HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991 04 12 Regular
.
.
.
August 19, 1991
TO:
Public Works Director
City Engineer ~~
226 Morton Lane - Street Drainage
FROM:
SUBJECT:
With regard to the last regular Commission Meeting on August 12,
1991, the resident of 226 Morton Lane presented his stormwater run-off
problem to the Commission.
It was determined by the Commission after some discussion to
seek a possible drainage easement on the property opposite 226 Morton Lane,
since a lake exists behind this property.
upon reviewing the plat books for North Orlando Ranches, Section 6,
it was noted that a fourteen (14) foot drainage easement exists between
lots225 and 227 (seven (7) feet on each side of the property line) to the
lake behind lots 225 and 227.
Since there is an existing drainage easement, it should be
helpful for you to construct a relief swale to the lake from the street as
a temporary measure to relieve the stormwater in this low area of the road
and alleviate the problems for the resident at 226 Morton Lane.
ffg
~y Manager
cc:
C1cc,S'. Co~
~()(l
C(t-
'E~ @;[W. fi7l~r.l
~)/V
AUG 20 .
. ]991'
J~Y of (i',.,.._ Zf)
'v Iv I cd SPRJ .,
([5~;- ~"
,.
.
.
.
rt I (I) /1'11<.-';--' l~ {. (
August 7. 1991
TO:
,:.-.., f'
SUBJECT:
Ci ty Managet'
City Engineer'fi!V
Highlands Lake Sidewalk
i
"
',~
FROM:
,.." -
: " " '''''OJ
, . :, ~ oJ
.... !.I
.' "
With regard to the issues raised by the Highlands Homeowners Association
as to the val idi ty of Mt'. Douglas 0, McBr iarty I s (Commonweal th Engineet'ing)
letter dated January 25, 1991. who was the previous engineer-of-record. the
folloWing remarks are made:
1) The statement that no sidewalk exists on the east side of Shepard Road
is cot'reet.
2) The concern of a road connection onto Shepard Road would
not occur is correct since it would require the City Commission to authorize such
a connection.
3) The statement regarding a buffer zone of trees to be maintained in
the right-of-way; thus establishing the basis fat' eliminating the sidewalk on
the east side would be correct: but consideration would be necessary in
detet'nlining the width needed to install the t'elocated gas line, Trees in this
area would have to be removed. A sixteen foot width would be available for both
the tree buffer and the gas line.
The variance that was granted to the developer. Florida Land Company, was
to maintain an envit'onmental tl'ee buffet' and to fOt'go the sidewalk on the east
side all within the right-or-way.
/fg
-
.'
January 25, 1991
Commonwealth
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
I:>;CORI'OMTlU
CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
.
.j
rrruJo:nr
Juhn D. Froschcr, r.E., C.O.
Vicc rrciidcnu
J"mci C. llu\.J, P.E. .
D..v.J E. ~lIcn. r.E.
Sen.,u Asoodalc
Srrl'hen E. B..jlcv. r.E.
A"'l4:.ar"i
Doullla. O. Mdlriau\', r,E.
No:cu M. D""'n,,v
Thurn.1i F. Will", A.ET.
Thom.u J. McC,lnn, r.E.
C1ty Commission
Clty of Winter Springs
1126 East State Road 4~4
Wlnter Sprlngs, Florlda 32700
Attentlon: Mr. Leonard T. Koslov, P.E.
Ci ty fng,ineer
Re: Highlond Lokes
Sid~wolk Varlance Request
Commonwealth Project No. 2D4-~5-2al
Ho~orab~e Comm1ssion:
,
On beha'lf of our Cllent, we are requestlno a variance to the sidewalk
requirement (Section 9-221 of the LDC) whlch requires sidewalks to be
.~onstructed an both sided of a roadway. We propose to construct
sldewalk, ln our project, alono the west side of Shepard Road only.
Along all other proposed roadways, we will construct sidewalks an bath
sldes,' as required by code. The reasons for thls request are os
follows:
.
1.
No sidewalk has boen installed along the east side of the
exist1ng portion of Shepard Road to the north.
2. Ariy development olono the east slde of Shepard Road, odjacent to
thls project; wil'l be 1n Seminole County and be of on lndustrial
or commercl01 land use fronting on County Road 419. Development
of this nature should not be permitted roar access onto Shepard
Road lnto a reSidential area.
