The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005 05 09 Public Hearing 402 EXEMPTION - 688 Saranac Drive CITY COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM 402 CONSENT INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING X REGULAR May 9, 2005 Meeting MGR. fDEPT Authonzation REQUEST: The Community Development Department recommends the City Commission hear the request for a waiver from Sectiou 6-86 by way of Subsection 20-354 (d) (7) of the City Code of Ordinances, to allow an addition to an existing residence at 688 Saranac Drive, Tuscawilla Unit 14A, Lot 104. PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to consider a waiver request by Steve Gruse from the requirements of Section 6-86 of the City Code of Ordinances to allow a 372.49 square foot (19.3' x 19.3') addition to encroach as much as 3.28 feet into the twenty-five (25) foot comer yard setback, fronting on Cayuga Drive. In addition to the Board of Adjustment hearing the waiver request, Section 20-354 (7) required the Planning and Zoning Board to review and make a recommendation to the City Commission, regarding the proposed setbacks in a planned unit development (PUD). The addition would follow the existing building line of the house, which appears to have been constructed in the mid-1980s, well before adoption of Ordinance No. 2004-31, in whieh the City established minimum building setbacks that 1t could enforce for primary structures within PUDs. APPLICABLE CODI<:: See, 20-354. Sec. 6-86, [PUD] Site development standards. Minimum setback requirements within PUD zoning districts. CHRONOLOGY: July 26, 2004 - City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 2004-31, establishing minimum building setbacks within PUDs. March 11,2005 - City received application package from Steve Gruse. April 7, 2005 - The Board of Adjustment (BOA) recommended the waiver request be approved. April 18, 2005 Public Hearing Item 400 Page 2 April 18, 2005 - The Planning and Zoning Board recommended the waiver request be approved. FINDINGS: 1) The subject site is located al688 Saranac Drive (Lot 104 of Tuscawilla Unit 14A), within the Tuscawilla PUD. The building setbacks for primary structures are not set forth on the final subdivision plat (Plat Book 32, page 22), 2) The house was constructed in 1986 and 1987. The existing primary structure does not meet the 25 foot setback requirement on the corner (Cayuga Drive) side of the property the addition is an extension of the existing building line along Cayuga Drive, 3) The property is a comer lot and the addition which prompts the waiver request faces a street rather than an immediate adjacent parcel. 4) The location of the addition as shown on the plot plan does not negatively affect sight lines at the comer ofSaranac Drive and Cayuga Drive. 5) The waiver request from the requirements of sections 20-354 (7) and 6-86 of the Code must conform to all six of the waiver criteria set forth in Section 20-34 of the City's Code of Ordinances. 6) The City Attorney has opined that the language in Section 20-354 (7) requires waivers from the minimum building setbacks in POO to be heard by both the Board of Adjustment and the Planning and Zoning Board, with a final decision being made by the City Commission. 7) The BOA voted 4-0 to recommend the waiver request be approved at its April 7, 2005, meeting. BOA RECOMMENDATION: waiver request be approved. At its April 7, 2005, meeting, the BOA recommended the P&Z RECOMMENDATION: At a special April 18, 2005, meeting, the P&Z Board recommended the waiver request be approved, RECOMMENDATION: setback waiver request. The BOA, P&Z Board, and staffrecomrnend approval of the ATTACHMENTS: A - Sections 20-354 (7) and 6-86 B - Letter from HOA C - Letters from neighbors D - Plot Plan submitted with proposed addition shown on the historical survey that demonstrates that the house was constructed in 1987. E - Waiver criteria F Draft BOA minutes G - Draft P &Z minutes COMMISSION ACTION: ATTACHMENT A ~ 20-354 WINTER SPRINGS CODE (4) The adequacy and proximity of public roads, utilities, services, and facilities re- quired to serve the development. The maximum allowed number of dwell- ing units per gross residential acre and maximum height by type of dwelling unit shall be as follows unless sp8cifically waived by the city commission after re. ceiving recommendations from the plan- ning and zoning board: Typ' Single-family detached Patio homes Townhouses Garden apart- ments Maximum Units per Gross Resi- dentialAcre Maximum Height 2 stories 4.5 7.0 10.0 16.0 2 stories 8 stories 3 stories (c) The applicant shall propose, and the plan- ning and zoning board shall recommend, the maximum allowable floor area ratio for all com- mercial and industrial uses within the PUD to the city commission. The commission may adopt the recommendation or make such changes or amend- ments as it deems proper. (d) The following site development standards shall apply unless waived by the city commission, specifically finding after receiving recommenda- tions from the planning and zoning board, that the unique characteristics of the development in question make unnecessary the application of one (1) or more of these provisions in order to carry out the intent and purpose of the planned unit development district; (1) The natural topography, soils and vegeta- tion shall be preserved and utilized, where possible, through the careful location and design of circulation systems, buildings and structures, parking areas, and open space and recreational areas. Removal of mature trees shall be compensated through the installation of landscaping materials. (2) Landscaping consisting of trees, shrubs, vines, ground covers, and irrigation facil- ities shall be installed in common areas of residential