HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 03 22 Regular Item B
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32700-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1000
Community Development Depl.
Planning Division
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR AGENDA ITEM:
II. B.
FURTHER REVISIONS TO THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT TO THE TRAFFIC CIRCULA nON .ELEMENT
SUBSTITUTING CITY'S TRANSPORTA nON STUDY FOR ALL TEXT
AND MAPS IN VOLUME I AND n. (LG-CPA-1-97)
STAFF REPORT:
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163.3174(4) Florida Statutes which states "Be the agency (Local
Planning Agency) responsible for the preparation of the comprehensive plan or plan
amendment and shall make recommendations to the governing body regarding the
adoption or amendment of such plan. During the preparation of the plan or plan
amendment and prior to any recommendation to the governing body, the Local Planning
Agency shall hold at least one public hearing, with public notice, on proposed plan or plan
amendment_"
The provisions of Sec. 2-57 of the City Code which state in part ". . .the planning and
zoning board shall serve as the local planning agency pursuant to the county
comprehensive planning act and the local government comprehensive planning act of the
state. . ."
The provisions of163.3187 F.S. which state in part "Small scale development amendments
adopted pursuant to the paragraph (l)(c) require only one public hearing before the
governing board, which shall be an adoption hearing. . .Small scale development
amendments shall not become effective until 31 days after adoption."
Mnrch I, 2000
Supplemenl to LG-CP A-]-97
1. BACKGROUND:
APPLICANT:
City of Winter Springs
1126 East S.R. 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
(407) 327-]800
REQUEST:
For the local Planning Agency to review and recommend additional requested changes to
the City's Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Element Data, Inventory & Analysis
section and Goals, Objectives and Policies section. As indicated in SUPPLEMENT NO.1
TO CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY - December, 1999.
PURPOSE:
The City previously intended to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the
results of the completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by
Conklin, Porter & Holmes. The contents of the Study are intended to replace completely
the current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of 2 and
Volume 2 of2. Since that time, the Town Center Concept has required a further revision
of the Updated Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 and 2 of2.
CHRONOLOGY:
*
City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan adopted on April 27, 1992.
.
City Commission on November 13, 1996, hired Conklin, Porter & Holmes to
prepare update of the Traffic Circulation Element of the City's Comprehensive
Plan.
.
In 1997, the City Commission hired Dover, Kohl & Partners to develop a Town
Center Concept Plan. The Commission adopted said plan.
March I, 2000
2
SupplcmCllllo LG-CPA- ] -97
· In March, 1998, the City Commission contracts with another Master Developer of
the Town Center, Joshi & Associates. Rohit Joshi proposed expanding the Town
Center to approximately 1,000 acres, extending to the beltway, as well as including
verious properties on the south side of S.R. 434.
CONSIDERA TIONS:
· The ORC Report on the Update to the Traffic circulation Element has been
received from DCA and Conklin, Porter and Holmes, the City's Transportation
consultant, has developed the response to it.
· The Update to the Traffic Circulation Element based on the City of Winter Springs
Transportation Study, August. 1997, was delayed for adoption 1998 due to: (1)
the new Town Center Concept Plan adopted by the Commission, (2) and later the
new Master Developer's desire to expand the Town Center Concept.
· DCA is now reviewing the proposed large scale comprehensive plan amendment
LG-CP A-1-98 which involves the creation of a Town Center District on the Future
Land Use Map along with a vision statement, goal, objectives, and policies for the
new district.
· While it is not a requirement that the Local Planning Agency review any changes
to the proposed amendment (Update to the Traffic Circulation Element) after an
ORC has been issued by the Department of Community Affairs, City staff believes
it is appropriate never-the-Iess to bring such additional changes before the LP A for
their further review and recommendation to the City Commission.
· It is expected that DCA will send the ORC Report on the proposed Town Center
large scale comprehensive plan amendment by mid-March. Staff will respond to
any objections or recommendations in the ORC Report and schedule a second
(adoption) public hearing on the Town Center amendment in April. Because of the
relatedness of the Update to the Traffic Circulation Element plan amendment,
based on the Winter Springs Transportation Study, August. 1997 and its
supplement (Supplement No.1) to the Town Center plan amendment, it is
recommended that the LP A review and make recommendation on Supplement
No. 1 to the City Commission for the April adoption public hearing.
March], 2000
..,
J
SUpplCIl1Cnl to LG-CP A-I-')7
FUNDING:
The City paid Conklin, Porter & Holmes for the update of the Traffic Circulation Element
from the Transportation Impact Fee, and now paid CPH for Supplement No. 1 to City of
Winter Springs Transportation Study, dated December, J 999.
II. SUMMARY OF SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE CITY OF
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY, DATED
DECEMBER 1999:
The City of Winter springs Transportation Study, dated August, 1997, identified no deficiencies in
the transportation infrustructure of the City's local system for the projected 20 I 0 traffic loadings.
Roadways identified for improvements included U.S. 17-92, S.R. 434, Seminola Boulevard, Lake
Drive, and Tuskawilla Road which are under the control of the County and FDOT. u.s. 17-92 is
under final construction of a six-lane improvement project from Shepard Road (Winter springs)
south to Melody Lane (Casselberry). State Road 434 has been improved to four (4) lanes from
S.R. 419 to the GreeneWay (S.R. 417). Seminola Boulevard has been improved to four (4) lanes,
Tuskawilla Road has been improved to four (4) lanes divided and Lake Drive is currently under
design for four (4) lanes, divided. This supplement updates the 1997 study to acknowledge these
improvements and the ones also constructed by the City. No changes were made to the land use,
existing uses, or projected development.
It has become evident that a collector road system is required for the undeveloped area east of the
City Hall. This area has been designated as the Town Center and is scheduled for growth within
the planning period. A roadway collector system has been identified to serve this area. Since
these roads are for new growth, the funding is projected to come from the transportation impact
fee. This collector system is shown on the attached revised drawings.
NOTE:
Only updated materials are attached to this supplement. Since the growth
projections have not been revised, the overall traftic study remains valid.
NOTE:
Terry Zadtke, Conklin Porter & Holmes, will give a presentation on the
Supplement No.1 to the City' of Winter Springs Transportation Study
August 1997.
March ], 2000
4
Supplcmcnllo LG-CPA-I-97
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Local Planning Agency make the following recommendation to the
City Commission:
That the City Commission hold a second (adoption) public hearing and adopt the
proposed large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A-1-97), updating
the Traffic Circulation Element in Volume 1 of2 and Volume 2 of2 of the City's
Comprehensive Plan, incorporating the response to the ORC Report and
Supplement No.1 to the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study. August
1997.
ATIACHMENTS:
B. City of Winter Springs Transportation Study - August. 1997.
A. Supplement No.1 to City of Winter Springs Transportation Study. August. 1997.
C Local Planning Agency Regular Agenda Item II. 1. For November 19, 1997
relating to LG-CP A-I-97 (Update to the Traffic Circulation Element).
March ], 2000
5
Supplement \0 LG-CP ;\-1-97
,'.
. ~l'
-.I ",'.
.r;:
',}
t,:",
" ...'
!.A:T'TACHMENT
. ':';,;:". \ :' ..'. . ,;;'Y .
~
.\"
A:
,
'..!f.:
.,
.
",I 'r"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
TRANSPORTATION STUDY
AUGUST 1997
Conklin, Porter and Holmes - Engineers, Inc.
1104 E. Robinson Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
CPH Project No_ W0459.00
I
I
,
I
I
I
l
.
INDEX
CHAPTER I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER II ........................ FINANCIAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS
CHAPTER ill........................ TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHAPTER IV ......................-. CONCURRENCY PLANNING
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Background
Winter Springs. a community of26,000 persons, is served by one major north-south route in the
central part of the city, TuskawilIa Road, and one major east-west route, S.R. 434. Two major
north-south routes exist on the western and eastern boundaries. On the western boundary is U.S.
17-92 and on the eastern boundary is the Greeneway, a multi-lane tollway. Located in south-
. central Seminole County in a rural/suburban residential setting. the City's major roadways
provide access to neighboring towns for Winter Springs residents and employees and facilitate
the flow of through traffic.
State Road 434 provides access to Oviedo and the Greeneway to the east and to Longwood and
U.S. 17-92 to the west. U.S. 17-92 and the Greeneway provide major arterial routes to Sanford
to the north or Orange County to the south. Recent widening of S.R. 434 from S.R. 419 to
TuskaWilla Road and projected widening from TuskawilIa Road to the Greeneway have positive
benefits for the City of Winter Springs.
Traffic circulation patterns are directly dependent upon the land uses associated with the property
adjacent to the roadway. While other factors such as major trip attraction (a theme park or an
airport) can have a substantial effect. it is often the land uses which dictate the current and
projected traffic volumes on a given road. A thorough examination of the land. uses and
projected COnstruction was performed as part of this Transportation Plan update.
Purpose
There are two primary purposes for the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study. The first is
to develop a tranSportation plan that defines the needs of the city.in.the forecast year 2010. The
second purpose is to. establish a mechanism for monitoring new development to insure that
needed transportation facili~es are in place concurrent with impacts from such development. In
addition. the following purposes are also important:
1. Develop a plan to guide the city in future transportation decisions; .
2. Provide the Traffic Circulation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan;
3. Develop a plan that assures that transportation improvements required" of
developers in the city are in accordance with the long range needs of the city;
4. "Define capital improvements needed to maintain a satisfactory level of service;
5. Review current financial resources available for transportation funding in the city.
I - I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
Transportation Plan Methodology
The City of Winter Springs is an integral part of the Orlando Urban Area Additionally, the city
is one of the larger municipalities within Seminole County and is located between two principal
arterials, S.R. 434 and Red Bug Lake Road. As such, transportation planning for Winter Springs
requires close cooperation with other planning efforts within the Orlando Region and Seminole
County. For this reason, the transportation planning methodology used to develop the
transportation plan must necessarily be compatible with transportation planning methodologies in
adjacent jurisdictions.
In order to accomplish this requirement, extensive use of data sources and planning models from
the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study (OUA TS) and the Seminole County
Transportation Management Program (TMP) were used in the development of the Winter
Springs Transportation Plan. The transportation plan development was divided into two phases.
These are:
Phase I - Organization and Data Collection; and
Phase n - Analysis and Plan Development.
Additionally, a third phase of the project was defIned to allow for the monitoring of new
development:
Phase ill - Concurrency Planning.
Wherever possible, existing data from the OUA TS and the Seminole County TIvfP were used in
the development of the Winter Springs Transportation Plan. This not only provides compatibility
with other planning activities within the region but, in addition, the use of existing data sources
minimizes the need for creating extensive new data.
- All data cQIlection efforts were designed to permit complete use of existing data sources. After
existing data .were carefully reviewed, additional data were collected. Among the data required
to conduct the technical analyses were land .useJsocio-economic data, traffic counts,
transportation planning models currently used in the surrounding region and existing data for
. planned developments witb..iD. the city and adjacent areas.
Transportation models developed from the OUATS and the TIvfP were applied for.existing
conditions to validate their effectiveness in forecasting existing traffic patterns withiri the Winter
Springs Study area. These tests were made in order to validate the use of the models.and the data
~puts to the models for forecast conditions. In order to permit more detailed analysis of
conditions wjthin the Winter Springs Study area, a more refined highway network and a zonal
system compatible with this network were developed.
1-2
I
I
Existing deficiencies on city, county and state systems were defined and Capital Improvement
Programs identified to resolve these transportation deficiencies. No existing deficiencies were
defined on the city colrector system.
I
I
Forecasts of anticipated land use/socio-economic activities for 2010 were made and the validated
transportation models applied against them. This allowed the definition of future capacity
deficiencies so that funding sources can be. developed to correct these deficiencies.
I
I
W045900.lNT
I
1-3
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHAPTER Il
.FINANCIAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS
Local governments in Florida are now confronting the fiscal situation of ever increasing demands
for services and capital facilities contrasted with declining assistance from traditional State and
Federal sources. National imperatives to reduce Federal budget deficits appear to offer little hope
for a resurgence of external funding sources for local improvements. In addition, recent changes in
the State Comprehensive Planning legislation now mandate that adequate infrastructure capacity be
present or programmed by the governing jurisdiction as a condition precedent to new development
approval. The local manifestations of these policy changes are twofold. First, local governments
must now develop alternative funding strategies to accommodate new growth and development
Second, the local government must ensure that the timing of the revenue collections a.Dd the
subsequent improvement construction are such that new infrastructure capacity is available when
required to accommodate new growth.
For pUrposes of this Transportation Study, funding will only be evaluated from the perspective that
projects contained herein are growth-induced. In cases where a roadway improvement is clearly
required to satisfy travel demand related to new growth and development, local governments are
entitled to pass this cost along to development in the form of regulatory fees collected prior to the
occupancy of the building. On the other hand, highway construction required as a result of existing
capacity deficiencies must be funded through traditional general revenue sources. These deficiencies
are being covered by other City programs and resources. The transportation impact fee should
provide the City of Winter Springs with sufficient revenue to maintain the desired level of services
on the highway network within its jurisdiction.
Financial Analysis F annat
This analysis evaluates the City of Winter Springs Transportation Impact Fee Funding to establish
the following:
1. Historical revenue collection and expenditure patterns;
2. Project revenue sources available to amortize any roadway deficiencies and/or
construct growth induced improvements; .
3. Provide a Capital Improvement Program format for the initial five year period of the
transportation study.
A general analytical framework is provided with which the city staff can replicate the type of fiscal
impact detenllinations provided in this report. By so doing, the City of Winter Springs will derive
maximum benefit from this study.
IJ -I
I
I
Data Base
I
Data for this portion of the report have been taken from the following sources:
I
1.
2.
City of Winter Springs Annual Budget, FY 1995-96 and 1996-97;
City of Winter Springs Annual Financial Statement, FY 1993-94 and FY 1994-95.
I
All data contained herein have been provided by the City of Winter Springs and are shown in
Appendix Table A-I through A-4 and represent all funding sources and expenditures for
transportation purposes available to the City.
I
J
Local Option Gas Tax - During the past five years, Winter Springs has made extensive use,ofLocal
Option Gas Tax (LOGT) funds for area wide roadway construction. In fact, the LOGT contingent
of funding has constituted the most significant revenue source for roadways in the City of Winter
Springs during the historical period surveyed. During this time, LOGT funds have ranged from a
low of $205,765 in FY 1993-94 to a high of $268,779 in FY 1990-91. Winter Springs bas used these
funds for a variety of transportation related projects. All funds have been allocated from this fund
to improve existing deficiencies and maintenance and are not available for construction of the growth
related roadway improvement projects.
I
One Cent Sales Tax - Seminole County has a one cent sales tax which is used specifically in the
County for transportation/roadway improvements.
I
I
I.
Federal Revenue Sharing (FRS) -lIDs revenue source has typically not demonstrated stability in year
to year appropriations. Local entitlements are always uncertain as a result of the Federal budget
process, and the program is always in danger of termination. For these reasons, it is recommended
that this revenue source be considered expendable. The City of Winter Springs should not consider
funding any critical roadway project primarily from FRS funds. Instead, to the extent that FRS funds
are availabl~,. if at all, the City should accelerate its Capital Improvement Program, or consider
adding projects which are not considered financially feasible when using only hard Tevenue sources.
Special Assessment Proiects - During the past twenty years, the City of Winter Springs has only used
this mechanism on improvements to Moss Road from S.R 434 to S.R. 419. It is recommended. that
. the City of Winter Springs .use special assessment projects as little as possible to improve local
streets.
General Fund Appropriations - These revenues, generally derived from ad valorem assessment, are
not used for funding major capital improvements in the roadway system. They are appropriated to
repair and replacement (R&R) expenditures, and to operation and maintenance (O&M) expenditures.
In addition, these revenues are generally used for major debt service by most cities in the State of
Florida The-City of Winter Springs has adhered to these principle during the five year period of the
financial inventory.
I1-2
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
112G EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32700-2799
Telephone (407) 327.1000
Community Development Dept.
Planning Division
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR AGENDA ITEM:
II. B.
FURTHER REVISIONS TO THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT TO THE TRAFFIC CIRCULA nON ELEMENT
SUBSTITUTING CITY'S TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR ALL TEXT
AND MAPS IN VOLUME I AND TI. (LG-CPA-1-97)
STAFF REPORT:
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163 .3174(4) Florida Statutes which states "Be the agency (Local
Planning Agency) responsible for the preparation of the comprehensive plan or plan
amendment and shall make recommendations to the governing body regarding the
adoption or amendment of such plan. During the preparation of the plan or plan
amendment and prior to any recommendation to the governing body, the Local Planning
Agency shall hold at least one public hearing, with public notice, on proposed plan or plan
amendment. "
The provisions of Sec. 2-57 of the City Code which state in part". . . the planning and
zoning board shall serve as the local planning agency pursuant to the county
comprehensive planning act and the local government comprehensive planning act of the
state. . ."
The provisions of 163.3187 F.S. which state in part "Small scale development amendments
adopted pursuant to the paragraph (1)(c) require only one public hearing before the
governing board, which shall be an adoption hearing. . .Small scale development
amendments shall not become effective until 31 days after adoption."
March I, 2000
Supplement to LG-CP A-I-97
1. BACKGROUND:
APPLICANT:
City of Winter Springs
1126 East S.R. 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
(407) 327-1800
REQUEST:
For the local Planning Agency to review and recommend additional requested changes to
the City's Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Element Data,.Inventory & Analysis
section and Goals, Objectives and Policies section. As indicated in SUPPLEMENT NO.1
TO CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY - December, 1999.
PURPOSE:
The City previously intended to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the
results of the completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by
Conklin, Porter & Holmes. The contents of the Study are intended to replace completely
the current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of 2 and
Volume 2 of2. Since that time, the Town Center Concept has required a further revision
of the Updated Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 and 2 of2.
CHRONOLOGY:
*
City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan adopted on April 27, 1992.
.
City Commission on November 13, 1996, hired Conklin, Porter & Holmes to
prepare update of the Traffic Circulation Element of the City's Comprehensive
Plan.
.
In 1997, the City Commission hired Dover, Kohl & Partners to develop a Town
Center Concept Plan. The Commission adopted said plan.
March I, 2000
2
Supplement to LG-CPA-I-97
· In March, ] 998, the City Commission contracts with another Master Developer of
the Town Center, Joshi & Associates. Rohit Joshi proposed expanding the Town
Center to approximately 1,000 acres, extending to the beltway, as well as including
verious properties on the south side of S.R. 434.
CONSIDERA TIONS:
· The ORC Report on the Update to the Traffic circulation Element has been
received from DCA and Conklin, Porter and Holmes, the City's Transportation
consultant, has developed the response to it.
· The Update to the Traffic Circulation Element based on the City of Winter Springs
Transportation Study, August. 1997, was delayed for adoption 1998 due to: (1)
the new Town Center Concept Plan adopted by the Commission, (2) and later the
new Master Developer's desire to expand the Town Center Concept.
· DCA is now reviewing the proposed large scale comprehensive plan amendment
LG-CPA-1-98 which involves the creation ofa Town Center District on the Future
Land Use Map along with a vision statement, goal, objectives, and policies for the
new district.
· While it is not a requirement that the Local Planning Agency review any changes
to the proposed amendment (Update to the Traffic Circulation Element) after an
ORC has been issued by the Department of Community Affairs, City staff believes
it is appropriate never-the-Iess to bring such additional changes before the LP A for
their further review and recommendation to the City Commission.
· It is expected that DCA will send the ORC Report on the proposed Town Center
large scale comprehensive plan amendment by mid-March. Staff will respond to
any objections or recommendations in the ORC Report and schedule a second
(adoption) public hearing on the Town Center amendment in April. Because of the
relatedness of the Update to the Traffic Circulation Element plan amendment,
based on the Winter Springs Transportation Study, August. 1997 and its
supplement (Supplement No.1) to the Town Center plan amendment, it is
recommended that the LP A review and make recommendation on Supplement
No. I to the City Commission for the April adoption public hearing.
March 1,2000
3
Supplement 10 LG-CP A-] -97
FUNDING:
The City paid Conklin, Porter & Holmes for the update of the Traffic Circulation Element
from the Transportation Impact Fee, and now paid CPH for Supplement No. 1 to City of
Winter Springs Transportation Study, dated December, 1999.
II. SUMMARY OF SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE CITY OF
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY, DATED
DECEMBER 1999:
The City of Winter springs Transportation Study, dated August, 1997, identified no deficiencies in
the transportation infrustructure of the City's local system for the projected 2010 traffic loadings.
Roadways identified for improvements included U.S. 17-92, S.R. 434, Seminola Boulevard, Lake
Drive, and Tuskawilla Road which are under the control of the County and FDOT. U.S. 17-92 is
under final construction of a six-lane improvement project from Shepard Road (Winter springs)
south to Melody Lane (Casselberry). State Road 434 has been improved to four (4) lanes from
S.R. 419 to the GreeneWay (S.R. 417). Seminola Boulevard has been improved to four (4) lanes,
Tuskawilla Road has been improved to four (4) lanes divided and Lake Drive is currently under
design for four (4) lanes, divided. This supplement updates the 1997 study to acknowledge these
improvements and the ones also constructed by the City. No changes were made to the land use,
existing uses, or projected development.
It has become evident that a collector road system is required for the undeveloped area east of the
City Hall. This area has been designated as the Town Center and is scheduled for growth within
the planning period. A roadway collector system has been identified to serve this area. Since
these roads are for new growth, the funding is projected to come from the transportation impact
fee. This collector system is shown on the attached revised drawings.
NOTE:
Only updated materials are attached to this supplement. Since the growth
projections have not been revised, the overall traftlc study remains valid.
NOTE:
Terry Zadtke, Conklin Porter & Holmes, will give a presentation on the
Supplement No.1 to the City. of Winter Springs Transportation Study
August 1997.
March I, 2000
1.1
Supplement to LG-CPA-] -97
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Local Planning Agency make the following recommendation to the
City Commission:
That the City Commission hold a second (adoption) public hearing and adopt the
proposed large scale comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CP A-1-97), updating
the Traffic Circulation Element in Volume 1 of2 and Volume 2 of2 of the City's
Comprehensive Plan, incorporating the response to the ORC Report and
Supplement No.1 to the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study. August
1997.
ATTACHMENTS:
B. City of Winter Springs Transportation Study - August. 1997.
A. Supplement No.1 to City of Winter Springs Transportation Study_ August. 1997.
C: Local Planning Agency Regular Agenda Item II. 1. For November 19, 1997
relating to LG-CP A-1-97 (Update to the Traffic Circulation Element).
March I> 2000
5
Supplement to I.Ci-CP A-1-97
", .
'\';",::.
. 'l
,~': .
.:':.--..,
',.',
.~/
".
..1, ~
;}'.~' f:'
:". ,r~~;.;'
.,.
'. ,
\~~~J?.:,:;t;'j;.:..:~. :,', :.,:'.' . '.
};,:',} :jf~1U; < ' , ,<::i;'~:;;': " "
;\~':\ ':,:AT.TACHMENT',
I ,r .~h.;.' . . ,
.-
>...
:.'"
~c .
A:
I,"
~, ,:,
;";',
",' .
, .
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
TRANSPORTATION STUDY
AUGUST 1997
Conklin, Porter and Holmes - Engineers, Inc.
1104 E. Robinson Street
Orlando, Florida 3280 I
CPH Project No. W0459_00
I
I
,
I
,
,
l
INDEX
CHAPTER I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTRODUCTION
CHAPTERII ........................ FINANCIAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS
CHAPTER ill. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . TRANSPORTATION PLAN
CHAPTERrv ....................... CONCURRENCY PLANNING
I
I
I
I
l
I
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Background
Winter Springs, a community of26,000 persons, is served by one major north-south route in the
central part of the city, Tuskawilla Road, and one major east-west route, S.R. 434. Two major
north-south routes exist on the western and eastern boundaries. On the western boundary is U.S.
17-92 and on the eastern boundary is the Greeneway, a multi-lane tollway. Located in south-
. central Seminole County in a ruralIsuburban residential setting, the City's major roadways
provide access to neighboring towns for Winter Springs residents and employees and facilitate
the flow of through traffic.
State Road 434 provides access to Oviedo and the Greeneway to the east and to Longwood and
U.S. 17-92 to the west. U.S. 17-92 and the Greeneway provide major arterial routes to Sanford
to the north or Orange County to the south. Recent widening of S.R. 434 from S.R. 419 to
TuskaWilla Road and projected widening from Tuskawilla Road to the Greeneway have positive
benefits for the City of Winter Springs.
Traffic circulation patterns are directly dependent upon the land uses associated with the property
adjacent to the roadway. While other factors such as major trip attraction (a theme park or an
airport) can have a substantial effect, it is often the land uses which dictate the current and
projected traffic volumes on a given road. A thorough examination of the land. uses and
projected COnstruction was performed as part of this Transportation Plan update.
Purpose
There are two primary purposes for the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study. The first is
to develop a transportation plan that defines the needs of the city.in "the forecast year 2010. The
second purpose is to. establish a mechanism for monitoring new development to insure that
needed transportation faciliti.es are in place concurrent with impacts from such development. In
addition, the following purposes are also important:
1. Develop a plan to guide the city in future transportation decisions; .
2. Provide the Traffic Circulation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan;
3. Develop a plan that assures that transportation improvements required" of
developers in the city are in accordance with the long range needs of the city;
4. "Define capital improvements needed to maintain a satisfactory level of service;
5. Review current financial resources available for transportation funding in the city.
1- I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
Transportation Plan Methodology
Tbe City of Winter Springs is an integral part of the Orlando Urban Area Additionally, the city
is one of the larger municipalities within Seminole County and is located between two principal
arterials, S.R. 434 and Red Bug Lake Road. As such, transportation planning for Winter Springs
requires close cooperation with other planning efforts within the Orlando Region and Seminole
County. For this reason, the transportation planning methodology used to develop the
transportation plan must necessarily be compatible with transportation planning methodologies in
adjacent jurisdictions.
In order to accomplish this requirement, extensive use of data sources and planning models from
the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study (QUA TS) and the Seminole County
Transportation Management Program (TMP) were used in the development of the Winter
Springs Transportation Plan. The transportation plan development was divided into two phases.
These are: .
Phase I - Organization and Data Collection; and
Phase II - Analysis and Plan Development.
Additionally, a third phase of the project was defmed to allow for the monitoring of new
development:
Phase III - Concurrency Planning.
Wherever possible, existing data from the QUA TS and the Seminole County TMP were used in
the development of the Winter Springs Transportation Plan. This not only provides compatibility
with other planning activities within the region but, in addition, the use of existing data sources
rninimi7es the need for creating extensive new data.
- All data cQllection efforts were designed to permit complete use of existing data sources. After
existing data -....:ere carefully reviewed, additional data were collected. Among the data required
to conduct the technical analyses were land lise/socio-economic data, traffic counts,
transportation planning models currently used in the surrounding region and existing data for
. planned developments wit.b.iD the city and adjacent areas.
Transportation models developed from the OUATS and the IMP were applied for.existing
conditions to validate their effectiveness in forecasting existing traffic patterns withiti the Winter
Springs Study area. These tests were made in order to validate the use of the models.and the data
~puts to the models for forecast conditions. In order to permit more detailed analysis of
conditions ~thin the Winter Springs Study area, a more refined highway network and a zonal
system compatible with this network were developed.
1-2
I
I
Existing deficiencies on city, county and state systems were defined and Capital Improvement
Programs identified to resolve these transportation deficiencies. No existing deficiencies were
defined on the city collector system.
I
I
Forecasts of anticipated land use/socio-economic activities for 2010. were made and the validated
transportation models applied against them. This allowed the definition of future capacity
deficiencies so that funding sources can be. developed to correct these deficiencies.
I
I
W045900.wT
I
1-3
i
I
I
CHAPTER I1
.FINANCIAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS
I
I
I
I
I
Local governments in Florida are now confronting the fiscal situation of ever increasing demands
for services and capital facilities contrasted with declining assistance from traditional State and
Federal sources. National imperatives to reduce Federal budget deficits appear to offer little hope
for a resurgence of external funding sources for local improvements. In addition, recent changes in
the State Comprehensive Planning legislation now mandate that adequate infrastructure capacity be
present or programmed by the governing jurisdiction as a condition precedent to new development
approval. The local manifestations of these policy changes are twofold. First, local governments
must now develop alternative funding strategies to accommodate new growth and development.
Second, the local government must ensure that the timing of the revenue collections and the
subsequent improvement construction are such that new infrastructure capacity is available when
required to accommodate new growth.
For pUrposes of this Transportation Study, funding will only be evaluated from the perspective that
projects contained herein are growth-induced. In cases where a roadway improvement is clearly
required to satisfy travel demand related to new growth and development, local governments are
entitled to pass this cost along to development in the form of regulatory fees collected prior to the
occupancy of the building. On the other hand, highway construction required as a result of existing
capacity deficiencies must be funded through traditional general revenue sources. These deficiencies
are being covered by other City programs and resources. The transportation impact fee should
provide the City of Winter Springs with sufficient revenue to maintain the desired level of services
on the highway network within its jurisdiction.
Financial Analysis Format
This analysis evaluates the City of Winter Springs Transportation Impact Fee Funding to establish
the following:
1. Historical revenue collection and expenditure patterns;
2. Project revenue sources available to amortize any roadway deficiencies and/or
construct growth induced improvements; .
3. Provide a Capital Improvement Program format for the initial five year period of the
transportation study.
A general analytical framework is provided with which the city staff can replicate the type of fiscal
impact deterIninations provided in this report. By so doing, the City of Winter Springs will derive
maximum benefit from this study.
II-I
D
I
Data Base
I
Data for this portion of the report have been taken from the following sources:
-
I
1.
2.
City of Winter Springs Annual Budget, FY 1995-96 and 1996-97;
City of Winter Springs Annual Financial Statement, FY 1993-94 and FY 1994-95.
I
All data contained herein have been provided by the City of Winter Springs and are shown in
Appendix Table A-I through A-4 and represent all funding sources and expenditures for
transportation purposes available to the City.
I
(
Local Option Gas Tax - During the past five years, Winter Springs has made extensive use of Local
Option Gas Tax (LOGT) funds for area wide roadway construction. In fact, the LOGT contingent
of funding has constituted the most significant revenue source for roadways in the City of Winter
Springs during the historical period surveyed. During this time, LOGT funds have ranged from a
lowof$205,765 inFY 1993-94 to a high of$268,779 in FY 1990-91. Winter Springs has used these
funds for a variety of transportation related projects. All funds have been allocated from this fund
to improve existing deficiencies and maintenance and are not available for construction of the growth
related roadway improvement projects.
I
One Cent Sales Tax - Seminole County has a one cent sales tax which is used specifically in the
County for transportation/roadway improvements.
I
I
I.
Federal Revenue Sharing (FRS) - This revenue source has typically not demonstrated stability in year
to year appropriations. Local entitlements are always uncertain as a result of the Federal budget
process, and the program is always in danger of termination. For these reasons, it is recommended
that this revenue source be considered expendable. The City of Winter Springs should not consider
funding any critical roadway project primarily from FRS funds. Instead, to the extent that FRS funds
are available:, if at all, the City should accelerate its Capital Improvement Program, or consider
adding projects which are not considered financially feasible when using only hard revenue sources.
Special Assessment Proiects - During the past twenty years, the City of Winter Springs has only used
this mechanism on improvements to Moss Road from S.R 434 to S.R. 419. It is recommended. that
. the City of Winter Springs .use special assessment projects as little as possible to improve local
streets.
General Fund ApproJ)riations - These revenues, generally derived from ad valorem assessment, are
not used for funding major capital improvements in the roadway system. They are appropriated to
repair and replacement (R&R) expenditures, and to operation and maintenance (O&M) expenditures.
In addition, these revenues are generally used for major debt service by most cities in the State of
Florida The-City of Winter Springs has adhered to these principle dming the five year period of the
financial inventory.
Il-2
Transportation Impact Fees
These are fees collected from new development/growth for the construction of new and improved
roadways.. The improvements must provide capacity for growth. Impact fees are not used for
correcting existing roadway deficiencies or repair and maintenance projects. These funds are used
to provide roadway capacity when and where it is needed in a timely fashion in order to allow growth
in an orderly fashion. It is advisable to periodically review the projects funded by impact fees to
determine that the funds are going to the area with the most need.
Roadway Revenue Resources
As noted earlier, this review emphasizes only hard revenue sources. Therefore, while Federal
revenue Sharing or State DOT discretionary funding may playa role in funding some roadway
segments, this analysis assumes that only those revenues identified as hard revenue sources will be
used to fund improvements.
Table 1
Available Trans ortation Revenues for Roadwa
T
W04j900.FINJtm
IJ-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHAPTER ill
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
This Chapter documents the updating of the transportation plan for the City of Winter Springs. This
plan was developed using procedures and data from similar planning activities in the surrounding
jurisdictions as well as information from the 1988 Transportation Element of the Comprehensive
Plan. The planning process focused on a detailed analysis of the roadways in Winter Springs
including the Municipal Collector System.
The City of Winter Springs is an integral part of the Orlando Urban Area In order to be compatible
with planning efforts in the Orlando area, extensive use was made of data sources from the Orlando
Urban Area Transportation Study (QUA TS) and the Seminole County Transportation Management
Program (IMP). Transportation planning models and procedures from these processes were also
used wherever possible.
I
Goals and Objectives.
I
Traffic circulation Goals and Objectives were developed as part of the Comprehensive Plan and
updated in this study. The updated goals, objectives and policies are as follows:
GOAL
I
Provide a road system within the City that facilitates internal traffic circulation, assists ingress and
egress from the municipal area, and accommodates through traffic simultaneously to coordinate
safely, efficiently, economically and conveniently the flow of all modes of transportation in and
around Winter Springs.
I
OBJECTIVE
A) 1brougbout the .planning period, the City shall develop and maintain a safe convenient and
efficient motorized and non-motorized transportation network, through establishment of
criteria to be enforced during site plan review, concurrency management and access
management by the statutory deadline.
Policies
1) The collector road system shall be funded by the standarcls-driven impact fee created
in 1990 by the City.
2) The collector road system shall be developed according to the master conceptual plan
and design standards derived under the auspices of the City, to coordinate the
construction of segments of the system by both the public and the private sectors.
IIJ-l
3) The conceptual plan does and shall continue to address through periodic review these
factors:
a. Current and projected deficiencies of arterial roads under other jurisdictions;
b. Existing deficiencies of City collector streets; and
c. Winter Springs shall continue to adopt revisions to the Land Development
Regulations to include guidelines and criteria consistent with nationally-
recognized standards and tailored to local conditions which provide for safe
and convenient on-site traffic flow, adequate pedestrian ways and sidewalks,
as well as sufficient on-site parking for both motoriz~d and non-motorized
vehicles.
4) Land development regulations, contain specific access management alterriative
techniques to control access and preserve level of service. These techniques include
but are not limited to the following:
a. Limit access to roads by controlling the number and location of site access
driveways and other intersecting roads;
b. Cross-access easements of adjacent properties where feasible; and
c. Use of frontage or back-lot parallel access roads where feasible.
OBJECTNE
B). Keep apprised of the schedules for improvements and ongoing policies of all jurisdictions
whose.-transportation responsibilities within the City limits affect the quality of life and the
levels of service on which-Winter Springs citizens depend.
Policies
1) Continue to monitor the construction schedules of Department of Transportation
regarding improvement of SR 434 through the City so that the level of service is not
degraded below the State's criteria for a principal arterial link. In applying the
lenience to permit three years in advance of funded improvements, be selective so
that development permitted to proceed prior to actual construction of, the higher
capacity road will include only those projects which further progress toward other
_ goals.
2) Require all development plans for property abutting state highways to include
controlled access and minimal driveway cuts, with common service roads connecting
ill-2
Throughout the planning period, the City will coordinate the transportation system needs
with land use designations; planning for land use and transportation is to be closely
correlated by ensuring that adequate capacity is available to accommodate the impacts of
development.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OBJECTIVE
J
C)
I
Policies
I
1)
J
2)
to adjacent development whenever possible, to minimize interruption of traffic on
the principal arterial sections. Coordinate permitting with the D.O.T. Access
Management Program.
3)
Pursue one of the objectives of the City's municipal collector road building program
- that of providing residents alternative routes over collector roads.
4)
Participate biannually in the update of the Seminole County impact fee road
construction schedule to press the need for widening of the northern section of
Tuscawilla Road, the only north-south arterial through Winter Springs.
5)
Coordinate development of all property in the City adjacent to Tuscawilla Road with
County requirements for laneage and intersection improvements to lessen
development impact until the road is improved.
6)
Continue to work with other jurisdictions to convert the former railroad into a
corridor for alternative modes of travel within the City - walking trails, bicycle paths,
equestrian and recreation.
Make-hi-annual traffic counts, plus increases to occur from permitted development
as of the effective date of the concurrency requirement.
No development orders will be issued that will degrade the level of service standard
of D on all roadways. Level of service must consider vested development and
transportation facilities committed for construction within three years.
3) Design and engineer the collector road system to minimize traffic impact on these
arterial roads.
4) Create intersections of the new City collector roads with arterials where they will
coordinate with the functioning of arterials.
5) Monitor the functioning of the arterial and collector road system by use of the
ill-3
D
I
I
I
TRANPLANIFSUTMS model updated (1996) by the City's traffic consultant so that
collector road improvements may be scheduled according to valid priorities.
6)
Establish the level of service for mwlicipal collector roads at LOS D.
7)
Require a traffic study for all new development generating more than 300 Daily
Trips. Such study to be conducted in accord with written procedures provided by the
City.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OBJECTIVE
D) Throughout the planning period, the City shall enforce the level of service standard on all
arterial and collector roads.
Policies
1) Update and monitor transportation concurrency with formalized procedures that
ascertain the permittability of proposed developments according to criteria
established by an expert consultant.
2) The City shall annually monitor the LOS status of arterial and all state roadways
within the City including U.S. Highways 17 and 92 and the Eastern Beltway, by
obtaining from the State and County their most recent traffic counts at points along
all roadways which would be affected by development in the City.
I
3) Permit no development Within the municipal limits that will cause the level of service
of any state arterial road to decrease below LOS D no sooner than three years prior
to construction funding of the impacted arterial as reflected in the Florida Department
of Transportation's then adopted Five-Year Plan.
I
I
I
I
OBJECTIVE
E)
Create through the configuration of the City-wide collector road system the interaction and
cohesiveness that have been lacking among the residential neighborhoods of Winter Springs,
but do so in a manner that enhances and preserves the quality of life within each community.
Policies
1) Extend the several true collector roads that now end abruptly or degrade from paving
to unimproved status within existing neighborhoods without connection or outlet to
another collector road or arterial, to complete valid collector linkages for these
communities.
ill-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OBJECTIVE
2)
When designing extensions of existing collector roads to their logical arterial
connection south of the City - the Lake Orive-Seminola Boulevard major collector
that is planned for improvement by the county - choose rights-of-way that minimi7e
intrusion and cut-through high speed traffic, so that improved traffic circulation is
not at the expense of peaceful habitation.
3)
Plan for completion of the one-ended collector roads in existing developments on a
neighborhood-by-neighborhood basis so that input from the residents is acquired.
4)
The City, shall ensure the provision and maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian
walkways to supplement collector roads between residential areas and parks, schools,
and other major attractors. Specific provisions for the establishment and
maintenance of bicycle pedestrian walkways shall include, but not necessarily be
limited to the following:
a. The City shall review all proposed development for its accommodation of
bicycle and pedestrian traffic needs.
b.
The land development regulations, shall continue to reqUIre all new
developments to provide bicycle parking space.
c. Sidewalks or other pedestrian ways shall be provided where feasible and
appropriate along all roadways.
F) In the design of the municipal collector road system, seize opportunities to solve specific
problems.
Policies.
1) Eliminate landlocked parcels by providing for rights-of-way to reach these properties.
2) Emphasize irriproved access for emergency vehicles to secluded areas in the design.
3) Permit no individual residential driveways onto the collector roads .where feasible.
4) Encourage "green commerce" along the abandoned CSX railroad corridor to create
an open view near any intersections of crossroads and the tracks. Green commerce
is to be defined by the City and shall include such commercial activities as nurseries,
truck farming, and outdoor recreation which does not require large areas of vertical
construction to block the drivers' clear view.
fl1-5
I
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OBJECTIVE
G) Conserve the ruirural environment and augment open space in the City as functions of road
development.
Policies
1) Where valid options are available, choose rights-of-way for the City collector system
distant enough from natural drainage features and upland habitats to coexist with
these natural areas.
2) The incursion of a roadway through these natural areas shall be allowed if it benefits
the public need,. such as for access by emergency vehicles or transporting school
children, outweighing other concerns.
3) Include in all new road plans adequate right-of-way for potential landscaping and
provide for maintenance, in the annual budget of the City.
. 4) Designate scenic drives along which collector road construction will be adapted to
preserve as much as possible of existing vegetation and canopy.
OBJECTIVE
H) Ensure that current and future rights-of-way are protected from encroachment from structures
or ancillary uses inconsistent with the designation of rights-of-way. Rights-of-way necessary
for the maintenance of level of service standards and for the safe design .of roadways in
accordance with State standards shall be required. Existing rights-of-way shall be preserved
through enforcement of setback provisions, which prevent encroachments into the rights-of-
way;
I
Policies.
1)
The City, in its land development regulations shall require the dedication of all
needed rights:..of-way and necessary roadway improvements for all new development,
and adopt provisions to protect existing rights-of-way by limiting the use and/or
encroachment by structures and ancillary uses.
I
I
2)
The City shall acquire right-of-way for future transportation needs as funds become
available.
I
r
ill-6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
Existing Conditions
To plan for the future transportation needs of the City of Winter Springs, a complete understanding
of the community's existing transportation system is necessary. Thi~ includes a thorough
understanding of existing transportation conditions and existing transportation deficiencies. To
accomplish this, an extensive data collection and review process was accomplished. TIlls effort
included a categorization of the existing roadways in the city .and their functional use or
classification, a detailing of existing traffic flows within the city and its surrounding area as revealed
in daily and peak hour traffic counts, a detailing of transportation planning models currently used
in the area including those used by Seminole County and the OUA TS, a detailing of the data
currently used in the area for transportation planning including computer coded networks and
socioeconomic data, and a review of existing transportation plans within the area including the city,
county, and the region.
Study Area ~ The development of a transportation plan for the City of Winter Springs requires a
detailed analysis of transportation plans and systems in the city and the surrounding area In addition
to the City's Comprehensive Plan, current transportation planning activities generally consider the
entire Orlando urban area which is defined as Seminole, Orange and Osceola County. While the
City of Winter Springs Transportation Plan must consider the established relationships between the
City and this entire region, a study area for more detailed analysis was defined.
In order to measure the impacts of growth within the City, the study area must include all of the city
and fringe areas surrounding the city that affect traffic flows within the city limits. For the purposes
of this analysis, a study area meeting these requirements was developed (see Figure 1). This area
is generally bounded on the north by Lake Jessup, on the east by the Eastern Beltway (C.R 417), on
the south by Red Bug Lake Road, and on the west by U.S. 17-92. These boundaries are compatible
with traffic zone boundaries established in the OUA TS and the Seminole County TIvfP.
Existing Roadways - The existing roadway system within the study area defined above has been
functionally ciassitied in the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study and in the Seminole County
TIvfP. These definitions of roadway usages as seen from the county perspective were reviewed so
that a similar classificatioo.ofroadway usage from the City's perspective could be made.
. Functional Classification of Existing System - Seminole County has developed a set of definitions
in order to functionally classify the roadways in the county according to their usage. These
definitions were adopted as a part of this study effort so that compatibility with local planning efforts
could be maintained. Thus, the roads shown in Seminole County traffic segment counts were
functionally classified and were adopted for use in this study. The list of the roadways within the
study area boundary is shown in Table 2. The functional classifications are also shown in Figure 2.
Existing Traffic Counts - Seminole County maintains a comprehensive traffic counting program
within the study area and the city. The most recently published counts from this agency were
reviewed and posted within the study area These state and county counts were available for 1995
ITl-7
I M't+--I~[,c.{-- ~ Z; '~-= --,' L'~f. I i '''rult-~ '1"< ~.-\ ~\,"==-"i',~IJ.~
L.:.~ { I ... ~~f.:~.~
I .;1 ~-~~~"...,:..o . I : ~ _ . .~ -c3~~
I . ~I I~ I I_~ /,\ ~~"" \. J/ ~ SANFORD. . J ."", ; \V~
I '~~~~_~. ,; ~.~~)~ ~b=f~i ' ~; /!IN
I L I I -,. '- ~A'jf,lir'~ )Y ,,:,. j ~ ~ 1 I !"'"
fTl~~~l-:~~!) ~. ... V ~ lr-lc, ,1r-1 l~9;-
I. ~.v~_i eo.u,,.,,,, /1. fb. \ =b U ~LJ II ~ [~
If \L~ I ~ 6~~~.~o '{. .~~. <;, \ ~-rWAV" I ~\ ~~
MH ft.' Ij~_~~:~-'~. .?~7 \\u'l ~ ~~.,
I -..:na.D ~-~... '. ;!.ll uv~ '"" '. ~_
;t~~ ~ ~~~ ~ .3 8 ! ~ .NORTH Si:CTloN _ \ - .
I ,. . ,~l)~~///L:-' . ~':-l ~ ~"N"~^Y ~ :1
. '. ~ I u:..awO'.o ...\.~"'" /, ~\ --=- ~')) ! Y
I m.._~ ~iLD9 i ~W=R~'~ , ; (:-
~. ~~VIJ)~~. ~\\~ S~~~~r;~)\I' 1\ ; I!.
I g::.~1-' :.1 ~ /JI-;::J J~I . ~ : I n I I
1-6 .~rT13 2 i -\ '. ,.SlUDY ~ ,. ~
I IL .A'- (~ 1 ~J_ :J;,4,)~~ . o<>'JLr~
.......!.J ~:.... ~I'.J .... _~~~~ 1.:. If. I
I . It I u-~ ." ~ ' . .. .' ... ~t
~ . ~~'!N~i~TE. i :~,. "M.H~ . f ~ ~ Jnc ) . '. ==. f~J
I ~ :-, . I', "J ~ ~ .. "'_0', I' ~ 'J'
..../ ~n; ,I , I. ',:: ~ ~
co ~ A'T. ~' '.M :- .
I ~ In.o.~ 0 "'. . ~ ~ ~
I l! ''-...T. c:r~/. ~~... . U I ;: I ! I { ~ I ; m:
. > ,,p- " ' ~ I "'OHa...,,,,C J I L";' ~,(.
.,. I ((;;, ~ MAO~N_ :.'"~ '.._ ... 0: ~: /. '-~I?"~~~
~! 5 -EATO~ .', '.''"'t~~~ .. \L\: '\! ~ I /1 II ~.~~; ! ~~
I . ~ VI ::: .:;; :?~ ~.::: {f~/i.~~;: G\ ~~~NROdd ~ ! i .u\~J2if2ll E0 I '" I
.-:. ..J1\1"~.Qi'l ~~ .{;;:Jt~~~.;::/:~-:I" I' ,.~~~' ~l ~ ~"".......u~. ~~~.
~ I I - ~"f'f ARK .. \. ~~ ,......... ~. .-. ,~~ II. r'~~.......~"",..
J ~ ".... I ~'-~S..'... .,.. r- .~i lL ~ ..,! _~;..'.~ ~""~..... ~
:~~Lf~)r"'" ~~~~ .~~~~::-:.,~ :J I~[.-vr\. I ~I J ~'IAAO~ I ~ l-t.
~I ~l '~\ :.~ '-:~~i~;;~~~:~ ..~'_I_ '\ !~i~'~o I '
I ,........ff'iL- -~ X'~..._. . Y".......,. . . <( :\I r -il ~ I . \-~
~~~u,~~ ~~~2~ ~l O:~R' "L~.:~A> IN."~'.D!' . 9 i f' ~ .l~ #':;:r~~~ ~.
I l::.:-:.},; '\7~. -j .. !:I <( --- ~ / \ Jo-.'
> 1).:::.,-, ...,,-&~<f.. "'3 ... . '::..:.j ... - > /! I 1<( i
. j '~~~::...'~:;.;~::. .:..:;::...~-::' ,I:.. ~ /' ~ ~ I J . ~ !
f ,~;;,~;~, .;;.~_~ 1--j' 11 '-, f~.:: . I 0 '.._.~
l-n'<.~ I~~,:. ; i~~~.~"""I~.. '-.:" l ~., ~~
J---nfJ:;;:~.' "",..j,) .:::: ....:.~./:' \ _ ~I WEST~' ~XPReSSWAV" Uo~.t:' ~l ~
gJ .::;:;;I~. .~ ....~~H.., . EAST' . . - ..,,--._..~ ,.... ~ I ...._~y Ii,!~ ~
I)~l'''':,'':~ - . ".O;',ou..' -. '..:.~ .' . CI'JO'Ol. i" ,.........
f ~ '::<;~l:~~~.~;:.":>~ ;:r~....;?' jil ';'l.~.i....:..." :. W ..;;"ir.-...m.. 0 .:.:-~..:;.:,,~ ,..:.....-. Ii. ~ ~"""'~U~~A
:+ '.[--.. .' ~;:;~ . -I ..~:J .'.'<:lJ ..~....<..".. c.",.., ~ I G
~:.~,,-,l .:,<-' ~.Cl .....~ I f-1:. .-. ...-.'. . I "
t1 it'" I}) oJ .,.,. i ':~;-\:~~)'" > 1.CV-Vl::'li~ ,.~. I I ~T ~ A C---=Z
-.. a · .'.:-. ~ ~ .~~ " . ::.::ri~ :;::J ~ 'l;?7;;7,;;:-J ,~, I ~ ; h II WM
I
~
~ :~~~~~
~"cU/. ~
t/,'//f;% ~
Conklin ~orter and Holm..
~ ~ lINQINIlBRS, IHe.
11()..4 r:: R06HSO"..I :nJtCD
CYft.ANoo. ~OA .J.1..D01
Tn 4.{)7 ...n-o~2
'AX ..07 ~~ I 0.)0
SCAIL NTS
DATE: J-l+-97
STUDY AREA LOCA TlON
'NINTB1 SPfllNGS TRANSPoRT A 1lON STUDY
RGURE
1
J:J[J NO..: "MJ~9.cn
-
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7) -
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
.16)
17)
18)
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 2
1996
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY
Freeways
Principal Arterials (State)
1)
Eastern Beltway (State)
1)
2)
S.R. 434
S.R. 419
Princioal Arterials (County)
Maior Collectors (County)
1)
2)
Red Bug Lake Road
TuskawiIla Road
1)
2)
East Lake Drive
Red Bug Lake Road - Tuskawilla
Road to Eastern Beltway
Minor Collectors (County)
1) Dodd Road
2) Eagle Boulevard
3) Shepard Road - U.S. 17-92 to Winter Springs City Limit
Municioal Collectors (City)
Bahama Road - Shore Road to Hayes Road
Dolphin Road - Moss Road to Hayes Road
Dyson Road - Tuskawilla Road to Shetland A venue
Edgemon A venue - Panama Road to .S.R. 419
Fischer Road - Panama Road to E. Lake Drive
Greenbriar Lane - Northern Way to Winter Springs Boulevard
Hayes Road - S.R. 434 to Bahama Road
Moss-Road - S.R. 419 to Panama Road
No[ihern-Way - All
Panama Road - Shore Road to Edgemon A venue
Shepard Road - Seminole County Line to End
Sheoah Boulevard - Shepard Road to S.R. 434
Shore Road - Panama Road to End
Winding Hollow Boulevard - S.R. 434 to End
Winter Springs Boulevard - Tuskawilla Road to Eastem Beltway
Trotwood Boulevard - Tuskawilla Road to Northern Way
Tuscora Drive - S.R. 434 to Northern Way
Vista-Willa Drive - S.R. 434 to N.?rthern Way
1lI-9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
~
I
I
,
J
I
------J::- Z ~
I
f
z
::>
~of~f
~~ f:_
-< z z <.>
........J::>::>.........
~:5800::
0::.........<.>0
....J~ '-'....
-< a:: a:: a:: <.> ~
a:: ~ 0 0 W Z
~ .... t; .... =l -<(
~ ~ ~ fd 8 ~
~ 0 =l ....J 0
....J ::::i: <.> 0<.> -<
;f. a.. a::
<.> 3 a:: a:: (} ~
z .... 0 0 z ::::!:
g:~~~~~
~ ~ II j @
V1
---Cr-:
z
.rr-
aaoa
n:
a
UJ
~
-<(
-J
ci
a::
W
~
-<
....J
o
::>
CD
Cl
W
a::
Conklin norter and Holmea
~ ~ -HQJNJlJlR., INC.
