HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 10 25 Regular Item E
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
, 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
Community Development Dept.
Planning Division
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY AGENDA ITEM
II. E.
CRC TUSKA WILLA ROAD SITE LARGE SCALE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT LS-CPA-5-00
Staff Report
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163.3174(4)(a) Florida Statutes which states in part "Be the agency
responsible for the preparation of the comprehensive plan or plan aJ.Tlendment and shall
make recommendations to the governing body regarding the adoption or amendment of
such plan. During the preparation of the plan or plan amendment and prior to any
recommendation to the governing body, the local planning agency shall hold at least one
public hearing, with public notice, on the proposed plan or plan amendment.
CONSIDERATIONS: '
I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
Carl Cahill
131 Park Lake Street
Orlando, FL 32803
(same)
REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting a change of Future Land Use Map designation from "Moderate
Density Residential" (3.6 - 6.5 DU per acre) and "Conservation" to the new "Town
Center" designation.
PURPOSE:
"To develop a mixed use single-family development and mixed use tract that compliments
the Town Center."
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
TuskawilIa Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CP A-5-00
'"
A. SITE INFORMATION
1. PARCEL NUMBER
26-20-3 0-5AR- UDOO-03 60
01-21-30-0000-0250
2. ACREAGE:
148 +/- acres
3. GENERAL LOCATION:
West side of Tuskawilla Road across from Hi-Flavor Meat Plant and trending
eastward and northward on the west side of the Tuskawilla Trails Manufactured
Home Park.
4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
(See First Attachment)
5. CHRONOLOGY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Property 2 (29 acres) was annexed into the City through Ordinance 2000-08 on
April 10, 2000. Property 3 was annexed into the City through Ordinance 2000-
24 on August 14,2000. Property 1 has been in the City for some time.
6. DEVELOPMENT TRENDS:
This general area along Tuskawilla Road around this site has been developing
with single family subdivisions such as Oak Forest, part of the larger Tuscawilla
PUD., and more recently Grand Reserve Subdivision. The City has finalized the
Town Center Fllture Land Use Map designation and area and established the
Town Center Zoning District. Developers have been contacting the City with
increasing interest now that the Town Center concept and regulations have been
finalized. First groundbreaking is expected around the intersection of S.R. 434
and Tuskawilla Road,~ith a grocery store and offices on the former Kingsbury
Property at the northwest corner.
7. EXISTING LAND USE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Approximately 90% of the property is vacant with tree cover. There are a few
residences on the west side of Tuskawilla Road area.
2
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
TuskawilIa Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CP A-5-00
8. LETTERS/PHONE CALLS IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION:
None at the time of writing of this Staff Report.
B. EXISTING LAND USES ADJACENT TO SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Vacant, completely treed.
North:
South:
Vacant, treed, and residences of the Oak Forest Subdivision.
East:
Tuskawilla Road, and further east pasture and buildings of the now closed
Hi-Flavor Meat Plant.
West:
Vacant, completely treed.
C. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Existing:
"Moderate Density" (3.6 - 6.5 DU per acre), "Town Center", and
"Conservation" .
Requested:
"Town Center" except for that area designated "Conservation".
D. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ADJACENT TO SUBJECT PROPERTY:
North:
"Lower Density Residential" (1.1 - 3.5 DU per acre), "Moderate Density
Residential" (3.6 - 6.5 DU per acre), "Town Center", and "Conservation".
South:
"Lower Density Residential" (1.1 - 3.5 DU per acre) and "Conservation".
East:
"Town Center", "Industrial" and "Conservation".
West:
"Lower Density Residential" (1.1 - 3.5 DU per acre).
E. ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Existing:
R- T "Mobile Home Park", (county) A-I "Agriculture"
Requested:
[ no request made at this time]
F. ZONING ADJACENT TO SUBJECT PROPERTY:
North:
R- T "Mobile Home Park".
3
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
Tuskawilla Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CP A-5-00
South:
PUD, "Planned Unit Development"
East:
R-T "Mobile Home Park" and (county) A-I "Agriculture".
West:
R-U "Rural-Urban" (1 DU per acre).
II. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS:
The following summarizes the data and/or issues which staff analyzed in reviewing this
application.
NOTE: It is City policy that the applicant of a large scale comprehensive plan amendment
provide the necessary data and analysis in accordance with 9J-5.005(2) Florida
Administrative Code, and Rule 9J-11.006(1)(b)1. - 5. Florida Administrative Code.
City staff performs the analysis of "consistency/compatibility" of the proposed large
scale comprehensive plan amendment with the City, State and Regional comprehensive
plans. [ per 163.3177(1 O)(A) F.S., 9J-5.001(9) F.A.C. and 9J-5.021(4) F.A.c. ]
A. PUBLIC FACILITIES:
1. ROADS/TRAFFIC CIRCULATION:
a. Availability of Access:
Access is to Tuskawilla Road.
b. Function Classification:
Tuskawilla Road is classified as an urban minor arterial by FDOT and as arterial
by Seminole County.
c. Improvements/expansions (including right-of-way acquisition) already
programmed or needed as a result of the proposed amendment.
At the time of development of the property, the developer would have to meet
the requirements of the City of Winter Springs Land Development Code,
specifically Chapter 9.
2. SANITARY SEWER, SOLIDWASTE, STORMWATERMANAGEMENT,
POTABLE WATER:
4
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
Tuskawilla Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CP A-5-00
POTABLE WATER:
a. Facilities serving the site.
None.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
The developer would tap into the 12 inch water main that runs along Tuskawilla
Road that runs just in front of the subject property.
SANIT ARY SEWER:
a. Facilities serving the site.
None.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
The developefwould tap into the line at the northeast point of Oak Forest
Subdivision. '
RE-USE WATER SYSTEM:
a. Facilities serving the site.
None.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
Not required.
DRAINAGE/STORMW ATER:
a. Facilities serving the site.
None. No structural drainage system.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
If the property is developed, then the project must meet Sec. 9-241 City Code
requirements and SJR WMD and other applicable requirements. Post
development runoff cannot exceed pre-development runoff (Use 25 year, 24
hour storm event for design). There must be a clear recorded easement for the
5
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
Tuskawilla Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CP A-5-00
infrastructure. The easement must be definitive for maintenance of structural
facilities.
SOLID WASTE:
a. Facilities serving the site.
The City has an exclusive franchise agreement with a solid waste hauler, Florida
Recycling, until 2006.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
None.
3. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
a. Facilities serving the site.
None.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
The property would involve a residential component; hence there would be a
requirement for recreational facilities or payment in lieu per Goal 1, Objective E,
Policy 1 of the Recreation and Open Space Element in the Comprehensive Plan.
4. FIRE:
a. Facilities serving the site.
None.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
None. The response time would 4 minutes from Fire Station #26.
5. POLICE:
a. Facilities serving the site:
None.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
6
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
Tuskawilla Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CPA-5-00
None. The response time to the subject property would be 4.5 minutes:
Emergency response time is 3.5 minutes. Non-emergency response time is 4.5
minutes. The average is 4,3 minutes over the whole City.
B. CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT:
The request is for a large scale comprehensive plan amendment which is viewed as a
preliminary development order (where no approval for construction is made) is not subject
to Concurrency. Concurrency review is deferred until application for a final development
order for the subject property, in accordance with the Concurrency Management System
established in the City's Comprehensive Plan Volume 2 of2.
C. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY:
1. SOILS:
The Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida, published by the Soil Conservation
Service of the US. Department of Agriculture notes: AWhile many factors other than
soils are important in planning for orderly development, soil quality is a basic and
continuing factor. It demands full consideration, not only as a guide in determining
use but also as a measure of the kind and magnitude of problems that must be
overcome for specific uses. The decisions on urban uses are not necessarily
determined on the basis of suitability. The physical characteristics and qualities of the
soil become paramount, and interpretations are more directly concerned with the
limitations, restrictions, or hazards and suggests corrective practices needed to prevent
serious mistakes."
The soils on this property are: (#) - indicates soil map designation
(10) Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional.. The soils in this map
unit are nearly level and very poorly drained. These soils are in swamps
and depressions. The slopes are dominantly less than 2 percent. In their
natural state, the soils in this map unit are not suited to use for homesites,
commercial or recreational development, or sanitary facilities. The main
limitations are' ponding, excess humus, low strength, and subsidence.
(15) Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands... The soils.in this map unit are nearly
level and very poorly drained. These soils are in depressions. Undrained
areas are ponded. The slopes are dominantly less than 2 percent. In their
natural state, the soils in this map unit are not suited to use for homesites,
commercial or recreational development, or sanitary facilities. The main
limitations are ponding and seepage. Water control, including drainage
outlets, is needed to overcome wetness. Fill material should be added to
7
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
Tuskawilla Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CPA-5-00
make these soils suitable for most urban uses.
(20) Myakka and EauGalle fine sands.. The soils in this map unit are nearly
leyel and poorly drained. These soils are on low broad plains on the
flatwoods.. The slopes are dominantly less than 2 percent. The soils in this
map unit are poorly suited to use for sanitary facilities, building sites, and
,recreational development. The main limitations are seepage and wetness.
Fill material should be added to make these soils suitable for most urban
uses.
2. TOPOGRAPHY:
The subject property ranges from 20 feet on the west end to a high of 50 feet toward
Tuskawilla Road (mean sea level).
3. FLOOD PLAIN AREA:
A review of the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program Rate Map (12117C0135-E;
April 17, 1995) appears to show the western portion of the subject land inside the 100
year flood plain area and is in Zone AH indicating flood depths of 1 to 3 feet(usually
areas of pond in g). The eastern portion of the subject property is in Zone X in areas
determined to be outside 500-year floodplain.
4. NATURAL RESOURCES, HISTORIC RESOURCES.
No natural or historic resources are known to exist on the subject land.
5. WILDLIFE AND SPECIES DESIGNATED AS ENDANGERED, THREATENED
OR SPECIAL CONCERN:
No federally listed endangered plants are known to exist in the county. It is essential
that surveys of such species be completed prior to site development of parcels
containing native vegetation communities. A wildlife survey of those species
designated as endangered, threatened or species of special concern is required prior to
final development approval for this property per 39-27.003.005 F.A.C.
D. CONSISTENCY/COMPATffiILITY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The proposal to redesignate the Tuskawilla Road Site property from "Moderate Density
Residential" (less the present "Conservation" designation) to the new Future Land Use Map
designation "Town Center" is consistent and compatible with the City's Comprehensive
Plan due to the property being adjacent to the area already designated on the Future Land
Use Map for "Town Center". The Town Center designation allows for and encourages a
8
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
Tuskawilla Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CPA-5-00
mixed use development pattern of commercial and residential. The intention of the property
owner is to develop the property with both commercial and residential components in
accordance with the "Town Center" Future Land Use Map designation and the Town
Center (Zoning) District Code.
E. NUISANCE POTENTIAL OF PROPOSED USE TO SURROUNDING LAND USES.
The nuisance potential of the proposed use resulting from the change of Future Land Use
Map designation from "Moderate Density Residential" (less the "Conservation"
designation) to "Town Center" to the surrounding properties should be minimal in view of
the following:
. The surrounding properties are essentially vacant. Any development of high density
residential i.e. apartments/condominiums in the near future should not present a
nuisance to surrounding properties.
. At the time of site development, a traffic impact analysis will be required to determine
what measures will be required to offset the impacts and maintain traffic flow.
. The City has development standards in its land development regulations to ensure
minimal impacts on surrounding properties, such as buffering. The City's land
development regulations and the site plan review process of the Development Review
Committee can ensure the prevention or minimization of any potential nuisances.
F. CONSISTENCY/COMPATffiILITY WITH CITY, STATE, AND REGIONAL
COMPREHENSIVE PLANS:
The City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan fully complies with the State
Comp~ehensive Plan adopted pursuant to Chapter 187, Florida Statutes, and the Strategic
Regional Policy Plan of the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council pursuant to
Chapter 163 Florida Statutes.
1. WITH THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and not in conflict with the
other elements of the City Comprehensive Plan, specifically: those that are supportive:
Land Use Element
Policy 3 under Objective A of Goal 1
Policy 4 under Objective A 'of Goal 1
Policy 2a under Objective A of Goal 3
Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element:
Local Planning Agency
Oetobd 25,2000
9
Tuskawilla Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CPA-5-00
Policy 5 under Objective A under Goal 1
Policy 10 of Objective A under Goal 1
Intergovernmental Coordination Element:
Policy 1 under Objective D of Goal 3
Objective E under Goal 1
Policy 1 a, 1 d under Objective F of Goal 1
2. WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
163.3177(10)(A) F.S.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers goals and policies
of the State Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 187 F.S.
List of goals, objectives and policies that indicate consistency with the State
Comprehensive Plan: 9J-5.021(4) F.A.C.
STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
(8) Water Resources
Goal (a) Policies 5, 10, 12
(16) Land Use
Goal (a) Policy 3
(22) The Economy
Policy 3
NOTE: A Local comprehensive plan shall be consistent with a Comprehensive
Regional Policy Plan or the State Comprehensive Plan if the local plan is
compatible with and furthers such plans. 9J-5.021(1) F.A.C.
The term "compatible with" means that the local plan is not in conflict with
the State Comprehensive Plan or appropriate comprehensive regional
policy plan. The term "furthers" means to take action in the direction of
realizing goals or policies of the state or regional plan. 9J-5. 021 (2) F.A. C.
For the purposes of determining consistency of the local plan with the State
Comprehensive Plan or the appropriate regional policy plan the state or
regional plan shall be construed as a whole and no specific goal and policy
shall be construed or applied in isolation from the other goals and policies
in the plans. 9J-5.021(2) F.A.C.
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
10
Tuskawilla Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CPA-5-00
3. WITH THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL
POLICY PLAN: 186.507 F.S.; 27-E-4 F.A.C.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers goals and
policies of the East Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan.
List of goals, objectives and policies that indicate consistency with the East
Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan: 9J-5.021(4) F.A.C.
EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL POLICY
PLAN:
Policy 57.1: 1,4, 5
Policy 58.1, 2
Policy 65.5
Policy 67.2
NOTE:
A Local comprehensive plan shall be consistent with a
Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan or the State Comprehensive
Plan if the local plan is compatible with and furthers such plans.
9J-5.021 (1) F.A.C.
The term "compatible with" means that the local plan is not in
conflict with the State Comprehensive Plan or appropriate
comprehensive regional policy plan. The term "furthers" means to
take action in the direction of realizing goals or policies of the state
or regional plan. 9J-5. 021 (2) F.A. C.
For the purposes of determining consistency of the local plan with
the State Comprehensive Plan or the appropriate regional policy
plan the state or regional plan shall be construed as a whole and no
specific goal and policy shall be construed or applied in isolation
from the other goals and policies in the plans. 9J-5.021(2) F.A.C.
G. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION:
In accordance with the 1985 Interlocal Agreement [on notification and planning
coordination - (Book 119, Page 89-188)] and Policy 1 under Objective D and Policy 1
under Objective F of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the City's
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
] I
Tuskawilla Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CPA-5-00
III.
Comprehensive Plan, the following governmental agencies have been notified of the this
proposed comprehensive plan amendment:
[ none - completely within the City of Winter Springs.]
FINDINGS:
.
This general area along Tuskawilla Road around this site has been developing with
single family subdivisions such as Oak Forest, part of the larger Tuscawilla PUD., and
more recently Grand Reserve Subdivision. The City has finalized the Town Center
Future Land Use Map designation and area and established the Town Center Zoning
District. Developers have been contacting the City with increasing interest now that
the Town Center concept and regulations have been finalized. First groundbreaking is
expected around the, intersection of S.R. 434 and Tuskawilla Road with a grocery
store and offices on the former Kingsbury Property at the northwest corner.
.
The proposal to redesignate the Tuskawilla Road Site property from "Moderate
Density Residential" (less the present "Conservation" designation) to the new Future
Land Use Map designation "Town Center" is consistent and compatible with the
City's Comprehensive Plan due to the property being adjacent to the area already
designated on the Future Land Use Map for "Town Center". The Town Center
designation allows for and encourages a mixed use development pattern of commercial
and residential. The intention of the property owner is to develop the property with
both commercial and residential components in accordance with the "Town Center"
Future Land Use Map designation and the Town Center (Zoning) District Code.
.
The surrounding properties are essentially vacant. Any development of involving
q)mmercial and single familo/patio homes in the near future should not present a
nuisance to surrounding properties.
.
At the time of site development, a traffic ,impact analysis will be required to determine
what measures will be required to offset the impacts and maintain traffic flow.
.
The City has development standards in its land development regulations to ensure
minimal impacts on surrounding properties, such as buffering. The State can require
deceleration lanes and center turn lanes to maintain traffic flow. The City's land
development regulations and the site plan review process of the Development Review
Committee can ensure the prevention or minimization of potential nuisances.
.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with the other elements of the
City's Comprehensive Plan
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
12
Tuskawilla Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CPA-5-00
.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers elements of the
State Comprehensive Plan, in Chapter 187 F. S.
.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers elements of the
East Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan.
IV.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the Staff Report and the Findings, staff recommends the Local Planning
Agency make the following recommendation to the City Commission:
1. That the City Commission hold a first (transmittal) public hearing and transmit to
the Department of Community Affairs the proposed Large Scale Comprehensive
Plan Amendment (LS-CP A-5-00), to change the Future Land Use Map (FLUM)
designation from "Moderate Density Residential" to "Town Center" on the
Tuskawilla Road Site property on the Future Land Use Map of the City's
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element (Volume 2 of2); and
2. Hold a second public hearing, after receiving and reviewing the ORC Report, to
adopt the plan amendment.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Map of Subject Property,
B. Supporting Data, Inventory & Analysis for the Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment
LS-CP A-5-00
Local Planning Agency
October 25, 2000
13
Tuskawilla Road Site Property Amendment
LS-CPA-5-00
ATTACHMENT A
C"
('
(
I' , 1'-= -S=I . /I ' 'I ~ I 46 Ii). " ,',; ';;"':1',,,,,L-,.,',./, '- ..', ~ '.; 'J,0C ' .'
,to,'-.'. ' ~, '. .. ; I w'~/I' ,,--~"r:=t____,~, - - "'-" ~;":;~;)": iTl'~;I';H~CJiJ;Yf:hr ; d" IMndl.nd'.-~,"\t:',,_- , '_ "
46A . '." (.f '- sJl.... 15 --. r .. . r. T' ...-: I SalliOr Dun \ ,'\ .
~) V- pNt i ,.:-;~;";i~'~.:!::I:-:'''''~,J, I ~Vlll. . .'1:. ....
,<' ,,431 , 0,,0 lr''_--,425,!',~!I:, -":::'~'i!Ii!l ~,j' ,o,~,", ._, ," ',""
- ~ \. ~ _so~'::-:;.... . r '.;-:':~; "':T :f1~"::;-:-lrfK1~----;--'--+';;_>-:-- .~.~,.. ~ {if;'~'/1, >- :: '. ...-"> '1'
8-- ...""..:'.. - .", ~n.~..,ll ',_, ~,l!:~"":~l[\jf.f \," \:-rCo...h"':-' ."~ ;"'i 0';'/'\" -' ~"',~""", ,
I ::-1" P.o-' _ft.. toOl _Irp ~ I '1 'I .... k '-,'- J' .. -. I' _ .-"",,,~ - I
, ~ I 46A "\1' " ""'-.. 'r!" "'e------- '........ 46, -,..' '-,.." ..
~ " .., ~; _'..J~.. ljJ ~t i!~::fdlii~: --=-.....mm..l, /\1:,'~ J: :N'w
: ,: ;, I ,.~- I I.', ~ .6'; ~.~; ;' q /'..J '~~:J~ ~L~Wif~D sanfolll----+(\~_._~ \",~. ':' --l- ~
1\ . "-,, , . 05'_'_';' ~25 ~!W. ~fJ<^,~'" A.... . > ,_1.:,-.. ,,:C,
, ' -- '.-..... , ' " ' , ~ 'I - ' ",. - y'-\., }',.. I ,
~ ,--:, ~',,;.' "(@116,'>:e>'T" // .,.....~,').~ 'h':;')~"'~'"'-::'\ 'n~-~~-'" ,;', '1~2'I{\l~\\ ' ::..: ",-;
l, ' ' \'X - (." flf ~ ilJ,~tc " ': -. .. . -, ;<,." 0:,,' - "I ",:",
; _; '_, j.~.::." ~~~:~ ,', ..'" \~:, '-i,;'~~ ~ ':~:L ~:.I~ ~ .::';/ : .. " ! ~ 'i .. ~ -- - ,i~ '~o~,:'~~ 1 td:'~.~.:' '-. ') . ~ l
0":--'-:- ,---'::(.;~,: .u~"" '~l..La.l<; ,:':..: i '~E~;'-'-" (!9,~w,., ;-b' - : \ l\ I~~~J- \X (<'1\', ~o '~-.
~_,- _ \ _ _. ~~:,i1~'" : _ , .. '-",_/'14 ~r ,r~I<o;;; ~C. (~J" 427 ~y "MOCf" l M.' WAY 00, ~ _ __' '. "L:--~ _;_-.....;:J~- .;..\ ~,
._~-. --~, " .'J '-.. \ ,,' "-'} , ,,~ -.,;-', H.w",,!;.-!/_ -1
'}fl" : ,-_:- . .=..,r.:;~,--- --,,- ~'f I";;; ~ --~ .. ,.J ..;..~- ~7_:_' '-',., '... " I ~c," ~ \
- ...::~;.~ L. ~/~:A!.. ' ^ ~[;--",-. --1" -~';'..r-'O" ---""ii"'" 1 ,;
. - 0 'on '-f!r-' 4 /~'15 I YAj , _,Hommod "-t~ ~,-",-~, ':': v:' ,":, ,
':: -.:., ;. '400'~ -'~"-'~ ...--;p ;~I :'')~-:J- / \', .. "~-'::'-4' ~o's-~>"\
. -..: : ~ ~.-o-,h.".~,~.:' :'1fU.'.XCh...~ \ ~~ L-- j '" -'_- \ '... -1'
. : :.,,- .r1~ ~ ;. -::~~~iI =-~~,/y ~ " - -..J.~' ..d' - G.",,~l' ; ; \~,: f~
_- :-~L. 6540:> .. ::. [qt~O\M.' 1""0 /"--::::....!; ~~_,~ '~b Po,,", - '<>-:" i \,,,,J.....t':"_:T--
- -1....... -L ;:.. _ ", . I'" L""l ( -\.419 ,,,,", . ..... OIl ." . -I, I ,.......
" - _<,~ I ).' '..... J'~ ~,J',';l ~----i', LA.~I JES::;UP, ~~' J .,1....
~.:-\:',' J I;n~~i_.~-,=ufu'''\~\~: '--..;;;(~:.~ SITE ,..uu/~Ir'~~ -_..,:-\:'/~, ,-{
/ / '\ irJ. S'~ ct~~?~~ J.~~~,: "!... (A ~~11 ;;-~~' ~'~~-'.', ". -: ", -~:t"L.o~; \.~ _ I ..f -~ ---i~~;
. . ~\ '1);434 U -:;/ ffijr '1,"\ m 'I~~I\ ~~ ,1" . '.' 0 'I' ~I ,~__1.':
.,,~~~ '0 II ',1,1' ('~ pi.J ~/'j _ ~:, H,':' I ~'__'T':"",._ft
""4 ~ ~r{ -:1! . ' - -~:~ -{'..~ /~:,,~ ',~,.'x':' ~ ~~ ~. 'lJ>...G..dcn. 419 .434 '~l" ,~! , ~ .
,.;1 1'1 I -= ' " ,-::./ ~ )j '-' \, ~ -, / / I P " ~J. , , '
, , It! -( I ' , ' - (, !if;-- -1"-H . y./ ", ......, '.k; -', I" , "
-,' t /,\ = -~'=::,f?}XI):JJt~ C~24Siifll ~ I" _.' ,9.......~1 _~~ "'-i.. , , :
'~ ~lL JT7 I J ~::>L'~ '~)__~/~~""""'",~~~-~~~ ,\);~~).bl7~ t -~ ':: Ah'}~~'hl.gIOn Hg..
\ , y' ,-/ r-;}JI(':d:" '0/ l,;,c:r: " ::t"0' I ...., m26 0.... J ~ 0
:y lit "'l \:, ~ ~/}l~',."" /..--", (- 1~~I;-J-~"b!!l,xl~~r1,.:' 'iC~ :',
ti' ,:rn",'l ~'v ,.\.tag,,: etJJ~f;;l28'-~ ("~,:/' \~. ~\, :;:\~~~ '~1'..1~" 7:;'=- t ~~::"nch
?-- ;-"" ~ ,f,,~ 427 ,~- - /-,' ..,\ \ \ ' J~ ~-,,-- 434 - Eco IOC~I"'Ch.~
~- ,,; 81\' m~ -- ~ ,"iR:.. r ,~r 111',1 'It','c 'UG" .~, ~'Oili ,.y', / SJ.-... j, ,'R,...- ,"" '
, 14 ,r' ., 'SIt ~t' ~=-' ";~~' ~'-' 0 "! ,0...-;: C '.In "
/....,- -:, :;-",~,.,;~ ~436.., ;,;,',::,--, ("I-:t;' --:-F~i ~II- "'~;: -IT'~ " -
EEL- -;::' ~ ,:,;""-"1i.LrT<IY ,- , ~ -', "", 'Cr-; ',a - , T', '/A ,~
~ ~(~~-,.Jl'~;" . ~\ = " ,'''-:'''~'rrL: c' ~_ v,.. ,"~.
)-4"~ c~:'~~ ~ " I" -~.~~ 'ICi,\:. ~~!r; I:'" '1)- \ ~Y< ~G~-'/~~;,,1'
1fJ~-'~'438;~ 1~~2'-"----~"\~~~ -'~?'~:~~~r\:f;~-1r'l.>?r~,,,,j'~: '~~,~/J~~, ' ,~
m. ." I 17 .~ ,?.;> - ~ _ ,",1,\ ., '_. -.~ \. \, ,"", -. --r -ooAPi
:c;u c..;.", -1\ \ _II 426'< ~' '/ lp': ..- Yt; ~'. . :
600 I - I....!. ~-~ '.~ l, ....- ! '~
_" 423,=+.- {~~':':'1 - ..~ ,.\.O~l~"- , -:: . /~, 1-' \' (:. .d0.:"~
, 8' =. ;',,_,(. ''115 -, ~o",. !,,-=~,--' /' ..;:\ l:':.: ';, ,j ( I.... -:~" ,'" '::~1'1>;--
, - ,,' , 0 "'. ' IJ~, 436 ,H 0;' (l6 A) ...... ; 'r9,"iZ. - \, :." .
,F~~'':.. ,,/ 426 )' " . ~ Jb, ~--'t:-<'''~: -::::"~2~ III h} ~: Ri1, .:" ~';~~" '_:-,
':0>, I. " ,',:;, " _ _,,'0Io-::;:hD -' ';",' ') I '-~ '~.( ',' 1J'..----ifIW& Zit ( , -
:-<" \ ' 'r~'\" f' - - 1,.5.51) ~' ; - = I \~.) ,-- 71 """L "'"
, ".' , 4 L,\ bk-j~ Fll' . 1-p[J[)M~,/' . ~ .@> / --;:/"\, -- :;',
Lit ~ ._. 400 "." ~ .uL.tt,_~ ':Jt..( .;_~_-=LlI ~- I ..~/_ ~.. " _ / I _n_.'>.,;.L_
~
Natth
Location
Map
~WYER
0Jll1 "!GJlEIDN
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
(NGIN(UUHC . 'lANHINC . SURVlYINC . (NVI"ONM(NrAl
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
520 SOUTH MAGNOUA AVENUE
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
7-20-00 TSWl
~
..)
)
)
METES and BOUND LEGAL
Plante Property
-
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOIS .3E, 39, 40, 41. 42,43,44,45,46,47,48, 57, 60 AND 61 LYING
WEST OF TUSKAWILLP. ROAD, "TUSKAWILLA.," O.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THe LEVY
GRANT. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SE:MINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND PART OF VACATED RIGHi-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1050, PAGE 401. SAID PUBLIC RECORDS. SJ..ID r::.,2Cc.:... 1-.$
FURTHER DESCRJ6EOlN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 14c, PAGeS 354-3S5 Ai..;D O:::F!Clf\L
RECORDS BOOK 260, PAGES 310-311, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS, BEttJG MORE
PARTICULARL Y DESCRISED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHW=ST CORNER OF LOT 55, "TUSKAWILLA: O.K.
MITCHELl'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE RUr-; S 87= 02' 58" E.
ALONG THE SOUTH LOT LINE OF SAID LOT 55, A DISTANCE OF 219.45 FEET TO A POINT
,LYING ON A CURVE. CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A CEJ'I."TRAL ANGLE OF
03" 33' 15", A RADIUS OF 5677.58 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 120 08' 25" E;
THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF
352.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 010 27' 37'"1 A RADIUS OF 5781.58
FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 110 05' 36" E; THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY
ALONG THE ARC OF S.A.ID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 147.34 FEET FOR A PO!NT OF
BEGINNING; Ti-IENCE DEPARTING SAID CURVE, RUN N ooe 06' ~3" E, A DISTANCE OF
51.09 FEET: THENCE RUN N 300 24' 55" W, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FE~; THENCE RUN,
N 45" 30' 24" W, P-. DISTANCE OF 146.05 FeET; THENCE RUN S 77" 02' 15" W. A DISTANCE
OF 3E.88 FE:T; THENCE RUN S 210 0,' 00" W, A DISTANCE 60.84 F:::E:T; THENCE RUN
S 13037' 33" W, A DISTANCE OF 72.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N 520 28' 55" W, A DISTANCE
OF 52..37 FEET; THENCE RUN S 550 28' 45" W, A DISTANCE OF 62.62 FE:=T; THENCE RUN
S 60" 28' 25" W, A DISTANCE OF 40.33 F=ET: THENCE RUN S 79" 38' 15" W, 10. DISTANCE
OF 80.50 FEET; THENCE RUN S 150 02' 50" E. A DISTANCE OF 70.~ fEET: TI-:ENCE RUN
N 8203-4' 46" W, A DISTANCE OF 106.99 F=:ET: THENCE RUN N 820 41' OS" 'N. A ~ISTANCE
'OF 95.32 FEET: THENCE RUN S 71044' 19" W, A DISTANCE OF 62.82 FEET; THENCE RUN
N 820 23' ~_3- W, A DISTANCE OF 166.51 FEET; THENCE RUN N 870 1~' 19" W, ,:.. lJ!S"lArJr::E
OF 194.43 FE.::T; THENCE RUN N 27= 29' 37" E, A DISTANCE OF 6:=.65 FeET; THErJCE
RUN N 21" 50' 46"W, A DISTANCE OF 60.65 FEET; THENCE RUN N 76" 22' aT' W, A
DISTANCE OF 61,47 FEET; THENCE RUN S 63" 17' 04" W, A DISTANCE OF 40.69 FEET;
THENCE RUN N 02057' 55" E, A DISTANCE OF 185.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S 870 02' 04" E.
A DISTANc:;E OF 966.05 FEET: S 450 30' 23" E, A DISTANCE OF 213.45 FEET TO A POINT
ON A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 010 01' 13",
A RADIUS OF 5781.58 FE::T AND A CHORD BEARING OF S i2C 20' 01" W; THENCE RUN
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF 102.S5 F::eT TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 5.6~ ACRES, MORE OR !..ESS.
AND ALSO
r()
&//;
OW;-J2r's Initials
)
-)
-)
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTIONS;
METES AND BOUND DESCRIPTION: (WRITTEN BY SURVEYOR)
BEGIN AT THE SOUT~VV"EST CORNER OF LOT 63. 'TUSKAWIL~A" O.R. MITCHEll'S SURV[~ O~
THE LEVY GRANT. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT o:JOK i, P;..GE
5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORJS OF SEMINOLS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN S 870 02' 05" E ALONG
THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF~WAY LINE OF THE CERTAIN 30 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID 'TUSKAW1LLA: 1 ~G5. 76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RfGHT-
OF-WAY LINE OF TUSKAVvJLLA ROAD AS SHOWN ON ~EMINOLE COUNTY PU8L1C WORKS
DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD PHASE IV, SAID POINT LYING ON A
CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5577,=5 FEE:T, A CHORD 0;: 2Si. g
FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 114 49' ';3" E; THENCE R'JN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE, AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 291.18 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2056' 15" TO
THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURe OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY. HAVING M.
RADIUS OF 5751.58 FE=r, A CHORD OF 147.77 F::ET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 11ft oS' :;:;" E;
THENCE RUN NORTHEAST=RLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND CURVE, 147.77 FeET:
THENCE DEPARTING SAID CURVE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN N 000 08' 13" E, 51.09 FEEl:
THENCE RUN N 300 24' 55- W, 50.00 FEET; THENCE RUN N 450 3D' 24" W, 146.05 FEET; THENCE
RUN S 7r 09' 15" W,, 36.88 FEET: THENCE RUN S 210 01' aD" W, 60.84 FEET; THENCE RUN
S 1;30 37' :33~ W, 72.57 FEET; THENCE RUN N 520 28' 55" W, 52.37 FEET; THENCE RUN S 55028' 4E"
W. 62.62 FE:T; THENCE RUN .s 60028' 25" W. 40.33 FECT:'THENCE RUN S 7go 3e' 15" W. 80.50
FEET; THENCE RUN S 150 02' 58" E, 70.34 FEET: THENCE RUN N 820 34' 46" W, 105.S:; FEET:
THENCE RUN N e20 47' OS" W, 95.32 FEET; THENCE RUN S 71044' 15" W, 152.82 FEET: THENCE
RUN N 820 23' 13" W, 165.51 FE:=T; THENCE RUN N B70 14' 19" W, 194.43 F::ET; Ti-iENCE RUN
N 27029' 37" E,'5S.65 FEEl; THENCE RUN N 210 50' 46" W, 60.65 FEET: THENCE RUN N 715022' aT'
W, 61.47 FEET; THENCE RUN S 63c 17' 04" W, 40.69 FEET: THENCE RUN N 020 57' 55" E, 185.1 E
FEET; THENCE RUN S 87" 02' Ot." E, 966.05 FEET: THENCE RUN S 45030' 23" E. 213.':5 ~E=T TO .".
POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD AS SHOWN eN SAl~
SEMINOLE COUNTY PUELJC WORKS DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF.WAY MAP OF TUSKAWILLP. RO;..C.
PHASE IV. SAID POINT 8EING ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY H.t.V:NG;.. RADIUS C;
5781,58 FE::T, A CHORD OF 131.59 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 130 29' ';8" E; THENCE
RUN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND RIGh'T-OF-Wt. Y LINE, 131.65 FEET THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1" 18' ISH TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE RUN N ,.;" os' 55" E
'.ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGriT-OF-WAY LINE, 2:;5.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF LOT 37 OF SAJD "TUSKA\iVlLLA:" THENCE DEPAKilNG SAID wESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE RUN S 87e CZ' OS" E ALONG THE NORTHERLY L1NE~ OF SAID LOT 37 AND LOT ~D OF SAiD
-TUSKAWlLLA" AND WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 328.16 FE:=T TO A POINT ON T!-:E
CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING BETWE::N LOTS 24 AN:; 2:; ON 7:-:E
NORTH, AND LOTS 58 AND 55 ON THE SOUTH OF SAID -TUSKAWILLA" VACATED IN O;:;:IClAL
RECORDS BOOK 1050. PAGE 401 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SeMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA:
THENCE RUN N 0::0 38" 32" E ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, .;eO.02 F==T TO A POINT ON THE
EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 25: THENCE DEPARTING SAID
CENTER LINE. RUN N ,n" G2' or E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY ur;:::OF ThAi
. CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING SETVVEEN LOTS 2 AND.17 ON THE EAST AND LOTS 15 AND 32
ON THE WEST OF SAID "TUSKAWILLA," 930.34 F:E1 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER 0;: SAID LOT
32; THENCE RUN S 03037' 41" W ALONG THE EJ...STERL Y RIGi-iT-OF-WAY LINE OF THAI CER;AIN
30 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID 'TUSKAW'lLL4'
1380.05 FE::T TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: CONTAINING 1252227.16 SQUARE FE~ (29.6::55
ACRES). '
:!:J /5
Owner's Inlt;;;!s
ATTACHMENT B
.
'.
.
IBoWYER
SllNGILElDN
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Tuskawilla Road Site
City of Winter Springs, Florida
Prepared for
Carl Cahill, CRC Development Company, Inc.
August 2, 2000
520 So//Ih Magnolia Aven//e . Orlando, Florida. 32801 . (407) 843-5120
.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Tuskawilla Road Site
Table of Contents
Land Use Amendment Narrative
I. Site Description ......... ..... ....... .............................. .... ........................................... ....................... 1
II. Surrounding Uses........... .... ............................. ........................... ..................................... .......... 1
III. Amendment Request ....... ........... ................ ......., ........................................................... ............ 1
A. Property 1 ........................ .................. ............... ................... ......................................... 1
B. Property 2 ........ ..... ..... .............. ..... ............. ...... ................ ................ ................ .............1
C. Property 3 ... ..... ............................ ....................... ......, ..................... ......... ............. ........2
IV. Statement of Compatibility, ......... ................. ..... .............................................. ...................... ..... 2
V. Town Center Background ......................................................................................... ................. 3
.
VI.
Urban Sprawl........................ ................................................................... ....... ........................... 4
VII. Land Use Element............................................ ...... ............... ..................... ............................... 6
A. Goal (2) .......... .... ...........,.................................................................. ............................. 6
B. Goal (3) ...................,.,.............. ..............., .......................................... .............. ....... ......7
C. Goal (4) ................................... .... ......,............. ......... ............. ............ .......... .................. 7
VIII. Town Center Lane Use Element................................................................................................ 7
A. Vision................................... .......,............................ ....... ............ ........................ .......7
B. Goal (5) ........................................... ......... ........ ........... ............;......... ............. ........ .......7
IX.
X
XI.
XII.
. XIII.
Infrastructure. ........ ................. ...... ......... ............ ..... ......... ...... ......... ..... ........ ... ... ....... ....... ....... ....8
Wetlands.."..,.........................................................,.,..........,.,..........,........................... ........,.....9
Soils ..........................,...................................................,................,...........................................9
Flood Prone............................ ............. ................................. ....... .................. .......... ....... ........... 9
East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and State Comprehensive Land Use Plan.... 9
.
.
.
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
Exhibit C:
Exhibit D:
Exhibit E:
Exhibit F:
Exhibit G:
Exhibit H:
Exhibit I:
Exhibit J;
Exhibit K:
Exhibit L:
Exhibit M:
Exhibit N:
Exhibit 0:
TSW11Reportsl5000
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Tuskawilla Road Site
Table of Contents
Continued
Exhibits
Application
,Owner Authorization
Land Use Amendment Narrative
Site Location Map
Aerial Map
Property Boundary Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Map
Town Center District Boundary Map
Environmental Assessment Report
Wetland Map
Geotechnical Report
Soils Map and Legend
Property Surveys
Property Legal Descriptions
.
.
.
Bo'WYER
SJINGLElDN
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit A
Application
.
.
.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
APPLICATION FOR COl\1PREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
(fO TIlE FUTURE LAND USE MAP - 2010)
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
CAHILL
CARL
Last
First
Middle
131 PARK LAKE STREET
ORLANDO
City
(407) 422-5456
FLORIDA
State
32803
Zip Code
If applicant does not own the property, provide the following:
(SEE ATTACHED OWNER AUTHORIZATION FORMS)
Last First
Middle
OWNER:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
City
state
Zip Code
This is a request for change of Future 'Land Use designation from
moder-3te dens; ty res. & unass; gned to Town Center on the property
described below.
Tax Parcel Number: 26-20-30-5AR UDOO-0360 AND 01-21-30-0000-0250
Size of Parcel:
+/- 148 Acres
sq. ft jacres.
Address of Property proposed for change of Future Land Use
Designation:
Tuskawilla Road
ADDRESS:
Winter Springs
32708
Zip Code
Florida
State
City
.
.
.
Present Zoning of the Parcel:
RT and Unassigned
Reason for request of change of Future Land Use Designation:
To develop a mixed use single-family development and mixed use tract that
compliment the Town Center District.
TO BE SUPPLIED AT TIME OF SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION:
* A copy of the most recent survey of the subj ect property.
* A copy of the legal description.
* Notarized authorization of the owner (if applicant is
other than owner or attorney for owner) .
* Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Fee.
Applicant/OwnerSignature:
Date: August 2, 2000
~~~
eFt: P',t9:~.I'~
.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE
CITY COMMISSION AS WELL AS APPROVAL BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. THE AMENDMENT IS NOT EFFECTIVE UNTIL THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS ISSUES A "NOTICE OF INTENT" TO FIND
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF 163.3184 AND 163.3187, FLORIDA STATUES AND 9J-11
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
APPLICANTS ARE ADVISED, THAT IF THEY DECIDE TO APPEAL ANY DECISIONS
MADE AT THE MEETINGS OR HEARINGS, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER
CONSIDERED AT THE MEETING OR HEARING, THEY WILL NEED A RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS AND, FOR SUCH PURPOSES, THEY WILL NEED TO INSURE
THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, AT THEIR COST,
WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS
TO BE BASED, PER 286.0105, FLORIDA STATUTES.
.
.
.
JBoVVYER
SJINGlLE'IDN
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit B
Owner Authorization
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
LETTER 01' AUTHORIZATION
.
LEGAL DESCRiPTION OF PROPERTY
Township (T) 20. R.ao.gc (R)~. Section (5) li. Blor;X (B) 5 AR . Lol/Parcel qpoO 0360
Subdivi~ion Name and Number: DR Mitchell's SurvC'Y of the Levy Grant
STATE OF: FLORJDA
COUNTY OF: _~EMlNOLE
.
\, Seminole Pines ^-slloe" Lld,----, the simple fee O'MlC1' oCme above doscribed proper1y,
hereby authorize Carl H. Cahill of CHC Development Co., Inc., to serve Il$ aKent on
my behaJ r and in Stead for the purpose of makmg and execu(in~, ar the agent' 3 discrt;1jon,
an applit:ation Of applil;ation5 for development permit approval by the City of Wint~1
SpriDSs, Florida. on the aforemc:tlioTlcd property including, but not limited to, application:!!
for annex.a\ion, special exception, conditional use permit, comprehensive plan amendment,
zofting amendment, subdivision of land, city code variance and waiver requestS, street and
plat vacations, PUD approval, site plan Llpproval, and engineering and building permit
approval. Any rcpn:Stnlation made 0J1 my behalf by my Authorized agent shall be legally
bindini 00 me and my afo~said property a.s if! myself had made said representations, md
the City oC Winter Springs has the righl to rely on ~aid representations in approvJnS or
disapproving any aforesaid applic.4.uon for development un my aforesaid property
~~?)-
NOTARYP~IC, S LeofFlorida
My Commission Expi.res:
Sworn to and subl!\;Cibcd before me
this 'Z2- dAy of ,,-~(UnQ , ..G&L-
Pcuonlllly Known ( ); or
Type of Identi fi canon Produced
- ---
~
.
nMornYc.~
Nolary Public - State of AorfdcI
My Commission ~ Ma 26. 2Oa2
Commission it- CCnao99
~-
,...
.
.
.
CITY OF WINTER SPRLNGS
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Township (T)-IL Range (R)~, Section (S) ~ Block (B) 0000, LotIParcel 0250
Subdivision Name and Number: Tuskawil1a
Metes and Bound Legal: Attached
- [()/JJ Attach and inirial ifnecessary.
STATE OF: FLORIDA
COIJNTY OF: SEMINOLE
I, L. D. Plante. Inc. . the simple fee O'WDer of the above described property, hereby
authorize Carl H. Cahill of eRC DeveloDmen! Co.. Inc., to se.."'Ve as agent on my
behalf and in stead for the purpose of making and executing, at the agent's discretion, an
application or applications for development permit approval by the City of Winter Springs,
Florida on the aforementioned property including, but not limited to, applications for
annexation, special exception., conditional use permit, comprehensive pla.'1 amendment,
zoning amendment, subdivision of land, city code: variance and waiver requests, street <LId
plat vacations, PUD approval, site plan approval, and engine->-ring 3..(1Q building permit
approva1. .tuly repre~cntatiDn made on my behalf by my authorized agenl shall be legally
binding on me:: and my aforesaid property as jf! myself had made said re?resentauoDS, and
the City of Winter Springs has the right to rely on said representations in approving Df
disapproving any aforesaid application for development on my ~esaid property.
, J. ,D. f1..~NrF.1 ~Q..,
O~PJJ'
(Signature of Owner)
Sworn to and subsgi.Q.ed before me
thisd.. \ st day or ,j~l\e.. ,~o()
d~~~rn,f1~m
NOTARY ~1BL~C. .State of Florida
My Corrun ISSlOn .t.xplres: 'NII/lIIll/lIIlllIIl
I .
","' '11 Shirlcv M. PaOer50l1 : .
Personally Known ( ./). ~~'" Nowyrublic,SUllrOffloriOa ':
" . . 'on No CC 6013972 '.
Type: ofIde...,tification Pro ",Q M~ ixp. 06/1112001::
, I~AXY.I'lL~~.~~" ~
! ~'>'> '>'> '>'>.........'>...'0......', '>'>":""''''' 'V'<'o'" "...,vo"","
.
.
.
METES and BOUND LEGAL
Plante Property
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 38, 39, 40, 41.42,43,44,45,46,47,48, 57, 60 AND 61 LYING
WEST OF TUSKAWILLJl.. ROAD, nTUSKAWILLA: D.R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THe LEVY
GRANT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND PART OF VACATED RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS RECORDED IN
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1050, PAGE 401, SAID PUBLiC RECORDS, S,l.JD P/.,;:::Cc=.:'" 1-.3
FURTHER DESCRIBED [N OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 148. PAGES 3S4-355 ArJD Ot::FICli-\L
RECORDS BOOK 260, PAGES 310-311, SAID PUBUC RECORDS, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWeST CORNER OF LOT 55, "TUSKAWILLA." D.R.
MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LE\IY GRANT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 5,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE RUt-; S 870 02' 58" E,
ALONG THE SOUTH LOT LJNE OF SAID LOT 55, A DISTANCE OF 219.45 FEET TO A POINT
L Y1NG ON A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A CE~TRAL ANGLE OF
03'" 33' 15", A RADIUS OF 5677.58 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 120 08' 25" E;
THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF
352.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 010 27' 37", A RADIUS OF 5781.58
FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 110 05' 36" E; THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 147.34 FEET FOR A PorNT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE DEPARTING SAID CURVE, RUN N 00= 08' ~3" E, A DISTANCE OF
51.09 FEET: THENCE RUN N 300 24' 55" W, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET: THENCE RUN
N 45030' 24" W, A DfSTANCE OF 146.05 FEET; THENCE RUN S 7r 09' 15" W, A DISTANCE
OF 36.88 FEET; THENCE RUN S 210 01' 00" W, A DISTANCE 60.84 FEET; THENCE RUN
S 13037' 33" W, A DISTANCE OF 72.57 FEET; THENCE RUN N 520 28' 55" W, A DISTANCE
OF 52.37 FEET; THENCE RUN S 550 28' 45" W, A DISTANCE OF 62.62 FEET; THENCE RUN
S SOC 28' 25" W, A DISTANCE OF 40,33 F:=ET: THENCE RUN S 79'" 38' 15" W, ;.. DISTANCE
OF 80.50 FEET: THENCE RUN S 15002' 58" E, A DISTANCE OF 70.3-4 FEET; TI~ENCE RlJN
N 820 34' 46" W, A DISTANCE OF 106,99 FEET; THENCE RUN N 82047' OS" W, A DISTANCE
OF 95.32 FEET; THENCE RUN S 71044' 19" W, A DISTANCE OF 62.82 FEET; Tf-!ENCE RUN
N 82023' 13" W, A DISTANCE OF 166.51 FEET; THENCE RUN N sr 14' 19" W,;', tJlSTArJCE
OF 194.43 FEET: 'THENCE RUN N 27= 29' 37" E, A DISTANCE OF 69.65 FEET; THENCE
RUN N 210 50' 4S" W, A DISTANCE OF 60.65 FEET; THENCE RUN N 760 22' 07" W, A
DISTANCE OF 61,47 FEET; THENCE RUN S 63" 17' 04" W, A DISTANCE Of 40,69 fEET;
THENCE RUN N 02" 57' 55" E, A DISTANCE OF 185.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S 870 02' 04" E,
A DISTANCE OF 966.05 FEET: S 450 30' 23" E, A DISTANCE OF 213.45 FEET TO A POINT
ON A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 010 01' 13",
A RADIUS OF 5781.58 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF S 12020' 0,11 W; THENCE RUN
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 102.S5 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 5.644 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
AND ALSO
CP
Owner's Initials
EXHIBIT "AU
. DESCRIPTIONS:
METES AND BOUND DESCRIPTION: (WRITTEN BY SURVEYOR)
BEGIN AT THE SOUTHVVEST CORNER OF LOT 63. 'TUSKAWIL~A: D.R. MITCHELL'S SURV[~ O~
THE LEVY GRANT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT 6:JOK I, PAGE
5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOL!:: COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN S 870 02' 05" E ALONG
THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE CERTAIN 30 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID "TUSKAWILLA," 1145.76 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE OF TUSKAVv1LLA ROAD AS SHOWN ON SEMINOLE COUNTY PU8L1C WORKS
DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD PHASE IV, SAID POINT LYING ON .A
CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5577,58 FEE:T, A CHORD Or: 291.1~
FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 11~ 49' 43" E; THENCE R'JN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE, AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 291.18 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2055' 1S" TO
THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURe OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY. HAVING A
RADIUS OF 5781.58 FEET, A CHORD OF 147.77 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF N 11ft 05' 33" E:
THENCE RUN NORTHEAST=RLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND CURVE, 147,77 FEET;
. THENCE DEPARTING SAID CURVE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN N 000 DB' 13" E, 51.09 FEET:
THENCE RUN N 30~ 24' 55~ W, 50.00 FEET; THENCE RUN N 450 30' 24" W, 146.05 FEET: THENC::
RUN $ 770 09' 15" W, 36.88 FEET; THENCE RUN S 21c 01' 00" W, 60.84 FEET: THENCE RUN
S 13037' 33" W, 72.57 r:EET; THENCE RUN N 52" 28' 55" W. 52.37 FEET; THENCE RUN S 550 28' 41:"
W, 62.62 FEET; THENCE RUN S 60028' 25" W. 40,33 FEET: THENCE RUN S 79038' 15" W, 80.50
FEET; THENCE RUN S 150 02' 58" E, 70.34 FEET: THENCE RUN N 82e 34' 46" W, 105.98 FEET;
THENCE RUN N e20 47' 09" W, 85.32 FEET; THENCE RUN S 7ie 44' 19" W, 62.82 FEET; THENCE
RUN N 82023' 13" W, 166.51 FEET; THENCE RUN N B7e 14' 19" W, 194.43 F:=ET; T~ENCE RUN
N 27029' 37" E, 69.65 FEET; THENCE RUN N 210 50' 46" W, 60.65 FEET: THENCE RUN N 7Eo 22' or
W, 61.47 FEET; THENCE RUN S 63C 17' 04" W, 40.69 FEET: THENCE RUN N 02" 57' 55" E, 185.1 e
FEET; THENCE RUN S 87" 02' 04" E, 966,05 FEET: THENCE RUN S 45" 30' 23" E, 213,..5 O=EET TO ,A,
POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF TUSKAWJllA ROAD AS SHOWN 0,...,' SA!::
SEMINOLE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT R'GHT-O~.WAY MAP OF TUSKAWILLA ROAu,
PHASE IV. SAID POINT 8ElNG ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAViNG A RADIUS C;
5781.58 FEET, A CHORD OF 131.69 FEET, AND A CHORD BEAR1NG OF N 130 29' 48" E; THENCE
RUN NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 131.69 FEET THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 18' 18" TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE RUN N 14" OS. 55" E
ALONG SAID EASTEF{L Y RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 23.9.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF LOT 37 OF SAJD "TUSKAItVILLA:' THENCE DEPARTING SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE RUN S 87" 02' 06" E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID LOT 37 AND LOT 40 OF SAID
"ruSKAWlLLA" AND WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 328.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN RIGKT-OF-WAY LYING BE1VVEEN LOTS 24 AN:; 25 ON THE
NORTH, AND LOTS 58 AND ~5 ON THE SOUTH OF SAID "TUSKAWILLA" VACATED IN OFFICIAL
RECORDS BOOK 10:0, PAGE 401 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF S~MJNOLE COUNTY FLORIDA'
THENCE RUN N 03" 38' 32" E ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, ~BO.02 FEET TO A POIN'T ON THE
EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 25; THENCE DEPARTING SAID
CENTER LINE, RUN N S7" 02' 07" E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY 1IrJ:: OF THAT
CERTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING BETVVEEN lOTS 2 AND 17 ON THE EAST AND LOTS 15 AND 32
ON THE WEST OF SAID "TUSKAWllLA," 930.34 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT
32; THENCE RUN S 03e 37' 41" W ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN
30 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID "TUSKAVVlLLA.
1380.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: CONTAINING i2S2227.16 SQUARE FE~ (29.6655
ACRES).
.
.
O/J
Owner's Initials
.
.
.
IBoWYER
S1lNGLElDN
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit C
Land Use Amendment Narrative
. land Use Amendment Narrative
I. Site Description
The subject site is approximately 148 acres located on the west side of Tuskawilla Road, south of
State Road 434, and contiguous to the current Town Center District. The specific property
boundaries are detailed on Exhibit D, Site Location Map.
II. Surrounding Uses (Please refer to Exhibit E, Aerial Map)
North: Conservation, Tuskawilla Trails Mobile Home Park, U.S. Post Office
East Tuskawilla Trails Mobile, Meat Packing Plant, Public School
South: Single-Family Residential
West Conservation
III.
Amendment Request
.
This Land Use Amendment consists of a request to amend the Land Use of various sites to Town
Center, or assign Town Center Land Use to recently annexed properties. Because the overall
request involves properties of varying status of assigned Land Use, this application will refer to
the sites as Property 1, Property 2, and Property 3 (please refer to Exhibit F, Property Boundary
Map). The specifics of each property are as follows:
A. Property 1
Property 1 contains approximately 108.49 acres. The Land Use designation for the site
is Moderate Density Residential with a Conservation overlay encumbering .:t 99 acres of
the property. The site is currently zoned R-T Mobile Home Park District.
Our request is to amend the current land use to Town Center. This change would
accommodate our application for concurrent rezoning that we have filed with the City for
the Town Center District Zoning. The anticipated development program includes
approximately'12 acres of residential with the remaining .:t 96 acres of the property to
remain as Conservation.
B.
Property 2
.
Property 2 contains approximately 38.78 acres. The Land Use designation and zoning
for the site are currently unassigned due to the site being recently annexed into the
City of Winter Springs. When the site was in unincorporated Seminole County, the Land
TSW1\Reports\5000
BOWYER-SINGLETON
.
.
.
Use designation was Medium Density Residential (up to 10 dwelling units per acre) with
an A-1 zoning classification.
Our request is to assign the Town Center Land Use to the site. This assignment would
accommodate our application for concurrent rezoning that we have filed with the City for
the Town Center District Zoning. The anticipated development program includes
approximately 17.34 acres of residential, 4.7 acres of mixed-use, 5.64 acres of
stormwater and 11.1 acres of Conservation.
C. Property 3
Property 3 contains approximately .8 acre. The site is currently under consideration for
annexation into the City of Winter Springs. The Seminole County Land Use Designation
for the site is currently Medium Density Residential (10 dwelling units per acre) with an
A-1 zoning classification.
Our request is to assign the Town Center Land Use to the site. This assignment would
accommodate our application for concurrent rezoning that we have filed with the City for
the Town Center District Zoning. The anticipated development program includes
approximately .8 acre that will be incorporated into the 4.7 acre mixed-use tract described
under Property 2.
Please refer to Exhibit G, Land Use Map, and Exhibit H, Zoning Map, for depictions of the
sites.
IV.
Statement of Compatibility
The subject request to amend the future land use of Properties 1, 2, and 3 to Town Center would
be compatible with surrounding development. These are infill properties that are one of perhaps
two sites that could be incorporated into the Town Center while meeting current Comprehensive
Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies for the district.
The following findings are made with respect to the site's compatibility with the surrounding
development:
A.
Property 1 currently is assigned Moderate Density Land Use that allows up to
6.5 dwelling units per acre. The current zoning is R-T Mobile Home Park District.
The development program for this portion of the site will consist of approximately
20 single-family dwelling units at a density comparable to the density entitlement
currently assigned. Single-family development is less intense than the currently
allowable mobile home units. Also, single family residential is compatible with the uses
allowed in the Town Center district in that it integrates one of the desired uses into the
center.
TSW1 IReports \5000
2
BOWYER-SINGLETON
.
.
.
B.
Properties 2 and 3 have been recently annexed or in the process of being annexed, into
the City, and therefore, land use is not assigned to the sites. However, the County land
use designation for the properties of Medium Density Residential would allow 10 dwelling
units per acre. The permitted zonings in this land use provide accommodations for
multiple family and residential professional development.
The proposed uses for the site are single family-residential and a mixed-use tract that
would allow uses that compliment the existing Town Center district. The density for the
single-family tract is currently proposed to be half of that permitted under the County's
land use designation. The mixed-use site is currently proposed for development that is
comparable to that allowed by the County's designation. To enhance compatibility with
the property to the south, a wall will be installed between it and Property 3.
East of the site is an existing meat packing plant in an industrial zoning and a public
school. The future land use for the majority of this area is industrial.
As indicated by the above findings, the proposed land use would be compatible with the
surrounding area.
v,
Town Center Background
On June 12, 2000, the City of Winter Springs adopted the Town Center Future Land Use Map
designation and assigned the same to approximately 240 acres of property. The creation of the
new Land Use resulted from several considerations, including, but not limited to:
· The State Road 434 Corridor Vision Plan outlined a ''Town Center" located around the
intersection of State Road 434 and Tuskawilla Road.
· Policy 3(c), the Traffic Circulation Element of the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan,
refers to the "creation in the undeveloped central area of Winter Springs of a primary
civic, business and service focus for the City.
· The City Commission declared that, based on numerous public meetings, that the Town
Center will be developed in the "neo-traditional" or "new urbanism" approach involving
mixed uses with increased densities and intensities.
According to the City's Comprehensive Plan, the "primary and fundamental purpose of the Town
Center shall be a place where people can reside in a mix of single and multiple family dwellings,
and also gather to shop, relax, recreate, be entertained, attend community events, and enjoy the
natural beauty of lands located in the Town Center."
Please refer to Exhibit I, Town Center District Boundary Map, for a graphic depiction of the Town
Center District.
T5W1\Reports\5000
3
BOWYER-SINGLETON
.
.
.
VI.
Urban Sprawl
9J-5.006 (5), Future Land Use Element, of the Florida Administrative Code pertains to the review
of plans and plan amendments for discouraging urban sprawl.
The following is a list of urban sprawl indicators with respective responses as to why this
proposed Plan Amendment does not promote urban sprawl.
A. Promotes, allows or designates for development substantial areas of the jurisdiction to
develop as low intensity, or single-use development or uses in. excess of demonstrated
need.
Response: The subject site is an infill property surrounded by lands that are developed.
The development program consists of a mix of uses including residential of moderate
intensity and a non-residential tract. These uses will support those proposed uses in the
Town Center district and will not be in excess of demonstrated need.
B.
Promotes, allows or designates significant amounts of urban development to occur in
rural areas at substantial distances from existing urban areas while leaping over
undeveloped lands which are available and suitable for development.
Response: The subject site is contiguous to the Town Center and is surrounded by
urban development.
c.
Promotes, allows, or designates urban development in radial, strip, isolated or ribbon
patterns generally emanating from existing rural developments.
Response: This site is an infi/! property that surrounded is by urban development. The
amendment would not create urban development on radial, strip, isolated or ribbon
pattern.
D. As a result of premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to other uses, fails to
adequately to protect and conserve natural resources, such as wetlands, floodplains,
native vegetation, environmentally sensitive areas, natural groundwater aquifer recharge
areas, lakes, rivers, shorelines, beaches, bays, estuarine systems, and other significant
natural systems.
Response: This proposed development program for the site will not impact any flood
prone areas and will protect approximately 98.53 acres (74% of the site) of wetlands as
conservation.
