HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 07 11 Public Hearing 500 Crown Castle International Conditional Use - Telecommunications Tower
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
AGENDA
TT~.l\/r ~Illl
___ ___ .A.:.J.l. ~ ___ ..J V V
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing v
.L"-
Regular
July 11, 2007
Meeting
MGR.
/DEPT. tf'1
REQUEST: The Community Development Department requests the Board of
Adjustment hear the request of Crown Castle International for a Conditional Use to allow
a telecommunications tower, on an approximately 75' x 75' lease site at the City's waste-
water treatment plant site in Tuscawilla, along Winter Springs Boulevard (1560 Winter
Springs Boulevard). The site is located within the PUD zoning district (the site has a
Public/Semi-Public Future Land Use designation).
APPLICANT:
The applicant's name is Crown Castle International and the site for this proposed tower
facility is owned by the City of Winter Springs. On June 25, 2007, the City Commission
granted permission for this application to proceed. However, the Commission made no
commitments on the merits of the application and emphasized the Code requirements for
locating cell towers and the use of lowest height technology.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to request the Board of Adjustment
consider the appropriateness of the proposed 150' tall monopole telecommunications
tower (cell tower) and its associated site improvements, pursuant to the criteria set forth
in Section 20-33 and Section 20-451 of the City's Code of Ordinances. Section 20-33
sets forth the criteria and process for a conditional use. Section 20-451, as amended by
Ordinance No. 2006-12, sets forth a 3 tiered zoning system for the location of all
proposed telecommunication towers within the City.
The first tier allows telecommunications towers as a permitted use at 4 specific, mapped
sites within the City (the City's wastewater treatment plant #1/west plant, the Seminole
County School Board Consolidated Services Facility - a.k.a. "bus bam, the City's west
effluent disposal sites - located at the SE quadrant of Site 16, east of the percolation
ponds, and the City Hall site).
July II, 2007
Public Hearing 500
Page 2 of9
The second tier allows telecommunication towers to be considered for a conditional use
at the following sites:
a. nOn property owned by the City of Winter Springs that is designated
public/semi-public on the City'sfuture land use map; or
b. On an existing commercial or industrial building, not located or incorporated
within a single family residential area, provided the tower does not extend
more than ten (10') feet above the roof line of the building and the tower does
not exceed the applicable maximum height limitation in the City Code; or
c. Within (enclosed) an existing church steeple or other type of existing structure
which exists for a primary purpose other than for personal wireless services.
It is the intent of this subsection to take advantage of existing structures for
providing personal wireless services and not to allow the construction of new
structures for said purposes; or
d Upon existing sports lighting structures, utility structures, and water tanks,
provided the structure is not located within a single family area, the tower
does not extend more than ten (10') feet above the top of the existing
structure, and the tower does not exceed the applicable maximum height
limitation in the City Code; or
e. On the site of the proposed Fire Station #3 which is to be located on the south
side ofS.R. 434 in Tuscawilla Tract 15, Parcel 3 (approximately 2300 feet
west of Vi stawill a Drive). Said tower, if approved, shall not exceed one
hundred twenty (120) feet. "
The third tier allows a request a for conditional use for a site not listed in tier one or tier
two, if the applicant presents competent, substantial evidence which demonstrates that the
first two tiers are not available or technically feasible for locating a tower. A
telecommunication tower shall be considered for a conditional use on the following
preferred sites, which are listed in the order of preference. These preferred sites shall be
considered in the sequence listed below and the applicant shall be required to
demonstrate, based on technical feasibility, that a more preferred site is not available or
suitable before requesting a lesser preferred site:
a. Property which has a future land use designation of Industrial.
b. Property which has a future land use designation of Mixed Use and is part of
a Development of Regional Impact.
c. Densely wooded or concealed areas limited to a golf course and areas of
property which have been designated conservation by perpetual easement and
on the city's future land use map. If a new telecommunication tower is placed
within trees or wooded areas, the tower shall be concealed by the surrounding
trees or wooded areas to the maximum extent possible to minimize the
visibility of the tower from any road, occupied building, and fairway if located
on a golf course. Trees can be existing on the subject property or installed to
meet the requirements of this subsection, or they can be a combination of
both.
d. Property which has a future land use designation of Greeneway Interchange
District.
July II, 2007
Public Hearing 500
Page 3 of9
All other locations shall be prohibited. Further, the construction of a tower for
speculative purposes shall be prohibited. For purposes of this code, it shall be deemed
primae facie evidence that a tower is being built for speculative purposes if the applicant
cannot provide with the application written evidence that one or more carriers have
committed to locate on the proposed tower within three (3) months of the construction of
the tower for a period of at least five (5) years.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
Section 9-600 through 9-606 of the City's Code of Ordinances
Section 20-33. Conditional Uses
Section 20-451, as amended by Ordinance No. 2006-12, Telecommunication Towers
The Telecommunications Act of 1996
Section 365.172 Florida Statutes
CONSIDERATIONS:
Cell phone service in the Tuskawilla P.U.D. has been problematic for some time. The
applicant proposes to locate a 150' tall monopole tower at a City-owned water treatment
plant site within the Tuscawilla Planned Unit Development (PUD) that has a
Public/Semi-Public FLU designation (this site qualifies as a Tier Two location pursuant
to Ordinance 2006-12).
The applicant must provide evidence that the proposed structure meets the criteria set
forth in Subsection 20-451(as amended by Ordinance 2006-12) of the City Code as well
as the conditional use criteria in Section 20-33. The attached application packet includes
the applicant's responses to the Section 20-33 criteria and Section 20-451 criteria. In
addition, the applicant must provide evidence that the proposal meets the requirements of
Section 9-600 through 9-606 of the City's Code of Ordinances (Aesthetic Review
Standards). Pursuant to Section 20-451, all telecommunication towers must comply with
the following development standards:
1. They shall be located as far as technically feasible from properties that are
designated residential on the City's Future Land Use and Zoning maps and shall
comply with all other applicable distance standards which are set forth in the City
Code.
The applicant has stated, and must substantiate, that the proposed tower is
as far as is technically feasible from properties designated residential on the
City's FLU and zoning maps. The request appears to comply with the other
applicable distance standards (e.g. the lease site appears to be 430' from the
nearest residential properties along Ironwood Court, in Glen Eagle, Unit 1).
The minimum distance from residential properties is 125% of the height of
the proposed tower. The 430' distance represents 286% of the proposed
tower height.
2. To the extent feasible, the lowest height technology must be incorporated
including, but not limited to, micro-cell technology.
The applicant must substantiate that the proposed tower and future co-
locators will incorporate the lowest height technology, including, but not
limited to, micro-cell technology. The applicant states that the proposed
July 11, 2007
Public Hearing 500
Page 4 of9
height is based on the number of co-locators and nearby dense tree canopy.
Staff has included as a part of this document, a report from Arthur K. Peters
wherein he details some alternate technologies, including the use of multiple,
low-height towers (as in Medina, Washington) and the use of stealth and
disguise facilities. Other low height technologies may be available and
should be considered before approving a 150 high monopole.
3. Tower height must be the minimum necessary to technically serve the applicant's
needs (not to exceed a total height of 165' or a height calculated based on a tower
setback of 125 percent of the tower height measured at grade from the base of the
tower to the closest residentially zoned property line.
As stated in item #1 above, the site appears to be approximately 430' from
the adjacent Glen Eagle, Unit 1 residential subdivision. As also referenced
above, the number of co-locators as well as the nearby dense tree canopy
were justifications given by the applicant for the 150' tower height. No
technical data was provided by the applicant which addressed the use of
some of the more effective stealth technologies. As previously stated, other
low height technologies may be available and applicable and should be
considered before approving a 150 high monopole.
4. The most effective stealth technology (including stealth towers) must be
incorporated.
The use of a 150' tall monopole does not appear to represent use of the most
effective stealth technology. However, staff also recognizes that there are
numerous other factors, including the number of co-locators and the existing
tree canopies on adjacent parcels, which influence the design of the proposed
facility. The antennae shall be internally-mounted/concealed rather than
close-mounted. Further, other stealth technologies should be employed to the
maximum extent feasible.
5. The location must be the least visually intrusive in the community.
To address this requirement, the applicant has provided a visual impact test
(balloon test) which was performed on May 16, 2007. This documentation
includes photographs of the balloon taken from various locations depicted on
a map. This test is attached as part of this report. This test provides
documentation of the visual impact of the proposed 150' tall monopole but
does not address the reduction of visual impacts on the community attainable
through the, use of lowest height technologies.
6. The proposed tower shall be located in an area where the visual impact on the
community is minimized to the greatest extent possible.
As stated above in item #5, the applicant has provided the balloon test to
document/address the visual intrusion into the neighboring communities.
Again, there has been no consideration of the possible mitigation levels
attainable through the use of lowest height technologies.
July 11, 2007
Public Hearing 500
Page 5 of9
7. Antennas must be close mounted or concealed (however concealment shall be
encouraged and preferred to the greatest extent practicable).
Staff requires concealed antennae.
Like all other developments of structures and buildings within the City, Ordinance 2006-
12 requires all applications for location of a telecommunications tower to comply with
Sections 9-600 through 9-606 of the City's Code of Ordinances. These sections address
the minimum community appearance and aesthetic review standards of the application.
Pursua.'1t to Section 9-603 of the City Code, the City Commission(as applied to this
application, a recommendation from the Board of Adjustment to the City Commission)
may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the application only after
consideration of whether the following criteria have been satisfied:
(1) The plans and specifications of the proposed project indicate that the setting,
landscaping, proportions, materials, colors, textures, scale, unity, balance, rhythm,
contrast, and simplicity are coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular
proposal, surrounding area and cultural character of the community.
The proposed 150' monopole is difficult to compare to any facility in the area except
the power transmission line poles in the area. The concrete poles for these lines are
approximately ninety (90') feet high and are similar in color to the proposed
monopole. It must be mentioned that none of these transmission line poles are
located within 500 feet of the proposed monopole site. The base of the monopole
and the ancillary equipment is enclosed with a chain-link fence and associated
landscaping located along the exterior of the fence. The proposed landscaping
meets the requirements of Section 20-451 of the City's Code of Ordinances with the
possible need to provide two additional trees and attendant shrubs near the fence
gate to provide additional screening in this area of the fence.
(2) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which
has been formally approved by the City within the surrounding area.
City Staff is aware of a small addition to the south side of the clubhouse restaurant
and the possible development of residential units on the Country Club site. Staff
has received no formal application for review nor have we seen any site plan for the
possible residential units. These projects represent expansion of an existing facility
and the addition of more residential units to the area. The use of lowest height
technology, even if additional towers are necessary to cover the service area, would
be more in harmony with the existing and future development and existing
recreational uses in the area.
(3) The plans for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any
other building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully
constructed, or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or
July 11, 2007
Public Hearing 500
Page 6 of9
intersecting street within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one
or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance:
(A) Front or side elevations,
(B) Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse
arrangement,
(C) Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof
line, hardscape improvements, and height or design elements.
The proposed 150' monopole is not similar to any other facility within five hundred
(500') ofthe site. No power transmission lines exist within 500' of the subject site.
(4) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the
established character of other buildings; structures or signs in the surrounding area with
respect to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon
commonly accepted architectural principles of the local community.
The proposed 150' monopole is different than any other facility in the immediate
area. While the proposed monopole is unique in Tuscawilla in terms of its purpose
and appearance, the use of lowest height could substantially improve the project's
relationship to the established character of other buildings and structures in the
surrounding area.
(5) The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of this
Article, the Comprehensive Plan for Winter Springs, design criteria adopted by the city
(e.g. Towne Center guidelines, SR 434 design specifications) and other applicable federal
state or local laws.
The use of a 150' monopole, when considered in light of the aesthetic review section
of the Code, does not represent consistency and compatibility as defined by this
section. The use of lowest height technology would allow for greater consistency and
compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood.
(6) The proposed project has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as
concrete masonry units with stucco, marble, termite-resistant wood, wrought iron, brick,
columns and piers, porches, arches, fountains, planting areas, display windows, and other
distinctive design detailing and promoting the character of the community.
The use of architectural enhancements is all but precluded when utilizing alSO'
monopole structure. The applicant has incorporated no significant architectural
enhancements into this project. Such enhancements might be a major element to
lower height facilities as would be the possible incorporation of these lower height
solutions into existing or compatible architectural elements. Examples may include,
but not be limited to, bell towers, entrance features, incorporation into existing
architecture, and clock towers.
July 11, 2007
Public Hearing 500
Page 7 of9
OTHER FACTORS:
Another cell tower site has been proposed on the Tuscawilla Country Club property.
This site is a Tier Three site as defined by Ordinance 2006-12. Should the Board of
Adjustment recommend approval of the Crown Castle site (the subject ofthis report), the
Tier Three site would not be viable as a stand alone cell tower site because of the
stipulations set forth in Ordinance 2006-12 that anyone proposing a Tier Three site must
present to the City competent substantial evidence which demonstrates that Tire One and
Tier Two locations are not available or technically feasible for the location of a tower.
The Tier Three site could be considered as part of the employment of lowest height
technology wherein multiple sites would be required to provide adequate '.'lireless service
to the area.
FINDINGS:
1. The site is owned by the City and has a Public/Semi-Public FLU designation. If this
facility is approved, the applicant will be required to enter into a lease agreement with the
City.
2. Pursuant to Section 20-33 of the City Code, "all conditional use recommendations and
final decisions shall be based on the following criteria to the extent applicable:
a) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the conditional use, including its
proposed scale and intensity, traffic-generated characteristics, and off-site
impacts, is compatible and harmonious with adjacent land uses, and will not
adversely impact land use activities in the immediate vicinity."
The concept of harmony and compatibility, as applied to the proposed
facility, is different than for an addition to a building. There are no other
similar structures in this immediate area with which this monopole can be
compared. The off-site impacts are limited to the visual presence of the
tower on surrounding residential areas. The use of lower height technology
would lessen this impact.
b) Whether the applicant has demonstrated the size and shape of the site,
the proposed access and internal circulation, and the design enhancements to be
adequate to accommodate the proposed scale and intensity of the conditional use
requested. The site shall be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities
such as screening, buffers, landscaping, open space, off-street parking, and similar
site plan improvements needed to mitigate against potential adverse impacts of
the proposed use."
The Public Works Department has stipulated that the lease site be limited to
an area of 65' X65'. This area will accommodate the tower and its ancillary
equipment as well as an adequate landscape area. Staff understands that a
slight modification may be necessary once the exact location is established.
Details regarding access, power supply feeds, and the source of power will be
addressed as part of the final engineering for the proposed tower.
July II, 2007
Public Hearing 500
Page 8 of9
C) Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the local
economy, including governmental fiscal impact, employment, and property
values."
Theoretically, the proposed facility could have a positive impact on the local
economy because it could enhance wireless communications in the Tuscawilla
area. In addition, the City would benefit financially from the lease payments.
If the applicant employed concealment, low height, stealth technologies,
impact on property values could be negligible.
d) Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on the natural
environment, including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife,
open space, noxious and desirable vegetation, and flood hazards."
The proposed facility will not have an adverse impact on the natural
environment, subject to the applicant providing a listed species survey
indicating no adverse impacts. In addition, a survey determining that the
location of the site is outside the 100 year floodplain. The applicant states
that no trees will be removed to accommodate the proposed tower.
e) Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on historic, scenic,
and cultural resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of
cultural and historic resources."
Staff does not believe that the proposed tower will create any ofthese adverse
impacts except for the possibility that an adverse impact may occur scenic
resources. The 150' height question needs to be addressed as part of the
consideration of scenic resources. At issue are the scenic vistas and views
and the potential adverse impacts to the area's scenic resources.
f) Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on public services,
including water, sewer, surface water management, police, fire, parks and
recreation, streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bicycle and
pedestrian facilities."
Staff does not believe the proposed use will create any of these adverse
impacts.
g) Whether the proposed use will have an adverse impact on housing and
social conditions, including variety of housing unit types and prices, and
neighborhood quality."
The proposed monopole should not impact social conditions and the variety
of housing types. Housing prices and neighborhood quality are potentially at
risk of being affected because of the visual presence of the proposed
July 11,2007
Public Hearing 500
Page 9 of9
monopole. The use of lowest height technology will decrease these potential
impacts.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Relocate the proposed lease site approximately 100' west/northwest, as
directed by Public Works Staff.
2. Decrease the proposed lease site to an area 65' by 65', as directed by
Public Works Staff.
3. Provide a tree survey for the area within 75' ofthe lease parcel.
4, Provide a Listed Species Report and sufficient documentation to verify
that the proposed facility location is not in the 100-year floodplain area.
5. The applicant must enter into a lease agreement with the City of Winter
Springs.
6. Any proposed tower solution must be compliant with Section 9-600
through 9-606 of the City's Code of Ordinances to the greatest extent
possible.
7. The applicant must provide credible and compelling data documenting
that the lowest height technology required to provide personal wireless
service to the Tuscawilla area has been used.
8. Any other conditions deemed appropriate by the Board of Adjustment to
meet the requirements of the applicable City Codes.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based upon the requirements contained in the applicable City Codes, including the
aesthetic review code (Section 9-600 through 9-606) and Section 20-451 as amended by
Ordinance 2006-12, it is questionable as to whether a 150' monopole meets the criterion
stipulated by the City for the use of lowest height technology and aesthetic compatibility
and harmony requirements under the Code.
Staff requests the Board of Adjustment consider the information presented in this staff
report and during the public hearing testimony and, if the Board is satisfied that the
request is consistent with all applicable criteria and code sections, recommend the City
Commission approve the request, subject to the Conditions of Approval detailed above.
The City Commission may consider the use of two or more shorter towers or the use of
concealed/stealth technology as an alternative to the one tower as proposed in this
request.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Location Map
B. Ordinance No. 2006-12
C. Arthur K. Peters Report
D. Application package
E. City Manager Letter on Tower Height
~
H
F
N
(<)
\0
N
bO
p.,
"0
Il)
E.S
i5
o
u
(
B
A
5
8
NOTES:
(.
Municipal Address Map Book
PRINTED: REVISED:
Apr 2005 1:
City of Winter Springs, FL
o 200
1"1- ..,..~-_
400
. Feet
3'
ap
Page
Developed By: &utheastem Surveying &: Mapping Corp.
2:
2633
ATTACHMENT B
ORDINANCE NO. 2006-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, AMENDING
SECTION 20-451 OF THE CITY CODE REGARDING
TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS AND ANTENNAS;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF PRIOR INCONSISTENT
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATION
INTO THE CODE SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City is granted the authority, under Section 2(b), Article vm, of the State
Constitution, to exercise any power for municipal purposes, except when expressly prohibited by
law; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has held several public workshops and hearings regarding
the current telecommunication tower ordinance and has determined that said ordinance should be
updated to potentially allow additional locations for telecommunication towers and/or other
appropriate personal wireless service facilities in order to enhance the quality of personal wireless
services that ar~ being provided to the citizens and businesses of Winter Springs; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, hereby finds this
Ordinance to be in the best interests ofthe public health, safety, and welfare ofthe citizens of Winter
Springs.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
reference.
Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated herein by this
Section 2. Code Amendment. The 8ity of Winter Springs Code, Section 20-451,
Telecommunication towers, is hereby amended as follows: (underlined type indicates additions and
strikeout type indicates deletions, while asterisks (***) indicate a deletion from this Ordinance of
text existing in Section 20-451. It is intended that the text in Section 20-451 denoted by the
asterisks and set forth in this Ordinance shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to
adoption of this Ordinance).
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 1 of 18
Sec. 20-451. Telecommunications towers.
1. (a) DefInitions.
Antenna shall mean a transmitting and/or receiving device used in telecommunications
that radiates or captures electromagnetic waves, including directional antennas, such as
panel and microwave dish antennas, and omni-directional antennas, such as whips,
o"".l"r1~"t"'\,.,. ....l"'IIrln't" "'.....+0..,..,""''''" n~n+o"'9'" .....1"'11,.11.0 I"l.....+onn"'" f"l.,..,rl Cln+oll';to o'lrth "'+1"'11+11'"\"("
v^,,-,,,.&uU.1.1J.5 J.UUUJ. u.1.U........U..1J.Ut.J, U!.uu&.\,{u..1 J.UU u.l.1L\i.lJ.J.J.J.u..:I UJ..1u. uU,"""'.UH.\,.I \"Iu.1 L.a.J. ~:H.UUV.U_U.
Co-location shall mean telecommunications towers that have the potential to have three
(3) or more carrier antennas located on it.
Development review committee shall mean the city staff composed of the city manager,
land development coordinator, city engineer, public works/utilities director, community
development coordinator, building official, police chief, fIre chief.
Guyed tower shall mean a telecommunications tower that is supported, in whole or in
part, by guy wires and ground anchors.
Lattice tower shall mean a telecommunications tower that is constructed with a series
of struts forming a non-solid surface tower, without guy wires standing on and fastened
to an in-ground pier.
Microwave shall mean a dish antenna, or a dish-like antenna used to link
communication sites together by wireless transmission of voice or data.
Monopole tower shall mean a telecommunications tower consisting of a single pole or
spire self supported by a permanent foundation, constructed without guy wires with
ground anchors.
Panel antenna shall mean an array of antennas designed to concentrate a radio signal in
a particular area.
Personal wireless services shall mean any personal wireless service defIned in the
Federal Telecommunications Act which includes Federal Communication Commission
(FCC) licensed commercial wireless telecommunications services including cellular.
personal communication services (pCSt specialized mobile radio (SMR). enhanced
specialized mobile radio (ESMR). paging as well as unlicensed wireless services. and
common carrier wireless exchange access services.
Stealth facility shall mean any telecommunications facility which is designed to blend
into the surrounding environment. Examples of stealth facilities include architecturally
screened roof-mounted antennas, antennas integrated into architectural elements, and
telecommunications towers designed to look like light poles, mono-power poles or trees.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 2 of 18
Telecommunications tower shall mean a monopole tower constructed as a free-standing
structure greater than thirty-five (35) feet and no more than one hundred sixty-five (165)
feet in height including antenna, which supports communication, transmission or
receiving equipment. The term includes towers for the transmission or receiving
television, AM/FM radio, digital, microwave, cellular telephones, or similar forms of
electronic communication. T'ue term excludes radar towers, radio support structures
licensed by the FCC, transportable communication devices, private home use of satellite
dishes and television antennas and satellite earth stations.
Whip antenna shall mean a cylindrical antenna that transmits signals in three hundred
sixty degrees (360) degrees.
(b) Findings and intent. The city has with increasing frequency received requests to
approve sites for telecommunications towers. Land development regulations have not
adequately identified specific procedures to address recurring issues relating to the
approval oflocations for telecommunications towers. Therefore, it is the intent of this
section to address the recurrent issues pertaining to the approval of telecommunications
towers upon parcels located in the city. Accordingly, the city commission finds that the
promulgation of this section is warranted and necessary:
(1) To protect residential areas and land uses from the potential adverse impacts of
telecommunications towers when placed at inappropriate locations or permitted without
adequate controls and regulation consistent with the provisions of law;
(2) To minimize the adverse visual impacts resulting from telecommunications towers
through sound and practical design, siting, landscape screening, and innovative
camouflaging techniques all in accordance with generally acceptable engineering and
planning principles and the public health, safety and welfare;
(3) To avoid potential damage to adjacent properties through sound engineering and
planning and the prudent and careful approval of telecommunications tower sites and
structures;
(4) To require shared use/co-location of existing and new telecommunications towers
(capability of having space for three (3) or more carriers) to avoid proliferation of
towers throughout the city. One (1) co-located position shall be reserved exclusively for
the use of the city;
(5) To ensure that location of telecommunications towers is consistent with the
provisions of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, the East Central Florida
Regional Policy Plan, the state comprehensive plan as well as the provisions of state and
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 3 of 18
federal law; and-
(6) To fix a fair and reasonable compensation, by resolution of the city commission, to
be paid to the city for the privilege to locat~ a telecommunications tower in the city and
defray the administrative costs of reviewing the applications. Also, a fee shall apply
separately to each antenna user on the tower or other support structure. Fee rates shall
be renegotiable when contract expires~;-
(7) To discourage new telecommunication towers and to encourage the use of existing
structures including. but not limited to. rooftops. sports lighting. utility poles. and
church steeples for deploying personal wireless service facilities: and
(8) To encourage the use of the lowest height technology to provide personal wireless
services including. but not limited to. micro cell technology.
(c) Applicability.
(1) All new telecommunications towers and antennas in the city shall be subj ect to these
regulations and all other applicable regulations. For purposes of measurement,
telecommunications tower setbacks as listed in subsection (f)( 1) shall be calculated and
applied to facilities located in the city, irrespective of other municipal and county
jurisdictional boundaries.
(2) All new communicatio~ antennas (Le., stealth rooftop or building mounted
antennas) which are not attached to telecommunications towers shall comply with
subsection (f)(11). .
(3) All telecommunication towers existing on July 14, 1997 shall be allowed to continue
their usage as they presently exist. Routine maintenance shall be permitted on such
existing towers. New construction other than routine maintenance on an existing
telecommunications tower shall comply with the requirements of this section.
(4) For purposes of implementing this section, a telecommunications tower that has
received city approval or building permit, but has not yet been constructed, shall be
considered an existing tower so long as such approval is current and not expired.
(d) Location, permitted use$ and conditional uses.
(1 ) All telecommunication towers shall comply with the following development
standards:
(i) They shall be located as far as technically feasible from properties that are
designated residential on the City's Future Land Use or Zoning Maps and shall comply
with all other applicable distance standards which are set forth in the city code:
(ii) To the extent technically feasible. the lowest height technology shall be
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 4 of 18
incorporated including. but not limited to. micro cell technology;
(iii) Towers shall be erected to a height that is the minimum height necessary to
te,?hnically serve the applicant's needs. but not exceeding the lesser of one hundred
sixty-five (165) or a height calculated based on a tower setback of one hundred twenty-
five (125) percent of the tower height measured at grade from the base of the tower to
the closest residentially zoned propertY line:
(iv) The most effective stealth technology (including stealth towers) shall be
incorporated;
(v) The location shall be the least visually intrusive location in the community;
(vi) The proposed tower shall be located in an area where the visual impact on the
community is minimized to the greatest extent practicable;
(vii) Antennas shall be close-mounted or concealed. However. concealment shall be
encouraged and preferred to the greatest extent practicable: and
(viii) The visual impact of all towers shall be reduced or eliminated to the maximum
extent possible by concealment. camouflage. and disguise.
(2) In addition to the standards set forth in subsection (1) above. the location of all
proposed telecommunication tower sites shall be determined based upon a tiered zoning
system. Specifically. a telecommunication tower shall be allowed as either a permitted
use or a conditional use depending upon the location of the applicable site:
(i) Tier One. Telecommunication towers shall be a permitted use
Tc1ecomnmnkations to~c.rs shall be a pellnittcd use at the following sites (see map
attachment Figure 1 dated February 12. 2007 July 14, 1997) subject to other
regulations which may apply:
,a. City of Winter Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant #1/West Plant.
b. Proximate area of the Seminole County School Board Consolidated Services Facility
(alk/a Bus Barn).
c. City of Winter Springs West Effluent Disposal Sites: at the southeast quadrant of Site
16 east of the southern nercolation ponds.
-. .
d. City of Winter Springs City Hall.
(2) A monopole shall be the pelmittcd ty pe oftde,-ommunications to ~eI within the City
of-VVintCI SPlingS. Stealth-designed monopoles ale encomagcd by the city.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 5 of 18
(311) Tier Two. A telecommunication tower shall be considered a conditional use at the
following locations. provided the proposed tower complies with the standards of this
section and complies with the conditional use criteria set forth in 20-33 of the City
Code:
a. On property owned by the City of Winter Springs that is designated public/semi-
public on the City's future land use map: or
b. On an existing commercial or industrial building. not located or incorporated within
a single family residential area. provided the tower does not extend more than ten (10)
feet above the roof line of the building and the tower does not exceed the applicable
maximum height limitation in the City Code: or
c. Within (enclosed) an existing church steeple or other type of existing structure
which exists for a primroy purpose other than for personal wireless services. It is the
intent ofthis subsection to take advantage of existing structures for providing personal
wireless services and not to allow the construction of new structures for said purposes;
or
d. Upon existing sports lighting structures. utility structures. and water tanks. provided
the structure is not located within a single family residential area. the tower does not
extend more than ten (10) feet above the top of the existing structure. and the tower
does not exceed the applicable maximum height limitation in the City Code: or
e. On the site of the proposed Fire Station #3 which is to be located on the south side
of S.R. 434 in Tuscawilla Tract 15. Parcel 3 (approximately 2.300 feet west of
Vistawilla Drive). Said tower. if approved. shall not exceed one hundred twenty (120)
feet.
(Hi) Tier Three. If an applicant presents to the city competent substantial evidence
which demonstrates that Tier One and Tier T\vo locations are net u,tailable or
technically feasible for the location of a tower. a telecommunication tower shall be
considered a conditional use on the following preferred sites. which are listed in order
of preference. The preferred sites shall be considered in the sequence listed below and
the applicant shall be required to demonstrate. based on technical feasibility. that a more
preferred site is not available or suitable before requesting a lessor preferred site:
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 6?f 18
a. Property which has a future land use designation of Industrial.
b. Property which has a future land use designation of Mixed Use and is part of a
Development of Regional Impact.
c. Densely wooded or concealed areas limited to a golf course and areas of property
which have been designated conservation bv perpetual easement and on the city's future
land use map. If a new telecommunication tower is placed within trees or wooded areas.
the tower shall be concealed bv the su.rrounding trees or wooded areas to the maximum
extent possible to minimize the visibility of the tower from any road. occupied building.
and fairway if located on a golf course. Trees can be existing on the subiect property
or installed to meet the requirements of this subsection. or they can be a combination
~~~ .
e. Property which has a future land use designation of Greeneway Interchange.
All other locations shall be prohibited. Further. the construction of a. tower for
speculativepurooses shall be prohibited. For purposes of this code. it shall be deemed
primae facie evidence that a tower is being built for speculative purooses if the applicant
can not provide with the application written evidence that one or more carriers have
committed to locate on the proposed tower within three (3) months of the construction
of the tower for a period of at least five (5) years.
Additional tdeeommunkation to ~eI site,s shall only be. pcmutted as a conditional use
pursuant to this section. A pIope.rty dcdMed eligible rol cOl1~idetation ~ ~ ~d~~~~
telcconumuucation to ~CI site is Ci~ ofVrTil1tCI Sptmgs Phe. Station #3 to be located 011
the south side by S.R. 434 in Tusc,a~i11a Tlllet 15, rMC,e1 3 (apploximatd) 2,300 fcet
west of Vistawilla Dtivc). Thc telecommunications to~e,l loc,atcd on this site shall,
Iequirc a conditional use, flOm the Wintel Splings Ci~ Commission In acc,old~~~~i~
this section and applic,able Ci~ Code, plO v islons. The to wet on this site shall not excecd
a height of one hundled twenty fGet (120) and shall only be available as a towel site
following apploval bji d~ commission as part of the gnmt of the conditional use.
FolIo wing applo v al and constI tIc-tion of thc rom (4) to ~ CIS descrlbe,d in this subsection,
additional to~cr5 may be, applied rol andjustifkdin accordance. with the applicable
stan:dMds for a conditional use in tile. Cit} Cod", as well as thc,sc standatds.
a. The to ~eI at plopose.d Pire Station #J and any subsequent additional
tclccollulltmication tO~CI is Icquiled fOt public saf(.,~ commt111kation needs, or
b. Technical data is presented by an applicant indicating that the proposed towcr is the
only technically feasible available site to assmc tc1econID1t111ications SCI vices covciage
ll<:.cds to Mca citizens, and
c. Such tcclmical data specified in subsection b., abo.v'e, is not for speculative, ootricd
telcc,onanmucatiol1s uses but is fO! CUl1cnt technology recognized or apPlOvcd for
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 7 of 18
5el vice. aIe.a ne.c,ds and maIket conditions underapplicabk state, fcde.lal or local laws,
regulations 01 OIdillat1CGS,
d. All such tcdmical data ghall be provided at: COgt to the applicant. The dty may, in
apploximate cases in its sole di5cIetion, letain the sCIvicc of tedmie.all, COnlpe.tent
eon5ult1mts to e valuate the data submitted by an applicant to justify an additional to wer
pmsnant to this oldinance. The. applie.al1t shall post a de-posit with the c.ity manager 01
l' .J" 1 1.rJ. l' &..rJ. -,'-1"' 1 1 .,
ill,) U~')i01i\"\.dU a .)U.l1i SUv..1 t.~at lJ.~eapp I."ant .1.01 ule auOltlolla. t....(,I..v!u!11U!1!vatlu!! tu wer
1'3.'5 the full cost oftcchnical review of such tOWel by city's eonsultant,and
e. Initial rc'~'ic'vY of any additional tclecornmt:m.ication to'vVcr giteg shall bc by thc city'g
development re.view contmittce. The conditional use. shall also be considered by the
plmnnng and zoning bomd wInch shall nlakG a rc(,onnnendation to the. city e.onlmission
conceming 5aid conditional use, and
f. Additional towel sites shall be.
(i) Located as far as possible from residentially zoned property (and at least the
minimum set forth in this oldinanec.), and
(ii) Erected t-o a height that is the minimmn height necessary to tcdmicall}" serve the
applic.ant's needs, but not e.xcGcding the IGssc.1 of one hundred sixty-fi vc. (1 G5) or a
hei~ e.alcul3.tcd based on a tower setback of one hundted twenty-fi ve (125) pe1cent of
the to wel hci~ measw cd at grade fr om tho base of the to wer to the d05CStt esidc.ntially
zoned property line., and
(Hi) The use of stealth to"vvcr is encouraged in aeeordance vrith this section.
( e) Site plan: Application: Technical Supporting Data.
ill Any telecommunications company or entity that intends to install a
telecommunications tower in the city shall file a site plan for review and approval by the
city in accordance with the city code. All proposed towers requiring conditional use
approval shall be reviewed by the board of adjustment for compliance with this section
and other applicable provisions of the city code. Upon review. . the board of adjustment
shall make a recommendation to the city commission of either approval. approval with
conditions~ or derJaL
(2) All applications shall contain the information required by the City to process
applicable building permits. aesthetic review pursuant to section 9-600 et seq. of the city
code. site plan permits. and any other required development permits. Applications shall
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 8 of 18
be processed within the time frames required by law. Additionally. at a minimum. the
following information shall also be provided by the applicant:
a. Name. address. telephone number. and original signatures of the applicant and all co-
applicants.
b. Detailed description of the request.
c. Location information including legal description of subiect property.. parcel
identification. geographic coordinates. and name of nearest roads. street addresses. or
other landmarks.
d. Scaled elevation and engineering drawings depicting the proposed tower and related
facilities including all mounts. antennas. collocation spaces. and equipment facilities.
e: A current property appraiser aerial delineating the subiect property. the proposed
tower and related facilities within 1.000 feet of the proposed tower and facilities.
f. For proposed towers within trees and wooded areas. a tree survey identifying the type.
size (DBH). and height of existing and/or proposed trees within a 75-foot radius oftbe
proposed tower and related facilities.
g. Future land use and zoning designation of the subiect property.
h. Any applicable letters of approval for the proposed request received by the apl'licant
from any other government agency including the FAA. FDOT. and FCC (if permitted
by law).
i. Documentation oflocation and site selection process. including search ring. location
and siting criteria. alternative sites in the area. and site selection methodology.
j. To the extent permitted or required by law., technical data. maps and analysis
showing the area to be served by the proposed tower and personal wireless service
facilities and any claimed gaps in coverage where the applicant desires to erect a tower.
In addition. technical data and maps demonstrating any other proposed. existing. and
authorized towers in the service area as the proposed tower and related facilities.
k. Documentation evidencing that one or more carriers have committed to locate an
antennae on the proposed tower for Pm:Poses of providing personal wireless services.
(3) The applicant shall provide a visual impact report that provides a line-of-sight
analysis including scaled and colored front. side. and rear elevation drawings or
photographs that depict the proposed tower and related facilities. The drawings or
photosp::aphs shall also depict any significant natural and manmade features that affect
the buffering of the potential visual impact of the proposed tower and related facilities.
Upon receipt of the visual impact report. the City may require the applicant to conduct
a visual impact demonstration consisting ora minimum of two hour balloon test. which
shall demonstrate the maximum height of the proposed tower. The balloon test shall be
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 9 of 18
scheduled with the City and representatives of the City shall be present at the proposed
site for purposes of evaluating the test.
(4) For pm:poses of demonstrating technical feasibility under this section ~0-4S 1. the
applicant shall be required to submit. in coni unction with a site plan application and to
the extent permitted or required by law. technical data indicating that the proposed
tower is the only technically feasible available site to assure telecommunications
services coveral!e needs to area citizens. Further, such technical data not for
speculative. untried telecommunications uses. but is for current technology recognized
or approved for service area needs and market conditions under applicable state. federal
or local laws. regulations or ordinances. All such technical data shall be provided at
cost to the applicant. The city may. in approximate, cases in its sole discretion. retain the
service of technically competent consultants to evaluate the data submitted by an
applicant to iustify an additional tower pursuant to this section. The applicant shall post
a deposit with the city manager or his designee in a sum such that the applicant for the
additional telecommunication tower pays the full cost of technical review of such tower
by city's consultant.
e. Initial revicw of all' additional tckcommunkation tower sites shall be by the city's
development review eomnlittee. Th6 conditional use shall also be c,ol1sidcled by the
plalming and zoning, bOa1d which shall nlake areGOlnm~lldati6n to the city commission
concerning said conditional use, and
(as defined in Chapter 20 "Zoning", if applicable
[TIllS r AC13 INTENTIONALLY L13FT BLANK] and/or Chapter 9 "Land
Development" Code of Or dil1at1ces, City of\Vinte:r Springs) with the land development
coordinator. Said site plan shall be reviewed by the development review committee.
(t) Performance standards/design criteria.
(1) Setbacks.
a. Telecommunications tower setbacks shall be measured from the base ofthe tower to
the property line of the parcel on which it is located.
b. The setback requirements shall be a minimum often (10) feet from any lot line and
shall comply with setback requirements in this section or the City Code for setbacks
from adjoining uses.
(2) Separation of towers from off-site uses used to calculate maximum tower height.
Separation distances between telecommunications towers and the lot line of any
residential zoned property shall be used to determine the maximum height of a proposed
tower. The maximum height of any tower shall not exceed one hundred sixty-five (165)
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 10 of 18
feet proVided however that the distance from the tower base to the nearest lot line of
residentially zoned property shall be a minimum of one hundred twenty-five (125)
percent of the tower height.
(3) Measurement of height.
a. Measurement of telecommunications tower height shall include antenna, base pad,
and any and all other appurtenances and shall be measured from the finished grade of
the parcel on which the telecommunications tower is located.
b. Telecommunications towers shall not exceed one hundred sixty five (165) feet in
height which shall include the antenna.
(4) Dlumination. Telecommunications towers shall not be artificially lighted except to
assure human safety as required by the Federal Aviation Administration.
(5) Finished color. Telecommunications towers not requiring FAA painting/marking
shall be of such color that will blend with the surrounding enVironment.
(6) Structural design.
a. Site plane s) are required and shall be submitted for approval as defined in Chapter 20
Zoning (if applicable) and/or Chapter 9 Land Development, Code of Ordinances, City
of Winter Springs, Florida.
b. Telecommunications towers shall be constructed in accordance with the EWfIA
222-E Standards as published by the Electronic Industries Association, which may be
amended from time to time, ASCE 7-95, "Minimum Design Load for Buildings and
Structures," (Wind Loads Chapter), as published by the American Society of Civil
Engineers, and further defined by ASCE 7-88, "Guide to the Use of the Wind Load
Provisions", both which may be amended from time to time, and all City of Winter
Springs constructionlbuilding codes as indicated in a statement signed, sealed and dated
by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of Florida.
c. Such statement shall also describe the tower's capacity, number and type of antennas
it can accommodate. No tower shall be p~rmitted to exceed its loading capacity. For all
towers attached to existing structures, the statement shall include certification that the
structure can support the load imposed by the tower.
d. All new telecommunications towers, and those existing towers to be modified, shall
have the capability of having space for three (3) or more carriers. Upon request by the.
~ e Qne of these spaces shall be reserved exclusively for the use of the City of
Winter Springs. Tower owners shall accommodate other antenna users on their towers.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page II of 18
e. Further, any improvements and/or additions (Le., antenna, satellite dishes, etc.) shall
require submission of a site plan signed, sealed and dated by a professional engineer
licensed in the State of Florida which provides substantial competent evidence of
compliance with the EITITIA 222-E Standards ASCE 7-95, "Minimum Design Load for
Buildings and Structures," (Wind Loads Chapter), as published by the American Society
of Civil Engineers, and further defined by ASCE 7-88, "Guide to the Use of the Wind
LoadProvisions," both which may be a..'l1ended from time to time, in effect at the time
of said improvement or addition.
(7) Public notice. Notice of any request, under this section, shall be published (in a
newspaper of general circulation) and personal notification shall be given to all property
owners located within three (3) times the height of the tower area. Personal notification
shall mean notice sent by first class U.S. mail, and to the board of directors of duly.
recognized homeowners associations.
(8) Signage. No commercial signage or advertising shall be permitted on a
telecommunication tower unless otherwise required by law or the signage pertains only
to the posting of the property relative to trespassing. The use of any portion of a tower
or perimeter fence/wall for signs or advertising purposes, including company name,
banners, streamers, etc., shall be prohibited.
(9) Fencing.
a. A vinyl coated chain-link fence or masonry wall not less than eight (8) feet in height
from finished grade shall be installed by the applicant around each telecommunications
tower. Barbed wire or other fencing method to prevent pedestrian access to the tower,
not to exceed two (2) feet in height, shall be installed along the top of the fence or wall,
but shall not be included when calculating the height of the fence or wall.
b. Access to the tower through the fence or wall shall be through a gate which shall be
locked at all times the tower site is not being occupied by the person or entity in charge
of the telecommunications tower or site.
(10) Landscaping. The visual impacts of a telecommunications tower shall be mitigated
for nearby viewers through landscaping or other screening materials at the base of the
tower and ancillary structures in order to maintain visual aesthetics for those who must
view the site on a regular basis including, but not limited to, proximate residents and the
travelling public. The following landscaping and buffering requirements shall be
required around the perimeter of the tower and accessory structures;
a. A row of shade trees of minimum of eight (8) feet tall that will reach heights of forty
(40) plus feet, two and one-half (2 1/2) inches in caliper, and a maximum of ten (10)
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 12 of 18
feet apart shall be planted around the outside perimeter of the fence/wall;
b. A continuous hedge shall be planted in front of the tree line referenced above; it shall
be at least thirty (30) inches high at planting capable of growing to at least thirty-six (36)
inches in height within eighteen (18) months shall be planted in front of the tree line
referenced above; .
c. All landscaping shall be ofthe evergreen variety being a minimum quality of Florida
#1.
d. All landscaping shall be xeriscape tolerant and shall be properly maintained by the
telecommunications tower owner/operator to ensure good health and viability.
The use of existing vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent practicable and
may be used as a substitute or supplement towards meeting landscaping requirements.
(11) Antennas on buildings. Stealth 100ttopOl building momrted antennas shall onI) be
pet:mittcdaftel buildout to tItl cc (3) co-locations 011 each of the rom (4) to wel sites
indicated in subsGc.tioll Cd) abOve. Aftel buildout occurs, th"11 ~ S,tealth rooftop or
building mounted antennas may be erected. Any stealth rooftop or building mounted
antennas which are not attached to a telecommunications tower, shall be a permitted
ancillary use to any commercial, industrial, public buildings, utility installation, and
recreation (sites greater than ten C I 0) acres in size) land uses indicated on the future land
use map of the city's comprehensive plan provided that:
a. Antennas shall only be permitted on buildings which are at least fifty (50) feet in
height (the height requirement may be waived if public safety needs warrant the
antenna);
b. Antennas may not extend more than twenty (20) feet above the highest point of a roof
(this requirement may be waived if public safety needs warrant additional height);
c. Antennas and related equipment buildings shall be located or screened to minimize
the visual impact of the antenna upon adjacent properties and shall be of a material or
color which matches the exterior of the building or structure upon which it is situated;
d. No commercial advertising shall be allowed on an antenna or supporting structure;
e. No signals, lights, illumination shaH be permitted on an antenna or equipment
building unless required by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): and
f. No more than one (I) total unmanned equipment building shall contain more than
seven hundred fifty (750) square feet of gross floor area or be more than twelve (12) feet
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 13 of 18
in height. All building shall be subject to regulations of the building department; and
(12) Equipment storage. Mobile or immobile equipment not used in direct support of
a telecommunications tower facility shall not be stored or parked on the site of the tower
unless repairs to the tower are being made, and are in progress.
(13) Schedule of structural integrity. Telecommunication tower owners/operators shall
submit to the building depa11ment a certified statement from a qualified, registered,
professional engineer, licensed in the State of Florida, attesting to the structural and
electrical integrity of the tower on the following schedule:
a. All towers examined one year after initial construction.
b. All towers every five (5) years;
c. The city may require such certified statement after a nearby unusually severe storm
event as determined by the (NOAA) national weather service.
(14) Transmission/reception interference. Each application to allow construction or
modification of a telecommunications tower shall include a certified statement from a
qualified, registered, professional engineer, licensed in the State of Florida, attesting that
the construction of the tower, including receiving and transmitting functions, shall not
interfere with public safety communications and the usual and customary transmission
or reception of radio, television, etc., service enjoyed by adjacent residential and non-
residential properties.
(15) Prohibitions with certain principal uses. Telecommunications towers are prohibited
when a proposed or existing principal use includes the storage, distribution, or sale of
volatile, explosive, or hazardous wastes such as LP gas, propane, gasoline, natural gas,
and corrosive or dangerous chemicals. This prohibition does not apply to emergency
generators.
(g) Co-location of communications antennas. The City of Winter Springs desires to
minimize the number and general proliferation of communication towers. This section
is intended to insure that telecommunication towers that are permitted within the City
of Winter Springs are utilized in a manner that provides for the maximum number of
service providers upon each tower within the context of technical feasibility and safety.
Further, this section is intended to minimize the number of such towers within the city.
Specifically, as a minimum, telecommunications towers exceeding one hundred (100)
feet in height shall be engineered and constructed to accommodate three (3)
communication providers. The city shall have the authority to require, specify and
otherwise stipulate that telecommunication towers be engineered and constructed in a
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 14 of 18
manner that provides for three (3) co-locations as part of the conditional use and/or site
plan approval processes. As a condition of approval of all telecommunication towers
and to the extent that co-location is technically feasible, all owners of existing
telecommunication towers shall, upon request of another service provider and for
reasonable and agreed upon consideration, permit additional communication service
providers upon such existing telecommunication tower. Applicants desiring to construct
new telecommunication towers shall submit written documentation that clearly explains
the need for and reasons for the proposed construction of a new telecommunication
tower rather than locating proposed antenna array/communication equipment upon an
existing tower. Such documentation shall include plans of existing and future towers by
the applicant/provider in question, correspondence with existing telecommunication
tower owners and may include a cpst analysis of alternatives. Existing service providers,
e.g., existing telecommunication tower owners, that are unwilling, upon request of
another service provider, to allow co-location upon such existing tower, shall submit
written documentation to the city with reasons and justification as to why such co-
location cannot be accomplished. Competition between service providers shall not be
considered to be a valid reason for preventing or otherwise obstructing co-location. The
city shall determine whether the applicant and/or existing provider are reasonable and
correct in their respective assertions. If the city determines that either party is being
unreasonableor otherwise uncooperative, the city shall deny the applicant's request for
a new tower and/or the city may cause the existing telecommunication tower's approval
to be revoked and said existing tower to be removed. Such determination involving
existing tower owners shall be made in writing and adopted by a majority vote of the
city commission upon holding an advertised public hearing and notification of the
owner at least fifteen (15) days prior to such hearing. Upon adoption of such
determination by the city commission, the existing tower owner and the property upon
which such tower is located shall be considered to be a violation of the city's Land
Development Regulations and shall be subject to any and all remedies and penalties
thereof.
To minimize adverse visual impacts associated with the proliferation and clustering of
telecommunications towers, co-location of communications antennas by more than one
(1) carrier on existing or new telecommunication towers shall take precedent over the
construction of new single-use telecommunications towers as follows:
(1) Proposed communications antennas shall co-locate onto existing
telecommunications towers.
(2) Type of construction. A telecommunications tower which is reconstructed to
accommodate the co-location of an additional communications antenna shall be of a
monopole tower type. Stealth-designed monopoles are encouraged.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Pagel5 of 18
(3) Height. An existing telecommunications tower may be modified or rebuilt to the
allowed height including antennas by compliance with this article;
(4) Onsite-location.
a. A Telecommunications tower which is being rebuilt to accommodate the co-location
of an additional communications antenna may be moved onsite, but shall comply with
01 maximize setback requirements from residentially zoned property.
b. After a telecommunication tower is rebuilt to accommodate co-location, only one (1)
tower shall remain on the site;
(h) Certification of compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) NIER
Standards. Prior to receiving final inspection by the Winter Springs Building
Department, documented certification shall be submitted to the FCC, with copy to the
land development coordinator, certifying that the telecommunications facility complies
with all current FCC regulations for non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIER).
(i) Abandonment.
(1) In the event the use of any telecommunications tower has been discontinued for a
period of one-hundred eighty (180) consecutive days, the tower shall be deemed to be
abandoned. Determination of the date of abandonment shall be made by the building
official who shall have the right to request documentation and/or affidavits from the
telecommunications tower owner/operator .regarding the issue of tower usage. The
telecommunications tower owner/operator shldl provide all requested information within
ten (10) working days of a request being made, and failure to so provide shall be
deemed to constitute one hundred eighty days (180) days of non-use of the tower. Upon
such abandonment, the owner/operator of the tower shall have an additional ninety (90)
days within which to:
a. Reactivate the use of the tower or transfer the tower to another owner/operator who
makes actual use of the tower; or
b. Dismantle and remove the tower. With regard to towers that received conditional use
approval, ninety (90). days after dismantling or the expiration of the two-hundred
seventy (270) day period as set forth in this section, the conditional use and/or variance
for the tower shall automatically expire.
(2) The City of Winter Springs, upon abandonment, and at its discretion, may assume
ownership of the tower at no cost, or require the owner to dismantle the tower at the
owner's expense. Ifthe decision is to dismantle the tower, the property shall be cleared
of all appurtenances and returned to its natural state.
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 16 of 18
(3) An appropriate surety instrument to assure dismantling costs shall be provided by
the owner prior to a tower construction permit.
Section 3. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior
inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts ofpnor ordLllaIlces
and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict.
Section 4. Incorporation Into Code. This Ordinance, including Figure I which is
attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference, shall be incorporated into the Winter
Springs City Code and any section or paragraph, number or letter, and any heading may be changed
or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Grammatical, typographical, and like errors
may be corrected and additions, alterations, and omissions, not affecting the construction or meaning
of this ordinance and the City Code may be freely made.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or
provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
adoption by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, and pursuant to City
Charter.
[ADOPTION PAGE FOLLOWS]
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 17 of 18
ADOPTED by the. City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular
meeting assembled on the 12th day of February, 2006.
~ j, /!;u4
1.:" .
---. .------...----.....
JU~ li'o tlu:sn, lYl;l~(}r _
A LORENZO-LUACES, City Clerk
Approved as to legal form and sufficiency for
the City Onter Springs only:
ANTHONY 0 GARGANESE, City Attorney
First Reading:
January 22, 2007
Second Reading:
February 12,2007
Effective Date:
February 12, 2007
City of Winter Springs
Ordinance No. 2006-12
Page 18 of 18
Figure 1 to Ordinance 2006-12
February 12, 2007
,
ATTACHMENT C
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
RECEIVED
APR 2 6 2007
ARTHUR K. PETERS
RADIO
TELEVISION
CATV
COMMON CARRIER
5422 NW 91 ST BOULEVARD
GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32653-2872
GITY or IJ'JINiER SPRINGS
~~Flfl}.e/ccE
(352) 331-0149
FAX: (352) 331-8026
www.akpce.com
akpce@cox.net
April 17, 2007
Mr. Ronald W. McLemore
('ih, f\A~n':)'-'ot"
.....,....). I.,I........II........~.....I
City of Winter Springs
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Dear Mr. McLemore:
This is in response to your request for information concerning (1) the experience that the City of
Medina, Washington is having with disguise and stealth cellular technology, and, (2) will similar
technology work in Winter Springs.
The City of Medina is small, with a population of about 3000 persons, a land area of 1.43 square miles
and a water area of 3.35 square miies. Its. population and area is ten times smaller and its tree density is
much lower than Winter Springs. Finally, Medina's terrain undulations are approximately similar to
Winter Springs except near tlie water where the land abruptly falls to sea level.
I spoke with Ms. Rebecca Leslie, a planning consultant to the City, and with Mr. Joseph Gellings,
Director of Development Services. The City regulates Wireless Communications Facilities in Title 17,
Chapter 90 of its Municipal Code.
A feature most pertinent to this analysis is that Medina overall tower heights are restricted to 35 ft.
above ground, including all antennas. This restriction has given rise to a number of different tower
configurations. For example,' one tower is a relatively thin pole-like structure. Another is disguised as a
light pole in a church parking lot. Another has recently been rebuilt using a fatter, shrouded cylindrical
tower. Co-location is encouraged on all towers. Some ground facilities are placed inside of in-ground
vaults having an above ground height of about 5 inches.
Medina has seven cellular towers. The spokespersons knew of few service problems. At present four
providers serve Medina over the seven towers. This implies that not all potential providers have physical
facilities in the City. It is believed that each tower supports a single provider. There are three cities
adjacent to Medina that likely have cell sites that provide service into Medina, possibly including
providers having no sites within Medina.
Since Medina cells use regular cellular equipment, there are no special technical issues relating to
disguise and stealth antennas. Only physical mounting and shrouding considerations differ between
normal and disguised facilities. For example, regular antennas mount to fake trees that hide the
antennas behind non-conducting fake leaves or needles. Also, regular antennas are used behind
shrouds within a lighting standard extension or a flagpole.
Because standard technology is employed in Medina, similar technology will work in Winter Springs.
However, due to the dissimilar size and population of the two cities, several important considerations
must be examined before employing the Medina experience.
Page 2
Mr. Ronald W McLemore
April 17, 2006
Most importantly, according to the Medina spokespersons, stealth and disguise facilities do not totally
hide cellular facilities and antennas, except in cases such as bell towers and the like. My personal
experience is that, for example, a tall bell tower or tall fake tree are almost as visually objectionable as
monopole towers because they can be foolishly out of scale and, as a result, more visible in some
locations and circumstances.
Another consideration is the number of towers required. In Medina there are seven towers in an area of
1.3 square miles for a tower density of 5.3 towers per square mile. If consideration is given in Winter
Springs to a 35 ft. maximunl height then, for the typical number of providers in Florida, three more
providers must be accommodated. At 35 ft. it is doubtful that there would be any collocations.
Therefore. the tower density would rise in Florida to 10 towers with a density of 7.7 towers per square
mile. The Winter Springs area currently requiring improved coverage has a radius of about one mile
covering an area of about 3.1 square miles. It could require 24 towers to cover that area with 7
providers using 35 ft. towers. This includes both 800 MHz and 1900 MHz systems.
If towers were allowed 70 ft. heights the numbers would decrease both because of greater range and a
few collocations might occur. Even with this height increase the number of towers could, in this case,
require 6 or more towers. There is also the issue that quite possibly the providers will do nothing further
in Winter Springs because of the expense of multiple towers and cell site equipment.
I recommend some consideration be given to the utilization of a single, relatively thin cylindrical
(uniform cross-section) monopole structure that houses antennas and transmission lines inside a non-
conducting shroud. These structures seem to be less visually distracting and perceptually fade into the
background noise rather quickly. The finish should be non-reflecting and have a pleasant, neutral gray
color, as opposed to white or black. This type of structure has been termed a flagpole, but when used
as an actual (white) flagpole, is usually offensively out-of-scale.
Finally, as an update to my March, 2006 report, there has been little progress of cellular alternative
technologies. There are a few standards being voted on in the next months that will lead to the
development of dual mode service that is aimed at seamlessly merging Wi-Fi and cellular services.
However, current plans for these services revolve around computer centric operations such as short
messages, images and e-mail. While there is mention of voice services and efforts to include voice in
the initial standard processes, convenient and fluid cellular-like voice services are still years in the future
because there have been no viable suggestions or proposals relating to managing transfer of calls
between Wi-Fi networks and the public switched telephone (cellular) network.
Sincerely,
Arthur K. Peters, P.E.
Via Facsimile and USPS
.'
. .
.. .
ATTACHMENTD
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1126 STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
407-327-5966
FAX:407-327-6695
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION
~ CONDITIONAL USE I SPECIAL EXCEPTION
o VARIANCE
o WAIVER
~ CAfa"iUt T~'~_C/() ~~s'lvh~~c.
Last First Mid Ie
MAILING ADDRESS: ;)('):") &OWQ(J&R: (?~~r ~\.~
~(A ~nrl t=:( 3'2..1-so
City State r;::) , Zip Code
y\c...hard. , (~~ 8wSOU(tIc()\.;S \f\e. Ctf't-v\
tJ-o:t--~-C2~1 ~ \\ I
If Applicant does NOT own the proAerty: .
PROPERTY OWNER: ~l+lA ~ Wtl'Lk S.Rrlt'lqS
Last ~ First 1"" ...J Middle
MAILING ADDRESS ~~W ~ ~ h"/-~~Z=roe
City ~te Zip Code
APPLICANT:
PHONE & EMAIL
PHONE & EMAIL
This request is for the real property described below: ,. () ~
PROPERTY ADDRESS: lS-tOD Wl~ Sf'r(f"\'J~ ~\ ~
TAX PARCEL NUMBER: ~\ - z..o- ~,- ~ rsE:,- C)060~- CIA
SIZE OF PARCEL:
Square Feet nAcres
EXISTING LAND USE: ~~ -r reeP{\\.~. ~(~
Current FUTURE LAND USE Classification: _po blLl., l~: r vb~
l
Current ZONING Ch"'ifioation, 'P Lt 1)
Please state YOUR REQUEST: ~~+ltfY\j;) ~ ~ lSD' rf>LDJ1O~
~~E' --.......,
!ii' .. "... '?I .~.~'"' "v . 'I~.
""- . ".......:;:: ij,~' ED
MAY 3 G Z007
March 2005
en Y OF I;\.IN U"H SPRiN
Pemlltung _ Sylvia' GS
The APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE for posting the blue notice card (provided by the City) on the site at
least SEVEN (7) DAYS prior to the Board of Adjustment Meeting at which the matter will be considered.
Said notice shall NOT be posted within the City right-of-way. All APPLICANTS shall be afforded minimal
due process as required by law, including the right to receive notice, be heard, present evidence, cross-
examine witnesses, and be represented by a duly authorized representative.
The CITY COMMISSION shall render all final decisions regarding variances, conditional uses and waivers
and may impose reasonable conditions on any approved variance, conditional use or waiver to the extent
deemed necessary and relevant to ensure compliance with applicable criteria and other applicable
provisions of the City Code wid Comprehensive Plan. i\.11 forma! decisions shall be based on competent
substantial evidence and the applicable criteria as set forth in Chapter 20, Zoning. APPLICANTS are
advised that if, they decide to appeal any decisions made at the meetings or hearings with respect to any
matter considered at the meetings or hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such
purposes, they will need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, at their cost, which
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, per 286.0105, Florida Statutes.
Any CONDITIONAL USE, VARIANCE, or WAIVER which may be granted by the City Commission shall
expire two (2) years after the effective date of such approval by the City Commission, unless a building
permit based upon and incorporating the conditional use, variance, or waiver is issued by the City within
said time period. Upon written request of the property owner, the City Commission may extend the
expiration date, without public hearing, an additional six (6) months, provided the property owner
demonstrates good cause for the extension In addition, if the aforementioned building permit is timely
issued, and the building permit subsequently expires and the subject development project is abandoned or
discontinued for a period of six months, the conditional use, variance or waiver shall be deemed expired
and null and void. (Code of Ordinances, Section 20-36.)
THE FOllOWING ITEMS ARE TO BE SUPPLIED WITH THIS APPLICATION:
D A copy of the most recent SURVEY of the subject property.
D A copy of the LEGAL DESCRIPTION reflecting the property boundaries.
D 11 x 17 MAP showing ADJACENT STREETS and ZONING AND LAND USE classifications
on the ADJACENT PROPERTY.
D JUSTIFICATION for the Request (See Attached List)
D NAMES and ADDRESSES of each property owner within 150 ft. of each property line.
D Notarized AUTHORIZATION of the Owner,
IF the Applicant is other than the Oviner or Attorney for the Owner (see below).
D APPLICATION FEES:
FEES are as SHOWN BELOW plus ACTUAL COSTS incurred for ADVERTISING or NOTIFICATION,
and for REIMBURSEMENT for TECHNICAL and/or PROFESSIONAL SERVICES which may be
required in connection with the review, inspection or approval of any development (based on accounting
submitted by the City's Consultant) , payable prior to approval of the pertinent stage of development.
CONDITIONAL USE / SPECIAL EXCEPTION ~
WAIVER $ 500
VARIANCE $ 500
TOTAL DUE
$
2
March 2005
By submitting this application you hereby grant temporary right of entry for city officials to enter upon the subject
property for purposes of evaluating this application.
**************************************************************************************
FOR USE WHEN APPLICANT IS OWNER OF THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY:
This is to certify that I am the Owner in fee simple of subject lands described within this Application for
Board of Adjustment consideration:
Signature of Owner
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
day of 20_.
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
Personally Known
Produced Identification:
(Type)
Did take an Oath
Did Not take and Oath
**************************************************************************************
FOR USE WHEN APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER OF THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY:
I,
do hereby, with my notarized signature, allow
to represent me in this Application related to my property. The
property is identified as: Tax Parcel Number(s) b 1- '2...6- .3 ( - S.&& ()Cx:)cx:::t:) -9 A:
1S-~~(~ ~' ~ ~ &,1,
,.M.{, . YII1 ~ ( "'32~
Located at
Signature ofOwner(s)
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
day of 20_"
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
Personally Known
Produced ID: (Type)
Did take an Oath
Did Not take and Oath
**************************************************************************************
3
Man:h200S
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
Taken from Winter Springs Code of Ordinances, Section 20-33(d):
All Conditional Use recommendations and final decisions shall be based on the
following criteria to the extent applicable, Attach additional paper as necessary:
o What is the Conditional Use you are requesting? '\0 --e.K-r~ ~ eo...
.\::::::.~f fJ_ 11" ,~,_ ,All...._. PAL,
_ _ ""-"- \. \"..."""" \..o"y f . ,vr \t"",(,J I - ~
o How is the Conditional Use (including its proposed scale and intensity, traffic-
generating characteristics, and offsite impacts) compatible and harmonious with
adjacent land uses'h -n ek:.! l~ s.~ ','":::. ~ .'
eN' -t~{'ov<- c..~~'- bU--c., u tv
~~~ ~~ ~~ 'J~c~ ~ adcl;h;n- ()
~ - ~
o Demonstrate how the size and shape of the site, the proposed access and
internal circulation, and the design enhancements are adequate to accommodate
the proposed scale and intensity of the conditional use requested. The site shall
be of sufficient size to accommodate design amenities such as screening buffers,
landscaping, open space, off-street parking, and other similar site plan
improvements needed to mitigate against potenti adverse impacts of the
proposed use. a.e..c.-e...2:>'b \.5 0 r-ou k-- l.
,ocJ~ I see- ...ii:e- p\~ ~ '" f'B"'-- ...~c.e.
~"L~ f\~ ,~~
8
March 2005
o Will the proposed use have an adverse impact on the local economy,
including govec.nmental fiscal ifPpact, loyment and property v lues? If no,
why not?' ~ ~ w\.
o Will the proposed use have an adverse impact on natural environment,
including air, water, and noise pollution, vegetation and wildlife, open space,
noxious and desirable vegetation, nd flood hazards? If no, why not? \h:~
~ ~ wJ1 ~ y!ft e..k:t l~
o Will the proposed use have an adverse impact on historic, scenic and cultural
resources, including views and vistas, and loss or degradation of c Itural and
historic resources? If no, Why not?
en-- c-J.J..v
~l~\v-)
o Will the proposed use have an adverse impact on public services, including
water, sewer, surface water management, police, fire, parks and recreation,
streets, public transportation, marina and waterways, and bic cle and pedestrian
facilities? If no, why not? '---"" .. "::> ~ l Q..
~ ~ ~ e'>LL" In'l
o Will the proposed use have an adverse impact on housing and social
conditions, including a variety of housin.,g ~hit types and pricEls, and ~jJ)
neighborhood quality? If no, why not? I'~ ~po~ lN~ W ,
inhM-u.- ~s r.-M-v~ ~ fh"~.ck<i1 ~ ce&vav-
ccw~O
9
M=::h 2005
/IIIII...IIn-II" 1'-'"
2007-06-08 14:34 VEGA ......... u... . '"'4072075925 >> AWSolutions, Inc.
r II I
Windsong. Inc.
Don UMlI
New Site Development
CwWii CiilJe liitG"i'i".at.ont!
6306lknjamin Road
Tampa, Florida. 33634
Rc: Proposed Tclccomm\lnieadol\$ Facilicy: 'fuselwilla. Florida
Dear Mr. Uurell,
I understand that Crown hu subltlittt:d a C6llditional U$C Applj~.tioR to tJw City of
Winter 8pri.Dp. Florida proposing to constrUct a new \l.dtComI'f\unications facility .. tht
Wintef Springs Water Tretwent fac.;iUt)' located at 1560 Wlnter SprinjS Blvd.. Winter
Springs. Florida 32708.
AI.... expcricneed win=lcn provi~. whose ~plishmcnts ..-c a ratter or record with
the Federal Commmde..ion. Commission, we arc intemtdd in developlDl an \II1licensed
BtoadMnd appliC:I\ion to serve the area of Tuscawilla.In ~l, I would like to explore the
locadoD further and. _ubjtaet to mut\lall)' bcnefiQi.' t~nn8 ~ condition.. could be
intereSted in leaiNl spaee in the futuR if )'0\& are suceenful in your elYott to win
jurisdictional approva1.
_~;?~r:~I'~~~~~pN'
Ricbltd V op
President
WlndJone, ,... I
Z007 -06--08 13:41
WINO SONG GROUP
Page 1
t;A Y :1 D l007
Conditional Use Application
(Tier II Proposal)
For
Proposed 150' Monopole
Site Location: City of Winter Springs Water Treatment Plant
Site Address: 1560 Winter Springs Blvd, Winter Springs,
Florida 32708
Property Owner: City of Winter Springs
Applicant: Crown Castle International
Applicant Address:
Property Zoning:
Property Tax J.D. #:
Legal Description:
6306 Benjamin Road, Tampa, Florida 33634
Current: PUD
Future: Public/Semi Public
31-20-31-5BB-000000-9A
LEG PT LOTS 8 910 & 111N 8-21-31 DESC AS BEG 650 (M) FT
S 75 DEG 10 MIN 48 SEC E OF INT W LI SEC &
SLY RfN WINTER SPGS BLVD RUN S 75 DEG 10 MIN 48 SEC E
1247.94 FT S 14 DEG 49 MIN 12 SEC W 340 FT
SLY ON CURVE 732.34 FT S 64 DEG 28 MIN 26 SEC W 315.39
FT S 37 DEG 29 MIN 38 SEC W 514.23 FT N 87 DEG
11 MIN 46 SEC W 629.84 FT N 30 DEG 55 MIN 51 SEC W 434.41
FT N 12 DEG 56 MIN 23 SEC W 100 FT N 34 DEG 11
MIN 57 SEC W 300 FT N 28 DEG 36 MIN 59 SEC E 602.11 FT N
14 DEG 49 MIN 12 SEC E 650 FT TO BEG
PHILLIP R YONGE GRANT PB 1 PGS 36 TO 38
Detailed description of the proposed Tier Two Conditional Use request:
Crown Castle International is proposing to locate a 150' Monopole in Tuscawilla in order to
accommodate the growing Cellular needs of the Winter Springs community, utilizing a stealth
type of technology. The search ring area was developed based on the demand for coverage
expressed by the Tuscawilla community.
A current property appraiser map of the subject property is provided below.
'~'~:"'i,>,: """,,.:
c,' .~___' ~ ,,',' ,', _', ;-"
.'.--....'.:.-.-'
.~,.""'..
" ".
"
LEGEND:
FLOOD PlAI't ZoM
wl""..."'"
~ln9
~f>t)O
City of Winter Sprit:l9S
, Parcel ZoninglVJap/
February 2007
The Engineering firm of record is:
A W Solutions, Inc.
300 Crown Oak Centre Drive
Longwood, Florida, 32750
Contact: Emmanuel Poulin, PE
Phone Number: 407-260-0231 Ext. 102.
This proposed site has been selected, based on City Code requirements, to protect residential
areas from potential adverse impact, and to minimize a visual impact as portrayed in the
accompanying Line of Sight Study, which was conducted as a part of a Balloon Test. The facility
will incorporate aesthetically pleasing technology used in other areas such as Medina,
Washington to create visual harmony within the community of Tuscawilla, Florida. Specifically,
Crown will incorporate a Flagpole type structure.
This proposed site is a City of Winter Springs owned and operated Water Treatment Plant. The
applicant, working with the Property Owner, has been able to identify a suitable equipment
compound. The location of the compound places it as far as technically feasible from those
properties that are designated residential, and not interfere with the Property Owner's property
uses. There is only one (1) known property located within three (3) times the height ofthe tower
(150 yards). The property is owned by the Winter Springs Golf, LLC. Personal notice has been
sent to the property owner in accordance with the City Ordinance. Further, public notice has or
will be filed within a newspaper of general circulation.
'...,
'l'
0;.
Three (3) times the heiQht of the Tower Map
4SOFeet (150 y,yds)
lSOyds
PurSU5"lt to Section 20-451, PMagraph (fX7), as amended, of
the Winter SprinQs City Ordinance No. 2006-12, the only
Property onwer wthin "(3) times the heiQht of the tower," or 450
feet (150 yards) is the City at Winter SprinQS. As such, personal
notification 1m been made.
If
rJ
~
~
~
q;
lroowOQd Q
Co Ii ht@<Ind P 1Q88 2000 MiofOsoftCor or.ltion.lrllllori!ssu lilt15. All ri hls'lturvld
Three (3) times the distance map
Crown, the nation's largest telecommunication site facilitator, has existing relationships with the
largest national wireless carriers as well as numerous regional and local carriers. Crown is
working to educate the wireless community about the possibility of co-locating their equipment
at this site, subject to jurisdictional approval, and will supplement this application with
The height of this proposed Monopole is based on the number of future co-locations and also
based on the dense tree canopy that surrounds the proposed site. One hundred and fifty feet in
height will allow each co-location a height that will technically serve each need, and still be the
least visually intrusive location for this region of the community.
This site will not be required to have FAA lighting, and the applicant has no provisions for any
signal or illumination type lighting.
The location of the proposed compound meets all requisite set back requirements based on the
distance of 125% of the tower height.
The proposed antennas would be close-mounted or concealed, and the applicant will propose to
reserve space for the City of Winter Springs.
With a Building Permit, that applicant would provide a schedule of structural integrity, and a
licensed Engineer(s) statement attesting to the structural and electrical integrity based on one
year, (after construction), and every five years. Further, the applicant will provide a certified
statement, from a professional engineer, (registered in the State of Florida), attesting that the
tower and the receiving/transmitting functions, shall not interfere with public safety
communications and the usual and customary transmission or reception of radio, television type
services that are enjoyed by the adjacent residential and non residential properties.
Included with this application, the applicant's site plan and Engineer's drawings depict a location
map with a scaled elevation drawing. These plans also include a current property appraiser's map
delineating the subject property.
This application also includes a visual impact report that was conducted on May 16, 2007. This
report was conducted in the form of a balloon test and photographs taken from various locations
in the close proximity to the subject property. Each photo is documented with a map that shows
the location of each photo taken. This map also shows photos that were taken inside the Water
Treatment Plant to show the proposed height.
The applicant has no intentions of allowing any commercial signage or advertising on this site.
The attached plans have provisions for no trespass, warning signs and emergency contact
information.
These plans include an eight foot tall chain-link vinyl coated fence with gate that restricts access,
which would be locked all times that the tower is not being occupied.
This site does not have any existing vegetation within the area of the compound, and the
applicant has provided plans for a continuous hedge and a row of trees based on City Code.
There are no existing trees on the lease parcel.
Prior to requesting a final inspection, the applicant will provide the City Building Department
with a Certification of Compliance from the Federal Communications Commission, certifying
that this telecommunications facility complies with all current FCC regulations for non-ionizing
electromagnetic radiation (NIER).
This proposed site is an unmanned and restricted access equipment facility, and will be used for
the transmission of radio signals for the purpose of providing public cellular service.
This facility will consume no unrecoverable energy and no potable water is to be provided. No
waste water or solid waste will be generated at this location.
Line-of-SiQht/Balloon Test
For
Proposed Tuscawilla Facilitv
Site Location:
Site Location: City of Winter Springs Water Treatment
Plant
Site Address: 1560 Winter Springs Blvd, Winter
Springs, Florida 32708
Property Owner: City of Winter Springs
Applicant: Crown Castle International
Applicant Address: 6306 Benjamin Road, Tampa, Florida
33634
Property Zoning: Current: PUD
Future: Public/Semi Public
Property Tax LD. #: 3l-20-31-5BB-000000-9A
Legal Description:
LEG PT LOTS 8 9 10& 11 IN 8-21-31 DESC AS BEG 650
(M) FT S 75 DEG 10 MIN 48 SEC E OF INT W LI SEC &
SLY RIW WINTER SPGS BLVD RUN S 75 DEG 10 MIN
48 SEC E 1247.94 FT S 14 DEG 49 MIN 12 SEC W 340
FT
SLY ON CURVE 732.34 FT S 64 DEG 28 MIN 26 SEC W
315.39 FT S 37 DEG 29 MIN 38 SEC W 514.23 FT N 87
DEG
11 MIN 46 SEC W 629.84 FT N 30 DEG 55 MIN 51 SEC W
434.41 FT N 12 DEG 56 MIN 23 SEC W 100 FT N 34 DEG
11
MIN 57 SEC W 300 FT N 28 DEG 36 MIN 59 SEC E
602.11 FT N 14 DEG 49 MIN 12 SEC E 650 FT TO BEG
PHILLIP R YONGE GRANT PB 1 PGS 36 TO 38
Prepared By: AW Solutions, Inc.
300 Crown Oak Centre Drive
Longwood, Florida 32750
(407)260-0231 ext.111
(,,;A v .1 & 2(IU7
BackQround:
Crown Castle International proposes to locate a 150' Monopole within the City of
Winter Springs Water Treatment plant located at 1560 Winter Springs Blvd,
Winter Springs, Florida 32708. Crown intends to utilize stealth type technology
to comply with the City's Tier Two zoning requirements.
Visual Evaluation:
A balloon test was conducted on Wednesday May 16th, 2007 in order to
determine the visual impact the 150' structure might pose to the Tuscawilla
Community. Notice of the meeting was provided to the City at least three (3) days
prior to the test.
At least 15 bright red balloons bundled together were placed into position at
approximately 11 :50 am and remained in place for a minimum of two (2) hours
pursuant to City requirements. The weather conditions were optimal for
conducting the test (low wind speed, no rain and good visibility).
After confirming that the test balloons reached their required height of 150',
members of the test team began to document the visual impact at several
locations surrounding the desired site location.
As evidenced in the attached photos, the balloons were visible from only a very
few locations of the entire surrounding area (See attached Photos).
Furthermore, the drive team received positive feedback from neighbors that is
confronted and that were able to see the balloons in an area of greatest visibility
(Fox Glen Drive and Braewick Street). Those residents were provided with
details concerning the plans.
The area just east of the test site located along Eagle Nest Circle revealed few
line of sight zones. There were no areas identified to the south of the test site
where line of sight was realized. The balloons were visible from certain areas of
the Winter Springs Golf Country Fairways and from the area off Greenbrier Lane.
BALLOON TEST PHOTOS
for
TUSCAWILLA
851 NORTHERN WAY
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
150' MONOPOLE
PERFORMED ON: WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 2007
I. ...... .... Ui1mi!I)I}I.J,U n ~
w .... ... ....~
";A Yi D 21lO?
Tuscawilla Photo Location Mal!
.al
Zi
(}
'tl
o
j
~
Vl
, .
~~:
I
d
Q)
'"'"
c.
~l
Q)
~
(f.)
Q)
""'
Q)
:::l
Q)
(")
b
.....
\
\
;\
II
\
I
',I!
1111
J, .
417';
rrrl
Jj ii
liil
fl; I
I fi
II i
'..;l
#"f.
Bear cf.
OWaSco.$t
'(ii
~
.c
0:0
"0).
Location 3
0~
I Location 8
1 Location 2
swan ;;>~
~,
':)
'$
-0
'0
dl
A
~
I Location 6
c~ eel< O~
~
r!
~
~~
;""~
F>>"'d-'O>'"
Northern Way
e 'q"o'
Oviecb ". e....<lb.'V
l>'Ie << .
.>: )<,11JUCl ~u'l ;p; 1~~""':':Y.o:; Ut"IO<i(.1t'::O! ):JraUol aIO:l(.r It ~. ~ . :-I~ I~. ....-11 rt .t r~~,~ r:i'd.
Notes: Reference the above noted photo location numbers to the attached photos.
I....... .. 11(1.llli'!VI,lI,Lltn~
... ~. .~
~
~
=
o
.....
......
~
CJ
o
~
o
......
o
..=
~
~
-
-
.....
~
~
CJ
111
=
~
=1)
:::::
-.,.
=.
.-...,
=.....,
.
.
N
:;t::
=
=
.-
.......
~
~
=
~
=
.......
=
..=
~
~
-
-
.-
~
~
~
rI:l
=
~
~t)
-.
':":<,
.1
.
--
~
=tt
=
=
.,..
....
~
~
=
~
=
....
=
..=
~
~
-
-
.,..
~
~
~
fI).
=
~
~
=#:
=
Q
.-
...
~
~
Q
~
Q
...
Q
~
~
~
-
-
.-
~
~
~
r:I:J
=
E-i
.
II)
=I:t:
=
o
....
......
~
CJ
o
~
o
......
o
..cl
~
~
-
-
....
~
~
CJ
rI:J
=
~
:::(
-:';:
-.
---
._..,~-
':"::"
=.".,
.
--
\0
:;t:
=
=
....
.....-
~
CJ
=
~
=
.....-
=
..=
~
~
-
-
....
~
~
CJ
rI).
=
~
=tJ
::::
-:,:',
-.
1':';
~
=:"
.
. i
t---
=t:t:
=
o
....
.....
~
eJ
o
~
o
.....
o
-=
~
~
-
-
....
~
eJ
rIJ.
=
~
~';
==
.-.,
;:::;c
't:.~,
..-...
:; ::
=,..,
.
...-
00
=#:
=
o
....
.......
~
CJ
o
~
o
.......
o
..=
~
~
-
-
....
~
~
CJ
~
=
~
=f
==
1':";
~.:
.. <...,
.
""
~
=
o
...
.......
~
~
o
~
o
.......
o
..=
~
~
-
-
...
~
~
~
~
=
~
=t
==
-";.
-..
=,
=-,
=
~
=t:I::
=
Q
....
......
~
~
Q
~
Q
......
Q
..c
~
~
-
-
....
~
~
~
l:'-l
=
~
;.(
r::'~
--.,
.
.
'1"""'1
'1"""'1
:;t:
=
o
......
.....
~
CJ
o
~
o
.....
o
..=
~
~
-
-
......
~
~
CJ
rIJ
=
~
=1;
::::
--..,
--'
T::-;
:-::' ~
=:.,
i
.
.
N
~
:;t::
=
=
......
.....
=
~
=
~
=
.....
=
..=
~
=
-
-
......
~
~
rI.l
=
~
;.i.:
-.
-
,,;:::,
'5:~
~:~
, .,
.
.
("f')
~
=tt
=
=
......
,...
=
t:.J
=
~
=
,...
=
..c
~
=
-
-
......
~
t:.J
fI.l
=
~
';.1.
""
==
.~:~
r:
"'
.
.
,
~
~
=#:
=
=
......
.......
~
~
=
~ (
=
.......
=
..= z
~ "..,
""
"...
'-::
'""::
~ -
~
-- Q:
--
......
~
~
~
~
=
~
~t
*.-:.:<.
oS"~
=:;:,
.
....
ADDRESS: 1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SITE NAME: WINTER SPRINGS
SITE 10: 8124-2867
Directions From Major City or Highway
FROM 1-4 GO EAST OF S.R. 436.
TAKE S.R. 436 TO RED BUG LAKE ROAD.
MAKE A LEFT (EAST) ON RED BUG LAKE ROAD AND
FOLLOW TO TUSKAWILLA ROAD.
GO LEFT (NORTH) ON TUSKAWILLA ROAD TO WINTER
SPRINGS BLVD.
MAKE RIGHT (EAST) ON WINTER SPRINGS BLVD. AND
FOLLOW TO SITE ADRESS. SITE ENTRANCE LOCATED AT
INTERSECTION OF WINTER SPRINGS BLVD. AND
DAVENPORT WAY.
SITE DIRECTIONS
.~:
n
~,
t~;
c,.:
2\
PROJECT INFORMATION
ZONING DRAWINGS FOR MONOPOLE TOWER AND COMPOUND INSTALLATION
Q
'...c~
Z
<:>
1.:7
tr.
td
:>
~
~
<:>
f.'::::.
r~>
eU.Tl"' j)j\TE
NAME:
DATE
I INTERNATIONAL .1
SITE NAME: WINTER SPRINGS
SITE 10: 8124-2867
ADDRESS: 1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
VICINITY MAP
SITE MANAGER
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
ZONING MANAGER
NAME:
NAME:
DATE
DATE
NAME:
DATE
ZONING DRAWINGS
SHEET NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
T-1
TITLE SHEET
ARCHITECTURAL
A-1
A-2
A-2.1
A-3
CC-1
TOWER ELEVATION
PARENT PARCEL SITE PLAN
AERIAL VIEW
DETAILED SITE PLAN
GROUNDING PLAN/CONDUIT RUNS
STANDARDIZED CONSTRUCTION
SPECIFICATIONS DETAILS & GUIDELINES
SHEET NUMBER
CD-1
CD-2
CD-4.1
EM-1
EB-1
GD-1
GD-2
S-1
DESCRIPTION
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
GATE DETAILS
TRENCH DETAILS/CONDUIT DETAILS
FRAME DETAIL
4 GANG METER
GROUNDING DETAILS
GROUNDING DETAILS
SITE SIGNAGE FENCE & GATE
PROPERTY INFORMATION
PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
ZONING: PUD
FUTURE LAND USE: PUBLIC/SEMI PUBLIC
PROPERTY TAX ID: 31-20-31-5BB.OOO-OOO-9A
RF ENGINEER
PROJECT MANAGER
NAME:
DATE
~ ~P5'W~...... .,
L~<", ~~ . ~ L_ (
I INTERNATIONAL +1
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, FL 33634
USA
1D ~ ~ ~
i5
z i5 i:j "
'" z
0 i:j '" z
i= 0
0: ~ N
0- 0: '"
0:: ~ e f[
U :>
Ul Iil gj Iil
w " ;L ~
Cl 18 '"
~~ .... ... ....
~ 0 ~
~
Q <( ~ ~ ~
Ul Cl
(50 < .. 0
cr:: z
A'WSOIutioDS
._l1iI'rpr...rat..
JIX) """," ON< CEHlRl' DRM, lU<<lW"JOO. Fl 32750
r~~' "'W_u.._
I -r11n
I .- In \) 1.\)~1
'" !\'l IV . "
q\.\ "j.
L EMMANUa POllUN ... J
FI,. P.:,E. _'54013
DRA\"'N BY: RAR
CHECKeD 8)': JV'm
DRAWING DATE: 4/30/07
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWILLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER.
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
TITLE SHEET
I SHEET NUMBER
T-1
GROWN IUSA VERSION:6.0 DATE:.30/n,3/06
(
:..,....
::;
.tlQIE;
<,
1. FINISHED COLOR OF PROPOSED FlAGPOLE SHALL BE OF SUCH A
COLOR THAT IN WILL BLEND WITH THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH FAA STANDARDS.
2. PROPOSED FlAGPOLE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
T1A 222-G STANDARDS AS PUBUSHED BY TELECOMMUNICATIONS
INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, AND ALL OF CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
CONSTRUCTION/BUILDING CODE.
3. PROVIDE NO TRESPASSING SIGNS ON FENCE. SEE SHEET S-1.
4. PER FAA REQUIREMENTS NO TOWER UGHTlNG IS REQUIRED.
fI1
II
n
II
U
n
II
U
/
PlU'OSED ANIDIlA 10 BE
lXIWWlll1llN RN:PO.[
~
~
~
I
'111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-11 '
i
:z
~
III
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
L~
!
~
SCALE: 1"= 20'
cen:e~ (j) '" -l (j) en en 000
(j) -l (j) (l)m-~ c ::j::j ~ffi~
:r: :r: )>3:Zo ::j c en ::j mm
m 0 m zrrl:e m (j) 0 m :;:0:;:
m ::E m )> Z )> z zz -;>;z
-l -l 0;0- 0 m :e ~ )>c t-5m[JJ
z m -l r-enZ 0 (j) j= 3:3: 0-(
c: ::j m"lJn; ::0 (j) ~ m mtll 0"'..
)> ;;:: :::a r- 0;0;0 m C .. m :s>-(
'" m oZen (j) z ~ -l ..
m m cel..., (j) ::j f1:l,-~
I ;0 r- Zen;o z ...:e:o
m ::;!-."z c <:;0
~ < r-el ;:: 0
)> ",en '" <:>
Ntll m ....
-l ~< ;0
0 "'!=l
Z
ELEVATION
1
p.~
~~;~
'" ~ .~
?~ -~ ~~.
~~ " :!:~
'f!!:'
'rJ:'/ --,..~'-'
~(g CJ.' , ~jIi, r:::
<:;l~o "i;. ~ r .....
-. ;t -.
Z < "=
N '" .:::::1
0 ~;..co
c> ~~
-J
REVISIONS
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY
A 4/30/07 ISSUED FOR REVIEW RAR
. 5/22/07 RE-ISSUED FOR REVIEW RAR
0 5/30/07 ISSUED FOR ZONING RAR
'"
'"
-lC>
)>'"
3:'"
...,m
c:1"t:
en.,,)>
)>r-3:
~Z
"';0
~O
)>
C
5
~cD
~~~
!: Cr~O
~,::~
:= ('Ti2:
.. '"
SU~ COMPLEnON NO~
.
1. lHE PROPOSED COMPOUND, TOWER AND EASEMENTS SHOWN HERE
ARE PREUMINARY ONLY. A SU~ THAT WIll DETERt.fINE THE
EXACT LOCATION IN REGARD TO lHE PARENT PARCa HAS NOT
SEED COMPLETED YET.
2. A SURVEY HAS YET TO BE COMPLETED TO DETERMINE THE BASE
FLOOD ElEVATION AND IF THE EXACT LOCATION or THE
COMPOUND WIll BE WITHIN A flOOD PlAIN OR IF GRADING IS
NECESSARY.
/
/
/
<.0
c>
--.
"^}
!i:'
(.";)'"
<')
(~.i
f-
....c
a
\
c.,
0:
Z
o
0-
n:~,
5!
i'3
\
"
z'
""
~
c'
PLOT UhT!::.
\;r,,\:if::
/
/
-.
-
/'-'-
I
I
I
I
/
I
/
-
I
~
/
/
I
I
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
1'~.
'0.
\
-.
-.
-
- WINTER Sp
- . 'RINes 8'1
-'-. L.VD.
-.
L-EXISTlNG WOODED AREA ~
-
~
EXISTING WATER ~
TANK
~
/
/
I ~ EXISTING ACCESS ROAD TO
~ BE unUZED
I
I
I
/
/
/
I
I
/
/
TREE UN\I
EXISTING WATER
TANK
/'-.....-.............--
EXISTING WATER
TANK
L- EXISTING
WOODED AREA~
/
------- -----
/
/
Jr EXISTING unUTY
POLE WI
/ TRANSfORMER
\,""
~~'\>
*<:::,~
~#
<;J>cfJ
EXISTING RffiNTION POND
\
\ /'
\ -----
:--
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~._.
:,/
~ TREE UNE
-H
b
....,
....
/"
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
._._._._._._._._._.~
L- EXISTING WOODED AREA ~
~
.'\
~1~1
~
-
-
EXISTING ROUNDABOur
I
/
/
I
/
/
r EXISTING PROPERlY UNE
I
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
:>
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
)
/
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
wt c~Qvy,?:r
C!^ ~'u ILL.
IINTERNATlONAL ...1
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, FL 33634
USA
fri ~ ~ ~
~
Z ~ ~ "
'" z
0 ~ e ~
i= '" N
a.. '" '"
[2 e fil e
(J ::l
fil ., lil
Vl .,
W ::l T ::>
Cl III ... III
'"
Vl ... ... ...
Z W ~ ~~
0 !;( 0 l:: g
Vi Cl S ~ ~
~ ci < ID 0
Q: Z
A~SoIutiDiiS
I II a tt t" ~ ,.JI Ji" I'l 1'. . .
JOO CR(YC'< ,'1M CEHlRE ~ llH:1lOOO. R. 32750
lEe <!G:~02.!1 F~ ~7.:!1:M749 Fl CCJ.\fmaJ
II
=
E
~,
II
L?'r ~/.~
""f'/ I
'---'^ i {\ l.QfJl I
W'\I\"'< l ~ I
I f:\AMANUa ~L'UN
L-.-_~' 15402L--.__
DRAWN av: RA~
CHECKED bY: ,IWD
DRAWING DATE: 4/30/07
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWILLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
PARENT PARCEL
SITE PLAN
I SHEET NUMBER
A-2
<D
~>
~~
t'~.;
G.i
....
.<
o
<;)
<.;,')
z
o
<h
o.~.
~
:%
\5
~-
",.
b
'"
'-"
~
!\
~jts
~~
wt Ck>QWN@
1")1 " ! [' j~
~I"'ll.......l <.._
I INTERNATIONAl ...1
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, Fl 33634
USA
>- ~ ~ ~
CD
15
z 15 i!i "
'" z
0 ~ '" z
i= 0
'" e N
D- e ~
0:: fil
() :>
Ul fil III fil
w :> T ::>
Cl III ... !a
!a '"
~w ... ! ...
~ i
Q~ 0
UlCl S
~o ., .. 0
a:: z
A'W'Slhltimls
I
fn"D'~Il.r.t.d
3Ii.' et_ OAK l:(ljlllE aIM:, UJHG'll):JIl, Fe J2150
1l'1; >I07.26'l.C2>1 FAX: 497~.0749 P. CIIAf 26963
.' ~
"~I rv
,01 '
-"'f' ". I
. '--'/!
"' : q~~71
UI '\';{.' ~ V .
,'nt',
ElAMANUEL PCUUN
Fl P.':. L~
I
L
DRAWN BY: RAR
CHECKED BY: JWD
DRAWING DATE: 4/30/07
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWllLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, Fl 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
AERIAL VIEW
I SHEET NUMBER
A-2.1
'0
//0:0
PROPOSED SHADE TREE, MIN. 8' TNJ. wi
2 ~" CAUPER, CAPABlE OF GROWING 40'+ 0 0
010'O.C. ~
" 0
, 0 0
PROPOSED CONTINUOUS HEDGE. 30" HIGH '" 0
AT TIME OF PlANTING, CAPABlE OF " 0
GROWING TO AT lEAST 36" WITHIN 18 " 0
MONTHS ", 0 0 0
" 0
, 0
", 0 0 0
' 0 0
", 0 0
, 0
", 0 0 0
' 0 0
", 0 0
, 0
", . 0 0
' 0 0
o
'"
""
,
~
.,<
~I~f
~9~
/'
/'
----
----
------
\0
c..~
'~
!;}
C:J
v,
t<...i
gNOTES:
<::> NJ. lANDSCAPING SHAU. BE OF THE EVERGREEN VMIEIY
C. BEING A MINIMUM QUAlITY OF flORIDA '1.
~ :UlAN~~~Nxg~~ET:r AND
;y; OWNER/OPER4TOR TO ENSURE GOOD HEAlTH AND
?i. QlWJTY.
'.:s-;
g NO EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED.
DATE
f:jLF r~jV.f:E:'
,/
/
/
/
/
/
,/
EXISTING ACCESS
ROAD TO BE
UTIUZED
PROPOSED 150'FlAGPOLE,
REFER TO NOTES~2
ON SHEET A-2 1
A-I
PROPOSED MULTI-TENANT
SERVICE STAND W
~
",/' /'
~ '" / '"
FUTURE TENANT )
LEASE MEA /
//
/
~
FUTURE TENANT
LEASE MEA
'"
FUTURE TENANT
LEASE MEA
'"
~"
/
'"
'"
/
---
/
FUTURE TENANT
LEASE MEA
----
---
---
----
"'--
----
"
./ ./ ./ ~----- T""'''
"
""-
""-
PROPOSED 8' CHijNUNK"
FENCE WI IN RESISTANT
VINYL SLATS. W
\.5l
,/
,/
"
"
"
"
,/
""-
,/
"
,/
"'--
/'
----
L- EXISTING DENSE
WOODED AAEA~
_.o~c'i.
~~C\):J"/
. \I.\~'
c.'~C\
~14
~ c;~r?-vyry~
~="/c\~) J L L.
I INTERNATIONAL "'I
L- EXISTING RETENTION
POND ~
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, FL 33634
USA
~ ~ ~ ~
~
z~~!i
~ ~ : ~
CL 0: t: N
~ E fil ~
&l lil ~ fil
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ " " ....
~~~
Q ..:: ~......~
VJ 0 .. '" '"
~ 0 <C .. c
0:: z
A'WSoIutiorlS
,/ I n 00 r p 0 r _ t . d
JOD CROIlN OAK canTlE DRI\{, LlJQOOO, fl 32750
,/ 1ll; 407.260.0231 fAX: 407.260.07~ fl COAl 26983
/'
/' D/U
/'
----
----
----
M~\~3 () ~~~1
EMMANUEl), POUUN
FL P.E. 54073
DRAWN BY: RAR
CHECKED BY: JWD
DRAWING DATE: 4/30/07
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWILLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
DETAILED SITE
PLAN
I SHEET NUMBER
SCALE: 1 16" 1'-0" A-3
OOWElD (TYP.)
Sf[ NOTE 1, (TYP.)
Sf[ NOTE 3. lHREE (3) TAILS- 2/0 AWG BARE
TINNED CU STRANDED WIRE (TYP. EACH LEG)
(I) BUSS BAR
(I) TOMR LEG
(I) SPARE
EXIST1NG UTIlITY \
:4'~ _b ~~41
ELECTRIC CO:DUIT~
E -E -[
-1-T
(2) 4' ~ TELCO
CONDUIT
/
;v/;- Y/"
"9",
00></
Y
CUSTDlIER 13 ANa 14 CONOUIT
RUNS (2) 4' ruC. ANa (2) 4' TELCO
TURNED UP INSIOl: 2' -O'xJ'-o'
PUUBOX W/ CN'S AND PULL STRINGS
<-.>..,
<:,.").
:>
.....--:::.0
;:;:)
v.,
:....c
<,"'"
_--1-------------____ _____-------
Q_--- I ---+------e-------
_-------~.J I
_- -..... I
___------ I
\ -- I
~ i
l:--- 2/0 AWG BARE TINNED CU I
j" STRANDED WIllE GROUND I
.. RING IB' (MIN.) ClEARANCE I
, \ FROM EDGE OF CONC. I
II \ FOUNDATION I
1 \ i
I ' ,
Ii '''-, i
A" I
----fl) I -',- :
,,~-- /. ! ~-- _________ L_______________-'~-------------------
/ I G~-l ------~----------~---------
, --
;' I (TYP.) '-"
, I "-
, I \
! I \
i I r-----------------------T---------------------~-
I ! r- TOWER UGIIlNlNG CONOUIT: I ,
I' RUN (I) 4" TURNED UP I : \
I AT INSIDE FACE OF TOMR I I I
(J) W/ BOOT INSTAllED I I
/r I I I :
, I I I I
, , I I
, I I I I
/ I : : ~'
: I I I
I I : : I
: I I I FUTURE TENANT AREA I
I :---------------: i FUTURE TENANT AREA i i
: C~4.1 i i i i
I I I t
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I CUSTOMER CONOUIT RUN 0
I I CUSTOt.tER 12 CONDUIT RUN I 11 (I) 4' ElEC. / (I) 4' \
I I rr (I) 4" ElEC. AND (I) 4' TELCO, I TELCO TURNED UP AT
I I I REDUCE AT SHElTER AS REQUIRED. I CONER OF CUST. LEASE W/
I I I I CAPS AND PUll STRINGS
I I I I !I I I
I I I I I~ I !I!I\
~~~~~~~~~~~~OC~OC-OC-OC-OC-OC-OC-OC-OC-OC-oc-OC-OC~I\
'I ~~OC OC-OC-OC-OC-OC-OC~OC-OC-OC-OC-OC-OC~\
FUTURE TENANT AREA
FUTURE TENANT AREA
(TYP.)
<.:.~
<.:;)
~
$-
LEGEND
o INSPECTION PORT
o GROUND ROD
. CADWELD CONNECTION
)( )( FENCE LINE
i
O;~
<:...,
D>\TE.
SITE GROUNDING PLAN
3
CD-4.
GROUNDING NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHAlL INSTALL THE t.4INIt.4UM NUt.4BER OF GROUND
RODS 1<5 INDICATED ON DRAWING. GROUND RODS SHAlL BE 5/B"Xl0 FOOT
COPPER GlAD GROUND RODS AND SHAlL BE SPACED AT A
15 FOOT APART. SEE GROUNDING PlAN FOR APPROXIt.tATE LOCATIONS;
CONTRACTOR SHAlL PlAN FOR INSTAlliNG ADDmONAL GROUNDING IS
REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE 5-0HMS OR LESS TO GROUND.
2. ALL BURIED GROUND WIRES INTERCONNECTING GROUND RODS,
TOWER STEEL, SHELTER, AND EQUIPMENT_EXTERNAL GROUND RINGS
(EGR) SHAlL BE 2/0 AWG BARE TINNED CU STIRANDED WIRE.
- ALL FENCE POST LEADS, ICE BRIDGES, AND UTILllY RACK LEADS
SHALL BE t.4INIMUt.4 #2 AWG CU WIRE. SEE: DWG EBt.4 FOR DETAILS
3. ALL GROUNDING WIRE AND LEADS SHAlL FLOW IN A SMOOTH
CLOCKWISE PATH WITH NO KINKS OR SHARP BENDS. ALL BELOW
GRADE CONNECTIONS SHAlL BE EXOTHERt.4IC WELDS (CADWELD).
TEE CONNECTORS ARE NOT PERt.4ITTED ABOVE OR BELOW GRADE
ON CROWN SITES.
- TO PREVENT TRIPPING HAZARDS, STUB-UP ALL GROUNDING
LEADS ON THE INTERIOR SIDE OF SELF-SUPPORT TOWER
FOUNDATION PIERS WHENEVER POSSIBLE.
- ALL TOWERS SHAlL HAVE THREE SEPARATIE GROUND WIRES
FROt.4 THE GROUND RING AND EXOTHERMICALLY WELDED TO
TOWER STEEL Bf.SE PLATIES.
- FOR SELF SUPPORT AND GUY TOWERS:
INSTALL SIX ADDmONAL GROUND LEADS, TWO LEADS PER LEG
AROUND THE TOWER FOR FUTURE CARRIER'S USAGE. ONE OF
THE TWO SPARE LEADS IS FOR THE CARRIER'S GROUND BAR
WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE TOWER BELOW THE ICE BRIDGE FOR
GROUNDING THE OUTER COAX SHEATH THAT GOES FROt.4 THE
TOWER VIA THE ICE BRIDGE.
-FOR MONOPOLES:
INSTALL SIX ADDmONAL GROUND LEADS, 2 LEADS PER LOCATION
AT 120" AROUND THE TOWER FOR FUTURE CARRIER'S USAGE
(NEAR THE ATTACHED TOWER LEADS)
- ALL SPARE GROUND LEADS FROM THE TOWER GROUND RING SHAlL
BE CUT OFF AT 12" ABM GRADE AND ZIP TIED OR TAPED TO THE
ATTACHED TOWER LEAD.
4. GROUND LEADS TO MONOPOLE SHAlL ONLY BE CADWELDED TO
MANUFACTURER'S GROUNDING TAB OR THE Bf.SEPLATES. "HEYER
CADWELD BRAZE OR WELD TO THE TOWER STRUCTURE SECTION".
5. ALL EXOTHERMIC WELDS TO ABOVE GRADE STEEL STRUCTURES
MUST BE COLD GALVANIZED AND SPRAYED WITH t.tATCHING RUST
INHIBITOR PAINT.
GROUND TEST PROCEDURES:
A. CCUSA STANDARD REQUIREMENT FOR RESISTIVITY TO EARTH
ON ALL SmES IS 5-0HMS OR LESS. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILllY TO ENSURE SUCH REQUIREt.4ENT IS ACHIMD.
REVIEW OF THE SOIL RESISTMlY TEST PRIOR TO INSTALLATION
OF THE SITE GROUNDING SYSTEM WILL GREATLY I<5SIST IN
DETERMINING THE lYPE OF GROUNDING INSTALLATION, NUMBER
AND lYPE OF GROUND ROD(S).
B. PERFORM THREE POINT fALL OF POTENTIAl GROUNDING
(MEGGER) TEST UTIUZING THE "AEt.4C 4500" TEST INSTRUMENT
FROM A MINIMUM OF TWO SEPARATE POINTS IN TWO SEPARATE
DIRECTIONS FROM THE POINT OF CONTACT.
C. PERFORt.4 GROUND TESTING ONLY IF NO RAINFALL Hf.S
OCCURRED WITHIN THREE DAYS, AND THERE IS NO STANDING
WATER IN THE GROUND WIRE TRENCHES.
D. THE CONTRACTOR SHAlL DOCUt.4ENT t.4EGGER TEST RESULTS
FOR THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND GROUNDING
COMPONENTS AND PHOTOGRAPH WITH A DIGITAL CAMERA THE
ENTIRE NEWLY INSTALLED GROUNDING SYSTEt.4 PRIOR TO
BACKFlWNG AN'( OPEN TRENCHES.
E. FORWARD THE MEGGER TEST DOCUt.4ENTATION TO THE
REGIONAL CCUSA REPRESENTATIVE (1<5 PART OF THE FINAL SmE
ACCEPTANCE DOCUMENTATION).
~ C;R4Q.Wt;Y"
Cft) j L. t
I INTERNATIONAL +1
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, FL 33634
USA
>- ~ ~ ~
CD
i5
z i5 ~ "
IX Z
0 ~ IX Z
f= IX ~ 2
CL E IX
1i:: f3 ~
u iil
Ul f3 III f3
w " j; iil
Cl !I! IX !a
~w ... ... ...
~ ~ ~
Q< ., ~
UlCl ~ ;;;-
~ ci .. '" 0
a:: z
A'WsututiOlIs
InngrllDret.d
I. ~ ~.cw.CEll1Rf.1'flI\r, 'l'HG'MY.ll,FLJV5Il
r~~ d~'~"
.".;'Y' /1 '.
t_____/ 't' f\ Fl{)\Yf
~I\'{ .~".} \l '- .
r \,
L [f;lIiWlUEL ~OUUN
'_ FL P.L 1540J.3
DRAWN I:ff, RAR
CHECKED BY: JWD
DRAWING DATE: 4/30/07
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWILLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
GROUNDING
PLAN/CONDUIT RUNS
I SHEET NUMBER
1
CC-1
2'-0"
(UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)
2 TO 1 SLOPE MAINTAIN TO BOTTOM OF DITCHLlNE /
FLOWLINE AND ON OPPOSITE SLOPE MATCH
EXISTING SLOPE. DITCHES SHALL A l' (FOOT) FLAT
BOTTOM WITH RIP RAP INSTALLED IN HEAVY
EROSION AREA.
12'-0"
(TYPICAL)
LINE POST WITH
CHAIN LINK FENCE
EXTERIOR
COMPOUND
COMPOUND
SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT
SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT
2:1 SLOPE
~.. . ~: ~
..... . 4
. ". .
.. .',
. .',
4 .
... .. .
111==111==111==11 1==111==111==111==111==111 III II 111==111==111==111==111==111==111==
==111==111==111==111==111==111==111==111- 11==1 1==1 1==111==111==111==111==111==111==111
NOTE: [SUBGRADE PROOF
-USE OF SWALES AND/OR DRAINAGE ROLLED/COMPACTED
DITCHES FOR PROPER WATER CLASS 4 GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL "MIRAFI-500X" (OR
RUNOFF AS NEEDED. EQUAL)
L 4" #3 STONE (3" TO 4" STONE WITH FINES AND DUST)
COMPACTED TO 80%
4" OF DGA STONE (1" OR SMALLER STONE WITH
FINES AND DUST) COMPACTED TO 80% (RUN
THROUGH PUG MILL OR ADD MOISTURE FOR PROPER
COMPACTION)
r 4" OF DGA STONE (1" OR LESS WITH
FINES AND DUST)
4" OF #3 STONE (3" TO 4" STONE
CLEAN)
CLASS 4 GEOTEXTILE MATERiAL
"MIRAFI-500X" (OR EQUAL)
SUBGRADE PROOF
ROLLED/COMPACTED
-AGGREGATE IS BASED ON AASHTO
STANDARDS.
-2" CROWN IN CENTER OF ACCESS,
UNLESS IN CURVES, THEN ACCESS
SHOULD BE SLOPED TO INSIDE OF
TURN / CURVE
NOTE:
-USE OF SWALES AND/OR DRAINAGE
DITCHES FOR PROPER WATER
RUNOFF AS NEEDED.
-AGGREGATE IS BASED ON
AASHTO STANDARDS.
ACCESS ROAD SURFACING DETAIL
SITE SURFACING OUTSIDE OF COMPOUND FENCES ~~A~E
1
TOP OF TOWER OR MONOPOLE
FOUNDATION
(0 Z
~
T/ FINISHED STONE MAT ~ ~
~
. a:
:::E.
. ... .
..,
8
"-.
g
Co)
""
~
<.
{:;;:;
I
I .a 4 4
,
~ffi~ffi~ffi~~ n~ffi~ffi~ffi~ffi~ffi~ffiW==III==III== T
' "-,, ,-, "-,, '-: :-' "-,, ,-" ,-" ,-, ,,-, ,,_. ~~~~~~~ELLED/
I I COMPACTED
l... __-~~----.j
",--- ---/
"
"
<?
~
13
~~
0;'.
$:
o
?i~
'"
o
c:.
<...~
F'LOT ]P',TE
FL.c ~~:\r}F...
NOT APPLICABLE
4
SURFACING AROUND TOWER FOUNDATION
5
SUBGRADE PROOF
ROLLED/COMPACTED
CLASS 4 GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL
"MIRAFI-500X" (OR EQUAL)
4" OF #3 STONE (3" TO 4" STONE
CLEAN)
4" OF DGA STONE (1" OR LESS WITH
FINES AND DUST)
. .' .
" . ..... ......
~
1=111=111=111=111=111=111=111=111=111=111=111=111=111=111=111=111=11
~ill~W~ill~ill~ill~ill~ill~ill~ill~lli~ill~lli~lli~ill~ill~ill~ill~
NOTE:
-USE OF SWALES AND/OR DRAINAGE DITCHES
FOR PROPER WATER RUNOFF AS NEEDED.
-AGGREGATE IS BASED ON AASHTO
STANDARDS.
-SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 1/4" PER FOOT TO MAX.
GRADE OF 6" FROM CENTER OF COMPOUND TO
EACH FENCE LINE
2
SITE COMPOUND AREA SURFACING
NOT APPLICABLE
n ~ ~~qwr;t
WJ VII~~R~::rI~~A~+1
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, FL 33634
USA
3
~ ~ ~ ~
~
z ~ i5 '"
0: Z
0 i5 ~ z
i= 0: 2
Cl.. 0: ~
1i': lr f.l
0 f.l iil f.l
(f) Ul
W " J; ::>
0 12 III
0: III
(f) " " "
z w i ~~
0 !;( S S
Vi 0 ~
~ ci < lD 0
cr z
A~SoIutiolfs
Inaorllor.t.d
JOO alO'lIl ON( WHIlE IlRIIE, Laaooo, Fl 32750
m.: 407.26ll.0231 fAX: 407.260.0749 fl CtJAf 26983
~f\'
i -
,i f\ 'lQ~1
N\~~ ~ V ~>'
E~MANUa: POUUN
Fl P.E. 54073
DRAWN BY: RAR
CHECKED BY: JWD
DRAWING DATE: 4/30/07
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWILLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
CONSTRUCTION
DEl AILS
I SHEET NUMBER
5
CD-1
NOT APPLICABLE
~~
-;;:)'
::.::
c
v'
;:0
~
<>
"F'''
z
o
f9.
~
<<'
v:
;~,
ts
C::;'
()
NOT APPLICABLE
F>L CT CU\TE
iLc
MIN.4 FASTENERS (HOG RINGS)
PER 2-1/2" 0 NPS LINE POST (TYP.)
3" 0 NPS CORNER
POST (TYP.)
1
3
8',0"
B'-O.
8'-0"
o
.'
~
1 1/2" 0 NPS TOP RAIL
& BRACE SCH. 40 (TYP.)
2-1/2" 0 NPS
LINE POST (TYP.)
2"GALV.MESH#9GA
FABRIC (TYP.)
BOTTOM TENSION WIRE
#7 GA. - ALUMINIZED COIL WIRE
FINISHED GRADE
~ FENCE FABRIC TO BE FLUSH
WITH TOP OF FINISHED GRADE
. TOP OF CHAIN LINK FENCE (FABRIC)
2'.0' :::: 8'-0" ABOVE TOP OF FIN. STONE
GATE HOLD BACK LOCATED 1 FT OFF
FACE OF FENCE (TYPICAL FOR 2 PLACES)
TYPICAL FENCE & GATE SECTION
STRETCHER BARS
TYPICAL
STYMIE LOCK
GATE KEEPER BRACKET ::r ~/
'^Y
^ X X >< I~
~IO ] ~~^
~XI
/, X X
~X~ X X XX
~X>Q<x>
X
I I ~ I)(Y YY
^^^
<0x ~ ~ ~ 0/Y' ^ X ><x<<
~*~~ )<><XXXy
XXXXx-.- X/y
~ ~ 0<1 ~'
Xx I'--- Vx
~ ~ >y<
)<
"--- ~ ~GATES
...c:
b..
STYMIE LOCK DETAIL
wt CR,QW(\I@
t /. *, ! ! 1=
Il,,, . 'J . ..,
IINTERNATIONAl",1
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, FL 33634
USA
2
>- ~ ~ ~
ID
~
Z ~ ~ c:>
"' z
0 iil "' lii
Ii: 0: ~ N
~ "'
ii: ~ ~
() Ii! '" Ii!
(/) '"
W ::> T ::>
0 III .... '"
!!l "' !!l
(/) .... ~ ....
z w ~ i
0 !;{ Ii! ~
Vi 0 ~
~ 0 -< Ol 0
~ z
A\VSolutioDS
Ino.rporat.d
JOO CRO'Ml OAK lINTRE IIRI\{, LQlG'MlOD, FL 32750
In; 407.2fill.0231 FA)(, 407.260.0749 FL CIlAf 2691lJ
A
-....~ '
i. '1
r
N\I\'< ~r~ 'tB~V
EMMANUEL POUUN
FL P"E. 54073
DRAWN BY: RAR
CHECKED BY: JWD
DRAWING DATE: 4/30107
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWILLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
GATE DETAILS
I SHEET NUMBER
4 CD-2
BOLT DOWNS
(TYP.4)
LIFT PINS
(TYP.2)
IDENTIFICATION
TELEPHONE
OR
ELECTRIC
PART NUMBER:
FCA243624FF4xx
INOTE: ALL STUB-UP CONDUITS INSIDE PULL
BOXES WILL BE 6" FROM TOP OF BOX AND
HAVE PULL STRING AND CAPS
PULL BOX DETAIL
o
'^'.
~r
'~
;;~
G.i
~
CUSTOMER STUB-UPS SHOULD BE
CAPPED OFF WITH PVC CAP AT GRADED \
LEVEL
GAA~\ ~
I" 'I ,,' "III" 'III" 'III" 'I ,,~' 'I I'
11==111==111==111==111==' 4- - ---f
I 1
1 = = T I PVC SCHEDULE 80 CONDUIT
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ "
\ "-
" ,
" ,
--- - "
"- ---, .--------7\
',II V
'___ I I \
BELOW GRADE SHALL BE
PVC SCHEDULE 80 CONDUIT
STRAIGHT CONDUITS BELOW
GRADE SHALL BE PVC SHEDULE 40
""III"'III"'III"'III"'III~'
11==111==111==111==111==1
c
<..(')
z
'-'
~
~
;.:::
z'
'"
o
5
CUSTOMER STUB UP DETAIL
?LCT L)/\T:,:. ~H..t:
TOP 8" SHALL STANDARD FILL
PER SITE SURFACE DETAIL
UNEXCAVATED
* TRENCH WIDTH AS REQ'D BY
POWERlTELEPHONE CO.; OR
QTY. OF CONDUITS
N
..-
HTEL WARNING TAPE
- z
o -
("') :2:
*
PVC POWER CONDUIT
GRAVEL FILL COMPACTED,
NO STONE OR ROCK LARGER
THAN 1" DIAMETER OR COMPACTED
SAND.
FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT SHOULD
SURROUND THE CONDUITS AT LEAST 8" ON
ALL SIDES
PVC TELCO CONDUIT
* 12" MIN. SEPARATION
VERIFY WITH LOCAL
CODES AND UTILITIES
* AS PER LOCAL CODE
REQUIREMENTS
NOTE:
NO DIRT SHALL BE USED FOR BACK FILLING
ONLY SMALL STONE CLEAN OR SAND
1
TYPICAL 2 CONDUIT TRENCH CONCRETE OR FILL
TOP 8" SHALL STANDARD FILL
PER SITE SURFACE DETAIL
UNEXCAVATED
* TRENCH WIDTH AS REQ'D BY
POWER/TELEPHONE CO.; OR
QTY. OF CONDUITS
N
..-
HTEL WARNING TAPE
o ?;
("') :2:
*
PVC TELCO CONDUIT
N
..-
PVC TELCO CONDUIT
PVC POWER CONDUIT
GRAVEL FILL COMPACTED,
NO STONE OR ROCK LARGER
THAN 1" DIAMETER OR COMPACTED
SAND.
FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT SHOULD
SURROUND THE CONDUITS AT LEAST 8" ON
ALL SIDES
* AS PER LOCAL CODE
REQUIREMENTS
* 12" MIN. SEPARATION
VERIFY WITH LOCAL
CODES AND UTILITIES
NOTE:
NO DIRT SHALL BE USED FOR BACK FILLING
ONLY SMALL STONE CLEAN OR SAND
3
TYPICAL 4 CONDUIT TRENCH CONCRETE OR FILL
~ CRQWf\.f
t/\\,-j'L
t.,-H'-\\t,~.; Lf.
I INTERNATIONAL +1
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, FL 33634
USA
2
>- ~ ~ ~
lD
~
Z ~ ~ '"
'" z
0 ~ '" z
i= 0
'" 12 N
0.. '" '"
a: 12 6 E
u ::>
Ul 6 l:l 6
w ::> ;L ::>
Cl !a '" !a
Ul ,... ,... !
z w ~ ~
0 !;( ., '"
Vi Cl ~ ~
~ ci < co 0
0:: Z
A\4fSolutioiiS
In.......Dr.t..
300 CROIN OAK i:EHM IlRM, ltJlG'IoOOD. Fl 32750
lIl; 407.2llO.O231 FAX: 407.260.0749 Fl aJJ.f 2698J
,~/'l
~{/~' \I ,-WI
, j
\'
EMt.4ANUEL POUUN
FL P.E.' 54073
DRAWN BY: RAR
CHECKED BY: JWD
DRAWING DATE: 4/30/07
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWILLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
TRENCH DETAllSI
CONDUIT DETAilS
I SHEET NUMBER
4 CD-4.1
~;
Q
t;~
;:X
s
~
Q
f,.,0
Z
<:>
lJ
f;/
\t.S
>
<<
~,
~
<:..)
0:
(we
DATE;
(l---------------~----
@ EXTERNAL GROUND RING
CIRCUIT BREAKER
PANEL
GFCIRECEPTACLE
) ." I
I I 1'. 1..
-----------------~--t---~~..~~-
1.1 ), I
I ) I. I
f . I ~.)
I I 1'1
I" I I..)
1 i 1'1
~. I ) _I
I -I I., I
I . I I. 1
): I I 1
~ 'I I . , I
L I I I
I,'f 1"1
I.. L_J 'I
I , ,)
1-'-____.:.1
5'-0"
REFER TO DWG EM-1
FOR FRAME DETAILS
.
DD
.
.
00
. .Ii8
00
. .Ii8
00
. .Ii8
00
4 GANG METER PACK
DD
DD
2 HOLE LUG
o
00 Q
SURGE
PROTECTOR
3
(TYP.)
FRONT ELEVATION
NOTE:
- ALL METAL EQUIPMENT CABINETS; HINGES; SCREWS; ENCLOSURES; CONDUIT NIPPLES; ETCo<
SHALL BE COATED WITH CLEAR COAT LAQUER SPRAY; EXCEPT STAINLESS STEEL EQUIPMENT.
- ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE POURED TO BELOW FINISHED STONE
FJ.E N(;\L~E~
NOTES:
1. STUB-UP CONDUITS 6" AWAY FROM EDGE OF CONCRETE
POST ENCASEMENT.
2. ALL PVC CONDUIT ABOVE FINAL GRADE SHALL BE
SCHEDULE 80 PVC CONDUIT.
3. ALL GALVANIZED POSTS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE
EXTERNAL GROUND RING (EGR) USING EXOTHERMIC
WELDS.
4. ALL ABOVE GRADE GROUNDING CONDUCTORS TO BUSS
BARS SHALL BE #2 AWG STRANDED/GREEN JACKETED CU
WIRE. TO FENCE POST, ICE BRIDGE POSTS, AND UTILITY
RACK POSTS MAY BE #2 AWG BARE TINNED CU SOLID.
EXOTHERMICALLY (CADWELD) WELDED TO 2/0 MAIN
GROUND RING JUST BELOW FINISHED GRADE.
5. ALL EXOTHERMIC WELDING MUST COMPLY WITH
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
6. TWO (2) 5/8"x10' (CU or CU CLAD) GROUND RODS (6'
APART as per NEC and/or local code) SHALL BE INSTALLED
IN LINE WITH THE TOWER EGR.
FINISHED GRADE
_____0000________00__... TO NEAREST
FENCE POST
REFER TO DRAWING EMS FOR
BILL OF MATERIALS AND NOTES
~ c;RQWf:.r
tj\,) I Lt
1 INTERNATIONAL '*'1
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, FL 33634
USA
fu ~ ~ ~
is
Z is ~ !f
0:
0 ~ 0: Z
t= 0: E ~
a. 0: 0:
a: E S E
() Iil ~ S
(f)
W :> ;): :>
0 en !a
en 0:
~I:! .... .... ....
~~ ~
o N
Q< $ S ';;-
(f)O
(50 .. ., 0
Ct::Z
A'WSoIutioifS
Ina...UG'f"&t.'1
JOI) CROtIN (),\1( ::ooJl( IlIN. LCIIGllOOO. fl J27"JI\
TEl: 401.26olQ.CJ1 rlX: 4O'~IO.0749 rl. CCAf 26~
--
eli..../'""'" //1
./...... ~ /;71/ '
v .
MAY ~ 0 2007
" I
EMM"'NUE~POUUN
FL P.,,- ~_
DRAWN BY: RAR
CHECKED BY: JV'lrJ
DRAWING DATE: 4/30/07
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWILLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
4 GANG METER
1
I SHEET NUMBER
EB-1
FRAME DETAIL FOR POWER AND/OR TELCO EQUIPMENT
1 m m m-.
11==111==111==1 :-
1:;>
"'
~
15"
(TYP.)
1,J.)
.>,
~;
;;;
t;j
l-
<(
c;,
SIDE ELEVATION
<.:,
.~':
&;
[5
:;:'"
NOTE:
<D- SPRAY CUT ENDS OF ALL UNISTRUT WITH COLD-GALV. AND PAINT
ON CLEAR LAQUER
;};
;:~,
~
c'
""
~)
~- ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE POURED TO BELOW FINISHED STONE
F\.CT
1:;>
1-
I III III 111=-."
11==11 1==111==1
9
"'
~"
,"
d ,
5'-0.
00
o .Ii
00
o .Ii
00
o .Ii
00
o D
o
00 0
4 METER
GANG BOX
. DD
DD
D
,,'d
FRONT ELEVATION
~
N
<9
Z
f.- C3
<l:
c..
(/)
...J
W
Z
~ Z
<l:
T- J:
U
...J
<l:
i=
[
i-
T-
5'
FINISHED GRADE
1 III III 111-. I III III IlL.
11==111==111==1 11==111==111==1
CONCRETE EASEMENT
(TYPICAL)
~ C(R,Qw/~.r
/.. -"~ f t ,~m
__/ . toft .1...,;.
1 INTERNATIONAL "'I
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, Fl33634
USA
fu ~ ~ ~
. ~
Z ~ ;;:; "
It: Z
0 ;;:; It: ~
f= It: ~ N
c.. 0: ~
a:: ~ El
u "
(f) El gj El
w " ;L "
Cl ::! It: ::!
~~ " " ~
~ ~
Q <l: g :::
(f)Cl ~ ';;;- ;;,.
(;So .. '" 0
Cl::Z
A~SolutioiiS
P.o.rlllorat""..
