HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 01 10 Regular
a.
. .
.
. .
e
e
(
460 East Altamonte Drive/Highway 436
Post Office Box 308
Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701
305/646-3441
January 4, 1983
Ms. Jacqui1ine Coch
City of Winter Springs
City Hall
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Dear Ms. Coch:
SUBJECT: Continued Occupancy of Temporary Bank Facility
Please accept this as our formal request of continued occupancy
of our temporary bank facility located on the corner of Moss
Road and State Road 434 in Winter Springs.
Our architect, KBJ, Inc. of Jacksonville is currently in conver-
sation with your city's Planning and Building Department and
we expect to receive site approval in the near future for
construction of our new facility. It is our goal to have
construction completed by June 30, 1984.
We appreciation your consideration. If you should have any
further questions or need further information, please feel free
to contact me. My direct telephone number is 646-3236.
Sincerely,
~ ~)
/,/1/// 6l~/'
. Robert B. Whitehill:,J
Senior Vice President
...
I .
.
I .
e
e
460 East Altamonte Drive/Highway 436
Post Office Box 308
Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701
305/646-3441
January 4, 1983
Ms. Jacquiline Coch
City of Winter Springs
City Hall
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Dear Ms. Coch:
SUBJECT: Continued Occupancy of Temporary Bank Facility
Please accept this as our formal request of continued occupancy
of our temporary bank facility located on the corner of Moss
Road and State Road 434 in Winter Springs.
Our architect, KBJ, Inc. of Jacksonville is currently in conver-
sation with your city's Planning and Building Department and
we expect to receive site approval in the near future for
construction of our new facility. It is our goal to have
construction completed by June 30, 1984.
We appreciation your consideration. If you should have any
further questions or need further information, please feel free
to contact me. My direct telephone number is 646-3236.
Sincerely,
//~/f i~cI!IF'
!~ R~bert B. Whitehill~
Senior Vice President
e
tit
e
'-Fl&~';;~TE~'S' ,
:t ,,~~~'\ 1.>
t.,) . tn'
,
'''.. '" "',. i ',}
,,~ ".~,,'
. l.(4,o/~.# 1!Jt'~''-:::;;/
.:: s :,y-~-_~P"
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
400 NORTH EDGEMON AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1800
~~O TO: Commission/Mayor
SUBJECT: Traffic Control - Tuscawilla Road - School Area
DATE: December 27, 1983
As you already know for sometime now we have been experiencing problems
in the immediate area of the new school on Tuscawilla Road. I had the Chief
provide me with a memo outlining our problems. The memo is attached for your
information and future use in your individual dealings with the County.
With the cooperation of the County Engineering Department the Chief has
resolved comments one and three of the attached memo. Unfortunately, comment
2, the installation of speed limit sign beacons has not been approved by the
County due to a policy that requires the children to actually be walking along
the road before blinking lights are installed. Presently, children are bussed
from the other side of Tuscawilla Road.
RR/pkl
Enclosure
.
e
e
..
y
,
TO:
Ricahrd Rozansky, City Manager
;.:
, ;
FROM: John Govoruhk, Chief of Pol ice
, \
DATE: December 15, 1983
SUBJ: TRAFFIC SPEED CONTROL DEVICES (35-83)
The Keeth Elementary School has impacted the City of Winter Springs in
several areas. The area of concern which I need to bring to your attention
deals with traffic speed control.
This department has written eighty (80) Unlawful Speed citations in the
time from school opening to November 11, 1983. The minimum speed violation
being 30MPH , up to 53MPH. The average speed violation is in the 40MPH
range, twice the posted school zone speed. I real ize the traffic on
Tuscawi I la Road takes a period of time to become fami I iar with this speed
zone, but there is also a burden to provide sufficient advanced warning.
In order to provide this warning I request you give consideration to
requesting the County Road Department involvement to provide the fol lowing:
1. Moving existing: school advance signs" further from their
existing location, away from the school. The maximum recommended
distance of 700' would be a minimum.
2. The installation of speed I imit sign beacons to warn publ ic of
speed I imit reduction. As per the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices, page 7B-5, " varible display signs with flashing beacons
should be used for the more critical situations, where greater
emphasis of the special school speed I imit is needed. "
3. Installation of highway pavement marking on Tuscawi Ila Road
to indicate" SCHOOL" for traffic a-proaching the school
speed zone from either direction.
These recommendations are made with hopes that serious consideration
be given to them. They may not be the solution, but additional warning
methods are necessary. Continued enforcement of Unlawful Speed wi I I be
conducted by this department, but it is not the desire to become the
solution to the problem in that manner. Our officers are already experiencing
Judges questionaing the adequacy of speed signs without signal beacons.
I do no want to run a " speed trap ", nor do I want to investigate accid-
ents before the solution arrives.
Your consideration in this matter is appreciated. I am avai lable for
further discussion or study of this, or other, matter.
/'
( 7
f.)" /j:
}~P<#ti~z>~/
/ Ch ~f v!9-vPo lice
. rllD N
Work performance product, addresses JOB TASKS: Support of Commission and Boards, ,'; k~
CITY CODES: Land Development, Zoning; C \
Walter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
, STAFF REPORT, PIk'mING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: 83,12,8,3/8 JAN. 84
Development/Unit: NORTH ORLANDO RANCHES, SECTION 7, BLOCK N, TRACT B, /SPLIT
Applicant/ Agent: McCOHAS/McGRIFF, C AND R REALTY INC.
Review/ Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/ APPROVAL OF "SPLIT" OF TRACT B
Text, Page: 1 of 2
Assessment/
Validation:
To: CITY }~AGER/Rozansky, and all parties who may become identified relevant
to the above identified request for review/action,
From: CITY PLANNER/Elwell (sign/date)
()bj{Ci[b,rll{
qftVl,BF-
Re: STAFF REVIEW for "action toward approval" of the above identified develop
men t .
Background information available on prior reviews/action includes:
01. Site information - provided by applicant (letter from applicant's agent,
"AFFIDAVIT FOR RECORD", "PROPOSAL", and approximation (sketch on copy of
~ existing plat of the development/unit identified above) attached), and;
02. Departmental review/action (City 11all meeting of 5 Jan. 84, attended by
Agent (identified) and heads of Depts.: Engineering/Public Works, Police,
Building, and the City Planner) concurred with agent/11cGriff that the
concept is approvable subject to explicit conditions to be set out here
in, and as follows:
The applicant/agent requests that:
03. The City Commission-approve the applicants proposal subject to the
following conditions of approval:
04. The approval shall be granted in accordance with City Code Sec. 14-3.1
Dividing ~latted property, and;
05. The applicant shall submit a plat/survey of Tract B redrawn at an
appropriate (even/workable) scale by a registered professional surveyor,
and otherwise, as may be required, so as to facilitate the depiction, for
further review, of "precisely" how the tract will be divided, and;
06. The plat/survey shall include depiction of the location of the existing
water body, so as to facilitate a determination, to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer, and the City Planner that two (2) "buildable" lots
can result from the "split", and now;
~ The City Planner/Elwell, finds in accordance with the Staff's concurrence
of 5 Jan. 84 that:
The applicant/agent's proposal is approvable, subject to the applicant/agent's
ability to meet the conditions identified above, and as these conditions may
h~ ~~~~r;n~~n/;mnn~pn hv tnp r,itv r,ommission.
Work performance product, addresses JOB TASKS: Support of Commission and Boards,
CITY CODES: Land Development, Zoning;
Walter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
At
STAFF REPORT, PlJu~ING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: 83,12,8,3/8 JAN. 84
Development/Unit: NORTH ORL&~DO RANCHES, SECTION 7, BLOCK N, TRACT B,/SPLIT
Applicant/ Agent: McCOMAS/McGRIFF, C AND R REALTY INC.
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMHISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL OF "SPLIT" OF TRACT B
Text, Page: 2 of 2
Assessment/
Validation:
cc: Mayor/City Commission,
All Dept. Heads,
Applicant/AGENT,
File
e
e
~~~~UWOC@
fJA N 9 '984
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
RECEIVED
The Ranchlands fAN 9 1984
winter Springs,~rl.
January 7, 1984 CITY PLANNER
e
OTY of WItlTfR SPRiNGS
OTY HAll
TOI City Council and Mayor
Winter Springs, Florida
Dear Council and Mayorl
There have been requests from landowners in The
R~lchlands asking you to approve property splits not
written into the city codes. and there will undoubtedly
be more. Thank you for being careful and conscientious
regarding these requests.
It took about a year of research and work to write
the current zoning covering The Ranchlands. Most of
the parcels of land at that time were from two to five
acres and the zoning was written so that an original
owner could split his property one time if he wished,
live on part of it. and sell off the other part.
When the zoning was installed, there were only a
few parcels of only one acre. so the code mentioned a
minimum lot of one acre in order not to conflict with
these few lots that consisted on one acre.
e
There is a possibility of a new land owner deciding
to try to use the one acre minimum as a tool to request
permission to split a large land unit into one acre
units solely to make money off land speculation rather
than using the land primarily as a homestead and sell-
ing off the remainder as another homestead. This wOv:d
defeat the intent of our zoning entirely and hurt near"cy
homesteads who bought believing they were protected by
this code.
Also. and this is posed as a question, is there not
still a state statute that says that a parcel of land.
five acres and less, that is divided into lots for sale,
must consist of improved lots? If so,then lot dividing
along these lines should conform to this. City ordinances
can be waived, but not statE> ordinances.
