Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 02 01 Other 2 Date: February 1, 2006 THE FOLLOWING WAS HANDED OUT BY MS. ELOISE SAHLSTROM, SENIOR PLANNER, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DURING THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING MEETING. ""t; ~ "" ~ "" ~ ~ """ ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ """ ~ ~ ~ i::; "" ...... I::! ~ %<.~ ~ .... <.:;~) ~ ~ ,.., .... I::! ~ ~ 1:; ~ ~ 0;:, "" ~ 0;:, .... ~ ~ ") :::: ..... "" .... ~ "" I::! X ~ ~ -s '"" '", ;::: ~ ~ ~~ ~ ..... :::: "'l :::: ~.... I::! 0;:,.", ~ .~ ~ ~""" ~ "" ~ ~ .;::: ~ ~ ~ %< ~ ~ .~ ~ %OQ) ~ "- -s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "- ~ ~~ ~~ I::! "- -S-s 't~ ~ 0;:, ~~ i:i;):::: ~~ "- 0;:, ~ ~ ~;:: ~ ~ ~~ o:l o:l .... .... '" '" .... .... ..2 5 E E '"' ;::l c:: ~ '-' "-l rJ) ..2 ~ .~ o:l 0 2j b[j V r.n - OJJ i~~ o .... c:: ~ 5 .g b[j~~ C::.~ .... '0 "'0 "'0 v o:l c:: V..o i,j E.::: OJ b[j~~ .S c: ~ g..g -B u u .~ r.n C\$ ::s: v t "'0 P.S ~ "E .5 ~ Ul ~ ~ Ul ~ Ul .~ II ...... "0 t": "S S 0 .5'; ~ ] 8 ... Ul .e-. ~ .~ 1 ~ ~ :E' 8 Q) 5 ~ -5 ;S ~.5 . B Ul Q) ~ o Ul ~~ ~~ i.5 1 .~ ~ ~ "0 & Q) ~ '=i ,t:) .5 'S tii Ul ..... is ~ . ..c:: u t": Q) ~ ~ ..c:: ..... ... Q) t u sE ~ 't~ '+-< 0 O..c:: ~ Ul '" e ODQ) ~ s .5 E" Ul 0 ~ u ~~ . s ;: " '" 2- b/J ;::l 0 cd t::: 0 ..... Il.i 0.... ] ....... N .... 0 o:l U I ... '" 0- L{') '" ~ ~ 0- 00 e<i ..l<: r<i r--- u <: o:l N ....... '""0 p:.l b/JO r<i I @) N t::: t::: '""0 H N gf 0 ..... ~ ~ 0- t::: o:l J 6"2 t::: t::: 8 0 o:l V L{') t::: '0 ~ ;::l '" 00 o:l ..t:< "''-'''..0 o:l ~ o:l v \-4 8 u (/) u v ..t:< t::: v ..l<: L{') o:l ::::1 ~ o:l -< L{') :=t' 0 c8 .... ~ t::: L{') ~ ~ ~ t::: 0 N .-< U V '" ~ b/J 0 8 t::: '0 ~ v 0 v ~ 8 "" ~ ..; "" ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ 0;:, ~.~ ~ ;::: 0;:, ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * '-<::: I::! ~ .~ ;::: ~ ~ \J .~ C4 ~ ~~ :::: (\) .0;:, ........... ~~ ~~ ~........... .:::: 0... '" u ~~ 0;:,<":' ;:::';;;- ~ ;::l ~~ .~ Il.i ~ ~ a ~ tl 1: ~ o:l \-4 ~ u o:l .~""d~ ~ .!?i ..0 :s: .9 & (D tIJ >- ~ '"0 >"t o Ii (D fJ) fJ) . ~ ~ c. ;S. ~ rD o..'<l l>) 0 o ~ o..~ fJ) fJ) (D ..... o Ci 0.. l>) .-. fJ) ..... (D ..... 0.. o 0 &0 o Ii fJ) 0 (D S ~. ~ <"g (D fJ) 0.. S' . ~>- fJ) fJ) ; :>;-' 2..& (D tn. S S ~ ~ 8 (D (D >-i fJ) fJ) (D cJg ;S . ~ ~ fJ) ~ o. 0 o ~ 1;; >-i '"0 Q'>-i >-i ~ ~ e. ~B (Jq~ o I"f 0.. (D - (D g. (Jq . Q'~~ i::::: 0 ~ ~ cJg n' I ::r':<:: ~ ..... ..... '"0 ..... ::r' S 0 (D (D & 0.. (D (D ;:;. g. S l>) era g " ~ ~ g. 8 0(Jq~ ~ ~ ..... ~ 0.. g- fJ) fJ) ..... e; 9-- ::r' '<l (D ~ 0..(D ~ Ci n(D (D o l>) fJ) fJ) ;;! ..... ..... ::r'(D (D l>) ~s.. n~ ~u~' n 0 j>a ~ ~. ~. (D u:<:: ~ l>) u~ o 0 ...., Q. ~ (D (D fJ) ..... fJ) o ~ Ii ::r' . u ~ (D 0" '"0 l>) >-i ~ ~ S (D o It tot '<l fJ) Ii ::r' (D 0.. ~ n · (Jq : e. W O~~s.. ~ l>) ..... '<l ~QCiO o ~ (D ~ S ..... S'~ 15 ~ a ~ ??o..<~ S. 3. e. (D ..... 0 >-i 0 l>) l>) & ~ ~(Dfr Ii tIJ ..... (t >- 8 0.. _:::0& o '"0 0 Q 8 fJ) -li(D (D ..... fJ) ::r' ~fJ) ;:;. l>) o l>) ~ N rtl 0.. l>) Ii o 0 0.. ~ o 8'~ >-i ~ S (D ;:;.-0 o ~ ...,.., i>)' g.q ;;! ~ .....(Jq o ~ ?f~ (Jq~ l>) ..... ..... ::r'::r' (D rtl >-i rtl ~..... 0.. '"0 ::r' l>) rtl rtl o 0.. . ~ l>) Ii ::r' l>) (Jq I"f (D (D S rtl o ..... o o ..... ::r' rtl >-i o n o ...,.., . o o :>;-' (D ~ Ii o S ~ o ~. U rtl ~ 0" '"0 l>) '"0 >-i o Ii rtl fJ) fJ) ..... ..... ~ 0 ~ 0 (D Ci fJ) ..... l>) S' Ii 2: N rtl o S' '"0 ~ ..... ~ 8- ~ ~ ;:;. l>) ~. ~ & Ii l>) ::r' (Jq n ~ o (D a a '"0 rtl o 0 o ..... rtl 0 o 0 ..... ..... o ::r' ...,..,(D 8-g. rtl(Jq tTJ @ ~~ fJ) ...,.., ::r'rtl 8 ~ o:g ..... . '\:I >-i rtl '"0 l>) >-i rtl ..... ::r' rtl tIJ >- ~ . . :>;-'u ~ (D '"0 ~ ~o 0'"0 e. l>) ~"g ..... (D ~ ~ ~ S' ;;r>~ Ii~ S' ~ (Jq ~ a 0 ~ :' ::r' n rtl o S S l>) ~ g' e. ~ . 'TJ S' l>) !f rtl ..... ::r' rtl S ~. o >-i ..... VJ VJ ~ rtl VJ ~ VJ ..... ...'\:1 ~~~g- g rtl g ~ ~;:;"";o.. >-i ~ VJ o rtl 0 n nnCi::r' a. ;3 (t' rtl rtl 0 8 g- o.. ..... ~. n '"0 0.. rtl ~~oot:j o l>) l>) >- ~. 5. ~ (Jq S' ~ ~1f n l>) ..... o >-i VJ VJ ~ l>) ..... n 0'3. n VJ . . a u g ~. (D ~ rt~ ;:; tIJ rtl >- 6~ ffi"g Q. g artl VJ VJ VJ l>) o 0.. n o o ..... (D o ..... W~ 8. ;s. o (D o :<:: g. ..... ::r' ..... ::r' (D tIJ >- ~ Ii o o ~(ti Yl 0 ..... >-i (D ...a ~ 1=\' rtl S (D o ..... VJ ...... 0- ~ ~ ...... \0 ...... ----- -!9 . ~ >- v; 00 o :>;-' ~ ..... 8 ::r' rtl (D VJ a @ 8 ~Ci rtl I"f 0.. S' .....(Jq ~ S' ::r'8' rtl >-i S S l>) l>) o' o. 2. g VJ l>) VJ 0 ~ 0.. VJ l>) l>) """' ~(Jq 0 rtl rtl <"! n 0 ~. ..... Ii rtl (tl (b" 00 0.. VJ It 0" l>) ..... Ii VJ rtl a&~ ~_o.. ~ l>) @ '" fJ) (Jq I"f l>) ..... 00..0 ~ ~. ~ o rtl >-i ur g rtl l>) ;S. s.. ~. s.(Jq rtl >-i . (l8 ~ (;)~ ..... l>) l>) ..... rtl 8 _. n @" ~ >-iO::r'>-irtl o >-i rtl ..... >-i >-i tn. 0.. 0 0 n ~ ;:;. ti ...,.., g ~ ..... n g Ii l>) irj>g. ~2..i!iaf4 15rtl.g(Dl>) ~ ~ S' S 5. _ (Jq 0 ..... o 0.0 ...,.., a l>) (Jq rtl rtl !f I ~ a. S' '"d 00(Jq~ ::;. (Jq l>) '"0 ~. >-i (Jq l>) >-i rtl >-i >-i !1l(Jq!1l(D ...a l>) (D l>) ~ >-i S ~ ~ 15 (Jq ur . .. " ua -. ::I .~ S' . ... :r " .,. a " -. ::I ua ~ " !l -. ::I ua . 71 - - I . I: " ,. ~ -. o ::I III :z: I .,. :r o I: - D. - EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORTS 14 Requirements as Identified in 163.3191(2), Florida Statutes Community-wide Assessment 1. Population growth and changes in land area [163.3191 (2)(a)] 2. Location of existing development in relation to the location of development as anticipated in the plan [163.3191 (2)(d)] 3. Extent of vacant and developable land [163.3191 (2)(b)] 4. The financial feasibility of providing needed infrastructure to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards and sustain concurrency through capital improvements, as well as the ability to address infrastructure backlogs and meet the demands of growth on public services and facilities [163.3191(2)@] 5. A brief assessment of successes and shortcomings related to each element [163.3191 (2)(h)] 6. Relevant changes in growth mangement laws (the state comprehensive plan, the appropriate strategic regional policy plan, Chapter 163, Part III, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code) [163.3191 (2)(f)] 7. A summary of public participation activities in preparing the report [163.3181 (2)0)] Evaluation of Major Issues 8. The identification of major issues and, where pertinent, the potential social, economic, and environmental impacts of these issues [163.3191 (2)(e)] 9. An assessment of whether plan objectives within each element, as they relate to major issues, have been achieved, and whether unforeseen and unanticipated changes in circumstances have resulted in problems and opportunities with respect to major issues in each element [163.3191 (2)(g)] 10. Any actions or corrective measures, including whether plan amendments are anticipated to address the major issues identified and analyzed in the report. Such identification shall include, as appropriate, new population projections, new revised planning timeframes, a revised future conditions map or map series, an updated Capital Improvements Element, and any new and revised goals, objectives and policies for major issues identified within each element [163.3191 (2)(i)] ..~ SEMlNoLE COUNTY ~>~~~-n:Rr.~.