENT B U~)~l--~s CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS I 0 ~ r p 2.1f- z '7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1126 STATE ROAD 434 REC WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708 407-327-5967 FAX:407-327-6695 Cl ~,!f!f"::." D' M 't;';~' b',,~<'lf 1., CITY OF WH~ITR Spr,INGS PerTmttlng - Dagmane BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION lID WAIVER o VARIANCE o CONDITIONAL USE I SPECIAL EXCEPTION o APPEAL OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION APPLICANT: JULIAN DEMORRA Middle KEY REALTY DEVELOPMENT First MAILING ADDRESS: 2845 ENTERPRISE ROAD DEBARY, FLRODIA 32718 City PHONE: (407) 538-1465 State Zip Code If Applicant does NOT own the property: PROPERTY OWNER: DEMORRA Last JULIAN First Middle PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: SAME AS ABOVE City Zip Code State This request is for the property described below: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 633 & 635 NIGHTHAWK CIRCLE, WINTER SPRINGS 32708- LOT # 101, lot 102 and 6 additional lots see ~ached. ().. . r:J TAX PARCEL NUMBER: V/Jtf/~~ ~ t2zr~ ~r~ SIZE OF PARCEL: tJ?tA'/ tv, 'P4n,.eeC- OI""'?~A'O"/~ Acres Current FUTURE LAND USE Classification: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Current ZONING Classification: PUD Please state YOUR REQUEST: Greenspointe Sub-Division was approved m~~._tIDe~185** "ISC restriction showed zero lot lines. I have built many homes on the lots I owne~[~Gli RECEIPTS completing the last few lots I have. Your PUD ordinance creates a hardship aJH1lI1akd'iitimpossi~I'ifSI6!!S 16:89 . Payent: $588. VII Receip.t It. : 889295 ChecklCredit Card It: 7672 . Clerk : ddubolS Paid By : KEY REALTY & DEVELO p April 30, 2004 WAIVER REQUEST A waiver requires compliance with all six (6) criteria outlined in Code Section 20-34: Address each of the following conditions related to the variance request. Attach additional paper as necessary: o What is the Waiver you are requesting? Exception from the recently enacted PUD ordinance related to set backs for zero lot lines o Is the proposed development plan in substantial compliance with Chapter 20 of the City's Code of Ordinances and in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan? This sub-division was aranted riahts to build over 20 years aao with "no" set back requirements in place except restrictions imposed by the deed restrictions. Over 90% of the lots have been built under these conditions. The comprehensive plan currently calls for medium density residential in the Hiahlands sub-division of which Greenspointe pertains to. o Will the proposed development plan significantly enhance the real property? It enhances the property in that it completes the area where the lots are now next to built homes. I am sure the neiahbors would be happy to see a home rather than en empty lot next to them. It sure increases propertv values for all o Will the proposed development plan serve the public health, safety, and welfare of the City of Winter Springs? It meets the requirements. " ' o Will the )Naiver diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood? It increases property value. A survey of current property values in Greenspoint shows an exponential increase the values of the homes. o Is the waiver request the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unreasonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under this chapter? Yes. 5 January 26, 2005 o Is the proposed development plan compatible with the surrounding neighborhood? Yes. Please bear in mind that 90% of the homes built in Greenspoint have less than 10' front set back and no rear set back requirements. The homes all alian beautifully. Chanaina the chararcted to meet the PUD set back not only chanaes the current look of the community but creates a hardship since all of my plans are the same. the lots are small and narrow. '", ' 6 January 26, 2005 j J ;:r_~1"O\~v.:fi~:!Ie.? 'i"f\I.lu""~""~ \\'(, ATTACHMENT C ~~ "" .... "oli< fIJ ~ ~ P-4 ~ ....' E-t o ~ E-t rn ~ o , '" ~ .,.~ ....J " ~ /} .0 ~ \ rJ' .' . . '.' ".' , . a ...'.... . ~ .CC '..' "'" ... ~ o r.. '~..", ' ' '. ' b. "~ ~ =c / ~ I 1\" ~ \, m' ~. ~,.;, ,. . -'. .,~ ~, 'Iii" )Ji!!IiI' ..- J!lIil .,~.. ~.'tiiiI' .....'""-"1. . . J!!iIIIIt .~.,:. > .., "., " ; ~ ,m .~ 1:' '~ -= :~ ~.{IJ. ~ r;;ii;' ... r:... ~. 2 . lC \.: ~~. ) ~ It q; :l!, ~ i::: q; \J l:::I --l o' ! Ii ::> o g ;\ ",' ...: ...= i~ ~. o o ii! Ii w > Q , ! ; ;1""'-::- -- r;c, . ' -\" ~ ~ J 1- < ! l-\J' !~\~ ~E~ ~lQ .. .l~, 01'. ~ . · .'~ ,:I~ S ~' ,:\~:~ :!\~\Q i'",:n W\!:t . \~l~ ~\ .~'tt.t~ ~;DI l~~~ ~ ~~ :\~:~ ~tffi - ~iz L ~ ~ _,~'z<al-'. = III ~ l i \ ~ \ z ;<q liJ ~ I ;; ! j I ~ ; :: II ~ .1 Lot ~ z C'~ ~'~ ~: ,~ :~~\.\~ o\~:;I\ij\e~I.'~i~' > 0~~ ~ ~ j~Q 0'. ~ i =, , ,8: ~ ! i1 ~ g i .. " ~ : ~} \ i1 ~ I ~" ! '" . l "1 - r:dIJI ,.....l...~1 .' ,J. " " 'J "".. ,~, ~ 1-" " ..... ,-" ..... .., . ." ,; t:l ~. ; ~ ~.~ i, ~: ~_,' ~ i ~ ~ ~r;r -i';r 'f,,,,:il, ~ lil ~. !iI . ~ g .. " " Ii ~ll!~~ ~:::~~~~~~~li~~~~~ ~~G:~g;;~~lip~~~~~.~~~~ ~~~ ~.q~&: ~~~~~~l:!i!~~~::=!~~Il1~~~~~~~~. ~~~~r.: :z,~ ~ ~l!lR~~;:~; ~~t;~~~ <PI ~~...;::;;~~ lijq;Eii ~=~; llJ=~ ~ ~NlCI ~;::;tlsrn~~;t!:o::~~'i!i8l~m~:ll.!::ll3;;; ~ ~p:Sl:ll'4 f ~~~ ~;~~: 1 ~~i~~~;~~ :~~5~':::~~:~~;:;~~~;;'~~~~~~~;~~~~;~~~~~~~;~:;;~~;~~';~ ~~;,~ ;~~~;~~ ~;~~;::: ::;5~ ;~~::2;~ ~;~ ;~; ~ ~ ~~~~;~rl;;;:~~:~~;:~~:;~~~~~~~;~: g 8 kill k ~ g 8 ~ 2 8 8 8 ~:: 88!K; ~~ ill ~ k 8 8 ~ 8 8 ~ jq r.. ~ ~ bt ~ ~ ~!ri ~ g 8 S i;; 888 g ~~ iI ~~ 888888 g,!1; 8 a~ ~ 8 88!!:::2 S ???~~~?R~~~~~;??~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~?~~f~~~~~~~??~~~~~~~~~~8~MR~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ :2:S'~ ~:;:;~~:::flllCl:~~~:lt~:t ~:;;1e8~ =i:JlaIU:!;~t::~ ~dl~J2 ~;:; ;;;l3~l!lllf~.;;18~lelill~ ;i8it:;bi3 Klb;!;!:,.[;;;hb!~HlI ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~. ~~ ~ ~~ ~~"" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 8 ~ ~.~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ;;;::l g $I ~ $l~ ~ ;;<;jR ~ Ii 51 i ~~~ <:i'~; 1II RS! $~i51 Sl.... -. 2;! R $ Ii 51 Ii til fiil51 ~ 5{ 51 fiiI!i1 ~ ~ lq i~~ i i~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ i,5tS: ~ lillill4J ~~ 2" - ! "-- .. - -~ 1 ..... N "'... 'Ol.....o!::::~;! ~~::: ~ ~:;:: ~ ~;~~ ~::::;~!iI Mill::: ~ ';q *;:, llll!! ~:; ~ ~::J ~:: ~ ~: S:Ii ~:;:;:!; ~ ~:;; ~ m Sri;,::; ~ r;;$ g;:::.~ ~J!:!;e::::~ r:"S ~ z ---- ~ . ~:~ ~~~ . .. ",~ ~ ---- ~ ~ ~ :::! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ , Sl '- ~ il ~ ~t ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~& IIHtlolIillillOO' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "'\l~it'<<l d~~~h ~ ~~~t:I~~1l '" ~~a~g~~ ~ ~~~~~~~ 'tCfi{IdCiI.t:::) ., ! i. ~ II." ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~. ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ' ~h ~ li1 ~~.~ ~ ~ ~., ~ ~ ~ ~p ,,~ q ~. h ~~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ n~~ i ~ ~~~ ~ ~ .~~~ ~ " ~...~ ~ · ~ n ~ Sl.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .' Q " ~ I~~i~l ~~~ ~ ~ I ~~~.~~ ~I~'~ I I ~~.I~I ~I!~I ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ,>,.~ ~ . '~~.'~ {~,.~ ~ ~ ~'~~.~fQ, '9'.~~ ~. ~'( ~.~~.,~'''~ ~~~, ~,~ ~3'~~ ~~ ~"~~~' ~ ,.~ Jg~ ~~~'.~~~~~~'~. ~~ 1:1~;t~~~~II~i~. ~~~~"S)"~)~~~~~~ ~ ':::l~...,lII~t:')G~ b,,~tl}';tt W !j~....;lt~""~I::~~~;lt~la~~!l:: Q ~~~~~~~~"Q~~~~Q~~ .. ~,d H q ~ ~ q .'Ii ~ h .~ !II ~ ~ ~ ' IJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \J ... Oi ~ I ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ i!~ ~.,'''''~,~!o~ ~ ~~a~~~~~~~~~"~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ <l i ~ ~ 'l: ~ ~ i:\ ~ <:i( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .:. ~ .. >- ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'q "" ~ll~C,~~ ~ ~ '\ ~ ~ '-' ~~t~~~~ ~~~~~~u ~~~~~~~ @@@(!)@@€1 .. ~ ~i .~ . ~ .