The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002 02 11 Informational B (2) COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM B Consent Informational X Public Hearing Regular February 1 L 2002 Regular Meeting Mgr. /~ Att. / Dept. REQUEST: Receive information regarding the HCCH Closing. PURPOSE: Informing the City Commission ofthe closing regarding the former HCCH Property which the City acquired pursuant to the Contract for Sale and Purchase and the Settlement Agreement approved by - the City Commission. APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY: None CON~IDERATIONS: The City Commission previously approved a Settlement Agreement and Contract for Sale and Purchase which required the City to purchase a 7.75 acre tract of property from the Health Care Center for the Homeless, Inc. (HCCH). Under the Contract for Sale and Purchase, closing was required and scheduled for fifteen (15) days after the due diligence period expired, provided the City found that: 1. The Title Commitment indicated that HCCH owned the property, free and clear of encumbrances. Page 1 of2 2. The appraisal confirmed the fair market value ofthe property was not less than Two Hundred Sixty Five Thousand Dollars ($265,000.00). 3. The environmental assessment did not contain environmental conditions that would prevent the use of not less than 3.2 acres ofthe subject property under the City's C-2 zoning district. During due diligence, the City found: 1. HCCH owned the property, free and clear of encumbrances. 2. The appraisal prepared for the City by Pinel & Carpenter, Inc., dated October 29, 2001, appraised the property at Two Hundred Sixty Five Thousand Dollars ($265,000.00). 3. By letter from David Dewey, Director of the St. John's River Water Management District, dated November 6,2001, St. John's confirmed: a) The wetland line provided by HCCH is valid until March 12,2006 (resulting in not less than 3.2 acres of usable uplands). b) Based on a November 5, 2001 inspection ofthe Property, no violations ofthe District's environmental Resource Permit rules exist on the Property. With the conditions of closing satisfied pursuant to the Contract, closing occurred on December 19, 2001. Under Paragraph 2 of the Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Sum paid by the City was Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A ATTACHMENT: None COMMISSION ACTION: None required. F:\DOCS\City of Winter Springs\Agenda\Respite Center closing Item B 2.7.02.wpd Page 2 of2 ""' .~- j Robert S. Miller District One. City of Winter Springs February 25, 2002 SUBJECT: Censure of Mayor Partkya for lying to this Commission regarding his part in the planned homeless Center in Winter Springs. TO: City Commission. I am asking that this issue be placed on the Commission agenda for Monday, April, 8, 2002, as a "Regular Agenda item," in order to determine if Mayor Partyka should be censured for deliberately misleading this Commission regarding his participation in the planning of the Homeless Center to be built in the City's Industrial Park last year. A second question is whether the Mayor should be ordered to reimburse the City for an invoice associated with his participation in the above transaction. At the City Commission meeting of July 23, 2001, an agreement was discussed with operators of the Homeless Center of Orange County, not to pursue a new Homeless Center facility in Winter Springs. Included in documentation provided by the Homeless Center to the City in support of the settlement, was an invoice for $1,465.00, from Universal Engineering Sciences (UES) of Orlando. The invoice is dated May 23, 2000, is addressed to Mr. Paul Partyka as Development Director. It requests payment for work completed at the new Homeless Center site in Winter Springs. Text in the letter states, "The scope of our investigation was planned in conjunction with and authorized by you." The letter continues... "This report contains the results of our investigations, and engineering interpretation of these with respect to the project characteristics described to us, and recommendations for the groundwater control, foundation design, and site preparation." Public records now available to the City reflect the following: 1. In early May 2000, as the sitting Mayor of Winter Springs, Mayor Partyka and the chief fund raiser for the Homeless Center at Saint Stephens Church, met privately with Winter Springs city staff, to encourage them to arrange for sewer and water to be provided to the Homeless Center site in Winter Springs. Mayor Partyka arranged for this subject to be placed on the City Commission agenda of May 22, 2000. 2. At the May 22, 2000 City meeting, Mayor Partyka again spoke eloquently about the need to provide sewer and water to the proposed Homeless Center site in the Winter Springs Industrial Park. He repeatedly insisted that the city needed to provide this service to the Industrial Park so as to protect the environment, save Lake Jessup, avoid ground water pollution, and to stop the "'- ,~ " spread of septic tanks. When asked an hour later by Commissioner McLeod, if Mayor Partyka had any interests in the property, the Mayor repeatedly reassured the Commission that he was only a Realtor for the transaction, and therefore only represented the seller, who obviously no longer had any interest in the property. On several occasions when the Homeless Center was discussed, the Mayor again assured this Commission that he was only the Realtor for the land transaction. 3. At a Commission meeting in early 2001 (a year later), Mayor Partyka, under more questioning about his role in the Homeless Center transaction, admitted to the City Commission that he was in fact the Broker for the transaction and represented the Homeless Center from the very beginning. Nothing was said at this time by the Mayor about work that he had authorized for the Homeless Center's construction, nor the substantial commission which he had received from funds raised for the project, from churches in the area. Citizens of Winter Springs are deeply distressed by the Mayor's repeatedly misleading of this Commission about his role in the transaction, which constitutes deception to this Commission, conflict of interest, as well as serious ethical questions regarding acceptable standards of conduct. Robert S. Miller, Commissioner Commissioner, District 1. City of Winter Springs. Encl.: Universal Engineering Sciences invoice of May 23, 2000 CC: Mayor Partyka City Manager City Attorney Sent By: BROWN,WARD,SALZMAN&WEISS,P.A.; 407 425 9596; Feb.11.0210:44AM; Page 2 'I; i 86/27/2001 03:~2 4079777822 _....._...._.........._ _........... ....""",.LVVLU.... MACA I ONE GROUP nc....... I n o..Hr<t:. l.L1~ I c:.r<: PAGE ela t""At:ll:. ~::f May 23, 2000 0tII0n .... - 0.....- . Gaho...U" 'f'<<\"~ 'R~ 'Bl~ - 0"""1\6 On..:n . Weft v.lm e..-:n .~ . OcIIIoI . "'1"poI . o.c..<y 83 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES Conw"".u:, 1.1: G->10GMl00l D-<QlM""rc' Thiw.rc:*I ~ t:;:....ron!T'.......1 ~ . C"",\tVC~on MAr.rl&1o ~ Realvast, Real Eslate Advisors /.]00 Lucien Way, Suito 350 MalUand. Florida 32751 Attention: Mr. Paul P ~ pertyk;] Development Olrector Reference: Geotochnlca) ~Iorotlon 7.6 +/- Aae 51te Old Sanford! Ovfedo Roa<J Seminole County. Florida Project No. 19290-016~1 Report No. 116A02 Dear Mr. Partyka: Universal Engineering Sciences has; completed the geolechniC<l1 exploration for tl1e referenced site in Seminole County. Florida. The SCXlpt) of our Investigation was planned In conjunctIon wIth and authorized by, you. This report contains the results of our InvestIgations. an engineering Interpretation of thB5~ with respect to the project characteristics described to us, and recommendations for the groundwater control, foundation desIgn, and site prepQretlon. We apprec;31e the opportunity to have worked with you on this project and look. forward to a continued a.5soclarJon. Please do not nesi18le to contact us If you should have any queEtlO"~. or if we may further assist you 6S your plan$ proceed. lIy submitted, AL I:NGINEERING SCIENCES, INC. eln. P. E. a P. E. No~ 51399 OJ' Project Manger tU~' <f/l.