HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987 12 14 Regular
~
December 11, 1987
TO:
Ci ty Manager ~
Land Development Coordinator .
Agenda Item t December 14, 1987
FROM:
RE:
A Staff Review for Fairway Lakes at Tuscawilla, Final Development Plan and
Preliminary Engineering, was held on December 2, 1987. The City Engineer
approved the project on November 30, 1987, with stipulations which must be
addressed on Final Engineering. Both Staff Review minutes and City Engineer
letter are attached.
This is a private subdivision and all streets will be owned and maintained by a
Hcmeowner I s Association. Therefore, the developer is seeking a variance to
Section 14-26 for a 40 I R-O-W instead of a 50 I R-Q-W. The developer is also
wanting the sidewalk on one side of the street only. These variances are
granted by the Ci ty Commission under Section 14-95.
.-
The P & Z Board met on December 9, 1987 and approved the project with two
stipulations, namely, that a 2nd emergency entrance be provided in the northern
section of the project and that the sidewalk be five (5) feet from the roadway.
/mh
cc: Mayor
City Conunission
,-..
,-
December 2, 1987
TO:
Ci ty Manager ~
Land Developnent CoordinatoW
FROM:
RE:
Staff Review, Fairway Lakes at Tuscawilla
The above referenced was held on December
were J. Afflebach, B. Austin and W. Temple.
Govoruhk, Holzman, Koch, Kozlov, LeBlanc,
items were discussed:
1, 1987. Representing the project
Staff members present were Artman,
Smi th and Taylor. The following
-
1. Golf cart/bike path to clubhouse in northwestern sector - Developer agreed
to install an opaque wall along each side of path to ensure the privacy of lots
28 and 29.
2. Golf Course Pond (western edge of project) - Developer will furnish
documentation as to agreement allcwing use of this pond by project.
3. Pond in Item 2 above - A question of safety arose. The pond has standing
water. If the pond is expanded, the slope will be 5 to 1 which exceeds the
Code requirement of 4 to 1.
4. Building setbacks from mean high water level - Any building not meeting the
50 I setback must be waived by the City Conunission.
5. Streets are private and will need a waiver from the City CClI1Unission for a
40 I R-C>-W and to have sidewalks on one side only.
6. Sidewalks along Greenbriar Lane - These are included on the Final
Engineering for Greenbriar Lane and have been approved by the CClI1Unission.
7. Wall - Developer has agreed to provide an unbroken barrier along Greenbriar
Lane which is to consist of a combination of fencing, berms, trees and
landscaping. Staff had no objection to this.
8. 2nd Entrance - Some Staff members w::>uld like to see a 2nd entrance. The
developer has planned for one entrance with an emergency access to the project
at the southern portion of the project. There is nothing in the Code requiring
a second entrance. This was an item of discussion.
~
MEMO
City Manager
December 2, 1987
Page 2
.......
9. Lot 40 must have 25 I frontage on the street and the utility easement
between Lots 40 and 41 has to be 15' in width. TI1ese two items will be
addressed in the Final Engineering.
This project will be presented to the Planning and Zoning Board on December 9,
1987.
/mh
cc: Staff
Planning and Zoning Board
........
--...
'"'' \.
. . . ''./'lINlll/' . \
. c;j ._~). '~"~
~''''./'' ........, Z~III
h!:::-( '0 )~
liU .
~ ,,:.,. ;
'~i . . ..
. .:,'
1\.. "...........,..
\-.~'f I..,...'.......
\. '\, ,......
CITY OF WINTER SP'RINGS. FLORIDA
,..-.
1126 STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1800
November 30, 1987
Mr. Brian D. Austin, P.E.
Project Manager
Donald W. McIntosh Associates, Inc.
2200 Park Avenue, North
Winter Park, FL 32789
RE: Fairway Lakes at Tuscawilla, Preliminary Engineering Plan
Dear Brian:
Your last subnittal of the engineering preliminary plan has been received
on November 25, 1987, which is in response to the City's letter dated
November 11, 1987.
The preliminary plan for Fairway Lakes at Tuscawilla is found to be
satisfactory contingent on the following items.
.-
1. TI1e utili ty easement between lots 40 and 41 is to be expanded to 15
feet in lieu of the existing 10 ft. with the appropriate adjustment made on the
final engineering.
2. Lot 40 will have to have an adjustment made to provide a minimum of 25
feet of frontage. Presently it is only 20 ft. TI1e appropriate adjustments are
to be made on the final engineering. Also, lot 68 will have to have a minimum
of 25 feet of frontage. The drawing appears to show 23 ft. Again,
adjustments will have to be made on the final engineering.
3. TI1e issues regarding the six (6) foot masonry wall, the establishment
of two entrances and width variations for the typical street section will have
to be addressed to the City Commission for disposition.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
/mh
cc: City Manager
Land Developnent Coordinator
Building Department
.~