We would appreciate your careful investigation into
the points in this letter. Thank you for your consider-
ation.
e
~r. & Mrs. W. E. Hiatt, Jr.
*~.?/7~.dy. ~.~,~c.
10 Panarr:a Road (/
Winter $prings, Fla.
/'../ J/. 4' ~
~ / (""t.-_ T" (,"."'-<- <---~-L-
Mr~,/John H. Van Eepoel
2)1 Tradewinds Road
Winter Springs, Fla.
!J [ -: '
...... .......' "....., .)r'j(ii'fU)
RE>:::S[VED
DEe 0 8 1983
e
C & R REAL TV, INC.
1002 South Winter Park Drive
Casselberry, Florida 32707
(305) 830-6700
CITY PlANNER
December 6, 1983
Ms. Jacqueline Koch
City Planner
400 North Edgemon Avenue
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
Dear Ms. Koch:
I am submitting this proposal on behalf of ~~. and ~TS. William C.
McComas, who own the property herein described. I have prepared
all the papers as per your instructions. The plat of the property
with the proposed split and subsequent results is also enclosed.
Please submit this proposal to the city planning board for their
approval. Please keep us apprised of any pertinent developments.
If you need any additional information or if I can assist you in
any way, please advise. Thank you for your assistance in this
matter.
e
Sincerely yours,
/. )
/~'. . ./ /.'
7 \.' L < ~./ <
, ' .' //
/,. " /" /
; '. _/;/ '.r\
\.. (/( /
'Rick McGriff
e
m
II-I..
S, 1- 7"03 .-=-- 4J
Each Office is Independently Owned and Operated
REAL TOR<ll
)>.30-4 700 t\'t~.J,,<;..E;:.s
C IJ'\: .~,,. "~'I
., iJ .... r' y..' ~,!" r~ r" .....
.. . - ',' :P;i!NGS
F;' ::'. ~ .7' .:, :":J) .
e
U~"(
"\. "'<
;" :_'~: . ,_i. _.,;~,
PROFOSAL
Proposal to Split the Property Legally Described as:
Section 7, Block N, Tract E, North Orlando Ranches
According to the enclosed plat, the dimensions of the parcel are
currently:
e
608.94 feet bordering Morton Lane
150 feet west side
137.77 feet east side
484.32 feet bordering Lake Tony
After dividing the parcel, the two subsequent parcels would have
dimensions as follows:
Westernmost Parcel
304.47 ft. bordering Morton Ln
150 feet west side
140 ft. approx. east side
242.16 ft. bordering Lk Tony
Easternmost Parcel
304.47 ft. bordering Morton Ln
140 ft. approx. west side
137.77 feet east side
242.16 ft. bordering Lk Tony
Ple~se refer to the enclosed plat and note that tho m~n~mum amount
of width of the :parcels vii th the lake at its highest point should
not be less than 100 feet. Since Lake Tony has receeded, the
existing shoreline anotated is no longer accurate. In addition,
the red dotted line represents the proposed division.
e
'J 1"'ft3
c ~o.
~.-'~ ,~:.-"
'--'
~/..::::/ ~-:v \:!/ '-~~ L~~~'
~ ~-IJ!JI" 11 v'" - ~ -, ~I''/
I. ~ _'/,,..,.. .". .
.....~ - '--,~,--
f;;:LL .sURVEY OF THE M05E5 E. LEVV GRANT ~
e .r:~~~~:; :::~~:~~R~ gf:1/eWLAE J~A.'
/ II I ..,
.:/571 /
SECT/ON 2, TWP. Z/ S~ R(
. -
.. --.----.-.---
an OF W;'FEP.. '-;~.'k!'\;5
R.~'-:E!VEf' \
\ \
DEe 8 1983 \ '\ \
\ . \
- -,
-.- Y-~rf;
CITY ~~~, $~
-_.--'-~:; '{;;. ~~ ?i;-,
--.-. " G- Z:.J J
~ ,( ~
.----.- ....;::;-'>'- --: ~. , () ~'.
-- 0 ...,- s-,., ~ ~
- -' -- -ROt'-.-: ;? · \ '-.9 c
--- ~ _<1'l . t....... fl..
u_'__. -. ------------ )1.'] 0.---~!.jA,....Z'3J./ ,. .-'o,~ -L 0\ 1-'
KJ~ I a t I I blJ1.LA./-,.,~--' k..... :._' qy '~\ /.
.,,;.;::-.~ "," -~:~rrrv~., ;7C~",(: (P \,J /. /
(,6 f; 1" . 6_~ of .." 6 ~t~:.c' "" ;;~$~ .... ; t-;, P.i~'~ .t:;ii/'
- (' 23 0 24 tl....q ,,",j, (0,,,11 .ot)/'l"
L2 ~l J 72 A <u 075 A t' ~\ o.8~ tI. tot 1(.2'<<; 22',I,:'r...?~'G
I 04/1 . i~O e
'-:-"" ~2 ~..1... \....' ,,0
~ '<"',.' o',v
i , @ ,~~. 'z}--=--1~~1--!~-:C?:" ?ie:. 2C~55",,", "?4'\~- 'g
." ," i ,/ 'M' ',~-: ~.~)- ;:43.G7 'fJ-~~)71i '- -, 1'!J0'.35 ~.:'1-';"C:( . It> '-'--' J,;. ~/ '~''''''' r"-
' I .',' '~.1 ,''if.> ,If-' I,.~~~<~ .~)
.. , .. . ) ':'J <~'....~ -..::;:,.... 9
--'.:~:; .' !/ ... ,0 . ~~.
':, 'N) iiJi .I 1)'
- 1 OI 6 ~ ~0 () G; 01)'1..
\\ pl,r t' ~ t O~G Ll. ~) ~);'I 1./</4. 1t;f!J
'. 1 p..
~ ..~- \ \
'G
Ii
L
Iii ..-
1
~
.1
.5
GO
~
....
..
:~
, c:-
._-\_-
,
. ,
. .
;"~ /....:'
: :. . . I '. ...,,-:
:... .' t. " ..
, ." . '.
' /__\'~!' . :. ::. '=- , t "
........
::~. :. /.:..:.~::~~.~ /;.:::
. -. ~;. ..'
,~ '.-:: t... ".. " .
J~' ,
.:J!)
-.....
, ,
".1
) .:)~....i
'\
\
--- "(' .'
....
'.
c3
I
-.(....::-:J. ..::~
"J/. ::::,'
,/'/ :;j'
- :;:: .:C
. (''\.I
~,:""
_l!\.o.J ....o'J,'
A~ "
;'\ ,.r'
__ __. 'J __ _ I~
.')
! .jZ ,L\
.. ~ .
,..n:.,,' d"'\
~~~:.~j ~
- '.. - ," .. " !J. l{;
_,,\ -f .
.",1/
10'
f I ....'.
DE5CRIPTION
r A' , C I , : r" - ,,-., (' __ 1. 'J ','c
( . --~) ,I <)<~':~ ,CV(,' rei'"":, I d:J rc:::c'-OGG Ir ,-~,-" /)::x:J:": I 1<1:):75 c; "--;e ,'-"(../C/C "<3~C-CS C <...,-:.
.., 'J, ..' '. ,..- <- c,,-,,~ ~ -, " J' . .. . ' r
-' r\..~\h'_1 ic..;; .'.::;C.~.O Ie"" c '-':;::-:-O:::::""'! .rJ'3 /30-:;.....-/2, Pc; C":e85 cl f.'ie P:';CI;::: Qecc.'"(J-; 0.- 5e'7iJ7C
..... c- '". . . r I, I'!' 1 I ,. ,. Ii. ' J .
. _:7:'__~~) ,j::,_...,.).~ Cl,C:-;.'-;l' ctCU,-';5 ':"';-E" ; Trc'7ce '5c'Jp,-;G."9ster:y acnq +:~e arc cf~ CUnt? t,',2 riq'7 .'i5
-a:. -,- ~ -',- _':,.-( r' /-. :-:...1.J-~- . -r-L,..,-c..... ::::--51 ~r' r("'l ./J-.C """-,.... 01.:::> Ci -".. J j:"~ ?.,t:' L-"rq _ ';,. C./ .:"\"),Q 5
· . '.J '<::-u...' '-, I:,l.",. '-0..0, C. ", i,,'V\.... .11...' UIV\.::-,C, .::;Il::-I. ,c.-I' 0'00,..... ~''-'c:\... '
'-.'.CS' ----....-.- ..-' .NORTH OR~,,-1NDO RLlIJChE3 .5EC-/-8;'o3 /-cco.ro'cc'''f7::Jh/~c.~ /2. P:~
'" ,.. - - .:- - .,~.~ -',.. ~- ( :' "^,..... -r 'J .. " '""I , r' A ,,'.- ,- r' " r f. I ('
. '; -' -'-','~ c :.:,~("! IV..JH I f-/ '. HL.LINvu K;-II V:"-,'i....:....; v.::t.... '-0 "cra C ~.a~c(" c 4~2.e.
''''-:.' ': '-;.-:; '-So C'(:"'.:~r-] r o-7r r~- <.--.:3~~:'Z(; - trr-7'""i a.-c O;S~'9,--;CC ,--'~ 4X!? 59 r: ~;,~-,....~ II e;,o57;?5~E -3?~
_.. ; ':-.-...~.-,.- -:'--:; c-'/.r->,- -~...,....., '" __~, _.' ~,~ /.' , '" .
C." ...~. ,_
'.. '-
.
e
e
an oJ: ',' ~ ~Fi'''il..l~
Rf"' ':;iVED
DEe 8 1983
AFFAJJAVIT FOR RECORD
CITY PLANNER
To Uhom it may concern:
We, the undersigned, do hereby acknowledge that we hold title to
the property of which the legal description is as follows:
Section 7, Block N, Tract B, North Orlando Ranches
Furthermore, we do hereby empower J. Richard McGriff, Jr. to act
as our duly authorized agent for the purpose of preparation and
submission of application to the proper authorities, in order to
obtain approval for the subdivision of the aforementioned
property from the 'Hinter Springs City Council. After execution
of the duties necessary to accomplish the request for subdivision
of said property, all authority granted herein by this affadavit
shall hereby be terminated.
,
I, ., 1
C I 1.../1 J / t' ,~// -(/ /C \:"7.::>
~.J '/(<..- L;Y~/-(Cj ~. c.></J eYer. / /' :>-
Date
,",///,''-
1"" N. HA ------
I'/~)?";'ik"~~ - ',l~3 (~) {"I ~ 'c; ,-di' /'-YZ;:/~5
~ta?y ~OT AR . .,."co.... ac::~e I ~gna ure ;' '.....-./ Date
'. My Co,...,~.lon E:xpires: ;2-;J-07
S~\e :o~ AlaskOi : ~
F~st "JuQ.i,Eial Dlst. : ,... ~.
\.:. . ~.Ur.L\lJ . ~
~ ~i~)}s to e~~~fy :that on this 22nd day of October, 1983, before me the above
a H~~}~:P":UP~~~):l'f~n,ifor the State of Alas].:a, duly commissioned and sworn as such,
perso~15 cn:fe~'-~h,l.hanne P. f1cComas and -dilliam C. EcComas, known to me and. to me
known to-~~~#Jlle-ividuals described in and who executed the foregoinc:, instrument,
and they acknowledged to me that they signed and sealed the same freely and
Work performance product, addresses JOB TASKS: Support of Commission and
CITY CODES: Land Development, Zoning;
Walter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
JII~/ fi/
Boards'J / ~
v
e
STAFF REPORT, PLfu~ING DEPT. WORK ORDER/DATE: NO.W.O./8 DEC. 84
Development/Unit: VANDEGRAAFF'S ESTATES/REPLAT OF LOT 3,BLOCK E,N. ORLANDO RANCHES, SEC.l
Applicant/ Agent: VANDEGRAAFF/
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMHISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL OF RECORD PLAT
Text, Page: 1 of 2
Assessment/
Validation:
To: CITY MANAGER/Rozansky, and all parties who may become identified relevant
to the above identified request for review/action,
From:
CITY PLANNER/Elwell (sign/date). . . . . .
(
10 J (j)4. 6'f
Re:
CITY COHHISSION -"action toward approval" of the above identified develop
ment.
Background information available on prior review/action includes:
01.
City Commission-review/action: APPROVAL IN CONCEPT
(minutes of 8 March 83 meeting, letter of 14 March 83,attached), and;
-02.
Departmental review/action (City Hall meeting of 5 Jan. 84, attended by
heads of Departments: Engineering/Public Works, Police, Building, and
the City Planner) concurred that the Plat approvable subject to
explicit conditions to be set out herein, and as follows:
The applicant shall meet the remaining conditions of approval established by
the City Commission prior action (identified) as follows:
03. The applicant-shall pay into the City's recreation fund an amount equal
to 5 percent of the Tax Assessor's appraisal of the value of the property
and;
04. The applicant-shall provide topographic information with each applica-
tion for building permits, and;
05. The applicant-shall pay to the City a $35.00 fee for recording the plat
as approved, and;
Other conditions arlslng from the Staff Review of the record plat submitted
by the applicant on 16 December 83 as follows:
06. The applicant-shall indicate, on the plat, the front, side and rear yard
lines in accordance with the existing zoning of lot "2";(refer: City
Code 44.27.13 thru 44.27.14), and;
e
\
07.
The applicant-shall indicate, on the plat, the front yard lines in
accordance with the existing zoning of lots "1" and "3" (refer: City
Code 44.27.13 thru 44.27.14, and;
08. The applicant-shall remove, revise and otherwise complete the
Work performance product, addresses JOB TASKS: Support of Commission and Boards,
CITY CODES: Land Development, Zoning;
Walter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
~
STAFF REPORT, PLfu'mING DEPT. HORK ORDER/DATE: NO. W . O. /8 DEC. 84
Development/Unit: VANDEGRAAFF'S ESTATES/REPLAT OF LOT 3,BLOCK E,N. ORLANDO RANCHES, SEC. 1
Applicant/ Agent: VANDEGRAAFF/
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL OF RECORD PLAT
Text, Page: 2 of 2
Assessment/
Validation:
certifications on the plat (to be specified) so as to meet requirements
for recording, and;
09. The applicant-shall designate the plat as a "replat" of North Orlando
Ranches, as per annotations on the applicant's copy, and;
10. The applicant-shall correct the spelling of the Plat title, and now;
All the above conditions-may be sanctioned/imposed by the Ci.ty Commission, as
conditions for their approval, to meet the applicant's "expressed" desire/need
for approval not later than 10 January 84. .
.c:
Mayor/City Commission,
All Departments,
Applicant/Agent,
File
,
~~~~UWOC@
IJA N 9 '984
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
RECEIVED
The Ranchlands IAN 9 1984
winter Springs. ~rl.
January 7. 1984 CITY PLANNER
e
CrY of WINTER SPRiNGS
ory HAll
TOI City Council and Mayor
Winter Springs. Florida
Dear Council and ~ayorl
There have been requests from landowners in The
RBIlchlands asking you to approve property splits not
written into the city codes. and there will undoubtedly
be more. Thank you for being careful and conscientious
regarding these requests.
It took about a year of research and work to write
the current zoning covering The Ranchlands. Most of
the parcels of land at that time were from two to five
acres and the zoning was written so that an original
owner could split his property one time if he wished,
live on part of it. and sell off the other part.
When the zoning was installed. there were only a
few parcels of only one acre. so the code mentioned a
minimum lot of one acre in order not to conflict with
these few lots that consisted on one acre.
e
There is a possibility of a new land owner deciding
to try to use the one acre minimum as a tool to request
permission to split a large land unit into one acre
units solely to make money off land speculation rather
than using the land primarily as a homestead a~d sell-
ing off the remainder as another homestead. This wou:d
defeat the intent of our zoning entirely and hurt nearby
homesteads who bought believing they were protected by
this code.
Also. and this is posed as a question. is there not
still a state statute that says that a parcel of land.
five acres and less, that is divided into lots for sale,
must consist of improved lots? If so.then lot dividing
along these lines should conform to this. City ordinances
can be waived. but not state ordinances.
We would appreciate your careful investigation into
the points in this letter. Thank you for your consider-
ation.
e
~r. & Mrs. W. E. Hiatt, Jr.
*~. ~)7~ .<3';'. ~ ~. C:Pc.
10 Panama Road (I
Winter $prLngs, Fla.
/'/ j ..1"/. ~. ./
'.t"'f...- TV t/.-<........ <....<~-L--
Mr~/John H. Van Eepoel
231 Tradewinds Road
Winter Springs, Fla.
. ,--:;:::::.-
L
e
e
e
.' '......'.:'\.::\.)...
- ~; ',:,,~::' EjA ,.-V:'. j
.. l' .'~,~
- ,., ", .'~~.. ':j..)
Jr'/ .. . <:" t.J
; f )
'A . \ ". . -1
r, "" t
, .. _, .. ;f
~ .......,. " . ..~.I
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
400 NORTH EDGEMON AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 3270B
T ,,18iJhcr.= (.:;J5) 327.1 :0')0
March 14, 1983
Mr. & Hrs. R.A. Van de Graaff
360 East Panama Road
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
Subject: Subdivision with Waiver of Improvements
Dear Mr. & ~~s. Van de Graaff:
/
The City COIT@ission has approved in concept your proposal to divide
Lot 3, Block E, Ranches Section 1 into three lots.
They also agree to waive installation of the subdivision improvements
normally required by Chapter 14 of the City Code, with the exception of the
section requiring dedication of park lands (see attached). As the enclosed
minutes explain, the COIT@ission decided not to waive this section, which means
an amourlt equal to 5 percent of the Tax Assessor's appraisal of the value of
the property will need to be paid into the City's recreation fund. The Com-
mission placed a similar condition on the only other proposal received under
this relatively new provision in the Code to waive install&tion of subdivision
ilLprovements.
In addition, please note the City Engineer's condition that topographic
information be provided with each application for a building per~it.
If you choose to proceed with your subdivision with these conditions,
please have a record plat prepared by a registered surveyor, drawn in accordance
with the diagr~n submitted on February 23, 1983, with your request. Then sub-
mit the original plat, three copies, the 5 percent payment to the recreation
fund, and the $35 fee for recording the plat to the City for processing.
If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
CI7Y OF WINTER SPRINGS
LA/ L
/~''7./.--4..p.LLv~~
,1- '1 ,'; :",. ,',
;ci'ty?fl~~~e;-' '
Jr~! saz
C'C': fn~.
.
e
e
J
Regular Meeting, City Commission, March 8, 1983
Page 2
1982-83-13
What remains to be considered is what will the impact be of truck traffic coming in
off 17-92 to Shepard Road down to the industrial area or out Florida Avenue over to
17-92. What ~ffect will that have on the people that live in Seminole County in
this area.
Mr. Dittmer was present and spoke for the request. Tom Green, Attorney, representing
the Wildwood Homeowners asked that the request be denied. David Hudick, Crestwood Way,
Sam Long, Heather Court, Beth Lee, Thistle Place, George Smith, Lakeview Drive, Doug
Gondera, Briarwood Drive, Mrs. A. Arenas, Lakeside Drive all spoke against the request.
Judy Montrose, Thistle Place spoke in discussion. Betsy Neilson, Glasgow Court, Glen
Gillete, Castlewood, Suzette Morris, Glasgow Court all spoke for the request.
Mayor Torcaso closed the public hearing and reconvened the Commission Meeting.
Attorney Green again spoke against the request. Attorney L. W. Carroll, representing
Mr. Dittmer asked to speak. Upon Attorney Kruppenbacher's recommendation, Mayor
Torcaso reopened the Public Hearing and recessed the Commission Meeting. Mr. Carroll
spoke for the request. Mr. Al Richardson, Linden Drive and Mrs. Grace Sullivan,
Wildwood, spoke against the request. Mayor Torcaso closed the public hearing and
reconvened the Commission Meeting.
Motion was made by Commissioner Linville to deny the redesignation of 30 acres west
of the power easement from PUD Multi-Family to PUD Industrial and PO (Professional
Offices) in yellow area; and my reasoning is I cannot believe that you do not have to
have a rear entrance on these buildings and also I feel there is no way to restrict
business only to daylight hours and not to weekends; I have to agree with homeowners,
I wouldn't want industrial next to me either. Seconded by Commissioner Adkins for
discussion. Discussion. Mr. Dittmer spoke in discussion. Vote on the motion:
Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville, aye;
Commissioner Trencher, no; Commissioner Grove, no; motion carried.
Request of Jay and Agnes Miller for vacation of utility easement on Lot 28, Walden
Terrace.
The City Planner explained the property is on the north side of Brookside Drive in
Walden Terrace. The request is basically to vacate the five foot utility easement
on the east side of the property to seek approval to build a boat shed. There are
two approvals necessary - to vacate the utility easement and then an exception to
the side setback from the Board of Adjustment. All the relevant utility companies
have waived any interest.
Motion was made by Commissioner Trencher to approve the request. Seconded by
Commissioner Hartman.Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Adkins, aye;
Commissioner Linville, aye; Commissioner Trencher, aye; Commissioner Grove, aye;
Commissioner Hartman, aye; motion carried.
Request of R.A. and H.T. Van de Graaff for waiver of subdivision requirements for
dividing Lot 3, Block E, Ranches Section 1 into three lots.
The City Planner explained the property is on the north side of Panama Road between
Hayes and Shore Roads. The request is under Sec. 14-3.2 which allows for waiver of
installation of subdivision improvements upon recommendation of staff and approval
by the Commission. The current request would be within the size standards of the
RC-l zone. The City Engineer has some comments which you have recommending you waive
the improvements.
Regular Meeting, City Commission, March 8, 1983
Page 3
1982-83-13
,
Motion was made by Commissioner Adkins that we approve the subdividing but subject
to the 5% fee to the City for parks and recreation based on the appraised (tax
assessor's) value. Seconded by Commissioner Grove. Discussion. Vote on the motion:
Commissioner Linville, aye; Commissioner Trencher, aye; Commissioner Grove, aye;
Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner Adkins, aye; motion carried.
First Reading of Ord. No. 274, to extend its territorial and municipal limits to
annex the hereinafter described lands situate and being in Seminole County, Fl., etc.:
Pointing to the map, Miss Koch said the Ord. No. 274, would allow the property in
crossmarks to be annexed into the City, approximately 260 acres. All will be zoned
R-U for at least two years following the annexation unless Seminole County would
waive the zoning.
Motion was made by Commissioner Trencher, seconded by Commissioner Hartman to read
Ord. No. 274 by title only on first reading. Discussion. Vote on the motion:
Commissioner Trencher, aye; Commissioner Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye;
Commissioner Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville, aye; motion carried.
Attorney Kruppenbacher read Ord. No. 274 by title only on first reading. The Public
Hearing is to be set for April 26, 1982.
Commission Ratification of appointments to P&Z Board and Code Enforcement Board:
Motion was made by Commissioner Hartman, seconded by Commissioner Adkins, to ratify
the appointments of Taru Joshi, D.Robert Smedley and Thomas Dougherty. Discussion.
Vote on the motion: Commissioner Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner
Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville, aye; Commissioner Trencher, aye; motion carried.
.