-"I#~ Br ~ H. Woloshln. P.E. P.E. No. 36734 Manager - GeolechnlC3/ Engineering ..... KH/8W:sl cc: Cllonl (4) 3532 Maggie Blvd. . Orlando. FI 32611 . (407) 423-0604 . F.'))( (407) 423-3106 ~~R-11-?~~? In:Aq /1~'7 /I?C:; qc:;q~ q,.1'/ PC\::J , "J OS/27/21301 '03: 42 4079777822 Y~14~'L~UU L~.LU ~~'~LOOL~ ~lACAIONE GROUP M~~_IH CAKt LLNI~~ PAGE ~b PAGE El5 UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES GEOTECHNICAl EXPLORAnOH 7.8 ./. ACRE SITE OLD SANFORDJOYJEDO ROAD SEMINOLE COUNTY, FlORJDA PROJECT NO. 19290-tl18.41 REPORT NO. 1164a2 PrQP.,.."d For~ Rearvest, Real Estate Advisors 2200 LucJen Way, Suite 350 Maitland, Florlda 32761 Prepared By: U"ivllrsal Englnlering Sc:iences 353.2 Maggie 80ulevard Orlando, Florida 32811 (407) 423-0504 M6Y 23. 2000 CoflSYllarlts in: Geol.eC:l'lroCllJ Engineonog . EnvironmeI1lal Scionc-.n' Ccmtl'VC'Oon MIllor\al& Testing' Threchcid I~ ~Cl!.S ln~ Ol'lando' GaitlecviIJlI . Rlviora a.u.ch. RodJodgo . DaylOt1B e-.:tJ. P\.n(a Gorda . 51. ~ustine . JAc.k.sooviIle . 0c.a/8 . Tampa {; 05/~Z(?QPi_~~3:42 4079777822 ...U......LVUL(.. fvlACA !ONE GROUF' ~LIM ~~~~ ~NI~t PAGE 07 PAGE Elf; Project No. 19290-016-01 Report No. 116402 '.0 INTROOUCJION 1.1 GENERAL In this report. we presenl the results of the subsurface investigations of the site for lhe proposed 7.a +/-:3cre site In Seminole County, Florida. We have divided this report into the following secl/ons: . SCOPE OF SERVICES. Defines what we dId · FINDINGS .'Describes what we encountered · RECOMMENDATIONS. Describes what we encourage you to do · LIMIT A nONS - Describes the restrictions Inherent in this report . SUMMARY - Reviews the materIal In rhls report · APPENDICES - Presents support materials referenced in this report. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION We understand that you propOse to construct a 2-story main structure wfth 2 adjacent structures on this site. We were provided with a site plan prepared by Lochrane Engineering, on May 15, 2000. We used this plan in preparing our investigation. The geotechnical study included herein is limited to structure area and does not include any pavement or drainage areas. Our recommendations are based upon the above considerations. If any of this information is incorrect or if you anticipate any changes, inform Universal Engineering Sciences so that we may review our recommendations. The site is located In SemInole County, Florida. A general location map of the project area appears in Appendix A: Site Location Map. 2.2 PURPOSE The purposes of this investigation were: . to investigate the general subsurface condition.s at the site; . to interpret and review the subsurface conditions with respect to the proposed construction; and · [0 provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for foundation design. and site preparation. Page 1 of 8 Pages sa J. . OS/27/2001 .03:42 "'<,.Ir~.eOOL(.J... HACA IONE GROUF. n~rlLln L~~~ L~Nl~~ PAGE 08 PAGE 07 4079777822 Project No. Report No. 19290--016-01 , 16402 This report presents an evalualionof site conditions on the basis of traditional ~eote~hnical procedures for site characterization. The recol/ered samples were not examined, elthe~ v'su~IIY or analytically, for chemical composition or environmental hazards. Universal Engineering Sciences would be pleased to perform these services, if you desire. - Our investigation was confined to the zone of soil likely to be stres~ed by the propo~ed construction. Our work did nol address the potential for surface expressIon of deep geologIcal conditions, such as sinkhole development related to karst activity. This evaluation requires a more extensive range of field services than performed in this study. We wfll be pleased to conduct an Investigation to evaluate the probable effect of the regional geology upon the proposed constructlon,_ if you desire. 2.3 FIELD INVESTIGATION The subsurface conditions In the structure area ware investigated with five (5) borings advanced to depths of 25 feet while performing the Standard Penetration Test. The locations of the boring were not surveyed and should be considered approximate. Our drilling crew located the boring locations upon estimated distances and relationships to obvious landmarks. We performed the Standard Penetration Test In each of the borings according to the procedures of ASTM D-1586, with continuous sampling performed above a depth of 10 feet, to detect slight variations in the 5011 profile at shallow depths. The basfc procedure for the Standard Penetration Test is as follows: a standard split-barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches, The number of blows required to drive the sampler 1-foot, after sQatlng 6 inches, is designated the penetration resistance, or N-value; this value is an index to soil strength and consistency. Jar samples of the soils encountered will be held in our laboratory for your Inspection for 60 days and then discarded, unless we are notified otherwise. 2.4 LABORATORY JNVESTIGATION The soil samples recovered (rom the soil test borings were returned to our laboratory and then visually examined and the field descriptions reviewed. We selected representative soil samples for laboratory testing consisting of five (5) wash No. 200 sieve analysis, and five (S) moisture content determinations. We performed these tests to aid In classifying the soils and to help to evaluate the general engineering dlaraderistics or the site solis. See Appendix 8: Boring Logs and Description of TestIng Procedures. for further data and explanations. Page 2 of B Pages EJ3 06/27/2801 ;03: 42' 4079777822 ......." -,."'.,H""'LoU.... MACA IONE GROUP n~ln ~~ ~~It~ PAGE 139 '-'AC:.l::. \11::1 Project No. 19290-016-01 Report No. 116402 3.0 ERELlMINARY FINDING~ 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS A Universal EngIneering Sciences engIneer performed a visual site Inspection of the subject property to gain a "hands-on" familiarity with the project area. From the site specific topographIc informalion provided, and from our site explorations, it is apparent that the site is generally flat. Vegetation on the site consisted primarily of underbrush and trees. We ta)Camined U.S.G.S. topographic quadra~gJe maps and the USDA Soil ConservatJon Service (SCS) Soil Survey of Seminole County for relevant Inform at/oil about the site. The SCS Soil Survey indlcstes the' soils on the site consist of Myakka and Eau Ga1lle Fine Sands (20). ThIs class of solls /s generally flat and pooriy drained Bands. 3.2 SUBSURFACE CONOITIONS The boring locations and detailed subsurface condillons are illuslrated in Appendix B: Boring Location Plan and Boring Logs. The classifications and descriptions shown on the logs are generally based upon Visual characterizations of the reCDvered soil samples and a limited number of laboratory tests. Also, see Appendix. 8: Soils Classification Chart, for further explanation of the symbols and placement of data on the Boring Logs. In general, the borings performed at the site revealed a somewhat uniform soli profile. The borings revealed a sequence fine sands grading from clean sand (SP) to SillY and clayey sand (SM, SC) to the explored depth of 25 feet. The blow counts "N" values measured in the borings ranged from 5 to 21 blows per foot. This is indicativa of loose to medium densa conditions. At the lime of our investigation (May 2000), we encountered groundwater at depths ranging from 4 to 5.3 feet below grade at the boring locations after the groundwater had stabilized. Page 3 of 8 Pages w OS/2//2001 .03:42 4079777822 --- -~, -~-~ ~~.