HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 11 06 Regular Item A
BOA AGENDA
ITEM A
CONSENT
INFORMATION
PUBLIC HEARING
REGULAR X
November 6.2003
Meeting
MGR. DEPT.
Authorization
REQUEST: The Community Development Department recommends the Board of
Adjustment (BOA) hear a request by Kinder Kampus, Inc. for a variance from Section 20-486
(please see Ordinance No. 2000-17) of the City Code of Ordinances, to authorize a new
monument sign to be constructed closer than 10' from the SR 434 right-of-way (ROW), within
the SR 434 Redevelopment Overlay Zoning District. .
PURPOSE: The purpose ofthis agenda item is to consider a request by Kinder Kampus, Inc.
for a variance from Section 20-486 of the City Code of Ordinances to allow them to replace the
existing non-conforming monument sign with another monument sign at 640 East SR 434.
The applicant contends that, given the location of the building, the intersection, the subdivision
entrance features, and the large existing tree, there is no other place in the SR 434 ROW for a
monument sign that would not be in conflict with the 10 foot setback [from the property line]
requirements.
APPLICABLE CODE:
Sec. 20-82. Duties and Powers; general.
The Board of Adjustment shall make recommendations to the City Commission to
grant any variance or special exception as delineated in this chapter.
(1) The board of adjustment shall have the additional following specific powers
and duties:
a.
b.
c. To recommend upon appeal such variance from the terms of this
chapter as will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to
November 6, 2003
Regular Item A
Page 2
special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions ofthis
chapter will result in unnecessary and undue hardship. In order to
recommend any variance from the terms of this chapter, the board of
adjustment must and shall find:
1. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are
peculiar to the land, structure or building and which are not
applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same
zoning district;
2. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from
the actions of the applicant;
3. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the
applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to
other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district;
4. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would
deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other
properties in the same zoning district under the terms of this
chapter and would work unnecessary hardship on the applicant;
5. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will
make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or
structure;
6. That the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the
general intent and purpose of this chapter, will not be injurious to
the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
(2) In recommending the granting of any variance, the board of adjustment may
recommend appropriate conditions and safeguards. Violations of such
. conditions and safeguards, when made part of the terms under which the
variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of the chapter. The board
of adjustment may recommend a reasonable time limit within which the
action for which the variance is required shall be begun or completed, or
both.
Sec. 20-103. Restrictions upon lands, buildings and structures.
(c) Percentage of occupancy (lot). No building or structure shall be erected...nor shall any
open space surrounding any building or structure be encroached upon or reduced in any
manner except in conformance with the building site requirements. .. for the district in which
such building or structure is located.
Sec. 20-486. Signs.
November 6, 2003
Regular Item A
Page 3
All signs and sign elements, including shape, form, lighting, materials, size, color and location
shall be subject to approval by the design review board if such signs or sign elements are
visible from adjacent properties or a street right-of-way.
(1) Ground mounted multi-tenant or project identification sign: For each multi-tenant
development under separate ownership, one (1) wide-based monument style permanent sign
with landscaped base identifying the name of the development and businesses within the
development shall be permitted. For development with five hundred (500) feet of frontage or
more on a major road, one additional sign may be permitted. The minimum separation for all
signs on an individual ownership parcel shall be two hundred (200) feet and:
a. Shall only advertise the name of the commercial development companies, corporation
or major enterprises within the commercial development. The primary address of the
building shall be incorporated into the sign with numerals/letters a minimum of eight
(8) inches in height, but the address shall not be counted against allowable copy area.
b. Shall be located no closer than ten (10) feet from front, side, or rear property lines.
c. Shall have a maximum of two (2) faces.
d. Shall be consistent in design, format and materials with the architecture of the proposed
building( s).
e. A wall sign shall not be higher than eight (8) feet above the closest vehicular use area.
f. Landscaping shall be incorporated around the base to include low growing shrubs and
ground cover and/or annuals to promote color.