11()-4 ( R~:sr>l STRaT
<:m.AAoo. I"\..CR()A J2.OOl
m-<<T1'~Z
rAX 4U7 o.~lQ..)e
SCALE: NTS
1996 EXlST1NG ROADWAY CLASStRCA TIONS RGURE
AND NUMBER OF LANES
WlNTER SPR1NGS TRANSPORT AnoN STUDY 2
DATE: .J-20-97
-X:l8 NO..: W(H.S9_01
I
I I v)
~T ~ (r-:
z 1
I
nt .cr::>
I -4; m 0
-4; m 0
I c I I !
z
w
C>
~
I (J) I i I
w
z
:J
z 1'1 0
w
I w
a:::
u
(J) ...
I
([)
ci
a:::
ci w
c ~
w -<
~ .....J
-<( C>
-J =>
en
c
w
a:::
Conk.)!n ~orter and Holme8
~ ~ ENGINEERS, IHC.
O 11tH E ROBlHSCN smfIT
ORLANDO. 11.000A J2<101
= .,,7 '2>-~
rJJ. +07 O.....a-l0,)6
SCAlE.: NTS
DATE: 3-20-97
SCREENUNES MODEL V AUDA noN 1996 RGURE
W1NTER SPRINGS TRANSPORT A T10N SlUDY 5
JOO NO.: WO~9.01
I
I
and are summarized in Table 3. Municipal collectors were not counted by Seminole County;
thus, the consultant made hourly machine counts on all of the roadways currently paved in early
1996. These counts are sununarized in Tables 4 and 5. These counts were used to help
determine roadway classifications and were also used as a base for model validation.
I
I
A vailable Model Inputs - The City of Winter Springs and the study area defined above are part of
the Orlando Urban Transportation Study and the Seminole County TMP. Each of these
transportation studies has developed a set of transportation planning models and a set of data that
is input to these models. These input data include descriptions of the roadway networks which
normally only include collectors and high classified roadways. Additionally, these studies used
socioeconomic data files which describe land use activities in discreet areas known as traffic
analysis zones (TAZ's).
I
I
I
These computer files and listings were gathered so that a complete understanding of the
transportation planning efforts in this area could be obtained. Additionally, these files were
transferred to the proper format for input to the model chosen for this study.
I
I
I
Existing TransPortation Plans - Both state and county transportation planning activities have
produced transportation plans within the Winter Springs Study Area. These plans have been
reviewed and a listing of the transportation improvements presently planned and programmed
(within 5 years) for the City of Winter Springs and the study area is provided in Table 6. These
improvements will be studied in the 2010 Transportation Plans and Existing Plus Committed
Plans in the development of recommendation and concurrency management procedures.
I
I:
I
(This space intentionally left blank)
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ill-II
II
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 3
1995
DAILY SEMINOLE COUNTY COUNTS
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY
Roadway Location 1995 ADT
U.S. 17-92 Dog Track Road to S.R. 434 52,114
S.R. 434 to S.R. 419 36,123
S.R. 434 S.R.419toU.S.17-92 24,892
S.R. 419 to Tuskawilla Road 24,757
TuskawiIla Road to Springs A venue 16,552
Springs A venue to Eastern Beltway 15,286
S.R. 419 S.R. 434 to Edgemon A venue 12,271
Edgemon Avenue to U.S. 17-92 15,553
Red Bug Lake Road Eagle Circle to Dodd Road 34,888
Dodd Road to Tuskawilla Road 35,790
Tuskawilla Road S.R. 434 to Trotwood Boulevard 12,058
Trotwood Blvd. to Winter Springs Blvd. 16,071
Winter Springs Blvd. to Dyson Drive 16,572
Dyson Drive to E. Lake Drive 22,867
E. Lake Drive to Eagle Boulevard 24,573
...~#.
Eagle Boulevard to Red Bug.Lake Road 25,398
. Red Bug Lake Road to Dike Road 22,684
E. Lake Drive Seminola Boulevard to Fischer Road 12,617
Fischer Road to Tuskawilla Road 9,472
Red Bug Lake Road Tuskawilla Road to Brooks Cave 30,448
Brooks Cave to Citrus Road 26,829
Citrus Road to Slavia Road 25,390
- Slavia Road to Eastern Beltway 17,589
...
Eagle Boulevard Dodd Road to Tuskawilla Road 4,278
III-I 2
Table 4
1996 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS
.-'
I
., RAW AVERAGE ADJUSTED
I
I
I TRAFFIC COUNT ANNUAL ANNUAL
ROADWAY FROM TO COUNTS DATE FOOT ADJ. TRAFFIC
TWO WAY 1996 FACTOR TWO WAY
SHEPARD RD U.S. 11-92 SHEOAH BLVD 3081 1/24 1 3081
SHEOAH BLVD SHEPARD RD. S. R. 434 5881 1/25 1 5881
MOSS RD. S.R. 434 C.R. 419 2431 1/24 1 2431
MOSS RD. PAN1\MA S.R. 434 4707 1/24 1 4707
EDGEMON AVE. SEHINOLA PANAMA 2774 1/25 1 2774
EDGEMON AVE. PAN1\MA S.R. 434 3783 1/25 1 3783
EDGEMON AVE. S.R. 434 C.R. 419 2480 2/6 1 2480
WADE ST. S.R. 434 C.R. 419 1034 1/25 1 1034
DOLPHIN RD. HAYES RD. SHORE RD. 241 1/25 1 241
HAYES RD. PAN1\MA S.R. 434 3381 1/29 1 3381
SHORE RD. PAN1\MA S .R. 434 475 1/29 1 475
TROTWOOD BLVD. TUSCAWILLA NORTHERN WAY 4121 1/29 1 4121
TROTWOOD BLVD WEST OF TUSKAWILLA 2046 1/29 1 2046
NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRS. BLVD. TROTWOOD BLVD. 1868 1/29 1 1868
NORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD. VIST1\WILLA 2501 1/30 1 2501
NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRS. BLVD, SHETLAND 2'136 1/30 1 2736
NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR WINTER SPRS. BLVD 1991 1/30 1 1991
VIST1\WILLA NORTHERN WAY SENECA 1410 1/31 1 1410
WINTER SPRS. BLVD TUSCMIILLA NORTHERN WAY 7384 1/30 1 7384
WINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR 6099 1/31 1 6099
WINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY 7484 1/31 1 7484
WINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY CITY LIMITS 12260 1/31 1 12260
GREENBRIAR WINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY 1141 1/31 1 1141
DYSON OR. TUSCAWILLA SHETLAND 3262 1/31 1 3262
SHETLAND CITRUS RD. DYSON OR. 4474 1/31 1 4474
ALTON RD. HAYES SHORE 1380 2/1 1 1380
BIRD RD. LAKE DR. NORTH 1267 2/1 1 1267
TUSKJ\WILLA S.R. 434 NORTH 917 2/1 1 917
TUSCOR?- NORTHERN WAY SR. 434 765 2/1 1 765
SENECA WINTER SPRS BLVD. 1/2 WAY 1418 2/1 1 lU8
SENECA 1/2 WAY VISTAWILLA 1054 2/1 1 1054
>-'
.-'
w
-
-
-
.-
-
-
.,.,....-
-
-
.,.-
-
-
-
--
TABLE 5
1996 AVERAGE ANNUAL A.M. AND P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS
r:--
.' AM PEAK HR PM PEAK AM PEAK PH PEAK
..
RAW AVERAGE RAW ADJUSTED ADJUSTED
TRAfFIC COUNT ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL
ROADlo/A Y fROM TO COUNTS DATE fOOT ADJ. TRAFFIC TRAFFIC TRAfFIC
TWO WAY 1996 FACTOR TWO WAY TWO WAY TWO WAY
SHEPARD RD U.S. 17-92 SHEOAH BLVD 284 1/24 1 290 284 290
SIIEOAH BLVD SHEPARD RD. S.~. 434 501 1/25 1 552 501 552
HOSS RD. S .R. 434 . C.R. 419 183 1/24 1 224 183 224
HOSS RD. PANAMA S.il.. 434 371 1/24 1 426 371 426
EDGEHON AVE. SEHINOLA PANAMA 243 1/25 1 291 243 291
EDGEHOtI AVE. PANAMA S.R. 434 381 1/25 1 332 381 332
EDGEHON AVE. S.R. 434 C.R. 419 213 2/6 1 320 213 320
WADE ST. S.R. 434 C.R. 419 108 1/25 1 115 108 115
DOLPHIN RD. HAYES RD. SHORE RD. 26 1/25 1 38 26 38
HAYES RD. PANAMA S.R. 434 319 1/29 1 344 319 344
SHORE RD. PANAMA S.R. 434 38 1/29 1 66 38 66
TROTWOOD BLVD. TUSCAWILLA NORTHERN WAY 444 1/29 1 498 444 498
TROTWOOD BLVD WEST OF TUSKAWILLA 230 1/29 1 204 230 204
NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRS. BLVD. TROTWOOD BLVD. 212 1/29 1 228 212 228
NORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD. VISTAWILLA 247 1/30 1 275 247 275
NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRS. BLVD. SHETLAND 270 1/30 1 301 270 301
NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR WINTER SPRS. BLVD 179 1/30 1 210 179 210
VISTAWILLA NORTHERN WAY SENECA 120 1/31 1 162 120 162
WINTER SPRS. BLVD TUSCAWILLA NORTHERN WAY 521 1/30 1 709 521 709
WINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR 475 1/31 1 576 475 516
WINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY 653 1/31 1 765 653 765
WINTE:R SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY CITY LIMITS 1043 1/31 1 1211 1043 1211
GRE:E:NBRIAR WINTER SPRS. BLVD. NORTHERN WAY 107 1/31 1 129 107 129
DYSON DR. TUSCAWILLA SHETLAND 261 1/31 1 319 261 319
SHETLAND CITRUS RD. DYSON DR. 467 1/31 1 453 467 453
ALTON RD. HAYES SHORE 134 2/1 1 156 134 156
BIRD RD. LAKE DR. NORTH 113 2/1 1 135 113 135
TUSKAWILLA S .R. 434 NORTH 144 2/1 1 162 144 162
TUSCORA NORTHERN WAY SR. 434 77 211 1 79 77 79
SENECA WINTER SPRS BLVD. 1/2 WAY 126 2/1 1 144 126 144
SENE:CA 1/2 WAY VISTAWILLA 86 2/1 1 149 86 149
.....
.....
I
I
I
I
Table 6
1996
PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IDGHW A Y SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORT A TION STUDY AREA
I
Roadway Segment Improvement Programmedl Planned1
u.s. 17-92 Lake Triplet Drive to Add 2 Lanes 1998
Shepard Road
S.R. 434 S.R. 419 to Tuskawilla Rd. Add 2 Lanes 1997
S.R. 434 Tuskawilla Rd to Eastern Add 2 Lanes 1998
Beltway
Tuskawilla Rd. Dike Rd to Red Bug Lake Add 4 Lanes 1997
Tuskawilla Rd. Red Bug Lake Rd to E. Add 2 Lanes 1998
Lake Drive
Tuskawilla Rd. E. Lake Drive to Winter Add 2 Lanes 1998
Springs Boulevard
Tuskawilla Rd. Winter Springs Boulevard Add 2 Lanes 1998
to S.R. 434
Lake Drive Seminola Boulevard to Add 2 Lanes 2002
TuskawiIla Road
Moss Road S.R. 434 to S.R. 419 Add 2 Lanes 2000
Winter Park Dr. Wilshire Dr. to Seminola Add Turn Lanes 1997
Boulevard
S.R. 434 U.S. 17-92 to S.R. 419 Add 2 Lanes 201<P
(6 Total)
-~#.
S.R. 434 S.R. 419 to Eastern Beltway Add 2 Lanes 2010
- (6 Total)
u.S. 17-92 Shepard Road to Airport Add 2 Lanes 2010
Boulevard
Red Bug Lake Rd Tuskawilla Rd. to S.R. 426 Add 2 Lanes 2010
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1. Contained in construction program ofFDOT or Seminole County.
2. Contained in OUATS 2010 Plan Update (Adopted Highway Needs Network).
3. Latest date based on need. This applies to all "2010" numbers in this column.
,
Ill-IS
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Level of Service Policies - Level of service (LOS) standards are essential for transportation
planning to determine both existing traffic conditions as well as project future deficiencies and
required facility improvements. The LOS of a roadway or roadway section analyzes the
condition of an existing facility in terms of its operating condition. There are six levels of
service used in transportation planning that are ranked in descending order of safety and
convenience of travel from level A to level F. A description of the accepted service levels is as
follows:
Level of Service
Description
A
Highest quality of service a particular road segment can
provide. General ,condition of free flow in which there is
very little or no restriction on spread or maneuverability
caused by the presence of other vehicles.
B
Reasonable unimpeded traffic and stable flow. Ability to
maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly
restricted, and stopping delays are not bothersome.
c
Characterized by stable flow, but restrictions in freedom to
select speed, to change lanes, or to pass is becoming
restricted for most drivers.
D
Approaching unstable flow. Tolerable average operating
speeds are generally maintained but are subject to
considerable and sudden variation. Driving comfort and
freedom to maneuver are low because of increased lane
density, adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal
timing, or some combination of these factors.
E
.-L,dicates significant delays and lower operating speeds.
Suc.h operations are caused by some combination of
adverse progression, high signal density, extensive queuing
at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing.
Driving comfort is low and accidental potential is high.
I
I
I
I
I
I
F
Forced flow operations at extremely low speeds. Roadway
tends to act as a storage area and intersection congestion is
likely at critical signalized intersections, with high
approach delays resulting. Adverse signal progression is
frequently a contributor to this condition.
III-16
I
I
I
t
1
I
I
I
I
I
The FDOT outlined in their Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual
for Planning (1995) the minimum acceptable operating LOS standards, as presented below.
TABLE 7
STATEWIDE MINIMUM LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
FOR THE STATE IDGHWAY SYSTEM
(Urbanized Areas Over 500,000)
Transitioning
Existing Inside Transportation Urbanized or
Urbanized Concurrency Management Incorporated Rural
Roadway Type Areas Areas Areas Areas
Freeways D D C B
Other Multi-lane D * C B
Two-lane D * C C
*Means the level of service standard will be set in a transportation mobility element that meets requirements of Rule
91-5.0057.
The City of Winter Springs falls into the category of "Inside Transportation Concurrency
Management Areas" for the purposes of determining LOS standards. Lacking the concurrency
management designation, the City is part of the existing Orlando Urbanized Area as defmed by
FDOT and the MPO which requires LOS D.
Seminole County has determined that Tuskawilla Road within the City limits falls within an
Urban Center Traffic Impact Area. The County's strategy, as per their Traffic Circulation
Support Document Volume IV of the 1991 plan update, allows a LOS E within these areas while
a LOS D is the minimum standard outside of the defined area.
In accord with the. Comprehensive Plan and previously adopted standards, Level of Service "D"
conditions on all roads within the City of Winter Springs and the study area was used as the
minimum standard. This corresponds with FDOT recommendations shown in Table 7 above.
Level of Service standards have been reduced to daily roadway capacity (service volumes) terms
in order to permit assessment of both existing and forecast conditions. The FDOT daily roadway
capacities as shown in Table 8 for LOS D were used (circled service volumes).
Existing Deficiencies - Given the standards defined above, the existing roadway system in the
study area and the City of Winter Springs were evaluated. This evaluation was based upon
existing roa~way volumes as documented in the previous discussion on traffic counts.
These analyses indicate that many roadways on the state and county system within the study area
were not operating within LOS D in 1996 (see Figure 3). Almost all are contained in Table 6 as
committed improvement projects. However, the following are not and need immediate auention:
ITI-17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 8
GENERAU2ED ANNUAL AVERAGE DAJLY VOLUMES FOR FLORlDA'S
URBANIZED AREAS.
Sf An: TWO- WAY ARTElUAl..S fREEWAYS
UNlNTERRurTED n..oW Group 1 (within llrbUlittd &1U OV'Cr ~ooo and ludiDalo Of" pa>>ina
willUn 5 miles oflhc prinury city anini b\oiDaa Wstria)
Uoslp.Jlttd LtYcl of Scrvico
l.e'vd of Suvia l...lne3 A B C 0 f
UDC3 A B C 0 E .. 22.00) 3~ ,.200 ~2.9OO 67,OC1J 80.800
2 UDdiv. 8,900 13,900 18,900 2",800 33,100 6 33.100 52.900 79,400 100.600 126.900
"Oiv. 21,sal 35.800 SO.100 60,100 71,600 8 .....100 70,.500 1 M.900 13-4.100 169.200
60iv. 31,.200 ~3,700 75,200 90,200 107,400 10 ~,200 88,.200 132.<400 167,700 211,400
12 63,.200 101.100 151,700 192.200 242.300
lNrElUtUPTED now
Group:2 (wilhillllrbanizalaru aDd DOl ia Groap 1)
C1au Ia (XUXl 10 2.49 aigll&lmd ~ pet mile) Lcvd of Scrvico
Levd of Service l...lne3 A B C 0 E
l..ulcs AU B C De.. E... 4 . 20,.300 32,.500 -48.,800 61,BOO 74,500
2 UDdiv. t2,600 Ij,200 16,600 11,000 c 6 30.600 48,900 73.400 93,OC1J 111,JOO
40iv. Il.900 33.300 .35,700 35.BOO 1- 8 40.800 65,.200 97.900 124,000 1~6,300
6Div. 43,.200 SO,-400 53,700 53,100 A 10 51.00) 81,500 122..300 155,000 193,-400
8Div. 53,800 62,000 . 65,800 6S,BOO s U 58,400 93,.200 140.000 177,300 223.600
s
C1au lb (2..SO 10 4.50 sign&1ittd inlaxdioAJ pet mile)
Lcvd of Savia:
C
l...lne3
2 Undiv.
40iv.
60iv.
8niv.
AU
BOO
E
1.~,9OO
34,000
51,400
62.900
8,800
19.200
29,300
lS.800
Class lJ (more Ihu 4.50 sj guJi:z.ed ill ICnc.ai003 pet mil. aDd DOl
wilhin primary cily a:atnJ busina.s di3triCl of urb&.Diz.cd
arca 0VCl 500,OCIO)
Lcvd of Servia:
UDe3 AOO B" C" 0 E
1 Undiv. 11,800 15.200
4 Div, 26,500 33,400
6 Diy. 40,700 50,600
80iv. 49.100 61.800
Class III (more than 4.50 slpaJin:d inl.e1'XCliocu peunlle aDd withiJI
primuy city =mJ busincu dislriCl oC urbuizal
VU over ~oo.CXXl)
Lcw.l or ScMce
Unc:s AOO BOO C"A 0 E
1 Undiv. 13.200 14.800
40iv. 29.500 32.600
6 Div. .....800 49,300
80iv. 54.700 60.100
NON-STATEROADWAYS
MAJOR CITY/COUNTY ROADWAYS
lAve1 of Service
l...u>cs A" BOO C e E
2UDdiv 10.900 15.500
4 Div. 24.400 33.200
60iv, 37.800 47,500 50.200
OTHER SIGNALIZED ROADWAYS
c (sipilizaJ intcncction azalym)
L Level oC Setvicc
^ unes AU BOO C E
s 2 Undiv 5.200 11.700
s '" Oiv. 11400 :!S100
II
C
1-
A
S
S
III
Una
2
2
Multi
Multi
ADJUSTMENTS
DMDEDlUNDMDED
(aller ~ng two-",-yvolumc indicted pctl%ll!)
Mtdba Wt Tllf1l Ba)'3 Adjustment FadOD
D~ . y~ +5~
U1Idividcd No -20$
UIdMdcd Yes .5~
UIdMdcd No -25~
ONE-WAY
(aIIU c:orrapoadiD It two-"'-y volume lDdicatcd pc1'OCDt)
One.Way ~ng Adjasunent
Una Two- WIY Unc:s Fac1Ol'
2 ~ ~
3 6 ...4()$
.. 8 ~
5 8 -25%
lloo.......- _ ~...-.. -l_t. _-.,... -"~..,..._ Tho_........ __DOt......;,~_bo _b.."....,....ct.:~ ~
1M ub'I ~ ~ ~ II"IOoddt ~.. t. -:I b ~ Of ~o.. ~ ......... ~ rw6-d ~ --. v..... w.o-. w. --.1 --........,.....mc (A.ADT) -.u-____
('--looK.- bocn. _ ..... .. ~ ......, "" --- oI..-oQ. ....... ....... 00 ... ,_ H......, ~ "'-.0 u~ -l Fkwi40 ...rtIc. ~ ... ............ do.. lloo ........ _
-...d"-'-'ol~~~~u...t-d...
c-:. boo. aclow.......!
Veoot___~~~~~W'Io~
Flooi.do 0."...".- 01 T ~ I~.
"-=
., O\JT
~
Ill-IS
I
I
I vi
----:k- Z L Cr:
I I z
.,fJ
I 3/\V
r--. ~Nl~dS
Cl
CJ)
0
I ...J
CJ)
Cl
W
w
()
I x
w
'--'
I-
Z
w
I (3
G:
w
Cl
I ~ I
w.
<.:>
w
I ...J
Cl
0::
I c:i
a:::
w
~
I ri <::
a ...J
w <.:>
:::l
::x:: en
-<(
I ...J Cl
W
a:::
I
"<t
,...,
I -.r
~
vi
I
t
J
Conklin ~orter and Holm..
~ [P IINOINII.R.) INC.
110. ( flCl6>>'oI~ SlRa:T
~oo. fL.CftlOA .)2Mr1
Tn -4-07 ..nr().4~2
FAX 4{J7 e.-4.8-1~
SCAlE: NTS
1996 EXlS1lNG DERCIENCIES
WINTER SPRtNGS "TRANSPORT A TlON STUDY
RGURE
3
DA TE: 3-20-97
Joe NO_: WO+59.01
l' 'T 1 _ 1 0
fA
II
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
r
I. S.R. 419 - U.S. ] 7-92 [0 Moss Road.
2. U.S. 17-92 - Shepard Road to S.R. 419.
3. Red Bug Lake Road - Winter Park Drive to Tuskawilla Road.
U.S. 17-92 is in the long range plans of the NfPO (OUA TS); however, it is very deficient and
should be moved to the FOOT five-year construction program. Neither the.S.R. 4 19 nor Red
Bug Lake Road sections mentioned above are contained on any programmed or planned 20 I 0
improvements list. There are no municipal collector facilities within the City of Winter Springs
operating at a LOS of less than D in 1996.
Model Development and Validation
To adequately forecast future traffic conditions in a rapidly urbanizing area such as the City of
Winter Springs, a set of transportation planning models must be developed and validated. In the case
of the City of Winter Springs, such models exist and these models have been previously used to
develop City, regional and county-wide plans. These models are contained in the model set
documented for the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study.
In order to provide the more detailed analysis required for the City of Winter Springs, this model set
was modified. These modifications include the development of a more detailed T AZ set
(microzones), a more detailed highway network, and the use of TRANPLAN/FSUTMS model
structure. These changes require the validation of the model set used in this process even though this
model set is derived from and closely resembles the OUA TS model set.
The model set used was originally tested and confirmed in the Casselberry Transportation Plan and
Impact Fee Study. It is derived from and based upon the QUA TS model set: This model set has
been modified as detailed below.
QUA TS Model Set - The transportation planning models used in the Orlando Urban Area
Transportation Study have-evGlved from a set of models developed in the mid-sixties and based upon
extensive -home interviews conducted.at-that time. The model set is divided into four general
functions and modifications to each of these functions have occurred over the last twenty-five years.
. Trip Generation - The existing OUA IS trip generation model is a cross-classification person trip
production model with attractions calculated using expressions derived from regression analysis.
This model currently uses 11 purposes including special generator purposes for the major tourist
attractions, the various universities and colleges in the region, and the Orlando International Airport.
The model requires extensive data not generally available such as the forecast of the median income
and car ownership by zone for the calculation of home-based productions.
Trip Distribution - The OUA TS trip distribution model utilizes each of the II purposes for which
productions and attractions are generated. Friction factors for each of these 11 purposes have been
developed, although the special generator purposes generally borrow friction factors from other
]Jl-20-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
J
I
I
purposes. There are not K-factors utilized in the model.
Modal Split! Auto Occupancy - The OUA TS model set includes a multi-nomial Iogit expression for
calculation of splits of trips to the transit sector. Auto occupancy is calculated with simple rates by
purpose. The modal split model is system-sensitive in that it requires the coded description of a
transit system.
Traffic Assignment - The current OUATS traffic assignment procedure consists of a 4-iteration
equilibrium assignment with capacity restraint. This process is applied using network descriptions
in accordance with the 1979 version of the Urban Transportation Planning System CUTPS)
developed by the US Department of Transportation.
Trip Generation Modifications - In order to make use of the data available from Seminole County
and to avoid the necessity to forecast income and car ownership as required by the OUA TS trip
generation model, modifications were made to this model. The trip generation models used are
based upon the OUATS models, but these models incorporate simpler rate expressions instead of
the more complex cross-classmcation models. These models have successfully been used numerous
times in the Orlando area including Casselberry and for Seminole County projects. In addition to
the Transportation Plan and Impact Fee Study in Casselberry, the models were used to forecast trip
generation for the Lake Mary Boulevard Corridor Study and the Lake Mary/I'-4 interchange study
for the Florida Department of Transportation. The models forecast vehicle trips instead of person
trips so they additionally do not require a separate auto occupancy model. The structure of the trip
generation 'statements used as input to the model validation procedure are detailed in Table 9. The
input socio-economic data for the Winter Springs traffic zones (Figure 4) was approved by the City
for 1996 and 2010 (see Appendix). All other zones used Seminole County or OUATS data (in
Orange County).
Use of OU A TS 11 Trip Pux:pose Models - Since trip generation expressions were available for each
of the OUATS non-special generator purposes, it was decided to use the entire 11 purpose models
available in QUA TS. This required incorporating the special generator expressions available.'from .
OUA TS into the Winter Springs Model Set. This use of the full OUA TS model purposes
additionally permitted use of the OUATS friction factors.
]JL-21-
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
,
I
TADLE 9
TRlP GENERA TJON EXPRESSIONS (VEHICLE TRlPS)
Winter SpringsTransportation Study - 1996
PRODUCTION EOUA TIONS
Homebase Work
=> 1.4 I (Dwelling Units) + 0.32 (Hotel-Motel Rooms)
Homebase Shopping
1.37 (Dwelling Units) + 0.48 (Hotel-Motel Rooms)
Homebase Pers.-Bus.
= 0.68 (Dwelling Units) + 0.48 (Hotel-Motel Rooms)
Homebase Social - Rec.