~~~. Page 1 of2 Special Topics 11. An assessment of the success or failure of coordinating future land uses and residential development with the capacity of existing and planned schools; establishing with the school board appropriate population projections; and coordinating the planning and siting of new schools [163.3191 (2)(k)] 12. An assessment of the comprehensive plan with respect to the water management district's regional water supply plan, including whether the Potable Water Element should be revised to include a work plan, covering at least a 10-year period, for building water supply facilities for which the local government is responsible that are needed to serve existing and projected development [163.3191 (2)(L)] 13. An evaluation of whether any past reduction in land use density within the coastal high-hazard area impairs the property rights of current residents when redevelopment occurs. The local government must identify strategies to address redevelopment and the rights of affected residents balanced against public safety considerations [163.3193(2)(m)] 14. An assessment of whether the criteria adopted pursuant to s. 163.3177(6)(a) was successful in achieving compatibility with military installations [163.3191 (2)(n)] ..~, ~. SEMlliiow COUNTY .~,~qs:~~~.~~~ Page 2 of 2 MAJOR ISSUES: STATE, REGIONAL AND LOCAL Vision of the Community · Does comprehensive plan take the cOlmnunity where it wants to be? Major State Issues Water Supply TranspOliation Land Use Schools Facilities Natural Disaster Preparedness/Hazard Mitigation Natural Resource Protection Economic Development Affordable Housing Infrastructure Military Facilities Water Supply · Availability of water to provide services to existing and projected population. · CUP capacity - Coordination with the Water Management District - · Water conservation and reuse · Alternative sources of water Transportation · Mobility issues in the community. · Traffic congestion, deficient roadway facilities · Alternatives means of transportation in the community. Land Use · Urban Infill and Redevelopment · Amlexations · Rural Development/ Protection of Agricultural Lands · Urban Sprawl Issues - USA Coordination of Land Use and School Planning Issues · School sitting policies, school location and growth trends and how do school location and capacity relate to the decision making process for proposed residential development. · Coordination mechanisms with the School Board. Natural Disaster Planning · Maps of Coastal High Hazard Areas · Public investment in CHHA that subsidize growth · Adequacy of shelter spaces to accommodate population · Progress in the efforts to maintain or reduce clearance times · Local Mitigation Strategy - Does LMS support land use strategy/vision? · Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan Natural Resource Protection · Springs, Aquifer recharge areas, wetlands, listed species and their habitat, historical/archaeological resources. Economic Development · Does the comprehensive plan foster the type of economic development activities the community is interested in? Affordable Housing Issues · Can people afford to live near the place of employment? · Availability of affordable housing issues to meet the needs of existing and future population · How well have Gap worked? Infrastructure Issues · Availability of public facilities to serve existing and projected population · Have LOS been maintained? · Effectiveness of USA in coordinating land use planning and provision of public facilities Military Facilities · Encroachment around the bases. · Coordination with military facilities planners. .' Attachment A ~r"vl^O le... CtJ I EAR ISSUES ~ {JDD '? The following list of key planning issues bear consideration for further study through the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Process. These issues have been identified through a public community meeting with the Land Planning Agency/Planning and Zoning Commission (LPA/P&Z), an interagency meeting with representatives of the cities, regional and state