HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 08 01 Public Hearing 500 Ordinance 2007-22 (2)
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
August 1. 2007
Meeting
Consent
Information
Public Hearin2 X
Re2ular
ITEM 500
/
Mgr./Dept
REQUEST: The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests that the
Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing for consideration of Ordinance 2007-22, a Large
Scale Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment, establishing a Public School Facilities Element
and amending the Capital Improvements and the Intergovernmental Coordination Elements
consistent with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.
PURPOSE: To comply with State mandated concurrency requirements related to
coordination between local governments and school boards in planning and permitting
developments that affect school capacity and utilization rates.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY
Florida Statute s. 163.3177 (related to required comprehensive plan elements)
Florida Statute s.163.31777 (public schools interlocal agreement)
Florida Statute s. 163.3180 (concurrency)
Florida Statute s. 163.3164 (32) (defmition of "financial feasibility")
Florida Adm. Code 9J-5.025 (related to public school facilities element for public school concurrency)
Florida Statute 163.3174 (4) (related to responsibilities of the Local Planning Agency regarding the comprehensive
plan)
Florida Statute s. 163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment.
Florida Statute s. 166.041 Procedures for adoption of ordinances and resolutions.
Winter Sprinl!:s Charter Section 4.15 Ordinances in General.
Winter Sprinl!:s Article III. Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Section 15-30. Authoritv. purpose and intent:
Section 15-36. Review criteria;
Section 15-37. Local Planning Agency Review and Recommendation:
CHRONOLOGY:
July 22,2007- Public Noticing in Orlando Sentinel ofLPA Public Hearing
Aug. 1. 2007- Local Planning Agency to hear the request and make recommendation to the City
Commission
CONSIDERATIONS:
August 1, 2007
Public Hearing Item 500
Page 2 of3
With the passage of Senate Bill 360, school facilities concurrency is no longer optional.
Legislation enacted by the 2005 Florida legislature mandates a comprehensive focus on school
planning by requiring local governments and school boards to adopt a school concurrency
system. School concurrency ensures coordination between local governments and school boards
in planning and permitting developments that affect school capacity and utilization rates.
As part of the legislative requirements, all Florida jurisdictions must adopt a Public School
Facilities Element as part of their Comprehensive Plan. In addition, local governments must add
to the Capital Improvements Elements that portion of the financially feasible School Board
Capital Program that addresses school capacity for the students within the jurisdiction, and text
changes to other elements such as the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, as may be
needed. The Public School Facilities Element must be consistent with the requirements of
s.163.3177(12), Florida Statutes. Each municipality within Seminole County is required to adopt
a Public School Facilities Element that is consistent with those adopted by the other local
governments within the County [s.163.3177(13)(a), F.S.] Seminole County School Board,
Seminole County, and the planning staff members from the seven (7) local governments
participated in a coordinated effort to achieve these results.
Additionally, the local governments within Seminole County must enter into an Interlocal
Agreement with the Seminole County District School Board to jointly establish the specific ways
in which the plans and processes of the school board and the local governments are to be
coordinated as part of the supporting data for the Element. The existing Interlocal Agreement
for Public School Facility Planning, adopted in 2003, has been revised consistent with the
requirements of subsection 163.31777, F.S., and will go to the City Commission for Adoption on
August 13,2007.
The Adopted Public School Facilities Element and the corresponding [updated Public Schools]
Interlocal Agreement must be submitted to the Dept of Community Affairs by January 1,2008.
Rule 9J-11.022, F.A.C., establishes the procedures for submitting public school interlocal
agreements and amended agreements.
Failure to adopt the Public School Facilities Element, to enter into an approved updated
interlocal agreement, or to amend the comprehensive plan as necessary to implement school
concurrency, will subject the local government to being prohibited from adopting comprehensive
plan amendments that increase residential density and subjects a school board to funding
withholding sanctions equivalent to the available funds for school construction.
This effort does not change the lines of responsibility for the provision of educational facilities.
The School District retains the responsibility for financing and constructing school facilities.
The Legislature has mandated this coordination of plans in much the same way that local
governments must now coordinate their plans with the Regional Water Supply Plans of the
Water Management Districts to improve overall coordination of efforts.
FINDINGS:
August 1,2007
Public Hearing Item 500
Page 3 of3
. The existing Public School Interlocal Agreement has been updated and includes the
establishment of public school Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs) to define the
geographic boundaries of school concurrency [so l63.3l80(13)(c), l63.3l80(13)(g)(5),
F.S.] The Interlocal Agreement will go to the City Commission for Adoption on August
13,2007 [so 163.31777, F.S.];
. Level-of-service standards have been included in the updated Interlocal Agreement to
establish maximum permissible school utilization rates relative to capacity amendments.
Level-of-service standards are also included in the amendment to the Capital
Improvements Element [s.163.3180(13)(b), F.S.];
. Amendments to the Capital Improvements Element (establishing a public school capital
facilities program) meet the requirement for being financially feasible [s.
163.3180(13)(d)1, F.S.];
. A new Public School Element is established and includes a proportionate-share
mitigation methodology [so 163.3180(13)(a), 163.3180(13)(e), 163.3177(12), F.S. and
Rule 9J5.025, F.A.C.];
. The proposed goals, objectives and policies of the new Public School Element are
compatible with those of the other local jurisdictions within Seminole County
[s.163.3177(13)(a), F.S.]; and
. The Intergovernmental Coordination Element has been updated to include coordinated
procedures for implementing school concurrency [so 163.3177(6)(h)(1) and
163.3180(13), F.S.];
ST AFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing for consideration of
Ordinance 2007-22, a Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment establishing a Public
School Facilities Element and amending the Capital Improvements and the Intergovernmental
Coordination Elements consistent with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.
IMPLEMENT A TION SCHEDULE:
Aug. 2. 2007- Display Ad in the Orlando Sentinel Noticing City Commission Transmittal Hearing
Aug. 13. 2007-City Commission 1 st Reading and Transmittal Hearing
Aug. 20. 2007-Transmittal to the Florida Dept of Community Affairs
Oct. 27. 2007- Anticipated receipt of the ORC Report (60 days to respond)
Nov. 29. 2007-Public Noticing in Orlando Sentinel for Adoption Hearing
Dec. 10. 2007-City Commission 2nd Reading and Adoption Hearing
Jan. L 2008- State Mandated Deadline for Submittal of Adopted Public Schools Element and
Updated Public Schools Interlocal Agreement [so 163.3177 (12)(i), F.S.] to DCA
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Public Noticing in the Orlando Sentinel
B. Ordinance 2007-22
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY RECOMMENDATION:
nd any
5. The
Ie per.
Ie per.
ley are
hom a
nlslra-
lolhe
]1 rep-
Hcllon
lion or
'lief In
J Pro--
NTHS
IVICE
:E OF
~F8R~
;e~f1!
<emgt
riME
THE
ERTY
I
; ON
:edenf
msor
eslole
, this
qER
PUB-
LED
ED.
TIME
OVE~
) (2
TH
oATH
" Ihls
Am:
.e, Jr.
Drive
32803
cllltv. The requesfed variances and
waivers are as follows:
~~lf.:'cWO~08.W~C?,~e~?Fowe~~
existing dumpster enclosure local.
ed within a Level 4 rear yard resl.
dentlal buffer to remain. The
dumpsler enclosure Is localed Iwo
leel from Ihe rear property line In
lieu 01 the required SO-foat separa.
tlon.
~~~r~~fO~08.~~~1~C?,~e~?I~~e~~
existing cross-access drive aisle 10-
cafed wllhln a Level 4 rear yard
:;~f~~~ls~ ~1~~,~ r2~"i~r}~
~~JI~~ ~~l:jf~~::;'~~rl~u of lhe
3. Variance 10 Land Develapmenl
Cade Section 8.2.2.l(~ to allow an
f~~1~1 ;tf~m~ate:ver~'~ag~ ~3
residential buffer 10 rema n
~ 2007
CITY OF IN~
PlANNING OA. /
LO~U C
;&~o: loelt.. I ir ~flL
MONOI'OLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TOWER
&''="~'t~:s:~:,B~)
AND &LIC
I'IlO SIVE
-U
~~M9:t~ OF THET~IWb~
WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE
COUNTY... FLORIDA, ADOPTING
A LARGo: SCALE COMPREHEN-
SIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ES-
~~~~'t~i~{sAlLUl~\fNS.fHR~1> ,
AMENDING THE CAPITAL IM-
PROVEMENTS AND INTERGOV-
~~~ttlN"rr.lMm~~~~~A~18~
CHAPTER 163.. FLORIDA STAT-
UTES, PROVlulNG FOR TRANS-
MITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, THE
REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSIS..
TENT ORDINANCES AND RESO-
LUTIONS, SEVERABILITY.. IN-
CORPORATION INTO THE LOM-
~~E~IVllIV~T~Lt~6 tMtl
ST"'c;rUS OF~HE PLAN AMEND-
MENTS. 0 DAY.
A 7;110 P.M. OR
l'irE
WI
IUI
malDA
h\\~
IHY,
Rm-o
.1
" un.
credl-
have
Ie;
:m for
ed In
ed fa
." de-
ottor-
, are:
lIE
yAy
r:eb~~~:~~l::r~"r'~~s b~IW='i
%':rao~gl ~tfe'~ily~'t~~'~'1lir'~
focafed 01 1126 Eosl Slofe Road 434,
rnl~i,';J~n!~(1 fJgfld~7~f& 'lW7~
~:~f~;,\~h dl~t~~IIJ:U:slnn~dlnJ
Ihese proce~~s should conlocl
~inf~I~Ji~lo/I~I~~r~'~o~:
vance of the meeling at (>107) 327-
1800, Extension 236. If vou decide
10 appeal any recommendallorld..
clslon mode bY Ihe Planning &
Zoning Board I Local Planning
~~(Jer~~h Jrft,'\~1 ~e~~rn~~:
will need a record of the proceed-
Ings, and for such purpases, YOU
may need to ensure that 0 verba.
tlm record of fhe proceedlnvs Is
made upon which Ihe appeal Is
based. Inleresled parties are ad.
vised thai lhev may appear at Ihe
~"irro a~gy~/o~s~~o~J'i~~"rt.
IIem.
SLS425347-JUL.22
e.'iJ,u~~tS~ ~OU~IOw~lr~id f~epeb:
llc H~orlnll.ln c;o~nclL C_ho[l'lbers,
IIld 10
",de-
either
afely
rltren
ultln
r..llef
)ti(,e.
INER
Courl
Vendi
CierI<
1001.
, :lOO7
r OF
Legal notices
Sale Notices
TIHN THE CIRCUrrCOURT OF
E EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
SEMINOLE COUf:lTY, FLORIDA.
CASE NO. 07.CA.135;l.lH
5fr~IJI~~~~tl:,~~~~;ION, INC., a
Plolnllff,
YS;
EDWYN SANOY DAWES and
GEORGE AUGUSTUS THOMSON,
M~~~T~~t ~Z~rf,fALR@~
~R~';,J' u~~~~~el~~d sll'c~~s.
son In In1er8$I/oasSlgns, Clevlsees,
f,ran1ees, cred1 r~1 successor
r stees or om~~~sons Dr
MARYANNE MORSE
As CierI< of Ihe Circuit Court
Seminole Counfy, Florida
(SEAL)
Bv: s/
As Depulv CierI<
~f~g;'ih\~~~' sTr~tre
Suite 3300
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
l;gjl m:~ !,FAX)
Attornevs for rfclalnllff
~t~~9.Tu'L.r.j~~i2.12r'
NOncE OF pUBUC SALE
~5~Fo~~Mf~~f~g ~It~~~
~~1JUeH!{Wr ,'W NcTci~FDY
O~ft ~lc,!is~5~~b~AFli:M:
TY ACT, SECTIONS 83.806 AND
83-807
PERSONAL MINI SlORAGE.WESl
UNIT
19
a
II
111
121.
137
141
I5Ii
110
245
Z52
Z53
210
212
Dl
JIM
I3e
341
341
311l
JIll
404
lO!I
4100
431
435
441
487
495
506
527
133
m-
Il CIIARaWl
CONTENTS MAY INC(U~e
KITCHENG HOUSEHOLD ITEMS,
~~~~Ir p}~~~~GC~RTpYJS:
FURNITURE, TOOLSR CL~TH-
t~~RE1SR ~5 KThL~AF6R VETH1:
g~~~JsOk~sNvlITEH~ ~~Ml'
TO BID ON UNITS.
f~~NpfJ~~s~~ AUufrl.L~Pll
12:30 '.M. VIEWING WILL BE AT
THE TIME OF THE SALE ONLY.
NOTICE OF pUBLIC SALE
~5~tg~~t~~I~N Blt~~~
SOLD FOR CASH TO SATISFY
~~~l AJilf4E~tO'~1 t..f1~~~:
UTES, SELF STORAGE FACI L1-
13:8cMT, SECTIONS 83-806 AND
FAlRvtEW MINI STORAGE
K~IT ·
113 CUNT FREDR\lllll'ic'~t~
1:15 EDDIE F EVANS
CONTENTS MAY INCLUDE
KITCHEN(; HOUSEHOLD ITEMS,
~~~~If j:lAl:UKGeGDA~~Rt8~~'
FURNITURE, TOOLS, CLOTH:
l~~RE1f~5\~h~AfJR NH1:
_.o1uUDs<o.,u>=AJ"ck~'t:E..li: g,.A,\-E.