= 0.76 (Dwelling Units) + 0.96 (Hotel-Motel Rooms)
Homebase School
= 0.83 (Dwelling Units)
Non-Homebased
= Same as attractions
ATrnACTIONEOUATIONS
Homebase Work
= 0.43 Retail Employment + 1.13 Other Employment - 8.15
Homebase Shopping
= 420 Retail Employment + 12.06
Homebase Pers.-Bus. = 023 Single Dwelling Units + 0.54 Hotel-Motel Units
+ 0.59 Total Employment - 11.05
Homebase Social- Rec. = 0.30 Total Dwelling Units + 0.84 High School Attendance
+ 0.69 Retail Employment + 1925
Homebase School = 0.08 (1-6 Attendance) + 0.13 (7-12) Attendance) + 3.02
Non-Homebased = 0.56 Total Dwelling Units + 3.80 Retail Employment
+ 0.32 Total Employment + 6.52
OTHER TRIP PURPOSE PRODUCTION AND ATTRACTION
Truck Production = 0.96 Retail Employment + 0.37 Total Dwelling Units
+ 0.14 Other Employment + 27.56
Truck Attraction
= Truck Trip Production
Internal-External
Attraction
= 0.42 Retail Employment + 0.12 Total Dwelling Units
+ 0.13 Hotel-Motel Units + 0.0.1 Other Employment + 24.36
Internal- External
Productions
= Calculated Through the Use of Growth Factors
]JJ. -22-
J
I
I
..
, "
'"
...
..,
...
Ie
3
I
J
I (I) a...
0<(
f z~
~CJ
(f)z
I a: z ~
W Z a:
I-<(~
I 2---1
3: a... B
LLa:
I O~
~~
I 02
I
I
,
I
:z --t-
Conklin ~orter and Holme.
~ P II:NOIMIUI:RS, INC.
110... ( ~ STRfI1
~ n.CRm-' ,Ylrol
TU. ....07 ...:2 =- O-....Y2
rAY- +07 ~1<DO
SCAlE: NTS
DA IT.: 3-20-97
1996 TRAffiC ZONES RGURE
WINTER SPRlNGS TRANSPoFIT A noN STUDY 4
JOEl NO_: W0459.01
I 1 1 _ 7-;
I
I
QUA TS Highway Network Modifications - The micro-computer process selected for use in this
Winter Springs Transportation Study is the TRANPLAN battery of programs as incorporated by the
Florida Department of Transportation into Micro-FSUTMS. This battery of programs was
developed by the Florida Department of Transportation in order to provide a standardized tool to
local planners throughout the state. This model is designed to enable the local planner to utilize the
data files and routines available throughout the State of Florida on micro-computers.
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
1
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
The regional network chosen for use in both Casselberry and Winter Springs was used by Seminole
County in the development of their Transportation Management Program (TMP). This network
required some modifications as zone sizes are extremely large.
Zone StrUcture Modifications - ;r.ri order to conduct the detailed analysis required in this effort,
modifications to the zone structure incorporated above were required. The Seminole County
network and zone structure used as input included only 300 zones for the entire three county region
including 91 zones in Seminole County. The resultant highway network was equally coarse. lbis
network and zone structure was subdivided into new zones compatible with the detailed highway
network previously described. Since the zone structure in Casselberry was previously developed
for a very detailed study, it was retained outside the City of Winter Springs. The resulting network
contained 400 zones with 29 micro-zones within the City of Winter Springs and 86 in the
Casselberry area Micro-zones used in the City of Winter Springs are shown in Figure 4 and those
in Casselberry are provided in the Appendix.
Winter Springs Transportation Network - Since the OUATS basic network was utilized as a skeleton
for the Winter Springs Study, roadways had to be added to the model structure. Existing major
roadways in the planning area are:
1. S.R. 434
2. Tuscawilla Road
3. Red Bug Lake Road
4. S.R. 436
5. U.S. 17-92
6. Seminola Boulevard-Lake Drive
7. S.R.419
8. Winter Park Drive
9. S.R. 426
Roadways added to the Winter Springs Network in this study are:
1. Northern Way
2. Winter Springs Boulevard
3. Dyson Road
4. .Trotwood Boulevard
5. Panama Road
~24-
I
I
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Hayes Road
Moss Road
Edgemon A venue
Sheoah Boulevard
Shepare1 Road
Shore Road
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The complete 1996 network used in this study is shown in Figure 2, 1996 Existing Roadway
Classification and Number of Lanes.
Model Validation
As a means of checking and validating travel inventories, several screenlines are normally defined
which would completely bisect the planning area. Screenlines should follow natural topographic
features and cut as few major streets as possible to minimize the cost of travel inventories which
would be conducted at those points. In the Winter Springs planning area, there are three screenlines.
Screenline A runs east-west, and Screenlines B and C run north-south. These screenlines are shown
in Figure 5.
Model validation was accomplished by loading of the current trip table (1996) on the network (see
Appendix for Traffic Assignment Node Map) and comparing assigned voltunes to observed volumes
as determined by traffic counts. The FSUlMSffRANPLAN computer programs examine the paths
from origin to destination to determine which links are used and then accumulates trips from the
origins to destinations on the links. Capacity restraint was used in the process of calibration to
change link speeds in response to loaded volumes with the objective of providing realistic
assignments. The files necessary to reproduce the 1996 E + C and 2010 traffic are shown in Tables -
10, 11 and 12, provided to the City along with the [mal report.
An Equilibrium Assignment (FSUlMS) was used to have a more balanced loading on the network.
Table 13 shows the screenline results on screenlines A, Band C in the Winter Springs area The
overall amount of trips are correct with very slight differences on both north-south and east-west
screenlines. As can be seen from Figure 6, most links in the Winter Springs network had very
acceptable assignment loadings.
I
1}r-2S-
I
-<t
t<)
-<t
ci
u)
(D-
-
. en
ci
~ ~
a w
~
w <{
~ ---l
<{ C)
-J
:::J
CD
a
w
~
Conklin ~orter and Holmes
~ ~ ENQINE~RS, INC.
O 1104 E ROBINSON STREET
ORlANDO. FLORIDA 32801
TEL 407 425-0452
FAX 407 54<1-1035
SCALE: NTS
DATE: 3-20-97
SCREENUNES MODEL V ALIDA TlON 1996
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORT A TlON STUDY
FIGURE
5
JOB NO.: W04-59.01
111- 26
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
J
r
r
!
File Name
LINKS.WSE
GRVTOT96.PRN
HASSIGN.WSE
File Name
LINKSEC. WSE .
GRVTOTEC.PRN
HASSIGN.WEC
File Name
LINKS 1 O. WSE
GRVTOTIO.WSP
HASSIGN.W8P
Table 10
MODEL VALIDATION FILES
(fRANPLAN)/(FSUTMS)
Table 11
E & C FILES
(TRANPLAN)/(FSUTMS)
Table 12
2010 FILES
(TRANPLAN)/(FSUTMS)
-27-
Content
1996 Road Network
Gravity Model-Input
1996 Assignment
Content
1996 + Committed Road
Network
Gravity Model-Input
1996 + Committed
Assignment
- Content
2010 Road Network
. Gravity Model-Input
2010 Assignment
I
I vi
~z r: ~
I I z
,.---..
00
00
to r')
.0.0
~ ~
~
O~
O""<f"
10.,..:
~
I
w
-'~
w=>
0-'
00
~>
~~
tF
<~
~~
o a u
~ g~g
woo
-' -
,.....
00
00'
[IJO
rici
C'lC'l
~
,.....
01")
010
0110
10&0
..... ~
~
,.....
00
00 .
10 to a::
.,..: c-i 0
or- ..:::. UJ
::,c
-<(
-'
0"""
0C'{
101'
-~
::e,
Cl
a:: ,.....
o~
w :5:5
::; ,,;-.i
~ ;;.) I")
~
<:>
::::>
m
Cl
w
a::
Conklin ~orter and Holmelll
~ ~ ENOIJUUIRS, INC.
, t o...t. ( RQBlN SC1'l S m(a
CA\....ANDO. F"IJ:R10A )1001
Tn 407 42=>-~
fAX +07 ~JQ3.0
SCALE: N 15
COMPARlSON OF EXlSTlNG AND
COMPUTER ASSJGNED VOLUMES
WlmER SPRJNGS TRANSPORT A 1100 STUDY
RGURE
6
DATE: 3-]1-97
JOB ~W.: 11'04-59.01
J 1 J -? .'3
I
I
I
Table 13
SCREENLINE COMPARISONS
1996 MODEL VALIDATION
(Average Daily Traffic)
Screenline
Model
~
Traffic
Dllin1
Percent
Validated
AA
BB
CC
25,600
67,600
61,300
25,141
69,029
61,713
1.02
0.98
0.99
I
I
I
I
I
Plan Development
In order to detail the transportation improvements that are needed in a particular area, the future
demand for transportation facilities must be quantified. This is normally done by using forecasts of
future socioeconomic activity to generate future trip making potential. These. trips are then assigned
to a network in order to detennine the transportation facilities necessary to meet these demands.
Socioeconomic Forecast - The basis for the forecast of socioeconomic (SE) data for the 1996 Winter
Springs Transportation Study outside the City are similar forecasts that are available from OUA TS.
Seminole County also has base year (1995), and 2001 data by OUATS TAZ. The forecasts for
Winter Springs micro-zones were developed by the consultant with the cooperation of the City of
Winter Springs.
The 1996 Winter Springs Transportation Study involved the creation of29 micro-zones within the
City as previously described. These micro-zones permitted the kind of detailed analysis of
socioeconomic growth that is critical to the detailed forecasts of future traffic that was required in
order to fully measure transportation impacts on municipal collector streets. This type of detailed
analysis was accomplished for the micro-zones within the city and changes to the previously
published socioeconomic projections for the city resulted. The fi.na1201 0 forecast of socioeconomic
~ta for the 29 micro-zones within the city is provided in the Appendix. It is important to understand
that this 2010 city projection is based on cmrent vested projects, approved PUDs and growth trends.
It does not assume a high density urban center at S.R. 434 and Tuscawilla Road. 2010 BE data for
the other zones within the region were taken from the OUA TS.
Test Highway Network - The 2010 test network was developed by the City in an attempt to
accommodate the type of 20 I 0 development described above and quantified with SE data in the
Appendix. This network incorporated all of the programmed improvements from the FDOT and
Seminole County as well as modifications to the 2010 Future Traffic Circulation Map (see
Dl-29-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
J
l
I
Appendix) to respond to the change in land development assumptions and minimize the impact on
residential areas as provided for in the Transportation Goals, Objectives and Policies, previously
described. This test network is illustrated in Figure 7.
An analysis of the assignment of Year 2010 trips to this network is provided in Table 14. It is clear
that LOS D will be exceeded on some major segments and several transportation improvements are
required in the Winter Springs study area in order to satisfy future traffic demands. These needed
improvements are primarily on the arterial system and the responsibility for making most of these
improvements has been undertaken by either the Florida Department of Transportation or Seminole
County. However, this test assignment also indicates that some improvements are needed on the
local street system. These improvements are the responsibility of the City.
Final Transportation Plan
The results of the assignments to the Test Highway Network were analyzed in order to develop a
final plan that represents the roadway improvements required in the City of Winter Springs and the
study area by 2010 (see Figure 8). These include improvements committed to by FDOT (5 Yr. Plan),
those committed to by Seminole County and in the OUATS 2010 update. These are shown in Table
6. Those improvements needed within the City Limits that are funded by sources other than the City
are shown in Table 15. Projects that are the City's responsibility are shown in Table 16.
JIl30-
I
I
I
-----2: Z ~
I
(/)
t..-:
z
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(1101)
^ VM.l138 Ntl31SV3
II)
II) W
W Z II)
~ z -<( ~
~ :s ~ :s
...J 0:: W 0
~ e ~ ~
~ III
ci
0::
~ W
a ::.::
-<(
w ...J
~ C>
-<( ::>
-J en
0
w
0::
G6-~l
.S"n
Conklin ~orter and Holmes
~ ~ IlINOlNIZIIRSJ, INC.
1104 ( ROBlHSOH $'1R'(IT
C1ltANDO. FHJRlOA )1001
TO. 407 "2~~1
fAX .t.(J7 ~IO.)O
SCALE: NTS
D^ 1E: 7-31-97
2010 TEST HIGHWAY NETWORK
'NlNTER SPRINGS TRANSPORT A TlON STUDY
RGURE
7
JOB NO.: 'l\C459.01
1JI.J2
........ --- - - - - - - - - .... - - - - - - ... I!III:IIII
TABLE 14 (2 of 3)
YEAR 2010 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH 2010 NETWORK
ROADWAY FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS 0 MODEL VIC MODEL
LANES CLASS DAlLY DAlLY RATIO DAlL Y
CAPACITY VOLUME LOS
MOSS ROAD S.R. 434 C.R.419 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 14,100 0.62 0
NORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD TUSCORA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 6,100 0.60 0
NORTHERN WAY TUSCORA DR. VISTAVILLA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,200 0.31 C
NORTHERN WAY VISTAVILLA DR. WINTER SPG BLVD-E 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,600 0.35 C
NORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD WINTER SPG BLVD-S 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,500 0.25 C
NOltTHERN WAY WINTER SPG BLVD SHETLAND AVE. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,600 0.35 C
NORTHERN WAY SHETI.AND AVE. GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,900 0.38 C
NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN. WINTER SPRG BLVD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,200 0.22 C
TROT WOOD BLVD TUSKA WILLA RD. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,500 0.44 C
WINTER SPG BLVD TUSKAWILLA RD. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 8,500 0.83 0
WINTER SPG OLVD NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,600 0.55 0
WINTER spa BLVD GREENBRIAR LN. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,000 0.49 C
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY NORTHER1" WAY 3 COLLECTOR 12,000 11,100 0.93 D
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY S.R.426 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 11,900 0.53 0
PANAMA ROAD EDGEMON AVE. MOSS ROAD 2 COLLECTOR' 10,200 9,100 0.89 0
PANAMA ROAD MOSS ROAD SHORE ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,300 0.13 C
IIA YES ROAD BAHAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,000 0.28 C
HA YES ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 6,600 0.65 0
DOl.PIIIN ROAD MOSS ROAD HA YES ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,700 0.26 C
FISHER ROAD EAST LAKE DRIVE PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,400 0.14 C
11I.33
-
(3 of 3)
TABLE 14
YEAR 2010 ROADWAY LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH 2010 NETWORK
ROADW A Y FROM Tq NO. OF ROADWAY . LOS D MODEL VIC MODEL
LANES CLASS DAILY DAILY RATIO DAlL Y
CAPACITY VOLUME LOS
TUSCORA DruVE NORTHERN WAY S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10.200 2,700 . 0.27 C
VISTA WILLA DR. NORTHERN WAY S.R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,000 0.39 C
GREENORIAR LN. NORTHERN WAY WJNTERSPRG BLVD. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,500 0.15 C
DYSON DR. TUSCA WILLA RD. SHETLAND AVE. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,600 0.26 C
SHETLAND AVE. RED Bua LAKE RD DYSON DRJVE 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,500 0.34 C
SHETLAND AVE. DYSON DRIVE NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,000 0.49 C
EDGEMON AVE. SEMINOLA BLVD PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 9,100 0.89 D
EDGEMON AVE. SHEPARD ROAD S.R.419 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,300 0.42 C
EDGEMON AVE. S.R. 434 SHEPARD ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,600 0.39 D
11I.34
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I lI1
-----=:::.E-Z ~ C ~
I Z
>-
g:
w
:2
w 0
~ ...........w
-< --.J~ (1l0l)
Z -<(
(/) (/) (/) :;( ZZ
W <.:>0 ^ VMiTI8 N~SV3 1
w w Z (/) 0::
z (J) z w z -i=
-<( w -<( 0 0 (/)u
-<( --.J Z "
--.J Z --.J -<( ~ V> ow
I- -<( W --.J Z z ~lQ
--.J 0:: w 0
:r: ::::> 5 ~
<.:> x 0 ~ ~ -<( x ~~
W Vi lJ... a.. w
. I I I I
. I
0 . 10-
z
w . 1
<.:>
~ . I
~
t')
~
ci
a::
ci w
c ~
-<
W --.J
~ <.:>
-J :::>
CD
c
w
a::
.
2'6'~ .
<.( ~
~/).. ~
.~
I')
~
a::
-....;
--.
G6~-l !fit.,
S.n
Conklin horter and Holme~
~ ~ IIJtQINURS. INC.
111)4 ( ROOH SOH S1RITT
Cfl\N<DO. flCfODA 32=
Tn. 407 "'2~
FA.X 4-(J7 ~lQ..)O
SCALE: NTS
DATE: 7-31-97
2010 NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS PLAN RGURE
WlNTER SPRINGS TRANSPORT A ~ STUDY 8
.:ce NO_, 'M)~9.01
III-JS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
!
Table 15
CITY 2010 ROAD NEEDS
DEVELOPER AND OTHER FUNDING
(Inside City Limits)
Developer
1. Connect Shepard Road to Edgemon A venue.
2. Improve Tuskawilla Road north ofS.R. 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue).
3. Improve Spring Avenue with drainage and paving improvements.
County
1. Improve TuscawiIla Road from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes.
2. Improve Shepard Road to three (3) lanes from U.S. 17-92 to Sheoab Boulevard.
3. Improve East Lake Drive from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes.
State
1. Improve U.S. 17-92 from Seminola Boulevard to S.R. 419 from four (4) lanes to eight (8)
lanes.
2. Improve S.R. 434 from U.S. 17-92 to Moss Road from five (5) lanes to seven (7) lanes.
3. . Improve S.R. 434 from S.R. 419 to Eastern Beltway from four (4) lanes to six (6) lanes.
4. Improve S.R. 419 from S.R. 434 to U.S. 17-92 from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes.
I11-36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
1
Table 16
CITY 2010 ROAD NEEDS
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FUNDING
Phase I
The following improvements should be undertaken by the City at the earliest possible date:
1. Improve Panama Road from Moss Road to Edgemon Avenue.
2. Improve Hayes Road north of Bahama Road to existing paving on Hayes.
3. Improve Moss Road from Panama Road north to existing paving on Moss Road.
4. Replace Hayes Road bridge.
5. . Replace Moss Road bridge.
Phase n
1. Paving and drainage improvements to Bahama Road from Shore Road to Hayes Road.
2. Paving and drainage improvements to Panama Road from Shore Road to Moss Road.
3. Paving and drainage improvements to Fisher Road from Panama Road to City Limits.
4. Add stacking lanes to Hayes Road at the S.R. 434 intersection.
Phase In
1. Upgrade Moss Road from S.R. 434 to S.R. 419 from two lanes to four lanes.
Phase IV
1. Improve Winter Springs Boulevard to three lane capability from Northern Way to Northern
Way (east section). This will be accomplished by adding turn lanes at each intersection for
both traffic flow directions.
IJl-37
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I-
I
~
I
Table 16
(Continued)
New Traffic Signals
The following traffic signals on major intersections should be installed when warranted by using lTE
standards. Signals shall be constructed using County mast arm standards:
1. S.R. 434 & Tuscora Drive
2. S.R 434 & Vista Willa Drive
3. S.R 419 & Edgemon Avenue
4. S.R 419 & Moss Road
The following traffic signals on minor intersections should be installed when warranted by using ITE
standards. Signals shall be constructed using Seminole County mast arm standards:
1. . Moss Road & Dolphin
2. Winter Springs Boulevard & Northern Way (westernmost)
3. ~orthern Way & Shetland Avenue
4. Northern Way & Tuscora Drive
5. Northern Way & Vista Willa Drive
6. Trotwood Boulevard & Northern Way
7. Edgemon Avenue & Shepard Road
8. Winter Springs Boulevard & Northern Way (easternmost)
1I1-38
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHAPTER IV
CONCURRENCY PLANNING
In 1985, the Florida Legislature adopted the "Growth Management Act," (Florida Statutes, Chp. 163)
to provide a framework for local governments to use as they develop or modify their long-range
Comprehensive Plans. One of the major provisions of this Act required local governments to insure
that the public facilities and services that are necessary to support development, be available
"concurrent" with the impacts of development. This means that all new development must be
located where existing services are available or where there are plans and funds to provide these
. services. It is understood that the Winter Springs City Commission intends to pass a concurrency
management ordinance in compliance with this requirement.
OBJECTIVE OF TIllS REVIEW
As of this date, the City of Winter Springs has not monitored traffic impacts from new development
since ~doption of the Comprehensive Plan; thus, approved (vested) development traffic mayor may
not be under the Level of Service (LOS) threshold established in the Comprehensive Plan. To
determine whether existing and committed (funded for construction within three years)
transportation facilities can accommodate existing and approved development, a comparison of
existing and committed traffic to adopted roadway capacities was accomplished. Since traffic
studies have not been required for new development, it was necessary to simulate this vested
(committed) traffic using traffic models calibrated for the City of Winter Springs (Chapter llI).
These models require socioeconomic data by traffic zone for the existing plus committed (E+C)
development This data was developed by the Consultant from data provided by the City (see Table
17), and the application of the model resulted in an assignment of E+C traffic to the system of
arterial and collector roads in the Winter Springs Area.
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
Since the traffic model results are in Average Daily Traffic (ADT), daily capacity was used for this
analysis. Peak hour traffic must be used in intersection analysis and for traffic impact studies (see
. following section). Where capacity is not available using ADT values, the applicant must show that
. peak hour traffic generated by the development will not cause any roadway link or intersection to
exceed the LOS provided for in the Comprehensive Plan (LOS D). '
Table 18 shows the status of each link in the City of Winter Springs as of the end of 1996. Those
links showing a negative " Available Capacity" will require widening before additional development
traffic can--.be accommodated. In some instances, it may be possible to accommodate the
development using a peak hour analysis which must be performed by the applicant. ADT traffic
IV -I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
values shown in Table 18 may be converting to peak hour using factors developed by FDOT' in their
derivation of LOS 0 Capacity.
The information in Table 18 (as updated) may be given to development applicants. It is understood
that as developments are approved, the table should be updated by adding traffic (ADT) obtained
from a Traffic Study Report. The table should be fully updated every two (2) years with new traffic
counts and E+C traffic either from the model or manually by deleting that portion of each project's
traffic that is builtout.
TRAFFIC llvIP ACT REPORTS FOR CONCURRENCY AND MITIGA nON
It is the intent of the City Commission to responsibly monitor growth and development in order to
ensure that adequate public facilities are in-place to se:ve new development, and that such facilities
perform at adopted levels of service so defined in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
In order to assess and monitor the impact of new development and comply with concurrency
requirements, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required for all new development, with the
exception of that provided by ordinance. The TIA will be used to determine the extent of site related
traffic improvements, mitigation for off-site improvements, and will be used as the basis for
concurrency determinations.
For proposed developments that will add 300 or more new Average Daily Traffic (ADT) to adjacent
roads, the TIA will provide a comprehensive assessment of the development's impact on the
surrOWlding road system. For proposed developments that will add less than 300 new ADT, the TIA
shall provide information regarding the development's impact on access points onto the adjacent
street system.
All developments with more than 300 ADT (''New Trips") shall be required to demonstrate that the
additional. vehicle trips generated by such development would not cause any road segment or
interSectiQn within the distances shown. in Table 1 (primary impact area) to exceed the Levels of
Service (LOS) as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and under Objective D given in Chapter ill.
The primary impact area shall be determined by drawing a circle with a center point at the centerline
of each development's access point(s), using the appropriate radius as provided in Table 1 based on
. the estimated ''New'' ADT. Any arterial or collector intersection that is captured within the primary
. impact area must be evaluated and shall be the starting point for a road segment that must also be
evaluated; except that any intersection which cannot be reached by normal driving practices on a
paved access from the development's access point may be excluded from the evaluation.
I Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning, FDOT 1995
(or as updated), See Table [-1.
rv-2
----.................------...--__1'iII!!l
TABLE 17
H
<
I
w
October 1996 City of Winter Springs Existing Plus Committed 'Socioeconomics Data
Seminole Subzone Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Total School School
County Single Multi-Family Industrial Commercial Service Employment Enrollment Enrollment
Traffic Zone Family DU DU Emolovment Employment Emolovment K-8 9..12
70 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
776 60 0 0 0 0 0 0
72 72 113 0 0 0 0 0 0
778 468 0 0 0 15 15 0
82 82 1371 0 0 9 30 39 0
83 83 545 0 0 . 104 0 104 0
780 127 0 10 0 10 20 0
781 1005 0 0 30 0 30 0
782 129 0 0 0 0 0 0
84 84 92 0 72 0 57 139 0
783 243 460 166 10 54 230 2458
85 85 0 0 0 28 0 26 0
86 86 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
785 25 0 0 54 0 54 0 2715
87 87 260 0 o . 6 72 78 0
786 473 0 0 0 0 0 0
787 557 0 0 0 0 0 0
88 88 130 0 0 0 11 11 0
788 498 0 0 0 0 0 0
789 103 0 0 0 0 0 0
89 89 170 0 0 3 8 11 0
90 90 370 0 0 11 55 86 0
790 447 - 32 0 40 0 40 0
791 349 157 0 0 0 0 0
91 91 962 40 0 96 0 95 1280
92 92 633 392 6 124 369 499 0
93 93 2 0 412 8 27 447 0
94 94 461 622 1340 531 568 2439 815
95 95 350 1066 110 227 457 794 0
TOTALS: 9946 2769 2116 1281 1733 5157 4553 2715
- - - ~ --- - - - .... - - - - -- ClmI
TABLE 18 (I o(3)
WINTER SPRINGS
E + C SYSTEM CAPACITY ANALYSIS
(A VERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC)
ROt\DW A Y FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D 1996 1996 E&C NEW AVAILABLE TRIPS
LANES CLASS DAILY COUNT COMMITTED TRAFFIC TRIPS CAPACITY THIS
(E &C) CAPACITY (E) TRAFFIC SINCE PROJECT
(C) 1996
U.S. 17.92 S.R. 434 SHEPARD RD. ' 0 ARTERIAL 47,500 36,123 4,271 40,394 7.108
U.S. \7.92 SHEPARD RD. C.R. 419 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 36,123 4,010 40,133 .9.035
S.R.434 U.S. 17.92 C.R. 419 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 24,842 3,996 28,890 2,210
S.R.434 C.R,419 TUSKAWILLA RD 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 24,752 5,509 30,258 844
S.R.04 TUSKAWILLA RD EASTERN BEL TwA Y 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 16,552 7,478 24,030 7.070
S.R.419 U.S. 17.92 EDGEMON AVE. 2 ARTERIAL 14,300 15,553 2,541 18,094 3.792
S.R.419 EDGEMON AVE. S.R. 43-4 2 ARTERIAL 14,300 12,271 1,274 13,545 755
E. LAKE DRIVE SEMINOLA BLVD FISHER ROAD 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 12,617 8,596 19,213 3.387
E. LAKE DRIVE FISHER ROAD TUSKAWILLA RD. 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 9,472 6,626 . 16,296 8,302
TUSKAWILLA RD. RED BUG LK RD EAGLE BLVD. 4 ARTERIAL 31,000 25,396 11,400 36,793 .5,~93
TUSKAWILLA RD. EAGLE BLVD. E. LAKE DRIVE 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 24,573 10,470 35,043 ~.043
TUSKAWILLA RD, E. LAKE DRIVE WINTER SPGS. BLVD 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 16,572 5,164 21,756 9.2H
TUSKAWILLA RD. WINTER SPGS BLVD TROTWOOD BLVD 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 16,071 2,374 16,441 12,559
TUSKAWILLA RD. TROTWOOD BLVD. S.R. 434 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 12,056 2,269 14,327 18.873
SHEPARD RD. U.S. 17.92 SHEOAH BLVD. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,061 60 3,141 7.059
SIiEOAH BLVD. SHEPARD RD. S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,631 1,060 6,941 3,259
BAKAMA ROAD HAYES ROAD WINDING HOLLOW 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 Dirt N1A
BL
MOSS ROAD PANAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 Dirt N1A
MOSS ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,707 606 5,315 ~.885
IV-4
~ .......- - - - - ... ..... --- - .... - .... .... --
- - - ....