3. A sidewalk along the wost side (residential side) of Shepard
Road, as constructod to tho north' of thiS project, would benefit
t.he residenco of this project. However, a sidewalk along the
east side of Shepar'j' Road would be redundant ond would cause the
unnecessary removal' of trees which will be providing a buffer
from non-residential dQvclopmont to the oo~t.
.
. We appreciate the Commission's .indulgence 1n this matter and hope for a
favorabJe ruling and grant1ng of this request.
A~sociotes, Inc.
~~~~UW[~
JAN 2 5 1991
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
Land Development Coordinator.
,
.
cc:
Mr, Donald LeBlanc. itV of Winter Springs, via: HD
Mr, G~rald ChQncellor. Chpn~cllor & ^fifonctntn~1 vtn; FAX & US,
Mr, non Cbmpbell, rlorida Land Company, via: fAX & US
dom/kodov, a~sl flm/proJ IChrono/v1a: 110
. '2180 ,WEST S,I\. 434. SUITE 'liDO · LONGWOOD. FLORIDA 32771).5010 · (~071 78R-RII\ · FAX (1071 7H.4(102 ·
.
.
.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-1800
July 23, 1991
Mr. Ronald D. Campbell, President
Florida Land Company
255 S. Orange Avenue
Suite 1444
Orlando, FL 32801
Re: Highland Lakes
Dear Mr. Campbell:
This letter is to advise you that the Highlands Homeowners Association has
requested that the City Commission reconsider their action of January 28,
1991 granting a variance to the Code eliminating the sidewalk requirements
on the east side of the above referenced project.
This request will be heard by the City Commission at the regularly scheduled
meeting of August 12, 1991 which will commence at 7:30 P.M. in City Hall
Chambers, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida.
By this letter, you are cordially invited to attend this meeting to present
your reasons for the elimination of the sidewalk.
Please contact me if further information is required.
Sincerely,
~~ \2~_
Donald R. LeBlanc
Land Developemnt Coordinator
jfg
cc: City Manager
City Clerk
Certified #P 292 357 737
.
.
.
~~~~UW![~
JUN 13 19911
.:jTY at WINTER SPRINGS
CITY MANAGER
'1iffiigtdan~
Homeowners',
Association.
U --.
675 Shepard Road
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
(407) 327-0640
Jun e 1 2, 1 991
, .
Mr. Richard Rozansky'
City of Winter Springs
1126 State Rd. #434
Winter Springs, Fl. 32708
".
Dear Mr. Rozansky:
'On yanuary 28, 1991, the City Commission granted a variance
to the code, eliminating the sidewalk on the east side of
Highlands ~akes. I have enclosed the Minutes of the meeting
concerning this matter for your review along with the request
from Floripa Land and Mr. Koslov's recommendation. '
The Highlands Homeowners' Association (HHOA) was not aware
of.this request nor were any of our members present at the
meeting. Had we been present, we certainly would have objected
to this variance.
During several informal staff meetings, the HHOA 'was assured
that the sidewalk would be included in the plan. It is the
opinion of the Highlands' Board of Directors and the
Architectural Review Board (ARB) that the sidewalk is'vital to
the overall master plans of the pun.
.
Presently, the'City i~ building a sidewalk on, the east side
of Sheoah Blvd. across from. the tennis courts all the way to
"Shepard Rd. Bopefully, as money is appropriated, the sidewalk
will ,continue on the northern side of Shepard Rd. to the perk
pond property. It is our hope that eventually as the remaining
property is developed, the sidewalk would continue to Edgemon
Ave. .If the sidewalk is built on the east. side, it would provide
for the least amount of curb cuts and thus have a long
uninterrupted distance. This plan is designed for the safety of
the residents who walk, jog or cycle through the community and
would be esthetically appealing as well.
I,
..
.
.
.
City of Winter Springs
page 2
It is ,our belief that any major changes to Highlands Lakes
must' first be approved by the HHOA and the ARB. Therefore, we
request that this subject be placed on the Agenda at the June
24th. Commission meeting for re-consideration.
Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated by the
Association.
I
Sincerely,
{~'/h. /J~
Kathleen M. Degrenia
EXEcutive Director
KMD/mir
cc:' fitle
enc 1.
",
.
.
.
..
l
'n{'
....
\ \
:.\\ \
\\ \
\\ \ '
\ \ \
\\ \
\ \
. \ \ \
\
\\~\
\h\
\. I
\ \~\
\ I~ \
\ \\ \
\ \
\ \\ \.
\ \
\\\ \
\\ \\
\\ \
'\ \
'\ "
,
" ,
// " ,
// .,
/
",""
~/
~
~ ..
" ~
" /:,..
/ I~"
1 'r
---......... ,
-...~.... II
.... './ I
" I
1/
/'1
II..
. 110.
,IOJ
I'
II ,
I .
/1 :~.N~ LU.4::t~ ~
I/'~ u
(/ ~~ iJwtwu.. ~ w:ulL
,I \, .
I' , .
111ft, '~
':'''"_''"::::.=:. ,,:!, = __ __ _ __ __ 0..:.------ _ J :.:.:.:.::'1' '
. . -------;;-r;..=;E:--RO-;:;--4-;4--------'~,~.
2.0 .Ji~ll2.:.!!..._ __ _ _ ___
---------------
OVE~AL.L.
STRut NA"'. MAP
<J~rnigl \lands
:..: -.---.-
'..
"
".
'..
rf
.
January 25', 1991
Commonwealth
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
ISCORI'ORATEO
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Atter;1tian:
Mr. Leonar.dT. Koslov, P.E.
City Engineer
Pr~.iJo:nl
John D. Flosch~r. P.E., C.O.
Vice Pr~sid~nu
Jam~. C. llo\'J. P.E.
DavlJ E. AII~n, P.E.
S~nl"r Anocialc
5lephen E. Bail~y. P.E.
AnocI311:S
Doul:la. O. MeBri3rl\', P.E.
Neeo M. Duwney
Thomas F. Willc, A.e:T.
Thoma. J. McCann. P.E.
':
City Commission
City of Winter Springs
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
/
Re: Highland Lakes
Sidewalk Variance Request
Commonwealth Project. No, 204-05-201
Honorable Commission:
On behalf of our Client, we are requesting a variance to the sidewalk
requirement (Section. 9-221 of the LDC) which requires sidewalks to be
constructed on both sided of 0 roodway, We propose to' ,construct
sidewalk, in our project, along the west side of Shepard Road only.
A'long 011. other proposed roadways, we will construct sidewalks on both
sides, .as required by code. The reasons for this request are. as
follows:
1 .
No sidewalk has been installed along tho east side of the
existing portion of Shepard Road to the north,
..
'2. Any development along the east side of Shepard Rood, adjacent to
this project, will be in Seminole County and be of on industrial
.or commercial land use fronting on County Road 419. Development
of thiS" nature should not be permitted rear access onto Shepard
Rood into a residential area,
3. A si~ewalk along the west side (residential side) of Shepard
Road, os constructed to the north of this project, would benefit
th,e residence of this projoc"t. However, 0 sidewalk along the
east side af. SheP!lrd Raadwauld be redundant and wauld couse the
unnecessary removal of trees which will be providing a buffer
from non-residential development to the east.
We appreciate the Commission's indulgence in this matter and hope for, a
favorable ruling a~d granting of this request.
Inc,
~~~tUWrr~
JAN 25 1991
CITY. OF WINTER SPRINGS
Land Development Coordinator.'
cc:
Mr, Donald LeBlanc, Ity of.Winter Springs, via: HD
Mr,' Gerald Chancellor, Chancollor & Associates, vta: FAX' US
Mr. Ron Campbell, Florida Lond Company," via: FAX & US
'.
.
dom/kOslov,~25/flm/proJ/chrono/via: HD
· 21BO WEST S.R. 434. SUITE HOO · lONG WOOD, FLORIDA 32779.5010 · (407) 7B8.8111 · FAX (407) 774.4002 .
~
.
.
.
.,
January 25. 1991
TO:
City Manager
City Engin.er~
Highland Lakes - Preliminary Engineering
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The. revised preli~inary ~ngineering for the Highland Lakes
proj~~t was received ~n January 24, 1991. All issues of the City's
October 5. 1990 lett~r have been addressed except for the matter
regarding the twelve (12) inch water line that is to come down .
Shepard Road~ This issue ,will have to be resolved by the City Commission
in conj~nction with the developer, Mr. Ron Campbell. Florida Land Company.
'",
On Sheet 2 of J of the engineering, there is a note stating
"Shepard Road requires a 6" W.M.. and 8" W.M. is to be installed'per
request,by the City of Winter Springs. The City of Winter Sprin~s to
pay the difference between the two".
It was publicly stated before the City Commission on January 14. 1991
that the Ut,ility Department-West required a twelve (12) inch water main
in lieu of a 6 or 8 inch water main on Shepard Road as per the Master
Water Plan ,previously approved by the City Commission. 1'he Utility
Director publicly stated that he made an error in originally requesting
that an ~ight (B) inc~ line be installed.
