The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007 03 12 Public Hearing 503 Aesthetic Review Don King Concrete COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM 503 Consent Informational Public Hearing Regular x March 12,2007 Meeting MG /DEPT Authorizati REQUEST: The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests the City Commission hold a Public Hearing for the Aesthetic Review for a 10,000 S.P. addition, with the associated ancillary improvements, to an existing 2,500 S.P. office (Don King Concrete) on 2.49 acres located on the north side of SR 434, between Barclay Reserve and Barrington Estates. PURPOSE: To encourage creative, effective, and flexible architectural standards and cohesive community development consistent with the intent and purpose of Article XI - Minimum Community Appearance and Aesthetic Review Standards. APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY: Ordinance 2003-43, Aesthetic Review Standards, City of Winter Springs Section 9-601. Approval prerequisite for permits. Section 9-605. Submittal requirements. City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances CHRONOLOGY: March 21. 2006 - Final engineering plans reviewed by the staff review committee. Mav 16. 2006 - Second staff review of the final engineering plans. November 1. 2006 - Pinal engineering/site plan approved by the Planning and Zoning Board by a 3-2 vote. November 27.2006- Pinal engineering/site plan approved by the Commission. December 6. 2006 - Pre-construction meeting with staff on site work. CONSIDERATIONS: The rectangular 2.49-acre site contains an existing 2,500 S.P. office building (a converted residence) and detached accessory buildings. The site is surrounded on three sides by walls (east and north by Barrington Estates and west by Barclay Reserve). One detached building (20.1' x 103.1' = 2,072 S.P.), located toward the rear and east side of the site, near Barrington Estates, is proposed to remain for storage. March 12,2007 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 503 Page 2 of4 The existing office is being re-painted and additional detailing has been added to the existing fa9ade in the form of a new water table line and mullions have been added to the windows. The existing building color will match that of the new building. The new 10,000 square foot office building is north of the existing building and is, therefore, shielded from the view of S.R 434 traffic. However, the new building incorporates a water table with a separate finish texture below the water table line. This treatment "anchors" the building visually to the site. Covered entrances use accent columns to frame the doorways and provide three dimensional relief to the fa9ade. The building windows utilize mullions to break up the larger panels of glass and provide a more traditional look. In addition, the windows are framed with an accent color trim that makes them appear more vertically oriented. The site contains a 32 square foot sign that was approved as part ofthe final engineering. This sign is detailed on the aesthetic review with the colors to match the building colors. Only the base sign is part ofthis review. The actual copy area must be brought before the Commission as part of a separate aesthetic review. Pursuant to staff s recommendation as approved by the Commission during approval of the final engineering and comments made by the Planning and Zoning Board during their discussion of the project, site and building lighting must be brought back to the commission for a separate aesthetic review. Should the Commission so desire, they can defer the approval of the sign copy area and the lighting to the City Manager. A condition of approval for this aesthetic review is that the existing storage building must receive a stucco finish and be painted to match the main buildings. The submittal requirements for aesthetic review are set forth in Section 9-605 and include the following: (a) a site plan; (b) elevations illustrating all sides of structures facing public streets or spaces; (c) illustrations of all walls, fences, and other accessory structures and the indication of