developments and in special areas of commercial and industrial devel- opments. Special attention should be given to parking areas, refuse storage areas, and in building setback and separation areas to achieve proper screening. (3) Common open space and recreational fa- cilities in accordance with the standards of the National Recreation Association shall be provided to serve the residents of the planned unit development. (4) All land shown on the final development plan as common open space, parks, and recreational facilities shall be protected through deed restrictions which shall en- sure the preservation of its intended use, the payment of future taxes, and the maintenance of areas and facilities for a safe, healthy and attractive living envi- ronment. (5) All common open space and recreational facilities shall be specifically included in the phasing plan, and shall be constructed and fully improved by the developer at an equivalent or greater rate than the con- struction of the residential structures which they serve. (6) The proposed location and an'angement of structures shall not be detrimental to existing or prospective adjacent land uses. Lighting, access points, or high noise level activities which adversely affect abutting property shall be prohibited. (7) Building setbacks from the mean high- water level of any lake, stream or body of water, shall be at least fIfty (50) feet. Other minimum setbacks, lot sizes, and lot widthSSh';i]I'beproposed by "flie appli~ cant, reviewed by the staff and the plan- ping and zoning board, and approved or modified by the city commission. (8) Central water systems, sewerage sys- tems, stormwater management systems, utility lines and easements shall be pro- vided in accordance with the appropriate sections of chapter 9. 1344 .20033 WINTER SPRINGS CODE lution, vegetation and wildlife, open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards. (5) Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic, and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of cultural and historic resources. (6) Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on public services, includ- ing water, sewer, surface water manage- ment, police, fire, parks and recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. (7) Whether the proposed. use will have an adverse impact on housing and social con- ditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and neighborhood qual- ity. (Ord. No. 200449, ! 2, 12-13-04) Sec. 20-34. Waivers. (a) Any real property owner may file a waiver application requesting a waiver for their real property from any term and condition of this chapter (except from the list of permitted, condi- tional and prohibited uses set forth in any zoning district category) if the property owner clearly demonstrates that the applicable term or condi- tion clearly creates an illogical, impossible, im- practical, or patently unreasonable result. (b) The board of adjustment shall be required to review all waiver applications and make a written recommendation to the city commission. Such recommendation shall include the reasons for the board's recommendation and show the board has considered the applicable waiver crite- ria set forth in this section. (c) Upon receipt of the board of adjustment's recommendation, the city commission shall make a fmal decision on the application. If the city commission determines that the board of adjust- ment has not made a recommendation on an application within a reasonable period of time, Supp. No. 6 the city commission may, at its discretion, con- sider an application without the board of adjustment's recommendation. (d) In addition to the standard set forth in paragraph (a) above, all waiver recommendations and fmal decisions shall also comply with the following criteria: (1) The proposed development plan is in sub- stantial compliance with this chapter and in compliance with the comprehensive plan. (2) The proposed development plan will sig- nificantly enhance the real property. (3) The proposed development plan serves the public health, safety, and welfare. (4) The waiver will not diminish property values in or alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood. (5) 'rhe waiver granted is the minimum waiver that will eliminate or reduce the illogical, impossible, impractical, or patently unrea~ sonable result caused by the applicable term or condition under this chapter. (6) The proposed development plan is com- patible with the surrounding neighbor- hood_ (Ord. No. 2004-49, ! 2, 12-13-04) I Sec. 20-35. Administrative appeals. (8) Any final administrative decision regard~ ing the enforcement or interpretation ofthis chap- ter, where it is alleged there is an error by an administrative official, can be appealed as set forth in this section. (b) Appeals shall be taken within thirty (30) days after such administrative decision is made by filing a written notice of appeal with the city manager stating the name of the decision maker, date of the decision, applicable code provisions and the specific grounds for appeal. Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the city manager shall schedule the appeal before the board of adjust- ment and transmit all documents, plans, papers or other materials constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken. 1320 ATTACHMENT B CHELSEA WOODS OF TUSCAWILLA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. P.O. BOX 620433 OVIEDO, FLORIDA 32762-0433 March 8, 2005 Mr. and Mrs. Gruse 688 Saranac Drive Winter Springs. Florida 32708 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gruse: The Chelsea Woods Homeowners Association (CWHOA) Architectural Control Committee has reviewed the drawings dated 10-21-04 prepared by Ken Ehlers P.E. for the planned addition to your home. The plan appears to meet the requirements of the deed reslrictions. You have confirmed lhat the exterior construction in terms of material. qualily of workmanship, and color will be the same as the existing structure. This will serve as a one time only waiver of the CWHOA Deed restriclion requirements that the addition be no closer than 25 feet to street line and no closer than 30 feet from the rear property line. Due 10 the fact the original structure did not meet these requirements. Such being lhe case, this is deemed acceplable and therefore approved. This approval is for a period not to exceed six months from the dale construction is started withoul resubmission of lhe improvement plans 10 the CWHOA Archilectural Control Committee. Please assure that your builder avoids incursion on and causing any damage to neighboring or city property. If any such damage occurs, the property musl be restored 10 its original condilion. We also ask that any portable balhrooms emplaced by workers be away from sidewalks. As you know. the City of Winter Springs requires a building permit before construction and prior approval for the removal of trees. Thank you for your inquiry and interest in maintaining the quality of our neighborhood. Please contact me at (407) 366-2895 if you have any questions. .// J1 p/: ~RiOS/~ CWHOA ACC-Chairman ATTACHMENT C March 6, 2005 To Whom It May Concern: We live across the street from the Omse Family, They have informed us of their plans to build an addition and we have no oijections, We are actually happy to see their home expand instead of seeing them move. If you should have any questions for us regarding this matter, we can be reached at the following address: Marshall and Karen Harris 675 Cayuga Drive Winter Springs, FL 32708 (407) 977-1745 Sincerely, Y/(M~aJtI~~/k Marshall and Karen Harris JCV March 7, 2005 City of Winter Springs Community Development Dept. 1126 State Road 434 Winter Springs, Fl 32708 Rc: Property at 688 Saranac Drive Winter Springs, Fl 32708 To Whom it May Concern: We live at 689 Saranac Drive, Winter Spring. We are across the street from Rebecca and Steve Gruse. who are considering adding on to their property at 688 Saranac Drive. We have seen their plans for the addition to the house and have no o~iections to the addition. Thank yon, David S~und rs Jan Saunders, Owner - 689 Saranac Drive ~~ March 7, 2005 To Whom It May Concern: Steve and Rebecca Cruse have expressed their desire 10 expand onto their house located at 688 Saranac Drive. We have discussed the plans of the additional square footage and feel that this would be very beneficial for the family. As property owners located next door to them we have no objections to this addition. Should you have any questions please feel free to call us at 407-977-9003. i1 /d' r'': cyJawr- ~. Charles and Dawn Penuel 690 Saranac Dr. Winter Springs, Fl 32708 db I!~ March 5, 2005 To Whom It May Concern: Property owners, Steve and Rebecca Gruse, have discussed their wishes to add an addition to their home at 688 Saranac Drive, Winter Springs, Florida. Details of the construction have been explained, and it appears to be a good step for this growing family to take at this time. As a property owner who is backed up to their lot line, we have no objections to this addition. If there are any questions concerning this matter, we can be reached at the following address: Cleveland and Nancy O'Neal 674 Cayuga Drive Winter Springs, FL Respectfully Submitted, ~//4,...i/ '/l~~, j J /:;71 , Cr:;:l:% and Nancy O'Neal March 6, 2005 To Whom It May Concern: We have reviewed the building plans of Steve and Rebecca Gruse and we approve of their design. We understand that they have submitted a variance request and we are satisfied that their addition will in no way affect our property value or infringe upon our rights as homeowners in this neighborhood. Res ectfully submitted, OuLQjLJ..jll Scott and Beverly McEwen \l 687 Saranac Drive Winter Springs, FL 32708 C::::' .~ ~~.-' .tt.ae O.l.-.ll5.n;>,::Iljll ",nD'" ..".... '''-n''laAn_~_5B6 .,1 ATTACHMENT D THE MINIMAl. -e. DAT1!D RlFER!NCm PROPIRTY IS 1.OC':An: G AS PER F.I.R.M. CXlMMUN or WlNTIR SPRINGS, SEMINOLE UARY IS, 1"2" NIT 14 "A", ACCOIlDING K 32, PMI. 21 - 24, Do\. tH ZONE "C", AREA OF PANEL NUMBI!R 120295 UNTY, FLORIDA. HAP I C' .qY<:t' v ,,:'" 0::'" v OJ 4I>lv~ I I ,. I 10S 103 (, &116010"51" 111 Z!ClCl L' n<<J tKD. 3.."" lUl.. H.,'Urr . 01. '4'~ 130 It " ".. US. ''It ) fY. (1)ou.n-.../MC:I.t!;_.....~ "' I;. =.~"W":-IIl':":"=:''lHl nc ~ar.::.:r~-==.IV...~... 1017. ftU21.~.....~1ES. . STEPHEN . RE G_ . , go.re U"',o, --- -~ CHARLES ROe DEFOOR &0 ASS Al!S, lNC, l'.o.ao.noJ,-.fLA.sno--./ {401leeo- n /-'-.1._- ATTACHMENT E ! .... WINTER SPRINGS CODE enclosures shall be supplied with all plans show- ing that same comply with wind load and live load requirements of the building code of the city. (c) Setbacks. The screen enclosure shall meet all code requirements for front and side yard setbacks which are applicable to the subject prop- erty. Notwithstanding any other applicable rear setback requirement, the screen enclosure shall not be located any closer than seven (7) feet from the rear property line of the subject property. On lakefrent property, no screen enclosure shall be located any closer than twenty-five (25) feet from the shoreline, as determined by the existing or established high-water control level. (d) Height. The screen enclosure shall not be higher than the primary structure on the subject property, except when the principal structure exceeds twelve (12) feet. In which case, the screen enclosure shall be set back an additional two (2) feet from the minimum setback taquirements contained in subsection (c) for every additional foot above twelve feet. (e) Easements. Screen