In addition. Section 9-261(b) of the Land Development Code states
"In 1"0 event shall the City be r'equired' to pay the cost of the installation
of the water and sewer trunk line system.'1 Therefore. the developer.
Florida Land Company. will be required to pay for all costs for water and
sewer installations. If the developer wishes to have these costs shared.
he would have to go to the Board of Adjustment to obtain a variance to this
requirement.
Next. the developer. Florida Land Company. wishes to delete the need
for a sidewalk on'the east side of Shepard Road. Since the east side of the
Shepard Road right-of-way is adjacent to the City limits (boundary). it is
recommended that the Commission grant this request. Reference Section 9-221(b)
Land Development Code. A letter from the Engineer of Record is attached.
Ifg
ee: Land Development Coordinator
Utility Director-West
Terry Zaud~ke-C.P.".
Duiiding Official
Public Works Director
t,
_'" l.- ....
.
Regular Mect~ng, Citr CommisQion, J~n. 2~, 1991
I
P!!B@ ~ 90~91"'6
Mr. Zaudtkc explained' the 12" line in the computer analysis t,hat was performed on .
a day-to-day basis without fire flow shows in the future, when that is connected,
we have a demand of over 600 gallons per minut.e going through that' end of the loop.
He said the significance of it in we need to provide in this area, the residentia~
area, by Code, 500 gallons per minute in addition to the maximum day and we need to
provide 1250 gallons per minute for any industrial or commercial establishment. That
is the basic reason for the l2"line.
Mr. Gerald Chancellor, Robinson St., Orlando, spoke for the development'.
Motion was made by Commissioner Partyka that we allow the development of this project
with 12" piping that is paid by the developer. Additionally, that th~ sidewalk on
the east ,side would be eliminated in terms of a variance to Code, and that the west
side have n sidewalk'per the letter and recommendationB by Mr. McDriarity. Seconded
by Commi88ione~ Langellotti. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Langellotti,
oye; Commissioner Donnelly, aye; Commissioner Partyka, aye; Commissioner Jonas, aye;,
,..mot ion carr ied.
I
PreRentation/Discussion on Purchase of Golf Course-Jack Ahern, Vice Presi~ent,
Florida Group Municipnl Leaaing, Inc,:
Mr. John T. Ahern, Florida Group Municipal Leasin~. from nocn Raton~ Flor!da, spoke
to the Commission. He said his company is presently involved in purchase and lease
purchase back to municipalities of facilities needed by municipalities throughout
the United States.
.
He said he has negotiated with the owners of Winter Springs Golf facility.' He said
we did that with the purpose of lease pur'chasing back to the City of Winter Springs
that facility. The cost that we pay for the facility is $4,800,000 and we project
to turn the facility back to the City of Winter Springs on n 240 month lease purchase
for a cost of ~42,57l.JO per month, which the 240 equal payments would equal 20
year lease purchase. At the end of said lease purchase, the property would revert
to the City for the cost of $1.00.
.,
Mr. Ahern said in the year 1989 or the early 'part of 1990 the present owners projected
a revenue base of $1,370,000 income vs. $840,000 expense ratio. The ~unaudited figures
show $1,372,453 income of revenue vs. $841,041 outgo on expenses.
The 240 equal payments of $42,571.37 which worked out to $510,804 per year on a
rental basis vs. $526,000 profit on r'evenue basis which includes $2"0,,000 for the
existing three partners which raises that to $546,000. In addition ~he City pays.
the golf course roughly JO to$J5,000 per year for spray effluent which raises that
number $576,000. giving the City a net operatinR profit for the year 1990 if the
City had owned it, approximately $66,000 per year profit. The owners projected
50,000 rounds of golf for the year 1990. Their actual count comes up to '55,184
rounds. 'Discussion followed. l .
'.
Dr. Sinthro, Greenspointe, John Ferring, Uo1tic Lnne, Mr. Carpenter, Greenspointe,
Susan Reid, Hayes Road, Terri Meta Aloha Court, all spoke in discussion.
Motion was made by Commissioner Partyka to table until the next meeting. Seconded
by Commissioner Donnelly. Vote on the motion: Comm16sioner Langel10tti, aye;
Commissioner Donnelly, aye;- Commissioner Partyka, aye; Commissioner Jonas, aye;
motion carried. .
NUISANCES
.
ARTICLE I. IN GENERA L
Sec. 13-1. General prohibition.