Suit Notices
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
THE 18TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN
AND FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY,
FLORIDA .
CASE NO.;01-CA.902.16J.G
~?T't~9~r~tk~~ELt~~PANY,
Plalnllff
Y,
?~tE~~o~iNW~~~~/~I: 1~t
Defendants
NOTICE OF ACTION
TO; JOSEPH K. THOMAS, JR.,
whose last known address was
56430 Hlcl<ory Streel. Astor. Flori-
da 32102
YOU ARE NOTIFIED Ihal an oc-
tlon for damages and claims of In.
t~\~f:st~oeW,~~ol~n~si~~1 1~lrwl~
properfy:
~"T~~~e2~lo'l'c~~:,.gsl~orp'rai
of Monhllttan as recor~ In Pial
back 2. PolIO 2. of the ubllc Re-
Qlrds of lok. Countv\ F orlda, run
~~~'~~m.rs:;r~ld ~~tg~ ~
dlslonce of 5,280.30 feel fa fhe
Soulheasf corner Ihereof' Ihence
t1.~~2e a E~I:la~Cjls~~;c~16ci~ 4~~rJ,
leel 10 a pelnl on Ihe Northerlv
rlghl Of way Of MinI< Road and fhe
~oIR~ln~~~n~Ln~. Jo'r'lW ~2~~t
Wesl 0 distance 01 114.80 feel 10 lhe
EaslerlY edge of a canal: fhence
Norlh along said canal a dlslonce
f,1 183 feel, more or less, 10 Ih4e In.
~f:;;.t1~ggf J~~ ~~n~~~\~ J~y~
~~; 'h,:nif. ".1g~~,~ol~I~~~t:::~:
along said waters edge In a South.
eastlj,"lv direction 10 0 !'llnl thai Is
Nro~:"~ t~~nl~ of 1~1 ::I(n::i~~~
fhence soulh 0 dlsf.!:,ce 01 '95 feel,
more of less, to the Polnl of Begln-
n~n~{lg~ .\~I,n"g~n~l~gl~fr'~I~~
~onge 2B Eosl, Lal<e Counly, ~Iorl.
o. also described as Lol 3, block
, according 10 an unrecorded plat
of Aslor Foresl CanlPslles.
hat been filed agalnsl you.and vou
are re~Ulred 10 erv. a COpy of
: ~~r:'An::;S?elO, Iboayo~n~
yld J. Kohns, Esq nd Teresa
N. Phillips, Esqul Plalnllff's
~:,:,or'i~e~.a,:,:h~:8 ~~ g~fo~s :.~~~~
Suite 410, Wlnler park, Florida
1~~8b~~~ ~ .l~rs ~~u~~I~\?~~r w~~~
fore service on Plaintiff's ottorney
~1~~~e3~n~rt t~'rra~~e'inV~~~d
___:_~. .,_.. l..... 6\.,_ .....11". ......_......,.&
d
eel
of
lhe
ce
Id
P I~
"Ihe
A.~olf
Ling
K ay
~ ~~
B ve
c gt:
Id
C 0'
Bing
c ~t-
SOl lhe
me
IOlore
cd
l~~
~ T
.20
W.
oc.
f ao~:
~~por-
lie
Flcor.
~II'S
olouth
N line
tli 2.38
~~~~'jh n
OF BEGINNING; Ihence continUe'
hNorfhwesterlY along sold curve
avlng a cenlral angle of oo721'1l'/I',
fn arc dlslance of 16.00 feel
~~'A'.l?r3 ,a t~~r~ I~"ri~~g d~~a~fI'
sold curve., run Soulh 89'51'1
Wesl, 0 dIStance of 4.90 feet.
thence Soulh 00104'53" Wesl, ~dl&~
tance of 15.96 feell Ihence ulh
89?41'32' East, 0 dlJlo~ce 0 490
feel 10 fhe POINT OF BEGtNNtNG. '.
~~~alning 78 square feet more or ~
r:Ul~o. tor 112/1U:1I-1i.;
PARCEL NO.; "3 . ...
f&U~p~~AO 15 .
That pertlon of Ihe Soulh half of :~ ..
the ,North half of Lol F, W. Bear-
dali s Map of SI. Joseph's, accord. :',..
~:~~~I~ntlnue 5
01'24'Sj. e..l, a d~slonce of U-
feel; Ihence run Soufh 89'49'4 .
~~J. ~u~I~~~'l,c30'~~'I~..5~~~,~
distance of 14060 feel; Ihence run
Norlh 89"49'46" Eo,!. 8 dj~lonC1!.l!f
9.25 feel to the POtN' F 11:01_'"
~~~!olnlng 137 SQUare feet more.tr
.
rc:'m~Oo~~' for 1131713:16-~-
Each Defendanl Is further noll-
fled fhaf Ihe Pelllloner will pellfldn
k'l{N8.ru~dJlfH6fO.T8~.m&~re 1'l3
Ihe Judges of the above.s~.d
Courl, on Mondav lhe 13th dav of
Augusl, 2001, 01 9;30 o.m" In
~g~,W~~rl~ou~~, WleN~~mlpgr:
Avenue, Sanford, Florida, In ac-'
~!~,r~i~ngceh ~'~ro 1~~eDm~aJa"~o~h ft
cOUse. AIi Delendonts to Ihls suit
and all olher Inleresled parties
m~yptlmg~ f~~t 8r::.o~\n~a'k~
tng O;lhe lime and plac'!. deslg~al-
ed and be heard. Anv Defendant
lolling 10 file 0 llmeiv rllCluesl for
~g~lrro sp,~I~~~y~af~kr~:hf !o
AND
Each Defendanf and any Ofjr
lifrsons claiming any Interest n
e properlv described In Ihe Pe l-
Ion In the obove-slYle~ Emlnenl
~~~I~P:e~~e~~t~~ d:='~'i
any you have, 10 Ihe Pellllon hen,.
lofore flied In Ihls cause on Ihe PIti
~~l:.~0n"'iW. 'JI'elllr~'I::\t!."~~
der of Taking, If desired. on Petl-
floner's At1omey, whose name aad
address Is shown below on or ~
fore Mondav, AUgusl 6, 2.007 and
file the original of = written
~'t'hse '1:ffn~"r~~elh:orO~~I~,
T~~gb:\~~e~~fc~:n I~ 1?~t'i!
floner's Attornev or fmmed,atelr.
lhereafter, 10 show whal righi, .
tie. Interest or lien you have, 'If
any or claim In and 10 the proper-
~hoc:s~~L~ \~ ~~~ ~:JIt~~~~~~
~~n~or"r'\r.es~~~d 0~31 ~~,;,ons
as sel forlh In sold Petition. If ~
fall .10 answer, a default may be
5n'ered .':folnsl you for Ihe relief
f~l\"fon~equ~~t ~h~~~I~~~' I~~ W
~~~?t" .1grveo~~~rrl~lht~:~nb~'Cr~~
the Order of Tol<lng.