~ ~ i 1 ~ ' . ~ ~ t I i i i .. W Q Cl i <I( g z ... ;c a: Cl Q Z 011 is Cl z Z :; c( : ...I I Z (f) <I( ~ t. ~ iii c( " z a: :J: ;,i w ... l- /O Ul '" <I( III :I .. .z i (.) !i ti I( :l ' ~ 8 !~ w f i a Q ~ e :, z.o <I(.il ~ hi !l ~ g- ! .... e z -I :l ~ fi I, w :oj .... Q 'I~ Q , ii: '" .' w :lJ > p Q ~lJ r Uu ~ ~ II tiu'~~~: ~~~~~~I . Wi ~ ~ ~ 1i ~ ~ ~ ; ~j ~~~~ ~~ ~~~: ~~~~ I ~ l! ~ ~ ~ ' ~~,t !Ii ~~~~ R ..<l "l ATTACHMENTD 9rw April 6, 2005 ReceIVED APR 0 7 Board of Adjustment, , City of Winter Springs, City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708 CITY OF WIN! ,"i'( Sr'f<INGS Current Plannlll[j AND Re: Waiver on proposed construction of new homes on the remaining eight undeveloped lots in Greenspointe, Winter Springs Commissioners, City of Winter Springs, City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708 Dear Members: The Architectural Control Committee of the Greenspointe Homeowners Association continues to encourage Mr. Julian Demora / Key Realty Development to build quality homes in Greenspointe and it is in our community's best interest to have Greenspointe totally built out. Those homes, however, must continue to be in harmony with the current one hundred eight homes in our development and any proposed homes must be constructed in accordance with applicable sections of our DECLARATION OF COVENANTS. RESTRICTIONS AND AGREEMENT OF MAINTENANCE . (Sections 12 through 17 of our DECLARATION. which specifically address Greenspointe's home construction requirements, are attached for your information a.nd review). The members of the Greenspointe Architectural Control Committee met on April 2, 2005, for the following purposes: (1) to view undeveloped Greenspointe lots 101 and 102 where two homes are proposed to be built in the near future (and on which lots Mr. Demora is requesting a waiver of Chapter 6, Article III, Sec. 6-86 of Winter Springs' BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS); (2) to review the location of the remaining six (6) undeveloped lots on the Plat of Greenspointe (and on which Mr. Demora is also requesting a waiver of Sec. 6-86 of the city BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS to build homes some time in the future); (3) to review Mr. Demora's Plot Plans for his proposed home construction on lots 101 and 102; and (4) to develop the Architectural Control Committee's recommendations to the Winter Springs Board of Adjustment and to the city Commissioners on future home construction in Greenspointe. Sections 12 through 17 of tbe GREENSPOINTE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Inc., DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS andAGREEMENT OF MAINTENANCE 12. RESIDENTIAL USE ONLY. No lot shall be used except for single family residential purposes. No building shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain on any lot other than one single family dwelling not to exceed two (2) stories in height and a private garage for not more than three (3) cars. 13. ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE. The Architectural Control Committee shall be composed of three (3) members of the Board of Directors of the GREENSPOINTE Homeowners' Association, Inc., (a Florida corporation not for profit), or three (3) persons appointed by the Board of Directors of said corporation not for profit who shall not necessarily be members of the Board of Directors. In the event of death of, or resignation of any member of the committee, the Board of Directors shall designate a successor within sixty (60) days from the date of said death or resignation. 14. PLAN APPROVAL. No building or construction of any nature shall be erected, placed or altered on any lot until the construction plans and specifications and a plan showing the location of the structure have been approved by the Architectural Control Committee as to quality of workmanship and materials, harmony of external design and external colors with existing structures, and as to location with respect to topography and finish grade elevation. The approval of the llighlands Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board is also required. 15. TIME FOR APPROVAL. The committees approval or disapproval as required in these covenants shall be in writing. In the event that the committee or its designated representative fails to approve or disapprove within thirty (30) days after plans and specifications have been submitted to it, or in the event if no suit to enjoin the construction has been commenced prior to the completion thereof, approval will not be required and the related covenants shall be deemed to have been fully complied with. 16. SQUARE FOOTAGE. No principal residence shall be erected unless the square footage area thereof, exclusive of screened porches, garages and storage rooms, shall equal or exceed one thousand four hundred (1,400) square feet; provided, however, that two-story homes need only have seven hundred (700) square feet on the ground floor. 17. TEMPORARY RESIDENCES. No structure of a temporary character, trailer, boat, motor home, tent, shack, garage, barn or other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence or appendage to such residence, either temporarily or permanently. The Committee reconvened on April 6 (following Julian Demora's provision of revised plot plans for the proposed homes on Greenspointe lots 101 and 102 to the Committee) to further discuss his proposed construction of homes on Greenspointe's eight undeveloped lots. Since Mr. Demora is applying for a City of Winter Springs waiver to build homes on Greenspointe's eight undeveloped lots with "a minimum three (3-0) foot side set- back" and "a minimum ten (10-0) foot front set-back" and "a minimum ten (10) foot back set-back" for the proposed homes (with the exception of the home on lot 102), the Greenspointe Architectural Control Committee unanimously agrees those set- back measurements are in harmony with existing homes in Greenspointe. Our Committee, therefore, recommends the approval of the waiver for those requested side, front and rear set-backs for all future homes to be built in Greenspointe by Key Realty (with the exception oflot 102.) Following review of the revised plot plan dated April 5, 2005, for the proposed home on lot 102, the Architectural Control Committee recommends approval of that plot plan which will require a set-back of only fIVe (5-0) feet from the front property line, ten (10-0) feet from the rear property line and three or more feet set-backs from the side property lines except for the approximately five feet at the rear of the right elevation where the proposed home on lot 102 will be built as shown on the revised plot plan for lot 102. Finally, any proposed construction on Greenspointe "golf course" lots 67,72 and 81, the rear property lines of which abut the Winter Springs golf course, cannot encroach into the twenty-fIVe (25-0) foot golf course buffer zone defmed in the 1983 deed transferring all of Greenspointe property from the owners of the Golf Course. We continue to appreciate the oversight of the City of Winter Springs regarding building codes to ensure quality homes continue to be built in our city. For the Architectural Control Committee: ~r.2&- Enclosure: Sections 12 through 17 of Greenspointe's DECLARATION OF COVENANTS. RESTRICTIONS AND AGREEMENT OF MAINTENANCE Copy: Architectural Review Board, Highlands Homeowners Association . .... _0 build houses on the 8 lots in keeping with the character of the will ~ave a minimum 3' side set-back, a minimum 10' front set-back & ..Urn 10' ijack set-back. hTE-one propbrty, lot# 102 has it's front on an extreme curve--- Therefore it will have 'circular drivew'ay, to accommodate parking & will be set-back 1.2' on the left front edge (approximately 8' from the curb-the right front edge will be set-back 30' (approxitn~tely 3:7' from the curb). The reason for shifting this house forward is to ensure that the back patio does not almost touch the rear neighbor's line. (see attached drawing oflot# 102) ~el<.Jest ;"'j j 14 VIe..-! ure 5 of. h oVlte OWV)er- S I n -f 6. U 0 V- ot lo--+ I 0 l .!- L 0 J I O~, 1f\'''-'\ 0 '" 't tJ; 3 k ~ ~ ,,1,J k C; >;d ~ (!0-{1) 4 cluj&- roSY)Ji7hih4ttlf &Rd. ~ ~ 9>7 s'j>l'>CltJbl LL (~ M~ l'\ S () \.A-{ Sly"; '2...' f <Q)~ ' \\-"~sl~ Sro ~~ h \l c*- c..\O 1 - d... ((, <- ~ 0';; ') Z- LQ) \..'V\ef Sfc IN ~ oS' \1 ~Ce.., <-\01 --7 <j~", 5b01 - ~ ~ 1 ~ r ~ (g,J)~ k, O)J~/V -L I D~ ~~&~./ . 5o(p ~.noof\bdl --C~.' ,()l t!>-~ ;:},,;, ~~- '.\ \ - 0- .)O(p'j.. \0l~~\r1V\~S ~ , . />'~ '3d-.iO'6 q?L.~ LV07- (;, 7',5~/O SO-c, -~'--.... G Yo /l/I(S-#.7'~t/~ cZ, WI/l/~ CK- -5'>/,e:./~ D- SJ /~_ '3 :z -?o <3 -.. _ . Page 1 of 1 John Baker From: Sent: To: Andrew Koberlein [kobera@iag.net] Monday, April 18, 20056:35 PM John Baker Subject: In reference to hearing Julian Demorra Code Waiver Request. I oppose any changes that do not promote a minimum clearance of 10Ft between structures going forward. Andrew Kober1ein 407-741-9109 643 NightHawk Circle Winter Springs FI. 32708 4/18/2005 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA . 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799 Telephone (407) 327-1800 Community Development Oept. Planning Division April 22, 2005 RE: Public Hearing - Julian Demorra Code Waiver Request Dear Property Owner: - The city of Winter Springs invites you toartend a public hearing to discuss a code waiver request by Julian Demorra to construct 8 homes within the Greenspoint subdivision (part of the Highlands Planned Unit Development). The homes are proposed on the following lots: 1, 8, 13,67, 72, 82, 101, and 102. A code revision changed the applicable building setbacks within the subdivision in July of 2004. The applicant states that building the remaining 8 homes with the new setbacks would be inconsistent with the existing development within Greeenspoint. The City Commission public hearing has been rescheduled to 6:30 p.m. on May 9, 2005, at the Winter Springs City Hall, located at 1126 E. State Road 434. If you should require additional information prior to the meetings, do not hesitate to reach me at 407-327-5966. Sincerely, ~, ' (/t:2 ~~ ;;;o~ Baker, AICP Senior Planner .,. ATTACHMENT E II PLOT PLAN" "RFAL PKtJPFH7'Y" DFSCRlP1lON" LOT 102; GREENSPOINTE, ACCORDING' TO' THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED: IN PLAT aool< 29; PAGES 24 lHROUGIt 27 OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. NOT A BOUNDARY SVRVEY .".. . C? r- <P ::c --t ::t: >- =e ::>0:: RE~~m~'E ~t,... j.'o.1;!,\<>, Kf "t)i ., tH: D ~.. APR 0 7 2005 \ P.c.~ ~ . ~\ o . \(' '0\\\\ Olr ~\~ -.1-\0:1. . . ~ ~ -....l u-\ ...... . ,i '~ CITY OF IA" ",I C '.,NTER SPRINGS ' urrent Planning lOT 101 GREENSPQINTE P".B. 29, PGS: 24-27 .s85.':42'.48~W 4&.00 ~ I / ~ :::0 t C'"';) r-- PROPOSED STORY CUNCRETE t- RESiDENCE #631- BLOCK . I F.F. ELE\JAl\ON ... 46.40' / I .~ .. ~ ~ -;. 8 'g ... !,!,. ~ '.~ L01' 102- GREENSPO\NlE P B. ' 29 _ PGS. 24-27 .' ~ 3.67' N85!42' 48."'E 76.94. \ \ \ \' , liON LEGEND: EL. - ELE.V"l1CII COIle. - COIlCRETE "/1: - AIR CClIlIlI11IlNER c.L.r. - ClWlI lJIlI( FENCE 1'iP. - l'lflCAL w.r. - WOQO fDIC€ II.E. - UlIJTf. WlDIEItT C '" G - aJRII .. QJTlER DE. - IIRAINAGE rASiIIENT CATV - CAIII.E ~ AI$f:R F.P.. - f1NIIHED. FUIClR. l&LE - 1BEPMQIlI; RISER as. - IlUIJlIIlO SEnW:IC llWIS - 'I1WIII'llMft]I P.Ml c.as.. - CClNCRE1E. aoac S1R\lC1URE. l.P. - Ulitfl' POlE ~ - PUll P.P. - PCMER PQ.E . _ lEAIUIlED- H.Q. - NA1URAL CR<IUNIl _ CAU:l.ll.AlUl SCl. "- - ~ fUT L:=::l 0.40'- ~ OO.A;=:2 J.. 4' ~'}.:. 9J: "X... : ~. .~ LOT 107 LOT 103- GREENSPOINTE PGS' 24- 27 P.8. 29. . _ A B B REV I A P.lUl. - I'ERMAIiHr RERRQlCE MCNUIolPIT c:.... - COIlCM1lllCllUllEllT P.o.c.. - 1ICllNT. QF. CCIAIf.IICDIENT, P.8.. - P.lAT. BOOIC. P.c. - PClIff f7 CUlY"lURE Pg. - PAGE P.R.c. - PQIlT av 1lE'4IJllIII CIlllV,,1\IlS N.R.. - 1IOIf,-RHllAL.- P.c.c. - PaNT f7 CCIUPClUIIO ClJRVAlURE RAD. - RADIAL P.T. - PClIff. t1F TANGIJlC'(. 11.. - IWlIUS- PJ. - PCltIT OF IH1ERIUmClH L. - ARC LEIlG1H P.CJ'l. - PERIIANDI1'. CCIl1RQ. PDIHT. ~. - CELT". ~ -: ":o~ ~;.. : =r:~y T.a. - TANGlIHT IIARWO ~ - COllER LIIE . \ \ \ \~ (}1 :10 r \-JO 0 ....0 -I N ~ \~ 0 to \ \ --- r o -I .... o ~. w.Y. - WAlER WETER r.H. - FIRE Il'lllfWIT N .. D - IlAIL AND OISC a... - 8DICH IIARIC PWT. - PAVEIlENl' F'" - F\ElJ) lIClCll< II.H. - IlAIIHCI.E ~. - AC1UAL -~ RIO - FOUND REC - RECCMRED SURVE:YOR'$' NO-TES: 1.. NOT VAUD. WITHOUT THE SIGN....TURE AND. ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA UCENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 2; lliE .REAL PROPER:rf. DESCRIPnoN!' SHOWN HEREON- IS IN- ACCORDANCE WlH lHE DESCRIPlION PROW>ED BY lHE CUENT. 3. NO UNDERGROUND.I"PROvaEN~, OR- VISIBlE INSTALLATIONS HAVE BEEN. LOCATED Ol'HER lHAN SHOVttl. 4. BEARINGS. ARE BASED. ON. lliE NORlH. UNE OF SAID. LOr 99. ASSUMED. AS. BEING N. 85''''2'W E. PER PLAT. 5.. HAVING. CONSULTED- lHE. NAlIONAL FLOO!l. INSURAN~ P1iMIUU J:lQU CERnFIED TO: KEY REALTY /Ie DEVELOPMENT SURVEYOR'S CERT/FlCA TE: Tf/IS IS 10 CER11FY mAT mlS SURVEY "'EElS mE IoIlNIMlJaI lECHHICAI. STANDARDS AS SET FORlH BV lHE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS ATTACHMENT F ~ 6-85 WINTER SPRINGS CODE enclosures shall be supplied with all plans show- ing that same comply with wind load and live load requirements of the building code of the city. (c) Setbacks. The screen enclosure shall meet all code requirements for front and side yard setbacks which are applicable to the subject prop- erty. Notwithstanding any other applicable rear setback requirement, the screen enclosure shall not be located any closer than seven (7) feet from the rear property line of the subject property. On lakefront property, no screen enclosure shall be located any closer than twenty-five (25) feet from the shoreline, as determined by the existing or established high-water control level. (d) Height. The screen enclosure shall not be higher than the primary structure on the subject property, except when the principal structure exceeds twelve (12) feet. In which case, the screen enclosure shall be set back an additional two (2) feet from the minimum setback requirements contained in subsection (c) for every additional foot above twelve feet. (e) Easements. Screen enclosures shall not be constructed within an easement area, unless the easement expressly allows said construction. (0 Screen enclosure modifications. If any por- tion of an existing screen enclosure is modified so that it no longer satisfies the definition in subsec- tion (a), the modified screen enclosure shall meet all building setback and height requirements that are applicable to principal and accessory build- ings for the subject property. (Ord. No. 2002-31, ~ 3, 10-28-02) Sec. 6-86. Minimum setback requirements within PUD zoning districts. (a) General. Unless otherwise provided else- where in the City Code or upon a plat of record previously approved by the city commission, the principal building setbacks for property zoned planned unit development (pun) shall be as follows: (1) Front yards. The front yard shall not be less than twenty-five (25) feet in depth; (2) Rear yards. The rear yard shall not be less than ten (10) feet in depth; Supp. No.6 (3) Side yards. The side yard shall not be less than five (5) feet on each side of the dwelling structure; and (4) Corner yards. On corner lots, the front yard set back of twenty-five (25) feet must be maintained, at a minimum, on all sides abutting public rights-of-way. Notwithstanding the minimum setback require- ments of this subsection, zero lot line property shall be governed by subsection (b) below. (b) Zero lot line. Unless otherwise provided elsewhere in the City Code or upon a plat of record previously approved by the city commis- sion, the principal building setbacks for zero lot line property zoned planned unit development (pun) shall be as follows: (1) Front yards. The front yard shall not be less than twenty-five (25) feet in depth; I (2) Rear yards. The rear yard shall not be less than ten h 0) feet in depth; ~ (3) Side yards. The side yard shall not be less than five (5) feet on one (1) side of the dwelling structure; and (4) Corner yards. On corner lots, the front yard set back of twenty-five (25) feet must be maintained, at a minimum, on all sides abutting public rights-of-way. (c) Conflicts. In the event of any conflict be- tween the requirements of this section and any declarations of covenants and restrictions govern- ing site conditions of a pun development within the city, the more restrictive shall apply. In the event of any conflict between the requirements of this section and any recorded development agree- ment approved by the city commission or court approved settlement agreement governing site conditions of a PUD development within the city, the conflicting provision in the development agree- ment or court approved settlement agreement shall prevail. (d) New PUD developments. Nothing con- tained in this section shall be construed as limit- ing the city commission's authority to impose setback requirements greater than the minimum 378.2 ~ 20-354 WINTER SPRINGS CODE (4) The adequacy and proximity of public roads, utilities, services, and facilities re- quired to serve the development. The maximum allowed number of dwell- ing units per gross residential acre and maximum height by type of dwelling unit shall be as follows unless specifically waived by the city commission after re- ceiving recommendations from the plan- ning and zoning board: Type Single-family detached Patio homes Townhouses Garden apart- ments Maximum Units per Gross Resi- dential Acre Maximum Height 2 stories 4.5 7.0 10.0 16.0 2 stories 3 stories 3 stories (c) The applicant shall propose, and the plan- ning and zoning board shall recommend, the maximum allowable floor area ratio for all com- mercial and industrial uses within the PUD to the city commission. The commission may adopt the recommendation or make such changes or amend- ments as it deems proper. (d) The following site development standards shall apply unless waived by the city commission, specifically finding after receiving recommenda- tions from the planning and zoning board, that the unique characteristics of the development in question make unnecessary the application of one (1) or more of these provisions in order to carry out the intent and purpose of the planned unit development district: (1) The natural topography, soils and vegeta- tion shall be preserved and utilized, where possible, through the careful location and design of circulation systems, buildings and structures, parking areas, and open space and recreational areas. Removal of mature trees shall be compensated through the installation oflandscaping materials. (2) Landscaping consisting of trees, shrubs, vines, ground covers, and irrigation facil- ities shall be installed in common areas of residential developments and in special areas of commercial and industrial devel- opments. Special attention should be given to parking areas, refuse storage areas, and in building setback and separation areas to achieve proper screening. (3) Common open space and recreational fa- cilities in accordance with the standards of the National Recreation Association shall be provided to serve the residents of the planned unit development. (4) All land shown on the final development plan as common open space, parks, and recreational facilities shall be protected through deed restrictions which shall en- sure the preservation of its intended use, the payment of future taxes, and the maintenance of areas and facilities for a safe, healthy and attractive living envi- ronment. (5) All common open space and recreational facilities shall be specifically included in the phasing plan, and shall be constructed and fully improved by the developer at an equivalent or greater rate than the con- struction of the residential structures which they serve. (6) The proposed location and arrangement of structures shall not be detrimental to existing or prospective adjacent land uses. Lighting, access points, or high noise level activities which adversely affect abutting property shall be prohibited. (7) Building setbacks from the mean high- water level of any lake, stream or body of water, shall be at least fifty (50) feet. Other minimum setbacks. lot sizes. and. lot widths shall be proposed by the appli- cant, reviewed by the staff and the plan- nin~ and zoning board, and approved or modified by the city commission. (8) Central water systems, sewerage sys- tems, stormwater management systems, utility lines and easements shall be pro- vided in accordance with the appropriate sections of chapter 9. 1344 ATTACHMENT G ~ 20-33 WINTER SPRINGS CODE lution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. (5) Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. (6) Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on public services, includ- ing water, sewer, surface water manage- ment, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. (7) Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on housing and social con- ditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood qual- ity. (Ord. No. 2004-49, ~ 2, 12-13-04) Sec. 20-34. Waivers. (a) Any real property owner may file a waiver application requesting a waiver for their real property from any term and condition of this chapter (except from the list of permitted, condi- tional and prohibited uses set forth in any zoning district category) if the property owner clearly demonstrates that the applicable term or condi- tion clearly creates an illogical, impossible, im- practical, or patently unreasonable result. (b) The board of adjustment shall be required to review all waiver applications and make a written recommendation to the city commission. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the board's recommendation and show the board has considered the applicable waiver crite- ria set forth in this section. (c) Upon receipt of the board of adjustment's recommendation, the city commission shall make a final decision on the application. If the city commission determines that the board of adjust- ment has not made a recommendation on an application within a reasonable period of time, Supp. No.6 the city commission may, at its discretion, con- sider an application without the board of adjustment's recommendation. (d) In addition to the standard set forth in paragraph (a) above, all waiver recommendations and final decisions shall also comply with the following criteria: (1) The proposed development plan is in sub- stantial compliance with this chapter and in compliance with the comprehensive plan. (2) The proposed development plan will sig- nificantly enhance the real property. (3) The proposed development plan serves the public health, safety, and welfare. (4) The waiver will not diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood. (5) The waiver granted is the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unrea- sonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under this chapter. (6) The proposed development plan is com- patible with the surrounding neighbor- hood. (Ord. No. 2004-49, ~ 2, 12-13-04) Sec. 20-35. Administrative appeals. (a) Any final administrative decision regard- ing the enforcement or interpretation ofthis chap- ter, where it is alleged there is an error by an administrative official, can be appealed as set forth in this section. (b) Appeals shall be taken within thirty (30) days after such administrative decision is made by filing a written notice of appeal with the city manager stating the name of the decision maker, date of the decision, applicable code provisions and the specific grounds for appeal. Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the city manager shall schedule the appeal before the board of adjust- ment and transmit all documents, plans, papers or other materials constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken. 1320 ---. --- r-- ~~~ ~r~~ r.