HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008 10 23 Public Hearing 500 Ordinance 2008-26 Amending the Comprehensive Plan-Annual Update to Capital Improvement ElementLOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
ITEM 500
October 23.2008
Meeting
Consent
Information
Public Hearin X
Re ular
REQUEST: The Community Development Department -Planning Division requests that the
Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing for consideration of Ordinance 2008-26,
amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate revisions and the annual update to the Capital
Improvement Element (CIE) required by Rule 9J-5.016 FAC and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. and
amending other elements of the plan as needed to ensure internal consistency.
PURPOSE: Annual update (with needed revisions) of the Capital Improvements Element
(CIE) in order to maintain a financially feasible 5-year schedule of capital improvements (SCI)
as required by the Florida Statutes.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
Florida Statute 163.3174 (4). (The LPA is responsible for monitoring and overseeing the comprehensive
planning program.)
Florida Statute 163.3177 (3)(a). (contents of the Capital Improvements Element)
Florida Statute s. 163.3164 (32). (definition of "financial feasibility")
Florida Statute s. 163.3180. (concurrency)
Florida Statute s. 166.041. Procedures for adoption of ordinances and resolutions.
Florida Administrative Code 9J-5.016. Capital Improvements Element. The purpose of the capital
improvements element is to evaluate the need for public facilities as identified in the other comprehensive
plan elements and as defined in the applicable definitions for each type of public facility, to estimate the
cost of improvements for which the local government has fiscal responsibility, to analyze the fiscal
capability of the local government to finance and construct improvements, to adopt financial policies to
guide the funding of improvements and to schedule the funding and construction of improvements in a
manner necessary to ensure that capital improvements are provided when required based on needs
identified in the other comprehensive plan elements. The element shall also include the requirements to
ensure that an adequate concunrency management system will be implemented by local governments
pursuant to Rule 9J-5.0055, F.A.C., of this chapter.
Winter Spr1nES Charter Section 4.15.Ordinances in General.
Winter Sprines Article III. Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
Section 15-37. Local Planning Agency Review and Recommendation:
October 23, 2008
Public Hearing Item 500
Page 2 of 3
CONSIDERATIONS:
In 1985, the Growth Management Act required each municipality to adopt local government
Comprehensive Plans to guide future growth and development; In 2005, Senate Bill 360
amended requirements of growth management laws; and in 2007, Statutes were amended by
House Bill 7203.
Florida Statutes require each municipality to annually update (and revise as needed) their Capital
Improvements Element (CIE) in order to maintain a financially feasible 5-year schedule of
capital improvements.
Failure to adopt the CIE amendment will result in the State prohibiting the City from adopting
future land use amendments. Failure to meet obligations identified in the CIE may result in
sanctions by the Administration Commission including ineligibility for grants.
The CIE amendment includes an assessment of the current operating conditions of the
concurrency related facilities (sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, parks and
recreation, schools, and transportation facilities) to identify current deficiencies and a projection
of future operating deficiencies to identify needed capital improvements. (A deficiency is a
facility or service that does not meet (i.e., is operating below) the adopted LOS Standard.)
The CIE amendment also includes revisions to out of date goals, objectives and policies required
by Rule 9J-5.016 FAC and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. Because, internal consistency must be
maintained within the Comprehensive Plan, amendments to other elements are included where
necessary, to maintain consistency with the CIE.
A major component to the CIE amendment is the Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI). Rule
9J-5.003(12), FAC defines "capital improvements" as physical assets "which are large scale and
high in cost... generally non-recurring and may require multi-year financing." The SCI includes
capital projects greater than $50,000 that are necessary to achieve and maintain LOS standards,
reduce existing deficiencies, provide for necessary replacements, and meet future demand during
the time period covered by the SCI. Only projects required to maintain the LOS standards
identified in the Comprehensive Plan are included in the SCI.
Florida Statutes require the SCI to be financially feasible. Supporting data and analysis must
demonstrate that sufficient revenues are currently available or will be available from "committed
funding sources" to fund the projects included in the first three (3) years of the SCI. Projects in
years four (4) and five (5) maybe funded from sources that are either "committed "or "planned".
("Committed" revenue is an existing source and amount of revenue currently available to the
City; "Planned" revenue is revenue that requires a referenda or other action, such as securing a
grant. )
Although any project included in the SCI represents a pledge by the City to pursue its
implementation, planning for projects included in the first three (3) years of the SCI must be
sufficiently advanced in order to determine the year of construction and to ensure that funding
from a committed source is allocated to the project. A CIE amendment is required to change the
scheduled year of construction of a project (sec. 163.3177(3)(b)1, F.S.)
October 23, 2008
Public Hearing Item 500
Page 3 of 3
If the annual update demonstrates that LOS standards will not be met within the 5-year schedule,
then the local government must adopt either a long term concurrency management system or
planning strategies in the CIE to address these deficiencies.
FINDINGS:
^ The amendment demonstrates that the City's LOS standards will be maintained during the
next 5-year planning period.
^ The amendment is financially feasible meaning that sufficient revenues are currently
available or will be available from committed funding sources to fund the projects included
in the first three (3) years;
^ Internal consistency within the Comprehensive Plan is maintained;
^ The CIE amendment is exempt from the normal biannual Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Cycle. No Transmittal Hearing is required, only an Adoption Hearing [Sec. 163.3177(3)(b)2,
F.S. and Sec. 163.3187(1)(f), F.S.].
^ The adopted amendment must be submitted to DCA no later than December 1, 2008.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing for consideration of
Ordinance 2008-26, amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate revisions and the annual
update to the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) required by Rule 9J-5.016 FAC and Chapter
163, Part II, F.S. and amending other elements of the plan as needed to ensure internal
consistency.
ANTICIPATED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
Oct. 23, 2008- Local Planning Agency to hold a public hearing, consider the amendment and make
recommendation to the City Commission.
Nov. 06, 2008- Public Noticing in Orlando Sentinel of Public Hearing.
Nov. 10, 2008- First Reading of Ordinance 2008-26 amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate
revisions and the annual update to the CIE.
Nov. 24, 2008- Second Reading/Adoption Public Hearing for Ordinance 2008-26, amending the
Comprehensive Plan to incorporate revisions and the annual update to the CIE.
Nov. 25, 2008- Transmittal to Florida Dept of Community Affairs.
Dec. 1, 2008- Statutory deadline for submittal of amendment.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Public Noticing of LPA in the Orlando Sentinel
B. Ordinance 2008-26 with Amendment
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY RECOMMENDATION:
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 9, loos F3 ATTACHMENT A
i
cops NDTI EA
's e • AND 0
of thfi On October 20 2008, f 9 iwtr on take Irmo• Pond. MIBIiC NOTICE IN THEE CIRCUIT COURT
pm., th• OriOndo tQity ID 1~99.30.0000-00.0~t Sec• FOR YOLUSIA COUNTY,
t
l
1
T
y
o
s IIIEETWI N2cORY N
!1hrN 0pY~1UNiTY
ate of DEYEIOPMENY DI81NICf on
2,
awnsh
untit will hold c Public T
V 22
C
outh, YOU WILL TAKE NOTICE FLORIDA.
Mearlnp In Clfy Council Ranye 30 ast Orange that on Wsdsss/s1~ toges>Mr CIVIL DIVISION
County
Florida (~epcl
CAcmbers
2nd
Flr
Cli
proo- stY et J
GSE N0
t00t
30311 CICI
80
RNd
th
t Ito-
claims Notice It MrebY given to all
THIN ,
,
,
.
.,
:
,
-
v
e
Y
/~.,
Nall, 100 SS Oron a Avenw, arty aiplion on file) reek Improvement Dls• UCIk IOOOICA83YIOOOOOOI
Orlando, Fl 3210 to consld• trio Board of Supervisors
Y
b
i
~
landowners within Me Ick-
FTER Dry Ne xt Corroudry~Dwd•
FIRST •• ^sol~sperslriet (the DISs ou may o
ta
K the second of two rsod•
n o copy of approved second readlrn of AUI1ppA aAN
BEAYKFS, U.C,
in s of: tM lepaf pr wrty descrltr Ordlnonce/Resolutlan 119: PIOIn11H,
p!p~pp~~pp CE OE THE pP lion by cpll~np t Comp• adoptlll~ amendment 9008
THIS TjICY) for lands generally
described os comorlclnp o~ft ALAND~ ORIDA. CH NGINp 1 oiler Clerk of 1M Board of WSFWP am ndI p and uo- vs.
E 2 11III G D BNA• ~ounty Commissioners. 107- dating ihq ~CI~ Compre•
o parcel of lend approxl•
ANDS mately 71fA7 are{, peneral• ON CEENEAAI uIuBS. 7700; or pltk one up at Mnslve Plon 9ppp88 an op• IIDIEAT NENIIY LeNAAF; et el.,
' 0 •C
~ South Rosalintl Avenue, proving trpnsm°Ittal 09 the Defendants.
l
NOT y located In the GryotWlrNer
~
l I
ICf OurID Floor; Orlando, report to the Deportment of /
l
I 1 0
FOR-
ulen, 0 e Wuory, Fbr
da,
odvismp~at c meetin or
tM landowners will be Meld
Dubli- }or the purpose of electlnp
i Y
N PAO ~ THE IN ET• Fbrido. Community AHain.
D tpUTN TNO ICE,pF BALE ~
sEC310N pF WI~ETEA OARpE~ N1r!-1N9 with oqet-sd~ ~Ipry ~dy Copies of sold resolution In MIRB iD CNAPE
ROAD AND ATN IVEY LAN
~ tM lorm In whlfh II was
Nd
lY
~
~~
A
s thrN (3) iuoervfsors.