WITNESS my hand and seal of
sold Courl on June 25, 21107. .
MARYANNE MORSE CLERK of
THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND,
FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY,
FLORIDA
By:1S! Coral Moore
Deputv Clerk
ROBERT A. McMILLAN, Count';
~-;..I ..-...~'b'I.,.."._n'.:.lwl.l ('" .
ORDINANCE NO. 2007-22
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING A LARGE SCALE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC
SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT AND AMENDING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
ELEMENTS CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES;
PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AFFAIRS, THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS, SEVERABILITY, INCORPORATION INTO THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND LEGAL STATUS OF
THE PLAN AMENDMENTS.
City of Winter Springs
Comprehensive Plan
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
August 2007
(Ord. 2007-22; 12-10-2007)
Prepared in Conjunction
with the Local Jurisdictions of Seminole County By:
City of Winter Springs
Community Development Department- Planning Division
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
CHAPTER IX
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
A. INTRODUCTION
The Public Schools Facility Element includes objectives and policies to support the provision of
public school facilities in a timely manner. However, it is not intended to be construed to interfere
with the School Board's constitutional and statutory obligation and sovereignty to provide a uniform
system of free public schools on a countywide basis or to require the School Board to confer with,
or obtain the consent of, the City, as to whether that obligation has been satisfied.
Additionally, this Element is not intended to be construed to impose any duty or obligation on the
City for the School Board's constitutional or statutory obligations. The City of Winter Springs does
not have the authority to directly provide school facilities, but is required by State Law to work with
the Seminole County School Board to address the coordination of public school facility planning
with land use planning and development approvals. The City of Winter Springs continues to be
responsible for approving or denying comprehensive plan amendments and development approvals
within its own jurisdiction, and nothing herein represents or authorizes a transfer of any of this
authority to the School Board.
Legislation enacted by the 2005 Florida Legislature mandated a comprehensive approach to school
planning by revising laws that govern both school districts and local government planning. A
coordinated effort was undertaken by the local jurisdictions of Seminole County and the Seminole
County School Board. Preparation of a new 2007 Inter/ocal Agreement for Public School Faciliry Planning
and School Concumnry including procedures for coordinating land use planning, development
approvals and school planning was the first step in this process and was adopted by the Board of
County Commissioners, City Commissions, and the Seminole County School Board.
The 2005 Legislation also included adoption of a Public School Facilities Element consistent with
those adopted by the other local governments within the County and consistent with the 2007
Inter/ocal Agreement for Public School Faciliry Planning and School Concumnry, sections 163.3177(12) and
163.3180 F.S. and Rule 9]-5.025, F.A.C. and which describes a proportionate-share mitigation
methodology. Additional amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan required by the 2005
legislation include:
. Adoption of the Level of Service standards applicable countywide that establish maximum
permitted school utilization rates relative to capacity into the Capital Improvements
Element;
. Adoption of the financially feasible Public School Capital Facilities Program addressing
school capacity improvements into the Capital Improvements Element that is adopted as
part of the Seminole County School Board's overall Capital Improvements Program;
. Amendments to revise objectives and policies that address the City's process of coordination
with the School Board in the Intergovernmental Coordination Element.
IX-1
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The following Tables indicate permanent school building capacity for every school under the
jurisdiction of the Seminole County School Board:
TABLE IX-I.I: Inventory of Elementary Schools
Elementary .\'ite Building J>amnnent BlIJg SHJ6-07
Se/rool Acrenge'" Sll Ft1< Stut/ent Capaci~l'1< FTEu
i\1. TA.'-10}.o"TE ELE'\1B.i'T ARY 15 116.223 991 864
BEAR LAKE ELEMENTARY 20 106.368 1.026 1.079
BENTLEY ELEMENTARY 17 127.200 933 975
CARILLON ELEMENTARY 34 125.997 942 801
CASSELBERRY ELE~.1ENTARY 10 105.147 906 798
CRYSTAL LAKE ELEMENTARY 10 110.873 827 661
EASTBROOK ELEMENTARY 15 107.352 932 816
ENGUSH ESTATES ELEIvIENTARY 21 117.412 843 762
EVA..~S ELEl>vIENTARY 25 103,745 974 858
FOREST CITY ELEMENTARY 15 133.598 956 871
GENEVA ELEMENI ARY 15 102.803 601 502
GOLDSBOROELEIvIENTARY 20 106.421 713 684
HAMILTON ELEMENTARY 19 89.598 725 816
HEATHROW ELEIvIENTARY 15 89,172 862 1.119
HIGHLAi'IDS ELEMENTARY 25 106.395 625 546
IDi'LL WILDE ELEMENTARY 15 104.399 825 887
KEETH ELEMENTARY 15 76,921 576 776
LAKE MARY ELEIvIENTARY 11 72,452 632 610
LAKE ORIENT A ELEr..1ENTARY 10 80.067 169 699
LAWTON ELEMENTARY 21 119.445 882 881
LAYER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 15 117,306 735 634
LONGWOOD ELEIvIENTARY 11 83.704 715 668
MIDWAY ELE~IENTARY 11 77.664 115 409
PARTIN ELEMENTARY 15 92,989 748 795
PINE CREST ELEMENTARY 25 104.709 823 880
RAINBOW ELEMENTARY 15 91.341 749 888
RED BUG ELEMENTARY 15 97.335 513 841
SABAL POINT ELEMENTARY 15 78.047 261 815
SPRING LAKE ELEMENTARY 20 83,638 331 820
STENSTROt.l ELEMENTARY 15 92.372 632 719
STERLING PARK ELEIvIENTARY 16 78.502 195 653
\VALKERELEMENTARYSCHOOL 15 115.802 937 890
WEKIVA ELEMENTARY 15 64,338 407 871
WICKLOW ELE},1ENTARY 16 113.694 804 821
\VlLSONELEMENTARY 16 117,159 881 950
WINTER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 15 107.487 810 632
WOODLANDS ELEMENTARY 20 95.295 840 815
Total 618 3,712,970 26,436 29,106
Average 17 100,351 714 787
Standal'd Per FTE 0.0212 128
*Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH)
**Seminole County School District Staff
IX-2
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
TABLE IX-2: Inventory of Middle Schools
Wid/IlL' Sill' Illlilding Permanenl/Illlg SYfJ6-07
ScllOOi Acreage" SII1'1" Sturlent Capacity"" FIE"'"
GREENWOOD LAKES MIDDLE 25 185,964 1.281 1,176
INDIAN TRAILS :MIDDLE 20 166.249 1.366 1.407
JACKSON HEIGHTS MIDDLE 62 146.427 1.345 1.293
L<\ WTON CHILES MIDDLE SCHOOL 25 193.512 1.419 1.450
MARKHAM WOODS MIDDLE 22 179.920 1.251 852
MILLENNIUM MIDDLE 28 212.031 1,548 1.746
!vfIL WEE MIDDLE 27 147.596 1,301 1.146
ROCK LAKE MIDDLE 17 131.544 1.153 1.124
SA.c'-Tf'ORD MIDDLE 28 159.741 1.408 1.319
SOUTH SE~IINOLE ~IIDDLE 21 143.730 1.179 1.221
TEAGUE MIDDLE 20 148,072 1.476 1.618
TUSKA WILLA ~IIDDLE 20 170.701 1,250 1.153
Total 315 1,985,487 15,977 15,505
Avel'age 26 165,457 1,331 1,292