TSW1 IReports \5000
4
BOWYER-SINGLETON
.
.
.
E.
Fails to adequately protect use of existing public facilities and services.
Response: As this subject site is surrounded by urban uses, public facilities and
services are readily available. Adequate capacity is available for all services provided to
the site.
F, Fails to maximize use of future public facilities and services.
Response: The development program offers a mix of uses at an intensity and location
that maximizes the use of future public facilities and services.
G. Allows for land use patterns or timing which disproportionately increase the cost in time,
money and energy, of providing and maintaining facilities and services, including roads,
potable water, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, law enforcement, education,
health care, fire and emergency response, and general government.
Response: The proposed development program will not adversely impact available
capacity for roads, water, sewer service, and storm water management systems.
Furthermore, the development site is located at the center of town within minutes from
law enforcement, education facilitates, health care, fire and emergency response, and
general government.
H,
Fails to provide clear separation between rural and urban land uses.
Response: Separation between rural and urban land uses are not an issue for the site in
that the site an infill property surrounded by urban development.
I. Discourages or inhibits infill development or redevelopment of existing neighborhoods
and communities.
Response: The subject property is infill development.
J. Fails to encourage an attractive and functional mix of uses.
Response: The request for the site combines a mixture of residential and
non-residential uses. Furthermore, the Town Center district contains architectural
standards and siting requirements that facilitate attractive development.
K.
Results in poor accessibility among linked or related land uses.
Response: The Town Center district encourages pedestrian movements between
varying uses. In addition, the site will be located within a 5 minute walking distance from
the heart of the Town Center.
TSW1 IReports 15000
5
BOWYER-SINGLETON
.
.
.
L.
Results in loss of significant amounts of functional open space.
Response: In addition to the :t 98.53 acres of wetland areas preserved for conservation
that may be utilized as passive recreation, there will also be an active park area
containing various uses that may include, but not be limited to, a ball field, tot lot,
swimming pool, etc.
VII. land Use Element
A. Goal (2)
TSW1\Reports\5000
To preserve the natural drainage features within Winter Springs as assets
complementing the residential and commercial areas.
Comment: The preliminary drainage design takes full benefit of the site's topography by
creating stormwater treatment and storage at the lowest contours of the upland areas of
the site. In a significant rain event, the stormwater will outfall into the :t 98.53 acres of
conservation.
1.
Objective (A)(2): Perpetuation of the existence and benefit of natural drainage
features, excluding them from uses that require the support of urban
infrastructure.
Comment: The developable portions of the site are not natural drainage
features; however, the conservation area does serve as a basin into which many
surrounding properties outfall. The conservation area, as a natural drainage
feature, will not require any urban infrastructure related to this development.
2. Objective (B): "The City shall ensure the protection of natural drainage features
and other natural resources such as native vegetative communities, historic
resources and wildlife habitat by providing for clustering of development on
property proposed to be improved in exchange for preservation of natural
resources, and permitting equivalent increased construction on the remaining
land owned by the same entity.
Comment: The development program proposes the preservation of
:t98.53 acres (74% of the site) to remain in perpetual conservation. Development
will be clustered onto the upland areas of the property.
.
Policy (1 )(c): Residential uses may be transferred to the upland portion
of a parcel designated as residential at a rate of 100% of the permitted
density on the conservation district area, up to a maximum density of
ten (10) dwelling units per acre on the upland portion of the property.
6
BOWYER-SINGLETON
.
.
.
Comment: Transferring density from the conservation district area is not
proposed at this time. However, if transfer did take place, it would not
exceed the maximum density of ten (10) dwelling units per acre.
B,
Goal (3)
1. Objective (C): Allocation of acreage and diversity of land uses sufficient for civic,
commercial, and industrial activity, either separately, or within a mixed use
class ification.
Comment: The development proposes a mixture of residential units,
non-residential use that compliment the Town Center district, and passive and
active recreation. The addition of the uses further the City's objective to allocate
diversity of land uses.
C. Goal (4)
1.
Objective A, Policy (5): Recreation facilities shall be installed in a neighborhood
park serving the area in which a new subdivision is located..."
Comment: With the construction of the residential component of the subject
development, active and passive recreation areas will be provided.
VIII. Town Center Lane Use Element
A, Vision
"....The City Commission of the City of Winter Springs desires to implement the
requirement of Policy 3c of Objective A under Goal 1 of the Traffic Circulation Element
which indicates that there be "creation in the undeveloped central area of Winter Springs
of a primary civic, business and service focus for the City.. ..It is the declaration of the
City Commission, based on numerous public meetings, that the Town Center will be
developed in the "neo-traditional" or "new urbanism" approach involving mixed uses with
increased densities and intensities."
Comment: The location of this proposed Land Use Amendment is contiguous to the
current Town Center district, and is therefore, sited in the central area of Winter Springs.
The development program for the site will provide uses that compliment the remainder of
the Town Center as it develops. The design of the site will be in keeping with
"neo-traditional" or " new urbanism" standards.
B.
Goal (5)
The primary and fundamental purpose of the Town Center shall be a place where people
can reside in a mix of single and multiple family dwellings, and also gather to shop, relax,
TSW1\Reports15000
7
BOWYER-SINGLETON
.
.
.
recreate, be entertained, attend community events, and enjoy the natural beauty of lands
located in the Town Center."
Comment: The residential and non-residential components of the development will be
designed so as to encourage pedestrian interaction. This will be accomplished through
pedestrian walkways, passive recreation areas, and, active recreation areas.
FUl1hermore, the heart of the Town Center will be located within a 5 minute waking
distance from the subject site.
1. Objective A: "The Town Center should be located in close proximity to existing
public facilities such as City Hall, Winter Springs High School, Central Winds
Community Park, and U.S. Post Office. The Town Center should be a compact
area primarily located on the north side of Route 434 and along both sides of
Tuskawilla Road, as depicted on the City's Future Land Use Map."
Comment: The subject site is contiguous to the existing Town Center district
making the site in close proximity to the aforementioned public facilities.
The addition of the subject site would keep the entire Town Center district
compact. The site is located along the west of Tuskawilla Road.
a.
Policy 1: From time to time, the City Commission may revise the Future
Land Use Map to designate land "Town Center" consistent with this
Objective."
Comment: This policy provides the City Commission with clear authority
to add additional lands to the existing Town Center.
b. Policy 4: Through the enactment of creative and flexible land
development regulations, permit a variety of mixed-uses consistent,
compatible, and in harmony with the Town Center Goal, including Single
family residential, multiple family residential, commercial retail and
services, public services and buildings, parks, and schools."
Comment: This policy is furthered in that the development program of
the subject site offers a variety of uses that are consistent, compatible,
and in harmony with the existing Town Center district.
IX,
Infrastructure
Roads: The site is situated in an area with a road network that more than meets the needs to
develop the subject site as proposed. The site fronts on Tuskawilla Road. Tuskawilla Road is
currently beingfour-Ianed by Seminole County, The road will have adequate capacity to
accommodate the subject site at an acceptable Level of Service.
TSW1\Reports\5000
8
BOWYER-SINGLETON
.
.
.
Sanitary: Sanitary service will be obtained from Winter Springs through a connection located to
the south. There is adequate capacity to accommodate development of the subject site at an
acceptable Level of Service.
Water: Water service will be obtained from Seminole County via a 12" water main. There is
adequate capacity to accommodate the site at an acceptable level of service.
X. Wetlands
An environmental assessment report was performed by Morgan Environmental Consulting (copy
attached as Exhibit J). During the assessment period, a wetland line was delineated and
surveyed in accordance with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) standards; a jurisdictional determination is
currently being sought for this line.
All development will comply with the permitting standards of any agency having jurisdiction over
such matters.
Please refer to Exhibit K, Wetland Map for a graphic depiction of the site in relation to wetlands.
XI.
Soils
Universal Engineering Sciences has performed a preliminary geotechnical exploration of the site.
According to their report, the existing on-site soils are suitable for development. Also, no muck
was found in the areas to be developed, nor was there any confining soil layer that would inhibit
percolation.
Please refer to Exhibit L for a copy of the Geotechnical Report. Also, refer to Exhibit M,
Soils Map, for a graphic depiction of the on-site soils.
XII, Flood Prone
According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the areas of the site proposed for development do not
contain any flood prone land.
XIII. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and State Comprehensive Land Use Plan
This Land Use Amendment Application furthers the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the East
Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan and the State's Comprehensive Plan.
TSW11Reportsl5000
9
BOWYER-SINGLETON
.
.
.
IBoWYER
SJINGLElDN
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit D
Site Location lVlap
.
.
.
Notth
Location
Map
~BpWYER
0Jll1 ~GLETON
Be AssoCIATES, INCOIlPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road SIte
ENCINEERINC . PlANNINC . SURVEYING . ENVUlONME'NrAl
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
PfBpared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
7-20-00 TSWl
.
.
.
Bo'WYER
SIrNGLElDN
..& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit E
AeriallVIap
.
.
.
Notth
Aerial
Photo
~BpWYER
0JJU. ~GLETON
IX AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
ENGINEERINC . PlANNINC . SURVEYINC . ENVUIONMfNTAl
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
7-20-00 TSW1
.
.
.
BoWYER
SJINGLETON
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit F
Property Boundary Map
.
------,
--- \
---r--- \
r---- .. \
\ \. \,
\ \ \
\ ,
\
\ \ \
\ \
\ \ \
\ \.._-~--\ \\
\ ,-----J_ ~
I
I
\ PROPERTY ONE I
I ,
\ 1--------1 j I
\\ Ii L---ji
PROPERTY TWO ! ~
\ i N
L rL--=--------d/
----------- ,~:,"~-~;;::/--- / f '
.
~
Notth
.
Property
Boundary Map
BoWYER
SJNGLETON
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
ENCINEERINC . PlANNIHC . SU'WEYINC . [NVU\ONM[HrAI
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co" Inc.
7-20-00
TSWl
.
.
.
BoWYER
S1ING1LElDN
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit G
Future Land Use Map
.
/
" r~
. "-_/
North
CITY OF 'VINTER SPRINGS
FUTURE LAND USE MAP ~ 2010
.
l!r:S~lP
1000 0
r.J'~"""".
1000
1000
JOOO
4000
SCAlL IN rEEl
Ii
If
if
II
L,-V:E
.\
, ,
..:ESUF \ \
\ '..
\\
\ \
'-......-.-........-.y)..,. '
1"\
/'\~ \'.
..[ t; ;';
t~::::=-- \;
LIoNO USE LECEND
, ,
I i r--:.}
-'ii"'~
-i i () (>-_.
if
, ,
, ,
, ,
//
, ,
, ,
, ,
/
. ..~:'~ ~ ~ .
~,
Etffi Rlntlc
C:l:::J:I) Roaidontlal
~ Low.r
Oonllty
" R..ldonticl
~ lIod.rat.
Denoity
R..idenlial
Ii' lI.dlurn
"- 00nl11y
" Roaid.ntlcl
~~Mr
o. no1ty
Ruidentlcl
m Urban
- Oonllly
- Ruldontial
0" lJtI.ty
" " Inltallatia".
, ,
,," ,,"0" Indultrial
"""
.... .' ~ ,:- -- .
,...: :
"
Ii
Ii
11
\t
n
I;
"
"
StUaJO //
''''''''''''''''~''';:''':;'~~'''':''''''''''\'' !
"
''.<i;''~',~"":,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,:;::;/ <
:"; "~.
'-,
"
"
'\':-:':"~:"'::"''::':'" :..
, ,
t~t':':':: COmrTMOr cia
J;;:~~
f'ooooo'l lIi.ed
I':;;oo;j Use
fI Recreational
. Con.orvatian
~ Pub.c
=:s:::: Bu~din9'
..... .:::..
'... :,::11'"
:; , ~-. ;
; ,
": ;;1 I
Ifl"
'U&;..~
1''"':"":;
,~'
j
f ;
j ! ....,...-.......
! J /.~>..----
!! //
.... {'-j::::..-:::-{ f
",,! ,,:1
\i
"
I' : ![
Ii ;' : i
{/ ~
, ;
[~ v1
H
::
\.
:\
\\
\~
\\
\":
11
':
fJ
.J
/;
h
'/
,/
,/
rr:;.'
..:-.:..~:.:.:.:;~:.. .
"':"~",.,,,,,,,,,-,;~;,,o.,~,,,,:,,,,,,.,,.
;j~
/!~
::'":7'.:::':'::~::::'-:::::::':~'~{ ~
H
/-'
!
\.,-;
,/
/
{/'":\---
;
LECEND
lit""" 0' ..n
~
crt'!' lW.1S
JooOIl"'..... .".(1 l(vtl
III'C stllU,* lOCA1()t11
I:
'"
c::=l
!\Hi,'
'~
''\.'"
"~,
..'........':...':.~::p;::::.
. ........ ...~ .
",
---,-,
~,..ou.,..-( l:JA1('9 l(vll
N< SUI~_ lOC"l00.
5"'((-: ,-<
O.
II
T(l(~~h...IA'1QH
.~::-
.. .
, .
,/ ;'
,.......", .:
: '
,
i:
jl
ENGINEERING & LAND SYSTEMS Inc.
"DC<
.....'1. -:"t(.~~..-: "'._,
;;"'''%~.,.t,;.~
...!...r..
.,
>,
\i
."'(' Wli.l
.
.
.
BoWYER
SJINGLElDN
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit H
Zoning lVlap
.
-.,
.
@ \
I
~
North
.
Zoning
Map
BoWYER
SJNGLETON
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
ENGINEERINC . PlANNINC . SUltV[YINC . [NV1RONMrNTAl
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
7-20-00 TSWl
.
.
.
BoVVYER
SIlNGJLETON
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit I
Town Center District Boundary Map
.
- - - - _. o. _ .: .
T
TOWN CENTER
A, Town Center District Boundary Map
l!!!!III'l!!!!! District Boundary
.... - County Enclaves (not in city)
--...~~
<
Q,{
(?
./
(?
J'
it'
~
"
.
:;.
-. -,
OUT ':
-PI,
\
,-
'\
\1-
\
cJ
~
Natth
.
Town Center
District Boundary
~BpWYER
0Jll1~GLE1DN
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
ENGIHEEfUNG . PLANNING. SURYEYINC . ENVI"ONMfNfAI
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
7-20-00 TSW1
.
.
.
IBoWYER
SIINGLElDN
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
lNCINF(FUNG . PlANNING' SUJlVEYING . ENVIRONMENTAl
Exhibit J
Environmental Assessment Report
Morgan Environmental Consulting
740 Florida Central Parkway, Suite 2004
Longwood, Florida 32750
.
June 1, 2000
o ~~~u:~~
Mrs. Sandy Bierly
CHC Development
1 31 Park Lake Street
Orlando, Florida 32803
Re: Environmental Status Report
Tuskawilla Trails/Plante Property
Dear Mrs. Bierly:
Per your request, a thorough environmental analysis of the subject property
has been performed, including information relating to listed species of
wildlife and plants, as well as a review of wetland issues, All field work has
been completed in conformance with applicable regulations and guidelines set
forth by the State of Florida and federal environmental regulatory agencies
as well as state and federal wildlife departments,
. SITE EVALUATION
The Tuskawilla Trails/Plante Property is an approximately 200 acre tract
that is located within Seminole County. This parent tract is composed of two
adjacent parcels that are separated by a number of out parcels. The
largest, approximately 1 60 acres, and most northern of these parcels is
referred to as Tuskawilla Trails and consists of a mobile home park, The
Tuskawilla Trails property fronts on the western side of State Road 434,
roughly one-half mile north of Tuskawilla Road, The second of these parcels
is approximately 39 acres in size and is located to the south and east of
Tuskawilla Trails. This parcel is referred to as the Plante Property and
fronts on the western side of Tuskawilla Road, approximately one-quarter
mile south of State Road 434. The Tuskawilla Trails property is located
within Section 36, Township 20 South, Range 30 East. The Plante property is
located within Section 1, Township 21 South, Range 30 East.