g. Signs shall be in accordance with the following schedule:
Building Size Maximum Copy Area
(Gross Floor Area)
Under 75,000 SF 32 SF
Maximum Height
12 feet
(2) Ground mounted single-tenant identification sign: One (1) wide-based monument style
permanent project identification sign shall be permitted per single-tenant parcel. One
additional permanent wide-based monument style project identification sign may be permitted
for parcels in excess of one (1) acre with more than one (1) ingress/egress serving more than
one (1) building. The minimum separation for all signs on an individual ownership parcel
shall be two hundred (200) feet.
a. Shall only advertise one (1) person, firm, company, corporation or major enterprise
occupying the premises:
b. Shall be located no closer than ten (10) feet from the front, side or rear property
lines.
c. Shall not exceed two (2) faces.
d. Sign copy area shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet per face. For parcels in
excess of four (4.0) acres, the project identification sign face may be increased to forty-
eight (48) square feet.
e. Shall be consistent in design, format and materials with the architecture ofthe proposed
building.
f. The sign shall not be more than eight (8) feet in height above the closest driveway or
vehicular use area.
November 6, 2003
Regular Item A
Page 4
g. Signs shall be in an enclosed base a minimum width of two-thirds (2/3) the width of the
sign. Landscaping shall be incorporated around the base to include low growing shrubs
and ground cover and/or annuals to promote color.
Ordinance No. 2000-17 (please see attached)
CONSIDERATIONS:
On November 10, 1997, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 683,
which, among other things, created the SR 434 Redevelopment Overlay Zoning
District. It also set forth standards for signage and provided a 5-year maximum
amortization period for signs that were not in compliance with the new
standards. On June 12,2000, the City Commission adopted Ordinance No.
2000-17, which provided that any sign, other than a billboard, could be
amortized and maintained until November 14,2002: At or prior to November
14,2002, all nonconforming signs were to be removed and may be replaced
with signs that conform to the design standards set forth in the S.R. 434
Redevelopment regulations. All directly affected property owners were notified
at or about the time Ordinance No. 2000-17 was adopted.
As a reminder of the up-coming deadline, on July 26,2002, former Community
Development Director Charles Carrington sent each property owner with a sign
in either of the SR 434 districts.
The subject site has C-1 Zoning, a Commercial Future Land Use designation,
and is located within the SR 434 Redevelopment Overlay Zoning District. The
applicant proposes to replace an existing non-conforming sign with a monument
sign. The monument sign would encroach into the applicable 10' sign setback.
The City Commission has granted at least one variance to save trees ( Paul
Starks building setback variance). Staff cannot recommend granting a variance
request that does not meet the.six variance criteria, although the Development
Review Committee did form a consensus that this was a unique situation and
that special consideration should be given to efforts to maintain the line of sight
at the intersection and to save such a large existing tree.
FINDINGS:
l).The subject site, 620 W. SR 434, is located within the C-1 zoning district, the
Commercial Future Land Use designation, and the SR 434 Redevelopment
Overlay Zoning District.
2).The SR 434 Redevelopment Overlay Zoning District sign standards have
been in effect since November 10, 1997, with the adoption of Ordinance No.
683.
3). On June 12,2000, Ordinance No. 2000-17 amended the amortization
deadline set forth in Ordinance No. 683 and set forth a November 14, 2002,
. November 6,2003
Regular Item A
Page 5
deadline for existing non-conforming signs to be removed and replaced with
signs that conform to Code.
4).On or about October 9,2003, the variance application (incomplete abutters
list) was received by the City.
5).The Board of Adjustment is required by Code to find that the variance
request meets all six variance criteria, set forth in Subsection 20-82 (1) (c), in
order to recommend approval.