TABLE 18 (2 of 3)
WINTER SPRINGS
E + C SYSTEM CAPACITY ANALYSIS
(AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC)
ROADWAY FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOSD 1996 1996 E&C NEW AVAILABLE TRIPS
LANES CLASS DAILY COUNT COMMITIED TRAFFIC TRIPS CAPACITY THIS
(E&C) CAPACITY (E) TRAFFIC SINCE PROJ::CT
(C) 1996
I.\OSS ROAD S,R, 434 C.R. 419 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 2,431 1,589 4,020 , 8,580
~IORTHER~1 WAY TROTWOOD BLVD TUSCORA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,500 84 2,584 7,616
tWRTHERN WAY TUSCORA DR. VISTAVILLA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,500 900 3,400 ' 6,800
tWRTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD WINTER SPG BLVD.S 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,868 129 1.997 8,203
NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPG. BLVD SHETLAND AVENUE 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,736 1,572 4,304 5,898
NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN. WINTER SPRG BLVD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,991 530 2,521 7,679
TROTWOOD BLVD TUSKAWILLA RD. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,121 906 5,027 5,173
WINTER SPG BLVD TUSKAWILLA RD. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 7,384 2,448 9,832 368
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 6,099 1,226 7,324 2.876
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 7,28-4 430 7,714 2.~86
WitHER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY S.R. 426 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 12,260 301 12,561 10.039
PANAMA ROAD EDGEMON AVE. MOSS ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 DIRT N/A
PAlJAI.V\ ROAD MOSS ROAD SHORE ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 DIRT NJA
HAYES ROAD BAfWM ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 DIRT NJA
HAYES ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,361 460 384 6,359
DOLPHIN ROAD MOSS ROAD HAYES ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 241 35 276 9,924
FISHER ROAD EAST LAKE ORNE PANNM ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,267 218 1,465 8.7'5
IY.S
~
{UImI
--
-
~
-
'-
~
-
-
..
-
-
-
-
-
..
11II
-
TABLE 18
WINTER SPRINGS
E + C SYSTEM CAPACITY ANALYSIS
(AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC)
(3 of 3)
ROADWAY FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D 1996 1996 E&C NEW AVAILABLE TRIPS
LANES CLASS DAILY COUNT COMMITIED TRAFFIC TRIPS CAPACITY THIS
(E&C) CAPACITY (E) TRAFFIC SINCE PROJECT
(C) 1996
SHORE ROAD PANAMA ROAD END 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 ~25 170 595 . Q,605
EAGLE RIDGE RD. BAHAMA ROAD S.R. <43<4 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 NOT OPEN
TUSCORA DRIVE NORTHERN WAY S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 765 2,127 2,692 7.308
VIST AWILLA OR. NORTHERN WAY S.R.<43<4 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,410 17<4 1,564 8.618
GREEtHJRlAR LN. NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRG BLVD. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,141 20 1.161 Q,03Q
DYSON OR. TUSCAWILLA RD. SHETLAND AVE, 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,262 281 3,543 8,657
SHETLAND AVE, DYSON DRIVE NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,474 125 4,599 5.601
EDGEMON AVE. E, LAKE DRIVE MOSS ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,77<4 49 2,823 7,377
EDGEMON AVE. SHEPARD ROAD S.R.419 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,~80 365 2,8<45 7,355
IV.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 19
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PRIMARY IMPACf AREA
FOR
TRAFFICIMPACf ANALYSIS (TIA)
(DEVELOPMENTS WITH 300 OR MORE ADT)
DAILY NEW TRIPS (AD1Y
GENERA TED
PRIMARY IMPACT AREA
(RADIDS)
300-1500
1501-5000
5001-10,000
10,001 +
Y:z-mile
1 mile
2 miles
3 miles
.'
2Total and "Passer-by" trips to be determined from the latest edition of Trip Generation,
Institute of Transportation Engineers or "M.icrotrans" software (Equations if available). ''New
Trips" include trips ends above those generated by existing use (parcel must be occupied within
last 5 years to qualify as existing) less "passer-by" trips.
fY-7
I
I
Definitions
I
The following terms are used to help specify the procedures necessary for the TIA:
I
I
I
I
I
I
Methodology Meeting - This is a meeting with the City of Winter Springs Staff to discuss the
methodology that will be used to prepare the TIA. 1b.is meeting is strongly recommended for
projects where the trip generation will be over 300 new daily (ADT). It is also suggested for projects
where new trip generation is under 300 ADT.
Intersection Analysis - Analysis of the Level of Service (LOS) of the intersection using the
"Operations Analysis" as defined by the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (or latest edition).
Site-Related Road Improvements - These are road capital improvements and right-of-way
dedications for direct access improvements to the development in question. These include, but are
not limited to:
I
1. Site Driveways and Roads;
2. Median cuts made necessary by such driveways or roads;
3. Right and left turn deceleration or acceleration lanes, leading to or from those
driveways or roads;
4. Traffic control measures for those driveways or roads;
5. Access or frontage roads not considered in impact fee calculations; and
6. Roads or intersection improvements whose primary purpose at the time of
construction is to provide access to the development.
I
I
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis - This is an analysis of the project's site(s) to verify whether a traffic
signal will be required. It shall include, at a minimum, an investigation of Traffic Signal Warrants
No; 1,2,9 and 11 from the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), latest edition.
This analysis may not be required if it can be shown that the traffic volumes are too.low-to warrant
such analysis. The need for such analyses should be determined in the Methodology Meeting.
J
Turn Lane - This means the width of pavement required to protect the health, safety and welfare of
the public and reduce adverse traffic impacts from turning movements, generated by a development
onto and off of a streeL Such turn lanes would include separate left-turn, right-turn deceleration
lanes, right-turn free-flow traffic lanes, and right-turn acceleration lanes.
I
I
I
"
I
Traffic Generating Development - Land development designed or intended to permit a use of the
land which will contain more dwelling units or floor space than the existing use of the land, or to
otherwise change the use of the land in a manner that increases the generation of vehicular traffic.
Trip End - A one-way movement of vehicular travel from an origin (one trip end) to a destination
(the other trip end). For the purpose of this requirement, "trip" shall have the meaning which it has
IV-8
I
I
in commonly accepted traffic engineering practice.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Trip Generation - The attraction and/or production of trips caused by a given type of land
development, as documented in the current Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) "Trip
Generation" publication, or as calculated using the computer software "Microtrans.tt
Traffic Modeling - The application of a series of mathematical formulae, converted to computer
software, for the purpose of estimating trip generation, trip distribution and traffic assignment to a
system of transportation facilities. Such models, calibrated for Winter Springs, currently in use by
Seminole County, or by the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study (OUATS), may be acceptable
if approved for use in the Methodology Meeting. Other such models will require documentation of
their appropriate application in the Winter Springs area
Pw:pose 'of TIA
The TIA is to identify transportation related impacts on the roadway that are likely to be generated
by a specific proposed development because of type, size, density, trip generation or location. The
TIA will identify access improvements, near-site improvements, and on-site improvements. The
. improvements are defined as follows:
I
1. Access Improvements
Road improvements necessary to provide safe and adequate ingress and egress and
for efficient operations. Access improvements include but are not limited to the
following:
I
I
a.
b.
Right-of-way easements;
Left and right turn lanes;
Acceleration and deceleration lanes;
Traffic control devices, signage and markings; and
Drainage and utilities as they relate to transportation improvements.
c.
d.
e.
J
I
I
I
I'
I
2.
Near-Site Improve~ents
Off-site or near-site improvements may be required in addition to impact fees to
satisfy concurrency requirements within the primary impact area
3.
On-Site Improvements
Road and parking improvements located within the boundaries of the specific parcel
proposed for development and road improvements which provide direct access (turn-
lane,tapers, signalization, etc.) and right-of-way dedication are deemed to be totally
the responsibility of the developer and exclusive of the transportation impact fee.
On-site circulation and parking issues will also be addressed including traffic
TV-9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
controls, pavement markings and traffic safety.
Content of TlA.
A TIA shall be prepared by a qualified Transportation Engineer pursuant to an acceptable
methodology of transportation planning and engineering procedures. It is understood that the report
and/or recommendations would be sealed by a professional engineer, registered in the State of
Florida The expense of preparing the TIA is to be borne solely by the Owner/Developer. The TIA
shall be reviewed for accuracy and content by the City or its representative prior to acceptance. Cost
of such review shall be borne solely by the Owner/Developer.
The TIA shall include the following items and describe the methodology, practices and principles
utilized in determining the findings and recommendations:
Requirements ofTIA with less than 300 new daily trips. The following shall be provided in letter
form with Engineer's seal and appropriate backup tables:
a Number of units (i.e. dwelling units, square feet, etc.);
b. Description of development and ITE category for trip generation;
c. Trip end rates, or equations (to be used if available) used to generate the traffic, and the
source of this information (use of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, latest edition is required
unless otherwise approved or required by the City);
d. Total trips generated for the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and the A.M. and P.M. peak
hours. (The peak hour for adjacent street traffic is usually the most appropriate peak. hour
to use);
e. c An analysis check if turn lanes, traffic signals, or other site related improvements will be
required at the project access points and roads. Turn lane warrants prescribed at the end of
this chapter are required. Turn lane design and length of storage lanes shall be based on
calculated "queue" length and shall conform to FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design
Standards (latest edition).
f. Sight distance triangld shall be plotted and included on site plans being reviewed with this
TIA. Limitation and restrictions within the sight distance triangle shiul be identified and
removed if contained on the property of the applicant.
3Use Index Nos. 545 and 546 ofFDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Standards (latest
edition) or alternative approved by the City.
TV-IO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TlA Requirements for Developments with 300 or More New Daily Trips - In addition to the
information listed above for projects generating less than 300 new trips, the following shall be
provided:
1. Existing Conditions:
a General Site Description - A detailed description of the proposed development
including site location, type of development, projected construction completion date,
and phasing. This section shall also provide a description of the roadway network
for the area under study, right-of-way and pavement widths, signal locations and
slgnage.
b. Discussion of Standards and Analysis Techniques - A detailed discussion of the
proposed analysis methodology, including intersection analysis, roadway capacities
and service volumes.
c. Analysis of Existing Condltions - For all roadways and intersections within the
subject area, the existing average daily traffic, and peak hour traffic volumes shall be
reported, and roadway link analysis and intersection analysis provided. The peak
hour of the generator (development) should be provided as it relates both to the A.M.
and P.M. peak hour of the adjacent street. This discussion should occur at the
methodology meeting and an agreed peak hour(s) determined for the TIA.
I
d.
Programmed Improvements - The analysis shall indicate any programmed
transportation improvements funded for the primary impact area A programmed
improvement is one that has been funded and is contained in a.work program. The
analysis shall indicate what program improvements are assumed in the analysis.
Programmed improvements expected to be under contract more than three (3) years
following the Certificate of Occupancy of this development shall not be used to
determine concurrency.
I
I
I
I
Statement of Project Trip Generation Characteristics - This shall indicate the project's trip
generation characteristics in terms of daily and peak hour generation. Full documentation shall be
provided if the trip generation rate utilized is other than that shown in the most recent ITE Trip
Generation Manual.' Such documentation shall be provided at the methodology meeting and
subsequently approved by the City prior to use. Special trip generation studies may be appropriate;
however, specific procedures, number of studies and location shall be reviewed and concurred in by
the City.
I
I
I
I
Statement of Background Traffic - The analysis shall include background traffic on the adjacent
roadway network. This shall include current traffic counts as well as projection of this base line
traffic to the occupancy date and/or concurrency date. All such growth factors require
documentation and justification. They should be discussed and agreed on at the Methodology
[V-II
I
I
I
Meeting.
I
I"
I
I
Statement of Trip Distribution and Assignment - The TIA shall provide projected trip distribution
with appropriate justification and documentation. The distribution of traffic approaching the
development shall either be based on demographic data, current turning movements in the area, or
"gravity model." The procedure to be included should be discussed and documented in the
Methodology Meeting. The project traffic shall be shown and superimposed over the background
volumes with totals indicated in map and/or table format. ADT and peak hour are required on all
links.
I
I
I
Traffic Impact Analyses - All analyses shall be on a peak hour basis. For intersection and driveway
analyses, turning movements will be required for a LOS analysis. Highway capacity manual
software (HCS or equivalent to be agreed at methodology meeting) would be used for intersection
and driveway access points. Link analysis shall be performed using software available from FDOT
and described in Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning.
Driveway access points as well as intersections within the primary impact area shall be evaluated for
the Levels of Service indicated in the traffic element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Critical
intersections to be analyzed shall be agreed to in the Methodology Meeting. At a "minimum, all
signalized intersections in the primary impact area shall be analyzed. In addition, a roadway link
analysis using the FDOT software shall be developed for all impacted (more than 30 new peak hour
trips) roadways shown in the City's Comprehensive Plan and located within the primary impact area
I
Tables and figures shall include but not be limited to the following:
TABLES
I
I
1.
Proposed Land Use by Phase, Type and Size;
2.
Passerby and/or Diverted Traffic Percentages by Phase and Land Use;
I
3.
Daily Trip Generation by Phase, Land Use, and Size with New Trips and
Passerby/Diverted Trips Separated;
I
I
4.
Peak Hour Trip Generation in the Same Categories as Daily Trip Generation;
and
5.
Trip Distribution - Percentages Approaching the Site by Direction.
FIGURES
I
I
1.
Vicinity Map Showing Site;
2.
Existing Traffic Counts by Link (ADT and Peak Hour);
I
TV-12
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3. Post-Development Peak Hour Traffic (Turning Movements) - Project and
Total Traffic Separated; \
4. Post-Development Daily Traffic; and
5. Recommended Improvements (either listed and described, in table format, or
on a drawing).
Traffic count summary documents and other reference material should be included in a Report
Appendix.
Conclusions and Recommendations - The report shall contain recommended improvements and
mitigating measures made necessary by the proposed development, including but not limited to:
a Road Widening;
b. Provision of turriing, acceleration and deceleration lanes;
c. Si~ization;
d. Regulatory Signage; and
e. New Roadway Construction.
I
I
I
While the payment of impact fees is presumed to mitigate off-site impacts, programmed
improvements (three years) may not be sufficient to accommodate the traffic impact of the project,
thus violating concurrency requirements contained in the Comprehensive Plan. It will be encumbent
upon the applicant to identify such intersections and links of the roadway system where Level of
Service standards will be violated at project buiIdout, or where improvements are planned three years
from the occupancy date of the development. It is understood that in those developments which are
not to be occupied within one year. growth of background traffic before Levels of Service are tested
is required.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TV-I3
I
i
I
TURN LANE POLICY
I
LEFT TURN LANES
I
1.
A left turn lane on the major cross street will be required when any two (2) or more of the
following warrants are satisfied:
I
I
I
I
a.
Posted speed limit is equal to or greater than thirty-five (35) mph.
b.
Number of Left Turn Movements
I. On multi-lane fa~ilities, the number of left turning vehicles from the major
roadway is equal to or weater than fifteen (15) during either the A.M. or PIM. .
peak hour of the major street.
I
I
I
2. On two (2) lane two-way facilities, the number of left turning vehicles from
the major roadway is equal to or greater than ten (10) and the opposing
through traffic volume exceeds three hundred and fifty (350) vehicles during
either the A.M. or P.M. peak hour.
c.
Available Sight Distance
If the available sight distance for left turning vehicles to observe approaching traffic
or for approaching traffic moving in either direction to observe the left turning
vehicle is less than the value shown in Table A-I for the posted speed of the major
street.
d. Access Control
1. The street has been designated as a controlled access facility by Seminole
County, FDOT, or the City of Winter Springs.
2. The roadway is a multi-lane divided facility and there is sufficient room in
the median to allow construction of a left turn lane.
e. Traffic Control
The intersecting minor street or access point driveway is controlled by a traffic signal.
2. Separate left "turn lanes are required on the intersecting minor streets or access point
driveways when any two (2) or more of the following warrants are satisfied:
IV-14
a. Posted Speed Limit
When the posted speed limit of the intersecting street or access point driveway is
equal to or greater than thirty (30) mph.
b. Number of Turning Vehicles
When the number of left turning vehicles from the intersecting street or access point
driveway is equal to or greater than sixty (60) vehicles during either A.M. or P.M.
peak hour of the arterial street.
c. Available Sight Distance
A vailable sight distance is not. an applicable warrant in this case:
d. When the street which is being entered has been designated as a controlled access
facility by Seminole County, FDOT, or the City of Winter Springs.
e. Traffic Control
When the intersecting street or access point driveway is controlled by a traffic signal.
DECELERATION AND RIGHT TURN LANES
I. A deceleration and right turn lane on the major street will be required when any two (2) or
more of the following warrants are satisfied:
a. Posted major street speed limit is equal to or greater than forty (40) mph.
b. Number of right turning movements from the major roadway is equal to or greater
than thirty (30) during either the A.M. or P.M. peak hour of the major street.
C. A vailable Sight Distance
If the available sight distance for a right turning vehicle to be seen 'by through traffic
traveling in the same direction is less than the value shown in Table A-I for the
posted speed limit of the major street.
d. Major street bas been designated as a controlled access facility by Seminole County,
FDOT, or the City of Winter Springs.
TV-15
e. Traffic Control
Intersecting street or access point driveway is controlled by a traffic signal.
2. Separate right turn lanes are required on a minor intersection street or access point driveway
whenever any two (2) or more of the following warrants are satisfied:
a. Posted speed limit of the intersecting or access point driveway is equal to or greater
than thirty (30) mph.
b. Number of right turning vehicles from the intersecting street or access point driveway
is equal to or greater than sixty (60) during either the A.M. or P.M. peak hour of the
major street.
c. Available sight distance is not an applicable warrant in this case.
d. Access Control
If the arterial street which is being entered has been designated as a controlled access
facility by Seminole County, FDOT, or the City of Winter Springs.
e. Traffic Control
1. Intersecting street or access point driveway is controlled by a traffic signal.
2. An acceleration lane is provided on the arterial street and the right turn
movement is not controlled by a yield or stop sign.
fY-16
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
/
TABLE 20
SIGHT DISTANCE FOR TURN LANE POLICY
(Rounded Values)
POSTED SPEED (1\1PH)
20
30
40
50
60
STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE
Minimum (FT) 125 200 275 400 525
Desirable (FT) 200 250 375 475 650
TV-17
- -- lIIIIoIlm
TABLE A-1
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
PUBLIC WORKS - LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX
PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Project Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Project Name Number 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02
Wagners Curve Removal 97 -4411-062 $80 000 $80 000
Public Works Compound 99-4411-063 $60 000 $60.000 $60 000 $60 000 $240 000
Resurfacing 98-4411-064 $150000 $150000 $150.000 $150000 $150000 $750 000
I Underdrains 98-4411-065 $50 000 $50 000 $50,000 $150000
ITOTAL ; $280 000 $210000 $260 000 $210000 $260,000 $1 220000 $0
I
PROPOSED PROJECT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
::-
"0
"0
"
:J
r:'-
,..,"
:-<
Project Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Revenue Source Number 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02
Local Option Gas Tax 97 -4411-062 $80 000 $80 000
Local Option Gas Tax 99-4411-063 $60 000 $60.000 $60 000 $60 000 $240 000
Local Option Gas Tax 98-4411-064 $150000 $150000 $150000 $150000 $150.000 $750 000
Local Option Gas Tax 98-4411-065 $50 000 $50 000 $50.000 $150 000
TOTAL $280 000 $210,000 $260 000 $210000 $260,000 $1 220000 $0
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURES BY YEAR
Project \ Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Equipment Name Number 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02
Vehicle 98-4411-066 $26,000 $20 500 $21.000 $67 500
TOTAL $26 000 $20 500 $0 $21 000 $0 $67 500 $0
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT REVENUE SOURCE BY YEAR
Project ; Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Vear 4 Year 5 Total Prior
Revenue Source Number " 97/98 98/99 . 99/00 00/01 01/02
Local Option Gas Tax 98-4411-066 $26 000 $20 500 $21,000 $67 500
TOTAL $26 000 $20 500 $0 $21.000 $0 $67 500 $0
-
-
-
-
-
-
E!
Qm
TABLE A-2
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX
Historical Data
FY 91 FY 92 FY 93 FY 94 FY 95 FY96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 2000
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTION
REVENUES:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES $268,779 $245,312 $237,753 $205,765 $221,816 $224,256 $245,644 $257,926 $270,822 $284,363
INTEREST "$35,483 $31,427 $13,261 $26,604 $30,451 $17,000 $25,000 $20,000 $20,000 S20,OOO
MISCELLANEOUS SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO SO
TOTAL REVENUES $304,262 $276,739 $251,0104 $232,369 $252,267 $241,256 $270,644 $277,926 5290,822 $ 304 ,36 3
PERCENT INCREASE 5.14% -9.05% -9.30% .7.43% 8.56% -4.36% 10.11% 4,62% 4,64% 4.66%
> RECURRING EXPENSES: $30,073 $19,901 $24,913 $28,556 $96,028 $197,500 $50,000 $75,000 $15,000 $75,000
'tJ
'tJ
!l S355,147 $344,804
g-, RECURRING CAPITAL OUTLAY $165,872 $366,256 $228,259 $0 $258.050 $250,000 $200,000 $200,000
><
,
"J
TOTAL EXPENSES $195,945 $386,157 $253,172 $28,556 $451,175 $542,304 $308,050 $325,000 $275,000 $275,000
PERCENT INCREASE 3.H% 97.07% -34.44% -88.72% 1479.97% 20,20% -43.20% 5.50% -15.38% 0.00%
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENSES $108,317 ($109,418) ($2,158) $203,813 ($ 198,908) ($301,048) ($37,406) ($47,074) $15,822 $29,363
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $505,352 $613,669 $504,251 $502,093 $705,906 $506,998 $205,950 $168,544 $12U70 $137,292
ENDING FUND BALANCE $613,669 $504,251 $502,093 $705,906 $506,998 $205,950 $168,544 $121,470 $137,292 $166,655
- - - _ ar:mJ mii!a
TABLE A-3
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND
FROM ANNUAL AUDIT
"
FY 93/94 FY 94/95
Actual Actual
Revenues:
Taxes
Fees' $571,213 $278,084
Intergovernmental revenues
Fines and forfeitures
Interest $32,495 $79,851
Miscellaneous
Total revenues $603,708 $357,935
).
"0 Expenditures:
"0
9 Current
&.
~ General government
w
Public safety
Transportation $10,444 $290
Capital outlay $107,297 $78,792 ,
, Total expenditures $117,741 $79,082
Excess (Dericlency) of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures $485,967 $278,853
Other Financing Sources (Uses):
Operating transfers In
Operating transfers out
Total other financing sources (uses)
Excess of Revenues and Other Financing Sources.
Over (Under) Expenditures and Other Uses $485,967 $278,853
Fund Balances, October 1, 1993/94 $1,109,406 $1,595,373
Fund Balances, September 30, 1994/95 $1,595,373 $1,874,226
---~-BiiI5llmm~
TABLE A-4
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
FINAL BUDGET FIGURES
JRANSPORTATIONIMPACTFEES
REVENUES & EXPENDITURES (UNAUDITED)
Description at Revenue
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND
Impact Fees Collected .
Interest Earned
Amended "To Date
FY 95/96 FY 96/97 FY 96/97
Actual Budget Actual
$282,993 $310,436 $158,121
$91,583 $50,900 $39,903
$374,576 $361,336 $198,024
$0 $1,470,164 $268,765
$374,576 $1 ,831,500 $466,789
TOTAL TRANSP. IMPACT FEE REVENUE
APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE REVENUES
.{; AND APPROPRIATION FROM FUND BALANCE
u
g
~ Account No. Description of Expenditure
1:. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND
53180 Consulting Services
54620 Signalization
56310 Capital Improvements
56930 Reserves
$92,613 $107,000 $77,111
$0 $21,000 $0
$0 $1,703,500 $399,678
$0 $0 SO
$92,613 $1,831,500 $466,789
$281,963 $0 $0
$374,576 $1,831,500 $466,789
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
APPROPRIATION TO FUND BALANCE
TOTAL EXPENSE AND APPROPRIATION
TO FUND BALANCE
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
FUND BALANCE - October 1...
Appropriations to (from) Fund Balance
FUND BALANCE - September 30,
$1,874,226
$281,963
$2,156,189
$2,156,189
($1,470,164)
$686,025
$2,156,189
($268,765)
$1,887,424
. To Date: 4/15/97
.ts'
]
5-
!;(,
I
V>
------......-...--........
TAULE A-5
October 1996 City of Winter Springs Existing Socioeconomics Data
Seminole Subzone Existing Existing Existing Existing Existing Total School School
County Single Multi-Family Industrial Commercial' Service Employment Enrollment Enrollment
Traffic Zone Family DU DU Emoloyment Employment Emoloyment K-8 9-12
.,
70 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
776 60 0 0 0 0 0 0
72 72 113 0 0 0 0 0 0
778 454 0 0 0 15 15 0
82 82 1132 0 0 9 30 39 0
83 83 545 0 0 104 0 104 0
780 120 0 10 0, 10 20 0
781 940 0 0 30 0 30 0
782 129 0 0 0 0 0 0
84 84 44 0 72 0 67 139 0
783 243 388 166 10 54 230 2450'
85 85 O. 0 0 26 0 26 0
86 86 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
, 785 25 0 0 54 0 54 0 2715
87 87 97 0 0 6 72 78 0
786 473 0 0 0 0 0 0
787 370 0 0 0 0 0 0
88 88 20 0 0 0 11 11 0
788 477 0 0 0 0 0 0
789 103 0 0 0 0 0 0
89 89 156 0 0 3 8 11 0
90 90 359 0 0 11 55 66 0
790 441 32 0 40 0 40 0
791 227 157 0 0 0 0 0
91 91 955 40 0 96 0 96 1200
92 92 633 392 6 124 304 434 0
93 93 2 0 412 8 27 447 0
94 94 449 622 1340 "531 568 2439 815
95 95' 327 796 110 227 457 794 0
TOTALS: 8897 2427 2116 1279 1678 5073 4465 27'15
f
t
~
-----8ammJlDm
TABLE A-6
City of Winter Springs 2010 Socioeconomics Data Projections
Seminole Subzone Existing ExlsUng Existing Existing Existing Total School School
County Single Multi-Family Industrial Commercial Service Employment Enrollment Enrollment
Traffic Zone Family DU DU Employment Employment Employment K-8 9-12
70 71 62 100 0 100 0 100 0
776' 118 40 0 100 0 100 0
72 72 346 0 0 640 0 1328 0
778 468 0 0 0 30 30 0
82 82 1371 16 0 9 30 39 0
83 83 585 0 0 104 0 104 0
780 127 0 15 0 325 340 0
781 1031 0 0 30 0 30 0
782 129 0 0 0 0 0 0
84 84 92 0 72 0 67 139 0
783 243 460 166 10 54 230 2458
85 85 31 0 26 1080 72 1178 0
86 86 89 140 12 100 0 112 0
785 107 106 0 54 0 54 0 2715
87 87 260 0 0 6 11 17 0
786 473 0 0 0 0 0 0
787 557 0 161 0 11 172 0
88 88 130 0 0 0 8 8 0
788 498 0 0 0 0 0 0
789 103 0 0 0 0 0 0
89 89 170 0 0 0 8 8 0
90 90 370 0 0 11 55 66 0
790 447 32 0 63 0 63 0
791 349 157 0 0 0 0 0
91 91 962 40 86 96 65 182 1200
92 92 633 392 213 124 369 706 0
93 93 2 0 1344 8 27 1379 0
94 94 461 622 1340 531 568 2439 1000
95 95 350 1066 695 227 457 1379 0
TOTALS: 10564 3171 4130 3293 2157 10203 4658 2715
I
I
I
f
f
I
[
TABLE A-7
WINTER SPRINGS
TRAFFIC ZONE CONVERSION
INDEX
Planning Data
Zone (Fi gure 4)
Assignment
Zone
71
776
72
778
82
83
780
781
782
84
783
85
86
785
87
786
787
88
788
-'-789
89
90
790
791
91
92
93
94
95 "
150
150
148
149
97
98
147
96
190
151
146
152
187
192
153
191
144
99
100
46
45'
143
6
14
3
4
5
1
2
P.ppendix-l
I
I
I
,l)
, ,~
/
/
(
~
-'. 55
o
Cl 0
o
SEE FIGURE 4
WINTER SPRINGS ZONES
C::.
IJ1l1~
LEGEND 54 48
j
- STUOY ARCA BOtNOARY.
-.-- MlCRo-ZONE BOUNDARY
32 MlCRo-ZONE to.mER 50
62
"..
MICRO-ZONE SYSTEM
FIGURE A~1
Source: Casselberry Transportdtion Plan by Foxworth, Swift and Associates.
fI.ppendLx-<l
,
.,.
, I If)
vi 0 'f" to
~-z '--- i: r-: -.r ;;::)-
I 'z to '\'"
If) l()
n "'t" ..:-
-.r
I n
Ol l() l()
0 "'<t" r--..
-.r
~JID )!.n
I to -K.,..
to
r--..
I
I I'
CO
I'
.-
I
r CO
0
~
-~
r
f (ID- Ol
I')
C'l 0 0
n ~-
"'<t"
Ol
.9~' ~
.(\.(" "}
r--.. -
Ol
0
/ .- ,...
I O<~"t <D
0(J ./ r--..
~ 0
I 6' sri" 19D ~ S-
u:; r--..
I') S~ 8-'"
r--..
~~
Conklin
~[p
~ort.r and Holme.
IUHllJ(J[)UU, INC.
11 ()..4 [ ~SCH S1"R:Ul
~ ft.C1bOA )2001
TO. 407 41~~
ru .o1 ~)Q..)6
SCAl..E; NTS
1996 TRAFRC ASS1GNMENT NElWORK
NODAL MAP.--.
WINTER SPRI1\K;S TRANsPoRT A nON STUDY
RGURE
A=2
DATE: 8-2G-97
JC(J NO.: \I,~59_01
i
I
I
I
I
(f)
I 00
z-a....
0:[[<(
0...<(:2
I (f)o:
o:r-z
WWO
~o:r-
I -=>:5
3:!;=>
LLLL 0
I Oaa:
~oO
_ C\l
0
I
I ;
~
"
\
I
r
,
')
:l !:
i ~
~ ~ ~
~
o
a:
o
:>:
~
Vl
B
~
2 ~~ ~~
~ g h
8
ED
u
Z 8
2 k~ r:
~ ~~ ~E
~ b ~~
"-
i II
:I
~ ~
~ ~
j u 10
c;: cJ ~ ~
~ ~ S ~ ~ 2 ~~
d t ~ ~ g " Q"
~ I: Sf)
"::i. 2 ~ ~ ~ '5 o~
~ l :1 . ~ 8 r:a
G -<( -<( -<( U u t~
z a..~a:::~~ i!
2 <.>~
..
~
2
3 ~
~ i ~
3 b 2
~ . J:
m ~ i
3-;-~
'-' x
f j
o
~
~
-<
r-
VI
~
~
U
B
I. a ~
-=<-f~ u i
--
Conklin ~orter and Holmea
~ P IOtIQlHlUlR S, IJofC.
11 (}.4 (" ReO N~ S'TREtT
~ nCR:OA J::DJl
TEl -KJ7 41j-~2
FAX 407 O~lO..-'.o
SCALE: NTS
D^TE: a-22-97
TEST HIGHWAY NETWORK
WlN1ER SPRINGS TRANSPoRT A 1lON STUDY
RGURE
A-3
...os NO-: ~9.01
e
'r
tJ")
8 I IJ) 0 ... to
~z~ ~ "Of" ;;;-..
I z to "'.....
tJ") tJ")
l') -r ,,"
"Of"
I l')
Il) Il)
-r r--
,....
,....
~.lt
I to ./
to
r--
I
I
I
I co
0
co
"'t"
-~
I ,....
,....
o
l')
"'t"
o
~-
en
~
~
r--
l~
/Cdo
/ "./'
C$ o~~
I
r-- .
en
o
....
",.
co
r--
o
.-
~
lea ~ ~
6'9.('.1
.:0
n
r--
~l
,....
8.......
Conklin
~~
~ortGr and Holm..
JD( Q IN J[][R S, IX C.
110-. ( ~s::H S7l':a:T
~ ft~'" ~
TU6.(f'J"'~
fAX +07 ~Ic..'.)
SC).~ NTS
2010 TRAFFiC ASSiGNMENT NETWORK
NODAL ~.
'HlNTErl SPRlNGS TRANsPoRT A noN STUDY
RGURE
A-4
DATE; 6-20-97
JOG NO.; 'MH59.01
-
-
-
-
....
. . , , ;', I.. .
778 Tuscawil/a Unit 11 66 '
778 Chelsea Woods 321
778 Bear Creek Estates '67
778 Chestnut Estates Ph. 1 & 2 37 14
491 0 0 0 14 0 0 0
72 EaQles Watch Ph. 1 & 2 57 53
72 Howell Creek Ph. 1 & 2 56 100
72 Tuscawllla Tract 15 Parcel 3 80
113 0 0 0 233 0 0 0
82 Tuscawilla Unit 11 B 28
82 Tuscawilla Unit 12 90
82 Arrowhead Unit 1 (Parcels 3 4 5) 0 11
82 Fairway Oaks 72
82 Wood stream (Arrowhead Unit 5) 32 56
82 Greenbriar Phase 1 86
82 Greenbriar Phase 2 34 81
82 Chesea Pare Phase 2 36
82 Chelsea Pare Pha.c;e 3(Fox Glen) 11 51
82 Chelsea Pare Phase 4 40
82 Bentley Green 44
82 Bentley Club 41
82 Glen Eaole Units 1 2 & 3 257
82 Carrino ton Woods 76
82 Davenport Glen 70
82 Chestnut Rldqe 52
82 Tuscawllla Unit #13 39
82 Braewick 85
82 Tuscawllla Unit 7 79
1132 0 0 0 239 0 0 0
muaI
s.mu
------JIlIIIUII-----_...IiZSRD
783 Tuscawilla Unit 8 78
783 Tuscawllla Unit 9 & 98 164
783 Casa Park Villas 316
783 Tuscany Place 72 72
783 Indian Trails Middle School 1
783 Keeth Elementary 1
242 388 2 0 0 72 0 O.
84 The Reserve at Tuscawllla 44 48
44 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
83 Tusca Oaks Phase 1 & 2 98 40
83 Wed~ewood Tennis Villas 233
83 GeorQetown Units 1.2 & 3 214
545 0 0 0 40 0 0 0
85 St. Johns LandIng 31
85 McDonalds 1
0 0 1 0 31 0 0 0
785 W.S. Municipal 8u/JdlnQ 1
785 W.S. HI~h School 1
785 Bills LandscaplnQ 1
785 Central Winds Park 1
0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
780 Arbor Glen 37 1
,
780 Tuscawllla Unit 6 89
780 St. Stephens 1
780 Kinder Care 1
780 Seven-Eleven 1
780 Tuscawilla Realty 1
780 Tuscawilla Office Complex
126 0 4 0 1 0 0 0
------RmlGma
. . .
; I' . . :. .
781 TuscawillaUnlt1 111 .
781 Tuscawllla Unit 2 65
781 Tuscawilla Unit 4 1379
781 Wedoewood"Unlts 1,2 & 3 128
781 Countrv Club Villaqe 1 2 & 3 245
781 Arrowhead Unit 2 10 18
781 Arrowhead Unit 1 - (Partial) 1 7
-
781 Tuscawilla Countrv Club 1
781 Arrowhead Unit 3 20
781 Arrowhead Unit 4 20
939 0 1 0 65 0 0 0
782 Winter Sprlnos Unit 3 129
129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
788 Oak Forest Unit 1 114
788 Oak Forest Unit 2 2A & 28 163
788 Oak Forest Unit 3 120
788 Oak Forest Unit 4 75
788 Tuscawilla Unit 5 10
788 Grand Reserve :4 12
-<\86 0 0 0 12 0 0 0
786 Oak Forest Unit 5 (lots 468 to 561) 94
786 Oak Forest Unit 6 Oots 562 to 715) 154
786 Oak Forest Unit 7 716 to 808) 93
786 Oak Forest Unit 8 lots 809 to 940) 132
473 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
87 Winter SprinQs Post Office 1
87 Seminole Pines 102 100
87 Windino Hollow (east of Easement) 63
102 0 1 0 163 0 0 0
- -
. .
:
787 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 9 109
787 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 10 112
787 Windina Hollow 149 187
" 370 0 0 0 187 0 0 0
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 2 52
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 2A 196
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 5 22 3
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 8 72
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 (Partf 14 3
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 4 (Part) 3 5
359 0 0 0 11 0 0 0
88 Seville Chase 0 - 110
Dunmar Estates 20
20 0 0 0 110 0 0 0
791 Mosswood Aoartments 147
791 Moss Glen Townhomes 10
791 The Vinevards 171
791 The Seasons 26 115
791 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 4 (Part) 5 2
791 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 (Part) 25 5
227 157 0 0 122 0 0 0
790 Hacienda Villaae 441 6
790 Plnewood Terrace 32
790 State Farm Insurance 1
790 Cumberland Farms 2
441 32 3 0 6 0 0 0
IIIIlIIII
Wl1aI
- --
...
- JiIIUI
I
92 Hlahlands Section 6 56
92 North Orlando 141
92 North Orlando 1 st Addilfon ~38
92 North Orlando 4th Addition 242
92 North Orlando 5th Addilfon (DartlalY 34
92 North Orlando 8th Addition 22
92 Lori Ann Acres 64
92 Douq's Unit 10 56
92 Moss Road Quads 20
92 Indian Ridge 84
92 Deer Sona 152
92 Fairfax Aoartments 16
92 La Petite NurseN 1
92 Mr. Bubbles Car Wash 1
92 Dr. Pete Corum
92 Banfield Funeral Home 1
92 Excelsior Park 1
92 Winter Sorinas Center 33
92 Barnett Bank 1
92 Villaae Market Place
92 Automotive One 1
92 Circle K 1
92 Public Works Comolex 1
92 Fire Station 1
92 Public Safety Comolex 1
633 392 42 0 0 0 0 0
m1
6m.i
----.....----------_Imm'
. '. . .
. . .
93 Winter Sorlnas Industrial Park .
93 Broadway Gymnastics
'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
94 Hiahlands Section 1 102
94 Hiahlands Section 2 41
94 Hiahlands Section 4 75
94 Highlands Section 7 & 8 56 2
94 Hlahlands (Blades Court) 8
94 Hlahlands East Quadraolxes 16
94 Highlands Patio Homes 25
94 Cyoress Club 75
94 Cvoress Villaae 22
94 Sheoah Section 2 144
94 Sheoah Sectlon 3 28
94 Hiahland Vlllaae One 62
94 Hlahland Villaae Two 74
94 Hiahland Lakes 31 10
94 Hiohlands ElementaN School 1
94 Bavtree 182
449 492 1 0 12 0 0 0
95 Sheoah Site A 46
95 Golf Terrace Aoartments 380 250
95 Wildwood 120 170
95 Seville on the Green 200 20
95 Greensoolnt 107 9
95 Hlahlands Section 5 41
95 Winter SDrinQs Golf Course
95 Hiohlands Glen 15 14
95 Sheoah Sec. 1 44
327 796 0 0 23 270 0 0
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 12 6
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1A & 18 55 3
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 6 37 2
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec 7 43 3
147 14
SUPPLEMENT NO.1
To
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
TRANSPORTATION STUDY
December 1999
CPR Engineers, Inc.
1117 E. Robinson Street
Orlando, Florida 32801
(407) 425-0452
CPH Project No. W0459.03
The Transportat; on S t nd y was com p Icted in I 997 and iden t i fled no deficiencies in the transportation
infra structure of the City 0 f W; n t er Springs' I Oca I system for the projected 20 10 tra ffi c loadi 0 gs.
Roadways identified for improvements included U.S. 17-92, S.R. 434, Seminola Boulevard, Lake
Drive, and TuskawHla Road which are under the control of the County and FDOT. U.S. 17-92 is
under final construction of a six-lane improvement project from Shepard Road (Winter Springs)
south to Melody Lane ( Cassel berry). State Road 434 has been improved to four lanes form S.R. 419
to the Greeneway. Semmola Boulevard has been improved to four lanes, TuskawHla Road has been
improved to four lanes divided and Lake Drive is currently under design for four lanes, divided. This
supplement updates the I 997 study to acknowledge these improvements and the ones also
constructed by the City. No changes were made to the land use, existmg uses, or projected
development.
It has become evident that a collector road system is required for the undeveloped area east of the
City Hall. This area has been designated as the Town Center and is scheduled for growth withm the
planning period. A roadway collector system has been identified to serve this area. Since these
roads are for new growth, the fundmg is projected to come from the transportation impact fee. This
collector system is shown on the attached revised drawings.
,;,,;~:
Only updated materials are attached to this supplement. Since the growth projections have not been
revised, the overall traffic study remains valid.
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! .
I
I
I
I
REVISEDIUPDATED TABLES and FIGURES
OBJECTIVE
G) Conserve the natural environmcnt and augment opcn space in the City as functions of
road development.
Policies
I)
Where valid options are available, choose rights-of-way for the City collector
system distant enough from natural drainage features and upland habitats to
coexist with these natural areas.
2)
The incursion of a roadway through these natural areas shall be allowed if it
benefits the public need, such as for access by emergency vehicles or transporting
school children, outweighing other concerns.
3)
Include in all new road plans adequate right-of-way for potential landscaping and
provide for maintenance, in the annual budget of the City.
4)
Designate scenic to preserve as much as possible of existing vegetation and
canopy.
OBJECTIVE*
'"
H) Ensure that current and future rights-of-way are protected from encroachment from
structures or ancillary uses inconsistent with the designation of rights-of-way. Rights-of-
way necessary for the maintenance of level of service standards and for the safe design of
roadways in accordance with State standards shall be required.
Policies
1) - The City, in its land development regulations shall require the dedication of all
needed rights-of-way and necessary roadway improvements for all new
development, and adopt provisions to protect existing rights-of-way by limiting
the use and/or encroachment by structures and ancillary uses.
2) The City shall acquire right-of-way for future transportation needs as funds
become available.
*Item H - Revised 12/99
TI1-6
]
]
1
]
J
1)
2)
3)
4)
. :l5)
t-'1 6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
17)
18)
19)
J
]
]
J
]
]
]
J
]
T;lblc 2
(Hcviscd 12/99)
1999
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORT A TION STUDY
Freeways
Principal Arterials (State)
I)
Easlern Beltway (Stale)
1)
2)
SR 434
SR 419
Principal Arterials (County)
Maior Collectors (County)
1) Red Bug Lake Road
2) Tuskawilla Road
1)
2)
East Lake Drive
Red Bug Lake Road - Tuskawilla
Road to Eastern Beltway
Minor Collectors (County)
Dodd Road
Eagle Boulevard
Shepard Road - U.S. 17-92 to Winter Springs City Limit
Tuskawilla Road (North of SR 434)
I)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Municipal Collectors (City)
Bahama Road - Shore Road to Hayes Road
Dolphin Road - Moss Road to Hayes Road
Dyson Road - Tuskawilla Road to Shetland Avenue
n Avenue - Panama Road to SR 419
Fischer oad - Panama Road to E. Lake Drive
r en riar Lane - Northern Way to Winter Springs Boulevard
Hayes Road - SR 434 to Bahama Road
Moss Road - SR 4 I 9 to Panama Road
Northern Way - All
Panama Road - Shore Road to Edgemon Avenue
Shepard Road - Seminole County Line to End
Sheoah Boulevard - Shepard Road to SR 434
Shore Road - Panama Road to End
Winding Hollow Boulevard - SR 434 to End
Winter Springs Boulevard - Tuskawilla Road to Eastern Beltway
Trotwood Boulevard - Tuskawilla Road to Northern Way
Tuscora Drive - SR 434 to Northern Way
Vista- Willa Drive - SR 434 to Northern Way
Town Center Collector SR 434 to Tuscawilla (East and West)
TII-9
~
i
]
]
]
]
J
J
]
]
.J
]
]
J.
J
]
T 1\ l\ L I: 1\
GEl'iERAU2ED ANNUALA YERAGE DAILY YOLUi\tES FOR FLOlUDA'S
URBANIZED AREAS'"
ST ^ IT nvO- w ^ y ARTERlA1...S
UNIl'ITEJUWPTED FLOW
U.wpa.llwl
La 1'>0
2 Undiv.
" Diy.
6 Diy.
uvel or Suvi~
C
18.900
.50.100
75,1IX)
E
33,100
71.600
107.400
Group 1
FREEWAYS
(wilhin urb.niz.c.d ltu on, 5OO.<XXllnd ludinlt to 0< pu..inlt
wilbin.5 mile..> or Ihe p,ima.ry cily ccnlnl bu.>iDC:1J dulric1)
Level 0 r Se rvicc
C
52, 900
79.400
105.900
132,400
151.700
A
8.900
21~
32,200
D
13,900
35.800
53.700
D
24.800
60.100
90.200
lNTERRUP'TE.D FLOW
La.no
"
6
8
10
12
^
21.rol
33.100
-<<,100
l5.ID;l
63.200
B
35,200
52,900
70,.500
88.200
101.100
D
67.0CIJ
100.600
1}.4.100
167,700
192,200
E
80,800
126.900
169 .200
211.400
242,300
Group:2 (within un,.ni:zcd IfU and nOl in Group 1)
CUI b (>0.00 10 2.49 aiglali2ulln~DcCtioll3 pcr mile) Le vel of Se rvicc
Level or Suvia l..u>e3 A B C D E
Lanes A"" B C E... .. 20,.300 32,.500 -48,800 61,800 74,.500
2 UDdiy. 12, 600 15,.200 17.000 c 6 30.600 48,900 73,400 93,OCIJ 117,300
4 Diy. 27.900 33,.300 35,800 L 8 40.800 6.5 ,200 97,900 124.0CIJ 156.300
6 Diy. .. 3,1IX) 50,400 53.700 A 10 51.000 81,500 122,.300 155.000 195.400
8 Diy. 53.800 62,000 6.5,800 6.5.800 s 12 58,400 93.200 140,000 1 n.300 223.600
s
NON-STATEROADWAYS
MNOR CITY/COUNTY ROADWAYS
Leve I of Se me.:
unc..s AU Boo C ~ E
2Undiv 10.900 15,.500
" Diy. 24.400 )3,200
6 Diy. 37,800 47,500 50.200
OTHERSIGNALlZED ROADWAYS
c (siz:n.tliud intmcction Ula.lY1U)
L Level or Servia:
^ unc..s A" BOO C E
2 Undiy 5.200 11,700
s 4 Diy. 11.400 25100
II
C
l.
^
S
S
III
Ulle3
2
2
Mulli
Multi
ADJ USTMTh-r.s
DIVlDEDlUNDIVlDED
(aller cor=ponding tWO-WIY volume indi~lcd pc:TCXnl)
Medw. Left Turn fuys Adjustment FK10n
Djyiclcd Yu +5%
UOOiv iclcd No _ 20%
Undividod Yes -5%
UOOiviclcd No -25%
Qua Ib (2.50 10 4.50 siglali:z.cd iDleDeCllolU pcr mile)
- . Level or Savie.:
AU BOO C
8,BOO
19,1IX)
29,300
3.5.800
LaDeS
2 Undiy.
4 Diy.
6 Diy.
8 Diy.
ONE-WAY
(alter co~ponding two-way volume indidlcd percenl)
One-WIY Corrcponding AdjU3.l1mnl
una Two-WIY Unc:s Floor
2 ~ ~
3 6 ~
4 8 ~
.5 8 .25%
Tho t>Ol. .- "'" ~ . .......o.-d -' _ bo _ <:rl:I "" ........., ~~"oono. Tho """f'"U rnoddo "- -.+OdIlSo t>bl. ;, dcrMd ""'""" b< ...., k>o ...,... "!"'Cffic pI-..... ~
TN \..IIbIi .....t ~ ~ ~ JlOII t. -.:I b c:orridror 01 ~:o.. ~ ...-+.en ~ n:&...d ~ 0.... v___ ~ ...... _~ ........... OUJ, ~ (AADT) rru..u_ ""01,,",,-
1'-1 "" "- r..:.o... ::;::: .., ou-, .... &:.) .,. l<-" 0( --no.. -' .... t-od "" .... ..... H........, Cof-c", "'....., Up.la< "'" nono. "'""- ....,.. '7 """ ..poIln1;.,. do<.. Tho ubI,,', ~
a.hC! I~J of ~ on.ari..a ~ D"Ilk b.c.l-
~1'Io(lI boe Ido~
Vol~wtCOon~..~ ~1oo ~...... ~
Fkw>d. Ocpon,."" 0( T~ I~.
<nDtn
OL'>'jm
111-.18
~~~'~~"'______~.t~.It.~ru_"""""""_'~~m ~~>-
-..........--
J
E
15.900
J.4 .000
51.400
62.900
O.u.s U (more 11wl4.50 SigDaJiud iD~neaions per mile and DOl
within primary city c:eotnJ busincu di3lrid Dr urblDizaI
a re I over 500.rol)
uve) Dr Scrvi~
UDc.3 An Boo C.. D E
2 Undiy. 11.BOO 1.5 .200
4 Diy; 26,.500 33,400
6Diy. 40.700 .50.600
8 Diy. 49,700 61.800
Oa.u III (more Ihan 4.50 sigrulizcd in~rxajOlU pq mile aDd wilhin
primlry city c:entnl blUil103 dislrid Dr urbllliud
:arca oYer 5OO,rol)
Lent or Scrvkx
u nc.s A" BOO C" D E
2 Undiy. 13.200 14,800
4 Diy. 29,.500 32,600
6 Div. 4-C ,800 49.300
8 Diy. 5<4,700 60,100
~r-c..c;
'iI(J~50001.T^Il/I111Z Dcccll\ucr I'J'}')
TABLE (1 of 3)
YEAR 2010 ROADWA Y LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH 2010 NETWORK
ROADWA Y FROM TO NO. OF ROADW A Y LOS D MODEL VIC RATIO MODEL
LANES CLASS DAILY DAILY DAl1..Y
CAP ACITY VOLUME LOS E
u.s. 17.92 S.R.434 SHEPARD RD. 6 ARTERIAL 47,500 52,200 1.10 F
U.S. 17.92 SH~PARD RD. C.R.419 6 ARTERIAL 47,500 55,200 1.16 F
S.R.4)4 U.S. 17-92 MOSS RD. 6 ARTERIAL 47,500 41,800 0.88 D
S.RA)4 MOSS RD. C.R.419 4 ARTERIAL 31,100 26,900 0.89 D
S.R.4)4 C.R.419 TUSKAWlLLA RD ARTERIAL 35,700 39,000 1.09 F
SR.4).1 TUSKAWILLA RD EASTERN 13 EL TW A Y ARTERIAL 35,700 41,800 1.19 F
S.R.419 U.S. 17-92 EDGEMON AVE. ARTERIAL 14,300 19,900 1.39
S.R.419 EDGEMO)'l AVE. S.R. 434 AR TERIAL 14,300 16,600 1.16 F
E. LAKE DRIVE SEMfNOLA 13LVD FISHER ROAD COLLECTOR 22,600 21,500 0.95 D
E. LAKE DRIVE rISHER.ROAD TUSKAW1LLA RD. COLLECTOR 22,600 22,600 1.00 D
TUSKA WILLA RD. RED BUG LK RD EAGLE BLVD. 6 ARTERIAL 47,500 39,500 0.83 D
TUSKAWILLA RD. EAGLE BLVD. E. LAKE DRIVE 4 ARTERIAL 35,700 35,500 0.99 D
TUSKAWILLA RD. E. LAKE DRIVE WfNTER SPGS. BLVD ARTERIAL 35,700 25,200 0.71 D
TUSKAWILLA RD. WfNTER SPGS BLVD TROTWOOD BLVD ARTERIAL 35,700 20,700 0.60 C
TUSKAWILLA RD. TROTWOOD BLVD. S.R.434 4 ARTERIAL 35,700 20,200 0.57 C
SHEPARD RD. U.S. 17-92 SHEOAH BLVD. COLLECTOR 10,200 11,200 1.10 E
SHEPARD RD. SHEOAH BLVD. EDGEMON AVE. COLLECTOR 10,200 7,900 0.78 D
SHEOAflI3LVD. SHEPARD RD. S.R.434 COLLECTOR 10,200 8,400 0.82 D
I3AHAMA ROAD HAYES ROAD WfNDING HOLLOW BL COLLECTOR 10,200 100 0.01 C
MOSS ROAD PANAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD COLLECTOR 10,200 6,800 0.67 D
MOSS ROAD DOLPHfN ROAD S.R. 434 COLLECTOR 10,200 7,300 0.72 D
'---' "'--01 "'-- """-" v.-...J - ~ ~ ---..... L....-.J u:..-.J ----.. \..........J L..-.__ ~ .--..j
Dcccmber 11)1)1)
TABLE (2 of 3)
YEAR 2010 ROADWA Y LINK LEVELS OF SERVICE
WITH 2010 NETWORK
ROADWA Y FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D MODEL VIC MODEL
LANES CLASS DAll..Y DAILY RATIO DAll..Y
CAPACITY VOLUME LOS E
MOSS ROAD S.R. 434 C.R.419 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 14,100 .62 D
NORTHERN WA Y TROTWOOD BLVD TUSCORA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 6,100 0.60 D
NORTHERN WA Y TUSCORA DR. VISTA VILLA DR. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,200 0.3 I C
NORTHERN WA Y VISTA VILLA DR. WINTER SPG BLVD.E 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,600 0.35 C
NORTHERN WAY TROTWOOD BLVD WINTER SPG BLVD-S 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,500 0.25 C
NORTHERN WA Y WINTER SPG BLVD SHETLAND AVE. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,600 0.35 C
NORTHERN WAY SHETLAND AVE. GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,900 0.30 C
NORTHERN WAY GREENBRIAR LN. WINTER SPRG BLVD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,200 0.22 C
TROTWOOD BLVD TUSKA WILLA RD. NORTHERN WA Y 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,500 0.44 C
WINTER SPG BLVD TIJSKA WILLA RD. NORTHERN WA Y 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 8,500 0.83 D
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WA Y GREENBRIAR LN. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,600 0.55 D
WINTER SPG BLVD GREENBRIAR LN. NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,000 0.49 C
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 12,000 11,100 0.93 D
WINTER SPG BLVD NORTHERN WAY S.R. 426 4 COLLECTOR 22,600 11,900 0.53 D
PANAMA ROAD EDGEMON AVE. MOSS ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 9,100 0.89 D
PANAMA ROAD MOSS ROAD SHORE ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,300 0.13 C
HA YES ROAD BAHAMA ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,000 0.28 C
HA YES ROAD DOLPHIN ROAD S.R.434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 6,600 0.65 D
DOLPHIN ROAD MOSS ROAD HA YES ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,700 0.26 C
fiSHER ROAD EAST LAKE DRIVE PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,400 0.14 C
l-
11...-....I
""'-
L.-...