Dsu: Nsyember l 7001
T
PY ne
rg
erelM
re
Ik
AN6
DOA A8 3M N M Ws Yw adoppted are avo !able for NO Y NEAEIY DNEN Iwrsu•
fVEY LINE' RE UELT IY a 1f uDlk Insxttlon of the d- ant an Order w Summo-
i~~E -R0~ ppWNEk A ON- ~iuwem~ si
flu of tM Distrlct, 190D Ho- ry F net Judgment of tbre-
U
d
IZI
NDYE
T
f
A
t
iros tdN
Plus: Drwernroereel
't M
i
t r
re erecee
O AN
N
O
cos r
0 I
L
e tel Plaz Bpulev~rd, Loke closure dated September 17,
ippNINO YAP; /ROYIDIN FOq wYe1 ree~ leelkudp Ols IssWeo Buena Vtlstc, Flor do. 1008, and entered n Case
lM
lkA Il
BEVERA8NT7Y AND AN CENE e
~
ew eneM
err
es •
Csc~rsl p~dds LLC
2p fop /Me );freer. y~ er
eee ape w
e No. 9001.30319 CI
IUCN:
DATE Interested parlits move 4 a M Brae! Bv: Angela Rao, Clerk d< A 30319XXXXXX of
appear and be heard ra•
Reedy Creek Nu ClrcuQf Court in and far
Suitt 880
Or s, ]1101 q
pardlnp same. A copy of tM B}erl ~ e!eylil eeeoesele• Improvement Dlstrict ~ Voluslo County Florida
Propposed Ordinance Is t~ e{~{ u 0 edoas w)U whereJn AUROkA LOAD
availobk In the Lity Clerk's 4!!eM~!! Act N IIID,!1!ew Bell OSC119DS3 IOR, 9, 100/ SERVICES, LLC Is Plointlff
enw Each landolvner may vote Olflce, City Hall. P
In person or by written wishing to appeal an
proxy. PraxY corms ma be Ion made durlnp the
62388 obtained upon reyves~ at Ina will need a record
the office of the Distrlct prot:eedinps InclVVdli
lOAd Manor er. located ai 201 testimony and evldei
East i~lne Street Suite 950 which iM appeal Is
Orlando, FL MBSI. At said Persons with d sob
r mNting each landowner or needing assistance }
hismer proxy shall be anti- fklpole In fhfis public
fled to cost one vote per .Ina should contact ih
acre of land owned by him/ Clerk's Office 0 (101
her and located wlihln the 2251, at least 11 Murs
~K• Distrlct far each Deraon vance of IAe meeting
elected. A frocflon o+ an
Y acre shall ba,treated as'one OL585/127 .
acre. On Octobdr 20 2001
Immediately tollowlnYY the m., the Orlando
to all landowners meeting than ~ountil will hold c '
mnef will De convened o repuSlpur eorlinpl rap Hv Cr
/rally ~ yr tlrwrit tTtrhe BmiNi o Is Hutal,nWOrS. OranYi A
(the open to the p bile and will Orlando, FL 32eo7 to r
ener• be conductca Yn accerdonce =r fM second of Iwo
~prr6• wNh tM rovlsions o- Flori• n s of• AN GROINN
c~eC do Low for Co munlN De- ODFp TNE` CITY OF Of
vtbpment Dlstr~cts. A copy roT GRANTING WAI
ride, of tM agenda for lhls meet• ~, A FLORIDA
r the Ina may be obtained from IT~D LIABILITY CC
the the Distrlct Manager at 101 NY A NpN•EXCLU
ewVor East Pine Street, Suite 950, FRANCHISE TO PRC
t ibi Orlando, FL 79/D1. ROLL•OF CONTA
laid COLLE4TION AND
TM mNtinp may W contln- PvO AL uF SOLID W
4nd ued to a date, time, and WI HIN THE CITY 0
e• place as ev)denGed b mo- LANDO; OUTLII
Walt lion of the mbJorl~y of FRAN HISEE'S DU
aped goord Members particlpat- AND ROVI ING
seta tng. TArn mov be acca- TERM AND CPONDII
rater dons when one or more Su- uNDERp WHICH
ieet- ppaarvrv
seas will participate by FRANCHISE BHALI
' of telephone. SEVERABRL~T pAN
ire. EFF~CTIVE DATE.
Pursuant to provisions of
~ the Americans with Disoblt• este parties may o
iHN Act, Dray person requlr- and be heard regal
Inl special ocCOmmodotlon same. A copy of the
Krt I'o p~rticlpote In lhls rraet• Dosed Ordinance is ~
rag s asked to adv{se the able In tM City Clerk
District OHlce of (107) Ml- ileac City HDII. Pei
'ue' 5521 al least flue calendar wishrnp to appeal any
days alor to the meeting. elan mode durlnp tM
It you .ore hearing or ing will need a record
cote sptech impaired please proceedinps includin
contact tM Flaido Relor tesflmanr and evlden
ten Service (100) 955-8770, who whiich the oppwl is t
~ of con old You in contacting Persons wlEh disoDl
Irct the Dlsfricf Office. needing 0eeletan[e t0
ticlpote In this public
ruth Eacn person wM decides to r should contact tM
opxol env ncf)on taken of Clerk's Otflce 0 (107
elan Il14 -v 1esn~r IbNiei~il W1~•gF
used. 3111.
ties
par• Mortho O. Haynie, County
e r• Comptroller
CIry As Clark of the Board of
116• County Canmissloners
i od• Olpn9e Lounty, Florida
I OLSI53919 lON
1~
DIIIC ~oF
cFry 00~~7708HHAA Do 310N
nV!' Notla Is Mnbv alven Mat
i
nor has
rarlonc
lion 111
Ilow an
are In•
ore
By: Angelo Rae, Ckrk `"' ""^' "'~ rurivwirn ao-
Reedv Creek cribed property as set
Improvement Dlstrict ~h In eeid Order of Final
Judgment, to-wlf:
)R//99SS 1DQ, 9, 2001 BUBDIYI E
D U AF _~,}
~€~T- GO eus
Or• these meetings Is advised 1251, of least 7/ Murs in od•
;pld that person will need o re• vona of the meelinp.
or cord d the praceedinps and
;I G~ that accordingly, the person OLS851161 1019
may need 10 enSUf! that p
lo- verbatim record of the aro• n cio 20 2008, a 1
far m., tAe Orlando City
ceedinps is mode, Including
I. A the testimony and evidence aunty! will hold a Public
be upon which such appeal is Heorinp In Clty Councll
to be based. Chambers, 2nd. Flr., City
Hall, 100 S. Orange Avenue.
the George 5. Flint Orlando, FL 721107 to consld~
ere Monaper Governmental er the seceM d two reedin
,tor AN OIIDWAN~E OF THE ~ f
Management Services '• di
Su- Centrot Florldo, LL RUING AY DIND CXAPTER 38
r of 4 Es THE I~{TT, ~~ppppE ppF RD NANCp•
she CORBSNbI 1019, !Glib 11IEI1TMENTNINWAO~~~~AEY
of Not ce of Landowners yA~N~IENDW'CC~, SOOFFECTION D7 ~of~ 6RRR~
iii SteverMn Ptinntation AIfD LTO ~~jyOpll~ro UCAEE~pCO~N•
me Commutia 01 landowners ~NTB uNANp tTR~tY PEF
bt• Meelinp Stevens PloMation 0 app Ill
ub• Community Development INp ~D~'p RENUMED PO
vi District TION F N DVID•
or Notice is nereDy Ylv~n to all aN
rnf landowners wifshln the Sfe- NOIr~ ~~ AMD ANE
.or yens PWnicfion Community DATE InMnstetl port es
Ito lorelvdilplnl~allyDlbpundtdfon Oppeor and De hears
on the west by Canoe Creek eardlrp somt. A copy r
pr Rood between 17th Street ovopabledn OhredC~fv CI
et• and DNr Run Road and on Office, CIfY Holl. Per
rm tM northeast byy tM Cifv of wishing to appeal onv
c., St. Cloud londtllh contaln• lion made durlnp iM
e, Ina apw4zimaMl 590 acres Ina will neatl q record r
da located In OsceaCo County, yroCeedinps Includlns
rap Florida, advlslno ikat a TN11monY and evident
meetinYY of IofldowMn wIH which iM appeal Is C~
be Aeld for t1~e purpose of Der one w11N Alsopll
ni electlnp IArN SuDervlwrs. M ~Inp ossl•tance to
h- Date: November d, 9001 1k~t~ind f is}op~uiblic
o- T1me:d:OD P.M.Cnl~erk's ~Ic• 0 f107~
a Ptoce:CiN Holl, 7rd Ibor, 2931, of least 91 rs i
at 1300 NIMh S5heet vona of fM meet rap.
m SL Cloud, Fbrldo
n OLSIS/965
Iv Each landowner may vote
ro n person or by wr71t0n
w hi~^P~ax~}orms m~>j D~ D NFAN
wiltlriptosnld~coiemcYy•sa PECTIN ppATE~ANDLE 125~EE~ppRANGE~AVE.,
verely restrict 1M ob1111y of GAL 5 ATUS OF THE ~AYT•ONA BEACH, FL
such a person to contest Ir'FLAN AMENDMENTS. 111/~ F~ 03/6251.6096
of o later date. WITFIIN Vl 1 WORK•
ON TNUII80AY,_0~~ ING DAY 0 `/ UR RE•
TM opplicatlons and assocl- ATT 1:90~E 0~~ CEIPT OF THE NOTICE
oted poperwak may be In• TEA TNt~'''~,Q OF ACTION/SALE; IF YOU
spatted by Me public of fM ql Ell 0 0 ARE HEARING IM•
Department of Develop- WI INC PAIRED, GALL 1.800-955-
ment Services 2315 Provi- tRl 8TA ppi~pp qq~~ A71• IF YOU ARE VOICE
dente Blvd., tsi floor, Delto- WINTER 8MWB8, NORIDA IMIIAIRED, CALL 1•e00•
nor, Florida, Monday -Fri- 955-0710 THIS IS NOT A
day, 1:00 a.m. • 5:00 p.m. The pproposed ordlnonce COURT INFORMATION
For further Information, may be Inspected by Inter- LINE
contact the City of Deltorw rated parties between 1
Oavelopment Services De• a.m. and 8 p.m., Monday Doted at Delontl, Florida,
eortment at 1386) 811-1100. through rldoY, of the on SEPTEMBER 25, 2008.
of any continuance of the ed at 1)26 Eost Sidts Rood
above schetluled public UI, Winter Springs, Fbri•
hearing will W announced da. Fa more information
of said public hearing and toll 1107) 327.11001217. Por-
no further notice repardlnp Wns with dlsobilltles neod-
sold continuance IS required Ina assistance to partialoato
to be published. In onv of mesa proceedings
It any
a
rjjy Persons with OISOD1litles Deal li bair
Eµ. n Ing. aslstonc/ to par- ppectin ore
pd. laic! t. In env of tsteu pro- tMy mpoY s
Clefy~~da I~ost~tMN (7 qpeel i to tE
109 wakirq Ys in odvo of Cinonce.