height and their associated materials; (d) elevation of proposed exterior permanent signs or other constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; (e) illustrations of materials, texture, and colors to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs; and (t) other architectural and engineering data as may be required. The procedures for review and approval are set forth in Section 9-603. The City Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the application only after consideration of whether the following criteria have been satisfied: (1) The plans and specifications ofthe proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, textures, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and cultural character of the community. The proposed buildings and associated improvements will be compatible with each on the subject site. The existing office building is proposed to be painted and additional fa~ade detailed added to improve its appearance fromS.R.434. The new office building is complementary to the existing March 12,2007 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 503 Page 3 of4 building. This new building is one-story in height and is buffered from adjacent properties to the west, north, and east by existing walls. (2) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has been formally approved by the City within the surrounding area. The subject site is surrounded on three sides by existing developments and on the south side by S. R. 434. (3) The plans for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance: (A) Front or side elevations, (B) Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement, (C) Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof line, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements. The proposed buildings do not appear excessively similar or dissimilar to the other structures in the immediate area. (4) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community. The proposed building has a contextually appropriate architectural style and includes design features and detailing that accentuate the building and enhance the established character of the existing structures on the site. (5) The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose ofthis Article, the Comprehensive Plan for Winter Springs, design criteria adopted by the city (e.g. Towne Center guidelines, SR 434 design specifications) and other applicable federal state or local laws. The O.K.Properties aesthetic review package, subject to the conditions set forth herein, meets the requirements of the City's design criteria as specified in the Code. (6) The proposed project has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as concrete masonry units with stucco, marble, termite-resistant wood, wrought iron, brick, columns and piers, porches, arches, fountains, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive design detailing and promoting the character of the community. The project is attractive and will be an asset to the community, given the architectural enhancements already mentioned. Staff believes the O.K. Properties aesthetic review package meets this requirement. March 12,2007 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 503 Page 4 of 4 FINDINGS: · The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the SR 434 design specifications except as noted. These inconsistencies will be addressed in a separate aesthetic review. · The new building will utilize colors and materials that will complement the other on-site buildings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff review found the applicant's request for Aesthetic Review in compliance and recommends approval of the Aesthetic Review package conditioned upon the addition of a stucco finish and complementary paint to the existing storage building. The lights and monument sign copy area will be brought back as a separate aesthetic review unless the Commission defers judgment on these items to the City Manager and staff. A TT ACHMENTS: A. Aesthetic Review Package B. November 1,2006 Planning and Zoning minutes C. November 27,2006 City Commission minutes COMMISSION ACTION: ATTACHMENT B CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDILOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 1,2006 PAGE 2 OF 6 Mr. Brian Fields, P.E., City Engineer, Public Works Department spoke on this Agenda Item. Discussion. Chairperson Karr opened the "Public Input" portion of the Agenda Item. No one spoke. Chairperson Karr closed the "Public Input" portion of the Agenda Item. "I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS PRESENTED ON THE AGENDA AND RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AS IS PRESENTED." MOTION BY ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER POE. SECONDED BY ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER BROWN. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER RYSER: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON TILLIS: AYE BOARD MEMBER POE: AYE BOARD MEMBER BROWN: AYE CHAIRPERSON KARR: AYE MOTION CARRIED. Further discussion ensued related to future projects. REGULAR AGENDA ... > REGULAR 300. Community Development Department Requesting The Planning And Zoning (P&Z) Board Consider And Approve A Final Engineering/Site Plan For A 10,000 Square Foot Addition, With The Associated Ancillary Improvements, To An Existing 2,500 Square Foot Office On 2.49 Acres Located On The North Side Of State Road 434, Between Barclay Reserve And Barrington Estates. Mr. John Baker, ASLA, Senior Planner, Community Development Department presented this Agenda Item and stated, "We do recommend approval subj ect to having the building mounted lighting and the storage building addressed through the Aesthetic Review and the Landscape Architect making some very minor modifications to the landscaping irrigation plans." CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 1,2006 PAGE 3 OF6 Mr. David Allen, P.E., President, Allen-Craig Civil Engineering, Inc., 361 South Central Avenue. Oviedo: spoke to the Advisory Board Members about this Agenda Item. Mr. Allen said, "We have been working on this particular site for a good while trying to keep the existing office that is there and work in some additional building space. When we first started, there were a significant number of out buildings that were damaged during the hurricanes. Those have been removed. We have since then rearranged the way we were going to do it the first time. We have met with Staff and attempted to meet everything that they requested. One thing that I will say, our permit with the [St. Johns River] Water Management District allows us to remove the wetland that is in the back. We did that in order to release us from any setbacks from that particular wetland. The District has agreed that it was a man-made pond. It had no real intrinsic value; that it was basically just a hole in the ground. However, Mr. King [Don King's Concrete, Inc.] asked us if we would not take it out, because he likes it." Mr. Allen then said, "While we do have the right to remove it, our plan does not take that right. We will still keep it there. We have created a stormwater pond around it and will fill in - during heavy rain storms, but then seeps down as it is required in the Stormwater Management permitting. Everything that we have approached Staff with has been very graciously received, although not graciously approved, and we have had to go back and modify some things. But, the way we have it set now, we believe it is the best situation for both our client and for the City." Discussion ensued on the lighting. With further discussion, Mr. Allen then said, "There is an existing swale that was constructed during the Barrington Estates project. It is on their property, but it is outside of their wall. What we have done - we have created a swale just before you get into their swale to - spread out the impact of our development and that is the way we plan to mitigate any of our stormwater. And at the same time, there are some plantings that are going in that general area, but we do not want to do anything significant back there, because we basically want to keep it as close to what it is, as we can." Further discussion ensued on the existing walls. Mr. Allen said, "There is a short section of our common property line with - Barclay [Reserve] that does not have a wall - and that is in the part of their side that was very close to being jurisdictional. Their jurisdictional line is right inside their property and they chose not to go down that far with their wall." Mr. Allen said, "There was some discussion about not getting so close to jurisdictional land. That is why there is that one (1) section. We do not plan to do anything over in that area either - because we want to stay as far away from that jurisdictional area as we can. " CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDILOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 1.2006 PAGE40F6 With further discussion, Mr. Allen said, "There is an existing shed behind the existing building. That is going to stay. But, that is pretty much an open shed; three (3) sided. The existing residential building that was converted to an office, the client wanted to keep, but he needed an additional- about 8,000 square feet for his business." Mr. Allen added, "Earlier today, my partner, Mike Craig called me and said that his discussion with our landscape person was that the landscaping was fine, but there were three (3) or four (4) notes that needed to be added to the irrigation sheet." "WITH THE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE FINAL ENGINEERING SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBJECT TO ADDRESSING THE BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTING IN THE EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING TO THE AESTHETIC REVIEW AND MODIFYING THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS, I WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS WITH THOSE STIPULATIONS." MOTION BY ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER POE. SECONDED BY VICE CHAIRPERSON TILLIS. DISCUSSION. Tape I/Side B VOTE: BOARD MEMBER BROWN: NAY CHAIRPERSONKARR: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON TILLIS: AYE BOARD MEMBER POE: AYE BOARD MEMBER RYSER: NAY MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT 400. Office Of The City Clerk Approval Of The October 4, 2006 Regular Meeting Minutes. "I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 4TH [2006] REGULAR MEETING MINUTES." MOTION BY CHAIRPERSON K.ARR. SECONDED BY ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER POE. DISCUSSION. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNlNG AGENCY REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 1.2006 PAGE50F6 VOTE: CHAIRPERSON KARR: AYE BOARD MEMBER BROWN: ABSTAINED BOARD MEMBER RYSER: AYE BOARD MEMBER POE: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON TILLIS: AYE MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT 401. Office Of The City Clerk Approval Of The October 16, 2006 Special Meeting Minutes. "I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 16TH [2006] SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY." MOTION BY CHAIRPERSON KARR. SECONDED BY ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER BROWN. DISCUSSION. VOTE: CHAIRPERSON KARR: AYE BOARD MEMBER POE: AYE BOARD MEMBER RYSER: AYE VICE CHAIRPERSON TILLIS: AYE BOARDMEMBERBROWN: AYE MOTION CARRIED. INFORMATIONAL AGENDA INFORMATIONAL 500. Not Used. In other business, Mr. Stevenson said, "We will try to update you at next month's Meeting on the status of all the projects in the City." Mr. Stevenson also noted the forthcoming Open Space Advisory Study Committee Meeting. 600. REPORTS No Reports were given. ATTACHMENT C CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 27, 2006 PAGE 6 OF 21 VOTE: DEPUTY MAYOR BLAKE: AYE COMMISSIONER MILLER: AYE COMMISSIONER McGINNIS: AYE COMMISSIONER KREBS: AYE COMMISSIONER GILMORE: AYE MOTION CARRIED. Attorney Garganese read the Ordinance by "Title" only. Mayor Bush opened the "Public Input" portion of the Agenda Item. No one spoke. Mayor Bush closed the "Public Input" portion of the Agenda Item. "MOVE TO APPROVE." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER McGINNIS. COMMISSIONER McGINNIS ADDED, "MOVE TO SECOND" [READING). MAYOR BUSH REMARKED, "MOTION TO APPROVE - SECOND READING BY COMMISSIONER McGINNIS. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER KREBS. DISCUSSION ." VOTE: COMMISSIONER GILMORE: AYE COMMISSIONER MILLER: AYE COMMISSIONER McGINNIS: AYE COMMISSIONER KREBS: AYE DEPUTY MAYOR BLAKE: AYE MOTION CARRIED. REGULAR AGENDA ) REGULAR 300. Community Development Department Requesting The City Commission Consider And Approve A Final Engineering/Site Plan For A 10,000 Square Foot Addition, With The Associated Ancillary Improvements, To An Existing 2,500 Square Foot Office On 2.49 Acres Located On The North Side Of State Road 434, Between Barclay Reserve And Barrington Estates. Mr. John Baker, AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department spoke on this Agenda Item. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 27, 2006 PAGE 7 OF 21 Mr. Michael Craig, Allen Craig Civil Engineering Incorporated, 361 South Central Avenue, Oviedo, Florida: spoke on the site design. Discussion. Commissioner Joanne M. Krebs said, "I noticed that the Vote from the Planning and Zoning Board was a 3-2 Vote - and I don't see anything in the Minutes telling me about any kind of conflict. I was wondering why there were two (2) that Voted against it?" Mr. Baker answered, "I believe that two (2) of the P and Z (Planning and Zoning) Board Members felt that the site could be redesigned to be more aesthetically pleasing. I believe that was their thought. They did not review the Aesthetic Review - we have not gotten to that." Further discussion ensued on perimeter walls. Commissioner Robert S. Miller said, "Where is the second pond?" Mr. Craig said, "The first pond is not showing on this drawing. But, it is right here at the end of the parking area." Commissioner Miller asked, "So, there will be a second pond there?" Mr. Craig said, "Right." Commissioner Miller then inquired, "Why isn't it reflected on these?" Mr. Craig said, "It is on another sheet of the plans." On the issue of perimeter walls, Deputy Mayor Blake said, "Your Surveyor says they are varying heights around the perimeter of the property. You mentioned the number five and half feet (5Yz') perhaps in some areas?" Mr. Craig stated, "Yes, and I'm just guessing with that. I see the reference right now that this is a note that was in the original survey which we start with as part of the design process and he's locating the wall without giving the specific height of the area." Deputy Mayor Blake stated, "If it is less than six feet (6') that would create an issue wouldn't it Mr. Baker? Doesn't Code require that between 'Commercial' and 'Residential' Uses that the wall be a minimum of six feet (6') around the perimeter..." Mr. Baker stated, "... Yes..." Deputy Mayor Blake continued, "... Unless - I know that at times we have granted a Variance for a wall along Wetland areas and it has been stated here, I believe, there is a Wetland area back in this area, where there is no wall, so we would have to take up that issue and then we need to take up the issue in the Site Plan approval process of any area around it, that is adjacent to a 'Residential' Use where the wall is less than six feet (6'). Correct?" Mr. Baker stated, "1 believe that's correct." Mr. Craig stated, "I'd be happy to ask the Surveyor to go back and - obtain that information if we believe it's critical." CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 27, 2006 PAGE 8 OF 21 Furthermore, Deputy Mayor Blake mentioned, "There is a requirement for a commercial development, and this is a 'Commercial' Usage..." Mr. Craig stated, "...Right." Mr. Baker stated, "I would point out though that we did require Barclay [Reserve] to put in a six foot (6') wall and we probably need to measure from the residential side and we can confirm or if there's a problem, we can have that fixed." Deputy Mayor Blake added, "So, that takes care of the west side. Correct?" Mr. Baker added, "I remember specifically telling them to put in a six foot (6') wall. Yes." Deputy Mayor Blake stated, "We just need to check and make sure." Deputy Mayor Blake added, "Hopefully, it is six feet (6') and it is not an issue." Deputy Mayor Blake said, "Even this wall down