HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 10 22 Regular 605 Values of Surplus Equipment and Proceed with Surplus Assets Disposal
Date: October 22, 2007
Due to time constraints, Regular Agenda Item
"605" was not discussed during the October 22,
2007 City Commission Regular Meeting.
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM 605
Informational
Consent
Public Hearing
Regular X
October 22. 2007
Regular Meeting
qJ
Mgr. / Dept.
Authorization
~
.
REQUEST:
City Manager and Information Services wishes to inform
the Commission on approximate values of surplus
equipment sent to auction and request that Commission
determine how to proceed with surplus assets disposal.
PURPOSE:
To inform the Commission on the approximate value of surplus assets
received from auction and to ask Commission how to dispose of future
surplus assets.
CONSIDERATIONS:
During the October 8, 2007 Commission meeting, Commission requested
information from staff on approximate values to be obtained by sending items to
auction. Research was conducted for the past 12 month period to obtain
approximate values of items to be sent to auction. While not all items on the
surplus asset list for the month of October 2007 were previously disposed of, a
comparison of items that have been disposed of in the past was made. From this
comparison only two items scheduled to be disposed of in October 2007, were
previously sent to auction: computers and vehicles.
On average a computer sent to auction over the past 12 months has retuned a
value to the City of $27.19. A Vehicle, either a car or a truck, sent to auction over
the past 12 months has retuned a value of $1 ,541.67.
If the above return for computers and vehicles holds true, the estimated return to
the City for the items scheduled for October 2007, would be $3,599.95. This does
not include the additional items that are scheduled to be sent to auction for which
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
CITY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING- OCTOBER 22,2007
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM605
PAGE20F3
an estimated value could not be determined based upon previous sales of such
items. This also does not consider variables such as condition or age of the
equipment or vehicles.
Estimated return on surplus equipment
Item
Computers
Vehicles
Price
$27.19
$1541.67
Quantity
19
2
Total
$516.61
$3,083.34
Grand Total Returned to City
$3,599.95
Facts:
~ Code of Ordinances, Chapter 2, Article VI, Division 3, Sec. 2-194.
Disposal of surplus property states that:
Property of the city that is obsolete or the continued use of which is
uneconomical or inefficient or for which there is no useful function which
property is not otherwise lawfully disposed of may be disposed of for value
to any person or may be disposed of for value without bids to the state or if
the property is without commercial value it may be donated, destroyed or
abandoned. Property deemed surplus by the city manager shall be sold at
public auction after publication of notice not less than fifteen (15) days
prior to sale.
(Ord. No. 421,99 VI--VIII, 6-13-88; Ord. No. 504,91, 6-10-91)
~ City computers are not normally decommissioned until they reach at least four
years of age. At that point, usually, they are either passed down to a less
resource-intensive-user unless the computer is problematic at which time the
computer is replaced with a new computer immediately. The newer
computers are covered under four-year warranties so after four years,
refreshing them with newer, faster technology is always recommended.
~ Information Services requests authorization from Commission once a month,
on the first Commission meeting of the month, to dispose of City assets via a
consent agenda item.
~ City-owned assets that are no longer needed or can no longer be used are
disposed of by one of two methods: transfer or disposal.
~ Items that are transferable must be in good usable condition. An item that is
still in good condition can be transferred from one department to another.
~ Items that are to be disposed of are disposed of in one of the following
methods: auction, destroy, salvage, or trade-in (with Commission approval).
~ Auction - The City uses Gideon Auctions for auctioning all surplus asset
items. The auction takes place every third Saturday of every month. The City
receives a check from Gideon, along with a statement of the items sold after
the auction. Gideon's fee is 10% for performing auction services for the City
of Winter Springs.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
CITY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING- OCTOBER 22, 2007
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 605
PAGE30F3
No action of government has caused more heartache and ended more careers, and
caused more negative publicity than the real or perceived misuse of public
property. No other property management activity has been involved in real or
perceived abuses of public property than the method by which public property is
disposed. For this reason, the method by which public property is disposed has
received substantial scrutiny and careful development to prevent real and alleged
actions of the misuse and abuse of public property. The method which best
establishes the residual value of taxpayer's property is the auction process because
it represents a true test of the marketplace in establishing value returned to the
taxpayers. The least effective method establishing the residual value of taxpayer's
property, and one which most exposes public officials to allegations of poor
judgment and misuse of public property is donations. The process of donating
public property by its nature says that public property is still usable but has no
value to the City. This is a contradiction. Additionally, this represents a judgment
of a public official rather than a test of the marketplace. This is indeed a slippery
slope.
There are other complications.
Surplus assets that are not immediately disposed of must be managed and they
take up much needed space around the City. If items are to be kept for donation,
the following questions must be answered:
y What items will be donated? All or some?
y How long will we hold items before they are sent to auction?
y Who will decide which charity gets which items?
y Who will manage this whole process?
In summary, the process of a public auction is the most efficient and least risky
method of disposal of surplus public property when compared to donations.
Furthermore, in most cases items auctioned by the City have passed their
serviceable life.
FUNDING:
Not applicable
RECOMMENDA TIONS:
It is highly recommended that the Commission not start down the slippery slope
of donating public property and continue the process in place for disposal of
public property.
ATTACHMENTS: None
COMMISSION ACTION: