The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2010 06 09 Public Hearings 500 Preliminary Five Year Capital Improvements Program FY 2010/11 thru FY 2015/16 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD / LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY ITEM 500 Information Public Hearing X Regular June 9, 2010 Meeting REQUEST: The Community Development Department — Planning Division requests that the Local Planning Agency review the preliminary Five -Year Capital Improvements Program for FY 2010/11 thru FY 2015/16. SYNOPSIS: All major capital project requests are to be submitted for review and recommendation by the Local Planning Agency. Staff will be in attendance from the various departments making requests (Public Works, Parks and Recreation, and Police) to answer questions. CONSIDERATIONS: APPLICABLE LAW, PUBLIC POLICY, AND EVENTS Section 2(b), Article VIII, of the State Constitution. Municipal Home Rule Powers Act Section 166 041, Florida Statutes. Procedures for adoption of ordinances and resolutions Winter Springs Charter, Article IV. Governing Body. Winter Springs Charter, Article VII. Financial Procedure. City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan FINDINGS The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) furthers the City's legitimate government purpose of meeting the demands for new and properly maintained infrastructure and facilities in a fiscally responsible manner and in furtherance of section 166.021, Florida Statutes. The CIP is the vehicle that links capital expenditures with adopted public policy. The CIP neither appropriates funds nor authorizes projects; it is a planning document. The CIP integrates planning for significant capital or operating projects with financial planning into a multi -year schedule ofprojects. It is used as an alternative to considering individual projects one -at -a -time without reference to overall community priorities or fiscal capacity. The CIP is the primary tool for implementing City Commission initiatives and reflects the various master plans that serve as a blueprint for future capital investment. The proposed CIP also serves as the companion to the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan, which outlines capital improvements that are required to maintain adopted levels of service and keep pace with community growth. June 9, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM 500 Each capital improvement is described, listed by year it is to be purchased or commenced, the amount to be spent per year, and the method of financing. The list is prioritized over the 5 -year period and is reviewed and updated annually. The adoption of the CIP does not commit the City to expenditures or appropriations beyond the first year (which will be included in the forthcoming Adopted FY2009 budget). What is Included? • Projects that cost more than $50,000, and • Projects identified in the Comprehensive Plan that are necessary to meet Levels of Service (LOS) [elimination of existing deficiencies]; • Projects which increase the capacity or efficiency of existing infrastructure; • Projects which replace failing infrastructure[the repair and replacement of existing public facilities]; and/or • Projects which enhance facilities and infrastructure [the provision for new public facilities]. Items may include: • New and expanded facilities; • Rehabilitation or replacement of existing facilities; • Major pieces of equipment; • Cost of professional studies related to the improvement; and/or • Acquisition of land related to a community facility. Priorities of Capital Improvements The biggest priority for the capital program is ensuring that facilities currently meet adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards and that they will continue to do so in the future as growth occurs or other conditions change. Adopted LOS are from the existing Comprehensive Plan and do not reflect the changes included in the EAR -Based Amendments transmitted to the State, as these will not be adopted until the fall. The adopted LOS standards are as follows: TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES Require the following minimum LOS standards for Transportation facilities based on average daily trips: • Limited Access Roads: as prescribed by FDOT • Arterials: LOS D • Collectors: LOS D SANITARY SEWER 100 gallons per person per day. POTABLE WATER 115 gallons (minimum) per person per day. SOLID WASTE- 3.7 pounds per person per day. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (DRAINAGE)- • Water Quantity - Peak post - development runoff rate shall not exceed peak pre - development runoff rate for the 25 -year, 24 -hour storm event. Each development shall accommodate its proportion of basin runoff rate above the downstream systems actual capacity. • Water Quality - Stonnwater treatment system which meets the requirements of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) and which is site - specific or serve sub -areas of the City. June 9, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM 500 • Roadway construction - All public roadways within a development shall be designed and constructed to standards which do not allow any amount of water above the roadway centerline during the following storm events for the following roadway types: o Local Roadway — 25 -year, 24 -hour design storm event (8.6 inches of rainfall). o Collector Roadway — 25 -year, 24 -hour design storm event (8.6 inches of rainfall). o Arterial Roadway — 100 -year, 24 -hour design storm event (10.6 inches of rainfall). PARKS AND RECREATION- • Parks- 8 acres (total public park and recreation land acreage, including open space) per 1,000 residents. The City may utilize State and county park lands and trails that are located within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. This standard includes both passive and active recreation lands. • City Owned Open Space- 4 acres per 1, 000 residents. Open space is defined as "undeveloped lands suitable for passive recreation or conservation ". SCHOOL CAPACITY as established by the Seminole County School Board- 100% of the aggregate permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each school type within each Concurrency Service Area, except for high schools which are established at 110% of the aggregate permanent FISH capacity for 2008 -2012 in order to financially achieve the desired LOS. The following thresholds shall be used to target initiation and budgeting of construction and/or purchase of capital facilities to meet projected future needs based on adopted LOS standards: • TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES- Volumes are at 90 % of adopted LOS capacity. • SANITARY SEWER 75 % of available capacity is being utilized. • POTABLE WATER 75 % of available capacity is being utilized. • PARKS AND RECREATION Park lands when 95 % of available land area is utilized or when 90 % of the population exists in areas in need of new park acreage. Ranking of Proposed Capital Improvements The following criteria were used by each Department Head in evaluating and ranking their list of capital improvement projects: • [8 pts.] Does the project eliminate (or assist in the elimination of) proven or obvious dangers to public or employee health or safety? [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC] [CIE, p. 1.1.3]; or • [6 pts.] Does the project raise a service or facility to an adopted Level of Service by eliminating (or assist in the elimination of) existing capacity deficits? [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC] [CIE, p. 1.1.3]; or • [4 pts.] Does the project maintain adopted Level of Service standards in already developed areas by increasing the efficiency of existing facilities or infrastructure? [CIE, p. 1.1.3] Will the project accommodate redevelopment Level of Service demands? [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC]; or • [2 pts.] Does the project represent a logical extension of facilities to accommodate