enclosures shall not be constructed within an easement area, unless the easement expressly allows said construction. (f) Screen enclosure modifications. If any por- tion of an existing screen enclosure is modified so that it no longer satisfies the definition in subsec- tion (a), the modified screen enclosure shall meet all building setback and height requirements that are applicable to principal and accessory build- ings for the subject property, (Ord. No. 2002-31, ~ 3, 10-28-02) Sec. 6.86. Minimum setback requirements within PUD zoning districts. (a) General. Unless otherwise provided. eLse- where in the City Code or upon a plat of record previously approved by the city commission, the principal building setbacks for property zoned. planned unit development (PUD) shall be as follows: (1) Front yards. The front yard shall not be less than twenty-five (25) feet in depth; (2) Rearyards. The rear yard shall not be less than ten (10) feet in depth; Supp. No.6 (3) Side yards. The side yard shall not be less than five (5) feet on each side of the dwelling structure; and (4) Corner yards. On corner lots, the front yard set back of twenty-five (25) feet must be maintained, at a minimum, on all sides abutting public rights-of-way. Notwithstanding the minimum setback require- ments of this subsection, zero lot line property shall be governed by subsection (b) below. (b) Zero lot line. Unless otherwise provided elsewhere in the City Code or upon a plat of record previously approved by the city commis- sion, the principal building setbacks for zero lot line property zoned. planned unit development (PUD) shall be as follows: (1) Front yards. The front yard shall not be less than twenty-five (25) feet in depth; (2) Rearyards. The rear yard shall not be less than ten (10) feet in depth; (3) Side yards. The side yard shall not be less than five (5) feet on one (1) side of the dwelling structure; and (4) Corner yards. On corner lots, the front yard set back of twenty-five (25) feet must be maintained, at a minimum, on all sides abutting public rights-of-way. (c) Conflicts. In the event of any conflict be- tween the requirements of this section and any declarations of covenants and restrictions govern- ing site conditions of a PUD development within the city, the more restrictive shall apply. In the event of any conflict bet.ween the requirements of this section and any recorded. development agree- ment approved by the city commission or court approved settlement agreement governing site conditions of a PUD development within the city, the conflicting provision in the development agree- ment or court approved settlement agreement shall prevail. (d) New PUD developments. Nothing con- tained in this section shall be construed as limit- ing the city commission's authority to impose setback requirements greater than the minimum 378.2 H~~-~~-~~~~ lb:~~ 4~'1 ,i;,!4 ~'/';s1 407 324 5731 P.01 _e,.... '::'Ut!~-~-C1C1Q ---. ---. r ATTACHMENT F CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, ORIDA . , MlNUrES BOARD OF AJ>JUS NT REGULAR MEETIN APRll.. 7, 2005 e DRAfT CALL TO ORDER The Board of Adjustment Regular Meeting of Thilrsda ,April 7, 2005 was oalled to order at 7:03 p,m, by Chainnan Thomas Waters in the Co ission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Ha!~ 1126 East Stale Road 434, Winter prings, Florida 32708). RDIl CaU: Chairman Thomas Waters, present Vice Chainnan ]""k Taylor, present Board Member Unda Colul18, present Board Member 1Ca.thryn Fairchild, absent Board Member Howard Cosman, present Board Member Linda Collins led the Pledge of Allegi 'e. , Chairman Walen acknowledged City Commissioner ally McGinnis in attendance and Mr. lohn, Baker, AlCP, Senior PianDer, Community D elopmont Department introduced Mr, Randy Stevenson, the City's new Community Dev lopment Department Director. PUBLIC INPUT None. CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT 200, Omce Orne City Clerk Ap roval OrThe March 3, 2005 Re lar Meeting 'nutel. "I MAKE A MOnON TRAT WE APPROVE T E MINUTES!' MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR. SECONDED BY OARD MEMBER COLLINS. DISCUSSION. "":,, re"d CSLp ~ef. ~0~ ~~-~~-~~~~ lb:~~ w. 4~f( ":><:::4 :::N..:>l 41:::1'( ..::l~4 ~'(..::ll I-'.l::j~ I ' crTI' ~ W1NT'EA SPRINGS. J:LOPJO^ M\l'oIUTES 1f] IO.urJ) OF .-.DJtJ5TMJ:l"T 'REGULAlt M'EETlNO - APlt!L 7. 2005 . \l'^0'E20f6 VOTE: 1l0,.uw MEMBER C'\sMA1'l; AYE CHA.IRMANWAl'ERS: AYE BOARD MEMBER COLLINS: AYE VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR: AYE MOTION CARRIED. DRAFT PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA PlJ8L1C mAlUJ'OGS 400, Community Development Department Recommend. ne BOA (Board or Adjustment) H The Request For A Waiver From SeelIon 6-86, Of The City Code Or Otdloan eI, To Allo.. A Builder T. Construct 8 (Eight) Homes, Consutent With The :sisting Devel.pment In The Greenlp.int Subdivision, With The Hi hlonds POO ( lanned Unit Devel.pment). Mr. 101m Baker introduced this Agenda Iwm and presen ed pictures of the Green,pointe Subdivision and said, "We support the. ten foot (lO) front and rear setbacks." Next, Mr. Baker stated. '~ do want to point out that b ed on the C.de Section that I provided you lDIlight, our Attorney (Antbony A. Garg ese] has infonned me - lJ) take this case to the planning and Zoning Board, thaI will e on the 1 g'" [April 2005] - a Specia.l Meeting _ beCore we take it to the City Co ssion. But, we do recommend approv:u with that one difference. Jl Discussion. Mr, Allen Epstein, 22 Spring Ridge Drive, Debary, PI rida: spoke on behalf of the Applicant, Mr, lulian DemoITIl- DIscussion.. Chainnan Waters opened the "Publtc Inpu," portion of ~is Agenda Item. Mr. Gary nfller. 609 Nigh,htrWk Circle, Wm'"" Springs Florida: as the President of the Grcenspointe Homeo\lo'l1.erls Association and Memb,. of the Architectural Control Committee, Mr. Diller spoke about the 'Written propos~ and noted being in favor of the "Request". : cn'.IT).J...JC" :..J::J 1,-.i!M .jn J. I 1; ~~:11 ~002-6~-~d~ '"'' Go"> "'-............ ...,......... ...."', -"'" .....,....1. ---. --.- "". ...~~ ~r~.1. r.~~ '....." .::........... '-'.... '-''-'v em 01' WIJIlTBR SPRJNas. FL.OPJDA MlNure' BOARD OF ADIVS1'MENT 1U!Gl.Jl...4.R.MS!'I1NG-APRJl'1.1005 PAGEJ OH Mr, Jam.. Charles, 634 Nighrhawk Circle. Wince>: Springs, Florida: "" the Vice ~ President of Gtunspoinre HomeoW!ler's Association d Member of the Architectural LV Control Committte, Mr. Charle, spoke. in favor of th "WiUver Reque't". Mr..s;.1fies^FT read a letter from. the Greenspomte Homeowner's As OClanon dated April 6, t9tt..fo"" copy was handed out to the Board Members, . Mr. Ron Crowe. 504 Spoonbut Court, Winter Springs, orido: spOke of ,eriou, dninage problem, and was opposed to thi, "Request". Ms. Calherine Graham, 667 Nighthawk Circle, Win" Springs, Florida: addressed the Board on drainage problems and noted she w"" oppose to this "Request". Tape IISidC'B Further discussion. Ms. Helga Schwan:, 720 Gallaway Call"', Wincer Spn gs. Florida: "" the President of the Highland's Homeowner's Association, Ms. Schw spoke about plans that were naT submitted to the Architecturo! Review Board. Mr. Michael SproU!/e. 623 A.nhinga Road, Winter Sprin :5, Florida: suggested building a two (2) story house; and spoke aboul cleaning out !he d tches 10 avoid drainage problems; and commented on emergency vehicles getting through he '!teets. Chair",an Warers closed the "Public Input" portiOn of his Agenda Item. Discussion. Mr. Boker siUd, "We followed the provisions of Ih Code for posting the Site and notifying people within one hundred and fitly feet (150' . 1 did notify Greenspointe ROA (Homeowner', As,ociation). I - did nOI think 'to notify the Highlands HOA (Homeowner's Association)." With further discussior>, Mr. Epstein said, "You have developments in Winler Springs that will not meet these new PUD (planned Unit De elopment) requirements and they will continue to build because they have a Developer's greement and the houses will be six feet (6') apart or ,even feet (7') apart because y changes after they got !hat Agreement won't apply to them." Mr. Epstein a.d I "So, we carne openly for a 'Waiver' under this new rule to build as we would in th PilSt." A list of signatures was handed out to the Board Memb rs in favor afLots 101 and 102, I , , Discussion. r:"rOl'..J r-.-,_ '':<''' .......... --..", .~ ..- ,.'... ,- nr"'-"':>-"'t::.J"'-' .I. (''''1::' ''It:l( ")O!::"l ~r..)J, , Mr, Julian DemomJ, 660 Nlghrhawk Circle. Wimer addressed the Board Membm regarding his "Waiver" TIIpl::a.'SidcA Further discussion. "t!::l( ..)<::4 ::>(,,).1. r-'.~4 eI'lY OF wn.rru. SPIUNGS, FLOl\IO... l'ouNVTBS BO~ OF ADJUSTMENT R.5GUtARMEETINO'-A,~ ',1005 PACi540~' ~jng~. Florida: the ~ heahan. UK Mr, Epstein said, "It was only this one (1) lot that create the odd problem, Otherwise, if you look at his [Mr, Boker] recommendation, I mplimenl him. It was very professionally done. Seven out of eight lots they have no prohlem with under the new PUP [planned Unit Development] OrdilWlce," "I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE W VER REQUEST FOR THE THREE FOOT (3') SIDE ANn TEN FOOT (10') ONT AND REAR SETBACK REQUESTS ON THE REFERENCED EIGHT ( ) LOTS, IN ADDITION, I AMEND TIDS MOTION TO DENY THE FRON YARD WAIVER REQUEST ON LOT 102 ENCROACHED ON THE PRO Rn'." MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR MR BAKER ASKED. 'DOES THAT MEAN THAT YOU WANT (LOT) 102 TO MEET THE TWEN F1VE FOOT (15') OR THE TEN FOOT (10') AS OPPOSED TO THE OT ERS?" VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR SAID, "TEN FOOT (10') ON THE EIG (8) LOTS - EIGHT (8) LOTS TOTAL RIGHT, SO THAT INCLUDES (LOT) 102?" MIL BAKER SAID, "".YES. BUT DO YOU ALL AGREE WITH - F It A FOUR (4) OR FIVE (5) FOOT SECTION OF THE SIDE OF (LOT) 102 ING DOWN TO 2.43 FEEn" VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR SAID, "I HAVE N PROBLEM WITH THAT!' SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. DI CUSSION. VOTE: VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR: AYE BOARD MEMBER COLUNS: AYE BOARD MEMBER CASMAN: AYE CHAIRMAN WATERS: NAY MOTION CARRIE.D. ChairmiUl Wa_ asked, ''Does this go to the 'P ond Z1' [Planning And Zoning) Board'" Mr, Boker said, "nus and the nexl case will both go 0 the April18,b [2005] Planning And Zoning BOald iUld I'm .hooting for the April 25" [ , 005) City Commission and I will be .ending out Ien... to the abutters if there is a change hen il goes to Commission," Chairl11011 Waters called a reCel3 at 8:50 p,m. The Meeting was called batk 10 order at 8: 58 p.m. ..,c:'l"..J ':-0::;.., ):::>~ ,Cl.., TC'TT C~~?_~?_~~~ C::('l"ll",..JC::: :..I':li.. 1M -In J. I T~, APR-~9-2005 17:00 41::1'( .j~4 5731 407 324 5731 P.05 em OF WTmU SP~GS, PlORIOA MlNUT~ IO.u.D Of ADJ'OSTM.J:NT IlWUI.A.I\ MEETING - AI"RIL", 2005 'AGE50F& ffJ PUWCHUlUNGS CV 401. Community Development Deplll1lllenr Recommends The BOA (Board Of Adjnstment) H. The Requ""t For nD.J\FT From Section 6-86. orne City Code OrOrdill......, To Allow An Addi&\'lR E:Ii.ting Ro5idence At 688 Saunac Drive, Tu.cawill. ni114A, Lot 104. Mr. Baker introduced this Agenda Item. Mr, Baker said, "We (Staff] recommend approvaL" Mr. Baker added, 'The Applicant is here. They have . letter - that they just gave me to pus t, that I would like to enter into the 'Record' it is from one of the abuttm stating they ha: e absolutely no objections to the 'Waiver Request' and I would like to provide that to the hainnan and to the City Clerk's Office:' Chairman Wa,,,,,, opened the "!'ubI" Inpul" portion oft i..Agenda Ire... Mr. StM! Gnue, 688 Saranac Drive, Winter Spring., Florida: addressed the Board regarding building an .addition to his home. Chairman Wa,er$ closed ,he "Public Input" portion oft is Agenda Item. Discussion. "I MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE THE SETH K 'WAIVER' REQUEST AT TIDS TIME." MOTION BY VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR. SECONDED BY BOAlUl MEMBER CASMAN. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER COLLINS: AYE BOAlUl MEMBER CASMAN: AYE CHAlRMANWATERS; AYE VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR: AYE MOTION CAlUUED, Discussion. 600. REPORTS No Reports. .-......"VJe ""'" ,iT"" ..In 111-, "1'<::" T r C:~~;::'-~.;;'-I>1r1H Mr~-~J-~~~~ ~r'~~ ~~, .".l~~ .".l(.".l~ <+lOt..::><::<-+ :::>(..)J. t".l:Jo !to'd "':<10,L CrrYOFWINTERS'tPJNO$,PLOW" M'1N\.m!S DOAJm or AJ>J1)SrMtNT R60uull. MEE1'TNQ - Al'RJL 1, 2005 i'^vE60P6 FUTIJRE AGENDA ITEMS DRfff None. ADJOURNMENT '" MAKE A MOllON TO ADJOURN." MO ION BY VICE CHAIRMAN TAYLOR. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBE COLLINS. DISCUSSION, WITH CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD TIlE MOT ON WAS AI'I'ROVED. MOllONCAlUU,I1!, Chaimlllll Waters a<ljOllmed theMeetill8 at 'Pproximat ly 9:13 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY: JOAN L BROWN DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED, THOMAS WATERS, CHAIRMAN BOARD OF ADruSTMENT NOTE' 'I'hc5c ~"nUle5"~ IJ1tl'tlvtd :'llhe .1005 6GU4 0 Adj\.lJ.l:!n:rI! RegulaT M'I:lI:tin&- ....,,.,., ..........,- ,..,.~ ,,,... TOTRL P.06 Fax:4076997967 Mag 2 2005 10:49 P.02 ATTACHMENT G # CITY OF WINTER SPRlNGS. FLORIDA DRAFT UNAPPROVED MIN1.JTI!S . PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDILOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 18, 2005 CALL TO ORDER ----.,-~ The Planning and Zomng Board/Loeal Planning Agency Special Meeting of Monday. April 18, 2005, was eaIled to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman WUliam Poe in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall. 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs. Florid> 32708), Roll CaU: Chairtnan William Poe, present Vice Chairperson Rosanne Karr. present Board Membq Tom BroWlJ., presen' Board Member Linda Tilli.. pre.."t Board Member Ned V os~a, present Board Member Ned Voska led the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC INPUT None. PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA ruauc nEAIUJ'lCS 400. Comm.uoity DevelopmeDt Department Recornmeods The Plal1.1lillg Abd Zoniac Board Hear The Requctt For A Waiver From Section. 211-354. (7) ADd 6-86, Of The City Code Of Onlill.nc... To Allo.. An AdditioD To AD ED,ting Reoldenet At 688 SanlDae Drive, To.e.will. Unit 14A, Lot 104. Mr. John Baker, Mep, Senior Planner) Community Development Department introduced this Agenda Item. Mr. Balcer stated, "We feel that it does meet the six (6) Criteria set forth for the Board of Adjustment to look at, but because Ihe way the Code is written, we also need to come to you for your recommendation because of the provisions in Section 20-354. Paragraph (7), that I provided in your packet." m'd [<:=iLv LZ( L0t> S!)t~I~dS ~3J.NII"l .:lO All:) ~1;5e se0C-Ce-A~ f-ax : 4Ur'b99r'9br' Ma~ 2 2005 10:49 P.03 CITY Of WINTBR, SPRINOS, fl.ORI.I).A. DRMT UNAPI"R.OVED MrN.UTE5 rL..v'iI'lNc ANll z.oN1N'C 804JU)/LOCAL PLANNING "GENe"" SPBClAL MBBTJNG- APRIL 18, 1003 PAOEZOF9 Chainnall Poe opened the "Public Input" portIon of lhl~ Agl!nda Item. Mr. SIeve Gruse, 688 SOt'llhtlC Drive, Winter SpringJ, Florida: Mr. Gruse identifie himself as the owner Qfthe property fOf four (4) years this J\JJ)e. No one spoke. Chairman. Poe closl!d the "Public Input" portion ofthiJ Age"da lJem. "I MA.JO> A. MOTION THA T ~ RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COMMISSION AfFROV..u. OF THE SETBA.CK 'WAIVER' REQUEST A-S IT MEETS mE SIX (6) CRITERIA. AND THAT'S BA-SED ON THE FINDINGS A-S SUBMIITED." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN, SECONDED BY VICE CHAlRPEltSON KARR. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD Ml!:MBER VOSKA.: A. YE BOARD MEMBER TIT.LlS: AYE CHAlRMAN rOE: A. YE BOARD MEMBER BROWN: A.YE VICE CHMRPERSON KARR: A.YE MOTION CARRIED, rUDL.IC HE.ulJNGS 401. CommuDity De.elopmeut nepartmeAt Recommeads ThE PballlDg ADd ZODing (P&Z) Board Hellr Tbe R.eqaest For A Wai.or F.om SectiOD' 2o.3~. ('7) A.Dd 6-86. or The City Code Of OrdiDaDces, To Mlo", A Buildor To Co..trIlet 8 (Eig&t) Horn.., COD,illeot With The Existiog Developmeat [n The Cree.spolat Subdi'Vuion, Within The HIghlands PUD (Planned UD;t Devclopment), Mr. Baker discussed this Agenda Item .and distributed an entail received and dated on April 1 S, 2005. Mr. Baker said, "That was an emall from a concerned citizen that we received late this evcning just before the Meeting. I did want to make sure it got in the 'Record' ," Mr. Baker stated, "They [Applicant) want to have a three foot (3') mmimum side setback and a ten foot (l0') front and rear setback with the exception of Lot 102. They are asking for about a four [feet] (4') to five foot (5') section of the building to be located as dose as 2,43 feet from the aide yard u.nd they are ~lcing for lhe front yard to be five feet (5'). Staff supports the 2.43 feet becAuse of the location of the other homes nearby, but the side yard for tha.t four [foot] (4') to five foot (S') section. we do not support the five foot (5') in the front. We support . ten foot (10') front and rear sctback." "g.d (SLt> L.Z'f: Let> S~NlddS ~31N[~ ~O A~]) Sl:G0 S00~-20-A~W Fax '4076997957 Ma~ 2 2005 10'49 P.04 CITY OF WJNTER SPRJNGS, FLORID^, DRAFT UNAl'PROVIiO .....INUTiS rlA.I\lNJNC AND ZONING BOAltD/LOCAL rUNNING ACtNCv SPECIAL MEETING ~ AlIUL I', 200!- PAGE)OF9 Discussion. A slide shOW' presentation was shown. ~ Mr. JlIlian Demorra, as the Builder and Resident of Greenspointe SUbdlvudon, Mr. DemOml s.ud, (1)ue to the Criteria of this lot, we are fighting to save some major size Oak. trees on the: comer of the Jot - the maio concern with the roadway - was the driveway:' Mr. Dcmorra. said, "I had my Surveyor put a driyeway in there that was eighteen by thirty [feet] (18' x 30)." Chainnan Poe asked, "Which Lot is that on?" Mr, DemolTll said, "That ;, on Lot 102. That's the one that we only haye the problem with - getting the last bowe on there." Furthennort;, Mr_ Demorra said, U] did have a lot of runoff from the adjacent houses," Mr. Demorra said, "Ms. Perez [Stonn Waler Utility Manager, Public Works Department] - Lot - lOt. there will bt: a drainage system to put in there to help accommodate for the drainage, \Vater even though it's not aU from my home. It's also from some of the existing homes that are built there that have guttering, shooting water right down towards our property:' Board Member Tom Brown said) "How about YOW' storm water?" Mr. Demorra said, 'lThere are catch basins there.'l Board Member Brown asked, "Are you goiDg to do something about that with the storm water?" Mr. Demorra said, "My tot is from the back comer of the buildings - elevated up high enough that where they sheet drain to the front curb and the water goes into the catch basins." Di$CussioD. Mr. Baker said, "Staff does not 'upport the five feet (5') in U,e tront." Chairman Poe opeMd the "Public Itlput" portion of thlS Agenda Item. Mr. William Vanlue, 509 Spoollbill Court, Winter Springs, Florida: briefly addressed the Board Members and is opposed to this "Waiver" Request Ms. Catherine Graham, 667 NighrJuzwk Circle, Winter Springs. Florida: spoke about the drainage in her yard and is opposed to this 'Waiver' Request. Discussion. M.s. Helga Schwartz, 720 Galloway Cou.rr. Winrer Springs, Florida: as the Vice President of the Highland's Homeowner's Association, Ms. Schwarz spoke about plans that were not submined to the Architectural Review Board. Ms. Schwarz stated) "I just want to make thiE. Board [Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency} aware that the Applicant has not approached the Highland's Homeowner's Association and we wanted to put that on 'Record' because we do have - ability to review Mr. Demorra's plans and determine location." (ll3'd :::SL.t' loc( L.1l3t' S9NlddS ~31NIM ~ A1IJ 91:60 ~G0G-G0-A~ Fa.x:4076997967 Ma~ 2 2005 10:50 P.05 CITY OF WINTER SPRlWCS. ~LORlOA OItAPT U'N"PPRovEO 'MINVTl!S rt.ANNJlIIG ANI) ZONJNC BOARD/l.OC"'L PLANNINC A.Cl.1"lCV SPEC/.AL MEETINC _ APRIL. II. 1()fJ,S "'A~~OF9 "I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE RECOMMEND THE APPROVAL ~ OF THE TEN FOOT (10') FRONT AND THE REAR BUILDING SEllJACK AT TJUU:E FEET (3'). AT 2,43 [FOOT] APPROXIMATELY FOUR (4') TO FlVE FEET (5') SEGMEl'/T ON TilE BUILDING LOT OF 102, AND THIS IS IN CONJUNCTJON WITII THE 'FINDINGS' FOUND BY TIlE CITY IN ADDITION TO . (PAIlJ\GRAPIl] NUMBER SEVEN (7) WHICH WOULn BE TIlE HlGIlLAND'S HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION REVIEW OF THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR ALL ADDmONAL CONDITIONS,>> MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER VOSKA, DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER BROWN: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON KARR: NAY BOARD MEMBER TILLIS: AYE CHAIRMAN POE: NAY BOARD MEMBER VOSKA: AYE MOTION CARRIED, PUBLIC J:lEAJUNGS 402. COIDJRlUJ.lty Developro.cat Department - PlaDDmg Dlvulob ADD-ON Requests Tbe PlallDlug And ZoDing lJoardILocal PlaDui.g Age~cy Hold A P.blic Hearillg Related To OrdiooDce 2005-13 Wbicb Revi.., The "H Ugbt lad.,lrial" Zoning District'. List OfCoaditional Uses To Add ~AutomobUt M2jor Service ADd Major Repolr E'tablishm..ls (I~"udibg Body Rtp,.;r. And Paiutlng)." Mr. Randy Steven.son. AICP. Director. Community Development Department presented thi, Agenda It om ond di.played the M>p of the ")-1" District within the City [of Winter Springs]. Mr. Stevenson said, "Staff. therefore recommends that the Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing related to Ordinance 2005-13, and make a recommendation of approval to the City Commission reg.arding amending the language of the '1-1 Light Industrial Zoning District' to allo", 'Automotive Major Service and Majot Repair Es.ablisluncnt (Including Body Repairs and Painting)' as a 'Conditional Use' within the 'Light Industrial' (I-I) DisDict, subject to certain conditiollS. Staff at lhis point, is of the opinion that one of those conditions would be th",t all paint and body repair take place witllin a completely enclosed building." Discus&ion. S0.d [Slot.> l.CE L.12It> S9Nl~d5 ~31NIM ~o Al]) 91:50 S00e-G~-^~ I-ax:al)(b';:l';:l(';ib( Ma~ "' 20U5 10 : SO P.06 CITY or WINTJ!.R SP~.IN(jS, FJ.QIUJ;;>A DRAFT l./ftAP'ItOVED MlNU'T'ES PLANNING ~D ZONING aoAJU)ILOCAL PLANNINC "CENC'Y SPBCt...I.Mf'.f.TI;NG-AI"RIL Ill, ~OO5 'AGE60F9 Chairman Poe opened the "Public Input" portion of this Agenda I",,". No one spoke. Chairman Poe closed the "Public Input "portion of Ihts Agenda Item_ "I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE FORWARD IT TO THE CITY COMMISSION- 200$014 Ill! TO CIlANGE OVER FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FROM THE CONDITIONAL USE FOR THE AUTOMOTIVE AND PAINT AND BODY SHOP." MOTION BY BOAlU> MEMBER VOSKA. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER TILLIS. DISCUSSION. VOTE, VICE CHAIRPERSON KARR: NAY BOARD MEMBER BROWN: AYE BOAlU> MEMBER VOSKA: AYE CHAIRMAN POE: AYE BOARD MEMBER TILLIS: AYE MOTION CAlUUEll, REGULAR AGENDA UCULAR SOO. Community Duelopmellt Department - Planning Division Reque". Tbat Tke Plani.g ADd ZoILi.g (I'&Z) Board Co..ider Add Appro.. A Finl Edgideeri.glSlte PI.. For A 10,028 Square Foot, O.~Story Retail Sale. Bulldiag 00 A 1.2~4 Acre Tract 00 SR (Slate Road) 434 At Hacienda Drive. Ms. Eloise Sahlstrom. AICP. ASLA, Senior Planner, Community Development Department presented this Agenda Item. M.. Sahlstrom .aid, "Staff has required the Applioant to provide a twenty rour foot (24') IN'ide cross access easement to the Cumberland Farm property that will allow an eventual connection to the East." Ms. Sahlstrom stated, "We do indicate tha.t the cross access easement would need to be 'R~orded' prior to the issuance of 3. Certificate of Occupancy for the building_ Staff does recommend approval ofthi& p.roject s.ubjtct to any of the revisions that might need to be made by the Project Landscape AIchitecl." 90-d rSLt> L.cC ~0t> S~leldS d31NIM jO A1IJ ~t:50 S00~-c0-^ew Fax:4076997967 Ma~ 2 2005 10:50 P.07 CITY Of' WI1'-l'reR SPRINGS. P1.OltJOA DRAFT UNAPPRQVHD MINUTI!S PLANNING Al'fIJ l.OI\Il'JIlG aGAAnILOCAL tLANNlNG AGENCY SP"@(,IALMEE.ilNC _ ,.pRJlll, 200S l"AGf10" "I'D LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION THA.T - THE PL.-\NNING A.ND ZONING BO!.RJ} RECOMMEND A.PPROVA.L TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE ATTACHED FINAL ENGINEERING SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBJECT TO THE REVISIONS NEEDED TO BE MADE BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE A.RCHITECT." M0'I101'l BY VICE CHAIRPERSON IURR. SECONDED BY BOA..RD MEMBER BROWN. DISCUSSION. MR. ROBERT VONHERBULlS. OWNER, MCKEE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, P.O, BOX 47/366, LAKE MONROE, FLORI/)A: REl'RESENTING TlJE MILLER'S OF 'MILLER SCHOOL SUPPLY' .-\ND REQUESTING CLARIF1CATION OF THE Df;CORATIVE WALL, MR. VONIlERBULIS SAID, "IT STATES A DECORATIVE MASONRY RETAlNING WALL WILL CONTAIN THE WATER RETENTION IN THE AREA 01'1 THE WEST SIDE OF HACIENDA (VILLAGE) - WE HAVE APPROXlMATELY A FORTY-TWO INCH (41") mGH WALL TIIAT IS FACING THE INSIDE OF THE RETENTION POND ANlII JUST WANT TO MAKE SUM THAT STAFF IS ACTUALLY RECOMMEND THAT BE A DECORATIVE WALL WHICH WOULD BE UNDER WATER DURING THE IlAINS OR ARE WE TALKING ABOUT A REGULA.R MA.SONRY WA.LL AND THE DECORATIVE WALL BEING STRICTLY THE ONE THAT'S ON THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE SEPAltATING US FROM THE RESIDENTS AS TO THE SOUTH?" MR VONIlERBULIS STATED, "OTHER THAN TlJAT, WE CONCUR ON ALL OF STAFF'S COMMENTS," MS. SAlILSTROM SAID, "THE WALl" INSIDE THE RETENTION AREA WOULD NEED TO MEET PUBLIC WORXS SPECIFICATIONS AND I THINK YOU'RE CORllECT - IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE DECORATIVE I WOULD NIED TO CllECK WITH OUR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR [MR /<IP LOCKCUFF, PUBLIC WORXSIUTlLlTY DEPA.RTMENT DlRECTORI ON THAT." VOTE: BOA..RD MEMBER BROWN: AYE BOARD MEMBER YOSKA: AYE BOARD MEMBER TILLIS: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON !CARR: AYE CHAIRMAN POE: AYE MOTlON CAo.RRllID. L0-d [~LP LeE L0p s!)t<l!I:IdS CJ31NIf'1 .:lD AlIJ ~1:60 S00~-~-)~W Fax '4075997957 Ma~ 2 2005 10'51 P.Og CITY OF w[NTERSPklNOS, )'\.0"10... 0......0 UN....1'1'ROVED MINUTE! rLA.l'lI'U'WG ANO ZOMrI'lG aoAlm/LOCAL rL""'NING ACBNCY SPECIAL. MEETfNC _ APRIL IS, 2005 PA.GE'OP5I ItEGUl..t\R 50]. Community DeyelopmEnt DeparttDtDt-l'luaiug DivisioD R"'Iue.b Tbat The PlaD.iDt And Zoning (P&Z) lIoud Co..ider ADd Approve PtelimlD.ry And Filial Site Plan And EagiDeerinc Pl*as Fo..- The 3.16 Acre Prol'uty o. The South....1 Comer or Mo.. Road ADd S.R (SIloIe Road) 434 Whic:h Includes Tbe Vac...t State Farm la,uranc.e BuildiD.g Along With The AdditiOD Of T..o (l) New Office Buildu.g. O. Tbe 3,16 Aere.. Ms. Sahlstrom pre<ented this Agenda Item and displayed pictures of the Site, Tllpo:z1SideA Di:lcussion. Mr. David Glunt, Project Engineer, Madden Engineering, Inc., 431 East Horatio Avellue'. Suite 160. Maitland, Florida.: &poke to the Board Members regarding this property. Mr. Craig F. Rouhier. Executive Vice Presi.dent, W. M Sanderlin & Associates, Inc.. Son",,-,', LTD. 738 Rugby Street. Orlando, Florida: addressed the Board Members on the various businesses planned for this Site. "I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR THE MOSS ROAD INTERNATIONAL OFflCE COMPLEX AS DEI'ICn:n OR AS SHOWN HERE TONIGHT ON THEIR flNAL ENGINEERING SITE DEVELOPMENT rLANS SUBJECT TO TilE CONDITIONS SETFORTII TONIGHT," MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER TILLIS, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN. DISCUSSION. BOARD MEMBER BROWN ASKED, "I WOULD JUST LIKE TO REMIND ELOISE (SAHLSTROM] THAT - GOOD POINT - BROUGIIT UP ABOUT THOSE AIR CONDITIONERS. IF YOU CONVEY TRAT ON!' MS. SA8LSTROM SAID, "ALRIGHT!' VOTE, VICE CIlAlRPERSON KARR" AYE CHAIRMAN POE, AYE BOARD MEMBER VOSKA, AYE BOARD MEMBER TILLIS, AYE BOARD MEMBER BROWN, AYE MOTION CAIUUED. 80'd [SlJ> U[ ill\7 S~NI~dS ~31NIM ~ Al]) Ll:50 ~00G-2~-A~W Fax:4076997967 Ma~ 2 2005 10:51 P.09 bl1 d ItI.l.U.L crrv OF WrNTER SPRINGS, I=LOR1DA DUPT UNN'PftOVEO MrNUTES PLANNINO AND lONJNC VOAaDlLOCAl. FJ..ANI'U",C .-.CtNCV SI'et:IALMEfTfNG". ^PfUl la. 2005 "AC~90F' ADJOURNMENT "I MOVE THAT WE ADJOURN," MOTION BY VICE CHA.lRPERSON KARR. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER BROWN. DISCUSSION. WITH THE CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD THE MOTION WAS APJ>ROVED, MO..ION CARR.lEIJ. Chmrmon Pee adjourned the Meeting at approximately 8: 59 p.m. RESPECTFUllY SUBMITTED. JOAN L BROWN DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED, WILLIAM H, POB, CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDILOCAL PLANNING AGENCY NOTE, These M:inuIiD ~ appnwed:u ~ .2005 '1.al'\nill6 Nod z",inl 8o:u'GlLDul PlIIlni"!, I\B~""')' Mt't:ling. 60'd Z~t' ~ci: 1.0t> S~ll&lS ~3mlM ~ MI) 8't : 60 SOOc-Z0-),ljW