Nothing may be done on any lot which may
become an annoyance or nuisance to the neigh-
borhood. No refuse pile or unsightly objects shall
be. allowed to be placed or suffered to remain
thereon. In the event the owner shall fail or refuse
to keep premises free of refuse piles or other un-
sightly objects or growths, then the city commis-
sion may enter upon such land and remove the
same at the expense of the owner and such entry
shall not be deemed a trespass,
(Ord. No. 44, ~ 44.76, 1-8-68)
."
Sec. 13-2. Uttering.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to place
or throw, or cause to be placed or thrown, any
paper, bottles or pieces thereof, tin cans, garbage,
glassware, refuse, debris or any other offensive,
unwholesome or unsightly matter whatever in or
on any street, road, sidewalk, alley, playground,
vacant property or any other public grounds, or
in or on the bank of any canal, stream, lake,
watercourse or pool within the city.
(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to cause
or permit junk, scrap metal, scrap lumber, waste-
paper products, discarded building materials, or
any unused abaridoned vehicle, or abandoned parts,
machinery or machinery parts, garbage, trash or
other waste materials to be in or upon any yard,
garden, lawn, outbuildings or premises owned,
rented, leased or otherwise occupied by him in
the city unless in connection with a business en-
terprise lawfully situated and licensed for the same.
(c) The existence of excessive accumulation or
untended growth of weeds, undergrowth or other
dead, or living plant life; or stagnant water, and
all other objectionable, unsightly or unsanitary
matter upon any lot, tract or parcel of land wi thin
this city be it uncovered or under open shelter, to
the extent and in the manner that such lot, tract
or parcel of land is or may threaten, or endanger
the public health, safety, or welfare, or may rea-
sonably cause disease, is hereby prohibited and
declared to be a public nuisance and unlawful.
(d) It shall be the duty of the owner of each lot,
tract, or parcel of land within the city to reason-
Supp. No.4
.
~ 13-26
ably regulate and effectively control excessive
growths and accumulations, as enumerated in sub.
section (e) on the property.
It shall also be the duty of the owner to drain,
regrade or fill any lot, tract, or parcel, including
swimming pools thereon, which shall be dangerous
or unsanitary, have stagnant water thereon, or be
in such other condition as to be susceptible to pro-
ducing disease or danger to the public.
(Code 1974, ~ 7-1; Ord. No. 464, ~ 1,2-12-90)
Sec. 13-3. Duty of owners of buildings to keep
surrounding property clean; notice;
failure to comply with notice.
(a) All land within a three-hundred-foot radius
of any dwelling or other building within the city
shall be kept in a clean and trim condition by the
owner of the property.
(b) If the owner of any property fails to comply
with the conditions of this section, he shall be
notified by the city of the violation and be al-
lowed fifteen (15) days to comply.
(c) If, after the fifteen-day period provided for
in subsection (b), the owner has not cleaned the
property in accordance with this section, the city
shall have the right and authority to enter upon
the property in question, clear the land according
to the requirements of this section and charge the
owner for the cost thereof.
(Code 1974, ~ 7-2)
Sees. 13-4-13-25. Reserved.
ARTICLE II. NOISE
Sec. 13.26. Prohibited generally.
It shall be unlawful for any person to make,
create, 01' maintain any unreasonably loud, dis-
turbing, and unnecessary noise within the city.
Noise of such character, intensity, or duration as
to be detrimental to the life, health, comfort, or
repose of any individual is prohibited.
(Code 1871, ~ 9.14(0))
79:3
.
.
.
,
August 5, 1991
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Land Development
RE: Church of the New Covenant Extension, Staff Review
coordinator@
Attached is the City Planner's comments regarding the above referenced.
This is an agenda item scheduled for August 12, 1991.
Jfg
attach
cc: Mayor
Commission
City Attorney
City Clerk
.
.
.
~. jO
August 5, 1991
TO: Land Development Coordinator
J. Koch, Dir. Admin. JComp. Planning~
Church of the New Covenant Expansion Development Plan
FROM:
RE:
Applicant should confer with County to determine if the advance in the
schedule for widening Tuscawilla Road to Winter Springs Boulevard prior
to 1996 affects their requirements for turn lanes or right-of-way
adjacent to this site.
County level of service standards will be enforced on Tuscawilla Road,
subject to any relief for small developments to be included in
concurrency management system.
Municipal transportation impact fees are in process of being updated
and a new ordinance and rates may be in effect by the time a building
permit for this expansion is obtained.
Jfg
.
.
.