Standal'd Pel' FTE 0.0197 124
* Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH)
-Seminole County School District Staff
TABLE IX-3: Inventory of High Schools
lliglJ /'iite Hllilding Permanent Hidg SY06-07
Srhooi Acreage" Sll N" Sturlenl Capacity"" F1'E""
CROOMS ACADEMY OF INFORMATION 20 103.956 901 529
HAGERTY HIGH SCHOOL 60 362,973 2,746 1.052
LAKE BRANTLEY SENIOR HIGH 52 364.488 2.944 3,206
LAKE HOWELL SENIOR HIGH 43 308.744 2.363 2.241
LAKE MARY SENIOR HIGH 50 357.293 2,831 2.589
LYMAN SENIOR HIGH 47 364.309 2.517 2.324
OVIEDO SENIOR HIGH 52 359.3 71 2.746 2.756
QUEST ACADE!\fY 2 18.665 125 104
SEMINOLE SENIOR HIGH 53 350,706 3.049 3.187
WTh.'TER SPRINGS SENIOR HIGH 59 305,635 2.445 2.489
Total 438 2,896,140 22,667 20,477
A vel'age 44 289.614 2,267 2,048
Standal'd Pel' FTE 0.0193 128
* Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH)
-Seminole County School District Staff
IX-3
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
C. ISSUES AND CONCERNS
1. Identifying Sites for Future School Facilities. The 2007 Inter/ocal Agreement for Public School
Facility Planning and School Concumnry provides a process for identifying future school sites. The
process includes, at a minimum, semi-annual meetings of the Planning Technical Advisory
Committee (PTAC) that can be used to coordinate land use and school facility planning. The next
step in that process is a committee created by the 2007 Inter/ocal Agreement for Public School Facility
Planning and School Concumnry, the Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (pSFPC). The
PSFPC has several responsibilities, including review of PTAC fIndings and submittal of
recommendations to the School Board. In order to ensure that the redevelopment and revitalization
of older portions of unincorporated Seminole County can continue, the issue of sites will continually
need to be addressed as part of the ongoing cooperative planning effort specifIed by the 2007
Inter/ocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concumnry.
2. Population and Student Projections. In accordance with the 2007 Inter/ocal Agreement jor Public
School Facility Planning and School Concumnry, Winter Springs and the School Board will share
population projections and projections of student enrollment for use in their planning efforts. The
2007 Inter/ocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concumnry specifIes that the parties
will use student enrollment projections provided by the School Board. However, the source of
student enrollment projections is based on the Capital Outlay Full Time Equivalent (COFTE)
cohort projections issued by the Department of Education in July of each year. These COFTE
projections are related to past enrollment trends and do not consider such factors as reduced land
availability for future growth and development. As the City of Winter Springs grows closer to
reaching build-out, these projections will become less reliable.
3. Proportionate Share Mitigation Efforts and Alternative Mechanisms for Ensuring School
Capacity. The 2007 Inter/ocalAgreementfor Public School Facility Planning and School Concumnry outlined
the process by which the School Board may entertain proportionate share mitigation options.
Proportionate share mitigation allows a developer to pay that portion of the cost of providing
capacity in a school facility that is necessary to serve that particular development or redevelopment
project. The methodology for calculating a developer's proportionate share as specifIed in the 2007
Inter/ocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concumnry is included in this Element
and will be added to the City's Land Development Regulations as part of the Concurrency
Management System. Mitigation options offer a variety of alternatives, including construction of a
charter school by the developer. If a mitigation proposal fails, the 2007 Inter/ocal Agreement for Public
School Facility Planning and School Concumnry offers an appeal process specifIed by Chapter 120, Florida
Statutes (FS.) as an alternative.
Another allowable alternative mechanism for mitigation impacts on schools is the establishment of
an Educational Facilities BenefIt District as allowed by Section 1013.355, F.S. This option permits
school districts and local governments to enter into separate Interlocal Agreements to arrange for
fInancing a school to allow redevelopment, revitalization or other development efforts, when
property owners involved agree to this special assessment. Osceola County adopted an ordinance
creating such a District in 2003. Should redevelopment and revitalization efforts in the City be
unable to proceed, even with proportionate share mitigation, further examination of the use of an
Educational Facilities BenefIt District may be needed.
IX-4
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
D. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL IX- 1: PROVIDE QUALITY EDUCATION. As a basic tenet of community life, it is the
goal of the City of Winter Springs to contribute to and maintain a high quality public school
environment.
Objective IX- 1: Level of Service Standards and Service Boundaries. The City of Winter
Springs shall coordinate with the Seminole County School Board in the School Board's efforts to
correct existing deficiencies and address future needs through implementation of adopted level of
service standards and appropriate public school facility service area boundaries.
The level of service standard is a countywide standard specified in the 2007 Inter/ocal Agreement]or
Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrenry, wherein the following terms are used:
Permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH):- meaning the permanent facilities within the
inventory of land, buildings and rooms in public educational facilities used by the Florida
Department of Education, Office of Educational Facilities; and
Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board and adopted
by local governments within which the level of service is measured when an application for
residential development is reviewed for school concurrency purposes. The CSA coincides with
groupings of school attendance zones within each school type based on adjacency.
Level of Service (LOS) standard- meaning a standard established to measure utilization of capacity
within a Concurrency Service Area (CSA). [Current LOS within a CSA is determined by dividing the
full-time equivalent student count (FTE) for the Fall Semester at the same type of schools by the
permanent FISH capacity of the same type of schools. Projected or future LOS is determined by the
dividing the projected enrolled students at the same type of schools within a CSA by the planned
permanent FISH capacity of the same type of schools.
Policy IX- 1.1: Adoption of Level of Service Standards (LOS). To ensure that the
capacity of schools is sufficient to support student growth, the City along
with other cities within the Seminole County, the County, and the School
Board agree that the desired LOS standard shall be 100% of the
aggregate permanent FISH capacity for each school type within each
Concurrency Service Area (CSA.).