~~ .~... ~~~~-o~-ooo . . ATTACHMENT H CITY OF WINTER SPRlNGS, ORIDA . MJNUTES BOARD OF ADJUST REGULAR MEBTlN APRIL 7,2005 tZ DRAfl CALL TO ORDER The Board of Adjustment Regular Meeting ofThursda ) April 7,2005 was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Chairman Thomas Waters in the Co ission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Ro~ 434, Winter p~s, Florida 32708). Roll Call: Chairman Thomas Waters, present Vice Chainnan Jack TayloT~ present Board Member Linda Collins, present Board Member Kathryn Fairchild, absent Board Member Howard Casman, present Board Member Linda Collins led the Pledge of AUegi Chairman Waters acknowledged City Commissioner ally McGinnis in attendance and Mr. John, Baker, AlCP, Senior Planner, Community D elopment Department introduced Mr. Randy Stevenson, the City's new Community Dev lopment Department Director. PUBLIC INPUT None. CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT 200. Office OrThe City Clerk Ap roval Of The Marcb 3, 2005 Re ular Meeting "I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE T E MINUTES." MOTION BY VICE CHAI.RMAN TAYLOR. SECONDED BY OARD MEMBER COLLINS. DISCUSSION. " ""'~~~' l~'/:;, ~.'~,:.: I, ," 'j' T0. d ~$Lr> a:r. "e~ - ~ ~.... ... ,_ I _~--r ___ I _~ I - em OF WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIO^ MlN11TES BOAll) OF ADJUSTMENT 1& REGULAR MEE'TlNa - ....PR"lL 7,2005 P^OE:z OF6 " VOTE: BO,ARD MEMBER CABMAN: AYE CHAIRMANWATERS; AYE BOARD MEMBER COLLINS: AYE VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR: AYE MOTION CARRIED. DRAFT PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA FUBLIC HEARINGS 400. Community Developmellt Departl!1ent Recommends Tbe BOA (Board or Adjustment) He The Request For A Waiver From Sec:dOD 6-86. Of The City Code OC Ordinall es, To Allow A Builder To Construct 8 (EIght) Homes, Consistent With The xi.dng Development In The Greeaspoint Subdivision, With The Hi hlands PUD ( lannedUbtt DevelopmeDt). Mr. lohn Baker introduced this Agenda Item and presen ed pictures of the Greenspointe Subdivision and said, "We support the ten foot (10) front and rearsetbacks.~ Next, Mr. Baker stated, "I do want to point out that b ed on the Code Section that I provided you tonight, our Attorney (Anthony A. Garg ese] has informed me - to take this case to the Planning and Zoning Board) that will e on the 1 gth (April 2005] - a Special Meeting - before we take it to the City Co ssion. But, we do recommend approval with that one difference." Discussion:. Mr. Allen Epstein, 22 Spring Ridge Drive, Debary, PI rlda: spoke on behalf of the Applicant, Mr. Julian Demorra. Discussion. Chairman Waters opened lhe . 'Public Input" portion of ~is Agenda Irem. - Mr. Gary Diller, 609 Nighrhawk Cire/e, Winter Springs. Florida: as the President of the Greenspointe Homeowner's Association and Memb I of the Architectural Control Committee, Mr. Diller spoke about the written propos and noted being in favor of the "Request". Ct"'H.1 T 'lJ...JC: :.J:l1 f. 1M ..In .l- I 1-1 ~~:lt ~00c-6c-~d~ ...... r -.-tc-""'" '-"'-...I.Ao I .'t..I..-J .c...' ". ~f.I(J,- \..J"-' l".J\..IV em OF W1NTt:lR SPRlNOS. FLORIDA MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT UVULAR MBE'T'tNG - APl'UL 7.1005 PAGE 3 OF (j _Mr. JameJ Charles, 634 Nighthawk Circle. Wi1lrer: Springs, Florida: as the Vice ~ President of Greenspointe Homeowper's Association d Member of the Architectural CY' Control. Committee, Mr. Charles spoke. in favor of th "Waiver Request". Mr~lMes^ .FT read a letter from the Greenspointe Homeowner's As ociation dated April 6, t!JI(Jf-' copy was handed out to the Board Members. . Mr. Ron Crowe, 504 Spoonbill Court, Wihter Springs, lorida: spoke of serious drainage problems and was opposed to this <(Request", Ms, Catherine Graham, 667 Nighlh(1Wk Circle, Winre Springs, Florida: addressed the Board on drainage problems and noted she was oppose Tape lISide B Further discussion, Ms, Helga Schwarz, 720 Galloway COJlrr. Wr'nrer Spri gs, Florida: as the President of the Highland's Homeowner's Association, Ms. Schw spoke about plans that were not submitted to the Architectural Review Board. Mr. Michael Sprouse, 623 Anhing(J Road, Winter SpYin s, F/ot'ida: suggested building a two (2) story house; and spoke about cleaning out the d tches to avoid drainage problems; and commented on emergency vehicles getting through he streets, ClJairman Waters closed the "Public Input" ponion of hiJ Agenda Item. Discussion. Mr. Baker said, "We followed the provisions of th Code for posting the Site and notifying people within one hundred and fifty feet (150' . I did notify Greenspointe HOA (Homeowner's Association). I - did not think to notify the Highlands HOA (Homeowner's AssoCiation)." With further discussion., Mr. Epstein- said, "You have developments in Winter Springs that will not meet these new PUD (planned Unit De elopment) requirements and they will continue to build because they have a Developer's greement and the houses will be six. feet (6') apart or seven feet (7') apart because y changes after they got that Agreement won't apply to them." Mr. Epstein ad , "So, we came openly for a 4WaiVet"' under this new I\l1e to build as we would in th past." A list ofeignatures was handed out to the Board Memb rs in favor of Lots 101 and 102, Discussion. C"'r.:\'..J ~rJ"" J'7r ~I")_ ,. '-tt:.Jr -">':::'"1 ;:)(,.;)J. t""'.\::l"l CITY OF wtNTElt SPJUNGS, fLOl\ID" MiNUTBS BOAAD OF ^DJlISTMtNT R!GUl..AR. MEETI'I'JO - "PlUL 7, lOOS PACiE4~O(' Mr. Julian Demorra, . 660 Nighrhawk Circle, Wimer .prings, FTon'da: the ~. , addressed the Board Memben regarding his "Waiver" a plication. UK ripe 2/Sicle A Further discussion. Mr. Epstein said. "It was only this one (1) lot that create the odd problem. Otherwise, if you look at his [Mr. Baker) recommendation, I mpliment him. It was very professionally done. Seven out of eight lots they have no problem with under the new PUD [Plaxmed Unit Development] Ordinance," HI MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE W VER REQUEST FOR THE mREE FOOT (3') SIDE AND TEN FOOT (10') ONT AND REAR SETBACK REQUESTS ON THE REFERENCED EIGHT ( ) LOTS. IN ADDITION. I AMEND THIS MOTION TO DENY THE FRON YARD WAIVER REQUEST ON LOT 102 ENCROACHED ON THE PRO RTY," MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR. MR BAKER ASKED. 'DOES THAT MEAN THAT YOU WANT (LOT] 102 TO MEET THE TWENT F1VE FOOT (25') OR THE TEN FOOT (10') AS OPPOSED TO THE OT ERS?" VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR SAID, "TEN FOOT (10') ON THE EIG (8) LOTS - EIGHT (8) LOTS TOTAL IUGHT, SO THAT INCLUDES {LOT] 102?" MR.. BAKER SAID, "...YES. BUT DO YOU ALL AGREE WITH - F R A FOUR (4) OR FIVE (5) FOOT SECTION OF THE SIDE OF (LOT] 102 ING DOWN TO 2.43 FEET?" VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR SAID, "I HAVE N PROBLEM WITH THAT." SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. DI CUSS ION. VOTE: VICECH~RMANTAYLOR: AYE BOAlU> MEMBER COLLINS~ AYE BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE CHAIRMAN WATERS: NAY MOTION CARRIED. Chairman Waters asked, "Does this go to the 'P and Z (Planning And Zoning] Board?" Mr. Balcer said, "TIus and the next case will both go 0 the April 18th [2005] Planning And Zoning Board and I'm shooting for the April 25th [ 005] City Commission and I will be sending out letters to the abutters ifthere is a change hen it goes to Commission." Chairman Waters called a recess at 8:50 p.m. The Meeting wa, called bade to order at 8:18 p.m, ~~.~ ~C)~ )~~ )~~ cnNTW~~ W~I~Tm ~n 11 T' TC'TT C~~~-~/-~~H "-tt:Jr ,,-J:~"'"t "')(-l.1. 