6). Staff does not find that the variance meets all of the six criteria for a
vanance:
1. there are conditions or circumstances peculiar to the land,
structure, or buildings which are not applicable to other lands, .
structures, or buildings in the same SR 434 Redevelopment Overlay
Zoning district (existing subdivision entrance features, intersection,
and the tree);
2. special conditions and circumstances are not the result of the actions
of the applicant;
3. granting the variance requested might convey on the applicant
special privileges that is denied by this chapter to other lands,
buildings or structures in the same overlay zoning district;
4. a literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would not
deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other
properties in the same overlay zoning district under the terms of
this chapter and would not work an unnecessary hardship on the
applicant;
5. the variance requested is not the minimum variance that will make
possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure; and
6. granting the variance requested would not be in harmony with the
general intent and purpose of this chapter and would undermine the
Code, which could be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare.
7). A financial hardship does not constitute a hardship in terms of granting a
vanance.
8). At its May 12, 2003, meeting, the City Commission voted to allow affected
property owners apply for a sign variance without paying the $500 variance
fee.
9). The proposed sign does not meet the 10 foot setback from the adjacent
property line, as set forth in Subsection 20-486 (1 ) (b) ofthe City Code of
Ordinances.
November 6, 2003
Regular Item A
Page 6
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the recommend that the City Commission deny the variance request
pursuant to the six variance criteria set forth in Subsection 20-82 (1) (c) of the City Code of
Ordinances.
BOA ACTION:
ATT ACHMENTS:
A - Ordinance No. 2000-17
B - Variance application & map
C - Picture/rendering of signage
1. ..
ATTACHMENT A
ORDINANCE NO. 2000-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF WlNT~R SPRINGS, FLORIDA A~ENDlNG THE
CITY OF WINTER~ SPRINGS CODE OF ORDINANCES,
SECTION 20-466 AND SECTION 20-454 DEALING WITH
SIGNS ALONG S.R434; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF
PRIOR INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION INTO
THE CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of Winter Springs created a special overlay zoning district
to encourage and provide for enhanced property development within the S.R. 434. commercial
corridor, and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of Winter Springs desired to reduce visual distraction
through uniform sign criteria, and
WHEREAS, The City Commission of Winter Springs recognizes that existing businesses
within the overlay district may have nonconforming signs whose replacement may impose a fitlanciaf
hardship, and
WHEREAS, the City Commission however, finds that nonconforming signs are not favored,
by law and shall, within a reasonable time proscribed herein, be amortized, removed, and replaced
with a new sign conforming to existing city codes;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
HEREBY ORDAINS, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Winter Springs Code Section 20-454 and 20-466 are hereby amended as follows:
(underlined type indicates additions and strilceol:lt type indicates deletions, while asterisks (* * *)
indicate a deletion from the Ordinance of text existing in Section 20-454 and Section 20-466. It is
intended that the text in Section 454 and Section 20-466 denoted by the asterisks and set forth inthis
Ordinance shall remain unchanged from the language existing prior to adoption of this Ordinance).
Section 20-454 Signs.
* * *
(r) Nonconforming Signs.
(1) Any sign, other than billboards, fla..vffig-RA-eRgtAal-oost-ffi excess of one-lttifH:iree
(~Q)-delffif5-af\(i which is nonconforming as~l\it-te6-stgn--arca or any-etflcr re..'lson
wflieh-we\:lld-Aeeessitat.:e-tfle-OOmf}tete--r-emeval-er--t-etaH-erlf\eemeA~f the sigH, shall be
amortized and Illay be maintained until November 14, 2002 .a-rer~ed-ef-ffem-eRetl-t-te
City or Willter Sprillgs Ordillallce No, :W()()-17
Pagc lor4
., ;,
2
ti-ve-(-B--yeufs fr-eAHfle--etfe€tive dute of these-eesigtt-St-afl4H:6s. The-t-efftl-et:yeafS-te-be
aet.efflHflee-by-tfle-eest~e sign or of reAevatioo~AelttffiAg-iflStallation, shull be as
fBllew~
GFiginal SigA-oost-er
ReAevat:-ien Cost
Permitted Years from
Effective Date of Design Standards
$9--$J~0
~Q-l $10,000
Gver $10,000
2
3
5
(2) Any owner of a sign '.vho desires to rely upon an amortization period longer than
three(J) years shall file with the City within one (I) year from the etfecti,,'e date of
these design standards, a statement setting forth the cost and date of the most rccent
FeAeVation, and a written agreement to remove or bring into conformance the
Aonconforming sign at or prior to the eJ{piration of thc amortimtion pcriod applicablc
to that sign. The maximum period to amortize a sign shall be five (5) years.
