HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009 04 20 EAR-Based Amendments Public Schools Facilities~ EAR-Based Amendments
As requested, the draft elements are being distributed one-at-a-time so that you will have ample
time for review, prior to the April 6 8~ April 20 Joint Local Planning Agency~City Commission
Meetings.
VII. PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES -Staff Analysis Executive Summary
No substantive changes to the Public Schools Facilities Element are proposed. The recommended
changes are only to provide continuity in formatting style.
These changes were presented to the Seminole County Planning and Technical Advisory
Committee (PTAC) as required under the terms of the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School
Facility Planning and School Concurrency As Amended January 2008. No one had any objections to
the proposed changes.
•
.~
•
City of Winter Sprinas
•
Comprehensive Plan
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
January 2008
Draft EAR-Based Amendments, February 1 b. 2009
Prepared For:
City of Winter Springs
Community Development Department
1 126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799
Uvdate Prepared Bv:
Plannina Communities, LLC
2510 Wild Tamarind Blvd.
Orlando. FL 32828
•
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. GOALS. OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES .....................................................................................1
B. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................13
C. EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................14
D. ISSUES AND CONCERNS ......................................................................................................27
LIST OF TABLES
Table VII- 1: Inventory of Elementary Schools ...........................................................................................14
Table VII- 2: Inventory of Middle Schools ..................................................................................................1 b
Table VII- 3• Inventory of High Schools ......................................................................................................17
LIST OF MAPS
•
•
Exhibit VII- 1: School Ancillary Plant Facilities in Seminole County .......................................................1 8
Exhibit VII- 2: Seminole County Elementar~School Locations .................................................................19
Exhibit VII- 3: Seminole County Middle School Locations ........................................................................20
Exhibit VII- 4: Seminole County High School Locations ............................................................................21
Exhibit VII- 5: Seminole County Schools Capital Improvements .............................................................22
VII-i
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
~-CHAPTER VII
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
A_GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL 1: ' ._ PROVIDE QUALITY EDUCATION. As a basic tenet of community life, it is
the goal of the City to contribute to and maintain a high quality public school
environment.
Objective 1.1: evel of Service Standards and Service Boundaries. The City e€
hall cooperate with the Seminole County School Board (School Boardl in their
efforts to correct existing deficiencies and address future needs through implementation of
adopted level of service standards and appropriate public school facility service area
boundaries.
The level of service standard is a countywide standard,, specified in the 2007 Interlocal
Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency As Amended January 2008;
(2007 ILA), wherein the following terms are used:
Permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH): meaning the permanent facilities within the
inventory of land, buildings and rooms in public educational facilities used by the Florida
Department of Education, Office of Educational Facilities; and
Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board and
adopted by local governments within which the level of service is measured when an application
for residential development is reviewed for school concurrency purposes. The CSA coincides with
groupings of school attendance zones within each school type based on adjacency.
Level of Service (LOS) +=Standard: meaning a standard established to measure utilization of
capacity within a _ SA. [Current LOS within a CSA is determined
by dividing the full-time equivalent student count (FTE) for the Fall Semester at the same type of
schools by the permanent FISH capacity of the same type of schools. Projected or future LOS is
determined by the dividing the projected enrolled students at the same type of schools within a
CSA by the planned permanent FISH capacity of the same type of schools.
Policy 1.1.1: ..Adoption of Level of Service L( OS) Standards-{~~
~9. Adopt the following desired LOS standard for school capacity
along with the other cities within Seminole County, the County, and the
School Board to ensure that the capacity of schools is sufficient to
support student growth,
i~,. ,...,.~a....a ,.~...n ~..
100% of the aggregate permanent FISH capacity for each school
type within each SA~_
Establish the following tiered LOS standard, toy=c-, financially achieve
the desired Los standard,
~~~:
VII-1
•
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
2008 - 2012 Be inning 2013
Elementary 8~ 100% of Permanent 100% of Permanent FISH
Middle CSA FISH Capacit Capacity
High School 1 10% of Permanent 100% of Permanent FISH
CSA FISH Capacit Capacity
Policy 1.1.2: Use of Level of Service (LOS) Standards.
~'~~" --. '~~~oordinate through the City's Concurrency Management
System T~ --~~°-'~--~~~ with the School Board and other local
jurisdictions,, to ensure that the LOS standards established for each
school type mare maintained.
Policy 1.1.3: Use of Concurrency Service Area (CSA)
Boundaries. ,-Apply school Concurrency using CSA
boundaries adopted by the School Board.
•
~eiis~olicy 1.1.4: lie SAs for Each Type of School. =1=ke
Recognize the CSA boundaries established by the School Board ..•:'
and as re-evaluated from time to time, based on clustered attendance
zones for each school type (elementary, middle and high school)
based on adjacency ,
r~eec~ec~.
olicv 1.1.5: SA Boundary Changes. Consider
the modification from time to time, of CSA maps made _at the
determination of the School Board, ~ .
-, _to maximize utilization of school capacity. "T',~.. ~-'-~~'
°-' :'-~" ~ ~ Receive the proposed change request 1}
::from the School Board, as transmitted to
the City and eke-other local jurisdictions. - ,
with supporting data and analysis-€er. Review and submit comments
on the proposed modification ::'~~" °---~~--- ~~-' ~--'~-~-~~ ~_~----~-~~ to the
School Board within forty-five (45) days.
l:sl4iey-1'.-~.&-Policy 1.1.6: .Coordination of School Board Capital
Improvements Schedule end Potential CSA Boundary Changes.