projected growth and new development demands by providing comparable Level of Service in developing areas? [CIE, p. 1.1.3] [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC]. In addition, add two pts. for each, as applicable: • [2 pts.] Is the project financially feasible (meaning, does the project have committed funding? [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC] [CIE, p. 1.1.3]; and • [2 pts.] Is the project coordinated with major projects of other agencies? Does the project accommodate plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide public June 9, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM 500 facilities within the local government's jurisdiction? [9J- 5.016(3)(c), FAC] [CIE, p. 1.1.3]; and • [2 pts.] Does the project specifically implement one or more policies of the Comprehensive Plan pertaining to concurrency requirements? [CIE, p. 1.1.3]. FISCAL IMPACT: The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is a 6 -year schedule of improvements that includes the Capital Improvements Element Schedule and all other capital projects to be funded by the City. COMMUNICATION EFFORTS: March 5, 2010- FY 2011 -2016 Capital Improvements Program and the Capital Improvements Element Forms distributed to Dept Directors. P &Z /Local Planning Agency Agenda Items are posted in City Hall and posted on City's Website STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the P &Z /Local Planning Agency hold a Public Hearing and make a recommendation to the City Manager and City Commission related to the preliminary Five -Year Capital Improvements Program for FY 2010/11 thru FY 2015/16. ATTACHMENTS: A. Preliminary Capital Improvements Program, FY 2010 /11 thru FY 2015/16 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY DEPARTMENT FY 2010/11 to FY 2015/16 LOS Funding Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Years Year 6 TOTALS Operating comprehensive Plan r Project Name category Source Description/Justification Location Rank Current Yr 2010/11 2011112 2012113 2013114 2014/15 2015H6 (Years 1-6) 2010/2011 impact Reference 2010/2011 Department: PARKS & RECREA Promotes Nail system; Improves recreational opportunities consistent ROS 1.1.1; ROS 1.1.9; Jeda Point Parks & SC with the recreational needs . of the SR 434 and SR 10 $ $ S $ - i - TBD ROS 1.5.2; ROS 1.7; County Park Recreation County; Accomodates growth through 417 ROS 1.7.1; CIE 1.2.1 (f) the addition of park acreage [LOS]. Outdoor amphitheatre furthers the network of public green spaces that form the framew for the Town Center and prom & expands trail ROS 1.1.1; ROS 11.9 system; Improves re creational Parks 8 CF 305 Winter Springs ROE 1.1.10; FLUE 1.3.3; 3 Magnolia Park Recreation & 1CTX opportunities consistent with the Town Center 10 $ 40,000 $ 1,148,750 $ $ $ $ $ S 1,148,750 T80 FLUE 2.1.5; FLUE 2.2.3; recteational needs of re sidents; Is a . catalyst for private FLUE 2.1.5; FLU development in the CIE 1.2.1(f); CIE 1.1.3 Town Center, ve° Ace dates growth through additional active recerational area [LOS]. Permanent dog park expansion ROS 1.1.1; R 1.1.10; Central Winds consistent with recreational needs of CWP ROS 1.4; ROS 1.41 L. 3 Park Expansion Parks & GRT /G residents; Utilizes grant funding; Expansion near 8 $ 100000 5 ! S $ - " $ .S $ - $ - $ 20500 ROS 1.5; FLUE1.3.3; Improvements Recreation NF Accomodates growth through SR 434 E 2.2.3; (Dog Park) additional active recreational area CIE 1.1.3; CIE 1.2 1(f) . [LOS). Trolwood Park Two new tennis courts w ith fencing ROS 1.4; ROS 1.4.1; d Tennis Courts N/A GNF consistent with recreational needs of Trotwood Park $ i $ 4 $ $ $ $ 80,000 ROS 1.5; FLUE 1.3.3 residents. Central Winds Heavy duty commercial shade Central Winds ROS 1. 