~ (3u) _. p_doff 0nd~me SL58S6S36
/ _ 1-7-H-10-0
DIANE M. MATOUSEK
As Clerk CircuH Court
!CIRCUIT trOURT SEAL)
Br: M S Mac of
As Deputy Clerk
AnDRNI;YS wR nurmFr:
.Ion PMrM: 1951) 561-OOII
sroNrl VOLI56111 1019, 10/16
ecl•
tai
jr. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
1 AND FOR ORANGE
the C LINTY, FLORIDA
Yrigo- mol•cA~11T"x
t Is COUNTRYNODE NOYE aANi. WC.
j~d PlalnfNl,
Antarl "s•
vIM /N A 0 E
a-
A 111 P
lOfl N.A., ana
ATTACHMENT B
Ordinance 2008-26
with the proposed amendments
to the Comprehensive Plan
will be conveyed separately, via email
once it is ready for distribution.
If you should desire a printed copy,
please contact the City Clerk's office
after receipt of the email and a hard copy
will be made available to you.
City of Winter Springs
Comprehensive Plan
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
October 2001
Amended, July 2007
Amended, January 2008
Draft Revisions, October 2008
Prepared For:
City of Winter Springs
Community Development Department
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799
Prepared By:
City of Winter Springs
Community Development Dept- Planning Division
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
The Cat~ital Improvements Element shall be the mec_hansm used to wide and implement the
Comprehensive Plan through the programming of public facilities and services as identified in the
other elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
GOAL 1:
~~e-e~~Iic-€~e~es-~tzeeded~e~ee~--t-l~dea?-e~~es=Qe~rts-~~-J
Provide public facilities and services which
protect and promote the public health, safety and general welfare of Winter Springs' residents in a
sustainable manner, while accommodating desired future growth and redevelopment at acceptable
Levels of Service.
Objective 1.1:
~rTr~~Annual Review. The City shall annually review and modify its Capital Improvements
F.le__ment__to ensure the financial feasibilit<~ and timely t~rovision of cat~ital facilities needed to
maintain Level of Service (LOS) standards.
Policy 1.1.1: A five-gear Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI (Table VIII-1, shall
identify capital projects needed to meet existing deficiencies, to
accommodate desired future growth and to replace obsolete or worn-out
facilities. The SCI shall identify funduig sources and shall be reviewed
and updated annually in order to maintain a continual five-year priority
and outline of capital projects planned for implementation.
Policy 1.1.2: The first year of the SCI will be included in the capital budget as part of
the annual budgeting process, along with any other capital improvements
that are identified in the City's Capital Improvements Program.
Policy 1.1.3: Capital projects shall be defined as those projects identified within the
other elements of the Comprehensive Plan that are necessary to meet
established LOS, increase the capacity or efficiency of existing
infrastructure, replace failing infrastructure or enhance facilities and
infrastructure that generally have a cost exceeding $50,000. (Ord. 2007-11;
07-23-2007)
Policy 1.1.4: Capital projects for the following facilities and infrastructure shall be
included and funded ~ ui the SCI:
c,
Transportation
Stormwater Management (Drainage)
Sanitary Sewer
VIII-1
Solid Waste
• Potable Water
• Parks and Recreation
Policy 1.1.5: The SCI will be updated to
maintain consistency withers-the Water Supply Work Plan (Exhibit IV-
B-1~. (Ord. 2007-11; 07-23-2007)
moved to another area)
Whether the project eliminates a public hazard;
Whether the project is necessary to meet established LOS;
Whether the project increases the efficiency of existing facilities or
infrastructure;
Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities within
the urban service area to accommodate desired future growth;
Whether the project implements the policies of the Comprehensive
Plan as they pertain to concurrency requirements;
Whether the project is financially feasible and its impact to the City's
budget;
Whether the project is coordinated with major projects of other
agencies; and
Whether the project is mandated by the State or Federal government.
Policy 1.1.6: An amendment to the comprehensive Plan is reduired to update the SCI
on an annual basis or to eliminate, defer, or delay the construction for
any facility listed in the five -year SCI. The amendment shall rewire only
a single adoption public hearing before the City Commission.
Policy 1.1.7: Corrections and modifications of costs and revenue sources in the SCI
ma~~ be made by orduiance without an amendment. ~ copy of the
ordinance shall be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community
Affairs following adoption.
Policy 1.1.8: If long term LOS deficiencies are projected, the Cite must adopt either a
long-term concurrency management s~~stem and a financially feasible
long-term capital improvements schedule or other planning strateg~% to
address these deficiencies.
Policy 1.1.9: Capital projects for school capacity improvements included in the
Seminole County School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan
adopted ~ 9~ September 9, 2008 for the fiscal year ~-
2008-200) through 2012-2013 are included
herein by reference.
Objective 1.2: Level of Service (LOS). The City shall utilize Level of Service OS criteria
defined in the various elements of this Plan when determining the timing and funding of capital
€ac~ities ro~ects. The City_ must demonstrate that the LOS standards will be achieved and
maintained b~,~ the end of the five-year planning period. A deficiency is a facility of service that does
not meet is operating below the adopted Level of Service (I.OS) standard.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Policy 1.2.1: Adopted LOS standards for facilities and infrastructure shall be as
follows:
a. Transportation Facilities- The following minimum LOS standards for
Transportation facilities based on average daily trips are: (sec Transportation
Element, Policy 1.1.1) (Oxd. 2005-11; 09-12-05) (Ord. 2007-22; 01-14-2008)
• Limited Access Roads: as prescribed by FDOT. (ord. 2007-22; 01-14-
2008)
• Arterials: LOS D
• Collectors: LOS D
b. Sanitary Sewer- 100 gallons per day per capita.
c. Solid Waste- 7.1 pounds per day per capita.
d. Potable Water- 115 gallons (minimum) per day per capita. (ord. 2007-
11; 07-23-2007) (Cross Reference: See Infrastructure Element, policy IV-B-1.1.)
e. Stormwater Management-
a. Water uantity -Peak post-development runoff rate shall
not exceed peak pre-development runoff rate for the 25-
year. 24-hour storm event. Each development shall
accommodate its proportion of basui runoff rate above the
downstream s~=stems actual capaciri=.
b. Water Quality= - Stormwater treatment system which meets
the requirements of the Florida Administrative (:ode
(F.A.C.) and which is site-specific or serve sub-areas of the
c
c. Roadway construction -All public roadway=s withui a
development shall be designed and constructed to standards
which do not allow any amount of water above the roadway
during the following storm events for the following roadway=
es:
i. Local Roadway - 25-year, 24-hour design storm
event 5.0 inches of rainfall
ii. Collector Roadway _ 25_~=ear, 24-hour design storm
event X8.6 inches of rainfall.
iii. Arterial Roadway - 100-year, 24-hour design storm
event (10.6 inches of rainfall
£ Parks- 5 acres (total park acreage) per 1,000 population.
g. School Capacity as established by the Seminole County School
Board- 100% of the aggregate permanent Florida Inventory of
School Houses (FISH) capacity for each school type within each
VIII-3
Concurrency Service Area, except for high schools which are
established at 110% of the aggregate permanent FISH capacity for
2008-2012 in order to financially achieve the desired LOS. (cross
Reference: Sec Public School Facilities 1?lemcnt, Policy IX-1.1.) (Ord. 2007-22; 01-14-
2008)
Policy 1.2.2: In coordination with other City dep
Development Department shall evaluate
determine fide compatibility e€~ke~
standards and with available to-
implementing improvements necessitated
artments, the Community
land use amendments to
tnenfis with the adopted LOS
funding fox
by the i~ ...~rl~l~i
~ land use amendments.
Policy 1.2.3: City capital projects shall use the following thresholds to target initiation
and budgeting of construction and/or purchase of capital facilities to
meet projected future needs based on adopted LOS standards:
Roadways -Volumes are at 90 % of adopted LOS capacity.
Sewer - 75 % of available capacity is being utilized.
Water - 75 % of available capacity is being utilized.
Stormwater -Adoption of TMDL Master Plan.
Recreation and Open Space -Park lands when 95 % of available land
area is utilized or when 90 % of the population exists in areas in need
of new park acreage.
Objective 1.3: Capital Improvement Evaluation. ~~Capital projects shall be evaluated to
determine if they meet the prioritization criteria and consistency with adopted Level of Service
~OS~ standards and/or public need.
Policy 1.3.1: The Commuiut~T Development Department-Planning Division shall
oversee the coordination of the Capital Improvements Element annual
update. The annual update is a 10-month process and is required to
ensure that necessary facilities and infrastructure to meet LOS standards
axe incorporated into the budgeting process.
Policy 1.3.2: Capital Project Reduest Forms will be prepared by the Community
Development Department-Planning Division and distributed to City
departments in Februar~~ each year.