~v ~U~~LVVL~~ /vlACAI ONE GROUF' n~H~ln ~HKC ~CNI~~ PAGE 10 t""Abt:.. I::J':J Project No. Report No. 19290-O16~01 116402 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 GENERAL The following recommendations are made based upon a review of th~ att~c~ed soil.test data, our understanding of the proposed construction, and experience with sImilar projects and subsurface conditions. If the srructuralloadings. building locations, or grading plans change from those discussed previously, we request the opportunity to review and possibly amend our recommendations with respect to those changes. Additionally. if subsurface conditions are encountered during construction which were not encountered In U1e borings, report those condItions Immediately to us for observatIon and recommendations. In this section of the report, we present our detailed recommendations for groundwater control. building foundatlons. site preparatfon and construction related services. 4.2 GROUNDWATER CONTROL The groundwater table will fluctuate seasonally dependlng upon local rainfall. The rainy season In Central Florida is normally between June and September. Based upon our review of U.S.G.S. data, Orange County Soils Survey, and regIonal hydrogeology. our best estimate for the seasonal high groundwater levels ere shoYm on the boring log sheets adjacent to their corresponding depths. The existing and estimated seasonal high Water levels at each boring location appear In Appendix B; Boring logs. It should be noted that the estimated seasonal high water levels do not provide any assurance that groundwater levels will not exceed these estImated levels during any given year in the future. Should the impediments to surface water drainage be present, or should rainfall intensity and duration, or total rain tall quantities, exceed the normally anticipated rainfall quantities, groundwater'levels might once again exceed our seasonal high estimates. We recommend positive drainage be established and maintained on the site during construction. We further recommend permanent measures be constructed to maintain positive drainage from the site throughout the life of the project - We recommend all foundation designs Incorporate the seasonal high groundwater conditions. 4.3 BUILDING FOUNDATIONS Provided the soils are compacted in accordance with the site preparation recommendations outlined in the Site Prepaldtion Section (4.7) of the report, we recommend that the proposed structures be supported on conventlonal, shallow spread foundations or 8 thickened edge monolltrJic slab. The following parameters may be used for prelimInary foundation design. Page 4 of 8 Pages EI3 86/21/2001 03:42 4879777822 --''''_.'~_oJ_ 4.........'"'" ...,tJt""<<JC~U' ~'lACA IONE GROUP nc.HL I M CLl,....::. Ct:.N I t.i< t-'Abt:. 11 PAGE 1 El Project No. Report No. 19290--016-01 11 6402 4.3.1 Bearlna Pressure The maximum allowable net soil bearing pressure to be used for prellmfnary shallow foundation design should not exceed 2500 pounds per square foot (psf). Net bearing pressure is defined as the soil bearing pressure at the base of the foundation in excess of the natural overburden pressure. The foundations should be designed based upon the maximum load that could be imposed by all loading conditions. . 4.3.2 Foundation Size The minimum widths recommended for any Isolated cclumn footing and continuous wall footing are 24 inches and 18 inches, respedlvely. Even though the maximum allowable sol b~arfng pressure may not be achieved, these width recommendation should control the size of the foundatlons. 4,3,3 Bearlnq Depth The foundations should bear at a depth of at least 18 inches below the exterior ~nal grades. We recommend stormwater and surface water be diverted away from the building exterior. both during and after construction to reduce the possIbility of erosron beneath the exterior footings. 4.3.4 Bearing Material The foundations may bear on either the compacted suitable natural soils or compacted structural fill. The bearing level soils, after compaction should have compactIon to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density of the bearing soils as determined by ASTM D~ 1557 (Modified Proctor), to the depth described subsequenlly in the Site Preparation Section (4.1) of the report. In addition to compaction the bearing soils must exhibil5tability and be free of "pumping" conditions. 4.3.5 Sertlement Estimates Post-construction seWement of the structure will be Influenced by several interrelated factors, such as (1) subsurface stratification and strength/compressibility characteristics of the bearing solis to a depth of approximately twice the width of Ihe footing; (2) footing size, bearing level, applied loads, and resulting bearing pressures beneath the foundation; (3) site preparation and earthwork construction techniques used by the contractor.,and (4) external factors. including but not limited to vibration (rom offslte sources and groundwater fluctuations beyond those normally anticipated for the n3tt,Jrally~occurring site and soli conditions which are present. Our settlement estimates for the structure are based upon the use at successful adherence to the site preparation 'recommendations presented later in this report. Any deviation from these recommendallons could result in an increase In the estimated post#construction settlement of the structure. Due to the sandy nature of the surficial soils following the compaction operations, we expect a s;gnlficanl portion of sotllemenl 10 be elasl;c in nature and occur relatively quickly, on~ Page 5 of 8 Pages 05/t7/2001,03:44 4079777822 ~~'.~I ~~uv ~~.,~ ~U'~LOOL~ HACA lONE GROUF' Mt.AL I H L:t..\I'<t:. Cl::.NTEf t-'Alit:. 1"L P CoG!:: 11 ProJed No. Repon No. 19290-D16-01 116402 Due to the sandy nature of the surfldal soils following the compaction operations, we expect a significant portion of settlement to be elastic In nature and occur relatively quickly. on application of the loads,' during and immediately folloWing. construction. Using the rerommended maximum bearing pressure, the assumed ma;ximum structural loads, and the field and laboratory test data which we have correlated into the strength and compressibility characteristics of the subsurface soils, we estimate the total, post-construction settlements of the structure to be 1.Inch or less. Differential settlement result from differences in applied bearing pressures and the variations in the compressibility characteristics of the subsurface soils. For the building pads prepared as recommended, we anticipate the differential settlement of less than Yrinch. 4.4 SITE PREPARATION We recommend only good practice. site preparation procedures. These procedures Indude: stripping the site of vegetation, proof-rolling and compacting the subgrade, and filling to grade with engineered fill. AdditIonal site preparation measures may, be requIred once the final geotechnical exploration is performed If differing site conditions are encountered. A detailed synopsis of the anticipated site preparation 'N'Ork Is as follows: 1. If required, perfonn remedial dev.'8tering pn'or to any earthwork operations. 2. Strip the pro'posed construction limits of ~II muck, grass, roots, topsoil, construction debris, and other deleterious materials withIn and' 0 feet beyond the perimeter of the proposed bulldlng. Expect clearing and grubbing to depths of 12 Inches. Deeper clearing and grubbing depths may be encountered In heavlly vegetated areas where major root systems and surficial organic soils are encountered. 