Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992 04 13 Regular . April 13, 1992 TO: City Attorney (KrUppenbacher~ Land Development coordinato~ FROM: RE: Davenport Glen, Maintenance Bond . This memo is to confirm our telephone conversation of April 10, 1992 where you stated that the above referenced was in order. Please notify me if this is incorrect. /fg cc: City Manager Mayor Commission City Clerk . . , , April 9, 1992 TO: City Manager ~ Land Development coordinato~ FROM: RE: Agenda Items, Commission Meeting April 13, 1992 The following items are scheduled for the Commission Meeting of April 13, 1992: 1) Davenport Glen - Acceptance, by City, of improvements. The City Engineer has approved the as-built engineering and the amount required for the maintenance bond. The bond is being reviewed by the City Attorney's office. Please see attached correspondence. The blanks on the maintenance bond will be filled in with the date of acceptance, if accepted. 2) Ordinance No. 519 - This is a request to vacate R-O-Ws located on Seminole Pines property (across from City Hall). Attached are the letters of no objection from the various utility companies. 3) Chestnut Ridge - P & Z Board Recommendations for Final Development Plan/Preliminary Engineering. Also attached are Staff comments. All of the Staff comments are to be addressed at Final Engineering. /fg attach. cc : Mayor Commission City Attorney City Clerk . . . PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MINUTES March 18, 1992 The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. BOARD MEMBERS: David Hopkins, Chairman, Present David McLeod, Vice-Chairman, Present Grace Anne Glavin, Present Martin Trencher, Present John Ferring, Present CITY OFFICIAL: Don LeBlanc - Land Dev. Coordinator Approval of the Minutes of December 18. 1991 Ferring moved to approve the minutes of December 18, 1992. Seconded by Trencher. Vote: all aye. Chestnut Ridae - Review of Final DevelOPment Plan/Preliminarv Enaineerina Ferring questioned LeBlanc about the fencing adjacent to Fairway Oaks. LeBlanc stated Fairway Oaks requested a fence separating the two developments. George Garrett, P.E., project engineer, discussed the proposed brick wall on Greenbriar Lane and Northern Way as well as the wooden stockade fence behind lots 34 through 40. Glavin asked for elaboration on the drainage easement. LeBlanc explained the original plans for the development had a different layout for the easement. The new plans have reconfigured the lots which requires the abandonment of the old (existing) easement and the dedication of a new easement. Garrett explained the new easement will be along the back of the lots. Dick Coniff, 1202 Royal Oak Drive, and Bill Wing, 1224 Royal Oak Drive, spoke on behalf of the Fairway Oaks Homeowners Association. Coniff presented a letter to the Board dated July 5, 1990, which was originally presented to Mayor Grove, regarding areas of concern. While three concerns were expressed in the letter, only one remains unresolved: the issue of the wooden stockade fence along Fairway Oaks. Coniff stated a brick wall should be continued. LeBlanc noted that the responsibility for the maintenance of a fence would belong to the homeowners association of Chestnut Ridge. Further, the City does not require a fence to be installed. The Board continued discussion about the fence issue. Garrett stated he would remain open to discussion regarding the type of fence or wall to be used. Trencher asked about the planting of trees along the Northern Way R.O.W. LeBlanc noted the city has no landscaping ordinance. Trencher made a motion to recommend acceptance of the plan to the commission with the following recommendations: 1) Developer will be asked to continue the masonry type fence from lots 34 through 40, and 2) put trees along the outer border of the fence along Greenbriar Land and Northern Way in a similar fashion as they appear in Glen Eagle. Seconded by Ferring. Vote: all aye. Recommendation will be forwarded to the City Commission. Respectfully Submitted, ~/~ Gregory Kern, Recording Secretary Planning & Zoning Board .~ . . . .- . /" Fairway Oaks Homeowners Assn. Winter Springs, Fla. 32708 July 5, 1990 Mayor Leanne Grove City of Winter Springs Winter Springs, Fla. 32708 Dear Madam Mayor: We would like to document the position of Fairway Oaks in regard to the Final Engineering and Approval of Chestnut Ridge, to be discusssed at the July 9 City Council meeting. Specifically, the approval was granted at the June 25 council meeting pending satisfaction of two contested issues: the location and shape of the retention pond on the Tuskawilla CC goif course 15th hole, and the fence planned to separate Chestnut Ridge from our neighborhood. Richard Ooniff, our Association President, spoke to Mr. Jim Mikus, owner of the golf course, subsequent to the June 25 meeting. Mr. Mikus assured him that his intention was to have the retention pond in question re~designed and moved into the fairway and was surprised that the drawings did not reflect this. We feel this issue should not be considered satisfied until the engineering drawings are officially submitted and reviewed by the City, Mr. Mikus, and our Association, as this pond directly borders our homes. The wooden stockade fence planne4 is totally unacceptable to us. We feel the developer should ere~t a brick wall along our common border identical to the wall planned fOF Chestnut Ridge's frontage