HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 03 27 Regular
G-CvvP
g,,?l/,.(.I~e
~")Ir!It.;$5 J'
COUNTY
o STA TE
I -, FORM 4 MEN
trl LAS,T NAME - FIRST NAME - MIDDLE NAME
- 0 tl/~ l3J1t~e
MAILING ADDRESS
. J t 34; '()~ c(R
. 'w 1/tV..,eft- ..s.o/Z/~
I' NAME OF AGENCY
, C.4ry O-k w//l/-fe~ SPG-5
RANDUM OF VOTIN
ONFLICT
AGENCY is unit of:
VU.DCOUNTY
~UNICIPALITY
TITLE OF PERSON RECORDING MINUTES
U
SPECIFY
C f-e<<-IC
DOTHER
MEMORANDUM OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A VOTING SITUATION [Required by Florida Statutes g112.3143 (1979) ]
If you have voted in your official capacity upon any measure in which you had a personal, private, or professional interest which inures to
your special private gain or the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained, please disclose the nature of your interest
below.
1.
Description of the matter upon which you voted in your official capacity:
j/aJA-~ COt-{)
,ct//V()~
If! #- /T/t'/lA:-e
vU&t//~
6?
,t:? ,g t tI ,I}t- e
5~~tJ
13 'I C I'lf
/Jt/-e /,<)0 ~
"O,L u..s
.
2.
Description of the personal, private, or professional interest you have in the above matter which inures to your special private gain or
the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained:
-PA!OpeK ~ 'tfU./A/-e/L
e
3.
Person or principal to whom the special gain described above will inure:
a.~ ourself b.O
Principal by whom you are retained:
(NAME)
L
r;3~
~,~
DATE ON WHICH FORM 4 WAS FILED WITH THE PERSON
RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING MINUTES OF THE MEETING AT
WHICH THE VOTE OCCURRED:
SIGNATURE
( ~~ 7/~C/
,
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person
responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be
filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. Florida law permits but does not require you to abstain from voting when a conflict
I of interest arises; if you vote, however, the conflict must be disclosed pursuant to the requirements described above.
re
,
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES ~ 112.317 (1979), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES
GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE
OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000.
L
CE FORM 4 - REV. 12-79
'(D)~~\tilW~ij
e MAR 26 '984
CITy of \!WnER SPRINGS
(.\'If HAll
e
e~!'2!.!pf ,
. '", k' I . A--
{~t~~~ t~) dCL~'
~-i/' -<,l/> ,'/C/o " ')!i ;;.i. .-b../'"
~ \. //7 J f/" " ;
March 26, 198: 1-11 ,'V1~.~~~(;[/or . ..l (( f
/ ~.
~ .
(
Mr. Richard Rozansky
City of Winter Springs
400 North Edgemond Drive
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
Dear ~1r. Rozansky,
As spokesman in general for the property
owners shown on the attached plat of the
Old Sanford Oviedo Road, I hereby request
your help in a matter that concerns us.
This portion of the road shown in green is
supposedly an abandoned road by the Seminole
County Commission. Most of the property is
located in the city of winter Springs and
therefore at present the only active industrial
property within the city limits.
e
We wish to improve this road to specs which
will be a lOO.ton industrial road with a
6" x 12" curb as part of the road base. We
are willing to do this at our own expense,
to improve our property with better access
and to increase the value of our property.
We would like a formal motion by the Commission
stating that the city will accept this road as
.a permanent road and maintain it once it is
completed. Hopefully within four weeks.
We also ask you as a Commission to pave Wade
Street to the end so as to help in our common
concern/with the one vital industrial park now in
your city.
If possible please let us know when you would
be willing and able to pave this.
e
Yours truly,
--::> /1 ~/ /.
-D ~~ lJ,-~'''''-
Burley G. Adkins
e
e
March 12, 1984
Winter Springs Commerce Center
Sanford-Oviedo Rd.
Winter Springs, Fl.
Attn: Mr. Buck Adkins
Proposal
1. Excavate roadway area to an approx. 9~" depth
1740' x 23' wide
e
,
2. Add 8" spi1 cement base with 7~ % cement mix- .
ture. Prime base when mixing is completed.
1740' x 23' width, 4446 sly area
3. Add H" type S-l asphalt to soil cement base,
area 1740' x 22'
Total
e
"
/
,C"\-
Optional: Add a 6" x 12" header curb on both sides of the ne\'i
roadway. 3480 LF @ 3.25.
Quotation 1S based on the above figures. Any extra excavating,
pipework; ditch grading, etc. shall be an additional cost to
this contract.
e
".
-...
e
e
.t'_~ ..1."- :J
ir I
L
, .
.' ,?
~
Signed .nd SQled. ift the
_t;~------
a:IJ1-~74/~L......
.---.- - - -:: '~~j
~~1::$ec)
lc,
~
~
"-
,
8.&o4C
2 .G30 '()
J::.
~.,.
6.8AC " <::?~
Il\ .3 ~ 13
~ 6. 'lAC 4- \9 IZ ~IQ 6.63 M,
.
IJ ~~
6. S ", ~ 5 6.85 AC :-: 7!1S
~ ~
8.16AC. \9
~. \4
~
~
~ S.7+-AI
79S
"
10 A.C IE
4;1804(.. 1\
..,
">
P}
..
.....
;.
'..; ~ :.
;" t
. .
. .
,,,,,~,,., ;,> $'''''
.,' ....
t. ~~:
:.. "'i:
1'" .~
. -J~
.
(,)
\
'"
-
'-
tr')
to
.
.~ ~.
-
0)
:; r>:;~':
.,
~
'J\ .
.;.~ " ,..:z.., ...
.-','--::
.,">. .!,
n ,.D ~...
,.
--~~~~~:~'&~
~
:;.~ ^
..I....... .~,
~~
':~.'.
,:,'d:Q
WP;k performance product. ad_sses JOB TASKS: Support 01" Cca.ssion and Boards.
CITY CODES: Land Development. Zoning: ·
Walter Thomas Elwell. CITY PLANNER. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA.
e
STAFF REPORT. PLANNING DEPT. ~ ORDER/DATE: 84,3,15,1 /
21 }~R..~y
'J\ :2-'1\ r ..
, 'y /j)
......). /
- If(f
Assessment/
Validation
Development/Unit: REGENCY SEVILLE
Applicant/Agent: E'fTO CORP./CONKLIN, PORTER & HOLMES
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL
FINAL ENGINEERING
Report Text. Page I, RESULTS OF STAFF REVIEW MEETING
To: CITY MANAGER/Rozansky, and all parties who may become identified relevant
to the above identified request for review/action,
Re: STAFF REVIEW-for action toward approval of the above identified develop-
ment.
~
'2. 6 /tf#- g,f
From: CITY PLANNER/Elwell (sign/date)........................................
AT ITS MEETING, THURSDAY, 9 A.~., 22 MAR.84 , CITY HALL,
ATTENDED AS FOLLOh'S:
1. APPLICANT/AGENT BILL HOLMES, JACKIE SMALLEY-PRESENT
..................................................................... 1.
e
,AND;
2. CITY MANAGER/ABSENT
..................................................................... 2.
,AND;
3. BUILDING OFFICIAL/SMITH-PRESENT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3.
,AND;
4. ENGR./PUBLIC WORKS DIR./HASSLER-PRESENT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' 4.
,AND;
5. FIRE CHIEF/HOLZ}~-PRESENT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5.
,AND;
6. PLANNER/ELWELL-PRESENT
..................................................................... 6.
,AND;
7. POLICE CHIEF/GOVORUHK-PRESENT
... ......... ... .......... ...... ............... ............ ........... 7.
,AND;
8. RECORDING SECRETARY/NOT AVAILABLE, NOTES BY ELWELL
..................................................................... 8.
,AND;
9. OTHER (SPECIFY);KATHLEEN DEGRENIA, HIGHLANDS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION-
PEESE~'l: . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9.
,AND FURTHER;
e
e
e
, STAFF REPORT, PLANNING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: 84,3,15,1 / 21 MAR. 84
~ Development/Unit: REGENCY SEVILLE
~Applicant/Agent: ETTO CORP./CONKLIN, PORTER & HOLMES
Review/Action Requested: CITY COHHISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL
FINAL ENGINEERING
Report Text, Page 2, RESULTS OF STAFF REVIEW MEETING
Assessment/
Validation
PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CITY CODE - THE CITY STAFF
FOUND THE FOLLOWING:
1. THE PLANS FOR THE DEVELOP~ENT (IDENTIFIED) ARE APPROVABLE
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS TO BE MET:
A. SPECIFIED BY CITY MGR. -ABSENT
.............................................................. A.
e
,AND;
B. SPECIFIED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL -NO MEMO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. B.
,AND;
C. SPECIFIED BY ENGR./PUBLIC WORKS DIR.- NO MEMO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. C.
,AND;
D. SPECIFIED BY FIRE CHIEF -MEMO ATTACHED
. . ........... .. . .. .......... .. . .. ... .... ......... ... .. ........ D.
,AND;
E. SPECIFIED BY PLANNER -SUBHITTED HEREWITH
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. E.
,AND;
F. SPECIFIED BY POLICE CHIEF -NO MEMO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. F.
,AND;
G. CONDITIONS BY THE BD. ARISING FROM DISCUSSION (RECORDED) AMONG
THE PARTIES PRESENT, AND SPECIFIED HEREIN AND AS FOLLOWS:
(1). THE APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE PLAN (PARKING SPACE
DETAIL, ATTACHED) TO PROVIDE SIX (6) FT. WIDE SIDE-
WALKS WHERE THEY MUST SERVE TO PROVIDE TWO (2) FT.
OVERHANG AREA FOR 200 SQ.FT. PARKING SPACES, AND
WHERE FOUR (4) FT. OF USABLE SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED WHEN
PARKING SPACES MAY BE OCCUPIED, OR ALTERNATIVELY;
THE APPLICANT SHALL SECURE BD. OF ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL
FOR 180 SQ. FT. PARKING SPACES IN CONJUNCTION WITH FOUR
(4) FT. WIDE SIDEWALKS.
(2). THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE 3~ FT. WIDE COLLECTOR
SIDEWALK AT BLDG. 15, AND;
e
(3). THE POSTMASTER t1UST CONCUR (FAVORABLE REVIEW AND RE-
SPONSE IN WRITING TO THE CITY PLANNER) WITH THE
APPLICANT'S STREET NAME/ADDRESSING PLAN (DIRECTORY!
CENTRAL DELIVERY SCHEME TO BE SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT),
"
e
e
STAFF REPORT, PLANNING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: 84,3,15,1 21 MAR. 84
e
Development/Unit: REGENCY SEVILLE
JApplicant/Agent: ETTO CORP./CONKLIN, PORTER & HOLMES
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL
FINAL ENGINEERING
Report Text, Page 3, RESULTS OF STAFF REVIEW MEETING
Assessment/
Validation
(4) THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE SIDEWALKS DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS WITHIN THE WEST
RIGHT OF WAY OF THE COLLECTOR STREET (SHEOAH BLVD.),
AND;
(5) THE APPLICANT MUST COMPLY WITH THE CITY FIRE CHIEF'S
MEMO DATED 22 MAR. 84 (REFER: ITEM 6. CONDITIONS/
EXCEPTIONS), AND;
(6) THE APPLICANT MUST SUBMIT FOR REVIEW/APPROVAL BY THE
CITY ENGR. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE PRIVATE ACCESS DRIVE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY
(PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT AS A CONDITION OF THEIR
TRANSACTION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER),
It
WTE/mn
Attachments: Attached
tit
cc: Applicant/Agent,
City Commission,
All Departments,
File (identified)
e
e
e
"TV OF WINTER SPRINGS
RECEIVED
Regular Meeting, City Commission, Jan. 10, 1984 Page 2 83-84-7
JAN19 1984 .
Attorney'lruppenbacher read Ordinance No. 282 by title only on second reading.
Mayor Torcaso recessed the Commission meeting and convened the public hearing for
purposetlf( _"ag comment on proposed Ord. No. 282. No one spoke for or against
the ordrnance. Mayor Torcaso closed the public hearing and reconvened the Commission
Meeting.
Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Adkins to adopt
Ord. No. 282. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner
Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Grove,
aye; motion carried.
Public Hearing for Ord. No. 284, rezoning Lots 26 and 27, Blk. D, D. R. Mitchell
Survey, etc. Second Reading.
Attorney Kruppenbacher read Ordinance No. 284 by title only on second reading.
Mayor Torcaso recessed the Commission meeting and convened the public hearing for
purposes of hearing comment on proposed Ord. No. 284. No one spoke for or against
the ordinance. Mayor Torcaso closed the public hearing and reconvened the Commission
Meeting.
MOtion was made by Commissioner Hartman to approve Ord. No. 284. Seconded by
Commissioner Jacobs. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Adkins, aye;
Commissioner Linville, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Grove, aye;
Commissioner Hartman, aye; motion carried.
e
Cypress Village Phase II, preliminary plan:
The plan was recommended for approval by the Planning & Zoning Board subject to
conditions on the report. Joan Cerretti of Harling Lockl~n & Associates, requested
certain waivers from the Commission.
lDtion was made by Commissioner Jacobs that we approve the Cypress Village Phase II
preliminary plan and waive that portion of Sec. 14-95 and Sec. 14-119 Subsection(b)
reference to traffic studies and sidewalks and subject to Staff Review. Seconded by
Commissioner Adkins. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Linville, aye;
Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye;
Commissioner Adkins, aye; motion carried.
Regency Seville, preliminary plan:
The preliminary plan was recommended for approval by the Planning & Zoning Board subject
to conditions on the report.Tarmo Purre, Agent and Bill Holmes, Conklin Porter & HOlmes,
were present. There was discussion of the parking spaces, and Bill Holmes said the
size would be shown on the final plan in detail.
Motion was made by Commissioner Adkins to approve the Regency Seville Preliminary Plan
subject to Staff Review. Seconded by Commissioner Jacobs. Discussion. In discussion,
Commissioner Jacobs asked the Manager to request the P&Z Board to give a recommendation
on lowering the size of the parking space from 200 to 180 sq. feet. Vote on the motion:
Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner
Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville, aye; motion carried.
e
. \
~ r .
e
Winter Springs Fire Department
102 North M.oss Rood
Winter Springs. FL 32707
Sto. #1 327-1000
#2 365.5802
FROM:
F I trr: c tof 1!iF
STAFF RPVIE
~:'J.i
,. .:~. ,.'
'\it. fa I Z~.:1 '
CITY OF WFNTEI SPIII6S
Rf:SEIVED
TO:
e } TV P t. AI/NEft-
REFERENCE:
MAR 2 2 J!I4
PHASE: f IIIIU-
-- CITY PLANNER
The following items, as indicated, have been reviewed and found to
be in conformance with, and/or acceptable to, Fire Department
requirements or standards with conditions or exceptions listed below:
Site/Staff Review Checklist
PROJECT:
REG 'EAley Sf: v Il...L t:
1.
FIRE HYDRANTS c
(e
a. Full compli'.nce with Chapter Six of ):he
City Code' ,l ,
b.Spacing .ndplacement
c. Access and availability (obstructions,etc.)
piA
~
).u '4:'
-~
,
2 . WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
b. Looped system
tri
~
A. Main size
3 . 'l'BOROGBFARES
c. Cul-de-sacs - adequate turnaround
area ~ equipment
p.,e.
rJ-
~
~.~
a. Paved right of way
b. Ingress and egress routes
.
" r .
. J ~
.
e
../e
e
e
Site/Staff Review Checklist
Page Two
4 . CONSTROCTION
a. Density
b. Type (materials)
c. Height
;vIA
1/./11
tV III
5. PROTECTION
liill
t1I /11
.
a. Detection system
b. Internal protection system
6.
CONDITIONS/EXCEPTIONS
4. Where hydrants are located between or adjacent to marked
parking spaces, care should be taken to allow sufficient
spacing to provide a full six (6) feet clearance on either
side of the hydrant to the probable location of a parked
vehicle. Protective barriers such as vertical steele "I"
beams or other suitable material should be installed to
preventvehicles from driving or backing into fire hydrants.
e
'DV~~~
f
I
1
.H;iC 711l'~, _
~D~~--'- --
Zoo'
I
L
"
t.
..
~
-
~l~ lZ'. "f "/2' -t'
"2,0 %oefl
~\qy
~
G ,PACE
.
--
. 4
. ,. .,.
---
.
.HIt"-~
ev.c& ..
.'~IFT. I
1/../fJf .
-
....
~
....
Q
1- MIN. ASPHAL TIC CONCRETE
8- BASE COURSE
,- ST AEMllZEO SUB-BASE
ST AffRE,VIEW'
. .
l
-A 'I
2,t:J I
.
-
.
.
,~
. & & . .
~ ~ .. ,
-~---
~.
" f!r,
I' J .
J~
.
'J
~()lJa)eJ!r4.
e,I J>J!!J..IAl-J:..
e
"e
. SLOPE.1"O~
TYPICAL PAV...NT a.eno..
I
f PAA'K./^,~.:::;p~ D/!!..,-;4/i,...
Co^,~UA/J j:ierg Ifk.~~
RE:4,~Nay ~EVII.L~
r ~ ". ),~.,., d~C~~
. .
e
e
e
e
e
_,9-s:.,.~ ~
~...-~ ...\NTE~ 'S: '.
".~u '< ~,',
.. 0 III ~ Y)) ,
~ :J;
,. . "... ~ /
... :/
I J .. . ~ ,..;;
..a k '<I. YJ.,It"" _-':'
't.l.'ol-r~.":> ,
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
400 NORTH EDGEMON AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1860
March 26, 1984
U. S. Postal Service
Attn: J. R. Long
Casselberry, Fl. 32707
Re: Street names, (None proposed)
Development/Unit: REGENCY SEVILLE
Applicant/Agent: ETTO CORP./CONKLIN, PORTER & HOLUES
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL
Dear Sir:
Please review the proposed Final Engineering (identified, attached for
your records, pursuant to your request-letter of R. D. Kelly, Postmaster,
dated: 15 Feb. 84) to assess the appropriateness of the street names
proposed (None) by the applicant (identified)..
At your earliest convenience please respond to this office with your
written approval/disapproval of the names proposed (None), and any recommen-
dations you may have for the assignment of street/property numbers by this
office. (Building Directory, Central Delivery proposed by applicant for
rental project on one parcel).
Your response will be assessed as criteria for approval of the final engin-
eering (no record plat will be required). Final approval is pending the
receipt of your recommendation.
Please address your requests for any additional copies of the plat, which you
may need for your purposes to the applicants (identified).
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
(J;t1IiJt ~U I
Walter Elwell/City Planner
WTE/mn
cc: Applicant/Agent
File (identified)
plat .~f ntlA'1f~'/A".,,1v17~9I"'a~ IKt al',ltalff,
Attachment:
Proposed rQQ9:rli
- .
'W
~
e
· 2 \f\bY
e
Planning and Zoning Board
Minutes
Wednesday, February 22, 1984
REGULAR MEETING
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Cindy Kaehler.
ROLL CALL
John Hatfield, Chairm~" present
Cindy Kaehler, Vice-Chairman, present
Richard DeFazio, present
Taru Joshi, present
Robert Smedley, present
CITY OFFICIALS
Walter Elwell, City Planner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 8, 1984.
Smedley moved to approve minutes as submitted. Joshi second. Vote: All aye.
Minutes approved as submitted.
ADNAC, PRELIMINARY PLAN (PUD), FISHER ROAD.
Elwell presentation. Discussion.
Smedley moved the application for approval of Preliminary Plan for Bluewater Trading Co.
be denied, and the applicant be informed that the first step should be in accordance to
~ction 44.85.5, paragraph two, found on page 1005. DeFazio second. Discussion
~Fazio withdrew second. Motion dies for lack of a second.
~'It~~e~~~~~~AAt"~.,~~~l;l~,,,~AM~;.o..t.~Ih1t~u.J..ii~.~~_'1~'::-'
engineer for Bluewater Trading Co., came forward to make his presentation for the
applicant. Applicant requested a recommendation from the Board tonignt (2-22-84).
Tom Binford, 409 Sheoah Blvd. Winter Springs, FL, speaking as agent for the property
owner and for the applicant requested that a decision be made tonight (2-22-84) with
or without prejudice. To either approve or deny the application as submitted.
Discussion. Hatfield moved to hear appli cant's presentation this' evening (2-22-84).
Motion dies for lack of a second.
Kaehler moved to table the applicant's request until the proper steps have been taken
so that the Board is covered legally in this matter. Smedley second.
Tom Binford, 409 Sheoah Blvd., Winter Springs, FL, came forward. Request he
respectfully go on the record that representing his client and the applicant that
"'"'....i4't'f.'~eny "da:mage1t~",~.~,"ve"~l:~ 'l~"'to. ~.~~"'.for."'8ft,....-,.eeours.~--~ .l>ll""'iII."',"""",W"~~~
Vote: All aye. Motion carries. Appli cant's request is tabled pending receipt
of the full Staff report and Zoning change request.
/TUSCAWILLA 14, PRELIMINARY PLAN (PUD) , WINTER SPRINGS BLVD., OVIEDO CITY LIMITS.
Elwell presentation. Applicant's presentation, Charlie True t Engineer for the
project came forward and made presentation. Discussion.
DeFazio moved that the Board recommend approval subject to the finDings of. further
Staff review. Smedley second. Discussion.
.te: DeFazio, aye; Hatfield, nay; Joshi, aye; Smedley, aye; Kaehler, nay.
e
e
- .
e
e
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
400 NORTH EDGEMON AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327.1800
March 16, 1984
,
MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNING/ZONING BOARD
FROM: CITY PLANNER/ELWELL
RE: Results of Staff Review Meetings on Tuscawilla/Unit 14,
pursuant to Planning/Zoning Bd. Approval subject to the
findings of further Staff Review
(Refer: Bd. minutes of 22 Feb. 84, attached)
Pursuant to the condition of the Board's approval (identified), the
findings of the Staff Review are attached for your information.
;.::. ''''''''~-~~'''''~~'''l(._.~,;.~-..-,......,.,:-,...;..,)..;.,~..:..;;~. ,~_:-,.:+.t;~~_)'i!.~J'_:""'~'l.l'.""'~~""::;!"r,":i-','" ""~l'''''''';\' :*,,';;. "\.t4~""'-"'~'jl'."ijl;-,oiI"'..'.. ........ ,,.~- ~.,'t.j.;i.-"'.'~:...t-~.~- ~.!~. .........!I'~.........ft~.,"'I"I'.~.'IIf";~Ao;~~)~_~;.~
~'."'l'~~~'.""'''-'-''-'_.'_1.'''- .',...:c"...4>.,. ...;" ....,_ .....~H,....'Y',~~'l;."'},.....""~~~"".:+,~_'\.'-\i.~~.~,......;l!lO..,; I' ;{d,_-......~..~....,~;.~.....r .:.
WTE/mn ..
.
'fo.
..~.....,-:>..-.:\..,..;."~..:-.:..4l",,~....~.~~-..~,,~~
Attachments: attached
File (identified)
"
e)
e
,
. .
"
V~rk pertormance product. .!e..ea JOB TASKS: SuPPorl 'ot t&.afi~ ';;"d Boards.
CITY CODES: Land Development, Zoning:
Walter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF WIBTEFt" S~INGS, FLORIDA.
STAFF REPORT, PLANNING DEPT. ~ORDER/~:84;2,1,2 / 24 FEB. 84
Development/Unit: TUSCAWILLA/UNIT 14 .
Applicant/Agent: WINTER SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT CORP. 0 . ALPERT .
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL
SUBDIVISION, PRELIMINARY PLAN (PUD)
Report Text, Page 1.
Assessment/
Validation
To:
From:
Re:
THE PLANNING/ZONING BD. RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT (IDENTIFIED)
SUBJECT TO THE FINDINGS OF FURTHER STAFF REVIEW (REFER: MINUTES OF PLANNING/
ZONING BD. MEETING 22 FEB. 84, IN PROGRESS), AND;
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE, THE STAFF HAS COMPLETED ITS REVIEW IN CONSULTATION WITH
THE APPLICANT (MEETING OF 24 FEB. 84) AND FINDS THE FOLLOWING REMAINING CON-
DITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF THE IDENTIFIED DEVELOPMENT: ?
d
ISSION ROAD FOR THE
}lIlf'~'~",
01. THE APPLICANT SHALL DEDICATE THE ACCESS RIGHTS TO
-.;:;.;~~ ti_.....t,_tJBM~~.'PftOIMAM~.1+.o!ftI'IUJ.~8*"....'flH5,-€Ifi;'
~';,;._~...
02. PHASED DEVELOPMENT, AS IT MAY BE PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT SHALL BE
REVIEWED FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO PLATTING, AND;
03. THE UNDESIGNATED TRACT FRONTING VISTAWILLA DRIVE SHALL BE DESIGNATED
"CONSERVATION, GREEN BELT," WITH OWNERSHIP RETAINED BY THE APPLICANT, AND'
04. THE APPLICANT SHALL END WINTER SPRINGS DRIVE, FOR SOME DISTANCE .TO BE
DETERHINED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SHORT OF
THE OVIEDO CITY LIMIT, AND;
05. THE APPLICANT SHALL EXTEND VISTAWILLA DRIVE NORTHWARD TO S.R. 419, IN
~"""""",,'-'''''I 'I .~1 ~ACC6Im'AN'C~"trtt:t"r'T~~''''~A'!TSrAt1'O'1tV.,TO 'rHt"cm O......"mr!l("'SPtn:'N~
AND AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT (IDENTIFIED), AND:
e)
,~.~.;'^~~'.~'~..~'
06. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A BUFFER AREA BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL AND
RESIDENTIAL AREA (LOTS 1,336) OF A DESIGN AND OTHERWISE TO THE SATIS-
FACTION OF THE CITY, AND
07. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL OTHERWISE MEET THE REQUIREMENT~ OF THE CITY CODES.
08.
THE APPLICANT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY ENGINEER
(SPECIFIED, MEMO OF 15 FEB. 84, ATTACHED).
WTE/mn
Attachments: attached;
cc: File (identified~
C~ty Commission,
.. Work performance product, add!..e. JOB TASKS: Support of ecJt"101l aIld Boards,
CIT'! CODES: Land Development, Zoning:
Val ter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CIT'! OF Wlft'J.'j!;l{ SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
.
STAFF REPORT, PLANNING ~. ~ ORDER/~: 84,2,1,2 / 16 MAR. 84
Development/Unit: Tuscawi11a/UNIT 14 .
Applicant/Agent:WINTER SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT CORP.!J. ALPERT
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW!APPROVAL
SUBDIVISION, PRELIMINARY PLAN (PUD) Assessment/
Report Text, Page 1, RESULTS OF STAFF REVIEW MEETING (CONTINUED FROM 24 FEB.84 Validation
To: CITY MANAGER/Rozansky, and all parties who may become identified relevant
to the above identified request for review/action,
From: CITY PLANNER/Elwell (s ign/ date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Re: STAFF REVIEW-for action toward approval of the above identified develop-
ment.
AT ITS MEETING, THURSDAY, 9 &~., 15 MAR. 84, CITY HALL,
ATTENDED AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPLICANT/AGENT IDENTIFIED/J. ALPERT-PRESENT
..................................................................... 1.
.
,AND ;
2. CITY MANAGER/ ABSENT
..................................................................... 2.
"'" il'.'~1:,"~r"",._'.__ .;,.",,\Uf';~... 11II~'hijl"""",,,,,~~,,,,,;'~'Ii"1~..~ .At1':'o"'::'" "" .,.,...;--+.".......' f. ......,"1o.,,__.~<'i<\oW>_~.v'~~.....~.....'if...,.
3. BUILDING OFFICIAL/ SMITH-PRESENT .
._1 *. At"
..................................................................... 3.
,AND;
4. ENGR./PUBLIC WORKS DIR./HASSLER-PRESENT
..................................................................... 4.
,AND;
5. FIRE CHIEF/HOLZMAN-PRESENT
..................................................................... 5.
,AND;
6. PLANNER/ ELWELL-PRESENT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6.
I
,AND;
:, .""'."".>'.''''''''!"\.,.,,..},,~,Petil~,;;(3ItKPf~OR:l:JHK~.'''..'''''.'
...."!"iC'.~:...!. )c'--"'-':~~~~';".~';~~~~1!_-~.".' ''''"~'-.
":."~'r<~~':"-_-
7. .. ."~"
.... ..................... .............. ................. ...... .......
,AND;
8. RECORDING SECRETARY! ABSENT-(TAPE RECORDED)
..................................................................... 8.
,AND ;
9. OTHER (SPECIFY); WILLIAM E. TIPTON,P.E. ,AGENT FOR TUSCAWILLA
....... of............................................................. 9.
,AND FURTHER;
.
e
e
STAFF REPORT, PLANNING ~. WORK ORDER/DATE: 84,21,2 / 16 MAR. 84
Avelopment/Unit: TUSCAWILLA/UNIT 14
( ~plicant/ Agent: WINTER SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT CORP. / J. ALPERT
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL
Assessment/
Report Text, Page 2 RESULTS OF STAFF REVIEW MEETING (CONTINUED FROM 24 FEB84 Validation
THE APPLICANT/AGENT (IDENTIFIED), AND THE APPLICANT'S TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEER (IDENTIFIED) ADDRESSED PRIOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RECOMMENDED BY
THE STAFF (REFER CONDITIONS: 04,05 STAFF REVIEW MEETING 24 FEB. 84), and
PRESENTED PRELIMINARY RESULTS (MAPS, TABULATIONS-NO NARRATIVE) OF A CON-
TINUING TRAFFIC ZONE ANALYSIS OF THE TUSCAWILLA PUD. THE APPLICANT/AGENT'S
POINTS MADE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
01. THEY INTEND TO COMPLETE THEIR ANALYSIS AS A BASIS OF SUPPORT FOR:
.......
A. THEIR TIMING FOR EXTENSION OF VISTA WILLA DRIVE TO S.R. 419
(ESTIMATED THREE (3) YEARS TO ACHIEVE GRADE CROSSING), AND;
B. THEIR INTENTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF WINTER SPRINGS BLVD.
EASTWARD FROM NORTHERN WAY TO S.R. 426 (OVIEDO), AND FURTHER.
02.
THEY EXPECT, FROM THE PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THEIR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
THAT THEY WILL COMMIT TO THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENT OF THE WINTER
SPRINGS BLVD. (LINK "...DETERMINED TO BE OVER CAPACITY WITH BUILDOUT"):
e
A. IMPROVE TO FOUR (4) TWELVE (12) FT. LANES, AND;
:4- . ff~ iI"liJW 4_ .. r .,..:, l(~.'''''..H .". II """"__....~......';....""""'__._.Il.* ,._ ".,."........__"""...i........ _.(OIIr,..,)""",...;:,~., >. .', .. ..,......:>".;.<(........_.....,.,,"""~;.:::::
B. IMPROVE TO MEET PROTECTED NEEDS.
THE CONSENSUS OF THE STAFF WAS TO ACCEPT THE APPLICANT/AGENT'S DATA AND
REMARKS AS INFORMATIVE, AND THAT THE CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL SPECIFIED BY
STAFF (IDENTIFIED, REFER: STAFF REPORT, 24 FEB. 84) REMAIN UNCHANGED.
ILL ~ "'At*t~h;:;ts:-" :P'~n':i;:~.ry-f~:rl~..:~ny-:!~...i.~t"~J_1!I# _Ill) "" ....~I_U__~.,__,.I'''.4..,... . .~~--~~.~;:.:
WTE/mn
cc: Applicant/Agent (identified),
Planning/Zoning Bd.,
All Departments,
File (Identified)
(-
e
I,
.~.,.
.~
i.
SIngle Family
'artments .-.
~
~
<.
i.
~
.f:
...."....,1,..........
~
--1-
.,
Q
~
i
-
-
-
600_:'
'- -
-
Lf lb =
--
/;;\ ~,
~ ~
-
-
~
~
..J;;U.
1/2-
~
%
%
owl
'10
~ ~?:-
o
o
~
"'"",
~
~1-
'I,
~
~
.:,
.:,
.:,
~
~.
~
~
o
..
4f
U
en
~
~
Reta i I .,.//I
Office ...
I
. I
Condominiums
Patio Homes
_J _
~
S R 419
~
@
~
t
""""""'."',1
o ~ '.~ ,'h..-
o
~
FtlT
e
~.!.l ~
.; I
SPRINGS
'-
...
...
...
...
... . .
... Jr ....J ..,
~ ;...J, '_
" -
~ 0
-
....,
"""""",
"
-
.
-
_1 5 1984NAL YSIS ZONES
TUt~~~EVELOPMENT PLAN
3/;ifgy
mil TiPTQH ASSOCIATE's
INCORPORATED
- O~L.HOO
II
~~
~~
I V "\
oT~UJh ~
I!'> SQ
I ='r i
: ~
~-~'J-
I' .,:,. .
e
e
e
Ab'
o
:I~
o I.J
"" ~
o
r--L
L.J-- .. U
\1
"-
....
....... (3)
-
~ .
....
....... a:
I
(J)
}..
....
-
~
p
~
e
.-.
x
\U
~
0- ,
,
'=>- ,.J
-
,
I
~~ ~ 31
".-...,...} J~"" .,..,~"",...,......". .\.-...N"''!'",_~,,,~,,,,,
~
9CL
o
t~
,
,
e
- -
-~ ~
-.
"'Q
~ '"
G~8
o I: z
:: 2 c
! ~ ~
l -
~
EI
~
~
~
I
~:
~
I
I
. ':-',~:\o,
I
,
e
\J
t
!
\-
~
~
.
~
~
~
V) I"-
.....
z \~
.
<!)
-
.Ki"~'-"""""""
V)
<
.....
:J
o
o
.J
:J
~
w
~
~
~
:J
o e
~;I~
o
e
f--u--
"^
~ l__J--
\)
~-.. '
!... a i
~ III '
i~ ~ g i
:i ~ 5 I
~ 15
f -
;
EJ
:t
~
~
I
I
L_--i 0 ~
~ I
~ > ll! ~
,~ "'-
..: ....
,l- l:) l1'
?
/: l ......
, ~ 5
VI 1..,
t CL
, E;
" I \J
L--
(7)
~
Q:
en
t.n .1lh~_~'~'1W'JJ.),)IAl ..~~ -'
, '. .~
~
,
I
r1
I
I
~
.! ~<v~
'0 o~"\
t"~
, )
""...' "~"~~~1.~-'~'~~"''''T~~-~,,~~;-.t:~h''
I
e
~
--
--
\
~
I
I
L
-
I
I
,~~~.-v~...;~.",~;.:o:'
.
.
.
';
,0
i
i
f
1
1f
I ~"';"""'''''' e fA) I 'TN
7Oi"t
I st'I~
C~'5 T1,.J~ =- bJ!. 31
. /l&,)r-CT3fl) -; ~,R.
(orlil '- =
419
-r
!SlJ1tt';)()L.[
~--
--,
L_,
,
CS
0:
,f?,
I
I
,~j
.
I
L,
I
I
l
':', '" '"\
,
,
I
,
-_J
~:~
--
--
,
t .
1
".I.
$j#/fl
CITY PLANNER
I~~III
.'
o ~oo 1000
L...r-"' I
FEET _
J I
I
. :)
;J
I
I
e
lIOClATE S
TII"TON AS
INCOItP'OfllA T (0
,.
e
i
I
-i
I
f
1-
f
r
I
"
$,
~
.
J'~
Ip
--
--
, 'I'. ,,':
LJ " /. ,
· ~ L 1I- '
... W, n.J rr,c.
\II IA T 10 ItDJ'Lr 7L "'_~"')__
7ef ,,;,(f-L. L~DS c
~".n ,"or' 419
",.,'-t ~ e A S.R.
IL T
0.3 =
~~,.,~e
\.)~ il- ~ :
7t$4 .:or
~ I 0, ~"o
0:/0
--, -
1....,
I
I
. ''lj'2..
~ -t 0;)
.- .,
,0
().~
.
I
L,
I
I
I
MAR 1 5 1984
. ~/l4/fl-
C'TV PlANNER
I~I~:,
~uo 100'
o ---" :i
~ a
FEET ..
-- I
3 ~.;,o:". I
~.
i'='''' I
8OC1ATt:
TI~N - TKD
~
~
e
e
~
~;I~
o
--
f--L--
L__J--
':S w
I U ..
o.
"I:
:2
~I~
..
~
p
~
110
~
~
(V\
en
..
~ J
ClC ~
(/) I.r\
-,
Q:: €
~
/
~.~~~,J~..,..J,....J1~~. ..,.\~,**~ _Ul'4'ft,*"t
'. '."~~_-' <;,,,,,,,,';'.)J"Jr~~ 111 MJ.*~~~: ~
,
I
,J
.
I
:;':~. ,~"'/'!:"*A........,,~;,~., ~'';'';1Il~:'f#-ll <~~',','"
.
.
'.,~"'- '-:"
Oil
..J ".'.'''''''''t+4t. ,t:o-.:t7,"",)..", ,,,,..~'.t'~,~;,~,
e
--
--
()'
t
v
oi
uJ
? t-
O <5
r:
VI
)i. :-
~ ~
::;r>-p.
.
,
,
,
'"-"."1
cr. ;::
j ~
() -~
t:i
o
o?
1
I
I
e
tit
an Of W'''!T~R SPRINGS
Rr:-'-i;:IVED
e
~.S3.a
_- ",\HTE~ '.
(f,CJ)
. . .-
. /'
~'.., -'" ':'..?
'..z:~""
FES 1 5 1984
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA,
.00 NORTH EDGEMON AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327.1800
CITY PlANNER
~/, S1 e1-
MEMO TO: Walter Elwell, City Planner
FRO~ Hassler, P.E., City Engineer/Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Review of 7USC/JWILLA UNIT 11- - ?KELI/t1/N/fRy PLr/N
I have reviewed the subject project and find it is not in compliance with the
~ollo~ing checked requirement(s) of Article II, Division 2, Section 14-30.,
Subsection (0.)(2) of the City Code.
~
Preliminary plan supporting data. The preliminary plan shall be
drawn on standard twenty-four-inch by thirty-six-inch paper for
convenient filing at a reasonable scale (normally one inch equals
one hundred (100) feet) and shall include the following:
e
[] 1. Name of development; date of preliminary plan or revision;
c..._~:JIIilIt!o\ill_~tJ!'I'I4"""", * ,......;... ..,Ji~~f: ,~...P~J;t~P~..,~~J~te,.aAT~~ge..,.)...n<:li.Qe,......,.,...,..~.r..;,..,....~".
the tract being subdivided; total number of lots; name,
address and telephone nQ~ber of developer, surveyor and
engineer.
2. Location map showing relationship between area proposed ~or
development and surrounding area.
Legal description of tract to be subdivided.
Boundaries of tract shown by a heavy line.
Existi:1~ streets. The name, location and right-of-wa:,'
width c: all existin[ inproved streets, rishts-of-way
and p~atted streets wi thin two hundred (200) feet 0:
the proposed subdi Yision; surface eleys:tio:1, incl'Jjin~
any legally established center line elevations; walks,
ff,~,.'''il'''''rr~~~..,,",t''~'445''. ~.tj}e<rS"~~~~ltet;e!~.".~~".., "., ',."^ '"'::''1'"'' ::"'-.:""tt~!''!''+i-t'''' "'~'!'i;..,....:tf!#;
o 6. Froposed streets. The name of temporary designation
(Street A, B, C, etc.), right-of-way, and type and width
of pavement. Include any streets shown on the adopted
comprehensive plan.
[] 7. Proposed easements or rights-of-way other than for streets
(e.g., for drainage, pedestrian ways, bridle paths, or
bicycle paths), location, width and purpose.
[] 8. Lots. Lot lines and scaled dimension, lot numbers, and/or
block numbers, and building setback lines for irregularly
shaped lots. The nuilding setback distance is the distance
required to meet the minimum lot width of the zoning district.
[] 9. Sites, if any, for multifamily dwellings, shopping centers,
churches, industry, parks, playgrounds, and other public and
nonpublic uses exclusive of single-family dwellings.
o
[]
o
o
3.
L.
5.
e
e
e
e
MEMO TO: Walter Elwell, City Planner
Page 2
o 10. Names of abutting subdivisions, recordation date and number.
o 11. Existing utilities on and abutting the tract; location, size
and invert elevation of sanitary, storm, and combined sewers;
location and size of water mains; location of gas lines, fire
hydrants, electric and telephone poles, and streetlights. If
water mains and sewers are not on or abutting the tract,
indicate the direction and distance to, and size of nearest
ones, showing invert elevation of sewers.
[] 12. Proposed utilities. A statement on the proposed method of
water supply and sewage disposa1.
[] 13. Other existing improvements, including buildings, on the tract.
[] 14. Natural features, including lakes, marshes or swamps, watercourses,
and other pertinent features; wooded areas. A general description
of soils and existing vegetation on the tract shall also be
provided (Seminole Coun~y Soils Survey).
[] 15. Existing contours at one-foot intervals based on U.S. Coast and
Geodetic Datum for the tract to be subdivided and, where prac-
ticable, extending twenty-five (25) feet beyond the tract
boundarj.
[] 16. Proposed surface drainage with direction of flow and method of
~ disposition to the natural drainage area indicated or other
~ acceptable stormwater systems.
~ 17. Subsurface conditions on the tract., to a minimum depth re~ested
...., ....'*.-.,. .",OH-...-.- '--!"Yr/8(t'TtY' tt:..~,~~y i-~;i'~~ ;"""i~am~"~r;d'~ti'ft"s~.o1" 't~~rs~ad':.\6...{I""""'w" .- .
W L ascertain subsurface soil, rock and groundwater conditions; depth
rlN,-I#- to groundwater; locaticn a:1d results of soil percola":-ion tests;
location and extent of muck pockets. Tests shall indicate
O weight-bearing capability of the soil after stripping and compacting.
18. Zoning on and abutting the tract.
[] 19. Proposed public improvements; highways or other major imrreveme:1ts
:r:l-a:1ned by rutlic authori ti es for :~ut '-Are consi deration on or ne5.!'
the tract.
o 20. DrRft 0: restrictive covenants, if any. == the develop~ent is a
FUJ or rrhrate development of any nature, restrictive cover.:ar.ts
will be required, if available at the time of submission.
,...." ,......._,..... ,...~,.~.,*"",...lJ_...~~.....~~~~.e.~w~;r~..~~".t\~~..r~s,t..eQ"..~~~. .tiI<~*l~". !>.Il""f~'
cross sections of the proposed gradine:, roadwa:y and si dewalk,
preliminary plans of proposed potable water and fire-fightin;
systems, sanitary sewage system, storm water management syste~ls.
All elevations shall be based on U.S. Coast and Geodetic Datum.
(Ord. No. 235 2, 5-26-81)
CAH/pkl
e
cc: Richard Rozansky, City Manager
e
e
e
:"c.>;::'::~~;,
. ~ , .
. . I ::
,.: /' .~
. . .'. "'''::...-;', ,.:::.:'
. -: ;..
CITY OF WI:\'TER SPRli\GS, FLO:UO:\
-- .----------.-----.. ----.--...----------- ---.-----
400 t~:J;rrH [DG=t.~JN NJ::NU::
WINTt:R SPf.C',;:;S. FlOR!DA 32703
T!)~e~hor,,, (305) 3?7.1300
October 19, 1983
1.!EMO TO: City l';8..'1ager
SUBJECT: Upgrading of \';'inter Springs Boulevard
The Staff met on Thursday, October 13, 1983, at 11: 00 -~.j and again on Tuesday,
October 18, 1983, at 11:00 AM to consider the need for upgrading 'Winter SprinGs
Boulevard, assuming there v.ill be connect.ion with SR 426 OT the proposed 434
Corridor eventually.
It is the consensus that such connection to an arterial road will change the
function of \.Jinter Sprir.~s Boulevard to a minor arteri[;.l cO:ilparable to Tuscawilla
Road.
First and foremost it is strongly recoIJ.Lended by the Staff that the speej limit
be maintdned. at 30 r.TE.
e
Second, it is recoU":lller,de.:l th8.t paving not be pemitted to extend to the ~';inter
Springs-Oviedo boundary until after both collector roads plc.nned to connect to
SR 419 on the north are cor:~pleted and open to relieve sose of the traffi:: inpa::t.'
~-.::.~~*..~"':~A.~............~~....-.,..-~~-...~........."...-,.. '-..~'~-.'" .~,- 'J ,~, ,"-', ',~~''''.J!......t'\"\: -.._"-.~..,~.-" ~,.,'n~\"'~"_^",, ....:.-",...;.:_..~.i..~.-t,..-...t-*.....~..~...-'.,:4)orfL\o.......:t...t:.....~ ~"_'%oo."..,.:._...,..:.",;",~ '''':: "...''; ""'~_'f_
Third~ it is recorm;ended that the current paving and drainage improvemel:f:.s of
'iUnt.er Spl'inr;s Boulevcird be upgraded to lY:eet the Cod~ requLce!:1ents for a di videJ.
arterial :co:l.d. This wO:..lld req"..lirc the follo-;ving:
(1) Increase paving width 2 feet each direction to be two 20-foC\t sectfo:-:s
plus curbs. This width is satisfactory only at 30 r.LPH speed. Greater
spe~ds wo~ld require wider paving for two lanes of vehicles mo':ing i:-:
one direction side by side.
(2)
Utilize part of the median to gain the added width rather th2!"", distUTO
the right-of-way outside the present paving to a\'oid possible ....l:.5-
J r~~4~~~,~n~~.~:~-~.~Z...;::.:~~~;~~~~.~~,;11:?:2.~;:...~~~t~.;:..~~~~~~:,;~.. .,.,..... ~.~:
:...~:.:
,:.: .- :~:: _. J _P ..~ . ,.-,:
(3) Place a condition on the apPToval of Tuscm:illa Unit 14 that the
construction needed to upgrad.e ";inter Springs Boulevard be acco~plisr"ed
simult.aneously '"ith either the connection ot the road,\'a.;r throil:;"h to
the East (SR l26 or the 43!~ Corridor) or (2) the developr::ent of the
last single f8J:'.il;y unit in 'l'uscawilla cast of Tuscawilla Road ~ ....hichever
co:::<es first, so that construction takes place prior to build-o"Jt by
"linter Springs Development Corp.
e
(4) ~"::Jnjtor the t~c.ftic counts on \'!intcr Spri.ngs Houlev:n'd to detcr::-:ine '"Then
t.o inst~.11 t!"::.ffic lie:hts. Explore the ider. or <,.n c3cro...... acco'.int to
filnJ traffic lishts by asscss;:J:'nt to dcvelof~!'S aLOOf; the roa.J.,;,:,/-bot:l
si n~:lf'-fQ.,"\ny a:Ll multi-fw:,il:r.
.) /'. L-'././
L..Jt /..-': ." ~ ; , ~ . -/<. c<-C4'-....-
..<- -~~ , --;~,~. -- ~'- ~-,..~. -~
e
e
.
.~.~ ,\~;,,~.\", ,
_' . ~ -R ~.
":1'i.'-'~"
'f, l~ ,....~ "'\.
':.f.: I; 4.~ .J,
j ,-' ~. ,
"\ ""J'~
. . --
, .-
#1 .... ,-:'
f;", "'t,",~D '" "'"
I .. ), '''' t ~.I....,."''4,..;..-r;>
,:,~~'S-"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
400 NORTH EDGEMON AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327.1800
October 17,1983
MEMO TO: Jacqueline Koch~ Director of Administrative Services
FRO~~ Hassler, P.E., Director of Public Works/Engineer
SUBJECT: Winter Springs Blvd. - Reclassification, Scope of Work
Should the future classification of Winter Springs Blvd. be an "arterial
road" or'~ivided arterial road", considerable work would be required.
The existing road way is divided, however, each lane of paving is 18 feet
between curbs. The City code, section 14-126 page 803 requires 24 feet
paving between curbs for each lane.
e
The median could be removed, each existing lane widened towards the center
and a center lane for turning installed.
~'" .........~., ~ '*'.lr......:-ot.q/' _I.' Jill: UL...~.lt~.~<.~,...,~~~t'WY! nJjf!) 1"H""~ ~jl1'!lW.l....""~ .1J'''~ ~'t"'.....':~~.,!:.)~,.w..,.ri",..f't"'_!IoJ',..........~'-':!r~~...~~
The additional width for each lane could be obtained by leaving the median as
is and widening towards the right-of-way.
Any proposed work or redesign will involve possible change to stormwater
drainage, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, and etc., and in some areas
may include relocation of street lighting.
~~,~'.lffr*,.J IT TfLI~W~ll L ~L'jj~ 1."t.n"'Jt~'" ~ l~"" .!'lL fl" ",Il..r ~J l.....f. ..~r'tt1.~:.,,.,l~..V~.~lI1,vt,r.lt t~,.,..'lI"'Tt-*'''IUJ' .r~JAnlr '__~f~
cc: City Manager
e
e
e
:e
? (; :'~~T0E~ ',~"
~, ~-~ .
;,t/ ".-w....'" .~;,.
1 U Ii . Y",
. l '
). . '\ .,... " ;;
't It,t. ..,
\ .., ..... 0'
'. ~ ......... \"
1\ ...,..... :0,..44_ _'
\ ", ... C- f $.~
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
400 NORTH EDGEMON AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS, FlORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327.1800
MEMO TO: City Planner
SUBJECT: Winter Springs Blvd. - Classification/Condition
DATE: October 3, 1983
It is apparent that at some future date Winter Springs Blvd. will
be opened to Oviedo. With this in mind and considering the level and
type of traffic we will probably experience. I feel that we should
look into not only a possible re-classification of Winter Springs Blvd.,
but also look at the road's ability to handle the level of traffic we
anticipate will be using the road in the future.
,
~e
You need to sit down with the staff and develope a scope of work/
guidelines so that we may begin immediately to study the problem a..d
.' make recommendations to the Commission.
.....l~.4.~1......~!'....H..#..,......~.....,,,...~~~...,t~~~4-\..~,,~,,..~.....L,~';"""'~;'~~l' ~.~~. ,~....t.d-~, ,~\;-....,l.:~."".\>.......,,~~ ,-, :"""~''!'~'"~''''''''' ~~M'~~~ iIJ""'~. ,.,...,~.
If you require any assistance let
:1
"
~
~
~,
I
"
1
'.' ~
:l
RR/pkl
.
~~--_'~";'''.c-;,l.. .l......,.,..t,-...,,~;.. "-"1 -t:e.~'C~~.:..*,~,..t.;.S'~~~;"'~:f~'"
c9~
~.. .."., '~,i: _,-",;"",..,,.ir. lor'-
.. .__~ ..:,~.~.\ ",'/\.,...~a.i.;.~~1:.f _'..;I,!II.....~.:~~to .,; .__l;.,.......~W......1! ......~-
..
"1
.1
~
!e
i
.
I
e
e
.\
\\
...
Regular Heeting. City CO!'1:nission. Sept. 27, 1983
Page 4
82-83-28
e Notion was made by Commissi oner Adkins to remove Kenneth Smi th and George Nahoney
from the Code Enforcement Board. Seconded by Commissi.oner Grove. Discussion. Vote
on the motion: Com.-nissioner Jacobs, aye; Com.nissioner Grove, aye; Com..'TIissioner
Hartman, aye; Co~:nissioner Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville, aye; motioh carried.
Co.-nmissioner Grove nominated Hike DePasquale.
Cormnissioner Hartraan nominated Haryann Cheeseman and Tom Stoddard.
Com:nissioner AJkins nominated Art Hoffr.1an.
Notion was made by Commissioner Jacobs that Naryann Cheeseman and Hike DePasquale
be appointed to the Code Enforcement Board with their terms expiring in 1986; and
}Ir. Tom Stoddard and Hr. Art Hoffman be appointed with their terms expiring in 1984.
Seconded by CO~lissioner Grove. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Grove,
aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner Adkins, aye; Corrilllissioner Linville,
aye; Coramissioner Jacobs, aye; motion carried.
~ointment of Trustee for Pension Plan:
Hotion \,Tas made by Commissioner Jacobs to' nominate Troy Piland as Trustee for the
Pension Plan for City EElployees. Seconded by Co~~issioner Linville. Discussion. Vote
on the motion: Co~~issioner Hartman, aye; Conrnissioner Adkins, aye; Co~~issioner
Linville, aye; Corr~issioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Grove, aye; motion carried.
e
.first ReadiI~of Ord. }io. 279, Panama!Fruit\,;Qod:
}btion \-.'as made by Cor:missioner Adkins that \,'e completely ignore this issue until
they bring a f'inal plan in for approval. Seconded by Commissioner Jacobs. Discussion.
. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville, aye; Commissioner
Jacobs, aye; Conmissioner Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye; motion carried.
'-'.......<4\"e.....NII! ...)!o'......"<""...",......,.....'--""'-"'.............,,-.........1llOIII!'!f.....~.,...~;., Ililll jn: ,...... .1l<j.,Pf"~_. !llJll'1 P"--ltlt'JjU_, '. ...,...."" l_lJ ~Jlj ,~._"'U~
City Nanager - Richard Rozansky:
Bid-Retail Systew Terminal: ~lanagcr Rozansky recommended we accept the bid for the
electronic cash register from Central Business Machines in the anount of $1,495.00.
}[otion was Dade by Commissioner Jacobs to accept the bid. Seconded by Commissioner
Adkins. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Co~~issioner Linville, aye; Co~~issioner
Jacobs, eye; COITli-..issioner Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner Adkins,
aye; motion carried.
P'Reports:
~!anager Rozan.sky reported that the preliminary plan for ~~~.g~~..~~~E ..~~,_~as been
submitted. In addition to this the engineering for the last .b~!<!~e in Tusca\1111a
.<'<If' ..~- "-......~as.~~ t56'5"u hni"rf't'ea--ror:-" ~pp~-J~i"f'. .....'1lI~M:gett"~Wf"!fttt ~l"ti~ '''':r'fd~S"~~!'ftt!~''I.~d'1 n -~
ha~ a sidewalk on one side. . As this is going to be a major thoroughfare) }fanager
Rozansky felt the Commission should consider sidewalks on both sides.
e
Nr. Jay Alpert, ~:inter Springs Developr.lent Corp., said he asked the Staff to revie\..T
the engineering on the bridge for D.E.R. He said'the last step for getting D.E.R.
approval for a bridge, D.E.R. approves the span, approves the construction and they
are concerned in the process that "\"e approach the City that the bridge \1111 be in
and the City approves that type of bridge structure and that that type of bridge
structure \Jill be acceptable to the City. He said all \o1~ asked was for the City Staff
to revie", th~ constructi.on plans of the bridge and come back te, us if the City had any
objection to that type of bridge. There was discussion of Unit 14.
..
e
e
Regular Heeting, City Commission, Sept. 27, 1983
Pa~e 5
82-83-28
.
}tot ion \-135 made by Curr.missioner Adkins. seconded by COi1l1':liss loner Jacobs to place
on the agenda the item of the last bridge in Tusc~\.:i l1a. Discussion. Vote on the
motion: Commissioner Jacohs, aye; Cormi1issioncr Crove, aye; CO::;::Jissioner Hartm.:lu,
aye; Con:nissioner Adkin~;, aye; Commissioner Linville, aye; motion carried.
Hotion '.fas made by Commissioner Grove that we advise the City ~lanager that it is
the intention of this City Con~ission there be sidewalks on both sides and should be
som2 type of a handrail. Seconded by Com~issioner Linville. Discussion. Vote on the
mo tion: Comlnissioner Grove, aye; COIT!:nissioner Hart",an, aye; Coa'TIissioner Adkins, aye;
COi':-,missioncr Linville, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; motion carried.
~ConL'TIissioner Jacobs asked that when ~inter Springs Development comes in with the
preliminary plan on Tuscawilla Unit 14, to also give us some idea as to when they
are going to put the roads through to S. R.419.
Manager Rozansky continued with his reports. He ~aid he will draft a resolution
supporting the stand of the County Connission on S. R. 419; as far as Wade Street,
a letter has been sent to the D.O.T. stating it is a private crossing which we
would like converted to a public crossing and to send rules ?~d guidelines and
cost estimates for having that changed. As of this date we have not received a
legal opinion from the County Attorney on the Old Sanford-Oviedo Road, and a rne~o
will be sent to Duncan Rose.
e
Com:i1i~sion Seat I - Jim Hartman:
----------.--
Co~nissioncr Hartm3n talked about the letter from Cardinal IndOstries in reference
to new legislation being considered that will allo~ nobile ho~es in any residential
zoning. This ,..'ill be discussed at the Florida League Convention.
---"""~-'-~~~l~s~~J~tn" II t ~tfltl~~f\ft~~"JI ".'.~~" ...L~ w.:1~.~tr ..kf(~ ...~~_... "...:,.,..... '-..rw aJ,ut"l *-Jilt _I 1 ~ III .... ~.~
At the last \'~orkshop Neeting Commissioner Adkins had brought up the fact that Lonb't.;ood
had p3ssed a resolution opposing the changes in the Seminole County Gas Tax. COcIl:nissione
Adkins feels this Commission should decide to pass a resolution either opposing any
further changes in the gas tax formula or to go along with the changes that may be
made in the next tcn years.
Con~issioner Adkins said when he first got on the Commission he had requested informa-
tion why the street lights were not put on the section of Winter Springs Boulevard
bet\.~een Northern \~ay and the Clubhouse. There was debate about \"hat type of lights
were to be put there and he asked what the decision was on th~t.
~~ - Lj I~D 1l'1"1..~,~~.f#tl~~.w'.t8ll' "~l1iV81i", De~}.Qpment.~~PQt..ti.Q.s.i...,.~il$.,9,..J:,~ . Wi,i....g~,sJ:~,.~~n~.t..._....,.".~..,..."'.
liehting would be placed along those areas of Winter Springs Boulevard that were not
developed at the time when development occurred. }lr. Alpert said originally the City's
plan was to go for some overhead wiring but that '.fas cancelled because the Code said
no overhead wiring. Another question has been asked the City, - there is ,.riring
and concrete poles availab-le on Northern \..'ay, all th2 way a10:1g Tuscany Place and
there also are no street li~ltS. Residents are requesting street lights in that
area, and they are asking since the lines are there and the poles are there, why
can't they get street lights.
e
..
e
e
e
.
--f
ie
~
1
f
i
f
!
'01 'T/,/"/ AWIUIt!O)Jff )f
:: :::m::::.:r::g :::at . .1
f
'"
x
Approval
Approval
Site Plan Review
e
PLICATION
CITY 0 WINTER SPRINGS
~
I
.
I;
AND ENGINEERING FOR THiS DEVELOPMENt WIrH
r
f
SUBMIT THREE COPIES OF THE P
THIS APPLICATION.
Applicant
1500 Wi
Address
I
f.
f
t
(If the applicant is
not the owner of the
subject property, the
application must include
a letter of authorizatio
signed by the owner.)
t
t,
i
;.
!i
Wi nter S
"
~.
,I,
..
~;.
f:
..
;"Y
_.. 'f
Legal Description of Subject operty: See attached Dlan - Tuscawilla Unit 14
~.
!!'
~'ota 1 Acres
275 . 80
l
1
~
Total Usab le Acres J
f
and Types of Roads Abu~ting .property):
,;>;.
tawi11a and Winter Spr1n's Blvd.
General Location (Include Nam
West of. Bear Creek between V
Present Land Use
Zoning Classification
Details of Request
't
~
Vacant
..
.t
J
PUD S
<
.1
.",'
~
.1
336 Sing
Dat. fll/Y)
Fee i ~ ,;-"2)
Ordinance References
~ * * *
..
t ;}f I j
Recetft No.
,-----
-'
., Signature. I
'f
Date
'7 -/..f - .rJ
,;
1
Legal and Ownership Verified
Action
j
n_ __--=-t
.
)
.
,
-~
e
e "
~w~/r
e
Planning and Zoning Board
Minutes
Wednesday, March 14, 1984
ROLL CALL
John Hatfield, Chairman, present
Cindy Kaehler, Vice-Chairman, present
Richard DeFazio, present
Taru Joshi, present
Robert Smedley, present
CITY OFFICIALS
Walter Elwell, City Planner
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Robert Smedley.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MARCH 8, 1983.
Kaehler moved to approve the minutes as submitted. Joshi second. Vote: All aye.
Minutes approved as submitted.
e
SUBDIVISION, PRELIMINARY PLAN ( EXISTING PUD ZONING), OAK FOREST/PHASE 2
Elwell presentation. Charlie True representing the applicant made his presentation.
Discussion.
DeFazio moved to approve the preliminary plan as shown contingent upon no development
be done on Tract A without submission of preliminary plans on Tract A and including
staff recommendations. Smedley second. Discussion
Hatfield moved to amend to include a provision requesting that the City Commission
take some steps to determine whether a Collector Road is appropriate and what type
of a plan should be developed so it can be considered with this application. The
City make a determination concerning Tract A so that the developer can proceed in
consideration with this application. Smedley second for discussion. Discussion
Smedley withdrew second. Motion dies for lack of second.
Smedley moved the original motion be amended to request City Commission determine
whether or not the City will want to use a portion or all of Tract A.
Hatfield second for discussion. Discussion. Hatfield withdrew second. Smedley
withdrew motion.
Vote on original motion: All aye. Motion carries.
Hatfield moved that the Planning and Zoning Board direct the City Planner to review
all existing files and information concerning Collector and Connecting Roads between
Tuscawilla and the other part of the City be made and report back to the Board at
the next meeting. Smedley second. Vote: All aye. Motion carries.
Smedley moved we recommend to the City Commission that in interest of freeing up
the Oak Forest Developer that some consideration be given to whether or not
Tract A should continue to be reserved or that the developer should be freed up
from his gentleman's agreement not to develop Tract A. Hatfield second. Discussion
Vote: All aye. Motion carries.
e
ANNEXATION - LOT 6 AND PORTION OF LOT 7. ENTZMINGER FARMS ADD. #2, 3..75 ACRES.
Smedley moved to take up item 6 of the amended agenda for discussion Hatfield second
for discussion. Discussion. Hatfield withdrew second. Smedley withdrew motion.
e
(. Work performance product, a.resses JOB TASKS: Support of ~ssion and Boards,
CITY CODES: Land Development, Zoning:
Walter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
STAFF REPORT, PLANNING ~. ~ ORDER/~: 84,2,1,1/9 MAR 84
Development/Unit: OAK FOREST/PHASE 2 .
Applicant/Agent: Bl:L-AlRE HOMES/J. ALPERT
Review/Action Requested: PLANNING/ZONING BD. REVIEW/APPROVAL
SUBDIVISION, PRELIMINARY PLAN (EXISTING PUD ZONING)
Report Text, Page 1, RESULTS OF STAFF REVIEW MEETING
Assessment!
Validation
To: CITY MANAGER/Rozansky, and all parties who may become identified relevant
to the above identified request for review/action,
Re: STAFF REVIEW-for action toward approval of the above identified develop-
ment.
.t1JJJ/Ji/14
tf4tV,~
From: CITY PLANNER/Elwell (sign/date)........................................
AT ITS MEETING THURSDAY, 9 A.M., 01 MARCH 84, CITY HALL, ATTENDED AS FOLLOWS:
.
1. APPLICANT/AGENT (IDENTIFIED, CHARLES H. TRUE P.E.,PRESENT, AND;
2. BUILDING OFFICIAL/SMITH, PRESENT, AND;
3. CITY MANAGER/ROZANSKY, PRESENT, AND;
4. ENG., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/HASSLER, PRESENT, AND;
5. FIRE CHIEF/HOLZMAN, PRESENT, AND;
6. PLANNER/ELWELL, PRESENT, AND;
7. POLICE CHIEF/GOVORUHK, PRESENT, AND;
'~!/I1II .1J1".'1 " ... -"'.II Jl ~mJ. 0 III 51! II rIll un 1t1<......ltrJJl I '[7' .*'1 llllJI.W . IUU JljI1J(.'" ...... ..J'It...... i_
--.........--.
:..:::.:.:~ ::-:
PURSUANT TO SECTION 14-30 OF THE CITY CODE THE STAFF (IDENTIFIED) FOUND THE
FOLLOWING:
1. THE PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT (IDENTIFIED) ARE APPROVABLE
SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. CONDITIONS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER (IDENTIFIED, REFER MEMO:
15 FEB. 84, ATTACHED), AND;
'!".....,
B. CONDITIONS SPECIFIED BY THE FIRE CHIEF (IDENTIFIED, REFER MEMO:
2 MAR. 84. ATTACHED), AND:
.'. ",..~ "'"..,.,''''' --cr..........caNDiTloN's....BY':THlf"sTAFF.. ARr'siNG~"FROM"Dt.S cfJ~ sf6N~'(R!CoR15ED)' . MlONC-' ALL" .
THE PARTIES PRESENT, AND SPECIFIED HEREIN AND AS FOLLOWS:
"'.....- ......_~ .
r - ,'. "1' '.1' ~
(1) THE APPLICANT SHALL IDENTIFY THE PROPOSED USE OF TRACT "A" FOR
THE REVIEW/SATISFACTION OF THE STAFF IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC.14-30
..(a)(2)b.8.
e
WTE/mn
Attachments: Attached
I cc: APPLICANT/AGENT (IDENTIFIED)
PLANNING/ZONING BD.,
ALL DEPARTMENTS)
FILE (IDENTIFIED)
/" .~'
.'
(,
e
e
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
.00 NORTH EDGEMON AVENUE
, WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327.1800
c:jl ~/3 '/
MEMO TO: Walter Elwell, City Planner
FROM:~assler, P.E., City Engineer/Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Review of OrJK FtJ!e€ST ,P/I&E i:!.. - ?KELIA1/N/fRY
and find it is not in compliance with the
Article II, Division 2, Section 14-30.,
I have reviewed the subject project
following checked requirement(s) of
f~~section (a)(2) of the City Code.
~.
[] 1. Name of development; date of preliminary plan or revision;
~.nl\."'lu..r.M It )41. *' .,1\. tJ\r;a.l.e~~~.~iQ~;,]fi1ltj;..A....4t~1!.;.,~~i~.a~'~a.*~'~ t~ - ~~:: :-:. :,:'''::;
the tract being subdivided; total number of lots; name,
address and telephone nurr~er of developer, surveyor auj
ene:ineer.
2. Location map showing relationship between area proposed for
development and surrounding area.
3. Legal description of tract to be subdivided.
4. Bour.daries of tract shown by a heavj line.
5. E):isting streets. The nane, location and right-of-~ay
widt~ of all existinf, improved streets, rights-of-w~y
and platted streets withi~ two hundred (200) feet o~
the proposed s~bdivision; surface ele\atio~, incluji~~
any legally established ce~ter line elevations~ walks, ~.
eurbs" ,:,.,"tt-en"culver'ts ete'. ,>: '~'" ,.-.' ~","""" >, '''C'. ',N ......."#...,,.....'-JO'V"-.'. ...._.....-.__...........'..
, 0..... . , ~ . . ......,., .. .' " - -. - . ~. ''It '" ,
Proposed streets. The name of temporary designatio~ .
(Street A, B, C, etc.), right-of-way, and ty-c,e and wi dth of (pO N';;o""'flJ
of pa":ement. Include any streets shown on the adopted
corr.prehensive plan.
Proposed easements or rights-of-way other than for streets
(e.g., for drainage. pedestrian ways, bridle paths, or
bicycle paths), location, width and purpose.~' . ~.. ~
o 8. Lots. Lot lines and scaled dimension, lot numbers, and/or
block numbers, and building setback lines for irregularly
shaped lots. The building setback distance is the distance
O required to meet the minimum lot width of the zoning district.
9. Sites, if any, for multifamily dwellings, shopping centers,
churches, industry, parks, playgrounds, and other public and
nonpublic uses exclusive of single-family dwellings.
e
Preliminary plan supporting data. The preliminary plan shall be
drawn on standard twenty-four-inch by thirty-six-inch paper for
convenient filing at a reasonable scale (normally one inch equals
one hundred (100) feet) and shall include the following:
o
o
8
>~'_' . . ...~ '.-:.- ~ .I.'.
e
.5 0"" Ii :J-o I
jOf4(C- "$'
SD '"" E' &. ?
" v-
10. Names of abutting subdivisions, recordation date and number.
11. Existing utilities on and abutting the tract; location, size
and invert elevation of sanitary, storm, and combined sewers;
location and size of water mains; location of gas lines, fire
hydrants, electric and telephone poles, and streetlights. If
water mains and sewers are not on or abutting the tract,
indicate the direction and distance to, and size of nearest
ones, showing invert elevation of sewers.
12. Proposed utilities. A statement on the proposed method of
water supply and sewage disposal.
13. Other existing improvements, including buildings, on the tract.
14. Natural features, including lakes, marshes or swamps, watercourses,
and other pertinent features; wooded areas. A general description
of soils and existing vegetation on the tract shall also be
provided (Seminole County Soils Survey).
15. Existing contours at one-foot intervals based on U.S. Coast and
Geodetic Datum for the tract to be subdivided and, where prac-
ticable, extending twenty-five (25) feet beyond the tract
boundary .
16. Proposed surface drainage with direction of flow and method of
disposition to the natural drainage area indicated or other
acceptable stormwater systems.
~ubsurface conditions on the tract, to a minimum depth requested
I~ r L'h'e"-.(lI! bj'*' ~.~Itfl@e~'"'4Ma+,i..()f) "1!Ml'!i',~w'~~''''''''''. H","'~""-'-"~
~scertain subsurface soil, rock and ~rc'JLdwater conditions; depth
to gro~d~ater; location and re~u2ts of soil percolation te~ts;
location and extent of muck pockets. Tests shall indicate
weight-bearing capability of the soil after stripping and compacting.
18. Zoning on and abutting the tract.
l? rrc'posed p'Jblic improvement~; tier.ways or otr"Jer majC'r improvements
planned by public authorities for :ut'...re consijerat.ion on or r.ear
the tract..
20. Ira:t of restrictive covenants, if ~~y. I: the develo~~ent is a
FUD or private development of any nat'.se, restl'icti ve covenant s
will be required, if availab:e at the time of sub~ission.
.' - ~."q-~:.;~::,~,~~~~~.,~,~~tH~~~a~~ ~~:~;~oP~~:~ ~;~'~~~~:?'r~~d~~;,_.~~~J:;!~~~~fi~"" ,.
preliminary plans of proposed potable water and fire-fightin~
systems, sanitary sewage system, storm water management systems.
All elevations shall be based on U.S. Coast and Geodetic Datum.
(Ord. No. 235 2, 5-26-81)
. ,
)"''''''~
(
e
MEMO TO:
Page 2
o
o
.
e
e
Walter Elwell, City Planner
o
o
o
o
o
~ 11.
-::;::.~....::..::::;._,?~~" ]I'
WI ,,,,
FI#~ l-
.',
:,~,~,'lhP""'~"",
o
o
o
..."t...........,~
At;:
CAH/pkl
e
;:> wllaF /)de
~JI $11: ?
GR-EFNBE"l-r A-,e€A ~
E'1-..~ LoTs ~9l) t 3/2-
cc: Richard Rozansky, City Manager
. .
"
e
.
"\4( "l"rrn~ .",1'"
..
~
e
e
-" '\,
_' -..,.\NTE:,q' , ,
.~-(j ~',
:t~'_
~ \. ,.. .,./J .
\' , :~~;,:~'~:':';/
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 84-019
400 NORTH EDGEMON AVENUE mv OF WINTER S~
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 RE:<":EIVED
Telephone (305) 327.1800
2 March 1984
MAR 2 1984
TO:
Walt Elwell, City Planner
CITY PLANNER
FROM: Charles L. Holzman, Fire Chief
REFERENCE: Preliminary Plan Review - Oak Forest, Phase Two
A preliminary Plan Review of Oak Forest, Phase Two indicates
the project is acceptable for the Fire Department except that
some distances between fire hydrants as well as distances
between fire hydrants and some lots appears to be in exceS$ of
Chapter Six of the Code. Specifically those noted are as
follows:
Lot 284 to Lot 294: 850'
Lot 235 to Lot 245: 800'
Lot 183 to Lot 174: 775'
Lot 295 to Lot 165: 900'
Lot 105 to Cul-de-sac lots 119, 120, and 121: 400'
Lot 29 to Cul-de-sac lots 49, 50: 450'
. ,.....110<... j_"II6"t'r"Tn.~""etlrat!.J1fte"!bt'l"1.r! r"'IIU!i1 -iI!" lIt1,","' 11 f ill 11
Uo_ lI.u:!. Ir 1 .~.
6Ii2---
Charles L. Holzman
Fire Chief
CLH:kb
~"~~.JI~~~f~! "'t_.'~~.,\,,,,-,~'i,iIIJN-"""':-\_'-~.4'i': ','-::-. .,:\_~>~,~::..tt~~~~~~W)\ ~-~)' 'A.~~'-'l.~ _ ~,~:#J~ ,~~t"9'W'!'-'~'~~~.+~~~~~."~~~~~~~-~'~
e
..1
fPLI CAT ION
CITY 0:> WINTER SPRINGS
t
X Approval of prel1minarl Plan
-(.
Approval of Final En8it.....eering
Site Plan Review ~
f
.
.
'It .. -.... 1:
e
'"
.
.
~
.
/ ,
,
.
and Plat
i I
1-
SUBMIT THREE COPIES OF THE
THIS APPLICATION.
AND ENGINEERING FOR THJ.S DEVELOPMENT WITH
Applicant
Bel Aire Homes
Name
~ "
. (If the applicant is
not the owner of the
subject property, the
application must include
a letter of authorizatio
signed by the owner.)
861 Douglas Ave
Address
~.;
.
LORgwood, Fl 32750
869-0200
Telephone
f:
1:
;-
~.
. '.
,.'
"'.
.1
t
~
fI'
~::
Legal Description of Subject
operty:
:; ~
>.
1'"
See attached p 1 ~~s
{
-'\.
Phase Two - Oak Fores t
"
,..
{',
';f
."otal Acres 281.9193
I-
Total Usable Acres~",
'.
J.
General Location (Include Nam
West of.Tuscawilla Road and
and Types of Roads Abutting Property):
l~'
4.
rth of Oak Forest Units 3 & 4.
~:
',.'
Present Land Use
Vacant
l
.
Zoning Classification P
,
711>
~.
"
Details of Request
lots
.
..;:
j
f
Date 1!;Y/YJ Signature'
e. ( I
* * *
Fee -L ,;{ 6'-0 Rece t No. 7r11 f(' Date 9' -/4- - t-J
.
Ordinance References
Legal ~nd Own~rship Verified
i~
l.-
~.
~
11
Action
t.
~.
~.
t"
J5..