3. Proof-~oll the subgrade with a heavily loaded, rubber-tired vehicle under the observation of a UnIversal Engineering Sciences geotechnlcaJ engineer or his representative. Proof- rolling will help locale <:my zones of especially loose or sofi soils not encountered in the soil test borings. Then undercut, or otherwise treat chese zones as recommended by the engineer. 4. Compact the subgrade from the surface by a medium weight vibratory raHer (a 1 Q-ton roller, for example) until you obtain a minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor ma;xlmum dry density (ASTM D-1557), 10 a depth of 3 feet below existing ground su~ace In the building limits. 5. Test the subgrade for compaction at a frequency of not less than one test per 2,500 square feef per foot of depth Improvement In the building area. Page 6 of 8 Pages m OS/27/2001 03:4f 407'3777822 (vIACA IONE GROUP .,....".....,'"'\"I..:,.u-, ~HLln ~H~~ ~~I~~ I-'Alit. l.j ~AI.:Jt::. l.L Project No. Report No. , 9290-016-01 116402 6. Place fill material. as required. The fill should consist of "clean," fine sand with less than 5 percent soli fines. You may use fill materials with soil fines betvveen 5 and 10 percent, but strie! moisture control may be required. Place fill in uniform 10- to 12-lndl loose lifts and compact each 11ft to a minimum density of 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. 7. Perform compliance tests within the fill at a frequency of not less than one test per 2.500 square feel per lift in the building areas, or at a minimum of two test locations, whichever is greater. 8. Test all footing cuts tor compactIon to a depth of 3 feet. Additionally, we recommend that you test one out of every. four column footings, and one test per every 200 lineal feet of wall footing. 4.5 CONSTRUCTION RELATED SERVICES We recommend the owner retain Unive~al Engineering Sciences to perform the final geotechnical evaluation and the construction materials tests and observations on this project The geotechnical engineering design does nol end with the advertisement of the constructlon documents. The design is an on-goIng process throughout construction. Because of our familiarity with the site conditions and the intent or the engineering design, we are most qualified to address problems that mlghtarise during construction In a timely and cost-effective manner. Page 7 of a Pages Ea OS/27',/2001' 83: 42, 407'3777822 aO'~~1 LUUU L~.LU 40/4~OO~~4 1'IACA IONE GROUF' HtULIH L~~~ L~NI~ I-'Al:il:. lq PAGE 13 Project No. Report No. 19290-016-01 11 6402 5.0 LIMITATIONS During the early stages of most construction projects, geolechnicallssues not addressed in this report may anse. Because of the naluralllmltations inherent in working with the subsurface, it is not possible for a geotechnical engineer to predict and address all possible problems. An Association of Engineering Firms Practicing In the Geosciences (AS FE) publication, "Important In(orm alion About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report" appears in Appendix C, and will help explain the nature of geotechnical issues. Page 6 of 8 Pages. .. w -,ur..,,,vuL.t.J..., IY1ACA lONE GROUP - nt:.HL I M ~rc:c. -';C.N I t..l'< PAGE 15 l-'Al.:i!:. lq 05i27i2001 83:42 4079777822 APPENDIX A OS/27/2081 03:42 4079777822 U~, LJI LUUU L~.LU ~Ui~LOOLa~. HACA lONE GROUP "C.~L I H l;OKt.. lA:.N I t..1'< PAGE 16 PAGE 15 .. -\.;1Y....~....d..:- .,~.~~. ~:. . _ ___J ..___. .', .....-, ~..... .".,- ~ . - . -. . . /;,~V;/ ..... :2 ~ 2000 I . SCURC~: USGS qUACRANGLE SCALE (n.) 0;1).\\1/./ II'!': R.K.5. SOLE, AS SHOWN 7.8 ACRE SITE OLD SANFORD-OVIEDO ROAD SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA SITE LOCATION MAP 5/22/00 93 UNIVERSAL (lo.C,N((Il'NC ~Cf(""CE.1 OS/27/2001 03:42 4079777822 UO'i~'~QUQ L~.LU ~O(~~OOL~q rvlACA lONE GROUP HeALtH C~ ~I~~ PAGE 17 PAGE 16 APPENDIX B OS/27/2001 03:42 4079777822 V~# ~~, 'VVV ~..LU ~Uf~4UV~~~ MACA lONE GROUP . nCf-iL I n VHKl:. \..t:J'l I c:.K . .------ -.-.'- -'- ~ 08-4 ~1Uof1 .-.. IC.~"", oz.1'.,," -- ~u -'- L'" H:~ l~ F- v.rc;~ .--....-.::. --- LL . 0..- _~;--___ . . ~+ :- - I: UJ: Co. cr IU.. "..,.. ~ !l~ <L 1'..0 w-= :~-::::~~'- LOCA nON BORINGS PERFORMED 5/17/00 PAGE 18 r-"'~c. 1::lJ. .~ ~ , ""'l c.j 2: ol~ - o ;. ctj" ,.. 0 N - a:: , '. i:ii l1J l.O '. :J"ti " Z ".j < '" r- ~ ~!~ ~~ IX' ... - ... <t ... tJ Co Cl ... ~ Co I-- ~ CI) N ~ ~ vi <;l . ;~ ~ q! x ~ ~I~ ~ L.U a::: ,. :;; g i ... ~ e/_ ti ~ I::l '" l( E ~ ... ~ il C :;:IG. ~ 0 <( cr 9 0 e::: ~ 0 0 UJ -l a. ~ > u.. Z 0 ~. 0 (f) I W ~ z i= c:r 0 ::l I t3 () cr 0 0 <( Q U -.J co a::: U1 " ,.... 5: -.J Z 0 ~ Z 0: ~ 0 CJ) UJ CD Cl CI) ~ 0 .. m UNIVERSAL c,.Cll< cc ".-C ~rooCEJ Piot: ( ~o: /3~/ 'THIS ORA'MNC REPROOUCED. FROM PLAN PRO",Oe:O BY' C.IEN T. 06/27/2001 03:42 4079777822 UV'L~/.UUU '~.LO ~~(~~COL~q '\--- 1.. t&. --. .- -- .. .' ~1 ...--- %., ~ o 40 I I APPROX. 5C,ALE (fT.) tvlACA IONE GROUP - H~ALIH CARE CENTEP. ....--... . '-- - ------ PAGE 19 PAGE 82 .-. . -----.- -..... ... "----- ... --'-- .-...- ..- -"._-- - _. -. -.-'- --.----- ---.-- --e...._.. ~8-5 ~~.~y. . ,c.t.e.,-y; :.. i >'0- ! r --. - -- - -- - .....---.. .-. ......- -- .- . -- -. -0 . -. . _ 0 B-t " '\---.. - .- h \d~L~- 4J \_ ___._-:-_ It': -- -. CO~E DUILOfNG 06-2 01 . : rAg.J(J~( 4..~ cei _ . ( Cr+ol. -- pll _ ~i ,1. I ..: ~:.::-: OLD SANFORD-OVIEDO LEGEN, -0 STANOARD PENETRAnON 1 e6/27/20el e3:47 4e79777822 MACA IONE GROUP I 1t.....I'""''- I n \..I~c:. vc..1'l It:., I-'Alil::. tl~ PAGE El3 .. , t l~ UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES BORING LOG ~OJt!eT ...0_: 'fI.:zClQt...ol o..a.. I"'f'O.Jf;CT: IlIlPOIl.T NO.: 11~2 PAGE: &-.2:.1 '.4 AOlE lOIn ot.D SA/IIF'OIlO RQ.a~VlliOO ROAD SEMlNOLll COUNTY. FI,OIUOA cur,,": Al!Al~T rAaTNEIlS. we. lOC.UlON: SEE lJORIfo4G LOCATION PlAN !lORING OE:lIGNA TION, B-1 Sl!e1'101'f: ~ TOWNS..,,.: 20S SHEET: 1 of 1 IUl~E: JOE. "!foU.A~; 0.8. ':LEV""nol'f ,rtl: CATE STAftno: S/17/'OQ WATeR TACll.f cnl: ..11 OATE FIHISHl!o: iii I 7100 OA TE Of' RE-"OING: 8/17100 ORILLEO BYl !J.E-S. - OIl.L.AHI EST. w.S.W. T. IrtJ: Z.6 rtPE 0' SAr.l.PlING: ASn.e ~1'" ~I ~ ~ IIl.OWS N Y A TTVUIERQ OEYTH Pot M -200 Me LIMITS ~ ClM3. P Pel! ,II" IBlOVVSl W.T. n OeSCAIPTlON I,., I'" 1FT.! COHT. IPT.' 1H00EMEHT F1'.1 0 l. Ll CAVI I~ E L PI 0 - a(/I., fin.. SAND (SPJ - -r- . - madlum don.... blown -~ - . H~$ t7 ~ . . ~ . . . . - &gr'lf tlra",," 6-9.12 21 . . - - . . . X ..:L . . - 100.. 5- -"-5:2';:1"'- ~"'"5"-" ---- _...____....~.h.__....~.__......_...._.........____.._._.........__....._. .................. ................. ..---. .-.......- .....,.......-.- ----.- : I - X ~"7 lDO~. gr.Y"iI....n c/..-yay fin. SAND ISC] 2-3-2 5 ~ 2J 20 27 1t X ~ - ~S 9 ~ I /'. """ ,/ X 3-4-4 e ~~ 10- - ...----..-.....-. ....---...-... .......... ...._._..._....._._..u._................. _._.................. .......... _ ...._....... .......-........ Ih............_ ...._--. ......_...40 ...--......-.... ..,......- I ""I ~ 'i-: ~. t ~ X ~~. I'~ ~ ~~ ,..._~~.~...._, .._...!.o..... 15- - ......-- ;-:r- .... ..... """'. -.- ..- ........ ........ ... ...-.......... "_." ...... ........... ..... n ....... ................. ..-............. .......-.. .......... ..........-..... ......--- I - Z" ~ . ~ .- LOo:r" !:If ay-bro"",, silly fin.. SAND: 'l"rltJ'l Cllrf r- ~ ". rsM) 20- 3.3.:3 e : ...--......-........ ..-........... -........ : .- -. ........-.. .............--.....-........... ...... .... ... ...........-....... .... ..... ..... . .......-........ ................. ........... ..---... ..........-..... .-.,.....-.