here as well which is Barrington [Estates] I think?" Mr. Baker answered, "Yes, Sir." Deputy Mayor Blake stated, "You don't recall if there's a requirement for six feet (6') at Barrington [Estates]?" Mr. Baker stated, "1 believe it was supposed to be six feet (6'). Can I verify that it was? No. I've never checked the height of the wall." Furthermore, Deputy Mayor Blake noted, "If we approve this tonight, it has to be subject to the considerations of the wall and that is specifically if Barclay [Reserve] was required to build six feet (6')." Deputy Mayor Blake continued, "If it is supposed to be six feet (6') and if it's been inspected and approved, then I would suggest - probably on that Barclay [Reserve] section, we are okay. If there is a similar requirement for Barrington [Estates] within their Site Plan document that shows it is going to be a six foot (6') wall and if we have inspected it and approved it, then I would suggest that that is probably okay as well. This portion back here where there is no wall, we probably need to have a Variance in order to not have a wall back there or some finding by the Commission that relieves them of the obligation to put a wall there." Mr. Baker said, "Perhaps a Waiver." Deputy Mayor Blake said, "Whatever is appropriate. My only concern is, I want to make sure that we are doing it right and thorough and we don't create another problem for ourselves." Mr. Baker stated, "Yes, Sir." Commissioner Gilmore stated, "A similar problem on the Barrington [Estates] side. Because I note in here that apparently they have a swale that continues after the wall..." Mr. Baker stated, "...I think the swale is on the Applicant's side of the wall; but, on the Barrington [Estates] property. But, I don't believe that the Barrington [Estates] wall is right on their property line. . ." Commissioner Gilmore stated, "... Because it appears here that you have two (2) swales that are going to join together. Their swale and the Applicant's swale. So, I think you just also need to be looking at the walls on both sides and make sure we are in Compliance." Mr. Baker stated, "Yes, Sir." CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 27, 2006 PAGE 9 OF 21 "MOTION TO APPROVE - PENDING THE AESTHETIC REVIEW AND THE HEIGHTH OF THE WALLS." MOTION BY COMMISSIONER McGINNIS. MAYOR BUSH NOTED, "THE WALLS MEET THE MINIMUM SIX FOOT (6') REQUIREMENT." COMMISSIONER McGINNIS ADDED, "RIGHT." SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER GILMORE. DISCUSSION. DEPUTY MAYOR BLAKE STATED, "I AM NOT SURE IF THAT MOTION GETS US TO WHERE WE NEED TO BE ON THIS. I WOULD ASK THE STAFF TO SUGGEST SOME LANGUAGE THAT WOULD PROVIDE THE CLARITY THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO GO FORWARD ON - BOTH THE REQUIRED VARIANCE OR WAIVER ON THAT SEGMENT WHERE THERE IS NO WALL AND GOING THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER OR NOT THE TWO (2) WALLS ON THE EAST AND THE WEST EDGE OF THE PROPERTY - AND THAT ON THE NORTH EDGE AS WELL, ARE INDEED SIX FEET (6'). AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR BLAKE. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MILLER. DISCUSSION. VOTE: (AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION) COMMISSIONER MILLER: AYE COMMISSIONER KREBS: AYE COMMISSIONER McGINNIS: AYE COMMISSIONER GILMORE: AYE DEPUTY MAYOR BLAKE: AYE MOTION CARRIED. VOTE: (ON THE MOTION, AS AMENDED) COMMISSIONER McGINNIS: AYE COMMISSIONER KREBS: AYE DEPUTY MAYOR BLAKE: AYE COMMISSIONER GILMORE: AYE COMMISSIONER MILLER: AYE MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA CONSENT 400. Public Works Department And Capital Projects Division Requesting Approval Of The Subsequent Contract Agreement With Progress Energy For Installation Of Streetlights Phase 4, 5, 6, And 8 As Part Of The Tuscawilla Lighting And Beautification District Phase 2 Beautification Project. This Agenda Item was not discussed. '.'t ","'1 \- <-:.... ~, ~ -~-- ."..... " REVISIONS FER 2 - 2005 I. Per City Review, 2. I .OG 2. Per City Review, 4.2G.OG 3. Per City Review, IO.23.0G 20' PARKING STALL CITY OF VJi'.n,..~ Si'idNGS Permitting - Kim ::.. 