.
*It should be noted that approximately 45 acres of the Tuskawilla Trails
property has previously been developed as a mobile home community.
Therefore, only the remaining :t 110 acres will be discussed within this
report.
Phone (407) 260-,0448 · Fax (407) 260-0446
.
.
.
Mrs, 'Sandy Bierly
Environmental Status Report
June 1, 2000
Page 2
With regard to upland tracts located within the parent parcel, there are
three (3) distinct vegetative communities, The first of these upland
communities is located within the Tuskawilla Trails property, within its'
southeast corner. These uplands can be characterized as a long leaf pine _
xeric oak community (FLUCCS* - 412) that is dominated by a canopy of
longleaf pine, live oak, and laurel oak; a sub-canopy of scrub oak and wax
myrtle; and a dense understory of saw palmetto, deermoss, and fetterbush.
The second upland community is located within the Plante property and
consists of the majority of land located north of the retention pond,
currently being constructed by Seminole County. This community can be
characterized as a pine - mesic oak community (FLUCCS* - 414) that is
dominated by a canopy of slash pine, laurel oak, red maple, and scattered live
oak; a sub-canopy of like-species and cabbage palm; and an understory of
primarily bahia, andropogon, blackberry, and muscadine vine. The final upland
community within the parent tract is located within the southern portion of
the Plante property, south of the above mentioned retention pond. This area
can best be characterized as a pine-flatwood community (FLUCCS*- 411 ) the
is dominated by a canopy of slash pine and scattered longleaf pine and
sweetgum; a sub-canopy of like-species and wax myrtle; and an understory
of dense saw palmetto, fetterbush, braken fern, greenbriar, and muscadine.
With regard to wetlands, one (1) system exists on-site that would be claimed
as jurisdictional by local, state, and federal agencies, This wetland, ~Ithough
contiguous, can be characterized as three (3) separate vegetative
communities. The largest of these wetland communities is located along the
western boundary of the Plante property and within the western and
southern portions of the Tuskawilla Trails property, This vegetative
community can best be described as a pond pine wetland (FLUCCS* - 622)
that is dominated by a canopy of pond pine, loblolly bay, sweetgum, and red
bay; a sub-canopy of like species, dahoon holly, and wax myrtle; and an
understory of palmetto, cinnamon fern, chain fern, and galberry. Due to the
drop in elevation along the western boundary, this system acts as a "seepage
slope" wetland, a wetland typically found on a sloped property, where there is
a confining layer close to the surface that "releases" water along the higher
elevations of .the slope rather that at the lower elevations,
.
.
.
Mrs. Sandy Bierly
Environmental Status Report
June 1, 2000
Page 3
The second wetland system within the limits of the parent parcel is located
within the southern portion of the plant property, just south and adjacent to
the Seminole County retention pond. This system is a mixed wetland
hardwood community (FLUCCS* - 61 7) that is dominated by a canopy of
sweetgum, loblolly bay, red bay, and scattered pond pine; a sub-canopy of
like species, sabal palm, wax myrtle, and dahoon holly; and an understory of
cinnamon fern, chain fern, greenbriar, and muscadine, This portion of the
overall forested wetlands is hydrologically fed from a receiving body located
to the west of Tuskawilla Road. Once the surface water is collected, it
drains west into the subject wetland system via a culvert underneath
Tuskawilla Road. More specifically, it empties into a small pond (FLUCCS* -
524) that is dominated by a blanket of duckweed. Once the surface water
stages up, it then sheetflows into the forested wetland, flowing west and
eventually reaching Lake Jessup.
The subject wetland has been delineated via flagging and has been labeled
MEC 101 thru MEC 123 along the southwestern boundary, MEC 201 thru MEC
213 along the northwestern boundary, and MEC 301 thru MEC 328 along its'
southern boundary, An aerial has been attached for your review with the
approximate boundaries and jurisdictional limits delineated,
SOILS SURVEY
While on-site, the subject property's soils were reviewed and were found to
be consistent with the identification of soils as listed within the Seminole
County Soils Survey, Soifs found to exist on-site based upon the soils survey
are as follows: Adamsville-Sparr fine sands (2); Basinger, Samsula, and
Hontoon soils, depression'al (10); Basinger and Smyrna fine sands,
depressional (11); Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands, depressional (11);
and Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (20).
.
.
.
Mrs. Sandy Bierly
Environmental Status Report
June 1, 2000
Page 4
WILDLIFE ANALYSIS
At this time, authorization has only been given for the review of the Plante
property. The Plante property has been extensively analyzed to determine
the extent of utilization by wildlife, with special emphasis given to
endangered, threatened, or special concern species, as listed by the Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FF&WCC) and the US Fish and
Wildlife Service (USF&WS). The wildlife survey was conducted utilizing
pedestrian transec~s of the site, in compliance with the FG&FWFC's technical
manual entitled Wildlife Methodologies Guidelines. No species of wildlife
listed as either being endangered, threatened, or of special concern was
observed residing within or utilizing this prop~rty.
However, it should be noted that an eagle's nest, which has been previously
determined by the FF&WCC to be active,- 'is known to exist off-site to the
west. This nest, SE 002, may be located within 1500' of the subject
properties. If this is the case, the project may be located within the nest's
primary or secondary protection zones and would therefore have certain
development restrictions that may apply, More detailed coordination with
the agencies will occur following submittal of site plan information to the
FF&WCC and USF&WS offices,
LISTED PLANT SPECIES ANALYSIS
No species of plant listed as being rare or endangered was observed within
the boundaries of the Plante property. However, the following species is
listed as being commercially exploited by the USF&WS commission: cinnamon
fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), Although this species is listed, there are no
restrictions toward the development of the property,
As stated above, no wildlife review of the Tuskawilla Trails property has been
performed or authorized,
.
.
.
Mrs. Sandy Bierly
Environmental Status Report
June 1, 2000
Page 5
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this information, or if you
need any additional information, please contact me at my office. Thank you.
~
Stephen Butler
Morgan Environmental Consulting, Inc,
attachment: aerial with approximate boundary and wetland delineations
.
.
.
BoWYER
SIINGLETDN
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit K
Wetland Map
.
.
.
),-
o~
~<t
" \"':
ir=f' I
38 /I \
"
"
@~ Ii '\
!!
-
3173
<b
,."",
Wetlands
Map
~BpWYER
~JIll ~GLE'IDN
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
ENGINEE"INC .. "lANNINC . SUftVEVINC . ENVUlONMENrAL
Comprehensive Polley
Plan Amendment
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
7-20-00 TSWl
.
.
.
BoWYER
SJrNGLETON
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit L
Geotechnical Report
UNIVERSAL
ENGINEERING SCIENCES
Offices in
. Orlando
. Gainesville
. Fort Myers
. Rock/edge
. SI. Augustine
. Daytona Beach
. West Palm Beach
. Jacksonville
, OcaJa
, Tampa
, Debary
Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering' Threshold Inspection
Environmental Sciences. Construction Materials Testing
May 31,2000
CHC Development Co" Inc,
131 Park Lake Street
Orlando, Florida 32803
Attention:
Mr. Carl H. Cahill
Reference: Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration
Tuskawilla Road Subdivision, BSA 14
Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida
Project No, 17636-004-01
Report No. 11'7384
.
Dear Mr. Cahill:
Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. has completed the preliminary geotechnical investigation
of the 24-acre property located on State Road 434 in Winter Springs, Seminole County, Florida.
The scope of this investigation was conducted in conjunction with, and authorized by, you.
1,0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
We understand you are considering developing a 24 acre site located on the west of Tuskawilla
Road, just south of SR 434 in Seminole County. We have been supplied with a faxed tax map
showing the property geometry, Further, you have identified concerns related to the presence
of hardpan soils. This preliminary evaluation will identify the general soils and groundwater
, conditions on the site,
This report contains the results of our investigations, information of the general subsurface
conditions, the presence or lack of unsuitable soils, and recommendations on the estimated
seasonal high groundwater conditions, preliminary foundation design, pavement design,
preliminary site preparation and potential geotechnical constraints to the proposed
development.
.
Page 1 of 5 Pages
3532 Maggie Blvd. 0 Orlando, FI 32811 · (407) 423-0504 · Fax (407) 423-3106
Project No.
Report No.
17636-004-01
117384
. 2,0 FIELD INVESTIGATION
.
.
At present the subject site is a partially cleared, undeveloped land with moderate to heavy
vegetation consisting mostly of pine and oak trees. As part of this preliminary geotechnical
exploration, the subsurface conditions across the site were investigated with a total of ten hand
auger borings advanced to depths of 7 feet each below existing grades. The approximate
locations of these soil borings (designated as AB-1 through AB-1 0) are presented in Appendix
A-1: Boring Location Plan,
The soil borings were performed by manually advancing a 3-inch diameter by 7 -inch length,
auger attached to a slender, solid stem into the soil to the required depth. The soil type is
evaluated by visual observation from the cuttings obtained from the auger.
Samples of the soils encountered at each representative soil layers encountered in the test pit
were obtained and saved in glass jars for visual inspection. These jar samples will be held in
our laboratory for your inspection for 60 days unless we are notified otherwise.
3,0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The subsurface conditions encountered at the boring locations consisted of mostly light brown,
grayish brown to dark brown, fine sands with trace of silt extending from the ground surface to
the depth of termination of 7 feet. At the time of our investigation, the groundwater table was
encountered at a depth of about 6,9 feet at three of the ten soil borings, Groundwater table
was not encountered to the depth of termination of 7 feet in the remaining borings. Deeper soil
borings will need to be performed to evaluate the groundwater table depths and elevations at
the subject site,
The boring locations and detailed subsurface conditions are illustrated in Appendix A: Boring
Location Plan and Appendix B: Boring Logs. The classifications and descriptions shown on the
logs are generally based upon visual characterizations of the recovered soil samples and a
limited number of laboratory tests. Also, see Appendix B: Soils Classification Chart, for further
explanation of the symbols and placement of data on the Boring Logs.
4.0 PRESENCE OR LACK OF UNSUITABLE SOILS
Overall, the subsurface conditions encountered consisted predominantly of relatively clean fine
sands with varying amounts of silt. While the surficial sandy soils are likely to be loose in
nature and may need extra compaction during site preparation, it should be suitable for support
of lightly loaded building structures, There was ,no evidence of presence of unsuitable soils
such as organic muck or soft clays within the depths encountered.
Page 2 of 5 Pages
[!:J
Project No.
Report No.
17636-004-01
117384
. 5.0 ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
The groundwater table will fluctuate seasonally depending upon local rainfall. The rainy season
in Central Florida is normally between June and September. Based upon our review of
U.S.G.S, data, Seminole County Soils Survey, and regional hydrogeology, our best estimate
for the seasonal high groundwater table could be on the order of at least 4,5 feet to 5 feet below
the existing ground surface at the soil boring locations, The existing and estimated seasonal
high groundwater table at each location appears in Appendix B: Boring Logs,
It should be noted that the estimated seasonal high groundwater levels do not provide any
assurance that groundwater levels will not exceed these estimated levels during any given year
in the future. Should impediments to surface water drainage exist on the site, or should rainfall
intensity and duration, or total rainfall quantities, exceed the normally anticipated rainfall
quantities, groundwater levels may exceed our seasonal high estimates.
6,0 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION DESIGN
.
Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, we anticipate that relatively lightly
loaded structures may be founded on conventional, shallow spread foundations or on
reinforced monolithic slabs with conventional site preparation. The actual design of the
foundations will most likely be governed by, building structure type, wall and column loads and
the allowable settlement for the structures. A comprehensive subsurface exploration and
analysis are necessary for the final foundation design and the site civil design of pavement
grades and retention ponds, Therefore, we strongly recommend the foundation design should
be based on additional information obtained from a comprehensive subsurface exploration
program,
7,0 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN
We recommend using a flexible pavement section for the design of parking lots and driveways,
Flexible pavements combine the strength and durability of several layer components to produce
an appropriate and cost-effective combination of available materials. For preliminarypavement
designs, we recommend using a three-layer pavement section consisting of stabilized
subgrade, base course, and surface course. A stabilized subgrade may be required due to the
relatively clean nature of the surficial sands since these sands may not provide the necessary
stability during the compaction operations, The three-layer pavement may be placed on
existing, prepared subgrade or compacted embankment fill.
8.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PREPARATION
Based on the subsurface conditions encountered, it is our opinion conventional normal
site preparation procedures should be adequate for support of lightly loaded buildings and for
parking lots over a majority of the soil. We encountered only surficial rootmat and root material
from the dense vegetation; these are anticipated to be stripped away during the initial earthwork
operations. The site preparation procedures may include but not be limited to the following
procedures:
.
Page 3 of 5 Pages
m
.
.
.
Project No.
Report No.
17636-004-01
117384
.
stripping the site of vegetation and removal of surficial topsoil, rootmat and surficial
organic soils completely where encountered;
· proof-rolling and proof-compacting the subgrade with a large vibratory roller; extra
compaction may be required due to the loose nature of the surficial sands on the site;
filling to grade with select fill material in thin lifts and compacting each lift adequately;
· QA/QC on the fill placed and testing of subgrade soils.
We would be glad to provide you with detailed recommendations for the site preparation
procedures once the final geotechnical exploration is completed,
9.0 POTENTIAL GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRAINTS
Overall, the subsurface conditions encountered at the site consisted of mostly clean sandy soils
which are favorable for normal construction. Other than some extra compaction efforts to
compact the surficial sands to support light buildings, we do not anticipate any major
geotechnical and subsurface constraints that would adversely affect development costs.
10.0 ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION
Finally, please note that this investigation is preliminary in nature and designed to provide you
information on general subsurface conditions and identify potential subsurface constraints that
may affect the cost of construction. The information obtained from this investigation is not
sufficient for design of foundation system, building and pavement grades, and retention ponds.
We strongly recommend that information obtained from this preliminary investigation be
supplemented with a more comprehensive subsurface exploration once the building, retention
layouts and the site plans have been finalized. The foundations for the building should be
designed based on the information obtained from a comprehensive geotechnical investigation
program.
11.0 LIMITATIONS
During the early stages of most construction projects, geotechnical issues not addressed in this
report may arise. Because of the natural limitations inherent in working with the subsurface,
it is not possible for a geotechnical engineer to predict and address all possible problems. An
Association of EngineeringFirms Practicing in the Geosciences (ASFE) publication, "Important
Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report" appears in Appendix C, and will help
explain the complex nature of geotechnical issues. Further, we present documents in
Appendix C: Constraints and Restrictions, to bring to your attention the potential concerns and
the basic limitations of a typical geotechnical report,
Page 4 of 5 Pages
B3
Project No.
Report No.