-. " ". , .. '. . b Loo:r.. Clayey tine ,.... gr~-{/(....n SAND (SCI !/X ~. 3-3-4 7 ~ ......~.~...... 22 ..J.~..., 5 2S -f- ......-............. .... ..... I TERMINATED FT. ... 00 ......-.-........ .........--.... A,1 25.0 .. - 30-.... ....................-. ................ .....-... .... ...... .......,..........._........u.._.................._........................... ................... ............... ...............- --........ ."......... ,....n-___._... .........- - . 06/27/2001 '03: 47' 4079777822 MACA IONE GROUP nc:.HL I 1"1 ~t<t:. L1:.N 111 PAGE tl:.:l PAGE: eo:; m UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES BORING LOG PROJI!:CY ..0.: ,g:lllO.o.s.o. ~RT~.I 11S40:z PAOf: 8-z.~ P~OJ€CT: 1I0Rf,.y O€SKlNATlOI'f: 8-2 :l€CnON: J<o TOWNSHIP: "!OS SMli€T: 1 of 1 A.o.NO!: 301 CUe-NT; lOCA.noN; II11MAJtItS: 1.1 ACIlE sm OLO SANI'OfID "OAO'OVlfOO IlOIi'D SeMlI'<<)LE COUNTY. flOAlD4 m:,.,I.VEST p"R~e~. If<. sel! ec~ I.cCA~ ~N G.S. Ell!VA. TlON 11'U: WATl;1I TABI.Ii lltl:. 5.3 g", re 01' IIUOlHO: '117(00 eST. W.3:W. T. ltu: 3.0 DATE ST....I{~O: CIA T6 FINIIII1E~ D"ILlfO BY: TYP!; OF S"'M~N(J; SII '100. !J O/Qo U...Jl. . QAUJlI ASTM 0.'5&8 OE.Pni 1fT J A Blows /oj ~ P&A S- (BlOWS' W. r. l ""CflE/IoU!JfT FT.I ~ Y M 8 o I. OESClW"T1CN .200 ('lC.1 Me ("-, A TTe'HIERG lIMITS lL P'f II: IFT.J !i4Y) ORO. CONT. 1"A\1 o MedIum denao Ql.Y'lln:lwn tlnll SAND I 5 ...2... 4.-4-7 1 1 6-7-10 1'7 3-3-4 7 -grWV 25 19 -~ -'-i'u-, ":x.;," . ..j,g9..t".m.l'dlm~..Cl'Y:q.Of:1...Ji. . Q..l:l{;J....__. .........-...... ....Ut....lu... n_..... "-_" ....-...--.. -.--- 3-3-4 7 - gr.VolIra..n 10 .:..~~_. __.1'~._... .._...... .............................................-.........-...-..-...,..".............__.--.-. .............-.. ...-..........1. ......__.. ......,.... .._.._...._... ....._..__.... . .. 16. 4,&.~ 10 ..-.---..-.... ..-.......... . ._..-.... r ., . _............h...._........_..._..................................................._.......... _0.....___,,_. ............._.. ............ _...___ .........._._.. ....,............ . " . ' '. . . 20 ......:!.:~.:~--..... .......~...... I.... ....... I~ :" ': ....-.....-..... -................44..............................._......................... .........._.._. .._._............ ......._.. .......... ..... ,_ ..._on ._..........._ . .. .... "0' . 25 .3-4~ e ........-............... ..........._, 5,0 FT. ................. ................. ......--. .---1.... ............. _.. .._........_. Firm. groy-~'nn u y LAY {ell ... c-. 30 .... .......-....-..-.. .....~.....n.. ........ ........- -........-.......,.................... ........'..........................................._.. .........,....... .'...'......... .......u. ............ ............._.. ..._....._. 06/27/2001 '03: 47' 4079777822 MACAIONE GROUP r1C.'-'l.- I n LLlt"(t:. Ll::.Ni: t-'Abt. IN PAGE El5 .' m UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES BORING lOG p~o.zl1Cr NQ.: 1lt'!Ino1&.Dl FlEPOI'lT,..O.: "~z "AGf.: Do:t.:I PROJECT! 7.11 ACRE SITE OLO SANFORD ROAo-OV'EOQ ROAC SIi""'NOt.1! COUNTY. FlORIDA ClIENT: flEAlv62T PAIlTNERS. INC. loco. TlON: SBe BOl'1I'fO lOCJ> nON P\..A1II 00f'l1/IIC CESIGNA nON: B-3 SECTION: 3- rowloISHIP; 20$ SHEET: 1 of 1 IUN(lE: JOE I'Ie,...",(s, co.s. Ii~EVAno,.. ,tu: 04 T1i S1' AATfiOI 5J171OO WAT"~ T"'8L2 !,.." ....s OA TE FIHIeHI!!), S" 7/00 OATE OF READlNQ: 1l/17f'OQ OIIUlu:a BY, \J.l.8.. . OIlLAl eST. W.~W.T. lhl: 2.5 T"I'P'E Of' ~~: A5n4 p.1UG A &lOWS ~ .,. OEPTH llo4 lBlOWS/ "".1'. /104 p nl'lll" e CfT,J l IHC:A~MENT Fl.' 0 ~ l 0 1-7-8 15 JL 5-3-3 6 ..1- 5 "--2:~'.:3'--" ......If..... .......... ...<<S-6 12 7.8-9 11 10 ._-~.~-_.. ._..~.~.._. ...-.... OeSCRlPTlON -zoo r "I Me I'lloJ A TTEAfl!RG LlMrrs Ll PI ~ IFTJ OAYl o~. COKT. (", Medium ~e~e '''whr blown line SAND 20 4.4-4 e LO<llllt Qr-r d.y.y tin. SANO ISC/ - MlIdlum denn. grllY"brown .....-.-. t___ _~.~~_._._ _.__.. Lao.. gray-gl.." aJlQtltly crr,-V- fin. SAJ\IO (SC, 20 20 .................. ......_...."......~..........."...............--............................... ................... .........--....... ........... .......n~. ..___........._ .________. -1009" 15 ......~.:~~._...- .....~.~.... --....... . ........ ......-........,..-............-.................--......... .....-~...'I.." .....-.....-... .........._ .__"_.. ....../0........... ._........._ ........ .....~.................................... ...--................ ..... . ................ ...-........... ........... ..._....... .. ..n......... ........_.._ Medium aenu 9''''-II".n aHty 'in~ AND '. [SMI 25 ..._.~:!...}..~..... ...3~" . BORING TEIiMINATeO AT .2.5.0 FT. . ................ .....~......... .... -............. .. ............- ~ i!: 30 .... .............--....... .............. ... ..... ..-...... .................................. ................... ........................................ ................. ................. 06/27/2001 . 03:47 407977782: MACA lONE GROUP . ..__.., ~ ~"'tt~ PAGE 05 PAGE El6 m UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCrENCES . BORING LOG PAO.JECT /oco.1 '1J2l1O.0,IJ-Q, REPOFlT NO.: , llS~2 PilOE: a.z... PI'OJeCT: OQRIHO ctSIGNA nON; 8-4 semON: J' TOWNSHIP; ZOS SHEET; 1 of 1 IIA 1\10 1/: :J04E 7.S ACRE ,1Tl$ OUl SA,..FQAO 1l0AC-OVIEDO ROAD SQo<<IUOIZ COUHTY. FlOlllOA Cl~Hl'; ReAL.VEST P'AF\TNERS. ~C. tOCA llON; SEe 110"""0 LOeA TION PlAN G.9. SLEIIA noN ,h): DATI; STARTEc: 5" 1100 WATER TAllt.e 1m; 4.0 OA TE ANJSHEo, 51l7rCO OAn O~ ~OINa, 5/17100 ORIL1.eo BY; U.E.S. . c~ E3T: W.S.W.T. 1m: 2.0 TYPE OF &AMPUJola, ASTloC 0-" a.s ,'U! "'AIIII: s; oel"TH 1FT.) ilO ~ lSLOW:S N ,. PeA a- 18LO\OlSl. W.T. L INCREJolENT ~., f! ~ M 8 o L OeSCRlP1l0N -200 '%1 Me ,,,) ATTE.A8EAa UJ,4ITS LL ,., II; (FTJ CATI o~. CONT. I", o LooUl brtlwn fin" SAND ISpt .1- ..IX: 3-:2-3 ~ -~ _ ~ 3-4...3 ., ..:J:...: · - 8 -c-:r:',,-- -.-- .-. ;. :s.,'. "Of -.,., 1lO. 'AND' ..... _u .x ~ r- 2-3.2 5 0 r\) .;.~ .~ 3-2-3 5 ~ -~ ~. ^ 3-3~ cs ;... , 0 - r.- '_."--'-~"'" ..--.. 7' . . .......--.-....-.............-......................_n_....................._......... ................ ~>' - ~ ~ .~ 6 ...1Z.. Looll. oray ,lilY flna SAND; wl'l" ",ot. [611041 .__."l-..7._... ......~~..._. -....... ".,.__.- -'.'-.'--'. ------ ................. ........... ........-- ..........-..-. ...---- .- - X 4.4-4 8 .;;. '. 15 - '- ...---....-. .r.-r....... .......... : .' , ..._.....____..............._. _.............................._..................._...... .... loose tan "Ity IIna SAND (SM) ............. ....1. .~ ....._._. .....__...._._ _.........~_.. - - - X 6-5-5 10 .. '. 20 - - .................-.... ............... ......... " .' . .....................-............................................._.......... ................. ...n....... .... ...... ......... . ......... .......... ......._........ _..;.~_.__ \- -rx 5-8-1' t 9 25 - '- ..........-........... .............. ......... - madium dll"~a : .. BOAflll(i TEA:MIIIlATED AT 25.0 FT. --............. ................. ...-." ....... ..' .......... ....... __... ,,,...0- ~ :: 30 - .... ...............-...-. ........ ...... .......... ..-...... .................. ........................_.................................. ................. ...... .......... ................. ....._..... ...._...... ................ ................ 06/27/2001 '03:4r 407'3777822 MACA IONE GROUP n<:J-4'- I n l..'-lt<:t:. LC:.NTE f-'A<::it::. ~b PAGE: 'fl7 w UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES BORING LOG '-QOJECY ~O.: n2~ls.o1 PlEiPOfrr NO.: 111l4cz PAGe: 11-2.5 ,"",OJ!!CT: 1I0"'NG D.~IClNATlON: 6-5 secno....: J.4 TOW ,"SH lJl': 205 SIoCEU: 1 of 1 AANQE: 30E 7." ACAE SITE 0\..0 SANI'ORO AOAo.01o'lEOO 11040 SEMlNOl.I c:ouI'frr. I'\.OAIOA CLIENT: REAL\if:st'I'.llIlr"'eAS. INC. o.s. EU!IIJlnc~ (Iv: D.