Receive aster identified in the 2007 ,
ILA, the
School Board's annual update of its Capital Improvements Schedule
~f3el~rl~e---:,f attendance zone changes and when necessary,
modifications to the CSA maps to provide maximum utilization of
facilities, to the greatest extent possible
:,:
gym.
•
VII-2
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Objective 1.2: 9~jeet~~=-~ Development Review Coordination fo Achieve
concurrency. The City e-~~ ~ ,will coordinate its development review efforts with the
~~---~--~'~ ~'~----`,- School Board to achieve concurrency in all public school facilities.
Policy 1.2.1: ~ek~7-:-Development Review Process. ''''-...:~__ ..,,..n ...:~~.t_..,.~
Withhold or condition the approval of any site plan, final subdivision,
or functional equivalent for new residential units not exempted, until a
School Capacity Availability Letter Determination (SCALD) has been
issued by the School Board to the City indicating that adequate school
facilities exist or until a mitigation agreement has been reached,
pursuant to the availability standard specified in iee~r}Subsection
163.3180(13)(e), Florida Statutes. (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvements
Element, Policy 1.7_6&4)
Policy 1.2.2: .Adoption of School concurrency Provisions into the
City's land Development Regulations. Adopt
school concurrency provisions into ~sthe City's land development
regulations for the review of development approvals, consistent with
the requirements of the 2007 ILA.
Objective 1.3: oordination of Existing and Future School Facility Planning
with the Future Land Use Element and Development Approval Process. The City ~" .' .~
shall coordinate with th~ ~,..w:•,~.',. ~--~~---~ School Board during development approvals and
changes to the City's Future Land Use Plan Map (PLUM) to help ensure the timely provision of
public school facilities.
Policy 1.3.1: .. oordination of Comprehensive Plan Amendments
and Facility Planning. "'''~-- ~;~~-----~" ~---:~-'--- Consider the availability
and future provision of school facility capacity, the provision of school
sites and facilities within neighborhoods, the compatibility of land uses
adjacent to existing schools and reserved school sites, the co-location of
parks, recreation and neighborhood facilities with school sites and the
linkage of schools, parks, libraries and other public facilities with
bikeways, trails, and sidewalks for safe access during the review of
proposed comprehensive plan land use map amendments.
•
VII-3
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
"T''
~
~"
Policv 1.3.2: l~e~--~~:Site Sizes and Co-location in the City.
~~~ ~:
~-- --~
ask Work with the School District to identify sites for future
educational facilities that meet the minimum standards of the School
Board where possible and which are consistent with the provisions of
the ~~`~° =~~itY's Comprehensive Plan. ~~~-=~~:fn-~ ~~€
~ • t~ ,. .. _ ..,. c .. t. ~..,1 u _... _.1 ,.
~
~
""'
~
vi
i
zct2
RYfi
-.3 , t
te
4tF
zvcT-i
zcxrrr
c~xrc~-
er1= Suggort the School Board in efforts to use standards
more appropriate to a built urban environments-e, when the size of
available sites does not meet the minimum School Board standards.
Work with the School Board to achieve co-location of schools with City
facilities, to the extent feasible, as a solution to the problem of lack of
sufficiently sized sites,
l~~olicy 1.3.3: peliey-~f--3~~Participation in Planning Technical
Advisory Committee (PTAC). Actively
participate in the TAC}, as
provided in the 2007 ILA,
._ .. ~ for the purpose of
discussing issues and formulating recommendations to the Public Schools
Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC) regarding coordination of land
use and school facilities planning, including such issues as population
and student projections, development trends, school needs, co-location
and joint use opportunities, ancillary infrastructure improvements
needed to support the schools, School Board Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan and the Public School Concurrency Program. (Cross
Reference: See Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Policy 1.2.7)
Policv 1.3.4: -1E~--3:4-Determining Impacts. Determination of
adequate school capacity will be the responsibility of the School Board.
Policy 1.3.5: otification of Submittal of Residential Applications.
Notify the School Board within 10 working days
of receipt of any land use or development application having a
residential component and X11-transmit submitted subdivision plans and
site plans to the School Board for their review.
Policy 1.3.6: otification of Meetings.
Provide the School Board with agendas of staff review, the Planning 8~
Zoning Board local Planning Agency and the City Commission
meetings.
Objective 1.4: oncurrency. The City :shall require
that public school facility capacity is available concurrent with the impacts of new residential
development, as required by Subsection 163.3180(13)(e), Florida Statutes (F.S.)
Policy 1.4.1: ..Timing of Concurrency Review. .
Reauire that all new residential development be reviewed for school
Concurrency prior to development approval` as defined in the 2007
VII-4
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
ILA.
Policy 1.4.2: ~~-jl~tesults of Concurrency Review. .Comply
with the availability standards of Subsection 163.3180(13)(e),
F.S., ~e-Fund do not deny development approval due to
failure to achieve the adopted LOS for public school facilities when the
following occurs:
• Adequate school facilities are planned and will be in place or
under construction within three (3) years of the development
approval.
• The developer executes a legally binding commitment to provide
mitigation proportionate to the demand for public school facilities
consistent with the methodology in the 2007 ILA. ~
~~~
Policy 1.4.3: esidential Uses Exempt from the Requirements of
School Concurrency. =1'#eExempt the following residential uses l-k~e
~~ from the requirements of school concurrency:
~-}± All single family lots of record at the time the school concurrency
implementing ordinance became effective.