17636-004-01
117384
. 12,0 CLOSURE
We appreciate the opportunity to have worked with you on this project and look forward to a
continued association. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you should have any questions,
or if we may further assist you as your plans proceed.
Respectfully submitted,
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC.
/I~'
Shridllar S, Rao
Project Engineei
~u-)M~ 5h/l:lo
Bruce H, Wolc,shin, P,E.
P.E. No, 36734
Manager - Geotechnical Engineering
SSR:BHW:cc
.
cc: Client (6)
Attachments
Appendix A-1: Boring Location Plan
Appendix B-1: Boring Logs
Appendix B-2: Soils Classification Chart
Appendix C-1: Important Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report
Appendix C-2: Constraints and Restrictions
.
Page 5 of 5 Pages
Ii8
.
.
.
BoVVYER
SJINGLElDN
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit M
Soils Map and Legend
.
.
.
North
Soil
Survey
BoWYER
SJNGLETON
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
ENGINEERING. PlAHNINC . SURYEYING . ENVUlOHMENrAI
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
520 SOUTH MAGNOUA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
7-20-00 TSWl
.
.
.
SOIL LEGEND
The recommended publication symbols are numerical. Map units without
percent slope designated are either level or nearly level or they are miscel-
laneous areas.
SYMBOL
2
3
4
5
'6
7
8
9
[!Q]
11
12
13
14
II[)
16
17
18
19
em
em
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
l]]]
32
33
34
35
NAME
Adamsville.Sparr fine sands
Arents, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Astatula fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Astatula fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes
Astatula-Apopka fine sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Astatula-Apopka fine sands, 5 to 8 percent slopes
Astatufa-Apopka fine sands, 8 to 12 percent slopes
Basinger and Delray fine sands
Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional
Basinger and Smyrna fine sands, depressional
Canova and Terra Ceia mucks
EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands
Felda mucky fine sand, saline, frequently flooded
Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands, depressional
Immokalee sand
Brighton, Samsula, and Sanibel mucks
Malabar fine sand
Manatee, Floridana, and Holopaw soils, frequently flooded
Myakka and EauGallie fine sands
Nittaw mucky fine sand, depressional
Nittaw muck, occasionally flooded
Nittaw, Okeelanta, and Basinger soils, frequently flooded
Paola-St. Lucie sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Pineda fine sand
Udorthents, excavated
Pomello fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Pompano fine sand, occasionally flooded
St. Johns and EauGallie fine sands
Seffner fine sand
Tavares-Millhopper fine sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes
Tavares-Millhopper fine sands, 5 to 8 percent slopes
Terra Ceia muck, frequently flooded
Urban land, 0 to 12 percent slopes
Wabasso fine sand
Soil
Survey
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
" BoWYER
SlNGLETON
&: AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENCINEERINC . PlANNINC . SURVEVINC . ENVI"ONMENrAl
520 SOUTH MAGNOUA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
Tuskawilla
Road Site
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
7-20-00 TSWl
.
.
.
BoVVYER
SlINGILETON
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit N
Property Surveys
,
I
I
,
I
.
.J
, ,
1
I
j
I
,
I
I
I
i
.
,
r
I
I
i
!
r
..
1
.
.
f,
1
.
~
I
'.
I
l
'n:,"~'._--:-.~' -_.-- ~.
Property One
N
~o 200 400
2:00 -
\ -l!" .
5=... 6RAPtt:C S~ALE .
,'.200
(T,
...
o.
i?
co
L,t.,;
-,
'"
3
--6-
i-
:'0
~
r
'"
t;l
..J
ui
0",
~J
v"
~~ Ii::!
...
.;
i'
CJ
I"~
~.
fcl'J
~~
"-
_Ill
p
r.
>-
~
~ ~
~
o
z
I
I
I
'" l.
a~v~;;;I~AI(~'~~~;;E~::~T~~~~:~~ ~;i~ =-E',-,
v
:::5
::..-<l4.'T
~111... uw. Ul'n _ ".....N
He~."O'M"r I . ~\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I \;;,
1\
-----I-----\-- --t------.--
I 'I
'I l'~_':" " :/\11 ::--::.
L 1....1.._.:\.. . ] 1.._1
I i
i --~..~
I .-, -----
r
...,'o....l7"J
..~,.....u
[j'F~_.~'
fJ ~-cn~~Jt_~ -
I f ''''~..--
~ 115 I "':~ I
'l J /_ I
It I- I ~ I
1.5 I --1-_ I
ii' - --I
I. . . 15 /
I'(~; ,/
.t i,---: __ I
j,1, Jr:-r
1:. /1 "
i r-__ 1 -
jl ',~:I "~';';:';l'
: ;;---;--
t. /
'I! .
: ~ 4U ,
r ~ I
I: If-- -/-
If /' I
~ ! q( .'
r If "
i J_
il! f:4 - ',:-
S :t I
~ ;:1 I
/ ~l f.-I
G-'!.Pf~N:;---" "...:.......' ,:::::~ ;1. _ ~.1
,.-:!:!..!;... --:...~- - " ! - --
--- r....;:...;".... i~~""-.-
I . ..lo.'1. ::~ B,; :a:.J 1.->---""--"':;:;---
, !t ~...,. "1Iol-xC"ftM.,_' ? --__:--....
, --
...
oc
.0
,:.
I
I
I
I
...:.----___..J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~ I
We.:
-t-- - ------- -t-----
~ I
<i
ci I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I!
"'
,.
~:
<,
i:
;:
, "
I
~ 4
I --_
I\)
I
,
I
I
I
-.;;::
s
I
G
'.c
.,
,..
.,
"
LESS OUT
I
I
I
---1
-.....
, .~... /('--..... ~ ~
Q'~ ,~.f.: / \ .../~~
)';{.~ "~ ,:,-,5" I ,...{-\,'" /.).~~
"..,.. .... ^?\ ~ ,;.' I, / -' \ A' ~ \ \ ~?
\ ~:\ 't.,j .. r./..... -' )\ 'f'>-~ \ \..,-l I LoU 36. 37. 38. 59. 60. 61. 74 and that POnion of lot 73 lytng Easterly of the Southerly
t .~.f: '&.. Ity /-:",'~ ~~}...... / /' pro.1ect1C1n of the Westerly l1nc of satd lot 74. all being in BlOCJ:. -0" of D_ R. fIIllTD-!ElL'S SURVEY
. 't i . ~ ..... ,,,.- 7r., ;.. ..-
(J 'I ~~-:. ':0.. 1':)1 ...'i' \ \\ \ \....- ,/./ /! Of THE LEVY GRJJ\i OX l.AK( JESSUP recorded in Plat floct 1. Pl\ge 5 Public Records of Seminole County.
1'... '. ,,' /', ,j' \\',~"). / I
-t ~ _,",,-Ill ~. .. ....).. '\ ,'\/ .....<' / floridll Gnd be~ng lIore puticularly descr10ed as follcntS: Begin at the II. 'J. corner of Lot 38
~ ~..--.::f":.. "I y........ \_",\' /, .......'\ \ I BLOCl -0'" of sitd D. It MITOlCLl''S 5URVn OF THE LfVY 6RA.'fT 00 LAKE JESSUP. thence .8:3650'35"(.
"0,"","1.1' L'''l._ 'j; ~ ! ...~-"-..~ // .,...x \ \ \ I 15129.61 fc:et alon9 the Nonnerly line of Lot!. 38. 37 iJnti 36 of said BLOCK "'0"' to tne pt. L corner
C#.r nllEl.\. '? .:;.:'~.~\~I>~ /' \ \ \ >
'./:n . ~~""'J.....\>J,.~":..'";; .,/ \ \ \ >; of said Lilt 36 BLOCK -0"; tnence S2rOZ'47-E. 2140.93 feet along the Easterly line.of LoB 35 .Ind
\\'it..I""pQ',.t,.\ ..._~-:r.../' l" \ V
\\ .~t ~..~ \'J..~i: - \)>/7 / S9 of uto BLOU"'o- to the Northerly l1ne of lUSKAWlUA recorded in Plat Book. 1. P"ge 5 Public
. \,.., ~"''''''''''''Jq.::i.~tJ...~'('/ . V I / R6<ords OJ' Seninole CountJ. Florida; thence NB7~04'40"W. 911.83 feet along.the northerly hne of
,;...... '-........ ....c:) \ ./ ,/ I I
~;' "\ ~ -<, I / ui~ tUSK).WllLA to the ft. W. comer of uid TUSKAWILLA: thence S03vJ4'20'W. 1988.68 feet along the
\ u- \ ~s r.~~ I \Cestull' line of ~1d TUSKAIllLLA t.o the Northerly, line of GARDE:MA FAA11S recorded in Pht DOOt. 6.
. if . -.~'-./ P.ge, 23 ,ne! 24 P.bltc Reconh o~ Sallnal. C""nty, florfdo; thence N84'52'oo"ll, 1234.64 f.et olong
~~ \ the 10rthErly 1in~ of utd GA.RCENA F~ to Souther\y projOectlon of the \Cesterly hne of lot 701 of
sa1d BlDq: -D-JD;.R. MITCHEll'S SURVEY OF DIE lEVY ',RAHT Cf( lAKE JESSUP, thence NOrJ4'15..
~~'~:.;/ / / \\ 3634.25 het 01009 utd Sout.herly projection of the Westerly 1 ine of Lot 14 .and along tile westerly
4_ :~. ~1ne of lc':.s. 7~.o 61 and JB of s.o.td mOCK -0- to the Point of 6egiMing.
I Containing 6,82~.ro2 sq~ ft. - 156.773 acres.
~\,""/~;. ,,/'/,/',/' ~"J\ch:" mo: That portion of lot 26 BLOCI. -S" of D. R. KITCHELL'S SURVEY OF lltE LEVY &AAJfT [J( lAKE
~ :# ". ~ JESSUP recM'Cled in Plat Book 1. Page 5 Public 'Records"Sellllngle County. Florida. bounded on the
West by .I platted ro.aci. 0f1 the East by S.R.. 419. .on the East by lot 26 LUITRELl.PARK recorded in
\-!"' '" ...... {k:<:-' Plat Book 11, Page 44 Public Records of Se:uinole County. florlda and on the Soutn by 1 s't Streit
/' ~~ o~ sa,fd Llr.'lREll PARK. Ind being more P4rticuhr~y described as follows:
~s ./ --..- ";'. Beg1n ot the most Ilortherly comer of lot 26 lUTTREllPARK recorded in Plat Book 11. Poge <<,
...... - Public Recuras of Sem;oole County. Flor1di.. thence S18D49'39"W'. 117-.93 feet along the Westerly Hne
~~"!. /' ~~~G;...~ I
\.u ./"'... of safd Let 26 to the Northerly line of l'st Street of said LUTTRHl PARK; thenc.e K11030'21"W,
\ l~. ,/',/' ~. Bl.53 hr.t alo09 nid Northerly 1 ine to the Westerly line of lot 26 BLOC):, .8"' of D.,:R. KITOiEU'S
~:.~ // '"
or SURVEY\ OF TltE LEVY GRMi ON lAl.E JESSUP ~corded in Plat Book. ~. Page 5. Public Records of Seminole.
-c.. tlo"..". County, Florido; thence ~Zo02'4rW, 5ZB.84 feet a1ang the westerly l1ne of utd Lot 2Ei BLOCK: -B"
\ <:,. ,/'/',/' \\ to the Westerly r1ght-of-." of State Roo. 419 (OVIEDO ROAD r.<o,.'" In Plet 800k 6. P",.s 74 .nd
>- /' 75 Public Ro.!cords Sea:loo1r Cour.ty. Flortc.); thence S38042'42"(, 506.78 feet along said westerly
\ 't./"../' /'" ri9nt-of-'WII~'; thence. STe'49'39"'W'. 9.48 feet to the Point of BeglMing.
~\....1, OJ,./' /' \\ I ConUlining 43.624 'q, ft, . 1.0015 ,<,es.
\'~//. //'\ \.'....
~~ ~ ,./'
/'
././ \ '\ .
'Z- -.,,} ~- L/ / /'/ · ~
/ "'''''''''''7- :-:--I(l:i~-- ~
I Ie I . ...../:.fl - ____ ,
,'--- _ __I " 1;:/ & ----~
1-- ---'I! f '
"r C'''''.l.tfT~,
U"'.".-.J
-" .
DESCRIPTION
./'
''I
./
./
~,
./
./
~
GENERAL NOTES
. _ Reco...afed P.R.M.(P...-mon.nt Refe'"8nce Monumm-
<X4"Conc,..,. Monument unnumbered.
i
2, "
I
, a
I
sR'Wtarad traa Pipe (umumb.recl.)
.s.t PR.M.(Pormanent R.f.re.nc. Monumeo.t ./(x.-
Concre1e N.on.tmen1 "i1h bran disk No.2005.)
,
i
I
I,
i
I
I
'I
1
I
!
I
I
i
I
f
i
r
,
,
1
1
1
i
I
i
I
I
!
!
I
j____.______'______o ..'-- I
r~:;:~~~'~~E~;;~;:;~,;"'!,'.,
,BOUNDARY SURVEY OF'MOHAWK VILLAGIf. ' I'
~. __. ___ W~,TER SF>_~G~,-FL~RIllA_.. ' ,
! ""'WINTER SPRINGS M:>~,~LE HO~E. CO~F.:'.~
.
.
.
;
III
i::
~
II.
.
.
:
~
III
~
.
.
.
.' it
"
Q
.
.
lW'T[ I'
.
=
F
:j
~Ii
~~
~~
ll!l:
....
Q~
!l!Cl
i::t.
~~
Cl~
l~~
Ie"~
t,jh~
~it'"
lIliCl~
"'''~I
Cl~~;
~..~~
i::~ Q
~..~~
.." .
..~it~
"''''''Ie
Cl~ClCl
~~~:
.....:i...
~"'~.3
10 Cl" II.
OCSCR I PTlOH
N8'7'"02'40"" 1979.63'
..
~
~
10
Q
..,
~
..,
~
Q
~
5
DOT[
~EVISJDNS
DCSCRlpTJCJriI
835.
53
54
S39"40'29"E
SI"-08'SS""
'54.48'
SUIIMITTAL
ClTr DI
aum
DAT[
lBoWYER-SlINGLETON
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
.U."..,.JlG . ..VI.a..rMTAl
'NOI.l'..JlO . ~LA..I..aA;ENUE I ORLANDO. F"L,.ORJDA 32001
520 SOUT4~;~:.N:JO_L:Jll"eC. F"'AX .07-649-B664
DAT( BY
[)6-23-oo GAR PE~JT SET
D(SCRIPT ION
IT
"'"
-
,lilt'
,d.IIIlJLl
LEGA.L DESCRIPTION
64, THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 37, .38,
LOTS 25 THROUGH .32. .39 THROUGH TUSCAWILLA, AS SHOWN ON D.R.
