HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008 02 25 Regular 600 Specimen Live Oak Tree Removal for Joey Walters, 775 S. Edgemon Avenue, Winter SpringsCOMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM 600
February 25, 2008
Meeting
REQUEST:
CONSENT
INFORMATIONAL
PUBLIC HEARING
REGULAR X
v'
Mir. /Dept. C-~ ~~e ~ny>
Authorization
The Community Development Department, City Arborist, recommends the City
Commission consider the request of Joey Walters of 775 S. Edgemon Avenue to
remove one (1) specimen Live oak tree located in the front yard of his residence.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this agenda item is for the City Commission to consider a request by Joey
Walters to remove (1) specimen (33 " inch diameter) Live oak tree from the front of his
residential property.
CONSIDERATION:
The specimen tree is located in the front yard of 775 S. Edgemon Avenue and within 2'
(feet) of the driveway. The resident indicates tree roots are lifting and cracking the driveway.
APPLICABLE LA W AND PUBLIC POLICY
On October 13, 2003, Chapter 5 of the City Code was repealed and replaced with Ordinance No.
2003-22 (pertinent sections enclosed as attachments).
Sec. 5-2. Intent and Purpose.
Sec. S-3. Definitions.
Sec. 5-4. Permit Required for Tree Removal and Land Clearing;
Separate Violations Criteria.
022508_COMM_Regula r_600_Speci men_Tree_Remova I_Walters
Sec. 5-8. Specimen or Historic Trees.
Sec. 5-16. Waivers and Appeals.
FINDINGS:
1) Section 5-8.b of the Arbor Ordinance provides that a specimen tree shall not be
removed except for extraordinary circumstances and hardships and only by final
permit approval by the City Commission.
2) Upon a visit to the site by the City Arborist, the 33" (inch) diameter Live oak tree
appears to be in good condition and in normal health with a high potential of
continued success.
3) Visible damages to the driveway are a direct result of normal and healthy root growth
when a tree of this species is located close to a hardscape feature.
4) The prognosis is that root growth will increase damage to the driveway if this tree is
left to continue without proper ANSI recommended root pruning conducted by an
ISA Certified Arborist.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Commission deny the request of Joey Walters to remove a (33" in
diameter) specimen Live oak tree located in the front of his residence at 775 S. Edgemon, within
2' (feet) of the driveway.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Ordinance 2003-22 (pertinent excerpts).
B. Photos of the tree located at 775 S. Edgemon (Photos on server).
COMMISSION ACTION:
1
• 1 ~
/ _ - X11 ~~~ ~~~/~~F~~11f~~lll ~~~~ ~ ~
.
:~.
w. ,
~~
~y ., .
P~ ~«~~ I~.t@h~ aYld ~Qt'~Or~6~
~, .
(~~ dose, The ptttpaea of thie.t~,aptar is to ~tabli~hprotoadve raguiaatlon~ liar Trees witbiu
. ~ the City itt order to maintain and proteot~tbe City Roraety to biter control pra~lam~ of
ffaodlag, aoii aoavet~atiaa, airpolludou and naiea,~aad to mal~a tha Clty aha~ithiar, tnara
attt'aodve and eafar plaoo in whivh to Iiva. .
(b~ Ir~tetst, The intent of thls Chaptor ie to enoourago the pre teotian of the ma7dmum number of
Trees within the Frimary Tres kroteodan Zeno and of large Spaaiinan ~raea wltbin the
Seavndary mrao Proteolion Zone. It`i~ fltrther the intent of this Chapter to anoouraga the
proteadon ofTreeg native to Central Florida andto enaaura~e nm, s~er~ val of~Qda,~set
. ~ -
To tbtie end, it shall ba upl~wfttl to et~t down, damag@, poiean, Orin a~pyothermaunar da~truy
or sense to be destroyed ~' Trey or other vegetation as covered by the provisions ofthis
mco Chapter except in accordance with the, provisions set forth herein,
C~J' . ~ecimen ~-ee. ~ TScee, other thaa anundeslrable tree, ~uoturallvunsoutidirep that o w.nt
b~reoavered by nrunin a dead true or diseased tro fat }~ hoe tner aFtwett
~~} inches or more in diameter. Specimen trees s all not final rAA ~,r aalt f
tau oTt4~, saud•plne (Ptnt~r clausal. or ohgrcw laurel fPr,uru~~ n~rw,th~~,.w~l
•Ct~ SS~ern. The main trunk of a plant; its primary axis that develops buds and shoots instead of
roots.