agencies, and identified by staff working with the adopted Vision 2020 - Seminole County Comprehensive Plan (SCCP). Florida Statues (F.S. 163.319(2)(e) requires in the EAR process, the "identification of major issues and, where pertinent, the potential social, economic, and environmental impacts of these issues" 1. Neighborhood Protection Citizens raised concerns regarding the protection of single family residential areas. The primary concern dealt with preventing incompatible neighboring land uses. A. Neighborhood protection is an issue as it relates to objectives and policies pertaining to infill or redevelopment of vacant properties adjacent to cities. These vacant properties may be in either the designated Urban or Rural Areas. Of special interest is the compatibility of uses, especially for lands being annexed by cities where a land use proposed is different than the adopted County land use. B. Neighborhood infrastructure is an issue as it relates to rehabilitation and retrofitting to address drainage needs and roadway maintenance improvements that will help to ensure the long-lasting quality of housing in Seminole County. The County is looking to prepare a schedule to fund these improvements over time. 2. Intergovernmental Coordination The goal in the Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the SCCP promotes the enhancement of intergovernmental coordination with cities in Seminole County, neighboring counties/cities and regional and state agencies. A. Continue to coordinate with the cities to revise or adopt new Joint Planning Agreements or Interlocal Agreements regarding vacant properties adjacent to the cities, defined transition areas (larger vacant areas adjacent to cities), compatibility of uses and enclaves (islands of unincorporated lands surrounded by city lands). B. Continue to coordinate water supply issues with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD), the cities in Seminole County and other entities, adjacent counties/cities, and private providers. C. Coordinate and enhance the use of shared parks and recreational facilities among the cities, the School Board and the County. 3. Libraries A group made up of the Mayors and County and City Managers in Seminole County meets regularly to discuss common issues. This group has evaluated the need for additional library space and the need for additional services, i.e., audiovisual services and computer rooms. Library Staff wish to address a means to measure level of service other than books per capita. Staff will evaluate the need to change the level of service from books per capita to square footage of library space per capita. 4. Protection of designated High Intensity Planned Unit Developments (HIP)/Economic Development Target Areas for Targeted Industries Address issues, review objectives and policies in the SCCP and provide direction on preserving valuable vacant lands for targeted industries for long term economic return to Seminole County. Valuable vacant lands that are developed into target industries, such as high tech industries, provide employment and long term economic stability for the County. To date, residential uses have been allowed to develop in the High Intensity Planned Unit Development/Economic Development Target Areas. Staff will evaluate the need for additional residential uses in these areas and look to whether the County should enhance existing policies (see, e.g. FLU Policy 5.6 - The Higher Intensity Planned Development land use designation is designed as a mixed use category which combines an aggressive strategy to attract specific "target industry," minimize urban sprawl, provide affordable housing opportunities, and alternative transportation strategies) to protect these valuable vacant lands for targeted industries. 