HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 06 03 Consent Item A
l'
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 6, 2004
I. CALL TO ORDER
The Board of Adjustment Regular Meeting of Thursday, May 6, 2004 was called to order
at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Thomas Waters in the Commission Chambers ofthe Municipal
Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708).
Roll Call:
Chairman Thomas Waters, present
Vice Chairman Jack Taylor, absent
Board Member Gary Diller, present
Board Member Kathryn Fairchild, present
Board Member Howard Casman, present
Board Member Kathryn Fairchild led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mr. John Baker, AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department
explained, "We have a slight error in Item Number 1. This was noticed to the abutters as
only a Variance for the screen enclosure setback and it appears that it also involves the
location of the pool in relation to the property line. So before any decision should be
made and recommendation made to the City Commission, I would like to re-notify
everyone within one hundred and fifty feet (150') and amend the sign."
II. CONSENT AGENDA
CONSENT
A. Approval Of The April!, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes.
"I MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE THE MINUTES AS WRITTEN."
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER DILLER. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
FAIRCHILD. DISCUSSION. WITH CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD THE
MOTION WAS APPROVED.
MOTION CARRIED.
1
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR MEETING - MAY 6, 2004
PAGE20F6
III.
REGULAR AGENDA
REGULAR
Community Development Department
A. Requests The Board Of Adjustment Hear A Request For A Variance By Phillip
And Janice Tucker From Section 6-85. Of The City Code Of Ordinances, To
Encroach 1.5' (One And One Half Feet) Into The 7' (Seven Foot) Rear Screen
Enclosure Setback. The Applicant Wishes To Construct A Screened Enclosure For
A Swimming Pool In The Rear Yard, Into The Rear Setback.
Mr. John Baker, AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department introduced
the Agenda Item.
Mr. Baker said, "They [Phillip and Janice Tucker] had a pool built and their pool
contractor - relied on some faulty surveying information or a mistake - made somewhere
measuring and the pool was put in the ground in a location that precludes them from
meeting the screen enclosure setback."
Mr. Baker added that the plan, "Shows the spa and the pool in conflict with our minimum
setbacks. That is the area that was not noticed to the Public." Mr. Baker stated, "We
[Staff] do not believe they meet the six (6) [Variance] Criteria." Chairman Waters said,
"What has been noticed to the "Public" is for the pool enclosure and now there needs to
be a 'Variance' for the pool itself, so it needs to be re-noticed." Mr. Baker said, "Yes Sir,
for both items." Chairman Waters also stated, "Your recommendation is - to wait and
hear the whole thing so it can be noticed properly."
Board Member Gary Diller asked Mr. Baker, "If this is going to have to be re-noticed,
then that is going to then afford perhaps an opportunity for other members of the
community to appear and speak in regards to this. Is that correct?" Mr. Baker said, "Yes
Sir." Mr. Baker said, "It was noticed for the screen enclosure setback, but not for the
pool."
Discussion.
Mr. Phillip Tucker, 105 Inwood Court, Winter Springs, Florida: addressed the Board.
Discussion. Mr. Tucker said, "It is not really a faulty survey, it is a misreading of an
incomplete surveyor a survey that was subject to misinterpretation."
Discussion.
Mr. Dan Lamper, 101 Brookshire Court; Winter Springs, Florida: addressed the Board
regarding his concerns.
Much discussion ensued.
1
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR MEETING - MAY 6, 2004
PAGE30F6
Chairman Waters asked Joan Brown [Deputy City Clerk] to check on availability to hold
a Special Meeting for Mr. and Mrs. Phillip Tucker. Discussion.
REGULAR
Community Development Department
B. Requests The Board Of Adjustment Hear A Request For A Variance By Virginia
Stern From Section 20-103. Of The City Code Of Ordinances, To Encroach As
Much As 10' (Ten Feet) Into The 20' (Twenty Foot) Rear Building Setback. The
Variance Is Contingent Upon The City Vacating A Portion Of A Private Drainage
Easement Along The Rear Of The Property (Separate Action By The City
Commission.)
Mr. Baker presented this Agenda Item.
Mr. Baker said, "We [Staff] have looked at this request according to the six (6) Variance
Criteria and of course you have to meet all six (6) of those [Variance] Criteria and we
[Staff] do not think they do."
Discussion.
Board Member Diller confirmed, "Your conclusion is that they do not meet any of the six
(6) [Variance Criteria]. Is that correct?" Mr. Baker replied, "That is correct."
Ms. Virginia Stern, 1406 Winding Stream Court, Winter Springs, Florida: briefly
addressed the Board.
Mr. John Orkis, 951 Wedgewood Drive, Winter Springs, Florida: spoke on behalf of Ms.
Stern regarding the request for a Variance.
Tape I/Side B
Much discussion ensued.
Mr. Steve Cox, President of the Bentley Green Homeowners Association, 876 Bentley
Green Circle, Winter Springs, Florida: briefly addressed the Board.
Mr. Rudi Stockham mer, Chairman of the Architectural Review Board/First Vice
President/Treasurer of the Bentley Green Homeowners Association, 856 Bentley Green
Circle, Winter Springs, Florida: spoke in favor of the "Variance" Request. Mr.
Stockhammer stated, "The Architectural Review Board has looked at the plans and we
are fine with the plans as long as they build according to Code of Winter Springs and the
other Codes." Mr. Stockhammer added, "The Architectural Review Board has asked - all
'I
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR MEETING - MAY 6, 2004
PAGE40F6
the neighbors are being asked whether they agree with it or do not agree." Mr.
Stockhammer indicated, "Everybody agreed."
Much discussion.
"I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE AND
PASS IT ON TO THE CITY COMMISSION FOR THEIR FINAL APPROVAL."
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER FAIRCHILD. WITH DISCUSSION, BO~
MEMBER FAIRCHILD WITHDREW HER MOTION.
"I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE RECOMMEND TO THE
CITY COMMISSION THAT THEY APPROVE - THE VARIANCE AS
REQUESTED." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER DILLER. SECONDED BY
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN. DISCUSSION.
MR BAKER SAID, "IJF AT SOME POINT, IF THIS MOTION CARRIES,
COULD I GET EVERYBODY TO ELABORATE. I FEEL EACH ONE - OF
THESE POINTS IS COVERED." CHAIRMAN WATERS REMARKED, "THAT
IS A GOOD POINT. WE DO NEED TO RECOMMEND TO THE [CITY]
COMMISSION AS TO HOW THESE SIX (6) [VARIANCE CRITERIA] POINTS
ARE AFFECTED BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT OUR MOTION NEEDS TO BE
BASED ON."
FURTHER DISCUSSION ENSUED.
Tape 2/Side A
DISCUSSION.
BOARD MEMBER DILLER REITERATED HIS MOTION AND STATED, "THE
MOTION - WAS TO FORWARD IT WITH A RECOMMENDATION FOR
APPROV AL."
CHAIRMAN WATERS ADDED, "SO EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS - IF YOU
ARE VOTING TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE - YOU WOULD VOTE YES, IF
YOU ARE VOTING NOT TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE, YOU WOULD
VOTE NO."
VOTE:
BOARD MEMBER CASMAN : AYE
CHAIRMAN WATERS: NAY
BOARD MEMBER FAIRCHILD: AYE
BOARD MEMBER DILLER: NAY
MOTION DID NOT CARRY.
"!
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR MEETING - MAY 6, 2004
PAGE50F6
Chairman Waters said, "It will go to the [City] Commission. You [Mr. Baker] will let the
applicant know what the date will be?" Mr. Baker said, "That will be the second Meeting
of this month."
IV. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Mr. Baker said, "We have a 'Conditional Use' for multi-family - condominiums _
fifteen (15) acres right next to Golf Terrace."
Board Member Fairchild asked Mr. Baker, "Do you want something in writing?" Mr.
Baker said, "I just need to have. the reasoning behind a recommendation of approval,
because it is very difficult to say, well, the Board recommends approval and disagrees
with Staff for the following reasons if you do not know the following reasons."
With further discussion Chairman Waters suggested another Meeting with Mr. Anthony
A. Garganese, City Attorney, to discuss the six Variance Criteria. Chairman Waters
stated, "That might be something that we might want to consider - if you all want to, we
can ask to do that in the next couple of months - sit down and talk to him [Attorney
Garganese], ask him questions."
Board Member Howard Casman asked, "Is there anywhere I am going to find a further
explanation ofthese six (6) [V ariance Criteria]?" Mr. Baker stated, "It is in the Code."
Discussion.
V. REPORTS
Mr.. Baker pointed out that there will be a Board of Adjustment Special Meeting
scheduled before the next Regular Meeting.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
"I MOVE TO ADJOURN."
SECONDED. DISCUSSJION.
MOTION WAS APPROVED.
MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER DILLER.
WITH CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD THE
"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MJNUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
REGULAR MEETING - MAY 6, 2004
PAGE 6 OF 6
Chairman Waters adjourned the Meeting at approximately 8:48 p.m.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
v/~~
THOMAS WATERS, CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
NOTE, Th~, Mi,,'" _ 'pprov", '~. 2004 B=d Of Ad;"""",,' >'go]" M,"i",.