At or prior to November 14. 2002. all nonconforming signs shall be removed and
may be replaced with signs that conform to the design standards set forth in the S.R.
434 New Development regulations.
(3) Violations shall be subject to Chapter 2, Article 3. Division 2 Code Enforcement,
City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances.
Section 20-466 Signs
* * *
( r) Nonconforming Signs.
( I ) .Any sign, other than billboards, having an original cost in exccss of one hundrcd
E$+OGJ-6eUars and which is nonconforming as to permitted sign area or any other reason
which would nccessitate the complete removal or replacement of the sign, shall be
amortized and may be maintained until November 14. 2002. a pcriod of from one (I) to
five (5) years from the effcctive date of these dcsign standards. The term of years to be
eet:eFmiflw-by-thc cost of the-sign or of renova~e~H4iflg instalilltien cost, shall be
as-fellews-;.
City or Winler Springs Ordinance No, 2()()()-17
I'llgc 2 or 4
')
.)
Gfigffial Sign cost or
ReAevat:ieA--Gest
Permitted Yeurs fr-em
Effective Date of Desigfl--St.afldaffis
$(40 $3,000
$3,00 1 to $1 0,000
Gve~O
2
3
5
"
(2) AAy owner of a sign ,....he-desircs to relay upon an amortization period longcr than
three (3) years shall file v{ith the City within one (1) year from the effective .9ate of these
design stananrds, a statement setting forth the cost and date of the most reoent
renovation, and a written agreement to removc or bring intooonformance the
ooooeAfufffiffig-sign at or p,rior to the expiration of the amortization period applicable to
tfl.at sign. The maximum period to amortize a sign shall be five (5) yetlffl:- .
At or prior to November 14.2002. all nonconforming signs shall be removed and
may be replaced with signs that conform to the design standards set forth in the S.R
434 Redevelopment regulations.
(3) Violations shall be subject to Chapter 2. Article 3. Division 2. Code Enforcement,
City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances.
Section 2. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent
ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission, or parts of ordinances and resolutions
in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict.
Section 3. Incorporation Into Code. This ordinance shall be incorporated into the Wint~r
Springs City Code and any section or paragraph number' or letter and any heading may be changed
or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing.
Section 4. Severability. Ifany section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision
of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed
a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption
by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida.
City of Willler Sl'rillgs Ordillullce No, 2000-17
"uge J of 4
. .
4
ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs. Florida, in a regular
meeting assembled on the ~ day of June v~{
Paul P. Partyka, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY
FOR Y OF ~INTER SPRINGS ONLY:
/: 1/ i/
Anthony A. Garganese,City Attorney
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Effective Date:
City of Willler Sprillgs Ordinllllce No. 2000-17
Page 4 of 4
l::J':J/fF~~/LJ3 ~ ,
. ,~N/'':;'"
,.
.,. ..:.'1t ','
FOR:
Hl73274755 14HJTER SPRNGS BLDDPT PAGE 01,. 'f
Jtflr."uA~jl-e1_~ . ~. -~. '; rJ(/),5
ATTACHMENT B /QI!V~
R,ecve~~eo
SEf' (5' 2003
- SPRINGS
OF WINlcR maria
. n.,CITY .H\nQ _ DaQ
'. perml...
BOARD OF ADJUSTHENT APPuICATION
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
1126 EAST SiATE ROAD ~J4
WINTER'SPRINCS, FL .32708-2,799
(407 )327 -1800
x
SPECIA~ EXCEPTION
V}>,.'RIANCE
'CONDITIONAL USE
ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION
1, APPLICANT:
2
3 . ... TTACH
5. ATTACH LEGAL'DESCRIPTION,
6, T~X PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
sq- Z~'lo{:, 20 I
7, LOCATION OF PARCEL (street ,Address and/or ,Nearest Cross
Streets):
s.
---"-"'''r
"'l\~~':":l ..
ZON WG :
Cl
. ., l-....~(..DC ro...."r . D .1
l:"'T"~- "'ID .._-,~,.......... .... '.U'L '~'""IV
..,J \.J4\~ .)Jr., U~G. . -.~ ""- -rl.. ~
By Signing belo~' I understand that City of Winter Sp~ings Officials
may ~nter upon my property to inspect that portion, as relates to
this application;
(If the applicant is not the owner of the subject property, the
applicant must' attach a lettel: of authorization signed by the
owner) ,
~EiTh ..&-~Vb,/ Sro~s
ORNER-PL'EASE TYPE ~
~ti. ". ~
Qf.lN€~~~T~ . " ,
PERSONS ME ADVISED THAT, IF THEY DECIDE TO APPEl\L ANY; DECISIONS
HADE AT .THESE KEE,TINGSIHEl\RINOS, THEY WILL .NEED A ,RECOR.D OF TJiE
PROCEEDiNGS AND FOR SUCK PURPOSE, THEY HILL NEED TO INSURE THAT A
VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS H~D~iAT'THEIR 'COST, WHICH I
INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY ANO'rVIDENCE UPON HHICH .THE APPEAL IS TO BE ~~~
BASED, PER SECTION 286.0105, FLORIDA STATUTES
SECTION 20-84 - APPEALS FROM DECI~rONS OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(1) Any per;son, or: per:Sons, Jointly or sever:ally agg'rieved by
any decision of the BO.ilr;d of Adjustment may, <./ithin thirty (30)
days aEter the filing of any decision in the office of the Board of
Adjustment, but not thereafter, apply to the City Council for
administrative ~elief. After a hear:ing.before the City Council an
aggrieved party may, within thirty (30) days after the decision of
the C.\,ty. Cou.ncil, file an appeal with a court ot competent
juriSdiction over the subject matter,'
. '~...6 r~'
El9LIJ8120El3 12:15
Hl73274_755
WINTER SPRNGS BLDDPT
PAGE 02
:' . ....."
APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
A sta.ff: Report \.Ii 1 1 be developed fol;" each' Application, The
Applicant should be prepared to address eac:h of the issues prov~ded
below for Variance reqU~gts.
In 'Jrder to grant a variance. the ,Board of Adjustment must m'ake the
fOllowing findin~s of fact: , .
1. That s~ecial'conditions and Circ:ms~~nces e~lst \.Inlcn are
peculiar to th~ !and. St.ructur'es o. biA~~;nQS 'involved and
which are' not aoolioable to: o~her _a.___, structures or
buildinQs in the same zonina ~ist~iot.
2. Th.a.t 9pecial conditions and: drcum$ta.nces do not rasult
from the 'actio!'l:l of the applioant, . '
3. That qranti'nq the variance requested \.iill not eon~er on.
.the applicant any speci~i o~i~i1eq~. that is den~~d by t~;s
chapter!' to other lands. buildino.!! or !Itructut'es. the!J e
zgn1no,di3tr'ic~, .
4. ' That, literal interpretation of t!e r:1l;OV~Si~S of t~~s
c~a~ter loIould dnriv~, the applica~t ~; .iQhtt c~m~vnJY enioyed
hvother: Droperties in, thes~mezk..in~ d;HlOi<;t. ~nder the
tez:oms ot this ehal'tar and woul Wet' un ec ssarl' .ha dship on
the !PPricant '. .
5. ~l\t tha v<ll:'1ance aranted is th~ minimum. variance that.
will ma.ke tiossible, the r~~;o~able use f 1-he' landLbu.ildina or
structu~ . . .. , .