3.6; ROS 1.4; d Park N/A GNF structures over a8 8 sets of bleachers Pant $ 100,000 ROS 1.4.1 at CWP baiI8elds. A d Outdoor Senior N/A GNF Outdoor Senior Fitness Wellness Sunshine Park $ S , i. $ 75 000 $ . S $ -`. S " " S 75,000 $ R OS 1.3.6; ROS 1.4; Fitness Course System Course. ROS 1.4.1; ROS 1 Senior Fitness Convert Civic Center to Senior Fitness ROS 1.3.6; ROS 1.4; d Center N/A GRT enter. Sunshine Park $ $ ` $ 200 000 S ' . $ S :. $ = S 200 $ ROS 1.4.1; ROS 1.5 Neighborhood Torcaso Park expansion consistent ROS1.4; ROS 1 .4.1; Community Parks & GRT with recreational needs of residents; Torcaso Park 6 $ $ $ $ 400,000 $ $ S' ! $ 400,000 5 - FLUE 1.3.3; HE 2.2.11; , i : Center Recreation Utilizes grant funding. CIE 1.1.3 Civic or Event BND, City Civic Center expansion d Center N/A GRT 8 consistent with recreational needs of Town Center 6 5,000,00 $ ROS 1.4; RO 1.4.1 PIMF re sidents; Uti grant funding. Multi - purpose athletic building Central Winds GRT CWP expansion consistent with recreational ROS 1.3.6 R OS 1.4; d Park Athletic N/A GRT 8 Amphitheatre 6 $ - S i - $ $ - $ - $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 S 12,000,000 $ Center PIMF needs of residents; Utilizes grant Area ROS 1.4.1; ROS 1.5 funding. �:i .._.: $ 140,000 $ 1 , 298,750 $ 275,0 $ 400,000 $ 5,000,000 S 6, 000,000 $ 6 ,000,000 $ 18,973,750 $ 20,500 Page 1 of 6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRA EPA FY 2010/11 to FY 201 5/16 BY D LOS Funding Year 1 Year 2 12 Ye 3 Year RTMENT 4 Yea Year 6 TO TALS Operating Comprehensive Plan r project Name Category Source DeseriptloN Justiflcatlon Location Rank Current Yr 2010111 2011/ 2012/13 2013114 2014/15 2016/16 (Yeare 1 6) Budget lmpad Reference 20102011 Department: PUBLIC WORKS City Hall BND, Expands existing facility 10 Expansion N/A PBIF 6 acco demands due to City Town Center 4 $ $ $ $ 1,900,000 $ 1,900,000 $ CIE 1 .1.3 RS growth. Major maintenance; Refurbishes 5 Resurfacing- N/A LGTX existing streets so that transportation City Wide 6 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,500,000 $.... - -- - TE 1 network is maintained. Services future demand and Michael Blake addresses futu deficiency of SR 434 FLUE 1 FLUE 1.3.3; i Blvd.(Spine Transptn 1CTX by expanding interconned'mg collector T own Center 4 $ 240,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ ! :! $ $ FLUE 2 TE 1; TE 1.2 Road) road network in Town Center to TE 1. CIE . 1.1.3 reduce demand on SR 434. Safety improvement; Improves City Northern Way / Sidewalks- iCTX & collector streets with the addition of SheOand FLUE 1.3.1; TE 1: TE 1.2; l Shetland/Northe N/A sidewalks estrians to in increase safety of 6 S $ 3; E . m GRT ped cooperation with Aven T E 1 . T 153; CIE 1 Seminole County. Sidewalk Wade Safety improvements; Furthers safe trensporta network to ensure FLUE 1. T 1; TE 1.2; 3 Street/419 STM adeq uate movement of peopl a nd SR 419 10 S 630,000 S S S 3 S S S S TE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 Improvements goods. Doran Drive (Blumberg to high sdwol} FLUE 1.3.1; FLU 1.3. I Doran Drive Trensptn 1CTX Refurb collector road ao t hat Town C enter 6 $ , $ 200,0 $ ,. $ r $ . - .., S ° .:I $ $ 200,000 $ TE 1; TE 1 .2; T 1 .3; existing LOS is maintained. - C I E 1 .1.3 Ra ncMenda Dirt road paving provides supporting FLUE 1.3.1; TE 1; TE 1.2 ! P Transptn 1CTX infras tc enhance existing Ranchlanda 6 $ 750 $ 6 00,000 $ $ $ $ ' $ $ 600,000 $ (10,0 TE 1.3; CIE 1. HE 1.1.9 houang stock. Residential Rebuilds existing neighbo _ • FLUE 1 TE 1; TE 1 Road Transptn 1CTX stree ao that trensportation network V arious S $ Rewnstruction is maintained. - : T E 1 IE 1 .3' C North Moas Major maintenance- Refurbishes FLUE 1 TE 1; TE 1 d Road Transptn 1CTX collector road so that existing LOS is Moss Road 6 $ $ - $ TE 1.3; CIE 1 .1.3 m aintained. Sheny Ave Tre nsptn FDO Helps ensure adequate movement of SR She 419 & 6 $ FLU FLUE 1.3.3 Dece Lane people and goods. ny Ave TE 1.2 TE 1 .3; C IE 1 .1 Hayes Road Trensptn STM Helps ensure adequate movement of SR 434 & g $ FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.3; Decel Lane people and goo Hayes Road TE 1 .2 TE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 Vistawilla Drive Trensptn STM Helps people ensure good Vista adequate movement of SR 