Policy 1.3.3: Project reduests shall be prepared with a description of how the project
achieves or maintains LOS or how it will implement the Comprehensive
Plan. Requests shall include a detailed cost analysis, uicluding estimated
costs for design, construction, land acduisition, and annual operatuig and
maintenance costs.
Policy 1.3.4: [moved from another areal-Project reduests for capital projects shall be
prioritized according to the following criteria:
Whether the project eliminates a public hazard;
Whether the project is necessary to meet established LOS;
Whether the project increases the efficiency of existing facilities or
infrastructure;
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
• Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities within
the urban service area to accommodate desired future growth;
• Whether the project implements the policies of the Comprehensive
Plan as they pertain to concurrency requirements;
• Whether the project is financially feasible and its impact to the City's
budget;
• Whether the project is coordinated with major projects of other
agencies; and
• Whether the project is mandated by the State or Federal government_
Policy 1.3.5: Project requests jec~s shall be evaluated by the Finance
Department to determin~~a-each project's impact on the City
budget and the financial feasibility of the project.
°'~=The Finance Department shall ~ evaluat~~g-fie
each project's funding options, the effect of the improvement on future
revenues, and the effect of the improvement on operation and
maintenance costs.
> >
1
Policy 1.3.6: The Communit~~ Development Department shall evaluate the timing,
location, and service area for each project request and determuie the
project's consistenceswith the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. ~e
Policy 1.3.7: An internal Capital Improvements Element annual update workshop
shall be held in March to discuss project requests and staff's findings.
Policy 1.3.8: The resulting information shall be compiled into a draft Capital
Improvements Program which shall be presented to the Local Planning
Agency for review and recommendation prior to the City Commission
budget workshops.
Policy 1.3.9:
VIII-5
..~~~. 4L, .~ 4
4L, .. ~.4. ~.. s~,.4..~ r
---- =--~ ---r---- r~
-~--~~•
Policy 1.3.10: moved to another area)
Objective 1.4: New Development to Bear a Proportionate Cost.
°r.New development shall bear a proportionate cost of public facility improvements in
order to maintain adopted level of service R OS) standards.
Policy 1.4.1: All development order applications shall be evaluated as to the impact of
the development on capital facilities and the operation and maintenance
of those facilities. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, the
following:
Expected capital costs, including the installation of new facilities
required that are related to the development.
Expected operation and maintenance costs associated with the new
facilities required by the development.
Anticipated revenues the development will contribute, including
impact fees, user fees, and future taxes.
Policy 1.4.2: When applicable, the City shall utilize developer's agreements to ensure
the timely and appropriate installation of needed capital facilities to
service new development. Such agreements will be executed under the
City's constitutional home rule power as authorized in Chapter 166 a~
,Florida Statutes.
Policy 1.4.3: The timely installation of capital improvements required to meet LOS,
which are to be funded by a developer shall be guaranteed in an
enforceable development agreement, interlocal agreement, or other
enforceable a~ree~ ,
. Such agreements will be executed under the City's
constitutional home rule power as authorized in Chapter 166 a~
,Florida Statutes.
Policy 1.4.4: To ensure ~tethat LOS standards are maintained, ~
the City may require
~e-~se a developmenter's agreements and/or development to proceed in
more than one phase.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Policy 1.4.5: The City shall continue to use impact fees
~d~ee to assess
new
development a pro rata share of the costs reduired to expand or acduire
capital facilities or eduipment made necessary by the new construction
from which the fees were collected or for principal pad=menu on debt
instruments for these facilities and services.
Policy 1.4.6: New developments shall be responsible for installing all internal otable
and reclaimed water and sewer systems, vehicular and pedestrian
circulation systems, and internal recreation/open space facilities within
their development. In addition, connections of internal systems to the
City's designated major potable and reclaimed water and sewer trunk
systems and vehicular and pedestrian circulation network shall be
the financial responsibility of the developer. In lieu of providing these
systems, the developer may contribute funds quid pro duo for use by the
City for funding expansion of similar systems.
Objective 1.5: Funding Sources. The City shall pursue adequate funding of ~ ° ~'~~ ~~H,.4~,.,.4...~ ~c
~-capital projects identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements SCI ~ The School
District retains the responsibility for financing and constructing school facilities. (ord. 200-22; 01-14-
2008)
Policy 1.5.1: The Cite shall demonstrate that the Capital Improvements Element is
financially feasible by ensuring that sufficient revenues are currently
available or will be available from committed funding sources for the first
three ~=ears of the SCI ~"I'able VIII-1). Financial feasibility for years four
and five of the SCI shall be demonstrated by ensuring that fiords are
committed or planned. Committed revenue sources include: ad valorem
taxes,, approved bonds, secured grants, state and federal funds, tax
revenue, impact fees, service charges and developer contributions
included withui an enforceable development ~reement~
Policy 1.5.2: Planned revenue sources may include the City's intent to increase the
level or amount of a revenue source, which is contingent on ratification
by public referendum. However, if the referendum fails, the Cit~r will
amend the Capital Improvements Element to either include policies
which identify alternative funding sources or take other actions as needed
to make the SCI financially feasibility while meeting concurrence
Policy 1.5.3: If projects are to be funded b~funds generated from sources outside the
Cit#= are relied upon to satisfy LOS standards then those funds shall be
included as the revenue source within the SCI.
Policy 1.5.4: For capital improvements that will be funded by developers, fuiancial
feasibility shall be demonstrated by being guaranteed ui an enforceable
VIII-7
development agreement or interlocal agreement or other enforceable
agreement. The agreement shall be reflected in the SCI a5 the revenue
source, if the capital improvement is necessary to serve the development
within the 5-year period.
Policy 1.5.5: Criteria ui Selecting Sources to Finance Public Facilities:
To the extent possible the following sources (listed in order of priority
and preferences are to be utilized to finance public facilities:
• Grants or other intergovernmental sources
• Developer contributions (inclusive of dedicated land and impact fee
• User revenues (inclusive of charges for services, local option ag s tax,
etc.
• Sales tax (local option infrastructure surtax
• Proceeds of Debt Instruments
• rid valorem property taxes
Policy 1.5.6: The City shall continue to participate in MetroPlan Orlando to ensure
funding distribution for transportation projects identified in the SCI.
~~~ ~~T
Policy 1.5.7: -f89°~$€ State revenue sharing motor fuels tax funds sl~tll may be
used for traffic related maintenance and capital
improvement projects.
Policy 1.5.8: e€ Net proceeds, after payment of existing bond obligations, of the
Seminole County Local Option Gasoline Tax ~Gl~ shall be reserved
specifically for traffic related maintenance and capital improvement
projects.
Policy 1.5.9: ° Total proceeds from the Seminole County Local Option
Sales Tax 1 C'I~ shall be reserved for ~ transportation related
capital projects.
Policy 1.5.10: Funds collected from ire-T~a~s~ Impact Fees shall be reserved
for growth related capital mss-:outlays.
Policy 1.5.11: ~ nnoi ..t ~i.,. ~..,...~ Proceeds from the Stormwater Utility Fund SUF shall
be reserved for stormwater management operating needs and capital
projects.
Policy 1.5.12: The City shall m~o4aintain a reserve account restricted for sanitary sewer
related capital projects.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Policy 1.5.13: A portion of funds collected from the Utility Enterprise Fund TEF
shall be reserved to complete sanitary sewer and potable
water capital projects.
.: n ~ ,, t,. ~ ~ ., ~ ~t_ ~t~ .. ~,......... ~ t mot, ,.
Policy 1.5.14: The Code of Ordinances shall continue to contain provisions for all new
developments to provide parks and recreation lands and/or facilities
and/or fees-in-lieu-of as specified in the Recreation and Open Space
Element.
VIII-9
Objective 1.6: Debt Management. The City shall
. manage debt issuance and obligations according to sound public
fiscal management principles so that the Citv is able to provide needed capital improvements and
maintain services at adopted levels of service R OS~
Policy 1.6.1: Criteria for Managing Debt Financing:
The City does not have legal debt limits or utilize specific debt ratios
such as the limitation on the use of revenue bonds as a percent of total
debt• the maximum ratio of total debt service to total revenue• and the
maxiumum ratio of outstanding capital indebtedness to property tax
base. Instead each debt issuance is evaluated on an individual basis
giving consideration to the following factors:
• type of facili ,t being financed
• significance of the annual debt service requirement
• favorable impact to the City
• economic capacity of the City
• overlapping debt which depend on the same economic base
• projected City growth rate.
Policy 1.6.2: Debt will be managed with the goal of maintaining or enhancing the
City's credit rating so as to lower total borrowing costs.
Policy 1.6.3: Long-term debt will not be utilized to fiord current and ongoing
operations;
Short-term debt may be issued to allow the City to meet its cash flow
requirements or to provide increased flexibility in financing,programs;
Debt may be issued for renovations, updates, modernizations and
rehabilitations provided the expenditures extend the useful life of the
capital asset;
Capital financed through the use of long-term debt shall be financed for
~neriod not to exceed the expected useful life of the asset.
Policy 1.6.4: The City will utilize external bond counsel for all debt issues and bonds
issued by the City shall be competitively bid unless the Cit~pproves a
negotiated sale.
Policy 1.6.5: The use of revenue bonds as a debt instrument shall be further evaluated
based on the following criteria:
A five (5) year projection of committed and/or planned revenues
related to the capital project being financed from all funds shall be
prepared and updated annually as a part of the SCI update
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
The impact of principal and interest revenue bond payments on the
operation and maintenance of the affected utility and/or department
will not require deferring current maintenance of existing
infrastructure.