<IolE ST.utT"ED: 5/17/00 WA.TER TABLI! Irtl: G.o DATE FINISHEO: ~"1OO OAT!! OF REAOING: 51' 7/00 OAlI..LEO fJV: U.e.lS. - Ol'lZ.A; EST. W.S.W.T. '"I: 2.0 TVP1: OF SA.~I\IO: AST.... 1).1".. LOCA 1'lO"': s~e IrOAINQ LOCA TION /'\.AN I'a.<ARICS: OE~ f,-y-.I r:> A 81.0WS ;c PEA 8. L ~OIENEJ.lT E N (9LOWg,r W. T. FT.' :> y M II o l oeSCI'lIPTION .2'00 (%, Me l~' A TTliIUJE~G lrMlTS LL PI lC 1FT.! ~,., ~- o:>>tT. l'loJ o Medium donJllt brown fine SAND ISPI '-- - X 8-7-8 -~ _ 4-7-9 15...1... 5 - ~ "-"IS::~r.::r~-- .....0..... ..__....~") Looae 10 ",.dlum d.".. ;fay-Drown cl..,.~ 7/..x line SAND ISCI - ~ 2-3-5 8 0- r?5 ~~ X ~ 5-8-8 12 //. . 10- - -........--..-.. ...........-. m",." ~ _.~...................................._..................._.._.............___..~....... _............. ..,......_...... _..._.. ........... ....._.._.__ ..___ ~ ~'.1 /.-,! /. 15 ..sz... Mecllvm den.. to loa.. g,...,..btown silty 11". 8AND ISM! ..-...-......... .--.,...,........ .....-- ......"....,.. -....,....... -- _:x 5-5-~ 11 - X 3-4.4 a 1 5 - - ..........--........ Looll8 gtllly-brown I;ft.,.-firs. SAND [::>1'.11 ... ,- '-" ... ..........,'. ", .......-...,.............-......-......--..........-...-.- ...... -, ...... .... .....,. . ........-...-. ...- ..-- ......,..... ...--........., ......-.- - -X 4-5.5 1 0 20 - - ...................... ........... " ....... .. .,. ................................................................................. ................ ..... ."....,- ..........- .......-.. ., '. ......- -.......--. >-- .. X 3.5-7 12 2S _:.-. ...-.............. . . . .. I ~ ... .......... .... m~....I... BOAING TERMINATflJ AI 2S-:0 FT. .................. ............... ........-. ........... .....................-......-- .. ... 30...... .. ... ....................... ._.u ..u.... ..................................,'... .....,........... .,............... ........... ............ ........._....... .......__ .~_.r"IV '1"'0 n1no1 ~ . . OS/27/2001 .03:47. 407'3777822 [n. UNIVERSAL t:::t::I ENGINEERING SCIENCES SYMBOLS ~ at PIoIorw "". I~ W"gf'W ~.m11g ~ 1ft. RooqulrWld" ~ Slu,dwd B9aan ~ 1'00' WOR W.lql'rt of Drill Rods Thln-Wall S....lb~ Tub. Undl.l1Jrb... G.mpl.r u.... p~ ec.. R.cowry fI"I:lfI'\ P.oalt Cot..CrUllr,g Op.-dorw s~~,. Takan III ..... l.-.I Sample Ncrt Tu.., ell IN. L...eI O'llnge',. 8011 Shill n.. OI'QUnd W~ L...... S~aneI High Ground W.tAr Le""O{ RELATIVE OENSI1Y (sand-allt) Vary Loon. Less Than 4 B/owslR. Loose - 4 - 10 Blows/Ft. Medium. 10 to 30 Blows/Ft DanAe - ~O to 50 BJows/A. VQry Den~Q - More Than SO Blows/Fr. CONSISTENCY (clay) V~ry Soft - L9SS Than.2 Slo>m/Fl Solt ~ 2 to 4 BlowsjFt. MedIum - 4 to B BloW3/Ft. Sriff - 6 to 15 Blows/Ft. Very Stiff. '5 to 30 810'rWs/Ft. Hard. More Than :30 BloWl;./Fr. MACA IONE GROUP ~L I H L.:AI'<l:. CENT!. t-'A\.:ie, 111 PAGE ~B I KEY TO BORING LOGS l UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM QIlOCH . 'Y'" a.oc..a TYYv::A4 IU.&.I B ........,.,-~ 'f' ~i aw ...._~----- 1 -.-""...- j I ~ QP ."""" ;,- ~'-'" - 0<___ ~, ...--. 11I100 '" t'O lit.. llj ei" <1M "'"" ;I......, ~""'~....a..w.. Ii i I GC 0.,... Q_ ~._.... .......,.. .. j !J ~ w...~.., _ -;-.a, I"";" II - ......a.- ilf. jp "'-" w- __ _ .,.....,. i jl~ ....... IIllalw"" ~ j j I lif ... 11I7 1_'" _;.0-", sc 0.,..,. ..........~ ............ loll\. -- .... """In.. _. ""'* J! -. .~ er ....,., ... MI'lb . all ~ C1. 1~'1l""""",a1_M_ iJII ;>1.--........, ....,.. _ ~ aD ~ , "/10( ....... '-" ...,.. Ii ~ 01.. . 0.;........ _ ___ ..,., ~ .. ir:- ~ aJE ~ -..g....... .... """'"- ... 4..""'............ ..,oll ... ~ _1IC ri I~ IE II! l:}' 'no..g_ cIo.ro "" ~ D' Ifltdry. II' , i f cb,. ON "'!)11M ........ ., ....,..... ... "",.. ....."""" "';-0, Ora..... ~ n P.... -..:0. ""' ~ "'9N'I OfOJ'';'" _a"'. ." -....- - -~-~ rn--_ PLASTICJTY CHART IIl;J !lO t i ., ~ M ~ 20 10 7 . o IQ '1:l'O 30 AD IlIO M 70 ac CIO tOO 110 lA:ItJ'oO u.a tT ~ "...,...v inv ....,-, n 1 00' \, 06/27/2001 . 03:47 407'3777822 MACAIONE GROUP tlL.-l-1l.-ln ~~c.. ~I... t-'A\.::lt. t:ltl PAGE B 9 t.. Project No. Report No. 19290-016-01 116402 DESCRIPTION OF LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES MOISTURE CONTENT DETERMINATION ASTM 0-2218 Moisture content is the ratio of the weight of water to the dry weight of sol/. Moisture COntent Is measured by drying a sample at 105 degrees Celsius. The moIsture content is expressed as a percent of the oven dried soil mass.. WASH 200'TEST The Wash 200 test Is performed by passing a representative soil sample over a No. 200 sieve and tin sing with water. The percentage of the solf graIns passing thIs sieve Is then calaJlated. 8-4 06/211~~~1' ~j:~1 411/':ltllt::lL ._1...__...._""-,. MI..\(.;l..\lUNl:. \:JKUUr- /"1l::.AL I H c..:ARE CENI '-'< r-1..\\:Jt:. t:l'::1 PAGE If' A.PPENDIX C 06/27/2~01 03:41 4079777822 MACA lONE GROUP . .--- . .. ....,,..,...L I...lCJ., I [, I-'Al:il:. 1fj PAGE 11 Geotochnical Enginoering Report lh1t foUOWinq inrormaUon is rLlvilfed to hel . DU mana e our risks. . . . ",:... Geotechnical Sen.-Icas Aro Performed for Speciflc Purposes, Persons. and Projects GooUJchnical 8~InOi)rs strucbJre tholr sllrvf~ 10 moot the ~pecitlc needs of tI'1slr clients. A gllOtAldlnIeel englMllring atvOy condudad for _ cl'.A1 or.glnS6r m..-, root "..r:tlll L"l6 r066d6 of 8 CDn$tnJctJon alntracror or even anattler dvll engineer. Because each geotechnical englneer1ng al&ldy Is unlqulI;ead'l geoteclVllcal engineering mpol1la unIquely prepllred fer tM dlenl No Dna except )'Ou should rsly on your geol9cl'1nlcal llnglneering report without firsl conRdlng wlth the gtJOtechnlcal engineer who prepared It. And no onlHlOt avon you.-shCluld apply the report rer Bny purpo~!I or prclec:x en::8p<< the one originally cont&mplati:ld. A Gootochnlcal Engineering Report Is Ba~ed on A Unique Set of Project Specific Factors Geo18chnlcal engIneers consIder a number or unIque project speclnc facIors whon esl.abllllhlng the scope 0' a study. TyplCJJI factors include; the dlenfs go9f~. ob]ec:Ultoo, and rtok managomenl preferences: the general nature 0' the stnJc:tura Involved. It:s size, 8I1d conflguraUon: the location or !he slructurq on the site; and other planned or exIsting slfe . imOf1)vsmenb. such a~ dCC8S$ reads, P:lrX)ng lab. and underground utml/as. Unless the geotechnIcal engineer who conduced the .5tudy specifically Indlcates otherwise. do nof rely on a geotechnical engineering r8poti that was: not prepansd /'or )'Ou. tIOt preparud for your project not prepared fur the specific site explored, or completed.before impo/"t.Qnt project change:s were made. Typical changes thet can erode the reliability or an e~stiog geo~chnlcal engineering report iriclude those thal affect: the function ot the prop:)sed structure 35 when It's changed 'rom e parking garage lD an gffice building. or 'rem a light Industrial pl~nlto a refrigerated warehouse, olevallon, configuration, lO<;ation, orianlalfon. ar wulght of the proposed .l1lJdure. . compoaltlon of the dealgn team. or pn:lject own~lp . ~ a general rulo, always In'orm your Q80l8chnlcal englnoera1 pro)ed cJuJrlgea-even minor onOlHJnd request an eaaeasment of Iholr Impact. Gootechnlcal engineers cannot QOCept respot18lbJllty or IlabRlty fer prob/(lms that OQ;;ur becauOG Chelr rnporta do no1 consider do\telopments of when the)' Went not Informed. Subsurface Condltlons Can Change A Q80technlcal engIneering report l:s based on conditfans Ih8t exlsted 81 the time the study \/ollIS perfotmed. Do not roJy on e g9QtBchnlcal engineering. report whose adequacy may have been attectod by lhe pasaaga of time: by man-made events such os COnt~tn:ctiQn on or adjacent to the !lIte: or by naturaj aVO/1l3 8ud'l as