1 1/2" TYPE 5-1 OR 5-3 I ASPHALT '"LCNGPff<<:A$r """"""- SLOPE AS SHO'It-N ON PL.ANS 12" PREPARED SU8GRADE COMPACTED TO 98" ASHTO T180, F8Y 50 AND LBR 25 I II I II I II I II II I ~ II I II I \ II I \~I I ) ~ I I """-i I I ~ I I ~ I III ~ Iii ~ I~ I~ ~ in I~ 0 ~ I::; V:l III II ~ I I I ~ I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I I ~ I I I ~ I III ~ I I I""" 3 ~ I I f,(JIN'5l ~ I I 1"<0'" I I I I ~ ~ I I I,JI V:l I I l"'ll ~~ I I I "I I I I ~I I I I I e" BAS( UMEROCK . COMPACTED TO 98% AASHTO T 180 lL.I \- (f) DRIVEWA Y AREA TYPICAL SECTION NTS NOTE: F'AVEMENT 5ECTION WlTHIN fOOT 'iW( SHALL INCLUDE: A. SURFACE couRSE SHALL BE MIN. 2' FDOT TYPE 5- I OR S-3 6. BASE COURSE SHALL BE MIN. 8" lIMEROCK COMf'ACTED TO 98% A5SHTO T ! 80 C. SU6GRAGDE SHAlL BE MIN. 12" COMPACTED TO 98% A5SHTO T 180 WI MIN. LBR 25 =**~(~N()."00lIW. U' " LCNO . 5 l.L lL.I U l.L l.L o (f) lL.I b2 lL.I 0- ~ 0- ~ o PRECAST BUMPER DETAIL NOTE, FDOT FERMITS REQUIRED FOR ALL WOR'" WITHIN SR 434 RIW INCLUDING UTILITY CONNECTIONS. DRIVEWAY WOR"'. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ALL CONDITIONS NOTED WITHIN THOSE PERMITS FOR ACTIVITIY WITHIN FDOT RIW. ALL STRlFFING MODIFICATIONS TO ElE FEFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FDOT INDEX I 734G. CROSSWAL'" LINES SHALL ElE SOLID WlHITE LINES, MARI<.ING ElOTH EDGES OF THE CROSSWAL"'. THEY SHALL ElE NOT LESS THAN GO< IN WIDTH AND SHOULD NOT ElE SFACED LESS THAN G' AFART. (FER MLlTCD SECT. 3El.18). (f) \1") 0 08<<1 :z C\.I II ~ >-= CL~ If) "" CU ~ ~ ~ lL.I 0 If) \- :z ~ NOT PLATTED 12' ". BARCLAY WOODS SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION, ( C- I ) t o d t o d BRICK WALL o;'L1 ~~NC~ I,OIN510t I'lWPl:RT"UNf 31 .0 CONC. FLUME AT INLET ~ BRICK WALL HflGHT VARIES 8G.2G FT. \r FROf'. el~ RAe" /s H~B '" i ~ <: '" '" ~ '" '-: '" 47.9 FT. '0, 0; " O! ~\1")<<:) (I'\~<(U>~ "'-.:.J = .....J I"-- " <(0~~~~ ~Z~<(r--r-- U~ZO~r-- liJ~~~~ , Z :r:: 0 :fJ - .....J 0 < :z <..!) ~ IL. ~ '0 lL.1z O~ ~<<:) . 1LI 0' ~ :=j.....J{f)O~~ <(Gu>~~tC <<10 .. 8 IE EX/5T. STORAGE 6LDG TO REMAIN, ff 21.G . S 00'07'42" W 648.95' Deist. E!lm't BRlCI< WALL Hf1GHT VARIES CK WALL HClGHT VARlfS BARRINGTON E5TATE5, (R- I A) ~ 1 NOTES: M1NUMUM BLDG. SET6ACKS: fRONT SIDE REAR 50 15' 15' LEGAL DESCRIPTION The East 1/2 of the West '/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeost 1/4, Section 4, Township 21 South, Range 31 East. Seminole County, Florido, f6SS the right of way for State Road 419. PARKING REQUIRED: 31 SPACES PARKING f'ROVIDEDr 39 SPACES ALL f"AVr:MENT MARKINGS 4 5IGN5 SHAlL BE CON5TRUCTe:D IN COMPUANCE WITH MUTeO. (LAT~5T EDITION) ALL EXIST. STRUCTURES ON S!TE TO BE RfMOV~D UNLESS SHOWN OTH~R\\1S~. ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION SHALl BE DOTAINED FROM err( OF WINTER 5f'RING5. DK PROPERTIES 400 WEST SR 434, WINTER SPRINGS, FLA. GEOMETRY PLAN 5heet No. IO.23.0G Date: Michael S. Craig, P. E. P. E. No. 29303 David E. Allen, P. E. P. E. No. 35752 Date: 2 of 5 a f 'a m l> <P -t a a a a a a a a a a a a t- T 'II '1 ~ In :~l ) ~ ~ 11 ~n 1111 ~~II = 11 ~ 12 ~ -I !!! CIl ... hi ~ -I Q z - 11 ) ~IL 1111 ~~ 1 ::J:TT"II TTT"'II '- 1I I" '"1111 I '"1111 11 u ~ I-'(j ~ o I-'(j t?j ~ ~ t--t t?j W. o ~ ~ t--t n t?j tD C t--t ~ U t--t Z (1 MONUMENT SIGN FOR D K PROPERTIES !l'.4' S' :..::~ :':::';:..:';.:.:.'.:<,':",,:-/::>,,'>~"::,'.:.\.>,:::'<.:.:.~..::..:~... .".," '.::'~ :.... .' '... .' ~ Cement. Flnleh ,'. ..... . Q . I ~ ~ I ~ Sign Area 32 M..x. Sc:l. Ft. ',' :' :....... " ".;,., ~. .4.: 'f' f .. .... .z.' L'i:i'\::'h::~:(<~jH~:.:;,::,::.:,.,:,..; :: ,':',.:.', : ': " " " --------------------- Foot.lnS 6t.uc:co Band M..t.c:h Color or Bande. On orrlc:::. eulldlns Monument Sign Shall Be In Design, Format, And Materials With Proposed Building Landscaping Will Be Provided Around Base Of Sign Which Will Include Low Growing Shrubs . DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 1 I~.~' o / \Bollarde Q I G'\ Frovlde 4' Wood Gatee t Provide Bond 6sam W/I lIS Can't Q I ~ 4' CONC 6lA6 Provld. Flb.rmse.h W~~?.te Dumpster Enclosure Shall Be In Design. Format. And Materials With Proposed Building Landscaping Will Be Provided Around Dumpster Enclosure