--
August 7, 1991
TO: Ci ty Manager
J. Koch, Dir. Admin./Comp. Planning~
Tipton's Proposed Contract to Update Transportation Impact Fee
FROM:
RE:
As discussed at our meeting with the transportation consultant, the
requested fee for updating the City's impact fee ordinance is
substantial this year - $10,000 - because all of the calculations
must be revised to reflect both (1) the new data in the 5th Edition
of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Manual just published
and (2) the 1991 design, right-of-way and construction costs for
paving and drainage for collector roads. Subsequent yearly updates
required by the Code should be less expensive.
This $10,000 fee can be charged to the transportation impact fee
account pursuant to Sec. 9-386.17 by the procedure in Sec. 9-386.15(b).
/fg
~~~;;[1\:: tilm
jt.'.JC 7 rHl
f.;TY. of WINTER SPR1NC.~
CITY MANAGER
.
.
.
~
August 5, 1991
TO:
City Manager
coordinato~
FROM:
Land Development
RE: Church of the New Covenant Extension, Staff Review
The above referenced was held on July 23, 1991. S. Cu1p, L. Smith,
T. Holton and V. Browning represented the project. Staff members
present were A1amina, Artman, Dallas, DeWitt, Govoruhk, Koch, Koz10v,
LeBlanc and Lockcuff.
Please refer to attached Staff comments.
Additional comments are:
1) Initial construction will be the classroom, Phase I.
2) According to the developer, the County does not
require road improvements until the second phase
commences, which is scheduled to be the expansion
of the worship facility.
3) The developer will notify the Oak Forest Homeowner's
Association before the water line is installed because
this will come across an easement in Oak Forest. It
will be the developer's responsibility to restore the
easement once work is done.
4) Impact fees will be applied.
This project meets all Code requirements.
ffg
attach.
cc: Mayor
Commission
City Attorney
City Clerk
.
.
..
........ ,,'
-
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Ttlltlphontl (407) 327.1800
July 1, 1991
Mr. Lawrence L. Smith Jr., P.E.
Dyer, Riddle, Mills & Precourt, Inc.
1505 East Colonial Drive
P.O. Box 538505
Orlando, FL 32853 8505
Re: The Episcopal Church of The New Covenant, Engineering Review
Dear Mr. Smith:
Your modification to the final engineering for the subject project,
received on June 20, 1991, was found to be satisfactory.
Upon completion of the project, you will have to submit a "Letter
of Certification", three (3) sets of "as-built" engineering and three
hundred dollars ($300.00) for an "as-built" inspection fee.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
MJ/L'l'K/fg
cc: City Manager
Land Development Coordinator V--o
Building Department
.
~~~_~IlW[~
AI!fG 01 1991
CL~ OE WINTER SP-RINGSl
tantt QQ.wlopment Coordlnatoo
July 15, 1991
TO:
Staff ~
Land Development Coordinato~ .
FROM:
RE:
Staff Review Board
The above referenced will convene at 9:00 A.M. on July 23, 1991 to
consider the Site Plan for The Episcopal Church of the New Covenant
Extension.
. Written comments are required for this meeting.
1. PCI" ~1\1 COdQ, R.e: ~e~. i-S4(b) .lo1\ !;;J)L)C.~T'O""Al.
~ a c', I, +: e.s :l. r e t" e. '\ u , ;"e-J.
~ '^. v-e..
~
~ ,;'4,.
/fg
z..
S?rlt'l"'-.\er s'1~+-e...,.,) ~\\I~~ MIlS+ be. MO""IJ..,.e.J.
1. "-"'. '" ,J t" e. c..o W\ ~ e 0'\ d ~ e , ~ 5} ~ I \ ~ +, ~ "" 0 .r . +
1east 00'\ e. .L~~ \, 1 cl.(c)Ylt ~ b. lOC,il+e.J ~ 4-
i"h62 e-n t(~ nee '('.'O-.v'l l\:1sc... ~II\.. ~o~J.
(K..t:. c'.~ cod,,: 7-7' J 7-77.)
r ......,o..,IJ )I~o C}1~e . 9re..i .l.4~t ()~ 4-\-,"II,h\-
.
to a re...ho- t::t (iH".ocp"j\..m tr 'the Q..ll~-I-,(;, b""dJ,(\,~
-\-0 le"6v,", 'ff ,t' k ler- ~ "" S' t ~ 1\,,1 .
.:5.
.
.R~c'JQ..~ ,
-/ , ,.,yn I t
';-Cl-'~ , /I~'
.
.
