Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995 07 05 Regular July 5, 1995 To: City Manager General Services Director S~ ~ From: Land Management Specialist ~ Re: S~Review Proposed Elementary School ''Eft The above referenced was held on July 5, 1995. C. Birkebak, D. Burke, J. Flynn andR. Zimmerman represented the project. Staffmembers present were Grimms, Jenkins, Ketteringham, Lallathin, LeBlanc and Taylor. There were outstanding comments from three (3) departments - Fire, Police and Public Works/ Utility Department (see attached Staff comments). Motion by Lallathin that the project be recommended for approval contingent on the three (3) departmental comments being satisfied and the Land Management Specialist be notified by the Department Heads that these were satisfied. Seconded by Grirnms. All voted aye. NOTE: Because this project is on fast track (scheduled to open September 96), this is being presented to the Planning and Zoning Board on July 5, 1995. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708-2799 Telephone (407) 327-1800 :MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Don LeBlanc, Land Management Specialist Thomas Grimms, AICP Community Development coordinat~ July 3, 1995 Proposed Elementary School liE" Landscape Plans Engineering and I have reviewed the plans and have no concerns or comments. ......... -= - '0......., V-,~V- ...... V '-'-"r::~..:.~ CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (407) 327-1800 July 3, 1995 :' Derek Burke, P. E. . WBQ Design & Engineering, Inc. 201 N. Magnolia Avenue Suite 200 Orlando, FL 32801 RE: Proposed Elementary School "E" Engirieering Review. Dear Mr. Burke: Th~ subjeqt engineering. plans. and stQrmwa~er pollution abatement calculations were received on June 16, '" 1995. The 25- yearj24~hour storm cal cuI ations and revised pl"ans were received on June 30, 1995. The following deficienci es were noted during review: 1. For both Basins #1 and #2, the 25-yearj24-hour stormwater calculations are missing the pipe sizing and hydraulic grade line (HGL) calculations that are required in Sec. 9-241 (revised by Ord. #581) of the Land Development Code (LDC). This is the piping leading to the ponds and the HGL in the inlets and manholes. This requirement was relayed to Rusty Zimmerman by telephone on the morning of June 23, 1995. A copy of Ord. #581 is attached and sample output sheets from the "aDICPR" Users Manual. 2. Regarding the ponds; Page 9 of the Ardaman & Associates soils report states that underdrains "...may be necessary to prevent aquatic vegetation." What was your rational e for not using underdrains? 3. On.sheet 1.6 of the engineering, you are showing regular and handicap parking spaces that are 10-feet X l8-feet and 12- feet X IS-feet, respectively. Sec. 9-276 of the LDC requires 200 s.f. of area for regular parking spaces. Generally, this has been 10-feet X 20-feet dimensionally. To the best of my knowledge, handicap spaces are to be 12-feet X 20-feet, not counting the ramp area. Please check with the Building Official on the handicap dimensions. .~ - . - .. . .',-.-,,- .~;~~.~...'t. . - .. - ...._...,--:-~~~;...;...~...__.~:-:-:-:.'"- -- ----- - .-.... ----....-.-.--- ... -.. . .... . ... -- - . .----.-.~7:--:~ Derek Burke, P.E. Elementary School "E" July 3, 1995 page 2 Please respond, to the preceding numbered comments in writing and provide the requested information or changes. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 327-8397. )f;::t~~d~ Mark L. Jenkins,~' City Engineer attachments: Ord. 581 / adICPR outputs (2) cc: City Manager (no attachments) utility Director (no attachments) Land Management Specialist (no attachments) Building Official (no attachments) Seminole County School Board (no attachments) , , :~ ' 'f i J ., ',-:'.~ ":.'..' TO: Don LeBlanc, Land Management Specialist FROM: Charles Sexton, Chief of Police DATE: June 30, 1995 SUBJ: Proposed Elementary School "E" Engineering Plans. ~ 70-95 I have received your memo and inspected the plans for Elementary School "E". I have no other comments at this time. >i.~ ~~/f..- - Charles Sexton Chief of Police TO: FROM: RE: DATE: MEMORANDUM Don LeBlanc, Land Management Specialist Don Houck, Building Official Q~ Elementary School "E" June 30, 1995 No further comments are required at this time. - DWH:aD1 DWH0029 MEMO FOR RECORD June 29, 1995 From: Don LeBlanc, Land MaMgement SpecWiJJt~ Re: Proposed Elementary School If Elf Environmental Comments On May 20, 1994, Universal Engineering Sciences in a Phase 1 Environmental SUlVey conducted for Calton Homes Incorporated stated on Page 7 of the report that "there is potential for impact to the subject site from the former contents of the extensively corroded 55 gallon drum observed on the site". It is further stated that ''It is our opinion that the groundwater beneath the subject site be tested for volatile organics via EP A Methods 601/602". In another Phase 1 Environmental Survey conducted for the School Board dated July 5, 1994, Universal Engineering Sciences, in the Summary and Conclusions, does not mention the 55 gallon drum (it is mentioned on Page 4 of this report) and now states that the groundwater contamination at the Sprague Electric site "does not pose a probable threat to the subject site. .....UES recommends no further investigation at this time. If In another letter from UES dated July 26, 1994, to the School Board, it was stated "UES recommends no further investigation at this time." I voiced my concerns to Ms. Chris Birkebak on the contradictions noted in a meeting held at City Hall on J1.Ule 28, 1995. She stated that she wi1llook into this matter. - - -.-- .-:.:-.-:--".---:-- .' . ..... .. TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Seminole County Public Schools District Administrative Office Facilities Planning Department MEMORANDUM Don LeBlanc, Land :Management Specialist Chris Blrkebak, Project Manager \if July 3, 1995 Elementary School E In response to your comments regarding the Phase I Environmental Swvey for the proposed Elementary School E site, I contacted Rohert Cronin, P.G. vvith Universal Engineering Sciences to <.IisCUS1~ lheir findings. The following is a reit.eration of that discussion: 1. The initial survey. dated May 20, 1995,indicated that there might be some potential hazards resulting from an ahandoned 55 gallon drum on the site and the existence of groundwater contamination at th~ Sprague Electric site. 2. Upon receipt of this report, the School Board requested furthcl" investigations by Universal Engineering Sciences (DES). 3. UES pelfo1"rneo additional investigations, which are outlined in theu- letters of July 5 and July 26, 1994. They concluded tllat the old drum posed no hazards because the surrounding soil and vegetation appeared healthy. They also found that the contamination at the Sprague Electric site was not a concern, since the contamination was localized to that site. 4. Robert Cronin spoke with Tim Larson at the FDE? in Tallahassee last week to check on thO' status of the clean-up at the Sprague Electric site. Mr. Larson said that they are completin~ the design of the clean-up plan and will begin work on the site within the next several months. He felt that the contamination would pose no threat to the school site. because of the distance between the sites, the lack of migration, and the fact that the school is utilizing the city water system. 1211 Mellonville Avenue. Sanford, Florida 32771 · Phone: (407) 322-1252 Facsimile: (407) 330-0742. roD: (407) 324-0699Personnel Services TDD: (407) 324-0595 Student Information FROM 407-330-0742 07-03-95 01:00 PM P02 Memorandum July 3, 1995 o. ~'.; 5. It is UES's conclusion that no further investigations are required. Don, we appreciate your concerns) but we tbel comfortable with our consultant's assessments and reconunendations. Thank you for your continued assistance on this project. cc: Dianne Kramer Boh Urban Ross Ponder FROM 407-330-0742 07-03-95 Cl!: CO PM P03 WINTER SPRINGS UTILITY I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 110 NORTH FLAMINGO AVENUE WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (407) 327-2669 Fax (407) 327-0942 June 26, 1995 .:; TO: Don LeBlanc, Land Management Specialist FROM: Kipton Lockcuff, P.E., Utility Director /~J- RE: HigWands Elementary Final Engineering We have reviewed the final engineering for the proposed elementary school in the Highlands and have the following comments: 1. The proposed connection to the existing water main shall be by tapping sleeve and valve. The proposed method does not rninlrnize the disruption of service to the Wildwood community. Please revise this connection. Also, a temporary jumper connection will be required for pressurizing the water main prior to receiving DEP certification. 2. The proposed gravity sewer main which is completely different than what was previously submitted should be reconsidered. The new route is over 1,000 feet longer and is a much more expensive alternative. Our plat records show that Tract "e" of the Highlands common area has a dedicated utility easement over the entire area of Tract "C" and a dedicated utility easement exists over the lots on Dundee Drive. Access should not be a problem and it would be a simpler and more economical solution. 3. The plans delineate an 8" X 3/4" tee along the west side of the school which really should be a 3/4" tap with a double strap tapping saddle and corporation. 4 The fire line master meter will not be supplied by the City of Winter Springs. The notes should be changed to reflect the School Board/contractor will be responsible for purchase and installation. The City will only inspect. 5. Water and sewer capacity is available for this project and the connection fees have been computed based on the DEP permit applications. The consultant has estimated flow of 4490 gpd based on a per capita consumption of 5.1 gallons per day and a population of 880. I find their calculations consistent with our historical data and concur with their determination. The capacity charges are $1.12 per gallon for water and $6.30 per gallon for sewer for a total of $33,315.80. File - ....-=-_... FIRE DEPARTMENT / 102 NORI1-I MOSS ROAD WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 TELEPHONE (407) 327-2332 ~~l FTRE AND RESCUE SERVICES MEMORANDUM To: Donald LeBlanc, Land Management Specialist From: Timothy J. Lallathin, Fire Chief 0~ I ~ Date: March 27, 1995 ~. Subject: Proposed Elem~ntary School "E" -. ~ The Fire Department has reviewed the above referenced proposal and make the following re~inmendatioris; -;.:~~.'.;. . . . . . 1. The location and spaCing of the fire hydrants meet standards and are acceptable. 2. The Utility Department will provide fire hydrant installation specifications. . . 3. At each fire hydrant location, the paved area adjacent to the hydrant should be Yellow line stripped (10' x 20.'), and a sign marked '"NO STANDING, STOPPING;.OR PARKING''. 4. The Department requests a complete structure fire sprinkler system. 5. The fire alarm system should be a complete function system with a 24 hour monitoring service.> . 6. The FIRE DEPARTMENT connections to the fire sprinkler system should be clearly marked and unobstructed.,. No further comments are required at this time. , .~, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708-2799 Telephone (407) 327-1800 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM: III. ANNUAL ELECTION OF OFFICERS BACKGROUND: Sec. 20-54 of the City Code provide for the selection of a chairman and vice-chairman of the Planning and Zoning Board. It states: There shall be a chairman and vice-chairman of the Planning and Zoning Board selected from and by the members. They shall serve a term of one (1) year or until their appointment to the board is terminated, whichever is shorter, unless sooner removed by the board. NOTE: Apparently, there have been no rules of conduct adopted by the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency with respect to time of election of officers, and other matters. Also, the P & Z Board is potentially a quasi-judicial body in certain matters that come before it, such as rezonings, site specific land use amendments, or other site-specific development requests. The Florida Supreme Court ruling of Snvder v. Board of Countv Commissioners of Brevard County, the ruling on Jenninqs v. Dade County and other recent developments of case law, have caused a transition in public hearing proceedings for local government relating to quasi- jUdicial matters. In view of the Snyder and Jennings rulings by the Florida Supreme Court that have prompted more formal procedures as a result, it is advisable that the board consider adopting rules of conduct/procedure for the conduct of hearings and other matters coming before it. There was discussion on traffic patterns, reclaimed water, water front recreation, etc. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff Review Board recommends that request be approved. Attached are Staff comments. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799 Telephone (407) 327-1800 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM: IV B. NEW BUSINESS PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL "E" - DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STAFF REPORT: BACKGROUND: Attached for your review is the overall layout for the proposed elementary school to be constructed on the north side of Shepard Road, between Sheoah Boulevard and U.S. 17/92. ANALYSIS: Attached is the interlocal agreement between the city and the School Board in regards to the school. The review process is to be in an expeditious manner as the school is scheduled to open in September 1996. The Staff will ensure that all Code requirements are met. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: NOTE: The Staff will conduct its initial review of this plan on the morning of July 5, 1995. By having this before you at this time, there will be no delay in presenting this to the Commission. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL "E" An InterlocaI Agreement between the City of Winter Springs and the School Board of Seminole County This INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by the CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, a body corporate eXisting under the laws of the State of Florida (the "City") and the SCHOOL BOARD OF SEl\HNOLE COUNlY, FLORIDA, a body corporate existing under the laws of the State of Florida (the "School Board"). WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement have determined to collectively utilize their individual powers in the public interest to promote the expeditious development of Elementary School "E"; and WHEREAS, the State Regulations for Educational Facilities of the Florida Administrative Code govern the planning and construction of schools in Seminole County and the comprehensive plan and land development regulations govern planning and construction in the City of Winter Springs; and WHEREAS, Section 235.193, Florida Statutes requires the coordination of planning between the School Board and the City of Winter Springs; and 'WHEREAS, Section 235.193(9), Florida Statutes, provides authority for a local governing body and district school Board to establish an alternative process for reviewing a proposed educational facility and site plan, and off-site impacts; and WHEREAS, Section 235.02, Florida Statutes, permits and authorizes the use of school buildings and school grounds as community centers; and WHEREAS, the City and the School Board serve the same public constituency; THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by both parties, the parties hereby agree, stipulate, and covenant as follows: 1. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the provisions of the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act contained in Section 163.01, Florida Statutes. 2. In order to coordinate and expedite the planning of Elementary School "E" and comply with Section 235.193, Florida Statutes, the City Commission will serve as the approving authority and the School Board will submit the following infonnation on the property under review: 1 a. legal description b. topograhical survey and location of existing natural features including trees c.environmental survey d. identification of existing soil types and conditions e. surrounding land use and zoning f. proposed site plan g. existing and proposed utilities h. proposed on-site and off-site improvements i. stormwater management plan. with drainage calculations j. identification of any proposed deviations to specified standards of the land development regulations, \Vith explanations for request k. additional information that the City requests in order to identify and evaluate the site plan and its adequacy as it relates to environmental concerns, health, safety, and welfare, offsite impact, and effects on adjacent property. The City staff will review the submitted documents, advise the School Board of deficiencies, and make recommendations to address the concerns. The revised submittal will then be scheduled for a public hearing before the City Commission at the earliest possible date. Following approval by the City Commission, school construction may proceed with normal utility and site development inspections. 3. The School Board will pay to the City the appropriate connection fees for water and sewer service based on proposed usage calculations approved by the City. ,- 4. Because the primary access to Elementary School"E" will be a Seminole County (the "County") facility, the City will accept the County transportation concurrency evaluation and determination unless there is an overriding public safety concern. 5. All notices and' clarifications required under this Agreement shall be directed to the following offices: For the City: City Manager Winter Springs City Hall 1126 E. State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida For the School Board: Superintendent Seminole County Public Schools 1211 Mellonville Avenue Sanford, Florida 32771 6.Each of the parties hereto hereby agree that they will execute and deliver such further instruments and do such further acts and things as may be necessary or desirable to carry out the purpose of this Agreement. 2 7.Each provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable. If any term or provision hereof is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such legality or invalidity shall not affect the remainder of this Agreement. 8.This Agreement and the rights of the parties shall be governed by and construed or enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be signed in their respective names by their proper officials and under their official seals this ~ day of W\~(. , 19.:L? he City of Wi" Sp~~ ~.I~ BY: hauman Dated:>1~ /~ 199'..5- 1 ) i Attest: ~.' ..:>- (\ l.\.-. _' . .l \ \ \ Dated: CYI- /0 - 9.J' Attest~ ~ - ~ 3 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708-2799 Telephone (407) 327-1800 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM: IV A. NEW BUSINESS LEFFLER REZONING REQUEST STAFF REPORT: BACKGROUND: Judge K. Leffler, on behalf of the Leffler Company, has made request to change that zoning assigned to approximately 177 acres north of S.R. 434 and east of the Seminole County School Board facilities from Rural Urban (R-U) to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) . ,~ In conjunction with this request, a Master Plan (Wagner station PUD) was submitted as per Code requirements. The Staff Review Board had this request as an agenda item at their meeting of June 6, 1995. ANALYSIS: The Future Land Use Designation for this property is Mixed Use which is compatible with the rezoning request. At the Staff Review Board meeting, D. McIntosh, representing the project, discussed the Master Plan and stated that the approach used was that of flexible land use - assigning multi-uses to a parcel while a decision is made as to the best use of the land. Then the preliminary engineering would be submitted for review. Different land uses addressed were residential, retirement/nursing facilities, apartments, condos, professional offices and commercial uses. The applicant is aware that there is a very strong possibility that the CSX Railroad and that there are a multitude of proposed uses for this right-of-way once it is abandoned. There was discussion on traffic patterns, reclaimed water, water front recreation, etc. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff Review Board recommends that request be approved. Attached are Staff comments. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799 Telephone (407) 327.1800 :MEMORANDUM FROM: Don LeBlanc, Land Management Specialist Thomas Grimms, AICP Community Development coordinato~ June 6, 1995 TO: DATE: RE: Review of Wagner Station P.U.D. (Leffler Property) The following observations are offered: 1. The developer should coordinate the park development with the City per Objective D, Policy 2; Objective E, Policy 2; Objective H, Policies 1 and 3 of the Recreation and Open Space Element of the city's Comprehensive Plan. It should be noted that in Policy 1) under Objective C) in Goal 3 of the the Land Use Element, Mixed Use requires that. ." open space shall not be less than 20%, and public uses, utilities or wetland conservation easements not less than 5%. . ." 2. The CSX Railroad has made request to abandon the rail line. There have been various proposals to utilize the rail bed if and when it is abandoned. The developer should be aware of this possibility. 3. The City's Future Land Use Map indicates the northwestern portion of the property is designated "Conservation". This designated area is approximately 1,500 feet north of S.R. 434 and seems to trend along the tree line roughly paralleling S.R. 434 approximately 1,500 feet eastward and then southward 250 feet and eastward approximately 650 feet and northward to the shore. The precise boundaries of land to be permanently classified "Conservation" shall be those jurisdictional lines prescribed by state agencies at the time of field review preparatory to engineering contiguous property for development. [per POlicy 2) and Policy 3)f. under Objective A) of Goal 2 of the Land Use Element] 4. Lands designated as "Conservation" on the Future Land Use Map are subject to the requirements of Policy 3) under Objective A) of Goal 2) of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 5. It may be noted that developer indicates on sheet 2 of 2 under MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS/LANDSCAPE BUFFERS 5) BSL/buffer from 'limits of wetlands: 25'. Policy 3)a. does state in part. . ."A larger buffer shall be required on a site-by-site basis when required to protect the resource". 5. The predominant soil map unit in the area of the project designated as "Conservation" is (22) Nittaw muck, occasionally flooded. According to the Soil Survey of Seminole Countv, Florida, this soil is nearly level and very poorly drained. It is on the flood plains and is occasionally flooded for long periods following prolonged, high intensity rains. The slopes are dominantly less than 2 percent. Other soil units are (9) Basinger and Delray fine sands and (10) Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional. Basinger and Delray fine sands are nearly level and poorly drained and very poorly drained. Basinger soil is poorly drained and Delray soil is very poorly drained. These soils are in sloughs and poorly defined drainageways. The slopes dominantly are less than 2 percent. Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils are nearly level and very poorly drained. These soils are in swamps and depressions. The slopes are dominantly less than 2 percent. June 6, 1995 TO: Land Management Specialist, Donald LeBlanc FROM: City Engineer, ~),f / Mark Jenkins, P.E. ~ SUBJECT: Leffler Property Zoning Change Request. The proposed PUD plan by McIntosh & Associates, received May 19,1995, was found to be acceptable. I have no engineering objections to the subject plan. I recommend it be forwarded to P & Z for approval. cc: City Manager Utility Director MEMO FOR RECORD June 5, 1995 From: Don LeBlanc, Land Management Specialist Re: Rezoning Reques~ Leffler Pro~ I have rC'\'iewed the above referenced request and have no objection to the request WINTER SPRINGS UTILITY I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 110 NORTH FLAMINGO AVENUE WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (407) 327-2669 Fax (407) 327-0942 June 5, 1995 TO: Don LeBlanc, Land Management Specialist Kipton Lockcuff, P.E., Utility Director )J Y Zoning Change Request - Leffler Property FROM: RE: We have reviewed the proposed Master PUD Plan for the Leffler Property and have no objection to the proposed rezoning. File MEMORL\.1'IDUM TO: Don LeBlanc, Land ~faIiagement Specialist Don W. Houck, Building Official (0 ~ FRO~1: RE: Rezoning Of Leffler Property DATE: May 30, 1995 Note (1 )c. conflict~ with the Land Use Summary for Tract A which does not indicate any square foomge for commerci.aJjoffice or.institutional use. Notc (3) of the Description ofLnnd Uses conflicts '.vith note 5. To be compatible with character of the area, I feel the rr..a:wnum heig.~t should be 35 feet or two stories for tracts B, C, D, E. Since tract A is more remote from the State Road 434 corridor, a height of 50' would be acceptable. Limit the number of entrances from State Road 434 to two. Overall the concept is a good use of the property and rezoning to PUD would be acceptable. FIRE DEPARTMENT 102 NORTH MOSS ROAD WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 TELEPHONE (407) 327-2332 FlRE AND RESCUE SERVICES MEMORANDUM To: Donald LeBlanc, Land Management Specialist From: Timothy J. Lallathin, Fire Chief ~ /~ Date: May 23, 1995 Subject: Zoning Change Request - Leffler Property The Fire Department has no objection to,the zoning 'change' request, and will review built in fire protection requirements atthe time of plans review for site and engineering., The nearestfirestationfor protection of this property is Station 24: located at 102 North Moss Road. The distance from the fire station to the property is approximately 1.5 miles. CC: David O'Brien, Deputy Fire Chief TO: DON LEBLANC, LAND MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST FROM: CHARLES SEXTON CHIEF OF POLICE REF: ZONING CHANGE REQUEST LEFFLER PROPERTY 58-95 DATE: OS/23/95 Written comments as per ouyr request for the June 2, 1995 meeting: After having reviewed the Master Plan for the Wagner station PUD, my only concern at this time is for the traffic turning eastbound from the central Boulevard II A II . Traff ic turning westbound onto SR 434 from Wagner station will have their choice of three different egresses (two of them being Right In/Right Out only), spreading out the volume. Eastbound traffic, however, will all have to make left turns from the single central roadway. Since this Boulevard "A" will also be aligned with Winding Hollow Blvd., it must obviously be a signalized intersection to safely handle the anticipated traffic patterns. Further comments on public safety and roadway markings will be provided when site plans are prepared. Please note: on sheet 2 of the Master Plan under the heading DESCRIPTION OF LAND USES, #3 and # 5 are in conflict as to the maximum height, in stories, of uses on Tracts B & E. One says two stories, the other says three stories. ~~ Charles Sexton Chief of Police --- CS/rap June 22, 1995 To: Planning and Zoning Board ~ From: Don LeBlanc, Land Management specialist~ Re: July 5, 1995 Meeting Agenda Items LEFFLER REZONING REQUEST - Judge K. Leffler, on behalf of the Leffler Company, has made request to change that zoning assigned to approximately 177 acres north of SR 434 and east of the Seminole County School Board facilities from Rural Urban (R-U) to Planned Unit Development (p.U.D.). The Future Land Use Designation for this property is :Mixed Use which is compatible with the rezoning request. Please refer to the Staff Review Minutes of June 6, 1995 and the Master PUD Plan submitted by the applicant. PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL "E" - Attached for your review is the overall layout for the proposed elementaty school to be constructed on the north side of Shepard Road, between Sheoah Boulevard and U.S. 17-92. The Staff will conduct its initial review of this plan on the moming of July 5, 1995. Also attached is the interlocal agreement between the City and the School Board in regards to the school. The review process is to be in an expeditious manner as the school is scheduled to open in September 1996. The Staff will ensure that all Code requirements are met. By having this before you at this time, there will be no delay in presenting this to the Commission. cc: City Manager (w/o attch) General Services Director (w/o attch)