On an annual basis, the City will restrict, for enterprise operations,
the amount of cash as required by bond covenants for the purpose of
ensue adequate repair and/or replacement of capital facilities.
o ~
Policy 1.6.6: The use of tax revenues as a pledge for the repayment of debt shall be
further evaluated based on the following criteria:
A five (5) year projection of committed and/or planned revenues
related to the capital project being financed from all funds shall be
prepared and updated annually as a part of the SCI update ~i~
o ~
i Ee-
[covered under >.6.2J
• ,
0
Policy 1.6.7: The impact of principal and interest revenue bond payments on the
operation and maintenance of the affected utility and/or department will
not require deferring current maintenance of existing infrastructure.
Policy 1.6.8: Cash restricted due to bond and grant covenants will be budgeted in
accordance with the terms of the covenants.
VIII-11
0
i
Policy 1.6.9: The City will competitively bid investment of escrow funds for advance
refundings if it is expected that bids will result in a lower cost and the
required securities are available in the market.
Policy 1.6.10:
... 4.. ..~...~
Objective 1.7: Concurrency Management. The Ciry shall continue to operate a Concurrency
Management System for the review of all proposed developments within the Ci ~
As part of the City's
Concurrency Management System, the City will help facilitate school concurrency review by the
School Board and shall rely upon the School Board to determine and report to the City if school
capacity is available. (Ord. 2007-22; 01-14-2008)
The concurrency evaluation system shall measure the potential impact of any proposal for a
development permit or order upon the established minimum acceptable levels of service (LOS) for
public schools, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, parks and recreation, and
transportation facilities, unless the development permit or order is exempt from the review
requirements of this section. No development permit or order which contains a specific plan of
development, including densities and intensities of development, shall be issued unless adequate
public facilities are available to serve the proposed development as determined by the concurrency
evaluation set forth 1n this section. (Ord. 2007-22; 01-14-2008)
Policy 1.7.1: Facilities Inventory and Reporting.
13n inventory of the available capacity of
roads, and potable water, sanitary sewer, and solid waste facilities shall be
maintained by the Public Works/Utility Department and supt~lied to the
Plamung Division on an as-needed basis for concurrency evaluation.
Policy 1.7.2: An inventory of public parks and acreage shall be maintained within the
City's Geographic Information S~=stems ma~pin~ software for purposes
of evaluating concurrence
Policy 1.7.3: As part of the annual update to the Capital Improvements Element, the
Community Development Department- Planning Division in
conjunction with the Public Works/Utility Department and Parks and
Recreation Department shall evaluate and report on current capacity
within each public facility category, including any encumbrances or
deficiencies. This annual report shall also identify any public facilities that
will require improvements to maintain adopted'~--~'~ ~~ ~~~-'~~ LOS a~
Policy 1.7.4: Data on current water supply demand and permitted capacity shall be
maintained by the Utility Department and supplied to the Planning
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Division on an as-needed basis for evaluation of proposed future land
use map amendments. (Ord. 2007-11; 07-23-2007) (Cross Reference: See Capital
Improvement, Policy 1.8.3 and Future Land Use Element, Policy 1.3.4.)
Policy 1.7.5: No development order shall be issued unless it can be determined that
adequate water supplies and associated public facilities and services are
available. (Ord. 2007-11; 07-23-2007) (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element
Policy 1.3.4.) However, public facility and service availability may be
deemed sufficient if the public facilities and services for a development
are phased, or the development is phased so that the Public facilities and
those related services which are deemed necessary by the City to operate
the facilities necessitated by the development are available concurrent
with the impacts of that development.
Policy 1.7.6: The City shall withhold the approval of any site plan, final subdivision or
functional equivalent which includes new residential units not exempted
by the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School
Concurrency As Amended January 2008 until the School Board has reported
that there is school capacity available or a mitigation agreement has been
reached. (Cross Reference: See Public School Facility Element, Policy IX- 1.7.1) and
Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Policy 1.2.8) (Ord. 2007-22; 01-14-2008)
VIII-13
Planning & Zoning Board/LPA
Special Meeting
October 23, 2008
The attached was distributed during the discussion of
Public Hearing 500 by Ms. Eloise Sahlstrom, Senior
Planner, Community Development Department.
Transportation Element
Objective 1.1 Level of Service. Throughout the planning period, the Ciry shall enforce
the Level of Service OS standard on all arterial and collector roads. (Cross reference: See capital
Improvement Element, Policy 1.2.1.a.)
Policy 1.1.1 The minimum daily LOS} standard, to be adopted as part of
this element and plan, shall be as follows:
• Limited Access Roads as prescribed by FDOT
• Arterials D
• Collectors D
The LOS standards are based on ADT (average daily trips).
The City shall coordinate with the MPO and LYNX to assist the County in maintaining
the County's adopted'°~~°' °~°°~•~°°LOS standard for mass transit -1.03 revenue
miles per capita per year based on the estimated functional population within the transit
service area. (Ord. 2005-11; 09-12-OS)
Policy 1.2.7 Land development regulations shall contain specific access management
alternative techniques to control access and preserve'~--~' ~F ~~°~~~LOS. These techniques
include but are not limited to the following:
• Limit access to roads by controlling the number and location of site access driveways;
(Ord. 2005-11; 09-12-05)
• Cross-access elements of adjacent properties where feasible; and
• Use of frontage or back-lot parallel access roads where feasible.
Policy 1.5.2 The City shall require that sidewalks be constructed
concurrently with new development, by the developer. Additional sidewalks will be
constructed in existing developed areas when requested
Policy 1.6.3 The City shall ensure that all roads serviced by public transit routes function at
a ~,.__„i ..c ...,.:....LOS sufficient to support the bus service.
Policy 1.9.6 The City shall continue to monitor the construction schedules of Department
of Transportation regarding improvement of SR 434 through the City so that the level--e€
_ _.~==LOS is not degraded below the state's criteria for a principal arterial link. In applying
the lenience to permit three years in advance of funded improvements, be selective so that
development permitted to proceed prior to actual construction of the higher capacity road
will include only those projects which further progress toward other goals.
Policy 1.11.1 The City shall continue requiring that adequate transportation facilities to
maintain the City's'--~' ~c ~~~~~~LOS standards be available to meet the traffic demands of
all new development prior to the issuance of a final development order, in accordance with
the Concurrency Management Provisions set forth in the Capital Improvements Element of
this Plan.
Policy 1.11.2 The City shall require that all new developments
anticipated to generate 300 or more daily trips be required to submit a Transportation
Impact Study. (Ord. 2005-11; 09-12-05) (See TE policy 1.1.3)
Infrastructure Element-
S~ary Sewer Subelement
Objective IV-A-1: Existing Wastewater Treatment. The City shall correct e~sting
deficiencies; ensure that the minimum Level of Service jLOS~ for sanitary sewer is met; and,
provide a level of treatment that meets the water quality standards fox effluent limitations
established by the FDEP.
Policy IV-A-1.1: The City's adopted level of service for sanitary sewer treatment shall be
100 gallons per erson~itx per day.
Policy IV-A-1.4: The City shall implement the Schedule of Capital Improvements ~SC):~
to correct existing deficiencies and update the seke~tle SCI
annually during the City's annual budget process.
Policy IV-A-1.5: All improvements and/or additions to sanitary sewer facilities shall be
compatible and adequate to meet the adopted'--~' ~r ~~--~~~ ~I.OS~ standards.
Policy N-A-1.6: All land use amendments shall require an analysis of the impact of such
amendment on the adopted '~--~' ~~ ~~~~~~ OS standard and existing sanitary sewer
facilities.
Policy IV-A-2.3: The City shall implement the S~ CI) to
prepare for future development and updates it annually during the City's annual
budget process.
Potable Water Subelement
Policy IV-B-3.1: Based upon the adopted'~--~' ~~ ~~~-~~~ LOS and data and analysis in the
City's lYlater Supply Plan 2007, the City will review future demands to verify that there are no
needs for future expansion of potable water facilities.
Policy IV-B-3.3: If new development would result in a significant increase in population
beyond current projections, the City shall reevaluate the potable water system capacity and
ensure that the central water system can meet '~--~' ~~ ~~~-'~~ LOS standards prior to
issuance of a development order.
Policy IV-B-4.2: The City shall implement the five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements
S~edule S~ CI,~for potable water facilities adopted in the Capital Improvements Element.
Policy IV-B-4.3: The City will review the Schedule of Capital Improvements ~e SC
annually and adopt a City budget that prioritizes needed potable water improvements to
meet the demands of future growth and approved developments.
Objective N-B-7: When reviewing applications for development orders within the City
limits, the City shall consider impact on the environment, including the ability to be served
by the City's existing water facilities. The City shall maintain initiatives to conserve potable
water resources, which ensure that existing Level of Service (LOS standards for potable
water, do not increase more than twenty (20) gallons per person per day.
Policy IV-B-7.4: The City shall implement the five-year SCI
for reclaimed water facilities adopted in the Capital Improvements Element, as well as the
annual Capital Improvement Plan.
Solid Waste Subelement
Policy IV-C-1.1: The City's minimum LOS'~--~' ~` ~~°~~~ for municipal solid waste shall be
7.1 pounds per person per day, which will be utilized to plan for future demand.
Policy IV-C-2.1: The City will provide adequate equipment to maintain a level of service
standard for solid waste collection of 7.1 pounds per ersone per day.
Drainage Subelement
Objective IV-D-1: Flood Control. The City shall achieve and maintain the following
adopted stormwater management Level of Service OS standards that shall meet or exceed
state and federal regulations for stormwater quality and quantity.
Policy IV-D-1.1: New development and redevelopment issued a development order after
June 30, 1991, shall meet the following water quality and quantity level-e€ ~I,OS~. standards:
Policy IV-D-2.8: The Ciry shall utilize the Stormwater Master Plan for preparation of the
five (5) year SCI to correct existing deficiencies and prepare for
future stormwater demands.
Policy IV-D-4.1: The City shall review detailed calculations for new projects prepared by a
registered professional engineer which show that retention and detention will be
accomplished to meet the adopted'--~' ~r ~~--~~~ (LOS, and that there will be no negative
impacts to downstream water quality or quantity.