?j± Any new residential development that has a preliminary plat (final
subdivision) or site plan approval or the functional equivalent for a
site specific development order prior to the commencement date of
the School Concurrency Program.
~: Any amendment to a previously approved residential development
which does not increase the number of dwelling units or change the
type of dwelling units.
-~}! Any age restricted community with no permanent residents under
the age of 18 (a restrictive covenant limiting the age of residents to
1 8 and older shall be required.)
Policy 1.4.4: se of Revenues Received Through Proportionate
Share Mitigation. ~~Direct any revenues r~for proportionate
share mitigation toward a school
capacity improvement identified in the School Board's Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan.
Policy 1.4.5: "~-'~~,- T" ^.~ °roportionate Share Mitigation. Consider in the
event, that there is not available school capacity to support a
development, that the School Board may entertain proportionate share
mitigation options and, if accepted, enter into an enforceable and
•
J~VII-5
I CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
binding agreement with the developer to mitigate the impact from the
development through the creation of additional school capacity.
A. Recoanize when the anticipated student impacts from a
proposed development cause the adopted LOS to be exceeded, the
developer's proportionate share will be based on the number of
additional student stations necessary to achieve the established LOS.
~reCalculate the amount to be paid ---~" '~~ ~~'~~~'~`~~' by the cost per
student station for elementary, middle and high school as determined
and published by the State of Florida.
B. alculate a developer's
proportionate share mitigation •-'~°" '~~ ~~ "'~---~ throuah the followinq
methodoloav:
Proportionate Share = (' Development students - Available
Capacity) x 2Total Cost per student station
Where:
'Development students =those students from the development that
are assigned to a CSA and have triggered a deficiency of the
available capacity.
2Total Cost =the cost per student station as determined and
published by the State of Florida.
C. =~eAllow the applicant .~k3~r~ ~e ~'~~ to enter a 90-day
negotiation period with the School Board in an effort to mitigate the
impact from the development through the creation of additional
capacity. Upon identification and acceptance of a mitigation option
deemed financially feasible by the School Board, the developer shall
enter into a binding and enforceable development agreement with the
School Board.
1. A mitigation contribution provided by a developer to offset the
impact of a residential development must be directed by the School
Board toward a school capacity project identified in the School
Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Capacity enhancing
projects identified within the first three (3) years of the Five-Year
Capital Improvement Plan shall be considered as committed in
accordance with Section 9.5 of the 2007 ILA.-
"~ _ ~.
2. If capacity projects are planned in years four (4) or five (5) of
the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan within the
same CSA as the proposed residential development, the developer
may pay his proportionate share to mitigate the proposed
development in accordance with the formula provided in Section
12.7 (B) of the 2007 ILA.
..
VII-6
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
3. If a capacity project does not exist in the Capital Improvement
Plan, the School Board will add a capacity project to satisfy the
impacts from a proposed residential development, if it is funded
through the developer's proportionate share mitigation
contributions. Mitigation options may include, but are not limited to:
a. Contribution of land or payment for land acquisition
suitable for and in conjunction with, the provision of additional
school capacity; or
b. Mitigation banking based on the construction of a
educational facility in exchange for the right to sell capacity
credits; or
c. Provide modular or permanent student stations acceptable
for use as an educational facilities; or
d. Provide additional student stations through the remodeling
of existing buildings acceptable for use as an educational
facility; or
e. Construction or expansion of permanent student stations at
the impacted school within the CSA; or
f. Construction of an educational facility in advance of the
time set forth in the School Board's Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan.
D. Recognize fFor mitigation measures (a) thru (f) above, that the
estimated cost to construct the mitigating capacity will reflect the
estimated future construction costs at the time of the anticipated
construction. Improvements contributed by the developer shall receive
school impact fee credit.
E. Apply n impact fee credit against €c~#he
proportionate share mitigation total. Credits wilt be given for that
portion of the impact fees that would have been used to fund the
improvements on which the proportionate fair share contribution was
calculated. The portion of impact fees available for the credit will be
based on the historic distribution of impact fee funds to the school type
(elementary, middle, high) in the appropriate CSA. Impact fee credits
shall be calculated at the same time as the applicant's proportionate
share obligation is calculated. Any school impact fee credit based on
proportionate fair share contributions for a proposed development
cannot be transferred to any other parcel or parcels of real property
within the CSA.
F. Do not amend or refund a~ proportionate share mitigation
contribution fter final
site plan or plat approval to reflect a reduction in planned or
constructed residential density.
rri~tart-~a~
~VI I-7
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Gam. Recognize that many proportionate share mitigation must be
directed by the School Board toward a school capacity improvement
identified in the School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
H1E. Require ~-~u~on conclusion of the negotiation period, that a second
Determination Letter 1-be issued. If mitigation is agreed to, the
School Board shall issue a new Determination Letter approving the
development subject to those mitigation measures agreed to by the
local government, developer and the School Board. Prior to, site plan
approval, final subdivision approval or the functional equivalent, the
mitigation measures shall be memorialized in an enforceable and
binding agreement with the local government, the School Board and
the Developer that specifically details mitigation provisions to be paid
for by the developer and the relevant terms and conditions. If
mitigation is not agreed to, the Determination Letter shall detail why
any mitigation proposals were rejected and why the development is
not in compliance with school concurrency requirements. A SCALD
indicating either that adequate capacity is available, or that there is
not a negotiated proportionate share mitigation settlement following
the ninety (90) day negotiation period as described in Section 12.7(B)
of the 2007 ILA _
. _ , constitutes final agency action
by the School Board for purposes of Chapter 120, F.S.