434 & 6 $ FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.3 Decel Lan s . willa TE 1.2; TE 1.3; CIE 1 d Tuacore Drive Trensptn TI F Helps ensure adequate movement of SR 434 & 6 $ 16 • S 160,000 $ FLUE 1.3.1; FLU Decal Lane people end goods. Tuscore TE 1.2; TE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 d Winding Hollow Transptn TIF Helps ensure quate movement of 250,000 $ 250,000 FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3.3; ; Decal Lane people and goods Win ding Hollow r TE 12; TE 1.3; CIE 1.1.3 Ora nge Avenue Improves road function and Orange Av to FLUE 1.3.1; FLUE 1.3. 3 Loop Transptn TIF beautification. CWP (SR 434) - 6 $ $ ! $ $ $ $ 1,500,000 90 $ 1 $ 1 ; T 1. Town Ctr TE 1.2.4, T 2.1.4; TE E 1.3 C t . 3 $ 2,452,000 $ 2,100 ,000 $ 1,000Page ,000 $ 1,650,000 $ 250,00 $ 410,000 $ 3,0,000 $ 9,210,000 $ (10,000) 2 of 6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY DEPARTMENT FY 2010/11 to FY 2015/16 Rank Operat r Project Name LOS Fu Description/ JustHkatbn Location ing Current Yr Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 year 6 TO TALS Budget Imp act Comprehensive Plan category SO Scor 2010/11 2011/12 2012113 2013N4 2014/15 2015/16 (Years 14) 2009201 Reference e 1 Departm UTILITY • Potable Water SR 46 potable Study of surface wa ter supply as a FLUE 1.3.1; IE 2.3; Akem ative Water UEF means of reducing on pota City Wide 6 $ 75, 000 $ 100, 000 ;� ! $ $ 175,000 5 - 16232 ; IE 5.1.7; • Water Supply water - CE 1.2.6 Electrical 6 Improvements to N/A UEF Major maintenance. WTP 42 6 $ 375,000 5 4 $ - S S $ - $ - IE 22; IE 2.2 1 WTP #2 WrP # Storage d Tank 1 N/A UEF Major maintenance. WTP #1 70,000 $ .i:. - .! S - • S !' - $ 70,000 S - IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 Resurfacing WTP #2 Storage d Tank N/A UEF Major maintenance. Wry 42 6 # ; ; $ $ 60,000 $ 60,0 0,000 S IE 22; IE 22.1 Resurfacing IE 2 WTP #3 Storage ... L. d Tank N/A UEF Major maintenance, WTP 43 6 $ $ # $ 70,000 $05$.,.:.,' IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1 ResurfaResurfa New Variable Frequency N/A UEF Control upgrades. WTP #1 6 $ S �' # - $ 3,000 IE 2.2; I622 .1 Controls WTP # SR 434 Spine SR 434 to I E22;IE221; d Rd to Tuacoro N/A UEF Water system hoping. Spine 4 S i :i S $ 200,000 S S S $ 2 00,000 # HE 1.3.10; CIE 1.1.3 Dr. Water Une Rd/Tuscora SR 434 Tuscora SR 434/ Spine .2; IE 2.2.1; d Dr. b Viate WA UEF Water system hoping. 4 S ! i ! - • S S 000 i Dr. Water Una Rd h SR 417 HE 13.10; CIE 1.1.3 Spine Rd IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; 3 (Michael Blake N/A UCF Water system hoping. Town Center 4 S $ 213,143 S i S 9 S S $ 143 i HE 1 3 IE 1 1 3 Blvd) Water Line E . .10; C . . .1.3 d Packed Towers N/A BND Water quality upgrades. WFP #1 4 S # $ # $ 2,500, # HE Eli 2.2; IE 2.2.1; WTP #1 ,__ �_ 1.3.10; CIE 1 d Chlorine Conv. N/A BND Water quality upgrades WFp #1 $ $ 80,0 $ IE 2.2; IE 2.2.1; WTp# 1 '. +._..- .... • .. HE 1.22. 3.10: CIE 1.7.3 d P acked Towers N/A BND Water quality upgrades WTP #3 4 S - $ $ $ 1,500,000 S S >� $ 1,500,000 S 1 .2; IE 2.2.1; WTP #3 143 $ - HE 13.10; CIE 1.1.3 d Packed Towers WA BND Water quality upgrades. WTP # 2 4 S - $ $ 1 - 150 0,000 $ 1,500,0 S _ IE .2; IE 2.2.1; WTP #2 HE 13.10; CIE 1.1.3 8 460,000 $ 358,143 $ 150,000 $ 2,835,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,700,000 $ - $ 6, 643, $ 3, 000 Page 3 of 6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY DEPARTMENT FY 2010/11 to FY 2015/16 LOS Funding Rank Year 1 Year 2 Year 7 Year 4 Year 6 Year 6 TOTALS Operating Comprehensive Plan Ima r Project Name Cate Source Description/ Justification Location Scor Curren Yr 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 (Years 141 Budget 201020/1 d Reference _ e Department: UTILITY - Administration Utilily/Pubhc Old Sanford- ? Works Facility N/A CF-311 Consolidates management. Oviedo Rd 4 $ 60,000 $ 750,000 $ $ S $ $ $ 750,000 $ 20,000 FLUE 1.3.3; CIE 1.1.3 Admnstm Bldg $ 60,000 $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 