Objective IV-D-5: Intergovernmental Coordination. The Ciry of Winter Springs shall
educate citizens and coordinate with applicable jurisdictions to address stormwater issues of
mutual concern and to provide adequate Levels of Service ~I.OS~ .
Recreation and Olen Space Element
Objective 1.1: Level of Service ~LOS~ Standards for Parks. To ensure adequate lands are
provided for parks, the city shall utilize Level of Service (LOSS standards for parks and other
criteria specific to population, park size and location. For purposes of implementing this
Objective, the City may utilize parklands under the jurisdiction of Seminole County and
parks provided within residential developments.
Policy 1.1.1: The L~-e€-Ser~,e-(LOS} standard for parks shall be as follows:
Overall Parkland: Five (5) acres per 1,000 ~sidents. This standard includes both passive and
active City parks and ~creatzonal facilities, and includes Community, Neighborhood, and Mini parks.
• Community and Neighborhood Parks: Five (5) acres per 1,000 ~sidents. This standard
applies to community and neighborhood park acreage combined.
Objective 1.3: LOS Updates. The City shall review and, if necessary, update the Parks
Level of Service (LOSS standards every five years.
Policy 1.3.1: The City Parks and Recreation Department shall provide a written report every
five (5) years justifying or proposing amendments to the'--~' ~` ~~--~~~ (LOS standards for
parks and recreation facilities.
Policy 1.3.2: At the time the first written report is prepared, the City shall consider the need
to adopt detailed '~--~' ~` ~~--~~~ OS standards for specific activity-based recreational
facilities (fields and courts).
Objective 1.6: Private Parks and Recreation Facilities. The City shall coordinate the
provision of open space by both public and private interests to achieve adopted Level of
Service OS standards.
Policy 1.7.2: The City shall utilize the'~--~' ~` ~~---'~~ LOS review to recommend recreation
improvements located within private development.
Table VIII-1 City of Winter Springs Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements fSCll FY 2008109.2012113
Project ~~ 108 ~~~ Oeaerlptbn 1 JuatlBcatbn ~~ a Year 1 Year 2 Year S Year 4 Yar 6 TOTALS Operatlny Budprt CamprehensNe
~~ 9orau ~- 2008109 2009110 2010111 Z011N2 2012HS (Yearal•6) Impaet200911008 PlanRdennca
L03: PARKS ~ RECREATION
Outdoor amphitlieatre fudhers the network of
public green spaces that farm the frameworkfa
fhe Tawn Center and promotes 8 expands trail R0.S 1 t 1, ROS
M~nolia Park
FUTURE
~•~ 8
system; Improves recreational opportunNes
Winter Sprir~s
10
$ 1290950
$ 164050
$
$
S -
S 1p55
000
$ 14, ROS-15 2,
FLUE-1
3
1; RUE-
1CTX corxistentwith1he reactional needs of residents; Town Center , .
.
Is a cefatyst for private development in the Town 2.1.5; FLUE-2.2.3;
Cerra; Accomodates growth through additbnal CIE-1.3.1
aaeage fa active rerx~tion ILOS].
Central Winds Park
GRT 8 Pennarrent dog park exparrsan consistent with
CVuP
ROS-1
4; ROS•1
4
1;
Expansbn Im
provem
FUTURE
PIMF 8 reaeafional needs of residents; Util¢es grant
Ponding; Aaromodates gravlh through additional
Fxpar~ion near
8
$
; -
$ 271,222
$
$ -
$ 271,222
$ 20,000 .
.
.
ROS-1.5.2; GE-
I~A Pik) GNF
aa~ge for active recreation [LOST. SR 434 1.3.5
Thal i 1 950 S 1&1 $ 271222 S S $ 1 222 S 20
LOS: POTABLE WATER
Plant design for reuse augmentation project- to
urface Water Treatment
FUTURE
UCF
augment and expand the use d reclaimed water
Stare of Lake
6
$ 207
000
$ IE N.B.3.2; FLUE
Plant Design
for imgation purposes, as a means of redurdrg
Jesup , - $ - $ $ - $ 207,000 S - 1.3.1; HE 1.3.9; IE
demaMs of growth on Die Fbddan Aqurfer. IV.Et.7; CE 1.2.8
~ ~ Aftemafne Water Study of a0emative water supply to reduce IE IV
B
3; IE N
B
3
2
~~y FUTURE UEF demand on potable waterfrom the Floridan City Wxle 6 $ 75,OOD $ - $ 175,000 $ $ - $ 250,000 $ .
.
.
.
.
Aqurfer. FLUE 1.3.1
Electrir,M knprwemants
to WfP #2
I~PLCMT
UEF
Major mairdenance to electrical system.
WfP #2
6
$ 300,000
$ -
$ -
$
$ -
$ ~~~
$ CIE 1.6.1; IE N.6.2;
IE IV.6.2.1
NewVadable Frequency
~~ WiP#i
REPLCMT
UEF
Cadrol upgrades
WfP #1
6
S -
$ 75,000
$ -
S
$ -
$ ~~~
$ CIE 1.6.1; IE N.6.2;
IE N.62.1
Total 000 7000 17ti 000 832000
LOS: SANITARY SEWER
West Force Main FUTURE UEF Propat needed to met future demand; Bolsters Lift Statron 10
8
S -
$ 210
000
$ -
$
$
S 210
000
i FLUE 1.3.1; CIE
Rerouting t Design service to new growth; Imprw~es efficiency. Discharge , , 1.3.3; IE N A1.5; H
East Face Main FUTURE UEF Protect needed to metfuture demand; Bolsters Tuslawilla 8 $ 50
000 $ _ $ X0
000 $ $ _ $ 350000 $ FLUE 1.3.1; CIE
ReroulinglDesign service tonewgrawlh;lmprovesefhciency. , , 1.3.3;IEN.AI.5;H
YuYURF Sand FOer
REPLACE
UEF
Prgect needed to meet future demand; Ina~ses
WrVRF
6
$
$ _
S
$ 250
000
$ -
S 250
000
$ HE 13.9; RUE
3; IE
1
1; GE 1
3
3
apaaty fa new growth; Improves el0ciency. , , .
.
.
.
NA 1.5; HE 1. i9
Total $ 210000 210000
Los: soup wnsTE
real $ $
Protect Name ~ peectlptloN ~~~ ~~~ a
~
~ Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Ypr 4 Year 5 TOTALS Operathp &rdpN Compretamslve
~ e
ear 2008f08 2009110 2010111 2011112 2012113 (Yvan 1~) Impact20091T009 PMn Rehnrrce
LOS: 3TORNIWATER
TMDL VYater Quality
Management Projects FUTURE SUF Mandate to meet Stffie water quality regulations;
Improves surfacewaterquality Gty Vdde 6 $ 55,000 $ 50,000 $ 75,000 ; - ~ - S 180,000.00 3 _ CIE 1.3.2; IE
. IV.D.1,1; CE 1.3.2
Lombardy Canal Piping REPLACE SUF Maja maintenance enabling efficient operation. Lombardy Road 6 $ g 50,000 5 - S - S - f 50,000,00 S - CIE 1.3.2; CIE 16.1;
area FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.
Total S 55,000 f 100,000 f 75,000 S - S - f 230,000 S -
LOS: TRANSPO RTATION
SR 434 8 SR 419 Traffa
IXISTING
iCTX Adctesses existing deficiency ar SR 434 with
. SR 434 8 6 $ 165
000 S S S 5 000
f 165 f CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1;
Signallmaovements u ~~
Want
PO ~9 SR 419 , - ,
FLUE 1.3.1;
Services future demand and addre~es fixture
Michael &ake BMd.
FUTURE
1CTX defioiera:y of SR 434 try expanding interconnecting
Tawn Center
4
$ 1
900
000
S -
i
i
i
f 1
900
000
S CIE 1.7; GE 1.7.4;
FLUE 1
3
1
TE 1
2
(Spine Road) ~ ~ network n Town Center to reduce ,
, ,
, - .
.
;
.
;
demarb on SR 434. TE 1.2.4; TE 1.3
V1kde StreeV419 1CTX 8 ~ improvements; Furthers safe transportation TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE
Improvements FUTURE FAT network to ensure adequa~ movement of people SR 419 10 $ 575,000 $ - ; - j f - S 575,000 ; - 1.3.1; GE 1.6.1;
and goods
FLUE 1.3.1;
Doran Drive (Blumberg tohigh schooq-
Doran Drive
REPLCMT
iCTX
Refurbishes odlector road so that existing LOS is
Tawn Carder
6
$ 200,000
f ~~ CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6,1;
mairdamed. FLUE 1.3,1;
RanchWnds Paving REPLCMT 1CTX art ~ P~nO Proves suPPortinA infrastructure Ranchlands 6 $ 700
000 $ 700
000 S - S i - S 1
400
000 S - HE 1.1.9; GE 1.3.1;
to enhance exkting hWSnA stack. , , ,
, FLUE 1.3.1
ResMential Road
REPLCMT
1CTX Rebuilds existing neghbahood streets so that
Various
6
$ 125
000
$ 110
000
f ~~
CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1;
Reconstruction hanspata0on rrelwork is maintained. , , FLUE 1.3.1;
Nath Moss Road REPLCMT 1CTX ~~ maintenance- Refurbishes cdledor road so Mom Road 6 $ 1
300
000 S ~ S 1
300
000 S - CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1;
that existing LOS Ls maintained. ,
, ,
, FLUE 1.3.1;
Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a SR 434 & TE i; TE 1.2; CIE
Hayes Road Decd Lane FUTUf~ TIMF deceleration lane to ensure adequate rrrovement 6 $ i~'~ f 125
000 1; GE 1
1;
1
3
6
Pty and g~~ Hayes Road , .
.
.
.