1Pefiey~Policy 1.4.6: Appeal Process. -~rRecoanize that a person substantially
affected by Rthe School Board's adequate capacity determination
made as a part of the School concurrency Process may appeal such
determination through the process provided in Chapter 120, F.S.
1F~~Policy 1.4.7: ~;~eE T~Considerafion of Adjacent concurrency
Service Areas. Consider if the projected student growth from a
residential development causes the adopted LOS to be exceeded in
the CSA, that an adjacent CSA which is contiguous with and touches the
boundary of; the concurrency service areas within which the proposed
c~4e~evelopment is located be evaluated for available
capacity. Conduct an adjacency evaluation review :'-°'~~
~~ as follows:
In conducting the adjacency review, the School Board shall first use
the adjacent CSA with the most available capacity to evaluate
projected enrollment impact and, if necessary, shall continue to the
next adjacent CSA with the next most available capacity in order
to ensure maximum utilization of school capacity to the greatest
extent possible.
2. Consistent with Rule 6A-3.0171, F.A.C., at no time shall the shift of
impact to an adjacent CSA result in a total morning or afternoon
transportation time of either elementary or secondary students to
exceed fifty (50) minutes or one (1) hour, respectively. The
transportation time shall be determined by the School Board
VII-8
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
transportation routing system and measured from the school to the
center of the subject parcel/plat in the amendment application,
along the most direct improved public roadway free from major
hazards.
Objective 1.5: 9~jee~ii*e~-~ Procedure for Annual Update of Capital Improvements
Element. The City ''~ shall amend its Capital Improvement Element (CIE) to include
that portion of the adopted School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan which deals with
capacity improvements.
Policy 1.5.1: Annual Update of Capital Improvements Element.
A~Update on an annual basis, no later than December 1 n of each
year, the City's Capital Improvements Element to
include that portion of the School Board's annual update of their
financially feasible Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan related to
capacity improvements. However, the City shall not have the
obligation, nor the responsibility for funding or accomplishing the
School Board Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
Policy 1.5.2: r~ji}~~~f ~-?-Addition of New Financially Feasible Fifth Year
Projects During Each Update. Include with each annual update to
the Capital Improvements Element :~'~°'~ a new fifth year with its
financially feasible school capacity projects that have been adopted
by the School District in its update of the Five-Year Capital
Improvement Schedule.
Policy 1.5.3: "~'~~,~ Tv c.2 '"ompliance with Florida Statute in Timing of Capital
Improvements Element Update. Amend the
City's Capital Improvements Element to reflect changes to the School
District's Five-Year Capital Facilities Plan in compliance with timing
requirements of Florida Statutes.
Objective 1.6: nsuring Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses,
Encouraging Co-location with Appropriate City Facilities, Location in Proximity to Residential
Areas to be Served and Function as a Community Focal Point. The City ., shall
ensure compatibility of school facilities with surrounding land use through the development review
process and shall encourage, to the extent feasible, co-location of new schools with compatible
City facilities, and the location of school facilities to serve as ~:-----°--~---~~;- L.,~~"'~~"":rommunity
focal points.
Policy 1.6.1: Allowable Locations of School Sites and Compatibility
Standards. Allow school sites ~°~~ ~"~~~-~~`~'~~ within any land use
designation in the City except Conservation/Conservation Overlay and
possibly industrial areas (Cross Reference FLUE Policy 1.11.1).~ti~
Ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses will be ensured through the
following measures:
~V I I-9
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
3,-• New school sites within the City must not be adjacent to any noxious
industrial uses or other property from which noise, vibration, odors,
dust, toxic materials, traffic conditions or other disturbances would
have a negative impact on the health and safety of students.
-t-~ Public school sites shall be compatible with environmental
protection, based on soils, topography, protected species and other
natural resources on the site.
~! An assessment of critical transportation issues, including provision of
adequate roadway capacity, transit capacity and bikeways, shall
be performed for proposed school sites prior to any development
to ensure safe and efficient transport of students.
(-~ New school sites must comply with the City's land development
regulations and must minimize potential detrimental impacts on
adjacent uses by providing sufficient on =site parking, sufficient
internal vehicular circulation to ensure that unsafe stacking of
vehicles on access roads does not occur, containment of off =site
light spillage and glare, and reduction of off- site noise through
compliance with the City's buffer requirements.
~+ New school sites for elementary and middle schools shall be
located in close proximity to existing or anticipated concentrations
of residential development. New school sites for high schools and
specialized schools are suitable for other locations, due to their
special characteristics.
K-• The development review process shall ensure that facilities such as
sanitary sewer and potable water will be available at the time
demanded by the new school site, and services such as public
safety can also be provided.
~• New school sites in shall have safe ingress and egress for
pedestrians, bicycles, cars, buses, service vehicles and emergency
vehicles. High schools should be located with access to collector or
arterial roads, rather than relying solely on local roads.
Policy 1.6.2: o-Location and Community Focal Point. ~ee~
e~'Encouraae to the extent feasible, the
eke-co-location of new school sites with appropriate City facilities, a~
recoanizing that new schools are an essential component
in creating a sense of community. Encouraae, through the development
review process, the location of new school sites so they may serve as
community focal points.
erx~rEnter into an 'nterlocal aareement with the
School Board where co-location takes place, to address shared uses of
facilities, maintenance costs, vehicular and bicycle parking, supervision
and liability issues, among other concerns.