6... 'I'~~t th~ at-ant ot the vati~~oe ~~; I ~~. ~~'harmorv with
f:l~~rf~ 1~te t:. and ourp9se o~ ttf' 1~~Pa:L will not
;~jur~ous ~o ~he neiahbot:'h66d. r 0 erw' t~imental to
~ubl:ic welfare. .....:'
the
be
the
7. Tfe request must be consistent with the ob1ectives and
~olicie3 o.f the ~omPtehensive Pl;n.
THE APpLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE CITY WITH THE; Ni\HES
1\NO AODRESSES OF EACH PROPERTY OrmER. WITH IN '150 FT.' or EACH
PROPERTY LINE BY TJil:: SCHEDULED TIME.
THE AP?~ICANT IS ~ESPONstBLE TO POST THE 'BLUE NOTICE CARD ON THE
SrT~ AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE ,BOARD OF:ADJUSTHENT MEETING, .
' AT WH!CHTHE MAT'l'ER WILL BE CONSIDERED: SAID ,NOTICE SHALL NOT BE: '_'
POSTED. WITHIN THE CITY RIOHTS-OF'-lvAY. . ,
I. "
.~ : ..I I '
To the City of Winter Springs
Attention Ms. Max Epstein
From Keith and Judy Stokes
Owners of Kinder Kampus
640 St. Road #434
Winter Springs, Fla.
The purpose of this letter is to request a varience to place a new sign as requested by the city on the above
mentioned address.
Please notice on the survey submitted previously that the approximate set back of the existing building is
25 feet. In addition to this there is a fully grown tree in the front yard area between the sidewalk and the
building. It is just to the side of this tree where the old sign now stands and it is in that area that would be
the most practical place for the new sign to be constructed.
The plans for the new sign have been submitted by our sign company and to our knowledge it meets all
requirements of the 'city.
We have attached a second sheet to this letter giving the information of the names and addresses of
properties within 150 feet of Kinder Kampus.
We respectfully request this varience to place our sign in an area of best exposure and still meet the
requirement of the city.
We have been business owners in the city since 1987. We always try to comply with any and all regulations
and keep our grounds and building in the condition condusive to the requirements of the City of Winter
Springs.
Thank you for your consideration in this important matter.
Sjn~erely ,
~.~.~ir .,Jdbl!U:d
~<1riJi#e4-
Keith/and Judy Stokes
-I.J.. '.-o-~\O'~
...._:._"'"-~..-
.' " ~:: . ~ .
.--:.~.~-:-.-':.-:::-:----:-.--:::-.
,<.. ..,. .'... ... .>"E.CEI
HEATH ,HAMPTON' \AND:',ASSOC=IAT~.~," I~~':., ".:~:" .,0'.0'
. . "Land Surveying Services.,.;; . 'iStP'J5'29,~~
Box, ,3 2 .".305- 3 65 -6 091 Oviedo,
." .
"-.--'--~-----",'"
.' . -"
,~.,-~
, ,.
~,:i.t~ !
C\\.o.",\,LI~I.:,... ~r'\cQ..?,'
. t.
; ;>4-+ \,.e
P.o.
:,4=
,\0
J
4J
.'
'2..
,~ "~
~~'I:.
1M,
.'\1;:,'1;
~r~;
r . ~\t
. . .t~,
.;~
" :'~,
-...)
...Jl
(19
~
f;
\1
I' .
..
~
"l
l!~;
\)
~. -<1-,
~:-'
~, "
'\ ~:.
I . ()
J
.'.\
i?<\-'
<t'"
.V" ..
OA~o
lS'
. \ - ....;:;, (';> ,.;j..--r
C--f:>-S
c!:lFFI<::.E'
~
~ .~!
~.':
r-.;,'
" ~: ;/,;'
~.... \~
~
, II
.', ~;..;[
...i. ~
'~
(/
.'
