HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 05 08 Regular 302 City Utility Billing
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM 302
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing
Regular X
May 8. 2006
Regular Meeting
MGR/DEPT.
Authorization
REQUEST:
City Manager advising the City Commission of the status of the City's efforts
regarding evaluation of the operations of the City's Utility Billing
Department.
PURPOSE:
This agenda item is needed to advise the City Commission of the status of the
City's efforts regarding evaluation of the operations of the City's Utility Billing
Department.
CONSIDERATIONS:
On April 10, 2006 the City Manager advised the City Commission that he had arranged for a
Peer Review of the City's Customer Service and Billing Policies and Procedures with the
Orlando Utilities Commission as part of a staff evaluation audit of the City's Utility
Billing/Customer Service function to be completed as follows:
STEP I: Problem Recognition.
STEP 2: Evaluation and Data Gathering.
STEP 3: Resolution Strategy.
STEP 4: Implementation, Goal Setting and Training.
STEP 5: On-Going Follow-Up.
Following is a summary of our efforts to date:
Staff has identified potential problem areas and gathered related data to assist us in further
evaluation and resolution.
Staff contacted and met with representatives from the Orlando Utilities Commission (OUC) on
April 27, 2006 to assess their operations and procedures and determine how these procedures
may be useful to the City. OUC is regarded in the industry as being a leader in utility billing
operations.
Several items resulted from this initial meeting:
1. It was noted that OUC cut-offs run approximately 4% of customers compared to 3% for
the City of Winter Springs.
2. OUC evaluated our written procedures regarding billing, payment, cut-off, etc. and
opined that our procedures were sufficient and actually "very good."
3. OUC offered insight as to several additional practices (that they currently employ) that
may be useful to the City. Staff is investigating these items in regard to practicality,
ability to interface with our computer system, cost, etc. and will include the results of this
investigation in its forthcoming report to the Commission. These practices include:
a. OUC utilizes a menu-driven automated phone system to answer many routine
calls/questions from customers. This system includes an option to speak to a live
operator. Specific standards and expectations are in place to ensure prompt and
timely answering of calls that default to a live operator. OUC also has in place
sufficient staff to further ensure compliance wit these standards.
b. OUC practices "call monitoring" (with a remote E- Talk system) of customer calls
to evaluate and maintain quality assurance of calls.
c. OUC segments call centers by call type, e.g., collections, payments arrangements,
cut-offs, and complaints.
d. OUC contracted with Equifax to perform an evaluation of their collections
procedures.
e. OUC assigns exclusive billing cycles to specific staff members. OUC feels that.
this practice enables those staff members to have more familiarity with that
particular cycle's customers and also gives them a sense of "ownership" ofthat
particular cycle.
f. OUC utilizes a company know as TeleVox to assist with collection of past due
customer payments. This system functions basically as follows: OUC sends a
periodic list of past due accounts (prior to cut-off) to Tele Vox who then follow up
with a "reminder/courtesy" call to the customer advising them of their past due
status - prior to cut-off. OUC advises that this service has reduced cut-offs from
approximately 9% to approximately 4%. OUC further advises that statistics
indicate that 72% of customers contacted via this system subsequently pay their
bills. This system is for residential customers only.
g. OUC is currently testing an automated meter reading program for multi-family
units that sends meter reads to OUC via its computer network system.
h. OUC's computer system contains "statistical tracking capabilities" that provides
and maintains payment history for each of its customers. This enables OUC to
assign internal "credit ratings" to each of its customers. This rating is then used to
determine when and if payment extensions are approved, cut-offs are
implemented, etc.
At this point, staffwill continue to evaluate the suggestions offered by oue as well as other
relevant data for potential implementation. We will then bring back the results along with
recommendations for implementation and associated costs to the City Commission.
However, we are proceeding immediately with Customer Service Training and have
procured two independent sources for this purpose:
1. OUC has offered to provide us with their customer service trainers to train our staff.
2. We have procured the services of George Colombo to provide additional customer
service training to our staff.
FUNDING:
Costs to be determined dependent upon the level of implementation.
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is presented at this point to provide the City Commission with the status of staff s
efforts to date and future plans, and to afford the City Commission the opportunity to provide
comments.
A TT ACHMENTS:
None.
COMMISSION ACTION: