Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985 10 21 Special ~', - r---, Conkin, ~ort... ..... Ho...... @~ =::"'":"ffim \ ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801 TEL 305 42s.<l452 , --- - e September 27, 1985 Mr. Peter Cowell City Planner City of Winter Springs 400 North Edgemon Ave Winter Springs, Fla 32708 REI Oak Forest Unit 6 CPH Job Number W0402.00 Dear Peter: We have completed the review of the final plan and data submission on Oak Forest, Unit 6. We hereby recommend approval based on the following conditionsl 1. That underdrains are installEd .. recommended by the Soils Consultant. A preliminary location ~or the underdrains has been shown on the plans and in thp. soil report. These locations will be r~evaluated in the field during construction with a report given to the City for review and follow-up. e 2. This recommendation is also subject to the standard provisions and requirements in the Cities Subdivision Code, and the permits issued by Florida Department of Environmental Regulations ad the st. John River. Management District for water, sewer and storm drainange. 3. Lots requiring demucking and fill as indicated in the soils report shown on the plans should be inspected by a Soils Consultant during the filling operation to allow certification that the unsuitable soils have been removed and that free draining fill has been properly placed and compacted in the house pad area. 4. The rear lot storm water retention treatment areas shall remain accessable after home construction and sales. Restriction shall be placed on the drainage/access easements to each retention area to insure continued access for maintenance. 5. The gabion basket dewatering system for the retention areas is experimental in application with only limited success in the Central Florida Area. Maintenance of the upstream filter face may be impossible and replacement would be very expensive. We, therefore, recommend that a valved (normally closed) pipe be placed at the bottom of each retention basin to allow emergency drawdown of the stored water for maintenance or as a back up system should the primary system fail. ---- A) The City should consider not taking over the retention area system for maintenance at the end of the normal maintenance bond period, but require an additional 5 year bond for that part of the .ystem to allow it to prove it..lf and to develop a functional maintenance record. It it doe.n't work a. designed, then it should be replaced with an ~ Corporate Office: 500 W. Fulton St., P. O. Box 1976, Sanford, FL 32772-1978 -:PWf' '" '< ';' ~1ft~'~Port... Me! Holm.. :t:.~" '. ' " ~ [p) ENGINEERS, INC. ~" ..; "- , ;'~:"'. 0 ,\ . " ' ~ , "f3' " ',. ayat... ~_:' ...~ .' :j ',^t' , . AhY def.ctive const~uction ~ damaginQ dete~io~ation of the gabion basket-filter fabric dewaterinQ system in the retention areas shall be corrected by repair or replacement with a suitable substitute prior to the final project acceptance or eKpiration and release of the maintenance bond whichever occurs first. . I ".' .. ~ ; t~;"~. ., 1/1 .. ~" If you have any questions, please call us. :~~ Sinrcerely, CONKLIN, PORTER, ~ HOLMES, ENG., INC. WRH/lj ~' Willi4m R. Holmes, P.E. cc: FAM Associates enc: Plans (1) City of Winter Springs (1 City ~ 1 Developer) Soils Report e ~. f. . ,)""., . ~, ., .,,~ t ~.. . /1. · fl. 'J Jure It...con 11..c..coet.aln..c '::1. C. '::I' h 01 -H-OIOI 0001 REGISTERED ARCHITECTr.~trf'''1'$NERS ANEW YORK OFFICE: SUITE 400 HIRAM SIBLEY BUILDING. EAST AVENUE AND ALEXANDER STREET. ROCHESTER. NEW YORK '46017 -~. "'''nl' 1'l325-6565 .. ~~~timqRUE~ '<ACE >."RUE" '""D'NG oW,NTER "RK, "OROO. "'., o'RE' COOE '" .".,"" OCT 16 1935 CITY of WINTER SPRiNGS an IlAllACER October 15, 1985 I~ ~1~~~ ___ 'WIt..- , Mr. ~ichard Rozansky City Manager Winter Springs City Hall 1126 E. State Road 434 Winter Springs, PL 32108 it~~- n.~\n.,.!~.\M.",; " · I",' '" i""~ v. '. "l....i. L~ L:.:.. 1, . . ~ - r: an" i)'~'4.\, . " C. Re: Coventry Place, Site Plan Review Dear Mr. Rozansky, e In accordance with the dates of the site plan review for the ab~e project, please be advised that our reengineering is nearing completion and resubmlssion will ~e forthcoming this week. It is our intent, per the review reRords to accomodate the review board in all aspects but one. As voiced the~, and conffrmed herein, we intend to appeal the request of your Fire Chief that the structure be fully sprinklered. We will base this appeal on our knowledge that no such requirements exist legally whether federal, state, or local. As per current design we have taken extended steps to afford safe and effective fire safety protection considered more than adequate. In the regard to the time element, although the board has said that all other items should be addressed prior to any appeal, we request to be placed on the agenda for the October 28th meeting inasmuch as we expected that, by that time, these items will have been dealt with. Accordingly we would appreciate your placement on the agenda of our request for appeal. Thank you very much. . cc: Peter Cowell o~ C't'" G.4'4\ ~'l'~ Qrr Irrt't CJIWI) F~( ClJI#F J G4nc.l<<''L1G - ~M 1~/lJr - --- ii' . - -- CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 STATE ROAD ~ WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 327~ Telephone (305) 327-1800 MEK> : October .17, 1985 'ID: City Manager, Richard RozanskY. F'RCM: . City Planner, Peter Cowell@; RE: Coventry Place Attached is a letter received today fran Mr. G. E. Yurchison in regard to a sprinkler system for Coventry Place. Also attached are the Site Plan Review Board Minutes of June 25; 1985, discussing the fact e that Mr. Yurchison v.JOUld have to go bacI< before the Ccmnission. Fran the date of the meeting Mr. Yurchison had 30 days in ~ch to make the request for his appeal to the Site Plan Review Board's decision. HeM do you wish to have this matter handled? Also, please note J that as of right IlCM, we do not have the amended site plan. C1,(~ ~~ ~ ~~~~nw~@. ~<-L '--V ocr 18 1985 ----- CI1Y of WINTER SPRiNGS an IlAIWiiEIl ~~~/~tt4 PC/lIfI1 Attachment . (!)~ ~ ~Sn. @ ~ fJb~ .. SITE PLAN REVIEW BOARD ... MINUTES TUESDAY~ JUNE-2S, 1985 . The Site Plan Review Board meeting w~s called to order at 9:00 a. .. Present: Fire Chief, Charles Holzman; Building Official Sam Smith; Utilities Director Harry Martin; City Planner Peter Cowell and Police Officer Charles Sexton. REVIEW OF COVENTRY PLACE The reason this is coming back before the Site Plan Review Board is the fact that the review was here over a year ago and therefore is null and void. Further, there are some discrepancies in the plan that need to be reevaluated in the review because they were not clarified or corrected at the time of the original review. e Corrections need to be made to the sidewalks in the rear. The three foot distance will need to be removed allowing the whole distance of the sidewalk to be even insuring that there will be no three foot sidewalks. The 9 x 20 parking spaces will be brought back to Code at 10 x 20, with handicapped spaces at 12 x 20 with signs. It will be necessary to curb around the areas that are not protected with wheel stops. Dumpsters will be screened and enclosed. Buffering will be along the entire front of the parking lot at the rear of the front setback from the street. In the side yard setbacks a buffered atea on the northside of the project is approximately 25 feet in width and an area on the souths ide 15 feet in width is to be left natural. A five foot sidewalk will run the full width of property along the front property line. The sidewalk will be put on the right of way. The developer has provided an adequate parking light plan. Street lights are being reviewed by Florida Power Corporat~on. There will be an internal mail system for the development.. The developer has also agreed to help with the traffic signal control device for Moss Road. The retention swales are to be sodded. A new manhole will not be permitted on North Moss Road and any additional water and sewer problem will have to be worked out with Winter Springs Water and Sewer prior to the issuance of a building permit. The developer will furnish the engineering calculations as to how many apartments can be sufficiently run off the four inch water line to Winter Springs Water and Sewer. . Additionally: 1. Drainage and retention engineering is to be reviewed by Conklin, Porter & Holmes, Engineers. 2. The direction and flow of stormwater must be corrected to meet the engineer's specifications for drainage. 3. Sprinkler system will be developed throughout the building per the recommendation of the fire chief. 4. PVC will be standardized to Winter Springs Wat~r & Sewer specifications. The meter will be moved to the front easement, arid if necessary additional ease- ment will be granted. Site Plan Review Board Meeting. Tuesday. June 25. 1985 Page 2 5. There vill be calculations t8 ensure that the pressure is adequate for a four inch line. ' · 6. The hydrant vill be relocated 10 feet away froa the water force main. 7. There vill be buffering across th~ front. also a sidewalk across the front. and curbing around the planted and noncurbed areas that are not protected wheel stops. 8. All parking spaces per code will be 10 x 20. handicapped spaces 12 x 20 with signs. all sidewalks will be the width of the sidewalk either 5 or 6 feet; no 3 foot sidewalks. 9. The rear sidewalk designed in asphalt will be changed to concrete; however. development is a separate issue to be dealt with. It will be left optional. The back sidewalk to be lighted if it is put in. 10. The stripping will be white per DOT Standards. 11. Dumpsters will be enclosed and fenced across the front. 12. Street lights will go before Florida Power Corporation for review of both parking and street lights. 13. The Developer will pickup a copy of the traffic signal agreement so that that can be filled out and returned. The Fire Chief has requested fire sprinkler system throughout the building. ~ ~.LAl 1 Q' I [ r .1J.lr',lA a r !.J. LJJ _ 1_ _A1J/~q'- l~"'" .....~_f R.... ~.......:.. vi... Three members of the Sit,.e Plan Review Board are in favor of the request. ~ Motion was made by Sam Smith and seconded by Peter Cowell to approve with all modifications. All aye. Respectfully submitted. 111~. . LJ~n~ Mary W lso . \\.....- Record ~ Secretary . FI LE 1t. .lI-rc/"i60ft ;"A,66oclal.6 '.~-:. ';,,~.O"TIU'.D AIICHITECTS AND PLANN.E". YQflIC O"~: SUITE 400 HNlY aUILDING. EAST AVENUE ANO A~XANOER mEET ."OCHUTER~ NEW YQflIC 14104. AR~A CODE 7t. ~::;-tI!!e lie!ft ~ lIB ....LlEU....... ....uou 'Ul~' -.... ..... 'LllIl'" ~. "E' COD<.. ",..... ........... ocr 10 19Ii . ~~ Octob.r 7. 19"_ em II WINTER SPRINGS \' .~ \:IJMM~ AI em .... . t ; ~ S ~t~.,;.~'J~C4 / I w) 'r. ?ter Covell. Cityrl.nner . "'1', l,~ City Ball ~ 1126 I. St.te ao.d 434 Wiater IpriDl_, PL 32701 . ~ fa w ~ , ~ j .. . I = - - .... Ji ; .~ .~ a.: Coventry Place, Congreg.te C.re facility for the Elderly, 208 B. Ho.. a..4, Wint.r S,rinl.i 710rida Dear HJr. Cowell, e With reference to you~ co..ent .eeting of la.t Friday wherein Hr. Webb .u~.itted his allel.to~y letter vith the aubsequent news- p.per .rticle tollow~nl the next d.y, it t. proper .nd expected that 1 too should co..ent, and I will herein. To begin vith, ~r. Webb,vas hired as the engineer to design the .ite Irades and stor. vate~ ..Ralement. Thi. vas accomplished by in.ertion of his desiln upon our orilinal site utility plan prepared by our office ~earing .y seal and signature. Upon placement of the I .ite drainage information Hr. Webb pl.ced bis aeal and signature aa vell. This particular drawing vaa indeed revised at the request of (.1) the office of B.U.D. who raised the elevation of the building and aurroundinl sidewalks, and (2) the reque8t of the City of Winter Sprinl8 to incorporate the nev 4 lane MO.8 aoad paving plan, vhicb included a storm vater inlet .t tbe front of the 8ite to accomodate our forvard storm vater. Actually improvtnl the stt. drainase. Mr. V.'b had knovledae of tbi. .nd p.rticipated in this correction. Vbat t. ger.aine i. tbat, upon .ub.i8.ion to tbe City for. nev site pl.n reviev, your consult.nts, Conklin, Porte~ & Bolme8, di.covered . design deficiency in the balan~. of the dr~tnage de8ilD includinl . qu.stioniDI of the desiln syste. ..ployed. At no time vas tbis office ..are of this, nor had such dr.in.le ~y.t.. b..n ch.Dled~ .iDce there ... no ne'd C.t th.t ti.e) to qu..tion ..... In Hr. Vebb'. r( 'on.. to this rai.ed que.tion h. do.. not .ddr... .thi. d.fici.ncy, .e.k.41 r.tber to .'.01.. bi...lf of .11 r..pon.ibility in...ucb .. the orilin.l elravin. ... '..n r.vi..d. Thi. i. .n att..pt by ~r. ..~b to e..de the point ia ....tion. i.... tb.t tb. dr.in.s. el..ilni. incoapet.nt. In..auch a. thi. va. the ar.. J6r .bich Hr. V."... hir.d. our insistence th.t b. cor~.ct the d..lln ... .et with hi. ~.fu..l to ..k. any corr.ctions. Slu_.rily. . n.. .nlin..r 1_. .erYlc. ~.. '..n ..ploy.el .nd Hr. V.bb tar.tn.ted .. 8ita anstn.ar. ?r\t 1-, ':':; ~. ~I !!!! ~'!Jt..'<i, . "7~~" t' ;;. ~~ -~~ 2 :.".. t:" ,! .lI - i ~ ;y . . ~ --IJ~IJ!IiiI!>-~,{.'t1fWft. :...:-.-_::.;;:::... -:...~ .'p '.: . .J;r',~;: .' ';'2~; ,,;;,h,,; *'~' '~.' , _. C.".ll,. ~. ..ae 2"" t . . 'il ItJ1:' j;" .' . ID cODclu.ioD, hi. alles.tioD. of a profe..t...l ItceD.tDI .e..ure liabillt, to littS.tieD, .uch .tep. . l' rearet tht. chata of e..eDt.~' .ill .ake the correctioD. Dece..ary .f thi. worthwhile project. ha..e create' .arioa. proble.. 'aD' raault iD hi.lapo.ur. aDd .. are DOW uD'er~.k~.a. aD' apoloai.. accor'ualy. V, to uphold the 'e..~iD lDtearlf) .;~ .I j -l ~J1 I . .. cc: Richard tozanaty Conklin, Porter & Kol... r. rinkbeiner, Ba.. e .. I ~; . 4i>; ~ . 04 . . . .~ he.' .~ i'1 't U'" << .r' .,. _1 ",,.d.h, " ,f' ~. I;' ,,-,~;;. t tt</; ~ ~ '" l..t.~f;,'* . ,..... ~ '~'_ \ ,," -~- ,N',~ ,11i>oI'.':-. ~i.~~ . ! . ~~ '~= ....t (': ,It, ., tf~ ,., 4";"1:" .:,,1- J.:'."'': .. ,. .. '1' ' l." .' . ". ,~ .:' ~...~;.., ~ ~ l' _i: ~ . "1' A .1 "- :. f"' '., ~'. .,. It ~.,.'~ ;'~ 'Lt'-'::, c' '! :~. tl r" ~O ,'... },'.' lit"'" ~ "S.! .~:'n'.~.. b.'~ '~.,.: :;1....,~ f..'~ "'~, \. '.i t'l . .i '"' q~,:;,:! ~~'. ;. t... '" t '. !.'lIl"~ g',' .. ~ "ca... ~ i\ J, '.'-ij tj."", ~ '--, ';. II" 1_. I. " f nj iX.".,', , "'l Si .., .~. ........ ; . 'i. c' 4.'; ..-' 'f\1..~, .. .~ "tt."r~ .~'. ~~ 1 :!.. .r ,'1 i' ~. :-i;;' r.. fC ~.. ~_~. t,~ ~ t" ~ . t ".. ~:;~, t. ,;.~t;,.~ {- c t 1('" ,:, ~.~ I..-a .E\T: i ~:~" I 'l./i ;1;' \ "-.<fiT . ~- '_. f~. ~ t ..:< }.. "'~.~: <.~.w:s .~.~ ~l .~ (DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE) FROM DEP'T DEP'T Ci ty Manager SUBJECT Coventry Place - Site Plan Review Fire Chief DATE October 21, 1985 Following are my thoughts and reasoning concerning my suggestions for a total sprinkler system throughout the Coventry Place structure which is referred in Mr. Yurchison's attached letter. Although Mr. Yurchison is correct in stating that no federal, state, or local requirements exist for fully sprinkling the structure I main- tain that the very nature of the type of occupancy and it's inhabitants should be cause for additional personal life safety precautions for those occupants. The fact that the building is a home for the elderly, some will be living alone, some will suffer from failing eyesight, hearing losses, . and some may-wi11 be bordering on senility, anyone of them still smoking, or