5. Infill Development and Redevelopment Measure the effectiveness of the County's infill development and redevelopment initiatives and SCCP policies. The County, due to the growth in the last twenty years, is reaching "build-out", meaning fewer vacant lands in the Urban Area. Redevelopment of existing uses and infill of vacant, skipped over lots becomes more prominent and special attention, such as insuring compatibility to existing uses or appropriate utilization of small lot sizes, is needed to accommodate this type of growth. A. Address infill adjacent to existing residential uses (see Neighborhood Protection issue). B. Redevelopment issues, i.e., US 17/92 in Fern Park area. 6. Make the Comprehensive Plan more Accessible and Understandable to facilitate the Strengthening of Citizen Voice A. Identify and assess ways the SCCP has and can improve public participation and the challenges related to obtaining citizen input. B. Demonstrate that through the SCI-NET process (a proposed County program to digitize County processes and documents for easier access and linkage of documents) the SCCP will be easier to understand and navigate. C. Staff will evaluate ways to write policies that are more easily understood. D. Staff will evaluate the SCCP to identify policies that need to be amended for consistency with State regulations. E. Staff will review the SCCP to ensure that the content of the policies are appropriate as guiding principles or are more applicable to be addressed in Land Development Code regulations. 7. Affordable Housing Determine the effect of development trends, i.e., large house sizes, and policies in the SCCP on the availability of housing options for moderate, low income and very low income families. 8. Drainage Needs Evaluate the success of correcting drainage deficiencies identified in the completed Drainage Basin Plans and review the progress to meet Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) strategies (the amount of pollution reduction needed) for Lake Jesup, which has been identified as an impaired surface water body. Required Special Topics by the Department of Community Affairs: Schools 1. An assessment of the success or failure of coordinating future land uses and residential development with the capacity of existing and planned schools is needed. Staff will document coordination efforts with the Seminole County School Board Staff. This issue will address the concern of the School Board due to recent land use changes that result in increased residential densities with higher numbers of school age children than was anticipated from population projections provided through the development of the SCCP; , 2. An assessment of success and failure of establishing appropriate population projections with the School Board. Planning Staff will review the method of communicating population projections with the School Board and, based on the issue stated in #1 above, attempt in the future to effectively provide the School Board Staff with the best information possible; and 3. An assessment of success or failure in assisting the School Board in planning and siting of new schools, especially due to the potential scarcity of vacant property adequate for new school sites. Water Supply Plan The Planning Division prepared a draft Water Supply Plan last year as required by State Statutes. Once the St. Johns River Water Management District completes the Regional Water Plan, Planning Staff will update the County's draft Water Supply Plan and will address the initial comments provided by the District during the first review of the document. Staff intends to complete the Water Supply Plan this year unless legislation is passed that changes the date of submission again.