.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
DON LEBLANC, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
JOHN GOVORUHK, CHIEF OF POLICE
JULY 18, 1991
SITE PLAN EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE NEW CONVENANT
10-91
Lighting within the project will be adequate for security.
At the Exit onto Tuscawilla Road a Stop Sign will be installed by Public
Works and a Stop Bar painted on the Roadway.
Adequate Handicap Parking as required by City Ordinance.
All Markings on Roadways are to be Thermoplastic and conforms with Roadway
and design standard specification issued by F.D.O.T..
1 ) 'J
(/' ./ C7 //' //
61Qd:;:~ht('1 v/2>/
Chief of Police
JG/eds
'-
.
MEMO: 7/23/91
TO: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
FROM: BUILDING DEPARTMENT (Inspector Alam1na)
RE: STAFF REVIEW / SITE REVIEW 7/23/91
EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE NEW COVENANT
THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT HAS NO OBJECTIONS ON THE ABOVE REFERENCE.
7)~
.
-
\
-
.
.
.
.
. .
TO: Don LeBlanc
FROM:
G. E. Artman
Date:
July 22, 1991
Episcopal Church of the New Covenant Extension
SUBJ:
~pa
At this time, compliance with the Arbor Ordinance has not been
accomplished nor has there been discussion as to the proper
placement of applicable traffic regulatory s1gns.
. .
.
WINTER SPRINGS WATER & SEWER EAST
890 NORTHERN WAY, C-l
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 365.3025
.July 30, 1991
TO:
DON LEBLANC
FROM:
MIKE DEWITT
RE:
CHURCH OF THE NEW COVENANT
CC:
KIP LOCKCUFF
.
1) Meter sizing is agreed upon
2) The water main ~rom Chokecherry Drive to the master meter will
b. pr...ure tested at 1~0 psi ~or two hours. I recommend the
complete .y.tem be t..ted, but that i. the responsibility o~
the owner
3) The utility company's responsibility ends at the master meter
. 91.157
.
.
SOILS LEGEND
~ AllAMSYlLLE- .PAlUI 'I..E ......0.
S ASTATULA-...-U "..[ .A"DI.O TO ... '1UlP[.
I TAYAIIE.-..LL_II 'INE ......OS.O TO...ILONS
~"''''''. ......~ .OILS DlVIOE
i
~
i
.
.
_ _ ~ ~ . CHOIlEeHEIIIIY DII.
~ :......"'1.---.1. '-' ~ --;.;;;;... - - - - - -
1'r1illAct~""" aoo ... ~
-.....- "~"'-""" -::> 'rfrn:.t=.r- ~.......,....-..
c::::...J I aID ~r Mna'-t
. , . I ==-"u'" ""IIY...,.,..~.r......r
i:-'~:::.~~ ,.~..... ' " II OAK fOfttST UNIT ONE
-.c.,..,.". "'MwT_ ~ ' . p.a. 12'. fIGS. az a'3
....... ,....... _ ",--, ZOIlEO NIl
....' ...--....
&5"~7' !IrE _. "llll....
~~
OUT icw CITY
NOT ~ATT[O
.
II
~
.. I
I
I
,
\
c....... ~-.oL..o e....
1.,..,6'00
c-..r.III.'6~
O-IU:I" j
C~T._~-I-.#r"
7_,C4._ ~~..,
/..,...6'.....
....
\
LAKE TUSK" WILLA PHASE II
PB.3t. PAGE ,8.:2
ZONED .u.o.
:.
z
- N _.S' 11'51' W #
--- ~"--'-..-..m
-__ :r.Il-..II.. ~
- - .-...L..
: ----.
--~,.
--
t:'ENE~ ~
,
.
TU$KAwtu..A TRAIL SUBDIV1SION
P...... PaGE.
ZOllED Pu.O
~ rNC ~ 41TI' ~ JII\II.fl~""". t:'N~.rr'-
~ ~D ,lAID ~TANV6 .I~'''''&I'II.
I'. TAlC ~~ JIl<<"",4/ 'NC~~ "'M""i:IItOI'~
~~ ""':Sl~. Slrr~~ ~~
IWrliIVr~ ....,""""".. ""'JIIINAL'T ~ ... V1'7~'TAIS
,.,. T~~€D~'''''''''D""AM1rr~y.$~'1'
~':;~';,~7'::::::'~ ~~_Z~
<< TAIfC .'z" """.". ~~ATCP AH7/INN-"", IIII/J Mr ,~
Z'GNI" tfI1II<<~ 1D ~ AI:!IU~ 1iII~ ~
~ff~~~~C 1~4f:t 7WI" AIfr AMlI"r"T~
... ~ M"I#K "'AIr'AU- ~ $~tfIIr SI7 JI/IJ.A
.,-ilJl,tilKnt1f1!:C~ n;,r#I;~Y~
AT nvl "",..,r..,-....,,,.. #r "'6e"I<H-.LtI.~.IM'"""
A'IWP. I~...."".