on Northern Way and Greenbriar Lane. Our reasons are: Oxbow Lane is a secondary Street just as Greenbriar Lane is. The developer should provide the same for. all street borders. The wooden fence planned is not particularly attractive at the time of installation. As a few years pass, the wood deteriorates and the paint or stain fades. Who is to provide the maintenance on this fence?' No organization is provided that is charged with this responsibility. A brick wall requires no maintenance. A stockade fence would negatively affect our home values, especially as it deteriorates. A wood fence would allow individual Chestnut Ridge residents to replace fence sections with gates and use our private property to access their back yards for such things as camper or boat storage, pool construction, etc. We would have no control in this. The cost of this wall is minimal given the total cost i of development. The developer is already erecting 1920 feet of wall along Northern Way and Greenbriar Lane. A wall along our common border would be approximately 540 feet long. We contacted a builder for a cost estimate of a brick wall, and got an average of $30 per foot. This totals $16,200, or $305 per lot. This is not much, compared to the cost of grading, water/sewer, paving, etc. The developer, for example, paid the golf course $125,000 for the right to build the retention ponds on the golf course (plus pay for the ponds). . /' . . ..... . In 1984, when Imara Corporation was planning condominiums on this parcel, the City Council and Imara agreed that a brick wall should be erected on the common property border. We are only asking for a continuation of that stance. One issue that was not included in discussion at the last Council meeting was the provision to tie an existing open storm drain on the Chestnut Ridge property to our drop inlet. The plans do show enclosed storm drainage on their property but do not specify the method to tie into our system. This needs to be reviewed and accepted by the city and Fairway Oaks. Our position is that the connection needs to be a closed connection with a provision for maintenance. It also needs to be confirmed whether or not there is a facility to prevent debris from entering the planned closed system and subsequent passage through our system and into our pond. The current arrangement is dnbris collection at our inlet. We thank you for your consideration. FAIRWAY OAKS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. /j/~r... , . Ri~D?r copies: Commissioner William A. Jacobs Commissioner Cindy Kaehler Commissioner Philip A. Kulbes Commissioner Arthur Hoffman Commissioner Paul P. Partyka Richard Rozansky, City Manager Frank Kruppenbacher, City Attorney Mary Norton, City Clerk . March 11, 1992 TO: Planning and Zoning Board ~) Land Development coordinato~ FROM: RE: Chestnut Ridge, Final Development Plan/Preliminary Engineering Attached are the plans and Staff comments in regards to the above referenced. The items mentioned are acknowledged by the developer and will be addressed during final engineering. . /fg attach. . - . March 11, 1992 TO: City Manager ~~ Land Development coordinator~ FROM: RE: Staff Review, Chestnut Ridge Final Development Plan The above referenced was held on March la, 1992. G. Garrett represented the project. Staff members present were Archer, Artman, Govoruhk, Kozlov, Lallathin, LeBlanc and Lockcuff. . Please see attached Staff comments. The other concern is the existing easement going through Lots 33 through 36. This easement will have to be abandoned and a new easement dedicated. See attached Ordinance No. 482. All of the comments made are to be addressed during Final Engineering. ffg attach. cc: Staff . ~..-'" . MEMO: 3/10/92 TO: FROM: BUILDING OFFICIAL RE: CHESTNUT RIDGE 1. Change note on fence at rear of Lot 33 to read lot 34. 2. Need transmittal letter where lighting plan is sent to FPC. . . . . . WINTER SPRINGS WATER & SEWER 1 NORTH FAIRFAX AVENUE WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (407) 327-1641 March 10, 1992 TO: Don LeBI,Ulc Land Development Coordinator From: Kipton Lockcuff, P.E. j/I__ Utility Director RE: Chestnut Ridge Preliminary Plan We have reviewed the preliminary plans for Chestnut Ridge sealed :1nd dated 2/14/92 and have the following comments: 1. Water - The existing water line Lane and not the west as shown. is approximately located at the Lot 39. is on the east side of Oxbow The stubout for this parcel midpoint of the rear line of 2. Sewer The flow of the gravity sewer system has been altered to discharge into the Fairway Oaks collection system which has more conveyance capacity than the Greenbriar system. At the point of connection on Oxbow Lane, there IS an existing lateral stub to Lot 38 which will have to be removed and plugged. 3. Effluent Reuse - Approved as shown. 4. Developer Agreement - As part of the final approval process, a developer agreement between the City and the developer must be executed and water and sewer capacity purchased. The current water and sewer connection fee is $2,450 per single family unit. Based on the 52 lots shown, the total connection fees due at developer agreement signing would be $127 ,t~OO. ........... , . TO: DON LEBLANC, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR FROM: JOHN GOVORUHK, CHIEF OF POLICE DATE: MARCH 9, 1992 SUBJ: CHESTNUT RIDGE 09-92 NO STREET NAMES: All street name sign(s), speed limit and stop signs to be installed by Public Works (with street address and arrows). (Sec. 9-203 & 9-204). . All markings on Roadways are to be thermoplastic and conforms with F.D.O.T. Roadways and design standard specifications. Only mailboxes as approved by U.S. Post Office standards are to be in the right-of-way. Supports for mailboxes - No concrete permitted and or allowed, Break-A-Way type (Sec. 17-1) City Ord. House Numbers will be posted, per City Ordinance (Sec. 9~4). ~~ ~: ~- :f/z'~~ J hn 0 k Ch e of Police JG/eds . ---"."",,~-- ,~~::tl~~/T~ . /.,._\,.r(.