10..-...1
---
l...--
L..-...J
'---'
'--
l:.l.I-J
i.......-I
I.--J
'----
Dcccmbcr 1999
(3 of 3)
TABLE
YEAR 2010 ROADWA Y LINK LEVELS OF SERV1CE
WITH 2010 NETWORK
ROADWAY FROM TO NO. OF ROADWAY LOS D MODEL VIC MODEL
LANES CLASS DAlLY DAILY RATIO DAlLY
CAPACITY VOLUME LOSS
TUSCORA DRIVE NORTHERN WAY S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,700 0.27 C
V1ST A WILLA DR. NORTHERN WAY S.R. 434 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,000 0.39 C
GREENBRIAR LN. NORTHERN WAY WINTER SPRG BLVD. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 1,500 0.15 C
DYSON DRIVE TUSKA WILLA RD. SHETLAND A VENUE 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 2,600 0.26 C
SHETLAND AVE. RED BUG LAKE RD. DYSON DRIVE 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 3,500 0.34 C
S HETLAND AVE. DYSON DRlVE NORTHERN WAY 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,000 0.49 C
EDGEMON AVE. SEMINOLA BLVD. PANAMA ROAD 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 9,100 0.89 D
EDGEMON AVE. SHEPARD ROAD S.R.419 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 4,300 0.42 C
EDGEMON AVE. S.R.434 SHEPARD ROAD. 2 COLLECTOR 10,200 5,600 0.39 D
W0459002.T AB/Ilmzld4
I (f)
-:;[- 2. -<-----\ )-
I :z
>--
n::
)-
1 w
2
w 0
0 "",,-w
4: -10 (1101)
z 4:
Vl zz
1 Vl Vl W 4: 00 ~ ^ VMIlJ8 N(JJ1SVJ
w w z Vl 0::
Z Vl Z 4: w 0 z Uif= 0::
-<( W -<( ...J Z """- 0 u 0
...J Z ...J -<( 0 Vi UW f-
4: w -I -VJ zU 'J^V
f- -I n:: w z z u..n::
I ::> n:: 0 5 ~ u..w 3:~ 8NI~dS
(? x 0 I 3: 4: 4:t- O...J
W in X O::z
u.. t- t- eL W t-_ f-O
U
. I I z
n::n::
] . ww
o. t-f-
0 B VlZ
-<(w
Z wU
w I
(?
w .
] ..J
n::
o
t-
ZU
3:w
0:::J
t- 0 ~
U rrl
Z ~
n::n::
ww
t-t-
VlZ
~tj
~
0000
J
J
]
]
ri
o
w
~
-<(
..J
o
n::
w
y
-<(
...J
)
(?
::>
CD
o
w
n::
I
"<I"
I")
"<I"
I
J
--.
4:7_
G6_1.[ !J1J_
S'n
~31N\M
~.
<{)'v
*
'0<<;:
~
o
0::
-....;
,& REVISED 12-7-99
Conklin
~[PJ
~orter and Holmes
ENGIHEERS, INC.
\10~ ( Roe:NSC..... Sffi((T
CALM':00, rlCRIO"-' 31801
TEL "07 "25-0~~1
r.A~ 407 5~~- :C~6
SCALE: N1S
OA1E: 7-31-97
2010 NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORT A TlON STUDY
FIGURE
8
JOB NO.: WO.;59.01
T:lblc 15
2010 HOAD NEEDS
DEVELOPER AND OTHER FUNDING
(Inside City Limits)
(Revised 12/99)
DevelollIT
1. Connect Shepard Road to Edgemon A venue. (Completed)
.2. Improve Tuskawilla Road north of SR 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue).
(Switch to Impact Fee Funding)
3. Improve Spring Avenue with drainage and p~ving improvements.
County
1. Improve Tuskawilla Road from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. (Under construction)
2. Improve Shepard Road to three (3) lanes from U.S. 17-92 to Sheoah Boulevard. (County
portion)
3. Improve East Lake Drive from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes. (Under design)
State
1. Improve U.S. 17-92 from Seminola Boulevard to SR 419 from four (4) lanes to eight (8)
lanes. (Construction for six [6] lanes completed.)
2. Improve SR 434 from U.S. 17-92 to Moss Road from five (5) lanes to seven (7) lanes.
3. Improve SR 434 from SR 419 to Eastern Beltway from four (4) lanes to six (6) lanes.
4. Improve SR 419 from SR 434 to U.S. 17-92 from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes.
T:lhlr J6
20JO HOAD NEEDS
CJTY OF WJNTEH SPRJNGS FUNDJNG
(Revised J 2/99)
Phnse J
The following improvements should be undertaken by the City at the earliest possible date:
1. Improve Panama Road from Moss Road to Edgemon A venue. (Completed)
2. improve Hayes Road north of Bahama Road to existing paving on Hayes. (Completed)
3. improve Moss Road from Panama Road north to existing paving on Moss Road.
(Completed)
4. Replace Hayes Road bridge. (Completed)
5. Replace Moss Road bridge. (Completed)
Phase II
1. Paving and drainage improvements to Bahama Road from Shore Road to Hayes Road.
2. Paving and drainage improvements to Panama Road from Shore Road to Moss Road.
(Completed)
3. Paving and drainage improvements to Fisher Road from Panama Road to City Limits.
4. Add stacking lanes to Hayes Road at the SR 434 intersection. (Completed)
Phase III
1. Upgrade Moss Road from SR 434 to SR 419 from two lanes to four lanes.
2. Improve Tuskawilla Road north ofSR 434 (formerly Brantley Avenue). (Switch project
from developer funded to impact fee.)
3. Construct Town Center collector road to accommodate new development. Roads will
connect SR 434 and Tuskawilla Road for collection traffic from this area.
Phase IV
I. Improve Winter Springs Boulevard to three lane capability from Northern Way to
Northern Way (east section). This will be accomplished by adding turn lanes at each
intersection for both traffic flow directions.
(f)
00
ZLLQ...
a:LL<{
Q...<{2
(f)a:
a:~Z
WWO
I-a:~
Z::J<{
3:~-1
::J::J
LLLLO
000:
~50
_ C\J
o
...
~
~
'-""~.
/
<,
\
\.
"
~
I-:;'
: '-'
~
H
I H ~
~z~ .
I ~ ~
& REVISED 12-7-99
Conklin
CGlP
~orter and Holmes
ENGINEERS, tHc.
.1104 E R08!:\lSC.... S-;R((T
Q,I1U'\ ,",'0 o. ncn:D" J2eOl
t(L "C7 ..::~-C"~l
r......~ .07 f.e-tQ)6
SCALE: NTS
DAn:: 8-22-97
TEST HIGHWAY NETWORK
WINTER SPRINGS TRANSPORTATlON STUDY
FIGURE
A-3
JOG NO.: WQ{59C\
I
j
I
1
]
1
1
J
1
]
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXISTING and PROJECTED
DEVELOPMENT
by
TRAFFIC ZONE
11-- :;::mmn.~:f:m.ll~ijam~t4p:'6.(,n:ti~~i~.$:$.mt:::::::~:::t/!::t f\m:~::~:::dJt:m:i~:'::~f,l.~'p.:m.m~~~ffilnij.l:~~ZQt.~,:::::~::::i~l'i::r~Jtf::::::'::'ii
ill~:r.I~'llllil ::;I~llil~';~~i f$.MfiiiWi rWWf} li:l~illri'~!~:r: )~ill[i~1!1; l]j~~II:liil!II~~i.I!:I:.:I!:'!:.I:
~~tf!~~1~~11tt1jl~1
778 Tuscawilla Unit 1 1 66
778 Chelsea Woods 321
778 Bear Creek Estates 67
778 Chestnut Estates 51
505 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
72 Eagles Watch 1 10
72 Howell Creek 1 53
72 Creeks Run 50 32
72 Courtney Springs 252
72 Kash n' Karry Center 1
72 Yeager Commercial 4 acres
313 252 1 0 32 0 4 acres 0
82 Tuscawilla Unit 1 1 B 28
82 Tuscawilla Unit 12 90
82 Arrowhead Unit 1 (Parcels 3,4,5) 0 3
82 Fairway Oaks 72
82 Woodstream 32
82 Greenbriar 172 17
82 Wicklow Greens 17 31
82 Chesea Parc Phase 2 36
82 Chelsea Parc Phase 3(Fox Glen) 57 5
82 Chelsea Parc Phase 4(Fox Glen II) 15 26
82 Bentley Green 44
82 Bentley Club 41
82 Glen EaQle Units 1 ,2 & 3 257
82 CarrinQton Woods 76
82 Davenport Glen 70
82 Chestnut Ridge 52
82 Tuscawilla Unit #1 3 39
82 Braewick 85
82 Tuscawilla Unit 7 79
1 262 0 0 0 82 0 0 0
783 Tuscawilla Unit 8 78
783 Tuscawilla Unit 9 & 98 164
783 Casa Park Villas 316
783 Tuscany Place 79 65
783 Indian Trails Middle School 1
783 Keeth Elementary 1
242 395 2 0 0 65 0 0
84 Schrimsher Town Center 16.3 Acres
84 The Reserve at Tuscawilla 80 12
80 0 0 0 12 0 16.3 Acres 0
12/07/1999
Page 1.of6
.-..1
__iiiiil.iiiif_iiiir-oo
Georgetown Units 1,2 & 3 214
Tusca Oaks 136
Wedgewood Tennis Villas 233
583
10
83
83
83
o
85
85
85
Sl. Johns Landing
McDonalds
Schrimsher Town Center
10
o
785
785
785
785
785
785
WS. Municipal Buildino
WS. High School
Bills Landscaping
Kinasbury Tract
Blumberg Tract
Central Winds Park
1
1
780
780
780
780
780
780
780
2
38
89
o
Arbor Glen
Tuscawilla Unit 6
Sl. Stephens
Kinder Care
Seven-Eleven
Tuscawilla Realty
Tuscawilla Office Complex
781 Tuscawilla Unit 1
781 Tuscawilla Unit 2
781 Tuscawilla Unit 4
781 Wedgewood Units 1,2,& 3
781 Country Club Village 1,2, & 3
781 Arrowhead Unit 2
781 Arrowhead Unit 1 - (Partial)
781 Tuscawilla Country Club
127
111
65
379
128
245
23
6
o
782 Winter Springs Unit 3
957
129
129
114
163
120
75
10
14
496
o
o
o
788 Oak Forest Unit 1
788 Oak Forest Unit 2,2A & 2B
788 Oak Forest Unit 3
788 Oak Forest Unit 4
788 Tuscawilla Unit 5
788 Grand Reserve
12/07/1999
o
o
1
1
1
1
o
1
4
o
4
o
o
o
o
o
o
Page 2 of 6
o
21
113
134
448
448
o
o
5
2
7
o
2
2
o
o
56 Acres
56Acres
27 Acres
1 0 Acres
o
37 Acres
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
.Ir~ ... L " :?i~~:r:\]::h::iJJi:!~tD;~MM.i::~~J.~:.oot~m:~.~;~QtO::Ilg:JJ::::J@Ei/;:t:
:wn:JJm~mn.l.tmW:a.VK~~t~~.4.(4f'Ml$.Q::!:k:::r::tJ:Jt
1!~r.IIIII!i :~~j:~i~I~~~j ~::I~ili,jl' :'::'::~i~.~l:;:. 11~~i~~I.II:~I~jl l:illl~'lli mmm:J:$.P.fu:ffi?::::f':ft:
~tmm~~~~t~trl~j~~~jtf!Jmttm~~
786 Oak Forest Unit 5 (lots 468 to 561 ) 94
786 Oak Forest Unit 6 (lots 562 to 71 5) 1 54
786 Oak Forest Unit 7 (71 6 to 808) 93
786 Oak Forest Unit 8 (lots 809 to 940) 1 32
473 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
87 L.D. Plante (unincQrporated)
87 Winter Springs Post Office 1
87 Seminole Pines 1 02 1 00
87 Windinq Hollow (east of Easement) 51 1 2
1 53 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0
787 Winding Hollow 330 6
787 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 9 1 09
787 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 10 1 12
787 Stone Gable 50
787 Stone Gable Commercial 0.5 acres
601 0 0 0 6 0 0.5 acres 0
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 2 52
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 2A 1 96
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 5 22 3
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 8 72
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 (Pari 1 4 3
90 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 4 (Pari 4 3
360 0 0 0 9 0 0 0
88 Seville Chase 91 1 9
88 Dunmar Estates 20
1 1 1 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
791 Mosswood Apartments 1 47
791 Moss Glen Townhomes 1 0
79 1 The Vineyards 1 71
791 The Seasons 1 41.
791 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 4 (Pari 5 2
791 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 (Pari 25 5
342 1 57 0 0 7 0 0 0
12/07/1999
Page 3 of 6
- . %;(j~~~/:~:~:::;:;mMJ:::::::M.~:@hQg;m.~:l#lkmeJ,:~4PMitf?nf~:~:{f:::::(:~:?j0
- .:iMiiliWiR{l:tmHt~:i:I~::a.Y.MQ.~t~l:i'fjt.M:~M~a9.~~il%Jiif~:i:iJ
11~1~11~1!11 iil~lfl~:111 i:!I;I\I~I: :!!!J~~~!!! ilj'~~I5.li'~~~i~ !11111'111~ ~t!!!!;:I~illl~::!I'i::!!I'::!: :m?fm~mW:?f
:.:.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.;.:.:.:.;.;.;.:.;.:.:.:.;.;
:~::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::;::::::::::
............................,................
..........,..,........
790 Hacienda Vil/aqe 441 6
790 Pinewood Terrace 32
790 State Farm Insurance 1
790 Cumberland Farms 2
441 32 3 0 6 0 0 0
"
9 1 Walden Terrace 63
9 1 North Orlando 2nd Addition 1 70
9 1 Garden Club Apartments 40
9 1 N.O. Terrace Section 1 64
9 1 N.O. Terrace Section 2 41
9 1 N.O. Terrace Section 3 77
91 N.O. Terrace Section 4 72
9 1 N.O. Terrace Section 5 45
9 1 N.O. Te.rrace Section 6 48
9 1 N.O. Terrace Section 8 64
91 N.O. Terrace Section 9 58
9 1 Foxmoor Unit 1 84
9 1 Foxmoor Unit 2 2
91 Foxmoor Unit 3 1 04
91 Foxmoor East 31 3
91 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 3 36
9 1 Winter Sprinqs Elementary 1
91 Walgreens 1
91 Dr. Martins 1
91 Winter SprinQs Food/Used Appliances 2
9 1 Cahill Property
9 1 The Atrium
9 1 Winter SprinQs Plaza
9 1 Winter Springs Vet 1
91 Storage World 1
959 40 7 0 3 0 0 0
12/07/1999
Page 4 of 6
!t!.,_.iiiiriiiiiiiiililr.iliiilI1iit*mmw
92 Highlands Section 6 56
92 North Orlando 141
92 North Orlando 1 st Addition 138
92 North Orlando 4th Addition 242
92 North Orlando 5th Addition (partial) 34
92 North Orlando 8th Addition 22
92 Lori Ann Acres 64
92 Doug's Unit 1 0 56
92 Moss Road Quads 20
92 Indian Ridge 84
92 Deer Song 152
92 Fairfax Apartments 16
92 La Petite Nursery 1
92 Mr. Bubbles Car Wash 1
92 Dr. Pete Corum
92 Banfield Funeral Home 1
92 Excels lor Park 1
92 Winter Springs Center 33
92 Barnett Bank 1
92 Village Market Place
92 Automotive One 1
92 Circle K 1
92 Public Works Complex 1
92 Fire Station 1
92 Public Safety Complex 1
633 392 43 0 0 0 0 0
93 Winter Springs Industrial Park
93 Broadway Gymnastics
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
94 HighlandS Section 1 1 02
94 Highlands Section 2 41
94 HiQhlands Section 4 75
94 HiQhlands Section 7 & 8 57 1
94 Highlands (Blades Court) 8
94 Highlands East Quadraplxes 16
94 Highlands Patio Homes 25
94 Cypress Club 75
94 Cypress Village 22
94 Sheoah Section 2 144
94 Sheoah Section 3 28
94 Highland Village One 62
94 Highland Village Two 74
94 Highland Lakes 41
94 Highlands Elementary School 1
94 Baytree 1 82
94 The Oaks (credits owed) 1 9 8
. ..., IrI' . I. rIrIrI 479 492 1 Q ,""0.: a 9 0 0 0
~
"~;:~~:~':~;:ii~i;~i~;~~jiijjli~:J'jij~~":;:i"~jjil~r~jli1"!i~!1.!j'~~"j1~iii :gih'""';;;1~~;~r~~t1f~~~i's '~~J.~~~;;'j~~~)1 ~~)J~~~~J'~)~ ~. +~ (HI 1')+I"'4:I'Jm"~'I!'i1~~4 ti,4;ifff.@f~r~ :if{.~~'R~~''''''+t.....,................"....
I HI'f 'IoH~H.llNHN 11011"'"
:;ijjn;f.t.@w@;I~ i::;;::jifMijlj@N: i::mj~~;:r::lr;:;: :::;::jM!lm:j:~:j;:! L::f,I~gj$~u:~:~n(!M!!j :.ult~'< m :(: :~~l~~~~ij:j:~:jjiJ~!~:jjmJi:~jl;;~:i.I:: :::I~'!:i':.:j~:ljl.~!:j::j'i!jj:j
;.;.;.:.;.;.:.:.;.;.;.:.:-:-:.;.;.;.:.:.;.;.;.;.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:. :::;::}::::::;JJn@::::{:::r::::: @mU1Wi~1jjiM;
95 Sheoah Site A 46
95 Golf Terrace Apartments 630
95 Wildwood 120 1 70
95 Seville on the Green 200
95 Greenspoint 1 1 1 5
95 Highlands Section 5 41
95 Winter Springs Golf Course
95 Highlands Glen I 29
95 Sheoah Sec. 1 44
95 Golfside Villas 20
95 Kia/Mitsubishi
345 1046 0 0 5 20 0 0
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1 1 5 3
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 1A &1 55 3
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec. 6 37 2
89 North Orlando Ranches Sec 7 43 3
150 1 1
776 Morse 0 206
776 Springs Landing 60 0
776 Cascells 0 0 0 270 67.5 acres
210 217 270 67.5 acres 0
7 1 Schrimsher 46.6 acres
71 Cascells 120 30 acres
0 0 0 0 0 120 76.6 acres 0
785 Blumberg 15 acres
785 Kingsbury 15 acres
785 Parker 36 1 9 acres
0 0 0 0 36 0 49 acres 0
86 Parkstone 353
86 Parkstone Commercial 13.7 acres
86 Seminole County Facilities Maint. 1
0 0 0 1 353 0 13.7 acres 0
TOTALS 9963 2806 68 1 1 062 923 320.6 acres I 0
12/07/1999
Page 6 of 6
" ,. . -. .
ATTACHMENT C
, .
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (<:07) 327-1800
Community Development
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR AGENDA ITEM:
ll.l.
CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE TRAFFIC
CrnCULATION ELEMENT SUBSTITUTING CITY'S
TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR ALL TEXT AND MAPS IN VOLUME I
AND ll. (LG-CPA-I-97)
STAFF REPORT:
. APPLICABLE LA \\1 AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163.3 I 74(4)"Florida Statutes which states "Be the agency (Local
Planning Agency) responsible for the preparation of the comprehensive plan or plan
amendment and shall make recommendations to the governing body regarding the
adoption or amendment. of such plan. During the preparation of the plan or plan
amendment and prior to any recommendation to the governing body, the Local Planning
Agency shall hold at least one public hearing, with public notice, on proposed plan or plan
amendment. "
The provisions of Sec. 2-:57 of the City Code which, state in part ". . .the planning and
zoning board shall serve as the local planning agency pursuant to the county
comprehensive planning act and the local government comprehensive planning act of the
state. . ."
The provisions of 163.3187 F.S. which state in part "Small scale development
am~ndments adopted pursuant to the paragraph (I )(c) require only one public hearing
before the governing board, which shall be an adoption hearing. . .Small scale
development amendments shall not become effective until 3 I days after adoption."
~
wg
Nov=?cr 19. 1997
LG.CP A. 1.97
.
::~
~
1. BACKGROUND:
APPLICANT:
City of Winter Springs
1126 East S.R. 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
(407) 327-] 800
REQUEST:
For the local Planning Agency to review and recommend the requested changes to the
City's Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Element Data, Inventory & Analysis
section and Goals, Objectives and Policies section.
PURPOSE:
The City needs to update the Traffic Circulation Element based on the results of the
recently completed City of Winter Springs Transportation Study prepared by Conklin,
Porter & Holmes. The contents of the Study are intended to replace completely the
current text and maps in the Traffic Circulation Element Volume 1 of2 and
Volume 2 of2.
CHRONOLOGY:
*
City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan adopted on April 27, 1992.
*
City Commission on November 13, 1996, hires Conklin, Porter & Holmes to
prepare update of the Traffic Circulation Element of the City's Comprehensive
Plan.
FUNDING:
The City pays Conklin, Porter & Holmes for the update of the Traffic Circulation Element
from the Transportation Impact Fee.
November 19. 1997
2
LG.CPA.I.97
II. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS:
The following summarizes the data and issues which staff analyzed in reviewing this application.
CHANGES TO VOLU1VIE 1 OF 2 CITY OF \VINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN 190-2010, THE TRAFFIC CIRCULA TJON ELEMENT'S GOALS, OBJECTIVES,
AND POLICIES.
NOTE:
Changes are indicated as "shading" for additions to original text, and
"strikethroughs" for deletions.
GOAL
Provide a road system within the City that facilitates internal traffic circulation, assists ingress and
egress from the municipal area, and accommodates through traffic simultaneously to coordinate
safely, efficiently, economically and conveniently the flow of all modes of transponation in and
around Winter Springs.
OBJECTIVE
A)
Throughout the planning period, the City shall develop and maintain a safe, convenient
and efficient motorized and non-motorized transportation network, through establishment
of criteria to be enforced during site plan review, concurrency management and access
management by the statutory deadline.
.
POLICIES
1) The collector road system shall be funded by the standards-driven impact fee
created in 1990 by the City.
2) The collector road system shall be developed according to the master conceptual
plan and design standards derived under the auspices of the City, to coordinate the
construction of segments of the system by both the public and the private sectors.
3) The conceptual plan does and shall continue to address through periodic review
these factors:
a. Current and projected deficiencies of anerial roads under other
jurisdictions.
b. Existing deficiencies of City collector streets.
,~
W
November 19. 1997
:;
LG.C?A.I.97
.......
c.
The optimal traffic circulation syslem 10 serve [he creal ion in the
undeveloped central area of Winter Springs of a primary civic, business and
service focus for Ihe Cily.
d. By till- ~teltulOI:Y dC'ldl;J/c, Winter Springs shall c:;qm.m:P":~:::fg adopt revisions
to the Land Development Regulations 10 include guidelines and criteria
consistent with nationally-recognized standards and tailored to local
conditions which provide for safe <lnd convenient on-site traffic flow,
adequate pedestrian ways and sidewalks, as well as sufficient on-site
parking for both motorized and non-motorized vehicles.
4) Tk Icvised land development regulations, to be aJopted by tIle ~tatutolY dcadlillc
shaH contain specific access management alternative techniques t'>...~ontrol access
and preserve level of service. These techniques may include but M~ not be limited
to the following:
a. Limit access to roads by controlling the number and location of site access
driveways and other intersecting roads:
b. Cross-access easements of adjacent properties where feasible;
c. Use of frontage or back-lot parallel access roads where feasible.