~FVII-10
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Objective 1.7: nsuring Provision of Necessary Infrastructure. There
shall be coordination between the City .~'~ei~r~and the ~~•--~~~'~ ~~.-•_~,. School Board
in the timely provision of infrastructure to support public school facilities.
Policy 1.7.1: ~~r=-,'--r-.:.aximizing Efficiency of Infrastructure.g
_ _ - Seek to
maximize efficient use of existing infrastructure and avoid sprawl
development by identifying future school sites that take advantage of
existing and planned roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, parks,, and
drainage systems durina participation in the future school site
identification process detailed in the 2007 ILA.
Policy 1.7.2: 'nee-v T~ ?:? Safe Student Access. ''''~-~':~~- ---~" ----_--°~- Provide safe
student access to school sites by coordinating the construction of new
neighborhoods and residential developments, expansion of existing
neighborhoods and developments and redevelopment or revitalization
of existing neighborhoods and developments with ~rounty's
safe road and sidewalk connection programs to school sites.
Policy 1.7.3: ._ icycle Access and Pedestrian Connection. "'
Coordinate bicycle access to public schools consistent
with the Seminole County icycle plan adopted by the
etropolitan planning organization,
METROPLAN ORLANDO.. ~ r_~Revise
the City's land development regulations,, as needed to specify that
performance standards for new residential developments adjacent to
existing and proposed school sites; other than age restricted
developments, shall include pedestrian connections between the
sidewalk network within the development and the adjacent school site.
-r3,r~Policy 1.7.4: oordination to Ensure Necessary Off-Site
Improvements. Work with the School Board, durina the
development review process for a proposed new school facility~~
mi'n'---~~~;~~i-t'~ ~'-•~ ~~'~~~~' ~~~•--'t to determine the party or parties
responsibility for the financing, construction, operating, and maintaining
of any needed off-site improvements, including but not limited to:
signalization, installation of deceleration lanes, roadway striping for
crosswalks, safe directional/warning signage and installation of
sidewa Iks.
Consider a new development adjacent to or sharing an access road
with an existing school or future school sit^ '~~--~-n~e, as mitigation
of the traffic impacts of the development for safe access to the school.
Efforts may include, but are not limited to:
developer striping of crosswalks, developer installation of sidewalks,
•
I~VII-1 1
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
payment for safe directional warning signage, and payment for
signalization.
~e~iejr~3:3:--Policy 1.7.5: ""-'~~-- T~' ~.~ Inclusion of Provisions for School Buses.
-~~~... ~:~_. -~.,.,, ... ~_:, ..:., Revise the City's land development regulations
to require the inclusion of school bus stops and turnarounds in new
residential developments that are not age restricted.
Objective 1.8: Coordination with School Board and Cities. The City
shall coordinate with the School Board and other local jurisdictions as specified
by the procedures in the 2007 ILA ~ ~,
.. and provide information for emergency preparedness.
Policy 1.8.1: roviding Data to the School Board. "P'~~ '~~`,- :'~~"
Maintain data on the approved number of residential
dwelling units by unit type and location and the corresponding number
of units within each development that have received a certificate of
occupancy (CO)..'~°rovide the data . to the School
Board annually by October 15rn.
Policy 1.8.2: "~'~~-- Tom' °.~ °roviding Representation. Assian
representatives to take part in committees and meetings as specified
by the 2007 ILA. =
Assign a staff
representative _ to the
(~~ee-(~TAC},. which shall meet as specified in the
;~~~:~r~2007 ILA. Appoint an elected official or designee X11•
#~e--a~,-to the ,~..~.r: ~..>^.._,, u,.,.:~: _„r,.~ ~:~~~...~~~«~.,
fPSFPC}~ which shall meet as specified in the 2007
ILA.
Fei!iey-a-r3.4~~olicy 1.8.3: ~ Advising of Proposed Changes.~'ke
Provide notification in accordance with the 2007 ILA
. , to the School Board of proposed amendments
to the Future Land Use Map (PLUM), rezonings, developments of
regional impact, and~or major residential or mixed use development
projects that may increase residential densities, effect student
enrollment, enrollment projections, or school facilities. ~kProvide such
notice-~~1--1~e-~rc~f within 10 working days of receipt of the
application.
olicx 1.8.4: Tn~~-f~f ~8--1 Emergency Preparedness.-- ;;~=~-•
~e Continue to provide information needed by the School Board
and local jurisdictions for emergency preparedness purposes.
I~VII-12
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
B_INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this document is to support the timely provision of the Seminole County School
Board. ISchool Board)'s constitutional and statutory obligation and sovereignty to provide a
uniform system of free public schools on a countywide basis. It is not the intent to require the
School Board to confer with, or obtain the consent of, the City, as to whether that obligation has
been satisfied. Additionally, this Element is not intended to be construed to impose any duty or
obligation on the City for the School Board's constitutional or statutory obligations. The City e€
5~i~-does not have the authority to directly provide school facilities, but is required by
State Law to work with the School Board to address the coordination of public
school facility planning with land use planning and development approvals. The City e#-aA/ir~#e+~
S~w~g~continues to be responsible for approving or denying comprehensive plan amendments
and development approvals within its own jurisdiction, and nothing herein represents or authorizes
a transfer of any of this authority to the School Board.
Legislation enacted by the 2005 Florida Legislature mandated a comprehensive approach to
school planning by revising laws that govern both school districts and local government planning.