To financially achieve the desired LOS standard, the following tiered
LOS standard is established as follows:
Elementary &
Middle CSA
High School
CSA
2008 - 2012
100% of Permanent
FISH Ca aci
110% of Permanent
FISH Ca aci
Be innin 2013
100% of Permanent FISH
Ca aci
100% of Permanent FISH
Ca aci
Policy IX- 1.2:
Use of Level of Service (LOS) Standards. The City shall use its
Concurrency Management System to coordinate with the School Board
and other local jurisdictions to ensure that the LOS standards established
for each school type is maintained.
IX-5
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policy IX- 1.3:
Policy IX- 1.4:
Policy IX- 1.5:
Policy IX- 1.6:
Use of Concurrency Service Area (CSA) Boundaries. The City shall
apply school concurrency using CSA boundaries adopted by the School
Board.
CSAs for Each Type of School. The CSA boundaries established by
the School Board will be based on clustered attendance zones for each
school type (elementary, middle and high school) based on adjacency and
will be re-evaluated by the School Board, as needed.
CSA Boundary Changes. At the determination of the School Board,
CSA maps may be modified from time to time, to maximize utilization of
school capacity. The School Board shall transmit the proposed. change
request with supporting data and analysis to the City and the other local
jurisdictions. The City, upon receipt of supporting data and analysis for
the proposed modification shall review and submit comments to the
School Board within forty-five (45) days.
Coordination of School Board Capital Improvements Schedule
and Potential CSA Boundary Changes. As identified in the 2007
lnter/ocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concumnry,
the School Board's annual update of its Capital Improvements Schedule
will include review of attendance zone changes and if necessary,
modifications to the CSA maps to the greatest extent possible to provide
maximum utilization.
Objective IX- 2: Development Review Coordination to Achieve Concurrency. The City of
Winter Springs will coordinate with the Seminole County School Board in the City's development
review efforts to achieve concurrency in all public school facilities.
Policy IX- 2.1:
Policy IX- 2.2:
Development Review Process. The City shall withhold or condition
the approval of any site plan, final subdivision, or functional equivalent
for new residential units not exempted, until a School Capacity
Availability Letter Determination (SCALD) has been issued by the
School Board to the City indicating that adequate school facilities exist or
until a mitigation agreement has been reached, pursuant to the availability
standard specified in section 163.3180(13)(e), Florida Statutes.
Adoption of School Concurrency Provisions into the City's Land
Development Regulations. The City shall adopt school concurrency
provisions into its land development regulations for the review of
development approvals, consistent with the requirements of the 2007
lnter/ocal Agreement]or Public School Facility Planning and School Concumnry]or
Coordinated Planning and School Concumnry.
IX-6
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Objective IX- 3: Coordination of Existing and Future School Facility Planning with the
Future Land Use Element and Development Approval Process. The School Board shall
coordinate future siting of schools and capacity needs with development approvals and changes to
the City's Future Land Use Plan Map (FLUM).
Policy IX- 3.1: Coordination of Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Facility
Planning. The City will consider the availability and future provision of
school facility capacity, the provision of school sites and facilities within
neighborhoods, the compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing
schools and reserved school sites, the co-location of parks, recreation and
neighborhood facilities with school sites and the linkage of schools,
parks, libraries and other public facilities with bikeways, trails, and
sidewalks for safe access during the review of proposed comprehensive
plan land use map amendments.
Policy IX- 3.2: Site Sizes and Co-location in the City. The City will work with the
School District to identify sites for future educational facilities that meet
the minimum standards of the School Board where possible and which
are consistent with the provisions of the Winter Springs Comprehensive
Plan. When the size of available sites does not meet the minimum
School Board standards, the City will support the School Board in efforts
to use standards more appropriate to a built urban environment. To the
extent feasible, as a solution to the problem of lack of sufficiently sized
sites, the City shall work with the School Board to achieve co-location of
schools with City facilities.
Policy IX- 3.3 Participation in Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC).
The City shall participate in the Planning Technical Advisory Committee
(PTAC) meetings, as provided in the 2007 Inter/ocal Agreement for Public
School Faciliry Planning and School Concumnry for Coordinated Planning and
School ConcUfTenry, for the purpose of discussing issues and formulating
recommendations to the Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee
(pSFPC) regarding coordination of land use and school facilities
planning, including such issues as population and student projections,
development trends, school needs, co-location and joint use
opportunities, ancillary infrastructure improvements needed to support
the schools, School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the
Public School Concurrency Program.
Policy IX- 3.4 Determining Impacts. The determination of adequate school capacity
will be the responsibility of the School Board.
Policy IX- 3.5 Notification of Submittal of Residential Applications. The City shall
notify the School Board within 10 working days of receipt of any land
use or development application having a residential component and will
transmit submitted subdivision plans and site plans to the School Board
for their review.
IX-7
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policy IX- 3.6
Notification of Meetings. The City shall provide the School Board
with agendas of staff review, the Planning & Zoning Board/Local
Planning Agency and the City Commission meetings.
Objective IX- 4: Concurrency. The City of Winter Springs shall require that public school facility
capacity is available concurrent with the impacts of new residential development, as required by
Section 163.3180(13)(e), Florida Statutes (F.S.)
Policy IX- 4.1:
Policy IX- 4.2:
Policy IX- 4.3:
Timing of Concurrency Review. The City shall require that all new
residential development be reviewed for school concurrency prior to
development approval as defined in the 2007 lnterlocal Agreement for Public
School Faciliry Planning and School Concurrenry for Coordinated Planning and
School Concurrenry.
Results of Concurrency Review. In compliance with the availability
standards of Section 163.3180(13)(e), F.S., the City shall not deny
development approval due to failure to achieve the adopted LOS for
public school facilities when the following occurs:
. Adequate school facilities are planned and will be in place or under
construction within three (3) years of the development approval.
. The developer executes a legally binding commitment to provide
mitigation proportionate to the demand for public school facilities
consistent with the methodology in the 2007 lnterlocal Agreement for Public
School Faciliry Planning and School Concurrenry for Coordinated Planning and
School Concun-enry.
Residential Uses Exempt from the Requirements of School
Concurrency. The following residential uses shall be exempt from the
requirements of school concurrency:
. All single family lots of record at the time the school concurrency
implementing ordinance became effective.
. Any new residential development that has a preliminary plat or site
plan approval or the functional equivalent for a site specific development
order prior to the commencement date of the School Concurrency
Program on July 1, 2008.
. Any amendment to a previously approved residential development
which does not increase the number of dwelling units or change the type
of dwelling units.