WEST OF" ruSCAWILLA ROAD, THE PLAT
54 LYING SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT, ACCORDING TO (' OF
~ITCHELL'S IN PLAT BOOK 1. PACE 5. PUBLIC RECORD...
lHEREOF AS RECORDED TOGETHER WITH ALL RIGHTS OF WAY LOCATED
SEMINOLE CouNlY, FLORIDA, Y RESOLUTION RECORDED IN
ADJACENT TO THE ABOVE LOTS AS VAC4TED :UBUC RECORDS OF" SEMINOL!:
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1050. PAGE 40~~ TH;:"" RIGHT OF WAY LYING
RIDA LESS THE EAST HAlF' - ON TH:;:
COUNTY, F'LO, ON THE WEST AND LOTS 23 AND 24
ADJA.CENT TO LOTS 25 AND 26
EAST; FROl.ol THE ABOVE THE FOLLOWING;
LESS AND EXECPT 7 38 53 54 AND 55, TAKEN rOR ROAD RIGHT
THOSE PORTIONS or LOTS :3, . . ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED
rOR TVSCAWILLA ROAD DESCRIBED IN PUBLIC RECORDS or
or WAY RECORDS BOOK .360.3, PAGE 1095.
IN QFFlCIAL
SE~INOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
LECEND
Ae,
ASPH
C.~.
(e)
(D)
(P)
(~)
DI'
IR
IRe
N/D
'ND
REe
epp
ID
<> F /H
I><l wv
W/~
SEC.
OHL
e
a.R.
PG.
RIW
P.D.B.
P,Q.C.
WI
-o-PP
E
6,
R
L
C.B.
I.B.
P.B.
P.D.L.
P.l.
P.C.
p.r.
B/"
C~P
RCP
PVC
[LEV
T.B.~.
ESMT.
M.E.S.
TIB
BIB
jlL8122'F.FLR.
-66-
C,L.r.
ELEC
CW
TELE
[R8
TRB
55
~H
C.O.
H.C.
W.r.
LP
CONC
C " G
D.O.T.
EIP
STA.
PROP
::r----
-"--
-<>
I><l eN
CORRJCATED METAL PIPE
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE
ELEVATION
TEMPORARY BENCH MARK
EASEMENT
MITl!RLD ~ND SECTION
TOP OF BANX
BOTTOM OF BANK
FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION
CONTOUR LINE
CHAIN LINK FENCE
ELECTRIC
CABLE TV RISER
TELEPHONE
ELECTRIC RlSER
TELEPHONE RISER
SANITARY SErrER
"'ANHOLE
CLEAN OUT
HANDICAPPED
WOOD FENCE
LIGHT POLE
CONCRETE
~~~~R:N~~7~; TRANSPORTATION
EDCE OF PAYEMENT
STATION
PROPERTY
SLOPE INDICATOR
~~~FIC FLO"
GAS VALVE
FLOW DIRECTION
=FIED CLAY (PIPE)
\ \ \. . I,. .~ I
' ': \ \ j\; \ \ \ : I i ~ \ i
\ : \ \29 \ \: \ 2lJ \ .2 5 :.; \ 24 '
I \ \ \ I I \ \ , \ \ I ~ \. .,.---/ I
" ' ,..', , , \ . \.... ~ ,
~--\---\ --~ ~~\--~'---'\~-f-"\---~"~---'{If-----------~----------.
I \ \ \ \ I '\ "Q I
I \ \ I ~ \ \ \ I ( '). II] I
I \ i i) J I '___
J \ L'=?OI .1\ \ ): 26 .r 23 __.1--- 22
" i""" I ; \ \ " \ ; II ~ ,I I
I ;' i ) -J-) ) : } . il +' ,I ~ ~ : ~: .....J ~i ~
' I / -1' L \ .) ~ E+- _ _ _ _ e
\I:J'/~,,'( \4j=rfEII(r l2~, t\~"4~\N'~)" ! ::tl/RI
- \ I '\ \ 'I r" "~. ~ "" I' I l'fl~
' ';, , \.., \ " \. . "~~
~ I ~: j. r , , \ "" , ''- , " ,~ "0 '.
~ \.. ..Ll... ~ ""~'~k""'Z~~bl_~........ : 'F: '
.= i 1.;--- -- ,: ,~-- -~--..:...~-....~==~_ ~~,,"~ ;'i~-----~'-:~7---~J f ! R
· I' ': ~- -. -'-. ",~ ". ~'R _ ..". .' <:- .. '>',,;:::,.~,? rii' I I
· I ,~ I;, . . "''' O. ON. U~ ..~ 'OH . .1 ""';:1~",,-i:lf~'
~ I/~ I:, 8 ~ ".iff" J
~ I 7: . ~..A6 43 42 ~. . ,,~.) I \L
~ 'r', ,~ I \i
: i ',--- L '-:::~"l L i J ,0
r ..==;7....~:~..~......~~....~T;~t~-, r'=~
i 64! 6 f " 60 ! 57 i' 5 i i-
i ii, i , i i I~
------------+-----------~ ~-----------+-----------~ ~-- --------~-
II 1 ; ; i ; ; i
I , . . , . . ,
I . . . J
I I I,
63 I 62 55 I
I ,
:~SJiI.' i I' II
I , I
rM'283"-'5462'O" ,- .JiJ1:Z=P~o:x. -L
- N8r02'40"" 1218.71' UN 10N 0' D.R.JlITCR6U'S
----- 0' rHIl UYY eRA r BOOK t,
S8"-4S'31"8 1 181.40'
OAK I"OR8S"1" UIIIT S8V8N
PLAr BDOK 3/1, PACIlS '6-17
ACRES
~~~~L;"E MONUMENT
CALCULATED
DEED
PLAT
MEASURED
DIAMETER
IRON ROD
IRON ROD wI CAP
NAIL .& DISC
FOUND
RECOvERED
CONC UTlUTY POLE
IDENTIFICATION
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER VALVE
WATER METER
~~~~I~~O VlILlTY LINE
CENTERLINE
OFFICIAL RECORDS
PAGE
RIGHT OF WAY
POINT OF BEGINNING
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
WITH
UTILITY POLE
PROPERTY LINE
CENTRAL ANGLE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
TANGENT BEARING
PLAT aOOK
:g:~ g~ l~iRSECTION
POINT OF' CURVATURE
POINT OF TANCENCY
BARBED ..,'UtE
COURSE RADIUS ARC
CURVE 15677.58'
CURVE:i578 1 .58'
LENGTH
367.64'
381.96'
INY
ve
DELTA
3"42'36"
3"47'07"
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY~
I(~OW AU. wEM Bl' ~E~E~~"':'ha~:~. 11
o 'c--.d aNI ,.... h. c......pl~rd the -....,. of tile
::. ":. "0_ In t,'" '~~:: := ~: == ':,.:
COOT.et rllp~ I'd undc-r ....r c1reetloll and
~~ ~ ~ P;:o'"~ral ~~-:: l~,qf ;:.~
~ ~._u os.::: ~ ~_ In OrDn9' CoutltJ',
S\OlutltS,; end D>Ot sa!
f1a,ido. o.:.t...:_________________
f\OJ"ictIt. ll'Olli;tr-G.tloo'l
S1""""'b.r.~__OO;"';_"L-~--------- H......, :HZl
~-Si.tl;\oI1on .t: .u.oootn, Ir>C..
520 Soulh WO.9nalia "_"'.
~~~~~ No. L.B1221
r1T1rn
North
I
WINTER SPRINGS
BOUNDARY SURVEY
I CHC DEVELOPMENT CO,. INC,
OFT
100 200
FLORIDA
....
0I>0/ll0
-
-
-...
'--ZIlI"
-
--
"""""
......
-..", ....
...-
-.,
.
.
.
BoWYER
SIlNGLElDN
& ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Exhibit 0
Property Legal Descriptions
.
.
.
Lots 36,37, 38, 59, 60, 61, 74 and that portion of Lot 73 lying Easterly of the Southerly
proje,tion of the Westerly line of said Lot 74, all being in 8LOCK "0" of O. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY
OF THE LEVY GRANT ON LAKE JESSUP re,orded in Plat Book I, Page 5 Publ i, Re,ords of Seminole County,
Florida and being more parti,ularly des,ribed as follows: 8egin at the N. W. ,orner of Lot 38
BLOCK "0" of said O. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT ON LAKE JESSUP, then,e N83050'35"E,
1929.61 feet along the Northerly line of "Lots 38, 37 and 36 of said BLOCK "0" to the N. E. 'orner
of said Lot 36 8LOCK "0"; then,e S22002'47"E, 2140,93 feet along the Easterly 1 ine. of Lots 36 and
59 of said BLOCK "0" to the Northerly line of TUSKAWILLA re,orded in Plat Book 1, Page 5 Publ i,
Re,ords of Seminole County, Florida; thence N87"04'40"W, 911.83 feet along the Northerly line of
said TUSKAWILLA to the N. W. corner of said TUSKAWILLA; thence S03034'20"W, 1988.68 feet along the
Westerly line of said TUSKAWILLA to the Northerly line of GAROENA FARMS recorded in Plat Book 6,
Pages 23 and 24 Publ1' Records of Seminole County, Florida; thence N84052'00"W, 1234.64 feet along
the Northerly line of said GAROENA FARMS to Southerly projection of the Westerly line of Lot 74 of
said BLOCK "0" ofo,R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT ON LAKE JESSUP; thence N07"14'15"W,
3634.25 feet alor9 said Southerly projection of the Westerly line of Lot 74 and along the Westerly
line of Lots 74. 61 and 38 of said BLOCK "0" to the Point of Beginning.
Containin9 6,829,032 sq. ft. = 156.773 acres.
ALSO: That portion of Lot 26 BLOCK "B" of O. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT ON LAKE
JESSUP recorded in Plat 800K 1, Page S Public "Records Seminole County, Florida, bounded on the
West by a platted road, on the East by S.R. 419, on the Ea'st by Lot 26 LUTTRElL ,PARK recorded in
Plat Book 11, Page 44 Public Records of Seminole County, Florida and on the South by 1 st Street
of said LUTTRELL PARK, and being more particularly described as follows:
Begin at the most Northerly corner of Lot 26 LUTTRELL PARK recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 44,
Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, thence SI8049'39"W, 117.93 feet along the Westerly line
of said Lot 26 to the tlortherly line of 1 st Street of said LUTTRELL PARK; thence N7l"30'27"W,
81.53 feet along said Northerly line to the Westerly line of Lot 26 OLOCK "B" of O.\R. MITCHELL'S
SURVE\ OF THE LEVY GRANT ON LAKE JESSUP recorded in Plat Book 1. Page 5, Public Records of Seminole-
County, Florida; thence N22002'47"W, 528.84 feet along the Westerly line of said Lot ~6 BLOCK "0"
to the Westerly right-of-way of State Road 419 (OVIEDO ROAD recorded in Plat Book 6, Pages 74 and
75 Publi, Re,ords Seminole County, Florida); thence S38"42'42"E, 506.78 feet along said Westerly
right-of-way; then,e 'SI8049'39"W, 9.48 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing 43,624 sq. ft. = 1.0015 acres.
Les:: :';at.:0area of' the existing Tuskawilla Trails devlopment
as indicated on the enclosed survey.
Property One
Legal
Description
BoWYER
S]NGLETON
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
ENCINEE'UNC . PLANNINC . SUfIIVE'f'INC . ENVI~ONM[Nr...,
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co" Inc.
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
7-20-00
TSW1
.
.
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 25 THROUGH 32. 39 THROUGH 64, THOSE PORT IONS OF LOTS 37, 38,
54 LYI NG WEST OF TUSCAWI LLA ROAD. TUSCAWI LLA, AS SHOWN ON D.R.
MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE LEVY GRANT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF AS RECORDED I N PLAT BOOK 1. PAGE 5, PUBL I C RECORDS OF
SEMI NOLE COUNTY, FLOR I DA, TOGETHER WI TH ALL RIGHTS OF WAY LOCATED
ADJACENT TO THE ABOVE LOTS AS VACATED BY RESOLUT I ON RECORDED IN
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1050, PAGE 401, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EAST HALF OF THE RIGHT OF WAY LYING
ADJACENT TO LOTS 25 AND 26 ON THE WEST AND LOTS 23 AND 24 ON THE
EAS T;
'LESS AND EXECPT FROM THE ABOVE THE FOLLOWI NG;
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 37,38,53,54 AND 55, TAKEN FOR ROAD RIGHT
OF WAY FOR TUSCAWILLA ROAD OESCRIBED IN ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED
IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3603, PAGE 1095, PUBLIC RECORDS OF
SEMI NOLE COUNTY, FLORI DA.
Property Two
Legal
Description
BoWYER
SJNGLElDN
& AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
ENCINEERING . PlANNINC . SUPlVfYINC . ENVIRONMENr".
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
520 SOUTH MAGNOUA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
TSWl
7-20-00
.
.
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF LOT 73, BLOCK "0" OF D. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF
THE MOSES E. LEVY GRANT AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I AT PAGE 5 OF
THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING WEST OF
TUSKAWILLA ROAD PHASE IV AND EAST OF THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF
THE WEST LINE OF TUSKAWILLA AS SHOWN ON SAID D. R, MITCHELL'S
SURVEY OF THE MOSES E. LEVY GRANT; BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OAK FOREST UNIT SEVEN AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 39 AT PAGES 16 AND 17 OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S 84048'49" E,
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF OAK FOREST UNIT SEVEN, A DISTANCE OF
123.67 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY
EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF TUSKAWILLA AS SHOWN ON D. R.
MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE MOSES E. LEVY GRANT AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK I AT PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY,
FLORIDA. M"D A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE S 8.,l048'49"
E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF OAK FOREST UNIT SEVEN, A DISTANCE OF
1.209.13 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD
PHASE IV; THENCE N 14008'55" E, ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE. A DISTANCE OF 54.48 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TUSKAWILLA
AS SHOWN ON SAID D. R, MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE MOSES E. LEVY
GRANT; THENCE N 87002'40" W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
TUSKAWILLA, A DISTANCE OF 1,218.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID TUSKAWILLA; THENCE S 03037'30" W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY
EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID TUSKAWILLA, A DISTANCE OF
6.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 0.836 ACRE MORE OR LESS,
DESCRIPTIONS FOR STREETS TO BE VACATED
THAT UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING SOUTH OF LOTS 55, 58, 59, 62,
AND 63; SOUTH OF UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN LOTS 55 AND 59 AND
BETWEEN LOTS 59 AND 62; WEST OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD PHASE IV AND
EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF TUSKAWILLA AS SHOWN ON D. R. MITCHELL'S
SURVEY OF THE MOSES E. LEVY GRAtH AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I AT
PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
THAT UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY LYI~IG WEST OF LOTS 31,32,47,48,63,
AND 64; WEST OF UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN LOTS 31 AND 48 AND
BETWEEN LOTS 47 AND 64; SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 32
EXTENDED WESTERLY AND NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF TUSKAWILLA AS
SHOW~I ON D. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE MOSES E. LEVY GRANT AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I AT PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THAT UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING NORTH OF LOTS
37 AND 40, NORTH OF THE UNNAMED RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN LOTS 37 AND
40; EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 40 AND WEST OF TUSKAWILLA ROAD
PHASE IV, TUSKAWILLA AS SHOWN ON D. R. MITCHELL'S SURVEY OF THE
MOSES E. LEVY GRANT AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I AT PAGE 5 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
Property Three
Legal
Description
BoWYER
SJNGLETON
&: AssOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Tuskawilla
Road Site
ENCIHEERING . PLANNING . SUIIY[YINC . [NVI"'ONMEHfAI
Comprehensive Policy
Plan Amendment
Prepared For:
CHC Development Co., Inc.
520 SOUTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
(407) 843-5120
FAX 407-649-8664
TSWl
7-20-00