for other reasons, lacking their full abilities and facilities, is reason enough to provide the maximum protection for their safety. / Meeting all fire codes, as well as the NFPA Life Safety Code may, in Mr. Yurchison's opinion, be more than adequate, however, meeting those standards merely means that the requirements have been met, not exceeded. Deaths from fire are rarely attributed to burns, rather the result of asphyxiation due to the inhalation of toxic gases-even from small fires, i.e., a smoldering mattress or a chair. I base my suggestion of a total sprinkled building of this nature on the fact that it has been reported that there have been no reported deaths in structures that contained a fully sprink1ered system that was in working condition at the time the fire occurred. -. ~~@tuwtij OCT 23 1985 eln' of WINTER SPRINGS em MANAGER - . ~_~ ~~\NTE~lr ~ ."(j ~', f~U~.'i~ ~:: .. ~' ' "''''''E~'/:;: · ~Vj 10 f~/!( CITY OF WIN12::~RINGS. FLORIDA 1126 STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (305) 327.1800 MEM): October 23, 1985 TO: City Manager, *~ and Ccmnission FRCM: City Planner, Peter Cowell ~ RE: Mt. Greenwood PUD, Tracts 1 and 2 Final Engineering Attached is a copy of the City Engineer's report to accept the final engineering for Tracts 1 and 2 of Mt. Greenwood PUD. The type of housing is canparable to R-lM housing directly e across fran Hayes Road to the entrance. These provisos have not been received for acceptance: 1. The design and engineering for the right turn lane onto Hayes Road and S.R. 434. 2. The sidewalk along Hacienda Village down Hayes Road to the project entrance. 3. Engineering and design and site plan for the amenities package for Tract 6. 4. The wall dividing Hacienda Village fran Tracts 1 and 3 of Mt. Greenwood . Further, the developer will not be able to plat or pull any building permits until the issue of the perculation ponds has been resolved. PC/UJiJ AttacluIent . .. .,r'" .-" ~ .. Conklin, ~ort.r and Hol..... ~ [p) ENGINEERS, INC. 500 W. FULTON STREET o POST OFFICE BOX 11176 . SANFORD, FLORIDA 32771 TEL305322-6841 TEL30583Hi717 1 -- , i. .};~.. .~ ' 9ctober .1, 1985' (J \~ , ..' ,~ l.;' I, Mr. ,Pete Cowell City of, Winter Springs J.126 EastS.,R. :434. Winter Springs, FL 32708 r. " , d Ii./, . Re: ~ount .Greenwood Phases I and II CPH Project No. W0402.00 " Dear Mr. Cowell: We have completed the review of the engineering supplied by Boyer Singleton & Associates for the Mount Greenwood PUD Tracts 1 and 2. The following comments are based on this review. 1. Lots 29, 30, 31, and 32 are graded as -BM lots to the back of the property lines. A potential problem is created in this area should the lots on 36, 37, and 38 be constructed improperly or if swimming pools are added at a later date, thereby cutting off the swale drainage thru these properties. To eliminate this problem, easements would have to be proYided ~etween lots 36, 37, 38 and 39 or the grading plan for1.ots 29, 30, 31, and 32 should be changed to Type A ~ ots. 2~ r#low ~~rows should be added to indicate the direction of 'flow along the rear retention swale behind lots 10, 11, 12 end 13 of Tract 1. .e"'.......l... . .:, ',.:\ . .'., .~. i: it~~;;1,}~ "', . ! 'f:~'i' 3., Tractno~ 2 has no sewer service to Lot no. 12. The spacing of the fire hydrants in Tract no. 2 did not meet the City 0Code of 350' to the lot line. No additional hydrants should !be, .r.equired as hydrants shown can be relocated to meet the . ,code.' .1. .~: ~ '. 'j ~iW~i'we recoia.end that additio-nal so11s information be provided ~'.~to fndicat'e whether underdrain's will be needed on these :.~" . streets ~ ." .. i~,'""i~' " .;' · -"~;:~~PPl"OValt)fthese drawi ngsi s contingent on the resolution of .,;""it,be above,i tells. f;::.";1'I". you have anyquesti ons, pI ease call our off1 ces. 1",:~:t~~:~ES TMZ:a1v '0 I - ENGINEERS, .INC.