Resolution No. 409, requesting the FDOT to provide for nighttime construction on the
widening of SR 436 between Boston & Douglas Ave., etc.:
Motion was made by Commissioner Trencher to adopt Resolution No. 409, seconded by
Commissioner Adkins. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Hartman, aye;
Commissioner Adkins, aye;Commissioner Linville, aye; Commissioner Trencher, aye;
Commissioner Grove, aye; motion carried.
City Manager - Richard Rozansky:
FY 1982-83 Budget Adjustment - Ord. No. 275, first reading:
Manager Rozansky suggested the public hearing be set for April 12, 1983, and have a
Workshop on March 29, 1983. Two changes have been made to the attachment of the
Budget ordinance, approximately $61,000.00 in the Capitol Improvements Fund and year
end Reserve $205,000.00. He said there will have to be some revisions in the revenues
and expenditures, namely a reduction in ad valorem because of the $25,000 exemption and
an adjustment in the utility taxes revenue.
The Commission was in agreement to read Ord. No. 275 by title only on first reading.
Attorney Kruppenbacher read Ord. No. 275 by title only on first reading.
Commissioner Trencher asked that the Commission reconsider the reduction of the utility
taxes and asked that an ordinance to reduce utility taxes be brought back to the
Commission for discussion at the Workshop on March 29, 1983.
Report of Municipal Complex Committee - Mr. Gil Artman:
Mr. Artman, Chairman of the Committee said there is a definite need for a municipal
complex to house the administrative staff and police department.
e
Work performance product, addresses JOB TASKS: Support of Commission
CITY CODES: Land Development, Zoning;
Walter Thomas Elwell, CITY PLANNER, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA.
! //O/YV
and Boards'J 1<
[
~
STAFF REPORT, PLfu~ING DEPT. \JORK ORDER/DATE:83,11,18,1/6 JAN. 84
Development/Unit: REGENCY SEVILLE
Applicant/ Agent: ETTO CORPORATION, TARMO PURRE, EDGAR TORNAY/CONKLIN,PORTER,HOLMES
Review/Action Requested: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLANS
Text, Page: 1 of 1
Assessment/
Validat-ion:
To: CITY MANAGER/Rozansky, and all parties who may become identified relevant
to the above identified request for "Review/Action",
From:
CITY PLANNER/Elwell (sign/date). . . . .
...~1I
CfTt1J1,84--
Re:
STAFF REVIEW-for action toward approval of the above identified develop-
ment.
Background information available on prior reviews/action includes:
01.
Site information, Coordination/Synthesis of the findings of Staff Review:
refer to prior "STAFF REPORT' dated 12 Dec. 83, attached, and;
-02.
Planning/Zoning Board review/action: RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT
TO CONDITIONS SPECIFIED (refer to minutes of Regular Meeting, Wednesday
14 Dec. 84, attached), and now;
The applicant/agent requests that:
03. The City Commission "sanction" approval ~ the preliminary plan-
recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board, and impose the conditions
specified (identified above), and further;
The City Planner/Elwell and the applicant/agent(Engineer/Holmes,Conklin,Porter
and Holmes) concur that:
04. Certain specific Commission action (waivers)-that may be required by the
City Code (Sec. 14-95, and Sec. ~4-ll9(b)(relative to certain conditions
to be imposed (No.16,page 2, and; No.18,page 3 of the 12 Dec. 83 Staff
Report) may be addressed by the City Commission more expeditiously in the
course of final plan review/action when the applicant's presentation of
sidewalk and street plans become more refined, and the City Planner's
interpretation of the Code becomes clarified, and;
I
"( ((' 'I
IC( Ii, \
, i " \, ,p11
jll/- I
II '
05. All the above identified conditions - may be sanctioned/imposed by the
City Commission as conditions of their approval, and to meet the
applicant's "expressed" desire/need for approval not later than 10 Jan.84.
. cc: Mayor/City Commission,
All Departments,
Applicant,
File
m.
. .
- .
. .
-
-
/
460 East Altamonte Drive/Highway 436
Post Office Box 308
Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701
305/646-3441
January 4, 1983
Ms. Jacquiline Coch
City of Winter Springs
City Hall
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Dear Ms. Coch:
SUBJECT: Continued Occupancy of Temporary Bank Facility
Please accept this as our formal request of continued occupancy
of our temporary bank facility located on the corner of Moss
Road and State Road 434 in Winter Springs.
Our architect, KBJ, Inc. of Jacksonville is currently in conver-
sation with your city's Planning and Building Department and
we expect to receive site approval in the near future for
construction of our new facility. It is our goal to have
construction completed by June 30, 1984.
We appreciation your consideration. If you should have any
further questions or need further information, please feel free
to contact me. My direct telephone number is 646-3236.
Sincerely,
~ ~)
/<./~q// 6l~'
~ Robert B. Whitehil1~
Senior Vice President