\. ,~~..~...'..n J:'...~~.~,o~-t- I, - ,~ ' . ~4/ G' j' .' ( t' ',~ji~ ": ,,\' .'?~~;~. ~~ . f! oriID~; FIRE DEPARTMENT 102 NORTH MOSS ROAD WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 TELEPHONE (407) 327-2332 FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES 4 March 1992 TO: Donald LeBlanc, Land Development Coordinator FROM, Timothy Lallathin. Fire Chief~ RE: Chestnut Ridge Final Development Plan - Preliminary Engineering The following comments are submitted on the above referenced development as pertains to fire hydrants. 1.) Hydrant location at lot 52 is OK. . 2.) Hydrant location between lots 7 and 8 is OK. 3.) Hydrant location between lots 43 and 44 needs to be changed to, between lots 45 and 46. (This is required by code to allow spacing between fire hydrants to be no greater than 750' in residential developments.) 4.) An additional fire hydrant needs to be added between lots 37 and 38. (Code requires that no structure be greater than 350' from a fire hydrant. ) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Each hydrant shall be painted uniformly. The hydrant barrel and all caps shall be DOT yellow. The bonnet shall be white with 3M reflective coating applied (or equivalent). The hydrant number shall be stenciled with one inch numbers, black in color. The hydrant number shall be provided by the fire department. . FILE . TO: Land Development Coordinator G. E. Artman ~~~ FROM: DATE: March 4, 1992 SUBJ: Chestnut Ridge Areas of concern with this project will be no lift holes allowed in the drainage pipe sections. All traffic regulatory signs will be installed by Public Works, developer to pay for cost of materials and of course, the Arbor Ordinance must be satisfied prior to the construction of any infrastructure. . . '-', .............. -__.._ 0_-0-.- ..'--_ _.__._...___. . CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (407) 327-1800 February 28, 1992 Mr. George E. Garrett, P.E. Regional Engineers, Planners & Surveyors, Inc. 817 North Garland Avenue Orlando, FL 32801 Re: Chestnut Ridge - Revised Preliminary Engineering Dear Mr. Garrett: . Your response transmittal and engineering plan sheet dated February 14, 1992, were received February 17, 1992. These were in response to the City's engineering review letter dated January 31, 1992. The Preliminary Engineering was found to be satisfactory. Before the project can receive Final Engineering approval, documents granting a "drainage easement" at the location of the pond outfall or "letter of no objection", will need to be forward- ed to the City. If any piping or outfall structure will be on the discharge site owned by Winter Springs, Development JV (WSDJV), then an "easement" will be needed. If only stormwater is being discharged on the discharge site (no pipes, etc.), then a "letter of no objection" will suffice. The letter from Lisa M. Miskinis, of WSDJV stating they are "...inclined to grant...." an easement, is not acceptable. The actual documents will have to be submitted. If you have any questions, please contact this office. . MJ/LTK/nav cc: Ci!l Manager 'lQ~!~:r.~_~"Pr.J.nzni~ ~uilding Official . Utility Director . . . April 3, 1992 TO: City Attorney~ Don LeBlanc ~ FROM: RE: Maintenance Bond Review, Davenport Glen Please review the above referenced. The City Engineer has approved the amount. Please review as expeditiously as possible as I plan to have it on the agenda for April 13th. All appears to be in order. /fg cc: City Manager . . . CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (407) 327-1800 March 23, 1992 Mr. Charles H. True, P.E. Donald W. McIntosh, Inc. 2200 Park Avenue North Winter Park, FL 32789 Re: Tuscawilla Unit 16 (a/k/a Davenport Glen) - "As-Built" Reinspection Dear Charles: The "as-built" reinspection for the subject project, was completed on March 23, 1992 and was found to be in general conformance to the engineering plans approved by the City. The "as-built" engineering was found to be satisfactory. /fg cc: . CiJ;Y- Manager ~nd Development Coordinator Building Department Glenn Marvin w. Scott Culp .. . . . -," CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA --.----------.--..- ..-.-- .._..~_... 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32706 Telephone (407) 327-1600 October 17, 1991 Mr. Charles H. True P.E. Donald W. McIntosh Assoc. Inc. 2200 Park Avenue North Winter Park, FL 32789 Re: Davenport Glen (a/k/a Tuscawilla Unit 16, Carrington Woods, Phase III) Dear Charlie: In reference to your letter dated October 15, 1991 on as-built costs, it is found that these costs are acceptable totaling $481,825.30 along with the proposed two year maintenance bond of $48,182.53, which is ten percent of the total cost. If you have any further questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, ~w ~L:lX(iilO 1'.E. /fg cc: . Ci'!y Manager ~nd Development Coordinator ~din9 Official Glenn Marvin, Winter Springs Devel. J.V.