Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 05 03 Property Tax Reform, An Honest LookPROPERTY TAX REFORM AN HONEST LOOK PROPERTY TAX REFORM 2 WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE? 3 WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE 4 WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE? 5 WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE? 6 WHY HAS PROPERTY TAX USE INCREASED? 7 SCHOOL COSTS 8 SCHOOL COSTS 9 SCHOOL COSTS 10 SCHOOL COSTS 11 SCHOOL COSTS 12 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COSTS 13 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COSTS 14 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COSTS 15 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COSTS 16 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COSTS LGCI VS. CPI 2000-2006 17 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COSTS 18 UNFUNDED MANDATES 19 UNFUNDED MANDATES 20 FOR EXAMPLE FLC LEGISLATIVE ALERT IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUESTED WORKERS COMPENSATION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 21 FOR EXAMPLE DO NOT PASS UNFUNDED STATE MANDATES IN ADDITION TO PROPERTY TAX REFORM WITH SIGNIFICANT REDUCTIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES. THE BILL WILL HAVE AN ESTIMATED MINIMUM $11 MILLION YEARLY IMPACT ON CITIES AND COUNTIES. 22 . rLWI..Ilgnjficant reductions ofJ.ggU Government revenues. . The bill will have an estimated cities and counties. impact on . The estimated $11 million yearly impact fI JmJ2gJ aovemment.l..itlat setf-insure workers' comDensation. (If your city self-insures, please estimate the fiscal impact for your city.) . ~ imDact on cities and counties will~ significant~ .$1.1 mWion yearl.L . Pension disability exoenses will increase. adding additional costs to cities and counties. . IDies OptinG Out ~ Security Proaram: The bills provide that the permanent total supplemental workers' compensation benefits received by a first responder whose employer does not partidpate in the social security program do not terminate after the first responder attains age 62. This provision will likely be very costly for cities that opted out of the social security program. . nill vC)ur l&5I1II.IJors to vote 1\NO" on any bill givinV speeli'll l?eneflll...m ~ MORE UNFUNDED MANDATES EXAMPLES INCLUDE: THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE'S RETREAT FROM FUNDING 23 LOCAL GOV'T GROWTH THE FISHKIND STUDY CONCLUDED THAT 17% OF NEW DOLLARS GENERATED IN THE PAST SIX YEARS HAVE BEEN 24 00 ~ u .~ > ~ ~ r:J) ~ ~ > o ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ > o ~ ~ ~ u o ~ Q) 8 o ~ . u '" 4--1 Q) Q) 8 '" .........-1 >. ~ .~ u ~ 4--1 ~ o u Q) Q) ~ C/) o ~ .........-1 0 P- 0 o ~ .........-1 U C/) Q) C/) ~ Q) ~ u q . ........-1 '"'0 . ........-1 ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ u . ........-1 Q) ""'d ~ ~ Il.) 6~ ~ 6 ~ >. o 0 U 4--1 .~ 0 rF\ C/) Q) :J 4--1 bJJ o 0 ~ Q) Q) Q) 888 o Q) Q) ~ P- ""'d Q) 0 0 P- ~ ~ o ~6 '" bJJ Q) ~ .........-1 ~ ~ ~ u] '" 04--14--1 ~ 0 q '"'0 Q) Q) Q) '"'0 d . ;::::::l Q) q C/) Q) u ~ Q) ~ Q) ~ u ~ E c, t.8 "e Q) OOOQ) ZU~Q)C/) . 8 C/) . ........-1 ~ o ~ ~ Q) '" 4--1 C/) ~ gf 0 ~ C/) bJJ 4--1 '" ~ C/) Q) o ~ o ~ . ........-1 C/) ~ P- o . ........-1 Cl ~ ~ ...., en tI) C) .5 ... c. tn ... ~ Q) - () .5 ;= .5 Q) C) C'CS tI) ::::) >< ~ ~ c ~ ::J - 0 ... () Q) c. 0 ... a.. (/) o o ..c: o en ~ o o I.() ~ o o "I:t ~ o o ('f) ~ o o N ~ o o ~ ~ o o CJ r:n ~ 4--l ~ c: ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ CJ ro rJ) 00 ~ Lr) 0 ;j CJ . . ~ \Cl ~ C\ c: ~ tftF tftF tftF ~ 0 Q.) ;j u > ~ u ~ CJ c: ~ ~ ~ .~ >< rJ) rJ) ~ CJ ~ r"\ . ....-I v 4--l rJ) rJ) ~ Q) >--. c: ~ ~ 4--l CJ ~ VJ ....c: OIJ ~ ~ CJ ~ ..j......) VJ CJ . >--. ~ (J) rJ) >< ..j......) u ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 CJ >< ..j......) ......-1 0 ~ +-4 ~ .~ VJ bJJ r.r; ~ Q.) c rJ) (J) (J) ~ f-- ~ ......... .~ 4--l ....c: VJ ;:J ~ >< CJ rJ) ..j......) (J) '""d .~ rJ) ~ c c (J) CJ rJ) ~ ~ . .....-1 ~ ~ CJ ~ C 4--l CJ CJ ..j......) u 0 rJ) ~ c . .....-1 +-4 ~ C ~ u ~ . .....-1 ~ 0..- .~ ~ C 4--l ~ E ~ .~ E (J) rJ) CJ ~ VJ ......-1 ~ ~ CJ ~ ~ ~ ~ > 0 0 0 ~ 4--l ~ ..j......) ..j......) ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ..j......) ..j......) ..j......) VJ VJ VJ ~ ro Q.) ro ro 0 0 0 ~ > c u u u Q) C 0 C ;j '""d '""d '""d 0 ro 0 ~ (J) CJ (J) ~ .~ .~ VJ VJ VJ ~ Q.) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ 4--l .~ ~ (J) (J) (J) ........-I 0 6 ~ 8 ~ +-4 +-4 +-4 ~ ..j......) ~ CJ u u u 0 ~ CJ C ~ C \0 tn c: ..... ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ . . CJ ~ CJ C\ Q ~ bJJ ~ 7.0 Efl- 6.0 c 0 :2: 5.0 4.0 New Property Tax Revenues vs. Increased Cost to Maintain the Status Quo New Property Tax Revenues I ncreased Cost to Mai ntai n the Status Quo 6.0 5.5 tI7 C 0 5.0 .- ~ 4.5 4.0 Public Safety vs. Property Taxes Public Safety Cost Increases Property Tax Revenue Increases