flood. earthquakes. or groUl'\dlhatorfluct.ualSQns. AJwa~ contact the geotechnical engineer be(~ apPlyIng !tie repon. to detennlne If It Is alln reliable. A minor amount of addll1cnaJ testing or analysis could prevent major problBl'M. Most GeotechnIcal FindIngs Ata Professional" Opinions SIts exploration Identified 6101bsurface condltlo~ only allhoSit .po/nm where subsUf1ae.e.testa 3re condueted or amnples erG taken. G80technlc9.1 engineers r&o'lew r>eld and laboratory data and then apply their pltlteuiona' judgement to render an opk1lon about subsl.Jtface conditions throughout the sileo AduaJ l;ubsurface conditions may ditfer-somel1molJ slgnl11cantly-froin those Indicated In your report. Rstainil"g the g60fechnicaf engIneer who developed your report to provide COnstruction - observaUon ;6 the most effective melhad of mandglng ltle M$ka aS5odalcd.with unanticipated cond~ions. 65/27/2001 03:47' 407'3777822 A Report's Recommendations ATe Not Final 00 not over rely on tile COf\StrucIJOI'l roc:ommend.llions lncludod in your report. Those rncommendaUon", are I'1QI final. bcca use gocl8c:tlnlcal englnaen; develop them Prfnc:lpaJIy from Judgement and oplnJon. GeotechnIcal engineers c:an flru;allZo tl'lelr rocommendatlons only by observtng actual aubsurl\!ca condltiOn4 ro\loated during OOhStruc:tJOO. The geoteeh,,'o;al englnoer who d6'Velo~~ your report cannot 1J1ISUme I'9sponsibility or lIobnlly for the report'lI rl'COmmendaUons 11 thQt engineer doell not perform conatnJdton ObsONallon. A Geotechnrcal Englneer'ng Report Is Subject to Misinterpretation Other d~lgn team memtlol'3' /'I'lblntorprelaUon of goob:lt1Olcel engineetinc repor13 has resUlled In C03Uy problems,' LOWDr th..t risk by having your gootechnic.31 engineer confer with appropriate member:s of the.deGlgn team after submllllng o,e 1'efX)f't. Also. retaIn your geoCochnleal engineer 10 review portlnent elements of the de.5;gn team'a plans and spodf1c.a60ns.. Conlrgetor.s caf1 elso mlalm8rpl'et Q geot.,a,nlcal englneerlng report. Roduce tt\at rUle by haYing your gootechnkal engIneer partldpa19 In pnatlId and pO,cc~ confe",neoa. and by providing canatructian obseNallon. Do Not Redraw the EnglnoeJ''s Logs Geotoct1,,~ englneElfS prepare ffnal bor1ng and tesllng IOQIl ba:sed upon thalr Interpretation of field 'Ioga and laboratory data. To prINent erro,-, gr oml:ssions, the logs. Included In a geot6chnica! engll'leenng report should never be rod/llWl'1 (or IncJUslon In arctlitectural or other design dreWlngll. Only photographic: Of electronic reproductJon 18 acceptable. but rvcogma !tIst &eparalil'1g logs from the report can elevate rl.k. Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Soml) owne~ :lnd design profeuionalll mistakenly believe lhoy C8l'l make ~ltactollll!able fer \.Inantlclpated subsurface CDndIUo"5 by limilfng wtlat they provide fer bid preparQtlon. To help prevent costly problems. give contrndcrs !hit complete geotoctlnical e"slneerlng report, but pMace It whit a clearly wrinen Ienoor of tr.Insmltta1. In that lett6l", advise c:Ontnlc:tcrll that ltIe report was not prepared to( purposes or bid development and lttat the I'8port's accuracy III limited; ASFE MACA lONE GROUP I-'At:.t. l.l. PAGE: 12 ._r-,_... ~"'-L- "--'C..J""w encourage th"m to co"ror with ttle geotechnical ongloaer Who prepBrod the report (a modest fee may be raqulrncf) and/Or aJI1dLJct lKlClltlof\dll ~lUdy to obtain U'lo spedtla typgs of . Informal/on they need or prefor. A prl.lbld conlef"eOQl can a1110 b6 vnllJable. Be sure o:.ntr9ctonl Mvg sumclantllrna to ~rlotm additional a1lldy. CKlly then might you be In a poaItJon ta gl.." c.onlractQr3 tho best Informatfon Q"lIl1able 10 }'9u, wNIG toqulrlng them to at least shan, somE! of the finandal relJponslblUUea lIttlmmlng from unantidpated condllJons. RUdRo8pons'blUty Provisions CI05sly Some clients. design profeaGlonals, and contractot':ll do not recognize that geotechnlcaf onglnaer111g 18 far !eN oxact lt1an other ongkleering disciplInes. This lack of unclerl5tandlng has croaled unreallatlc elCpOGtatlons U"lat' have led to dl&4ppolntml'lnls. claims, and .dispulEls. To help redllCa such rislt3, geolAilchnlcal ongl.,ecrs commonly Includll a variety Qf 8l;llgnslory provisIons In theIr report.. Somotlmes labeled i1m1lallons,- ~ny aI thesa provisions Indlcste wh$re gootaehnk:al engineo(s responsJblIltles begin and end, to help otll611l recoQnlze U16lr own l'Q-panslblllUea 9f1d rtaka. Read !hellO provielonll cOllely. A5k QUestions. Your geol.edlnlc:al engineer should respond fully and fnJnkly. Geoenvfronmental Concems NG Not Covered Tllo aQulpment, ted'InJquoa, and f)(1nJoonel uaed ra pelfurm II gooerNlrtlnmental study dMer algnlftc.ontly rrom Ihoae UlHId 10 perform Q geoloctmlcal srudy. For that ",3acn, 9 geoteehnlcal engineering re~ort does not usually relate any goognvlronmenl:oll findings, wnckJslonll. or rac::DmmendaUon&; ll.~,. sbout tno likelihood of encourrtaring Undell3ro~ storage lanlls or ragu/alsd contamlnant!!. Unantlclpsted envIrOnmental problems !\ave led to numerou~ proJeel fsllvrea. 1f)oU have not yel o/)lBlnEK1 your own geoenvlrcnmentallnformaUon. ask your geotechnical consultant fOr rlsk management Quldenc.a. Do nor rely on an onvironmental roport prepared for 1OfTl~"8 efse. Rolyon Your Geotechnical EngIneer for AddltJonaJ Assistance Memtlenship In ASFE exposes geotschniaal aogineera to a wide CIITOIY of risk management ~cttnlque5 that can bll of genuille beneflr for 9veryt:lne Invollled wM a c:.onstnJctIc" project. Conferwlrh your ASFE-mernborg60teehnical engineerformore infomlatlon. PROFESS I aNAl. FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8611 COloa..,me Road Sulta G106 SUver Spring, MD 20910 Tolsphone: 301-565-2733 FaClllmJIe: 301-589-2017 oman: InfQcm~sfe.oro WWW.39fe.Qrn c:.""..gnl t 1198 Dy ...srE. MQ, Un',,, AS"" ll'1'- -..... """,,,u'on 10 Clo 10. _IcoU.... 0( lNo ~~ DY .", ___ ...,....""'_ 1. ""llrnaly p"""b;l<!d. R..oJ...,. I". ~g'" ..... ~ Ift...not. 01 ""' ~ ~~" ~ty ~t'-G. .ft.fJ,..., tw eon. O""Y ~ rwIt --0-'__" ~ fJI.ASFE 0(' Iler ~ fill f1I'W'... 01 ~'r r....-cn IlGER06983..5M OS/27/2001 83:47 4079777822 MACA lONE GROUP 1'~"I~~\,.oc..I'Ill.. PAGE 12 PAGE 13 Project No. 19290-016.-01 Report No. 116402 CONSTRA'NT~ AND RESTRICTIONS WARRANTY Universal Engineering Sciences has prepared this report for our client for his exduslve use. in accordance with generally accepted soli and foundation engineering practices, and makes no other warranty either expressed or implied as to the professional advice provided in the report. UNANTICIPATED SOIL CONDITIONS The analysis and recommendations submitted In this report are based upon the data obtaIned from soIl borings performed at the locations Indicated on the Boring Location Plan. This raport does not reflect any variations which may occur between these borings. The nature and extent of variatIons between borings may not becOme known until excavation begins. If variations appear, we may have to re-evaluate our recommendations after performing on4site observations and noting the characteristics of any variations. CHANGEO CONDlnONS We recommend that the spedflcations for the project require that tha contractor immediately notify Universal Engineering Sdences. as weir as the owner. when subsurface conditions are encountered that are different from those present In thIs report. No claim by the contractor for any conditions differing from those anticipated in the plans, spedficatlons, and those found In this report. should be allowed unless the contractor notifies the owner and Universal Engineering Sciences of such changed conditions. Further. we recommend that all foundation work and site Improvements be observed by a representatJve of Universal Engineering Sciences to monitor field condItions and changes, to verify design assumptions and to evaluate and recommend any appropriate modIfications to this report_ MISINTERPRETATION OF SOIL ENGINEERING REPORT Universal Engineering Sdences Is responsible for the conclusIons and opinions contained within this report based upon the data relating only to the specific project and location discussed herein. !f the condusions or recommendations based upon the data presented Bre made by others. those Conclusions or recommendations are not the responsibility of Universal Engineering Sciences. C.2.1 t 06/27/2001 83:47 4079777822 MACA lONE GROUP . -=-'"11..' n '--Hr<:c:. L:l:.N II::. PAGE 13 PAGE 14 Project No. 19290-016-01 Report No. 1 16402 CHANGED STRUCTURE OR LOCAnON This report was prepared in order to aid In the evaluation at thIs project and to assist the architect or engineer In the design of thIs project. If any changes in the design or location of the structure a5 ouWned in this report are planned, or jf any structures ere included or added that are not discussed in the report, the conclusions and recommendations contained In this report shall not be consIdered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the conclusions modlfled or approved by Universal Engineering Sciences. ' USE OF REPORT BY BIDDERS Bidders whO are examining the reportprfor.!o subm!sslon or a bid ara cauUoiisd that this report was prepated as an aid to the 'deslgners 0' the project and It may affect actuar construction operatJons. Bidders are urged to make their own soli borings. test pits, test caissons or other lnvestlgatfons to determIne those ronditions that may affect construction operations. Universal Engineering Sciences cannot be responsTble for any interpretations made from this report or the attached . boring logs with regard to their ade(:juacy in reflecting subsurface conditIons whIch 'Nfll affect constructfon operat1on~. STRATA CHANGES Strata changes are Indicated by a definite "ne on the boring logs Which accompany thIs report. However. the actual change In the ground may be more gradual. Where changes occur between soil samples. the location of the change must necessarily be estimated using all available information and may not be shown at the exact depth. OBSERVATIONS DURJNO ORILLrNG Attempts are made to detect and/or Identify occurrences,durlng drilling and sampling, such 8S: water level. boulders. zOI1es of lost circUlatJon. relative ease or resistance to drilling progress, unusual sample recovery, variation of driving resistance, obstructions. etc.; however, lack of mention does not preclude their presence. C - 2.2 " . 65/27/2601 .03:47 407'3777822 MACAIUNI::. t:i~uut-' . ~'- I I I ,-,-,r;,c.. "'-'C,J"t I . r-HI.:lt:. 1.4 PAGE lS Project No. 19290-01&01 RepQrt No. 116402. WATER lEVELS Water level readIngs have been made in the drill holes during drilling and they Indicate normally occurring conditions. Water levels may not have been stabilized at the last reading. ThIs data has been reviewed and interpretations made In this report. However, It must tle noted that fluctuations in the level of the groundwater may occur due to variation s In rainfall, temperature, tldes. and other factors not evident at the tIme measurements were made and rep~rted. SInce the probability of such variaUons Is. anticipated, design draWings and specJflcatlons s~ld accommodate such possJblllties and construction planning should be based upon such assumptions of variations. LOCATION OF BURIED OBJECTS All users of thIs report ata cautioned that there was no requIrement for Universal Engineering Scfences to attempt to locste any man-made burled objects durfng the course ot this exploration and that no attempt was made by UnIversal Eng{neerlng Scfences to locate any such buried objects. Universal Engineering Sdences cannot be responsible for any buried man-made obJects" which are SUbsequently encountered durfng constructIon that are not discussed wfthin the text of thIs report. TIME This report renects the soil conditions at the tIme of investigation. If the report is not used In a reasonable amount of Ume, slgnlflcant changes to the site may occur and additional reviews" may be required. C -2.3 ..........v 'r'O'" ...'" n.. no 1 \: 06/29/01 07:28 '0'4074234410 UNIVERSAL ENGRG BASE MAP: "CASSELBERRY. FLA." U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE ~AP. PHOTOREVlSED 1980 ((l] 0021006 i ~ o 2000 I APPROXIMA TE SCALE. FEET .:J ...:.... m PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 7.8 ACRE SITE, 350 OLD SANFORD-OVIEDO ROAD WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA U.S.G.S. SITE LOCATION MAP UNIVERSAL (.'1CINEERINC SCIENCES DRAWN ay: G.B. I DATE: 1/24/01 'CHECKED aT:~c:::..... I DATE: //~ y-;{.j SCALE: AS SHOWN I PROJECT NO: l1J47-001-01 I REPORT NO: I;:;; \ 4f;:, I PACE NO: A-I 06/29/01 07:29 '0'4074234410 UNIVERSAL ENGRG _~ 00}j006. , UNDEVELOPED LAND /.' l ~ 0 150 1 I APPROXIMA TE SCALE. FEET UNDEVELOPED LAND r--- ----- UNDEVELOf'ED LAND SUBJECT PROPERTY I TAYlOR !.lADE SYSTEMS (BOA T PRODUCTS) I I " ~: I t01""------ DUIJPED Tl,RES PAINT CANISTERS II ~ 1 \ THE CRO'IES \ \ _______ UNPAVED RPOAD COUNS(UNG I ------ ~ CENTER DULlPE:O DEBRIS ~I \\ OUMPE:O SOIL AND CONCRETE RUSeLE II I II ____ - II I If- OLD .., I ___ ' ~S~FORD_ - _ I ~[DO RO~ . --~ -- ---- UNUMITED WELDING VACANT (fORMER ClASSIC fENO:: CO.) JJST C:::NCREIT & MASONRY o I a:) ,., o o z AUTO SALES '" SERI/lCE m PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 7.8 ACRE SITE. 350 OLD SANFORD-OVIEDO ROAD WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA SITE PLAN UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES DRAWN BY; G.B. DATE: 1/24/01 SCAL.(: AS SHOWN 06/29/01 07:29 '0'4074234410 UNIVERSAL ENGRG ~ 0.<?4/006 I ~ -a, 0.. <. '9--6c:."pl"-":''' "'. ...1 \\ ~ (.' lurfS :,- ..~"..:: 4R!A """ROX. '.SB: -'C.) \ ~)2 ..~ '& ~ : ~ --..l I "-3.. \ ;::: t - I .r. c :Ii o ~ 60 I "] SCALE (FT.) , . 06/29/01 07:30 '840742JHIO UN I VERSAL ENGRG____ 01/18/2881 22:14 487<12862El-1 i-'EAL TH CilRE CENTER L . MAY-17-2000 10:41 ~ 005/006 .- --. ...- PAGE 03 L~ EN:lll-DRlt-O 407 B'36 9167 PROPFRTY SKEICH FOIT INFORMATION ONLY Lor I .... THtS 1$ NOr ~ SUI'fYlY )0. I I :' LOr , I ~ J \ -; I 3.~5~ \ , c.~") _. \ ~ / "\ ~ !;,/ I .. / I \ \ \ I -!P:t I --- \ --- ~---- \ O(f) '~AN;:-0t90 --i- . OV/~L.t> ~ . I(.J~O I I , I , !!IG/IIlIM. CMIav c.-., · ~ P.~ l I" . OJ< HJ:AI"'I/(O~ UJr 4 ;:). ~ ).".".. ~-:~.. (~.....:~) ... , /. f).{/S IS Nflr A CJC(JN!)J./f'Y CIf T'O/"(XJRNWICN.. SlJlf'Vlr. I. TH/$ rs A SJ(ffr..,., /."~:~T/NQ tJI1NWtr.AJ/'r' ..,)(~ ~nAl(/) rlAA< ~7'to IT...." IfrV1IfCW1.Ir:NrAlJ:J.:J. .- GO'd ~OO'ON O~:Il oo.s~ nl?W ~~~r9~~LO~[;131 ^9010NHJ31*al~~j9z1r~ ~Y-17-oo 0711~ ~,v> OF fiPUt:/DAR'r' $URIIF'f LO~ ...I, ~NrZ1olIN~ f',A;Q~~ AOOiflON NO.. 2~~,:: t~-J/~t '!:~ :: tg~04 4. ''-lid ~'ut. .50.00 fut b!J..""f1 m.(J,.~,P"l<<Grd8 01 S~oI. Count 1"Icffl1a. rllcord.~ ..., Plot llgoM . Pc .. ,..."",1<1 . 06/29/01 07:30 f3I1Ul/2Elf31 22: l4 ". '0'40742 J 441 0 UNIVERSAL ENGRG ~ 006/006 4B74286284 I-€AL TH CARE CENTER PAGE El2 P.04 407-3l!UlI OZUJI\ I~ I \ , I ~ I I " I I -- \ I , 1t3IC='"...~ I \ I Ii ...mra. , \i \ I I I~ ~~ I \ ~, , I tV ~ I ~ " \ I ..~ 3' ",r. \1 I I...~ I I.. I 7.7~ Ac. Ii I ..;'" I '>>7.HI ..,. I ~ I Y 4! 1 l \ I I I I 1 1 1 1 I )OCI.QQ' .-1 I I \ I I I I ~etf I I , I I ,10.0' 1 I I , I I I , I , , I I , :a.... I , -- , k.. ~...J L.!- . . .1 \ . :'::'1.' . lICIT. - ~ - - .rt.::::: _- ~~.::.. ~.....~,.,...... "'- -..... - ---- Crt ~ hf. ...--. - - ;;:'~'Jt;.= --- II r . d roo' ON ?:5:: [ r '1:..'7", =- :s.a1Ul m-:: ~47. -- - ... N-~-- ~ A ~-=-- oO.se: new ZLlt9Z~LO~t:131 A9010NHJ31*al~~39Z1r~