40'( 324 5731 P.05 eTTY O'P~R SP~GS, Fl..oRlOA MINU'f!:,S BOAlU> OF AJ>JtISTMENT R.EGUI...A~ MEET!NCi - APRIL 1, 1005 PAGE 5 or: 6 ~ rtIBLlC H!A1UNGS LV 401. Community Development Department Recommends The BOA (Board or Adjustment) He The Request For [\OvA FT From Section 6-86. Orne City Code OfOrdinallces, To Allow An AddiJ;t:110 E::r:istingResidence At 688 S.ranac Drive, Tuscawilla nit 14A, Lot 104. Mr. Baker introduced this Agenda Item. Mr. Baker said. "We [Staff] recommend approval." Mr. Baker added, 'The Applicant is here, They have a letter - that they just gave me to pass t, that I would like to enter iDto the (Record' it is from one of me abutters stating they ha e absolutely no obj~tioDS to the 'Waiver Request' and I would like to provide that to the hairman and to the City Clerk's Office." Chairman Water3 opened the "Pubflc Input" portion oft is.Agenda Ire",. Mr. Steve Gruse, 688 Saranac Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: addressed the Board regarding building an addition to his home. Chainnan Waters closed "the "Public Inpu.t" portion ofl is Agenda Item. Discussion. "1 MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE THE SETB K 'WAIVER' REQUEST AT TillS TIME." MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER COLLINS~ AYE BOARD MEMBER CASMAN~ AYE CHAIRMANWATERS: AYE VICECHAlRMANTAYLOR~ AYE MOTION CARRIED. Discussion. 600. REPORTS No Reports. r-,.."',,", 11 \.J JC ).J~ I j.. T m ..Jri 1 \ T-I TC:TT C~~?-~?-~~H .....~'-t ....J!-'.L. r.t:..lo ~0'd ~lOJ. " . CITY OF WINn~ S'fIUNOS. Ft.01lJt)^ t-iINUTSS IOARD or AJ)J1)STMtNT REGUUIl. MEETTNQ - ""JUt i. 2005 P^VE 6 0116 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS DRdf None. ADJOURNl\fENT "( MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN." MO ION BY VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR. stCONJ>ED BY BOARD MEMBE . COLLINS. DISCUSSION. WITH CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD TIlE MOT ON WAS APPROVED. MOTIQN CARRIED. Chairman Waters adjolII11ed the Meeting at approximat ly 9: 13 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMlITED BY: JOAN L. BROWN DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED: THOMAS WATERS, CHAIRMAN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 'Non~ These: MlnUIe5....c:rr .~tova;l :it the ,100S S(lUd 0 AdjUSl!n::n[ RteUI:tf Ma:tillJr. ,....~. I """""1_ .-,.,..... .,........ TOTAL P.06 rclX.4U(O'j'j(:;:lO( l'Ia~ .! ,lIJU:) 1U: 4':;j t-'.lJi ATTACHMENT I ~~ CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAFT UNAPPROVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETlNG APRIL 18, 2005 CALL TO ORDER ....,--.... The Planning and Zoning BoardILocal Planning Agency Special Meeting of Monday, April 18, 2005, was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman William Poe in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708). Roll Call= Chairtnan William Poe, present Vice Chairperson Rosanne Karr. present Board Member Tom Brown, present Board Member Linda Tillis) present Board Member Ned Vosta, present Board Member Ned Voska led the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC INPUT None. PUBLIC BEAJUNGS AGENDA ruauc HEAlU~CS 400. CommuDity Developmeat Department Recommends The Plau.oiJlg And ~niag Board Hear The Request For A Waiver FroDl Sections 20..354, (7) ADd 6-86. Of The City Code or OrdiOBaces, To Allow An Addition To An EXiJtibg Residence At 688 Saraaac Drive, Toscawilla Unit 14A, Lot 104. Mr. John Baker. AlCP, Senior Planner) Community Development Department introduced this Agenda Item. Mr. Baker stated, "We feel that it does meet the six (6) Criteria set forth for the Board of Adjustment to look at, but because the way the Code is written. we also need to come to you for your recommendation because of the provisions in Section 20-354. Paragraph (7), that I provided in your packet." H3"d [SLt' L.Z[ L0p S~Nl~S ~3~NIM ~o ^llJ Sl:S0 S00~-c0-^tlW raX'4uro'::'::!r::!or I'IC.!;! L LUU.:l 1U ./.1':::1 r-.U~ CITY OP Wl}./TBR SPRINGS. f'lORI.DA DRAFT UNAPPRovED MlNurES PL~NING AND Z.ONlNC .O....A>>/LOCAL PL^NN1NG AC8NC)' SPBCIAL MBBTtNG - APRIL l8. 2005 PAOE 2 OF 9 Chairman Poe opened the "Public Input" portron ofthrs Agenda Item. Mr. Steve Gruse. 688 Saranac Drive, Winter Springs. Florida: himself as the owner of the property fOf CoW" (4) years this June. No one spoke. Chainnan Poe closed the "Public Input" portion of this Agenda Item. "I MAKE A MOTION TIlA T WE RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL OF THE SETBACK 'W AlVER' REQUEST AS IT MEETS mE SIX (6) CRITERIA AND THAT'S BASED ON THE FINDINGS AS SUBMITTED." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN. SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRPERSON K.ARR.. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER VOSKA: AYE BOARD MEMBER TILLIS: AYE CHAIRMAN POE: AYE BOARD MEMBER BROWN: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON KARR: AYE MOTION CARRIED. fUBue HEAJUNGS 401. Community Development DepartmeDt RecornmeDds The PbllDlDg A.ad ZODing (P&Z) Board Belir The ~eqDe5t For A WJliver From Sectioos 2()"354. (7) Aad 6-86. or The City Code Of Ordinances, To Allow A Builder To COD.truct 8 (Eight) Homes. ConsisteDt With The Existiog Developmeat In The GreeDspolbt Subdivision, Within The Highlands PUD (PI.nned Uait Development). Mr. Baker discussed this Agenda Item and distributed an ernail received and dated on April 18, 2005. Mr. Baker said, "That was an email from a concerned citizen that we received late this evening just before the Meeting. I did want to make sure it got in the · Record) ." Mr. Baker stated. "They [Applicant) want to have a. three fool (3') minimum side setback and a ten foot (10') front and rear setback with the exception of Lot 102. They are asking for about a four [feet) (4') to five foot (5') section of the building to be located as close as 2.43 feet from the side yard and they are asking for the front yard to be five feet (5'). Staff supports the 2.43 feet because of the location of the other homes nearby, but the side yard for that four [foot] (4') to five foot (5') section. we do not support the five foot (5') in the front. We support a ten foot (10') front and rear setback." c(3'd f:Sl~ U( L.~p S9NI~dS ~31NIM ~O ALl) St:G0 S00c-G0-A~W I 0.1...... t;~.J r ~.J;;:; r ,;n,; I I'IO,;:J .;; ';;',.H),.) .I.',). LJ:;l I. ',)Lj CITY OF WI'Nl'EI\ SPRINGS, FLORIDA DRAf1' UNAl'PROV60 MINUTeS PLAI'<lr(INC AN)) tONING JOAllD/LOCAL rUNNING AGI:NCY SPEC1^l MEETING - APIUL 18,200' PAGE) Of 9 Discussion. A slide show presentation was shown, Mr. Julian Demorra, : as the Builder and Resident of Greenspointe Subdivigion, Mr. Demorra said, leDue to the Criteria of this lot, we are fighting to save some major size Oak trees on the comer of the lot - the maio concern with the roadway ~ was the driveway," Mr. Demorra said, "I had my Surveyor put a driveway in lbere that was eighteen by thiny [feet] (18' x 30'):' Chainnan Poe asked, uWhich Lot is that on?U Mr. Demorra said, "That is on Lot 102. That's the one that we only have the problem with - getting the last house on there." Furthermore, Mr. Demorra said, "I did have a lot of runoff from the adjacent houses." Mr. Demorra said, "Ms. Perez (Stonn Water Utility Manager, Public Works Department] - Lot - 101. there will be a drainage system to put in there to help accommodate for the drainage, water even though it's not aU from my home. It's also from some of the:: existing homes that are built there that have guttering. shooting water right down towards our property," Board Member Tom Brown said) "How about your storm water?" Mr. Demorra said, "There are catch basins there." Board Member Brown asked., "Are you going to do something about that with the storm water?" Mr. Demorr8 said, HMy lot is from the back comer of the buildings - elevated up high enough that where they sheet drain to the front curb and the waler goes into the catch basins." Discussion. Mr. Baker said, "Staff does not support the five feet (5') in the front." Chairman Poe opened the ''Public Input" portion of thlS Agenda Item., Mr. William Vanlue, 509 Spoonbill Court, Winter Sprillgs, Flot"ida: briefly addressed the Board Members and is opposed to this "Waiver" Request. Ms. Catherills Graham, 667 Nighthawk Circle, Winter Sprillgs. Florida: spoke about the drainsge in her yard and is opposed to this 'Waiver' Request. Discussion. Ms. Helga Schwartz, 720 Galloway Cou.rt, Winter Springs, Florida: as the Vice President of the Higbland.s Homeowner's Association, Ms. Schwarz spoke about plans that were not submitted to the Architectural Review Board. Ms. Schwan stated, "r just want to make this Board [Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency) aware that the Applicant has not approached the Highland's Homeowner's Association and we wanted to put that on 'Record' because we do have - ability to review Mr. Demorra's plans and determine location." (e!'d ~S~t> a( L.e!t> SnNlddS ~31NIM ~O All) 91:60 S00G-G0-A~ r Cl.