Sec.~5-Q~ ' Pet~mit Required for T~e~ Removal and Land C[earingJ 8eparats Violations;
CriEeria~Contr~ctor~~~ripl~~utre~i..
(a)
PeMttit Regc~tred: No Person eha11 engage iri Tree Removal or engage in Lind Clegg
located within the City, 'wrthatct Brat obtaining a permit ag provided in tliia Chapter. ~
~aroperty owner hoe retained a oontr tac or to erform the Laud Ctegrlri a oR~moval t a
Ind Cle9~ri . ~ v
~x Tr~eTrae Re}*nav~ It shall be asepara#e violation nFtbis Chapter ~
removed and each day a person is engaged in Land Clearing withat~t a permit,
TREE PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION
Sec. 5-8: Specimen or historic trees.
(b) Removal. Notwithstanding any other pro-
vision of this chapter, specimen or historic trees
shall not be removed except for extraordinary
circumstances and hardships and only by final
permit approved by the city commission.
(Ord. No. 2002-08, § 2, 4-8-02; 2003-22, § 2,
10-13-03)
Sec. 5-16. Waivers; incentive program and
appeals.
(a) Waivers. The city commission may grant a
waiver to provisions of this chapter where the
applicant demonstrates that the literal interpre-
~ 6-16
tation of the chapter will deny the applicant
reasonable use of the property or where such
waiver can be demonstrated to be consistent with
the purpose and intent of the chapter. The pres-
ervation of any approved tree over four (4) inches
in caliper may be considered as the basis for the
granting of a waiver from the literal application of
the provisions of the city's land development
regulations. If, in the determination of the city
commission, the sole basis for the request for
waiver is to preserve such tree which would
otherwise have to be removed, it may direct any
required waiver fee to be waived.
(b) Appeals. Any person adversely affected by
an administrative interpretation of this chapter
by the city forester may first appeal that inter-
pretation to the city manager by filing a written
notice of appeal of said interpretation within ten
(10) calendar days of.said interpretation. The city
manager shall decide said appeal within five (5)
business days. Any person adversely affected by
an administrative decision of the city manager
under this chapter may appeal that interpreta-
tion to the city commission by filing a written
notice of appeal of said interpretation within
thirty (30) calendar days of said interpretation.
Failure to file an appeal within the time periods
required by this subsection shall result in the
administrative interpretation to be declared final
and shall be deemed a waiver. of the person's right
to further appellate review and proceedings. The
city commission shall decide said appeal within
thirty (30) days of the city's receipt of said notice
of appeal and the city commission's decision shall
be final. Except for the mandatory time periods
required for the notice of appeal, the time periods
required for a decision may lie extended by mu-
tual agreement between the city and the person
filing the notice of appeal.
(c) Incentive program. The city commission re-
serves the right to offer and approve incentives
for purposes of protecting and preserving mature
trees and planting enhanced landscaping. Such
incentives shall have a public benefit and may
include, but are not limited to, varying provisions
of the cites land development regulations (e.g.
reduced park%ng, modified setbacks) and provid-
ing credits to city development fees. Any incen-
tives granted antler this subsection shall be con-
Sapp. No. 5 323-
Date: February 25, 2008
This was drawn and shown to the City
Commission at the February 25, 2008 City
Commission Regular Meeting during the
discussion of Regular Agenda Item "600".
~-*
~~
)~ r
~ ~' ~