DESCRIPTION: NORTGAGE SURVEY
Lot 1 of REPLATNUHRER 3 OF /I. PORTION OF'NCRTWORLMlDO TOIlNSITl:: 4TH':.n:nTION'8.,
recorded in .rlat Book 15 on, Page 94,of the Public Records'of Seminole County,
F loridll.
SCALE:
1"
20'
1
i
I IIP.Rt:HY CY.RTIPY. to thu partio".' HAted horcoll; thoJ,t. tllle.
drawing ["~preZlftntQ a. Hucvey, made by' nil! or'my rupnuumtalJ.vo'i,
.' in 4ccord.nc!t) with th.., Inton..tion t1upplied to lnfl;~ by' uoliel.
parlicfl, wit.hout. lwncf!t 01 iI lltlr. Gourch uuleDR' lh~'y fit,."
ouppl led, and CQ~t8_ thn Minimum T(~chniC.Jl Standard!] (or .SurvoYIlI,
in the Stat.o ot Florldll,,' IChaptor 211U1-6 of tho ."lorlda Alt.l"':"
J.nt,..,Uv,j (",o<1u),_ itn,t 1. furttu"!r cr.rtJ.r'l t.h.ll.' I hav{'O r.onHultod
tho Y,~ch.!t...l' ~1Hlr'J'Hlcy.. M....."qcn.cllt ^1'CIICY~fj. t"l,)od Illnl.lrancC'."
Ralu' ~lp fur this L1rtl.:l -lIIml :tOUlliJ thnt thin pro()(]rty liea.;!n
t'lood"Zone C. . .:. '.... , ' .
~~\~:;i '/,......:....:.
.~~~~~-~-~-~.
.ptnfl, JU.~:.l144, ~ - l
Prolc8ui~l.l Land SUI'VOVUI'~ . '.'
St..tn of Ph"lrt.da:.,
FILE:
North Orlando. To\-:ns He
JOB NO:' 875280
DATE:
Nov. 30, 1987
FOR:
K.C. & Judith T; Stokes
'.1."
,~ ,','
Z:\MISC\kindercampU5.plt 6/30/2003 11 :09:57 AM
';' ~E~ U ":"~f ~E: ~r)
Scale: 1:9.08 Height: 52.106 Length: 91.035 in
JUt 0 8 2003
\,~j ~ ':' ,_': ~ '.:", ,'.; 1 i.:;~: :3Pf{li~GS
Por:'(nt~i;lQ" i\{Hkt.l:
- "
.,
. , -.
'. .':::,:'~.:;/~,:.':Li!... :....:"I:..~'I~';;.T,~..~. .,_~\::'.{,.,~~.:...__.~,':~:.~i - -'~~..j:,,>,'j' .. ::,... ',.;:,............>
.. .I.::."..I~:":;::;::.'.'..., '~'.,-,:
";~ ".. ];,\ .~',: <;,:~j /1'(,n;;,,;... . ,.; , t.. : ,'"
. ", ..,-i....r;.,. .. . ; ;.. "'. ",' :.. '.:"'_ _ " ..,.
; .;'\.,' . '. '. '..,' .
" .
. A'. ...,Q..:i~.::-', .(.'.....1.. ...,~:1;,:". ..'......'c'.: ":'b. ."..,~.,...':..I.. .,d.::'....c':...'..'. ..
.. .... ... ,:t.::I...8,: <:I..:,.\.:y' .', ...:.~.II.:,', i:', .... :'. ...~re
An." L'e"a;r'~i:ng,';:<0'ente'r
." ." . ....4:U"-3::2_t:4;6':1.3,.lic.#388-4
'-'-". -,"-",'",,: J,," .,.~.' ,. ~"'~'" , L' ~..,,~.l/.,.r}.._'.; .L .1 '..,.-' ,~''''"...~::..~,(l.!...,I" ""'~'"""""~''-" . UJ\. "I" ,.'" l; <,.tl.,.._....I..._.,.",_~,.~ .1,).: '"'. _:;,
>
~
~
>
n
==
~
~
2
~
n