HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 01 24 Regular
Work performance product, addresses JOB TASKS: Support of Commission
CITY CODES: Land Development, Zoning:
Walter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
\ . STAFF REPORT. PLANNING ~. ~ ORDER/~: 83,12,7,1 /
I
j l1/Y'l
and Boards. /1
/_ .../y2J
19L ~JJ84
Development/Unit: HIGHLANDS GLENS
Applicant/Agent: ROLLINGWOOD DEV. CORP., KEN LEVITT/HARLING,LOCKLIN ASSOCIATES,CERRETTI
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLANS
Report Text, Page 1
Assessment/
Validation
Re: STAFF REVIEW-for action toward approval of the above identified develop-
ment.
To: CITY MANAGER/Rozansky, and all parties who may become
to the above identified request for review/action,
From: CITY PLANNER/Elwell (s ign/ date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BACKGROUND-Information available on prior review/action include~
",
01.
Recommendation-by Planning/Zoning Bd.:
*Approval, subject to conditions specified (refer: minutes of Regular
Meeting, 11 Jan. 84, not available at the time of this report), and;
0",
-02.
Findings of review-by the Staff (specified, refer:
Staff Report to City Manager dated 8 Jan. 84, attached), and further;
\.
FINDINGS RELEVANT TO CITY COMMISSION PROCEDURE-for review/action on the reques
(identified) are as follows:
03. Section 14-31, Action on Preliminary Plan ~ City Commission -
Specifies that the Commission must act and report to the applicant:
*Approval, or;
*Conditional Approval, or;
*Disapproval, or;
*Request additional information from the applicant, and;
04. Section 14-32 specifies-that the Commission shall:
*Upon disapproval-indicate the Chapter 13 sections not complied with by
applicant, or;
*Upon conditional approval-specify the conditions, and;
05. Section 14-33 specifies-that approval of the preliminary plan shall be
construed only as authority for submitting a final plan, and further;
FINDINGS RELEVANT TO THE DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE COMMISSION-in review/approval
on the request (identified) are as follows:
.6.
Section 14-60(a) (3) specifies-that the Commission is required to make
finding by motion duly passed that: .
*the land is suitable for development as proposed, and if so;
*the plan shall be a?proved for further processing, and further;
,
STAFF REPORT, PLANNING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: 83,12,7,l / 19 JAN. 84
.
Development/Unit: HIGHLANDS GLENS
Applicant/Agent: ROLLINGWOOD DEV. CORP., KEN LEVITT/HARLING, LOCKLIN ASSOCIATES, CERRETTI
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLANS
Report Text, Page: 2
AS$essment/
Validation
Certain specific action by City Commission is required for approval of the
development as proposed by the applicant (to date) and as follows:
07. Section 14-119(b)-requires specific Commission action to waive public
street (sidewalk) standards:
* sidewalks proposed on one side only of private easement of access
(refer: record of applicant's negotiation with Planning/Zoning Bd.,
item 01. herein), and now therefore;
e
.
STAFF REPORT, PLANNING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: 83,12,7,1 / 19 JAN. 84
,
Development/Unit:HIGHLANDS GLENS
Applicant/Agent: ROLLINGWOOD DEV. CORP., KEN LEVITT/HARLING,LOCKLIN ASSOCIATES, CERRETTI
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLANS
(
Report 'l'ext, Page 3
ABsessment/
Validation
IN CONCLUSION, BASED UPON THE FOREGOING REVIEW-the applicant/agent's request
(identified) is approvable subject to:
08. All conditions identified herein and by reference herein, and as they
may now be sanctioned/imposed by the Commission as conditions of their
approval, and;
09. Any/all additional requirements (to be specified by the Commission pur-
suant to the Codes (identified) and as they may be imposed as conditions
of their approval.
WTE/mn
Attachments: attached
cc:
City Commission/Mayor
Applicant/Agent,
All Departments,
City Attorney,
File.
(
.
~--
ADMINISTRATION (administrative system analysis through teamwork methodology)
l!~ suggested-that for an expeditious and otherwise effective review
(limited to salient points) of the request (identified), the parties relevant
to the request may wish to annotate, by the numbers, in the column provided
herein throughout-on the right, their personal assessments of this reports'
logie/information. Such a regular and uniform system of analysis may serve
to:
01. Call to attention-for review' by all relevant parties any errors or mis-
information herein, and to;
02. Validate conclusions-arrived at above, and to otherwise;
03. Assist-Commission and Board members-in formulating their ,motions (work-
able and otherwise manageable by Staff) on the action they may wish to
take, and
~
, It is further suggested-that where parties (identified) may wish clarification
of this work performance product, their annotated copies may be used as
reference 1n correspondence, or returned for a response by the author
(identified) .
<..
e
e
"
,. .
1.'._.
.~-
~..
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
RECEIVED
:IAN 1 0 1984
CITY PlANNER
January 10, 1984
'City of Winter Springs
'400 North Edgemon Avenue
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
Gentlemen:
lan~
Homeowners'
Association.
Ir--.
675 Shepard Road
Winter Springs. Florida 3270B
(3051 327-0640
The Highlands Homeowners' Association Architectural Review Board
has approved the preliminary site plans for Highlands Glens, a
portion of Highlands Tract B, developed by Rollingwood Homes, Inc.
The above referenced property is approved subject to compliance
with the City of Winter Springs code.
Further Architectural Review Board approval must be obtained
for building elevations, type of housing, color and material
selection, landscaping, cluster and floor plans, fencing, signs and
entrance way.
Sincerely,
-.:;(~~.,()~
Kathleen M. Degrenia
Executive Director
KMD:jm
Work performance product, addresses JOB TASKS: Support of Commission and Boards,
CITY CODES: Land Development, Zoning;
Walter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
.
STAFF REPORT, PUu'rnING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: 83,12,7,1/8 JAN. 84
Development/Unit: HIGHLANDS GLENS
Applicant/ Agent: ROLLINGWOOD DEV. CORP., KEN LEVITT/HARLING,LOCKLIN ASSOCIATES ,CE:RRETTI
Review/Action Requested: PLANNING/ZONING BD. REVIEW/APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLANS
Text, Page: 1 of 3
Assessment/
Validation:
To: CITY MANAGER/Rozansky, and all parties who may become identified relevant
to the above identified request for review/action,
From: CITY PLANNER/Elwell (sign/date). .
. !IJoIklFlat11
Q!iJY1,B:f
Re: STAFF REVIEW-for action toward approval of the above identified develop-
ment.
Background Information available from prior reviews/action includes:
01. Site Data:
e
A. Present zoning - PUD
B. Total Area - 2.90 acres
C. Total units - 29
D. Density 10 units/acre
02. Building Data:
A. Minimum setback from property line
Front -25'
Side- 15'
Rear- 10'
bldg. to bldg. - 20'
B. Max. bldg. height-35,
C. Typical lot dimensions - 24' x 90'
D. Parking - 2 spaces per unit: 58 spaces (1 open/l covered)
Guest: 4 spaces
E. Sale of units - fee simple
F. Internal access to units - 24' wide ingress/egress easement.
G. Homeowners assn. to maintain all open space and retention area.
H. Units #28,29 to be used as models until project is sold out.
03.
Utility Services:
A. Water by NOWSCO
B. Sewer by NOWSCO
C. Power by Fla. Power Corp.
D. Telephone by United Telephone Co.
E. Solid waste by local franchise
F. Fire Protection by City of Winter Springs
e
04. Landscape Data:
A. Dense vegetation exists on the site.
B. One (1) tree each 75 linear feet of perimeter
Work performance product, addresses JOB TASKS: Support of Commission and Boards,
CITY CODES: Land Development, Zoning;
Walter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
.
STAFF REPORT, PLfu'mING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: 83,12,7,1/8 JAN. 84
Development/Unit: HIGHLANDS GLENS
Applicant/ Agent: ROLLINGWOOD DEV. CORP., KEN LEVITT/HARLING,LOCKLIN ASSOCIATES,CERRETTI
Review/Action Requested: PLANNING/ZONING BD. REVIEW/APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLANS
Text, Page: 2 of 3
Assessment/
Validation:
C. Existing trees to be preserved if healthy and not conflicting with
development.
D. Trees which remain may be substituted for proposed trees.
05. Soils:
Swamp-based on Seminole Co. Soil Survey. All soils in developed area to
be amended according to accepted practices, and;
Departmental review/action on the above (City Hall meeting of 5 Jan. 84 atten-
ded by Applicant's agent/Cerretti and heads of Depts.: Engineering/Public
Works, Police, Building, and the City Planner/Elwell) achieved concurrance of
all attending that the plans identified are approvable, subject to explicit
conditions to be set out herein, and as follows:
4It Coordination/Synthesis of the findings of Staff Review:
01. There shall be no cuts in the islands of Sheoah Blvd. other than those
shown, and;
02. All building structures shall be equipped with gutters to channel roof
runoff to the on site drainage system, and;
03. Capacity of the offsite, storm drainage system to accept the develop-
ments runoff must be assessed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer,
and;
04. Fire hydrant locations and water distribution system must be assessed to
the satisfaction of the City Fire Chief, and;
05. A question of alternatives in the location of sewer laterals in the
access easements to fee simple parcels shall be resolved by the applicant
to the satisfaction of the City Engr., and;
Other conditions as they may arise are as follows:
06.
The City Planner must verify from submissions which may be required of
the applicant, compliance with any/all additional conditions for approval
as they may be required by Department memos (in progress, and relevant to
the understanding/concurrance of 5 Jan. 84 identified above) and as
they shall address this item (06), and;
.
Other conditions, relative to Article III DESIGN STANDARDS are as follows:
07. In accordance with Sec. 14-95 - the private streets must meet the design
Work performance product, addresses JOB TASKS: Support of Commission and Boards,
CITY CODES: Land Development, Zoning;
Walter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
.
STAFF REPORT, PUu.'rnING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: 83,12,7,1/8 JAN. 84
Development/Unit: HIGHLANDS GLENS
Applicant/ Agent: ROLLINGWOOD DEV. CORP., KEN LEVITT/HARLING,LOCKLIN ASSOCIATES,CERRETTI
Review/Action Requested: PLANNING/ZONING BD. REVIEW/APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLANS
Text, Page: 3 of 3
Assessment/
Validation:
construction and inspection standards established for public streets
unless waived by specific commission action, and;
Other conditions, relative to Article IV REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS are as follows:
08. In accordance with l4-ll0(a)-prior to the installation of any required
improvements of the development, all supplementary data (specified) shall
be submitted to the City Planner, and;
09. In accordance with l4-ll9(b)-sidewalks shall be required in all develop-
ments unless specifically excepted by the City Commission, and now
therefore;
~All the above conditions- may be sanctioned/imposed by the City Planning/
~Zoning Bd. as conditions for their approval, to meet the applicant's
"expressed" desire/need for approval not later than 11 January 84.
cc: City Planning/Zoning Bd.,
All Dept. heads,
Applicant/Agent,
File
e
~"'3...
e(i.fJ;
.. . ;,
. ;-
~. .. .' .:r
...., -".,.
.".",,~~
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA
mY OF WJHm W"lG::.
RECEIVED
JAN 9 1984
tl dd"u.J)4l Ik.M ~ /
~7d rr ,~~;':f Ic-Iw-(.Vj
mY PLANN[R
~ NORTH EDGEMON AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1800
January 6, 1984
MEMO TO: Walter Elvell, City Planner
FROM~assler, P.E., City Engineer/Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Reviev of Highlands Glens, Preliminary
I have revieved the subject project and find it is not in compliance vith the
folloving checked requirement(s) of Article II, Division 2, Section 14-30.,
Subsection (a)(2) of the City Code.
Db.
e
e
Preliminary plan supporting data. The preliminary pl~~ shall be
drawn on standard tventy-four-inch by thirty-six-inch paper for
convenient filing at a reasonable scale (normally one inch equals
one hundred (100) feet) and shall include the fOlloving:
o
1. Name of development; date of preliminary plan or revision;
scale of plan; north arrow; approximate acreage in the
the tract being subdivided; total number of lots; name,
address and telephone number of developer, surveyor and
engineer.
2. Location map shoving relationship between area proposed for
development and surrounding area.
3. Legal description of tract to be subdivided.
4. Boundaries of tract shown by a heavy line.
5. Existing streets. The name, location and right-of-way
vidth of all existing improved streets, rights-of-vay
and platted streets within tvo hundred (200) feet of
the proposed subdivision; surface elevatio~, including
any legally established center line elevations; walks,
curbs, gutters, culverts, etc.
6. Proposed streets. The name of temporary designation
(Street A, B, C, etc.), right-of-vay, and type and width
of pavement. Include any streets shown on the adopted
comprehensive plan.
7. Proposed easements or rights-of-way other than for streets
(e.g., for drainage, pedestrian vays, bridle paths, or
bicycle paths), location, vidth and purpose.
8. Lots. Lot lines and scaled dimension, lot numbers, and/or
block numbers, and building setback lines for irregularly
shaped lots. The building setback distance is the distance
required to meet the minimum lot vidth of the zoning district.
9. Site~, if any, for multifamily dwellings, shopping centers,
churches, industry, parks, playgrounds, and other public and
nonpublic uses exclusive of single-family dwellings.
o
o
8
o
o
o
o
..
e
CITY Of WI~nER SPRINGS
RECEIVED
JAN 9 1984
MEMO TO: Walter Elwell~ City Planner
Page 2
CITY PLANNER
o
.~
e
CAH/pkl
e
o
o
o
10. Names of abutting subdivisions ~ recordation date and number.
11. Existing utilities on and abutting the tract; location, size
and invert elevation of sanitary, storm~ and combined sewers;
location and size of water mains; location of gas lines, fire
hydrants, electric and telephone poles~ and streetlights. If
water mains and sewers are not on or abutting the tract,
indicate the direction and distance to, and size of nearest
ones~ showing invert elevation of sewers.
12. Proposed utilities. A statement on the proposed method of
water supply and sewage disposal.
13. other existing improvements, including buildings~ on the tract.
14. Natural features, including lakes, marshes or swamps, watercourses~
and other pertinent features; wooded areas. A general description
of soils and existing vegetation on the tract shall also be
provided (Seminole County Soils Survey).
15. Existing contours at one-foot intervals based on U.S. Coast and
Geodetic Datum for the tract to be subdivided and~ where prac-
ticable~ extending twenty-five (25) feet beyond the tract
boundary.
16. Proposed surface drainage with direction of flow and method of
disposition to the natural drainage area indicated or other
acceptable storrowater systems. (Show Cross Section of Swale)
17. Subsurface conditions on the tract~to a minimum depth requested
by the city engineer; location and results of tests ~ade to
ascertain subsurface soil, rock and groundwater conditions; depth
to groundwater; location and res~lts of soil percolation tests;
location and extent of muck pockets. Tests shall indicate
weight-bearing capability of the soil after stripping and compacting.
18. Zoning on and abutting the tract.
19. Proposed public improvements; highways or other major improvements
planned by public authorities for future consideration on or near
the tract.
20. Draft of restrictive covenants, if any. If th~ development is a
PUD or private development of any nature, restri cti ve covenants
will be required~ if available at the time o~ submission.
21. Other preliminary plans. When requested by the city, typical
cross sections of the proposed grading, roadway and sidewalk,
preliminary plans of proposed potable water and fire-fighting
systems, sanitary sewage system, storm water management systems.
All elevations shall be based on U.S. Coast and Geodetic Datum.
(Ord. No. 235 2, 5-26-81)
(ll)*Existing Storm Water invert~ Capacity & discharge point of existing
system.
o
1KI
~
o
o
o
o
cc: Richard Rozansky, City Manager
NOTE: Compliance with Stnadard Provisos