. Any age restricted community with no permanent residents under the
age of 18 (a restrictive covenant limiting the age of residents to 18 and
older shall be required.)
IX-8
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policy IX- 4.4:
Policy IX- 4.5
Use of Revenues Received Through Proportionate Share
Mitigation. Any revenues received for proportionate share mitigation
are to be directed by the School Board toward a school capacity
improvement identified in the School Board's Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan.
Proportionate Share Mitigation. In the event there is not available
school capacity to support a development, the School Board may
entertain proportionate share mitigation options and, if accepted, shall
enter into an enforceable and binding agreement with the developer to
mitigate the impact from the development through the creation of
additional school capacity.
A. When the anticipated student impacts from a proposed development
cause the adopted LOS to be exceeded, the developer's proportionate
share will be based on the number of additional student stations
necessary to achieve the established LOS. The amount to be paid will be
calculated by the cost per student station for elementary, middle and high
school as determined and published by the State of Florida.
B. The methodology used to calculate a developer's proportionate share
mitigation shall be as follows:
Proportionate Share = CDevelopment students - Available Capacity)
x 2Total Cost per student station
Where:
lDevelopment students = those students from the development that
are assigned to a CSA and have triggered a deficiency of the available
capacity.
zrotal Cost = the cost per student station as determined and
published by the State of Florida.
C. The applicant shall be allowed to enter a 90-day negotiation period
with the School Board in an effort to mitigate the impact from the
development through the creation of additional capacity. Upon
identification and acceptance of a mitigation option deemed financially
feasible by the School Board, the developer shall enter into a binding and
enforceable development agreement with the School Board.
1. A mitigation contribution provided by a developer to offset the
impact of a residential development must be directed by the School
Board toward a school capacity project identified in the School
Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Capacity enhancing
projects identified within the first three (3) years of the Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan shall be considered as committed in
accordance with Section 9.5 of the 2007 Inter/ocal Agreement for Public
School Facility Planning and School Concurrenry for Coordinated Planning and
School Concurrenry.
IX-9
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
2. If capacity projects are planned in years four (4) or five (5) of the
School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan within the same
CSA as the proposed residential development, the developer may pay
his proportionate share to mitigate the proposed development in
accordance with the formula provided in Section 12.7 (B) of the 2007
Inter/ocal Agreement for Public School Faciliry Planning and School Concurrenry
for Coordinated Planning and School Concurrenry.
3. If a capacity project does not exist in the Capital Improvement
Plan, the School Board will add a capacity project to satisfy
the impacts from a proposed residential development, if it is funded
through the developer's proportionate share mitigation contributions.
Mitigation options may include, but are not limited to:
a. Contribution of land or payment for land acquisition suitable
for and in conjunction with, the provision of additional school
capacity; or
b. Mitigation banking based on the construction of a
educational facility in exchange for the right to sell capacity
credits; or
c. Provide modular or permanent student stations acceptable
for use as an educational facilities; or
d. Provide additional student stations through the remodeling of
existing buildings acceptable for use as an educational facility; or
c. Construction or expansion of permanent student stations at
the impacted school within the CSA; or
f. Construction of a educational facility in advance of the time
set forth in the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement
Plan.
D. For mitigation measures (a) thru (f) above, the estimated cost to
construct the mitigating capacity will reflect the estimated future
construction costs at the time of the anticipated construction.
Improvements contributed by the developer shall receive school impact
fee credit.
E. Developer shall receive an impact fee credit for the proportionate
share mitigation. Credits will be given for that portion of the impact fees
that would have been used to fund the improvements on which the
proportionate fair share contribution was calculated. The portion of
impact fees available for the credit will be based on the historic
distribution of impact fee funds to the school type (elementary, middle,
high) in the appropriate CSA. Impact fee credits shall be calculated at
the same time as the applicant's proportionate share obligation is
calculated. Any school impact fee credit based on proportionate fair
share contributions for a proposed development cannot be transferred to
any other parcel or parcels of real property within the CSA.
IX-10
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policy IX- 4.6
F. A proportionate share mitigation contribution shall not be
subsequently amended or refunded after final site plan or plat approval to
reflect a reduction in planned or constructed residential density.
G. Impact fees shall be credited against the proportionate share
mitigation total.
H. Any proportionate share mitigation must be directed by the School
Board toward a school capacity improvement identified in the School
Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
I. Upon conclusion of the negotiation period, a second Determination
Letter shall be issued. If mitigation is agreed to, the School Board shall
issue a new Determination Letter approving the development subject to
those mitigation measures agreed to by the local government, developer
and the School Board. Prior to, site plan approval, final subdivision
approval or the functional equivalent, the mitigation measures shall be
memorialized in an enforceable and binding agreement with the local
government, the School Board and the Developer that specifically details
mitigation provisions to be paid for by the developer and the relevant
terms and conditions. If mitigation is not agreed to, the Determination
Letter shall detail why any mitigation proposals were rejected and why
the development is not in compliance with school concurrency
requirements. A SCALD indicating either that adequate capacity is
available, or that there is not a negotiated proportionate share mitigation
settlement following the ninety (90) day negotiation period as described
in Section 12.7(B) of the 2007 Inter/ocal Agreement for Public School Faciliry
Planning and School Concurrenry for Coordinated Planning and School Concurrenry
constitutes final agency action by the School Board for purposes of
Chapter 120, F.S.
Appeal Process. A person substantially affected by a School Board's
adequate capacity determination made as a part of the School
Concurrency Process may appeal such determination through the process
provided in Chapter 120, F.S.
Objective IX- 5: Procedure for Annual Update of Capital Improvements Element. The City
of Winter Springs shall amend its Capital Improvement Element (CIE) to include that portion of the
adopted School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan which deals with capacity
improvements.
Policy IX- 5.1
Annual Update of Capital Improvements Element. On an annual
basis, no later than December 1 st of each year, the City shall update the
City's Capital Improvements Element to include that portion of the
School Board's annual update of their financially feasible Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan related to capacity improvements. However,
the City shall not have the obligation, nor the responsibility for funding
or accomplishing the School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
IX-11
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policy IX- 5.2
Policy IX- 5.3
Addition of New Financially Feasible Fifth Year Projects During
Each Update. Each annual update to the Capital Improvements
Element shall include a new fifth year with its financially feasible school
capacity projects that have been adopted by the School District in its
update of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Schedule.
Compliance with Florida Statute in Timing of Capital
Improvements Element Update. The City shall amend its Capital
Improvements Element to reflect changes to the School District's Five-
Year Capital Facilities Plan in compliance with timing requirements of
Florida Statutes.
Objective IX- 6: Ensuring Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses, Encouraging Co-
location with Appropriate City Facilities, Location in Proximity to Residential Areas to be
Served and Function as a Community Focal Point. The City of Winter Springs shall ensure
compatibility of school facilities with surrounding land use through the development review process
and shall encourage, to the extent feasible, co-location of new schools with compatible City facilities,
and the location of school facilities to serve as Community Focal Points.