20,000 LOS Funding Rank Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 TOTALS Operating Comprehensive Plan r Project Na e category Source Description/Justification LLocation hp Current Yr Scar 2010/11 201111 (Veen 'et 2012113 2013/14 2014/16 2016/16 (Vee l4) Budget Impac Reference mIv 20102011 e Department: UTILITY - Reclaimed Water Lake Jesup Water Study for ug reuse augmentation project - to ament and FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.3.10; 3 Lake Jesup Potable UCF expand the use of reclaimed water for Lake Jesup 6 $ 85,000 $ - $ - IE 2.3; IE 2.3.2; IE 5.1.7, Water Study Water arpatron p urposes, as a means of reducing demands of growth on the CE 1.2.8 Floridan Aquifer. Reclaimed Augments demand on the City's Water Augmnt Potable BND will not exceed Potable water system so that the C Shore of Lake _ FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.3.10, d its 2013 CUP Je s field : ay 6 $ 700,000 $ 2,450,000 $ !R - - $ $ $ $ 2,460,000 $ 75,000 IE 2.3; .2; Pump Station - Water a8ocation and allows the expansion of fields CE IE 2.3 1.2.8 I6 5.1.7; Phase A the City's reclaimed water system. Reclaimed Expands reduces reclaimed water system and ity's potable d Distribution - Water Water Potable BND water system demand on the C so that the City will not City Wide 6 $ - $ 1,025,000 S 1,025,000 $ - IE 2u3; IE 2 3 2EIE 5.17; Phase 1 exceed its 2013 CUP allocation. CE 1.2.8 Reclaimed Expands reclaimed water system and FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.3.10; d Water Potable BND reduces demand on the Ciy'a potable City Wide 6 $ - $ $ :. $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ . S 8 2,000,000 $ IE 2.3; 2.3.2, IE 5.1.7; Distribution - Water exceed its 2013 CUP allocation. water system so that the City will not Phase 2 CE IE 1.2.8 Reclaimed Expands reclaimed water system and FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.3.10; d Water Potable BND re duces demand on the City' potable City Wide 6 3 $ $ $ $ $ 1,030,000 $ 1,030,000 8 2,060,000 $ IE 2.3; 1E2.3.2; IE 5 . 1 . 7 ; • Distribution - Water water system so that the City will not Phase 3 exceed its 2013 CUP allocation. CE 1.2.8 $ 786,000 $ 3,475,000 $ 1, 025,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1 $ 1,030,000 $ 8,560,000 $ 75,000 Page 4 of 6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY DEPARTMENT FY 2010/11 to FY 2015/16 LOS Funding Rank Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 TOTAL Operating Comprehensive Plan r Project Name Category Source Description/ Justification Location ing Current Yr 2010/11 2011112 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 (Years 1-8( Budget Impact Reference Scor 20102011 e Department: UTILITY - Sanitary Sewer Replace Variable N/A UEF Major maintenance. EWWTP 6 $ 60 $ $ S - $ $ $ f - $ FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12; Freqncy Contrls L .__ I _ - - - - - IE 1.1.4; IE 1.4.3 West Force 3 Main Sanitary UEF B service to new growth; Lift Station 10 8 $ 285,000 S $ $ $ $ !. $ -' S - $ 10,000 FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12; Rerouting / Sewer Improves efficiency. Discharge IE 1.1.4; IE 1.4.3 Design East Force Main Sanitary Bolsters service to new growth; FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12; Rerouting / Sewer UEF improves efficiency. Tuskawilla 8 $ $0,000 $ 3$0,000 $ $ S $ $ $ 750,000 $ IE 1.1.4, IE 1.4.3 Design O Sewer Line N/A RSA Annual reline of portions of s stem. City Wide 6 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,500,000 $ FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12; Restoration y - IE 1.1.4; IE 1.4.3 d WWRF Sand Sanitary UEF Increases capacity brnew growth; WWRF 6 $ $ ." : $ $ $ 250,000 $, .. ',3 $ 250000 $ FLUE 1.3.1;1-1E 1.1.12; Fitter Sewer Improves efficiency. IE 1.1.4; IE 1.4.3 l,WRF Plant el . 