4E. &tArtlY AIV,.""",.,.,J04I ~ ..., T~. ~ MtI4
IJtIItfDV ,..,.,., 6fII ~ JI"Wt)~~ IY ~
~~~~i~~ I: ~1tN.<<: ITItMr
'2 OIAl-'NIIC ."0 ~ t:Jt>rt"PwCr,/'JiItfTrJ' rNI ~S~ r
4:'L.~.., I/IUILDlIIC ''''l.L aE "~C1U11*CD TOr
TNI. Pc.AN. ALL orNer ~ul'DII>IC AreA.
"..~LIQ ... ,r",r4.Jr<< .rc 7"P rCItllAJN
UMDlaTuraCD OU"MC """W' J COU8T1tVt7'/OM
. IC7DITIIt>>I PGID IJiD'f""It>>I ~ .,. .st~ ."'CrCt M.
~ SOOOfNC ~ At50 8C ~ ..... ao...o
...., MMIICDuIn:l." AQJJflNNr = ~Qlow C'fMBIN..
ClMt:rr"""", F'l&rWIlIIt'O ~(Gr'AS5CD)"NOAL.I: 't1ntC/lt
~~<<D~ AI'C 7Z) ~ ~"" ~b ItIWC/1lCD.
Norc
~~~eIUN.&MIIlIIC; Aft"'A la rc..,.
acA'&D,c;.'JIIDCD iI&ND ~'eD
;/IICC'Otr..:u1VC n> ARr:""'CC.TV~ ~","T~.
/!alII!"""'" ~~I""'P'JV/IIIIYI
~~.-zP.....-.r".".""","
~.,., ...., "" ~""""'IIIW"~ ~
., "'..".,.,1 J/IIII' ,AilAI....., ~.w-, ..
;iIM'~II, r"ll1 .....1IIt>
""'~ ....~. 0. _ "" ~
"'~AMf ""'"vPlrI>- ,.-. 14N:" ,.~
~. ~r~
.- ~_ ~.., ,/IWtI::I_
,.. I"'..... ,-..
LOCATIONIIA..
:.IOCWALN ~IJD
==...-= eX/aTINt:
, . - . . ppot:JO:iU)
z:zzz:zzz ruru'C
SeCTION 12. TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST
THE CITY OF IIINTER SPRINGS. SENINOLE COUNTY. FZ.DRIDA
DESCRrl'rr_ (O.R... UtNI. ,.".71. & noJ
,... ... __r_ ." ... _"'" ~J#IItf"_ ,__ ., ""...,,,..,.,.,.11. ,...., -
_...,_.,..,.,.,.".,., ,--,II."". ___,.,,.,...-,.,..
..,,.-.,---~,....,~ ,..,. -...."..... ...,....~/_.,..,....
. .....-."....,- .......,...,...-.... -....-..."..........
__,. .,4_. . ....._." D.. IwC.' ....... aM'.'.T. ... ",",' -
.....,....... ..,. ~ ..... ............ ..... ~......,..., .,~.,.
_ _ ........._,~ .,_.~." "'.M IWf ..,.......,....,4.~
...... _ __,rh." _ _"'.14 _ ..M 1Wf..........,.......
....... ... _ _.,. ,.. ..,." .. _Nf~ ., --. .
L/t&N77NII RAN
A~~ ~SJlrlAl.~~
~~IY'~NM~~
TZ:J #!J(JIIVSTA"r;Cr,J/QJJN.
~..
=~~~'4:t~ ,~.rNC:
~~ ,~. .,r6tD~
"".->.) "'~-"...
--
.0-548..00
~
I' -i
~=.Jl0
un.lI. HI III II ~"\l1I L".\ I'IIH Olll1.I"I"
-
SITE PLAN
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH
OF THE NEW COVENANT
. nOlllOA _ i.......I..
-
n.IlUAIl't ".1
... ,-.'d
~-/7' :n-' ~ rT
-
J.
...- . ~ . .."...,.
~~,:-==--::,::,".:.-=:.:::-_---
WINTE:lIII .'UIlIO
....
...