Policy IX- 6.1
Allowable Locations of School Sites and Compatibility Standards.
School sites are allowable within any land use designation in the City
except Conservation/Conservation Overlay and possibly industrial areas
(Cross Reference FLUE Policy 1.11.1). Compatibility with adjacent land uses
will be ensured through the following measures:
. New school sites within the City must not be adjacent to any noxious
industrial uses or other property from which noise, vibration, odors,
dust, toxic materials, traffic conditions or other disturbances would
have a negative impact on the health and safety of students.
. Public school sites shall be compatible with environmental
protection, based on soils, topography, protected species and other
natural resources on the site.
. An assessment of critical transportation issues, including provision of
adequate roadway capacity, transit capacity and bikeways, shall be
performed for proposed school sites prior to any development to
ensure safe and efficient transport of students. .
. New school sites must comply with the City's land development
regulations and must minimize potential detrimental impacts on
adjacent uses by providing sufficient on site parking, sufficient
internal vehicular circulation to ensure that unsafe stacking of
vehicles on access roads does not occur, containment of off site light
spillage and glare, and reduction of off- site noise through
compliance with the City's buffer requirements.
. New school sites for elementary and middle schools shall be located
in close proximity to existing or anticipated concentrations of
residential development. New school sites for high schools and
IX-12
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policy IX- 6.2
specialized schools are suitable for other locations, due to their
special characteristics.
. The development review process shall ensure that facilities such as
sanitary sewer and potable water will be available at the time
demanded by the new school site, and services such as public safety
can also be provided.
. New school sites in shall have safe ingress and egress for pedestrians,
bicycles, cars, buses, service vehicles and emergency vehicles. High
schools should be located with access to collector or arterial roads,
rather than relying solely on local roads.
Co-Location and Community Focal Point. Recognizing that new
schools are an essential component in creating a sense of community, to
the extent feasible, the City shall encourage the co-location of new school
sites with appropriate City facilities, and shall encourage, through the
development review process, the location of new school sites so they
may serve as community focal points. Where co-location takes place, the
City may enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the School Board to
address shared uses of facilities, maintenance costs, vehicular and bicycle
parking, supervision and liability issues, among other concerns.
Objective IX-7: Ensuring Provision of Necessary Infrastructure. The School Board will
coordinate with the City of Winter Springs to ensure the timely provision of public facilities to
support the necessary functions of public school facilities.
Policy IX- 7.1
Policy IX- 7.2
Maximizing Efficiency of Infrastructure. During participation in the
future school site identification process detailed in the 2007 lnterlocal
Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrenry, the City
shall seek to maximize efficient use of existing infrastructure and avoid
sprawl development by identifying future school sites that take advantage
of existing and planned roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, parks and
drainage systems.
Safe Student Access. The City will ensure safe student access to school
sites by coordinating the construction of new neighborhoods and
residential developments, expansion of existing neighborhoods and
developments and redevelopment or revitalization of existing
neighborhoods and developments with Seminole County's safe road and
sidewalk connection programs to school sites.
IX-13
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policy IX- 7.3
Policy IX- 7.4
Policy IX- 7.5
Bicycle Access and Pedestrian Connection. The City will coordinate
bicycle access to public schools consistent with the Seminole County
countywide bicycle plan adopted by the Metropolitan Planning
Organization, METROPLAN. In addition, the City shall revise its
land development regulations as needed to specify that performance
standards for new residential developments adjacent to existing and
proposed school sites, other than age restricted developments, shall
include pedestrian connections between the sidewalk network within the
development and the adjacent school site.
Coordination to Ensure Necessary Off-Site Improvements. During
the development review process for a proposed new school facility the
City will work with the School Board to determine the party or parties
responsibility for the fInancing, construction, operating, and maintaining
of any needed off-site improvements, including but not limited to:
signalization, installation of deceleration lanes, roadway striping for
crosswalks, safe directional/warning signage and installation of sidewalks.
A new development adjacent to or sharing an access road with an
existing school or future school site shall mitigate the traffIc impacts of
the development for safe access to the school. Such mitigation efforts
may include, but are not limited to: developer striping of crosswalks,
developer installation of sidewalks, payment for safe directional/warning
signage, and payment for signalization.
Inclusion of Provisions for School Buses. The City shall revise its
land development regulations to require the inclusion of school bus stops
and turnarounds in new residential developments that are not age
restricted.
Objective IX-8 Coordination with School Board and Cities. The City of Winter Springs
shall coordinate with the School Board and other local jurisdictions as specifIed by the procedures in
the 2007 lnterlocal Agreement Jor Public School Faciliry Planning and School Concurrenry and provide
information for emergency preparedness.
Policy IX- 8.1
Providing Data to the School Board. The City shall maintain data on
the approved number of residential dwelling units by unit type and
location and the corresponding number of units within each
development that have received a certifIcate of occupancy (CO). The
data shall be provided to the School Board annually by October 15th.
IX-14
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policy IX- 8.2
Policy IX- 8.3
Policy IX- 8.4
Providing Representation. The City shall assign representatives to take
part in committees and meetings as specified by the 2007 Inter/ocal
Agreement for Public School Facilities Planning and School Concurrenry. A staff
representative shall be assigned to the Planning Technical Advisory
Committee (PTAC) which shall meet as specified in the lnterlocal
Agreement. An elected official or designee shall be appointed to the
Public Schools Facilities Planning Committee (pSFPC) which shall meet
as specified in the lnterlocal Agreement.
Advising of Proposed Changes. The City shall provide notification in
accordance with the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facilities
Planning and School Concurrenry. to the School Board of proposed
amendments to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), rezonings,
developments of regional impact, and/or major residential or mixed use
development projects that may increase residential densities, effect
student enrollment, enrollment projections, or school facilities. Such
notice will be provided within 10 working days of receipt of the
application.
Emergency Preparedness. The City shall continue to provide
information needed by the School Board and local jurisdictions for
emergency preparedness purposes.
IX-15
City of Winter Springs
Comprehensive Plan
INTERGOVERNMENT AL COORDINATION ELEMENT
October 2001
Amended, July 2007
Amended. December 2007
Prepared For:
City of Winter Springs
Community Development Department
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799
Prepared By:
Land Design Innovations, Inc.
140 North Orlando Avenue, Suite 295
Winter Park, Florida 32789
City of Winter Springs
Comprehensive Plan
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
October 2001
Amended, July 2007
Amended, December 2007
Prepared For:
City of Winter Springs
Community Development Department
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799
Prepared By:
Land Design Innovations, Inc.
140 North Orlando Avenue, Suite 295
Winter Park, Florida 32789