-Z . '4t,.l (O~~ (::lO ( IVIa.~ .! .!UU:) lU ; ~U r'.U':l CITV OF WINTER. SPIUNGS. j:LORIOA OJUFT UNAP'PRO"I!O MINUTES rLANNIJIIG AND ZONlNC 80AJlOIl.OCAL PLANNING ACENCV SPEClAL t.IlEETIN'C - AP~lI.. I H. 1(ll),S I'ACF. $ OF 9 "I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THA TWE RECOMMEND THE APPROY AL OF THE TEN ll'OOT (10') FRONT AND THE REAR BUIL.DING SETBACK AT THREE FEET (3'). AT 2.43 (FOOT) APPROXIMATELY FOUR (4') TO RVE FEET (5') SEGMENT ON THE BUILDING LOT OF 102, AND THIS IS IN CONJUNCT'ON WITH THE 'FINDINGS' FOUND BY THE CITY IN ADDITION TO . (PARAGRAPH) NUMBER SEVEN (7) WIDeR WOULD BE THE HIGHLAND'S HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION REVIEW OF THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR ALL ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS.>> MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER VOSKA. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER BROWN~ AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON KARR.: NAY BOARD MEMBER TILLIS: AYE CHAIRMAN POE: NAY BOARD MEMBER VOSKA: AYE MOTION CARRIED. PUBLlC HEARINGS 402. Community Developrneut Department - PlaDDmg Division ADD-ON Request! The PlaB.lng And Zoning BoardILocal PlanniDg Agency Hold A Public Hearing Related To Ordln8Dce 2005-13 Wbicb Revises The "1-1 Light Industrial" Zoning District). List OfCo.ditional Uses To Add "AQtomobUe Major Servic:c And Major Repair EatJlblisbmeDu (lnc:ludibg Body Repairs And Paintlbg)." Mr. Randy Stevenson, AICP, Director, CommWlity Development Department presented this Agenda Item and displayed the Map of the "1-}" District within the City [of Win.ter Springs]. Mr. Stevenson said. "Staff, therefore re~mmends that the Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing related to Ordinance 2005-13, and make a recommendation of approval to the City Commission regarding amending the language of the '1-1 Light Industrial Zoning District' to alJow 'Automotive Major Service and Major Repair Establishment (Including Body Repairs and Painting)' as a 'Conditional Use' within the "Light Industria.1' (I-I) District, subject to certain conditions. Staff at this point, is of the opinion that one of those conditions would be that all paint and body repair take place within a completely enclosed building," Discussion. S0"d r:Sl.tl' ar 1.0t> ~NI~dS ~3lNIM ~o All) 9l:60 S00G-G0-^~ I r.J..A. ~l..) I V;J;J I ;;V I r'lo.:J L L'...JV.'> J.'.).,;)I.) I.UO CITY or WINUR SPRINGS. FLORIDA DRAfT VNAPPR.OVED MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING aoAkDILOCAL "LANNING ~CE~(:~ SPBCIAI. Mef,l"lNG - AT'RJL 18. 200S PAGE60F9 Chairman Poe opened the "Public Input" portion of this Agenda Item. No one spoke. Chairm.an Poe closed the "Public Input" portion of th is Agenda Item. "I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE FORWARD IT TO THE CITY COMMISSlON. 2005-14 (13) TO CHANGE OVER FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FROM THE CONDITIONAL USE FOR T8E AUTOMOTIVE AND P AlNT AND BODY SHOr." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER VOSKA. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER TILLIS. DISCUSSION. VOTE: VICE CHAIRPERSON KAR.R: NAY BOARDMEMBERBROWN: AYE BOARD MEMBER VOSKA: AYE CHAIRMANPOE: AYE BOARD MEMBER TILLIS: AYE MOTION CARRIED. REGULAR AGENDA IU:GULAR 500. Community D~velopUlent Department - Planning Division Reque.ts That The Pl..uliag ADd Zolliag (t&Z) Board CODsider ADd Appro\'e A Final EDgiDeerillglSlte PI.. For A 10,028 SqQsre Foot, Oue-Story RetaJI SaleJ Building 0.. A 1.ZS4 Acre Traet On SR (State Road) 434 At Hadenda Drive. Ms. Eloise Sahlstrom, AICP, ASLA, Senior Planner, Community Development Department presented this Agenda Item. Ms. Sahlstrom said, "Staff has required the Applicant to provide a twenty four foot (24') wide cross access easement to the Cumberland Farm property that will allow an eventual connection to the East." Ms. Sahlstrom stated, "We do indicate that the cross access easement would need to be 'Recorded' prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. Staff does recommend approval of this project subject to any of the revisions that might need to be ma.d~ by the Project Landscape Architect." 90"d [~Lp l.cE 1..0~ S~lddS d31N1M ~O All) ~t:50 S00c-G0-^~W r-aX.4U(O'j;!(;!O( r1ald L.' iUU~ lU:::-,U I-'.Ur' CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. PLOfUDA O~fT UNAPPROVED MINUTl!S rLANNlNG AI'l)) l.ONIl'lG BOAllOILOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETINC - APRIL 18, 200S PAGE 701' Q "I'D LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION THAT - THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO mE CITY COMMISSION OF THE ATTACHED FINAL ENGINEERING SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBJECT TO THE REVISIONS NEEDED TO BE MADE BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT." MOTION BY VICE CHAIRPERSON KARR. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN. DISCUSSION. MR. ROBERT JlONHERBULIS, OWNER, MCKEE CONSTRUCTION COMPA.NY, P.O. BOX -171366, LAKE MONROE, FLORIDA~ REPRESENTING THE MILLER'S OF ~MlLLER SCHOOL SUPPL V' AND REQUESTING CLARInCATION OF nu: DECORATIVE WALL, MR. VONHERBULIS SAID, "IT STATES A DECORATIVE MASONRY RETAINING WALL WILL CONTAIN THE WATER RETENTION IN THE AREA ON TH:E WEST SIDE OF HACIENDA (VILLAGE} - WE HAVE APPROXlMATELY A FORTY-TWO INCH (42") HIGH WALL TRAT IS FACING THE INSIDE OF THE RETENTION POND AND I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT STAFF IS ACTUALLY RECOMMEND THAT BE A DECORATIVE WALL WHICH WOULD BE UNDER WATER DURING THE RAINS OR ARE WE TALKING ABOUT A REGULAR MASONRY WALL AND THE DECORATIVE WALL BEING STRICTLY THE ONE THAT'S ON mE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING US FROM THE RESIDENTS AS TO THE SOUTH?'Y MR VONHERBULIS STATED, "OTHER THAN THAT, WE CONCUR ON ALL OF STAFF'S COMMENTS." MS. SAHLSTROM SAID, "'THE WALL INSIDE TIlE RETENTION AREA WOULD NEED TO MEET PUBLIC WORKS SPECIFICATIONS AND I THINK YOU'RE CORRECT - IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE DECORATIVE I WOULD NEED TO CHECK WITH OUR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR [MR. KIP LOCKCUFF, PUBLIC WORKSIUTILITY DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR) ON THAT." VOTE: BOARD MEMBER BROWN: AYE BOARD MEMBER VOSKA: AYE BOARD MEMBER TILLIS: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON KARR.: AYE CHAIRMAN POE: AYE MOTION CA.RRIEl1. ~0'd [~L~ Lcr ~0~ S9NI~dS ~31NIM ~o ^ll) ~1:6e S00G-G0-A~W rax :4U(b~~(~b (' May l lUU~ lU:~l P.DS CITY OF wINTER SPRINGS, FI.O~IOA O~AFT UN,\l'I'RovED MINUTES rLAJII~INC AND Z.ON~C BOAJU)./LOCAL PLANNING AG&NCV SPECIAL MEETING - APRIL I a, 2005 PA.GE lJ OP 9 IU:CUl..AR SOl, Conullubity Deyelopment Department - PlaDning Division Requests Tbat The Plan.ing And Zoning (P&Z) Boud Consider And Approve Prdim1nary And Final Site Plan And Engineering Plans For The 3.16 Acre Property 00 The Southeast Corner Of Moss Road And S.R. (State Road) 434 Wlaicb Includes Tbe Vacant State Farm Insurance Building Along With The Addition OfY'fIPO (2) New Office Buildings On Tbe 3.16 Acres. Ms. Sahlstrom presented this Agenda Item and displayed pictures of the Site. Tape 2tside A Discussion. Mr. David Glunt, Project Engineer, Madden Engineering, Inc., 431 East Horatio Avenue, Suite 260, Maitland, Florida: spoke to the Board Members regarding this property. Mr. Craig F. ROJlhier, ftecutive Vice President, w: M. Sallderlin & Associates, Inc.. SanrT'USt, LTD, 738 Rugby Street. Orlando, Florida: addressed the Board Members on the various businesses planned for this Site. "PD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR THE MOSS ROAD INTERNATIONAL OFfiCE COMPLEX AS DEPICTED OR AS SHOWN HERE TONIGHT ON THEIR FlNAL ENGINEERING SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SETFORTH TONIGHT," MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER TILLIS. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN. DISCUSSION. BOARD MEMBER BROWN ASKED, "I WOULD JUST LIKE TO REMIND ELOISE (SAIlLSTROM] THAT - GOOD POINT - BROUGHT UP ABOUT THOSE AIR CONDITIONERS. IF YOU CONVEY THAT ON.,t MS. SAHLSTROM SAInt "ALRIGHT.t' VOTE: VICE CHAIRPERSON KARR: AYE CHAIRMAN POE~ AYE BOA.RD~MBER YOSKA: AYE BOARD MEMBER TILLIS: AYE BOARD MEMBER BROWN: AYE MOTION ~ARlUED. 80-d (S~t:> U( ~017 59NI~dS ~31NIM 30 ^llJ ~1:b0 S0ee-G0-^~W rclX.4U(O~~('jO( 1"IBIj L: ",'IJU::l llJ ;::l 1 r'.U'.:i b~ d IO.J.U.J. crrv Of W(NT~1t SPRINGS. FLORIDA OR,J.PT UNJlJ>"1l0VEO MINUTES PLANNII'4C NIX) WlIl.NC 8OAaDlLOCAJ.. rLANNI~C ACtNCY SPECIAl.MEETlNO" ^P1UlI8, 2005 PAGe90F9 ADJOURNMENT "I MOVE THAT WE ADJOURN." MOTION BY VICE CHAIRPERSON KARR. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN. DISClJSSION. WITH THE CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD THE MOTION WAS APPR.OVED, MOT.ION CARRlED. Chairman Poe adjourned the Meeting at approximately 8:59 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.' JOAN L. BROWN DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED: WILLIAM H. POB, CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDILOCAL PLANNING AGENCY NOTE, Then MlftullCl wen: approved 3.1 the .2005 'laMing Md Zonin. 8oatdlLocAI YlIn"ing ^r.Cl'lcy M~lint. 60'd f:~L" ar l0l:7 SDNI~S ~31NIM ~ ^ll) 81:80 S00c-c0-^~1 ATTACHMENT J =1 '0 z CD "'C 'Ci5 b c: ~ .... 0 en C'll ~ - "'C c: Q) E CD Q) E u E! en >< '+- C'll CD b w Q) CD "'C ..... 'Ci5 (5 C) C'll Q) 0 c: c: a.. .~ 0 0 " " c., ..... ~ Q) " c;; ~~~~~~~~~" ~ '('I)('I)~I.O('I)..... . ." -:. 1.0 ..... .....('\j '" .... :at: II) " c;; ---i:n -Co --~ o.....~~- 1.00- Ll:!~o C'Ii('i)('i) '~..o .~.....~-:. 1.0 ~ .... ~I b~bbbNi:ni:ni:ni:n~ ('I) ..... ('I) ..... ....., ....., . C'Ii ..... ,.. ,.. ('\j ..... 1.0 ('\j cl E I.L O>~ -- Co .('I)~Co~i:nI.ON~c., .....CJ)C'Ii ~""'''''':'''''C'Ii('\j .......... en en ! " :i "t= ~~~~~~ ~ e e e e e e ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ .- .- .- .- .- .- oUooouuuuuu 0:: .~ 0:: 0:: 0:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C'll :e C'll C'll C'll C'll C'll C'll C'll C'll C'll g>CDg>~~;;;;;; .- :!:: .- .- .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~C)C)C)C)C) ~~~~~zzzzzz ~('I)CJ)""'I.O<OOCOOI.O"'" ('\j('l)ooO.....I.OI.O,....('\j('\j <0<0<0<0<0<0<0<0<0<0<0 ,....COO.....('\j<O('I),....('I),....CO .....('\j~~~~,....,....COCJ)CJ) _I '0 ...J Date: May 23, 2005 The following Documents were provided to the City Commission on May 23, 2005 during Public Hearings Agenda Item "403" and during the respective Motion, were made part of the Record. ~ / 111 m He> me:> / ,,; c::;e 6'1" Jl/S if 17/.'I/ r "'" # J C J. III #~e ctS1:3 7f- a~ CeoPl!J, 7:1t9A-e ,IS ;hI/ ill ~5~r- flfzm~ ~e;f'~~:e~/:;/e:.;e:~BrRIFCr m- ~e~~7"'-.. e4-.S'e~r .;F'7?/€ iI/,,/5.T7!1-/Vr~ F-/f t7 n-1 );iJ iH L1;e L .. J~L[i ..~..~;e.TY ....,-!Ne 1:)j v-----/- r;i : ' ..HL Hi #J)()dt1ess .',;:1 lfli-- ~S t'.7 i!: ~/ vt-- 111 'n~Q ~ 'Ii! I ~! '" ~i~j U .~rr. ,l'.." bjl'Ps ---1. ~.~.~." , ~ i] 6l~? ~ j; ~ 1~ ; ~ " 11H l' ...~.......:~. . H" ;1 I ~ 1 +1,j iH '"i U .CJ. 0- 11+ :11 / r"r ro ~"'~d r=r ~6J-n j7 ~~rr~J8-7 ).,//Ve &/1/ j, 1/1/7 ~ tJAI j.l #"'77'1 ,/f-A(' ~..-,v? d I~ I /7' / /6 / /7/ 6/ ~ I . A!~?-~ r.6Jtt.1/l: .... At t 7 j,r,{~&1/' /1/ , ?-"''I tll--r.-rI/;. ) 7/ ..;;- ) ~ .4 9 I 19 / /1 / ~ .y /7 / :>~~CN8/d_ /' // a / ?7 :s I' I?ey ./ / " ~ () g'" I /1 # .~ I I / I . ,to. ! ' \ \, , \, , . , . ~>> / ,"~ , ~": ,,"). .t.4, ~ ~ , " ,~... .':.' ~ ,f~ ~. ."~ 5~l.(1 II PLOT PLAN II "REAL PROPERTY DESCR(pnON" lOT 102, GREENSPOINTE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 29, PAGES 24 THROUGH 27 Of THE PUBUC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY C? .- c::;? :::c: --t ::c: >- ::=e ::x: c-";) ;;:0 / (""";) r-- / / b ~ ,. - P.C.:\. --P. ~~ o . \\ O~\ \\ o 0' ~\'? l.J.l0' ~ \0). ~ >'h;;J -.l lS5.Q1.Jv ~\ ~ u c.. ~ ~ ... .,. 8 8 N85042' 48"E ~ ~ L==1 0.40' G... OO~=2Jo r) ''OJ" </.9 . ~v ..) "Sf " P.R.Il. - PERIlAHDIT IlEFEIIEHCE IICliUIIEIIT P.o.e. - POINT ~ COII1oIOICtIlOIT P.e. - PQHT OF CURVA1URE P.R-c. - PlJHT OF ~ OJRVAlURE P.C.CO - POI..T OF lXlWPOU..D QJ/l\IAlllRE P. T. - PQHT OF TI.HCOlCY P.1. - PCU;T OF INWRSEClKlK P.c.P. - PERIlIoNEHT ClWTRCl.. PClNT P.D.L - PCU;T Cli UHE c.a. - QlQRD IIEARlHG T.a. - TIoNCOlT IlEARIHO ,\'l():[J;tOi) '4io-'~~''''"'';1~~.t~,},.''''t.!J GREENSPOINTE P.B. 29, PGS. 24-27 \ \ \ \~Ul \' \JP -.!o a ~'O -I \~ a U> \ \ --- 3.0' S85042' 46"W ......... .9.00 PROPOSED STORY CONCRETE kLOCK RESIDENCE #631 F.F. ELEVATION 0= 46.40 ~ ii \' a -I 004 8 ... '" b 9.6. LOT@ GREENSPOINTE P.B. 29, PGS. 24-27 a (Xl 76.94 ........... \ \ \ \ LEGE\NO: CONe. - CONCRflE CoL/'. - QlAlII UHK fENCE w.r. - WOOO fENCE C ~ C - ClJlII . CUTWR CAtv - C.IlllE 1lU\l51lW R1SEft lEU: - TfUl>HllNE llIliE1l 'IlII.HS - TRAIlSFOAWER "AD LP. - UGHT i'Cl..E POP. - PO\lEII P<U H.c:. - NATUIIAL CROIHO SQ. n. - 5QUARE fEET LOT 103 GREENSPOINTE P.B. 29. PGS. 24-27 LOT 107 C-1 l =55. 03' " R"""60. 0011=-=5203)' Oe> C.II. P.1l- :1i. AAD. A. L A A.P. A/W ~ - ClWCRETE IlClilJllEHT - PlAT IlOllI( - i'AGE - NCli-RAlllN.. - HAllIN.. - AADlUS - ARC lENGlIi - llEUA - RAOlUS POOIT - RIGHT-OF-WAY - CENTER UNE T ION n. - flfYA1IOH Ale - AIR CCli1ll1lOHER nP. - lWlCAL U.L - UTlJ1\' EASPotEHT D.E. - llAAlNAGE EASflOEHT U. - fINISHEDfUlOR a.s. - IIUl.IlINQ SEl1IACK ~c.,.a.~ s. -_ ~~m: BLOCK STRUC1URE Il - IlEASlRm C - CALOJl.J.1EO A88REVIA W.II. - WATER IIETER r.lI. - fIRE lI'l1l11IoNT N _ II - NAlL loNG DISC B.II. - IlOIOi IlAAK P......T. - PA_T F.B. - F1fU) lIOOI< >>.11. - IlI.HHOI.f (A) - ACTUAl NSI - NO 5lJRVE'tCft lDEllllflCA 1IOH f)jO - FOlJNO REC - Afco~m SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. NOT VAUD WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL Of A flORIDA UCENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 2. lHE OREAL PROPERrt DESCRIPllDN' SHOWN HEREON IS IN ACCORDANCE 'Mlli ruE DESCRIPlION PROVIDED BY lHl' CUENT. 3. NO UNDERGROUND II.lPROVEt.lENTS OR VISIBLE INSTAU..ATIONS HAVE BEEN LOCA lED OlliER THAN SHOVt1'4. .. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORlH UNE Of SAID lOT 99 ASSUI.lED AS BEING N. 85"42'-4a' E. PER PLAT. 5. HAVING CONSULTED lliE NAllONAL fLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAt.l fiRM. I HAVE OETERU1NEO lliAT lliE SUBJECT PROPERlY UES IN ZONE 'x'. NOT A SPECIAL flOOD AREA PER ARt.! PAl\IEL , 12117C 0130 E. DATED APRIL 17. \995. CllY OF WINTER SPRINGS(1202950. SEMINOLE COUNlY. FLORIDA. 6. ELEVATIONS ARE lRUE BASED ON satlNOLE COUNlY BENOilotARJ< 1~+4101 alENT: KEY REALTY JOB NUMBER: 03- 11 CADD owe. FILE: OJ-II GREENSPOINTE NOT A BOUNDARY SURIlEY COMMENTS FIELD DATE OFFICE DATE PLOT PLAN NA 5.R.B. 3/1/05 REVISE PLOT PLAN NA 5.R.fl. 4:505 REVISE PLOT PLAN NA S.R.B. 4/} /05 REVISE PLOT PLAN NA 5.R.B. 4/15/05 CERnFIED TO: KEY REALlY '" DEVELOPMENT SURVEYOR'S CERnnCA TE: lHlS IS TO CERTIfY lHAT THIS SlJR~ IIEfTS lHE t.IlNlI4Ut.l lEOlNICAl.. STANOARDS AS SET fORlli BY lliE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND l.lAPPERS IN CHAPTER 6\G17-6, fLORIDA ADUINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1-72.027. FLORIDA STATUTES. SCOTT BECH1R, P.S.t.l. PROFESSIONAl SUR'iEYOR & t.lAPPER FLORIDA REGlSTRA liON NUMBER 5807 ;(OTp~S(4:;;~;';~~;;:::::7INC'