FLUE 1.3.1;
Vistavrilla Drive Decel Addesses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a SR 434 & TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE
Lane FUTURE TIMF deceleration Mnetoensure equate movement o Ustawilla 6 $ 125,000 f 125,000 1.3.1; GE 1.61;
people and 0~. FLUE 1.3.1;
Services future demand and addre~es future Orange Av to
Orange Avenue Loop
FUTURE
TIMF
~dency of SR 434 try expanding interconnecting
Central Vdnds
6
$ 1
500
0
S 1
500
000 CIE 1.7; CIE 1.7.4;
1; TE 12;
FLUE 1
3
cdkdor road network in Tarn Center to reduce Park (SR 434) - ,
, ,
, .
.
demand on ~ 434.
Tarn Center TE t2.4; TE 1.3
Paves existing neghbortwod dirt greet for use as
Bahama Road
FUTURE
TIMF a cdlecbr road so that transportation network is Shore Rd to
Hayes Rd in the
6
$ 400000
f 400 ~
CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1;
maintained. Provides supportinginfrastrudure
Ranchlands FLUE 1.3.1;
(stree4 paving) to enhance exi~ng housng ctodc
T~- = 3,915,000 f 810,000 S 1,500,000 S 400,000 f 1,500,000 S 7,926,000 i -
LEGEND:
Funding Sources: Funding Sources:
1 CTX One Cent Sales Tax (Road Improvement Fund) -115 PIMF Park 8 Rec Imped Fee Fund
CF•305 1999 Constmdion Capital Project Fund - 305 R8R Ulil' Renewal d Re lecement Fund
GNF General Fund TLBD Assessment District uscawilla Li Mi 6 Beautificin
GRT Grams 8 CDBG UCF Util' Construction Fund
Local 0 ion Gas Tax ran ortaiion Im rovement Fun Util' Ent rise Fund
Table VIII.2 Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements ISCI) FY 2008!09 - 2012113 by Fund
Pro d Name
k
C
t FurMNg
DeaalptloNJuatlfkation
Locatlon Year 1 Year 2 Year S Year 4 Year 6
TOTALS Oparatlrp 6udpk Canpnherralve
a
apory Sourca ~~ ~~ 2008H0 2010111 2011M2 2012N3 Impact PNnRetaarce
1CTX -ONE CENT SALES TAX iROAD IMPROVEMENT FUND) -115
SR 434 & SR 419 Traffic
Si
ll
EXISTING
iCTX Addresses existing defx~ency on SR 434 wiUi SR 434 &
6
000
$ 165
S
S -
S -
S
S 165
000
S qE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1;
gna
mprovemeMs upgraded traffic signals. SR 419 ' , FLUE 1,3.1;
Services future demand and addresses future
Michael Blalae Bhrd.
FUTURE
1CTX
defidency of SR 434 by expanding interconnecting CIE 1.7; CIE 1.7.4;
(Spine Road)
colleda road network in Tawn CerOer to redrce Town Center 4 $ 1,900,000 ; - S - S - i - S 1,900,000 S FLUE 1.3.1; TE 1.2;
demand on SR 434.
TE1.2.4;TE1.3
Wade StreeU419 1CTX & Safety improvements; Furthers safe transportation TE 1; TE 1.2; qE
Improvements FUTURE FDOT network to sure adequate movement of people SR 419 10 $ 215,000 S - 5 - S - S S 215,000 S - 1,3.1; qE 1.6.1;
and goods.
FLUE 1.3.1;
Doran Drive (&umberg to high schaoq
Doran Drive
REPLCMT
iCTX
Refurbishes cdlector road so that existing LOS is
Town Center
6
$ 2011,000
S ~~~ qE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1;
mainhained. FLUE 1.3.1;
Ranchlarrds Paving REPLCMT 1CTX art road paving provides supporting infrastructure Ranchlands 6 $ 700
000 S 700
000 ; S - S - S 1A00
000 S HE 1.1.9; qE 1.3.1;
to enhance existing housn9 ~~ , , , FLUE 1.3.1
~~~ Road
R REPLCMT 1CTX Rebuilds existing neighborhood streets sa that Various 6 $ 125
000 S 110
000 S ~ ~ qE 1.3.1; C~ 1.6.1;
econstruction hansportation network is maatlained. , , FLUE 1.3.1;
North Mces Road REPLCMT 1CTX Molar maintenance• Refurbishes collector road so Moss Road 6 $ 1
300
000 S - S - 300
000
S 1 S
- qE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1;
that ex6sting LOS is mairrtairred. ,
, ,
, FLUE 1.3,1;
Outdoor amphitheatre furthers the network of
pubic green spaces that farm the framework to
the Town Center and pronr~es 8 expands trail ROS 1 1 1, ROS-
Magnol~ Park
FUTURE
~-~ 8
~ Improves recrnatior~ opportunities
VJ~rr6er Springs 1.4; ROS• 1.5.2;
1CTX
mrsistent with the receeatonal needs of residents;
Town Center 10 $ 300,000 $ 164,050 S - S - S - S 404,050 S - RUE-1.3.1; RUE-
Is a cetatyst to private development in the Town 2.1.5; RUE- 2.2.3;
Center; Accomodates growth through addiGanal CIE• 1.3.1
acr~ge fa active recreation [LOS].
TOTAL 1CTX E XPENSE S 3855000 S 974 S 1300000 S S S 6129050 S
TOTAL 1 C T X R E V E N U E S 3,200 S 1A14,214 S 1,414,214 S 353,551 S S 6,381,982
BND•BONDS
TOTAL BND EX PENSE S S S S S S S
TOTAL BND RE VENUE S S S S f S
CF305 1999 CON STRUCTIO N CAPIT AL PROJECT FUND
Outdoor amphitheatre furthers the network of
pubic green spaces that tam the iremewak fa
the Tavn Center and promotes 8 expands trail ROS i 1 i, ROS•
Magnoka Park
FUTURE
~-~ &
system; Improves receational opportunities
Whiter Springs 1.4; ROS• 1.5.2;
iCTX
cansisterdwfth the recreational creeds of residents;
Town Center 10 $ ~ y~ S S i - S - S 990,950 S - RUE• 1.3.1; RUE-
Is a catalyst for prvate devebpmeM in the Town 2.t5; RUE• 2.2.3;
Center; Acmmodates growth through addition qE 131
aa~ge to active recreation [LOS],
TOTAL CF•305 EXPENS E 890950 990950
TOTAL CF-305 REVENU E S 890 S S S i 890850
ProJetl Name LOS Fundrp DeacrlpdaY JuatlRatfon L~Ipt Ran1dno Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 TOTALS ~°~~ 6udyet Col~hensiYe
CahBory 8oarce ac«• 2006108 2009110 2010111 2011M2 2012115 Inpact PlanRefennca
FDOT -FLORIDA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
Wade StreeV419 1 CTX 8 ~f' improvements; Fudhers safe transpodation TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE
Improvements FUTURE ~qT network to ensure adequate movement of people SR 419 10 $ 360,000 $ - $ $ _ $ $ 360,000 $ - 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1;
and Aceds FLUE 1.3.1;
TOTAL FDOT EXPENSE $ 360000 $ $ S - S S 360000 $
TOTAL F D O T REVENUE $ 380,000 $ $ $ $ 360,000
GNF-GENERAL FUND
Central Winds Park GRT 8 Permanent dog park exparrs~ consistent with
GYvP
Expansion Improvements FUTURE
PIMF 8 recreational needs of residents; U[il¢es grant
Exparrsbn near
8
$ -
S -
$ -
$
S
$
$ 20
000 8061.4; 8061.4.1;
Rte-1
5
2; CIE-
(Dog Park) GNF funding; Accarwdates pravlh through additional SR 434 , .
.
acr~ge for active recre~ion [LOS], 1.3.5
TOTAL GNF EXPENSE $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 20000
TOTAL GNF REVENUE $
GRT -GRANTS 8 CDBG
Central VJ~nds Park GRT 8 Pertnar~nt ~ ~~ expansion consistent wilh CVO
Expansion Improvements
FUTURE
PIMF 8
recr~tional needs of residents; Utilizes grand
Expansion near
6
$ -
$
$ 135
611
$
$
$ 135
611
$ 20
000 8061.4; 8061.4.1;
ROB 1
5
2; C~-
(Dog Park) GNF funding; Accomodates growth through addNonal SR 434 , , , .
.
1
3
5
acreaDe Tar antive recreation [LOS]. .
.
TOTAL GRT EXPENSE $
• $
• $ 135 11 $ $ $ 135611 $ 20000
TOTAL GRT REVENUE $ 602 $ 200 $ 135 11 $ S $ 937611
PIMF -PARK 3 REC IMPACT FEE FU ND
Central Vends Park GRT 8 Permanent dog park expansion consistent with
GVYP
4
ROS-1
4; ROS-1
1;
Expansion Improvements FUTURE PIMF 8 recreational needs of residents; Utilzes grant
funding; Aceomodates growth throtGh additional Expanson near 6 $ - $ - $ 135,611 $ - $ - $ 135,811 $ 20,000 .
.
.
ROS-1.5.2; qE-
(Dog Park) GNF
acreage fa active recreatwn [LOS). SR 434 1.3.5
TOTAL PIMF EXPENSE $ S $ 135,611 $ $ $ 135,611 S 20,000
TOTAL PIMF REVENUE S 125,50D $ 115,000 $ 100,000 $ 110,D00 $ 115 $ 565,500
SUF - STORMWAT ER UTILIT 1f (ENTERPiSSE) FUND
TMDL Water Quality
ManagementProjeds FUTURE SUF ~~ to meet State water quality regulations;
I
rf qty yMde 6 $ 55,000 $ 50,000 $ 75
000 ; - S - S 180,000.00 $ _ qE 1.3.2; IE
mproves su
acewaterquality. , N,D.1.1; CE 1.3.2
Lombardy Canal Piping REPLACE SUF Major maintenance enacting efficient operation. Lombardy Road 6 $ $ ~ ~ $ - $ - $ - $ ~ ~~ $ - qE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1;
area FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.