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12; Painting WA UEF Major maintenance. WWRF 6 $ 75 E 3 $ - ! $ . S $ - f - - IE 1.1.4:IE 1.4.3 d Backhoe N/A UEF Equipment Replacement city Wide 6 $ ; $ 80 000 $• $ $ $ ! $ 80,000 $ CIE 1.13 - $ 720,000 $ 600,000 $ 370,000 S 250,000 $ 500,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 2,180,000 $ 10,000 LOS Funding Year 1 Year 2 7 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 TOTALS Operating Comprehensive Plan r Project Name Category Source Description/Justification Loeatlon Renk CurrantYr 2010/11 2011/12 201210121 13 2013/14 2014!15 2016/16 (y�mtil Budget Impact Reference 20102011 Department: STORMWATER Solary Canal Northwest . FLUE Partnership with Oviedo, Seminole comer DeLeon d Regional Stormwater SJR GRT County, 8 SJRWMD for regional Street & 6 $ 800,000 $ 700,000 $ [ $ $ $ - $ $ 700,000 4 1 1 1 1I CIE 1; HE 1.1.12; 1.2.3; CIE 11. IE . 5.3 Stormwater D GRT stormwater pond. Howard Facility 1 Lombardy Canal Majar maintenance enabling efficient Lombardy Road Pi ping Stormwater SUF operation. area 6 $ 25,000 S . $ $ - 8 FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.12 TMDL Mandate to meet State Water Stormwater SUF water quality regulations; City Wide 6 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 75,000 s $ $ $ $ 125,000 CIE 1.2.3; IE 4.1.1 Quality Improves surface water d WR °etrell N/A SUF Replace non - functioning WR's 8 weir Various 6 $ 4 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ ' $ $ - f 100,000 $ FLUE 1.3.3; CIE 1.1.3 Replacement structures at various locations __ . - - - Stormwater Pipe O Refining / N/A SUF Major Maintenance City Wide 6 $ 45,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 350,000 $ - FLUE 1.3.3; CIE 1.1.3 Replacement $ 885,000 $ 900,000 $ 175,000 $ 50000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 1,275,000 $ - Page 5 of 6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BY DEPARTMENT FY 2010/11 to FY 2015/16 LOS Funding Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 0 TOTALS Operating Comprehensive Plan r Project Category Source Description/Justification Locatbn Rank Current 2010H1 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015H5 Budget Impact (Years 1i) 20102011 Reference Department: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Repaving, addition of 8' Sidewalk, Shepard Road Street Lighting and Signage, FLUM 1.4.8; FLUM 1.6.2; TE 17 -92 Underground Drainage, Sustainable Streetscape N/A CDD 10 $ CRA landscaping. For Shepard Road at 17- $ 500,000 $ - $ - _ $ $ $ $ 500,000 $ ` - 1.2; TE 1.4.9; CE 1.2.5; HE Project 92. Increased public safety, economic 2.2. development. $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - LOS Funding Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 5 TOTALS Operatin Comprehensive Plan r Project Name Category Source D°ae riptleN JwtHkatlon Location Current Yr Rank 2010111 2011/12 2012113 2013114 2014175 2016116 (Years ra l4 1i) Budget Impel Reference 20102011 Department: POLICE New Sto New 40x50 out building to be used for Building a N/A GNF the secure storage of bulk properly Department 6 $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - CIE 1.1.3 and evidence storage 8 - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ • $ - $ 100,000 $ Funding Sources: Funding Sources: 1CTX One Cent Sales Tax (Road Improvement Fund) - 115 PBIF Public Buildings Impact Fee Fund BND Bonds PIMF Park & Rec Impact Fee Fund CF-305 1999 Construction Capital Project Fund - 305 PRV Private Contributions CF -311 Construction Fund - 311 R &R Utility Renewal & Replacement Fund DEF Development Services Enterprise Fund RSV Reserves FIMF Fire Impact Fee Fund SC Seminole County FDOT Florida Dept of Transportation STM Stimulus Federal Funding GNF General Fund SUF Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund GRT Grants & CDBG , TIF Transportation Impact Fee Fund LGTX Local Option Gas Tax (Transportation Improvement Fund) TLBD Assessment District (Tuscawilla Lighting & Beautifictn) MTF Medical Transportation Fund UCF Utility Construction Fund OFD Assessment District (Oak Forest Wall) I UEF Utility Enterprise Fund , Page 6 of 6