A coordinated effort was undertaken by the local jurisdictions of Seminole County and the
Seele~ee~y-School Board. Preparation of a new Interlocal Agreement for Public School
Facility Planning and School Concurrency including procedures for coordinating land use planning,
development approvals and school planning was the first step in this process and was adopted
by the Board of County Commissioners, City Commissions, and the Se-~e~ey-Eer~#y-School Board
in 2007 and Aamended in January 2008.
The 2005 Legislation also included adoption of a Public School Facilities Element consistent with
those adopted by the other local governments within the County and consistent with the 2007
Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency As Amended
January 2008 (2007 ILA),. Ssections 163.3177(12) and 163.3180 F.S. and Rule 9J-5.025, F.A.C.
and which describes aproportionate-share mitigation methodology. Additional amendments to
the City's Comprehensive Plan required by the 2005 legislation include:
• Adoption of the Level of Service L( OS1 standards applicable countywide that establish
maximum permitted school utilization rates relative to capacity into the Capital
Improvements Element;
Adoption of the financially feasible Public School Capital Facilities Program addressing
school capacity improvements into the Capital Improvements Element that is adopted as
part of the $err-ir~ele-Eetir~y-School Board's overall Capital Improvements Program;
Amendments to revise objectives and policies that address the City's process of
coordination with the School Board in the Intergovernmental Coordination Element.
•
I~FVI I-13
i•
i•
I CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
21
20
19
_._. _
C_ EXISTING CONDITIONS
The following Tables indicate permanent school building capacity for every school under the
jurisdiction of the Sefl~tele-C~rr~y-School Board:
TABLE ~V II-l.l :Inventory of elementary acnools
Site Perm. Bldg Student SY 09-10
Elementary School Acreaae Blda Sa Ft Caoacity* Projection
Altamonte ElementarX 1~` 1 1 6.223 991 $Qz
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
25
106.395 _._-- -
625
._. .
516
_..
- 44 (al 23 (b)
__ _
Z~.42 ~ _ . ._.. ~~ _ _._._. ~~..
11 72.452 ~ $3Z
__
10 80.067 863 634
21 1 1 44 ----...___..__$~2._ .....__.-._ ___._...-.._~.
_ 15
__- 1 17.306
_ _
.._.-....._...---._. 735
_.-__.__.V._.._.._-__.._._...
_____ 570
.._._-__._-._..
1 1 83.704 715 604
1 1 77,664 _Z~~_. .------ ---__ _ __
2~ 1 4 __ __ . . _ ._ $~ _ __.. ..... Z1.Z
1.....4.1. ~2... __ X22,.
~~ __ >~Q _ ....._ __. $~.~
78.047 ......_.-._..___ __~.__-~_-_..-.._.._._.._Q~4... .__.--.- ---_.__.._.__~Q_
20 83.638 725 789
___._
16 __ _
78,502
991
604
15 1 15,802 937 859
.$
_ _ _
Z
_..
_ __ ..774
_ 1 1 _ _. 4 ~.. .__.__ _ . _~..
1 1 1
1 4 _..
.... ~..
.................... - __......__._ .~.
~~ ~Q ~Z
I * 100% of Student Stations; (a) Combination Elementary and Middle School• (b) Elementary School Only
Source: Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) and Seminole County School District, February 2009
I VII-14
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
•
•
~,
~ , i, r
.~.LT.~~,I~-+V-=EL-AIE\T;~F'I~ 1~ IL~~~.=:~ «91 Sc*~4
BEM? L_~IiE ELE~iE\T:~.i~~~ _!+ 1(i6.3~it L02C~ 1.07~>
BE~TLEZ"ELE\fE\"T_~R1' 1' 127.24{~ 933 9'S
C.3RILLC)\ ELEIIE~T-~R1" 3-1 1?5.~)9' 9•i2 rUl
C.~SSELBERRI'ELE\fE\7aR1" 14 lij5.1~7 906 '9S
C R~"tiT 3L L.~E ELE~iE\T_3RZ" 10 114.5'3 S_' 6ti1
E ~~TBRCxII; ELE\fE\-I' aRI' 1 S i U'. 3 S: 93' 516
E\CiLItiH E'iT.-RTES ELE~IEVTr1R~' ~1 11'.1? S-13 'r=
E ~ :~~5 ELE\IE`T.~RI' _~ 103.75 9'-4 SAS
F! ~RE~T C'IT1' ELE\IE\"T.>~RZ' 1 ~ 133.595 9'6 871
C:E\~` :-~ ELE~IE\'I:~RI' 1 ~ 102.543 601 ~+~:
C~OLDSBORG ELE\IE\T.-SRI' =0 l0ii.~21 713 6S-i
H~\iILTO\ ELE\1E\T.-CRY l9 S~~.c9S ?_'S SIC
HE.~THRGR' ELE~IE\T_4RI' 15 59.172 S(i2 1.119
HIC*HL:~\DS ELE'~iE~T.-~R1' =5 106.39 6_5 e-16
IDI'LLL~'ILDE ELE\iE\T.~RI" 15 14.399 S25 SS?
I~EETH ELE\iE\T.aRI" S76 '76
L.~IiE \i.~RI' ELE\IE\T.~RI' I ~ 63 ~ 610
Lr~IiE :IRIE\ TA ELE\IE\T.~F: I S 169 699
L.~~Z"TO\ ELE\IE\T~RI" S52 SS1
LG\GR E7 D ELE_\iE\T.~RIG`- Z~ ~ I ~ S~ ~ U C ~ ' 15 6G5
~iIDR:aI'ELE\1E\?.~Rl- 115 ~i~9
P:~RTI\ ELE~iE\T.-1RI' 15 9.959 74S '~}c
?I\E CREST ELEDIE\T.~RI" 25 1U~.709 S_3 SSu
R~I\BU~l' ELE~IE\T_=~R1' 1 S 91.3-11 '49 SSS
RED Bt'Ci ELE\IE\~TaRI" 15 97.335 513 5-41
ti.~B:~l, P011T ELE~iE\T_3R~ 15 75.4-17 261 Sls
SPRI\C.L.~E ELE\IEtitT.aRI' 24 S3.635 331 S20
ATE\STRO~1 ELE\1E\T.-SRI' 15 92.372 632 71~~
STERLI~GP.-\RIiELEtIEti'I'.-~R1' lti 'S,~42 195 6~~
~~:~LI~ERELE\iE\T.~,RI SC'HGOL 15 115.502 937 S9t~
't~'EI~I~ :~ ELEDIE~'T.~RI" 15 6-4.3_ S -407 S"1
ti~`IC'hL! )It' ELE\1E~L3R1 16 113.Ci9d SO-i S'1
tVILSG~ ELE\iE~`T:~RI' 16 11'.159 SSi 950
Zi'I~`TER SPRIGS ELE~IELTT-~R1" 15 10".~5- S14 63_
tit'GODL.~'~DS ELE\IE\T.-~R1" 24 95.=95 S-i4 Si5
Total 618 3.712,970 26,36 29.106
A~•er:~ge 17 100.3=1 71.4 '87
titatld~rd Per FTE O.U212 128
*Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH)
**Seminole County School District Staff
VII-15
'•
i~
I~
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
IAISLt VII-"l: Inventory of Middle Schools
~ Pe rm. Bldg Student SY 09-10
Middle School Bldg S~ Ft
Acreage Capacity* Projection
Greenwood Lakes Middle ~ 1 4 1,240 1.058
Hopper Elementary and Middle (dl 44 d 21 (b)
Indian Trails Middle ~ 1 24 1.386 1.257
Jackson Heights Middle 62 146.427 1,345 1,328
Lawton Chiles Middle 25 193,512 1,355 1,356
Markham Woods Middle 22 179.920 1223 1,055
Millennium Middle ~ 212,031 1 4 1.343
Milwee Middle 1 14 1,261 968
Rock Lake Middle 1 1 1 44 1.153 1,054
Rosenwald Middle and Hiah (al 79 (al 19 (bl
Sanford Middle ~ 1 41 1.414 1.343
South Seminole Middle 21 143,730 1,179 1,1 22
Teague Middle 20 148,072 1,476 1,30.
* 95% of Student Stations
ja) Combination Middle and Hiah School
(bl Middle School Only
(d) Combination Elementary and Middle School
Source: Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH1 and Seminole County School District. February 2009
~ +~vn- ~ 6
**Seminole County School District Staff
i•
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
IAISLt i~Vll-3: Inventory of Fllgh Schools
it Perm. Bldst SY 09 10
Hggh School Bldg S~ Ft Student
Acreaae Caaacity* Projection
¢Q 103.956
x¢2.973 75q**
2.678 588
125
2.195
522 364,488 2,859 2,912
43 308,744 2.277 2.277
~Q 357,29 2.765 2.376
1 364.309 441 2.368
_____ _._
- 359,371
__ ._.._.._. __ 2.767
79 (al 1.964
60 (bl
~ 350 7 2.615 3.083
i•
i•
* 90% of Student Stations
** 85% of student stations
(al Combination Middle and Hiah School
(bl Hieh School Only
Source: Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) and Seminole County School District, February 2009
The following exhibits illustrate locations of existing ancillary plant facilities, existing schools, and
locations of proposed capital improvements to existing school facilities. No new ancillary plant
facilities are planned. The SA} boundary maps are included in the
Support Documents.
I~VII-17
**Seminole County School District Staff
i•
i•
i•
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Exhibit VII-1: School Ancillary Plant Facilities in Seminole County
0
0
N
a ~~
~ ~ ~ ~
U
~ r ~. .e K
._ C
{ n
c,
o
N
Q
M
_S
d
C
C
C
G
U c
4
Ji
U
_ _
1
T
r
~r u
L ~'"
t
.t'
.
_
r ~~" -' t, t f
_
'i .i .
i4
.. .~
,=- r i ~
I
C~
"' y ' ~ J 3
i~
J.
_ f
h i ~~~~~..~ .` m
~' ~
;fit ~
~~~
•
~ ii
r ~
_. v
; ._ .....
'
.,,"°'
W
Y4
' re
'~ i
__c
m, ~
Q,
i S
9
S J ~
b
n ,
~ r
~ , --
~~ ~ i ip
~~ -. ~p~
E~ I C i
I~
~ ! ~ b
3d
~ m
^~
~'. ~ ' '
~. i iX`
''Si
C
V '~ ~I t~jl
1.__.. M1... «t_ -
_ ^_
/ /
I VII-18
•
•
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Exh
I~VII-19
I CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
I Exhib
i•
it~Vll-3: Seminole County Middle School Locations,
~;
1
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~' [ ~..
d ~,..
~ a, ,, ~'~:"~ ~
~f
r
J
.4.