TOTAL SUF EXPENSE $ 55000 $ 100000 $ 75 $ $
• S 230 000 $
T 0 T A L SUF REVENUE $ 1,035,000 $ 1,040,000 $ 1,042 S 1,045,000 $ 1,047 $ 5,209,000
ProJed Nam L0.4 Furrdkrp DeacrlpdoN Juatlfkatlon ~~ a Year 1 Year 2 Year S Year 4 Year 6 TOTALS ~~ 9tbpet ~PIw
Cahp°r1' Source &a~ 2008109 2008110 2010M1 2011H2 2012115 Impxt PgnRehrana
T1MF -TRANSPO RTATION I MPACT FEE FUND
Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a ~ 434 $ TE 1; TE 1.2; GE
Hayes Road Decel Lane FUTURE TIMF deceleration lane to ersure adequate movement 6 $ 125,000 S 125,000 1.3.1; CIE 1.6
1;
people and goods. Hayes Road .
FLUE 1.3.1;
Vistavilla Drive Decel Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 try adding a SR 434 & TE 1; TE 1.2; GE
Lane FUTURE TIMF deceleration lane to ensure adequate movement
Vistawilla 6 $ 125,OOD S 125,000 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1;
people and goods. FLUE 1.3.1;
Services future demand and addresses future
Orarge Avenue loop
FUTURE
TIMF deficiency of SR 434 by expanding interconnecting
Tawn Center
6
$ 1
500
000
500
000
S 1 CIE 1.7; CIE 1.7.4;
FLUE 1
3
1
TE 12
collector road network in Town Center to reduce ,
, ,
, .
.
;
;
demand on SR 434.
TE 1.24; TE 1.3
Paves exisOrrg neiphlxxtxxxl dirt street for use as
Bahama Road FUTURE TIMF a cdlector road so ttxjt transportstan networkis Rarrchlarids 6 $ 400000 S qOp 000 CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1;
maintained. Provides srpportinp infra~rudure FLUE 1.3.1;
(street paving) to enhance extstinA ~~A ~~
TOTAL TIMF E XPENSE S 250000 S S S 400000 S 1500000 S 150000 S
TOTAL T I M P R EVENUE S BS2A50 S 410,000 S 380,000 S 390,000 S 400,000 S 2,222450
UCF - UTILITY CONSTRUCTbN FUN D
Plant design for reuse a~menta6on project- to
urFace Water Tr~tmerd
FUTURE
UCF
aupmerd and expand the use of reclaimed water
Shore d Late
6
$ 207000
S
207
0 IE N. B.3.2; FLUE
Plain Design
for irrigatbn purposes, as a mans of reduclng
Jesup - _ S - i - ,0
0
S f - 1.3.1; HE 1.3.9; IE
demands of growth on the Floridan Aquifer. N.E. t.7; CE 1.2.8
TOTAL UCF EXPENSE S 207 S S 207000
TOTAL UCF REVENUE S 421,OOD S 2,000 S S S S 423,000
LIEF - UTILITY ENTERPR~E FUND
SR 46 AttematA2 Wafer ~' of atternatnre water supply to reduce IE N
8
3; IE IV
B
3
2
Suppy FUTURE LIEF demand on potablewaterfromthefbridan CityV~fde 6 $ 75,000 S - $ 175,000 S - i S 250.000 S - .
.
.
.
.
Aquifer. FLUE 1,3.1
Eledncallmfxwements
to WiP #2 REPLCMT LIEF Majormaintenancetoeledricalsystem. WfP#2 6 $ 300,000 i - j - S - S - S 300,000 f
- CIE 1.6.1;IEIV.8.2;
IE N.8.2.1
New Variable Frequency
Cadrols WiPki REPLCMT LIEF ComrW uppre~s. W fp #1 6 g _ $ 75,000 ; - _ - $ - S ~ ~ =
- CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.B.2,
IE IV.B.2.1
West Force Main FUTURE LIEF project needed to meet future demand; Bolsters Lift Statbn 10
S
S -
$ 210
000
S -
S -
i -
S 210
000
; - RUE 1.3.1; CIE
Rerouting! Design serviceto new growth; Improves efficiency. Discharge , , 1.3.3; IE N.A.1.5; H
East Force Main
FUTURE
LIEF Project needed to meet future demand; Bolters
Tuskawila
8
$ 50
000
$ -
000
$ 300
= -
j -
S 350
000
S - RUE 1.3.1; CIE
Rerouting/Design seroketonew rowfh;lm
A Proves eff~~ncY. , , , 1.3.3; IE N.A.1.5; H
WVJRF Sand Fltter
REPLACE
LIEF
Prged needed to meet future demand; Increases
VVWRF
6
S -
$ -
S
$ 250
000
$ -
S 250
000
= - HE 1.3.9; RUE
1; CIE 1
1
3
3
3; IE
capadly for new praMh; Im~wes efficlency. , , ,
.
.
.
N.A.1.5; HE 1.19
TOTAL U E F EX PENSE 425000 285000 415000 250 000 1 000
TOTAL LI E F RE VENUE S B 072,150 S B 750000 S 8,775,000 S 000 S 8,825000 S 43222150
Fundin Sources: Fundin Sources:
1 CTX One Cent Sales Tax (Road Improvement Fund) -115 PIMF Park S Rec Impact Fee Fund
CF-305 1999 Construction Ca ital Project Fund - 305 R8R Uti Renewal & Re lacement Fund
FDOT Fbrida De t of Tran ortaibn TLBD Assessment District uscav~illa Li htin 8 Beautifidn
GNF General Fund UCF Uti Construction Fund
GRT Greds & CDBG UEF Ukii En1e rise Fund
Local 0 ion Gas Tax ran elation Im rovement Fund
Table VIII- 3: Facility Program -Public School Facilities: Summary of Policies, Programs and Capital
Improvements with Cost Impacts
Scheduled Program and Cost Impacts for 10N/2008 - 9/30/2013
he Seminole County School Board Capital Improvement Plan inGudes significant remodeling of existing structures and the
wilding of new structures to expand student capacity over the next five years.
Total 5 Year Cost: 5412,226,62
Potential Additonal Cost Impacts DuringlBeyond the Five Year Planning Period
FTE Projections show a continued decline in student enrollment until 2010 with an inrease each year following. The 2005
oak year is illustrated as not being regained until 2016.
vailable Funding Options- Major revenue sources available to the School Board are Ad Valorem Taxes, State Revenue
ounces, Local Option Sales Tax, Impact Fees, Gasoline Tax Refund, COPS, and Interest.
Souse: Seminole County School Board's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan, Adopted September 9, 2008 for the fiscal year 2008-2009 through 2012-2013.
Tahla VIII Sr_hnnl Canital Imnrnvement Plan for Seminole County Facilities - Remodelino 8 Additions
Remodeling 8r Additiions 2008-2009 2009.2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Z01Z-2013
Casselbeny Media $1,000,000 $5,000,000
Hamilton $1,000,000 $7,000,000
Idyllwilde Admin $500,000 $1,000,000
Jackson Heights $1,000,000 $21,000,000
Lawton $700,000 $10,000,000
Lyman Bldgs. 7, 9, 10 $6,000,000
Milwee Remodeling $1,000,000
Pine Crest Addition/Remodeling $1,000,000 $8,000,000
Seminole High $13,500,000
Spring Lake $1 000 000 $8 000 000
Stenstrom $1 000 000 $7 000 000
Wekiva $1 000 000 $11 000 000
Wilson/Geneva Pods & Renovations $800 000 $4 000 000
Small Projects $700 000 $700 000 $700 000 $700 000 $700 000
Excel Relocation/Remodel $1,900,000
Sales Tax Projects
Oviedo High $14,400,000
Red Bug $1,000,000 $8,000,000
Sterling Park $11,000,000
Misc.
Contingency $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000
Source: Seminde County Scholl Board's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan, Adopted September 9, 2008 for the fiscal year 2008-2009 through 2012-2013.
Tahla VI11-~ Sr•_hnal Capital Imerovement Revenue Sources
Revenue 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 20012-2013
State
Class Size Reduction - - - - -
Peco New Construction $1,473,990 $424,977 $624,691 $668,143 $267,882
Peco Maintenance $2,260,756 $3,049,660 $3,049,660 $3,029,957 $2,948,333
CO&DS Bonds $6,850,000
CO&DS $368,064 $368,064 $368,064 $368,064 $368,064
Local
2 Mill $65,321,653 $65,739,115 $70,102,761 $75,615,833 $81,879,555
2 Mil State Reduction ($8,165,207) ($8,217,389) ($8,762,845) ($9,451,979) ($10,234,944)
COPS $21,000,000
Sales Tax $12,185,567 $7,953,238 $8,152,069 $4,126,356
Impact Fees $3,300,000 $3,300,000 $3,300,000 $3,300,000 $3,300,000
Gasoline Tax Refund $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
Interest $1,100,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Undesignated
SUB-TOTAL $105,794,823 $73,717,665 $77,934,400 $78,756,374 $79,628,890
Prior Year Ca over $8,781,041 $3,738,712 $10,659,561 $7,645,383 $6,350,966
TOTAL $114,575,864 $77,456,377 $88,593,961 $86,401,757 $85,979,856
$OUroe: Seminole Cormty School Boazd's Pive fear Capital Improvement Plan, Adopted September 9, 2008 for the 5scal year 2008-2009 through 2012-2013.
Tahle VIII_R Planned New Public School Facility Construction
New Construction 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
Land $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000
New Midway Elementary $1,000,000
New Elementary "N"
CSA E9 $1,000,000
Bus Compound Annex $3,000,000
30 Modular Classrooms
Rosenwald $10,100,000
Source: Seminole County School Board's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan, Adopted September 9, 2008 for the fiscal year 2008-2009 through 2012-2013.