JOG CIWIM 0/1( CDl '" !lRI\{, lCflCIl:XID, fl 32150
~ 407:tKl.02Jl FAX: 407.2!O.Om ~ COAl 21983
I ~rl1
M~Y 3 0 ~ggf
Et.lMAN\JEm POUUN
'-_ FL P.E. .54073
DRAWN BY: RAR
CHECKED BY: JWD
DRAWING DATE: 4/30107
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWllLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, Fl32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
FRAME DETAIL
I SHEET NUMBER
1
EM-1
GROUND ROD 1 GROUND ROD DETAIL 2 INSPECTION PORT DETAIL 3
TWO-HOLE COMPRESSION LUG
BURNDY CAT #YA2C2TC38E2
OR APPROVED EQUAL
HEX BOLT
LOCK WASHER USE 1/4" FOR
FLAT WASHER ATTACHMENT TO
~ METAL ENCLOSURES
COPPER SHEILD & 3/8" FOR
~ ATTACHMENT TO
GROUND BARS
FLAT WASHER
LOCK WASHER
TYPE GR TYPE SV HEX NUT
INSTALLATION NOTES:
1. BOLTS, WASHERS, AND NUTS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL.
~ 2. SELECT BOLT LENGTH TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO
EXPOSED THREADS.
3. BURNISH MOUNTING SURFACE TO REMOVE PAINT IN THE AREA
;.c~ OF LUG CONTACT.
.~ GROUND BAR
t<"}
'-' TYPE PH TYPE KA TYPE VS 4. APPLY COPPER-SHIELD COMPOUND TO MATING SURFACE OF
'"
C:;J
~...., LUG AND WIPE CLEAN EXCESS COMPOUND.
>...;,.c-
';;:
a NOTES
5. ALL METAL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE EXTERNALLY
1. SECURE TO INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR WALL wi S.S. LAG GROUNDED TO THE TOWER EGR. (PAINTED METAL SURFACES
<d HARGAR CAT # GBB-1442-G OR APPROVED EQUAL MUST HAVE SMALL SECTION OF PAINT REMOVED BEFORE
Z
<.:) INSTALLATION, AND SHALL BE SPRAYED LIGHTLY WITH CLEAR
7, 2. OMIT INSULATOR WHEN MOUNTING TO TOWER STEEL OR
i.Y._ COAT LACQUER FINISH).
ld PLATFORM STEEL. USE INSULATORS WHEN ATTACHING TO
";:'"
[$ BUILDINGS OR SHELTERS
c.::.::.
z
3<
<'::> CADWELDS (TYPICAL) 4
"" GROUND BAR 5 GROUNDING TO FLAT SURFACES TYPICAL 6
{we
~
CADWELD TYPE NC
THERMOWELD TYPE CR-17
DOUBLE CABLE TO GROUND ROD
GRADE ~
I" 'I I' "1I1':":":1I1':":":111~ II~
II I III m ffi::::J 11='
8" PVC CPLG. (THRD.)
W
f-
, zO
o -2
(") ::2;w
* w
~
CADWELD
c ':":":11i"'111':":":111~1I~'
Tf:111m III m 111='
T1FINISH GRADE
SUBGRADE
b
(")
".
u
2/0 AWG BARE STRANDED TINNED COPPER WIRE,
ANIXTER CAT. #1A-0201 OR APPROVED EQUAL
111-Ti\.!..!
\.- TRENCH BOTTOM
<0
~COPPER CLAD
GROUND ROD
5/8"QlX10'-0" LONG
2/0 TINNED CU EXTERNAL
TOWER GROUND RING WIRE
COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD Q
CAD WELD TEST LOOP TO
GROUND RING WIRE
CAD WELD TYPE GT
THERMOWELD TYPE CR-2
HORIZONTAL TO GROUND ROD
* NOTE:
GROUND ROD SHALL BE MIN. 30" BELOW GRADE OR 6" BELOW FROST LINE.
(WHICH EVER IS GREATER) AS PER N.E.C. ARTICLE 250-50(D)
* NOTE:
GROUND WIRE SHALL BE MIN. 30" BELOW GRADE OR 6" BELOW FROST
LINE. (WHICH EVER IS GREATER) AS PER N.E.C. ARTICLE 250-50(D)
n ~ t~{~W~.
W "INTERNATIONAL ...,
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, FL 33634
USA
~d ~ ~
I.. ~
Z ~ i:j '"
0: Z
0 i5 ~ ~
ti: .. N
.. 0:
ii: e fil e
() :::>
U') S l:l fil
w " ;L :::>
0 i:l 0: !8
U') ... .... i
z w ~ ~
0 !;( '" N
Vi 0 ~ ';;-
~ 0 < ., c
a:: z
A\VSolutioliS
InaDr"or.t.d
300 CIlO'lH ON( C[NTR!: DRI\t LllIG'MlOIl. FL 32750
TEe 407~02J1 FAX: 407.260.0749 FL COAl 26t83
~,.-:."
~/1
MA~ 3 0 20D}
I
EMtAANU POUUN
Fl P.E. 54073
DRAWN BY: RAR
CHECKED BY: JWD
DRAWING DATE: 4/30/07
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWILLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
GROUNDING DETAILS
I SHEET NUMBER
GD-1
" I 1::;::11 E,:3 11;:;::111
\ r#2/0 TINNED STR. CU
Y _(TJP.) ,
\, ~
\..L 2/0 AWG BARE ~
I TINNED CU COPPER CLAD
STR. (TYP.) GROUND ROD
I
I
L__~
p ~?Jo \p )~2J
~
~~~~~~~~
A
V
TOWER STEEL~
(;\
~ -------
II
II
-Jr I
, f!'
C) _
C") :::!E
:ROUND RING WIRE J
II E
lli::;:m.~~~ II~ 11::;:;1
I
I
I
TOWER FOUNDATION ~
TOWER GROUND DETAIL
CONCRETE
POST FOUNDATION
METERBOARD POST
I
CADWELD TO PIPE -.....J ) \
TYPICAL FOR ALL l ; ~
METALPO:T ~~ J
GD-1
~
~
"'" I11I
II II
~ ~ NOTE:
-- - --~ALWAYSCADWELD TO SIDE OF FENCE' .. i..-
POST TO PREVENT TRIPPING HAZARD
- MECHANICAL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS
ARE PROHIBITTED
-TOP OF FENCE FABRIC SHALL BE LEVEL,
CUT SIDE OF FENCE FABRIC TO BE
INSTALLED TOWARD THE GROUND, AND
SMOOTH SIDE TO BE INSTALLED TOWARD
THE BARBED WIRE.
CADWELD 2/0 GROUND WIRE TO
BASEPLATES ONLY, NEVER
CADWELD TO MONOPOLE
TOWERS OR HOLLOW LEG SST.
CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND
CLEAN PAINTED OR RUSTED
SURFACES BEFORE
CADWELDING. PAINT SURFACES
AFTER INSTALLATION PER
CROWN STANDARDS.
BARBED WIRE
2'.0" RADIUS BEND
(MINIMUM, TYP.)
~x 'X 'X 'X x.)(V'
XXXXxX'X
Xx'X V'XV~><)<;.
XX'X'XX'><)<
'X 'X'X 'X
x: X X ")(''>< X ~
X'X VV'><><.)<
W~)<
X X ')()< 'X 'X 'X
k X X 'X )< X X)<
X 'XX vv
~XXX-/<x'><x'><x'><x'><x
~'X 'X'X'X
'^xX ~
~W
X 'X'XX 'X'X
~W
& Y\l0 'X'X'X'X
N;0X)<Xlv
X X x"x 'X X""x:
SUBGRADE
HII-
K.
I
) gl
2/~ AWG BARE TINNED J
STR. CU (TYP.)
Q COPPER CLAD GROUND J
ROD 3/4" x 10' LONG
i.
I SCAlE: I
N.T.S. 1
FENCE GROUNDING
5'.0" PIGTAIL FOR
E~QUIP. \
! SUPPORT CHANNEL
FOR ELECTITELCO EQUIP.
:)
-
\MAIN GRO~ND RING-
",.
~:.:.)
~~
~
z:;
-
-
-
--
-
-
2/0 AWG BARE TINNED
CU STR. (TYP.)
NOTE:
-NUMBER OF LEADS FROM GROUND RING TO METER BOARD EQUIPMENT:
ONE FOR EACH POST (3), ONE FOR EACH WIREWAY (3), ONE FOR TELCO BOX
(1), ONE FOR ELECTRIC METER PANEL (1), ONE FOR BUSSBAR (1)
C':
<c'
Z
c-
~
~
;.~:
:z:
~
e;;
c~
-GROUND RODS AT METERBOARD TO BE 30" MIN. OR 6" BELOW FROST LINE
(WHICH EVER IS DEEPEST).
"! (iT DPJf.
C":: ,;: t~!\f'JE:.:
METER RACK GROUNDING TYPICAL - PLAN VIEW
7
7'
~ CORNER
~ FENCE POST
FENCE FABRIC
(#2 AWG BARE SOLID TINNED
COPPER WIRE CADWELD TO
EXTERIOR GROUND RING
AND FENCE POST
'j ~ CADWELD TO SIDE OF
~ POST 6" ABOVE FINISH
GRADE
&,/
FINISH GRADE
I ~~ 12
#2 AWG BARE SOLID TINNED
COPPER WIRE TAIL FROM
FENCE POST CADWELDED
TO 2/0 CU EXTERIOR GROUND
RING (TYP.)
COPPER CLAD
GROUND ROD
3
GD-1
-
~~
'--
TO FENCE
-
I SCAlE:
N.T.S.
I 4
GATE
CADWELD
CONNECTIONS
FENCE POST
10
~
)Q :~v~
/ V
I ~ h I
t::::::::=
/
CADWELD TO SIDE OF
POST 6" ABOVE FINISH
GRADE
GATE JUMPER 2/0
AWG WELDING CABLE
r
/
~V" 10
"lX~/
~ ~INISHGRADE,
I I #2 AWG BARE SOLID TINNED
T~~ .... - 2" ~~.- ~~~f;~i~~~:~:~riUND
RING +/- 12" FROM FENCE POST
GATE GROUNDING DETAIL
I ~~ I 3
CONCRETE
POSTFOUNDATI~
\
UNISTRUT CLAMP
FOR CONDUIT
~
J
\
METERBOARD --...........1
POST l
")
-
\ SUPPORT CHANNEL
FOR ELECTITELCO EQUIP.
UNISTRUT CLAMP
FOR SUPPORT CHANNEL
UNISTRUT CLAMP DETAIL
I SCAU:'
N.T.S. .
I 5
wt ~\QW~.
~ (u ." i ..f.......
<oJ' v' L
I INTERNATIONAL ...1
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, FL 33634
USA
~d ~ ~
~
z ~ Gi C>
'" Z
0 Gi ~ z
t= .. S
c.. .. ..
a:: e s e
() s ~ s
Ul
W ::> T ::>
0 !a Ili l:l
~ w .. ,.. ,..
Qt( ~ ~ ~
UlO ~ ';;:)-
(50 < '" 0
~z
AW'Solutions
Inaar.01'flt'_d
JOO CR<llIN ~ 't. c.lNlRE IIRM, l.lIIG'tOOIl. P. 'ill5(J
lD.: 407_'6..il2J1 F,J(: ~.07J9 Fl COAl 16'J83
Ii )
P,llt
~..) '.
','t .1
'-- ., -'"
\'- I
\ t
Mfi?,~ 0 200~?
EWMuEl'.'€ POUUN
Fl P.E. 154D'/~
DRAWN BY: RAft
CHECKED BY: v'WD
DRAWING DATE: 4/30/07
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWILLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
GROUNDING DETAILS
I SHEET NUMBER
GD-2
~
SCHEMATIC SIGNAGE PLAN
NO SCALE
10
M
.'. '!.
... ~ "
8
";:;
~
V')
S!
<'
,.,
<::>
<.0
z'
~
i;t'
;');
1~
~
c~
n::
<.'
PL GT D,<;,:rF..
CONC. FTG.
10" DIA. x 36"
(TYP)
GATE HOLD BACK
L.E NilJ./E.:
NOTE:
o CAUTION - RFE SIGN
(BLACK, YELLOW, WHITE) TO
BE MOUNTED NEAR TOWER LEG
W/ CLIMBING CABLE.
DO NOT RESTRICT CLIMBING ACCESS.
@ ASR SIGN TO BE MOUNTED
AT TOWER BASE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
CD CCUSA MARKETING/ID SIGN 18"x24"
(INCLUDES SITE ADDRESS)
CCUSA MARKETING SIGN: 14"x20" (BMI SITES)
ACCESS GATE (IF INSTALLED)
SEE DRAWING CD-2 DETAIL #3
GATE
ACCESS
ROAD
MONOPOLE SITE
RAZOR WIRE WARNING SIGN -
(IF APPLICABLE)
CHAIN LINK FENCE
~
TOWER SITE COMPOUND SIGN PLACEMENT
SITE SIGNAGE SECTION "A-A"
CD
MARKETING ID SIGN
(IF ACCESS ROAD GATE INSTALLED)
,'.
.". '.
::.. ~.,.
'):. ~
~~... ~.~~
'. ."
2
PRIVATE
PROPERTY
RED BACKGROUND
WIWHITE LETTERING
NO
TRESPASSING
VIOLATORS
WILL BE
PROSECUTED
CD NO-TRESSPASSING SIGN
18" WIDE X 24" HIGH
WARNING
THIS SITE IS
POSTED &
on PROTECTED---
BY
RAZOR WIRE
@ RAZOR-WIRE SIGN
18" WIDE X 24" HIGH
WHITE BACKGROUND
WIRED LETTERING
RED BACKGROUND
WIWHITE LETTERING
RED BACKGROUND
WIWHITE LETTERING
WHITE BACKGROUND
W/BLACKLETTERING
FCC TOWER REGISTRATION NO.
1234567
@ FCC REGISTRATION SIGN
24" WIDE X 18" HIGH
SITE 10# 000000
VERIFIED 911 STREET ADDRESS
CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE
FOR LEASE INFORMATION CAll
1-817-788-7011
FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY SERVICE CAlL
'-aoo.788-7Ql1
(1) MARKETING/ID SIGN
24" WIDE X 18" HIGH
WARNING
. AlITHORIZED PERSONNel ONLY
. HARD HATS REQUIRED
. WATCH FOR FALLING MATERIAL
. WATCH FOR TRiPPING HAZARDS
. WATCH FOR UNEVEN SURFACES
. IN THE EVENT OF A T-STORN. VACATE THE
COMPOUND.
LT. GRAY W/BLACK LETTERING
RED BACKGROUND
WIWHITE LETTERING
WHITE BACKGROUND
W/BLACK LETTERING
@ CAUTION-HARD HAT CONSTRUCTION
AREA AND TRIPPING HAZARDS
24" WIDE X 18" HIGH
WWHITE BACKGROUND Lf01A
a W/BLACK LETTERING ~
5" WIDE X 10" HIGH
@ ANCHOR POINT SIGNS
10" WIDE X 10" HIGH
NOTICE
RADIO FREQUENCY ENVlORMENT AREA
o NOTICE-RFE SIGN
12" WIDE X 18" HIGH
CAUTION
RADIO FREQUENCY ENVIORMENT AREA
@ CAUTION-RFE SIGN
12" WIDE X 18" HIGH
GREEN BACKGROUND
WIWHITE LETTERING
WHITE BACKGROUND
W/BLACK LETTERING
YELLOW BACKGROUND
W/BLACK LETTERING
WHITE BACKGROUND
W/BLACK LETTERING
AND YELLOW SYMBOL
I
@
ASR + WHITE W/BLACK LETTERING
1234567
ASR SIGN
10" WIDE X 4" HIGH
NOTE:
ALL SIGNS TO BE INSTALLED ACCORDING
TO DWG SITE SIGNAGE ADJACENT TO GATES
(LEFT OR RIGHT SIDE OF GATE IS
ACCEPTABLE, BUT MUST BE MOUNTED ON
GATE SIDE OF COMPOUND, SO AS TO BE
READABLE WITH GATES OPEN OR CLOSED).
TYPICAL SIGNS AND SPECIFICATIONS
~ ~Qw~r
"",it) ! L L
I INTERNATIONAL +1
6306 BENJAMIN ROAD
TAMPA, FL 33634
USA
1D ~ ~ ~
~
z ~ ~ "
0: Z
0 ~ z
f= ~ 0
0: N
0- 0: 0:
a:: e ril e
u ril ~ 8
Vl
W :> I :>
Cl " ll1 !3
!Il
~w ... ... ...
~ ~ ~
Q ~ "
VlCl ~ ~~
~ci < lD 0
a::z
A\VSoIUllifs
In.o...~or.t.d
JO() CROIII ON( <INlRE llRM, LOHG'MIOO. Fl 3V50
Tn: 401.260.0231 FAX: 401.260.0749 Fl COAl 26983
~IU
I
\
MAY'30 2001
Et.4t.IANUEL;POUUN
FL P.E. .54073
DRAWN BY: RAR
CHECKED BY: JWD
DRAWING DATE: 4/30/07
SITE NUMBER:
SITE NAME:
I SITE NAME
TUSCAWILLA
I BUSINESS UNIT NUMBER
I SITE ADDRESS
1560 WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
SEMINOLE COUNTY
USA
I SHEET TITLE
SITE SINAGE
FENCE AND GATE
I SHEET NUMBER
3
8-1
ATTACHMENT E
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
Ronald W. McLemore
City Manager
June 29, 2007
Crown Castle International
300 Crown Castle Drive
Longwood, FL 32750
Dear Sir:
This letter is to advise you that the City Commission has expressed strong concerns regarding the
negative aesthetic impacts of cell tower monopoles at the 130-150 foot height being discussed at
this time. The Commission has expressed a strong preference for a lower tower alternative that
would fit on an existing telephone pole and a new pole installation that would not extend above
the typical tree canopy line in the City.
This letter is provided for advisory purposes only and should not be construed in any way as a
regulatory decision.
If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
/(cv~ tJ 7}/~J'~f
Ronald W. McLemore
City Manager
/jp
cc: Community Development Director
Richard Vega richard. vega@awsolutionsinc.com