4.~--
7
L _
Qj T
~` !
r=
~:.~=
L
L C
! 'r.
r1'
~ ~
r~
,Mph 'l
Or
Y
t~
_ 1 ou,\.J j
a~
4 j
N
i
3
6 C
P S
f1/'~~ a~
_V
..~
_ ,jt
/// }K i
`_ ~ ~ Y
~~., ~ ~ r
a~ ''J
~ ~` ~„ ~ '
:'_ L'1~D_ r a1
•~
•,
v ~ ~
.~
i•
~J
I~VII-20
i•
•
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Exhibi
~ V11i~-4: Jeminole County high School Locations,
r
o:
L ~ ° ~ ~.
~ _ .r ., z
m ~..~
.~ . ~ ~ '`r.:'
r,
~.- ~
f, ~,
s s
L pr,
~;~y
r I ~~ ' r
~.1 rj ~ ~ _T ,'~, t, ~
~~ .rf„v
~",w `& ~ `
,, f .'
$S ~
~i
'O„~~
v
" -~- -~-
i
i
c
r
o
.~
y
'+ i
I _
s {/~~~e~~
T :/
I~VII-21
I•
i•
i•
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Exhibit VIII-5: Seminole County Schools 5-Year Capital Improvements Plan,
3A9'~February 2009
1
,t
uF t N
~ • • •
V ~
a+
' o
N
M
Z
0
~'
a
L
+: a
~'
n
t N
y
~
g3
N
t.
<. {....
v~ 2
f.
~..i
G - t
Y f
p
•
• 2
J"
.1 v
f ~
'+~, ^
~
~ _ ~ ;
• <,
C
.~
:._ ~; •
_ S
o
,
`
_ ~ ~
• ~ ~
2 w f r.
f~
a
I , .~
O
• 3
~
yi
V~
a'c • o
¢
m Y K
U
__
~-
o
• ~ K
W i
~ • z
W
,r'
t 4 ~ • ^y
`~'~ 1
"' a
!''
.`_ ~ ~ ' ~ u~si
f
• • w
< f • J 3 ~ O
/1~~
_ y ~ SY W
~i ~
~~ ~ _
-~,.~,
W
Y
• 2
S
N
•
3
~
Y
I
I I~VII-22
i~
i•
i•
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT I
~~.
- -----„~
•
w
w w
" ,
r
.....,,,
r, w
w
'~ w
•
s w
~• w w • ~ a
C
~~r
•
w
~
a
4~VI1-23
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
i•
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
~::,~. a, n------~~~m
;. >
~ }~
• ~ ~~ ,
f
i •
Entire .~-~~ ~.
i•
I -
~~ .
Page Struck ~
~~ ~~
VII-24
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
•
•
I~VII-25
•
•
•
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
VII-26
•
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
~- ISSUES AND CONCERNS
1. Identifying Sites for Future School Facilities. The 2007 ILA _ ,
_provides
a process for identifying future school sites. The process includes, at a minimum,
semi-annual meetings of the Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) that
can be used to coordinate land use and school facility planning. The next step in
that process is a committee created by the 2007 ILA ,
. ,the Public
Schools Facilities Planning Committee (PSFPC). The PSFPC has several
responsibilities, including review of PTAC findings and submittal of
recommendations to the School Board. In order to ensure that the redevelopment
and revitalization of older portions of unincorporated Seminole County can
continue, the issue of sites will continually need to be addressed as part of the
ongoing cooperative planning effort specified by the 2007 ILA•~f•---T~~e,
. h . -
t
•
2. Population and Student Projections. In accordance with the 2007 ILAnterlaes~
`"~, the City ~i+~s-and the School Board will share population
projections and projections of student enrollment for use in their planning efforts.
The 2007 ILA
specifies that the parties will use student enrollment
projections provided by the School Board. However, the source of student
enrollment projections is based on the Capital Outlay Full Time Equivalent (COFTE)
cohort projections issued by the Department of Education in July of each year.
These COFTE projections are related to past enrollment trends and do not consider
such factors as reduced land availability for future growth and development. As
the City ~-r`~~~t~rows closer to reaching build-out, these projections will
become less reliable.
i'~VII-27
I CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
3. Proportionate Share Mitigation Efforts and Alternative Mechanisms for Ensuring
School Capacity. The 2007 ILA _ ,
_ . ~ outlined the process by which the School
Board may entertain proportionate share mitigation options. Proportionate share
mitigation allows a developer to pay that portion of the cost of providing capacity
in a school facility that is necessary to serve that particular development or
redevelopment project. The methodology for calculating a developer's
proportionate share as specified in the 2007 ILA
_ ~ is included in this
Element and will be added to the City's Land Development Regulations as part of
the Concurrency Management System. Mitigation options offer a variety of
alternatives, including construction of a charter school by the developer. If a
mitigation proposal fails, the 2007 ILA
~, _ ~ _ - offers an appeal process
specified by Chapter 120, Florida Statutes (F.S.) as an alternative. Another
allowable alternative mechanism for mitigation impacts on schools is the
establishment of an Educational Facilities Benefit District as allowed by Section
101 3.355, F.S. This option permits school districts and local governments to enter
into separate ~interlocal ~ragreements to arrange for financing a school to allow
redevelopment, revitalization or other development efforts, when property owners
involved agree to this special assessment. Osceola County adopted an ordinance
creating such a District in 2003. Should redevelopment and revitalization efforts in
the City be unable to proceed, even with proportionate share mitigation, further
examination of the use of an Educational Facilities Benefit District may be needed.
•
1~V11-28