.
OBJECTIVE
B. Keep apprised of the schedules for improvements and ongoing policies of all jurisdictions
whose transportation responsibilities within the City limits affect the quality of life and the
levels of service on which Winter Springs citizens depend.
POLICIES
1) Continue to monitor the construction schedules of the Department of
Transportation regarding improvement of S.R. 434 through the City. Tillie
developlllClIl pCIIII;ts to tll~ delle. ofcllJt;c;pated ",,;JCJ/;llg ;11 1995 - 1996 so that the
~C::Y.~.~..().r...~ervice is not degraded below the State's criteria for a backlogged UI ball
p..!m9HiID arterial link. In applying the lenience to permit three years in advance of
funded improvements, be selective so that development per.mitted to proceed prior
to actual construction of the higher capacity road will include only those projects
which further progress toward other goals.
2) Require all development plans for property abutting state highways to include
controlled access and minimal driveway cuts, with common service roads
~
l'ovcmbc, 19. 1997
Lj
LG.CPA-I.97
~.
e
~
7)
8) .
9J
m
connecting to adjace~ldevelopment whenever possible, to minimize interruption of
traffIc on the tJTban plinCipal arterial sections. Coordinate permitting with the
D.O.I. Access Management Program.
3)
Pursue one of the objectives of the City's municipal collector road building
program - that of providing residents alternative routes over collector roads. to
Icdl.lce Ille dCfJ(.lldclI(.y 011 OVCIUUIU(.IICd SI'lle (111(.1;,11 IOC1U~.
4)
Ke..e..p D.O.I. ;1I[OIIIIe..d of lilt. ~111l::JgCIICy ~(I ,,;ccs Pi O"iS;OII d;lelllllla tllc Cly 110""
face..~ YIIitlJ 0111) a two-IClm.: ~llbstcllld'IIJ COllllcct;OIl bctvvGGII tIle two side..!> of tile
Cly so IIJattlle He..e..d to W;dell S.R. 4:::;.:t as SOOIl 'IS pos!>;blc.. is Hot ovc.dookcd
wlle..u e..OHStl ue..lioll !>c..lIGduk~ <'II c I Cv;Gwed )G<'Illy to develop tIle.. Ilcxt 5 yU\I State
pfarr
4-5)
Participate biannually in the update of the Seminole County Impact Fee road
construction schedule to press the need for widening of the' northern section of
TuskawiUa Road, the only nO/1h-south anerial through Winter Springs, SOOllel
tllau ] 999 a~ IIOW plallllGd.
56)
Coordinate development of all propeny in the City adjacent to Tuskawilla Road
with County requirements for laneage and intersection improvements to lessen
development impact until the road is improved.
flOCe..cd w;tll tile.. luuu;e;pal Golkctol IO<lJ pIa II !>C-.=;lIICllts tllal w;1I1 edil ect tl affic
frOlu cougesteJ ~cCt;OIl$ ofT uska\v;llcl Ro"J to tile colketol loop, to ZlUglllCllt the
capacity oftllis ill tel ial clllJ 111";lIta;11 11IG kvc.l of ~el v;CG ~et by tile.. COUllty, Zl!>
applovcd fOI ;[.5 fJlall.
Coope..late. witll tllG SClllillOlc COUld)' C.<pl e..~s"VClj Aulllol ity to Pi e..Pill e.. fOI tile
openiHg iu ]99-4 Ofll,c ;ut~lclIClIl.=;C <It S.R. 4:::;.:t witll;11 tLc city alld levic""
CJlgille..e..I;H.:5 pIau!> Cllld ;1I[1;;115il;G5 of dc\"cloplllcut ill 'vV;lItCI 5pl ;llg~ tllM will be
gCu(.lalGd Ly Ill;':> JlJajo, 1"dT.G ;11[<:', ;::.(.,,1;011 to <I::'.:>UI C. II,G, (. will be.. 110 de..l, ;1I1e..llldl
cffe..c.l~ Ou ue..alLy plOpGdy UIICka jlll;sd;(.t;OII of tile. e..oullty 01 tile.. Cily ofOv;edo Lo
the. ea~t.
[Comprehensive Plan Amendment to delete 9), adopted on January] 0, 1994]
. .t~il~1~ii~~~C~1~'~i';;;~~h:e~;~~~...
So...nnbcr 19. 1997
LG-CP,\- 1-97
:)
OBJECTIVE
C) Throughout the planning period, the City will coordinate the transportation system needs
with land use designations; planning for land use and transportation is to be closely
correlated by ensuring that adequate capacity is available to accommodate the impacts of
development.
POLICIES
1) ~:k;~i~~f:~HB.:G.:aJ DelcI III;IIG tllG dctu,d traffic counts, plus increases to occur from
then permitted development, 011 S.R. ..G4 <lIIJ COulltY-lIIa;lltaille.d T uskawilla Road
as of the effective date of the concurrency requirement.
2) Establisb pe.a"- Il0uI level of ~c:.1 vice. ~tdIlJ<l1 d of"O" fOI S.R. .:tJ4 alld S.R. 4 I 9.
No development orders will be issued that will degrade the level of service
standard of"D" on all other roadways.
J) LstaLlislJ all illl(.1 ;111 kvd of 5(;1 viCG S!<lIIJ'1I cl of"[" fOI T uska vvilla Road. TI,is
Ic.vd of SCI vie-Co sIcllldalJ ~llidl Lc c11C111::;GJ UPOIl COlllplc;t;OII of tllc Selllillo!c. coullty
T l.lskawilla Road IlIljJl Ovl::llll:;llt PI 0::;1 <1111 ill 1996. \\'111:;11 \"olllpleted, tllc Cily slJall
alllclld its COllljJlcllell'sivc plclIl to LO~ O.
tA
"iiilI
3 4) Design and engineer the collector road system to minimize traffic impact on these
arterial roads.
4)
a:-
Create intersections of the new City collector roads with arterials where
they will coordinate with the fimctioning of arterials.
b. I,ltclsc.ct l!.c V'vcstelll clld of tile illtcllI<ll loop of tllc C; t y c.olleetol load
systclII vvcst ofLlle ;lItel~c:.cl;UII of S.R. .:\J.:\ <llld S.R. .:t 19, W]ICI c S.R. 4}4
is allC~ady ~ve jCllleS.
e. IlItCI.sCC.L II.e casLel1l (:lId of II Ie City loop a,;d S.R. 4J4 cast oftllc
illteJseet;oll of tIle S.R. 4J4 <llld Tuskavvilla Road, wllele p,ojeeted tlaffic
COUlltS 011 S.R. 434 decl GClse s;::;llifieaIlLly.
5) ~~~.t.()T t.~~..!i.mctioning of the arterial and collector road system by use of the
it~~/FSUTMS model dC'velopeJ {lp'dated::@99$j by the City's traffic
consultant so that collector road improvements may be scheduled according to
valid priorities. .
6) Establish the level of service for municipal collector roads at LOS "Dl>.
o
Novcmb:r 19. 1997
6
LG.CPA.1.97
7) As \..ach .sC~III"111 of tilL. 1.:1I1'<1nccd 1I11111iCipCd ~OHGCIOI I u,lli .'>ySICIII is eOlllptctcd;-
catculat" IIIG ilJdil;olICd 11'111'11':' e"fl<lc.ilj "I (cilCJ. 'lIId (I Gli;t II,is cllllOUIII 10 II,,, C;ty
to "liable. cCJui'<lkllt g,owrtrtcTb( pL.~llIillCd willlill Willlel Splill~.s.
1) ~~9gffi~Jm:~f~.m.q!:~EY.~X::r~r:'a II' ..Q~''Y.::p.evel opineijt'~enw~ tiijg'')#gf:~:::lgffi?1::?:gg::!B.~nX.......
l1.f~r~:~9fh{fut,19..YU?MJ2;~L~o.T1d. ~{qr~:~jn.'a(;c;ofd;\yUti;:>>.iiJt~.r.'fQr9#~9.jJ.f.~~:;:pfQY19.:~:J19:
w.w...........w...B.t.
OBJECTIVE
D) Throughout the planning period, the City shall enforce the level of service standard on all
arterial and collector roads.
POLICIES
1)
Mopt~mB#..~I~.::~i14.::m.9ngQr a t~ansponation concurrency 01 d;, lal lee. by Oetobe"
t99t; &nm fOIIlIClI;L;II~ fo.i.mi:l1i~~.d procedures to t.h?t ascenain the permittability of
proposed developments according to criteria established by an expert consultant.
.
2) The City shall annually monitor the LOS status of arterial and all state r().a..d..":".~)'s
~!~.~,..~~e City including U.S. Highways 17 and 92 and the "XPI e.ssvvay gg$l~iii
~l!.1}K@!~ by obtaining from the State and County their most recent traffic counts at
points along all roadways which would be affected by development in the City.
3)- Permit no development within the municipal limits that will cause the level of
service of any state anerial road to decrease below LOS "D" no sooner than three
years prior to construction funding of the impacted arterial as reflected in the
Florida Depanment of Transportation's then adopted Five-Year Plan.
rCJJJJ;t~ ~hall Hot bc dellic:.d, IIOWCV~I. based 0111)' 011 a tGlllpolal)' deo,adat;oll ill
LOS tllclt wOuld oee.UI ;[tJIC ;lItc:.IG!.CIII=>CS oftl.c; Sellliilolc:. eOullty LXpJeSSvvcly at
Red Dug Lake. Road "lid <It S.R. 4J.:t we. C opellcd fll ;01 to tll(. cOlllplet;oll of tile
caus<.wll} aClo~~ La"-" Jc~UJ.I' Tile tCII./-IOlll.)' excess tlllougl. tlougl. tlafLc sllall
not be illcluJc:.J ill cc\lculcll;lI=> LOS. JlIICIIlH~Ji<ltL. .sta~CS witl, ",.,Jlicll ;lIt<'1 c1lal,ges
opell 011 Red Du~ Lc'd\G Ruml ClIIJ S.R. -1::;4 >\,;11 JI<lW tillite tlllou~ll \Yilltcl
Spl;lj~.'> to till.. [^pJGSSwcIY [IJelI willlcJ;lcel c1WcI)' ~Olll II,e Cly 10 tile. 1l0ltll of
~~
~
Novembc119. 1997
7
LG-CPA.I.97
...
\
~
'~
o
take. k:,uJ.1 wl,e.'1 tll'll ;lItcTclr.m::;L ;s uJ.1(IIc-ct:--=fIIC. L^GL:>:> II 'IfT.C ~I,all L,c CO",putcd
by Illcall::' of tile. rSUT?vi-S-modc-l--oF-tk C;ly'::. II ,,[fIe. C;I e.UI'lt;Oll dlld tll,1I f,gul C
shatl--not-b-e. c1la,::;~"bh:--tcrtl,e. C;ty ;" Jetel 111;1';1'::; S.R-:-'-&I CtlfJ"C;ly 01 TlI~kawiHa
Road e.avae;ly to Ve.l 111;t Je.vc.lOPIlI~"r-in-t+rc--€iry-
OBJECTIVE
E) Create through the configuration of the City-wide collector road system the interaction
and cohesiveness that have been lacking among the residential neighborhoods of Winter
Springs, but do so in a manner that enhances and preserves the quality of life within each
community.
POLICIES
1) Extend the several true collector roads that now end abruptly or degrade from
paving to unimproved status within existing neighborhoods without connection or
outlet to another collector road or arterial, to complete valid collector linkages for
these communities.
2)
When designing extensions of existing collector roads to their logical arterial
connection south of the City - the Lake Orive-Seminola Boulevard major collector
that is planned for i.fJ:lpr?veme~tby the county - choose rights-of-way that
minimize intrusion ~'P.~?~t):(::f1l.I:04.gh:highspe~djraftjc 011 tlJ(~ 1 c.sidellts, so that
improved traffic circulation is not at the expense of peaceful habitation.
3) Plan for completion of the one-ended collector roads in existing developments on a
neighborhood-by-neighborhood basis so that input from the residents is acquired.
4) The City, shall ensure the provision and maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian
walkways to supplement collector roads between residential areas and parks,
schools, and other major attractors. Specific provisions for the establishment and
maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian walkways shall include, but not necessarily
be limited to the following:
a. The City shall review all proposed development for its accommodation of
bicycle and pedestrian traffic needs.
b.
The I ev;~ed land development regulati()~s, to lJe adopted by tile ~la.lulOI y
dcadEllc, shall illelude. :.Itllldtll Js coiitiil'Ue to require all new developments
to provide bicycle parking spaces.
November 19. ) 997
8
LG-CPA.I.97
.
@
c. Sidewalks of-.other pedestrian ways shall be provided where feasible and
appropriate along all roadways.
OBJECTIVE
F) In the design of the municipal collector road system, seize opportunities to solve specific
problems.
POLICIES
1) COOl dillatc. till:' ;lIt'-l ~c;ct;Oll vf thl;; cvlk~to, 1001-1 illld T uskcl w ilia Road w itll tllc
Sellool DOell J to develop clIl ,d;:=,llIl1\;lIt tllClt WClY oITcl cdtGlllclti vC acccss to tllC
pi CSCJll elewclllal J 5e1100l ClIId tile plclIlllcd wiJdk. 5c1100J 011 T u5ka willa Road.
1 ~) Eliminate landlocked parcels by providing for rights-of-way to reach these
properties.
23) Emphasize improved access for emergency vehicles to secluded areas in the
design.
3 4) Permit no individual residential driveways onto collector fQ:??:*~Y.!h~r~::if.~?~I!?l@: or
al1elia] loads ,~Ilell 10calloCldwclY's CCIII be desigllc:.d clIId dGvcloped wll;c!J
c.oll50lidate tl ;J-IS to tllc '-olk-dol VI 'II tel ;,11 I OClJ s.Y~telll.
4 5) Encourage "green commerce" along the a.QWhflbhe'q CSX railroad corridor to
create an open view near any intersections of crossroads and the tracks. Green
commerce is to be defined by the City and shall include such commercial activities
as nurseries, truck farming, and outdoor recreation which does not require large
areas of vertical construction to block the driver's clear view.
OBJECTIVE
G) Conserve the natural environment and augment open space in the City as functions of road
development.
POLICIES
1) Where valid options are available, choose rights-of-way for the City collector
system distant enough from natural drainage features and upland habitats to
coexist with these natural areas.
Navcrnbct 19.1997
9
LG-CP A.I-97
2) The incursion of a roadway I hrough I hese natural areas shall be allowed if it
benefits the public need, stich as for access by emergency vehicles or transporting
school children, outweighing other concerns.
3) Include in all new road plans adequate right-of-way for potential landscaping and
provide for maintenance, in the annual budget of the City.
4) Designate scenic drives along which collector road construction will be adapted to
preserve as much as possible of existing vegetation and canopy.
OBJECTIVE
H) Ensure that current and future rights-of-way are protected from encroachment from
structures or ancillary uses inconsistent with the designation of rights-of-way. Rights-of-
way necessary for the maintenance of level of service standards ~ria;:{QEl!h~;~:~f~;ff:~~~grr~Qf
tQ~a~yg:m~ig:~f9.r.a..~h9.~twHH:::$J~te:s[al1~ai~ls shall be required. Existing rights-of-way
shall be preserved through enforcement of setback provisions, which prevent
encroachments into the rights-of-way.
POLICIES
1)
The City, in tLc. I c:.v;~cd IE land development regulations to be. cldoptc.d by tIle
statutol)' dcadl;'lc, shall require the dedication of all needed rights-of-way and
necessary roadway improvements for all new development, and adopt provisions
to protect existing rights-of-way by limiting the use and/or encroachment by
structures and ancillary uses.
A
"V
2) The City shall acquire right-of-way for future transportation needs as funds
become available.
ID!mi~
WJ
Er.tll~;!t:~ffi;~:::ftq}y';::::~.~:Yf.{O=P.:PO I~ql.es :rel a t in g t (j::left turn. I anes'/:B':~~:~f.~r;~~'lQH:::~D~:::11gHf
RmmQm~
In
liillif~i~~fi:~litl[~l~fI~~~f~~~:S:~~~~~:~]::$:e:+eg'Jired.:::wh~n:::*DY::lYiQ:Rgj:i::Q:r
a~
g9$.f~H:::~p'~~8.JJ,)i,V:'$ :~qVa I to or g~ e~re.'r t haIi:ihi rt)Nm/~R~::~)::mp.B;
~
Novcmtxr 19. 1997
10
LG.CPA-I.97
~.\
.
@.
=-
C-
g)
c.~
.........
at
......."'.
e.~
b~
911:p)~lti~l~nefacili\ies.lhe number of left turning vehicle~.P?m)~emajoI
rc>a9.~a y.i~:~gyAllo or gre<11 e r.\ han . ti ft een (J 5) . cI u rin geil.h~(th~A:Mt:6.t
B;M::.p'.~ak))9Vr9Jl he .majorslreel.
q
Q"H..:Jwp.:(7.5:I~DmtYJ.p~ J.i.~ y.filcili i ies/fhe.,D {;m b~Hb. f:J.~:ff::h~'rm.ng:::Y.~m~t~~'@:gb~
~~~lfB.l:f~:~i~~;i~Nl~:~:~~~I~~~I::~~~~~tlf~~hf:~:iwtJ~B~~~111;1:~r~!l~h.g
~'y'Q:pg:'.~)'n{~~::Ii.r~::.6{Mj:'.9YP~f\/l;:peakh9lit
fI!.~
[i~\iilr{w~il~~;1~~[~r~~~~~~~~yli~i11'I~f&ii'~
;~
m
~2~~r~l:I~I.f~1~~~'~~0W~:t1~ \t~:~:'~~~~~~;~;:~~C~#.$.::,~~:gmJY::!?Y:i:$~m!:nQI~
ft
[h:~:::t6~a'wgy:i:!~~;:~':::h1UI iFlalled i vi d eClfacili tYa.hathe~~::}@$Pff.r~r~n!:i:iQ~m:~ln
t..il~:::hi"~dj~q::::i~)'::~ilo\\'2oiist'n.i'ctjon of CllefttlJrkt~ne;
~::~::::
g~
~1:i;~~if~jfQg:::i)}jno cst reet or access.: pqintJlrive~~YS~~:ifQhlr9.H:~~i::By:g
1I11.'lil~f~~~J,~fM~;~lii~Yh\~~6\~~~il~lllII~
ifr
~i.i1~~~li~~~j:!~~~~;;-~;~~tt:rft~~eri~.r~fhi~~i~~f~~~~f:iQr:::~g~:~~:~;:p':Qmi
ffi
if~~i[~~~t~~1~k~E~I:~;~~:~;~;:~~~~~i~~~~~1!l~1Iff~l'@
~y'~!I.~.~):~::~$.!1ilifIW~ thn.~~}:i'~}n 0 t. an'. a p pi i c'ab I e \.V~rra rit:::injvr~:i#?~~~:
~lli.i~;~f*1~t~~71~t!~~~;:.~~t2~.miJ".'1i~
}yh;~g:;ih~::)Wfen'~cilngst~e.et .0 r access. poi ntdhyewa"Yd:~l~r~Qlfpn~an3,y:::~
~i:~.ffic::'s iImAL!
Novnnbcr 19. 1997
LG.CP,\.!.97
II
'.
G
~
3:)
::../.
~J.
n
..',,,
A-:':Q.S~~I~.(~ting andrighl turn lane on rhe l11<ljor street will berec)lIiredwheJl:ahy
~Wp':(~):pr:Ij)oreoLlhe following.warrants ilre satisfied:
f,i}
R9.~m.~rii~mf::.51reet. speed Jin1il is eC]lIal..toor>greater"iHaH:f.9ijY;(~;Q):ffipm
g~
li;lfl\!~~~:~~1~~y,t:l~i;~~{~~T~~~~~~~:~I'tillillt97
@
ilf~ll'&~!f;~t~~~t~~::;lfIt!:l~l:'~~}l~IIII(~f~~~
a~
w~
Il!~~~~lr~f:::~~~I~~~~~J~'~~~~i~~:~:~~~~~ll:~'d ..~tG~~~::ff?:~nny@!Yi::$~:fmgQJ.:~
m
[n.i~rl~~ml.gi(~'t[ief,or::a~:~~s?:point: dnV.~W~y::j:s::}:onti:$,fl~:d.::j:ljyI~::::i~~:q,l:~!gfi~l~
i(II;i[~~:~tff~g.~~f~~~{t~'::~~~J~l~O~~'..~~~~~f;lW~~rJ~~~_i.~~i~II!!~r.i~~llr}p.:!
~:::~
m
~i~tt~:t~li~l%i~::~}t~;~}::~~.ect.iry'g:.:of.:aq:g:~~s';p6j:nt:::lf.ay~w~y~:mi!i~gp.'~~ilQ
?i
li{C~I'~*~t1~~~~r~i~':;!~tS(~~~il~.~114.
m
~g~D.abj~'i::~!1mH.dis.tan'~:~::i;{.hotari'apP'li2apl~:SYaIT~HH~B::fRf~::q?'s.~:ij
g}
ff:JHe'arten~f:street which is bein~ entefed:hasbeen'de~igri.~tfd~~:j::~'
~iw~~~~d.;:a=~'tess facility. by Semi:lOle Cou'nty~ FDOT~::9f:tR~Gj~y:i!~ffi}Mml~[
g~
mJ~:E~.i.~iIf:{g::;~h:~H::Qr::~'~.ce.'~.s: PO i n i..driY:e.~a)(;.i~...co f)tf<j>:iJ~:(f:::$);':::?::J[~~g:::$lgg?Jg
Ill~~~~~~~1;~G~!i:~~~:'lIDr~~~:-~:s~jj:~Jd~.:@~~~M~~:~.tj:;%p~::!jth~:5ghl::rom
Novcmba 19. 1997
LG.CPA.I-97
1:2
CHANGES TO VOLU]\,IE 2 OF 2 CITY or \\'li'\TER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN 190-2010, THE TRAFFIC CIHCLJL.-\TIO:\' ELEf\'IENT'S DATA AND ANALYSIS.
A. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROJECTIONS; CONCURRENCY
Substitute pages JII-7 to IV-I3 inclusive in place of existing pages TC-l to TC-42
inclusive.
B. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:
The proposed changes in the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study, August 1997,
prepared by Conklin, Porter & Holmes will help promote economic development by
requiring the provision and timing of roadway infrastructure to meet the market demand
for new land use development, thereby creating a etlicient and convenient flow of traffic
through Winter Springs.
c. CONSISTENCY/COMPATIBILITY WITH CITY, STATE, AND REGIONAL
COl\1PREHENSIVE PLANS:
L
WITH THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
e
This City initiated comprehensive plan amendment is intended to update the Traffic
Circulation Element' Data, Inventory & Analysis (Volume I of2) and the Goals,
Objectives and Policies (Volume 2 of2). These changes will be compatible with
the other elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and not in conflict with the
other elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan, specifically:
Capital Improvements Element:
Policy] a under ObjeClive A
Policy I under Objective C
Policy I under Objective 0
Objective E
ill
~
N 0Vl::mbcr 19. 1997
13
lG-CPA-I.97
2. WITH THE ST ATE CO)VIPREHENSIVE PLAN: 163.3 J 77( 1 O)(A) F.S.
The comprehensive plan amendmenl is compatible wilh and furthers the following
goals, objectives and policies of the Slate Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 187 F.S.
91-5.021(4) F.A.C.
(16) Land Use
Policy 5
(12) Energy
Policy 3
(18) Public Facilities
Policy 4,7, 9
NOTE:
A Local comprehensive plan shall be consistent with a
Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan or the State Comprehensive
Plan if the local plan is compatible with and furthers such plans.
9J-5.021 (I) F.A.C.
a
'V
The term "compatible with" means that the local plan is not in
conflict with the State Comprehensive Plan or appropriate
comprehensive regional policy plan. The term "furthers" means to
take action in the direct ion of realizing goals or policies of the state
or regional plan. 9J-5.021 (2) F.A.C.
For the purposes of determining consistency of the local plan with
the State Comprehensive Plan or the appropriate regional policy
plan the state or regional plan shall be construed as a whole and no
specific goal and policy shall be constnled or applied in isolation
from the other goals and policies in the plans. 9J-5.021 (2) F.A.C.
3. WITH THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL
POLICY PLAN: 186.507 F.S.; 27-E-4 F.A.C.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers the following
goals, objectives and policies of the East Central Florida Comprehensive Regional
Policy Plan. 9]-5.021(4) F.A.C.
Policy 64.2: 3
c14
~
N~ 19. 1997
14
LG.CPA.I-97
e
ill.
@
Policy 6"1.6 3
Policy 64.S: J
Policy 64.23: I
NOTE:
A Local comprehensive plan shall be consistent with a
Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan or the State Comprehensive
Plan if the local plan is compatible with and furthers such plans.
9]-5.021 (I) F.A.C.
The term "compatible with" means that the local plan is not in
conflict with the State Comprehensive Plan or appropriate
comprehensive regional policy plan. The term "furthers" means to
take action in the direction of realizing goals or policies of the state
or regional plan. 9]-5.021 (2) F.A.C.
For the purposes of determining consistency of the local plan with
the State Comprehensive Plan or the appropriate regional policy
plan the state or regional plan shall be construed as a whole and no
specific goal and policy shall be construed or applied in isolation
from the other goals and policies in the plans. 9J-5.02](2) F.A.C.
FINDINGS:
*
A number of changes have occurred since the preparation and adoption
(on April 27, 1992) of the City's comprehensive Plan, prompting' the need for an
update of the Traffic Circulation Element.
*
City Commission hires Conklin, Poner & Holmes to update the Traffic Circulation
Element.
*
The City initiated. comprehensive plan amendment updates the Traffic Circulation
Element' Data, Inventory & Analysis (Volume I of2) and the Goals, Objectives
and Policies (Volume 2 of2). These changes are compatible with the other
elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
*
- The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and not in conflict with the
other elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Novnnbcr 19.1997
15
LG.CP.'\-I.97
.
e
..
The comprehensive plan amendment is compillible with and furthers the goals,
objectives and policies of the SIClte Comprehensive Plan.
..
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers the goals,
objectives and policies of the East Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy
Plan.
IV. STAFF RECOMMEND A T10N:
Staff recommends the Local Planning Agency make the following recommendation to the
City Commission:
That the City Commission hold a first (transmittal) public hearing and transmit to
the Department of Community Affairs the proposed large scale comprehensive
plan amendment (LG-CP A-I-97), updating the Traffic Circulation Element in
Volume 1 of2 and Volume:2 01'2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
ATIACHMENTS:
City of Winter Springs Transportation Stud" - August. J 997
NO'Vnnbcr 19. 1997
16
LG-CPA-I.97